Form 6-K/A
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 6-K/A
Report of Foreign Private Issuer
Pursuant to Rule 13a-16 or 15d-16 of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2008
Commission file number 1- 12874
TEEKAY CORPORATION
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
4th Floor,
Belvedere Building
69 Pitts Bay Road
Hamilton, HM 08 Bermuda
(Address of principal executive office)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant files or will file annual reports under cover Form
20-F or Form 40-F.
Form 20-F þ Form 40- F o
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper as permitted by
Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(1).
Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper as permitted by
Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(7).
Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant by furnishing the information contained in this Form
is also thereby furnishing the information to the Commission pursuant to Rule 12g3-2(b) under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
Yes o No þ
If Yes is marked, indicate below the file number assigned to the registrant in connection with
Rule 12g3-2(b): 82-
EXPLANATORY NOTE
Teekay Corporation (generally referred to herein as the Company, we, our or us) is filing this
Quarterly Report on Form 6-K/A for the three months ended March 31, 2008 (this Amendment or this
First Quarter 2008 Form 6-K/A Report) to amend our Quarterly Report on Form 6-K for the period
ended March 31, 2008 (the Original Filing) that was filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (or SEC) on May 28, 2008.
a. |
|
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities |
|
|
|
In August 2008, we commenced a review of our application of Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards (or SFAS) No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, as
amended. Although we believe that our applicable derivative transactions were consistent with
our risk management policies and that our overall risk management policies continue to be sound,
based on our review we concluded that certain of our derivative instruments did not qualify for
hedge accounting treatment under SFAS No. 133 for the three months ended March 31, 2008 and
2007. Certain of our hedge documentation, in respect of our assessment of effectiveness and
measurement of ineffectiveness of our derivative instruments for accounting purposes, was not in
accordance with the technical requirements of SFAS No. 133. |
|
|
|
Accordingly, although we believe each of these derivative instruments were and continue to be
effective economic hedges, for accounting purposes we should have reflected changes in fair
value of these derivative instruments as increases or decreases to our net income (loss) on our
consolidated statements of income, instead of being reflected as increases or decreases to
accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), a component of stockholders equity on our
consolidated balance sheets and statements of changes in stockholders equity. |
|
|
|
The change in accounting for these transactions does not affect the economics of the derivative
transactions or our cash flows or liquidity. |
|
b. |
|
Non-Routine, Complex Financial Structures and Arrangements, and Other |
|
|
|
Subsequent to the release of its preliminary second quarter financial results, we reviewed and
revised our financial statement presentation of debt and interest rate swap agreements related
to our joint venture interests in the RasGas 3 LNG carriers. As a result, certain of our assets
and liabilities have been grossed up for accounting presentation purposes. These adjustments,
which do not affect our net income, cash flow, liquidity, cash distributions or stockholders
equity in any period, are described below. |
|
|
|
Through a wholly-owned subsidiary, we own a 40 percent interest in the four RasGas 3 LNG
carriers. The joint venture partner, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Qatar Gas Transport
Company, owns the remaining 60 percent interest. Both wholly-owned subsidiaries are joint
and several co-borrowers with respect to the RasGas 3 term loan and related interest rate
swap agreements. Previously, we recorded 40 percent of the RasGas 3 term loan and interest
rate swap obligations in our financial statements. We have now made adjustments to our
balance sheet to reflect 100 percent of the RasGas 3 term loan (March 31, 2008 and December
31, 2007 $360.6 million) and interest rate swap obligations (March 31, 2008 $21.4
million; December 31, 2007 $9.6 million), as well as offsetting increases in assets, for
the fourth quarter of 2006 through the first quarter of 2008. We have also made adjustments
to our statement of income to reflect 100 percent of the interest expense (three months
ended March 31, 2008 $4.6 million; three months ended March 31, 2007 $2.8 million) on
the RasGas 3 term loan with an offsetting amount to interest income from our advances to
the joint venture. These adjustments do not result in any increase to our net exposure in
this joint venture. |
|
|
In 2005, we adopted a long-term share-based incentive plan (the Vision Incentive Plan or VIP)
for senior management. During 2005, we recognized the VIP expense when incurred instead of over
the vesting period. Upon transition to SFAS 123R on January 1, 2006, we were required to account
for the VIP based on the fair value of the award as the VIP has a share-based component in
determining the amount of the ultimate grant. However, we continued to calculate compensation
expense for the VIP under the methodology we had followed in 2005, as we did not identify the
VIP as within the scope of SFAS 123R. We have now made adjustments to our statements of income
(loss) to increase (decrease) general and administrative expenses for the three months ended
March 31, 2008 and 2007 ($1.5) million and $2.1 million, respectively). We have also made
adjustments to our balance sheets to decrease other long-term liabilities (March 31, 2008 $4.7
million; and December 31, 2007 $8.1 million) and to increase (decrease) accrued liabilities
(March 31, 2008 ($1.3) million; and December 31, 2007 $3.6 million). These accounting
adjustments associated with the VIP do not impact amounts paid out under the plan. |
|
|
|
We have also restated certain other items primarily relating to amounts attributable to minority
interests and the measurement of the fair value of certain derivative instruments. |
As a result of the conclusions described above, we are restating in this First Quarter 2008 Form
6-K/A Report our historical balance sheets as of March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007, and our
statements of income and cash flows for the three months ended March 31, 2008 and 2007.
Note 17 of the notes to the consolidated financial statements included in this First Quarter 2008
Form 6-K/A Report reflects the changes to our unaudited consolidated financial statements as a
result of our restatement and provides additional information about the restatement.
To restate results for certain prior fiscal years based on the conclusions of the assessments
described above, we have also filed a 2007 Annual Report on Form 20-F/A to amend our Annual Report
on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2007 that was filed with the SEC on April 11, 2008.
The 2007 Annual Report on Form 20-F/A restates certain financial information, including: historical
balance sheets as of December 31, 2007 and 2006; statements of income, cash flows and changes in
stockholders equity for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006, and 2005; and selected financial
data as of and for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006, 2005, 2004 and 2003.
For the convenience of the reader, this First Quarter 2008 Form 6-K/A Report sets forth the
Original Filing in its entirety, although we are only restating portions of Part I. Financial
Information affected by the amended financial information. The changes we have made are a result
of and reflect the restatement described herein; no other information in the Original Filing has
been updated.
Except for the amended or restated information described above, this First Quarter 2008 Form 6-K/A
Report continues to speak as of the date of the Original Filing. Other events occurring after the
filing of the Original Filing or other disclosures necessary to reflect subsequent events have been
or will be addressed in other reports filed with or furnished to the SEC subsequent to the date of
the Original Filing.
We do not intend to amend previously-filed Quarterly Reports on Form 6-K for quarterly periods
ending prior to December 31, 2007. As a result, the reader should not rely on our prior filings,
but should rely upon the restated financial statements and the report of our independent
registered public accounting firm for affected periods contained in this First Quarter 2008 Form
6-K/A Report.
Page 2 of 42
TEEKAY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
REPORT ON FORM 6-K/A FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 2008
INDEX
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PAGE |
|
PART I: FINANCIAL INFORMATION |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page 3 of 42
ITEM 1 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
TEEKAY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME (LOSS)
(in thousands of U.S. dollars, except share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restated - Note 17 |
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31 |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
REVENUES (note 14) |
|
|
743,372 |
|
|
|
578,248 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OPERATING EXPENSES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Voyage expenses |
|
|
169,461 |
|
|
|
117,479 |
|
Vessel operating expenses (note 14) |
|
|
143,049 |
|
|
|
95,190 |
|
Time-charter hire expense (note 14) |
|
|
144,484 |
|
|
|
98,357 |
|
Depreciation and amortization (note 16) |
|
|
97,707 |
|
|
|
79,263 |
|
General and administrative (note 14) |
|
|
64,639 |
|
|
|
58,980 |
|
Gain on sale of vessels and equipment (note 11) |
|
|
(496 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Restructuring charge (note 12) |
|
|
1,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
620,344 |
|
|
|
449,269 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from vessel operations |
|
|
123,028 |
|
|
|
128,979 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OTHER ITEMS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense (note 14) |
|
|
(282,248 |
) |
|
|
(55,905 |
) |
Interest income (note 14) |
|
|
60,609 |
|
|
|
14,954 |
|
Foreign exchange loss (note 6) |
|
|
(31,992 |
) |
|
|
(1,676 |
) |
Minority interest income (expense) |
|
|
26,560 |
|
|
|
(7,755 |
) |
Other net (note 12) |
|
|
(1,086 |
) |
|
|
6,386 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other items |
|
|
(228,157 |
) |
|
|
(43,996 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income |
|
|
(105,129 |
) |
|
|
84,983 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per common share amounts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings (note 15) |
|
|
(1.45 |
) |
|
|
1.16 |
|
Diluted earnings (note 15) |
|
|
(1.45 |
) |
|
|
1.14 |
|
Cash dividends declared |
|
|
0.2750 |
|
|
|
0.2375 |
|
Weighted average number of common shares (note 15) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
72,644,397 |
|
|
|
73,129,585 |
|
Diluted |
|
|
72,644,397 |
|
|
|
74,545,165 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the unaudited consolidated financial statements.
Page 4 of 42
TEEKAY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(in thousands of U.S. dollars)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As at |
|
|
As at |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
(Restated - Note 17) |
|
|
|
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents (note 6) |
|
|
555,673 |
|
|
|
442,673 |
|
Restricted cash current (note 7) |
|
|
36,343 |
|
|
|
33,479 |
|
Accounts receivable |
|
|
289,324 |
|
|
|
262,420 |
|
Vessels held for sale (note 11) |
|
|
42,704 |
|
|
|
79,689 |
|
Net investment in direct financing leases current |
|
|
21,851 |
|
|
|
22,268 |
|
Prepaid expenses |
|
|
119,834 |
|
|
|
126,761 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
65,317 |
|
|
|
57,609 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
1,131,046 |
|
|
|
1,024,899 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted cash long term (note 7) |
|
|
663,471 |
|
|
|
652,717 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vessels and equipment (note 6) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At cost, less accumulated depreciation of $1,104,651 (2007 $1,061,619) |
|
|
5,463,227 |
|
|
|
5,295,751 |
|
Vessels under capital lease, at cost, less accumulated amortization of $82,293
(2007 $74,442) (note 7) |
|
|
926,338 |
|
|
|
934,058 |
|
Advances on newbuilding contracts (note 9) |
|
|
682,178 |
|
|
|
617,066 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total vessels and equipment |
|
|
7,071,743 |
|
|
|
6,846,875 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment in direct financing leases non-current |
|
|
73,520 |
|
|
|
78,908 |
|
Investment in joint ventures (note 9) |
|
|
136,508 |
|
|
|
135,515 |
|
Derivative instruments (note 14) |
|
|
51,930 |
|
|
|
39,381 |
|
Loans to joint ventures |
|
|
725,462 |
|
|
|
729,429 |
|
Other non-current assets |
|
|
209,352 |
|
|
|
219,923 |
|
Intangible assets net (note 4) |
|
|
267,769 |
|
|
|
259,952 |
|
Goodwill (note 4) |
|
|
447,323 |
|
|
|
434,590 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
|
10,778,124 |
|
|
|
10,422,189 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
95,019 |
|
|
|
89,691 |
|
Accrued liabilities |
|
|
335,251 |
|
|
|
278,587 |
|
Current portion of long-term debt (note 6) |
|
|
395,063 |
|
|
|
331,594 |
|
Current obligation under capital leases (note 7) |
|
|
154,257 |
|
|
|
150,791 |
|
Current portion of in-process revenue contracts (note 4) |
|
|
78,242 |
|
|
|
82,704 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
1,057,832 |
|
|
|
933,367 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt (note 6) |
|
|
5,215,558 |
|
|
|
4,931,990 |
|
Long-term obligation under capital leases (note 7) |
|
|
717,631 |
|
|
|
706,489 |
|
Derivative instruments (note 14) |
|
|
299,162 |
|
|
|
164,769 |
|
Deferred income tax |
|
|
82,301 |
|
|
|
78,623 |
|
Asset retirement obligation |
|
|
25,028 |
|
|
|
24,549 |
|
In-process revenue contracts (note 4) |
|
|
188,191 |
|
|
|
205,429 |
|
Other long-term liabilities |
|
|
178,793 |
|
|
|
176,680 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
7,764,496 |
|
|
|
7,221,896 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies (notes 7, 9 and 14) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minority interest |
|
|
504,075 |
|
|
|
544,339 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock
and additional paid-in capital ($0.001 par value; 725,000,000
shares authorized; 72,303,163 shares outstanding (2007 - 72,772,529);
72,802,363 shares issued
(2007 - 95,327,329)) (note 8) |
|
|
628,221 |
|
|
|
628,786 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
1,881,398 |
|
|
|
2,022,601 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income (note 13) |
|
|
(66 |
) |
|
|
4,567 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
2,509,553 |
|
|
|
2,655,954 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
|
10,778,124 |
|
|
|
10,422,189 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the unaudited consolidated financial statements.
