Edgar Filing: BRENDAN TECHNOLOGIES INC

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-KSB

(Mark One)

x Annual Report Pursuant To Section 13 or 15(d) Of the Securities Exchange Act Of 1934

For the fiscal year end June 30, 2007

¨ Transition Report under Section 13 or 15(d) Of the Securities Exchange Act Of 1934

For the transition period from _____ to _____

COMMISSION FILE NUMBER 033-24138-D

BRENDAN TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

(Name of small business issuer in our charter)

NEVADA		38-3378963
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
2236 Rutherford Rd., Suite 107
Carlsbad, California		92008
(Address of principal executive offices)		(Zip Code)

Issuer's telephone number (760) 929-7500

Securities registered under Section 12(b) of the Exchange Act: NONE.

Securities registered under Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act:

COMMON STOCK, $0.004995 PAR VALUE PER SHARE.

Check whether the issuer is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act ¨

Check whether the issuer (1) filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act during the past 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨

Check if there is no disclosure of delinquent filers in response to Item 405 of Regulation S-B contained in this form, and no disclosure will be contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-KSB or any amendment to this Form 10-KSB. ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act) Yes ¨ No x

Revenues for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2007 were: $521,330.

The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates computed by reference to the price at which the common equity was sold as of September 25, 2007 was $2,975,405.

State the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer's classes of common equity, as of the latest practicable date. As of September 25, 2007 the issuer had 23,705,594 shares of Common Stock outstanding.

Transitional Small Business Disclosure Format (Check one): Yes ¨ No x

Annual Report on Form 10-KSB

for the Year Ended June 30, 2007

TABLE OF CONTENTS

		Page

	PART I

ITEM 1.	Description of Business	3
ITEM 2.	Description of Property	6
ITEM 3.	Legal Proceedings	6
ITEM 4.	Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders	7

	PART II

ITEM 5.	Market for Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Small
	Business Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities	7
ITEM 6	Management's Discussion and Analysis or Plan of Operation	8
ITEM 7.	Financial Statements	17
ITEM 8.	Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
ITEM 8A	Controls and Procedures	18
ITEM 8B.	Other Information	18

	PART III

ITEM 9.	Directors, Executive Officers, Promoters and Control Persons; Compliance with Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act	18
ITEM 10.	Executive Compensation	20
ITEM 11.	Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters	22
ITEM 12.	Certain Relationships and Related Transactions	24
ITEM 13.	Exhibits	24
ITEM 14.	Principal Accountant Fees and Services	27

DISCLOSURE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

Certain statements contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB constitute "forward-looking statements". These statements, identified by words such as “plan”, "anticipate", "believe", "estimate", "should," "expect" and similar expressions, include our expectations and objectives regarding our future financial position, operating results and business strategy. These statements reflect the current views of management with respect to future events and are subject to risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause our actual results, performance or achievements, or industry results, to be materially different from those described in the forward-looking statements. Such risks and uncertainties include those set forth under the caption "Management's Discussion and Analysis or Plan of Operation" and elsewhere in this Form 10-KSB. We advise you to carefully review the reports and documents we file from time to time with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), particularly our quarterly reports on Form 10-QSB and our current reports on Form 8-K.

As used in this annual report, the terms "we", "us", "our", Brendan”, and the “Company” mean Brendan Technologies, Inc., unless otherwise indicated.

PART I

ITEM 1. DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS.

The Company

On September 15, 2006, we changed our name to Brendan Technologies, Inc., a Nevada corporation (“Brendan”) from Omni U.S.A., Inc., a Nevada corporation (“Omni”). On December 29, 2005, Omni merged with Brendan Technologies, Inc., a Michigan corporation formed on October 31, 1997 doing business as Brendan Scientific Corporation (“Brendan Sub”). Brendan Sub became the surviving corporation in the merger and a wholly-owned subsidiary of Omni. Brendan Sub continues its corporate existence under the laws of the State of Michigan and is Brendan’s only subsidiary.

Concurrently with the merger, 4,754,709 shares of Brendan Sub common stock outstanding immediately before the merger were converted into 19,018,836 shares of Brendan, a four for one ratio. Also concurrently with the merger, (i) 4,352,879 shares of Brendan common stock were issued to the holders of Brendan Sub Senior and Bridge Notes totaling $2,654,198 in aggregate principal and interest, a conversion rate of 1.64 shares per $1.00 under such debt; and (ii) 900,000 shares of Brendan common stock was issued to individuals who participated in the arrangement of the merger.

Common stock options and warrants exercisable into 973,500 shares of Brendan Sub before the merger became exercisable into 3,894,000 common shares of Brendan after the merger. The exercise price of the Brendan stock options and warrants was adjusted to 25% of the exercise price of the Brendan Sub stock options and warrants.

We are a software company that designs, develops and markets computational analytical software products for the laboratory testing industry. Brendan’s laboratory workflow and analysis software platform manages the raw, computed and analytical data in testing laboratories and in manufacturing.

Brendan evolved from the initial work of our founder John R. Dunn II, Ph.D., now our Chairman, President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Technical Officer. Brendan’s first commercialized product is StatLIA®, software designed specifically for immunoassay testing. Since Dr. Dunn’s early work on StatLIA® over ten years ago, StatLIA® has been developed with software engineers, mathematicians and laboratory professionals who specialize in laboratory testing. Over the years, StatLIA® has been used in laboratories, undergoing numerous revisions and additions to develop the product.

There can be no assurance that we can achieve profitable operations, and we will need additional financial resources during the next twelve months.

StatLIA®

Immunoassays, one of the world’s largest and fastest growing testing technologies, is used to test for metabolites found in AIDS, hepatitis, cancer, environmental pollutants, side effects of new drugs and thousands of other biological and environmental substances. Immunoassays are a broadly applicable technology allowing low cost, rapid analysis through high throughput testing. Immunoassays are used extensively in pharmaceutical, hospital, clinical reference, academic and industrial research, environmental, agricultural, food processing and veterinarian laboratories throughout the world.

StatLIA® uses comprehensive statistics to directly or indirectly analyze the performance of each of the nine immunoassay components (label, tracer, antibody, buffer, incubation, separation, standards, controls and unknowns). StatLIA® stores a fixed set of stable reference assays which are statistically compared to a single assay or multiple assays to detect changes in reagents or incubation conditions. With a reference set of at least two assays, standard curve and control specimen parameters in the current assay are statistically compared to the same parameter in the reference assays to identify any statistically significant differences.

StatLIA® is intended to address the following:

· Insufficient Quality - Error rates in Immunoassay testing is estimated to be as high as 4%. Testing errors and the inability to directly locate error sources is costly and time consuming. We believe that StatLIA® will reduce the error rates and enhance the tester’s ability to locate the error source.

· Lack of Automation - Immunoassay testing is very labor intensive due to many manual steps in the processing, tracking and analysis of the data produced. With high throughput testing becoming the industry norm, the data needs to be managed with even greater efficiency. We believe that StatLIA® will reduce such labor costs.

· Regulatory Compliance - Federal regulations are placing increasing demands for compliance with the Food and Drug Administration’s (“FDA”) quality assurance regulations. We believe that StatLIA® will meet the growing need for automated software that can assist laboratories in complying with the regulations.

· Need for Better Data Management - Improved technologies have allowed greater automation in Immunoassay testing, increasing throughput volumes but requiring better connectivity and standardization for the management of the data generated. We believe that StatLIA® will address the need for greater connectivity and standardization.

Brendan first targeted the immunoassay market with StatLIA® because it is a fragmented and large market that may allow Brendan to sell our software to testing equipment distributors and original equipment manufacturers (“OEMs”), and earn a share of business from large organizations.

Users of StatLIA® include device and reagent manufacturers, pharmaceutical companies, clinical diagnostic centers and government testing laboratories. Distributors of StatLIA® include device and reagent manufacturers and their distributors, as well as Brendan’s direct sales force.

Customer Base

We have used most of our capital to date in the development of StatLIA® and the expansion of the program to encompass all of the differing immunoassay technologies and workflow configurations found in research and clinical laboratories. Existing customers who have used StatLIA® in laboratories include several large pharmaceutical companies, clinical diagnostic organizations, reagent manufacturers and research entities. This client base also serves as a source of revenue for additional instruments and workstations, and support and maintenance renewal fees.

Many of our institutional clients operate under rigorous FDA regulations, or the European equivalent, and the FDA requires that new software products be validated.

Strategy

Industry Analysis

Using data obtained from Morgan Stanley Dean Witter, Global Industry Analysts, and other published industry and marketing reports, and instrument manufacturer sales figures, we estimate this market to represent over $1 billion in revenue and does not include the food processing, agricultural, veterinarian, or the rapidly expanding environmental immunoassay markets. This also does not include software applications for other technologies. According to the Health Industry Manufacturer’s Association, more than $50 billion in medical devices, diagnostic products and health information systems are currently purchased annually in the United States and more than $120 billion worldwide. This represents only the clinical market segment and not pharmaceutical, research, environmental and other segments.

Conventional laboratory software falls into two primary areas: laboratory management or instrumentation. Laboratory management software handles billing, report generation, and other administrative tasks. The software is not designed for complex technical computation. Software for the testing instruments operates as dedicated systems and is basically designed only to generate results. It is not designed for the complete statistical analysis and data management and record keeping requirements for pharmaceutical, clinical or research labs, nor is it designed to exist in a cooperative environment with other immunoassay instruments.

StatLIA® was introduced to meet this need, which we believe no other commercial software available meets. By using StatLIA® for their assay validation and documentation as well as standardizing on it as one uniform system throughout their organization, pharmaceutical companies may save substantial time and resources supplying the necessary documentation to get new drugs to market and clinical laboratories may increase productivity and reliability while reducing costs.

Market

We believe that through Brendan we have the opportunity to introduce a product to serve an under-served niche market: the software used in biomedical and non-biomedical testing laboratories. The testing industry generates more than $100 billion in revenues each year to run tests for drug development, medical diagnostics and treatments, water and soil samples, infectious disease research, food contaminants, and numerous other health and industry-critical applications.

