UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
x |
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2011
OR
o |
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission File Number: 1-7797
PHH CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
MARYLAND |
|
52-0551284 |
(State or other jurisdiction of |
|
(I.R.S. Employer |
incorporation or organization) |
|
Identification Number) |
|
|
|
3000 LEADENHALL ROAD |
|
|
MT. LAUREL, NEW JERSEY |
|
08054 |
(Address of principal executive offices) |
|
(Zip Code) |
856-917-1744
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No o
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer x |
|
Accelerated filer o |
|
|
|
Non-accelerated filer o |
|
Smaller reporting company o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No x
As of October 21, 2011, 56,343,415 shares of PHH common stock were outstanding.
|
|
Page |
|
|
|
|
1 | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
3 | ||
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
37 | |
71 | ||
72 | ||
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
73 | ||
73 | ||
73 | ||
73 | ||
73 | ||
74 | ||
74 | ||
|
|
|
|
75 | |
|
76 |
Except as expressly indicated or unless the context otherwise requires, the Company, PHH, we, our or us means PHH Corporation, a Maryland corporation, and its subsidiaries.
CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
Certain statements in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q are forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements may also be made in other documents filed or furnished with the SEC or may be made orally to analysts, investors, representatives of the media and others.
Generally, forward-looking statements are not based on historical facts but instead represent only our current beliefs regarding future events. All forward-looking statements are, by their nature, subject to risks, uncertainties and other factors. Investors are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements. Such statements may be identified by words such as expects, anticipates, intends, projects, estimates, plans, may increase, may fluctuate and similar expressions or future or conditional verbs such as will, should, would, may and could. Forward-looking statements contained in this Form 10-Q include, but are not limited to, statements concerning the following:
· the impact of the adoption of recently issued accounting pronouncements on our financial statements;
· the impact of the risk retention requirements and other provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act;
· future origination volumes and loan margins in the mortgage industry;
· our belief that sources of liquidity will be adequate to fund operations and repayment of upcoming debt maturities;
· our expectation of future income from new client signings;
· our expectation of reinsurance losses and associated reserves; and
· mortgage repurchase and indemnification requests and associated reserves and provisions.
Actual results, performance or achievements may differ materially from those expressed or implied in forward-looking statements due to a variety of factors, including but not limited to the factors listed and discussed in Part IIItem 1A. Risk Factors in this Form 10-Q and Part IItem 1A. Risk Factors in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 and those factors described below:
· the effects of continued market volatility or continued economic decline on the availability and cost of our financing arrangements and the value of our assets;
· the effects of a continued decline in the volume of U.S. home sales and home prices, due to adverse economic changes or otherwise, on our Mortgage Production and Mortgage Servicing segments;
· the effects of changes in current interest rates on our business and our financing costs;
· our decisions regarding the use of derivatives related to mortgage servicing rights, if any, and the resulting potential volatility of the results of operations of our Mortgage Servicing segment;
· the effects of increases in our actual and projected repurchases of, indemnification given in respect of, or related losses associated with, sold mortgage loans for which we have provided representations and warranties or other contractual recourse to purchasers and insurers of such loans, including increases in our loss severity and reserves associated with such loans;
· the effects of reinsurance claims in excess of projected levels and in excess of reinsurance premiums we are entitled to receive or amounts currently held in trust to pay such claims;
· the effects of any significant adverse changes in the underwriting criteria or existence or programs of government-sponsored entities, including Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, including any changes caused by the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act or other actions of the Federal government;
· the effects of any inquiries and investigations of foreclosure procedures or other servicing activities by attorneys general of certain states and the U.S. Department of Justice, any litigation related to our mortgage servicing activities, or any related fines, penalties and increased costs;
· the ability to maintain our status as a government sponsored entity-approved seller and servicer, including the ability to continue to comply with the respective selling and servicing guides, including any changes caused by the Dodd-Frank Act;
· the effects of any changes to the servicing compensation structure for mortgage servicers pursuant to the programs of government sponsored-entities;
· changes in laws and regulations, including changes in mortgage- and real estate-related laws and regulations (including changes caused by the Dodd-Frank Act), status of government sponsored-entities and state, federal and foreign tax laws and accounting standards;
· the effects of the insolvency of any of the counterparties to our significant customer contracts or financing arrangements or the inability or unwillingness of such counterparties to perform their respective obligations under, or to renew on terms favorable to us, such contracts, or our ability to continue to comply with the terms of our significant customer contracts, including service level agreements;
· the effects of competition in our existing and potential future lines of business, including the impact of consolidation within the industries in which we operate and competitors with greater financial resources and broader product lines;
· the ability to obtain financing (including refinancing and extending existing indebtedness) on acceptable terms, if at all, to finance our operations or growth strategy, to operate within the limitations imposed by our financing arrangements and to maintain the amount of cash required to service our indebtedness;
· the ability to maintain our relationships with our existing clients and to establish relationships with new clients;
· the ability to attract and retain key employees;
· a deterioration in the performance of assets held as collateral for secured borrowings;
· the impact of the failure to maintain our credit ratings;
· any failure to comply with covenants under our financing arrangements;
· the effects of the consolidation of financial institutions and the related impact on the availability of credit; and
· the impact of changes in the U.S. financial condition and fiscal and monetary policies, or any actions taken or to be taken by the U.S. Department of the Treasury and the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System on the credit markets and the U.S. economy.
Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date on which they are made. Factors and assumptions discussed above, and other factors not identified above, may have an impact on the continued accuracy of any forward-looking statements that we make. Except for our ongoing obligations to disclose material information under the federal securities laws, we undertake no obligation to release publicly any revisions to any forward-looking statements. For any forward-looking statements contained in any document, we claim the protection of the safe harbor for forward-looking statements contained in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
PHH CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)
(In millions, except per share data)
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Nine Months Ended |
| ||||||||
|
|
September 30, |
|
September 30, |
| ||||||||
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
| ||||
Revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Mortgage fees |
|
$ |
68 |
|
$ |
75 |
|
$ |
210 |
|
$ |
193 |
|
Fleet management fees |
|
42 |
|
38 |
|
128 |
|
116 |
| ||||
Net fee income |
|
110 |
|
113 |
|
338 |
|
309 |
| ||||
Fleet lease income |
|
370 |
|
342 |
|
1,050 |
|
1,030 |
| ||||
Gain on mortgage loans, net |
|
203 |
|
265 |
|
381 |
|
509 |
| ||||
Mortgage interest income |
|
24 |
|
29 |
|
82 |
|
69 |
| ||||
Mortgage interest expense |
|
(48 |
) |
(47 |
) |
(150 |
) |
(126 |
) | ||||
Mortgage net finance expense |
|
(24 |
) |
(18 |
) |
(68 |
) |
(57 |
) | ||||
Loan servicing income |
|
112 |
|
105 |
|
337 |
|
303 |
| ||||
Change in fair value of mortgage servicing rights |
|
(410 |
) |
(254 |
) |
(601 |
) |
(626 |
) | ||||
Net derivative gain related to mortgage servicing rights |
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
| ||||
Valuation adjustments related to mortgage servicing rights, net |
|
(409 |
) |
(254 |
) |
(600 |
) |
(626 |
) | ||||
Net loan servicing loss |
|
(297 |
) |
(149 |
) |
(263 |
) |
(323 |
) | ||||
Other income |
|
22 |
|
19 |
|
127 |
|
52 |
| ||||
Net revenues |
|
384 |
|
572 |
|
1,565 |
|
1,520 |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Salaries and related expenses |
|
124 |
|
127 |
|
375 |
|
360 |
| ||||
Occupancy and other office expenses |
|
14 |
|
16 |
|
44 |
|
45 |
| ||||
Depreciation on operating leases |
|
307 |
|
307 |
|
922 |
|
921 |
| ||||
Fleet interest expense |
|
19 |
|
24 |
|
60 |
|
72 |
| ||||
Other depreciation and amortization |
|
7 |
|
6 |
|
19 |
|
17 |
| ||||
Other operating expenses |
|
155 |
|
94 |
|
368 |
|
303 |
| ||||
Total expenses |
|
626 |
|
574 |
|
1,788 |
|
1,718 |
| ||||
Loss before income taxes |
|
(242 |
) |
(2 |
) |
(223 |
) |
(198 |
) | ||||
Income tax benefit |
|
(104 |
) |
(9 |
) |
(100 |
) |
(87 |
) | ||||
Net (loss) income |
|
(138 |
) |
7 |
|
(123 |
) |
(111 |
) | ||||
Less: net income attributable to noncontrolling interest |
|
10 |
|
15 |
|
17 |
|
22 |
| ||||
Net loss attributable to PHH Corporation |
|
$ |
(148 |
) |
$ |
(8 |
) |
$ |
(140 |
) |
$ |
(133 |
) |
Basic and diluted loss per share attributable to PHH Corporation |
|
$ |
(2.62 |
) |
$ |
(0.14 |
) |
$ |
(2.48 |
) |
$ |
(2.39 |
) |
See accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Unaudited)
(In millions, except per share data)
|
|
September 30, |
|
December 31, |
| ||
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
84 |
|
$ |
195 |
|
Restricted cash, cash equivalents and investments (including $237 and $254 of available-for-sale securities at fair value) |
|
528 |
|
531 |
| ||
Mortgage loans held for sale |
|
2,699 |
|
4,329 |
| ||
Accounts receivable, net |
|
729 |
|
573 |
| ||
Net investment in fleet leases |
|
3,414 |
|
3,492 |
| ||
Mortgage servicing rights |
|
1,198 |
|
1,442 |
| ||
Property, plant and equipment, net |
|
59 |
|
46 |
| ||
Goodwill |
|
25 |
|
25 |
| ||
Other assets |
|
599 |
|
637 |
| ||
Total assets (1) |
|
$ |
9,335 |
|
$ |
11,270 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Accounts payable and accrued expenses |
|
$ |
437 |
|
$ |
521 |
|
Debt |
|
6,561 |
|
8,085 |
| ||
Deferred taxes |
|
621 |
|
728 |
| ||
Other liabilities |
|
274 |
|
358 |
| ||
Total liabilities (1) |
|
7,893 |
|
9,692 |
| ||
Commitments and contingencies (Note 10) |
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value; 1,090,000 shares authorized; none issued or outstanding |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Common stock, $0.01 par value; 273,910,000 shares authorized; 56,340,713 shares issued and outstanding at September 30, 2011; 55,699,218 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2010 |
|
1 |
|
1 |
| ||
Additional paid-in capital |
|
1,080 |
|
1,069 |
| ||
Retained earnings |
|
325 |
|
465 |
| ||
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
|
21 |
|
29 |
| ||
Total PHH Corporation stockholders equity |
|
1,427 |
|
1,564 |
| ||
Noncontrolling interest |
|
15 |
|
14 |
| ||
Total equity |
|
1,442 |
|
1,578 |
| ||
Total liabilities and equity |
|
$ |
9,335 |
|
$ |
11,270 |
|
See accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
Continued.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS(Continued)
(Unaudited)
(In millions)
(1) The Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets include assets of variable interest entities which can be used only to settle their obligations and liabilities of variable interest entities which creditors or beneficial interest holders do not have recourse to PHH Corporation and subsidiaries as follows:
|
|
September 30, |
|
December 31, |
| ||
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
| ||
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
22 |
|
$ |
47 |
|
Restricted cash, cash equivalents and investments |
|
259 |
|
241 |
| ||
Mortgage loans held for sale |
|
522 |
|
389 |
| ||
Accounts receivable, net |
|
81 |
|
64 |
| ||
Net investment in fleet leases |
|
3,214 |
|
3,356 |
| ||
Property, plant and equipment, net |
|
1 |
|
1 |
| ||
Other assets |
|
62 |
|
82 |
| ||
Total assets |
|
$ |
4,161 |
|
$ |
4,180 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Accounts payable and accrued expenses |
|
$ |
23 |
|
$ |
38 |
|
Debt |
|
3,352 |
|
3,367 |
| ||
Other liabilities |
|
10 |
|
5 |
| ||
Total liabilities |
|
$ |
3,385 |
|
$ |
3,410 |
|
See accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN EQUITY
(Unaudited)
(In millions, except per share data)
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2011
|
|
PHH Corporation Stockholders |
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional |
|
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
|
|
Common Stock |
|
Paid-In |
|
Retained |
|
Income |
|
Noncontrolling |
|
Total |
| ||||||||
|
|
Shares |
|
Amount |
|
Capital |
|
Earnings |
|
(Loss) |
|
Interest |
|
Equity |
| ||||||
Balance at December 31, 2010 |
|
55,699,218 |
|
$ |
1 |
|
$ |
1,069 |
|
$ |
465 |
|
$ |
29 |
|
$ |
14 |
|
$ |
1,578 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Comprehensive (loss) income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Net (loss) income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(140 |
) |
|
|
17 |
|
|
| ||||||
Currency translation adjustment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
|
| ||||||
Unrealized gains on available-for-sale securities, net of income taxes of $1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Change in unfunded pension liability, net of income taxes of $0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Total comprehensive (loss) income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(140 |
) |
(8 |
) |
17 |
|
(131 |
) | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Distributions to noncontrolling interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(16 |
) |
(16 |
) | ||||||
Stock compensation expense |
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
| ||||||
Stock issued under share-based payment plans, including excess tax benefit of $0 |
|
641,495 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
| ||||||
Balance at September 30, 2011 |
|
56,340,713 |
|
$ |
1 |
|
$ |
1,080 |
|
$ |
325 |
|
$ |
21 |
|
$ |
15 |
|
$ |
1,442 |
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2010
|
|
PHH Corporation Stockholders |
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional |
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
|
|
Common Stock |
|
Paid-In |
|
Retained |
|
Comprehensive |
|
Noncontrolling |
|
Total |
| ||||||||
|
|
Shares |
|
Amount |
|
Capital |
|
Earnings |
|
Income |
|
Interest |
|
Equity |
| ||||||
Balance at December 31, 2009 |
|
54,774,639 |
|
$ |
1 |
|
$ |
1,056 |
|
$ |
416 |
|
$ |
19 |
|
$ |
12 |
|
$ |
1,504 |
|
Adjustments related to the spin-off |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Comprehensive (loss) income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Net (loss) income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(133 |
) |
|
|
22 |
|
|
| ||||||
Currency translation adjustment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Unrealized gains on available-for-sale securities, net of income taxes of $1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Change in unfunded pension liability, net of income taxes of $0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Total comprehensive (loss) income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(133 |
) |
6 |
|
22 |
|
(105 |
) | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Distributions to noncontrolling interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
(5 |
) | ||||||
Stock compensation expense |
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
| ||||||
Stock issued under share-based payment plans, including excess tax benefit of $0 |
|
726,722 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
| ||||||
Balance at September 30, 2010 |
|
55,501,361 |
|
$ |
1 |
|
$ |
1,066 |
|
$ |
284 |
|
$ |
25 |
|
$ |
29 |
|
$ |
1,405 |
|
See accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
(In millions)
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
| ||||
|
|
September 30, |
| ||||
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Cash flows from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Net loss |
|
$ |
(123 |
) |
$ |
(111 |
) |
Adjustments to reconcile Net loss to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Capitalization of originated mortgage servicing rights |
|
(357 |
) |
(296 |
) | ||
Net unrealized loss on mortgage servicing rights and related derivatives |
|
600 |
|
626 |
| ||
Vehicle depreciation |
|
922 |
|
921 |
| ||
Other depreciation and amortization |
|
19 |
|
17 |
| ||
Origination of mortgage loans held for sale |
|
(27,013 |
) |
(23,724 |
) | ||
Proceeds on sale of and payments from mortgage loans held for sale |
|
29,131 |
|
22,639 |
| ||
Net gain on interest rate lock commitments, mortgage loans held for sale and related derivatives |
|
(321 |
) |
(491 |
) | ||
Deferred income tax benefit |
|
(109 |
) |
(97 |
) | ||
Other adjustments and changes in other assets and liabilities, net |
|
(410 |
) |
67 |
| ||
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities |
|
2,339 |
|
(449 |
) | ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Cash flows from investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Investment in vehicles |
|
(1,190 |
) |
(1,112 |
) | ||
Proceeds on sale of investment vehicles |
|
280 |
|
268 |
| ||
Proceeds on sale of mortgage servicing rights |
|
|
|
6 |
| ||
Net cash paid on derivatives related to mortgage servicing rights |
|
(1 |
) |
|
| ||
Purchases of property, plant and equipment |
|
(16 |
) |
(10 |
) | ||
Purchases of restricted investments |
|
(185 |
) |
(350 |
) | ||
Proceeds from sales and maturities of restricted investments |
|
204 |
|
78 |
| ||
(Increase) decrease in restricted cash and cash equivalents |
|
(15 |
) |
362 |
| ||
Other, net |
|
24 |
|
10 |
| ||
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
(899 |
) |
(748 |
) | ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Cash flows from financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Proceeds from borrowings |
|
42,675 |
|
39,552 |
| ||
Principal payments on borrowings |
|
(44,198 |
) |
(38,202 |
) | ||
Issuances of common stock |
|
8 |
|
7 |
| ||
Cash paid for debt issuance costs |
|
(20 |
) |
(44 |
) | ||
Other, net |
|
(15 |
) |
(5 |
) | ||
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities |
|
(1,550 |
) |
1,308 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Effect of changes in exchange rates on Cash and cash equivalents |
|
(1 |
) |
(2 |
) | ||
Net (decrease) increase in Cash and cash equivalents |
|
(111 |
) |
109 |
| ||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
|
195 |
|
150 |
| ||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
|
$ |
84 |
|
$ |
259 |
|
See accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
BASIS OF PRESENTATION
PHH Corporation and subsidiaries (collectively, PHH or the Company) is a leading outsource provider of mortgage and fleet management services operating in the following business segments:
· Mortgage Production provides mortgage loan origination services and sells mortgage loans.
· Mortgage Servicing performs servicing activities for originated and purchased loans.
· Fleet Management Services provides commercial fleet management services.
The Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements include the accounts and transactions of PHH and its subsidiaries, as well as entities in which the Company directly or indirectly has a controlling interest and variable interest entities of which the Company is the primary beneficiary. PHH Home Loans, LLC and its subsidiaries are consolidated within the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, and Realogy Corporations ownership interest is presented as a noncontrolling interest.
The Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements have been prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, which is commonly referred to as GAAP, for interim financial information and pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and disclosures required by GAAP for complete financial statements. In managements opinion, the unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements contain all adjustments, which include normal and recurring adjustments necessary for a fair presentation of the financial position and results of operations for the interim periods presented. The results of operations reported for interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the results of operations for the entire year or any subsequent interim period. These unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements should be read in conjunction with the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.
On March 31, 2011, the Company sold 50.1% of the equity interests in its appraisal services business, Speedy Title and Appraisal Review Services, (STARS) to CoreLogic, Inc. for a total purchase price of $35 million. The total purchase price consisted of an initial $20 million cash payment that was received on March 31, 2011, and three future $5 million installment payments to be received on March 31, 2012, 2014 and 2016. Upon the occurrence of certain events prior to September 30, 2017, the Company may have the right or obligation to purchase CoreLogics interests. The Company deconsolidated STARS and retained a 49.9% equity interest, which is accounted for under the equity method and is recorded within Other assets with an initial fair value of $34 million as of March 31, 2011. The net assets of STARS were not significant. A $68 million gain on the sale of the 50.1% equity interest was recorded within Other income, which consisted of the net present value of the purchase price paid by CoreLogic plus the initial fair value of the remaining equity method investment in STARS. Subsequent to March 31, 2011, the Company will still participate in the appraisal services business through its interest in STARS, and will be entitled to its proportionate share of STARS earnings based on its 49.9% ownership interest.
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. These estimates and assumptions include, but are not limited to, those related to the valuation of mortgage servicing rights, mortgage loans held for sale, other financial instruments and goodwill, the estimation of liabilities for mortgage loan repurchases and indemnifications and reinsurance losses, and the determination of certain income tax assets and liabilities and associated valuation allowances. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Unless otherwise noted and except for share and per share data, dollar amounts presented within these Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements are in millions.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
CHANGES IN ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Goodwill. In December 2010, the FASB issued new accounting guidance on performing tests of goodwill impairment, ASU No. 2010-28, When to Perform Step 2 of the Goodwill Impairment Test for Reporting Units with Zero or Negative Carrying Amounts. This new accounting guidance requires that entities perform a two-step test when evaluating goodwill impairment by first assessing whether the carrying value of the reporting unit exceeds the fair value (Step 1) and, if it does, perform additional procedures to determine if goodwill has been impaired (Step 2). This guidance require entities performing the goodwill impairment test to perform Step 2 of the test for reporting units with zero or negative carrying amounts if it is more likely than not that a goodwill impairment exists based on qualitative considerations. The Company adopted the updates to goodwill impairment guidance effective January 1, 2011. The adoption did not have an impact the Companys financial statements.
Business Combinations. In December 2010, the FASB issued new accounting guidance on business combinations, ASU No. 2010-29, Disclosure of Supplementary Pro Forma Information for Business Combinations. This new accounting guidance requires a public entity that presents comparative financial statements to disclose revenue and earnings of the combined entity as though the business combination that occurred during the current year had occurred as of the beginning of the comparable prior annual reporting period only. This new accounting guidance also expands the supplemental pro-forma disclosures for Business Combinations to include a description of the nature and amount of material, nonrecurring pro forma adjustments directly attributable to the business combination included in the reported pro forma revenue and earnings. The Company adopted the new business combination guidance effective January 1, 2011. The adoption did not have an impact on the Companys financial statements.
Revenue Recognition. In October 2009, the FASB issued new accounting guidance on revenue recognition, ASU No. 2009-13, Multiple Deliverable Arrangements. This new accounting guidance addresses how to determine whether an arrangement involving multiple deliverables (i) contains more than one unit of accounting and (ii) how the arrangement consideration should be measured and allocated to the separate units of accounting. The Company adopted the updates to revenue recognition guidance effective January 1, 2011. The adoption did not have an impact on the Companys financial statements.
Receivables. In April 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-02, A Creditors Determination of Whether a Restructuring Is a Troubled Debt Restructuring. This new guidance requires a creditor performing an evaluation of whether a restructuring constitutes a troubled debt restructuring, to separately conclude that both (i) the restructuring constitutes a concession and (ii) the debtor is experiencing financial difficulties. This standard clarifies the guidance on a creditors evaluation of whether it has granted a concession as well as the guidance on a creditors evaluation of whether a debtor is experiencing financial difficulties. The update also requires entities to disclose additional quantitative activity regarding troubled debt restructurings of finance receivables that occurred during the period, as well as additional information regarding troubled debt restructurings that occurred within the previous twelve months and for which there was a payment default during the current period. The Company adopted the new accounting guidance effective July 1, 2011, and applied it retrospectively to January 1, 2011. The adoption did not have an impact on the Companys financial statements.
RECENTLY ISSUED ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
Transfers and Servicing. In April 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-03, Reconsideration of Effective Control for Repurchase Agreements. This update to transfers and servicing guidance removes from the assessment of effective control the criterion relating to the transferors ability to repurchase or redeem financial assets on substantially the agreed terms, even in the event of default by the transferee. This update also eliminates the requirement to demonstrate that the transferor possesses adequate collateral to fund substantially all the cost of purchasing replacement financial assets. The new accounting guidance is effective beginning January 1, 2012, and should be applied prospectively to transactions or modifications of existing transactions that occur on or after January 1, 2012. The Company does not anticipate the adoption of this update will have a material impact on its financial statements.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Fair Value Measurement. In May 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-04, Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards. This update to fair value measurement guidance addresses changes to concepts regarding performing fair value measurements including: (i) the application of the highest and best use and valuation premise; (ii) the valuation of an instrument classified in the reporting entitys shareholders equity; (iii) the valuation of financial instruments that are managed within a portfolio; and (iv) the application of premiums and discounts. This update also enhances disclosure requirements about fair value measurements, including providing information regarding Level 3 measurements such as quantitative information about unobservable inputs, further discussion of the valuation processes used and assumption sensitivity analysis. The new accounting guidance is effective beginning January 1, 2012, and should be applied prospectively. The Company does not anticipate the adoption of this update will have a material impact on its financial statements.
Comprehensive Income. In June 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-05, Presentation of Comprehensive Income. This update to comprehensive income guidance requires all nonowner changes in stockholders equity be presented either in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or two separate but consecutive statements. In the two-statement approach, the first statement should present total net income and its components followed consecutively by a second statement that should present total other comprehensive income, the components of other comprehensive income, and the total of comprehensive income. This update also requires additional changes to the face of the financial statements including eliminating the presentation of other comprehensive income as a part of stockholders equity, and the presentation of certain reclassification adjustments between net income and other comprehensive income. The new accounting guidance is effective beginning January 1, 2012, and should be applied retrospectively. The adoption of this update will impact the presentation and disclosure of the Companys financial statements but will not impact its results of operations, financial position, or cash flows.
Goodwill. In September 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-08, Testing Goodwill for Impairment. This update amends the current guidance on testing goodwill for impairment. Under the revised guidance, entities testing goodwill for impairment have the option of performing a qualitative assessment before calculating the fair value of the reporting unit. If entities determine, on the basis of qualitative factors, that the fair value of the reporting unit is more likely than not less than the carrying amount, the two-step impairment test would be required. This update does not change how goodwill is calculated or assigned to reporting units, nor does it revise the requirement to test goodwill annually for impairment. In addition, the update does not amend the requirement to test goodwill for impairment between annual tests if events or circumstances warrant; however, it does revise the examples of events and circumstances that an entity should consider. The amendments are effective for annual and interim goodwill impairment tests performed for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2011, with early adoption permitted. The Company does not anticipate the adoption of this update will have a material impact on its financial statements.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
2. Earnings Per Share
Basic loss per share attributable to PHH Corporation was computed by dividing Net loss attributable to PHH Corporation during the period by the weighted-average number of shares outstanding during the period. Diluted loss per share attributable to PHH Corporation was computed by dividing Net loss attributable to PHH Corporation by the weighted-average number of shares outstanding, assuming all potentially dilutive common shares were issued.
The weighted-average computation of the dilutive effect of potentially issuable shares of Common stock under the treasury stock method excludes the effect of securities that would be anti-dilutive, including: (i) outstanding stock-based compensation awards representing shares from restricted stock units and stock options; (ii) stock assumed to be issued related to the 2012 Convertible notes; (iii) purchased options and sold warrants related to the assumed conversion of the 2012 Convertible notes; and (iv) sold warrants related to the Companys 2014 Convertible notes. The computation also excludes the assumed issuance of the 2014 Convertible notes and related purchased options as they are currently to be settled only in cash. Shares associated with anti-dilutive securities are outlined in the table below.