Page 5 of 42
TEEKAY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(in thousands of U.S. dollars)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restated - Note 17 |
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
Cash and cash equivalents provided by (used for) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OPERATING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income |
|
|
(105,129 |
) |
|
|
84,983 |
|
Non-cash items: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
97,707 |
|
|
|
79,263 |
|
Amortization of in-process revenue contracts |
|
|
(21,158 |
) |
|
|
(23,484 |
) |
Gain on sale of marketable securities |
|
|
(2,708 |
) |
|
|
(1,817 |
) |
Gain on sale of vessels and equipment |
|
|
(496 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Loss on repurchase of bonds |
|
|
598 |
|
|
|
|
|
Equity income (net of dividends received: March 31, 2008 and 2007 $nil) |
|
|
3,609 |
|
|
|
1,595 |
|
Income taxes expense (recovery) |
|
|
2,483 |
|
|
|
(3,886 |
) |
Employee stock option compensation |
|
|
2,606 |
|
|
|
2,225 |
|
Foreign exchange loss and other net |
|
|
3,444 |
|
|
|
25,199 |
|
Unrealized losses (gains) on derivative instruments (note 14) |
|
|
155,171 |
|
|
|
(13,674 |
) |
Change in non-cash working capital items related to operating activities |
|
|
(43,784 |
) |
|
|
(50,890 |
) |
Expenditures for drydocking |
|
|
(6,240 |
) |
|
|
(12,567 |
) |
Distribution from subsidiaries to minority owners |
|
|
(13,110 |
) |
|
|
(5,724 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net operating cash flow |
|
|
72,993 |
|
|
|
81,223 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FINANCING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt |
|
|
565,324 |
|
|
|
591,329 |
|
Debt issuance costs |
|
|
(3,406 |
) |
|
|
(2,547 |
) |
Repayments of long-term debt |
|
|
(253,773 |
) |
|
|
(227,549 |
) |
Repayments of capital lease obligations |
|
|
(2,241 |
) |
|
|
(2,185 |
) |
Repayment of loans from joint venture partner |
|
|
(535 |
) |
|
|
(3,653 |
) |
Decrease / (increase) in restricted cash |
|
|
2,651 |
|
|
|
(81,078 |
) |
Net proceeds from sale of Teekay Offshore Partners L.P. units |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,449 |
) |
Net proceeds from sale of Teekay Tankers Ltd. shares |
|
|
(892 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Issuance of Common Stock upon exercise of stock options |
|
|
326 |
|
|
|
16,750 |
|
Repurchase of Common Stock (note 8) |
|
|
(20,512 |
) |
|
|
(3,035 |
) |
Cash dividends paid |
|
|
(20,013 |
) |
|
|
(17,344 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net financing cash flow |
|
|
266,929 |
|
|
|
269,239 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INVESTING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenditures for vessels and equipment |
|
|
(292,917 |
) |
|
|
(187,883 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of vessels and equipment |
|
|
36,630 |
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of marketable securities |
|
|
(520 |
) |
|
|
(88,233 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of marketable securities |
|
|
7,283 |
|
|
|
12,782 |
|
Investment in joint ventures |
|
|
(1,258 |
) |
|
|
(1,253 |
) |
Loans to joint ventures |
|
|
(3,085 |
) |
|
|
(61,601 |
) |
Investment in direct financing lease assets |
|
|
(17 |
) |
|
|
(1,725 |
) |
Direct financing lease payments received |
|
|
5,822 |
|
|
|
5,056 |
|
Other investing activities |
|
|
21,140 |
|
|
|
(805 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investing cash flow |
|
|
(226,922 |
) |
|
|
(323,662 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
113,000 |
|
|
|
26,800 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of the period |
|
|
442,673 |
|
|
|
343,914 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of the period |
|
|
555,673 |
|
|
|
370,714 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental cash flow information (note 5)
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the unaudited consolidated financial statements.
Page 6 of 42
TEEKAY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(all tabular amounts stated in thousands of U.S. dollars, except share data)
1. Basis of Presentation
The unaudited interim consolidated financial statements have been prepared in conformity with
United States generally accepted accounting principles. They include the accounts of Teekay
Corporation (or Teekay), which is incorporated under the laws of the Republic of The Marshall
Islands, and its wholly owned or controlled subsidiaries (collectively, the Company). Certain
information and footnote disclosures required by United States generally accepted accounting
principles for complete annual financial statements have been omitted and, therefore, it is
suggested that these interim financial statements be read in
conjunction with the Companys restated audited
financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2007
included in Form 20-F/A filed April 6,
2009. In the opinion of management, these financial statements reflect all adjustments, of a normal
recurring nature, necessary to present fairly, in all material respects, the Companys consolidated
financial position, results of operations, and cash flows for the interim periods presented. The
results of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2008 are not necessarily indicative of
those for a full fiscal year.
The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been restated. The nature of the
restatements and the effect on the consolidated financial statement
line items are discussed in Note
17 of the Notes to the Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements. In addition, certain disclosures in the
following notes have been restated to be consistent with the consolidated financial statements.
2. Segment Reporting
The Company has four reportable segments: its offshore segment, its fixed-rate tanker segment, its
liquefied gas segment, and its spot tanker segment. The Companys offshore segment consists of
shuttle tankers, floating production storage and offloading (or FPSO) units and floating storage
and offtake (or FSO) units. The Companys fixed-rate tanker segment consists of conventional crude
oil and product tankers subject to long-term, fixed-rate time-charter contracts. The Companys
liquefied gas segment consists of liquefied natural gas (or LNG) carriers and liquefied petroleum
gas (or LPG) carriers. The Companys spot tanker segment consists of conventional crude oil tankers
and product carriers operating in the spot market or subject to time-charters or contracts of
affreightment that are priced on a spot-market basis or are short-term, fixed-rate contracts. The
Company considers contracts that have an original term of less than three years in duration to be
short-term. Segment results are evaluated based on income from vessel operations. The accounting
policies applied to the reportable segments are the same as those used in the preparation of the
Companys consolidated financial statements.
The following tables present results for these segments for the three months ended March 31, 2008
and 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed-Rate |
|
|
Liquefied |
|
|
Spot |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Offshore |
|
|
Tanker |
|
|
Gas |
|
|
Tanker |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment |
|
|
Segment |
|
|
Segment |
|
|
Segment |
|
|
Total |
|
Three months ended March 31, 2008 |
|
(restated) |
|
|
(restated) |
|
|
(restated) |
|
|
(restated) |
|
|
(restated) |
|
|
Revenues |
|
|
258,788 |
|
|
|
60,815 |
|
|
|
56,132 |
|
|
|
367,637 |
|
|
|
743,372 |
|
Voyage expenses |
|
|
38,901 |
|
|
|
680 |
|
|
|
150 |
|
|
|
129,730 |
|
|
|
169,461 |
|
Vessel operating expenses |
|
|
83,820 |
|
|
|
16,370 |
|
|
|
11,623 |
|
|
|
31,236 |
|
|
|
143,049 |
|
Time-charter hire expense |
|
|
35,038 |
|
|
|
11,720 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
97,726 |
|
|
|
144,484 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
46,074 |
|
|
|
9,673 |
|
|
|
14,195 |
|
|
|
27,765 |
|
|
|
97,707 |
|
General and administrative (1) |
|
|
27,062 |
|
|
|
5,290 |
|
|
|
5,485 |
|
|
|
26,802 |
|
|
|
64,639 |
|
Gain on sale of vessels and equipment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(496 |
) |
|
|
(496 |
) |
Restructuring charge |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from vessel operations |
|
|
27,893 |
|
|
|
15,582 |
|
|
|
24,679 |
|
|
|
54,874 |
|
|
|
123,028 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed-Rate |
|
|
Liquefied |
|
|
Spot |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Offshore |
|
|
Tanker |
|
|
Gas |
|
|
Tanker |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment |
|
|
Segment |
|
|
Segment |
|
|
Segment |
|
|
Total |
|
Three months ended March 31, 2007 |
|
(restated) |
|
|
(restated) |
|
|
(restated) |
|
|
(restated) |
|
|
(restated) |
|
|
Revenues |
|
|
248,875 |
|
|
|
44,589 |
|
|
|
37,477 |
|
|
|
247,307 |
|
|
|
578,248 |
|
Voyage expenses |
|
|
28,726 |
|
|
|
560 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
88,188 |
|
|
|
117,479 |
|
Vessel operating expenses |
|
|
60,290 |
|
|
|
11,690 |
|
|
|
6,458 |
|
|
|
16,752 |
|
|
|
95,190 |
|
Time-charter hire expense |
|
|
41,173 |
|
|
|
3,837 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
53,347 |
|
|
|
98,357 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
45,722 |
|
|
|
8,468 |
|
|
|
10,794 |
|
|
|
14,279 |
|
|
|
79,263 |
|
General and administrative (1) |
|
|
24,904 |
|
|
|
4,633 |
|
|
|
5,000 |
|
|
|
24,443 |
|
|
|
58,980 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from vessel operations |
|
|
48,060 |
|
|
|
15,401 |
|
|
|
15,220 |
|
|
|
50,298 |
|
|
|
128,979 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes direct general and administrative expenses and indirect general and administrative
expenses (allocated to each segment based on estimated use of corporate resources). |
Page 7 of 42
TEEKAY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(all tabular amounts stated in thousands of U.S. dollars, except share data)
A reconciliation of total segment assets to amounts presented in the consolidated balance sheets is
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
(restated) |
|
|
|
|
Offshore segment |
|
|
3,238,875 |
|
|
|
3,187,635 |
|
Fixed-rate tanker segment |
|
|
834,829 |
|
|
|
795,775 |
|
Liquefied gas segment |
|
|
3,476,123 |
|
|
|
3,366,049 |
|
Spot tanker segment |
|
|
2,045,484 |
|
|
|
1,966,166 |
|
Cash and restricted cash |
|
|
558,927 |
|
|
|
446,102 |
|
Accounts receivable and other assets |
|
|
623,886 |
|
|
|
660,462 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated total assets |
|
|
10,778,124 |
|
|
|
10,422,189 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3. Acquisition of 50% of OMI Corporation
On June 8, 2007, the Company and A/S Dampskibsselskabet TORM (or TORM) acquired, through a
jointly-owned subsidiary all of the outstanding shares of OMI Corporation (or OMI). The Company and
TORM divided most of OMIs assets equally between the two companies in August 2007. The price of
the OMI assets acquired or to be acquired by the Company was approximately $1.1 billion, including
approximately $0.2 billion of assumed indebtedness. The Company funded its portion of the
acquisition with a combination of cash and borrowings under existing revolving credit facilities
and a new $700 million credit facility.