Brendan has focused on the analytical segment of the market. This is the computation, storage and analysis of the raw signal data generated by a testing instrument. However, the majority of the software used to analyze these tests is a part of the instrument software that is provided by the instrument manufacturer. These routines do not provide all of the capabilities and are not as extensive as the data currently computed by StatLIA®.

StatLIA® allows laboratories to interface all of their immunoassay testing instruments into one uniform system. As one system, as compared to the more common configurations consisting of isolated testing instruments, the StatLIA® system can be easily interfaced to our customer’s main database for reporting patient results and recording clinical trial data, among other processes. The system also integrates into a laboratory’s network, so that multiple computers can be used to prepare, compute, analyze and report all assay data, thereby increasing workflow. StatLIA®’s superior quality control process not only determines the accuracy of the test more reliably than other software currently available, but also pinpoints the specific cause of a problem in a bad test, dramatically reducing laboratory downtime and reagent costs.

Competition

Almost all immunoassay software is produced and sold by manufacturers bundled with their instruments. The software is included to stimulate sales of their instruments and is not usually marketed as a stand-alone product. Conventional laboratory software falls into two primary areas: laboratory management or instrumentation functionality. Laboratory management software handles billing, report generation and other administrative tasks. The software is not designed for complex technical computation. On the other hand, software for testing instruments operates as a dedicated system and is designed primarily to generate testing data. This software has limitations meeting the complete statistical analysis, data management, data utilization and record keeping demands of pharmaceutical, clinical or research labs, nor is it designed to exist in a cooperative environment with other testing instruments.

Prior to Brendan, we believe that no company has focused as extensively on the gap between instrument operational software and administrative LIM software. Brendan has worked with several industry-leading labs to develop StatLIA® and we believe that StatLIA® is a unique software product that surpasses any software currently available for this market.

To date, the majority of StatLIA® sales have been replacing existing OEM software on testing equipment. This software, bundled with the instruments, is Brendan’s current main competition. Existing equipment-specific software include Softmax, used for Molecular Device’s microplate readers and Gen5 used for BioTek Instrument’s microplate readers. We believe instrument manufacturers are excellent prospects for distribution agreements to incorporate or bundle our software with their instruments.

Intellectual Property

We attempt to protect the proprietary aspects of our products with copyrights, trade secret law and internal nondisclosure safeguards. The source code for the software contained in our products is considered proprietary and we do not furnish source code to our customers. We have also entered into confidentiality agreements with our employees. Despite these restrictions, it may be possible for competitors or users to copy aspects of our products or to obtain information that we regard as a trade secret.

There is a rapid pace of technological change in the software industry, which in turn compels us to continually enhance and extend our product lines. We believe that patent, trade secret and copyright protection is less significant to our competitive position than factors such as the knowledge, ability and experience of our personnel, new product development, frequent product enhancements, name recognition and ongoing, reliable product maintenance and support.

Employees

Brendan currently has 14 full time employees and two part time consultants. Brendan has entered into employment agreements with certain of our employees.

ITEM 2. DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY.

We conduct our corporate functions and manufacturing, product development, sales and marketing activities in Carlsbad, California. We rent 3,988 square feet of office space at 2236 Rutherford Road, Suite 107, Carlsbad, California 92008 under a two-year lease ending May 31, 2008 for a monthly rent ranging from $4,825 for the first year increasing to $4,985 for the second year. The average monthly rent for the two-year period is $4,905. This space is adequate to meet our foreseeable future needs.

ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS.

None.

ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS.

None.

PART II

ITEM 5. MARKET FOR COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND SMALL BUSINESS ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES.

Our Common Stock is traded in the over-the-counter market and is quoted on the NASD OTC Bulletin Board system maintained by the National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc. Prices reported represent prices between dealers, do not include markups, markdowns or commissions and do not necessarily represent actual transactions. The market for our shares has been sporadic and at times very limited.

The following table sets forth the high and low closing price for the Common Stock for the fiscal years ended June 30, 2007 and 2006. Closing prices previous to the reverse merger date of December 29, 2005, are reflective of the closing prices for the predecessor corporation.

	Closing Price
	High		Low

Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2007
First Quarter	$	0.50	$	0.21
Second Quarter	$	1.01	$	0.40
Third Quarter	$	0.60	$	0.35
Fourth Quarter	$	0.51	$	0.37

Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2006
First Quarter	$	1.85	$	1.36
Second Quarter	$	1.75	$	1.10
Third Quarter	$	1.20	$	0.60
Fourth Quarter	$	0.68	$	0.25

We had approximately 715 shareholders of record as of September 25, 2007. Because most of our common stock is held by brokers and other institutions on behalf of stockholders, we are unable to estimate the total number of beneficial owners represented by these record holders. We have never paid a cash dividend on our common stock and do not expect to pay one in the foreseeable future.

Recent Sale of Unregistered Securities

During June 2007, we sold to and received cash from a group of investors 8% Convertible Debentures for an aggregate $175,000 and common stock purchase warrants to purchase up to 700,000 common shares.

Issuance

Number of Shares

Maturity

8% Convertible Debentures

Date of

Amount of

May Be Converted

Date of

Debenture holder

Debenture

Into

Debenture

Derek Duchein, IRA Account

6/6/2007

90,000

180,000

6/6/2009

Julie Duchien, IRA Account

6/6/2007

60,000

120,000

6/6/2009

Bryan Holland

6/11/2007

25,000

50,000

6/11/2009

175,000

350,000

Common Stock Purchase Warrants

Name

Date of Issuance

Number of Shares

Exercise Price

Expiraton Date

Derek Duchein, IRA Account

6/6/2007

180,000

0.60

6/6/2012

Debenture

Julie Duchien, IRA Account

6/6/2007

120,000

0.60

6/6/2012

Debenture

Bryan Holland

6/11/2007

50,000

0.60

6/11/2012

Debenture

Derek Duchein, IRA Account

6/6/2007

180,000

1.00

6/6/2008

Debenture

Julie Duchien, IRA Account

6/6/2007

120,000

1.00

6/6/2008

Debenture

Bryan Holland

6/11/2007

50,000

1.00

6/11/2008

Debenture

700,000

With respect to the above securities issuances, the Registrant relied on exemptions provided by Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”) and Rule 506 under the Securities Act. No advertising or general solicitation was employed in offering the securities. The securities were issued to a limited number of persons all of whom were accredited investors as that term is defined in Rule 501 of Regulation D under the Securities Act. All were capable of analyzing the merits and risks of their investment, acknowledged in writing that they were acquiring the securities for investment and not with a view toward distribution or resale, and understood the speculative nature of their investment. All securities issued contained a restrictive legend prohibiting transfer of the shares except in accordance with federal securities laws.

ITEM 6. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OR PLAN OF OPERATION.

Overview

Brendan completed a reverse merger transaction on December 29, 2005 with Brendan Sub, a Michigan corporation formed in October 1997. Prior to the merger, Omni, through its wholly-owned subsidiary, Omni U.S.A., Inc., a Washington corporation ("Omni-Washington") and Omni-Washington's wholly-owned subsidiary, Omni Resources, Ltd., a Hong Kong company ("Omni Resources"), through its wholly-owned manufacturing facility, Shanghai Omni Gear Co., Ltd.("Shanghai Omni Gear"), designed, developed, manufactured and distributed power transmissions (also known as "gearboxes" or "enclosed gear drives") for use in agricultural, industrial, "off-highway" and construction equipment. Omni, through another wholly-owned subsidiary, Butler Products Corporation, designed, developed, manufactured and distributed trailer and implement jacks and couplers, which included light and heavy-duty jacks and couplers used in a variety of trailers. Immediately following the closing of the merger, the subsidiaries of Omni were sold to its founders and Brendan Sub became the only wholly owned subsidiary of Omni, the public company which was renamed Brendan Technologies, Inc, a Nevada corporation, in September 2006. Brendan Sub continues to be the only operating subsidiary of Brendan Technologies, Inc.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

The preparation of consolidated financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities.

On an ongoing basis, we evaluate our estimates, including those related to our product returns, bad debts, intangible assets, long-lived assets and contingencies and litigation. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.

We have identified two accounting policies that we believe are key to an understanding of our financial statements. These important accounting policies require management's most difficult, subjective judgments.

1. Revenue Recognition

We recognize revenues related to software licenses and software maintenance in accordance with the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (“AICPA”) Statements of Position (“SOP”) No. 97-2, “Software Revenue Recognition,” as amended by SOP No. 94-4 and SOP No. 98-9. We follow the guidance established by the SEC in Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 104, as well as generally accepted criteria for revenue recognition, which require that, before revenue is recorded, there is persuasive evidence of an arrangement, the fee is fixed or determinable, collection is reasonably assured, and delivery to our customer has occurred. In addition, our invoices may include multiple elements that identify vendor specific objective evidence of fair value for each of those elements. We recognize revenue as follows:

Software- our software is sold with an indefinite license period, and as such, product revenue is recorded at the time of the customer’s acceptance (generally 30 days after shipment which allows for a 30 day return guarantee if the customer is not satisfied with the product), net of estimated allowances and returns.

Post-contract customer support- (“PCS”) obligations are generally for annual services and are recognized over the period of service. Revenues for which payment has been received are treated as deferred revenue until services are provided and revenues have been earned.

Training and service calls- recognized at the time training or service calls are provided.

Royalties- we recognize revenue from royalties only after the cash has been collected (typically 30 days after the end of the quarter on which the royalty payment is based.)

Licensing- we also derive license revenue from fees for the transfer of proven and reusable intellectual property components. Generally, these payments will include a nonrefundable technology license fee, which will be payable upon the transfer of intellectual property. License fees will be recognized upon the execution of the license agreement and transfer of intellectual property provided no further significant performance obligations exist and collectibility is deemed probable.

Customization revenue- fees related to software service contracts to aid customers in adapting such intellectual property to their particular instruments, which will be performed on a best efforts basis and for which we will receive periodic milestone payments, will be recognized as revenue over the estimated development period, using a cost-based percentage of completion method.