The following table summarizes the calculations of basic and diluted loss per share attributable to PHH Corporation for the periods indicated:
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Nine Months Ended |
| ||||||||
|
|
September 30, |
|
September 30, |
| ||||||||
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
| ||||
|
|
(In millions, except share and per share data) |
| ||||||||||
Net loss attributable to PHH Corporation |
|
$ |
(148 |
) |
$ |
(8 |
) |
$ |
(140 |
) |
$ |
(133 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Weighted-average common shares outstanding basic and diluted(1) |
|
56,436,649 |
|
55,620,844 |
|
56,297,629 |
|
55,403,556 |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Basic and diluted loss per share attributable to PHH Corporation |
|
$ |
(2.62 |
) |
$ |
(0.14 |
) |
$ |
(2.48 |
) |
$ |
(2.39 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Antidilutive securities excluded from the computation of dilutive shares: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Outstanding stock-based compensation awards |
|
2,062,302 |
|
2,743,376 |
|
2,062,302 |
|
2,743,376 |
| ||||
Assumed conversion of 2012 Convertible notes |
|
|
|
|
|
594,876 |
|
|
|
(1) Due to the net loss recognized for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, there were no potentially dilutive securities included in the calculations of diluted earnings per share, as their inclusion would have been antidilutive.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
3. Restricted Cash, Cash Equivalents and Investments
The following table summarizes Restricted cash, cash equivalents and investment balances:
|
|
September 30, |
|
December 31, |
| ||
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
| ||
|
|
(In millions) |
| ||||
Restricted cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
291 |
|
$ |
277 |
|
Restricted investments, at fair value |
|
237 |
|
254 |
| ||
Total |
|
$ |
528 |
|
$ |
531 |
|
The restricted cash related to our reinsurance activities was invested in certain debt securities as permitted under the reinsurance agreements. These restricted investments are classified as available-for-sale securities and remain in trust for capital fund requirements and potential reinsurance losses, as summarized in the following tables:
|
|
September 30, 2011 |
| ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
average |
| ||||
|
|
Amortized |
|
Fair |
|
Unrealized |
|
Unrealized |
|
remaining |
| ||||
|
|
Cost |
|
Value |
|
Gains |
|
Losses |
|
maturity |
| ||||
|
|
(In millions) |
| ||||||||||||
Corporate securities |
|
$ |
52 |
|
$ |
52 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
31 mos. |
|
Agency securities (1) |
|
89 |
|
91 |
|
2 |
|
|
|
23 mos. |
| ||||
Government securities |
|
93 |
|
94 |
|
1 |
|
|
|
23 mos. |
| ||||
Total |
|
$ |
234 |
|
$ |
237 |
|
$ |
3 |
|
$ |
|
|
25 mos. |
|
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
| ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
average |
| ||||
|
|
Amortized |
|
Fair |
|
Unrealized |
|
Unrealized |
|
remaining |
| ||||
|
|
Cost |
|
Value |
|
Gains |
|
Losses |
|
maturity |
| ||||
|
|
(In millions) |
| ||||||||||||
Corporate securities |
|
$ |
71 |
|
$ |
71 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
30 mos. |
|
Agency securities (1) |
|
106 |
|
107 |
|
1 |
|
|
|
26 mos. |
| ||||
Government securities |
|
76 |
|
76 |
|
|
|
|
|
28 mos. |
| ||||
Total |
|
$ |
253 |
|
$ |
254 |
|
$ |
1 |
|
$ |
|
|
27 mos. |
|
(1) Represents bonds and notes issued by various agencies including, but not limited to, Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and Federal Home Loan Banks.
During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011, gains of $1 million from the sale of available-for-sale securities were realized and realized losses were not significant. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010, the amount of realized gains and losses from the sale of available-for-sale securities was not significant.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
4. Transfers and Servicing of Mortgage Loans
Residential mortgage loans are sold through one of the following methods: (i) sales to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac and loan sales to other investors guaranteed by Ginnie Mae, or (ii) sales to private investors. The Company may have continuing involvement in mortgage loans sold by retaining one or more of the following: servicing rights and servicing obligations, recourse obligations and/or beneficial interests (such as interest-only strips, principal-only strips, or subordinated interests). During the nine months ended September 30, 2011, the Company did not retain any interests from sales or securitizations other than mortgage servicing rights. See Note 9, Credit Risk for a further description of recourse obligations.
The total servicing portfolio consists of loans associated with capitalized mortgage servicing rights, loans held for sale, and the servicing portfolio of loans subserviced for others. The total servicing portfolio, including loans subserviced for others was $178.1 billion and $166.1 billion as of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively. Mortgage servicing rights (MSRs) recorded in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets are related to the capitalized servicing portfolio, and are created either through the direct purchase of servicing from a third party, or through the sale of an originated loan.
The activity in the loan servicing portfolio associated with capitalized servicing rights consisted of:
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
| ||||
|
|
September 30, |
| ||||
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
| ||
|
|
(In millions) |
| ||||
Balance, beginning of period |
|
$ |
134,753 |
|
$ |
127,700 |
|
Additions |
|
26,502 |
|
21,246 |
| ||
Payoffs, sales and curtailments |
|
(16,980 |
) |
(17,037 |
) | ||
Balance, end of period |
|
$ |
144,275 |
|
$ |
131,909 |
|
The activity in capitalized MSRs consisted of:
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
| ||||
|
|
September 30, |
| ||||
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
| ||
|
|
(In millions) |
| ||||
Balance, beginning of period |
|
$ |
1,442 |
|
$ |
1,413 |
|
Additions |
|
357 |
|
296 |
| ||
Changes in fair value due to: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Realization of expected cash flows |
|
(146 |
) |
(173 |
) | ||
Changes in market inputs or assumptions used in the valuation model |
|
(455 |
) |
(453 |
) | ||
Balance, end of period |
|
$ |
1,198 |
|
$ |
1,083 |
|
Contractually specified servicing fees, late fees and other ancillary servicing revenue were recorded within Loan servicing income as follows:
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Nine Months Ended |
| ||||||||
|
|
September 30, |
|
September 30, |
| ||||||||
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
| ||||
|
|
(In millions) |
| ||||||||||
Net service fee revenue |
|
$ |
111 |
|
$ |
100 |
|
$ |
327 |
|
$ |
296 |
|
Late fees |
|
5 |
|
5 |
|
15 |
|
15 |
| ||||
Other ancillary servicing revenue |
|
11 |
|
12 |
|
30 |
|
30 |
| ||||
As of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the MSRs have a weighted-average life of approximately 4.3 years and 5.7 years, respectively. See Note 12, Fair Value Measurements for additional information regarding the valuation of MSRs.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The following table sets forth information regarding cash flows relating to loan sales in which the Company has continuing involvement: |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
| ||||
|
|
September 30, |
| ||||
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
| ||
|
|
(In millions) |
| ||||
Proceeds from new loan sales or securitizations |
|
$ |
26,984 |
|
$ |
21,802 |
|
Servicing fees received (1) |
|
327 |
|
296 |
| ||
Other cash flows on retained interests (2) |
|
|
|
1 |
| ||
Purchases of delinquent or foreclosed loans (3) |
|
(32 |
) |
(42 |
) | ||
Servicing advances (4) |
|
(1,296 |
) |
(1,179 |
) | ||
Repayment of servicing advances |
|
1,253 |
|
1,151 |
| ||
(1) Excludes late fees and other ancillary servicing revenue.
(2) Represents cash flows received on retained interests other than servicing fees.
(3) Excludes indemnification payments to investors and insurers of the related mortgage loans.
(4) As of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, outstanding servicing advance receivables of $226 million and $187 million, respectively, were included in Accounts receivable, net.
During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011, pre-tax gains of $123 million and $441 million, respectively, related to the sale or securitization of residential mortgage loans were recognized in Gain on mortgage loans, net in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations.
During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010, pre-tax gains of $146 million and $344 million, respectively, related to the sale or securitization of residential mortgage loans were recognized in Gain on mortgage loans, net in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations.
5. Derivatives
The Company did not have any derivative instruments designated as hedging instruments during the nine months ended September 30, 2011 or during the year ended December 31, 2010. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011, the Company executed certain derivative transactions to serve as an economic hedge of a portion of the interest rate risk associated with its Mortgage servicing rights (MSRs). The Company entered into these derivative transactions to ensure that there would be sufficient capacity under its debt facilities to fund higher origination volumes given the declining mortgage rates, while maintaining compliance with the leverage covenants in its debt agreements. The increase in mortgage asset-backed debt, coupled with the decline in value of MSRs resulting from lower mortgage rates, could have the effect of increasing the indebtedness to tangible net worth ratio in the short term.
Derivative instruments are recorded in Other assets and Other liabilities in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets, except for certain instruments related to the convertible note transactions which are recorded in equity. Derivative instruments and the risks they manage are as follows:
· Forward delivery commitmentsRelated to interest rate and price risk for Mortgage loans held for sale and interest rate lock commitments
· Option contracts Related to interest rate and price risk for interest rate lock commitments
· MSR-related agreements Related to interest rate risk for mortgage servicing rights
· Interest rate contractsRelated to interest rate risk for variable-rate debt arrangements and fixed-rate leases
· Convertible note-related agreementsRelated to the issuance of the 2014 Convertible notes
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
· Foreign exchange contractsRelated to exposure to currency fluctuations that would impact our investment in, or borrowings related to, our Canadian operations
The following table presents the balances of outstanding derivative instruments on a gross basis and the application of counterparty and collateral netting:
|
|
September 30, 2011 |
|
December 31, 2010 |
| ||||||||||||||
|
|
Asset |
|
Liability |
|
Notional |
|
Asset |
|
Liability |
|
Notional |
| ||||||
|
|
(In millions) |
| ||||||||||||||||
Interest rate lock commitments |
|
$ |
177 |
|
$ |
2 |
|
$ |
7,705 |
|
$ |
42 |
|
$ |
46 |
|
$ |
7,328 |
|
Forward delivery commitments: (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Not subject to master netting arrangements |
|
19 |
|
26 |
|
2,946 |
|
61 |
|
14 |
|
4,703 |
| ||||||
Subject to master netting arrangements(2) |
|
66 |
|
173 |
|
16,136 |
|
248 |
|
68 |
|
16,438 |
| ||||||
Interest rate contracts |
|
1 |
|
|
|
538 |
|
4 |
|
|
|
653 |
| ||||||
Option contracts |
|
3 |
|
|
|
930 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
MSR-related agreements |
|
5 |
|
|
|
1,020 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Convertible note-related agreements(3) |
|
14 |
|
14 |
|
|
|
54 |
|
54 |
|
|
| ||||||
Foreign exchange contracts |
|
1 |
|
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
|
|
30 |
| ||||||
Total, gross |
|
286 |
|
215 |
|
|
|
409 |
|
182 |
|
|
| ||||||
Netting adjustments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Offsetting receivables/payables |
|
(95 |
) |
(95 |
) |
|
|
(241 |
) |
(241 |
) |
|
| ||||||
Cash collateral paid/received |
|
26 |
|
(70 |
) |
|
|
|
|
190 |
|
|
| ||||||
Total, net |
|
$ |
217 |
|
$ |
50 |
|
|
|
$ |
168 |
|
$ |
131 |
|
|
| ||
(1) The net notional amount of Forward delivery commitments was $7.9 billion and $10.3 billion as of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively.
(2) Represents derivative instruments that are executed with the same counterparties and subject to master netting arrangements. Forward delivery commitments subject to netting shown above were presented in the Condensed Consolidated Balance sheets as follows:
|
|
September 30, 2011 |
|
December 31, 2010 |
| ||||||||
|
|
Asset |
|
Liability |
|
Asset |
|
Liability |
| ||||
|
|
Derivatives |
|
Derivatives |
|
Derivatives |
|
Derivatives |
| ||||
|
|
(In millions) |
| ||||||||||
Other Assets |
|
$ |
19 |
|
$ |
48 |
|
$ |
10 |
|
$ |
3 |
|
Other Liabilities |
|
47 |
|
125 |
|
238 |
|
65 |
| ||||
Total |
|
$ |
66 |
|
$ |
173 |
|
$ |
248 |
|
$ |
68 |
|
(3) The notional amount of derivative instruments related to the issuance of the 2014 Convertible notes was 9.6881 million shares of the Companys Common stock as of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The following table summarizes the gains (losses) recorded in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for derivative instruments:
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Nine Months Ended |
| ||||||||
|
|
September 30, |
|
September 30, |
| ||||||||
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
| ||||
|
|
(In millions) |
| ||||||||||
Gain on mortgage loans, net: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
IRLCs |
|
$ |
509 |
|
$ |
508 |
|
$ |
942 |
|
$ |
1,089 |
|
Options contracts |
|
(7 |
) |
(12 |
) |
(14 |
) |
(24 |
) | ||||
Forward delivery commitments |
|
(247 |
) |
(130 |
) |
(337 |
) |
(376 |
) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Net derivative gain related to mortgage servicing rights: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
MSR-related agreements |
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Fleet interest expense: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Interest rate contracts |
|
(2 |
) |
(2 |
) |
(3 |
) |
(8 |
) | ||||
Foreign exchange contracts |
|
(1 |
) |
(14 |
) |
(6 |
) |
(9 |
) | ||||
6. Vehicle Leasing Activities
The following table summarizes the components of Net investment in fleet leases:
|
|
September 30, |
|
December 31, |
| ||
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
| ||
|
|
(In millions) |
| ||||
Operating Leases: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Vehicles under open-end operating leases |
|
$ |
7,995 |
|
$ |
7,601 |
|
Vehicles under closed-end operating leases |
|
192 |
|
208 |
| ||
Vehicles under operating leases |
|
8,187 |
|
7,809 |
| ||
Less: Accumulated depreciation |
|
(5,050 |
) |
(4,671 |
) | ||
Net investment in operating leases |
|
3,137 |
|
3,138 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Direct Financing Leases: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Lease payments receivable |
|
91 |
|
106 |
| ||
Less: Unearned income |
|
(4 |
) |
(3 |
) | ||
Net investment in direct financing leases |
|
87 |
|
103 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Off-Lease Vehicles: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Vehicles not yet subject to a lease |
|
184 |
|
248 |
| ||
Vehicles held for sale |
|
12 |
|
7 |
| ||
Less: Accumulated depreciation |
|
(6 |
) |
(4 |
) | ||
Net investment in off-lease vehicles |
|
190 |
|
251 |
| ||
Total |
|
$ |
3,414 |
|
$ |
3,492 |
|
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
7. Debt and Borrowing Arrangements
The following table summarizes the components of Debt:
|
|
September 30, 2011 |
|
December 31, 2010 |
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
Wt. Avg- |
|
|
|
Wt. Avg- |
| ||
|
|
|
|
Interest |
|
|
|
Interest |
| ||
|
|
Balance |
|
Rate(1) |
|
Balance |
|
Rate(1) |
| ||
|
|
(In millions) |
| ||||||||
Term notes, in amortization |
|
$ |
1,363 |
|
2.1 |
% |
$ |
1,167 |
|
2.2 |
% |
Term notes, in revolving period |
|
426 |
|
1.6 |
% |
989 |
|
2.0 |
% | ||
Variable-funding notes |
|
1,111 |
|
1.4 |
% |
871 |
|
1.9 |
% | ||
Other |
|
33 |
|
5.1 |
% |
39 |
|
5.1 |
% | ||
Vehicle Management Asset-Backed Debt |
|
2,933 |
|
|
|
3,066 |
|
|
| ||
Committed warehouse facilities |
|
2,078 |
|
1.9 |
% |
2,419 |
|
2.1 |
% | ||
Uncommitted warehouse facilities |
|
135 |
|
1.2 |
% |
1,290 |
|
1.2 |
% | ||
Servicing advance facility |
|
74 |
|
2.7 |
% |
68 |
|
2.8 |
% | ||
Mortgage Asset-Backed Debt |
|
2,287 |
|
|
|
3,777 |
|
|
| ||
Term notes |
|
781 |
|
8.1 |
% |
782 |
|
8.1 |
% | ||
Convertible notes |
|
455 |
|
4.0 |
% |
430 |
|
4.0 |
% | ||
Credit facilities |
|
80 |
|
3.8 |
% |
|
|
|
% | ||
Unsecured Debt |
|
1,316 |
|
|
|
1,212 |
|
|
| ||
Mortgage Loan Securitization Debt Certificates, at fair value(2) |
|
25 |
|
7.0 |
% |
30 |
|
7.0 |
% | ||
Total |
|
$ |
6,561 |
|
|
|
$ |
8,085 |
|
|
|
(1) Represents the weighted-average stated interest rate of the facilities as of the respective date, which may be different from the effective rate due to the amortization of premiums, discounts and issuance costs. Facilities are variable-rate, except for the Unsecured Term notes, Convertible notes, and Mortgage Loan Securitization Debt Certificates which are fixed-rate.
(2) Cash flows of securitized mortgage loans support payment of the debt certificates and creditors of the securitization trust do not have recourse to the Company.
Assets held as collateral that are not available to pay the Companys general obligations as of September 30, 2011 consisted of:
|
|
Vehicle |
|
Mortgage |
| ||
|
|
Asset-Backed |
|
Asset-Backed |
| ||
|
|
Debt |
|
Debt |
| ||
|
|
(In millions) |
| ||||
Restricted cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
258 |
|
$ |
6 |
|
Accounts receivable |
|
64 |
|
87 |
| ||
Mortgage loans held for sale |
|
|
|
2,264 |
| ||
Net investment in fleet leases |
|
3,211 |
|
|
| ||
Total |
|
$ |
3,533 |
|
$ |
2,357 |
|
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The following table provides the contractual debt maturities as of September 30, 2011:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage Loan |
|
|
| |||||
|
|
Vehicle |
|
Mortgage |
|
|
|
Securitization |
|
|
| |||||
|
|
Asset-Backed |
|
Asset-Backed |
|
Unsecured |
|
Debt |
|
|
| |||||
|
|
Debt(1) |
|
Debt |
|
Debt |
|
Certificates |
|
Total |
| |||||
|
|
(In millions) |
| |||||||||||||
Within one year |
|
$ |
947 |
|
$ |
2,287 |
|
$ |
330 |
|
$ |
8 |
|
$ |
3,572 |
|
Between one and two years |
|
779 |
|
|
|
421 |
|
6 |
|
1,206 |
| |||||
Between two and three years |
|
747 |
|
|
|
250 |
|
5 |
|
1,002 |
| |||||
Between three and four years |
|
395 |
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
399 |
| |||||
Between four and five years |
|
69 |
|
|
|
350 |
|
3 |
|
422 |
| |||||
Thereafter |
|
|
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
8 |
| |||||
|
|
$ |
2,937 |
|
$ |
2,287 |
|
$ |
1,359 |
|
$ |
26 |
|
$ |
6,609 |
|
(1) Maturities of vehicle management asset-backed notes, a portion of which are amortizing in accordance with their terms, represent estimated payments based on the expected cash inflows related to the securitized vehicle leases and related assets.
Capacity under all borrowing agreements is dependent upon maintaining compliance with, or obtaining waivers of, the terms, conditions and covenants of the respective agreements. Available capacity under asset-backed funding arrangements may be further limited by asset eligibility requirements. Available capacity under committed asset-backed debt arrangements and unsecured credit facilities as of September 30, 2011 consisted of:
|
|
|
|
Utilized |
|
Available |
| |||
|
|
Capacity |
|
Capacity |
|
Capacity |
| |||
|
|
(In millions) |
| |||||||
Vehicle Management Asset-Backed Debt: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Term notes, in revolving period |
|
$ |
426 |
|
$ |
426 |
|
$ |
|
|
Variable-funding notes |
|
1,543 |
|
1,111 |
|
432 |
| |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Mortgage Asset-Backed Debt: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Committed warehouse facilities |
|
2,985 |
|
2,078 |
|
907 |
| |||
Servicing advance facility |
|
120 |
|
74 |
|
46 |
| |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Unsecured Committed Credit Facilities(1) |
|
530 |
|
96 |
|
434 |
| |||
(1) Utilized capacity reflects $16 million of letters of credit issued under the Amended Credit Facility, which are not included in Debt in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet.
Capacity for Mortgage asset-backed debt shown above excludes $2.1 billion not drawn under uncommitted facilities.
The fair value of debt was $6.6 billion and $8.2 billion as of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively.
VEHICLE MANAGEMENT ASSET-BACKED DEBT
Vehicle management asset-backed debt primarily represents variable-rate debt issued by a wholly owned subsidiary, Chesapeake Funding LLC (Chesapeake), to support the acquisition of vehicles by the Fleet Management Services segments U.S. leasing operations and debt issued by the consolidated special purpose trust, Fleet Leasing Receivables Trust (FLRT), the Canadian special purpose trust, used to finance leases originated by the Canadian fleet operation.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Vehicle management asset-backed debt includes term notes, which provide a fixed funding amount at the time of issuance, or Variable-funding notes under which the committed capacity may be drawn upon as needed during a commitment period, which is typically 364 days in duration. The available capacity under Variable-funding notes may be used to fund future amortization of other Vehicle management asset-backed debt or to fund growth in Net investment in fleet leases during the term of the commitment.
As with Variable-funding notes, certain Term notes may contain provisions that allow the outstanding debt to revolve for specified periods of time. During these revolving periods, the monthly collection of lease payments allocable to each outstanding series is available to fund the acquisition of vehicles and/or equipment to be leased to customers. Upon expiration of the revolving period, the repayment of principal commences, and the monthly allocated lease payments are applied to the notes until they are paid in full.
Term Notes
On September 28, 2011, Chesapeake issued $335 million of Series 2011-2 Term notes. Proceeds from the notes were used to pay down a portion of the Series 2010-1 Notes and Series 2011-1 Notes.
As of September 30, 2011, Term notes outstanding that are revolving in accordance with their terms are Chesapeake Series 2009-3, 2010-1 Class B Note, 2011-1 Class B Note and 2011-2. Expiration dates of the revolving periods range from October 20, 2011 to September 19, 2013.
As of September 30, 2011, Term notes outstanding that are amortizing in accordance with their terms are Chesapeake Series 2009-1, 2009-2 and 2009-4 and the FLRT Series 2010-1. Final repayment dates of Term notes in their amortization period range from September 7, 2012 to March 15, 2014.
Variable-funding Notes
On August 31, 2011, the Series 2010-2 Indenture Supplement of the FLRT facility was amended to extend the maturity date to August 30, 2012. The facility was also amended during the quarter to increase capacity to $343 million. The commitments of this facility are renewable subject to agreement by the parties.
On June 29, 2011, Chesapeake amended and restated the Series 2010-1 Indenture Supplement and entered into a Series 2011-1 Indenture Supplement. In addition, the maturity of the Series 2010-1 Variable-funding notes was extended and the total committed funding available to Chesapeake was increased. Pursuant to the 2010-1 and 2011-1 Supplements, Chesapeake may issue up to $700 million and $500 million, respectively, in aggregate principal under commitments provided by a syndicate of lenders. Proceeds of the Series 2011-1 Variable-funding notes were used to pay down the outstanding balance of the Series 2010-1 Variable-funding notes. As of September 30, 2011, commitments under the 2010-1 and 2011-1 Supplements are scheduled to expire on June 27, 2012 and June 27, 2013, respectively, but are renewable subject to agreement by the parties. If the scheduled expiration date of the commitments is not extended, the notes amortization period will begin.
MORTGAGE ASSET-BACKED DEBT
Mortgage asset-backed debt primarily represents variable-rate warehouse facilities to support the origination of mortgage loans, which provide creditors a collateralized interest in specific mortgage loans that meet the eligibility requirements under the terms of the facility. The source of repayment of the facilities is typically from the sale or securitization of the underlying loans into the secondary mortgage market. These facilities are typically 364-day facilities, and as of September 30, 2011, the range of maturity dates for committed facilities is October 5, 2011 to August 10, 2012.
Committed Facilities
As of September 30, 2011, the Company has outstanding committed mortgage warehouse facilities with the Royal Bank of Scotland, plc, Credit Suisse First Boston Mortgage Capital LLC, Ally Bank, Bank of America, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. and Fannie Mae.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
On August 12, 2011, committed 364-day variable-rate mortgage repurchase facilities were entered into with Wells Fargo by PHH Mortgage and PHH Home Loans, with $300 million and $150 million capacity, respectively, pursuant to master repurchase agreements and certain related agreements.
On July 28, 2011, the variable-rate committed facility of PHH Home Loans with Ally Bank was amended to extend the maturity date from July 31, 2011 to December 1, 2011.
On June 24, 2011, the variable-rate committed mortgage repurchase facility with the Royal Bank of Scotland, plc was amended to reduce the committed capacity to $500 million and was extended to June 22, 2012, among other provisions.
On May 25, 2011, the committed variable-rate mortgage repurchase facilities with Credit Suisse First Boston Mortgage Capital, LLC were extended to May 23, 2012, with the option to renew the agreements for an additional year.
Uncommitted Facilities
The Company has an outstanding uncommitted mortgage repurchase facility with Fannie Mae. The facility has total capacity of up to $3.0 billion as of September 30, 2011, less certain amounts outstanding under the $1.0 billion committed Fannie Mae facility.
On June 24, 2011, the Company entered into a $200 million variable-rate uncommitted facility with the Royal Bank of Scotland, plc.
Servicing Advance Facility
The Company has a committed facility with Fannie Mae that provides for the early reimbursement of certain servicing advances made on behalf of Fannie Mae.
UNSECURED DEBT
Term Notes
Term notes include $350 million of 9.25% Senior notes due March 1, 2016 that have been registered under a public registration statement and $423 million of Medium-term notes. The effective interest rate of the term notes, which includes the accretion of the discount and issuance costs, was 8.9% as of September 30, 2011. The range of maturity dates for the term notes is March 1, 2013 to April 15, 2018.
Credit Facilities
Credit facilities primarily represents an Amended and Restated Competitive Advance and Revolving Credit Agreement, dated as of January 6, 2006, among PHH, a group of lenders and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as administrative agent. The facility has $525 million of commitments which are scheduled to expire on February 29, 2012. Provided certain conditions are met, the Company may extend the commitments for an additional year at its request. These conditions include, among others, the payment of extension fees and the maintenance minimum liquidity of at least $250 million as of February 29, 2012. Minimum liquidity, as defined in the agreement, is the sum of unrestricted cash and cash equivalents plus available capacity under the facility less the unpaid balance of the 2012 Convertible Notes.
Convertible Notes
Convertible notes include a private offering of $250 million of 4.0% Convertible senior notes with a maturity date of April 15, 2012 and a private offering of $250 million of 4.0% Convertible senior notes with a maturity date of September 1, 2014.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
As of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the carrying amount of the convertible notes is net of an unamortized discount of $45 million and $70 million, respectively. The effective interest rate of the convertible notes, which includes the accretion of the discount and issuance costs, was 12.7% as of September 30, 2011. There have been no conversions of the convertible notes since issuance.
DEBT COVENANTS
Certain debt arrangements require the maintenance of certain financial ratios and contain affirmative and negative covenants, including, but not limited to, material adverse change, liquidity maintenance, restrictions on indebtedness of the Company and its material subsidiaries, mergers, liens, liquidations, sale and leaseback transactions, and restrictions on certain types of payments, including dividends and stock repurchases.
During the nine months ended September 30, 2011, the covenants for the RBS repurchase facility and the CSFB Mortgage repurchase facility were amended to require the Company to maintain a minimum of $1.0 billion in committed mortgage repurchase or warehouse facilities, with no more than $500 million of gestation facilities included towards the minimum, excluding the uncommitted facilities provided by Fannie Mae. As of September 30, 2011, the Company was in compliance with all financial covenants related to its debt arrangements.
Under certain of the Companys financing, servicing, hedging and related agreements and instruments, the lenders or trustees have the right to notify the Company if they believe it has breached a covenant under the operative documents and may declare an event of default. If one or more notices of default were to be given, the Company believes it would have various periods in which to cure certain of such events of default. If it does not cure the events of default or obtain necessary waivers within the required time periods, the maturity of some of its debt could be accelerated and its ability to incur additional indebtedness could be restricted. In addition, an event of default or acceleration under certain agreements and instruments would trigger cross-default provisions under certain of its other agreements and instruments.
8. Income Taxes
Interim income tax expense or benefit is recorded by applying a projected full-year effective income tax rate to the quarterly Income before income taxes for results that are deemed to be reliably estimable. Certain results dependent on fair value adjustments of the Mortgage Production and Mortgage Servicing segments are considered not to be reliably estimable and therefore discrete year-to-date income tax provisions are recorded on those results.
