Unassociated Document
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark one)
x
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
For the quarterly period ended October 31, 2011
OR
o
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
For the transition period from _______________ to _______________
Commission File Number: 0-15535
LAKELAND INDUSTRIES, INC.
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware
|
|
13-3115216
|
(State of incorporation)
|
|
(IRS Employer Identification Number)
|
701 Koehler Avenue, Suite 7, Ronkonkoma, New York
|
|
11779
|
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
(Zip Code)
|
(631) 981-9700
(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yesx No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a nonaccelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definition of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12-b-2 of the Exchange Act. Check one.
Large accelerated filer ¨
|
Accelerated filer ¨
|
|
|
Nonaccelerated filer ¨ (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
|
Smaller reporting company x
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12-b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yeso No x
As of July 31, 2011, the aggregate market value of the registrant’s common stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant was $38,911,451 based on the closing price of the common stock as reported on the National Association of Securities Dealers Automated Quotation System National Market System.
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.
Class
|
|
Outstanding at December 6, 2011
|
Common Stock, $0.01 par value per share
|
|
5,225,237 shares
|
LAKELAND INDUSTRIES, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES
FORM 10-Q
The following information of the Registrant and its subsidiaries is submitted herewith:
|
|
Page
|
|
|
|
PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION:
|
|
|
|
|
Item 1.
|
Financial Statements:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Introduction
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations
|
|
|
Three Months and Nine Months Ended October 31, 2011 and 2010
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income
|
|
|
Three Months and Nine Months Ended October 31, 2011and 2010
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
|
|
|
October 31, 2011 and January 31, 2011
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
Condensed Consolidated Statement of Stockholders' Equity
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended October 31, 2011
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
Condensed Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended October 31, 2011 and 2010
|
9
|
|
|
|
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements |
10
|
|
|
|
Item 2.
|
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
|
25
|
|
|
|
Item 3.
|
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
|
32
|
|
|
|
Item 4.
|
Controls and Procedures
|
32
|
|
|
|
PART II - OTHER INFORMATION:
|
|
|
|
|
Item 6.
|
Exhibits
|
33
|
|
|
|
Signature Pages
|
33
|
LAKELAND INDUSTRIES, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements
Introduction
SPECIAL NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This 10-Q may contain certain forward-looking statements. When used in this Form 10-Q or in any other presentation, statements which are not historical in nature, including the words “anticipate,” “estimate,” “should,” “expect,” “believe,” “intend,” “project” and similar expressions, are intended to identify forward-looking statements. They also include statements containing a projection of sales, earnings or losses, capital expenditures, dividends, capital structure or other financial terms.
The forward-looking statements in this Form 10-Q are based upon our management’s beliefs, assumptions and expectations of our future operations and economic performance, taking into account the information currently available to us. These statements are not statements of fact. Forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties, some of which are not currently known to us that may cause our actual results, performance or financial condition to be materially different from the expectations of future results, performance or financial condition we express or imply in any forward-looking statements. Some of the important factors that could cause our actual results, performance or financial condition to differ materially from expectations are:
|
·
|
Our ability to obtain fabrics and components from suppliers and manufacturers at competitive prices or prices that vary from quarter to quarter;
|
|
·
|
Risks associated with our international manufacturing and start-up sales operations;
|
|
·
|
Potential fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates;
|
|
·
|
Our ability to respond to rapid technological change;
|
|
·
|
Our ability to identify and complete acquisitions or future expansion;
|
|
·
|
Our ability to manage our growth;
|
|
·
|
Our ability to recruit and retain skilled employees, including our senior management;
|
|
·
|
Our ability to accurately estimate customer demand;
|
|
·
|
Competition from other companies, including some with greater resources;
|
|
·
|
Risks associated with sales to foreign buyers;
|
|
·
|
Restrictions on our financial and operating flexibility as a result of covenants in our credit facilities;
|
|
·
|
Our ability to obtain additional funding to expand or operate our business as planned;
|
|
·
|
The impact of potential product liability claims;
|
|
·
|
Liabilities under environmental laws and regulations;
|
|
·
|
Fluctuations in the price of our common stock;
|
|
·
|
Variations in our quarterly results of operations;
|
|
·
|
The cost of compliance with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and rules and regulations relating to corporate governance and public disclosure;
|
|
·
|
The significant influence of our directors and executive officers on our company and on matters subject to a vote of our stockholders;
|
|
·
|
The impact of a decline in federal funding for preparations for terrorist incidents;
|
|
·
|
The limited liquidity of our common stock;
|
|
·
|
The other factors referenced in this Form 10-Q, including, without limitation, in the sections entitled “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.” The factors described under “Risk Factors” disclosed in our fiscal 2011 Form 10-K.
|
We believe these forward-looking statements are reasonable; however, you should not place undue reliance on any forward-looking statements, which are based on current expectations. Furthermore, forward-looking statements speak only as of the date they are made. We undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements after the date of this Form 10-Q, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. In light of these risks, uncertainties and assumptions, the forward-looking events discussed in this Form 10-Q might not occur. We qualify any and all of our forward-looking statements entirely by these cautionary factors.
LAKELAND INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(UNAUDITED)
Three months and Nine months ended October 31, 2011 and 2010
|
|
THREE MONTHS ENDED
|
|
|
NINE MONTHS ENDED
|
|
|
|
October 31,
|
|
|
October 31,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$ |
24,744,033 |
|
|
$ |
25,680,587 |
|
|
$ |
76,162,356 |
|
|
$ |
74,693,511 |
|
Cost of goods sold
|
|
|
17,330,988 |
|
|
|
18,494,839 |
|
|
|
52,688,619 |
|
|
|
52,649,619 |
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
7,413,045 |
|
|
|
7,185,748 |
|
|
|
23,473,737 |
|
|
|
22,043,892 |
|
Operating expenses
|
|
|
7,184,167 |
|
|
|
6,280,544 |
|
|
|
20,594,448 |
|
|
|
19,642,005 |
|
Operating profit
|
|
|
228,878 |
|
|
|
905,204 |
|
|
|
2,879,289 |
|
|
|
2,401,887 |
|
VAT tax charge Brazil
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(1,583,247 |
) |
Interest and other income, net
|
|
|
(12,328 |
) |
|
|
15,602 |
|
|
|
53,302 |
|
|
|
49,867 |
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(161,914 |
) |
|
|
(77,362 |
) |
|
|
(425,471 |
) |
|
|
(255,635 |
) |
Income from continuing operations before income taxes
|
|
|
54,636 |
|
|
|
843,444 |
|
|
|
2,507,120 |
|
|
|
612,872 |
|
Provision (benefit) for income taxes
|
|
|
(90,998 |
) |
|
|
144,125 |
|
|
|
411,650 |
|
|
|
453,345 |
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
|
145,634 |
|
|
|
699,319 |
|
|
|
2,095,470 |
|
|
|
159,527 |
|
Discontinued operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from operations of discontinued India glove manufacturing facility (including loss on disposal of $880,694 in 2011)
|
|
|
(1,128,390 |
) |
|
|
(78,855 |
) |
|
|
(1,445,026 |
) |
|
|
(444,024 |
) |
Income tax benefit
|
|
|
(406,120 |
) |
|
|
(28,388 |
) |
|
|
(520,210 |
) |
|
|
(159,849 |
) |
Loss on discontinued operations
|
|
|
(722,270 |
) |
|
|
(50,467 |
) |
|
|
(924,816 |
) |
|
|
(284,175 |
) |
Net income (loss)
|
|
$ |
(576,636 |
) |
|
$ |
648,852 |
|
|
$ |
1,170,654 |
|
|
$ |
(124,648 |
) |
Earnings (loss) per share-basic
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
$ |
0.03 |
|
|
$ |
0.13 |
|
|
$ |
0.40 |
|
|
$ |
0.03 |
|
Discontinued operations
|
|
$ |
(0.13 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.01 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.18 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.05 |
) |
Net income (loss)
|
|
$ |
(0.11 |
) |
|
$ |
0.12 |
|
|
$ |
0.22 |
|
|
$ |
(0.02 |
) |
Earnings (loss) per share - Diluted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
$ |
0.03 |
|
|
$ |
0.13 |
|
|
$ |
0.39 |
|
|
$ |
0.03 |
|
Discontinued operations
|
|
$ |
(0.13 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.01 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.17 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.05 |
) |
Net income (loss)
|
|
$ |
(0.11 |
) |
|
$ |
0.12 |
|
|
$ |
0.22 |
|
|
$ |
(0.02 |
) |
Weighted average common shares outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
5,225,020 |
|
|
|
5,440,520 |
|
|
|
5,224,371 |
|
|
|
5,440,396 |
|
Diluted
|
|
|
5,356,835 |
|
|
|
5,546,389 |
|
|
|
5,348,172 |
|
|
|
5,513,939 |
|
Numbers may not add due to rounding.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
LAKELAND INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(UNAUDITED)
Three and Nine months ended October 31, 2011 and 2010
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
October 31
|
|
|
October 31
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$ |
(576,636 |
) |
|
$ |
648,852 |
|
|
$ |
1,170,654 |
|
|
$ |
(124,648 |
) |
Other comprehensive income (loss):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flow hedge in China
|
|
|
40,698 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
108,375 |
|
|
|
— |
|
Foreign currency translation adjustments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lakeland Brazil, S.A.