2. Going Concern

The financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis. However, during the years ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, we incurred net losses of $2,110,698 and $845,393, respectively, and had an accumulated deficit of $8,352,407 and $6,241,709, at June 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively. In addition, at June 30, 2007, we had a working capital deficit of $1,679,643 and are in default on $225,382 of debt and interest. Our ability to continue as a going concern is dependent upon our ability to generate profitable operations in the future and/or to obtain the necessary financing to meet our obligations and repay our liabilities arising from normal business operations when they come due. The outcome of these matters cannot be predicted with any certainty at this time and as such raise substantial doubt as to our ability to continue as a going concern. Since inception, we have satisfied our capital needs through debt and equity financings and expect to continue to fund from these sources until profitability is achieved. There can be no assurance that funds will be available at terms favorable to us or that future profitability can be achieved.

Results of Operations

On December 29, 2005, we completed the acquisition of substantially all the assets of Brendan Sub pursuant to the Merger Agreement and completed the disposition of substantially all the assets of Omni-Washington and Butler pursuant to the Stock Purchase Agreement. As a result of these transactions and the issuance of common stock to the shareholders, noteholders and individuals who assisted in the merger, Brendan Sub, a now wholly-owned subsidiary of ours, became the accounting acquirer and the transaction was accounted for as a reverse merger acquisition.

Year Ended June 30, 2007 Compared to the year ended June 30, 2006

Selected Financial Information

	Year Ended			Year Ended			Increase
	June 30, 2007			June 30, 2006			(Decrease)%			%

Statements of Operations
Revenues	$	521,330		$	681,337		$	(160,007	)		-23.5	%

Selling expenses		101,296			103,190			(1,894	)		-1.8	%
General and administrative
expenses		2,115,310			1,215,966			899,344			74.0	%
Other income		(38,121	)		-			(38,121	)		NM
Interest expense		453,543			207,574			245,969			118.5	%
Total expenses		2,632,028			1,526,730			1,105,298			72.4	%

Net (loss)	$	(2,110,698	)	$	(845,393	)	$	(1,265,305	)		149.7	%

Net (loss) per basic and
diluted share	$	(0.09	)	$	(0.06	)	$	(0.03	)		50.0	%

Revenue

Revenue for the year ended June 30, 2007 decreased $160,007, 23.5%, to $521,330 compared to $681,337 for the year ended June 30, 2006. The primary reason for the sales decrease was during the year ended June 30, 2006 we received a pre-release order amounting to approximately $127,000 for a minor segment of our upgraded version of the StatLIA® software. No similar licenses were received during the current fiscal year. In addition, revenue has been negatively impacted due to our customers waiting for the release of our upgraded version of StatLIA®. The upgraded version of StatLIA® is scheduled to be released during the first half of fiscal year 2008.

Selling Expenses

Selling expenses for the year ended June 30, 2007 remained stable at $101,296 compared to $103,190 for the year ended June 30, 2006.

General and Administrative Expenses

General and administrative expenses increased by $899,344, 74.0%, to $2,115,310 for the year ended June 30, 2007 from $1,215,966 for the year ended June 30, 2006. The primary reasons for the increase were approximately $673,000 related to an increase in personnel, approximately $45,000 related to increasing the infrastructure to upgrade our StatLIA® software, approximately $113,000 related to our investor relations program and approximately $39,000 increase in travel and trade show costs.

Interest Expense

Interest expense increased by $245,969, 118.5%, to $453,543 for the year ended June 30, 2007 from $207,574 for the year ended June 30, 2006. The primary reason for the increase was the increase in interest expense related to convertible debentures.

Capital Resources

	As of						Increase
	June 30, 2007			June 30, 2006			(Decrease)
Working Capital

Current assets	$	250,218		$	205,920		$	44,298
Current liabilities		1,929,861			1,765,729			164,132
Working capital deficit	$	(1,679,643	)	$	(1,559,809	)	$	119,834

Long-term debt	$	1,381,629		$	117,650		$	1,263,979

Stockholders' deficit	$	(2,875,965	)	$	(1,596,529	)	$	1,279,436

	Year Ended	Year Ended	Increase
	June 30, 007	June 30, 2006	(Decrease	)
Statements of Cash Flows Select Information


Net cash provided (used) by:
Operating activities	$	(1,804,748	)	$	(508,818	)	$	(1,295,930	)
Investing activities	$	(130,805	)	$	(67,351	)	$	(63,454	)
Financing activities	$	1,871,057		$	693,177		$	1,177,880

	As of				Increase
	June 30, 2007		June 30, 2006		(Decrease)
Balance Sheet Select Information

Cash and cash equivalents	$	85,016	$	149,512	$	(64,496	)

Accounts receivable	$	75,283	$	56,107	$	19,176

Accounts payable and accrued expenses	$	1,382,875	$	1,348,419	$	34,456

Liquidity

We have historically financed our operations through debt and equity financings. At June 30, 2007, we had cash holdings of $85,016, a decrease of $64,496 compared to June 30, 2006. Our net working capital deficit at June 30, 2007, was $1,679,643 compared to $1,559,809 as of June 30, 2006.

These financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis. However, during the years ended June 30, 2007 and June 30, 2006, we incurred net losses of $2,110,698 and $845,393, respectively, and had an accumulated deficit of $8,352,407 and $6,241,709, at June 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively. Our ability to continue as a going concern is dependent upon our ability to generate profitable operations in the future and/or to obtain the necessary financing to meet our obligations and repay our liabilities arising from normal business operations when they come due. The outcome of these matters cannot be predicted with any certainty at this time. Since inception, we have satisfied our capital needs through debt and equity financings.

We will need to seek additional financing to meet our liquidity requirements.

Management plans to continue to provide for our capital needs during the twelve months ending June 30, 2008, by increasing sales through the continued development of our products and by debt and/or equity financings. These financial statements do not include any adjustments to the amounts and classification of assets and liabilities that may be necessary should we be unable to continue as a going concern.

New Accounting Pronouncements

In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, “The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities”. This Statement permits entities to choose to measure many financial assets and financial liabilities at fair value. Unrealized gains and losses on items for which the fair value option has been elected are reported in earnings. SFAS No. 159 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. We are currently assessing the impact of SFAS No. 159 on our financial position and results of operations.

In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 158, “Employers’ Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans.” This Statement requires an employer to recognize the over funded or under funded status of a defined benefit post retirement plan (other than a multiemployer plan) as an asset or liability in its statement of financial position, and to recognize changes in that funded status in the year in which the changes occur through comprehensive income. SFAS No. 158 is effective for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2006. The adoption of SFAS No. 158 had no impact on our financial position and results of operations.

In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, “Fair Value Measures”. This Statement defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value under GAAP, expands disclosures about fair value measurements, and applies under other accounting pronouncements that require or permit fair value measurements. SFAS No. 157 does not require any new fair value measurements. However, the FASB anticipates that for some entities, the application of SFAS No. 157 will change current practice. SFAS No. 157 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007, which for us would be the fiscal year beginning April 1, 2008. We are currently evaluating the impact of SFAS No. 157 but do not expect that it will have a material impact on our financial statements.

In September 2006, the SEC issued Staff Accounting Bulletin (“SAB”) No. 108, “Considering the Effects of Prior Year Misstatements when Quantifying Misstatements in Current Year Financial Statements.” SAB No. 108 addresses how the effects of prior year uncorrected misstatements should be considered when quantifying misstatements in current year financial statements. SAB No. 108 requires companies to quantify misstatements using a balance sheet and income statement approach and to evaluate whether either approach results in quantifying an error that is material in light of relevant quantitative and qualitative factors. SAB No. 108 is effective for periods ending after November 15, 2006. The adoption of SAB No. 108 had no impact on our financial position and results of operations.

In June 2006, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation Number 48, "Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes - an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109." This Interpretation clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in an enterprise's financial statements in accordance with FASB Statement No. 109, "Accounting for Income Taxes." This Interpretation is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006. We are currently assessing the effect of this Interpretation on our financial statements.

Risk Factors

You should consider the following discussion of risks as well as other information regarding our common stock. The risks and uncertainties described below are not the only ones. Additional risks and uncertainties not presently known to us or that we currently deem immaterial also may impair our business operations. If any of the following risks actually occur, our business could be harmed.

We have a limited operating history.

We commenced operations in November, 1997 and have a limited operating history. Our success will be dependent upon our ability to successfully exploit our unique proprietary technology. Our success will depend in large part on our ability to deal with the problems, expenses, and delays frequently associated with developing and marketing our software technology. Losses are likely to continue before our operations will become profitable. There is no assurance that our operations will prove profitable.

We depend on new products and development to generate revenues.

Substantially all of our revenues have been derived, and substantially all of our future revenues are expected to be derived, from the license of the software and sale of our associated services, and the development and sale of future products. Accordingly, broad acceptance of our software products and services by customers is critical to our future success as is our ability to design, develop, test and support new software products and enhancements on a timely basis that meet changing customer needs and respond to technological developments in emerging industry standards. There can be no assurance that we will be successful in developing and marketing new software products and enhancements that meet changing customer needs and respond to such technological changes or evolving industry standards.

Our success depends upon developing distribution channels.

Our distribution strategy is to develop multiple distribution channels. We have historically sold our products only through direct sales, Internet sales, and original equipment manufacturers (“OEMs”). We expect to increasingly utilize OEMs and independent sales representatives, and to pursue utilizing systems integrators, value added resellers (“VARs”), and software retailers. There can be no assurances that these distribution channels will be effective sales channels.

Our success is dependent on our founders and other key personnel.

Our performance is substantially dependent upon the performance of our executive officers and key employees, particularly that of Dr. John R. Dunn, II. Dr. Dunn was responsible for creation of the software and the scientific principles incorporated therein. As a result, Dr. Dunn is the single most knowledgeable person with regard to the software. It would be difficult for us to find an adequate replacement for Dr. Dunn in the immediate future.

Given our early stage of development, we are further dependent upon our ability to retain and motivate high quality personnel, especially our management and highly skilled development teams. We do not have key person life insurance policies on any of our employees. The loss of the services of any of our executive officers or other key employees could have a materially adverse effect on our business, operating results or financial condition. We intend to purchase key man life insurance when management decides funds are available.

Our future success also depends on our continuing ability to identify, hire, train, and retain other highly qualified technical and managerial personnel. Competition for such personnel is intense and there can be no assurance that we will be able to attract, hire or retain other highly qualified technical and managerial personnel in the future. The inability to attract and retain the necessary technical and managerial personnel could have a materially adverse effect upon our business operating results or financial condition.

