Edgar Filing: APPLIED MATERIALS INC /DE

Form 10-Q

UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

Form 10-Q

(Mark One)

QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended January 29, 2012

TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from to

Commission File Number 000-06920

Applied Materials, Inc.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)


Delaware		94-1655526
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

3050 Bowers Avenue,		95052-8039
P.O. Box 58039 Santa Clara, California (Address of principal executive offices)		(Zip Code)

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

(408) 727-5555

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes þ No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.


Large accelerated filer þ	Accelerated filer ¨	Non-accelerated filer ¨	Smaller reporting company ¨
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No þ

Number of shares outstanding of the issuer’s common stock as of January 29, 2012: 1,291,121,831

APPLIED MATERIALS, INC.

FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED JANUARY 29, 2012

TABLE OF CONTENTS


		Page
	PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1:	Financial Statements (Unaudited)		3
	Consolidated Condensed Statements of Operations for the Three Months Ended January 29, 2012 and January 30, 2011		3
	Consolidated Condensed Statements of Comprehensive Income for the Three Months Ended January 29, 2012 and January 30, 2011		4
	Consolidated Condensed Balance Sheets at January 29, 2012 and October 30, 2011		5
	Consolidated Condensed Statements of Stockholders’ Equity for the Three Months Ended January 29, 2012		6
	Consolidated Condensed Statements of Cash Flows for the Three Months Ended January 29, 2012 and January 30, 2011		7
	Notes to Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements		8
Item 2:	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations		36
Item 3:	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk		55
Item 4:	Controls and Procedures		55

	PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1:	Legal Proceedings		56
Item 1A:	Risk Factors		56
Item 2:	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds		68
Item 6:	Exhibits		69
	Signatures		70

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements

APPLIED MATERIALS, INC.

CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS


	Three Months Ended
	January 29, 2012		January 30, 2011
	(Unaudited) (In millions, except per share amounts)
Net sales	$	2,189	$	2,686
Cost of products sold		1,403		1,550

Gross margin		786		1,136
Operating expenses:
Research, development and engineering		304		270
Selling, general and administrative		303		221
Restructuring charges and asset impairments (Note 11)		—		(29	)

Total operating expenses		607		462
Income from operations		179		674
Interest and other expenses		24		5
Interest and other income, net		4		11

Income before income taxes		159		680
Provision for income taxes		42		174

Net income	$	117	$	506

Earnings per share:
Basic and Diluted	$	0.09	$	0.38
Weighted average number of shares:
Basic		1,299		1,324
Diluted		1,310		1,335

See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements.

APPLIED MATERIALS, INC.

CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME


	Three Months Ended
	January 29, 2012		January 30, 2011
	(Unaudited)
	(In millions)
Net income	$	117	$	506

Other comprehensive income, net of tax:
Change in unrealized net gain on investments		1		(1	)
Change in unrealized net gain on derivative investments		—		(1	)

Other comprehensive income (loss)		1		(2	)

Comprehensive income	$	118	$	504

See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements.

APPLIED MATERIALS, INC.

CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED BALANCE SHEETS*


	January 29, 2012			October 30, 2011
	(In millions, except per share amounts)
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents (Notes 3 and 4)	$	1,681		$	5,960
Short-term investments (Notes 3 and 4)		316			283
Accounts receivable, net (Note 6)		1,576			1,532
Inventories (Note 7)		1,772			1,701
Deferred income taxes, net		572			580
Other current assets		240			299

Total current assets		6,157			10,355
Long-term investments (Notes 3 and 4)		955			931
Property, plant and equipment, net (Note 7)		956			866
Goodwill (Notes 8 and 9)		3,875			1,335
Purchased technology and other intangible assets, net (Notes 8 and 9)		1,519			211
Deferred income taxes and other assets		135			163

Total assets	$	13,597		$	13,861


LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Current portion of long-term debt	$	2		$	—
Accounts payable and accrued expenses (Note 7)		1,327			1,520
Customer deposits and deferred revenue (Note 7)		1,014			1,116
Income taxes payable		151			158

Total current liabilities		2,494			2,794
Long-term debt (Note 10)		1,947			1,947
Employee benefits and other liabilities (Note 13)		506			320

Total liabilities		4,947			5,061

Stockholders’ equity (Note 12):
Common stock		13			13
Additional paid-in capital		5,651			5,616
Retained earnings		13,043			13,029
Treasury stock		(10,064	)		(9,864	)
Accumulated other comprehensive income		7			6

Total stockholders’ equity		8,650			8,800

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	13,597		$	13,861

*	Amounts as of January 29, 2012 are unaudited. Amounts as of October 30, 2011 are derived from the October 30, 2011 audited consolidated financial statements.

See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements.

APPLIED MATERIALS, INC.

CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

(UNAUDITED)

(In millions)


	Common Stock					Additional Paid-In Capital			Retained Earnings			Treasury Stock					Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income		Total
	Shares			Amount		Additional Paid-In Capital			Retained Earnings			Shares		Amount			Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income		Total
Balance at October 30, 2011		1,306		$	13	$	5,616		$	13,029			573	$	(9,864	)	$	6	$	8,800
Net income		—			—		—			117			—		—			—		117
Other comprehensive income		—			—		—			—			—		—			1		1
Dividends		—			—		—			(103	)		—		—			—		(103	)
Share-based compensation		—			—		53			—			—		—			—		53
Stock options assumed in connection with acquisition		—			—		11			—			—		—			—		11
Issuance under stock plans, net of tax detriment of $14 and other		3			—		(29	)		—			—		—			—		(29	)
Common stock repurchases		(18	)		—		—			—			18		(200	)		—		(200	)

Balance at January 29, 2012		1,291		$	13	$	5,651		$	13,043			591	$	(10,064	)	$	7	$	8,650

See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements.

APPLIED MATERIALS, INC.

CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS


	Three Months Ended
	January 29, 2012			January 30, 2011
	(Unaudited) (In millions)
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income	$	117		$	506
Adjustments required to reconcile net income to cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization		112			63
Net loss on dispositions and fixed asset retirements		2			1
Provision for bad debts		4			—
Restructuring charges and asset impairments		—			(29	)
Deferred income taxes		28			10
Net recognized loss on investments		5			4
Share-based compensation		53			33
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of amounts acquired:
Accounts receivable		147			(115	)
Inventories		179			(100	)
Income taxes receivable		6			1
Other current assets		90			(4	)
Accounts payable and accrued expenses		(390	)		(159	)
Customer deposits and deferred revenue		(154	)		208
Income taxes payable		(22	)		1
Employee benefits and other liabilities		4			5

Cash provided by operating activities		181			425

Cash flows from investing activities:
Capital expenditures		(37	)		(24	)
Cash paid for acquisition, net of cash acquired		(4,179	)		—
Proceeds from sale of facility		—			39
Proceeds from sales and maturities of investments		313			443
Purchases of investments		(254	)		(537	)

Cash used in investing activities		(4,157	)		(79	)

Cash flows from financing activities:
Proceeds from common stock issuances		2			13
Common stock repurchases		(200	)		(150	)
Payment of dividends to stockholders		(104	)		(93	)

Cash used in financing activities		(302	)		(230	)

Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents		(1	)		—

Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents		(4,279	)		116

Cash and cash equivalents — beginning of period		5,960			1,858

Cash and cash equivalents — end of period	$	1,681		$	1,974

Supplemental cash flow information:
Cash payments for income taxes	$	33		$	165
Cash refunds from income taxes	$	3		$	1
Cash payments for interest	$	41		$	—

See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements.

APPLIED MATERIALS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

Note 1 Basis of Presentation

Basis of Presentation

In the opinion of management, the unaudited interim consolidated condensed financial statements of Applied Materials, Inc. and its subsidiaries (Applied or the Company) included herein have been prepared on a basis consistent with the October 30, 2011 audited consolidated financial statements and include all material adjustments, consisting of normal recurring adjustments, necessary to fairly present the information set forth therein. These unaudited interim consolidated condensed financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in Applied’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 30, 2011 (2011 Form 10-K). Applied’s results of operations for the three months ended January 29, 2012 are not necessarily indicative of future operating results. Applied’s fiscal year ends on the last Sunday in October of each year. Fiscal 2012 and 2011 each contains 52 weeks, and the first quarter of fiscal 2012 and 2011 each contained 13 weeks.

In November 2011, Applied completed its acquisition of Varian Semiconductor Equipment Associates, Inc. (Varian). Beginning in the first quarter of fiscal 2012, the acquired business is included in Applied’s consolidated results of operations and the results of the Silicon Systems Group and Applied Global Services segments.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make judgments, estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ materially from those estimates. On an ongoing basis, Applied evaluates its estimates, including those related to accounts receivable and sales allowances, fair values of financial instruments, inventories, intangible assets and goodwill, useful lives of intangible assets and property and equipment, fair values of share-based awards, and income taxes, among others. Applied bases its estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities.

Revenue Recognition

Applied recognizes revenue when all four revenue recognition criteria have been met: persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists; delivery has occurred or services have been rendered; seller’s price to buyer is fixed or determinable; and collectability is probable. Applied’s shipping terms are customarily FOB Applied shipping point or equivalent terms. Applied’s revenue recognition policy generally results in revenue recognition at the following points: (1) for all transactions where legal title passes to the customer upon shipment, Applied recognizes revenue upon shipment for all products that have been demonstrated to meet product specifications prior to shipment; the portion of revenue associated with certain installation-related tasks is deferred, and that revenue is recognized upon completion of the installation-related tasks; (2) for products that have not been demonstrated to meet product specifications prior to shipment, revenue is recognized at customer technical acceptance; (3) for transactions where legal title does not pass at shipment, revenue is recognized when legal title passes to the customer, which is generally at customer technical acceptance; and (4) for arrangements containing multiple elements, the revenue relating to the undelivered elements is deferred using the relative selling price method utilizing estimated sales prices until delivery of the deferred elements. Applied limits the amount of revenue recognition for delivered elements to the amount that is not contingent on the future delivery of products or services, future performance obligations or subject to customer-specified return or adjustment. In cases where Applied has sold products that have been demonstrated to meet product specifications prior to shipment, Applied

APPLIED MATERIALS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

believes that at the time of delivery, it has an enforceable claim to amounts recognized as revenue. The completed contract method is used for SunFab^tm thin film lines. Spare parts revenue is generally recognized upon shipment, and services revenue is generally recognized over the period that the services are provided.

When a sales arrangement contains multiple elements, such as hardware and services and/or software products, Applied allocates revenue to each element based on a selling price hierarchy. The selling price for a deliverable is based on its vendor specific objective evidence (VSOE) if available, third party evidence (TPE) if VSOE is not available, or estimated selling price (ESP) if neither VSOE nor TPE is available. Applied generally utilizes the ESP due to the nature of its products. In multiple element arrangements where more-than-incidental software deliverables are included, revenue is allocated to each separate unit of accounting for each of the non-software deliverables and to the software deliverables as a group using the relative selling prices of each of the deliverables in the arrangement based on the aforementioned selling price hierarchy. If the arrangement contains more than one software deliverable, the arrangement consideration allocated to the software deliverables as a group is then allocated to each software deliverable using the guidance for recognizing software revenue, as amended.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In June 2011, the FASB issued authoritative guidance on the presentation of comprehensive income to require an entity to present the total of comprehensive income, the components of net income, and the components of other comprehensive income either in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements. The authoritative guidance also required presentation of adjustments for items that are reclassified from other comprehensive income in the statement where the components of net income and the components of other compressive income are presented, which was indefinitely deferred by the FASB in December 2011. Applied early adopted this authoritative guidance in the first quarter of fiscal 2012. The implementation of this authoritative guidance did not have an impact on Applied’s financial position or results of operations.

In May 2011, the FASB issued authoritative guidance to provide a consistent definition of fair value and ensure that the fair value measurement and disclosure requirements are similar between U.S. GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards. This authoritative guidance limits the highest-and-best-use measure to nonfinancial assets, permits certain financial assets and liabilities with offsetting positions in market or counterparty credit risks to be measured on a net basis, and provides guidance on the applicability of premiums and discounts. This authoritative guidance also expands the disclosures on Level 3 inputs by requiring quantitative disclosure of the unobservable inputs and assumptions, as well as description of the valuation processes and the sensitivity of the fair value to changes in unobservable inputs. The new guidance will be effective for Applied in the first quarter of fiscal 2013. The implementation of this authoritative guidance is not expected to have a material impact on Applied’s financial position or results of operations.

APPLIED MATERIALS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

Note 2 Earnings Per Share

Basic earnings per share is determined using the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per share is determined using the weighted average number of common shares and potential common shares (representing the dilutive effect of stock options, restricted stock units, and employee stock purchase plans shares) outstanding during the period. Applied’s net income has not been adjusted for any period presented for purposes of computing basic or diluted earnings per share due to the Company’s non-complex capital structure. For purposes of computing diluted earnings per share, weighted average potential common shares do not include stock options with an exercise price greater than the average fair market value of Applied common stock for the period as the effect would be anti-dilutive.