Income tax benefit was significantly impacted by the following items that increased (decreased) the effective tax rate:
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Nine Months Ended |
| ||||||||
|
|
September 30, |
|
September 30, |
| ||||||||
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
| ||||
|
|
(In millions) |
| ||||||||||
State and local income taxes, net of federal tax benefits |
|
$ |
(15 |
) |
$ |
(1 |
) |
$ |
(14 |
) |
$ |
(13 |
) |
Liabilities for income tax contingencies |
|
|
|
|
|
(8 |
) |
1 |
| ||||
Changes in valuation allowance |
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
6 |
|
2 |
| ||||
Noncontrolling interest |
|
(3 |
) |
(5 |
) |
(6 |
) |
(8 |
) | ||||
State and local income taxes, net of federal tax benefits. The impact to the effective tax rate from state and local income taxes primarily represents the volatility in the pre-tax income or loss, as well as the mix of income and loss from the operations by entity and state income tax jurisdiction.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Liabilities for income tax contingencies. The impact to the effective tax rate from changes in the liabilities for income tax contingencies primarily represents decreases in liabilities associated with the resolution and settlement with various taxing authorities, partially offset by increases in liabilities associated with new uncertain tax positions taken during the period. During the nine months ended September 30, 2011, the IRS concluded its examination and review of the Companys taxable years 2006 through 2009.
Changes in valuation allowance. The impact to the effective tax rate from changes in valuation allowance primarily represents loss carryforwards generated during the period for which the Company believes it is more likely than not that the amounts will not be realized. For the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, the increases were primarily driven by tax losses generated in each period by our mortgage business.
Noncontrolling interest. The impact to the effective tax rate from noncontrolling interest represents Realogy Corporations portion of income taxes related to the income or loss attributable to PHH Home Loans. The impact primarily represents the impact of PHH Home Loans election to report as a partnership for federal and state income tax purposes, whereby, the tax expense is reported by the individual LLC members. Accordingly, the Companys Income tax (benefit) expense includes only its proportionate share of the income tax related to the income or loss generated by PHH Home Loans.
9. Credit Risk
The Company is subject to the following forms of credit risk:
· Consumer credit riskthrough mortgage banking activities as a result of originating and servicing residential mortgage loans
· Commercial credit riskthrough fleet management and leasing activities
· Counterparty credit riskthrough derivative transactions, sales agreements and various mortgage loan origination and servicing agreements
Consumer Credit Risk
The Company is not subject to the majority of the risks inherent in maintaining a mortgage loan portfolio because loans are not held for investment purposes and are generally sold to investors within 60 days of origination. The majority of mortgage loan sales are on a non-recourse basis; however, the Company has exposure in certain circumstances in its capacity as a loan originator and servicer to loan repurchases and indemnifications through representation and warranty provisions. Additionally, the Company has exposure through its reinsurance agreements that are inactive and in runoff.
Loan performance is an indicator of the inherent risk associated with our origination and servicing activities. In limited circumstances, the Company has exposure to possible losses on loans within the servicing portfolio due to loan repurchases and indemnifications, as further discussed below.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The following tables summarize certain information regarding the total loan servicing portfolio, which includes loans associated with the capitalized Mortgage servicing rights as well as loans subserviced for others:
|
|
September 30, |
|
December 31, |
| ||
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
| ||
|
|
(In millions) |
| ||||
Loan Servicing Portfolio Composition: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Owned |
|
$ |
147,356 |
|
$ |
140,160 |
|
Subserviced |
|
30,773 |
|
25,915 |
| ||
Total |
|
$ |
178,129 |
|
$ |
166,075 |
|
Conventional loans |
|
$ |
142,789 |
|
$ |
136,261 |
|
Government loans |
|
28,704 |
|
23,100 |
| ||
Home equity lines of credit |
|
6,636 |
|
6,714 |
| ||
Total |
|
$ |
178,129 |
|
$ |
166,075 |
|
Weighted-average interest rate |
|
4.7 |
% |
4.9 |
% |
|
|
September 30, 2011 |
|
December 31, 2010 |
| ||||
|
|
Number of |
|
Unpaid Balance |
|
Number of |
|
Unpaid Balance |
|
Portfolio Delinquency(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30 days |
|
2.15 |
% |
1.81 |
% |
2.36 |
% |
2.01 |
% |
60 days |
|
0.56 |
% |
0.50 |
% |
0.67 |
% |
0.60 |
% |
90 or more days |
|
0.96 |
% |
0.93 |
% |
1.21 |
% |
1.27 |
% |
Total |
|
3.67 |
% |
3.24 |
% |
4.24 |
% |
3.88 |
% |
Foreclosure/real estate owned(2) |
|
1.88 |
% |
1.94 |
% |
2.30 |
% |
2.37 |
% |
(1) Represents the loan servicing portfolio delinquencies as a percentage of the total number of loans and the total unpaid balance of the portfolio.
(2) As of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, there were 15,470 and 18,554 of loans in foreclosure with unpaid principal balance of $2.8 billion and $3.3 billion, respectively.
Foreclosure-Related Reserves
Representations and warranties are provided to purchasers and insurers on a significant portion of loans sold and are assumed on purchased mortgage servicing rights. In the event of a breach of these representations and warranties, the Company may be required to repurchase a mortgage loan or indemnify the purchaser, and any loss on the mortgage loan may be borne by the Company. If there is no breach of a representation and warranty provision, there is no obligation to repurchase the loan or indemnify the investor against loss. In limited circumstances, the full risk of loss on loans sold is retained to the extent the liquidation of the underlying collateral is insufficient. In some instances where the Company has purchased loans from third parties, it may have the ability to recover the loss from the third party.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Foreclosure-related reserves are maintained for probable losses related to repurchase and indemnification obligations and on-balance sheet loans in foreclosure and real estate owned. A summary of the activity in foreclosure-related reserves is as follows:
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
| ||||
|
|
September 30, |
| ||||
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
| ||
|
|
(In millions) |
| ||||
Balance, beginning of period |
|
$ |
111 |
|
$ |
86 |
|
Realized foreclosure losses |
|
(62 |
) |
(47 |
) | ||
Increase in reserves due to: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Changes in assumptions |
|
59 |
|
54 |
| ||
New loan sales |
|
12 |
|
8 |
| ||
Balance, end of period |
|
$ |
120 |
|
$ |
101 |
|
Foreclosure-related reserves consist of the following:
Loan Repurchases and Indemnifications
The maximum exposure to representation and warranty provisions exceeds the amount of loans in the capitalized portfolio of $144.3 billion; however, the range of total possible losses cannot be estimated because the Company does not service all of the loans for which it has provided representations or warranties. As of September 30, 2011, approximately $191 million of loans have been identified in which the Company has full risk of loss or has identified a breach of representation and warranty provisions; 14% of which were at least 90 days delinquent (calculated based upon the unpaid principal balance of the loans).
As of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, liabilities for probable losses related to repurchase and indemnification obligations of $87 million and $74 million, respectively, are included in Other liabilities in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Mortgage Loans in Foreclosure and Real Estate Owned
Mortgage loans in foreclosure represent the unpaid principal balance of mortgage loans for which foreclosure proceedings have been initiated, plus recoverable advances made on those loans. These amounts are recorded net of an allowance for probable losses on such mortgage loans and related advances.
Real estate owned, which are acquired from mortgagors in default, are recorded at the lower of the adjusted carrying amount at the time the property is acquired or fair value. Fair value is estimated based upon the estimated net realizable value of the underlying collateral less the estimated costs to sell.
The carrying values of the mortgage loans in foreclosure and real estate owned are recorded within Other Assets in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as follows:
|
|
September 30, |
|
December 31, |
| ||
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
| ||
|
|
(In millions) |
| ||||
Mortgage loans in foreclosure |
|
$ |
117 |
|
$ |
128 |
|
Allowance for probable losses |
|
(20 |
) |
(22 |
) | ||
Mortgage loans in foreclosure, net |
|
$ |
97 |
|
$ |
106 |
|
Real estate owned |
|
$ |
50 |
|
$ |
54 |
|
Adjustment to estimated net realizable value |
|
(13 |
) |
(15 |
) | ||
Real estate owned, net |
|
$ |
37 |
|
$ |
39 |
|
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Mortgage Reinsurance
The Company has exposure to consumer credit risk through losses from two contracts with primary mortgage insurance companies that are inactive and in runoff. The exposure to losses through these reinsurance contracts is based on mortgage loans pooled by year of origination.
As of September 30, 2011, the contractual reinsurance period for each pool was 10 years and the weighted-average reinsurance period was 4.2 years. Loss rates on these pools are determined based on the unpaid principal balance of the underlying loans. The Company indemnifies the primary mortgage insurers for losses that fall between a stated minimum and maximum loss rate on each annual pool. In return for absorbing this loss exposure, the Company is contractually entitled to a portion of the insurance premium from the primary mortgage insurers.
The Company is required to hold cash and securities in trust related to this potential obligation, which were $237 million, included in Restricted cash, cash equivalents and investments in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet as of September 30, 2011. The amount of cash and securities held in trust is contractually specified in the reinsurance agreements and is based on the original risk assumed under the contracts and the incurred losses to date.
As of September 30, 2011, the unpaid reinsurance losses outstanding were $8 million, and $94 million was included in Other liabilities in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet for incurred and incurred but not reported losses associated with mortgage reinsurance activities (estimated on an undiscounted basis).
A summary of the activity in reinsurance-related reserves is as follows:
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
| ||||
|
|
September 30, |
| ||||
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
| ||
|
|
(In millions) |
| ||||
Balance, beginning of period |
|
$ |
113 |
|
$ |
108 |
|
Realized reinsurance losses |
|
(49 |
) |
(13 |
) | ||
Increase in liability for reinsurance losses |
|
30 |
|
36 |
| ||
Balance, end of period |
|
$ |
94 |
|
$ |
131 |
|
Commercial Credit Risk
Vehicle leases are primarily classified as operating leases; however, certain leases are classified as direct financing leases and recorded within Net investment in fleet leases in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.
As of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, direct financing leases greater than 90 days past due total $22 million and $19 million, respectively. As of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, direct financing leases greater than 90 days that are still accruing interest were $20 million and $16 million and the allowance for credit losses was $2 million and $3 million, respectively.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
10. Commitments and Contingencies
Legal Contingencies
The Company is party to various claims and legal proceedings from time to time related to contract disputes and other commercial, employment and tax matters.
PHH Mortgage Corporation, a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, was the defendant in a lawsuit initiated in 2009 in the United States District Court, Middle District of Georgia, by a borrower with a loan that has been serviced by the Company. The borrower alleged breach of contract, negligent servicing and violations of the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act. During the three months ended September 30, 2011, the Company reached an agreement to settle the matter for an amount that was not significant to its results of operations or financial position.
In connection with the heightened focus on foreclosure practices across the mortgage industry in 2010 and 2011, the Company has received inquiries from regulators and attorneys general of certain states as well as from the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform of the U.S. House of Representatives and the U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee, requesting information regarding foreclosure practices, processes and procedures, among other things. Although the Company has not been assessed any material penalties or fines associated with its foreclosure practices to date, it is reasonably possible that the Company could experience an increase in foreclosure-related litigation and could be assessed fines and penalties related to foreclosure practices in the future. However, the amount of any losses in connection with such matters cannot be reasonably estimated given the inherent uncertainty around the outcome of such matters.
Tax Contingencies
In connection with the Companys spinoff from Cendant Corporation (now known as Avis Budget Group, Inc.), a Tax Sharing Agreement was entered into to govern the allocation of liabilities for taxes between Cendant and the Company, for tax years prior to and including the spin-off. The Company, since it was a subsidiary of Cendant through January 31, 2005, was included in an IRS audit of Cendant for the tax years ended December 31, 2003 through 2006, and may have been subject to liability to both the IRS, and Cendant, for certain taxes that might have been assessed pursuant to the audit, as provided under applicable law and as provided in the tax sharing agreement.
During the three months ended September 30, 2010, the IRS concluded its examination of Cendants taxable years 2003 through 2006, and the material issues related to the Companys potential obligations to Cendant under the Tax Sharing Agreement have been favorably resolved. As a result of the conclusion of the examination, the Company recorded an additional deferred tax asset of $1 million, with a corresponding increase to Retained earnings.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
11. Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income
The after-tax components of Accumulated other comprehensive income were as follows:
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2011 |
| ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
Gains On |
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
|
Currency |
|
Available- |
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
|
Translation |
|
for-Sale |
|
Pension |
|
|
| ||||
|
|
Adjustment |
|
Securities |
|
Adjustment |
|
Total |
| ||||
|
|
(In millions) |
| ||||||||||
Balance at December 31, 2010 |
|
$ |
36 |
|
$ |
1 |
|
$ |
(8 |
) |
$ |
29 |
|
Change during 2011 |
|
(10 |
) |
1 |
|
1 |
|
(8 |
) | ||||
Balance at September 30, 2011 |
|
$ |
26 |
|
$ |
2 |
|
$ |
(7 |
) |
$ |
21 |
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2010 |
| ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
Gains On |
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
|
Currency |
|
Available- |
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
|
Translation |
|
for-Sale |
|
Pension |
|
|
| ||||
|
|
Adjustment |
|
Securities |
|
Adjustment |
|
Total |
| ||||
|
|
(In millions) |
| ||||||||||
Balance at December 31, 2009 |
|
$ |
27 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
(8 |
) |
$ |
19 |
|
Change during 2010 |
|
3 |
|
2 |
|
1 |
|
6 |
| ||||
Balance at September 30, 2010 |
|
$ |
30 |
|
$ |
2 |
|
$ |
(7 |
) |
$ |
25 |
|
All components of Accumulated other comprehensive income presented above are net of income taxes; however the currency translation adjustment presented above excludes income taxes on undistributed earnings of foreign subsidiaries, which are considered to be indefinitely invested.
12. Fair Value Measurements
Recurring Fair Value Measurements
For assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis, there has been no change in the valuation methodologies during the nine months ended September 30, 2011. Changes in the classification pursuant to the valuation hierarchy during the nine months ended September 30, 2011 are discussed below under Mortgage Loans Held for Sale. The incorporation of counterparty credit risk did not have a significant impact on the valuation of assets and liabilities recorded at fair value as of September 30, 2011 or December 31, 2010. Significant inputs to the measurement of fair value of assets and liabilities classified as Level three and further information on the assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis are as follows:
Mortgage Loans Held for Sale. Mortgage loans held for sale (MLHS) are classified within Level Two and Level Three of the valuation hierarchy. During the three months ended September 30, 2011, certain Scratch and Dent (as defined below), non-conforming and construction loans were transferred from Level Three to Level Two of the valuation hierarchy based on an increase in the availability of market data and increased trading activity. Although the market for non-conforming and Scratch and Dent loans does not have the same liquidity as the market for conforming loans, the number of observable market participants and the number of non-distressed transactions has increased while the implied risk premium has decreased to the point where available market information on transactions and quoted prices for similar assets are determinative of fair value. As of September 30, 2011, Level Three MLHS include second lien loans that are valued using a discounted cash flow model.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The following table reflects the difference between the carrying amounts of Mortgage loans held for sale measured at fair value, and the aggregate unpaid principal amount that the Company is contractually entitled to receive at maturity:
|
|
September 30, 2011 |
|
December 31, 2010 |
| ||||||||
|
|
Total |
|
Loans 90 days or |
|
Total |
|
Loans 90 days or |
| ||||
|
|
(In millions) |
| ||||||||||
Mortgage loans held for sale: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Carrying amount |
|
$ |
2,699 |
|
$ |
15 |
|
$ |
4,329 |
|
$ |
14 |
|
Aggregate unpaid principal balance |
|
2,624 |
|
28 |
|
4,356 |
|
21 |
| ||||
Difference |
|
$ |
75 |
|
$ |
(13 |
) |
$ |
(27 |
) |
$ |
(7 |
) |
The following table summarizes the components of Mortgage loans held for sale:
|
|
September 30, |
|
December 31, |
| ||
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
| ||
|
|
(In millions) |
| ||||
First mortgages: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Conforming (1) |
|
$ |
2,468 |
|
$ |
4,123 |
|
Non-conforming |
|
157 |
|
138 |
| ||
Construction loans |
|
6 |
|
11 |
| ||
Total first mortgages |
|
2,631 |
|
4,272 |
| ||
Second lien |
|
10 |
|
11 |
| ||
Scratch and Dent (2) |
|
56 |
|
40 |
| ||
Other |
|
2 |
|
6 |
| ||
Total |
|
$ |
2,699 |
|
$ |
4,329 |
|
(1) Represents mortgage loans that conform to the standards of the government-sponsored entities.
(2) Represents mortgage loans with origination flaws or performance issues.
Derivative InstrumentsInterest Rate Lock Commitments. The average pullthrough percentage used in measuring the fair value of interest rate lock commitments was 73% and 78% as of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively.
Mortgage Servicing Rights. The significant assumptions used in estimating the fair value of Mortgage servicing rights (MSRs) were as follows (in annual rates):
|
|
September 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
Weighted-average prepayment speed (CPR) |
|
17 |
% |
12 |
% |
Option adjusted spread, in basis points |
|
843 |
|
844 |
|
Volatility |
|
32 |
% |
29 |
% |
The following table summarizes the estimated change in the fair value of MSRs from adverse changes in the significant assumptions:
|
|
September 30, 2011 |
| |||||||
|
|
Weighted- |
|
Option |
|
Volatility |
| |||
|
|
(In millions) |
| |||||||
Impact on fair value of 10% adverse change |
|
$ |
(85 |
) |
$ |
(42 |
) |
$ |
(7 |
) |
Impact on fair value of 20% adverse change |
|
(162 |
) |
(82 |
) |
(14 |
) | |||
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
These sensitivities are hypothetical and presented for illustrative purposes only. Changes in fair value based on a variation in assumptions generally cannot be extrapolated because the relationship of the change in assumption to the change in fair value may not be linear. Also, the effect of a variation in a particular assumption is calculated without changing any other assumption; in reality, changes in one assumption may result in changes in another, which may magnify or counteract the sensitivities. Further, this analysis does not assume any impact resulting from managements intervention to mitigate these variations.
Assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis were included in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as follows:
|
|
September 30, 2011 |
| |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash |
|
|
| |||||
|
|
Level |
|
Level |
|
Level |
|
Collateral |
|
|
| |||||
|
|
One |
|
Two |
|
Three |
|
and Netting (1) |
|
Total |
| |||||
|
|
(In millions) |
| |||||||||||||
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Restricted investments |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
237 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
237 |
|
Mortgage loans held for sale |
|
|
|
2,679 |
|
20 |
|
|
|
2,699 |
| |||||
Mortgage servicing rights |
|
|
|
|
|
1,198 |
|
|
|
1,198 |
| |||||
Other assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Derivative assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Interest rate lock commitments |
|
|
|
|
|
177 |
|
|
|
177 |
| |||||
Forward delivery commitments |
|
|
|
85 |
|
|
|
(65 |
) |
20 |
| |||||
Interest rate contracts |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
| |||||
Option contracts |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
| |||||
MSR-related agreements |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
1 |
| |||||
Convertible note-related agreements |
|
|
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
14 |
| |||||
Foreign exchange contracts |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
| |||||
Securitized mortgage loans |
|
|
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
32 |
| |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
LIABILITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Debt: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Mortgage loan securitization debt certificates |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
25 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
25 |
|
Other liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Derivative liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Interest rate lock commitments |
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
2 |
| |||||
Forward delivery commitments |
|
|
|
199 |
|
|
|
(165 |
) |
34 |
| |||||
Convertible note-related agreements |
|
|
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
| |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash |
|
|
| |||||
|
|
Level |
|
Level |
|
Level |
|
Collateral |
|
|
| |||||
|
|
One |
|
Two |
|
Three |
|
and Netting(1) |
|
Total |
| |||||
|
|
(In millions) |
| |||||||||||||
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Restricted investments |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
254 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
254 |
|
Mortgage loans held for sale |
|
|
|
4,157 |
|
172 |
|
|
|
4,329 |
| |||||
Mortgage servicing rights |
|
|
|
|
|
1,442 |
|
|
|
1,442 |
| |||||
Other assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Derivative assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Interest rate lock commitments |
|
|
|
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
42 |
| |||||
Forward delivery commitments |
|
|
|
309 |
|
|
|
(241 |
) |
68 |
| |||||
Interest rate contracts |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
| |||||
Convertible note-related agreements |
|
|
|
|
|
54 |
|
|
|
54 |
| |||||
Securitized mortgage loans |
|
|
|
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
42 |
| |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
LIABILITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Debt: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Mortgage loan securitization debt certificates |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
30 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
30 |
|
Other liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Derivative liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Interest rate lock commitments |
|
|
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
46 |
| |||||
Forward delivery commitments |
|
|
|
82 |
|
|
|
(51 |
) |
31 |
| |||||
Convertible note-related agreements |
|
|
|
|
|
54 |
|
|
|
54 |
|
(1) Represents adjustments to arrive at the carrying amount of assets and liabilities presented in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets for the effect of netting the payable or receivable and cash collateral held or placed with the same counterparties under master netting arrangements.
Activity in assets and liabilities classified within Level Three of the valuation hierarchy consisted of:
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, 2011 |
| |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest |
|
|
|
Mortgage loan |
| |||||
|
|
Mortgage |
|
Mortgage |
|
rate lock |
|
Securitized |
|
securitization |
| |||||
|
|
loans held |
|
servicing |
|
commitments, |
|
mortgage |
|
debt |
| |||||
|
|
for sale |
|
rights |
|
net |
|
loans |
|
certificates |
| |||||
|
|
(In millions) |
| |||||||||||||
Balance, beginning of period |
|
$ |
155 |
|
$ |
1,508 |
|
$ |
48 |
|
$ |
34 |
|
$ |
26 |
|
Realized and unrealized gains (losses) for assets |
|
(1 |
) |
(410 |
) |
509 |
|
1 |
|
|
| |||||
Realized and unrealized losses for liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
| |||||
Purchases |
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Issuances |
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Settlements |
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
(382 |
) |
(3 |
) |
(2 |
) | |||||
Transfers into level three |
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Transfers out of level three |
|
(134 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Balance, end of period |
|
$ |
20 |
|
$ |
1,198 |
|
$ |
175 |
|
$ |
32 |
|
$ |
25 |
|
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2011 |
| |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest |
|
|
|
Mortgage loan |
| |||||
|
|
Mortgage |
|
Mortgage |
|
rate lock |
|
Securitized |
|
securitization |
| |||||
|
|
loans held |
|
servicing |
|
commitments, |
|
mortgage |
|
debt |
| |||||
|
|
for sale |
|
rights |
|
net |
|
loans |
|
certificates |
| |||||
|
|
(In millions) |
| |||||||||||||
Balance, beginning of period |
|
$ |
172 |
|
$ |
1,442 |
|
$ |
(4 |
) |
$ |
42 |
|
$ |
30 |
|
Realized and unrealized gains (losses) for assets |
|
(11 |
) |
(601 |
) |
942 |
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Realized and unrealized losses for liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
| |||||
Purchases |
|
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Issuances |
|
308 |
|
357 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Settlements |
|
(306 |
) |
|
|
(763 |
) |
(10 |
) |
(8 |
) | |||||
Transfers into level three |
|
85 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Transfers out of level three |
|
(253 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Balance, end of period |
|
$ |
20 |
|
$ |
1,198 |
|
$ |
175 |
|
$ |
32 |
|
$ |
25 |
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, 2010 |
| |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest |
|
|
|
Mortgage loan |
| |||||
|
|
Mortgage |
|
Mortgage |
|
rate lock |
|
Securitized |
|
securitization |
| |||||
|
|
loans held |
|
servicing |
|
commitments, |
|
mortgage |
|
debt |
| |||||
|
|
for sale |
|
rights |
|
net |
|
loans |
|
certificates |
| |||||
|
|
(In millions) |
| |||||||||||||
Balance, beginning of period |
|
$ |
103 |
|
$ |
1,236 |
|
$ |
142 |
|
$ |
47 |
|
$ |
35 |
|
Realized and unrealized gains (losses) for assets |
|
(8 |
) |
(254 |
) |
508 |
|
2 |
|
|
| |||||
Realized and unrealized losses for liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
| |||||
Purchases, issuances, and settlements, net |
|
45 |
|
101 |
|
(436 |
) |
(4 |
) |
(4 |
) | |||||
Transfers into level three |
|
19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Transfers out of level three |
|
(24 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Balance, end of period |
|
$ |
135 |
|
$ |
1,083 |
|
$ |
214 |
|
$ |
45 |
|
$ |
33 |
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2010 |
| ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest |
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage loan |
| ||||||
|
|
Mortgage |
|
Mortgage |
|
rate lock |
|
|
|
Securitized |
|
securitization |
| ||||||
|
|
loans held |
|
servicing |
|
commitments, |
|
Investment |
|
mortgage |
|
debt |
| ||||||
|
|
for sale |
|
rights |
|
net |
|
securities |
|
loans |
|
certificates |
| ||||||
|
|
(In millions) |
| ||||||||||||||||
Balance, beginning of period |
|
$ |
111 |
|
$ |
1,413 |
|
$ |
26 |
|
$ |
12 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Realized and unrealized gains (losses) for assets |
|
(13 |
) |
(626 |
) |
1,089 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
| ||||||
Realized and unrealized (gains) losses for liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
| ||||||
Purchases, issuances and settlements, net |
|
41 |
|
296 |
|
(901 |
) |
(1 |
) |
(12 |
) |
(11 |
) | ||||||
Transfers into level three (1) |
|
45 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Transfers out of level three |
|
(49 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Transition adjustment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11 |
) |
51 |
|
40 |
| ||||||
Balance, end of period |
|
$ |
135 |
|
$ |
1,083 |
|
$ |
214 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
45 |
|
$ |
33 |
|
(1) Represents the transition adjustment related to the adoption of updates to Consolidation and Transfers and Servicing accounting guidance resulting in the consolidation of a mortgage loan securitization trust.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
We conduct a review of fair value hierarchy classifications on a quarterly basis. Changes in the availability of observable inputs may result in the reclassification, or transfer, of certain assets or liabilities. Such reclassifications are reported as Transfers into our out of Level Three as of the beginning of the quarter that the change occurs. Transfers into Level three generally represent mortgage loans held for sale with performance issues, origination flaws or other characteristics that impact their salability in active secondary market transactions. Transfers out of Level three generally represent mortgage loans held for sale with corrected performance issues or origination flaws or loans that were foreclosed upon. Mortgage loans in foreclosure are measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis, as discussed in further detail below.
As discussed under Mortgage loans held for sale above, for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011, Transfers out of level three also represent the transfer of transfer of certain mortgage loans between Level Three to Level Two of the valuation hierarchy based on an increase in the availability of market bids and increased trading activity.
Realized and unrealized gains (losses) related to assets and liabilities classified within Level Three of the valuation hierarchy were included in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations as follows:
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Nine Months Ended |
| ||||||||
|
|
September 30, |
|
September 30, |
| ||||||||
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
| ||||
|
|
(In millions) |
| ||||||||||
Gain on mortgage loans, net: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Mortgage loans held for sale |
|
$ |
(2 |
) |
$ |
(10 |
) |
$ |
(18 |
) |
$ |
(20 |
) |
Interest rate lock commitments |
|
509 |
|
508 |
|
942 |
|
1,089 |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Change in fair value of mortgage servicing rights: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Mortgage servicing rights |
|
(410 |
) |
(254 |
) |
(601 |
) |
(626 |
) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Mortgage interest income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Mortgage loans held for sale |
|
1 |
|
2 |
|
7 |
|
7 |
| ||||
Securitized mortgage loans |
|
2 |
|
2 |
|
4 |
|
5 |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Mortgage interest expense: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Mortgage securitization debt certificates |
|
(1 |
) |
(2 |
) |
(4 |
) |
(5 |
) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Other income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Securitized mortgage loans |
|
(1 |
) |
1 |
|
(4 |
) |
2 |
| ||||
Mortgage securitization debt certificates |
|
1 |
|
1 |
|
1 |
|
|
| ||||
Unrealized gains (losses) included in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations related to assets and liabilities classified within Level Three of the valuation hierarchy that are included in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets were as follows:
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Nine Months Ended |
| ||||||||
|
|
September 30, |
|
September 30, |
| ||||||||
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
| ||||
|
|
(In millions) |
| ||||||||||
Gain on mortgage loans, net |
|
$ |
174 |
|
$ |
405 |
|
$ |
173 |
|
$ |
406 |
|
Change in fair value of mortgage servicing rights |
|
(353 |
) |
(191 |
) |
(455 |
) |
(453 |
) | ||||
Mortgage interest income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
| ||||
Other income |
|
(1 |
) |
1 |
|
(4 |
) |
2 |
| ||||
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Non-Recurring Fair Value Measurements
Other assets. The allowance for probable losses associated with mortgage loans in foreclosure and the adjustment to record real estate owned at estimated net realizable value were based upon fair value measurements from Level Two of the valuation hierarchy. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 total foreclosure-related charges of $20 million and $59 million, respectively, were recorded in Other operating expenses, which include changes in the estimate of losses related to off-balance sheet exposure to loan repurchases and indemnifications in addition to the provision for valuation adjustments for mortgage loans in foreclosure and real estate owned. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010, total foreclosure-related charges of $8 million and $51 million, respectively, were recorded in Other operating expenses.