The Company believes that this acquisition further enhances its position as a leading operator of
medium-size tankers and the Company expects that the acquisition will improve the utilization of
its existing vessels. This has contributed to the recognition of goodwill.
The Company acquired seven Suezmax tankers, three Medium-Range product tankers and three Handysize
product tankers from OMI. Teekay also assumed OMIs in-charters of an additional six Suezmax
tankers and OMIs third-party asset management business (principally the Gemini pool). The Company
and TORM continue to hold two Medium-Range product tankers jointly in OMI, as well as two Handysize
product tanker newbuildings scheduled to deliver in 2009. The parties intend to divide these
remaining assets equally in due course.
The assets acquired from OMI on August 1, 2007 are reflected in the Companys consolidated
financial statements from that date. The acquisition of OMI has been accounted for using the
purchase method of accounting, based upon estimates of fair value. The estimated fair values of
certain assets and liabilities are being determined with the assistance of third-party valuation
specialists. The Company expects this work to be completed during the second quarter of 2008. As
such, certain estimates of fair value are preliminary and are subject to further adjustment.
The following table summarizes the preliminary fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities
assumed by the Company at August 1, 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Original at |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revised at |
|
|
|
August 1, 2007 |
|
|
Revisions |
|
|
August 1, 2007 |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash, cash equivalents and short-term restricted cash |
|
|
577 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
577 |
|
Other current assets |
|
|
67,159 |
|
|
|
(40,331 |
) |
|
|
26,828 |
|
Vessels and equipment |
|
|
923,670 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
923,670 |
|
Other assets long-term |
|
|
6,820 |
|
|
|
31,680 |
|
|
|
38,500 |
|
Investment in joint venture |
|
|
64,244 |
|
|
|
5,785 |
|
|
|
70,029 |
|
Intangible assets subject to amortization |
|
|
60,540 |
|
|
|
8,407 |
|
|
|
68,947 |
|
Goodwill (spot tanker segment) |
|
|
31,961 |
|
|
|
16,852 |
|
|
|
48,813 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets acquired |
|
|
1,154,971 |
|
|
|
22,393 |
|
|
|
1,177,364 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities |
|
|
21,006 |
|
|
|
(1,429 |
) |
|
|
19,577 |
|
Other long-term liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,873 |
|
|
|
15,873 |
|
In-process revenue contracts |
|
|
25,402 |
|
|
|
(3,811 |
) |
|
|
21,591 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities assumed |
|
|
46,408 |
|
|
|
10,633 |
|
|
|
57,041 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets acquired (cash consideration) |
|
|
1,108,563 |
|
|
|
11,760 |
|
|
|
1,120,323 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page 8 of 42
TEEKAY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(all tabular amounts stated in thousands of U.S. dollars, except share data)
4. Goodwill, Intangible Assets and In-Process Revenue Contracts
Goodwill
The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill for the three months ended March 31, 2008 for the
Companys reporting segments are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed-Rate |
|
|
Liquefied |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Offshore |
|
|
Tanker |
|
|
Gas |
|
|
Spot Tanker |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment |
|
|
Segment |
|
|
Segment |
|
|
Segment |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
Balance as of December 31, 2007 |
|
|
359,231 |
|
|
|
3,648 |
|
|
|
35,631 |
|
|
|
36,080 |
|
|
|
434,590 |
|
Adjustment to goodwill acquired (note 3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,733 |
|
|
|
12,733 |
|
Reallocation of goodwill acquired between
segments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,163 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,163 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of March 31, 2008 |
|
|
359,231 |
|
|
|
10,811 |
|
|
|
35,631 |
|
|
|
41,650 |
|
|
|
447,323 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intangible Assets
As at March 31, 2008, the Companys intangible assets consisted of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-Average |
|
|
Gross Carrying |
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
Net Carrying |
|
|
|
Amortization Period |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Amortization |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
|
(years) |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
Contracts of affreightment |
|
|
10.2 |
|
|
|
124,250 |
|
|
|
(71,411 |
) |
|
|
52,839 |
|
Time-charter contracts |
|
|
15.5 |
|
|
|
243,427 |
|
|
|
(43,250 |
) |
|
|
200,177 |
|
Other intangible assets |
|
|
2.8 |
|
|
|
20,097 |
|
|
|
(5,344 |
) |
|
|
14,753 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13.1 |
|
|
|
387,774 |
|
|
|
(120,005 |
) |
|
|
267,769 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As at December 31, 2007, the Companys intangible assets consisted of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-Average |
|
|
Gross Carrying |
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
Net Carrying |
|
|
|
Amortization Period |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Amortization |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
|
(years) |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
Contracts of affreightment |
|
|
10.2 |
|
|
|
124,250 |
|
|
|
(68,895 |
) |
|
|
55,355 |
|
Time-charter contracts |
|
|
16.0 |
|
|
|
232,049 |
|
|
|
(37,374 |
) |
|
|
194,675 |
|
Other intangible assets |
|
|
5.0 |
|
|
|
10,797 |
|
|
|
(875 |
) |
|
|
9,922 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13.7 |
|
|
|
367,096 |
|
|
|
(107,144 |
) |
|
|
259,952 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aggregate amortization expense of intangible assets for the three months ended March 31, 2008 and
2007 was $12.9 million and $6.5 million, respectively. Amortization of intangible assets for the
next five years is expected to be $32.1 million (remainder of 2008), $34.7 million (2009), $27.7
million (2010), $26.6 million (2011), $22.5 million (2012), and $124.2 million (thereafter).
In-Process Revenue Contracts
As part of the Companys acquisitions of Petrojarl ASA (or Petrojarl) in 2006 and 50% of OMI in
2007, the Company assumed certain FPSO service contracts and charter-out contracts with terms that
are less favorable than prevailing market terms at the time of acquisition. The Company has
recognized a liability based on the estimated fair value of these contracts. The Company is
amortizing this liability over the remaining term of the contracts on a weighted basis based on the
projected revenue to be earned under the contracts.
Amortization of these in-process revenue contracts for the three months ended March 31, 2008 and
2007 was $21.2 million and $23.5 million, respectively. Amortization for the next five years is
expected to be $61.0 million (remainder of 2008), $66.6 million (2009), $58.3 million (2010), $34.7
million (2011), $20.4 million (2012) and $25.4 million
(thereafter).
5. Supplemental Cash Flow Information
Upon
delivery of the last two RasGas II LNG Carriers (as defined in Note 7) in the first quarter of 2007, the remaining
vessel costs and related lease obligations amounting to $15.3 million were recorded. These
transactions were treated as non-cash transactions in the Companys consolidated statements of cash
flows.
Page 9 of 42
TEEKAY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(all tabular amounts stated in thousands of U.S. dollars, except share data)
6. Long-Term Debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
(restated) |
|
|
|
|
|
Revolving Credit Facilities |
|
|
2,501,712 |
|
|
|
2,393,967 |
|
Senior Notes (8.875%) due July 15, 2011 |
|
|
236,488 |
|
|
|
246,059 |
|
USD-denominated Term Loans due through 2021 |
|
|
2,379,261 |
|
|
|
2,162,420 |
|
Euro-denominated Term Loans due through 2023 |
|
|
476,392 |
|
|
|
443,992 |
|
USD-denominated Unsecured Demand Loan |
|
|
16,768 |
|
|
|
17,146 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,610,621 |
|
|
|
5,263,584 |
|
Less current portion |
|
|
395,063 |
|
|
|
331,594 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,215,558 |
|
|
|
4,931,990 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of March 31, 2008, the Company had twelve long-term revolving credit facilities (or the
Revolvers) available, which, as at such date, provided for borrowings of up to $3,633.5 million, of
which $1,131.8 million was undrawn. Interest payments are based on LIBOR plus margins; at March 31,
2008 and December 31, 2007, the margins ranged between 0.50% and 0.75% and the three-month LIBOR
was 2.69% and 4.70%, respectively. The total amount available under the Revolvers reduces by $163.2
million (remainder of 2008), $188.5 million (2009), $196.0 million (2010), $781.6 million (2011),
$214.1 million (2012) and $2,090.1 million (thereafter). All of the Revolvers are collateralized by
first-priority mortgages granted on 62 of the Companys vessels, together with other related
security, and include a guarantee from Teekay or its subsidiaries for all outstanding amounts.
The 8.875% Senior Notes due July 15, 2011 (or the 8.875% Notes) rank equally in right of payment
with all of Teekays existing and future senior unsecured debt and senior to Teekays existing and
future subordinated debt. The 8.875% Notes are not guaranteed by any of Teekays subsidiaries and
effectively rank behind all existing and future secured debt of Teekay and other liabilities,
secured and unsecured, of its subsidiaries. During the three months ended March 31, 2008, the
Company repurchased $9.5 million principal amount of the 8.875% Notes (see also Note 12).
The Company has sixteen U.S. Dollar-denominated term loans outstanding, which, as at March 31,
2008, totaled $2,379.3 million. Certain of the term loans with a total outstanding principal
balance of $512.7 million as at March 31, 2008, bear interest at a weighted-average fixed rate of
5.10%. Interest payments on the remaining term loans are based on LIBOR plus a margin. At March 31,
2008 the margins ranged between 0.3% and 1.0% and the three-month LIBOR was 2.69%. The term loans
reduce in quarterly or semi-annual payments commencing three or six months after delivery of
newbuilding vessels financed with the loans, and fourteen of the term loans also have balloon or
bullet repayments due at maturity. The term loans are collateralized by first-preferred mortgages
on 35 of the Companys vessels, together with certain other security. In addition, all but $100.9
million (December 31, 2007 $103.8 million) of the outstanding term loans are guaranteed by Teekay
or its subsidiaries. Included in the total of $2,379.3 million (December 31, 2007 $2,162.4
million) is a loan for $601.0 million (December 31, 2007 $601.0 million) which is in place to
fund the RasGas 3 joint venture project and for which the Company is liable on a joint and several basis together
with its unrelated project partner (see Note 9(b)). The Company has reported 100% of the obligation under this
borrowing agreement. The funds received have been advanced to the
RasGas 3 joint venture, which is accounted for using the equity method
and the entire amount advanced is included in Loans to Joint Ventures.
The Company has two Euro-denominated term loans outstanding, which, as at March 31, 2008 totaled
302.4 million Euros ($476.4 million). The Company repays the loans with funds generated by two
Euro-denominated long-term time-charter contracts. Interest payments on the loans are based on
EURIBOR plus a margin. At March 31, 2008, the margins ranged between 0.6% and 0.66% and the
one-month EURIBOR was 4.4%. The Euro-denominated term loans reduce in monthly payments with varying
maturities through 2023 and are collateralized by first-priority mortgages on two of the Companys
vessels, together with certain other security, and are guaranteed by a subsidiary of Teekay.
Both Euro-denominated term loans are revalued at the end of each period using the then prevailing
Euro/U.S. Dollar exchange rate. Due substantially to this revaluation, the Company recognized
unrealized foreign exchange losses of $32.0 million and $1.7 million during the three months ended
March 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
The Company has two U.S. Dollar-denominated loans outstanding owing to joint venture partners,
which, as at March 31, 2008, totaled $15.6 million and $1.1 million, respectively, including
accrued interest. Interest payments on the first loan, which are based on a fixed interest rate of
4.84%, commenced in February 2008. This loan is repayable on demand no earlier than February 27,
2027.