	Three Months Ended
	January 29, 2012		January 30, 2011
	(In millions, except per share amounts)
Numerator:
Net income	$	117	$	506
Denominator:
Weighted average common shares outstanding		1,299		1,324
Effect of dilutive stock options, restricted stock units and employee stock purchase plans shares		11		11

Denominator for diluted earnings per share		1,310		1,335

Basic and diluted earnings per share	$	0.09	$	0.38
Potentially dilutive securities		18		19

APPLIED MATERIALS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

Note 3 Cash, Cash Equivalents and Investments

Summary of Cash, Cash Equivalents and Investments

The following tables summarizes Applied’s cash, cash equivalents and investments by security type:


January 29, 2012	Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Losses		Estimated Fair Value
	(In millions)
Cash	$	855	$	—	$	—	$	855

Cash equivalents:
Money market funds		819		—		—		819
Municipal securities		7		—		—		7

Total Cash equivalents		826		—		—		826

Total Cash and Cash equivalents	$	1,681	$	—	$	—	$	1,681

Short-term and long-term investments:
U.S. Treasury and agency securities	$	198	$	1	$	—	$	199
Non-U.S. government securities*		44		—		—		44
Municipal securities		367		2		—		369
Commercial paper, corporate bonds and medium-term notes		218		3		—		221
Asset-backed and mortgage-backed securities		303		3		1		305

Total fixed income securities		1,130		9		1		1,138
Publicly traded equity securities		40		20		—		60
Equity investments in privately-held companies		73		—		—		73

Total short-term and long-term investments	$	1,243	$	29	$	1	$	1,271

Total Cash, Cash equivalents and Investments	$	2,924	$	29	$	1	$	2,952

APPLIED MATERIALS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)


October 30, 2011	Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Losses		Estimated Fair Value
	(In millions)
Cash	$	297	$	—	$	—	$	297

Cash equivalents:
Money market funds		5,663		—		—		5,663

Total Cash equivalents		5,663		—		—		5,663

Total Cash and Cash equivalents	$	5,960	$	—	$	—	$	5,960

Short-term and long-term investments:
U.S. Treasury and agency securities	$	184	$	1	$	—	$	185
Non-U.S. government securities*		40		—		—		40
Municipal securities		371		2		—		373
Commercial paper, corporate bonds and medium-term notes		216		3		1		218
Asset-backed and mortgage-backed securities		307		3		1		309

Total fixed income securities		1,118		9		2		1,125
Publicly traded equity securities		8		19		—		27
Equity investments in privately-held companies		62		—		—		62

Total short-term and long-term investments	$	1,188	$	28	$	2	$	1,214

Total Cash, Cash equivalents and Investments	$	7,148	$	28	$	2	$	7,174

*	Includes agency and corporate debt securities guaranteed by non-U.S. governments, which consist of several Canadian provinces, Australia, Germany, the United Kingdom, and the Netherlands.

Maturities of Investments

The following table summarizes the contractual maturities of Applied’s investments at January 29, 2012:


	Cost		Estimated Fair Value
	(In millions)
Due in one year or less	$	285	$	286
Due after one through five years		537		541
Due after five years		5		6
No single maturity date**		416		438

	$	1,243	$	1,271

**	Securities with no single maturity date include publicly-traded and privately-held equity securities, and asset-backed and mortgage-backed securities.

APPLIED MATERIALS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

Gains and Losses on Investments

Gross realized gains and losses on sales of investments during the three months ended January 29, 2012 and January 30, 2011 were as follows:


	Three Months Ended
	January 29, 2012		January 30, 2011
	(In millions)
Gross realized gains	$	2	$	5
Gross realized losses	$	1	$	1

At January 29, 2012, Applied had a gross unrealized loss of $1 million due to a decrease in the fair value of certain fixed income securities. Applied regularly reviews its investment portfolio to identify and evaluate investments that have indications of possible impairment. Factors considered in determining whether an unrealized loss was considered to be temporary, or other-than-temporary and therefore impaired, include: the length of time and extent to which fair value has been lower than the cost basis; the financial condition, credit quality and near-term prospects of the investee; and whether it is more likely than not that Applied will be required to sell the security prior to recovery. Generally, the contractual terms of investments in marketable securities do not permit settlement at prices less than the amortized cost of the investments. Applied has determined that the gross unrealized losses on its marketable securities at January 29, 2012 are temporary in nature and therefore it did not recognize any impairment of its marketable securities for the three months ended January 29, 2012. For the three months ended January 30, 2011, Applied did not recognize any impairment of its marketable securities.

The following table provides the fair market value of Applied’s investments with unrealized losses that are not deemed to be other-than-temporarily impaired as of January 29, 2012.


	In Loss Position for Less Than 12 Months				Total
	Fair Value		Gross Unrealized Losses		Fair Value		Gross Unrealized Losses
	(In millions)
Asset-backed and mortgage-backed securities	$	57	$	1	$	57	$	1

Total	$	57	$	1	$	57	$	1

The following table provides the fair market value of Applied’s investments with unrealized losses that are not deemed to be other-than-temporarily impaired as of October 30, 2011.


	In Loss Position for Less Than 12 Months				Total
	Fair Value		Gross Unrealized Losses		Fair Value		Gross Unrealized Losses
	(In millions)
Commercial paper, corporate bonds and medium-term notes	$	32	$	1	$	32	$	1
Asset-backed and mortgage-backed securities		77		1		77		1

Total	$	109	$	2	$	109	$	2

Unrealized gains and temporary losses on investments classified as available-for-sale are included within accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net of any related tax effect. Upon realization, those amounts are reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) to results of operations.

APPLIED MATERIALS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

Note 4 Fair Value Measurements

Applied’s financial assets are measured and recorded at fair value, except for equity investments held in privately-held companies. These equity investments are generally accounted for under the cost method of accounting and are periodically assessed for other-than-temporary impairment when events or circumstances indicate that an other-than-temporary decline in value may have occurred. Applied’s nonfinancial assets, such as goodwill, intangible assets, and property, plant and equipment, are recorded at cost and are assessed for impairment when events or circumstances indicate that an other-than-temporary decline in value may have occurred.

Fair Value Hierarchy

Applied uses the following fair value hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value into three levels and bases the categorization within the hierarchy upon the lowest level of input that is available and significant to the fair value measurement:

•

Level 1 — Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities;

•

Level 2 — Inputs other than Level 1 that are observable, either directly or indirectly, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities, quoted prices in markets that are not active, or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities; and

•

Level 3 — Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities.

Applied’s investments are comprised primarily of debt securities that are classified as available-for-sale and recorded at their fair values. In determining the fair value of investments, Applied uses pricing information from pricing services that value securities based on quoted market prices and models that utilize observable market inputs. In the event a fair value estimate is unavailable from a pricing service, Applied generally obtains non-binding price quotes from brokers. Applied then reviews the information provided by the pricing services or brokers to determine the fair value of its short-term and long-term investments. In addition, to validate pricing information obtained from pricing services, Applied periodically performs supplemental analysis on a sample of securities. Applied reviews any significant unanticipated differences identified through this analysis to determine the appropriate fair value.

Investments with remaining effective maturities of 12 months or less from the balance sheet date are classified as short-term investments. Investments with remaining effective maturities of more than 12 months from the balance sheet date are classified as long-term investments. As of January 29, 2012, substantially all of Applied’s available-for-sale, short-term and long-term investments were recognized at fair value that was determined based upon observable inputs.

APPLIED MATERIALS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis

Financial assets and liabilities (excluding cash balances) measured at fair value on a recurring basis are summarized below as of January 29, 2012 and October 30, 2011:


	January 29, 2012										October 30, 2011
	Level 1			Level 2		Level 3		Total			Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total
	(In millions)										(In millions)
Assets:
Money market funds	$	819		$	—	$	—	$	819		$	5,663	$	—	$	—	$	5,663
U.S. Treasury and agency securities		102			97		—		199			109		76		—		185
Non-U.S. government securities		—			44		—		44			—		40		—		40
Municipal securities		—			376		—		376			—		373		—		373
Commercial paper, corporate bonds and medium-term notes		—			221		—		221			—		218		—		218
Asset-backed and mortgage-backed securities		—			305		—		305			—		309		—		309
Publicly traded equity securities		60			—		—		60			27		—		—		27

Total	$	981		$	1,043	$	—	$	2,024		$	5,799	$	1,016	$	—	$	6,815

Liabilities:
Deferred compensation	$	(6	)	$	—	$	—	$	(6	)	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—

Total	$	(6	)	$	—	$	—	$	(6	)	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—

The deferred compensation liability represents our obligation to pay benefits under a non-qualified deferred compensation plan. The related investments, held in a rabbi trust, consist of equity securities, primarily mutual funds, and are classified as Level 1 in the valuation hierarchy.

There were no transfers in and out of Level 1 and Level 2 fair value measurements during both the three months ended January 29, 2012 and January 30, 2011. Applied did not have any financial assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis within Level 3 fair value measurements during both the three months ended January 29, 2012 and January 30, 2011.

Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Non-recurring Basis

Equity investments in privately-held companies are generally accounted for under the cost method of accounting and are periodically assessed for other-than-temporary impairment when an event or circumstance indicates that an other-than-temporary decline in value may have occurred. If Applied determines that an other-than-temporary impairment has occurred, the investment will be written down to its estimated fair value based on available information, such as pricing in recent rounds of financing, current cash positions, earnings and cash flow forecasts, recent operational performance and any other readily available market data. Equity investments in privately-held companies totaled $73 million at January 29, 2012, of which $51 million of investments were accounted for under the cost method of accounting and $22 million of Level 3 investments had been measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis due to an other-than-temporary decline in value. At October 30, 2011, equity investments in privately-held companies totaled $62 million, of which $40 million of investments were accounted for under the cost method of accounting and $22 million of Level 3 investments had been measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis due to an other-than-temporary decline in value. Applied did not recognize any impairment on its equity method investments in privately-held companies for both the three months ended January 29, 2012 and January 30, 2011.

APPLIED MATERIALS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

Other

The carrying amounts of Applied’s financial instruments, including cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, notes payable, and accounts payable and accrued expenses, approximate fair value due to the short maturities of these financial instruments. At January 29, 2012, the carrying amount of long-term debt was $1.9 billion and the estimated fair value was $2.2 billion. The estimated fair value of long-term debt is determined by Level 2 inputs and is based on quoted market prices for the same or similar issues.

Note 5 Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities

Derivative Financial Instruments

Applied conducts business in a number of foreign countries, with certain transactions denominated in local currencies, such as Japanese yen, euro, Israeli shekel, Taiwanese dollar and Swiss franc. Applied uses derivative financial instruments, such as forward exchange contracts and currency option contracts, to hedge certain forecasted foreign currency denominated transactions expected to occur typically within the next 24 months. The purpose of Applied’s foreign currency management is to mitigate the effect of exchange rate fluctuations on certain foreign currency denominated revenues, costs and eventual cash flows. The terms of currency instruments used for hedging purposes are generally consistent with the timing of the transactions being hedged. Applied does not use derivative financial instruments for trading or speculative purposes.

Derivative instruments and hedging activities, including foreign currency exchange contracts, are recognized on the balance sheet at fair value. Changes in the fair value of derivatives that do not qualify for hedge treatment, as well as the ineffective portion of any hedges, are recognized currently in earnings. All of Applied’s derivative financial instruments are recorded at their fair value in other current assets or in accounts payable and accrued expenses.

Hedges related to anticipated transactions are designated and documented at the inception of the hedge as cash flow hedges and are typically entered into once per month. Cash flow hedges are evaluated for effectiveness quarterly. The effective portion of the gain or loss on these hedges is reported as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income or loss (AOCI) in stockholders’ equity and is reclassified into earnings when the hedged transaction affects earnings. The majority of the after-tax net income or loss related to derivative instruments included in AOCI at January 29, 2012 is expected to be reclassified into earnings within 12 months. Changes in the fair value of currency forward exchange and option contracts due to changes in time value are excluded from the assessment of effectiveness. Both ineffective hedge amounts and hedge components excluded from the assessment of effectiveness are recognized promptly in earnings. If the transaction being hedged is no longer probable to occur, or if a portion of any derivative is deemed to be ineffective, Applied promptly recognizes the gain or loss on the associated financial instrument in general and administrative expenses. The amount recognized due to discontinuance of cash flow hedges that were probable not to occur by the end of the originally specified time period was not significant for the three months ended January 29, 2012 and January 30, 2011.

Additionally, forward exchange contracts are generally used to hedge certain foreign currency denominated assets or liabilities. These derivatives are typically entered into once per month and are not designated for hedge accounting treatment. Accordingly, changes in the fair value of these hedges are recorded promptly in earnings to offset the changes in the fair value of the assets or liabilities being hedged.

The fair values of derivative instruments at January 29, 2012 and October 30, 2011 were not material.

