UNITED STATES
FORM 10Q
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D. C. 20549
(Mark One) |
|
|
|
ý |
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
|
|
For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2003 |
|
|
|
OR |
|
|
|
o |
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO
SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE |
|
|
For the transition period from to |
|
|
|
Commission file number: 0-610 |
EQUITY OIL COMPANY |
||
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) |
||
|
||
COLORADO |
|
87-0129795 |
(State or other jurisdiction of |
|
(I.R.S. Employer |
|
|
|
Suite 806, 10 West Third South, Salt Lake City, Utah 84101 |
||
(Address of principal executive offices) |
||
|
|
|
(801) 521-3515 |
||
Registrants telephone number, including area code |
||
|
||
|
||
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report) |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes ý No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act)
Yes o No ý
APPLICABLE ONLY TO ISSUERS INVOLVED IN BANKRUPTCY
PROCEEDINGS DURING THE PRECEDING FIVE YEARS:
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed all documents and reports required to be filed by Sections 12, 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 subsequent to the distribution of securities under a plan confirmed by a court.
Yes o No o
APPLICABLE ONLY TO CORPORATE ISSUERS:
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date (May 7, 2003): 12,008,661
PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM I: Financial Statements
EQUITY OIL COMPANY
Statements of Operations
For the three months ended March 31, 2003 and 2002
(Unaudited)
|
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
||
REVENUES |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Oil and gas sales |
|
$ |
6,728,397 |
|
$ |
3,511,397 |
|
Other |
|
118,577 |
|
66,210 |
|
||
|
|
6,846,974 |
|
3,577,607 |
|
||
EXPENSES |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Operating costs |
|
2,003,716 |
|
1,707,062 |
|
||
Depreciation, depletion and amortization |
|
1,925,000 |
|
900,000 |
|
||
3-D seismic |
|
9,917 |
|
14,934 |
|
||
Exploration |
|
43,393 |
|
63,659 |
|
||
General and administrative |
|
795,210 |
|
547,314 |
|
||
Production and exploration overhead |
|
433,997 |
|
344,425 |
|
||
Accretion expense |
|
68,000 |
|
|
|
||
Interest |
|
310,589 |
|
50,889 |
|
||
|
|
5,589,822 |
|
3,628,283 |
|
||
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes |
|
1,257,152 |
|
(50,676 |
) |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Provision for (benefit from) income taxes |
|
464,769 |
|
(18,696 |
) |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Income (loss) from continuing operations |
|
792,383 |
|
(31,980 |
) |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Discontinued operations (Note 6) |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Income from operations of properties sold, net of provision for income taxes of $52,812 and $43,296 |
|
90,041 |
|
73,816 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Gain on sale of properties, net of provision for income taxes of $415,168 |
|
655,168 |
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Income before cumulative effect of accounting change |
|
1,537,592 |
|
41,836 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Cumulative effect of change in accounting, net of benefit from income taxes of $622,832 |
|
(1,061,865 |
) |
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
NET INCOME |
|
$ |
475,727 |
|
$ |
41,836 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Proforma net income reflecting adoption of SFAS 143 |
|
|
|
$ |
23,786 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.
2
EQUITY OIL COMPANY
Statements of Operations
For the three months ended March 31, 2003 and 2002
Continued
(Unaudited)
|
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
||
Basic income (loss) per common share |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Income (loss) from continuing operations |
|
$ |
.07 |
|
$ |
(.00 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Income from discontinued operations |
|
$ |
.06 |
|
$ |
.01 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Income before cumulative effect of accounting change |
|
$ |
.13 |
|
$ |
.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Cumulative effect of change in accounting |
|
$ |
(.09 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
NET INCOME |
|
$ |
.04 |
|
$ |
.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Diluted income (loss) per common share |
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Income (loss) from continuing operations |
|
$ |
.07 |
|
$ |
(.00 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Income from discontinued operations |
|
$ |
.06 |
|
$ |
.01 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Income before cumulative effect of accounting change |
|
$ |
.13 |
|
$ |
.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Cumulative effect of change in accounting |
|
$ |
(.09 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
NET INCOME |
|
$ |
.04 |
|
$ |
.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Proforma net income per share, reflecting adoption of SFAS 143 |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Basic |
|
|
|
$ |
.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Diluted |
|
|
|
$ |
.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Weighted average shares outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Basic |
|
12,008,661 |
|
12,687,061 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Diluted |
|
12,231,505 |
|
12,813,446 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.