Among other matters, the Companys long-term debt agreements generally provide for maintenance of
certain vessel market value-to-loan ratios and minimum consolidated financial covenants. Certain
loan agreements require that a minimum level of free cash be maintained. As at March 31, 2008 and
December 31, 2007, this amount was $100.0 million. Certain of the loan agreements also require that
the Company maintain an aggregate level of free liquidity and undrawn revolving credit lines with
at least six months to maturity, of at least 7.5% of total debt. As at March 31, 2008 and December
31, 2007, this amount was $349.8 million and $326.0 million, respectively.
Page 10 of 42
TEEKAY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(all tabular amounts stated in thousands of U.S. dollars, except share data)
7. Capital Leases and Restricted Cash
Capital Leases
Suezmax Tankers. As at March 31, 2008, the Company was a party, as lessee, to capital leases on
five Suezmax tankers. Under the terms of the lease arrangements, the Company is required to
purchase these vessels after the end of their respective lease terms for fixed prices. At their
inception, the weighted-average interest rate implicit in these leases was 7.4%. These capital
leases are variable-rate capital leases; however, any change in our lease payments resulting from
changes in interest rates is offset by a corresponding change in the charter hire payments received
by the Company. As at March 31, 2008, the remaining commitments under these capital leases,
including the purchase obligations, approximated $230.6 million, including imputed interest of
$19.4 million, repayable as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Year |
|
Commitment |
|
|
2008 |
|
$129.7 million |
|
2009 |
|
$8.5 million |
|
2010 |
|
$8.4 million |
|
2011 |
|
$84.0 million |
|
RasGas II LNG Carriers. As at March 31, 2008, the Company was a party, as lessee, to 30-year
capital lease arrangements for the three LNG carriers (or the RasGas II LNG Carriers) that operate
under time-charter contracts with Ras Laffan Liquefied Natural Gas Co. Limited (II) (or RasGas II),
a joint venture between Qatar Petroleum and ExxonMobil RasGas Inc., a subsidiary of ExxonMobil
Corporation. All amounts below relating to the RasGas II LNG Carriers capital leases include the
Companys joint venture partners 30% share.
Under the terms of the RasGas II LNG Carriers capital lease arrangements, the lessor claims tax
depreciation on the capital expenditures it incurred to acquire these vessels. As is typical in
these leasing arrangements, tax and change of law risks are assumed by the lessee. Payments under
the lease arrangements are based on tax and financial assumptions at the commencement of the
leases. If an assumption proves to be incorrect, the lessor is entitled to increase the lease
payments to maintain its agreed after-tax margin. However, the Company may terminate the lease
arrangements at any time. If the lease arrangements terminate, the Company would be required to pay
termination sums to the lessor sufficient to repay the lessors investment in the vessels and to
compensate it for the tax-effect of the terminations, including recapture of any tax depreciation.
At their inception, the weighted-average interest rate implicit in these leases was 5.2%. These
capital leases are variable-rate capital leases. As at March 31, 2008, the commitments under these
capital leases approximated $1.1 billion, including imputed interest of $622.1 million, repayable
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Year |
|
Commitment |
|
|
2008 |
|
$18.0 million |
|
2009 |
|
$24.0 million |
|
2010 |
|
$24.0 million |
|
2011 |
|
$24.0 million |
|
2012 |
|
$24.0 million |
|
Thereafter |
|
$977.1 million |
|
Spanish-Flagged LNG Carrier. As at March 31, 2008, the Company was a party, as lessee, to a
capital lease on one Spanish-flagged LNG carrier, which is structured as a Spanish tax lease.
Under the terms of the Spanish tax lease, the Company will purchase the vessel at the end of the
lease term in 2011. The purchase obligation has been fully funded with restricted cash deposits
described below. At its inception, the implicit interest rate was 5.8%. As at March 31, 2008, the
commitments under this capital lease, including the purchase obligation, approximated 141.7 million
Euros ($223.4 million), including imputed interest of 20.1 million Euros ($31.7 million), repayable
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Year |
|
Commitment |
|
2008 |
|
24.4 million Euros ($38.5 million) |
2009 |
|
25.6 million Euros ($40.4 million) |
2010 |
|
26.9 million Euros ($42.4 million) |
2011 |
|
64.8 million Euros ($102.1million) |
FPSO Units. As at March 31, 2008, the Company was a party, as lessee, to capital leases on one FPSO
unit, the Petrojarl Foinaven, and the topside production equipment for another FPSO unit, the
Petrojarl Banff. However, Teekay Petrojarl has legally defeased its future charter obligations for these
assets by making up-front, lump-sum payments to unrelated banks,
which have assumed Teekay Petrojarls
liability for making the remaining periodic payments due under the long-term charters (or Defeased
Rental Payments) and termination payments under the leases.
Page 11 of 42
TEEKAY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(all tabular amounts stated in thousands of U.S. dollars, except share data)
The Defeased Rental Payments for the Petrojarl Foinaven are based on assumed Sterling LIBOR of 8%
per annum. If actual interest rates are greater than 8% per annum, the Company receives rental
rebates; if actual interest rates are less than 8% per annum, the Company is required to pay
rentals in excess of the Defeased Rental Payments. For accounting purposes, this embedded
derivative has been separated from the host contract and is accounted for as a derivative
instrument.
As is typical for these types of leasing arrangements, the Company has indemnified the lessors for
the tax consequence resulting from changes in tax laws or interpretation of such laws or adverse
rulings by authorities and for fluctuations in actual interest rates from those assumed in the
leases.
Restricted Cash
Under the terms of the capital leases for the four LNG carriers described above in this Note 7, the
Company is required to have on deposit with financial institutions an amount of cash that, together
with interest earned on the deposits, will equal the remaining amounts owing under the leases,
including the obligations to purchase the LNG carriers at the end of the lease periods, where
applicable. These cash deposits are restricted to being used for capital lease payments and have
been fully funded with term loans and, for one vessel, a loan from the Companys joint venture
partner (see Note 6). The interest rates earned on the deposits approximate the interest rates
implicit in the applicable leases.
As at March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007, the amount of restricted cash on deposit for the three
RasGas II LNG Carriers was $489.8 million and $492.2 million, respectively. As at March 31, 2008
and December 31, 2007, the weighted-average interest rate earned on the deposits was 5.3%.
As at March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007, the amount of restricted cash on deposit for the
Spanish-flagged LNG carrier was 124.4 million Euros ($196.0 million) and 122.8 million Euros
($179.2 million), respectively. As at March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007, the weighted-average
interest rate earned on these deposits was 5.0%.
The Company also maintains restricted cash deposits relating to certain term loans and other
obligations, which cash totaled $14.0 million and $14.8 million as at March 31, 2008 and December
31, 2007, respectively.
8. Capital Stock
The authorized capital stock of Teekay at March 31, 2008 was 25,000,000 shares of Preferred Stock,
with a par value of $1 per share, and 725,000,000 shares of Common Stock, with a par value of
$0.001 per share. During the three months ended March 31, 2008, the Company issued 0.01 million
shares upon exercise of stock options, and repurchased 0.5 million shares for a total cost of $20.5
million. At March 31, 2008 there was no remaining share repurchase authorization. As at March 31,
2008, Teekay had 72,802,363 shares of Common Stock (December 31, 2007 95,327,329) and no shares
of Preferred Stock issued. As at March 31, 2008, Teekay had 72,303,163 shares of Common Stock
outstanding (December 31, 2007 72,772,529).
As at March 31, 2008, the Company had reserved pursuant to its 1995 Stock Option Plan and 2003
Equity Incentive Plan (collectively referred to as the Plans) 6,422,206 shares of Common Stock for
issuance upon exercise of options or equity awards granted or to be granted. During the three
months ended March 31, 2008, the Company granted options under the Plans to acquire up to 1,443,900
shares of Common Stock to certain eligible officers, employees and directors of the Company. The
options under the Plans have ten-year terms and vest equally over three years from the grant date.
All outstanding options expire between June 13, 2008 and March 7, 2018, ten years after the date of
each respective grant.
During March 2008, the Company granted 10,500 shares of restricted stock awards with a fair value
of $0.4 million, based on the quoted market price, to certain of the Companys directors. The
shares of restricted stock are issued when granted and are subject to potential forfeiture. If at
any time during the three-year period after the date of grant a recipient of these shares ceases to
be a director of the Company, the shares of restricted stock that remain subject to forfeiture must
be returned to the Company. These shares of restricted stock are released from this forfeiture
provision equally over three years.
9. Commitments and Contingencies
a) Vessels Under Construction
As at March 31, 2008, the Company was committed to the construction of ten Suezmax tankers, three
LPG carriers, one product tanker and four shuttle tankers scheduled for delivery between May 2008
and July 2011, at a total cost of approximately $1.3 billion, excluding capitalized interest. As at
March 31, 2008, payments made towards these commitments totaled $328.1 million (excluding $30.9
million of capitalized interest and other miscellaneous construction costs), and long-term
financing arrangements existed for $843.2 million of the unpaid cost of these vessels. The Company
intends to finance the remaining amount of $151.9 million through incremental debt or surplus cash
balances, or a combination thereof. As at March 31, 2008, the remaining payments required to be
made under these newbuilding contracts were $313.3 million (2008), $287.8 million (2009), $230.8
million (2010) and $163.2 million (2011).
Page 12 of 42
TEEKAY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(all tabular amounts stated in thousands of U.S. dollars, except share data)
As at March 31, 2008, the Company was committed to the construction of two LNG carriers
scheduled for delivery in November 2008 and
March 2009. The Company has entered into these transactions with a joint venture partner who has
taken a 30% interest in the vessels and related long-term, fixed-rate time-charter contracts. All
amounts below include the joint venture partners 30% share. The total cost of these LNG carriers
is approximately $376.9 million, excluding capitalized interest. As at March 31, 2008, payments
made towards these commitments totaled $303.3 million (excluding $28.2 million of capitalized
interest and other miscellaneous construction costs), and long-term financing arrangements existed
for the remaining $73.6 million unpaid cost of these LNG carriers. As at March 31, 2008, the
remaining payments required to be made under these contracts were $37.6 million (2008) and $36.0
million (2009). Upon delivery, these two LNG carriers will be subject to 20-year, fixed-rate
time-charters to The Tangguh Production Sharing Contractors, a consortium led by BP Berau, a
subsidiary of BP plc. Pursuant to existing agreements, on November 1, 2006, Teekay LNG agreed to
acquire the Companys ownership interest in these two vessels and related charter contracts upon
delivery of the first LNG carrier.
b) Joint Ventures
In August 2005, the Company announced that it had been awarded long-term, fixed-rate contracts to
charter four LNG carriers to Ras Laffan Liquefied Natural Gas Co. Limited (3) (or RasGas 3), a
joint venture company between a subsidiary of ExxonMobil Corporation and Qatar Petroleum. The
vessels will be chartered to RasGas 3 at fixed rates, with inflation adjustments, for a period of
25 years (with options to extend up to an additional 10 years), scheduled to commence in the second
quarter of 2008. The Company has entered into these transactions with its joint venture partner,
Qatar Petroleum, which has taken a 60% interest in the vessels and time-charters. In connection
with this award, the joint venture has entered into agreements with Samsung Heavy Industries Co.
Ltd. to construct four 217,000-cubic meter LNG carriers at a total cost of approximately $1.0
billion (of which the Companys 40% portion is $400.7 million), excluding capitalized interest. As
at March 31, 2008, payments made towards these commitments by the joint venture company totaled
$801.3 million (of which the Companys 40% contribution was $320.5 million), excluding capitalized
interest and other miscellaneous construction costs. Long-term financing arrangements existed for
all of the remaining $200.3 million unpaid cost of these LNG carriers (including the joint venture
partners 60% share). These remaining payments are due in 2008. Pursuant to existing agreements, on
November 1, 2006, Teekay LNG agreed to acquire the Companys ownership interest in these four
vessels and related charter contracts upon delivery of the first LNG carrier, which occurred on May
6, 2008.