APPLIED MATERIALS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

The effect of derivative instruments on the Consolidated Condensed Statement of Operations for the three months ended January 29, 2012 and January 30, 2011 was as follows:


		Three Months Ended January 29, 2012							Three Months Ended January 30, 2011
		Effective Portion					Ineffective Portion Excluded from Effectiveness Testing		Effective Portion				Ineffective Portion Excluded from Effectiveness Testing
	Location of Gain or (Loss) Reclassified from AOCI into Income	Gain or (Loss) Recognized in AOCI		Gain or (Loss) Reclassified from AOCI into Income			Gain or (Loss) Recognized in Income		Gain or (Loss) Recognized in AOCI		Gain or (Loss) Reclassified from AOCI into Income		Gain or (Loss) Recognized in Income
		(In millions)							(In millions)
Derivatives in Cash Flow Hedging Relationships
Foreign exchange contracts	Cost of products sold	$	—	$	1		$	—	$	4	$	4	$	(2	)
Foreign exchange contracts	General and administrative		—		(2	)		—		—		2		—

Total		$	—	$	(1	)	$	—	$	4	$	6	$	(2	)


		Amount of Gain or (Loss) Recognized in Income
	Location of Gain or (Loss) Recognized in Income	Three Months Ended January 29, 2012		Three Months Ended January 30, 2011
		(In millions)
Derivatives Not Designated as Hedging Instruments
Foreign exchange contracts	General and administrative	$	6	$	2

Total		$	6	$	2

Credit Risk Contingent Features

If Applied’s credit rating were to fall below investment grade, it would be in violation of credit risk contingent provisions of the derivative instruments discussed above, and certain counterparties to the derivative instruments could request immediate payment on derivative instruments in net liability positions. The aggregate fair value of all derivative instruments with credit risk-related contingent features that were in a net liability position was immaterial as of January 29, 2012.

Entering into foreign exchange contracts with banks exposes Applied to credit-related losses in the event of the banks’ nonperformance. However, Applied’s exposure is not considered significant.

APPLIED MATERIALS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

Note 6 Accounts Receivable, Net

Applied has agreements with various financial institutions to sell accounts receivable and discount promissory notes from selected customers. Applied also discounts letters of credit through various financial institutions. Applied sells its accounts receivable without recourse. Details of discounted letters of credit, factored accounts receivable and discounted promissory notes for the three months ended January 29, 2012 and January 30, 2011 were as follows:


	Three Months Ended
	January 29, 2012		January 30, 2011
	(In millions)
Discounted letters of credit	$	—	$	123
Factored accounts receivable and discounted promissory notes		70		36

Total	$	70	$	159

Financing charges on the sale of receivables and discounting of letters of credit are included in interest expense in the accompanying Consolidated Condensed Statements of Operations and were not material for both periods presented.

Accounts receivable are presented net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $77 million at January 29, 2012 and $73 million at October 30, 2011. Applied sells principally to manufacturers within the semiconductor, display and solar industries. As a result of challenging economic and industry conditions, certain of these manufacturers may experience difficulties in meeting their obligations in a timely manner. While Applied believes that its allowance for doubtful accounts is adequate and represents Applied’s best estimate as of January 29, 2012, Applied will continue to closely monitor customer liquidity and other economic conditions, which may result in changes to Applied’s estimates regarding collectability.

Note 7 Balance Sheet Detail


	January 29, 2012		October 31, 2011
	(In millions)
Inventories
Customer service spares	$	319	$	328
Raw materials		447		407
Work-in-process		319		336
Finished goods*		687		630

	$	1,772	$	1,701

Included in finished goods inventory is $192 million at January 29, 2012, and $224 million at October 30, 2011, of newly-introduced systems at customer locations where the sales transaction did not meet Applied’s revenue recognition criteria as set forth in Note 1. Finished goods inventory includes $195 million and $140 million of evaluation inventory at January 29, 2012 and October 30, 2011, respectively.

APPLIED MATERIALS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)


	Useful Life	January 29, 2012			October 30, 2011
	(In years)	(In millions)
Property, Plant and Equipment, Net
Land and improvements		$	170		$	163
Buildings and improvements	3-30		1,188			1,155
Demonstration and manufacturing equipment	3-5		727			686
Furniture, fixtures and other equipment	3-15		730			722
Construction in progress			34			12

Gross property, plant and equipment			2,849			2,738
Accumulated depreciation			(1,893	)		(1,872	)

		$	956		$	866

In the first quarter of fiscal 2011, Applied received $39 million in proceeds from the sale of a property located in North America and incurred a loss of $1 million on the transaction.


	January 29, 2012		October 30, 2011
	(In millions)
Accounts Payable and Accrued Expenses
Accounts payable	$	484	$	484
Compensation and employee benefits		268		455
Warranty		161		168
Dividends payable		103		104
Other accrued taxes		54		81
Interest payable		14		31
Restructuring reserve		9		11
Other		234		186

	$	1,327	$	1,520

As of January 29, 2012, other accrued expenses included a $23 million acquisition obligation for untendered Varian shares.


	January 29, 2012		October 30, 2011
	(In millions)
Customer Deposits and Deferred Revenue
Customer deposits	$	198	$	249
Deferred revenue		816		867

	$	1,014	$	1,116

Applied typically receives deposits on future deliverables from customers in its Energy and Environmental Solutions and Display segments. In certain instances, customer deposits may be received from customers in the Applied Global Services segment.

APPLIED MATERIALS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

Note 8 Business Combination

On November 10, 2011, Applied completed the acquisition of Varian, a public company manufacturer of semiconductor processing equipment and the leading supplier of ion implantation equipment used by chip makers around the world, for an aggregate purchase price of $4.2 billion in cash, net of cash acquired and assumed earned equity awards of $27 million, pursuant to an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the Merger Agreement) dated as of May 3, 2011. Applied’s primary reasons for this acquisition were to complement existing product offerings and to provide opportunities for future growth. Varian designs, markets, manufactures and services ion implantation systems. These systems are primarily used in the manufacture of transistors, which are a basic building block of integrated circuits (ICs) or microchips. Ion implantation systems create a beam of electrically charged particles called ions, which are implanted into transistor structures at precise locations and depths, changing the electrical properties of the semiconductor device. These implantation systems may also be used in other areas of IC manufacture for modifying the material properties of the semiconductor devices, as well as in manufacturing crystalline-silicon solar cells and light-emitting diodes (LEDs).

Applied allocated the purchase price of this acquisition to tangible and identifiable intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed, based on their estimated fair values. Applied recorded $2.5 billion in goodwill, which represented the excess of the purchase price over the aggregate estimated fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed in the acquisition. Of this amount, $1.7 billion of goodwill was allocated to the Silicon Systems Group segment, and the remainder was allocated to the Applied Global Services segment. Goodwill is not deductible for tax purposes. The estimated fair value assigned to identifiable intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed was based upon preliminary estimates. Valuations and assumptions pertaining to income taxes are subject to change as additional information is obtained during the measurement period.

The following table summarizes the preliminary allocation of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the acquisition date:


Estimated Fair Values	Acquisition 2012
	(In millions)
Cash and cash equivalents	$	632
Short-term investments		56
Accounts receivable, net		194
Inventories		250
Deferred income taxes and other current assets		66
Long-term investments		62
Property and equipment, net		104
Goodwill		2,540
Purchased intangible assets		1,365
Other assets		10

Total assets acquired		5,279

Accounts payable and accrued expenses		(134	)
Customer deposits and deferred revenue		(52	)
Income taxes payable		(60	)
Deferred income taxes		(147	)
Other liabilities		(25	)

Total liabilities assumed		(418	)

Purchase price allocated	$	4,861

APPLIED MATERIALS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

The following table presents detail of the purchase price allocated to purchased intangible assets of Varian at the acquisition date:


	Useful Life		Purchased Intangible Assets 2012
	(In years)		(In millions)
Developed technology		1-7	$	987
Customer relationships		15		150
In-process technology				142
Patents and trademarks		10		69
Backlog		1		7
Covenant not to compete		2		10

Total purchased intangible assets			$	1,365

The results of operations of Varian are included in Applied’s consolidated results of operations, primarily in the results for the Silicon Systems Group and Applied Global Services segments, beginning in the first quarter of fiscal 2012. For the three months ended January 29, 2012, net sales of Varian products of approximately $200 million and an operating loss of approximately $130 million were included in the consolidated results of operations. Results of operations included charges of $153 million attributable to inventory fair value adjustments on products sold, amortization of purchased intangible assets, share-based compensation associated with accelerated vesting, deal costs and other integration costs associated with the acquisition. Of this amount, deal costs and other acquisition-related costs of $36 million were not allocated to the segments.

The following unaudited pro forma consolidated results of operations assume the acquisition was completed as of the beginning of the fiscal reporting periods presented. The pro forma consolidated results of operations for the three months ended January 30, 2011 combine the results of Applied for the three months ended January 30, 2011, with the results of Varian for the three months ended December 31, 2010.


	Three Months Ended
	January 29, 2012		January 30, 2011
	(In millions, except per share amounts)
Net sales	$	2,189	$	2,969
Net income	$	196	$	449
Basic and diluted earnings per share	$	0.15	$	0.34

The pro forma results above include adjustments related to the purchase price allocation and financing of the acquisition, primarily to increase depreciation and amortization with the higher values of property, plant and equipment and identifiable intangible assets, to increase interest expense for the additional debt incurred to complete the acquisition, and to reflect the related income tax effect. The pro forma results for the three months ended January 30, 2011 include costs of $102 million, which reduced net income due to inventory fair value adjustments on products sold, share-based compensation associated with accelerated vesting and acquisition-related costs, which are not expected to occur in future quarters. The pro forma information does not necessarily reflect the actual results of operations had the acquisition been consummated at the beginning of the fiscal reporting period indicated nor is it necessarily indicative of future operating results. The pro forma information does not include any (i) potential revenue enhancements, cost synergies or other operating efficiencies that could result from the acquisition or (ii) transaction or integration costs relating to the acquisition.

APPLIED MATERIALS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

Note 9 Goodwill, Purchased Technology and Other Intangible Assets

Goodwill and Purchased Intangible Assets

Applied’s methodology for allocating the purchase price relating to purchase acquisitions is determined through established and generally accepted valuation techniques. Goodwill is measured as the excess of the cost of the acquisition over the sum of the amounts assigned to tangible and identifiable intangible assets acquired less liabilities assumed. Applied assigns assets acquired (including goodwill) and liabilities assumed to one or more reporting units as of the date of acquisition. Typically, acquisitions relate to a single reporting unit and thus do not require the allocation of goodwill to multiple reporting units. If the products obtained in an acquisition are assigned to multiple reporting units, the goodwill is distributed to the respective reporting units as part of the purchase price allocation process.

Goodwill and purchased intangible assets with indefinite useful lives are not amortized, but are reviewed for impairment annually during the fourth quarter of each fiscal year and whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of an asset may not be recoverable. The process of evaluating the potential impairment of goodwill and intangible assets requires significant judgment, especially in emerging markets. Applied regularly monitors current business conditions and other factors including, but not limited to, adverse industry or economic trends, restructuring actions and lower projections of profitability that may impact future operating results.

In fiscal 2011, Applied adopted authoritative guidance which allows entities to use a qualitative approach to test goodwill for impairment. This authoritative guidance permits an entity to first perform a qualitative assessment to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying value. If it is concluded that this is the case, it is necessary to perform the two-step goodwill impairment test. Otherwise, the two-step goodwill impairment test is not required. Under the two-step goodwill impairment test, Applied would in the first step compare the estimated fair value of each reporting unit to its carrying value. Applied’s reporting units are consistent with the reportable segments identified in Note 16, based on the manner in which Applied operates its business and the nature of those operations. Applied determines the fair value of each of its reporting units based on a weighting of income and market approaches. Under the income approach, Applied calculates the fair value of a reporting unit based on the present value of estimated future cash flows. Estimated future cash flows will be impacted by a number of factors including anticipated future operating results, estimated cost of capital and/or discount rates. Under the market approach, Applied estimates the fair value based on market multiples of revenue or earnings for comparable companies, as appropriate. If the fair value of the reporting unit exceeds the carrying value of the net assets assigned to that unit, goodwill is not impaired and no further testing is performed. If the carrying value of the net assets assigned to the reporting unit exceeds the fair value of the reporting unit, then Applied would perform the second step of the impairment test in order to determine the implied fair value of the reporting unit’s goodwill. Applied would then allocate the fair value of the reporting unit to all of the assets and liabilities of that unit, as if Applied had acquired the reporting unit in a business combination, with the fair value of the reporting unit being the “purchase price.” The excess of the “purchase price” over the carrying amounts assigned to assets and liabilities represents the implied fair value of goodwill. If Applied determined that the carrying value of a reporting unit’s goodwill exceeded its implied fair value, Applied would record an impairment charge equal to the difference.

Applied performed a qualitative assessment to test goodwill for impairment in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2011, and determined that it was more likely than not that each of its reporting units’ fair value exceeded its carrying value and that it was not necessary to perform the two-step goodwill impairment test.

During the first quarter of fiscal 2012, goodwill and other indefinite-lived intangible assets increased by $2.7 billion due to the acquisition of Varian as discussed in Note 8.

APPLIED MATERIALS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

Details of indefinite-lived intangible assets were as follows:


	January 29, 2012						October 30, 2011
	Goodwill		Other Intangible Assets		Total		Goodwill		Other Intangible Assets		Total
	(In millions)
Silicon Systems Group	$	2,108	$	142	$	2,250	$	381	$	—	$	381
Applied Global Services		1,006		—		1,006		193		—		193
Display		116		—		116		116		—		116
Energy and Environmental Solutions		645		—		645		645		—		645

Carrying amount	$	3,875	$	142	$	4,017	$	1,335	$	—	$	1,335

Other intangible assets that are not subject to amortization consist primarily of in-process technology, which will be subject to amortization upon commercialization. If an in-process technology project is abandoned, the acquired technology attributable to the project will be written-off.