|
|
|
(1,904,804 |
) |
|
|
504,978 |
|
|
|
(678,905 |
) |
|
|
1,333,788 |
|
Canada
|
|
|
(25,641 |
) |
|
|
4,396 |
|
|
|
(263 |
) |
|
|
26,861 |
|
United Kingdom
|
|
|
(94,165 |
) |
|
|
34,850 |
|
|
|
11,494 |
|
|
|
(73,660 |
) |
China
|
|
|
19,908 |
|
|
|
55,018 |
|
|
|
46,645 |
|
|
|
59,991 |
|
Russia/Kazakhstan
|
|
|
(36,022 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(25,950 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
Other comprehensive income (loss)
|
|
|
(2,000,026 |
) |
|
|
599,242 |
|
|
|
(538,604 |
) |
|
|
1,346,980 |
|
Comprehensive income (loss)
|
|
$ |
(2,576,662 |
) |
|
$ |
1,248,094 |
|
|
$ |
632.050 |
|
|
$ |
1,222,332 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
LAKELAND INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
October 31, 2011 and January 31, 2011
|
|
October 31,
2011
|
|
|
January 31,
2011
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$ |
5,946,651 |
|
|
$ |
5,953,069 |
|
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $222,300 at October 31, 2011 and $210,100 at January 31, 2011
|
|
|
15,242,845 |
|
|
|
14,377,188 |
|
Inventories, net of reserves of $1,458,000 at October 31, 2011 and $1,495,000 at January 31, 2011
|
|
|
47,312,694 |
|
|
|
45,295,295 |
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
2,262,174 |
|
|
|
2,296,941 |
|
Assets of discontinued operation in India
|
|
|
2,980,841 |
|
|
|
3,669,601 |
|
Prepaid income and VAT tax
|
|
|
1,225,235 |
|
|
|
1,814,691 |
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
1,832,480 |
|
|
|
2,318,214 |
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
76,802,920 |
|
|
|
75,724,999 |
|
Property and equipment, net
|
|
|
13,588,861 |
|
|
|
11,096,329 |
|
Intangibles and other assets, net
|
|
|
8,739,949 |
|
|
|
8,256,904 |
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
6,258,740 |
|
|
|
6,297,751 |
|
Total assets
|
|
$ |
105,390,470 |
|
|
$ |
101,375,983 |
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
$ |
5,389,716 |
|
|
$ |
6,474,468 |
|
Accrued compensation and benefits
|
|
|
1,934,763 |
|
|
|
1,411,599 |
|
Other accrued expenses
|
|
|
730,529 |
|
|
|
2,697,445 |
|
Liabilities of discontinued operation in India
|
|
|
366,207 |
|
|
|
33,940 |
|
Current maturity of long-term debt and short-term borrowing
|
|
|
1,455,508 |
|
|
|
100,050 |
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
9,876,723 |
|
|
|
10,717,502 |
|
Borrowings under revolving credit facility
|
|
|
12,705,632 |
|
|
|
11,485,698 |
|
Other long-term debt
|
|
|
4,483,941 |
|
|
|
1,592,461 |
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
102,345 |
|
|
|
103,270 |
|
VAT taxes payable long-term
|
|
|
3,312,846 |
|
|
|
3,309,811 |
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
30,481,487 |
|
|
|
27,208,742 |
|
Commitments and Contingencies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders' equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, $.01 par; authorized 1,500,000 shares (none issued)
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
Common stock, $.01 par; authorized 10,000,000 shares, issued, 5,581,678 and 5,568,744; outstanding, 5,225,237 and 5,254,303 at October 31, 2011 and January 31, 2011, respectively
|
|
|
55,817 |
|
|
|
55,687 |
|
Treasury stock, at cost, 356,441 shares at October 31, 2011 and 314,441 shares at January 31, 2011
|
|
|
(3,352,291 |
) |
|
|
(3,012,920 |
) |
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
50,728,547 |
|
|
|
50,279,613 |
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
27,363,703 |
|
|
|
26,193,049 |
|
Other comprehensive income
|
|
|
113,207 |
|
|
|
651,812 |
|
Total stockholders' equity
|
|
|
74,908,983 |
|
|
|
74,167,241 |
|
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity
|
|
$ |
105,390,470 |
|
|
$ |
101,375,983 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
LAKELAND INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
(UNAUDITED)
Nine months ended October 31, 2011
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
Treasury Stock
|
|
|
Additional
Paid-in
Capital
|
|
|
Retained
Earnings
|
|
|
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, January 31, 2011
|
|
|
5,568,744 |
|
|
$ |
55,687 |
|
|
|
(314,441 |
) |
|
$ |
(3,012,920 |
) |
|
$ |
50,279,613 |
|
|
$ |
26,193,049 |
|
|
$ |
651,812 |
|
|
$ |
74,167,241 |
|
Net income
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
1,170,654 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
1,170,654 |
|
Other comprehensive income (loss)
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(538,605 |
) |
|
|
(538,605 |
) |
Stock-based compensation:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grant of director stock options
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
18,548 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
18,548 |
|
Restricted Stock issued at par
|
|
|
12,934 |
|
|
|
130 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(130 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
Restricted Stock Plan:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 Plan
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
4,253 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
4,253 |
|
2009 Plan
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
476,692 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
476,692 |
|
Shares returned to Company in lieu of payroll taxes
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(50,429 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(50,429 |
) |
Stock Buy-back Program
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(42,000 |
) |
|
|
(339,371 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(339,371 |
) |
Balance October 31, 2011
|
|
|
5,581,678 |
|
|
$ |
55,817 |
|
|
|
(356,441 |
) |
|
$ |
(3,352,291 |
) |
|
$ |
50,728,547 |
|
|
$ |
27,363,703 |
|
|
$ |
113,207 |
|
|
$ |
74,908,983 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
LAKELAND INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(UNAUDITED)
Nine months ended October 31, 2011 and 2010
|
|
NINE MONTHS ENDED
|
|
|
|
October 31,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
Cash Flows from Operating Activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$ |
1,170,654 |
|
|
$ |
(124,648 |
) |
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
499,493 |
|
|
|
591,751 |
|
Provision for doubtful accounts
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(6,509 |
) |
Provision for inventory obsolescence
|
|
|
(37,000 |
) |
|
|
260,614 |
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
1,207,135 |
|
|
|
1,478,761 |
|
Deferred income tax
|
|
|
28,786 |
|
|
|
3,169,278 |
|
Loss on disposal of discontinued operations
|
|
|
880,694 |
|
|
|
— |
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in accounts receivable
|
|
|
(1,030,161 |
) |
|
|
(1,220,955 |
) |
(Increase) decrease in inventories
|
|
|
(2,158,394 |
) |
|
|
44,913 |
|
(Increase) decrease in other assets
|
|
|
597,111 |
|
|
|
(2,719,667 |
) |
Increase (decrease) in accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities
|
|
|
(2,545,306 |
) |
|
|
3,968,722 |
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
|
|
|
(1,386,988 |
) |
|
|
5,442,260 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows from Investing Activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of property and equipment
|
|
|
(3,593,674 |
) |
|
|
(1,235,789 |
) |
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(3,593,674 |
) |
|
|
(1,235,789 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows from Financing Activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of stock under stock repurchase program
|
|
|
(339,371 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
Net (payments) borrowings under loan agreements
|
|
|
5,460,961 |
|
|
|
(3,720,830 |
) |
Cash paid for taxes in lieu of shares issued under restricted stock program
|
|
|
(50,429 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
|
|
5,071,161 |
|
|
|
(3,720,830 |
) |
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash
|
|
|
(96,917 |
) |
|
|
(123,913 |
) |
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(6,418 |
) |
|
|
361,728 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
|
|
5,953,069 |
|
|
|
5,093,380 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
|
|
$ |
5,946,651 |
|
|
$ |
5,455,108 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
LAKELAND INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
Lakeland Industries, Inc. and Subsidiaries (the "Company"), a Delaware corporation organized in April 1982, manufactures and sells a comprehensive line of safety garments and accessories for the industrial protective clothing and homeland security markets. The principal market for our products is the United States. No customer accounted for more than 10% of net sales during the nine-month periods ended October 31, 2011 and 2010.