The Company has a 33% interest in a consortium that will charter four newbuilding 160,400-cubic
meter LNG carriers for a period of 20 years to the Angola LNG Project, which is being developed by
subsidiaries of Chevron Corporation, Sociedade Nacional de Combustiveis de Angola EP, BP Plc, Total
S.A. and ENI SpA. Final award of the charter was made in December 2007. The vessels will be
chartered at fixed rates, with inflation adjustments, commencing in 2011. The remaining members of
the consortium are Mitsui & Co., Ltd. and NYK Bulkship (Europe) Ltd., which hold 34% and 33%
interests in the consortium, respectively. In connection with this award, the consortium has
entered into agreements with Samsung Heavy Industries Co. Ltd. to construct the four LNG carriers
at a total cost of approximately $921.4 million (of which the Companys 33% portion is $304.1
million), excluding capitalized interest. As at March 31, 2008, payments made towards these
commitments by the joint venture company totaled $106.0 million (of which the Companys 33%
contribution was $35.0 million), excluding capitalized interest and other miscellaneous
construction costs. As at March 31, 2008, the remaining payments required to be made under these
contracts were $90.6 million (2009), $113.2 million (2010), $475.6 million (2011) and $135.9
million (2012). In accordance with existing agreements, the Company is required to offer to Teekay
LNG its 33% interest in these vessels and related charter contracts no later than 180 days before
the scheduled delivery dates of the vessels.
c) Long-Term Incentive Program
In 2005, the Company adopted the Vision Incentive Plan (or the VIP) to reward exceptional corporate
performance and shareholder returns. This plan will result in an award pool for senior management
based on the following two measures: (a) economic profit from 2005 to 2010 (or the Economic
Profit); and (b) market value added from 2001 to 2010 (or the MVA). The Plan terminates on December
31, 2010. Under the VIP, the Economic Profit is the difference between the Companys annual return
on invested capital and its weighted-average cost of capital multiplied by its average invested
capital employed during the year, and the increase in MVA from January 1, 2001 to December 31,
2010, where the MVA is the amount by which the average market value of the Company for the
preceding 18 months exceeds the average book value of the Company for the same period.
Under the terms of the VIP, an interim award may only be made to VIP participants in 2008 and the
final award may only be made in 2011. During March 2008, the 2008 interim award, with a value of
$13.3 million, was paid to participants in the form of 328,600 restricted stock units. These
restricted stock units vest in three equal amounts in November 2008, November 2009 and November
2010. Each restricted stock unit is equal in value to one share of the Companys Common Stock and
reinvested dividends from the date of the grant to the vesting of the restricted stock unit. At
least 50 percent of any distribution from the balance of the VIP award pool in 2011 must be paid in
a form that is equity-based, with vesting on half of this percentage deferred for one year and
vesting on the remaining half of this percentage deferred for two years.
During
the three months ended March 31, 2008 and 2007, the Company
recorded an expense related to the VIP
of $0.5 million and $3.5 million, respectively, which are included in general and administrative
expense.
d) Other
The Company enters into indemnification agreements with certain officers and directors. In
addition, the Company enters into other indemnification agreements in the ordinary course of
business. The maximum potential amount of future payments required under these indemnification
agreements is unlimited. However, the Company maintains what it believes is appropriate liability
insurance that reduces its exposure and enables the Company to recover future amounts paid up to
the maximum amount of the insurance coverage, less any deductible amounts pursuant to the terms of
the respective policies, the amounts of which are not considered material.
Page 13 of 42
TEEKAY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(all tabular amounts stated in thousands of U.S. dollars, except share data)
10. Fair Value Measurements
Effective January 1, 2008, the Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (or
SFAS) No. 157, Fair Value Measurements (or SFAS No. 157). In accordance with Financial Accounting
Standards Board Staff Position No. FAS 157-2, Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 157 (FSP 157-2),
the Company will defer the adoption of SFAS No. 157 for its non-financial assets and non-financial
liabilities, except those items recognized or disclosed at fair value on an annual or more
frequently recurring basis, until January 1, 2009. The adoption of SFAS No. 157 did not have a
material impact on the Companys fair value measurements.
SFAS No. 157 clarifies the definition of fair value, prescribes methods for measuring fair value,
establishes a fair value hierarchy based on the inputs used to measure fair value and expands
disclosures about the use of fair value measurements. The fair value hierarchy has three levels
based on the reliability of the inputs used to determine fair value as follows:
Level 1. Observable inputs such as quoted prices in active markets;
Level 2. Inputs, other than the quoted prices in active markets, that
are observable either directly or indirectly; and
Level 3. Unobservable inputs in which there is little or no market
data, which require the reporting entity to develop its
own assumptions.
The following tables present the Companys assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value
on a recurring basis and are categorized using the fair value hierarchy.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value at |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset / (Liability) |
|
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Interest rate swap agreements (restated) (1) |
|
|
(337,771 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(337,771 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swap agreements (restated) (1) |
|
|
47,992 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
47,992 |
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency forward contracts (1) |
|
|
35,664 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35,664 |
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swaptions (1) |
|
|
(6,333 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,333 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Bunker fuel swap contracts (1) |
|
|
(706 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(706 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Freight forward agreements (1) |
|
|
6,715 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,715 |
|
|
|
|
|
Foinaven embedded derivative (1) |
|
|
(19,164 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(19,164 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Marketable securities(2) |
|
|
33,894 |
|
|
|
33,894 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The fair value of the Companys derivative instruments is the estimated amount that the
Company would receive or pay to terminate the agreements at the reporting date, taking into
account current interest rates, foreign exchange rates, bunker fuel prices, spot market rates
for vessels, and the current credit worthiness of both the Company and the swap
counterparties. |
|
(2) |
|
The fair value of the Companys marketable securities is the quoted market price as at the
reporting date. |
11. Vessel Sales
During March 2008, the Company sold one Handysize product tanker. During March 2008, the Company
entered into an agreement to sell a second Handysize product tanker which was delivered in April
2008, and which is presented on the March 31, 2008 balance sheet as vessel held for sale. During
March 2008, the Company also entered into an agreement to sell a third vessel upon the expiration
of its current time-charter, which is expected to be during September 2008. All three vessels are
part of the Companys spot tanker segment.
12. Restructuring charge and Other net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31 |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
(restated) |
|
|
(restated) |
|
Equity loss from joint ventures |
|
|
(3,609 |
) |
|
|
(1,595 |
) |
Gain on sale of marketable securities |
|
|
2,708 |
|
|
|
1,817 |
|
Loss on bond repurchase |
|
|
(598 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Income tax (expense) recovery |
|
|
(2,483 |
) |
|
|
3,886 |
|
Volatile organic compound emission plant lease income |
|
|
2,570 |
|
|
|
2,773 |
|
Miscellaneous income (expense) |
|
|
326 |
|
|
|
(495 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other net |
|
|
(1,086 |
) |
|
|
6,386 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During the three months ended March 31, 2008, the Company incurred restructuring charges of $1.5
million relating to costs incurred to change the crew of the Samar Spirit from Australian crew to
International crew. The Company does not expect to incur any additional restructuring cost relating
to this change in operations.
Page 14 of 42
TEEKAY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(all tabular amounts stated in thousands of U.S. dollars, except share data)
13. Comprehensive (Loss) Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
(restated) |
|
|
(restated) |
|
Net (loss) income |
|
|
(105,129 |
) |
|
|
84,983 |
|
Other comprehensive (loss) income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized (loss) gain on marketable securities |
|
|
(5,833 |
) |
|
|
7,853 |
|
Reclassification adjustment for gain on sale of marketable securities |
|
|
(2,708 |
) |
|
|
(1,759 |
) |
Minimum pension liability |
|
|
1,058 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net effect from qualifying cash flow hedging instruments |
|
|
2,850 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive (loss) income |
|
|
(109,762 |
) |
|
|
91,077 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As at March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007, the Companys accumulated other comprehensive (loss)
income consisted of the following components:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2008 |
|
|
December 31, 2007 |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
(restated) |
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gain on derivative instruments |
|
|
6,370 |
|
|
|
3,520 |
|
Minimum pension liability |
|
|
(5,220 |
) |
|
|
(6,278 |
) |
Unrealized (loss) gain on marketable securities |
|
|
(1,216 |
) |
|
|
7,325 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(66 |
) |
|
|
4,567 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14. Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities
The Company uses derivatives in accordance with its overall risk management policies. The following
summarizes the Companys risk strategies with respect to market risk from foreign currency
fluctuations, changes in interest rates, spot market rates for vessels and bunker fuel prices.
The Company hedges portions of its forecasted expenditures denominated in foreign currencies with
foreign currency forward contracts. Certain of these foreign currency forward contracts are
designated, for accounting purposes, as cash flow hedges of forecasted foreign currency
expenditures. Where such instruments are designated and qualify as cash flow hedges, the effective
portion of the changes in their fair value is recorded in accumulated other comprehensive loss,
until the hedged item is recognized in earnings. At such time, the respective amount in accumulated
other comprehensive loss is released to earnings and is recorded within operating expenses, based
on the nature of the expense being hedged. The ineffective portion of these foreign currency
forward contracts has also been reported in operating expenses,
based on the nature of the expense being economically hedged. During the three months ended March
31, 2008, the Company recognized unrealized losses of $0.4 million in general and administrative
expenses (2007 $nil) and $0.6 million in vessel operating expenses (2007 $nil), relating to the
ineffective portion of its foreign currency forward contracts.
Changes in fair value of foreign currency forward contracts that are not designated, for accounting
purposes, as cash flow hedges are recognized in earnings and are reported in operating expenses,
based on the nature of the expense being economically hedged. During the three-month periods ended
March 31, 2008 and 2007, the Company recognized unrealized (gains) losses, relating to foreign
currency forward contracts that are not designated as cash flow hedges as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
Vessel operating expenses |
|
|
(425 |
) |
|
|
(1,767 |
) |
Time-charter hire expenses |
|
|
(66 |
) |
|
|
(144 |
) |
General and administrative |
|
|
(566 |
) |
|
|
(1,807 |
) |
Foreign currency exchange loss (gain) |
|
|
2,472 |
|
|
|
(6,578 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
1,415 |
|
|
|
(10,296 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page 15 of 42
TEEKAY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(all tabular amounts stated in thousands of U.S. dollars, except share data)
As at March 31, 2008, the Company was committed to the following foreign currency forward contracts
for the forward purchase of foreign currency:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contract Amount in |
|
|
Average Contractual |
|
|
Expected Maturity |
|
|
|
Foreign Currency |
|
|
Exchange Rate (1) |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
(millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions of U.S. Dollars) |
|
Norwegian Kroner: |
|
|
1,280.7 |
|
|
|
6.04 |
|
|
$ |
132.6 |
|
|
$ |
74.6 |
|
|
$ |
5.0 |
|
Euro: |
|
|
15.8 |
|
|
|
0.71 |
|
|
$ |
18.1 |
|
|
$ |
4.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
Canadian Dollar: |
|
|
47.8 |
|
|
|
1.02 |
|
|
$ |
32.4 |
|
|
$ |
14.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
British Pounds: |
|
|
30.0 |
|
|
|
0.51 |
|
|
$ |
37.6 |
|
|
$ |
18.9 |
|
|
$ |
1.9 |
|
Australian Dollar: |
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
|
1.24 |
|
|
$ |
2.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Singapore Dollar: |
|
|
3.6 |
|
|
|
1.38 |
|
|
$ |
2.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Average contractual exchange rate represents the contractual amount of foreign currency one
U.S. Dollar will buy. |
In addition, certain of the Companys forward contracts obligate the Company to enter into forward
purchase contracts for approximately Norwegian Kroner 90.0 million at a rate of 6.34 Norwegian
Kroner per U.S. Dollar at the discretion of the counterparty during 2008.