Finite-Lived Purchased Intangible Assets

Applied amortizes purchased intangible assets with finite lives using the straight-line method over the estimated economic lives of the assets, ranging from 1 to 15 years.

Applied evaluates long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying value of an asset group may not be recoverable. Applied assesses the fair value of the assets based on the amount of the undiscounted future cash flow that the assets are expected to generate and recognizes an impairment loss when estimated undiscounted future cash flow expected to result from the use of the asset, plus net proceeds expected from disposition of the asset, if any, are less than the carrying value of the asset. When Applied identifies an impairment, Applied reduces the carrying value of the group of assets to comparable market values, when available and appropriate, or to its estimated fair value based on a discounted cash flow approach.

Intangible assets, such as purchased technology, are generally recorded in connection with a business acquisition. The value assigned to intangible assets is usually based on estimates and judgments regarding expectations for the success and life cycle of products and technology acquired. Applied evaluates the useful lives of its intangible assets each reporting period to determine whether events and circumstances require revising the remaining period of amortization. In addition, Applied reviews intangible assets for impairment when events or changes in circumstances indicate their carrying value may not be recoverable. Management considers such indicators as significant differences in actual product acceptance from the estimates, changes in the competitive and economic environment, technological advances, and changes in cost structure.

APPLIED MATERIALS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

Details of finite-lived intangible assets were as follows:


	January 29, 2012									October 30, 2011
	Purchased Technology			Other Intangible Assets			Total			Purchased Technology			Other Intangible Assets			Total
	(In millions)
Gross carrying amount:
Silicon Systems Group	$	1,300		$	252		$	1,552		$	310		$	20		$	330
Applied Global Services		28			44			72			28			40			68
Display		110			33			143			110			33			143
Energy and Environmental Solutions		106			232			338			105			232			337

Gross carrying amount	$	1,544		$	561		$	2,105		$	553		$	325		$	878

Accumulated amortization:
Silicon Systems Group	$	(295	)	$	(17	)	$	(312	)	$	(256	)	$	(8	)	$	(264	)
Applied Global Services		(20	)		(36	)		(56	)		(20	)		(31	)		(51	)
Display		(103	)		(25	)		(128	)		(102	)		(25	)		(127	)
Energy and Environmental Solutions		(51	)		(181	)		(232	)		(48	)		(177	)		(225	)

Accumulated amortization	$	(469	)	$	(259	)	$	(728	)	$	(426	)	$	(241	)	$	(667	)

Carrying amount	$	1,075		$	302		$	1,377		$	127		$	84		$	211

During the first quarter of fiscal 2012, the change in gross carrying amount of the amortized intangible assets was approximately $1.2 billion, due to the acquisition of Varian as discussed in Note 8.

Details of amortization expense were as follows:


	Three Months Ended
	January 29, 2012		January 30, 2011
	(In millions)
Silicon Systems Group	$	48	$	4
Applied Global Services		5		2
Display		2		2
Energy and Environmental Solutions		6		6

Total	$	61		14

For the three months ended January 29, 2012 and January 30, 2011, amortization expense was charged to the following categories:


	Three Months Ended
	January 29, 2012		January 30, 2011
	(In millions)
Cost of products sold	$	52	$	9
Selling, general and administrative		9		5

Total amortization expense	$	61	$	14

APPLIED MATERIALS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

As of January 29, 2012, future estimated amortization expense is expected to be as follows:


	Amortization Expense
	(In millions)
2012	$	164
2013		210
2014		199
2015		182
2016		174
Thereafter		448

	$	1,377

Note 10 Borrowing Facilities and Long-Term Debt

Applied has credit facilities for unsecured borrowings in various currencies of up to $1.6 billion, of which $1.5 billion is comprised of a committed four-year revolving credit agreement with a group of banks that is scheduled to expire in May 2015. This agreement provides for borrowings in United States dollars at interest rates keyed to one of the two rates selected by Applied for each advance and includes financial and other covenants with which Applied was in compliance at January 29, 2012. Remaining credit facilities in the amount of approximately $103 million are with Japanese banks. Applied’s ability to borrow under these facilities is subject to bank approval at the time of the borrowing request, and any advances will be at rates indexed to the banks’ prime reference rate denominated in Japanese yen. No amounts were outstanding under any of these facilities at both January 29, 2012 and October 30, 2011.

Long-term debt outstanding as of January 29, 2012 and October 30, 2011 was as follows:


Due Date	Principal Amount			Stated Interest Rate			Effective Interest Rate			Interest Payment Dates
	(In millions)
June 15, 2016	$	400			2.650	%		2.666	%	June 15, December 15
October 15, 2017		200			7.125	%		7.190	%	April 15, October 15
June 15, 2021		750			4.300	%		4.326	%	June 15, December 15
June 15, 2041		600			5.850	%		5.879	%	June 15, December 15
Other debt		1

		1,951
Total unamortized discount		(4	)

Total long-term debt	$	1,947

Applied has debt agreements that contain financial and other covenants. These covenants require Applied to maintain certain minimum financial ratios. At January 29, 2012, Applied was in compliance with all such covenants.

Note 11 Restructuring Charges and Asset Impairments

On July 21, 2010, Applied announced a plan to restructure its Energy and Environmental Solutions segment, which was expected to impact between 400 to 500 positions globally. During the third quarter of fiscal 2010, Applied incurred employee severance charges of $45 million associated with this program. During the first quarter of fiscal 2011, as a result of changes in Applied’s operating environment and business requirements, Applied

APPLIED MATERIALS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

revised its workforce reduction under this program to approximately 200 positions and recorded a favorable adjustment of $28 million. As of January 29, 2012, the severance accrual associated with restructuring reserves under this program was $1 million.

On November 11, 2009, Applied announced a restructuring program to reduce its global workforce as of October 25, 2009 by approximately 1,300 to 1,500 positions, or 10 to 12 percent, over a period of 18 months. During the third quarter of fiscal 2010, Applied revised its global workforce reduction under this program to approximately 1,000 positions. In fiscal 2010, Applied recorded restructuring charges of $84 million associated with this program. As of January 29, 2012, the severance accrual associated with restructuring reserves under this program was $3 million.

During the first quarter of fiscal 2011, Applied favorably adjusted the remaining severance accrual associated with a global restructuring program announced in the first quarter of fiscal 2009 by $4 million. As of January 29, 2012, no severance accrual remained under this program.

Changes in severance accruals associated with restructuring reserves for the first quarter of fiscal 2012 were as follows:


	Severance
	(In millions)
Balance, October 30, 2011	$	6
Consumption of reserves		(2	)

Balance, January 29, 2012	$	4

In addition, as of January 29, 2012, Applied had $5 million in restructuring reserves associated with facilities. During the first quarter of fiscal 2011, Applied recorded asset impairment charges of $3 million related to a facility held-for-sale.

Note 12 Stockholders’ Equity, Comprehensive Income and Share-Based Compensation

Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income

Components of accumulated other comprehensive income, on an after-tax basis where applicable, were as follows:


	January 29, 2012			October 30, 2011
	(In millions)
Pension liability	$	(25	)	$	(25	)
Unrealized gain on investments, net		18			17
Cumulative translation adjustments		14			14

	$	7		$	6

Stock Repurchase Program

On March 8, 2010, Applied’s Board of Directors approved a new stock repurchase program authorizing up to $2.0 billion in repurchases over the next three years ending in March 2013. Under this authorization, Applied renewed its systematic stock repurchase program and may also make supplemental stock repurchases from time to time, depending on market conditions, stock price and other factors.

APPLIED MATERIALS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

The following table summarizes Applied’s stock repurchases for the first quarters of fiscal 2012 and 2011:


	Three Months Ended
	January 29, 2012		January 30, 2011
	(In millions, except per share amounts)
Shares of common stock repurchased		18		11
Cost of stock repurchased	$	200	$	150
Average price paid per share	$	10.95	$	13.74

Dividends

In December 2011, Applied’s Board of Directors declared a quarterly cash dividend in the amount of $0.08 per share, aggregating $103 million, that will be paid on March 15, 2012 to stockholders of record as of February 23, 2012. Applied currently anticipates that it will continue to pay cash dividends on a quarterly basis in the future, although the declaration and amount of any future cash dividend are at the discretion of the Board of Directors and will depend on Applied’s financial condition, results of operations, capital requirements, business conditions and other factors, as well as a determination that cash dividends are in the best interest of Applied and its stockholders.

Share-Based Compensation

Applied has adopted stock plans that permit grants to employees of share-based awards, including stock options, restricted stock, restricted stock units (also referred to as “performance shares” under Applied’s principal equity compensation plan, the Employee Stock Incentive Plan) and performance units. In addition, the Employee Stock Incentive Plan provides for the automatic grant of restricted stock units to non-employee directors and permits the grant of share-based awards to consultants. Applied also has two Employee Stock Purchase Plans, one for United States employees and a second for international employees (collectively, ESPP), which enable eligible employees to purchase Applied common stock.

During the three months ended January 29, 2012 and January 30, 2011, Applied recognized share-based compensation expense related to stock options, ESPP shares, restricted stock units, restricted stock and performance units. Total share-based compensation and related tax benefits were as follows:


	Three Months Ended
	January 29, 2012		January 30, 2011
	(In millions)
Share-based compensation	$	53	$	33
Tax benefit recognized	$	15	$	10

The effect of share-based compensation on the results of operations for the three months ended January 29, 2012 and January 30, 2011 was as follows:


	Three Months Ended
	January 29, 2012		January 30, 2011
	(In millions)
Cost of products sold	$	13	$	11
Research, development, and engineering		13		10
Selling, general and administrative		27		12

Total share-based compensation	$	53	$	33

APPLIED MATERIALS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

The cost associated with share-based awards that are subject solely to time-based vesting requirements, less expected forfeitures, is recognized over the awards’ service period for the entire award on a straight-line basis. The cost associated with performance-based equity awards is recognized for each tranche over the service period, based on an assessment of the likelihood that the applicable performance goals will be achieved.

At January 29, 2012, Applied had $313 million in total unrecognized compensation expense, net of estimated forfeitures, related to grants of stock options, restricted stock units, restricted stock, performance units and shares issued under Applied’s ESPP, which will be recognized over a weighted average period of 2.9 years. At January 29, 2012, there were 150 million shares available for grants of stock options, restricted stock units, restricted stock, performance units and other share-based awards, and an additional 54 million shares available for issuance under the ESPP.

Stock Options

Applied grants options to purchase, at future dates, shares of its common stock to employees and consultants. The exercise price of each stock option equals the fair market value of Applied common stock on the date of grant. Options typically vest over three to four years, subject to the grantee’s continued service with Applied through the scheduled vesting date, and expire no later than seven years from the grant date. The fair value of each option grant is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. This model was developed for use in estimating the value of publicly traded options that have no vesting restrictions and are fully transferable. Applied’s employee stock options have characteristics significantly different from those of publicly traded options. There were no stock options granted in the three months ended January 29, 2012 and January 30, 2011.

Stock option activity for the three months ended January 29, 2012 was as follows:


	Shares			Weighted Average Exercise Price
	(In millions, except per share amounts)
Outstanding, at October 30, 2011		30		$	13.05
Assumed in Varian acquisition		5		$	4.85
Exercised		—		$	—
Canceled and forfeited		(8	)	$	16.77

Outstanding at January 29, 2012		27		$	10.50

Exercisable at January 29, 2012		19		$	11.61

Restricted Stock Units, Restricted Stock and Performance Units

Restricted stock units are converted into shares of Applied common stock upon vesting on a one-for-one basis. Restricted stock has the same rights as other issued and outstanding shares of Applied common stock except these shares have no right to dividends and are held in escrow until the award vests. Performance units are awards that result in a payment to a grantee in shares of Applied common stock on a one-for-one basis if performance goals and/or other vesting criteria established by the Human Resources and Compensation Committee of Applied’s Board of Directors (the Committee) are achieved or the awards otherwise vest. Restricted stock units, restricted stock and performance units typically vest over four years and vesting usually is subject to the grantee’s continued service with Applied and, in some cases, achievement of specified performance goals. The compensation expense related to the service-based awards is determined using the fair market value of Applied common stock on the date of the grant, and the compensation expense is recognized over the vesting period.

APPLIED MATERIALS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

Restricted stock units, restricted stock and performance units granted to certain executive officers and other key employees are also subject to the achievement of specified performance goals (performance-based awards). These performance-based awards become eligible to vest only if performance goals are achieved and then actually will vest only if the grantee remains employed by Applied through each applicable vesting date.