The condensed consolidated financial statements included herein have been prepared by us, without audit, pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission, and reflect all adjustments (consisting of only normal and recurring adjustments) which are, in the opinion of management, necessary to present fairly the condensed consolidated financial information required therein. Certain information and note disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) have been condensed or omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations. While we believe that the disclosures are adequate to make the information presented not misleading, it is suggested that these condensed consolidated financial statements be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission for the year ended January 31, 2011.
The results of operations for the three-month and nine-month periods ended October 31, 2011, are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year.
3.
|
Principles of Consolidation
|
The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated.
Inventories consist of the following:
|
|
October 31, 2011
|
|
|
January 31, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Raw materials
|
|
$ |
21,844,777 |
|
|
$ |
17,830,675 |
|
Work-in-process
|
|
|
2,026,618 |
|
|
|
2,796,825 |
|
Finished goods
|
|
|
23,441,299 |
|
|
|
24,667,795 |
|
|
|
$ |
47,312,694 |
|
|
$ |
45,295,295 |
|
Inventories include freight-in, materials, labor and overhead costs and are stated at the lower of cost (on a first-in, first-out basis) or market.
Basic earnings per share are based on the weighted average number of common shares outstanding without consideration of common stock equivalents. Diluted earnings per share are based on the weighted average number of common and common stock equivalents. The diluted earnings per share calculation takes into account the shares that may be issued upon exercise of stock options, reduced by the shares that may be repurchased with the funds received from the exercise, based on the average price during the period.
The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings per share for “Income for continuing operations” at October 31, 2011 and 2010 as follows:
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
October 31,
|
|
|
October 31,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
Numerator
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income from continuing operations
|
|
$ |
145,634 |
|
|
$ |
699,319 |
|
|
$ |
2,095,470 |
|
|
$ |
159,527 |
|
Denominator
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator for basic earnings per share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(weighted-average shares which reflect 356,441 and 355,041 and 125,322 and 125,322 shares in the treasury as a result of the stock repurchase program for the three months and nine months in each of 2011 and 2010, respectively
|
|
|
5,225,020 |
|
|
|
5,440,520 |
|
|
|
5,224,371 |
|
|
|
5,440,396 |
|
Effect of dilutive securities from restricted stock plan and from dilutive effect of stock options
|
|
|
131,815 |
|
|
|
105,869 |
|
|
|
123,801 |
|
|
|
73,543 |
|
Denominator for diluted earnings per share (adjusted weighted average shares)
|
|
|
5,356,835 |
|
|
|
5,546,389 |
|
|
|
5,348,172 |
|
|
|
5,513,939 |
|
Basic earnings per share from continuing operations
|
|
$ |
0.03 |
|
|
$ |
0.13 |
|
|
$ |
0.40 |
|
|
$ |
(0.03 |
) |
Diluted earnings per share from continuing operations
|
|
$ |
0.03 |
|
|
$ |
0.13 |
|
|
$ |
0.39 |
|
|
$ |
(0.03 |
) |
6.
|
Revolving Credit Facility
|
At October 31, 2011, the balance outstanding under our revolving credit facility amounted to $12.7 million. In January 2010, the Company entered into a new one-year $23.5 million revolving credit facility with TD Bank, N.A. In January 2011, TD Bank, N.A. agreed to a two-year extension to expire January 2013. In June 2011, TD Bank, N.A. agreed to extend the term to June 2014 and add a $6.5 term loan facility to be used to fund capital expansion in Brazil, Mexico and Argentina, as well as the ability to refinance existing debt in Canada. Borrowings under this $6.5 million term loan facility are in the form of a five-year term loan.
As of October 31, 2011, there was $3.7 million outstanding under this term loan facility, which is being used to fund capital projects in Brazil and Mexico. The credit facility contains financial covenants including, but not limited to, fixed charge ratio, funded debt to EBIDTA ratio, inventory and accounts receivable collateral coverage ratio, with respect to which the Company was in compliance at October 31, 2011. The current interest rate on this term loan at October 31, 2011, was 2.47%, and principal was due $63,333 monthly.
Purchases from DuPont (see Note 13) and Southern Mills accounted for 16.3% and 17.5% of total purchases for the nine-month period ended October 31, 2011, and 25.7% and 6.8% of total purchases for the nine-month period ended October 31, 2010.
8.
|
Employee Stock Compensation
|
The Company’s Director’s Plan permits the grant of share options and shares to its Directors for up to 60,000 shares of common stock as stock compensation. All stock options under this Plan are granted at the fair market value of the common stock at the grant date. This date is fixed only once a year upon a Board member’s re-election to the Board at the Annual Shareholders’ meeting. Director’s stock options vest ratably over a six-month period and generally expire six years from the grant date.
There are two general equity plans, the 2006 and 2009 equity plans, and a nonemployee director option plan. Each of the 2006 and 2009 plans has the identical structure and each plan includes all of the components described below:
|
Nature and terms
|
Restricted Stock Plan - employees
|
Long-term incentive compensation-three-year plan. Employees are granted potential share awards at the beginning of the three-year cycle at baseline and maximum amounts. The level of award and final vesting is based on the Board of Director’s opinion as to the performance of the Company and management in the entire three year cycle. All vesting is three-year “cliff” vesting - there is no partial vesting. The valuation is based on the stock price at the grant date and amortized to expense over the three-year period.
|
|
|
Restricted Stock Plan – Directors
|
Long-term incentive compensation-three-year plan. Directors are granted potential share awards at the beginning of the three-year cycle at baseline and maximum amounts. The level of award and final vesting is based on the Board of Director’s opinion as to the performance of the Company and management in the entire three-year cycle. All vesting is three-year “cliff” vesting-there is no partial vesting. The valuation is based on the stock price at the grant date and amortized to expense over the three-year period.
|
|
|
Matching award program
|
All participating employees are eligible to receive one share of restricted stock awarded for each two shares of Lakeland stock purchased on the open market. Such restricted shares are subject to three-year time vesting. The valuation is based on the stock price at the grant date and amortized to expense over the three-year period.
|
|
|
Bonus in stock program - employees
|
All participating employees are eligible to elect to receive any cash bonus in shares of restricted stock. Such restricted shares are subject to two-year time vesting. The valuation is based on the stock price at the grant date and amortized to expense over the two-year period. Since the employee is giving up cash for unvested shares, the amount of shares awarded is 133% of the cash amount based on the grant date stock price.
|
|
|
Director fee in stock program
|
All directors are eligible to elect to receive any director fees in shares of restricted stock. Such restricted shares are subject to two- year time vesting. The valuation is based on the stock price at the grant date and amortized to expense over the two-year period. Since the director is giving up cash for unvested shares, the amount of shares awarded is 133% of the cash amount based on the grant date stock price.
|
|
|
Non-employee director stock option plan
|
The plan provides for an automatic one-time grant of options to purchase 5,000 shares of common stock to each nonemployee director newly elected or appointed. Options are granted at not less than fair market value, become exercisable commencing six months from the date of grant and expire six years from the date of grant. In addition, all nonemployee directors re-elected to the Company’s Board of Directors at any annual meeting of the stockholders will automatically be granted additional options to purchase 1,000 shares of common stock on that date.
|
The following table represents our stock options granted, exercised and forfeited during the nine months ended October 31, 2011.