3
EQUITY OIL COMPANY
Statements of Comprehensive Income
For the three months ended March 31, 2003 and 2002
(Unaudited)
|
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Net income |
|
$ |
475,727 |
|
$ |
41,836 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Other Comprehensive Loss |
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Unrealized losses on financial instruments, net of benefit from income taxes of $125,733 |
|
$ |
(214,363 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Comprehensive income |
|
261,364 |
|
$ |
41,836 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.
4
EQUITY OIL COMPANY
Balance Sheets
as of March 31, 2003 and December 31,2002
(Unaudited)
|
|
March 31, |
|
December 31, |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
2,126,490 |
|
$ |
1,348,024 |
|
Accounts and advances receivable |
|
4,736,386 |
|
4,396,473 |
|
||
Income taxes receivable |
|
1,055,499 |
|
1,054,927 |
|
||
Deferred income taxes |
|
28,460 |
|
28,460 |
|
||
Other current assets |
|
221,455 |
|
215,177 |
|
||
|
|
8,168,290 |
|
7,043,061 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Property and equipment, at cost |
|
144,968,920 |
|
147,174,977 |
|
||
Less accumulated depreciation, depletion and amortization |
|
(76,269,140 |
) |
(78,148,866 |
) |
||
|
|
68,699,780 |
|
69,026,111 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Other assets |
|
671,935 |
|
731,184 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
TOTAL ASSETS |
|
$ |
77,540,005 |
|
$ |
76,800,356 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
1,391,424 |
|
$ |
2,157,291 |
|
Accrued liabilities |
|
166,697 |
|
406,681 |
|
||
Income taxes payable |
|
196,143 |
|
170,399 |
|
||
Fair value of financial instruments |
|
2,120,584 |
|
1,584,988 |
|
||
|
|
3,874,848 |
|
4,319,359 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Fair value of financial instruments |
|
137,500 |
|
333,000 |
|
||
Asset retirement obligation |
|
3,215,061 |
|
|
|
||
Revolving credit facility |
|
32,500,000 |
|
34,500,000 |
|
||
Deferred income taxes |
|
4,301,554 |
|
4,398,319 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Total liabilities |
|
44,028,963 |
|
43,550,678 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Stockholders Equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Common stock |
|
12,856,661 |
|
12,856,661 |
|
||
Paid in capital |
|
3,738,263 |
|
3,738,263 |
|
||
Less cost of treasury stock |
|
(1,991,444 |
) |
(1,991,444 |
) |
||
Retained earnings |
|
20,330,833 |
|
19,855,106 |
|
||
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
|
(1,423,271 |
) |
(1,208,908 |
) |
||
|
|
33,511,042 |
|
33,249,678 |
|
||
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
$ |
77,540,005 |
|
$ |
76,800,356 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.