Our success will depend, in part, on the continuing and growing interest in quality control and quality assurance regarding reliable laboratory and manufacturing testing results among the markets targeted by our products.

An additional factor which we believe will be critical to the acceptance of our products is a continuing need in our targeted markets for more powerful solutions for instrument connectivity, networking, and data management.

No governmental or regulatory agency must approve the production or sale of any of our products at this time. However, we intend to voluntarily pursue the acknowledgment and approval of certain federal agencies to gain further awareness and acceptance for our new statistical methodologies. There can be no assurance that the interest in quality control and quality assurance will continue among the testing industry, general public or governmental and regulatory agencies.

We have worker’s compensation and general liability insurance but do not have professional liability insurance at this time.

We do intend to purchase such insurance when funds become available if management concludes that the benefit of having such a policy outweighs our cost. Any professional liability claims made prior to acquiring such insurance or for amounts exceeding the coverage after the insurance is purchased, could have an adverse material effect on us. In addition, we will purchase a key man life insurance policy naming Dr. John Dunn II as the insured and we as the beneficiary if management concludes that the benefit of having such a policy outweighs our cost. We further intend to purchase director and officer liability insurance when management decides that funds are available in order to attract additional directors and officers.

We are subject to the risks and uncertainties inherent in new businesses.

We are subject to the risks and uncertainties inherent in new businesses, including the following:

· We may not be able to raise enough money to develop our services and bring them to market;

· Our projected capital needs may be inaccurate, and we may not have enough money to develop our services and bring them to market;

· We may experience unanticipated development or marketing expenses, which may make it more difficult to develop our services and bring them to market;

· Even if we are able to develop our services and bring them to market, we may not earn enough revenues from the sales of our services to cover the costs of operating our business.

· If we are unsuccessful in our development efforts, we are not likely to ever become profitable.

We have never paid cash dividends on our Common Stock, and do not anticipate that we will pay cash dividends in the foreseeable future.

The payment of dividends by us will depend on our earnings, financial condition and such other factors as our Board of Directors may consider relevant. We currently plan to retain any earnings to provide for our development and growth.

We will need additional financing.

Our ability to continue as a going concern is dependent upon our ability to generate profitable operations in the future and/or to obtain the necessary financing to meet our obligations and repay our liabilities arising from normal business operations when they come due. The outcome of these matters cannot be predicted with any certainty at this time. Since inception, we have satisfied our capital needs through debt and equity financings. We will need to seek additional financing to meet our liquidity requirements. There is no assurance that financings can be obtained in amounts and at terms acceptable to us. If capital is not available, we may be required to curtail our operations.

The market for our products is unproven and acceptance of our products is crucial.

The market for our software and services has only recently begun to develop, is rapidly evolving and could be subject to an increasing number of competitive market entries. While we believe that our software products offer significant advantages for quality assurance, regulatory compliance and reliability in the clinical, pharmaceutical, environmental, and manufacturing industries, there can be no assurance that our products will become widely adopted for use in those industries.

Because a market for our products and services is new and evolving, it is difficult to predict the future growth rate, if any, and size of this market. There can be no assurance that the market for our products and services will develop or that our products and services will be used in the marketplace. If the market fails to develop, develops more slowly than expected, or becomes saturated with competitors, or if our products do not achieve market acceptance, our business, operating results and financial condition will be materially adversely affected.

We compete with companies that have substantially greater resources.

Our management believes that over 90% of our current competitors are instrument manufacturers. These manufacturers primarily develop and market their software programs to be used with only their instruments and not as stand-alone programs (which could be used with competing manufacturers’ instruments or even earlier models of their own instruments). The level of interoperability of such software with the instruments sold by their competitors or with laboratory computer systems is minimal or nonexistent. This market is splintered into many fragments and no one or few of these instrument manufacturers hold a commanding percentage of market share. To our knowledge, no commercial product available in the world today offers the quality control and quality assurance capabilities or many of the advanced computational features found in StatLIA®. However, we believe that at some point in the future, many of our competitors will use quality assurance methodologies similar to, or as effective as, those incorporated in StatLIA®. Some of these competitors may be of greater size and have greater financial resources than ours. We believe that most instrument manufacturers currently marketing immunoassay software will remain focused on instrumentation and not develop software as complex as StatLIA® for the limited market share held by any one of these manufacturers. We believe that most of our future competition will be from software companies but we can give no assurances. Because our products are either newly-developed or in the process of being developed, no guarantees can be given as to how commercially viable such new products will be in the marketplace.

We intend to interface StatLIA® with all immunoassay testing instruments which are capable of exporting unprocessed raw data. Although we has been able to receive, decode and process data from all instruments attempted to date, there can be no assurance that we will be able to collect data from all immunoassay instruments manufactured.

Although device manufacturers are currently the largest competitors, we believe that OEM’s will soon serve as ideal partners as equipment makers seek to remove themselves from software development and partner with more powerful programs. We will focus on OEM’s as a primary sales channel.

We believes that the statistical quality control and quality assurance principles and the connectivity and data management methodologies incorporated in StatLIA® can be applied in new products for other disciplines and technologies. We have outlined other programs in addition to StatLIA® to be developed in the next three years for application in testing laboratories and manufacturing. However, the statistical quality control and quality assurance principles and methodology have been tested only in the immunoassay field for which StatLIA® was designed, and to a lesser extent, in steel tensile testing and chromatography. There can be no assurances that we will be able to successfully develop and market all of our intended products.

Our success and ability to compete is dependent in part upon our proprietary technology.

While we rely on trademark, trade secret and copyright law to protect our technology, we believe that factors such as the technological and creative skills of our personnel, new product developments, frequent product enhancements, name recognition and reliable product maintenance are more essential to establishing and maintaining a technology leadership position. We do not presently have any patents or patent applications pending. There can be no assurance that others will not develop technologies that are similar or superior to our technology. The source code for our proprietary software is protected both as a trade secret and as a copyrighted work. We generally enter into confidentiality or license agreements with our employees, consultants and vendors, and generally control further access to and distribution of our software, documentation and other proprietary information. Despite these precautions, it may be possible for a third party to copy or otherwise obtain and use our products or technology without authorization, or to develop similar technology independently. Despite our efforts to protect our proprietary rights, unauthorized parties may attempt to copy aspects of our products or to obtain and use information that we regard as proprietary. Policing unauthorized use of our products is difficult. There can be no assurance that the steps taken by us will prevent misappropriation of our technology or that such agreements will be enforceable.

Vigorous protection and pursuit of intellectual property rights or positions characterize the fiercely competitive software industry, which has resulted in significant and often protracted and expensive litigation. Therefore, our competitors may assert that our technologies or products infringe on their patents or proprietary rights. Problems with patents or other rights could increase the cost of our products or delay or preclude new product development and commercialization by us. If infringement claims against us are deemed valid, we may not be able to obtain appropriate licenses on acceptable terms or at all. Litigation could be costly and time-consuming but may be necessary to protect our future patent and/or technology license positions or to defend against infringement claims.

We may be effected by changes in Securities Laws and Regulations

We have made, and will need to continue to make, changes in our corporate governance and securities disclosure and compliance practices as a result of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. The SEC and the NASD have enacted, and we expect will continue to enact, new rules on a variety of subjects as a result of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. While we believe that we can ultimately comply with the new legislated requirements associated with being a public company, compliance with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 will increase our costs and may present new challenges and risks. These developments could also possibly make it more difficult and more expensive to obtain director and officer liability insurance. We may be required to accept reduced coverage or incur substantially higher costs to obtain coverage for our officers and directors, which may make it more difficult for us to attract and retain qualified board members or executive officers. We are currently evaluating and monitoring regulatory developments and cannot estimate the timing or magnitude of additional costs that may be incurred as a result of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

We will be required to implement an internal control structure and procedures for financial reporting, including those contemplated by Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, designed to enable management to contest to the effectiveness of our internal controls during the initial year, our year ending June 30, 2008, and our registered public accounting firm to opine to the effectiveness of our internal controls subsequent to the initial year, our year ending June 30, 2009. To comply with these requirements, we expect that we may need to hire additional accounting and finance staff and implement new financial systems and procedures. There can be no assurance that we will be able to implement such controls in a timely fashion and, therefore, we may not be able to contest to or receive an opinion from independent sources that our internal controls are effective.

Shares of our common stock which are eligible for sale by our stockholders may decrease the price of our common stock.

We have 23,705,594 common shares outstanding of which 1,227,079 are freely tradable and 22,478,515 are saleable under Rule 144. We also may have up to 17,690,667 additional shares which could be outstanding following conversions of debentures, exercise of warrants and exercise of stock options. If our stockholders sell substantial amounts of our common stock, the market price of our common stock could decrease.

There is a limited but potentially volatile trading market in our common stock, which may adversely affect our stock price.

Our common stock trades on the OTC Bulletin Board. The Bulletin Board tends to be highly illiquid, in part because there is no national quotation system by which potential investors can track the market price of shares except through information received or generated by a limited number of broker-dealers that make a market in particular stocks. There is a greater chance of market volatility for securities that trade on the Bulletin Board as opposed to a national exchange or quotation system. This volatility may be caused by a variety of factors, including:

The lack of readily available price quotations;

The absence of consistent administrative supervision of “bid” and “ask” quotations;

Lower trading volume; and

Market conditions.

There could be wide fluctuations in the market price of our common stock. These fluctuations may have an extremely negative effect on the market price of our securities.

Because our common stock is classified as “penny stock,” trading in it could be limited, and our stock price could decline.

Our common stock falls under the definition of “penny stock.” “Penny stocks” are equity securities with a market price below $5.00 per share, other than a security that is registered on a national exchange or included for quotation on the NASDAQ system, unless the issuer has net tangible assets of more than $2,000,000 and has been in continuous operation for greater than three years. Issuers who have been in operation for less than three years must have net tangible assets of at least $5,000,000. As a result, trading in our common stock is limited because broker-dealers are required to provide their customers with disclosure documents prior to allowing them to participate in transactions involving our common stock. These disclosure requirements are burdensome to broker-dealers and may discourage them from allowing their customers to participate in transactions involving our common stock.