As at March 31, 2008, the Companys accumulated other comprehensive income included $6.4 million of
unrealized gains on foreign currency forward contracts designated as cash flow hedges.
The Company enters into interest rate swaps which exchange a receipt of floating interest for a
payment of fixed interest to reduce the Companys exposure to interest rate variability on its
outstanding floating-rate debt. In addition, the Company holds interest rate swaps which exchange a
payment of floating-rate interest for a receipt of fixed interest in order to reduce the Companys
exposure to the variability of interest income on its restricted cash deposits. The Company has not
designated, for accounting purposes, its interest rate swaps as cash flow hedges. Unrealized gains
or losses relating to changes in fair value of the Companys interest rate swaps have been reported
in interest expense or interest income in the consolidated statements of income (loss).
During the three months ended March 31, 2008, the Company recognized an unrealized loss in interest
expense of $201.8 million (2007 $6.1 million unrealized gain), and an unrealized gain in interest
income of $37.6 million (2007 $4.1 million unrealized loss) relating to the changes in fair value
of its interest rate swaps
As at March 31, 2008, the Company was committed to the following interest rate swap agreements
related to its LIBOR-based debt, restricted cash deposits and EURIBOR-based debt, whereby certain
of the Companys floating-rate debt and restricted cash deposits were swapped with fixed-rate
obligations or fixed-rate deposits:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value / |
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying Amount |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Fixed |
|
|
|
|
|
Principal |
|
|
of Asset / |
|
|
Remaining |
|
|
Interest |
|
|
|
|
|
Amount |
|
|
(Liability) |
|
|
Term |
|
|
Rate |
|
|
|
Interest Rate |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
(years) |
|
|
(%)(1) |
|
|
|
Index |
|
(restated) |
|
|
(restated) |
|
|
(restated) |
|
|
(restated) |
|
LIBOR-Based Debt: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Dollar-denominated interest rate swaps (2) |
|
LIBOR |
|
|
500,107 |
|
|
|
(26,029 |
) |
|
|
28.8 |
|
|
|
4.9 |
|
U.S. Dollar-denominated interest rate swaps
(restated) |
|
LIBOR |
|
|
3,278,989 |
|
|
|
(251,893 |
) |
|
|
7.7 |
|
|
|
5.0 |
|
U.S. Dollar-denominated interest rate swaps (3) |
|
LIBOR |
|
|
938,536 |
|
|
|
(60,436 |
) |
|
|
18.3 |
|
|
|
5.3 |
|
LIBOR-Based Restricted Cash Deposit: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Dollar-denominated interest rate swaps (2) |
|
LIBOR |
|
|
480,073 |
|
|
|
23,308 |
|
|
|
28.8 |
|
|
|
4.8 |
|
EURIBOR-Based Debt: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Euro-denominated interest rate swaps (4) (5) |
|
EURIBOR |
|
|
476,393 |
|
|
|
25,271 |
|
|
|
16.2 |
|
|
|
3.8 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Excludes the margins the Company pays on its variable-rate debt, which at of March 31, 2008
ranged from 0.3% to 1.00% |
|
(2) |
|
Principal amount reduces quarterly. |
|
(3) |
|
Inception dates of swaps are 2008 ($30.0 million), 2009 ($408.5 million), 2010 ($300.0
million) and 2011 ($200.0 million). |
|
(4) |
|
Principal amount reduces monthly to 70.1 million Euros ($110.6 million) by the maturity dates
of the swap agreements. |
|
(5) |
|
Principal amount is the U.S. Dollar equivalent of 302.4 million Euro. |
Page 16 of 42
TEEKAY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(all tabular amounts stated in thousands of U.S. dollars, except share data)
During May 2006, the Company sold two swaptions for $2.4 million. The Company has not applied hedge
accounting to these instruments and they have been recorded at fair value. These options, if
exercised, will obligate the Company to enter into interest rate swap agreements whereby certain of
the Companys floating-rate debt will be swapped with fixed-rate obligations. The terms of these
swaptions are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest |
|
Principal |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rate |
|
Amount(1) |
|
|
|
Remaining Term |
|
Fixed Interest Rate |
Index |
|
$ |
|
Start date |
|
(years) |
|
(%) |
LIBOR |
|
150,000 |
|
August 31, 2009 |
|
12.0 |
|
4.3 |
LIBOR |
|
117,188 |
|
May 15, 2008 |
|
11.0 |
|
4.0 |
(1) Principal amount reduces $5.0 million semi-annually ($150.0 million) and $2.6 million quarterly
($117.2 million).
In order to reduce variability in revenues from fluctuations in certain spot tanker market rates,
the Company has entered into forward freight agreements (FFAs) and synthetic time-charters (STCs).
FFAs involve contracts to move a theoretical volume of freight at fixed-rates, thus attempting to
reduce the Companys exposure to the spot tanker market rates. STCs are a means of achieving the
equivalent of a time-charter for a vessel that trades in the spot tanker market by taking the short
position in a long-term FFA. As at March 31, 2008, the Company had six STCs which were equivalent
to 3.5 Suezmax vessels. As at March 31, 2008, the FFAs, which include STCs, had an aggregate
notional value of $65.7 million, which is an aggregate of both long and short positions, and a net
fair value of $6.4 million. The FFAs, which include STCs, expire between April 2008 and September
2009. The Company has not designated these contracts as cash flow hedges. Net gains and losses
from FFAs and STCs are recorded within revenues in the consolidated statements of income.
The Company hedges a portion of its bunker fuel expenditures with bunker fuel swap contracts. As at
March 31, 2008, the Company was committed to contracts totalling 20,430 metric tonnes with a
weighted-average price of $395.9 per tonne and a fair value of ($0.7) million. The bunker fuel swap
contracts expire between April and December 2008.
The Company is exposed to credit loss in the event of non-performance by the counterparties to the
foreign currency forward contracts, interest rate swap agreements, FFAs and bunker fuel swap
contracts; however, the Company does not anticipate non-performance by any of the counterparties.
In order to minimize counterparty risk, the Company only enters into derivative transactions with
counterparties that are rated A or better by Standard & Poors or Aa3 by Moodys at the time of the
transaction. In addition, to the extent possible and practical, interest rate swaps are entered
into with different counterparties to reduce concentration risk.
The Company also uses FFAs in non-hedge-related transactions to increase or decrease its exposure
to spot market rates, within strictly defined limits. Historically, the Company has used a number
of different tools, including the sale/purchase of vessels and the in-charter/out-charter of
vessels, to increase or decrease this exposure. The Company believes that it can capture some of
the value from the volatility of the spot tanker market and from market imbalances by utilizing
FFAs. As at March 31, 2008, the Company was committed to non-hedge-related FFAs totaling 5.9
million metric tonnes with a notional principal amount of $65.2 million and a fair value of $0.3
million. These FFAs expire between April 2008 and December 2008.
15. Earnings Per Share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
(restated) |
|
|
(restated) |
|
|
Net (loss) income available for common stockholders |
|
|
(105,129 |
) |
|
|
84,983 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of common shares |
|
|
72,644,397 |
|
|
|
73,129,585 |
|
Dilutive effect of employee stock options and restricted stock awards |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,415,580 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock and common stock equivalents |
|
|
72,644,397 |
|
|
|
74,545,165 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per common share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Basic |
|
|
(1.45 |
) |
|
|
1.16 |
|
- Diluted |
|
|
(1.45 |
) |
|
|
1.14 |
|
For the three months ended March 31, 2007, the anti-dilutive effect of 1.4 million shares,
attributable to outstanding stock options was excluded from the calculations of diluted earnings
per share.
16. Change in Accounting Estimate
Effective January 1, 2008, the Company increased its estimate of the residual value of its vessels
due to an increase in the estimated scrap rate per lightweight ton. The Companys estimate of
salvage values took into account the then current scrap prices and the historical scrap rates over
the five years prior to December 31, 2007. As a result, depreciation and amortization expense has
decreased by $3.3 million and net income has increased by $2.8 million, or $0.04 per share for the
three months ended March 31, 2008.
Page 17 of 42
TEEKAY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(all tabular amounts stated in thousands of U.S. dollars, except share data)
17. |
|
Restatement of Previously Issued Financial Statements |
|
a. |
|
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities |
|
|
In August 2008, the Company commenced a review of its application of Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards (or SFAS) No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging
Activities, as amended. Based on its review the Company concluded that certain of its interest
rate swap agreements, foreign currency forward contracts, bunker fuel swap contracts and forward
freight agreements did not qualify for hedge accounting treatment under SFAS No. 133 for the
three months ended March 31, 2008 and 2007. The Companys findings were as follows: |
|
|
|
One of the requirements of SFAS No. 133 is that hedge accounting is appropriate only for
those hedging relationships that a company expects will be highly effective in achieving
offsetting changes in fair value or cash flows attributable to the risk being hedged. To
determine whether transactions satisfy this requirement, entities must periodically assess
the effectiveness of hedging relationships both prospectively and retrospectively. Based on
the Companys review, the Company concluded that the prospective hedge effectiveness
assessment that was conducted for certain of the Company derivative instruments on the date
of designation was not sufficient to conclude that the derivative instruments would be
highly effective, in accordance with the technical requirements of SFAS No. 133, in
achieving offsetting changes in cash flows attributable to the risk being hedged. |
|
|
|
|
To conclude that hedge accounting is appropriate, another requirement of SFAS No. 133 is
that the applicable hedge documentation specifies the method that will be used to assess,
retrospectively and prospectively, the hedging instruments effectiveness, and the method
that will be used to measure hedge ineffectiveness. Documentation for certain of the
Companys derivative instruments did not clearly specify the method to be used to measure
hedge ineffectiveness. |
|
|
|
|
Certain of the Companys derivative instruments were designated as hedges when the
derivative instruments had a non-zero fair value. However, this designation was not
appropriate as the Company used certain methods of measuring ineffectiveness that are not
allowed in the case of non-zero fair value derivatives. |
|
|
For accounting purposes the Company should have reflected changes in fair value of these
derivative instruments as increases or decreases to the Companys net income (loss) on its
consolidated statements of income, instead of being reflected as increases or decreases to
accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), a component of stockholders equity on the
consolidated balance sheets and statements of changes in stockholders equity. |
|
|
|
The change in accounting for these transactions does not affect the Companys cash flows or
liquidity. |
|
b. |
|
Non-Routine, Complex Financial Structures and Arrangements, and Other |
|
|
Subsequent to the release of its preliminary second quarter financial results, the Company
reviewed and revised its financial statement presentation of debt and interest rate swap
agreements related to its joint venture interests in the RasGas 3 LNG carriers. As a result,
certain of the Companys assets and liabilities have been grossed up for accounting presentation
purposes. These adjustments, which do not affect the Companys net income, cash flow,
liquidity, cash distributions or stockholders equity in any period, are described below. |
|
|
|
Through a wholly-owned subsidiary, the Company owns a 40 percent interest in the four RasGas 3
LNG carriers. The joint venture partner, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Qatar Gas Transport
Company, owns the remaining 60 percent interest. Both wholly-owned subsidiaries are joint and
several co-borrowers with respect to the RasGas 3 term loan and related interest rate swap
agreements. Previously, the Company recorded 40 percent of the RasGas 3 term loan and interest
rate swap obligations in its financial statements. The Company has now made adjustments to its
balance sheet to reflect 100 percent of the RasGas 3 term loan (March 31, 2008 and December 31,
2007 $360.6 million) and interest rate swap obligations (March 31, 2008 $21.4 million;
December 31, 2007 $9.6 million), as well as offsetting increases in assets, for the fourth
quarter of 2006 through the first quarter of 2008 (see Note 6). The Company has also made adjustments to its
statement of income to reflect 100 percent of the interest expense (three months ended March 31,
2008 $4.6 million; three months ended March 31, 2007 $2.8 million) on the RasGas 3 term loan
with an offsetting amount to interest income from its advances to the joint venture. These
adjustments do not result in any increase to the Companys net exposure
in this joint venture. |
|
|
|
In 2005, the Company adopted
the long-term share-based VIP for senior management (see Note 9(c)). During 2005, the Company recognized the VIP expense when incurred
instead of over the vesting period. Upon transition to SFAS 123R on January 1, 2006, the Company
was required to account for the VIP based on the fair value of the award as the VIP has a
share-based component in determining the amount of the ultimate grant. However, the Company
continued to calculate compensation expense for the VIP under the methodology it had followed in
2005, as it did not identify the VIP as within the scope of SFAS 123R. The Company has now made
adjustments to its statements of income (loss) to increase (decrease) general and administrative
expenses for the three months ended March 31, 2008 and 2007 ($1.5) million and $2.1 million,
respectively. The Company has also made adjustments to its balance sheets to decrease other
long-term liabilities (March 31, 2008 $4.7 million; and December 31, 2007 $8.1 million) and
to increase (decrease) accrued liabilities (March 31, 2008 ($1.3) million; and December 31,
2007 $3.6 million). These accounting adjustments associated with the VIP do not impact amounts
paid out under the plan. |
|
|
|
The Company has also restated certain other items primarily relating to amounts attributable to
minority interests (other assets: March 31, 2008 $15.9 million, December 31, 2007 $8.4
million; minority interest: March 31, 2008 $18.7 million, December 31, 2007 $18.8 million;
minority interest expense: three months ended March 31, 2008 $0.6 million; three months ended
March 31, 2007 $1.0 million) and the measurement of the fair value of certain derivative
instruments (derivative instruments: December 31, 2007 $6.2 million) and has reclassified an
embedded derivative from long-term liabilities to derivative instruments (December 31, 2007
$19.6 million). |
Page 18 of 42
TEEKAY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(all tabular amounts stated in thousands of U.S. dollars, except share data)
As a result of the accounting treatment assessment conclusions described above in this Note 17, the
Company is restating herein its historical balance sheets as of March 31, 2008 and December 31,
2007; and its statements of income and cash flows for the three months ended March 31, 2008 and
2007.