5
EQUITY OIL COMPANY
Statements of Cash Flows
For the three months ended March 31, 2003 and 2002
(Unaudited)
|
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
||
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Net income |
|
$ |
475,727 |
|
$ |
41,836 |
|
Adjustments |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Depreciation, depletion and amortization |
|
1,925,000 |
|
900,000 |
|
||
Accretion expense |
|
68,000 |
|
|
|
||
Cumulative effect of change in accounting |
|
1,061,865 |
|
|
|
||
Gain on sale of properties |
|
(1,278,426 |
) |
|
|
||
Change in other assets |
|
59,249 |
|
14,693 |
|
||
Equity loss in Symskaya Exploration |
|
|
|
40,398 |
|
||
Change in deferred income taxes |
|
651,800 |
|
24,600 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Increase (decrease) from changes in: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Accounts and advances receivable |
|
(339,913 |
) |
155,765 |
|
||
Other current assets |
|
(6,278 |
) |
25,893 |
|
||
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities |
|
(1,005,851 |
) |
(210,345 |
) |
||
Income taxes receivable/payable |
|
25,172 |
|
1,297 |
|
||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
1,636,345 |
|
994,137 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Advances to Symskaya Exploration |
|
|
|
(40,398 |
) |
||
Capital expenditures |
|
(1,190,261 |
) |
(1,446,126 |
) |
||
Proceeds from sale of assets |
|
2,332,382 |
|
|
|
||
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities |
|
1,142,121 |
|
(1,486,524 |
) |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Payment of credit facility fees |
|
|
|
(75,424 |
) |
||
Payments on credit facility |
|
(2,000,000 |
) |
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Net cash used in financing activities |
|
(2,000,000 |
) |
(75,424 |
) |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
NET (DECREASE) INCREASE IN CASH |
|
778,466 |
|
(567,811 |
) |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT BEGINNING OF PERIOD |
|
1,348,024 |
|
960,970 |
|
||
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT END OF PERIOD |
|
$ |
2,126,490 |
|
$ |
393,159 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.
6
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note 1. Interim Financial Statements
In the opinion of the Companys management, the accompanying interim financial statements reflect the necessary adjustments, all of which are of a normal and recurring nature, to present fairly the financial position of Equity Oil Company (the Company) as of March 31, 2003, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the three month periods ended March 31, 2003 and 2002.
The financial statements and the accompanying notes to financial statements have been prepared according to rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Accordingly, certain notes and other information have been condensed or omitted from the interim financial statements presented in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. These financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Companys 2002 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
The results for the three month period ended March 31, 2003 are not necessarily indicative of future results.
Note 2. Net Income Per Share
Basic net income per share is computed using the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted net income per share is computed using the weighted average number of common and, if dilutive, common equivalent shares outstanding during the period. Common equivalent shares consist of the incremental common shares issuable upon the exercise of stock options (using the treasury stock method).Options to purchase approximately 1,750,000 shares of common stock at prices of $1.06 to $5.125 per share were outstanding at March 31, 2003, of which, 222,844 incremental shares (768,800 options) were included in the computation of diluted net income per share for the first quarter of 2003.
Options to purchase approximately 1,993,000 shares of common stock at prices of $1.06 to $5.50 per share were outstanding at March 31, 2002, of which, 126,385 incremental shares (417,800 options) were included in the computation of diluted net income per share for the first quarter of 2002.
Note 3. Hedging Activities
The Company periodically enters into oil and gas financial instruments to manage its exposure to oil and gas price volatility. The instruments are usually placed with counterparties that the Company believes are minimal credit risks. It is the Companys policy to only enter into derivative contracts with investment grade rated counterparties deemed by management to be competent and competitive market makers. The oil and gas reference prices upon which the price
7
hedging instruments are based reflect various market indices that have historically correlated with actual prices received by the Company.
As of March 31, 2003, the Company had commodity price hedges in place for 1,100 barrels of oil per day and 6,000 MMBTU of natural gas per day under costless collars. The oil hedge has a floor of $23.00 and a ceiling of $27.10 and the gas hedges ranged from $3.00 per MMBTU to $4.915 per MMBTU. The settlement price for the hedges during the quarter ended March 31, 2003 resulted in cash payments of $1,762,445 from the Company to the counterparty. The fair value of these financial instruments at March 31, 2003, as computed by the counterparty, was ($2,258,084). This amount is shown on the balance sheet as a current liability of $2,120,584 and a long term liability of $137,500. There were no financial instruments in place during the first quarter of 2002.