Stock Options
|
|
Number of
Shares
|
|
|
Weighted Average
Exercise Price per
Share
|
|
Weighted Average
Remaining
Contractual Term
|
|
Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
|
|
Outstanding at January 31, 2011
|
|
|
12,200 |
|
|
$ |
9.02 |
|
3.61 years
|
|
$ |
17,030 |
|
Granted during the nine-months ended October 31, 2011
|
|
|
5,000 |
|
|
$ |
8.28 |
|
6.00 years
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
Outstanding at October 31, 2011
|
|
|
17,200 |
|
|
$ |
7.26 |
|
3.58 years
|
|
$ |
8,000 |
|
Exercisable at October 31, 2011
|
|
|
17,200 |
|
|
$ |
7.26 |
|
3.58 years
|
|
$ |
8,000 |
|
There were no exercises or forfeitures during the nine-months ended October 31, 2011.
Restricted Stock Plan and Performance Equity Plan
On June 21, 2006, the stockholders of the Company approved a restricted stock plan (the “2006 Equity Incentive Plan”). A total of 253,000 shares of restricted stock were authorized under this plan. On June 17, 2009, the stockholders of the Company authorized 253,000 shares under a new restricted stock plan (the “2009 Equity Incentive Plan”). Under the restricted stock plans, eligible employees and directors are awarded performance-based restricted shares of the Company common stock. The amount recorded as expense for the performance-based grants of restricted stock are based upon an estimate made at the end of each reporting period as to the most probable outcome of this plan at the end of the three-year performance period. (e.g., baseline, maximum or zero). In addition to the grants with vesting based solely on performance, certain awards pursuant to the plan have a time-based vesting requirement, under which awards vest from two to three years after grant issuance, subject to continuous employment and certain other conditions. Restricted stock has no voting rights until fully vested and issued, and the underlying shares are not considered to be issued and outstanding until vested.
Under the 2009 Equity Incentive Plan, the Company has granted up to a maximum of 241,744 restricted stock awards as of October 31, 2011. All of these restricted stock awards are nonvested at October 31, 2011 (182,675 shares at “baseline”), and have a weighted average grant date fair value of $7.45. Under the 2006 Equity Incentive Plan, there are also outstanding as of October 31, 2011, unvested grants of 338 shares under the stock purchase match program. The Company recognizes expense related to performance-based awards over the requisite service period using the straight-line attribution method based on the outcome that is probable.
As of October 31, 2011, unrecognized stock-based compensation expense related to restricted stock awards totaled $830,855, consisting of $212 remaining under the 2006 Equity Incentive Plan and $830,643 under the 2009 Equity Incentive Plan, before income taxes, based on the maximum performance award level, less what has been charged to expense on a cumulative basis through October 31, 2011, which was set at baseline. Such unrecognized stock-based compensation expense related to restricted stock awards totaled $358,095 at the baseline performance level. The cost of these nonvested awards is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of three years. The Board has estimated its current performance level to be at the baseline level, and expenses have been recorded accordingly. The performance based awards are not considered stock equivalents for earnings per share (“EPS”) calculation purposes.
Stock-Based Compensation
The Company recognized total stock-based compensation costs of $499,493 and $591,751 for the nine months ended October 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively, of which $4,253 and $43,257 result from the 2006 Equity Incentive Plan and $476,692 and $548,494 result from the 2009 Equity Incentive Plan for the nine months ended October 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively, and $18,548 and $0, respectively, from the Director Option Plan. These amounts are reflected in selling, general and administrative expenses. The total income tax benefit recognized for stock-based compensation arrangements was $179,817 and $213,031 for the nine months ended October 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively.
Total Restricted Shares
|
|
Outstanding
unvested
grants at
maximum at
beginning of
FY12
|
|
|
Granted
during
FY12
through
October 31,
2011
|
|
|
Becoming
Vested
during FY12
through
October 31,
2011
|
|
|
Forfeited
during FY12
through
October 31,
2011
|
|
|
Outstanding
unvested
grants at
maximum at
October 31,
2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted stock grants - employees
|
|
|
137,123 |
|
|
|
8,014 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
145,137 |
|
Restricted stock grants - directors
|
|
|
63,184 |
|
|
|
4,686 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(4,686 |
) |
|
|
63,184 |
|
Matching award program
|
|
|
3,058 |
|
|
|
3,000 |
|
|
|
(2,220 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
3,838 |
|
Bonus in stock - employees
|
|
|
19,479 |
|
|
|
22,801 |
|
|
|
(16,479 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
25,801 |
|
Retainer in stock - directors
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
4,122 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
4,122 |
|
Total restricted stock plan
|
|
|
222,844 |
|
|
|
42,623 |
|
|
|
(18,699 |
) |
|
|
(4,686 |
) |
|
|
242,082 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares under 2009 plan
|
|
Outstanding
unvested
grants at
maximum at
beginning of
FY12
|
|
|
Granted
during
FY12
through
October 31,
2011
|
|
|
Becoming
Vested
during FY12
through
October 31,
2011
|
|
|
Forfeited
during FY12
through
October 31,
2011
|
|
|
Outstanding
unvested
grants at
maximum at
October 31,
2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted stock grants - employees
|
|
|
137,123 |
|
|
|
8,014 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
145,137 |
|
Restricted stock grants - directors
|
|
|
63,184 |
|
|
|
4,686 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(4,686 |
) |
|
|
63,184 |
|
Matching award program
|
|
|
500 |
|
|
|
3,000 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
3,500 |
|
Bonus in stock - employees
|
|
|
3,000 |
|
|
|
22,801 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
25,801 |
|
Retainer in stock - directors
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
4,122 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
4,122 |
|
Total restricted stock plan
|
|
|
203,807 |
|
|
|
42,623 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(4,686 |
) |
|
|
241,744 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares under 2006 Plan
|
|
Outstanding
unvested
grants at
maximum at
beginning of
FY12
|
|
|
Granted
during
FY12
through
October 31,
2011
|
|
|
Becoming
Vested
during FY12
through
October 31,
2011
|
|
|
Forfeited
during FY12
through
October 31,
2011
|
|
|
Outstanding
unvested
grants at
maximum at
October 31,
2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted stock grants - employees
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Restricted stock grants - directors
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Matching award program
|
|
|
2,558 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(2,220 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
338 |
|
Bonus in stock - employees
|
|
|
16,479 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(16,479 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Retainer in stock - directors
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Total restricted stock plan
|
|
|
19,037 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(18,699 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
338 |
|
Weighted average grant date fair value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares under 2009 Equity Incentive Plan
|
|
Outstanding
unvested
grants at
maximum at
beginning of
FY12
|
|
|
Granted
during
FY12
through
October 31,
2011
|
|
|
Becoming
Vested
during FY12
through
October 31,
2011
|
|
|
Forfeited
during FY12
through
October 31,
2011
|
|
|
Outstanding
unvested
grants at
maximum at
October 31,
2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted stock grants - employees
|
|
$ |
8.00 |
|
|
$ |
8.00 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
8.00 |
|
Restricted stock grants - directors
|
|
$ |
8.00 |
|
|
$ |
8.00 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
8.00 |
|
|
$ |
8.00 |
|
Matching award program
|
|
$ |
9.03 |
|
|
$ |
7.99 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
8.14 |
|
Bonus in stock - employees
|
|
$ |
9.31 |
|
|
$ |
8.39 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
8.50 |
|
Retainer in stock - directors
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
8.17 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
8.17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares under 2006 Equity Incentive Plan
|
|
Outstanding
unvested
grants at
maximum at
beginning of
FY12
|
|
|
Granted
during
FY12
through
October 31,
2011
|
|
|
Becoming
Vested
during FY12
through
October 31,
2011
|
|
|
Forfeited
during FY12
through
October 31,
2011
|
|
|
Outstanding
unvested
grants at
maximum at
October 31,
2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted stock grants - employees
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
Restricted stock grants - directors
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
Matching award program
|
|
$ |
10.56 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
10.95 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
7.98 |
|
Bonus in stock - employees
|
|
$ |
5.63 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
5.63 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
Retainer in stock - directors
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Overall weighted average per share - all plans
|
|
Restricted stock grants - employees
|
|
$ |
8.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
8.00 |
|
Restricted stock grants - directors
|
|
$ |
8.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
8.00 |
|
Matching award program
|
|
$ |
10.31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
8.14 |
|
Bonus in stock - employees
|
|
$ |
6.20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
8.50 |
|
Retainer in stock - directors
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
8.17 |
|
Total restricted stock plan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9.