Rules promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission under Section 15(g) of the Exchange Act require broker-dealers engaging in transactions in penny stocks, to first provide to their customers a series of disclosures and documents, including:

A standardized risk disclosure document identifying the risks inherent in investment in penny stocks;

All compensation received by the broker-dealer in connection with the transaction;

Current quotation prices and other relevant market data; and

Monthly account statements reflecting the fair market value of the securities. In addition, these rules require that a broker-dealer obtain financial and other information from a customer, determine that transactions in penny stocks are suitable for such customer and deliver a written statement to such customer setting forth the basis for this determination.

ITEM 7. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.

The financial statements required by this item begin on page F-1 with the index to consolidated financial statements.

ITEM 8. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE.

On December 29, 2005, Omni completed the acquisition of substantially all the assets of Brendan Sub pursuant to the Merger Agreement and completed the disposition of substantially all the assets of Omni-Washington and Butler pursuant to the Stock Purchase Agreement. On December 29, 2005, Omni provided notice to Harper & Pearson Company (“Harper & Pearson”) that they would no longer be retained as Omni’s independent registered accounting firm. Harper & Pearson’s reports on the consolidated financial statements of Omni and Omni’s subsidiaries for the two fiscal years ended June 30, 2005, did not contain any adverse opinion or disclaimer of opinion, nor were they qualified or modified as to uncertainty, audit scope, or accounting principles.

On December 29, 2005, the Board of Directors of Omni elected to engage Farber Hass Hurley McEwen LLP (“FHHM”) to serve as Omni’s independent registered accounting firm.

On December 29, 2005, Omni was informed that it had been accepted as a client of FHHM.

During our two fiscal years ended June 30, 2005 and the subsequent interim period through December 29, 2005, there were no disagreements between Omni and Harper & Pearson on any matter of accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure, or auditing scope or procedure, which disagreements, if not resolved to Harper & Pearson's satisfaction, would have caused them to make reference to the subject matter of the disagreement in their reports on the financial statements for such years.

Omni authorized Harper & Pearson to respond fully to the inquiries of FHHM concerning the subject matter of the reportable event and provided Harper & Pearson with a copy of the foregoing disclosures. Attached as Exhibit 99.3 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 5, 2006 is a copy of Harper & Pearson's letter, dated January 4, 2006, stating its agreement with the statements made in the filing.

During Omni's two fiscal years ended June 30, 2005, and the subsequent interim period through December 29, 2005, Omni did not consult FHHM with respect to the application of accounting principles to a specific transaction, either completed or contemplated, or the type of audit opinion that might be rendered on Omni’s consolidated financial statements, or any other matters of reportable events as set forth in Items 304(a)(2)(i) and (ii) of Regulation S-B.

ITEM 8A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES.

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

As a result of the enactment of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, issuers such as Brendan that file periodic reports under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Act”) are required to include in those reports certain information concerning the issuer’s controls and procedures for complying with the disclosure requirements of the federal securities laws pursuant to Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(b) and 15d-15(b). These disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by an issuer in the reports it files or submits under the Act, is communicated to the issuer’s management, including its principal executive officer and principal financial officer, or persons performing similar functions, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. A control system can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met.

Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, we conducted an evaluation of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures, as such term is defined under Rules 13a-14(c) and 15d-14(c) promulgated under the Act, within 90 days prior to the filing date of this report. Based on that evaluation, our principal executive officer and our principal financial officer concluded that the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures were effective in timely alerting them to material information required to be included in our periodic reports filed with the SEC under the Act. The design of any system of controls is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving our stated goals under all potential future conditions, regardless of how remote.

Change in Internal Controls.

There have been no significant changes made in the internal controls and there were no other factors that could significantly affect our internal controls during the fourth quarter of the fiscal year covered by this report.

ITEM 8B. OTHER INFORMATION.

None.

PART III

ITEM 9. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS, PROMOTERS AND CONTROL PERSONS; COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 16(A) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT.

The following table and biographical summaries set forth information, including principal occupations and business experience, about our directors and the executive officers at June 30, 2007:

Directors and Executive Officers

Our directors and executive officers are as follows:

Name	Age	Position

John R. Dunn II	56	Chairman, Chief Executive Officer, President, and Director
George Dunn	50	Secretary, Chief Operating Officer
Lowell W. Giffhorn	60	Chief Financial Officer and Director
Theo Vermaelen	53	Director
Stephen Eisold	60	Director
Jason Booth	41	Director

The business experience of each of our executive officers and directors is set forth below.

John R. Dunn II is the founder of Brendan and has served as the Chairman, Chief Executive Officer, President and Director of Brendan since 1997. Dr. Dunn has had extensive experience in hospital and clinical laboratories, including bio-science laboratories. He has set up and run a reference laboratory specializing in immunoassays and been a consultant in immunoassay development and statistics for several clinical and hospital laboratories. Dr. Dunn obtained a Ph.D. in Biology from Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, in 1987 and he obtained a B.S. in Biology from Wayne State University in 1974.

George Dunn has served as the Secretary and Chief Operating Officer of Brendan since 1997. Mr. Dunn has extensive experience in marketing and sales and the implementation of strategic plans, market segment analysis, promotions, sales and sales support development. Mr. Dunn received his B.A. in Communication Arts from Michigan State University in 1981.

Lowell W. Giffhorn has served as our Chief Financial Officer since October 2005. Since July 2005, Mr. Giffhorn also serves as the Chief Financial Officer of Imagenetix, Inc., a publicly held nutritional supplement company. Mr. Giffhorn was the Chief Financial Officer of Patriot Scientific Corp., a publicly held semiconductor and intellectual property company, from May 1997 to June 2005 and was a member of its Board of Directors from August 1999 to April 2006. From June 1992 to August 1996 and from September 1987 to June 1990 he was the CFO of Sym-Tek Systems, Inc. and Vice President of Finance for its successor, Sym-Tek Inc., a supplier of capital equipment to the semiconductor industry. Mr. Giffhorn obtained a M.B.A. degree from National University in 1976 and he obtained a B.S. in Accountancy from the University of Illinois in 1969. Mr. Giffhorn is also a director and chairman of the audit committee of DND Technologies, Inc., a publicly held company. Mr. Giffhorn devotes approximately 50% of his time to our affairs.

Theo Vermaelen has served as a Director since December 2005. Since 2001, Dr. Vermaelen has been the Schroders Chaired Professor of International Finance and Asset Management at INSEAD, a business school with campuses in Fontainebleau, France and Singapore. From 1998 to 2003, Dr. Vermaelen was portfolio manager of the KBC equity buyback fund. Dr. Vermaelen has taught at the University of British Columbia, the Catholic University of Leuven, London Business School, UCLA, the University of Chicago, and Maastricht University. He is the co-editor of the Journal of Empirical Finance. He is also a consultant to various corporations and government agencies and Program Director of the Amsterdam Institute of Finance, a training institute for investment bankers and other financial professionals. Dr. Vermaelen obtained his M.B.A. in 1976 and Ph.D. in Finance in 1980 from the Graduate School of Business, University of Chicago.

Stephen C. Eisold has served as a Director since December 2005. From February 2001 to November 2005, Mr. Eisold was the Chief Executive Officer of Brendan. From 1998 to 2001, Mr. Eisold was the Chief Executive Officer at Axiom Biotechnologies, Inc. From 1996 to 1998, Mr. Eisold was the Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer at Cypros Pharmaceutical. Previously Mr. Eisold was the General Manager of North America Pharmaceuticals for Gensia and before which he held various marketing and business development positions with Marion Laboratories. Mr. Eisold obtained a M.B.A. degree from Rockhurst College, Kansas City, MO, in 1981 and a B.S. in Biology from Springfield College, Springfield, MA, in 1968.

Jason Booth has served as a Director since August 2006. Since 1999, Mr. Booth has been the owner of Booth Publications, Inc., which focuses on sales and marketing campaigns primarily for the pharmaceutical industry. For the five years previous to that, Mr. Booth provided executive recruiting and retention consulting services for large and small company human resource departments as an Account Manager for Pro Staff Personnel Services. Mr. Booth is also on the board of directors of the Potawatomi Business Development Corporation, who in July 2006, purchased from us a $1 million 8% convertible debenture with attached common stock purchase warrants. He is also a tribal member of the Turtle Mountain Band of Chippewa Indians. Mr. Booth obtained a B.S. in English from the University of Minnesota in 1989.

John R. Dunn II and George Dunn are brothers.

Except for Dr. Dunn and Mr. Giffhorn, all of our directors are independent directors, as defined by current NASDAQ listing standards and the rules and regulations of the SEC.

Committees of the Board of Directors

Our Board has a standing Audit Committee. The entire Board serves as the Compensation Committee.

Audit Committee. The Audit Committee is responsible for: (1) selection and oversight of our independent accountant; (2) establishing procedures for the receipt, retention and treatment of complaints regarding accounting, internal controls and auditing matters; (3) establishing procedures for the confidential, anonymous submission of concerns regarding accounting and auditing matters; (4) engaging outside advisors; and, (5) funding for the outside auditors and any outside advisors engaged by the audit committee. The Audit Committee, which met four times during fiscal year 2007, is composed of one employee director and one other director, who was determined by the Board to be an independent director. During 2007, the Audit Committee consisted of Dr. Vermaelen (Chairman) and Mr. Giffhorn.

The Board of Directors has determined that Dr. Vermaelen is an audit committee financial expert as defined in Item 401 of Regulation S-B promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission. The Board's conclusions regarding the qualifications of Dr. Vermaelen as an audit committee financial expert were based on his experience at financial and educational institutions and his doctoral degree in finance.

Code of Ethics

We have set forth our policy on ethical behavior in a document called "Code of Business Conduct and Ethics." This policy applies to the members of our Board of Directors and all employees, including (but not limited to) our principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller and persons performing similar functions. This policy comprises written standards that are reasonably designed to deter wrongdoing and to promote the behavior described in Item 406 of Regulation S-B promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission. No waivers of the Code were granted in 2007.

Compliance with Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act

Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires our directors, executive officers and persons who beneficially own 10% or more of a class of securities registered under Section 12 of the Exchange Act to file reports of beneficial ownership and changes in beneficial ownership with the SEC. Directors, executive officers and greater than 10% shareholders are required by the rules and regulations of the Commission to furnish us with copies of all reports filed by them in compliance with Section 16(a).