Note 4. Asset Retirement Obligations
In August 2001, the FASB issued SFAS No. 143 (SFAS 143), Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations. SFAS 143 is effective for the Company beginning January 1, 2003. The most significant impact of this standard on the Company was a change in the method of accruing for site restoration costs. Under SFAS 143, the fair value of asset retirement obligations is recorded as a liability when incurred, which is typically at the time the assets are placed in service. Amounts recorded for the related assets are increased by the amount of these obligations. Over time, the liabilities are accreted for the change in their present value and the initial capitalized costs are depreciated over the useful lives of the related assets.
The Company used an expected cash flow approach to estimate its asset retirement obligations under SFAS 143. Upon adoption at January 1, 2003, the Company recorded a retirement obligation of $3,147,061, an increase in property and equipment cost of $1,997,619, an increase in accumulated depreciation, depletion and amortization of $535,255 and a cumulative effect of accounting change loss, net of tax, of $1,061,865. As a result of adoption of SFAS 143, the Company estimates that accretion expense will be approximately $273,000 in 2003.
At January 1, 2003, there are no assets legally restricted for purposes of settling asset retirement obligations. There was no impact on the Companys cash flows as a result of adopting SFAS 143 since the cumulative effect of change in accounting method is a non-cash transaction.
The Companys estimated asset retirement obligation liability at January 1, 2002 was approximately $2.9 million.
Note 5. Stock Based Compensation Plans
At March 31, 2003, the Company had one stock-based compensation plan. The Company applies APB Opinion No. 25 and related interpretations in
8
accounting for this plan. Accordingly, no compensation cost has been recognized for options granted to employees under its fixed stock option plan.
On December 31, 2002, the FASB issued SFAS 148, Accounting for Stock Based Compensation Transition and Disclosure, which amends SFAS 123. SFAS 148 requires more prominent and frequent disclosures about the effects of stock-based compensation. The Company adopted, SFAS 148 for the year ended December 31, 2002. The Company will continue to account for its stock based compensation according to the provisions of APB Opinion No. 25.
Had compensation cost for the Companys stock options been recognized based on the estimated fair value on the grant date under the fair value methodology prescribed by SFAS No. 123, as amended, the Companys net earnings and earnings per share would have been as follows:
|
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Net income, as reported |
|
$ |
475,727 |
|
$ |
41,836 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Less: Total stock-based employee compensation expense determined under the fair value based method for all awards, net of related tax effects. |
|
36,772 |
|
53,362 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Pro forma net income (loss) |
|
$ |
438,955 |
|
$ |
(11,526 |
) |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Net income (loss) per share |
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Basic |
As reported |
|
$ |
.04 |
|
$ |
(.00 |
) |
|
|
Pro forma |
|
$ |
.04 |
|
$ |
(.00 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Diluted |
As reported |
|
$ |
.04 |
|
$ |
(.00 |
) |
|
|
Pro forma |
|
$ |
.04 |
|
$ |
(.00 |
) |
|
Note 6. Discontinued Operations
During February and March 2003, three packages of Canadian oil and gas properties were sold for approximately $2.4 million, resulting in a gain of approximately $1.2 million ($805,800 net of tax). In accordance with the provisions of SFAS 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets, the results of operations and gain on sale of these properties have been reflected as discontinued operations. Revenue from these Canadian oil and gas
9
properties was approximately $147,000 and $154,000 for the three month periods March 31, 2003 and March 31, 2002. After the sales, the Companys remaining Canadian asset is its 50% interest in the Cessford Field located in southern Alberta.
ITEM 2
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Gas sales from the recent Sacramento Basin gas acquisition and higher crude oil and natural gas prices accounted allowed for higher oil and gas revenues for the first quarter of 2003 as compared to the first quarter of 2002. Oil and gas sales were 92% higher in the first quarter of 2003 as compared to the first quarter of 2002. Total oil and gas sales for the three month period ended March 31, 2003 were $6,728,397, compared to $3,511,397 during the first quarter of 2002. The recent Sacramento Basin acquisition accounted for $3.1 million of the 2003 oil and gas sales.