|
Manufacturing Segment Data
|
Domestic and international sales are as follows in millions of dollars:
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
October 31,
|
|
|
October 31,
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
Domestic
|
|
$ |
12.7 |
|
|
|
51 |
% |
|
$ |
16.2 |
|
|
|
63 |
% |
|
$ |
41.0 |
|
|
|
53 |
% |
|
$ |
45.8 |
|
|
|
61 |
% |
International
|
|
|
12.0 |
|
|
|
49 |
% |
|
|
9.5 |
|
|
|
37 |
% |
|
|
35.2 |
|
|
|
47 |
% |
|
|
28.9 |
|
|
|
39 |
% |
Total
|
|
$ |
24.7 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
$ |
25.7 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
$ |
76.2 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
$ |
74.7 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
We manage our operations by evaluating each of our geographic locations. Our North American operations include our facilities in Decatur, Alabama (primarily the distribution to customers of the bulk of our products and the manufacture of our chemical, glove and disposable products), Jerez, Mexico (primarily disposable, glove and chemical suit production) and St. Joseph, Missouri and Sinking Spring, Pennsylvania (primarily woven products production). We also maintain three manufacturing companies in China (primarily disposable and chemical suit production), a wovens manufacturing facility in Brazil and a glove manufacturing facility in New Delhi, India (about to be closed). Our China and Brazil facilities produce the majority of the Company’s revenues. The accounting policies of these operating entities are the same as those described in Note 1 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended January 31, 2011. We evaluate the performance of these entities based on operating profit, which is defined as income before income taxes, interest expense and other income and expenses. We have sales forces in Canada, Europe, Latin America and China, which sell and distribute products shipped from the United States, Mexico, Brazil or China. The table below represents information about reported manufacturing segments for the three-month and nine-month periods noted therein:
|
|
Three Months Ended
October 31
(in millions of dollars)
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
October 31
(in millions of dollars)
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
Net Sales from Continuing Operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
USA
|
|
$ |
13.61 |
|
|
$ |
16.44 |
|
|
$ |
44.36 |
|
|
$ |
47.52 |
|
Other foreign
|
|
|
4.37 |
|
|
|
3.72 |
|
|
|
14.09 |
|
|
|
11.56 |
|
China
|
|
|
6.54 |
|
|
|
9.12 |
|
|
|
21.35 |
|
|
|
24.10 |
|
Brazil
|
|
|
4.87 |
|
|
|
3.11 |
|
|
|
12.96 |
|
|
|
8.96 |
|
Less intersegment sales
|
|
|
(4.65 |
) |
|
|
(6.71 |
) |
|
|
(16.60 |
) |
|
|
(17.45 |
) |
Consolidated sales
|
|
$ |
24.74 |
|
|
$ |
25.68 |
|
|
$ |
76.16 |
|
|
$ |
74.69 |
|
External Sales from Continuing Operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
USA
|
|
$ |
12.88 |
|
|
$ |
16.10 |
|
|
$ |
41.36 |
|
|
$ |
45.83 |
|
Other foreign
|
|
|
3.65 |
|
|
|
2.65 |
|
|
|
11.85 |
|
|
|
8.71 |
|
China
|
|
|
3.34 |
|
|
|
3.82 |
|
|
|
9.99 |
|
|
|
11.19 |
|
Brazil
|
|
|
4.87 |
|
|
|
3.11 |
|
|
|
12.96 |
|
|
|
8.96 |
|
Consolidated external sales
|
|
$ |
24.74 |
|
|
$ |
25.68 |
|
|
$ |
76.16 |
|
|
$ |
74.69 |
|
Intersegment Sales from Continuing Operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
USA
|
|
$ |
0.73 |
|
|
$ |
0.34 |
|
|
$ |
3.0 |
|
|
$ |
1.69 |
|
Other foreign
|
|
|
0.72 |
|
|
|
1.07 |
|
|
|
2.24 |
|
|
|
2.85 |
|
China
|
|
|
3.20 |
|
|
|
5.30 |
|
|
|
11.36 |
|
|
|
12.91 |
|
Brazil
|
|
|
0.00 |
|
|
|
0.00 |
|
|
|
0.00 |
|
|
|
0.00 |
|
Consolidated intersegment sales
|
|
$ |
4.65 |
|
|
$ |
6.71 |
|
|
$ |
16.60 |
|
|
$ |
17.45 |
|
Operating Profit from Continuing Operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
USA
|
|
$ |
(0.60 |
) |
|
$ |
.24 |
|
|
$ |
(0.45 |
) |
|
$ |
0.21 |
|
Other foreign
|
|
|
0.09 |
|
|
|
(0.09 |
) |
|
|
0.49 |
|
|
|
(0.05 |
) |
China
|
|
|
0.46 |
|
|
|
1.37 |
|
|
|
1.94 |
|
|
|
3.25 |
|
Brazil
|
|
|
0.11 |
|
|
|
0.08 |
|
|
|
0.17 |
|
|
|
(0.07 |
) |
Less intersegment profit
|
|
|
0.17 |
|
|
|
(.70 |
) |
|
|
0.73 |
|
|
|
(0.94 |
) |
Consolidated operating profit
|
|
$ |
0.23 |
|
|
$ |
.90 |
|
|
$ |
2.88 |
|
|
$ |
2.40 |
|
Depreciation and Amortization Expense from Continuing Operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
USA
|
|
$ |
0.16 |
|
|
$ |
0.18 |
|
|
$ |
0.51 |
|
|
$ |
0.57 |
|
Other foreign
|
|
|
0.04 |
|
|
|
0.04 |
|
|
|
0.11 |
|
|
|
0.09 |
|
China
|
|
|
0.08 |
|
|
|
0.06 |
|
|
|
0.24 |
|
|
|
0.24 |
|
Brazil
|
|
|
0.10 |
|
|
|
0.08 |
|
|
|
0.35 |
|
|
|
0.25 |
|
Consolidated depreciation and amortization expense
|
|
$ |
0.38 |
|
|
$ |
0.36 |
|
|
$ |
1.21 |
|
|
$ |
1.15 |
|
Interest Expense from Continuing Operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
USA
|
|
$ |
0.11 |
|
|
$ |
0.03 |
|
|
$ |
0.27 |
|
|
$ |
0.09 |
|
Other foreign
|
|
|
0.06 |
|
|
|
0.05 |
|
|
|
0.18 |
|
|
|
0.15 |
|
China
|
|
|
0.00 |
|
|
|
0.00 |
|
|
|
0.00 |
|
|
|
0.00 |
|
Brazil
|
|
|
0.08 |
|
|
|
0.04 |
|
|
|
0.18 |
|
|
|
0.16 |
|
Less intersegment
|
|
|
(0.09 |
) |
|
|
(0.05 |
) |
|
|
(0.21 |
) |
|
|
(0.14 |
) |
Consolidated interest expense
|
|
$ |
0.16 |
|
|
$ |
0.07 |
|
|
$ |
0.42 |
|
|
$ |
0.26 |
|
Income Tax Expense from Continuing Operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
USA
|
|
$ |
(0.28 |
) |
|
$ |
0.09 |
|
|
$ |
(0.29 |
) |
|
$ |
0.16 |
|
Other foreign
|
|
|
0.05 |
|
|
|
(0.37 |
) |
|
|
0.19 |
|
|
|
(0.29 |
) |
China
|
|
|
0.18 |
|
|
|
0.31 |
|
|
|
0.56 |
|
|
|
0.78 |
|
Brazil
|
|
|
(0.06 |
) |
|
|
0.37 |
|
|
|
(0.20 |
) |
|
|
0.16 |
|
Less intersegment
|
|
|
0.02 |
|
|
|
(0.26 |
) |
|
|
0.15 |
|
|
|
(0.36 |
) |
Consolidated income tax expense
|
|
$ |
(0.09 |
) |
|
$ |
0.14 |
|
|
$ |
0.41 |
|
|
$ |
0.45 |
|
Total Assets (at Balance Sheet Date):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
USA
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
$ |
37.43 |
|
|
$ |
36.78 |
|
Other foreign
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
14.75 |
|
|
|
12.90 |
|
China
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
22.32 |
|
|
|
18.14 |
|
India
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
3.73 |
|
|
|
4.63 |
|
Brazil
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
27.16 |
|
|
|
22.75 |
|
Consolidated assets
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
$ |
105.39 |
|
|
$ |
95.20 |
|
Long-lived Assets (at Balance Sheet Date)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
USA
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
$ |
5.33 |
|
|
$ |
4.14 |
|
Other foreign
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
0.03 |
|
|
|
1.40 |
|
China
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
2.49 |
|
|
|
2.29 |
|
India
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
2.49 |
|
|
|
2.89 |
|
Brazil
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
3.25 |
|
|
|
3.06 |
|
Consolidated long-lived assets
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
$ |
13.59 |
|
|
$ |
13.78 |
|
10.