Based solely on our review of copies of the reports we received from persons required to make such filings and our own records, we believe that from the period July 1, 2006 through June 30, 2007 that all such forms were timely filed with the SEC.

ITEM 10. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION.

There is shown below information concerning the compensation of our principal executive officer and the most highly compensated executive officers whose total compensation exceeded $100,000 (each a “Named Officer”) for the fiscal years ended June 30, 2007 and 2006.

SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE

Name and	Fiscal				Option
Principal Position	Year		Salary ($)		Awards ($)		Total ($)
[a]	[b]		[c]		[f]		[j]
John R. Dunn II		2007	$	108,000	$	5,071	$	113,071
President, CEO and		2006	$	108,000	$	27,427	$	135,427
Director

George Dunn		2007	$	108,000	$	5,071	$	113,071
VP, Secretary and		2006	$	102,000	$	24,565	$	126,565
COO

We estimate the fair value of the options issued at the issuance date by using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following weighted-average assumptions used for those options issued during the year ended:

	June 30, 2007	June 30, 2006

Dividend yield	0%	0%
Volatility	42%	1%-30%
Risk-free interest rates	5.10%	2.76%-4.84%
Expected life	5 years	5 years

OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS AT FISCAL YEAR-END

Name	Number		Option		Option
	of		Exercise		Expiration
	Securities		Price		Date
	Underlying		($)
	Unexercised
	Options
	(#)
	Exercisable
[a]	[b]		[e]		[f]
John R. Dunn II		40,000		$0.75		April 6, 2011
President, CEO and		60,000		$0.64		April 6, 2011
Director		50,000		$0.64		June 15, 2012

George Dunn		400,000		$0.125		April 6, 2011
VP, Secretary and		400,000		$0.025		April 6, 2011
COO		60,000		$0.64		April 6, 2011
		50,000		$0.64		June 15, 2012

Employment Contracts

In November 2004, we entered into an employment agreement with our Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, Dr. John Dunn II, which expires on November 1, 2011. The employment agreement provides for an annual salary of $108,000. The agreement also provides that we may terminate the agreement with 30 days written notice if termination is without cause. Our obligation would be to pay Dr. Dunn monthly payments equal to his base salary for 24 months. In addition, all of Dr. Dunn’s options would immediately vest. The agreement also provides that Dr. Dunn can terminate employment if we merge with or consolidate with another entity, or we are subject in any way to a transfer of a substantial amount of our assets, resulting in the assets, business or operations of ours being controlled by an entity or individual other than Brendan.

In November 2004, we entered into an employment agreement with our Vice President of Marketing and Chief Operating Officer, George Dunn, which expires on November 1, 2011. The employment agreement provides for an annual salary of $96,000. The annual salary was increased to $108,000 as of January 1, 2006. The agreement also provides that we may terminate the agreement with 30 days written notice if termination is without cause. Our obligation would be to pay Mr. Dunn monthly payments equal to his base salary for 24 months. In addition, all of Mr. Dunn’s options would immediately vest. The agreement also provides that Mr. Dunn can terminate employment if we merge with or consolidate with another entity, or we are subject in any way to a transfer of a substantial amount of our assets, resulting in the assets, business or operations of ours being controlled by an entity or individual other than Brendan.

DIRECTOR COMPENSATION

Name	Fees	Option	All Other	Total
	Earned	Awards	Compensation	($)
	or	($)	($)
	Paid In
	Cash
	($)
[a]	[b]	[d]	[g]	[h]
Lowell W. Giffhorn	-	$5,071	$75,000	$80,071
Theo Vermaelen	-	$5,071	-	$5,071
Stephen Eisold	-	$5,071	-	$5,071
Jason Booth	-	$9,043	-	$9,043

Mr. Giffhorn is our Chief Financial Officer and one of our directors. The amount reflected as other compensation is the amount he was paid as our Chief Financial Officer. He received no compensation for being a director.

We reimburse our directors for any travel related expenses incurred in performing their duties as directors. In addition, we granted stock options to each of Messrs. Dunn, Giffhorn, Vermaelen, and Eisold in the amounts of 50,000 and 100,000 shares and to Mr. Booth in the amount of none and 100,000 shares during the years ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively.

ITEM 11. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS.

The following table sets forth certain information concerning our common stock ownership as of September 25, 2007, by (1) each person who is known by us to be the beneficial owner of more than five percent of our common stock; (2) each of our executive officers and directors; and (3) all of our directors and executive officers as a group. The address of each such stockholder is in care of us at 2236 Rutherford Road, Suite 107, Carlsbad, California 92008.

		Shares of Common	Percentage
		Stock Beneficially	of Outstanding
Name	Postion with the Company	Owned (1) (2)	Shares

Executive Officers and
Directors

John R. Dunn II (3)	Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Technical Officer and Director	5,005,000	21.0%

George Dunn (4)	Vice President, Secretary and Chief Operating Officer	2,301,000	9.4%

Lowell W. Giffhorn (5)	Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Director	645,000	2.7%


Theo Vermaelen (6)	Director	859,359	3.6%

Steven Eisold (7)	Director	724,494	3.0%

Jason Booth (8)	Director	75,000	*

All Exective Officers and Directors as a Group (6 persons) (9)		9,609,853	37.3%

Greater than 5% Owners


Potawatomi Business Development Corp.		4,000,000	Note 10

Robert Tabor		4,730,589	20.0%

Massoud Kharrazian		1,487,136	6.3%

* Less than 1%

(1) Reflects amounts as to which the beneficial owner has sole voting power and sole investment power.

(2) Includes stock options, common stock purchase warrants and convertible debentures exercisable within 60

days from the date hereof.

(3) Comprised of 4,880,000 shares and 125,000 stock options.

(4) Comprised of 1,416,000 shares and 885,000 stock options.

(5) Comprised of 20,000 shares, 125,000 stock options, 300,000 common stock purchase warrants and 200,000

shares issuable on the conversion of a debenture.

(6) Comprised of 654,359 shares, 125,000 stock options, 40,000 common stock purchase warrants and 40,000

shares issuable on the conversion of a debenture.

(7) Comprised of 599,494 shares and 125,000 stock options.

(8) Comprised of 75,000 stock options.

(9) Comprised of 7,549,853 shares, 1,460,000 stock options, 340,000 common stock purchase warrants and

240,000 shares issuable on the conversion of a debenture.

10) The shares issuable to Potawatomi Business Development Corp. (PBDC) on the conversion of debentures or the exercise of warrants

would not be deemed beneficially owned (due to exercise restrictions within the debentures and warrants) within the meaning of

Sections 13(d) and 13(g) of the Exchange Act to the extent that their acquisition in a debenture conversion or a warrant exercise by

PBDC would cause PBDC to own in excess of 4.99% of our outstanding common stock immediately following such conversion or

exercise. By the terms of the debentures and warrants, the 4.99% limitation may be increased to a maximum of 9.99% if we accept a tender

offer and a change in control takes place. Therefore, it is expected that PBDC will not beneficially own more than 9.99% of our

outstanding common stock at any time. Carol Leese has ultimate voting and/or investment control over the securities owned by PBDC.

Equity Compensation Plan Information

					Number of securities
					remaining available
	Number of securities				for issuance under
	to be issued upon		Weighted average		equity compensaton
	exercise of		exercise price of		plans (excluding
	outstanding options,		outstanding options,		securities reflected in
	warrants and rights		warrants and rights		column (a))
Plan Category	(a)		(b)		(c)

Equity compensation
plans approved by
shareholders		4,975,000		$0.41		2,525,000

Equity compensation
plans not approved
by shareholders		8,660,667		$0.88		-

Total		13,635,667		$0.71		2,525,000

Common shares issuable on the exercise of common stock warrants have not been approved by the shareholders and, accordingly, have been segregated in the above table.

ITEM 12. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS.

In June and December 2006 we entered into 8% Convertible Debentures with attached common stock purchase warrants with Mr. Giffhorn, an executive officer and director, and Dr. Vermaelen, a director, aggregating $120,000. The Convertible Debentures mature in two years and the common stock purchase warrants are exercisable from 1 to 5 years with exercise prices ranging form $0.60 to $1.00.

We believe that the above transactions were fair, reasonable and upon terms at least as favorable to us as those we might have obtained from unaffiliated third parties.

One of our directors, Jason Booth, is also a director for the Potawatomi Business Development Corporation.

ITEM 13. EXHIBITS

(a) The following documents are filed as a part of this Report:

1. Financial Statements. The following consolidated financial statements and Report of

Independent Registered Certified Public Accounting Firm is included in Part II of this Report:

Report of Farber Hass Hurley & McEwen LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

Consolidated Balance Sheets- As of June 30, 2007 and 2006

Consolidated Statements of Operation- Years Ended June 30, 2007 and 2006

Consolidated Statement of Stockholders' Equity- Years Ended June 30, 2007 and 2006

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows- Years Ended June 30, 2007 and 2006

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

2. Exhibits. The following Exhibits are filed as part of, or incorporated by reference into,

this Report:

Exhibit No.	Document

3.0	Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws

3.1	Amended and Restated Articles of the Company, as amended November	(1)
	30, 1994, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to Amendment No. 1 to
	Registration Statement on Form SB-2 dated December 22, 1994

3.2	Certificate of Designation of Series A Redeemable Convertible Preferred	(1)
	Stock incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to Registration Statement on
	Form SB-2 dated October 12, 1994

3.3	Certificate of Designation of Series B Redeemable Convertible Preferred	(1)
	Stock incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to Registration Statement on
	Form SB-2 dated October 12, 1994

3.4	Bylaws of the Company incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.4 to	(1)
	Registration Statement on Form SB-2 dated October 12, 1994

3.5	Certificate of Amendment of Articles of Incorporation dated May 16, 2006	(1)
	incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.5 to Form 10-KSB for year ended June 30, 2006

4.0	Instruments Defining the Rights of Security Holders, Including Debentures

4.1	Agreement and Plan of Merger among Omni U.S.A., Inc., Omni Merger Sub, Inc.,	(1)
	Edward Daniel, Jeffrey Daniel and Brendan Technologies, Inc. dated as of
	December 29, 2005 incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Current Report
	on Form 8-K dated January 5, 2006