The Company recorded net income for the 2003 first quarter of $475,727 or $.04 per share. This compares to net income for the first quarter of 2002 of $41,836, or $.00 per share. For the first quarter of 2003 higher gas production, higher gas prices, higher crude oil prices and the gain from the sale of certain Canadian properties were partially offset by payments made under commodity hedging agreements and the cumulative effect of change in accounting method.
Excluding the impact of the non-cash charge for the change in accounting method relating to the adoption of SFAS 143, income before cumulative effect for the first quarter of 2003 was $1,537,592 or $.13 per share. This includes income from discontinued operations of $745,209, net of income taxes. Also included in the income from continuing operations are payments made under hedging contracts of $1,762,445. These payments are netted against oil and gas sales revenue.
Oil production in the 2003 first quarter was 145,000 barrels, compared to 156,000 in the fourth quarter of 2002 and 163,000 in the first quarter of 2002. The decrease from quarter to quarter is attributable to the normal production declines of our properties as they mature. Gas production decreased during the quarter from 1.16 billion cubic feet in the fourth quarter of 2002 to 898,000 million cubic feet during the first quarter of 2003. Due to The Sacramento Basin acquisition in April 2002 resulted in a gas production increase of 189% for the first quarter of 2003 over the same period of the 2002 first quarter production of 311,000 Mcf.
The average crude oil price received in the first quarter 2003 was $24.88 per barrel, compared to $17.35 per barrel received during the
10
same period of 2002. Gas prices also increased in the first quarter of 2003, averaging $3.36 per Mcf, compared to $1.87 per Mcf received during the first quarter of 2002. The received prices are calculated net of payments made under hedging agreements. During the first quarter of 2003, the Company made payments to the counterparty for oil hedges of $663,366 and natural gas hedges of $1,099,079. No hedge settlement payments were made in 2002.
As of March 31, 2003, the Company had commodity price hedges in place for 1,100 barrels of oil per day and 6,000 MMBTU of natural gas per day under costless collars. The oil hedge has a floor of $23.00 and a ceiling of $27.10 and runs from May 2002 through April 2003. One gas hedge for 5,000 MMBTU has a floor of $3.00 and a ceiling of $4.43 per MMBTU for the period May 2002 through April 2004. The second gas hedge, for 1,000 MMBTU, has a floor of $3.50 and a ceiling of $4.915 per MMBTU and runs from January 2003 through December 2003. The fair value of the hedges as computed by the counterparty at March 31, 2003 was ($2,258,084). This amount is shown on the balance sheet as a current liability of $2,120,584 and a long term liability of $137,500.
Operating expenses were higher in 2003 than 2002. Lease operating costs increased from $1,707,062 in 2002 to $2,003,716 in 2003, a 17% increase. The increase is attributable to the operating costs on the Sacramento Basin properties acquired during the second quarter of 2002. Costs associated with these properties totaled approximately $505,000 during the first quarter of 2003. We were successful during the first quarter of 2003 in reducing operating costs on our other operated properties.
Depreciation, depletion and amortization (DD&A) charges during the 2003 quarter were substantially higher than the amount recorded during the same quarter of 2002. This increase is attributable to DD&A charges on the recently acquired gas properties in California which have a reserve life which is shorter than our other oil and gas properties. DD&A for these assets was approximately $1.0 Million for the first quarter of 2003.
The increase in general and administrative expenses is primarily attributable to increases in salaries and employee benefits, general liability, control of well and other insurance costs, and investor relations costs. Also contributing to the increase were costs associated with pursuing acquisition and divestiture opportunities.
The increase in production and exploration overhead is attributable to increased salary and employee benefit costs.
Higher interest costs in 2003 reflect the increased balance of the debt outstanding under the Companys credit facility. Our current average interest rate on debt outstanding is approximately 3.55%.