For performance-based awards granted during fiscal 2011, 2010 and 2008, the performance goals require (i) the achievement of targeted annual, adjusted operating profit margin levels compared to Applied’s peer companies in at least one of the four fiscal years beginning with the fiscal year of the grant, and (ii) that Applied’s annual adjusted operating profit margin is positive in such year. An award that has become eligible for time-based vesting based on achievement of the performance goals will vest over approximately four years from the date of grant, provided that the grantee remains employed by Applied through each scheduled vesting date. Performance-based awards that do not become eligible for time-based vesting in a particular year may become eligible for time-based vesting in subsequent years up until the fourth fiscal year after grant, after which they are forfeited if the required performance goals have not been achieved. During the three months ended January 29, 2012, the Committee granted performance-based awards that require the achievement of positive and relative annual, adjusted operating profit margin goals in a manner similar to the previously granted performance-based awards, with additional shares becoming eligible for time-based vesting depending on certain levels of achievement of Applied’s total shareholder return (TSR) relative to a peer group comprised of companies in the Standard & Poor’s 500 Technology Sector measured at the end of a two-year period beginning fiscal 2012. The fair value of these performance-based awards is estimated on the date of the grant and assumes that the specified performance goals will be achieved. If the goals are achieved, these awards vest over a specified remaining service period as described above. If the performance goals are not met, no compensation expense is recognized and any previously recognized compensation expense is reversed. The expected cost of each award is reflected over the service period and is reduced for estimated forfeitures.

As of January 29, 2012, 100 percent of the performance-based awards granted in fiscal 2011 had been earned based on performance and became subject to the additional time-based vesting requirements. As of January 29, 2012, 82 percent of the performance-based awards granted in fiscal 2010 had been earned based on performance and became subject to the additional time-based vesting requirements. The remaining 18 percent of the awards may still be earned, depending on future performance in one or both of fiscal years 2012 and 2013. As of January 29, 2012, 90 percent of the performance-based awards granted in fiscal 2008 had been earned. The remaining 10 percent of the awards were forfeited as specified performance goals were not fully achieved. No performance-based awards were granted in fiscal 2009.

Restricted stock unit, restricted stock and performance share unit activity for the three months ended January 29, 2012 was as follows:


	Shares			Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value		Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Term
	(In millions, except per share amounts)
Non-vested restricted stock units, restricted stock and performance units at October 30, 2011		28		$	12.64		2.8 Years
Granted		14		$	10.64
Vested		(5	)	$	13.08
Canceled		(1	)	$	13.55

Non-vested restricted stock units, restricted stock and performance units at January 29, 2012		36		$	11.79		3.1 Years

At January 29, 2012, 1 million additional performance-based awards could be earned upon certain levels of achievement of Applied’s TSR relative to a peer group at a future date.

APPLIED MATERIALS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

Employee Stock Purchase Plans

Under the ESPP, substantially all employees may purchase Applied common stock through payroll deductions at a price equal to 85 percent of the lower of the fair market value of Applied common stock at the beginning or end of each 6-month purchase period, subject to certain limits. No shares were issued under the ESPP during the three months ended January 29, 2012 or January 30, 2011. Compensation expense associated with the ESPP is calculated using the fair value of the employees’ purchase rights under the Black-Scholes model.

Note 13 Employee Benefit Plans

Applied sponsors a number of employee benefit plans, including defined benefit plans of certain foreign subsidiaries, and a plan that provides certain medical and vision benefits to eligible retirees. A summary of the components of net periodic benefit costs of these defined and postretirement benefit plans for the three months ended January 29, 2012 and January 30, 2011 is presented below:


	Three Months Ended
	January 29, 2012			January 30, 2011
	(In millions)
Service cost	$	4		$	4
Interest cost		4			4
Expected return on plan assets		(3	)		(3	)

Net periodic benefit cost	$	5		$	5

Note 14 Income Taxes

Applied’s effective income tax rate slightly increased to 26.4% for the first quarter of fiscal 2012 from 25.6% for the first quarter of fiscal 2011. The rate for the first quarter of fiscal 2011 included the impact of legislation restoring the U.S. federal research and development tax credit, which favorably affected the effective tax rate by approximately 2 percentage points. Applied’s future effective income tax rate depends on various factors, such as tax legislation, the geographic composition of Applied’s pre-tax income, and the tax rate on equity compensation. Management carefully monitors these factors and timely adjusts the interim income tax rate accordingly.

A number of Applied’s tax returns remain subject to examination by taxing authorities. These include U.S. federal returns for fiscal 2008 and later years, California returns for fiscal 2006 and later years, tax returns for certain other states for fiscal 2006 and later years, and tax returns in certain jurisdictions outside of the United States for fiscal 2004 and later years.

The timing of the resolution of income tax examinations, as well as the amounts and timing of various tax payments that may be made as part of the resolution process, is highly uncertain and could cause an impact to Applied’s consolidated results of operations. This could also cause large fluctuations in the balance sheet classification of current assets and non-current assets and liabilities. Applied expects that unrecognized tax benefits will decrease by $9 million in the next 12 months.

APPLIED MATERIALS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

Note 15 Warranty, Guarantees and Contingencies

Warranty

Changes in the warranty reserves during the three months ended January 29, 2012 and January 30, 2011 were as follows:


	Three Months Ended
	January 29, 2012			January 30, 2011
	(In millions)
Beginning balance	$	168		$	155
Provisions for warranty		30			51
Consumption of reserves		(37	)		(33	)

Ending balance	$	161		$	173

Applied products are generally sold with a 12-month warranty period following installation. The provision for the estimated cost of warranty is recorded when revenue is recognized. Parts and labor are covered under the terms of the warranty agreement. The warranty provision is based on historical experience by product, configuration and geographic region. Quarterly warranty consumption is generally associated with sales that occurred during the preceding four quarters, and quarterly warranty provisions are generally related to the current quarter’s sales.

Guarantees

In the ordinary course of business, Applied provides standby letters of credit or other guarantee instruments to third parties as required for certain transactions initiated by either Applied or its subsidiaries. As of January 29, 2012, the maximum potential amount of future payments that Applied could be required to make under these guarantee agreements was approximately $51 million. Applied has not recorded any liability in connection with these guarantee agreements beyond that required to appropriately account for the underlying transaction being guaranteed. Applied does not believe, based on historical experience and information currently available, that it is probable that any amounts will be required to be paid under these guarantee agreements.

Applied also has agreements with various banks to facilitate subsidiary banking operations worldwide, including overdraft arrangements, issuance of bank guarantees, and letters of credit. As of January 29, 2012, Applied Materials, Inc. has provided parent guarantees to banks for approximately $186 million to cover these services.

Legal Matters

Jusung

Applied has been engaged in several lawsuits and patent and administrative proceedings with Jusung Engineering Co., Ltd. and/or Jusung Pacific Co., Ltd. (Jusung) in Taiwan and South Korea since 2003, and more recently in China, involving technology used in manufacturing LCDs. Applied believes that it has meritorious claims and defenses against Jusung that it intends to pursue vigorously.

In 2004, Applied filed a complaint for patent infringement against Jusung in the Hsinchu District Court in Taiwan seeking damages and a permanent injunction for infringement of a patent related to chemical vapor deposition (CVD) equipment. Jusung filed a counterclaim against Applied. On December 31, 2010, the Hsinchu District Court dismissed both actions, and appeals by both parties remain pending at the Taiwan Intellectual Property Court. Jusung unsuccessfully sought invalidation of Applied’s CVD patent in the Taiwanese Intellectual

APPLIED MATERIALS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

Property Office (TIPO). In September 2010, the Taipei Supreme Administrative Court dismissed Jusung’s appeal of the TIPO’s decision. In 2009, Jusung filed a second action with the TIPO seeking invalidation of Applied’s CVD patent, which action remains pending.

In 2006, Applied filed an action in the TIPO challenging the validity of a Jusung patent related to separability of the transfer chamber on a CVD tool. Jusung sued Applied and AKT America in the Hsinchu District Court in Taiwan alleging infringement of the same patent. In March 2009, the Hsinchu District Court dismissed Jusung’s lawsuit; in October, 2010, the Taiwan Intellectual Property Court dismissed Jusung’s appeal; and on December 1, 2011, the Supreme Administrative Court dismissed Jusung’s further appeal. Separately, the TIPO granted requests by Applied and another party to invalidate Jusung’s patent. Following intermediate court appeals, on December 15, 2011, the Supreme Administrative Court dismissed Jusung’s further appeal, irrevocably invalidating Jusung’s patent. In November 2009, Applied filed an action in China with the Patent Reexamination Board of the State Intellectual Property Office seeking to invalidate a Chinese counterpart to Jusung’s separable chamber patent. On June 18, 2010, the Patent Reexamination Board issued a decision invalidating Jusung’s patent in China. Jusung appealed to the Beijing No. 1 Intermediate People’s Court and on June 13, 2011, this Court dismissed Jusung’s appeal. Jusung appealed this decision to the Beijing High People’s Court in July 2011, and Jusung’s appeal remains pending.

In 2006, Jusung filed a complaint of private prosecution in the Taipei District Court of Taiwan alleging that Applied’s outside counsel received from the Court and used a copy of an expert report that Jusung had filed in the ongoing patent infringement lawsuits that Jusung had intended to remain confidential. The complaint named as defendants Applied’s outside counsel in Taiwan, as well as Michael R. Splinter, Applied’s Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, as the statutory representative of Applied. The Taipei District Court dismissed the private prosecution complaint, and the matter was transferred to the Taipei District Attorney’s Office. The Taipei District Attorney’s Office issued six separate rulings not to prosecute, each of which Jusung appealed. In the first five instances, the Taiwan High Court District Attorney returned the matter to the Taipei District Attorney’s Office for further consideration. Following the sixth ruling not to prosecute, the Taiwan High Court District Attorney dismissed Jusung’s appeal. Jusung then petitioned to the Taipei District Court for a trial, and the Court announced on February 7, 2012 that it will dismiss Jusung’s petition.

Korea Criminal Proceedings

In February 2010, the Seoul Prosecutor’s Office for the Eastern District of Korea (the Prosecutor’s Office) indicted employees of several companies for the alleged improper receipt and use of confidential information belonging to Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. (Samsung), a major Applied customer based in Korea. The Prosecutor’s Office did not name Applied or any of its subsidiaries as a party to the criminal action. The individuals charged included the former head of Applied Materials Korea (AMK), who at the time of the indictment was a vice president of Applied Materials, Inc., and certain other AMK employees. Hearings on these matters are ongoing in the Seoul Eastern District Court. Applied and Samsung entered into a settlement agreement effective as of November 1, 2010, which resolves potential civil claims related to this matter, which is separate from and does not affect the criminal proceedings.

From time to time, Applied receives notification from third parties, including customers and suppliers, seeking indemnification, litigation support, payment of money or other actions by Applied in connection with claims made against them. In addition, from time to time, Applied receives notification from third parties claiming that Applied may be or is infringing or misusing their intellectual property or other rights. Applied also is subject to various other legal proceedings and claims, both asserted and unasserted, that arise in the ordinary course of business.

APPLIED MATERIALS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

Although the outcome of the above-described matters or these claims and proceedings cannot be predicted with certainty, Applied does not believe that any of these proceedings or other claims will have a material adverse effect on its consolidated financial condition or results of operations.

Environmental Matters

Liabilities for future remediation costs are recorded when environmental assessments and/or remedial efforts are probable and costs can be reasonably estimated. Environmental liabilities classified as current are included in accounts payable and accrued expenses with the non-current portion included in other liabilities. Generally, the timing of these accruals is based on the completion of a feasibility study or a commitment to a formal plan of action. Environmental liabilities are based on best estimates of probable undiscounted future costs based on currently available information. Should new information become available, the liability would be adjusted.

In connection with the acquisition of Varian, Applied assumed certain environmental liabilities, including environmental investigation and remediation costs. Environmental remediation costs incurred were not material for the three months ended January 29, 2012. At January 29, 2012, Applied’s environmental liability was $9 million, of which $8 million was classified as non-current and included in other liabilities. As part of accounting for the acquisition of Varian, Applied performed a review and assessment of the assumed environmental liabilities. Management believes that the liability arising from environmental-related matters is not material to Applied’s consolidated financial position.

Prior to the acquisition, Varian had entered into a settlement agreement with an insurance company to pay a portion of the past and future environmental-related expenditures. Accordingly, as part of the acquisition, Applied recorded a receivable of $2 million as of January 29, 2012, which is included in other assets.

Note 16 Industry Segment Operations

Applied’s four reportable segments are: Silicon Systems Group, Applied Global Services, Display, and Energy and Environmental Solutions. Applied’s chief operating decision-maker has been identified as the President and Chief Executive Officer, who reviews operating results to make decisions about allocating resources and assessing performance for the entire company. Segment information is presented based upon Applied’s management organization structure as of January 29, 2012, and the distinctive nature of each segment. Future changes to this internal financial structure may result in changes to Applied’s reportable segments.

Each reportable segment is separately managed and has separate financial results that are reviewed by Applied’s chief operating decision-maker. Each reportable segment contains closely related products that are unique to the particular segment. Segment operating income is determined based upon internal performance measures used by Applied’s chief operating decision-maker.