See Note 9, Credit Risk for further discussion regarding the balances of mortgage loans in foreclosure, real estate owned, and the off-balance sheet exposure to loan repurchases and indemnifications.
13. Variable Interest Entities
Significant variable interest entities included in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets are as follows:
|
|
September 30, 2011 |
| ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
Chesapeake |
|
FLRT and |
|
Mortgage |
| ||||
|
|
PHH Home |
|
and D.L. |
|
PHH Lease |
|
Securitization |
| ||||
|
|
Loans |
|
Peterson Trust |
|
Receivables LP |
|
Trust |
| ||||
|
|
(In millions) |
| ||||||||||
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Cash |
|
$ |
17 |
|
$ |
2 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Restricted cash(1) |
|
2 |
|
215 |
|
42 |
|
|
| ||||
Mortgage loans held for sale |
|
512 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Accounts receivable, net |
|
17 |
|
64 |
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Net investment in fleet leases |
|
|
|
2,709 |
|
505 |
|
|
| ||||
Property, plant and equipment, net |
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Other assets |
|
19 |
|
9 |
|
2 |
|
32 |
| ||||
Total assets |
|
$ |
568 |
|
$ |
2,999 |
|
$ |
549 |
|
$ |
32 |
|
Assets held as collateral(2) |
|
$ |
447 |
|
$ |
2,988 |
|
$ |
517 |
|
$ |
|
|
LIABILITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Accounts payable and accrued expenses |
|
$ |
18 |
|
$ |
2 |
|
$ |
2 |
|
$ |
|
|
Debt |
|
417 |
|
2,448 |
|
453 |
|
25 |
| ||||
Other liabilities |
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Total liabilities(3) |
|
$ |
445 |
|
$ |
2,450 |
|
$ |
455 |
|
$ |
25 |
|
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
| ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
Chesapeake |
|
FLRT and |
|
Mortgage |
| ||||
|
|
PHH Home |
|
and D.L. |
|
PHH Lease |
|
Securitization |
| ||||
|
|
Loans |
|
Peterson Trust |
|
Receivables LP |
|
Trust |
| ||||
|
|
(In millions) |
| ||||||||||
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Cash |
|
$ |
40 |
|
$ |
4 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Restricted cash (1) |
|
|
|
202 |
|
39 |
|
|
| ||||
Mortgage loans held for sale |
|
384 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Accounts receivable, net |
|
14 |
|
50 |
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Net investment in fleet leases |
|
|
|
2,854 |
|
502 |
|
|
| ||||
Property, plant and equipment, net |
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Other assets |
|
10 |
|
12 |
|
18 |
|
42 |
| ||||
Total assets |
|
$ |
449 |
|
$ |
3,122 |
|
$ |
559 |
|
$ |
42 |
|
Assets held as collateral (2) |
|
$ |
331 |
|
$ |
3,106 |
|
$ |
506 |
|
$ |
|
|
LIABILITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Accounts payable and accrued expenses |
|
$ |
20 |
|
$ |
3 |
|
$ |
16 |
|
$ |
|
|
Debt |
|
304 |
|
2,577 |
|
450 |
|
30 |
| ||||
Other liabilities |
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Total liabilities (3) |
|
$ |
329 |
|
$ |
2,580 |
|
$ |
466 |
|
$ |
30 |
|
(1) Relates primarily to amounts collected for lease payments and related receivables specifically designated to purchase assets, to repay debt and/or to provide over-collateralization related to vehicle management asset-backed debt arrangements.
(2) Relates to the entitys borrowing arrangements and are not available to pay the Companys general obligations. See Note 7, Debt and Borrowing Arrangements for further information.
(3) Excludes intercompany payables.
PHH Home Loans
For the nine months ended September 30, 2011, approximately 22% of the mortgage loans originated by the Company were derived from Realogy Corporations affiliates, of which approximately 84% were originated by PHH Home Loans.
14. Related Party Transactions
CERTAIN BUSINESS RELATIONSHIPS
Thomas P. (Todd) Gibbons, one of the Companys Directors effective July 1, 2011, is Vice Chairman and Chief Financial Officer of the Bank of New York Mellon Corporation, the Bank of New York Mellon, and BNY Mellon, N.A. (collectively BNY Mellon). The Company has certain relationships with BNY Mellon, including financial services, commercial banking and other transactions. BNY Mellon is a lender, along with various other lenders, in several of the Companys credit facilities functions as the custodian for loan files, and functions as the indenture trustee on the Convertible notes due in 2012 and 2014, and the Senior notes due in 2016, as well as several of the Vehicle management asset-backed debt facilities. The Company also executes forward loan sales agreements and interest rate contracts with BNY Mellon. These transactions were entered into in the ordinary course of business upon terms, including interest rate and collateral, substantially the same as those prevailing at the time. The fees paid to BNY Mellon, including interest expense, during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 were not significant.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
15. Segment Information
Operations are conducted through three business segments: Mortgage Production, Mortgage Servicing and Fleet Management Services.
· Mortgage Production provides mortgage loan origination services and sells mortgage loans.
· Mortgage Servicing performs servicing activities for originated and purchased loans.
· Fleet Management Services provides commercial fleet management services.
Certain income and expenses not allocated to the three reportable segments and intersegment eliminations are reported under the heading Other. The Companys operations are substantially located in the U.S.
Management evaluates the operating results of each of the reportable segments based upon Net revenues and segment profit or loss, which is presented as the income or loss before income tax expense or benefit and after net income or loss attributable to noncontrolling interest. The Mortgage Production segment profit or loss excludes Realogy Corporations noncontrolling interest in the profit or loss of PHH Home Loans.
Segment results were as follows:
|
|
Net Revenues |
| ||||||||||
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Nine Months Ended |
| ||||||||
|
|
September 30, |
|
September 30, |
| ||||||||
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
| ||||
|
|
(In millions) |
| ||||||||||
Mortgage Production segment (1) |
|
$ |
264 |
|
$ |
336 |
|
$ |
647 |
|
$ |
690 |
|
Mortgage Servicing segment |
|
(312 |
) |
(160 |
) |
(313 |
) |
(362 |
) | ||||
Fleet Management Services segment |
|
432 |
|
397 |
|
1,233 |
|
1,194 |
| ||||
Total reportable segments |
|
384 |
|
573 |
|
1,567 |
|
1,522 |
| ||||
Other |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
(2 |
) |
(2 |
) | ||||
Total |
|
$ |
384 |
|
$ |
572 |
|
$ |
1,565 |
|
$ |
1,520 |
|
|
|
Segment Profit (Loss) (2) |
| ||||||||||
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Nine Months Ended |
| ||||||||
|
|
September 30, |
|
September 30, |
| ||||||||
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
| ||||
|
|
(In millions) |
| ||||||||||
Mortgage Production segment (1) |
|
$ |
95 |
|
$ |
161 |
|
$ |
172 |
|
$ |
235 |
|
Mortgage Servicing segment |
|
(368 |
) |
(195 |
) |
(467 |
) |
(492 |
) | ||||
Fleet Management Services segment |
|
21 |
|
17 |
|
56 |
|
38 |
| ||||
Total reportable segments |
|
(252 |
) |
(17 |
) |
(239 |
) |
(219 |
) | ||||
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
(1 |
) | ||||
Total |
|
$ |
(252 |
) |
$ |
(17 |
) |
$ |
(240 |
) |
$ |
(220 |
) |
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
|
Total Assets |
| ||||
|
|
September 30, |
|
December 31, |
| ||
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
| ||
|
|
(In millions) |
| ||||
Mortgage Production segment |
|
$ |
3,073 |
|
$ |
4,605 |
|
Mortgage Servicing segment |
|
1,995 |
|
2,291 |
| ||
Fleet Management Services segment |
|
4,207 |
|
4,216 |
| ||
Other |
|
60 |
|
158 |
| ||
Total |
|
$ |
9,335 |
|
$ |
11,270 |
|
(1) For the nine months ended September 30, 2011, Net revenues and segment profit for the Mortgage Production segment includes a $68 million gain on the 50.1% sale of the equity interests in the Companys appraisal services business.
(2) The following is a reconciliation of Loss before income taxes to segment profit (loss):
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Nine Months Ended |
| ||||||||
|
|
September 30, |
|
September 30, |
| ||||||||
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
| ||||
|
|
(In millions) |
| ||||||||||
Loss before income taxes |
|
$ |
(242 |
) |
$ |
(2 |
) |
$ |
(223 |
) |
$ |
(198 |
) |
Less: net income attributable to noncontrolling interest |
|
10 |
|
15 |
|
17 |
|
22 |
| ||||
Segment profit (loss) |
|
$ |
(252 |
) |
$ |
(17 |
) |
$ |
(240 |
) |
$ |
(220 |
) |
16. Subsequent Events
On October 13, 2011, the committed mortgage warehouse asset-backed debt facility with the Bank of America was amended to renew $400 million of committed borrowing capacity, pursuant to a master repurchase agreement and certain related agreements. The facility was extended through October 11, 2012, with the option to renew the agreement for another year.
The Companys gestation agreement with the Bank of America was allowed to expire. The prior facilities with Bank of America had consisted of a committed facility with $200 million borrowing capacity, and a $500 million off-balance sheet gestation facility.
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements,Item 1A. Risk Factors and our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and Item 1. Business, Item 1A. Risk Factors, Item 7. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Conditions and Results of Operations and our Consolidated Financial Statements and the notes thereto included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.
Our Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations is presented in sections as follows:
· Overview
· Results of Operations
· Risk Management
· Liquidity and Capital Resources
· Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements and Guarantees
· Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
· Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements
OVERVIEW
We are a leading outsource provider of mortgage and fleet management services. We conduct our business through three operating segments: a Mortgage Production segment, a Mortgage Servicing segment and a Fleet Management Services segment. Our Mortgage Production segment originates, purchases and sells mortgage loans through PHH Mortgage. Our Mortgage Servicing segment services mortgage loans originated by PHH Mortgage, and also purchases mortgage servicing rights and acts as a subservicer for certain clients that own the underlying servicing rights. Our Fleet Management Services segment provides commercial fleet management services to corporate clients and government agencies throughout the United States and Canada.
Although our Fleet Management Services segment has historically generated a larger portion of our Net revenues, our Mortgage Production and Mortgage Servicing segments have historically contributed a significantly larger portion of our Net income (loss). Our Mortgage Production and Mortgage Servicing segments have experienced, and may continue to experience, high degrees of earnings volatility due to significant exposure to interest rates and the real estate markets, which impacts our loan origination volumes, valuation of our mortgage servicing rights and foreclosure-related charges.
Executive Summary
During the third quarter of 2011, we experienced a significant decline in mortgage interest rates that drove rates below the then-historical lows experienced during the third quarter of 2010. The decline in interest rates generated an increase in mortgage refinance activity and greater total loan margins in our Mortgage Production segment compared to the first half of 2011. The decline in interest rates during the third quarter of 2011 caused an unfavorable change in fair value of our Mortgage servicing rights resulting from the increase in projected prepayments, which contributed to the segment loss in our Mortgage Servicing segment.
In the second and third quarters of 2011, we signed agreements with five new private label services clients to provide mortgage process management services in our Mortgage Production segment. We were unable to reach an agreement to renew our existing relationship with Charles Schwab Bank, which represented 9% and 11% of our mortgage loan originations for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and year ended December 31, 2010, respectively, as well as approximately $9 billion of subserviced loans as of September 30, 2011. We will continue to service the mortgage loans resulting from our relationship with Charles Schwab Bank in our owned servicing portfolio. We expect the addition of these new private label clients to more than offset the estimated income, including subservicing income, which we would have expected to have earned in 2012 through our relationship with Charles Schwab Bank.
As discussed below under Industry Trends - Regulatory Trends, the financial services industry, and the mortgage industry in particular, continues to be the subject of increased regulatory focus. This has resulted, and could continue to result, in increased regulatory costs and may result in increased losses associated with regulatory actions and litigation.
On March 31, 2011, we sold 50.1% of the equity interests in our appraisal services business (Speedy Title and Appraisal Review Services, or STARS) to CoreLogic, Inc. and retained the remaining 49.9% of the interests. STARS provides appraisal services, credit research, flood certification, and tax services. We believe this new relationship will enable us to leverage the technology and product expertise of CoreLogic to enhance the customer experience and, ultimately, drive earnings growth. We received a $20 million cash payment in March 2011, with three $5 million installment payments to be received on March 31, 2012, 2014 and 2016. The sale resulted in a total gain of $68 million during the first quarter of 2011 which was inclusive of a $34 million non-cash gain from the initial valuation of our equity method investment upon deconsolidation of STARS.
Our Fleet Management Services segment continued the positive momentum from 2010 with strong earnings from fee-based services and reduced costs. We continue to experience growth in our principal fee-based products as our average maintenance service cards grew 13% during the third quarter of 2011 compared to 2010.
The following table presents summarized results for PHH Corporation for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010:
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Nine Months Ended |
| ||||||||
|
|
September 30, |
|
September 30, |
| ||||||||
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
| ||||
|
|
(In millions, except per share data) |
| ||||||||||
PHH Corporation Consolidated: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Net loss attributable to PHH Corporation |
|
$ |
(148 |
) |
$ |
(8 |
) |
$ |
(140 |
) |
$ |
(133 |
) |
Basic and diluted loss per share attributable to PHH Corporation |
|
(2.62 |
) |
(0.14 |
) |
(2.48 |
) |
(2.39 |
) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Reportable Segments Profit (Loss):(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Mortgage Production segment |
|
$ |
95 |
|
$ |
161 |
|
$ |
172 |
|
$ |
235 |
|
Mortgage Servicing segment |
|
(368 |
) |
(195 |
) |
(467 |
) |
(492 |
) | ||||
Fleet Management Services segment |
|
21 |
|
17 |
|
56 |
|
38 |
|
(1) Segment Profit (Loss) is described in Note 15, Segment Information, in the accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
The following summarizes the key highlights that drove our operating performance and segment profit (loss) for our reportable segments during the period indicated in 2011 in comparison to the same period in 2010:
Mortgage Production Segment
Quarterly Comparison:
· Segment profit was $66 million lower compared with 2010 primarily due to a 20% decline in the volume of interest rate lock commitments expected to close and lower gain on sale margins.
· Interest rate lock commitments expected to close declined to $11.4 billion in 2011 from $14.4 billion in 2010 due to lower refinance activity. Total loan margins in 2011 declined from 2010, reflecting the significant increase in industry originations and the sustained refinance activity that we experienced during 2010.
· Total mortgage closing volumes for 2011 were $12.7 billion of which approximately 67% were retail and 33% were wholesale/correspondent.
Year-to-Date Comparison:
· Segment profit was $63 million lower compared with 2010 primarily due to an 18% decline in the volume of interest rate lock commitments expected to close and lower total loan margins, partially offset by a $68 million gain on the sale of 50.1% of the equity interests in STARS during the first quarter of 2011.
· Interest rate lock commitments expected to close declined to $24.0 billion in 2011 from $29.2 billion in 2010 primarily due to lower purchase applications in 2011 as compared to 2010. Total loan margins declined from 2010, reflecting a reduction in the level of industry originations.
· Total mortgage closing volumes for 2011 were $36.3 billion of which approximately 70% were retail and 30% were wholesale/correspondent.
Mortgage Servicing Segment
Quarterly Comparison:
· Segment loss was unfavorably impacted in 2011 by a $361 million decrease in the market and credit-related fair value of our mortgage servicing rights driven primarily by lower long-term interest rates, as compared to a $197 million decrease during 2010.
· Loan servicing income increased by $7 million reflecting the continued growth in our loan servicing portfolio, partially offset by a $4 million increase in net reinsurance loss. Our average total loan servicing portfolio increased by 12% from $157.5 billion in 2010 to $176.0 billion in 2011.
· Foreclosure-related charges remain elevated at $20 million during 2011, compared to $8 million in 2010, reflecting a continued higher level of repurchase requests and loss severities.
Year-to-Date Comparison:
· Segment loss was unfavorably impacted in 2011 from a $453 million decrease in the market and credit-related fair value of our mortgage servicing rights driven primarily by lower long-term interest rates, as compared to a $478 million decrease during 2010.
· Loan servicing income increased by $34 million reflecting the continued growth in our loan servicing portfolio and a lower net reinsurance loss. Our average total loan servicing portfolio increased by 11% from $154.8 billion in 2010 to $172.3 billion in 2011.
· Foreclosure-related charges remain elevated at $59 million during 2011, compared to $51 million in 2010, reflecting a continued higher level of repurchase requests and loss severities.
Fleet Management Services Segment
Quarterly Comparison:
· Segment profit increased by $4 million to $21 million in 2011, driven by higher units and usage of fee-based management services, higher lease syndication volume and lower operating costs.
· Maintenance service, fuel, and accident management average units all increased in 2011 compared to 2010 despite a 6% decline in the number of leased vehicles.
Year-to-Date Comparison:
· Segment profit increased by $18 million to $56 million in 2011, driven by higher units and usage of fee-based and asset-based management services coupled with lower operating costs.
· Maintenance service, fuel, and accident management average units all increased in 2011 compared to 2010 despite a 6% decline in the number of leased vehicles.
See Results of Operations for additional information regarding our consolidated results and the results of each of our reportable segments.
Industry Trends
Regulatory Trends
Financial Regulatory Reform
The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, among other provisions, established the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection (CFPB), which began operations on July 21, 2011. The CFPB will implement and enforce the consumer protection provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act and will have the authority to examine all non-bank mortgage lenders, brokers and services, among other entities. We will be subject to the regulatory authority of the CFPB through our mortgage subsidiaries.
Six federal agencies, including the SEC, have proposed a rule providing sponsors of securitizations with various options for meeting the risk-retention requirements of the Dodd-Frank Act. Among other things, the options include retaining risk of the securitization transactions equal to at least 5% of each class of asset-backed security, 5% of par value of all asset-backed security interests issued, 5% of a representative pool of assets, or a combination of these options.
As required by the Dodd-Frank Act, the proposal includes descriptions of loans that would not be subject to these requirements, including asset-backed securities that are collateralized exclusively by residential mortgages that qualify as qualified residential mortgages (or QRMs). Proposed criteria to qualify for an exemption from the risk retention requirements include, but are not limited to: (i) maximum loan-to-value ratios for purchases and refinances of 80% and 75%, respectively; (ii) mortgage payment to gross income and debt payments to gross income ratios of 28% and 36%, respectively; (iii) borrower credit requirements including no current delinquencies, 60-day plus delinquencies in the past 2 years, or bankruptcies/ foreclosures in the past 3 years; and (iv) loan-type requirements including no interest only, negative amortization, balloon payments or prepayment penalties.
The proposed rule would also recognize that the 100% guarantee of principal and interest provided by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac meets their risk-retention requirements as sponsors of mortgage-backed securities for as long as they are in conservatorship or receivership with capital support from the U.S. government.
Substantially all of the loans that we originated during 2010 and 2011 were sold to Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, or Ginnie Mae and would therefore have been exempt from the risk-retention requirements under the current proposal. For our lease securitizations, we believe we currently retain a subordinate position relative to the issued asset-backed securities in excess of the proposed 5% requirement, and we are continuing to monitor the potential impact under the proposed rules.
Focus on Foreclosure Practices
During the first quarter of 2011, various federal regulators completed a review of 14 entities involved in the mortgage servicing process and noted weaknesses in foreclosure governance processes, foreclosure document preparation processes, and oversight and monitoring of third-party vendors, including foreclosure attorneys. These regulators took formal actions against each of the 14 entities subject to this review to address those weaknesses and risks. These actions require each entity, among other things, to conduct a more complete review of certain aspects of foreclosure actions that occurred between January 1, 2009, and December 31, 2010.
While we were not included in these reviews, we have received inquiries and requests for information from regulators and attorneys general of certain states as well as from the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform of the U.S. House of Representatives and the U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee, requesting information as to our foreclosure processes and procedures, among other things. While we have not been assessed any material penalties resulting from our foreclosure practices to date, we expect the higher level of focus on foreclosure practices will result in higher legal and servicing related costs as well as potential regulatory fines and penalties.
Home Affordability Program
On October 24, 2011, the Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA) announced changes to the existing Home Affordability Refinance Program (HARP) for certain loans sold to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. The changes to HARP are designed to allow more mortgage loans to be eligible for refinancing under the program. Specifically, these changes eliminate the maximum loan-to-value ratio and appraisal requirements and reduce risk-based pricing and other fees to borrowers. The FHFA further announced that it is waiving certain lender representations and warranties for loans refinanced under the program. To be eligible for refinance under these changes to HARP, the loan must have been sold to Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac prior to May 31, 2009, and the loan must be current at the time of refinance with no late payments in the past six months. In addition to these changes, the FHFA announced that HARP will continue through December 31, 2013.
The FHFA is expected to provide operational guidance to lenders in mid-November on the changes to HARP, and we expect to be able to begin accepting applications for loan refinances under the revised HARP beginning in 2011. These changes to HARP could generate an increase in originations from related refinance activity, which could result in an increase in loan margins and potentially reduced origination capacity as more eligible borrowers enter the origination market. Additionally, we may experience a reduction in the value of our Mortgage servicing rights as actual and projected prepayments increase.
Mortgage Production Trends
During the third quarter of 2011 mortgage interest rates dropped to historic lows, which generated a significant increase in refinance activity and higher loan margins. Refinance originations are highly dependent on the level of relative interest rates as well as the borrowers ability to qualify for the mortgage and could vary materially from these projections depending on interest rates and economic conditions.
As of October 2011, Fannie Maes Economics and Mortgage Market Analysis forecasted declines in industry loan originations to $351 billion during the fourth quarter of 2011 as compared to $544 billion during the fourth quarter of 2010. The analysis is also forecasting a 26% decline for 2012 to $958 billion annual volume. The forecasted declines are due to a decrease in projected refinance originations offset by a slight increase in projected purchase originations.
Total loan margins have declined from 2010 levels reflecting a more competitive environment given declining volumes. Although total loan margins for 2011 have declined from the prior year, we did see improvement during the third quarter of 2011, compared to the first half of 2011, as mortgage rates declined and demand increased. Gain on sale margins generally tighten in a rising interest rate environment and widen in a declining interest rate environment as loan originators manage capacity.
Mortgage Servicing Trends
The declining housing market and general economic conditions, including higher unemployment rates, have continued to negatively impact our Mortgage Servicing segment through elevated levels of delinquencies and high loss severity rates on defaulted loans. The increased regulatory focus on servicing activities, including foreclosure practices, has increased and will likely continue to increase servicing costs across the industry.
Despite some stabilization in the level of overall portfolio delinquencies, we have seen a significant increase in repurchase requests, primarily from the agencies, resulting in a corresponding increase in foreclosure-related costs especially related to loans originated during 2005 through 2008. We believe repurchase requests will continue to be high for the remainder of 2011 and into 2012.
In addition to the increased focus on loan repurchases and indemnifications, we have experienced higher reinsurance losses as a result of the continued weakness in the housing market coupled with an elevated level of delinquency and foreclosure experience. We paid $16 million and $49 million in reinsurance claims during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011, respectively, and expect our paid claims for certain book years to remain high into 2012 as foreclosures are completed and insurance claims are processed and finalized. We hold cash and securities in trust related to our potential obligation to pay such claims, which were $237 million and were included in Restricted cash, cash equivalents and investments in the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of September 30, 2011. We expect that the amount currently held in trust will be significantly higher than future claims for reinsurance losses.
In January 2011, the Federal Housing Finance Agency directed Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to develop a joint initiative to consider alternatives for future mortgage servicing structures and compensation. Under this proposal, the GSEs are considering potential structures in which the minimum service fee would be reduced or eliminated altogether. This would provide mortgage bankers with the ability to either sell all or a portion of the retained servicing fee for cash up front, or retain an excess servicing fee. While the proposal provides additional flexibility in managing liquidity and capital requirements, it is unclear how the various options might impact mortgage-backed security pricing and the related pricing of excess servicing fees. The GSEs are also considering different pricing options for non-performing loans to better align servicer incentives with MBS investors and provide the loan guarantor the ability to transfer non-performing servicing. The Federal Housing Finance Agency has indicated that any change in the servicing compensation structure would be prospective and would not be expected to occur prior to mid-2012. These changes, if implemented, could have a significant impact on the entire mortgage industry and on the results of operations and cash flows of our mortgage business.
See Risk Management for additional information regarding mortgage reinsurance and loan repurchases.
Fleet Management Services Trends
The fleet management industry continues to be impacted by the relative strength of the U.S. economy. As the U.S. economy improves, we expect to see continued improvement in the industry. We believe that improvement in the economic conditions will be reflected in continued growth in our service unit counts. We expect the slow decline of the number of funded vehicles to continue in the industry and to see a corresponding trend in our number of leased units.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Consolidated Results
The following table presents our consolidated results of operations for the third quarters and nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010:
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Nine Months Ended |
| ||||||||
|
|
September 30, |
|
September 30, |
| ||||||||
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
| ||||
|
|
(In millions) |
| ||||||||||
Net fee income |
|
$ |
110 |
|
$ |
113 |
|
$ |
338 |
|
$ |
309 |
|
Fleet lease income |
|
370 |
|
342 |
|
1,050 |
|
1,030 |
| ||||
Gain on mortgage loans, net |
|
203 |
|
265 |
|
381 |
|
509 |
| ||||
Mortgage net finance expense |
|
(24 |
) |
(18 |
) |
(68 |
) |
(57 |
) | ||||
Loan servicing income |
|
112 |
|
105 |
|
337 |
|
303 |
| ||||
Valuation adjustments related to mortgage servicing rights, net |
|
(409 |
) |
(254 |
) |
(600 |
) |
(626 |
) | ||||
Other income |
|
22 |
|
19 |
|
127 |
|
52 |
| ||||
Net revenues |
|
384 |
|
572 |
|
1,565 |
|
1,520 |
| ||||
Depreciation on operating leases |
|
307 |
|
307 |
|
922 |
|
921 |
| ||||
Fleet interest expense |
|
19 |
|
24 |
|
60 |
|
72 |
| ||||
Total other expenses |
|
300 |
|
243 |
|
806 |
|
725 |
| ||||
Total expenses |
|
626 |
|
574 |
|
1,788 |
|
1,718 |
| ||||
Loss before income taxes |
|
(242 |
) |
(2 |
) |
(223 |
) |
(198 |
) | ||||
Income tax benefit |
|
(104 |
) |
(9 |
) |
(100 |
) |
(87 |
) | ||||
Net (loss) income |
|
(138 |
) |
7 |
|
(123 |
) |
(111 |
) | ||||
Less: net income attributable to noncontrolling interest |
|
10 |
|
15 |
|
17 |
|
22 |
| ||||
Net loss attributable to PHH Corporation |
|
$ |
(148 |
) |
$ |
(8 |
) |
$ |
(140 |
) |
$ |
(133 |
) |
See segment results below for a detailed discussion of the results for our reportable segments.