The following table sets forth a reconciliation of the Companys previously reported and restated
net income (loss) for the periods shown (in thousands of US dollars):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income (Loss) |
|
|
Retained Earnings |
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
|
At December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As previously reported |
|
|
15,178 |
|
|
|
76,375 |
|
|
|
1,943,397 |
|
Adjustments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative instruments, net of minority interest |
|
|
(121,191 |
) |
|
|
11,684 |
|
|
|
(26,785 |
) |
Non-routine, complex financial structures and arrangements, and other |
|
|
884 |
|
|
|
(3,076 |
) |
|
|
223 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As restated |
|
|
(105,129 |
) |
|
|
84,983 |
|
|
|
1,916,835 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table presents the effect of the restatement on the Companys unaudited consolidated
statement of income for the three months ended March 31, 2008 (in thousands of U.S. dollars, except
share and per share amounts):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Routine, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Complex |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Structures and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative |
|
|
Arrangements, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
As Reported |
|
|
Instruments |
|
|
and Other |
|
|
As Restated |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
REVENUES |
|
|
736,391 |
|
|
|
6,981 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
743,372 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OPERATING EXPENSES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Voyage expenses |
|
|
168,723 |
|
|
|
738 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
169,461 |
|
Vessel operating expenses |
|
|
145,443 |
|
|
|
(2,394 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
143,049 |
|
Time-charter hire expense |
|
|
144,921 |
|
|
|
(437 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
144,484 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
97,707 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
97,707 |
|
General and administrative |
|
|
67,671 |
|
|
|
(1,515 |
) |
|
|
(1,517 |
) |
|
|
64,639 |
|
Gain on sale of vessels and equipment |
|
|
(496 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(496 |
) |
Restructuring charge |
|
|
1,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
625,469 |
|
|
|
(3,608 |
) |
|
|
(1,517 |
) |
|
|
620,344 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from vessel operations |
|
|
110,922 |
|
|
|
10,589 |
|
|
|
1,517 |
|
|
|
123,028 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OTHER ITEMS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(87,188 |
) |
|
|
(190,429 |
) |
|
|
(4,631 |
) |
|
|
(282,248 |
) |
Interest income |
|
|
18,359 |
|
|
|
37,619 |
|
|
|
4,631 |
|
|
|
60,609 |
|
Foreign exchange loss |
|
|
(29,483 |
) |
|
|
(2,509 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(31,992 |
) |
Minority interest income (expense) |
|
|
3,472 |
|
|
|
23,721 |
|
|
|
(633 |
) |
|
|
26,560 |
|
Other net |
|
|
(904 |
) |
|
|
(182 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,086 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other items |
|
|
(95,744 |
) |
|
|
(131,780 |
) |
|
|
(633 |
) |
|
|
(228,157 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
|
15,178 |
|
|
|
(121,191 |
) |
|
|
884 |
|
|
|
(105,129 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per common share amounts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings |
|
|
0.21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.45 |
) |
Diluted earnings |
|
|
0.21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.45 |
) |
Cash dividends declared |
|
|
0.2750 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.2750 |
|
Weighted average number of common shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
72,644,397 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
72,644,397 |
|
Diluted |
|
|
73,435,167 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
72,644,397 |
|
Page 19 of 42
TEEKAY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(all tabular amounts stated in thousands of U.S. dollars, except share data)
The following table presents the effect of the restatement on the Companys unaudited consolidated
statement of income for the three months ended March 31, 2007 (in thousands of U.S. dollars, except
share and per share amounts):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Routine, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Complex |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Structures and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative |
|
|
Arrangements, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
As Reported |
|
|
Instruments |
|
|
and Other |
|
|
As Restated |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
REVENUES |
|
|
578,395 |
|
|
|
(147 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
578,248 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OPERATING EXPENSES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Voyage expenses |
|
|
118,939 |
|
|
|
(1,460 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
117,479 |
|
Vessel operating expenses |
|
|
97,441 |
|
|
|
(2,251 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
95,190 |
|
Time-charter hire expense |
|
|
98,501 |
|
|
|
(144 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
98,357 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
79,263 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
79,263 |
|
General and administrative |
|
|
58,797 |
|
|
|
(1,875 |
) |
|
|
2,058 |
|
|
|
58,980 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
452,941 |
|
|
|
(5,730 |
) |
|
|
2,058 |
|
|
|
449,269 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from vessel operations |
|
|
125,454 |
|
|
|
5,583 |
|
|
|
(2,058 |
) |
|
|
128,979 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OTHER ITEMS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(60,383 |
) |
|
|
7,325 |
|
|
|
(2,847 |
) |
|
|
(55,905 |
) |
Interest income |
|
|
16,168 |
|
|
|
(4,061 |
) |
|
|
2,847 |
|
|
|
14,954 |
|
Foreign exchange loss |
|
|
(5,888 |
) |
|
|
4,212 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,676 |
) |
Minority interest income (expense) |
|
|
(5,640 |
) |
|
|
(1,097 |
) |
|
|
(1,018 |
) |
|
|
(7,755 |
) |
Other net |
|
|
6,664 |
|
|
|
(278 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,386 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other items |
|
|
(49,079 |
) |
|
|
6,101 |
|
|
|
(1,018 |
) |
|
|
(43,996 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
76,375 |
|
|
|
11,684 |
|
|
|
(3,076 |
) |
|
|
84,983 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per common share amounts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings |
|
|
1.04 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.16 |
|
Diluted earnings |
|
|
1.02 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.14 |
|
Cash dividends declared |
|
|
0.2375 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.2375 |
|
Weighted average number of common shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
73,129,585 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
73,129,585 |
|
Diluted |
|
|
74,545,165 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
74,545,165 |
|
Page 20 of 42
TEEKAY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(all tabular amounts stated in thousands of U.S. dollars, except share data)
The following table presents the effect of the restatement on the Companys unaudited consolidated
balance sheet as at March 31, 2008 (in thousands of U.S. dollars):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Routine, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Complex |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Structures and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative |
|
|
Arrangements, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
As Reported |
|
|
Instruments |
|
|
and Other |
|
|
As Restated |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
555,673 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
555,673 |
|
Restricted cash current |
|
|
36,343 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36,343 |
|
Accounts receivable |
|
|
289,324 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
289,324 |
|
Vessels held for sale |
|
|
42,704 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42,704 |
|
Net investment in direct financing leases current |
|
|
21,851 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,851 |
|
Prepaid expenses |
|
|
119,834 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
119,834 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
49,449 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,868 |
|
|
|
65,317 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
1,115,178 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,868 |
|
|
|
1,131,046 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted cash long term |
|
|
663,471 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
663,471 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vessels and equipment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At cost, less accumulated depreciation of $1,104,651 |
|
|
5,463,227 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,463,227 |
|
Vessels under capital lease, at cost, less accumulated
amortization of $82,293 |
|
|
926,338 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
926,338 |
|
Advances on newbuilding contracts |
|
|
682,178 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
682,178 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total vessels and equipment |
|
|
7,071,743 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,071,743 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment in direct financing leases non-current |
|
|
73,520 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
73,520 |
|
Investment in joint ventures |
|
|
136,508 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
136,508 |
|
Derivative instruments |
|
|
51,930 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51,930 |
|
Loans to joint ventures |
|
|
359,288 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
366,174 |
|
|
|
725,462 |
|
Other non-current assets |
|
|
219,652 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10,300 |
) |
|
|
209,352 |
|
Intangible assets net |
|
|
267,769 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
267,769 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
447,323 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
447,323 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
|
10,406,382 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
371,742 |
|
|
|
10,778,124 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
95,019 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
95,019 |
|
Accrued liabilities |
|
|
331,971 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,280 |
|
|
|
335,251 |
|
Current portion of long-term debt |
|
|
383,795 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,268 |
|
|
|
395,063 |
|
Current obligation under capital leases |
|
|
154,257 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
154,257 |
|
Current portion of in-process revenue contracts |
|
|
78,242 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
78,242 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
1,043,284 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,548 |
|
|
|
1,057,832 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
4,866,232 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
349,326 |
|
|
|
5,215,558 |
|
Long-term obligation under capital leases |
|
|
717,631 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
717,631 |
|
Derivative instruments |
|
|
263,551 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35,611 |
|
|
|
299,162 |
|
Deferred income tax |
|
|
80,701 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,600 |
|
|
|
82,301 |
|
Asset retirement obligation |
|
|
25,028 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,028 |
|
In-process revenue contracts |
|
|
188,191 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
188,191 |
|
Other long-term liabilities |
|
|
198,949 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(20,156 |
) |
|
|
178,793 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
7,383,567 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
380,929 |
|
|
|
7,764,496 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minority interest |
|
|
487,357 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,718 |
|
|
|
504,075 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock
and additional paid-in capital ($0.001 par
value; 725,000,000 shares authorized; 72,303,163
shares outstanding; 72,802,363 shares issued) |
|
|
628,221 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
628,221 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
2,142,489 |
|
|
|
(258,842 |
) |
|
|
(2,249 |
) |
|
|
1,881,398 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
|
|
(235,252 |
) |
|
|
258,842 |
|
|
|
(23,656 |
) |
|
|
(66 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
2,535,458 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(25,905 |
) |
|
|
2,509,553 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
|
10,406,382 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
371,742 |
|
|
|
10,778,124 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page 21 of 42
TEEKAY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(all tabular amounts stated in thousands of U.S. dollars, except share data)
The following table presents the effect of the restatement on the Companys unaudited consolidated
balance sheet as at December 31, 2007 (in thousands of U.S. dollars):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Routine, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Complex |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Structures and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative |
|
|
Arrangements, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
As Reported |
|
|
Instruments |
|
|
and Other |
|
|
As Restated |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
442,673 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
442,673 |
|
Restricted cash current |
|
|
33,479 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33,479 |
|
Accounts receivable |
|
|
262,420 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
262,420 |
|
Vessels held for sale |
|
|
79,689 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
79,689 |
|
Net investment in direct financing leases current |
|
|
22,268 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,268 |
|
Prepaid expenses |
|
|
126,761 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
126,761 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
50,097 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,512 |
|
|
|
57,609 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
1,017,387 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,512 |
|
|
|
1,024,899 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted cash long term |
|
|
652,717 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
652,717 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vessels and equipment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At cost, less accumulated depreciation of $1,061,619 |
|
|
5,295,751 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,295,751 |
|
Vessels
under capital lease, at cost, less accumulated
amortization of $74,442 |
|
|
934,058 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
934,058 |
|
Advances on newbuilding contracts |
|
|
617,066 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
617,066 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total vessels and equipment |
|
|
6,846,875 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,846,875 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment in direct financing leases non-current |
|
|
78,908 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
78,908 |
|
Investment in joint ventures |
|
|
135,515 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
135,515 |
|
Derivative instruments |
|
|
39,148 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
233 |
|
|
|
39,381 |
|
Loans to joint ventures |
|
|