4.2	Stock Purchase Agreement by and among Jeffrey K. Daniel, Craig L. Daniel, and	(1)
	Edward Daniel, as the Purchases, and Omni U.S.A., Inc., as the Seller, dated as
	of December 29, 2005 incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to Current Report
	on Form 8-K dated January 5, 2006

4.3	Amendment to Loan and Related Agreements and Waiver of Default (PACCAR)	(1)
	incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to Current Report on Form 8-K dated
	January 5, 2006

Exhibit No.	Document

4.4	Amendment to Loan and Related Agreements and Waiver of Default (Textron)	(1)
	incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4 to Current Report on Form 8-K dated
	January 5, 2006

4.5	Promissory Note between Jeffrey K. Daniel, Craig L. Daniel, and Edward Daniel,	(1)
	collectively the Borrowers, and Omni U.S.A., Inc. with a maturity date of
	December 29, 2008 incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.5 to Current Report
	on Form 8-K dated January 5, 2006

4.6	2006 Equity Incentive Plan incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.6 to	(1)
	Registration Statement on Form S-8 dated June 15, 2006

4.7	Form of Securities Purchase Agreement incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.7	(1)
	to Current Report on Form 8-K dated July 18, 2006

4.8	Form of 8% Convertible Debenture incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.8	(1)
	to Current Report on Form 8-K dated July 18, 2006

4.9	Form of Registration Rights Agreement incorporated by referecne to Exhibit 4.9	(1)
	to Current Report on Form 8-K dated July 18, 2006

4.10	Form of Warrant incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.10 to Current Report on	(1)
	Form 8-K dated July 18, 2006

4.11	Form of Loan and Security Agreement incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.11	(1)
	to Current Report on Form 8-K dated July 18, 2007

4.12	Form of 15% Secured Promissory Note incorporated by referecne to Exhibit 4.12	(1)
	to Current Report on Form 8-K dated July 18, 2007

4.13	Form of Warrant incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.13 to Current Report on	(1)
	Form 8-K dated July 18, 2007

10.0	Material Contracts

10.1	John R. Dunn II Employment Contract dated November 1, 2004 incorporated by	(1)
	reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Current Report on Form 8-K dated January 5, 2006

10.2	George Dunn Employment Contract dated November 1, 2004 incorporated by	(1)
	reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Current Report on Form 8-K dated January 5, 2006

14.0	Code of Ethics

14.1	Code of Ethics incorporated by reference to Exhibit 14.1 to Form 10-KSB for year	(1)
	ended June 30, 2006

Exhibit No.	Document

21.0	Subsidiaries of the small business issuer

21.1	Subsidiaries of the small business issuer incorporated by reference to Exhibit 21.1	(1)
	to Form 10-KSB for the year ended June 30, 2006

31.0	Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certifications

31.1	302 Certification of John R. Dunn II	(2)

31.2	302 Certification of Lowell W. Giffhorn	(2)

32.0	Section 1350 Certifications

32.1	906 Certification of John R. Dunn II	(2)

32.2	906 Certification of Lowell W. Giffhorn	(2)


	(1) Previously filed in indicated registration statement or report
	(2) Exhibit filed herewith

ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES.

The following is a summary of the fees billed to Brendan by our principal accountant for the fiscal years ended June 30, 2007 and 2006:

Farber Hass Hurley & McEwen LLP

Fee category	2007		2006

Audit fees	$	82,794	$	16,250

Audit-related fees	$	1,400	$	-

Tax fees	$	-	$	-

All other fees	$	-	$	-

Total fees	$	84,194	$	16,250

Audit fees. Consists of fees for professional services rendered by our principal accountants for the audit of our annual financial statements and the review of financial statements included in our Forms 10-QSB or services that are normally provided by our principal accountants in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements.

Audit-related fees. Consists of fees for assurance and related services by our principal accountants that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of our financial statements and are not reported under "Audit fees."

Tax fees. Consists of fees for professional services rendered by our principal accountants for tax compliance, tax advice and tax planning.

All other fees. Consists of fees for products and services provided by our principal accountants, other than the services reported under "Audit fees," "Audit-related fees" and "Tax fees" above.

Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures

All services provided by our independent registered public accounting firm, Farber Hass Hurley & McEwen LLP (“FHHM”) are subject to pre-approval by our Audit Committee. The Audit Committee has authorized each of our members to approve services by FHHM in the event there is a need for such approval prior to the next full Audit Committee meeting. The Audit Committee has also adopted policies and procedures that are detailed as to the particular service and that do not include delegation of the Audit Committee’s responsibilities to management under which management may engage FHHM to render audit or non-audit services. Any interim approval given by an Audit Committee member and any such engagement by management must be reported to the Audit Committee no later than our next scheduled meeting. Before granting any approval, the Audit Committee (or a committee member if applicable) gives due consideration to whether approval of the proposed service will have a detrimental impact on FHHM’s independence. The full Audit Committee pre-approved all services provided by FHHM in fiscal 2007 and 2006.

Based upon the Audit Committee's discussion with management and the independent auditors and the Audit Committee review of the representations of management and the report of the independent accountants to the Audit Committee, the Audit Committee approved that the Board of Directors include our audited financial statements in our Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the years ended June 30, 2007 and 2006 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Index to Consolidated Financial Statements

Index to Consolidated Financial Statements


Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm	F-2

Consolidated Balance Sheets, June 30, 2007 and 2006	F-3

Consolidated Statements of Operation, for the years ended
June 30, 2007 and 2006	F-4

Consolidated Statement of Stockholders' Deficit, for the years ended
June 30, 2007 and 2006	F-5

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, for the years ended June 30,
2007 and 2006	F-6

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements	F-7-F-22

F-1

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Board of Directors

Brendan Technologies, Inc.

Carlsbad, California

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Brendan Technologies, Inc. ("the Company") as of June 30, 2007 and 2006, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity (deficit) and cash flows for the years ended June 30, 2007 and 2006. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall consolidated financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Brendan Technologies, Inc. as of June 30, 2007 and 2006, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for the years ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in the notes to the financial statements, the Company has incurred a loss of approximately $2,111,000 in the current year, has negative working capital of approximately $1,680,000, and is in default on two of its notes payable. These matters raise substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. Management's plans concerning these matters are also described in the notes to the consolidated financial statements. The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.


Farber Hass Hurley McEwen LLP

/s/ Farber Hass Hurley McEwen LLP

Camarillo, California

August 26, 2007

F-2

Brendan Technologies, Inc.
Consolidated Balance Sheets

June 30,	2007			2006

ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	85,016		$	149,512
Accounts receivable, net		75,283			56,107
Prepaid expenses		89,919			301
Total current assets		250,218			205,920

Property and equipment, net		157,356			72,740
Other assets		27,951			8,190

	$	435,525		$	286,850

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT
Current liabilities:
Convertible notes payable in default	$	130,000		$	255,000
Accrued interest in default		95,382			78,217
Note payable		100,000			-
Accounts payable		12,916			161,430
Accrued wages and vacation		842,525			772,030
Accrued interest		527,434			414,959
Deferred revenue		98,394			77,651
Current portion of lease obligations		7,388			6,442
Current portion 8% convertible debentures net of debt discount		24,010			-
Current portion 8% convertible debentures net of debt discount-
related parties		91,812			-
Total current liabilities		1,929,861			1,765,729

Long term portion of lease obligations		3,607			10,996
8% Convertible debentures net of debt discount		1,343,868			23,002
8% Convertible debentures net of debt discount - related parties		34,154			83,652
Total liabilities		3,311,490			1,883,379

Stockholders' deficit
Preferred stock, $.004995 par value; 5,000,000 shares
authorized: none outstanding		-			-
Common stock, $.004995 par value; 50,000,000 shares
authorized: 23,705,594 and 25,498,794 issued and
outstanding at June 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively		118,409			127,366
Additional paid in capital		5,358,033			4,517,814
Accumulated deficit		(8,352,407	)		(6,241,709	)
Total stockholders' deficit		(2,875,965	)		(1,596,529	)
	$	435,525		$	286,850

See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm, summary of accounting policies
and notes to consolidated financial statements.

F-3

Brendan Technologies, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Operation

Year Ended June 30,	2007			2006

Revenue	$	521,330		$	681,337

Selling expenses		101,296			103,190
General and administrative expenses		2,115,310			1,215,966
		2,216,606			1,319,156

Income (loss) from operations		(1,695,276	)		(637,819	)

Other income (expense)
Other income		38,121			-
Interest expense		(453,543	)		(207,574	)

Loss before provision for income taxes		(2,110,698	)		(845,393	)

Provision for income taxes		-			-

Net loss	$	(2,110,698	)	$	(845,393	)

Basic and diluted loss per share	$	(0.09	)	$	(0.06	)

Basic and diluted weighted average
common shares outstanding		23,710,507			15,146,106

See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm, summary of accounting

F-4

Brendan Technologies, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Deficit

Years Ended June 30, 2007 and 2006
	Common Stock						Additional Paid			Retained Earnings			Stockholders'
	Shares			Amount			in Capital			(Deficit)			(Deficit)
Balance, July 1, 2005		4,687,209		$	23,413		$	1,161,948		$	(5,396,316	)	$	(4,210,955	)

Issuance of common stock at $3.00
per share		67,500			337			202,163			-			202,500
Offering costs paid in cash								(31,875	)		-			(31,875	)
Brendan shares converted to Omni at 4 to 1		14,264,127			71,248			(71,248	)		-			-
Brendan notes payable and accrued interest
converted to Omni stock		4,352,879			21,743			2,632,455			-			2,654,198
Omni common shares issued in payment of
Brendan accounts payable related to merger		100,000			500			34,500			-			35,000
Omni common shares issued to an
individual as costs of the merger		800,000			3,996			(3,996	)		-			-
Omni shares previously outstanding
recapitalized due to the merger		1,227,079			6,129			(6,129	)		-			-
Sale of previous Omni operating subsidiaries
treated as contributed capital		-			-			498,000			-			498,000
Value of warrants and stock options issued		-			-			101,996			-			101,996
Net (loss) for the year ended
June 30, 2006		-			-			-			(845,393	)		(845,393	)
Balance, June 30, 2006		25,498,794		$	127,366		$	4,517,814		$	(6,241,709	)	$	(1,596,529	)

Cancellation of shares		(1,793,200	)		(8,957	)		8,957			-			-
Warrant valuation related to financing costs		-						40,403			-			40,403
Warrant valuation as result of services provided		-						30,390			-			30,390
Non cash issuance of stock options		-						80,208			-			80,208
Non cash debt discount on issuance of
8% convertible debentures, net of amortization		-						680,261			-			680,261
Net (loss) for the year ended June 30, 2007		-						-			(2,110,698	)		(2,110,698	)
Balance, June 30, 2007		23,705,594		$	118,409		$	5,358,033		$	(8,352,407	)	$	(2,875,965	)
See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm, summary of accounting policies
and notes to consolidated financial statements.