Income tax benefit
We record our interim tax provisions or benefits by applying a projected full-year effective income tax rate to our quarterly pre-tax income or loss for results that we deem to be reliably estimable. Certain results dependent on fair value adjustments of our Mortgage Production and Mortgage Servicing segments are considered not to be reliably estimable and therefore we record discrete year-to-date income tax provisions on those results.
Quarterly Comparison: During the third quarter of 2011, the Income tax benefit was $104 million and was impacted by a $15 million benefit from state and local income taxes due to the mix and amount of pre-tax income and loss from the operations by entity and state tax jurisdiction.
During the third quarter of 2010, the Income tax benefit was $9 million and was impacted by a $3 million net decrease in valuation allowances for deferred tax assets, primarily due to taxable income generated during the third quarter of 2010.
Year-to-Date Comparison: During 2011, the Income tax benefit was $100 million and was primarily impacted by an $8 million decrease in the liabilities for income tax contingencies, primarily due to the resolution and settlement with various taxing authorities, including the conclusion of the IRS examination and review of our taxable years 2006 through 2009, and a $14 million benefit from state and local income taxes due to the mix and amount of pre-tax income and loss from the operations by entity and state tax jurisdiction, offset by a $6 million net increase in the valuation allowance for deferred tax assets primarily due to tax loss carryforwards generated during the period for which we believe it is more likely than not that the amounts will not be realized.
During 2010, the Income tax benefit was $87 million and was impacted by a $13 million benefit from state and local income taxes due to the mix and amount of pre-tax income and loss from the operations by entity and state tax jurisdiction, offset by a $2 million net increase in valuation allowances for deferred tax assets, primarily due to tax loss carryforwards generated during the period for which we believe it is more likely than not that the amounts will not be realized.
Appraisal Services Business Joint Venture
On March 31, 2011, we sold 50.1% of the equity interests in our appraisal services business, Speedy Title and Appraisal Review Services, (STARS) to CoreLogic, Inc. for a total purchase price of $35 million, consisting of an initial $20 million cash payment received on March 31, 2011, and three future $5 million installment payments to be received on March 31, 2012, 2014 and 2016. Upon the occurrence of certain events prior to September 30, 2017, we may have the right or obligation to purchase CoreLogics interests. We retained a 49.9% equity interest in STARS, which is accounted for under the equity method and was recorded within Other assets with an initial fair value of $34 million as of March 31, 2011.
During the nine months ended September 30, 2011, a $68 million gain on the sale of the 50.1% equity interest was recorded within Other income, which consisted of the net present value of the purchase price from CoreLogic plus the $34 million from the initial valuation of our equity method investment in STARS. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011, earnings from the equity method investment in STARS of $2 million and $3 million, respectively, are recorded as a component of Other income and represent 49.9% of the pre-tax income of the STARS joint venture over the period.
Discussed below are the results of operations for each of our reportable segments. Segment profit or loss is presented as the income or loss before income tax expense or benefit and after net income or loss attributable to noncontrolling interest. The Mortgage Production segment profit or loss excludes Realogys noncontrolling interest in the profits and losses of PHH Home Loans. The Other segment includes costs related to general and administrative functions that are allocated back to our reportable segments, certain income and expenses not allocated and intersegment eliminations.
The following table presents the results of our Other segment:
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Nine Months Ended |
| ||||||||
|
|
September 30, |
|
September 30, |
| ||||||||
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
| ||||
|
|
(In millions) |
| ||||||||||
Net revenues |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
(1 |
) |
$ |
(2 |
) |
$ |
(2 |
) |
Salaries and related expenses |
|
16 |
|
4 |
|
52 |
|
15 |
| ||||
Occupancy and other office expenses |
|
2 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
| ||||
Fleet interest expense |
|
(1 |
) |
(1 |
) |
(3 |
) |
(2 |
) | ||||
Other depreciation and amortization |
|
1 |
|
1 |
|
3 |
|
1 |
| ||||
Other operating expenses |
|
17 |
|
1 |
|
37 |
|
6 |
| ||||
Corporate overhead allocation |
|
(35 |
) |
(6 |
) |
(94 |
) |
(21 |
) | ||||
Total expenses |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
(1 |
) |
(1 |
) | ||||
Segment loss |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
(1 |
) |
$ |
(1 |
) |
As a result of our transformation initiatives, as of January 1, 2011 certain general and administrative functions that had previously been part of our Mortgage Production, Mortgage Servicing and Fleet Management Services segments were consolidated into our Other segment, including information technology, human resources, finance, and marketing. The majority of general and administrative expenses are allocated back to the segments through a corporate overhead allocation.
Certain costs previously reported by our Mortgage Production, Mortgage Servicing and Fleet Management Services segments as Salaries and related expenses during 2010 are now included in the corporate overhead allocation and reported as a component of Other operating expenses. The table below provides a summary of our corporate overhead allocation by segment:
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Nine Months Ended |
| ||||||||
|
|
September 30, |
|
September 30, |
| ||||||||
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
| ||||
|
|
(In millions) |
| ||||||||||
Mortgage Production segment |
|
$ |
20 |
|
$ |
4 |
|
$ |
50 |
|
$ |
11 |
|
Mortgage Servicing segment |
|
4 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
2 |
| ||||
Fleet Management Services segment |
|
11 |
|
2 |
|
33 |
|
8 |
| ||||
Other |
|
(35 |
) |
(6 |
) |
(94 |
) |
(21 |
) | ||||
Total |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Other operating expenses for the third quarter of 2011 in our Mortgage Production, Mortgage Servicing and Fleet Management Services segments increased by $16 million, $4 million and $9 million, respectively, as compared to the same period of 2010 resulting from our internal reorganization and continued development of our corporate infrastructure. Other operating expenses for the nine months ending September 30, 2011 in our Mortgage Production, Mortgage Servicing and Fleet Management Services segments increased by $39 million, $9 million and $25 million, respectively, as compared to the same period of 2010 resulting from our internal reorganization and continued development of our corporate infrastructure. These increases were partially offset by corresponding decreases in Salaries and related expenses and Other operating expenses exclusive of corporate allocations. See individual segment results discussions below for further detail.
Mortgage Production Segment
The following tables present a summary of our financial results and key related drivers for the Mortgage Production segment, and are followed by a discussion of each of the key components of Net revenues and Total expenses:
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Nine Months Ended |
| ||||||||
|
|
September 30, |
|
September 30, |
| ||||||||
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
| ||||
|
|
(In millions, except average loan amount) |
| ||||||||||
Loans closed to be sold |
|
$ |
9,552 |
|
$ |
9,976 |
|
$ |
26,082 |
|
$ |
23,309 |
|
Fee-based closings |
|
3,197 |
|
2,702 |
|
10,244 |
|
7,251 |
| ||||
Total closings |
|
$ |
12,749 |
|
$ |
12,678 |
|
$ |
36,326 |
|
$ |
30,560 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Purchase closings |
|
$ |
6,211 |
|
$ |
5,361 |
|
$ |
16,078 |
|
$ |
14,954 |
|
Refinance closings |
|
6,538 |
|
7,317 |
|
20,248 |
|
15,606 |
| ||||
Total closings |
|
$ |
12,749 |
|
$ |
12,678 |
|
$ |
36,326 |
|
$ |
30,560 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Fixed rate |
|
$ |
9,139 |
|
$ |
10,134 |
|
$ |
25,804 |
|
$ |
24,016 |
|
Adjustable rate |
|
3,610 |
|
2,544 |
|
10,522 |
|
6,544 |
| ||||
Total closings |
|
$ |
12,749 |
|
$ |
12,678 |
|
$ |
36,326 |
|
$ |
30,560 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Retail closings |
|
$ |
8,597 |
|
$ |
8,567 |
|
$ |
25,373 |
|
$ |
22,096 |
|
Wholesale/correspondent closings |
|
4,152 |
|
4,111 |
|
10,953 |
|
8,464 |
| ||||
Total closings |
|
$ |
12,749 |
|
$ |
12,678 |
|
$ |
36,326 |
|
$ |
30,560 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Average loan amount |
|
$ |
257,872 |
|
$ |
239,585 |
|
$ |
256,977 |
|
$ |
236,026 |
|
Loans sold |
|
$ |
8,579 |
|
$ |
9,293 |
|
$ |
28,307 |
|
$ |
21,952 |
|
Applications |
|
$ |
22,704 |
|
$ |
27,166 |
|
$ |
49,006 |
|
$ |
55,323 |
|
IRLCs expected to close |
|
$ |
11,429 |
|
$ |
14,361 |
|
$ |
23,974 |
|
$ |
29,160 |
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Nine Months Ended |
| ||||||||
|
|
September 30, |
|
September 30, |
| ||||||||
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
| ||||
|
|
(In millions) |
| ||||||||||
Mortgage fees |
|
$ |
68 |
|
$ |
75 |
|
$ |
210 |
|
$ |
193 |
|
Gain on mortgage loans, net |
|
203 |
|
265 |
|
381 |
|
509 |
| ||||
Mortgage interest income |
|
21 |
|
26 |
|
72 |
|
60 |
| ||||
Mortgage interest expense |
|
(29 |
) |
(30 |
) |
(90 |
) |
(73 |
) | ||||
Mortgage net finance expense |
|
(8 |
) |
(4 |
) |
(18 |
) |
(13 |
) | ||||
Other income |
|
1 |
|
|
|
74 |
|
1 |
| ||||
Net revenues |
|
264 |
|
336 |
|
647 |
|
690 |
| ||||
Salaries and related expenses |
|
84 |
|
95 |
|
251 |
|
256 |
| ||||
Occupancy and other office expenses |
|
7 |
|
9 |
|
22 |
|
25 |
| ||||
Other depreciation and amortization |
|
2 |
|
2 |
|
7 |
|
8 |
| ||||
Other operating expenses |
|
66 |
|
54 |
|
178 |
|
144 |
| ||||
Total expenses |
|
159 |
|
160 |
|
458 |
|
433 |
| ||||
Income before income taxes |
|
105 |
|
176 |
|
189 |
|
257 |
| ||||
Less: net income attributable to noncontrolling interest |
|
10 |
|
15 |
|
17 |
|
22 |
| ||||
Segment profit |
|
$ |
95 |
|
$ |
161 |
|
$ |
172 |
|
$ |
235 |
|
Mortgage Production Statistics
Mortgage loan originations are driven by the demand to fund home purchases and the demand to refinance existing loans. Purchase closings are influenced by the number of home sales and the overall condition of the housing market whereas refinance closings are sensitive to interest rate changes relative to borrowers current interest rates. Refinance closings typically increase when interest rates fall and decrease when interest rates rise. Although the level of interest rates is a key driver of refinancing activity, there are other factors which influence the level of refinance closings including home prices, underwriting standards and product characteristics. The demand for wholesale/correspondent closings is influenced by a variety of factors, including overall industry capacity and represented 30% of our total closings during the nine months ended September 30, 2011. Retail loans are generally more profitable than wholesale/correspondent and have higher loan margins and higher expenses.
Interest rate lock commitments (IRLCs) represent an agreement to extend credit to a mortgage loan applicant, or an agreement to purchase a loan from a third-party originator, whereby the interest rate on the loan is set prior to funding. Interest rate lock commitments expected to close are adjusted for the amount of loans expected to close in accordance with the terms of the commitment. IRLCs expected to close result in loans closed to be sold as we do not enter into interest rate lock commitments on fee-based closings.
As of October 2011, Fannie Maes Economics and Mortgage Market Analysis shows a decrease in mortgage industry volumes of approximately 23% and 17% during the third quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2011, respectively, as compared to 2010. Although mortgage interest rates have remained at relatively low levels through 2011, many borrowers took advantage of the low interest rate environment in 2010 by refinancing after interest rates declined. As a result, IRLCs expected to close declined by 20% during the third quarter of 2011 and 18% during the nine months ended September 30, 2011 compared to the respective periods in 2010, despite similar interest rate environments.
Quarterly Comparison: Total closings increased $0.1 billion (1%) compared to 2010 primarily due to an increase in purchase closings driven by an improvement in home sales offset by a decline in refinancing closing volumes as many borrowers took advantage of the low interest rate environment in 2010 by refinancing after interest rates declined.
Year-to-Date Comparison: Total closings increased $5.8 billion (19%) compared with 2010 primarily due to a $4.6 billion increase in refinance closings coupled with an increase in purchase closings driven by an improvement in home sales. The significant increase in refinance closings was a result of the decline in mortgage interest rates during the latter half of 2010 which resulted in an increase in refinance activity and IRLCs during that period, which ultimately closed in 2011.
Mortgage Fees
Loans closed to be sold and fee-based closings are key drivers of Mortgage fees. Mortgage fees consist of fee income earned on all loan originations, including loans closed to be sold and fee-based closings. Fee income consists of amounts earned related to application and underwriting fees and fees on cancelled loans. Appraisal and other income generated by our appraisal services business is included through the quarter ended March 31, 2011. Fee income also consists of amounts earned from financial institutions related to brokered loan fees and origination assistance fees resulting from our private-label mortgage outsourcing activities. Fees associated with the origination and acquisition of mortgage loans are recognized as earned.
Quarterly Comparison: Mortgage fees decreased by $7 million (9%) compared to 2010 primarily due to a decrease in the number of retail closings units partially offset by an increase in fee-based closings compared to 2010.
Year-to-Date Comparison: Mortgage fees increased by $17 million (9%) compared to 2010 primarily due to an increase in the number of retail closings units coupled with an increase in fee-based closings compared to 2010.
Gain on Mortgage Loans, Net
IRLCs expected to close are the primary driver of Gain on mortgage loans, net. Gain on mortgage loans, net includes realized and unrealized gains and losses on our mortgage loans, as well as the changes in fair value of our interest rate locks and loan-related derivatives. The fair value of our interest rate locks is based upon the estimated fair value of the underlying mortgage loan, adjusted for: (i) estimated costs to complete and originate the loan and (ii) the estimated percentage of IRLCs that will result in a closed mortgage loan. The valuation of our interest rate lock commitments and mortgage loans approximates a whole-loan price, which includes the value of the related mortgage servicing rights. Mortgage servicing rights are recognized and capitalized at the date the loans are sold and subsequent changes in the fair value are recorded in Change in fair value of mortgage servicing rights in the Mortgage Servicing segment.
The components of Gain on mortgage loans, net were as follows:
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Nine Months Ended |
| ||||||||
|
|
September 30, |
|
September 30, |
| ||||||||
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
| ||||
|
|
(In millions) |
| ||||||||||
Gain on loans |
|
$ |
200 |
|
$ |
259 |
|
$ |
341 |
|
$ |
493 |
|
Change in fair value of Scratch and Dent and certain non-conforming mortgage loans |
|
(3 |
) |
(2 |
) |
(3 |
) |
(6 |
) | ||||
Economic hedge results |
|
6 |
|
8 |
|
43 |
|
22 |
| ||||
Total change in fair value of mortgage loans and related derivatives |
|
3 |
|
6 |
|
40 |
|
16 |
| ||||
Total |
|
$ |
203 |
|
$ |
265 |
|
$ |
381 |
|
$ |
509 |
|
Gain on loans is primarily driven by the volume of IRLCs expected to close, total loan margins and the mix of wholesale/correspondent closing volume. Margins generally widen when mortgage interest rates decline and tighten when mortgage interest rates increase, as loan originators balance origination volume with operational capacity. For wholesale/correspondent closings and certain retail closings from our private label clients, the cost to acquire the loan reduces the gain from selling the loan into the secondary market.
Change in fair value of Scratch and Dent and certain non-conforming mortgage loans is primarily driven by additions, sales and changes in value of Scratch and Dent loans, which represent loans with origination flaws or performance issues.
Economic hedge results represent the change in value of mortgage loans, interest rate lock commitments and related derivatives, including the impact of changes in actual pullthrough as compared to our assumptions.
Quarterly Comparison: Gain on loans decreased $59 million (23%) compared to 2010 primarily due to a 20% decrease in IRLCs expected to close and lower total margins. The decrease in total margins was due to both lower initial loan pricing margins and the lower value of initial capitalized mortgage servicing rights. Mortgage interest rates declined during the third quarter of 2011, which generated an increase in loan margins and related refinance activity during the quarter; however, margins were relatively higher during 2010 as mortgage interest rates declined earlier in the year and remained low throughout the quarter.
The $1 million unfavorable change in fair value of Scratch and Dent and certain non-conforming loans compared to 2010 was primarily attributable to additions to the population of Scratch and Dent loans resulting from repurchases and salability issues which was partially offset by an increase in estimated fair value related to a change in the composition of the Scratch and Dent loan population.
There was a $2 million decrease in economic hedge results compared to 2010. Economic hedge results in both periods were negatively impacted by significant interest rate volatility.
Year-to-Date Comparison: Gain on loans decreased $152 million (31%) compared to 2010 primarily due to an 18% decrease in IRLCs expected to close, lower total margins and a higher mix of wholesale/correspondent closings which have lower gain on sale margins than retail closings. The decrease in total margins was due to the lower value of initial capitalized mortgage servicing rights, which resulted from reductions in interest rates, coupled with a reduction in initial loan pricing margins reflecting a more competitive environment given declining industry volumes.
The $3 million favorable change in fair value of Scratch and Dent and certain non-conforming loans compared to 2010 was primarily due to the sale of Scratch and Dent loans at a gain during 2011 coupled with an increase in estimated fair value of the remaining population of Scratch and Dent loans.
The $21 million increase in economic hedge results compared to 2010 was primarily driven by lower volatility in mortgage interest rates partially offset by a lower impact from actual pullthrough of mortgage loans, as compared to assumptions. Mortgage interest rates declined significantly during 2010, which caused a reduction in the value of our mortgage loans that was not offset by related derivatives.
Mortgage Net Finance Expense
Mortgage net finance expense allocable to the Mortgage Production segment consists of interest income on mortgage loans, interest expense allocated on debt used to fund mortgage loans and an allocation of interest expense for working capital. Mortgage net finance expense is primarily driven by the average balance of loans held for sale, the average volume of outstanding borrowings, the note rate on loans held for sale and the cost of funds rate of our outstanding borrowings. A significant portion of our loan originations are funded with variable-rate short-term debt. Loans are generally sold to investors within 60 days of origination.
Quarterly Comparison: Mortgage net finance expense increased by $4 million compared to 2010 and was comprised of a $5 million decrease in Mortgage interest income offset by a $1 million decrease in Mortgage interest expense. The decrease in Mortgage interest income was attributable to a lower average note rate on loans held for sale resulting from lower mortgage interest rates for conforming first mortgage loans compared to 2010. The decrease in Mortgage interest expense was primarily due to lower average interest rates compared to 2010.
Year-to-Date Comparison: Mortgage net finance expense increased by $5 million compared to 2010 and was comprised of a $17 million increase in Mortgage interest expense offset by a $12 million increase in Mortgage interest income. The increase in Mortgage interest expense was primarily due to a higher average volume of loans held for sale that was partially offset by lower average interest rates compared to 2010. The increase in mortgage interest income was primarily due to higher average loans held for sale that was partially offset by lower average note rates on loans resulting from lower mortgage interest rates for conforming first mortgage loans compared to 2010.
Other Income
Year-to-Date Comparison: Other income increased $73 million compared to 2010, which was primarily attributable to a $68 million gain on the 50.1% sale of the equity interests in our appraisal services business discussed above under Consolidated Results and $3 million in earnings from our continued equity interest in STARs subsequent to the sale.
Salaries and Related Expenses
Salaries and related expenses allocable to the Mortgage Production segment consist of salaries, payroll taxes, benefits and incentives paid to employees in our mortgage production operations and commissions paid to employees involved in the loan origination process.
The components of Salaries and related expenses were as follows:
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Nine Months Ended |
| ||||||||
|
|
September 30, |
|
September 30, |
| ||||||||
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
| ||||
|
|
(In millions) |
| ||||||||||
Salaries, benefits and incentives |
|
$ |
49 |
|
$ |
55 |
|
$ |
158 |
|
$ |
159 |
|
Commissions |
|
27 |
|
30 |
|
69 |
|
76 |
| ||||
Contract labor and overtime |
|
8 |
|
10 |
|
24 |
|
21 |
| ||||
Total |
|
$ |
84 |
|
$ |
95 |
|
$ |
251 |
|
$ |
256 |
|
Salaries, benefits and incentives are primarily driven by the average number of permanent employees. In 2011, we combined general and administrative functions, as discussed under Segment Results above, which favorably impacted salaries, benefits and incentives compared to 2010. Commissions are primarily driven by the volume of retail closings. Contract labor and overtime is primarily driven by origination volumes and consists of overtime paid to permanent employees and amounts paid to temporary and contract personnel. We continue to evaluate our employee cost structure and balance the number of employees with anticipated loan origination volumes.
Quarterly Comparison: Salaries, benefits and incentives decreased by $6 million compared to 2010 due to a $6 million decrease from the combination of general and administrative functions which is allocated to Other expenses in 2011. The $3 million decrease in commissions was primarily due to a decline in closings from our real estate channel, which have higher commission rates than private label closings. Contract labor and overtime decreased by $2 million and was driven by lower application volumes related to lower overall industry volumes.
Year-to-Date Comparison: Salaries, benefits and incentives decreased by $1 million compared to 2010 due to a $19 million decrease from the combination of general and administrative functions which is allocated to Other expenses in 2011 partially offset by an $18 million increase from an increase in the average number of permanent employees in the mortgage production operations. The $7 million decrease in commissions is primarily due to a decline in closings from our real estate channel, which have higher commission rates than private label closings, partially offset by an increase in closings in our private label services channel. Contract labor and overtime increased by $3 million and was driven by higher overall closing volumes.
Other Operating Expenses
Other operating expenses allocable to the mortgage production segment consist of production-related direct expenses, allocations for corporate overhead and other production related expenses. In 2011, certain additional general and administrative functions were combined as discussed under Segment Results above.
The components of Other operating expenses were as follows:
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Nine Months Ended |
| ||||||||
|
|
September 30, |
|
September 30, |
| ||||||||
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
| ||||
|
|
(In millions) |
| ||||||||||
Production-related direct expenses |
|
$ |
30 |
|
$ |
30 |
|
$ |
73 |
|
$ |
73 |
|
Corporate overhead allocation |
|
20 |
|
4 |
|
50 |
|
11 |
| ||||
Other expenses |
|
16 |
|
20 |
|
55 |
|
60 |
| ||||
Total |
|
$ |
66 |
|
$ |
54 |
|
$ |
178 |
|
$ |
144 |
|
Production-related direct expenses represent variable costs directly related to the volume of loan originations and consist of appraisal, underwriting and other direct loan origination expenses. These expenses are incurred during the loan origination process and are primarily driven by applications. Corporate overhead allocation consists of segment allocations of general and administrative costs. Other expenses consist of other production-related expenses that include, but are not limited to professional and information technology fees, outsourcing fees and customer service expenses.
Quarterly Comparison: Production-related direct expenses remained constant as compared to 2010. Corporate overhead allocation was unfavorably impacted by $16 million from the combination of general and administrative functions coupled with further investments in our information technology platform and enterprise risk management process. The $4 million decrease in other expenses primarily resulted from a decrease in outsourcing fees compared to 2010.
Year-to-Date Comparison: Production-related direct expenses remained constant as compared to 2010. Corporate overhead allocation was unfavorably impacted by $39 million from the combination of general and administrative functions coupled with investments in our information technology platform and enterprise risk management process. The $5 million decrease in other expenses primarily resulted from expenses incurred during 2010 associated with executing our transformation plan partially offset by an increase in customer service expenses resulting from the high level of refinance activity and IRLCs during the latter half of 2010 which ultimately closed in 2011.
Mortgage Servicing Segment
The following tables present a summary of our financial results and key related drivers for the Mortgage Servicing segment, and are followed by a discussion of each of the key components of Net revenues and Total expenses:
|
|
As of September 30, |
| ||||
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
| ||
|
|
($ In millions) |
| ||||
Ending total loan servicing portfolio |
|
$ |
178,129 |
|
$ |
159,411 |
|
Number of loans serviced |
|
1,048,291 |
|
980,717 |
| ||
Ending capitalized loan servicing portfolio |
|
$ |
144,275 |
|
$ |
131,909 |
|
Capitalized servicing rate |
|
0.83 |
% |
0.82 |
% | ||
Capitalized servicing multiple |
|
2.8 |
|
2.7 |
| ||
Weighted-average servicing fee (in basis points) |
|
30 |
|
30 |
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Nine Months Ended |
| ||||||||
|
|
September 30, |
|
September 30, |
| ||||||||
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
| ||||
|
|
(In millions) |
| ||||||||||
Average total loan servicing portfolio |
|
$ |
176,019 |
|
$ |
157,479 |
|
$ |
172,298 |
|
$ |
154,762 |
|
Average capitalized loan servicing portfolio |
|
143,396 |
|
130,937 |
|
140,909 |
|
129,480 |
| ||||
Payoffs and principal curtailments of capitalized portfolio |
|
6,014 |
|
7,053 |
|
16,980 |
|
17,037 |
| ||||
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Nine Months Ended |
| ||||||||
|
|
September 30, |
|
September 30, |
| ||||||||
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
| ||||
|
|
(In millions) |
| ||||||||||
Mortgage interest income |
|
$ |
3 |
|
$ |
3 |
|
$ |
11 |
|
$ |
10 |
|
Mortgage interest expense |
|
(19 |
) |
(16 |
) |
(59 |
) |
(52 |
) | ||||
Mortgage net finance expense |
|
(16 |
) |
(13 |
) |
(48 |
) |
(42 |
) | ||||
Loan servicing income |
|
112 |
|
105 |
|
337 |
|
303 |
| ||||
Change in fair value of mortgage servicing rights |
|
(410 |
) |
(254 |
) |
(601 |
) |
(626 |
) | ||||
Net derivative gain related to mortgage servicing rights |
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
| ||||
Valuation adjustments related to mortgage servicing rights, net |
|
(409 |
) |
(254 |
) |
(600 |
) |
(626 |
) | ||||
Net loan servicing loss |
|
(297 |
) |
(149 |
) |
(263 |
) |
(323 |
) | ||||
Other income (expense) |
|
1 |
|
2 |
|
(2 |
) |
3 |
| ||||
Net revenues |
|
(312 |
) |
(160 |
) |
(313 |
) |
(362 |
) | ||||
Salaries and related expenses |
|
8 |
|
9 |
|
25 |
|
29 |
| ||||
Occupancy and other office expenses |
|
2 |
|
2 |
|
7 |
|
7 |
| ||||
Other depreciation and amortization |
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
| ||||
Other operating expenses |
|
45 |
|
24 |
|
121 |
|
94 |
| ||||
Total expenses |
|
56 |
|
35 |
|
154 |
|
130 |
| ||||
Segment loss |
|
$ |
(368 |
) |
$ |
(195 |
) |
$ |
(467 |
) |
$ |
(492 |
) |
Mortgage Net Finance Expense
Mortgage net finance expense allocable to the Mortgage Servicing segment consists of interest income credits from escrow balances, income from investment balances (including investments held in reinsurance trusts) and interest expense allocated on debt used to fund our mortgage servicing rights, which is driven by the average volume of outstanding borrowings and the cost of funds rate of our outstanding borrowings.
Quarterly Comparison: Mortgage net finance expense increased by $3 million (23%) compared to 2010 primarily due to an increase in the interest expense allocated to fund our Mortgage servicing rights (MSRs) resulting from a higher average MSR balance.
Year-to-Date Comparison: Mortgage net finance expense increased by $6 million (14%) compared to 2010 due to a $7 million increase in Mortgage interest expense that was partially offset by a $1 million increase in Mortgage interest income. The increase in Mortgage interest expense was primarily due to an increase in the interest expense allocated to fund our MSRs resulting from a higher average MSR balance. The increase in Mortgage interest income was due to an increase in income earned on customer escrow accounts resulting from higher average escrow balances related to an 11% increase in the average total loan servicing portfolio.