Applied derives the segment results directly from its internal management reporting system. The accounting policies Applied uses to derive reportable segment results are substantially the same as those used for external reporting purposes. Management measures the performance of each reportable segment based upon several metrics including orders, net sales and operating income. Management uses these results to evaluate the performance of, and to assign resources to, each of the reportable segments. Applied does not allocate to its reportable segments certain operating expenses that it manages separately at the corporate level, which include costs related to share-based compensation; certain management, finance, legal, human resources, and research, development and engineering functions provided at the corporate level; and unabsorbed information technology and occupancy. In addition, Applied does not allocate to its reportable segments restructuring and asset impairment charges and any associated adjustments related to restructuring actions, unless these charges or adjustments pertain to a specific reportable segment. Segment operating income excludes interest income/expense and other financial charges and income taxes. Management does not consider the unallocated costs in measuring the performance of the reportable segments.

APPLIED MATERIALS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

In November 2011, Applied completed its acquisition of Varian. Beginning in the first quarter of fiscal 2012, the acquired business is primarily included in the results for the Silicon Systems Group and Applied Global Services segments, with certain corporate functions included in corporate and unallocated costs.

The Silicon Systems Group segment includes semiconductor capital equipment for etch, rapid thermal processing, deposition, chemical mechanical planarization, metrology and inspection, wafer packaging, and ion implantation.

The Applied Global Services segment includes technically differentiated products and services to improve operating efficiency, reduce operating costs and lessen the environmental impact of semiconductor, display and solar customers’ factories. Applied Global Services’ products consist of spares, services, certain earlier generation products, remanufactured equipment, and products that have reached a particular stage in the product lifecycle. Customer demand for these products and services is fulfilled through a global distribution system with trained service engineers located in close proximity to customer sites.

The Display segment includes products for manufacturing LCDs for TVs, personal computers and other video-enabled devices.

The Energy and Environmental Solutions segment includes products for fabricating solar photovoltaic cells and modules, high throughput roll-to-roll coating systems for flexible electronics and web products, and systems used in the manufacture of energy-efficient glass.

Net sales and operating income (loss) for each reportable segment for the three months ended January 29, 2012 and January 30, 2011 were as follows:


	Net Sales		Operating Income (loss)
	(In millions)
2012:
Silicon Systems Group	$	1,344	$	271
Applied Global Services		534		107
Display		104		5
Energy and Environmental Solutions		207		(23	)

Total Segment	$	2,189	$	360

2011:
Silicon Systems Group	$	1,496	$	543
Applied Global Services		567		85
Display		147		28
Energy and Environmental Solutions		476		144

Total Segment	$	2,686	$	800

In the first quarter of fiscal 2011, Applied recorded a favorable adjustment of $28 million related to a restructuring program announced in fiscal 2010 that was reported in the Energy and Environmental Solutions segment.

APPLIED MATERIALS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

Reconciliations of total segment operating income to Applied’s consolidated operating income for the three months ended January 29, 2012 and January 30, 2011 were as follows:


	Three Months Ended
	January 29, 2012			January 30, 2011
	(In millions)
Total segment operating income	$	360		$	800
Corporate and unallocated costs		(181	)		(127	)
Restructuring and asset impairment benefit, net		—			1

Income from operations	$	179		$	674

Corporate and unallocated costs included $36 million of deal costs and other acquisition-related costs related to the Varian acquisition.

The following companies accounted for at least 10 percent of Applied’s net sales for the three months ended January 29, 2012, which were for products in multiple reportable segments.


	January 29, 2012
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd .		27	%
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited		12	%

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

All statements in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and those made by the management of Applied, other than statements of historical fact, are forward-looking statements. Examples of forward-looking statements include statements regarding Applied’s future financial or operating results, cash flows and cash deployment strategies, declaration of dividends, share repurchases, business strategies, projected costs, products, competitive positions, management’s plans and objectives for future operations, research and development, acquisitions and joint ventures, growth opportunities, customers, working capital, liquidity, investment portfolio and policies, and legal proceedings and claims, as well as industry trends and outlooks. These forward-looking statements are based on management’s estimates, projections and assumptions as of the date hereof and include the assumptions that underlie such statements. Forward-looking statements may contain words such as “may,” “will,” “should,” “could,” “would,” “expect,” “plan,” “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “potential” and “continue,” the negative of these terms, or other comparable terminology. Any expectations based on these forward-looking statements are subject to risks and uncertainties and other important factors, including those discussed in Part II, Item 1A, “Risk Factors,” below and elsewhere in this report. Other risks and uncertainties may be disclosed in Applied’s prior Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) filings. These and many other factors could affect Applied’s future financial condition and operating results and could cause actual results to differ materially from expectations based on forward-looking statements made in this document or elsewhere by Applied or on its behalf. Applied undertakes no obligation to revise or update any forward-looking statements.

Overview

Applied provides manufacturing equipment, services and software to the global semiconductor, flat panel display, solar photovoltaic (PV) and related industries. Applied’s customers include manufacturers of semiconductor wafers and chips, flat panel liquid crystal displays (LCDs), solar PV cells and modules, and other electronic devices. These customers may use what they manufacture in their own end products or sell the items to other companies for use in advanced electronic components. Applied operates in four reportable segments: Silicon Systems Group, Applied Global Services, Display, and Energy and Environmental Solutions. A summary of financial information for each reportable segment is found in Note 16 of Notes to Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements. A discussion of factors that could affect Applied’s operations is set forth under “Risk Factors” in Item 1A of Part II of this report, which is incorporated herein by reference. Product development and manufacturing activities occur primarily in North America, Europe, Israel and Asia. Applied’s broad range of equipment and service products are highly technical and are sold primarily through a direct sales force.

Applied’s results historically have been driven primarily by worldwide demand for semiconductors, which in turn depends on end-user demand for electronic products. Each of Applied’s businesses is subject to highly cyclical industry conditions, as demand for manufacturing equipment and services can change depending on supply and demand for chips, LCDs, solar PVs and other electronic devices, as well as other factors, such as global economic and market conditions, and technological advances in fabrication processes. In light of this cyclicality, Applied’s results can vary significantly year over year, as well as quarter over quarter.

The following table presents certain significant measurements for the three months ended January 29, 2012, October 30, 2011 and January 30, 2011:


	Three Months Ended									Change January 29, 2012 Compared to October 30, 2011			Change January 29, 2012 Compared to January 30, 2011
	January 29, 2012			October 30, 2011			January 30, 2011
	(In millions, except per share amounts and percentages)
New orders	$	2,008		$	1,595		$	2,971		$	413		$	(963	)
Net sales	$	2,189		$	2,182		$	2,686		$	7		$	(497	)
Gross margin	$	786		$	852		$	1,136		$	(66	)	$	(350	)
Gross margin percent		36	%		39	%		42	%		(3) points			(6) points
Operating income	$	179		$	361		$	674		$	(182	)	$	(495	)
Operating margin percent		8	%		17	%		25	%		(9) points			(17) points
Net income	$	117		$	456		$	506		$	(339	)	$	(389	)
Diluted earnings per share	$	0.09		$	0.34		$	0.38		$	(0.25	)	$	(0.29	)

Non-GAAP Results
Gross margin	$	890		$	862		$	1,145		$	28		$	(255	)
Gross margin percent		41	%		40	%		43	%		1 point			(2) points
Operating income	$	344		$	384		$	659		$	(40	)	$	(315	)
Operating margin percent		16	%		18	%		25	%		(2) points			(9) points
Net income	$	240		$	271		$	484		$	(31	)	$	(244	)
Diluted earnings per share	$	0.18		$	0.21		$	0.36		$	(0.03	)	$	(0.18	)

Reconciliations of non-GAAP measures are presented under “Non-GAAP Results” below.

The first quarter of fiscal 2012, fourth quarter of fiscal 2011, and first quarter of fiscal 2011 each contained 13 weeks.

In November 2011, Applied completed its acquisition of Varian Semiconductor Equipment Associates, Inc. (Varian). Beginning in the first quarter of fiscal 2012, the acquired business is included in Applied’s consolidated results of operations and in the results for the Silicon Systems Group and Applied Global Services segments. For the three months ended January 29, 2012, net sales of Varian products were approximately $200 million.

Financial results for the first quarter of fiscal 2012 as compared to the fourth quarter of fiscal 2011 reflected an increase in new orders, while net sales remained essentially flat. The increase in new orders reflected increased demand for semiconductor equipment, partially offset by softness in spares demand and a weak industry environment for display and solar equipment. Operating income in the first quarter of fiscal 2012 included $153 million of charges attributable to the acquisition of Varian consisting of inventory fair value adjustments on products sold, amortization of purchased intangible assets, share-based compensation associated with accelerated vesting, deal costs and other integration costs. Of this amount, $96 million was recorded under cost of products sold and $57 million was included in operating expenses. Operating expenses included $36 million of deal costs and other acquisition-related costs, which were not allocated to the segments.

Financial results for the first quarter of fiscal 2012 as compared to the first quarter of fiscal 2011 reflected decreased demand across all segments due to uncertain global economic and industry conditions. Total new orders and net sales in the quarter decreased year-over-year, primarily due to decreased demand for crystalline silicon (c-Si) solar PV equipment and LCD TV equipment. Operating income in the first quarter of fiscal 2011 included a favorable adjustment to restructuring reserves of $32 million, offset by asset impairment charges of $3 million.

Results of Operations

New Orders

New orders by geographic region, determined by the location of customers’ facilities, for the three months ended January 29, 2012, October 30, 2011 and January 30, 2011 were as follows:


	January 29, 2012				October 30, 2011				January 30, 2011				% Change January 29, 2012 Compared to October 30, 2011			% Change January 29, 2012 Compared to January 30, 2011
	($)		(%)		($)		(%)		($)		(%)
	(In millions, except percentages)
Korea		666		33		330		21		225		8		102			196
Taiwan		367		18		283		18		745		25		30			(51	)
Japan		167		8		173		11		187		6		(3	)		(11	)
China		82		4		211		13		654		22		(61	)		(87	)
Southeast Asia		50		3		98		6		135		4		(49	)		(63	)

Asia Pacific		1,332		66		1,095		69		1,946		65		22			(32	)
North America(*)		467		23		324		20		679		23		44			(31	)
Europe		209		11		176		11		346		12		19			(40	)

Total		2,008		100		1,595		100		2,971		100		26			(32	)

(*)	Primarily the United States.

New orders of $2.0 billion for the first quarter of fiscal 2012, including approximately $270 million in new orders for Varian products, were up 26 percent from the fourth quarter of fiscal 2011. The increase was primarily attributable to increased demand for semiconductor equipment from foundry customers, partially offset by decreased demand from solar equipment customers

New orders for the first quarter of fiscal 2012 were down 32 percent from the first quarter of fiscal 2011. The decrease was primarily attributable to sharp decreases in demand for c-Si solar products and LCD TV equipment.

For the first quarter of fiscal 2012, orders to customers in Korea had the largest increase as compared to the fourth quarter of fiscal 2011, the majority of which were for semiconductor equipment. Orders to customers in Korea for the first quarter of fiscal 2012 as compared to the first quarter of fiscal 2011 increased, while orders to customers in all other regions decreased.

New orders by reportable segment for the three months ended January 29, 2012, October 30, 2011 and January 30, 2011 were as follows:


	January 29, 2012				October 30, 2011				January 30, 2011				% Change January 29, 2012 Compared to October 30, 2011			% Change January 29, 2012 Compared to January 30, 2011
	($)		(%)		($)		(%)		($)		(%)
	(In millions, except percentages)
Silicon Systems Group		1,418		70		925		58		1,610		54		53			(12	)
Applied Global Services		517		26		564		35		552		19		(8	)		(6	)
Display		40		2		20		1		142		5		100			(72	)
Energy and Environmental Solutions		33		2		86		6		668		22		(62	)		(95	)

Total		2,008		100		1,595		100		2,971		100		26			(32	)

For the three months ended January 29, 2012, combined new orders for the Silicon Systems Group and Applied Global Services as a percentage of total new orders slightly increased compared to the three months ended October 30, 2011, while combined new orders for Display and Energy and Environmental Solutions as a percentage of total new orders slightly decreased.

New orders for the first quarter of fiscal 2012 as compared to the first quarter of fiscal 2011 reflected decreased demand across all segments. For the three months ended January 29, 2012, combined new orders for the Silicon Systems Group and Applied Global Services as a percentage of total new orders increased compared to the three months ended January 30, 2011, while combined new orders for Display and Energy and Environmental Solutions as a percentage of total new orders decreased.

Applied’s backlog for the most recent three fiscal quarters was as follows: $2.2 billion at January 29, 2012, $2.4 billion at October 30, 2011, and $3.2 billion at July 31, 2011. Backlog adjustments for the quarter ended January 29, 2012 were negative and totaled $52 million. Negative backlog adjustments of $146 million consisted of financial debookings, cancellations and foreign exchange effects primarily related to solar customers. Negative adjustments were offset in part by $94 million of acquired Varian backlog. Backlog consists of: (1) orders for which written authorizations have been accepted and assigned shipment dates are within the next 12 months, or shipment has occurred but revenue has not been recognized; (2) contractual service revenue and maintenance fees to be earned within the next 12 months; and (3) orders for SunFab™ thin film solar lines that are anticipated to be recognized as revenue within the next 12 months. Applied’s backlog at any particular time is not necessarily indicative of actual sales for any future periods, due to the potential for customer changes in delivery schedules or cancellation of orders. In the first quarter of fiscal 2012, approximately 67% of the net sales in the Silicon Systems Group, Applied’s largest business segment, were from orders received and shipped in the same quarter.