During February and March 2003, three packages of Canadian oil and gas properties were sold for approximately $2.4 million, resulting in
11
a gain of approximately $1.2 million ($805,800 net of tax). In accordance with the provisions of SFAS 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets, the results of operations and gain on sale of these properties have been reflected as discontinued operations. Revenue from these Canadian oil and gas properties was approximately $147,000 and $154,000 for the three month periods March 31, 2003 and March 31, 2002. After the sales, the Companys remaining Canadian asset is its 50% interest in the Cessford Field located in southern Alberta.
Other comprehensive loss of $214,363 for the first quarter of 2003 represents the Companys unrealized loss on commodity hedges, net of income taxes, that were in place at March 31, 2003. As a requirement of our new credit facility, we were required to hedge certain amounts of our production in an effort to remove commodity price volatility from our cash flows. The counterparty valued the hedges at March 31, 2003 at ($2,258,084). Therefore, a liability was recorded and the tax effected unrealized net loss is included in other comprehensive loss.
CAPITAL RESOURCES AND LIQUIDITY
The Companys cash balances increased 58% from December 31, 2002 due principally to higher oil and gas sales revenues and net proceeds from the sale of certain Canadian oil and gas properties offset by capital expenditures and payments on our revolving credit facility. Cash flow from operating activities for the first three months of 2003 increased $642,209 or 65% to $1,636,346 from $994,137 for the first three months of 2002.
Investment in property and equipment for the first three months of 2003 totaled $1,190,262 compared to $1,446,126 during the same period of 2002.
Debt outstanding at March 31, 2003 was $32.5 million, a decrease of $2.0 million from year-end 2002 amounts. We will continue to utilize future excess operating cash flow to reduce the amount outstanding under our credit facility.
We believe that existing cash balances, cash flow from operating activities, and funds available under our credit facility will provide adequate resources to meet our capital and exploration spending objectives for 2003.
OTHER ITEMS
The Company has reviewed all other recently issued, but not yet adopted, accounting standards in order to determine their effects, if any, on the results of operations or financial position of the Company. Based on that review, the Company believes that none of these pronouncements will have a significant effect on current or
12
future financial position or results of operations.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES
A summary of our significant accounting policies is included in Note 1 of our financial statements contained in the annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002. We believe the application of these accounting policies on a consistent basis enables us to provide financial statement users with useful, reliable and timely information about our results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.
The preparation of financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make judgements, estimates and assumptions regarding uncertainties that affect the reported amounts presented and disclosed in the financial statements. Our management reviews these estimates and assumptions based on historical experience, changes in business conditions and other relevant factors that they believe to be reasonable under the circumstances. In any given reporting period, actual results could differ from the estimates and assumptions used in preparing our financial statements.
Critical accounting policies are those that may have a material impact on our financial statements and also require management to exercise significant judgement due to a high degree of uncertainty at the time the estimate is made. Our senior management has discussed the development and selection of our accounting policies, related accounting estimates and the disclosures set forth below with the Audit Committee of our Board of Directors. We believe our critical accounting policies include those addressing the recoverability and useful lives of assets, and oil and gas reserve estimates.
FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS
The preceding discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements, including the notes thereto, appearing in the Companys annual report on Form 10-K. Except for the historical information contained herein, the matters discussed in this report contain forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27a of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 2le of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, that are based on managements beliefs and assumptions, current expectations, estimates, and projections. Statements that are not historical facts, including without limitation statements which are preceded by, followed by or include the words believes, anticipates, plans, expects, may, should or similar expressions are forward-looking statements. Many of the factors that will determine the Companys future results are beyond the ability of the Company to control or predict. These statements are subject to
13
risks and uncertainties and, therefore, actual results may differ materially. All subsequent written and oral forward-looking statements attributable to the Company, or persons acting on its behalf, are expressly qualified in their entirety by these cautionary statements. The Company disclaims any obligation to update any forward-looking statements whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.