Loan Servicing Income
The components of Loan servicing income were as follows:
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Nine Months Ended |
| ||||||||
|
|
September 30, |
|
September 30, |
| ||||||||
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
| ||||
|
|
(In millions) |
| ||||||||||
Net service fee revenue |
|
$ |
111 |
|
$ |
100 |
|
$ |
327 |
|
$ |
296 |
|
Late fees and other ancillary servicing revenue |
|
16 |
|
17 |
|
45 |
|
45 |
| ||||
Curtailment interest paid to investors |
|
(7 |
) |
(8 |
) |
(20 |
) |
(21 |
) | ||||
Net reinsurance loss |
|
(8 |
) |
(4 |
) |
(15 |
) |
(17 |
) | ||||
Total |
|
$ |
112 |
|
$ |
105 |
|
$ |
337 |
|
$ |
303 |
|
The primary drivers for Loan servicing income are the average capitalized loan servicing portfolio and average servicing fee. Net service fee revenue is driven by recurring servicing fees that are recognized upon receipt of the coupon payment from the borrower and recorded net of guaranty fees. Net service fee revenue also includes subservicing fees where we receive a nominal stated amount per loan which is less than our average servicing fee related to the capitalized portfolio. Curtailment interest paid to investors represents uncollected interest from the borrower that is required to be passed onto investors and is primarily driven by the number of loan payoffs.
Net reinsurance loss represents premiums earned on reinsurance contracts, net of ceding commission and provisions for reinsurance reserves.
Quarterly Comparison: The $11 million increase in net service fee revenue was primarily due to a 10% increase in the average capitalized loan servicing portfolio compared to 2010 partially offset by an increase in guarantee fees as a result of a greater composition GSE loans included in our capitalized servicing portfolio. The $4 million increase in net reinsurance loss was primarily attributable to a $3 million increase in the provision for reinsurance reserves due to higher incurred losses and a $1 million decrease in premiums earned related to outstanding reinsurance agreements which have continued in runoff status.
Year-to-Date Comparison: The $31 million increase in net service fee revenue was primarily due to a 9% increase in the average capitalized loan servicing portfolio compared to 2010 partially offset by an increase in guarantee fees as a result of a greater composition of GSE loans included in our capitalized servicing portfolio. The $2 million decrease in net reinsurance loss was primarily attributable to a $6 million decrease in the provision for reinsurance reserves resulting from lower delinquencies associated with reinsured loans which was partially offset by a $4 million decrease in premiums earned related to outstanding reinsurance agreements which have continued in runoff status.
Change in Fair Value of Mortgage Servicing Rights
The fair value of our MSRs is estimated based upon projections of expected future cash flows considering prepayment estimates, our historical prepayment rates, portfolio characteristics, interest rates based on interest rate yield curves, implied volatility and other economic factors. Generally, the value of our MSRs is expected to increase when interest rates rise and decrease when interest rates decline due to the effect those changes in interest rates have on prepayment estimates. Other factors noted above as well as the overall market demand for MSRs may also affect the valuation.
Refer to Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk for an analysis of the impact of 25 bps, 50 bps and 100 bps changes in interest rates on the valuation of our MSRs as of September 30, 2011.
The components of Changes in fair value of mortgage servicing rights were as follows:
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Nine Months Ended |
| ||||||||
|
|
September 30, |
|
September 30, |
| ||||||||
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
| ||||
|
|
(In millions) |
| ||||||||||
Actual prepayments of the underlying mortgage loans |
|
$ |
(38 |
) |
$ |
(48 |
) |
$ |
(111 |
) |
$ |
(117 |
) |
Actual receipts of recurring cash flows |
|
(11 |
) |
(9 |
) |
(37 |
) |
(31 |
) | ||||
Credit-related fair value adjustments |
|
(8 |
) |
(6 |
) |
2 |
|
(25 |
) | ||||
Market-related fair value adjustments |
|
(353 |
) |
(191 |
) |
(455 |
) |
(453 |
) | ||||
Total |
|
$ |
(410 |
) |
$ |
(254 |
) |
$ |
(601 |
) |
$ |
(626 |
) |
The change in fair value of MSRs due to actual prepayments is driven by two factors: (i) the number of loans that prepaid during the period and (ii) the current value of the mortgage servicing right asset at the time of prepayment. Credit-related adjustments represent the change in fair value of MSRs primarily due to changes in projected portfolio delinquencies and foreclosures. Market-related adjustments represent the change in fair value of MSRs due to changes in market inputs and assumptions used in the valuation model.
Quarterly Comparison: The $10 million decrease in actual prepayments of the underlying mortgage loans during the third quarter compared to 2010 was primarily due to a 20% decrease in loan payoffs.
Credit-related fair value adjustments decreased the value of our MSRs by $8 million during the third quarter of 2011 compared to $6 million during 2010 primarily due to an increase in projected delinquencies and foreclosures in the capitalized portfolio.
Market-related fair value adjustments decreased the value of our MSRs by $353 million during the third quarter of 2011 compared to $191 million during 2010. The $353 million decrease during 2011 was primarily attributable to a decrease in mortgage interest rates, which declined to historically low levels during the quarter, coupled with a flattening of the yield curve. During the third quarter of 2011, the primary mortgage rate used to value our MSR declined by 52 bps, which resulted in an increase in expected prepayments from increased refinance activity. The $191 million decrease during 2010 was primarily due to a decrease in mortgage interest rates which led to higher expected prepayments. During the third quarter of 2010, the primary mortgage rate used to value our MSR declined by 32 bps.
Year-to-Date Comparison: The $6 million decrease in actual prepayments of the underlying mortgage loans compared to 2010 was primarily due to a 5% decrease in loan payoffs.
Credit-related fair value adjustments increased the value of our MSRs by $2 million compared to reducing the value by $25 million during 2010. The favorable credit-related fair value adjustments were primarily due to an improvement in total delinquencies, foreclosures and real estate owned coupled with a decrease in projected delinquencies and foreclosures. The $25 million unfavorable credit-related adjustment during 2010 was primarily due to an increase in projected delinquencies and foreclosures in the capitalized portfolio.
Market-related fair value adjustments decreased the value of our MSRs by $455 million compared to $453 million during 2010 and the decrease in value for both periods was primarily due to a decrease in mortgage interest rates which led to higher expected prepayments. During the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, the primary mortgage rate used to value our MSR declined by 76 bps and 86 bps, respectively.
Net Derivative Gain Related to Mortgage Servicing Rights
From time-to-time, we may use a combination of derivative instruments to protect against potential adverse changes in the fair value of our MSRs resulting from a decline in interest rates. The change in fair value of derivatives is intended to react in the opposite direction of the market-related change in the fair value of MSRs, and generally increase in value as interest rates decline and decrease in value as interest rates rise. The amount and composition of derivatives used depends on the exposure to loss of value on our MSRs, the expected cost of the derivatives, our expected liquidity needs and the increased earnings generated by origination of new loans resulting from the decline in interest rates. During the third quarter of 2011, we made the decision to hedge a small portion of our risk related to MSRs.
For both the third quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2011, the value of derivatives related to our MSRs increased by $1 million. There were no open derivatives related to MSRs for the third quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2010.
Other Income (Expense)
Other income (expense) allocable to the Mortgage Servicing segment primarily consists of the change in the net fair value of a mortgage securitization trust where we hold a residual interest.
Year-to-Date Comparison: The $5 million unfavorable change compared to 2010 was primarily due to an increase in projected credit losses of the underlying securitized mortgage loans.
Salaries and Related Expenses
Salaries and related expenses allocable to the Mortgage Servicing segment consist of salaries, payroll taxes, benefits and incentives paid to employees in our servicing operations. In 2011, we combined general administrative functions, as discussed under Segment Results above, which favorably impacted Salaries and related expenses compared to 2010.
Year-to-Date Comparison: The $4 million (14%) decrease in salaries and related expenses compared to 2010 was primarily attributable to the combination of general and administrative functions, which is allocated to Other operating expenses in 2011.
Other Operating Expenses
The components of Other operating expenses allocable to the Mortgage Servicing Segment were as follows:
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Nine Months Ended |
| ||||||||
|
|
September 30, |
|
September 30, |
| ||||||||
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
| ||||
|
|
(In millions) |
| ||||||||||
Foreclosure-related charges |
|
$ |
20 |
|
$ |
8 |
|
$ |
59 |
|
$ |
51 |
|
Corporate overhead allocation |
|
4 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
2 |
| ||||
Other expenses |
|
21 |
|
16 |
|
51 |
|
41 |
| ||||
Total |
|
$ |
45 |
|
$ |
24 |
|
$ |
121 |
|
$ |
94 |
|
Foreclosure-related charges are driven by the volume of repurchase and indemnification requests as well as expected loss severities which are impacted by various economic factors including delinquency rates and home price values. Corporate overhead allocation relates to segment allocations of general and administrative costs. In 2011, certain additional general and administrative functions were combined as discussed under Segment
Results above. Other expenses include operating expenses of the Mortgage Servicing segment, including costs directly associated with servicing loans in foreclosure and real estate owned, professional fees and outsourcing fees.
Quarterly Comparison: The continuing high levels of repurchase requests, primarily from agency invested loan sales, and loss severities contributed to $20 million in foreclosure-related charges during 2011. The pipeline of unresolved repurchase requests was 54% larger as of September 30, 2011 compared to September 30, 2010. The $8 million in foreclosure-related charges during 2010 was primarily due to the timing of repurchases, indemnifications and make-whole payments on defaulted loans. Corporate overhead allocation was unfavorably impacted by $4 million from the combination of general and administrative functions coupled with further investments in our information technology platform and enterprise risk management process. The $5 million increase in other expenses was primarily attributable to costs associated with servicing delinquent and foreclosed loans and real estate owned.
Year-to-Date Comparison: The continuing high levels of repurchase requests, primarily from agency invested loan sales, and loss severities contributed to $59 million in foreclosure-related charges during 2011. The $51 million in foreclosure-related charges during 2010 was primarily due to timing of repurchases, indemnifications and make-whole payments on defaulted loans. Corporate overhead allocation was unfavorably impacted by $9 million from the combination of general and administrative functions coupled with further investments in our information technology platform and enterprise risk management process. The $10 million increase in other expenses was primarily attributable to costs associated with servicing delinquent and foreclosed loans and real estate owned.
Fleet Management Services Segment
The following tables present a summary of our financial results and related drivers for the Fleet Management Services segment, and are followed by a discussion of each of the key components of our Net revenues and Total expenses:
|
|
Average for the |
|
Average for the |
| ||||
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Nine Months Ended |
| ||||
|
|
September 30, |
|
September 30, |
| ||||
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
|
|
(In thousands of units) |
| ||||||
Leased vehicles |
|
272 |
|
289 |
|
275 |
|
292 |
|
Maintenance service cards |
|
324 |
|
286 |
|
320 |
|
278 |
|
Fuel cards |
|
296 |
|
276 |
|
293 |
|
274 |
|
Accident management vehicles |
|
297 |
|
290 |
|
295 |
|
289 |
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Nine Months Ended |
| ||||||||
|
|
September 30, |
|
September 30, |
| ||||||||
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
| ||||
|
|
(In millions) |
| ||||||||||
Fleet management fees |
|
$ |
42 |
|
$ |
38 |
|
$ |
128 |
|
$ |
116 |
|
Fleet lease income |
|
370 |
|
342 |
|
1,050 |
|
1,030 |
| ||||
Other income |
|
20 |
|
17 |
|
55 |
|
48 |
| ||||
Net revenues |
|
432 |
|
397 |
|
1,233 |
|
1,194 |
| ||||
Salaries and related expenses |
|
16 |
|
19 |
|
47 |
|
60 |
| ||||
Occupancy and other office expenses |
|
3 |
|
5 |
|
11 |
|
13 |
| ||||
Depreciation on operating leases |
|
307 |
|
307 |
|
922 |
|
921 |
| ||||
Fleet interest expense |
|
20 |
|
25 |
|
63 |
|
74 |
| ||||
Other depreciation and amortization |
|
3 |
|
3 |
|
8 |
|
8 |
| ||||
Other operating expenses |
|
62 |
|
21 |
|
126 |
|
80 |
| ||||
Total expenses |
|
411 |
|
380 |
|
1,177 |
|
1,156 |
| ||||
Segment profit |
|
$ |
21 |
|
$ |
17 |
|
$ |
56 |
|
$ |
38 |
|
Fleet Management Fees
The drivers of Fleet management fees are leased vehicles and service unit counts as well as the usage of fee-based services. Fleet management fees consist primarily of the revenues of our principal fee-based products: fuel cards, maintenance services, accident management services and monthly management fees for leased vehicles. During the second half of 2010, we added transportation safety training services through the acquisition of the assets of a former supplier. This acquisition has positively impacted Fleet management fees during the third quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2011.
Quarterly Comparison: Fleet management fees increased by $4 million (11%) compared to 2010 primarily due to additional driver safety training service fees coupled with higher usage of fee-based fleet management services and an increase in service unit volume.
Year-to-Date Comparison: Fleet management fees increased by $12 million (10%) compared to 2010 primarily due to additional driver safety training service fees coupled with higher usage of fee-based and asset-based fleet management services and an increase in service unit volume.
Fleet Lease Income
Fleet lease income consists of leasing revenue related to operating and direct financing leases as well as the gross sales proceeds associated with our lease syndications. We originate certain leases with the intention of syndicating to banks and other financial institutions, which includes the sale of the underlying assets and assignment of any rights to the leases. Upon the transfer and assignment we record the proceeds from the sale within Fleet lease income and recognize the cost of goods sold within Other operating expenses for the undepreciated cost of the asset sold.
Leasing revenue related to operating leases consists of an interest component for the funding cost inherent in the lease as well as a depreciation component for the cost of the vehicles under lease. Leasing revenue related to direct financing leases consists of an interest component for the funding cost inherent in the lease.
Quarterly Comparison: Fleet lease income increased by $28 million (8%) compared to 2010 primarily due to a $31 million increase in lease syndication revenue related to the amount of lease syndications coupled with an increase in leasing revenues attributable to a change in the mix of our net investment in leases to a greater amount of vehicles under operating leases from direct financing leases that was partially offset by lower leasing revenue from a decrease in the average number of leased vehicles.
Year-to-Date Comparison: Fleet lease income increased by $20 million (2%) compared to 2010 primarily due to a $21 million increase in lease syndication revenue related to the amount of lease syndications coupled with an increase in leasing revenues attributable to a change in the mix of our net investment in leases to a greater amount of vehicles under operating leases from direct financing leases that was partially offset by a decrease in the average number of leased vehicles.
Other Income
Other income primarily consists of gross sales proceeds from our owned vehicle dealerships and the gain or loss from the sale of used vehicles. The cost of vehicles sold from our owned dealerships is included in cost of goods sold within Other operating expenses.
Quarterly Comparison: Other income increased by $3 million (18%) compared to 2010 primarily due to gains on the sale of used vehicles.
Year-to-Date Comparison: Other income increased by $7 million (15%) compared to 2010 primarily due to gains on the sale of used vehicles and vehicle sales to retail customers at our dealerships.
Salaries and Related Expenses
Salaries and related expenses allocable to the Fleet Management Services segment consist of salaries, payroll taxes, benefits and incentives paid to employees in our fleet services operations. In 2011, we combined general administrative functions, as discussed under Segment Results above, which favorably impacted Salaries and related expenses compared to 2010.
Quarterly Comparison: Salaries and related expenses decreased by $3 million (16%) compared to 2010 primarily from the combination of general and administrative functions which is allocated to Other operating expenses in 2011.
Year-to-Date Comparison: Salaries and related expenses decreased by $13 million (22%) compared to 2010 primarily from the combination of general and administrative functions which is allocated to Other operating expenses in 2011.
Depreciation on Operating Leases
Depreciation on operating leases is the depreciation expense associated with our vehicles under operating leases included in Net investment in fleet leases.
Fleet Interest Expense
Fleet interest expense is primarily driven by the average volume and cost of funds rate of outstanding borrowings and consists of interest expense associated with borrowings related to leased vehicles, changes in market values of interest rate cap agreements related to vehicle asset-backed debt and amortization of deferred financing fees.
Quarterly Comparison: Fleet interest expense decreased by $5 million (20%) compared to 2010 primarily due to a favorable change in the cost of funds rates resulting from debt renewals and a decrease in the amortization of deferred financing fees.
Year-to-Date Comparison: Fleet interest expense decreased by $11 million (15%) compared to 2010 primarily due to a favorable change in the cost of funds rates resulting from debt renewals and a decrease in the amortization of deferred financing fees. Fleet interest expense was also positively impacted by $5 million compared to 2010 related to changes in fair value of interest rate cap agreements associated with vehicle management asset-backed debt.
Other Operating Expenses
The following table presents a summary of the components of Other operating expenses:
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Nine Months Ended |
| ||||||||
|
|
September 30, |
|
September 30, |
| ||||||||
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
| ||||
|
|
(In millions) |
| ||||||||||
Cost of goods sold |
|
$ |
44 |
|
$ |
14 |
|
$ |
71 |
|
$ |
49 |
|
Corporate overhead allocation |
|
11 |
|
2 |
|
33 |
|
8 |
| ||||
Other expenses |
|
7 |
|
5 |
|
22 |
|
23 |
| ||||
Total |
|
$ |
62 |
|
$ |
21 |
|
$ |
126 |
|
$ |
80 |
|
Cost of goods sold is driven by vehicle sales at our owned dealerships and the syndication of certain leases to banks and other financial institutions. The gross sales proceeds from our owned dealerships are included in Other income and the proceeds from syndications are recorded within Fleet lease income.
Corporate overhead allocation relates to segment allocations of general and administrative costs. In 2011, certain additional general and administrative functions were combined as discussed under Segment Results above.
Quarterly Comparison: The $30 million increase in cost of goods sold was primarily attributable to the increase in the amount of lease syndication volume compared to 2010. Corporate overhead allocation was unfavorably impacted by $9 million from the combination of general and administrative functions coupled with further investments in our information technology platform and enterprise risk management process. Other expenses increased by $2 million compared to 2010 primarily due to expenses resulting from the addition of driver safety training services.
Year-to-Date Comparison: The $22 million increase in cost of goods sold was primarily attributable to the increase in the amount of lease syndication volume compared to 2010. Corporate overhead allocation was unfavorably impacted by $25 million from the combination of general and administrative functions coupled with further investments in our information technology platform and enterprise risk management process. Other expenses decreased by $1 million compared to 2010 primarily due to expenses incurred during 2010 associated with executing our transformation plan partially offset an increase in expenses resulting from the addition of driver safety training services.
RISK MANAGEMENT
In the normal course of business, we are exposed to various risks including, but not limited to, interest rate risk, consumer credit risk, commercial credit risk, counterparty credit risk, liquidity risk, and foreign exchange risk. The Finance and Risk Management Committee of the Board of Directors provides oversight with respect to the assessment of our overall capital structure and its impact on the generation of appropriate risk adjusted returns, as well as the existence, operation and effectiveness of our risk management programs, policies and practices. Our Chief Risk Officer, working with each of our businesses, oversees governance processes and monitoring of these risks including the establishment of risk strategy and documentation of risk policies and controls.
Interest Rate Risk
Our principal market exposure is to interest rate risk, specifically long-term Treasury and mortgage interest rates due to their impact on mortgage-related assets and commitments. Additionally, our escrow earnings on our mortgage servicing rights and our net investment in variable-rate lease assets are sensitive to changes in short-term interest rates such as LIBOR. We also are exposed to changes in short-term interest rates on certain variable rate borrowings including our mortgage warehouse asset-backed debt, vehicle management asset-backed debt and our unsecured revolving credit facility. We anticipate that such interest rates will remain our primary benchmark for market risk for the foreseeable future.
During the three months ended September 30, 2011, we entered into certain derivative contracts to hedge a portion of the interest rate associated with its Mortgage servicing rights (MSRs). Although the notional amount of these derivatives was less than 1% of unpaid principal balance of the MSRs, we entered into these derivative contracts to ensure there would be an adequate cushion above the leverage and net worth covenants of our debt facilities to fund the increase in origination volume if rates moved down further, given the leverage covenant of debt-to-tangible net worth of 6.5 to 1. As rates decline, the increase in mortgage asset-backed debt, coupled with the decline in value of MSRs resulting from lower mortgage rates, could have the effect of increasing indebtedness to tangible net worth ratio in the short term.
Refer to Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk for an analysis of the impact of 25 bps, 50 bps and 100 bps changes in interest rates on the valuation of assets and liabilities sensitive to interest rates.
Consumer Credit Risk
Our exposures to consumer credit risk include:
· Loan repurchase and indemnification obligations from breaches of representation and warranty provisions of our loan sales or servicing agreements, which result in indemnification payments or exposure to loan defaults and foreclosures;
· Mortgage reinsurance losses; and
· A decline in the fair value of mortgage servicing rights as a result of increases in involuntary prepayments from increasing portfolio delinquencies.
Loan Repurchases and Indemnifications
Foreclosure-related reserves are maintained for probable losses related to repurchase and indemnification obligations and related to on-balance sheet loans in foreclosure and real estate owned.
Foreclosure-related reserves consist of the following:
|
|
September 30, |
|
December 31, |
| ||
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
| ||
|
|
(In millions) |
| ||||
Loan repurchase and indemnification liability |
|
$ |
87 |
|
$ |
74 |
|
Allowance for probable foreclosure losses |
|
20 |
|
22 |
| ||
Adjustment to value for real estate owned |
|
13 |
|
15 |
| ||
Total |
|
$ |
120 |
|
$ |
111 |
|
A summary of the activity in foreclosure-related reserves is as follows:
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Nine Months Ended |
| ||||||||
|
|
September 30, |
|
September 30, |
| ||||||||
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
| ||||
|
|
(In millions) |
| ||||||||||
Balance, beginning of period |
|
$ |
122 |
|
$ |
104 |
|
$ |
111 |
|
$ |
86 |
|
Realized foreclosure losses |
|
(27 |
) |
(15 |
) |
(62 |
) |
(47 |
) | ||||
Increase in reserves due to: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Changes in assumptions |
|
20 |
|
9 |
|
59 |
|
54 |
| ||||
New loan sales |
|
5 |
|
3 |
|
12 |
|
8 |
| ||||
Balance, end of period |
|
$ |
120 |
|
$ |
101 |
|
$ |
120 |
|
$ |
101 |
|
We subject the population of repurchase and indemnification requests received to a review and appeal process to establish the validity of the claim and corresponding obligation. The following table presents the unpaid principal balance of our unresolved requests by status:
|
|
As of September 30, 2011 |
|
As of December 31, 2010 |
| ||||||||||||||
|
|
Investor |
|
Insurer |
|
|
|
Investor |
|
Insurer |
|
|
| ||||||
|
|
Requests |
|
Requests |
|
Total |
|
Requests |
|
Requests |
|
Total |
| ||||||
|
|
(In millions) |
| ||||||||||||||||
Agency Invested: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Claim pending (1) |
|
$ |
33 |
|
$ |
1 |
|
$ |
34 |
|
$ |
9 |
|
$ |
1 |
|
$ |
10 |
|
Appealed (2) |
|
30 |
|
2 |
|
32 |
|
34 |
|
22 |
|
56 |
| ||||||
Open to review (3) |
|
93 |
|
27 |
|
120 |
|
50 |
|
9 |
|
59 |
| ||||||
Agency requests |
|
156 |
|
30 |
|
186 |
|
93 |
|
32 |
|
125 |
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Private Invested: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Claim pending (1) |
|
4 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
1 |
|
2 |
|
3 |
| ||||||
Appealed (2) |
|
17 |
|
2 |
|
19 |
|
15 |
|
7 |
|
22 |
| ||||||
Open to review (3) |
|
10 |
|
7 |
|
17 |
|
13 |
|
2 |
|
15 |
| ||||||
Private requests |
|
31 |
|
9 |
|
40 |
|
29 |
|
11 |
|
40 |
| ||||||
Total |
|
$ |
187 |
|
$ |
39 |
|
$ |
226 |
|
$ |
122 |
|
$ |
43 |
|
$ |
165 |
|
(1) Claim pending status represents loans that have completed the review process where we have agreed with the representation and warranty breach and are pending final execution.
(2) Appealed status represents loans that have completed the review process where we have disagreed with the representation and warranty breach and are pending response from the claimant. Based on claims received and appealed during the last twelve month period ending September 30, 2011 that have been resolved, we were successful in refuting over 90% of claims appealed.
(3) Open to review status represents loans where we have not completed our review process. We appealed approximately 75% of claims received and reviewed during the last twelve month period ending September 30, 2011.
See Note 9, Credit Risk, in the accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information regarding our foreclosure-related reserves.
Mortgage Reinsurance
We have exposure to consumer credit risk through losses from two contracts with primary mortgage insurance companies, that are inactive and in runoff. We are required to hold securities in trust related to this potential obligation, which were $237 million as of September 30, 2011 and were included in Restricted cash, cash equivalents and investments in the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.
The reserve for incurred and incurred but not reported losses associated with our mortgage reinsurance activities, is determined on an undiscounted basis, and is included in Other liabilities in the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.
A summary of the activity in reinsurance-related reserves is as follows:
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Nine Months Ended |
| ||||||||
|
|
September 30, |
|
September 30, |
| ||||||||
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
| ||||
|
|
(In millions) |
| ||||||||||
Balance, beginning of period |
|
$ |
97 |
|
$ |
128 |
|
$ |
113 |
|
$ |
108 |
|
Realized losses |
|
(16 |
) |
(7 |
) |
(49 |
) |
(13 |
) | ||||
Increase in reserves(1) |
|
13 |
|
10 |
|
30 |
|
36 |
| ||||
Balance, end of period |
|
$ |
94 |
|
$ |
131 |
|
$ |
94 |
|
$ |
131 |
|
(1) The increase in reinsurance reserves is recorded as an expense within Loan servicing income in the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations.
The following table summarizes certain information regarding mortgage loans that are subject to reinsurance by year of origination as of September 30, 2011:
|
|
|
|
Maximum |
|
|
|
|
|
Foreclosures/ |
| ||
|
|
Unpaid |
|
Potential |
|
Average |
|
|
|
Real estate |
| ||
|
|
Principal |
|
Exposure to |
|
Credit |
|
|
|
owned/ |
| ||
|
|
Balance (UPB) |
|
Reinsurance Loss |
|
Score(3) |
|
Delinquencies(1)(3) |
|
Bankruptcies(2)(3) |
| ||
|
|
($ In millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Year of Origination: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
2003 and prior |
|
$ |
1,162 |
|
$ |
226 |
|
693 |
|
5.65 |
% |
6.64 |
% |
2004 |
|
826 |
|
97 |
|
691 |
|
5.03 |
% |
8.55 |
% | ||
2005 |
|
808 |
|
32 |
|
694 |
|
5.49 |
% |
11.19 |
% | ||
2006 |
|
538 |
|
8 |
|
692 |
|
5.61 |
% |
16.69 |
% | ||
2007 |
|
1,110 |
|
23 |
|
700 |
|
5.52 |
% |
13.57 |
% | ||
2008 |
|
1,888 |
|
61 |
|
725 |
|
3.73 |
% |
5.24 |
% | ||
2009 |
|
406 |
|
7 |
|
758 |
|
0.26 |
% |
0.08 |
% | ||
Total |
|
$ |
6,738 |
|
$ |
454 |
|
707 |
|
4.75 |
% |
8.69 |
% |
(1) Represents delinquent mortgage loans for which payments are 60 days or more outstanding as a percentage of the total principal balance.
(2) Calculated as a percentage of the total unpaid principal balance.
(3) Based on June 30, 2011 data.