Backlog by reportable segment as of January 29, 2012, October 30, 2011 and January 30, 2011 was as follows:


	January 29, 2012				October 30, 2011				January 30, 2011				% Change January 29, 2012 Compared to October 30, 2011			% Change January 29, 2012 Compared to January 30, 2011
	($)		(%)		($)		(%)		($)		(%)
	(In millions, except percentages)
Silicon Systems Group		1,044		48		913		38		1,202		34		14			(13	)
Applied Global Services		649		30		662		28		807		23		(2	)		(20	)
Display		267		12		337		14		499		14		(21	)		(46	)
Energy and Environmental Solutions		202		10		480		20		1,028		29		(58	)		(80	)

Total		2,162		100		2,392		100		3,536		100		(10	)		(39	)

Net Sales

Net sales by geographic region, determined by the location of customers’ facilities, for the three months ended January 29, 2012, October 30, 2011 and January 30, 2011 were as follows:


	January 29, 2012				October 30, 2011				January 30, 2011				% Change January 29, 2012 Compared to October 30, 2011	% Change January 29, 2012 Compared to January 30, 2011
	($)		(%)		($)		(%)		($)		(%)
Korea		628		29		363		17		169		6	73	272
Taiwan		489		22		353		16		635		24	39	(23)
Japan		217		10		255		12		166		6	(15)	31
China		180		8		408		19		674		25	(56)	(73)
Southeast Asia		79		4		98		4		154		6	(19)	(49)

Asia Pacific		1,593		73		1,477		68		1,798		67	8	(11)
North America(*)		417		19		434		20		610		23	(4)	(32)
Europe		179		8		271		12		278		10	(34)	(36)

Total		2,189		100		2,182		100		2,686		100	—	(19)

(*)	Primarily the United States.

Net sales of $2.2 billion for the first quarter of fiscal 2012 as compared to the fourth quarter of fiscal 2011 remained essentially flat, and were down 19 percent from the first quarter of fiscal 2011. Net sales for the first quarter of fiscal 2012 included sales of Varian products of approximately $200 million. The decrease in net sales compared to the first quarter of fiscal 2011 reflected decreased demand for c-Si solar products and LCD TV equipment.

For the first quarter of fiscal 2012, net sales to customers in Korea, the majority of which were for semiconductor equipment, had the largest increase compared to the fourth quarter of fiscal 2011 and the first quarter of fiscal 2011. In the first quarter of fiscal 2012, the majority of net sales in Korea, Taiwan and North America reflected purchases of semiconductor products.

Net sales by reportable segment for the three months ended January 29, 2012, October 30, 2011 and January 30, 2011 were as follows:


	January 29, 2012				October 30, 2011				January 30, 2011				% Change January 29, 2012 Compared to October 30, 2011	% Change January 29, 2012 Compared to January 30, 2011
	($)		(%)		($)		(%)		($)		(%)
Silicon Systems Group		1,344		61		1,067		49		1,496		56	26	(10)
Applied Global Services		534		24		629		29		567		21	(15)	(6)
Display		104		5		171		8		147		5	(39)	(29)
Energy and Environmental Solutions		207		10		315		14		476		18	(34)	(57)

Total		2,189		100		2,182		100		2,686		100	—	(19)

Net sales for the first quarter of fiscal 2012 as compared to the fourth quarter of fiscal 2011 increased for the Silicon Systems Group and decreased in all other segments. Net sales for the first quarter of fiscal 2012 decreased across all segments compared to the first quarter of fiscal 2011. For the three months ended January 29, 2012, combined net sales for the Silicon Systems Group and Applied Global Services as a percentage of net sales increased compared to the three months ended October 30, 2011 and January 30, 2011, while combined net sales in Display and Energy and Environmental Solutions as a percentage of total net sales decreased.

Gross Margin

Gross margins for the three months ended January 29, 2012, October 30, 2011 and January 30, 2011 were as follows:


	Three Months Ended									Change January 29, 2012 Compared to October 30, 2011			Change January 29, 2012 Compared to January 30, 2011
	January 29, 2012			October 30, 2011			January 30, 2011
	(In millions, except percentages)
Gross margin	$	786		$	852		$	1,136		$	(66	)	$	(350	)
Gross margin (% of net sales)		36	%		39	%		42	%		(3	) points		(6	) points
Non-GAAP Results
Gross margin	$	890		$	862		$	1,145		$	28		$	(255	)
Gross margin (% of net sales)		41	%		40	%		43	%		1	point		(2	) points

The decrease in the gross margin for the first quarter of fiscal 2012 as compared to each of the fourth and first quarters of fiscal 2011 was principally attributable to changes in segment product mix, the amortization of acquired Varian inventory step-up and additional inventory charges. Gross margin during the first quarters of fiscal 2012 and 2011 included $13 million and $11 million of share-based compensation expense, respectively. Non-GAAP gross margin for the first quarter of fiscal 2012 was $890 million, up 1.2 points from the fourth quarter of fiscal 2011 and down from $1.1 billion for the first quarter of fiscal 2011. Reconciliations of non-GAAP measures are presented under “Non-GAAP Results” below.

Research, Development and Engineering

Research, Development and Engineering expenses for the three months ended January 29, 2012, October 30, 2011 and January 30, 2011 were as follows:


	Three Months Ended						Change January 29, 2012 Compared to October 30, 2011		Change January 29, 2012 Compared to January 30, 2011
	January 29, 2012		October 30, 2011		January 30, 2011
	(In millions)
Research, development and engineering	$	304	$	269	$	270	$	35	$	34

Applied’s future operating results depend to a considerable extent on its ability to maintain a competitive advantage in the equipment and service products it provides. Applied believes that it is critical to continue to make substantial investments in RD&E to assure the availability of innovative technology that meets the current and projected requirements of its customers’ most advanced designs. Applied historically has maintained its commitment to investing in RD&E in order to continue to offer new products and technologies. The increase in RD&E expense for the first quarter of fiscal 2012 as compared to each of the fourth and first quarters of fiscal 2011 was primarily due to RD&E expenses incurred by Varian of approximately $37 million. RD&E expense during the first quarters of fiscal 2012 and 2011 included $13 million and $10 million of share-based compensation expense, respectively. Development cycles range from 12 to 36 months depending on whether the product is an enhancement of an existing product, which typically has a shorter development cycle, or a new product, which typically has a longer development cycle. Most of Applied’s existing products resulted from internal development activities and innovations involving new technologies, materials and processes. In certain instances, Applied acquires technologies, either in existing or new product areas, to complement its existing technology capabilities and to reduce time to market.

Marketing, Selling, General and Administrative

Marketing, selling, general and administrative expenses for the three months ended January 29, 2012, October 30, 2011 and January 30, 2011 were as follows:


	Three Months Ended						Change January 29, 2012 Compared to October 30, 2011		Change January 29, 2012 Compared to January 30, 2011
	January 29, 2012		October 30, 2011		January 30, 2011
	(In millions)
Marketing, selling, general and administrative	$	303	$	222	$	221	$	81	$	82

The increase in marketing, selling, general and administrative expenses for the first quarter of fiscal 2012 as compared to the fourth and first quarters of fiscal 2011 was primarily due to the addition of Varian and acquisition-related costs incurred in connection with the Varian acquisition aggregating $86 million. Marketing, selling and general and administrative expenses during the first quarters of fiscal 2012 and 2011 included $27 million and $12 million of share-based compensation expense, respectively.

Restructuring Charges and Asset Impairments

Restructuring charges and asset impairment expenses for the three months ended January 29, 2012, October 30, 2011 and January 30, 2011 were as follows:


	Three Months Ended							Change January 29, 2012 Compared to October 30, 2011		Change January 29, 2012 Compared to January 30, 2011
	January 29, 2012		October 30, 2011		January 30, 2011
	(In millions)
Restructuring charges and asset impairments	$	—	$	—	$	(29	)	$	—	$	29

During the first quarter of fiscal 2011, as a result of changes in Applied’s operating environment and business requirements, Applied revised its workforce reduction associated with a restructuring program in its Energy and Environmental Solutions segment announced in the third quarter of fiscal 2010, and recorded a favorable adjustment of $28 million. In addition, Applied favorably adjusted the remaining severance accrual associated with a global restructuring program announced in the first quarter of fiscal 2009 by $4 million. Also, during the first quarter of fiscal 2011, Applied recorded an asset impairment charge of $3 million related to a facility held for sale.

For further details, see Note 11 of Notes to Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements.

Interest and Other Expenses

Interest and other expenses for the three months ended January 29, 2012, October 30, 2011 and January 30, 2011 were as follows:


	Three Months Ended						Change January 29, 2012 Compared to October 30, 2011		Change January 29, 2012 Compared to January 30, 2011
	January 29, 2012		October 30, 2011		January 30, 2011
	(In millions)
Interest and other expenses	$	24	$	24	$	5	$	—	$	19

Interest and other expenses for the first quarter of fiscal 2012 remained flat as compared to the fourth quarter of fiscal 2011. The increase in interest and other expenses in the first quarter of fiscal 2012 from the first quarter of fiscal 2011 was primarily due to interest of $23 million on senior unsecured notes issued in the third fiscal quarter of 2011.

Interest and Other Income, Net

Interest and other income, net, for the three months ended January 29, 2012, October 30, 2011 and January 30, 2011 were as follows:


	Three Months Ended						Change January 29, 2012 Compared to October 30, 2011			Change January 29, 2012 Compared to January 30, 2011
	January 29, 2012		October 30, 2011		January 30, 2011
	(In millions)
Interest and other income, net	$	4	$	10	$	11	$	(6	)	$	(7	)

The decrease in interest and other income, net in the first quarter of fiscal 2012 from the fourth quarter of fiscal 2011 was primarily due to a decrease in gains realized on sale of investment securities. The decrease in interest and other income, net in the first quarter of fiscal 2012 from the first quarter of fiscal 2011 was primarily due to a decrease in gains realized on sale of investment securities and lower interest rates.

Income Taxes

Income tax expenses (benefit) for the three months ended January 29, 2012, October 30, 2011 and January 30, 2011 were as follows:


	Three Months Ended									Change January 29, 2012 Compared to October 30, 2011		Change January 29, 2012 Compared to January 30, 2011
	January 29, 2012			October 30, 2011			January 30, 2011
							(In millions, except percentages)
Provision (benefit) for income taxes	$	42		$	(112	)	$	174		$	154	$	(132	)
Effective income tax rate		26.4	%		(32.6	)%		25.6	%		59.0 points		0.8 point

Applied’s effective income tax rate increased to 26.4% for the first quarter of fiscal 2012 from a benefit of 32.6% for the fourth quarter of fiscal 2011 and slightly increased from 25.6% for the first quarter of fiscal 2011. The rate for the fourth quarter of fiscal 2011 included a favorable U.S. Internal Revenue Service audit settlement of $203 million. The rate for the first quarter of fiscal 2011 included the impact of legislation restoring the U.S. federal research and development tax credit, which favorably affected the effective tax rate by 2 percentage points. Applied’s future effective income tax rate depends on various factors, such as tax legislation, the geographic composition of Applied’s pre-tax income, and the tax rate on equity compensation. Management carefully monitors these factors and timely adjusts the interim income tax rate accordingly.

Segment Information

Applied reports financial results in four segments: Silicon Systems Group, Applied Global Services, Display, and Energy and Environmental Solutions. A description of the products and services, as well as financial data, for each reportable segment can be found in Note 16 of Notes to Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements. Applied does not allocate to its reportable segments certain operating expenses that it manages separately at the corporate level. These unallocated costs include costs for share-based compensation; certain management, finance, legal, human resources, and RD&E functions provided at the corporate level; and unabsorbed information technology and occupancy. In addition, Applied does not allocate to its reportable segments restructuring and asset impairment charges and any associated adjustments related to restructuring actions, unless these charges or adjustments pertain to a specific reportable segment.

The results for each reportable segment are discussed below.

Silicon Systems Group Segment

The Silicon Systems Group segment includes semiconductor capital equipment for deposition, etch, rapid thermal processing, chemical mechanical planarization, metrology and inspection, wafer packaging and, with the addition of Varian, ion implantation. Development efforts are focused on solving customers’ key technical challenges, including transistor performance and nanoscale patterning, and improving chip manufacturing productivity to reduce costs.

The competitive environment for the Silicon Systems Group in the first quarter of fiscal 2012 reflected continued investment in the semiconductor industry driven by capacity demand for mobile computing. Foundry customers led capacity additions for leading edge technology nodes, constituting the primary driver for net sales of the Silicon Systems Group for the first quarter of fiscal 2012. DRAM investment remained low in the period due to lack of profitability and oversupply in the DRAM memory market.