|
Income Tax Audit/Change in Accounting Estimate
|
The Company establishes a liability for tax return positions in which there is uncertainty as to whether or not the position will ultimately be sustained. Amounts for uncertain tax positions are adjusted in quarters when new information becomes available or when positions are effectively settled. The Company recognizes interest expense and penalties related to these unrecognized tax benefits within income tax expense.
The Company is subject to US federal income tax, as well as income tax in multiple US state and local jurisdictions and a number of foreign jurisdictions. The Company’s federal income tax returns for the fiscal years ended January 31, 2003, 2004, 2005 and 2007 have been audited by the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”). The Company has received a final “No Change Letter” from the IRS for FY07 dated August 20, 2009. The Company has received notice from the IRS on March 21, 2011, that it will shortly commence an audit for the FY09 tax return.
Our three major foreign tax jurisdictions are China, Canada and Brazil. According to China tax regulatory framework, there is no statute of limitations on fraud or any criminal activities to deceive tax authorities. However, the general practice is going back five years, and general practice for records maintenance is 15 years. Our China subsidiaries were audited during the tax year 2007 for the tax years 2006, 2005 and 2004. Those audits were conducted in the ordinary course of business. China tax authorities did not perform tax audits in the ordinary course of business during tax years 2008, 2009, 2010 or during the current year as of current filing date. China tax authorities performed a fraud audit, but the scope was limited to the fraud activities found in late FY09 as discussed more fully in Note 15 to the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended January 31, 2010. This audit covered tax years from 2003 through 2008. We have reached a settlement with the Chinese Government in January 2009. China tax authorities have performed limited reviews on all China subsidiaries as of tax years 2008, 2009 and 2010 with no significant issues noted. We believe our tax positions are reasonably stated, and we do not anticipate any future tax liability from FY12 or earlier operations.
Lakeland Protective Wear, Inc., our Canadian subsidiary, follows Canada tax regulatory framework recording its tax expense and tax deferred assets or liabilities. As of this statement filing date, we believe the Company’s tax situation is reasonably stated, and we do not anticipate future tax liability.
The Company’s Brazilian subsidiary is currently under a tax audit, which raised some issues regarding the tax impact related to the merger held in 2008 and the resulting goodwill resulting from the structure which was set up at the company's Brazilian counsel's suggestion. The Company has not received any formal communication from the authorities. Since there is no formal claim received, and there may not be such a claim in any case, management and counsel are at this time and are unable to determine the likely outcome of any such potential claim and whether it is probable, possible or remote that any significant liability might be incurred. However, this structure is relatively common in acquisitions of Brazilian operations made by non-Brazilian companies. In general, acquisitions with this structure have survived challenge by the taxing authorities in Brazil. The cumulative amount of tax benefits recognized on the company’s books through October 31, 2011, resulting from the tax deduction of the goodwill amortization is USD$730,000.
11.
|
Derivative Instruments and Foreign Currency Exposure
|
The Company has foreign currency exposure, principally through sales in Canada, Brazil, China, Argentina, Chile and the UK, and production in Brazil, Mexico and China. Management has commenced a derivative instrument program to partially offset this risk by purchasing forward contracts to sell the Canadian Dollar, the Chilean Peso, the Euro, the Great Britain Pound and the Argentina Peso other than the cash flow hedge discussed below. Such contracts are largely timed to expire with the last day of the fiscal quarter, with a new contract purchased on the first day of the following quarter, to match the operating cycle of the Company. Management has decided not to hedge its long position in the Chinese Yuan or the Brazilian Real. We designated the forward contracts as derivatives not designated as hedging instruments with loss and gain recognized in the current earnings. In the three-months ended October 31, 2011, the Company sustained a loss on foreign exchange in Brazil of $340,000 or $(0.05) per share included in net income from continuing operations. In the three months ended October 31, 2010, the Company recorded a gain on foreign exchange in Brazil of $161,000 or $0.03 per share included in net income from continuing operations.
The Company accounts for its foreign exchange derivative instruments by recognizing all derivatives as either assets or liabilities at fair value, which may result in additional volatility in both current period earnings and other comprehensive income as a result of recording recognized and unrecognized gains and losses from changes in the fair value of derivative instruments.
Currently, we have two types of derivatives to manage the risk of foreign currency fluctuations. We enter into forward contracts with financial institutions to manage our currency exposure related to net assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies. Those forward contracts derivatives not designated as hedging instruments are generally settled quarterly. Gain and loss on forward contracts are including current earnings. We also enter cash flow hedge contracts with financial institutions to manage our currency exposure on future cash payments denominated in foreign currencies. The effective portion of gain or loss on cash flow hedge is reported as a component of other comprehensive income and reclassified into earnings in the same period or periods during which the hedged forecasted transaction affects earnings. Our hedge positions are summarized below:
Fair Value of Derivative Instruments
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments
Foreign Exchange Forward Contracts
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
October 31, 2011
|
|
|
October 31, 2010
|
|
|
October 31, 2011
|
|
|
October 31, 2010
|
|
Notional Value in USD
|
|
$ |
3,444,100 |
|
|
$ |
2,836,935 |
|
|
$ |
9,950,406 |
|
|
$ |
6,622,888 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain and loss reported in current operating income (expense)
|
|
$ |
41,307 |
|
|
$ |
(118,147 |
) |
|
$ |
(130,927 |
) |
|
$ |
(198,007 |
) |
There is no outstanding balance from foreign exchange forward contracts as of October 31, 2011 or October 31, 2010
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments
Asset Derivative from Foreign Currency Cash Flow Hedge
|
|
As of
October 31, 2011
|
|
Reported in
balance sheet
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notional value in USD
|
|
$ |
9,539,425 |
|
|
Gain and loss reported in equity as other comprehensive income
|
|
$ |
87,615 |
|
Other assets
|
Effect of Derivative on Income Statement from Foreign Currency Cash Flow Hedge
|
|
Nine Months Ended
October 31, 2011
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
October 31, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain reclassed from other comprehensive income into current earnings during three months ended October 31, 2011 reported in operating income
|
|
$ |
30,243 |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
The cash flow hedge is designed to hedge the payments made in Euros and USD to our China subsidiaries. As of October 31, 2011, there were no open fair value hedge contracts, and $87,614 has been recorded as other asset to account for the value of cash flow hedge. There was no cash flow hedge in fiscal 2011.