Commercial Credit Risk
We are exposed to commercial credit risk for our clients under the lease and service agreements of our Fleet Management Services segment. We manage such risk through an evaluation of the financial position and creditworthiness of the client, which is performed on at least an annual basis. The lease agreements generally allow us to refuse any additional orders; however, the obligation remains for all leased vehicle units under contract at that time. The fleet management service agreements can generally be terminated upon 30 days written notice.
Counterparty & Concentration Risk
We are exposed to risk in the event of non-performance by counterparties to various agreements, derivative contracts, and sales transactions. In general, we manage such risk by evaluating the financial position and creditworthiness of counterparties, monitoring the amount for which we are at risk, requiring collateral, typically cash, in instances in which financing is provided and/or dispersing the risk among multiple counterparties.
As of September 30, 2011, there were no significant concentrations of credit risk with any individual counterparty or group of counterparties with respect to our derivative transactions. Concentrations of credit risk associated with receivables are considered minimal due to our diverse client base. With the exception of the financing provided to customers of our mortgage business, we do not normally require collateral or other security to support credit sales.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
We manage our liquidity and capital structure to fund growth in assets, to fund business operations, and to meet contractual obligations, including maturities of our indebtedness. In developing our liquidity plan, we consider how our needs may be impacted by various factors including maximum liquidity needs during the period, fluctuations in assets and liability levels due to changes in business operations, levels of interest rates, and working capital needs. We also assess market conditions and capacity for debt issuance in various markets we access to fund our business needs. Our primary operating funding needs arise from the origination and financing of mortgage loans, the purchase and funding of vehicles under management and the retention of mortgage servicing rights. Sources of liquidity include: equity capital (including retained earnings); the unsecured debt markets; committed and uncommitted credit facilities; secured borrowings, including the asset-backed debt markets; cash flows from operations (including service fee and lease revenues); cash flows from assets under management; and proceeds from the sale or securitization of mortgage loans and lease assets.
Commitments under our $525 million Amended Credit facility are scheduled to terminate on February 29, 2012. We may extend the commitments of the facility for an additional year, provided certain conditions are met, including the payment of extension fees and meeting a minimum liquidity requirement of at least $250 million as of February 29, 2012, among other provisions. Minimum liquidity, as defined under the agreement, is the sum of unrestricted cash and cash equivalents plus available capacity under the facility less the unpaid balance of the 2012 Convertible notes. Based on our current forecasted cash flows, we expect to meet the terms of the extension option for the facility.
We have $250 million of Convertible notes that mature on April 15, 2012. We continue to evaluate the available alternatives to fund the maturity of the notes, which include, among other options, utilizing available capacity of the Amended Credit facility (subject to compliance with terms and extension of the agreement) or seeking refinancing through alternative sources available in the credit markets.
Given our expectation for business volumes, we believe that our sources of liquidity are adequate to fund our operations for the next 12 months and to repay our upcoming maturities.
Cash Flows
At September 30, 2011, we had $84 million of Cash and cash equivalents, a decrease of $111 million from $195 million at December 31, 2010. The following table summarizes the changes in Cash and cash equivalents during the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010:
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
| |||||
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
| |||||
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
Change |
| |||
|
|
(In millions) |
| |||||||
Cash provided by (used in): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Operating activities |
|
$ |
2,339 |
|
$ |
(449 |
) |
$ |
2,788 |
|
Investing activities |
|
(899 |
) |
(748 |
) |
(151 |
) | |||
Financing activities |
|
(1,550 |
) |
1,308 |
|
(2,858 |
) | |||
Effect of changes in exchange rates on Cash and cash equivalents |
|
(1 |
) |
(2 |
) |
1 |
| |||
Net (decrease) increase in Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
(111 |
) |
$ |
109 |
|
$ |
(220 |
) |
Operating Activities
Our cash flows from operating activities reflect the net cash generated or used in our business operations and can be significantly impacted by the timing of mortgage loan originations and sales. In addition to depreciation and amortization, the operating results of our reportable segments are impacted by the following significant non-cash activities:
· Mortgage Production Capitalization of mortgage servicing rights
· Mortgage Servicing Change in fair value of mortgage servicing rights
· Fleet Management Services Depreciation on operating leases
During the nine months ended September 30, 2011, cash provided by operating activities was $2.3 billion. This is primarily reflective of $2.1 billion of net cash provided by the significant increase in mortgage loan sales in our Mortgage Production segment. Other adjustments and changes in other assets and liabilities, net primarily includes the $68 million gain on the sale of equity interests in our appraisal services business and a $290 million net change in cash collateral posted on derivative agreements.
The net cash provided from the operating activities of our Mortgage production segment resulted from a $1.6 billion decrease in the Mortgage loans held for sale balance in our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets between September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, which is the result of timing differences between origination and sale as of the end of each period. The decrease in Mortgage loans held for sale also resulted in a decrease in Mortgage Asset-Backed Debt as further described in Financing Activities below.
During the nine months ended September 30, 2010, cash used in our operating activities was $ (449) million. This was reflective of $1.1 billion of net cash used to fund the significant increase in mortgage loan originations and in the operating activities of our Mortgage Production segment that was partially offset by cash provided by the operating activities of our Fleet Management Services and Mortgage Servicing segments.
Investing Activities
Our cash flows from investing activities include cash outflows for purchases of vehicle inventory, net of cash inflows for sales of vehicles within the Fleet Management Services segment as well as changes in the funding requirements of Restricted cash, cash equivalents and investments for all of our business segments. Cash flows related to the acquisition and sale of vehicles fluctuate significantly from period to period due to the timing of the underlying transactions.
During the nine months ended September 30, 2011, cash used in our investing activities was $ (899) million, which primarily consisted of $910 million in net cash outflows from the purchase and sale of vehicles, partially offset by $20 million in net cash inflows from the sale of an interest in our appraisal services business.
During the nine months ended September 30, 2010, cash used in our investing activities was $ (748) million, which primarily consisted of $844 million in net cash outflows from the purchase and sale of vehicles, which was reflective of the increased demand for vehicle leases during that time, that was partially offset by a $90 million increase in Restricted cash and cash equivalents.
Financing Activities
Our cash flows from financing activities include proceeds from and payments on borrowings under our Vehicle Management Asset-Backed Debt, Mortgage Asset-Backed Debt and Unsecured Debt facilities. The fluctuations in the amount of borrowings within each period are due to working capital needs and the funding requirements for assets supported by our secured and unsecured debt, including Net investment in fleet leases, Mortgage loans held for sale and Mortgage servicing rights.
During the nine months ended September 30, 2011, cash used in our financing activities was $(1.6) billion and related to net payments on borrowings resulting from the decreased funding requirements for Mortgage loans held for sale described in the Operating Activities section above.
During the nine months ended September 30, 2010, cash provided by our financing activities was $1.3 billion related to net proceeds from borrowings resulting from the increased funding requirements for Mortgage loans held for sale and net investment in vehicles described in the Operating Activities section above.
Debt
We utilize both secured and unsecured debt as key components of our financing strategy. Our primary financing needs arise from our assets under management programs which are summarized in the table below:
|
|
September 30, |
|
December 31, |
| ||
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
| ||
|
|
(In millions) |
| ||||
Restricted cash, cash equivalents and investments |
|
$ |
528 |
|
$ |
531 |
|
Mortgage loans held for sale |
|
2,699 |
|
4,329 |
| ||
Net investment in fleet leases |
|
3,414 |
|
3,492 |
| ||
Mortgage servicing rights |
|
1,198 |
|
1,442 |
| ||
Total |
|
$ |
7,839 |
|
$ |
9,794 |
|
Asset-backed debt is used primarily to support our investments in vehicle management and mortgage assets, and is secured by collateral which include certain Mortgage loans held for sale and Net investment in fleet leases, among other assets. The outstanding balance under the Asset-backed debt facilities varies daily based on our current funding needs for eligible collateral. In addition, amounts undrawn and available under our revolving credit facility can also be utilized to supplement asset-backed facilities and provide for the funding of vehicles in U.S. and Canada as well as the funding of mortgage originations.
The following table summarizes our debt as of September 30, 2011:
|
|
|
|
Total Assets |
| ||
|
|
|
|
Held as |
| ||
|
|
Balance |
|
Collateral(1) |
| ||
|
|
(In millions) |
| ||||
Vehicle Management Asset-Backed Debt |
|
$ |
2,933 |
|
$ |
3,533 |
|
Mortgage Asset-Backed Debt |
|
2,287 |
|
2,357 |
| ||
Unsecured Debt |
|
1,316 |
|
|
| ||
Mortgage Loan Securitization Debt Certificates, at fair value(2) |
|
25 |
|
|
| ||
Total |
|
$ |
6,561 |
|
$ |
5,890 |
|
(1) Assets held as collateral are not available to pay our general obligations.
(2) Cash flows of securitized mortgage loans support payment of the debt certificates and creditors of the securitization trust do not have recourse to the Company.
See Note 7, Debt and Borrowing Arrangements, in the accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information regarding the components of our debt.
Vehicle Management Asset-Backed Debt
Vehicle management asset-backed debt primarily represents variable-rate debt issued by our wholly owned subsidiary, Chesapeake Funding LLC, to support the acquisition of vehicles used by our Fleet Management Services segments U.S. leasing operations and debt issued by Fleet Leasing Receivables Trust, a special purpose trust, used to finance leases originated by our Canadian fleet operation.
Vehicle management asset-backed funding arrangements consist of the following facilities as of September 30, 2011:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
End of |
|
Estimated |
| |||
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
Available |
|
Revolving |
|
Maturity |
| |||
|
|
Balance |
|
Capacity |
|
Capacity(1) |
|
Period(2) |
|
Date(3) |
| |||
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Chesapeake 2009-2 |
|
$ |
721 |
|
n/a |
|
n/a |
|
n/a |
|
03/15/14 |
| ||
Chesapeake 2009-1 |
|
411 |
|
n/a |
|
n/a |
|
n/a |
|
01/15/13 |
| |||
FLRT 2010-1 |
|
136 |
|
n/a |
|
n/a |
|
n/a |
|
04/15/13 |
| |||
Chesapeake 2009-4 |
|
95 |
|
n/a |
|
n/a |
|
n/a |
|
12/07/12 |
| |||
Term notes, in amortization |
|
1,363 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Chesapeake 2011-2 |
|
335 |
|
$ |
335 |
|
$ |
|
|
09/19/13 |
|
02/07/16 |
| |
Chesapeake 2009-3 |
|
52 |
|
52 |
|
|
|
10/20/11 |
|
09/07/14 |
| |||
Chesapeake 2010-1- Class B Note |
|
23 |
|
23 |
|
|
|
06/27/12 |
|
03/07/15 |
| |||
Chesapeake 2011-1 - Class B Note |
|
16 |
|
16 |
|
|
|
06/27/13 |
|
12/07/15 |
| |||
Term notes, in revolving period |
|
426 |
|
426 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Chesapeake 2010-1 |
|
463 |
|
700 |
|
237 |
|
06/27/12 |
|
01/07/15 |
| |||
Chesapeake 2011-1 |
|
331 |
|
500 |
|
169 |
|
06/27/13 |
|
10/07/15 |
| |||
FLRT 2010-2(4) |
|
317 |
|
343 |
|
26 |
|
08/30/12 |
|
12/15/14 |
| |||
Variable funding-notes |
|
1,111 |
|
1,543 |
|
432 |
|
|
|
|
| |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Other |
|
33 |
|
33 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Total |
|
$ |
2,933 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
(1) Capacity is dependent upon maintaining compliance with the terms, conditions, and covenants of the respective agreements and may be further limited by asset eligibility requirements.
(2) During the revolving period, the monthly collection of lease payments allocable to each outstanding series creates availability to fund the acquisition of vehicles and/or equipment to be leased to customers. Upon expiration, the revolving period of the related series of notes ends and the repayment of principal commences, amortizing monthly with the allocation of lease payments until the notes are paid in full.
(3) Represents the estimated final repayment date of the amortizing notes.
(4) On November 1, 2011, the FLRT 2010-2 series was amended to increase capacity to $565 million.
Mortgage Asset-Backed Debt
Mortgage asset-backed debt primarily represents variable-rate mortgage repurchase facilities to support the origination of mortgage loans. Mortgage repurchase facilities, also called warehouse lines of credit, are one component of our funding strategy, and they provide creditors a collateralized interest in specific mortgage loans that meet the eligibility requirements under the terms of the facility during the warehouse period. The source of repayment of the facilities is typically from the sale or securitization of the underlying loans into the secondary mortgage market. We utilize both committed and uncommitted warehouse facilities and we evaluate our needs under these facilities based on forecasted volume of mortgage loan closings and sales.
Our funding strategies for mortgage origination may also include the use of committed and uncommitted mortgage gestation facilities. Gestation facilities effectively finance mortgage loans that are eligible for sale to an agency prior to the issuance of the related MBS.
Mortgage asset-backed funding arrangements consist of the following as of September 30, 2011:
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
Available |
|
Maturity |
| |||
|
|
Balance |
|
Capacity |
|
Capacity(1) |
|
Date |
| |||
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
|
|
|
| |||
Debt: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Facilities of PHH Mortgage: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Fannie Mae |
|
$ |
1,000 |
|
$ |
1,000 |
|
$ |
|
|
12/16/11 |
|
RBS |
|
364 |
|
500 |
|
136 |
|
06/22/12 |
| |||
CSFB |
|
160 |
|
350 |
|
190 |
|
05/23/12 |
(2) | |||
Wells Fargo |
|
44 |
|
300 |
|
256 |
|
08/10/12 |
| |||
Bank of America |
|
93 |
|
210 |
|
117 |
|
10/13/11 |
(3) | |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Facilities of PHH Home Loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
CSFB |
|
256 |
|
325 |
|
69 |
|
05/23/12 |
(2) | |||
Ally Bank |
|
130 |
|
150 |
|
20 |
|
12/01/11 |
| |||
Wells Fargo |
|
31 |
|
150 |
|
119 |
|
08/10/12 |
| |||
Committed repurchase facilities |
|
2,078 |
|
2,985 |
|
907 |
|
|
| |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Uncommitted facilities of PHH Mortgage: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Fannie Mae |
|
135 |
|
2,030 |
|
1,895 |
|
n/a |
| |||
RBS |
|
|
|
200 |
|
200 |
|
06/22/12 |
| |||
Uncommitted repurchase facilities |
|
135 |
|
2,230 |
|
2,095 |
|
|
| |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Servicing advance facility |
|
74 |
|
120 |
|
46 |
|
03/31/12 |
| |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Total Debt |
|
$ |
2,287 |
|
$ |
5,335 |
|
$ |
3,048 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Off-Balance Sheet Gestation Facilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Bank of America |
|
$ |
223 |
|
$ |
500 |
|
$ |
277 |
|
10/13/11 |
(3) |
JP Morgan Chase |
|
|
|
500 |
|
500 |
|
09/30/12 |
| |||
Total Off-Balance Sheet Gestation Facilities |
|
$ |
223 |
|
$ |
1,000 |
|
$ |
777 |
|
|
|
(1) Capacity is dependent upon maintaining compliance with the terms, conditions, and covenants of the respective agreements and may be further limited by asset eligibility requirements.
(2) Provided certain conditions are met, the CSFB facilities may be renewed for an additional year at the Companys request.
(3) On October 13, 2011, the committed mortgage warehouse asset-backed debt facility with the Bank of America was amended to renew $400 million of committed borrowing capacity and the gestation agreement was not renewed, as discussed in the Note 16, Subsequent Events, in the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
Unsecured Debt
Unsecured credit facilities are utilized to fund our short-term working capital needs, and are utilized to supplement asset-backed facilities and provide for a portion of the operating needs of our mortgage and fleet management businesses. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011, the maximum daily balance of the Amended Credit Facility was $160 million, and the weighted-average daily balance was $23 million and $11 million, respectively.
Unsecured arrangements consist of the following as of September 30, 2011:
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
Available |
|
Maturity |
| |||
|
|
Balance |
|
Capacity |
|
Capacity |
|
Date |
| |||
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
|
|
|
| |||
4% notes due in 2012 |
|
$ |
249 |
|
n/a |
|
n/a |
|
04/15/12 |
| ||
4% notes due in 2014 |
|
206 |
|
n/a |
|
n/a |
|
09/01/14 |
| |||
Convertible notes |
|
455 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
7.125% notes due in 2013 |
|
423 |
|
n/a |
|
n/a |
|
03/01/13 |
| |||
9.25% notes due in 2016 |
|
350 |
|
n/a |
|
n/a |
|
03/01/16 |
| |||
Other |
|
8 |
|
n/a |
|
n/a |
|
04/15/18 |
| |||
Term notes |
|
781 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Amended credit facility |
|
80 |
|
$ |
525 |
|
$ |
429 |
(1) |
02/29/12 |
(2) | |
Other |
|
|
|
5 |
|
5 |
|
09/30/12 |
| |||
Credit Facilities |
|
80 |
|
$ |
530 |
|
$ |
434 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Total |
|
$ |
1,316 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) Utilized capacity reflects $16 million letters of credit issued under the Amended Credit Facility, which are not included in Debt in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet.
(2) Provided certain conditions are met, the Amended credit facility may be renewed for an additional year at the Companys request. See further discussion under Liquidity and Capital Resources above.
As of October 21, 2011, our credit ratings, and ratings outlook on our senior unsecured debt were as follows:
|
|
|
|
Short- |
|
|
|
|
|
Senior |
|
Term |
|
Ratings |
|
|
|
Debt |
|
Debt |
|
Outlook |
|
Moodys Investors Service |
|
Ba2 |
|
NP |
|
Stable |
|
Standard & Poors |
|
BB+ |
|
B |
|
Stable |
|
Fitch |
|
BB+ |
|
B |
|
Stable |
|
A security rating is not a recommendation to buy, sell or hold securities, may not reflect all of the risks associated with an investment in our debt securities and is subject to revision or withdrawal by the assigning rating organization. Each rating should be evaluated independently of any other rating.
As a result of our senior unsecured long-term debt not being investment grade, our access to the public debt markets may be severely limited. We may be required to rely upon alternative sources of financing, such as bank lines and private debt placements and pledge otherwise unencumbered assets. Furthermore, we may be unable to retain all of our existing bank credit commitments beyond the then-existing maturity dates. As a consequence, our availability of funding and cost of financing could rise significantly, thereby negatively impacting our ability to finance some of our capital-intensive activities, such as our ongoing investment in mortgage servicing rights and other retained interests.
See Part IItem 1A. Risk FactorsRisks Related to our CompanyOur senior unsecured long-term debt ratings are below investment grade and, as a result, we may be limited in our ability to obtain or renew financing on economically viable terms or at all. in our 2010 Form 10-K for more information.
Debt Covenants
Certain of our debt arrangements require the maintenance of certain financial ratios and contain affirmative and negative covenants, including, but not limited to, material adverse change, liquidity maintenance, restrictions on our indebtedness and the indebtedness of our material subsidiaries, mergers, liens, liquidations, sale and leaseback transactions, and restrictions on certain types of payments, including dividends and stock repurchases.
During the nine months ended September 30, 2011, the covenants for the RBS repurchase facility and the CSFB Mortgage repurchase facility were amended to require us to maintain a minimum of $1.0 billion in committed mortgage repurchase or warehouse facilities, with no more than $500 million of gestation facilities included towards the minimum, excluding the uncommitted facilities provided by Fannie Mae. At September 30, 2011, we were in compliance with all of our financial covenants related to our debt arrangements.
Under certain of our financing, servicing, hedging and related agreements and instruments, the lenders or trustees have the right to notify us if they believe we have breached a covenant under the operative documents and may declare an event of default. If one or more notices of default were to be given, we believe we would have various periods in which to cure certain of such events of default. If we do not cure the events of default or obtain necessary waivers within the required time periods, the maturity of some of our debt could be accelerated and our ability to incur additional indebtedness could be restricted. In addition, an event of default or acceleration under certain of our agreements and instruments would trigger cross-default provisions under certain of our other agreements and instruments.
OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS AND GUARANTEES
We utilize committed mortgage gestation facilities as a component of our financing strategy. Certain gestation agreements are accounted for as sale transactions and result in mortgage loans and related debt that are not included in our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. As of September 30, 2011, we have $1 billion of commitments under off-balance sheet gestation facilities and $223 million of these facilities were utilized. As discussed in Note 16, Subsequent Events, in the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, $500 million of these commitments expired and were not renewed as of October 13, 2011.
See Part IIItem 7. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of OperationsOff Balance Sheet Arrangements and Guarantees of our 2010 Form 10-K for information regarding our other Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements and Guarantees.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES
There have not been any significant changes to the critical accounting policies and estimates discussed under Part II Item 7. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates of our 2010 Form 10-K.
RECENTLY ISSUED ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
For information regarding recently issued accounting pronouncements and the expected impact on our financial statements, see Note 1, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies in the accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
Our principal market exposure is to interest rate risk, specifically long-term Treasury and mortgage interest rates due to their impact on mortgage-related assets and commitments. Additionally, our escrow earnings on our mortgage servicing rights and our net investment in variable-rate lease assets are sensitive to changes in short-term interest rates such as LIBOR and commercial paper rates. We also are exposed to changes in short-term interest rates on certain variable rate borrowings including our mortgage asset-backed debt, vehicle management asset-backed debt and our unsecured revolving credit facility. We anticipate that such interest rates will remain our primary benchmark for market risk for the foreseeable future.
Sensitivity Analysis
We assess our market risk based on changes in interest rates utilizing a sensitivity analysis. The sensitivity analysis measures the potential impact on fair values based on hypothetical changes (increases and decreases) in interest rates.
We use a duration-based model in determining the impact of interest rate shifts on our debt portfolio, certain other interest-bearing liabilities and interest rate derivatives portfolios. The primary assumption used in these models is that an increase or decrease in the benchmark interest rate produces a parallel shift in the yield curve across all maturities.
We utilize a probability weighted option-adjusted spread model to determine the fair value of mortgage servicing rights and the impact of parallel interest rate shifts on mortgage servicing rights. The primary assumptions in this model are prepayment speeds, option-adjusted spread (discount rate) and implied volatility. However, this analysis ignores the impact of interest rate changes on certain material variables, such as the benefit or detriment on the value of future loan originations, non-parallel shifts in the spread relationships between mortgage-backed securities, swaps and Treasury rates and changes in primary and secondary mortgage market spreads. For mortgage loans, interest rate lock commitments and forward delivery commitments on mortgage-backed securities or whole loans, we rely on market sources in determining the impact of interest rate shifts. In addition, for interest-rate lock commitments, the borrowers propensity to close their mortgage loans under the commitment is used as a primary assumption.
Our total market risk is influenced by a wide variety of factors including market volatility and the liquidity of the markets. There are certain limitations inherent in the sensitivity analysis presented, including the necessity to conduct the analysis based on a single point in time and the inability to include the complex market reactions that normally would arise from the market shifts modeled.
We used September 30, 2011 market rates on our instruments to perform the sensitivity analysis. The estimates are based on the market risk sensitive portfolios described in the preceding paragraphs and assume instantaneous, parallel shifts in interest rate yield curves. These sensitivities are hypothetical and presented for illustrative purposes only. Changes in fair value based on variations in assumptions generally cannot be extrapolated because the relationship of the change in fair value may not be linear.
The following table summarizes the estimated change in the fair value of our assets and liabilities sensitive to interest rates as of September 30, 2011 given hypothetical instantaneous parallel shifts in the yield curve:
|
|
Change in Fair Value |
| ||||||||||||||||
|
|
Down |
|
Down |
|
Down |
|
Up |
|
Up |
|
Up |
| ||||||
|
|
100 bps |
|
50 bps |
|
25 bps |
|
25 bps |
|
50 bps |
|
100 bps |
| ||||||
|
|
(In millions) |
| ||||||||||||||||
Mortgage assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Restricted investments |
|
$ |
3 |
|
$ |
2 |
|
$ |
1 |
|
$ |
(1 |
) |
$ |
(2 |
) |
$ |
(5 |
) |
Mortgage loans held for sale |
|
45 |
|
32 |
|
18 |
|
(22 |
) |
(47 |
) |
(102 |
) | ||||||
Interest rate lock commitments |
|
82 |
|
62 |
|
37 |
|
(51 |
) |
(115 |
) |
(268 |
) | ||||||
Forward loan sale commitments |
|
(143 |
) |
(102 |
) |
(57 |
) |
69 |
|
147 |
|
319 |
| ||||||
Option contracts |
|
(3 |
) |
(3 |
) |
(2 |
) |
3 |
|
8 |
|
26 |
| ||||||
Total Mortgage loans held for sale, interest rate lock commitments and related derivatives |
|
(19 |
) |
(11 |
) |
(4 |
) |
(1 |
) |
(7 |
) |
(25 |
) | ||||||
Mortgage servicing rights |
|
(427 |
) |
(203 |
) |
(91 |
) |
93 |
|
191 |
|
385 |
| ||||||
Derivatives related to MSRs |
|
50 |
|
18 |
|
8 |
|
(6 |
) |
(10 |
) |
(17 |
) | ||||||
Total Mortgage servicing rights and related derivatives |
|
(377 |
) |
(185 |
) |
(83 |
) |
87 |
|
181 |
|
368 |
| ||||||
Other assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
(1 |
) |
(1 |
) | ||||||
Total mortgage assets |
|
(393 |
) |
(194 |
) |
(86 |
) |
84 |
|
171 |
|
337 |
| ||||||
Total vehicle assets |
|
7 |
|
3 |
|
1 |
|
(1 |
) |
(3 |
) |
(7 |
) | ||||||
Interest rate contracts |
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
2 |
| ||||||
Total liabilities |
|
(28 |
) |
(14 |
) |
(7 |
) |
7 |
|
13 |
|
27 |
| ||||||
Total, net |
|
$ |
(415 |
) |
$ |
(205 |
) |
$ |
(92 |
) |
$ |
90 |
|
$ |
182 |
|
$ |
359 |
|
DISCLOSURE CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
As of the end of the period covered by this Form 10-Q, management performed, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, an evaluation of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Exchange Act. Our disclosure controls and procedures are designed to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed in the reports we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commissions rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures. Based on that evaluation, management concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of September 30, 2011.
CHANGES IN INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING
There have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended September 30, 2011 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
For information regarding legal proceedings, see Note 10, Commitments and Contingencies in the accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
This Item 1A should be read in conjunction with Part IItem 1A. Risk Factors in our Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010. Other than with respect to the risk factors discussed below, there have been no material changes from the risk factors disclosed in Part IItem 1A. Risk Factors of our 2010 Form 10-K.
Risks Related to Our Company
A failure in or breach of our technology infrastructure or information protection programs, or those of our outsource providers, could result in the inadvertent disclosure of the confidential personal information of our customers, as well as the confidential personal information of the employees and customers of our clients. Any such failure or breach could have a material and adverse effect on our business, reputation, results of operations, financial position or cash flows.
Our business model and our reputation as a service provider to our clients are dependent upon our ability to safeguard the confidential personal information of our customers, as well as the confidential personal information of the employees and customers of our clients. Although we have put in place a comprehensive information security program that we monitor and update as needed, security breaches could occur through intentional or unintentional acts by individuals having authorized or unauthorized access to confidential information of our customers or the employees or customers of our clients which could potentially compromise confidential information processed and stored in or transmitted through our technology infrastructure.
A failure in or breach of the security of our information systems, or those of our outsource providers, could result in significant damage to our reputation or the reputation of our clients, could negatively impact our ability to attract or retain clients and could result in increased costs attributable to related litigation or regulatory actions, claims for indemnification, higher insurance premiums and remediation activities, the result of any of which could have a material and adverse effect on our business, reputation, results of operations, financial position, or cash flows.
None.
None.
None.
Information in response to this Item is incorporated herein by reference to the Exhibit Index to this Form 10-Q.