Certain significant measures for the three months ended January 29, 2012, October 30, 2011 and January 30, 2011 were as follows:


	January 29, 2012			October 30, 2011			January 30, 2011			Change January 29, 2012 Compared to October 30, 2011				Change January 29, 2012 Compared to January 30, 2011
	(In millions, except percentages)
New orders	$	1,418		$	925		$	1,610		$	493		53%	$	(192	)	(12)%
Net sales		1,344			1,067			1,496			277		26%		(152	)	(10)%
Operating income		271			278			543			(7	)	(3)%		(272	)	(50)%
Operating margin		20	%		26	%		36	%				(6) points				(16) points
Non-GAAP Results
Operating income		386			284			546			102		36%		(160	)	(29)%
Operating margin		29	%		27	%		36	%				2 points				(7) points

New orders for the first quarter of fiscal 2012 increased by $493 million as compared to the fourth quarter of fiscal 2011, reflecting increased demand from foundry customers and the addition of Varian’s business. New

orders included approximately $210 million for Varian products. New orders decreased by $192 million to $1.4 billion for the first quarter of fiscal 2012 compared to the first quarter of fiscal 2011, primarily due to decreased demand from logic customers.

New orders for the Silicon Systems Group by end use application for the three months ended January 29, 2012, October 30, 2011 and January 30, 2011 were as follows:


	January 29, 2012			October 30, 2011			January 30, 2011
Foundry		57	%		46	%		54	%
Memory		29	%		22	%		23	%
Logic and other		14	%		32	%		23	%

Net sales for the first quarter of fiscal 2012 increased by $277 million as compared to the fourth quarter of fiscal 2011 due to increased investment by foundry customers. Net sales included approximately $150 million for Varian products. Net sales decreased by $152 million to $1.3 billion for the first quarter of fiscal 2012 compared to the first quarter of fiscal 2011, primarily due to decreased investment by logic customers. Three customers accounted for 69 percent of net sales in this segment for the first quarter of fiscal 2012. Approximately 67 percent of net sales in the first quarter of fiscal 2012 were for orders received and shipped within the quarter.

The segment’s book to bill ratio (new orders divided by net sales) for the first quarter of fiscal 2012 increased to 1.1 compared to 0.9 for the fourth quarter of fiscal 2011 and remained essentially flat at 1.1 compared to the first quarter of fiscal 2011. Operating income for the first quarter of fiscal 2012 remained essentially flat compared to the fourth quarter of fiscal 2011, while operating margin decreased from 26 percent in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2011 to 20 percent in the first quarter of fiscal 2012. The decrease in operating margin was primarily attributable to change in customer and product mix with the inclusion of Varian and incremental costs associated with Varian operations. Operating income decreased by $272 million to $271 million for the first quarter of fiscal 2012 compared to first quarter of fiscal 2011, reflecting the decrease in net sales, incremental costs associated with Varian operations, inventory fair value adjustments on products sold, amortization of purchased intangible assets, share-based compensation associated with accelerated vesting and other integration costs associated with the acquisition. Non-GAAP operating income for the first quarter of fiscal 2012 was $386 million or 29 percent of net sales, up from $284 million or 27 percent of net sales from the fourth quarter of fiscal 2011 and down from $546 million or 36 percent of net sales from the first quarter of fiscal 2011. Reconciliations of non-GAAP measures are presented under “Non-GAAP Results” below.

The following regions accounted for at least 30 percent of total net sales for the Silicon Systems Group segment for one or more of the three months ended January 29, 2012, October 30, 2011 or January 30, 2011:


	Three Months Ended
	January 29, 2012				October 30, 2011				January 30, 2011				% Change January 29, 2012 Compared to October 30, 2011			% Change January 29, 2012 Compared to January 30, 2011
	($)		(%)		($)		(%)		(%)		(%)		% Change January 29, 2012 Compared to October 30, 2011			% Change January 29, 2012 Compared to January 30, 2011
	(In millions, except percentages)
Korea		552		41		258		24		118		8		114			368
North America		280		21		312		29		487		33		(10	)		(43	)

In the first quarter of fiscal 2012, customers in Korea and North America accounted for 62 percent of total net sales for this segment. In the first quarter of fiscal 2011, customers in North America and Taiwan accounted for 60 percent of total net sales for the Silicon Systems Group segment.

Applied Global Services Segment

The Applied Global Services segment encompasses technically differentiated products, including spares, services, certain earlier generation equipment products, and remanufactured equipment, to improve operating efficiency, reduce operating costs, and lessen the environmental impact of semiconductor, display and solar customers’ factories. Customer demand for products and services is fulfilled through a global distribution system with trained service engineers located in close proximity to customer sites.

Industry conditions that affected Applied Global Services’ sales of spares and services in the first quarter of fiscal 2012 were principally semiconductor manufacturers’ wafer starts as well as foundry utilization rates.

Certain significant measures for the three months ended January 29, 2012, October 30, 2011 and January 30, 2011 were as follows:


	January 29, 2012			October 30, 2011			January 30, 2011			Change January 29, 2012 Compared to October 30, 2011				Change January 29, 2012 Compared to January 30, 2011
	(In millions, except percentages)
New orders	$	517		$	564		$	552		$	(47	)	(8)%	$	(35	)	(6)%
Net sales		534			629			567			(95	)	(15)%		(33	)	(6)%
Operating income		107			160			85			(53	)	(33)%		22		26%
Operating margin		20	%		25	%		15	%				(5) points				5 points
Non-GAAP Results
Operating income		113			162			87			(49	)	(30)%		26		30%
Operating margin		21	%		26	%		15	%				(5) points				6 points

New orders for the first quarter of fiscal 2012 decreased by $47 million as compared to the fourth quarter of fiscal 2011, and net sales decreased by $95 million, reflecting lower wafer starts, partially offset by the addition of Varian’s business. New orders included approximately $60 million for Varian products and services. Net sales for the fourth quarter of fiscal 2011 included $71 million in sales for two thin film solar projects.

New orders for the first quarter of fiscal 2012 decreased by $35 million to $517 million for the first quarter of fiscal 2012 compared to the first quarter of fiscal 2011, and net sales decreased by $33 million. The decreases in new orders and net sales were primarily due to lower demand for refurbished equipment. Net sales included approximately $50 million for Varian products and services. The book to bill ratio was 1.0 for the first quarters of both fiscal 2012 and 2011, and was 0.9 for the fourth quarter of fiscal 2011.

Operating income and non-GAAP operating income for the first quarter of fiscal 2012 both decreased as compared to the fourth quarter of fiscal 2011, reflecting decreased net sales. Operating income increased by $22 million to $107 million for the first quarter of fiscal 2012 compared to first quarter of fiscal 2011. The increase in operating income for the first quarter of fiscal 2012 was a result of improved margins on spares and remanufactured equipment. Non-GAAP operating income for the first quarter of fiscal 2012 was $113 million or 21 percent of net sales, up from $87 million or 15 percent of net sales from the first quarter of fiscal 2011. Reconciliations of non-GAAP measures are presented under “Non-GAAP Results” below.

Display Segment

The Display segment encompasses products for manufacturing LCDs for TVs, personal computers, tablet PCs, smart phones, and other consumer-oriented devices. The segment is focused on expanding market share by differentiation with larger-scale substrates for TVs, entry into new markets such as the low temperature polysilicon (LTPS) and touch panel sectors, and development of products to enable cost reductions through productivity and uniformity.

The competitive environment for Applied’s Display segment in the first quarter of fiscal 2012 was characterized by decreased capacity requirements for larger flat panel televisions and growing demand for touch screen devices compared to the prior year. The display industry remains in a down-cycle.

Certain significant measures for the three months ended January 29, 2012, October 30, 2011 and January 30, 2011 were as follows:


	January 29, 2012			October 30, 2011			January 30, 2011			Change January 29, 2012 Compared to October 30, 2011				Change January 29, 2012 Compared to January 30, 2011
	(In millions, except percentages)
New orders	$	40		$	20		$	142		$	20		100%	$	(102	)	(72)%
Net sales		104			171			147			(67	)	(39)%		(43	)	(29)%
Operating income		5			31			28			(26	)	(84)%		(23	)	(82)%
Operating margin		5	%		18	%		19	%				(13) points				(14) points
Non-GAAP Results
Operating income		7			33			30			(26	)	(79)%		(23	)	(77)%
Operating margin		7	%		19	%		20	%				(12) points				(13) points

New orders for the first quarter of fiscal 2012 increased by $20 million to $40 million as compared to the fourth quarter of fiscal 2011, while net sales decreased by $67 million to $104 million, reflecting ongoing weakness in LCD TV equipment demand. New orders decreased by $102 million for the first quarter of fiscal 2012 compared to the first quarter of fiscal 2011 and net sales decreased by $43 million to $104 million. The decrease in new orders and net sales year over year reflected weakness in demand for LCD TV equipment, offset in part by demand for touch panel and LTPS systems to manufacture new mobile devices like smart phones and tablets.

The book to bill ratio slightly increased to 0.4 for the first quarter of fiscal 2012 compared to 0.1 for the fourth quarter of fiscal 2011. The book to bill ratio, however, decreased compared to 1.0 for the first quarter of fiscal 2011, reflecting lower new orders and net sales. For the first quarter of fiscal 2012, operating income decreased by $26 million to $5 million as compared to the fourth quarter of fiscal 2011 and decreased by $23 million compared to first quarter of fiscal 2011 reflecting the decrease in net sales. Non-GAAP operating income for the first quarter of fiscal 2012 was $7 million or 7 percent of net sales, down from $33 million or 19 percent of net sales from the fourth quarter of fiscal 2011 and down from $30 million or 20 percent of net sales from the first quarter of fiscal 2011. Reconciliations of non-GAAP measures are presented under “Non-GAAP Results” below.

The following regions accounted for at least 30 percent of total net sales for the Display segment for one or more of the three months ended January 29, 2012, October 30, 2011 or January 30, 2011:


	Three Months Ended
	January 29, 2012				October 30, 2011				January 30, 2011				% Change January 29, 2012 Compared to October 30, 2011			% Change January 29, 2012 Compared to January 30, 2011
	($)		(%)		($)		(%)		($)		(%)					% Change January 29, 2012 Compared to January 30, 2011
	(In millions, except percentages)
Taiwan		45		43		60		35		80		54		(25	)		(44	)
China		18		17		75		44		62		42		(76	)		(71	)

Four customers accounted for 64 percent of net sales in the Display segment for the first quarter of fiscal 2012. Customers in Taiwan and China continued to account for the majority of net sales in this segment for the first quarter of fiscal 2012.

Energy and Environmental Solutions Segment

The Energy and Environmental Solutions segment includes products for fabricating c–Si solar PVs, high throughput roll-to-roll coating systems for flexible electronics and web products, and systems used in the manufacture of energy-efficient glass. This business is focused on delivering solutions to generate and conserve energy, with an emphasis on lowering the cost to produce solar power by providing equipment to enhance manufacturing scale and efficiency.

Certain significant measures for the three months ended January 29, 2012, October 30, 2011 and January 30, 2011 were as follows:


	January 29, 2012			October 30, 2011			January 30, 2011			Change January 29, 2012 Compared to October 30, 2011				Change January 29, 2012 Compared to January 30, 2011
	(In millions, except percentages)
New orders	$	33		$	86		$	668		$	(53	)	(62)%	$	(635	)	(95)%
Net sales		207			315			476			(108	)	(34)%		(269	)	(57)%
Operating income (loss)		(23	)		17			144			(40	)	(235)%		(167	)	(116)%
Operating margin		(11	)%		5	%		30	%				(16) points				(41) points
Non-GAAP Results
Operating income		(17	)		23			122			(40	)	(174)%		(139	)	(114)%
Operating margin		(8	)%		7	%		26	%				(15) points				(34) points

New orders for the first quarter of fiscal 2012 decreased by $53 million to $33 million as compared to the fourth quarter of fiscal 2011, and net sales decreased by $108 million to $207 million, reflecting solar industry overcapacity. For the first quarter of fiscal 2012, new orders decreased by $635 million and net sales decreased by $269 million. The year over year decreases in new orders and net sales were also due to excess manufacturing capacity. For the first quarter of fiscal 2012, 73 percent of the segment’s net sales were from products shipped prior to fiscal 2012 and reported as deferred revenue at October 30, 2011.

The book to bill ratio decreased to 0.2 for the first quarter of fiscal 2012, reflecting decreased demand, compared to 0.3 for the fourth quarter of fiscal 2011 and 1.4 for the first quarter of fiscal 2011. The Energy and Environmental Solutions segment reported an operating loss of $23 million for the first quarter of fiscal 2012 compared to operating income of $17 million for the fourth quarter of fiscal 2011 and $144 million for the first quarter of fiscal 2011, primarily attributable to lower net sales of c-Si solar products and inventory charges of $31 million. Non-GAAP operating loss for the first quarter of fiscal 2012 was $17 million, while non-GAAP operating income was $23 million for the fourth quarter of fiscal 2011 and $122 million for the first quarter of fiscal 2011. Reconciliations of non-GAAP measures are presented under “Non-GAAP Results” below.

The following regions accounted for at least 30 percent of total net sales for the Energy and Environmental Solutions segment for one or more of the three months ended January 29, 2012, October 30, 2011 or January 30, 2011:

January 29,
2012

October 30,
2011

January 30,
2011

% Change
January 29, 2012
Compared to
October 30, 2011

% Change
January 29, 2012
Compared to
January 30, 2011

($)

(%)

($)

(%)

($)

(%)

(In millions, except percentages)