12. VAT Tax Issue in Brazil
Asserted Claims
VAT tax in Brazil is both at the federal and state level, but the larger amount is at the state level. We commenced operations in Brazil in May 2008 through an acquisition of Lakeland Brasil, S.A. (“Qualytextil”, “QT”). At the time of the acquisition, and going back to 2004, the acquired company used a port facility in a neighboring state, rather than its own, in order to take advantage of incentives, in the form of a discounted VAT tax, to use such neighboring port facility. We continued this practice until April 2009. The practice was stopped largely for economic reasons, resulting from additional trucking costs and longer lead time. The Bahia state auditors (state of domicile for the Lakeland operations in Brazil) initially reviewed the period from 2004-2006 and filed a claim for unpaid VAT taxes in October 2009. The claim asserted that the state VAT taxes are owed to the state of domicile of the ultimate importer/user and disregarded the fact that the VAT taxes had already been paid to the neighboring state.
In October 2009, QT received an audit notice from Bahia claiming the taxes paid to Recife/Pernambuco should have been paid to Bahia in the amount of R$4.8 million and assessed fines and interest of an additional R$5.6 million for a total of R$10.4 million (approximately US$3.0 million, $3.5 million and $6.5 million, respectively).
Bahia had announced an amnesty for this tax whereby the taxes claimed were paid by QT by the end of the month of May 2010, and the interest and penalties were forgiven. According to fiscal regulation of Brazil, this amnesty payment has since been partially recouped as credits against future taxes due.
Set forth below are the total amounts of potential tax liability from both the first and second claims, the amount of payments already made into amnesty or scheduled for future payment, which are not eligible for future credit (essentially the discount allowed as an incentive by the neighboring state), less the amount of VAT taxes actually paid which are available as a credit and the amounts of the escrow released by one of the three sellers of the Brazilian company acquired by the Company. The foregoing forms the basis for the USD $1.6 million charge to expense recorded by Lakeland in the first quarter of fiscal 2011.
|
|
<——————-BRL——————->
|
|
|
<——————-USD —————->
|
|
Foreign exchange rate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.82 |
|
|
1.82 |
|
|
1.82 |
|
|
|
Total Paid
Or To Be
Paid Into
Government
Under
Amnesty
Program
|
|
|
Total Not
Available
For Credit1
|
|
|
Available
For
Credit2
|
|
|
Total Paid
Or To Be
Paid Into
Government
Under
Amnesty
Program
|
|
|
Total Not
Available
For
Credit¹
|
|
|
Available
For
Credit2
|
|
Original claim 2004-2006
|
|
|
3,474,843 |
|
|
|
1,419,572 |
|
|
|
2,055,270 |
|
|
|
1,909,254 |
|
|
|
779,985 |
|
|
|
1,129,269 |
|
Second claim
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pre-acquisition 2007-April 2008
|
|
|
2,371,196 |
|
|
|
981,185 |
|
|
|
1,390,011 |
|
|
|
1,302,855 |
|
|
|
539,112 |
|
|
|
763,743 |
|
Post-acquisition May 2008-April 2009
|
|
|
3,580,403 |
|
|
|
1,481,546 |
|
|
|
2,098,857 |
|
|
|
1,967,255 |
|
|
|
814,037 |
|
|
|
1,153,218 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Totals
|
|
|
9,426,442 |
|
|
|
3,882,303 |
|
|
|
5,544,139 |
|
|
|
5,179,364 |
|
|
|
2,133,134 |
|
|
|
3,046,230 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Escrow released from one seller released escrow
|
|
|
1,000,795 |
|
|
|
1,000,795 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
549,887 |
|
|
|
549,887 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Charged to expense at April 30, 2010
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
2,881,508 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
1,583,246 |
|
|
|
- |
|
¹ Essentially represents the discount originally offered as incentive by neighboring state.
2 The amount allowed as credit against future payments represents the VAT taxes actually previously paid to the neighboring state.
Of these claims, our attorney informs us that R$1.0 (US$0.6) million will be successfully defended based on a lapse of statute of limitations and R$0.3 (US$0.2) million based on state auditor misunderstanding. No accrual has been made for these items.
The total taxes paid into the amnesty program on May 31, 2010 were R$3.5 (US$2.2) million.
Amounts from Preacquisition Period; Escrow
The initially asserted tax claims of R$4.8 million (R$10.4 million with penalty and interest) (US$3.0 million and $6.5 million, respectively) all relate to imports during the period 2004-2006, prior to the QT acquisition by the Company in May 2008. At the closing, there were several escrow funds established to protect the Company from contingencies as discussed herein. One seller has released, to the Company, his escrow with a balance of R$1.0 (US$0.6) million as an indemnification payment for this claim. Lakeland has filed a claim against the remaining funds in escrow. The remaining funds in escrow have a total current balance of R$2.1 (US$1.3) million.
An audit for the 2007-2009 period has been completed by the State of Bahia. In October 2010, the Company received a claim for 2007-2009 from the State of Bahia for taxes of R$6.2 (US$3.9) million and fines and penalties of R$4.9 (US$3.1) million, for a total of R$11.1 (US$6.9) million, which had been expected per above. The Company intends to defend and wait for the next amnesty period. Of these claims, our attorney informs us that R$0.4 (US$0.3) million will be successfully defended based on state auditor misunderstanding.
Lakeland intends to apply for amnesty and make any necessary payments upon the forthcoming amnesty periods imposed by the local Brazilian authorities. Of this R$6.2 (US$3.9) million exposure, R$3.4 (US$2.1) million is eligible for future credit. The R$2.8 (US$1.7) million balance is subject to indemnification from the Seller of QT to the Company, and the Company is in the process of pursuing this claim through an arbitration proceeding in progress. Also, there is $0.1 million our attorney informs us is a mistake made by the state auditor, which he believes will be successfully defended.
Company counsel advises the Company that in his opinion the next amnesty will come before the end of the judicial process. There has been a long history in Bahia of the state declaring such amnesty periods every two to three years going back 25 years. The litigation process begins as two separate administrative proceedings and, after a period of time, must be switched to a formal court judicial proceeding. If the next amnesty does not arrive prior to the commencement of the formal court proceedings, the Company will have to remit a “judicial deposit” covering the exposure from 2007-2009 in taxes of approximately R$6.2 (US$3.9) million plus assessed fines and interest bringing the judicial deposit needed to approximately R$11.1 (US$6.9) million. The initial estimated time period to Judicial Court deposit was 1.5-2 years.
Future Accounting for Funds
Following payment into the amnesty program, the taxes were since recouped via credits against future taxes due. The Company does not expect any further charges to expense other than as described below:
In addition to the direct cost of the additional tax liability accrued per above, there are several additional costs which will be future costs. There will be interest costs on the cash paid during the period from the payment to the state and the credit to be subsequently used, which has been and will be charged to expense as incurred. There will be legal fees to defend and resolve this legal matter before the state, which will be charged to expense as incurred. Further, there will be a loss of an incentive known as “desenvolve”3 as a result of using the credit rather than cash payments for the future VAT taxes. The “desenvolve” has already been reflected in the operating results subsequent to May 2010 through August 2011 when the initial credit was exhausted and the Company resumed normal monthly cash payments for VAT taxes. This has been reflected as a reduction in the gross margin in the ensuing period through August 2011. This is not a cost but a lost discount.