F-5

Brendan Technologies, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

Year Ended June 30,	2007			2006
Operating activities:
Net loss	$	(2,110,698	)	$	(845,393	)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss
to cash provided by operating activities:
Amortization and depreciation		46,189			14,858
Provision for uncollectible receivables		1,000			-
Stock option compensation		80,208			83,650
Amortization of debt discount		164,951			-
Amortization of financing costs		17,398			-
Amortization of warrant valuation issued for services		11,397			-
Other non cash items		(38,122	)		98,000
Changes in assets and liabilities:
(Increase) decrease in accounts receivable		(20,176	)		15,644
(Increase) decrease in prepaid expense and other assets		(67,381	)		29
Increase (decrease) in accounts payable		(110,392	)		48,773
Increase (decrease) in accrued liabilities		200,135			60,967
Increase (decrease) in deferred revenue		20,743			14,654
Net cash (used in) operating activities		(1,804,748	)		(508,818	)
Investing activities:
Purchase of property and equipment		(130,805	)		(67,351	)
Net cash (used in) investing activities		(130,805	)		(67,351	)
Financing activities:
Principal payments of lease obligations		(6,443	)		(2,448	)
Principal payments on notes payable in default		(125,000	)		-
Proceeds from notes receivable on sale of Omni divisions		-			400,000
Proceeds from issuance of 8% convertible debentures		1,902,500			125,000
Proceeds from issuance of short term note payable		100,000			-
Proceeds from issuance of common stock, net of cash
paid for costs		-			170,625
Net cash provided by financing activities		1,871,057			693,177
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents		(64,496	)		117,008
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year		149,512			32,504
Cash and cash equivalents, end of year	$	85,016		$	149,512
Supplemental Disclosure of Cash Flow Information:
Cash paid during the period for:
Interest	$	88,306		$	17,708
Income taxes	$	-		$	-
Non Cash Investing and Financing Activities:
Debt discount on 8% convertible debentures	$	680,261		$	18,346
Financing costs related to debentures and notes	$	40,403		$	-
Valuation of warrants issued for services	$	30,390		$	-
Property and equipment acquired through lease	$	-		$	7,886
Conversion of Brendan notes payable into common stock	$	-		$	1,692,972
Conversion of Brendan accrued interest into common stock	$	-		$	961,226
Issuance of common stock in payment of accounts payable	$	-		$	35,000

See accompanying reports of independent registered public accounting firms, summary of accounting policies

and notes to consolidated financial statements.

F-6

BRENDAN TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 1 - Business

Nature of Business

Brendan Technologies, Inc., a Nevada corporation (“we” or “Brendan”) provides software solutions to improve the accuracy, quality control, workflow, and regulatory compliance of immunoassay testing in laboratories in the biopharmaceutical, clinical, research, veterinarian and agricultural industries.

Name Change and Merger of Brendan Technologies, Inc. into Omni, U.S.A., Inc.

On September 15, 2006, Omni changed its name to Brendan Technologies, Inc. On December 29, 2005, Omni U.S.A., Inc., a Nevada corporation (“Omni”), Omni’s wholly-owned subsidiary Omni Merger Sub, Inc., a Michigan corporation (“Merger Sub”) entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “Merger Agreement”) with Brendan Technologies, Inc., a Michigan corporation (“Brendan Sub”), pursuant to which Merger Sub was merged with and into Brendan Sub and Brendan Sub became the surviving corporation in the merger and a wholly-owned subsidiary of Omni. Brendan Sub continues its corporate existence under the laws of the State of Michigan. Concurrently with the merger, 4,754,709 shares of Brendan Sub common stock outstanding immediately before the merger were converted into 19,018,836 shares of Omni common stock, a four for one ratio. Also concurrently with the merger, (i) 4,352,879 shares of Omni common stock were issued to the holders of Brendan Sub Senior and Bridge Notes totaling $2,654,198 in aggregate principal and interest, a conversion rate of 1.64 shares per $1.00 under such debt; (ii) 900,000 shares of Omni common stock was issued to individuals who participated in the arrangement of the merger.

Common stock options and warrants exercisable into 973,500 shares of Brendan Sub before the merger became exercisable into 3,894,000 common shares of Omni after the merger. The exercise price of the Omni stock options and warrants were adjusted to 25% of the exercise price of the Brendan Sub stock options and warrants.

Following the transactions effected by the Merger Agreement, Brendan Sub is now our sole wholly-owned subsidiary and we conduct all our operations through Brendan Sub.

Note 2- Going Concern

Going Concern

These financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis. However, during the years ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, we incurred net losses of $2,110,698 and $845,393, respectively, and had an accumulated deficit of $8,352,407 and $6,241,709, at June 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively. In addition, at June 30, 2007, we had a working capital deficit of $1,679,643 and are in default on $225,382 of debt and interest. Our ability to continue as a going concern is dependent upon our ability to generate profitable operations in the future and/or to obtain the necessary financing to meet our obligations and repay our liabilities arising from normal business operations when they come due. The outcome of these matters cannot be predicted with any certainty at this time and as such raise substantial doubt as to our ability to continue as a going concern. Since inception, we have satisfied our capital needs through debt and equity financings and expect to continue to fund our operations from these sources until profitability is achieved. There can be no assurance that funds will be available at terms favorable to us or that future profitability can be achieved. The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability and classification of recorded asset amounts or the amounts and classification of liabilities that might be necessary should we be unable to continue as a going concern.

F-7

BRENDAN TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

business operations when they come due. The outcome of these matters cannot be predicted with any certainty at this time and as such raise substantial doubt as to our ability to continue as a going concern. Since inception, we have satisfied our capital needs through debt and equity financings and expect to continue to fund our operations from these sources until profitability is achieved. There can be no assurance that funds will be available at terms favorable to us or that future profitability can be achieved. The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability and classification of recorded asset amounts or the amounts and classification of liabilities that might be necessary should we be unable to continue as a going concern.

Management’s Plans

Management's plans to eliminate the going concern situation include, but are not limited to, the following:

· Obtain additional equity or debt financing from investors. Subsequent to June 30, 2007, we received net

proceeds of $555,000 from the issuance of a bridge loan to a group of five investors.

· Increase revenue from the sale of our software. We are anticipating releasing an upgraded version of our

software during the next twelve months that will address customer enterprise level requirements.

· If necessary, we will initiate cost cutting programs that would reduce cash requirements.

Note 3 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Consolidation Policy

The foregoing financial information has been prepared from the books and records of Brendan. Brendan’s consolidated financial statements include the accounts of our wholly-owned subsidiary, Brendan Sub. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. In the opinion of management, the financial information reflects all adjustments necessary for a fair presentation of the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of ours in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.

Cash and cash Equivalents

Cash and cash equivalents include cash, funds invested in money market funds and cash invested temporarily in various instruments with maturities of three months or less at the time of purchase.

Trade Accounts Receivable

We provide for the possible inability to collect accounts receivable by recording an allowance for doubtful accounts. We write off an account when it is considered to be uncollectible.

F-8

BRENDAN TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued).

Property and Equipment

Property and equipment are stated at cost. Expenditures for major renewals and betterments that extend the useful lives of property and equipment are capitalized, upon being placed in service. Expenditures for maintenance and repairs are charged to expense as incurred. Depreciation is computed over the estimated useful life of three years, except leasehold improvements which are depreciated over the lesser of the remaining lease life or the life of the asset, using the straight-line method. We follow the provisions of the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") Statement of Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 144, "Accounting for the Impairment of Long-lived Assets." Long-lived assets and certain identifiable intangibles to be held and used by us are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. We periodically evaluate the recoverability of our long-lived assets based on estimated future cash flows and the estimated fair value of such long-lived assets, and provide for impairment if such undiscounted cash flows are insufficient to recover the carrying amount of the long-lived asset.

Revenue Recognition

Training and service calls- recognized at the time training or service calls are provided.

Royalties- we recognize revenue from royalties only after the cash has been collected (typically 30 days after the end of the quarter on which the royalty payment is based.)

F-9

BRENDAN TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

License fees will be recognized upon the execution of the license agreement and transfer of intellectual property provided no further significant performance obligations exist and collectibility is deemed probable.

Software Development Costs

Costs associated with the development and enhancement of proprietary software for sale is expensed as incurred. The costs incurred between the time when our products reach technological feasibility and when they are available for general release to the public are

capitalized and amortized over their estimated useful lives. When such assets have been capitalized, they are reviewed each period to determine if the value of the asset has been impaired. We currently have no capitalized and unamortized software development costs.

Research and Development

We account for research and development costs in accordance with several accounting pronouncements, including SFAS No. 2, Accounting for Research and Development Costs, and SFAS No. 86, Accounting for the Costs of Computer Software to be Sold, Leased, or Otherwise Marketed. Costs to maintain and upgrade our software after initial release to our customers are expensed when incurred. Research and development costs were immaterial during each period.

Stock Based Compensation

Effective January 1, 2006, we adopted FASB Statement No. 123R, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation” (“SFAS 123R”). SFAS 123R requires all share-based payments to employees, including grants of employee stock options and restricted stock, to be recognized in the financial statements based on their fair values. Under SFAS 123R, the pro forma disclosures previously permitted under APB 25 are no longer an alternative for financial statement reporting purposes.

F-10