Important factors that may effect future results include, but are not limited to: drilling success, the availability of equipment and contract services, environmental risks and impediments, geologic hazards, the risk of a significant natural disaster, the inability of the Company to insure against certain risks, fluctuations in commodity prices, the inherent limitations in our ability to estimate oil and gas reserves, changing government regulations, as well as general market conditions, competition and pricing, and other risks detailed from time to time in the Companys SEC reports, copies of which are available upon request from the Companys investor relations department.
ITEM 3
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
The answers to items listed under Item 3 are inapplicable or negative except for items related to interest rate and commodity price risk.
Our credit facility has variable interest rates and any fluctuation in interest rates will increase or decrease our interest expense.
We have market risk exposure related to the prices received for the sale of crude oil and natural gas. We periodically enter into hedge contracts to manage the commodity price risk.
ITEM 4
Controls and Procedures
Within 90 days prior to the filing date of this Report, the Companys principal executive officer (CEO) and principal financial officer (CFO) carried out an evaluation of the effectiveness of the Companys disclosure controls and procedures. Based on those evaluations, the Companys CEO and CFO believe
(i) that the Companys disclosure controls and procedures are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports it files under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SECs rules and forms and that such information is accumulated and communicated to the Companys management, including the CEO and CFO, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required
14
disclosure; and
(ii) that the Companys disclosure controls and procedures are effective.
There have been no significant changes in the Companys internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect the Companys internal controls subsequent to the evaluation referred to in Item 4, above, nor have there been any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies or material weaknesses.
PART II
OTHER INFORMATION
The answers to items one through five listed under Part II are inapplicable or negative, except as shown below
ITEM 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K
(a) Exhibits
(i) Restated Articles of Incorporation. Incorporated by reference from the annual report on Form 10-K for the year-ended December 31, 1995.
(ii) Amended By-Laws. Incorporated by reference from the annual report on Form 10-K for the year-ended December 31, 1997.
(iii) Change in Control Compensation Agreement for David P. Donegan incorporated by reference from the Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2001. Change in Control Compensation Agreement for Russell V. Florence, incorporated by reference from the annual report on Form 10-K for the year-ended December 31, 2000. Change in Control Compensation Agreements for Paul M. Dougan and James B. Larson, incorporated by reference from the annual report on Form 10-K for the year-ended December 31, 1997.
(iv) Exhibit 99-1 - Certifications pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
(b) Reports on Form 8-K
None.
15
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned there unto duly authorized.
|
|
|
EQUITY OIL COMPANY |
|
||
|
|
|
(Registrant) |
|||
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|||
DATE: |
May 9, 2003 |
|
By |
/s/ Paul M. Dougan |
|
|
|
|
|
Paul M. Dougan, President |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
||
DATE: |
May 9, 2003 |
|
By |
/s/ Russell V. Florence |
|
|
|
|
|
Russell V. Florence, Treasurer |
|||
16
CERTIFICATIONS
I, Paul M. Dougan, President and Chief Executive Officer of Equity Oil Company, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Equity Oil Company (the Company):
2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;
4. The Companys other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the Company and we have:
a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;
b) evaluated the effectiveness of the Companys disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the Evaluation Date); and
c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;
5. The Companys other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the Companys auditors and the audit committee of the Companys board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the Companys ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the Companys auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and
17
b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Companys internal controls; and
6. The Companys other certifying officer and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.
Date: May 9, 2003 |
By |
/s/ Paul M. Dougan |
|
|
|
Paul
M. Dougan, President and |
18
CERTIFICATIONS
I, Russell V. Florence, Treasurer of Equity Oil Company, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Equity Oil Company (the Company):
2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;
4. The Companys other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the Company and we have:
a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;
b) evaluated the effectiveness of the Companys disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the Evaluation Date); and
c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;
5. The Companys other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the Companys auditors and the audit committee of the Companys board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the Companys ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the Companys auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and
19
b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Companys internal controls; and
6. The Companys other certifying officer and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.
Date: May 9, 2003 |
By |
/s/ Russell V. Florence |
|
|
|
Russell V.
Florence, Treasurer and |
20