3 A definition of this term is given on page 57 of the January 31, 2011, Form 10-K.
Summary of Cash Flow Requirements: (R$ millions and US$ millions)
Claim period/description
|
|
Taxes
|
|
|
Fines
and
penalties
|
|
|
Maximum judicial
deposit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004-2006 not paid into amnesty and being defended. Management does not plan to pay this into amnesty
|
|
R$ |
1.3 |
|
|
R$ |
1.9 |
|
|
R$ |
3.2 |
|
|
US$ |
1.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007-2009 claim by State of Bahia (1)
|
|
R$ |
6.2 |
|
|
R$ |
5.7 |
|
|
R$ |
11.9 |
|
|
US$ |
7.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL
|
|
R$ |
7.5 |
|
|
R$ |
7.6 |
|
|
R$ |
15.1 |
|
|
US$ |
8.8 |
|
(1) Our attorney informs us that based on the slow progress so far in the administrative proceedings for the 2007-2009 claim, that believes it is now more likely than not that the next amnesty will arrive prior to the need to pay the R$11.1 judicial deposit. Therefore, the most likely cash flow outlook in management’s opinion is as follows:
R$3.1 (US$1.9) million 2004-2006 Judicial deposit
|
Quarter One Fiscal year 2013
|
R$6.2 (US$3.9) million 2007-2009 claim into amnesty
|
Quarter One Fiscal year 2013 to Quarter Three Fiscal year 2013
|
Further, management believes it will be able to satisfy the R$3.1 (US$1.9) million judicial deposit by pledging real estate owned rather than paying cash.
At the next amnesty period:
|
·
|
If before judicial process - still administration proceeding - the Company would pay just the taxes with no penalty or interest. This would then be recouped via credits against future taxes on future imports. As before, the Company would lose desenvolve3 and interest.
|
|
·
|
If after judicial process commences - the amount of the judicial deposit previously remitted would be reclassified to the taxes at issue, and the excess submitted to cover fines and interest would be refunded to QT. As above, the taxes would be recouped via credits against future taxes on future imports, but we would lose desenvolve3 and interest.
|
|
·
|
The desenvolve3 is scheduled to expire on February 2013 and will be partially phased out starting February 2011. Based on the anticipated timing of the next amnesty, there may be little amounts of lost desenvolve3 since it would largely expire on its own terms in any case.
|
Possible Recourse Actions
The Company’s counsel has reviewed potential actions against sellers under indemnification proceedings, including possible claims on postacquisition exposure resulting from misrepresentations, and has begun arbitration proceedings against two of the selling stockholders. The Company is also evaluating potential action for recourse against other parties involved in the original transactions.
When the Company receives the remaining funds from escrow, this will be recorded as a gain at such time. Any further indemnifications from the sellers and potential other parties will also be recorded as a gain at such time as received.
The Company has also asserted indemnification rights under its Share Purchase Agreement with the sellers and has other legal avenues for recoupment of these monies against both the sellers and will in the future against negligent third parties. Such recoupment, if successful, will be reported as profits over future periods when and if collected.
Balance Sheet Treatment
The Company has reflected the above items on its October 31, 2011, balance sheet as follows:
|
|
|
|
(R$ millions)
|
|
|
US$ millions
|
|
Noncurrent assets
|
|
VAT taxes eligible for future credit
|
|
$ |
3.5 |
|
|
$ |
2.2 |
|
Long-term liabilities
|
|
Taxes payable
|
|
$ |
6.0 |
|
|
$ |
3.3 |
|
13. Termination of License Agreement with DuPont
The Company received notice dated July 12, 2011, from E.I. DuPont de Nemours and Company (“DuPont”) stating that DuPont has terminated the DuPont Wholesaler Agreement dated January 1, 2011. DuPont has fulfilled orders for purchases of finished garments containing Tychem® and Tyvek® through September 10, 2011.
14. Brazil Management and Share Purchase Agreement
On May 19, 2010, the president and V.P. of Operations (the “two terminated sellers”) of Qualytextil, S.A. (“QT”), Lakeland’s Brazil subsidiary, were terminated for cause as a result of numerous documented breaches of their Management Agreements (“MA”) with QT and misrepresentations in their Share Purchase Agreement (“SPA”) with Lakeland. As a result of these breaches and misrepresentations, Lakeland has taken the position that it is not obligated to pay their share or 65% of any Supplemental Purchase Price (“SPP”) due in 2011 pursuant to the SPA. These two sellers’ shares constitute 35% and 30%, respectively, of the SPP totals, if any, which may be due under the SPA. The former Chief Financial Officer of QT has been promoted to President of QT. He holds the remaining 35% of the SPA and SPP totals.
Lakeland and the two terminated sellers unsuccessfully attempted to negotiate a settlement. The claim is now in arbitration. Lakeland has asserted further damages in such arbitration proceeding as more fully discussed in Note 13. The matter is currently being arbitrated with a decision expected in March 2012. Should the terminations be determined by the Arbiters not to be for cause, there could be a payment up to approximately $10.3 million USD payable to the two terminated individuals, or $5.5 million to one and $4.8 million to the other. These payments reflect contractual provisions that entitle these individuals to maximum earn-out payments should they be terminated without cause. Based on the actual results of calendar 2010 as contractually specified, no supplemental purchase price has been earned. Management believes it has strong evidence to support its case that the terminations were properly for cause and believes it is probable that there will be no liability to the Company. As such, no accrual has been made. However, as with most judicial proceedings, there is a reasonable possibility that a loss may be incurred. The current balance in the escrow fund is approximately $1.3 million USD which, if released by the arbitration panel to the Company, will represent a gain contingency, net of legal fees and other related costs.
The legal and arbitration fees are being charged to expense as incurred.
The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill during fiscal year 2012 are summarized in the following:
|
|
USA
|
|
|
Brazil
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Balance as of January 31, 2011
|
|
$ |
871,296 |
|
|
$ |
5,426,455 |
|
|
$ |
6,297,751 |
|
During fiscal year 2012 through October 31, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of foreign currency translation
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(39,011 |
) |
|
|
(39,011 |
) |
Balance as of October 31, 2011
|
|
$ |
871,296 |
|
|
$ |
5,387,444 |
|
|
$ |
6,258,740 |
|
16. Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In June 2011, the FASB issued amendments to the presentation of comprehensive income, which become effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011. The amendments eliminate the current reporting option of displaying components of other comprehensive income within the statement of changes in stockholders’ equity. Under the new guidance, the Company will be required to present either a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or an income statement immediately followed by a statement of comprehensive income. Also, both presentation methods require that reclassification adjustments from other comprehensive income to net income be shown on the face of the financial statements.
17. Discontinued Operations in India
On December 5, 2011, the Company decided to discontinue operations in its India glove manufacturing facility and put the assets and business up for sale. The Company decided to sell this division primarily because it has incurred significant operating losses since inception, and the Company has been unsuccessful in developing sufficient sales to reach at least break even. The Company is attempting to sell the operations as an ongoing operation but, if unsuccessful, is preparing for a shutdown of operations by January 2012.
Prior year financial statements for the three and nine months ended October 31, 2010, have been restated to present the operations of the India glove manufacturing subsidiary as a discontinued operation.
In conjunction with the discontinuance of operations, the Company recognized a pretax loss on disposal of $880,694, consisting of $585,000 in inventory write-downs, $145,494 in shutdown expenses and $150,000 in operations in Q4 until shutdown. The assets and liabilities of the discontinued operations are presented separately under the captions “Assets of discontinued operations in India” and Liabilities of discontinued operations in India;” respectively, in the accompanying Balance Sheets at October 31, 2011 and January 31, 2011, and consist of the following:
|
|
October 31, 2011
|
|
|
January 31, 2011
|
|
Cash
|
|
$ |
193,110 |
|
|
$ |
121,436 |
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
70,606 |
|
|
|
100,254 |
|
Inventory
|
|
|
190,013 |
|
|
|
622,480 |
|
Other current asset
|
|
|
36,084 |
|
|
|
20,371 |
|
Property/equipment
|
|
|
2,491,028 |
|
|
|
2,805,060 |
|
Total assets of discontinued operations
|
|
|
2,980,841 |
|
|
|
3,669,601 |
|
Liabilities of discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
46,290 |
|
|
|
29,467 |
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
319,917 |
|
|
|
4,473 |
|
Total liabilities of discontinued operations
|
|
|
366,207 |
|
|
|
33,940 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|