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report on Form 10-Q to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
PHH CORPORATION | |
|
|
|
|
By: |
/s/ Jerome J. Selitto |
|
|
Jerome J. Selitto |
|
|
President and Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
Date: November 2, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
By: |
/s/ David Coles |
|
|
David Coles |
|
|
Interim Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
(Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer) |
|
|
|
Date: November 2, 2011 |
|
|
Exhibit No. |
|
Description |
|
Incorporation by Reference |
|
|
|
|
|
3.1 |
|
Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation. |
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on February 1, 2005. |
|
|
|
|
|
3.2 |
|
Articles Supplementary. |
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 27, 2008. |
|
|
|
|
|
3.3 |
|
Articles of Amendment to the Charter of PHH Corporation effective as of June 12, 2009. |
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 16, 2009. |
|
|
|
|
|
3.4 |
|
Amended and Restated By-Laws. |
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on November 1, 2011. |
|
|
|
|
|
4.1 |
|
Specimen common stock certificate. |
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004 filed on March 15, 2005. |
|
|
|
|
|
4.2 |
|
See Exhibits 3.1, 3.2, 3.3 and 3.4 for provisions of the Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation, as amended, and Amended and Restated By-laws of the registrant defining the rights of holders of common stock of the registrant. |
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to our Current Reports on Form 8-K filed on February 1, 2005, March 27, 2008, June 16, 2009 and November 1, 2011, respectively. |
|
|
|
|
|
4.3 |
|
Indenture dated as of November 6, 2000 between PHH Corporation and The Bank of New York Mellon (formerly known as The Bank of New York, as successor in interest to Bank One Trust Company, N.A.), as Trustee. |
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005 filed on November 22, 2006. |
|
|
|
|
|
4.3.1 |
|
Supplemental Indenture No. 1 dated as of November 6, 2000 between PHH Corporation and The Bank of New York Mellon (formerly known as The Bank of New York, as successor in interest to Bank One Trust Company, N.A.), as Trustee. |
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005 filed on November 22, 2006. |
|
|
|
|
|
4.3.2 |
|
Supplemental Indenture No. 2 dated as of January 30, 2001 between PHH Corporation and The Bank of New York Mellon (formerly known as The Bank of New York, as successor in interest to Bank One Trust Company, N.A.), as Trustee. |
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on February 8, 2001. |
|
|
|
|
|
4.3.3 |
|
Supplemental Indenture No. 3 dated as of May 30, 2002 between PHH Corporation and The Bank of New York Mellon (formerly known as The Bank of New York, as successor in interest to Bank One Trust Company, N.A.), as Trustee. |
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.5 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2007 filed on August 8, 2007. |
|
|
|
|
|
4.3.4 |
|
Supplemental Indenture No. 4 dated as of August 31, 2006 between PHH Corporation and The Bank of New York Mellon (formerly known as The Bank of New York, as successor in interest to Bank One Trust Company, N.A.), as Trustee. |
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on September 1, 2006. |
|
|
|
|
|
4.3.5 |
|
Form of PHH Corporation Internotes. |
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.6 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2008 filed on May 9, 2008. |
Exhibit No. |
|
Description |
|
Incorporation by Reference |
|
|
|
|
|
4.3.6 |
|
Form of 7.125% Note due 2013. |
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.5 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on February 24, 2003. |
|
|
|
|
|
4.4 |
|
Amended and Restated Base Indenture dated as of December 17, 2008 among Chesapeake Finance Holdings LLC, as Issuer, and JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., as indenture trustee. |
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.76 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 filed on March 2, 2009. |
|
|
|
|
|
4.4.1 |
|
Series 2009-1 Indenture Supplement, dated as of June 9, 2009, among Chesapeake Funding LLC, as issuer, and The Bank of New York Mellon, as indenture trustee. |
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.5.11 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2009 filed on November 5, 2009. |
|
|
|
|
|
4.4.2 |
|
Series 2009-2 Indenture Supplement, dated as of September 11, 2009, among Chesapeake Funding LLC, as issuer, and The Bank of New York Mellon, as indenture trustee. |
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on September 16, 2009. |
|
|
|
|
|
4.4.3 |
|
Series 2009-3 Indenture Supplement, dated as of November 18, 2009, among Chesapeake Funding, LLC as issuer and The Bank of New York Mellon, as indenture trustee. |
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4.3 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2010, filed on August 3, 2010. |
|
|
|
|
|
4.4.4 |
|
Form of Series 2009-3 Class A Investor Note |
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4.4 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2010, filed on August 3, 2010. |
|
|
|
|
|
4.4.5 |
|
Form of Series 2009-3 Class B Investor Note |
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4.5 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2010, filed on August 3, 2010. |
|
|
|
|
|
4.4.6 |
|
Form of Series 2009-3 Class C Investor Note |
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4.6 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2010, filed on August 3, 2010. |
|
|
|
|
|
4.4.7 |
|
Series 2009-4 Indenture Supplement, dated as of December 18, 2009 among Chesapeake Funding, LLC as issuer and The Bank of New York Mellon, as indenture trustee. |
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4.7 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2010, filed on August 3, 2010. |
|
|
|
|
|
4.4.8 |
|
Form of Series 2009-4 Class A Investor Note |
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4.8 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2010, filed on August 3, 2010. |
|
|
|
|
|
4.4.9 |
|
Form of Series 2009-4 Class B Investor Note |
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4.9 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2010, filed on August 3, 2010. |
|
|
|
|
|
4.4.10 |
|
Form of Series 2009-4 Class C Investor Note |
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4.10 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2010, filed on August 3, 2010. |
|
|
|
|
|
4.4.11 |
|
Series 2010-1 Indenture Supplement, dated as of June 1, 2010 among Chesapeake Funding, LLC as issuer and The Bank of New York Mellon, as indenture trustee. |
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4.11 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2010, filed on August 3, 2010. |
Exhibit No. |
|
Description |
|
Incorporation by Reference |
|
|
|
|
|
4.4.12 |
|
Form of Series 2010-1 Floating Rate Asset Backed Variable Funding Investor Notes, Class A. |
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4.12 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2010, filed on August 3, 2010. |
|
|
|
|
|
4.4.13 |
|
Form of Series 2010-1 Floating Rate Asset Backed Investor Notes, Class B. |
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4.13 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2010, filed on August 3, 2010. |
|
|
|
|
|
4.4.14 |
|
Amended and Restated Series 2010-1 Indenture Supplement dated as of June 29, 2011, among Chesapeake Funding, LLC, PHH Vehicle Management Services, LLC, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., Certain Non-Conduit Purchasers, Certain CP Conduit Purchaser Groups, Funding Agents for the CP Conduit Purchaser Groups, Certain Class B Note Purchasers and The Bank of New York Mellon. |
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on July 6, 2011. |
|
|
|
|
|
4.4.15 |
|
Series 2011-1 Indenture Supplement dated as of June 29, 2011, among Chesapeake Funding, LLC, PHH Vehicle Management Services, LLC, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., Certain Non-Conduit Purchasers, Certain CP Conduit Purchaser Groups, Funding Agents for the CP Conduit Purchaser Groups, Certain Class B Note Purchasers and The Bank of New York Mellon. |
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on July 6, 2011. |
|
|
|
|
|
4.4.16 |
|
Series 2011-2 Indenture Supplement dated as of September 28, 2011, between Chesapeake Funding, LLC, as issuer, and The Bank of New York Mellon, as indenture trustee. |
|
Filed herewith. |
|
|
|
|
|
4.5 |
|
Indenture dated as of April 2, 2008, by and between PHH Corporation and The Bank of New York, as Trustee. |
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 4, 2008. |
|
|
|
|
|
4.5.1 |
|
Form of Global Note 4.00% Convertible Senior Note Due 2012. |
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 4, 2008. |
|
|
|
|
|
4.6 |
|
Indenture dated as of September 29, 2009, by and between PHH Corporation and The Bank of New York Mellon, as Trustee. |
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 1, 2009. |
|
|
|
|
|
4.6.1 |
|
Form of Global Note 4.00% Convertible Senior Note Due 2014. |
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit A of Exhibit 4.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 1, 2009. |
|
|
|
|
|
4.7 |
|
Trust Indenture dated as of November 16, 2009, between BNY Trust Company of Canada as issuer trustee of Fleet Leasing Receivables Trust and ComputerShare Trust Company Of Canada, as indenture trustee. |
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.8 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 filed on March 1, 2010. |
|
|
|
|
|
4.7.1 |
|
Series 2010-1 Supplemental Indenture dated as of January 27, 2010, between BNY Trust Company of Canada as issuer trustee of Fleet Leasing Receivables Trust and ComputerShare Trust Company Of Canada, as indenture trustee. |
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.8.1 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 filed on March 1, 2010. |
|
|
|
|
|
4.7.2 |
|
Fleet Leasing Receivables Trust Series 2010-1 Class A-1a Asset-Backed Note. |
|
Incorporated by reference to Schedule A-1a of Exhibit 4.8.1 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 filed on March 1, 2010. |
Exhibit No. |
|
Description |
|
Incorporation by Reference |
|
|
|
|
|
4.7.3 |
|
Fleet Leasing Receivables Trust Series 2010-1 Class A-1b Asset-Backed Note. |
|
Incorporated by reference to Schedule A-1b of Exhibit 4.8.1 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 filed on March 1, 2010. |
|
|
|
|
|
4.7.4 |
|
Fleet Leasing Receivables Trust Series 2010-1 Class A-2a Asset-Backed Note. |
|
Incorporated by reference to Schedule A-2a of Exhibit 4.8.1 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 filed on March 1, 2010. |
|
|
|
|
|
4.7.5 |
|
Fleet Leasing Receivables Trust Series 2010-1 Class A-2b Asset-Backed Note. |
|
Incorporated by reference to Schedule A-2b of Exhibit 4.8.1 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 filed on March 1, 2010. |
|
|
|
|
|
4.7.6 |
|
Fleet Leasing Receivables Trust Series 2010-1 Class B Asset-Backed Note. |
|
Incorporated by reference to Schedule B of Exhibit 4.8.1 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 filed on March 1, 2010. |
|
|
|
|
|
4.7.7 |
|
Series 2010-2 Supplemental Indenture dated as of August 31, 2010, between BNY Trust Company of Canada as issuer trustee of Fleet Leasing Receivables Trust and ComputerShare Trust Company Of Canada, as indenture trustee. |
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.7.7 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2010 filed on November 3, 2010. |
|
|
|
|
|
4.7.8 |
|
Fleet Leasing Receivables Trust Series 2010-2 Class A Asset-Backed Note. |
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.7.8 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2010 filed on November 3, 2010. |
|
|
|
|
|
4.7.9 |
|
Fleet Leasing Receivables Trust Series 2010-2 Class B Asset-Backed Note. |
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.7.9 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2010 filed on November 3, 2010. |
|
|
|
|
|
4.8 |
|
Indenture dated as of August 11, 2010 between PHH Corporation, as Issuer, and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as Trustee. |
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on August 12, 2010. |
|
|
|
|
|
4.8.1 |
|
Form of 91/4% Senior Note Due 2016. |
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.8.1 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2011 filed on May 4, 2011. |
|
|
|
|
|
10.1 |
|
Amended and Restated Competitive Advance and Revolving Credit Agreement, dated as of January 6, 2006, by and among PHH Corporation and PHH Vehicle Management Services, Inc., as Borrowers, J.P. Morgan Securities, Inc. and Citigroup Global Markets, Inc., as Joint Lead Arrangers, the Lenders referred to therein (the Lenders), and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as a Lender and Administrative Agent for the Lenders. |
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.47 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005 filed on November 22, 2006. |
Exhibit No. |
|
Description |
|
Incorporation by Reference |
|
|
|
|
|
10.1.1 |
|
Second Amendment, dated as of November 2, 2007, to the Amended and Restated Competitive Advance and Revolving Credit Agreement, as amended, dated as of January 6, 2006, by and among PHH Corporation and PHH Vehicle Management Services, Inc., as Borrowers, J.P. Morgan Securities, Inc. and Citigroup Global Markets, Inc., as Joint Lead Arrangers, the Lenders referred to therein, and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as a Lender and Administrative Agent for the Lenders. |
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on November 2, 2007. |
|
|
|
|
|
10.1.2 |
|
Third Amendment, dated as of March 27, 2008, to the Amended and Restated Competitive Advance and Revolving Credit Agreement, as amended, dated as of January 6, 2006, by and among PHH Corporation and PHH Vehicle Management Services, Inc., as Borrowers, J.P. Morgan Securities, Inc. and Citigroup Global Markets, Inc., as Joint Lead Arrangers, the Lenders referred to therein, and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as a Lender and Administrative Agent for the Lenders. |
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1.2 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2009 filed on November 5, 2009. |
|
|
|
|
|
10.1.3 |
|
Fourth Amendment, dated as of June 25, 2010, to the Amended and Restated Competitive Advance and Revolving Credit Agreement, as amended, dated as of January 6, 2006, by and among PHH Corporation and PHH Vehicle Management Services, Inc., as Borrowers, J.P. Morgan Securities, Inc. and Citigroup Global Markets, Inc., as Joint Lead Arrangers, the Lenders referred to therein and JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. as a Lender and as a Administrative Agent for the lenders. |
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1.3 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2010 filed on August 3, 2010. |
|
|
|
|
|
10.2 |
|
Purchase Agreement dated March 27, 2008 by and between PHH Corporation, Citigroup Global Markets Inc., J.P. Morgan Securities Inc. and Wachovia Capital Markets, LLC, as representatives of the Initial Purchasers. |
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 4, 2008. |
|
|
|
|
|
10.2.1 |
|
Master Terms and Conditions for Convertible Bond Hedging Transactions dated March 27, 2008 by and between PHH Corporation and J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. |
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 4, 2008. |
|
|
|
|
|
10.2.2 |
|
Master Terms and Conditions for Warrants dated March 27, 2008 by and between PHH Corporation and J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. |
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 4, 2008. |
|
|
|
|
|
10.2.3 |
|
Confirmation of Convertible Bond Hedging Transactions dated March 27, 2008 by and between PHH Corporation and J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. |
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 4, 2008. |
|
|
|
|
|
10.2.4 |
|
Confirmation of Warrant dated March 27, 2008 by and between PHH Corporation and J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. |
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 4, 2008. |
|
|
|
|
|
10.2.5 |
|
Master Terms and Conditions for Convertible Debt Bond Hedging Transactions dated March 27, 2008 by and between PHH Corporation and Wachovia Bank, N.A. |
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 4, 2008. |
|
|
|
|
|
10.2.6 |
|
Master Terms and Conditions for Warrants dated March 27, 2008 by and between PHH Corporation and Wachovia Bank, N.A. |
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 4, 2008. |
Exhibit No. |
|
Description |
|
Incorporation by Reference |
|
|
|
|
|
10.2.7 |
|
Confirmation of Convertible Bond Hedging Transactions dated March 27, 2008 by and between PHH Corporation and Wachovia Bank, N.A. |
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 4, 2008. |
|
|
|
|
|
10.2.8 |
|
Confirmation of Warrant dated March 27, 2008 by and between PHH Corporation and Wachovia Bank, N.A. |
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 4, 2008. |
|
|
|
|
|
10.2.9 |
|
Master Terms and Conditions for Convertible Bond Hedging Transactions dated March 27, 2008 by and between PHH Corporation and Citibank, N.A. |
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.10 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 4, 2008. |
|
|
|
|
|
10.2.10 |
|
Master Terms and Conditions for Warrants dated March 27, 2008 by and between PHH Corporation and Citibank, N.A. |
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.11 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 4, 2008. |
|
|
|
|
|
10.2.11 |
|
Confirmation of Convertible Bond Hedging Transactions dated March 27, 2008 by and between PHH Corporation and Citibank, N.A. |
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.12 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 4, 2008. |
|
|
|
|
|
10.2.12 |
|
Confirmation of Warrant dated March 27, 2008 by and between PHH Corporation and Citibank, N.A. |
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.13 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 4, 2008. |
|
|
|
|
|
10.3 |
|
Third Amended and Restated Master Repurchase Agreement dated as of June 24, 2011, between The Royal Bank of Scotland PLC, as Buyer, PHH Mortgage Corporation, as Seller. |
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 30, 2011. |
|
|
|
|
|
10.3.1 |
|
Third Amended and Restated Guaranty dated as of June 18, 2010, made by PHH Corporation in favor of The Royal Bank of Scotland, PLC. |
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 23, 2010. |
|
|
|
|
|
10.4 |
|
Purchase Agreement dated September 2, 2009 by and among PHH Corporation, PHH Vehicle Management Services, LLC, Chesapeake Funding LLC and J.P. Morgan Securities, Inc, Banc of America Securities LLC and Citigroup Global Markets, Inc., as representatives of several initial purchasers. |
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.12 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2009 filed on January 12, 2010. |
|
|
|
|
|
10.5 |
|
Purchase Agreement dated September 23, 2009, by and between PHH Corporation, Citigroup Global Markets Inc., J.P. Morgan Securities Inc. and Wells Fargo Securities, LLC, as representatives of the Initial Purchasers. |
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on September 29, 2009. |
|
|
|
|
|
10.5.1 |
|
Master Terms and Conditions for Convertible Bond Hedging Transactions dated September 23, 2009, by and between PHH Corporation and JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association, London Branch. |
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on September 29, 2009. |
|
|
|
|
|
10.5.2 |
|
Master Terms and Conditions for Warrants dated September 23, 2009, by and between PHH Corporation and JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association, London Branch. |
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on September 29, 2009. |
|
|
|
|
|
10.5.3 |
|
Confirmation of Convertible Bond Hedging Transactions dated September 23, 2009, by and between PHH Corporation and JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association, London Branch. |
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on September 29, 2009. |
Exhibit No. |
|
Description |
|
Incorporation by Reference |
|
|
|
|
|
10.5.4 |
|
Confirmation of Warrants dated September 23, 2009, by and between PHH Corporation and JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association, London Branch. |
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on September 29, 2009. |
|
|
|
|
|
10.5.5 |
|
Master Terms and Conditions for Convertible Bond Hedging Transactions dated September 23, 2009, by and between PHH Corporation and Wachovia Bank, National Association. |
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on September 29, 2009. |
|
|
|
|
|
10.5.6 |
|
Master Terms and Conditions for Warrants dated September 23, 2009, by and between PHH Corporation and Wachovia Bank, National Association. |
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on September 29, 2009. |
|
|
|
|
|
10.5.7 |
|
Confirmation of Convertible Bond Hedging Transactions dated September 23, 2009, by and between PHH Corporation and Wachovia Bank, National Association. |
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on September 29, 2009. |
|
|
|
|
|
10.5.8 |
|
Confirmation of Warrants dated September 23, 2009, by and between PHH Corporation and Wachovia Bank, National Association. |
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on September 29, 2009. |
|
|
|
|
|
10.5.9 |
|
Master Terms and Conditions for Convertible Bond Hedging Transactions dated September 23, 2009, by and between PHH Corporation and Citibank, N.A. |
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.10 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on September 29, 2009. |
|
|
|
|
|
10.5.10 |
|
Master Terms and Conditions for Warrants dated September 23, 2009, by and between PHH Corporation and Citibank, N.A. |
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.11 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on September 29, 2009. |
|
|
|
|
|
10.5.11 |
|
Confirmation of Convertible Bond Hedging Transactions dated September 23, 2009, by and between PHH Corporation and Citibank, N.A. |
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.12 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on September 29, 2009. |
|
|
|
|
|
10.5.12 |
|
Confirmation of Warrants dated September 23, 2009, by and between PHH Corporation and Citibank, N.A. |
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.13 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on September 29, 2009. |
|
|
|
|
|
10.5.13 |
|
Amendment to Convertible Bond Hedging Transaction Confirmation dated September 29, 2009, by and between PHH Corporation and JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association, London Branch. |
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 1, 2009. |
|
|
|
|
|
10.5.14 |
|
Confirmation of Additional Warrants dated September 29, 2009, by and between PHH Corporation and JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association, London Branch. |
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 1, 2009. |
|
|
|
|
|
10.5.15 |
|
Amendment to Convertible Bond Hedging Transaction Confirmation dated September 29, 2009, by and between PHH Corporation and Wachovia Bank, National Association. |
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 1, 2009. |
|
|
|
|
|
10.5.16 |
|
Confirmation of Additional Warrants dated September 29, 2009, by and between PHH Corporation and Wachovia Bank, National Association. |
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 1, 2009. |
|
|
|
|
|
10.5.17 |
|
Amendment to Convertible Bond Hedging Transaction Confirmation dated September 29, 2009, by and between PHH Corporation and Citibank, N.A. |
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 1, 2009. |
Exhibit No. |
|
Description |
|
Incorporation by Reference |
|
|
|
|
|
10.5.18 |
|
Confirmation of Additional Warrants dated September 29, 2009, by and between PHH Corporation and Citibank, N.A. |
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 1, 2009. |
|
|
|
|
|
10.6 |
|
Form of Indemnification Agreement. |
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on August 20, 2010. |
|
|
|
|
|
10.6.1 |
|
PHH Corporation Unanimous Written Consent of the Board of Directors effective August 18, 2010. |
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on August 20, 2010. |
|
|
|
|
|
10.6.2 |
|
PHH Corporation Management Incentive Plan. |
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 6, 2010. |
|
|
|
|
|
10.6.3 |
|
Form of PHH Corporation Management Incentive Plan Award Notice. |
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 6, 2010. |
|
|
|
|
|
10.6.4 |
|
Amended and Restated 2005 Equity and Incentive Plan (as amended and restated through June 17, 2009). |
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 22, 2009. |
|
|
|
|
|
10.6.5 |
|
First Amendment to the PHH Corporation Amended and Restated 2005 Equity and Incentive Plan, effective August 18, 2010. |
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on August 20, 2010. |
|
|
|
|
|
10.6.6 |
|
Form of PHH Corporation 2005 Equity and Incentive Plan Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement, as amended. |
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.28 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2005 filed on May 16, 2005. |
|
|
|
|
|
10.6.7 |
|
Form of PHH Corporation 2005 Equity and Incentive Plan Non-Qualified Stock Option Conversion Award Agreement. |
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.29 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2005 filed on May 16, 2005. |
|
|
|
|
|
10.6.8 |
|
Form of PHH Corporation 2005 Equity and Incentive Plan Non-Qualified Stock Option Award Agreement, as revised June 28, 2005. |
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.36 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2005 filed on August 12, 2005. |
|
|
|
|
|
10.6.9 |
|
Form of PHH Corporation 2005 Equity and Incentive Plan Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement, as revised June 28, 2005. |
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.37 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2005 filed on August 12, 2005. |
|
|
|
|
|
10.6.10 |
|
Form of 2009 Performance Unit Award Notice and Agreement for Certain Executive Officers, as approved by the Compensation Committee on March 25, 2009. |
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 31, 2009. |
|
|
|
|
|
10.6.11 |
|
Separation Agreement between PHH Corporation and Mark R. Danahy dated as of August 4, 2010. |
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on August 4, 2010. |
|
|
|
|
|
10.6.12 |
|
Letter Agreement between PHH Corporation and Alvarez & Marsal North America, LLC dated March 1, 2011. |
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 4, 2011. |
|
|
|
|
|
10.6.13 |
|
Separation Agreement by and between Sandra Bell and PHH Corporation dated as of May 6, 2011. |
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on May 9, 2011. |
Exhibit No. |
|
Description |
|
Incorporation by Reference |
|
|
|
|
|
10.7 |
|
Trust Purchase Agreement dated January 27, 2010 between Fleet Leasing Receivables Trust, as purchaser, PHH Fleet Lease Receivables L.P., as seller, PHH Vehicle Management Services Inc., as servicer and PHH Corporation, as performance guarantor. |
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.15 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 filed on March 1, 2010. |
|
|
|
|
|
10.7.1 |
|
Agency Agreement dated as of January 25, 2010, between BNY Trust Company of Canada as trustee of Fleet Leasing Receivables Trust, PHH Vehicle Management Services Inc., as financial services agent of Fleet Leasing Receivables Trust and as originator, PHH Fleet Lease Receivables L.P., as seller and Merrill Lynch Canada Inc., CIBC World Markets Inc., RBC Dominion Securities Inc. and Scotia Capital Inc., as agents. |
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.15.1 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 filed on March 1, 2010. |
|
|
|
|
|
10.7.2 |
|
Agency Agreement dated as of January 25, 2010, between BNY Trust Company of Canada as trustee of Fleet Leasing Receivables Trust, PHH Vehicle Management Services Inc., as financial services agent of Fleet Leasing Receivables Trust and as originator, PHH Fleet Lease Receivables L.P., as seller and Merrill Lynch Canada Inc. and Banc of America Securities LLC, as agents. |
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.15.2 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 filed on March 1, 2010. |
|
|
|
|
|
10.8 |
|
Mortgage Loan Participation Purchase and Sale Agreement dated as of July 23, 2010, between PHH Mortgage Corporation, as seller, and Bank of America, N.A., as purchaser. |
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on July 29, 2010. |
|
|
|
|
|
10.8.1 |
|
Amendment No. 2 to Mortgage Loan Participation Purchase and Sale Agreement dated as of July 14, 2011, between Bank of America, N.A. and PHH Mortgage Corporation. |
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on July 20, 2011. |
|
|
|
|
|
10.9 |
|
Purchase Agreement, dated August 6, 2010, by and between PHH Corporation, Banc of America Securities LLC, Citigroup Global Markets Inc., J.P. Morgan Securities Inc., and RBS Securities Inc., as representatives of the Initial Purchasers. |
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on August 9, 2010. |
|
|
|
|
|
10.10 |
|
Registration Rights Agreement, dated August 11, 2010, by and between PHH Corporation and Banc of America Securities LLC, Citigroup Global Markets Inc., J.P. Morgan Securities Inc., and RBS Securities Inc., as representatives of several initial purchasers of the notes. |
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on August, 12, 2010. |
|
|
|
|
|
10.11 |
|
Mortgage Loan Participation Sale Agreement dated as of September 2, 2010, between PHH Mortgage Corporation, as seller, and JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association, as purchaser. |
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on September 3, 2010. |
|
|
|
|
|
10.11.1 |
|
Amendment No. 1 to Mortgage Loan Participation Sale Agreement dated as of August 15, 2011, by and between PHH Mortgage Corporation, as seller, and JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association, as purchaser. |
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on August 17, 2011. |
|
|
|
|
|
10.11.2 |
|
Amendment No. 2 to Mortgage Loan Participation Sale Agreement dated as of September 27, 2011, by and between PHH Mortgage Corporation, as seller, and JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association, as purchaser. |
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on September 29, 2011. |
Exhibit No. |
|
Description |
|
Incorporation by Reference |
|
|
|
|
|
10.12 |
|
Letter Agreement between Fannie Mae and PHH Mortgage Corporation dated December 16, 2010. |
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on December 22, 2010. |
|
|
|
|
|
31.1 |
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
Filed herewith. |
|
|
|
|
|
31.2 |
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
Filed herewith. |
|
|
|
|
|
32.1 |
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
Filed herewith. |
|
|
|
|
|
32.2 |
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
Filed herewith. |
|
|
|
|
|
101.INS |
|
XBRL Instance Document |
|
Furnished herewith. |
|
|
|
|
|
101.SCH |
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document |
|
Furnished herewith. |
|
|
|
|
|
101.CAL |
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document |
|
Furnished herewith. |
|
|
|
|
|
101.LAB |
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Labels Linkbase Document |
|
Furnished herewith. |
|
|
|
|
|
101.PRE |
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document |
|
Furnished herewith. |
|
|
|
|
|
101.DEF |
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document |
|
Furnished herewith. |
Confidential treatment has been requested for certain portions of this Exhibit pursuant to Rule 24b-2 of the Exchange Act which portions have been omitted and filed separately with the Commission.
Confidential treatment has been granted for certain portions of this Exhibit pursuant to an order under the Exchange Act which portions have been omitted and filed separately with the Commission.
Management or compensatory plan or arrangement required to be filed pursuant to Item 601(b)(10) of Regulation S-K.