366,716 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
362,713 |
|
|
|
729,429 |
|
Other non-current assets |
|
|
228,345 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,422 |
) |
|
|
219,923 |
|
Intangible assets net |
|
|
259,952 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
259,952 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
434,590 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
434,590 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
|
10,060,153 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
362,036 |
|
|
|
10,422,189 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
89,691 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
89,691 |
|
Accrued liabilities |
|
|
274,944 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,643 |
|
|
|
278,587 |
|
Current portion of long-term debt |
|
|
324,082 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,512 |
|
|
|
331,594 |
|
Current obligation under capital leases |
|
|
150,791 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
150,791 |
|
Current portion of in-process revenue contracts |
|
|
82,704 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
82,704 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
922,212 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,155 |
|
|
|
933,367 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
4,578,908 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
353,082 |
|
|
|
4,931,990 |
|
Long-term obligation under capital leases |
|
|
706,489 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
706,489 |
|
Derivative instruments |
|
|
129,079 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35,690 |
|
|
|
164,769 |
|
Deferred income tax |
|
|
77,023 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,600 |
|
|
|
78,623 |
|
Asset retirement obligation |
|
|
24,549 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,549 |
|
In-process revenue contracts |
|
|
205,429 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
205,429 |
|
Other long-term liabilities |
|
|
201,100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(24,420 |
) |
|
|
176,680 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
6,844,789 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
377,107 |
|
|
|
7,221,896 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minority interest |
|
|
527,494 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,845 |
|
|
|
544,339 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock
and additional paid-in capital ($0.001 par
value; 725,000,000 shares authorized; 72,772,529
shares outstanding; 95,327,329 shares issued) |
|
|
628,786 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
628,786 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
2,163,189 |
|
|
|
(137,651 |
) |
|
|
(2,937 |
) |
|
|
2,022,601 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income |
|
|
(104,105 |
) |
|
|
137,651 |
|
|
|
(28,979 |
) |
|
|
4,567 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
2,687,870 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(31,916 |
) |
|
|
2,655,954 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
|
10,060,153 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
362,036 |
|
|
|
10,422,189 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page 22 of 42
TEEKAY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(all tabular amounts stated in thousands of U.S. dollars, except share data)
The following table presents the effect of the restatement on the Companys unaudited statement of
cash flows for the three months ended March 31, 2008 (in thousands of U.S. dollars):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Routine, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Complex |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Structures and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative |
|
|
Arrangements, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
As Reported |
|
|
Instruments |
|
|
and Other |
|
|
As Restated |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
Cash and cash equivalents provided by (used for) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OPERATING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
15,178 |
|
|
|
(121,191 |
) |
|
|
884 |
|
|
|
(105,129 |
) |
Non-cash items: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
97,707 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
97,707 |
|
Amortization of in-process revenue contracts |
|
|
(21,158 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(21,158 |
) |
Gain on sale of marketable securities |
|
|
(2,708 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,708 |
) |
Gain on sale of vessels and equipment |
|
|
(496 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(496 |
) |
Loss on repurchase of bonds |
|
|
598 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
598 |
|
Equity income (net of dividends received: March 31,
2008 - $nil) |
|
|
3,220 |
|
|
|
389 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,609 |
|
Income taxes |
|
|
2,726 |
|
|
|
(243 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,483 |
|
Employee stock option compensation |
|
|
2,606 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,606 |
|
Foreign exchange loss and other net |
|
|
33,491 |
|
|
|
(34,126 |
) |
|
|
4,079 |
|
|
|
3,444 |
|
Change in fair value of derivative instruments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
155,171 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
155,171 |
|
Change in non-cash working capital items related to
operating activities |
|
|
(38,821 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,963 |
) |
|
|
(43,784 |
) |
Expenditures for drydocking |
|
|
(6,240 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,240 |
) |
Distribution from subsidiaries to minority owners |
|
|
(13,110 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13,110 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net operating cash flow |
|
|
72,993 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
72,993 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FINANCING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt |
|
|
565,324 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
565,324 |
|
Debt issuance costs |
|
|
(3,406 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,406 |
) |
Repayments of long-term debt |
|
|
(253,773 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(253,773 |
) |
Repayments of capital lease obligations |
|
|
(2,241 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,241 |
) |
Repayment of loans from joint venture partner |
|
|
(535 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(535 |
) |
Decrease in restricted cash |
|
|
2,651 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,651 |
|
Net proceeds from sale of Teekay Tankers Ltd. shares |
|
|
(892 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(892 |
) |
Issuance of Common Stock upon exercise of stock options |
|
|
326 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
326 |
|
Repurchase of Common Stock |
|
|
(20,512 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(20,512 |
) |
Cash dividends paid |
|
|
(20,013 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(20,013 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net financing cash flow |
|
|
266,929 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
266,929 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INVESTING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenditures for vessels and equipment |
|
|
(292,917 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(292,917 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of vessels and equipment |
|
|
36,630 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36,630 |
|
Purchases of marketable securities |
|
|
(520 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(520 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of marketable securities |
|
|
7,283 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,283 |
|
Investment in joint ventures |
|
|
(1,258 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,258 |
) |
Loans to joint ventures |
|
|
(3,085 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,085 |
) |
Investment in direct financing lease assets |
|
|
(17 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(17 |
) |
Direct financing lease payments received |
|
|
5,822 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,822 |
|
Other investing activities |
|
|
21,140 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,140 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investing cash flow |
|
|
(226,922 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(226,922 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
113,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
113,000 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of the period |
|
|
442,673 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
442,673 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of the period |
|
|
555,673 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
555,673 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page 23 of 42
TEEKAY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(all tabular amounts stated in thousands of U.S. dollars, except share data)
The following table presents the effect of the restatement on the Companys unaudited statement of
cash flows for the three months ended March 31, 2007 (in thousands of U.S. dollars):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Routine, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Complex |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Structures and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative |
|
|
Arrangements, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
As Reported |
|
|
Instruments |
|
|
and Other |
|
|
As Restated |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
Cash and cash equivalents provided by (used for) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OPERATING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
76,375 |
|
|
|
11,684 |
|
|
|
(3,076 |
) |
|
|
84,983 |
|
Non-cash items: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
79,263 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
79,263 |
|
Amortization of in-process revenue contracts |
|
|
(23,484 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(23,484 |
) |
Gain on sale of marketable securities |
|
|
(1,817 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,817 |
) |
Equity income (net of dividends received: March 31, 2007 - $nil) |
|
|
1,595 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,595 |
|
Income taxes |
|
|
(4,082 |
) |
|
|
196 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,886 |
) |
Employee stock option compensation |
|
|
2,225 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,225 |
|
Foreign exchange loss and other net |
|
|
20,329 |
|
|
|
1,794 |
|
|
|
3,076 |
|
|
|
25,199 |
|
Change in fair value of derivative instruments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13,674 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13,674 |
) |
Change in non-cash working capital items related to operating
activities |
|
|
(50,890 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(50,890 |
) |
Expenditures for drydocking |
|
|
(12,567 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12,567 |
) |
Distribution from subsidiaries to minority owners |
|
|
(5,724 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,724 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net operating cash flow |
|
|
81,223 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
81,223 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FINANCING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt |
|
|
591,329 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
591,329 |
|
Debt issuance costs |
|
|
(2,547 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,547 |
) |
Repayments of long-term debt |
|
|
(227,549 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(227,549 |
) |
Repayments of capital lease obligations |
|
|
(2,185 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,185 |
) |
Repayment of loans from joint venture partner |
|
|
(3,653 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,653 |
) |
Increase in restricted cash |
|
|
(81,078 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(81,078 |
) |
Net proceeds from sale of Teekay Offshore Partners L.P. units |
|
|
(1,449 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,449 |
) |
Issuance of Common Stock upon exercise of stock options |
|
|
16,750 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,750 |
|
Repurchase of Common Stock |
|
|
(3,035 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,035 |
) |
Cash dividends paid |
|
|
(17,344 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(17,344 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net financing cash flow |
|
|
269,239 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
269,239 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INVESTING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenditures for vessels and equipment |
|
|
(187,883 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(187,883 |
) |
Purchases of marketable securities |
|
|
(88,233 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(88,233 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of marketable securities |
|
|
12,782 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,782 |
|
Investment in joint ventures |
|
|
(1,253 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,253 |
) |
Loans to joint ventures |
|
|
(61,601 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(61,601 |
) |
Investment in direct financing lease assets |
|
|
(1,725 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,725 |
) |
Direct financing lease payments received |
|
|
5,056 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,056 |
|
Other investing activities |
|
|
(805 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(805 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investing cash flow |
|
|
(323,662 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(323,662 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
26,800 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,800 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of the period |
|
|
343,914 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
343,914 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of the period |
|
|
370,714 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
370,714 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page 24 of 42
TEEKAY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
March 31, 2008
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 2 MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Restatement of Previously Issued Financial Statements
The discussion and analysis below reflects the impact of our restatement. Please read Note 17 of
the notes to the consolidated financial statements for a more detailed discussion of our restated
results and the basis for them. The following table sets forth a reconciliation of previously
reported and restated net income (loss) for the periods shown (in thousands of US dollars):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income (Loss) |
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As previously reported |
|
|
15,178 |
|
|
|
76,375 |
|
Adjustments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative instruments, net of minority interest |
|
|
(121,191 |
) |
|
|
11,684 |
|
Non-routine, complex financial structures and arrangements, and other |
|
|
884 |
|
|
|
(3,076 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As restated |
|
|
(105,129 |
) |
|
|
84,983 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OVERVIEW
We are a leading provider of international crude oil and petroleum product marine transportation
services. Over the past five years, we have undergone a major transformation from an owner of
ships in the cyclical spot tanker business to a growth-oriented asset manager in the Marine
Midstream sector. This transformation has included the expansion into the liquefied natural gas
(or LNG) shipping sector through our publicly-listed subsidiary, Teekay LNG Partners L.P. (or
Teekay LNG), and further growth of our operations in the offshore production, storage and
transportation sector through our publicly-listed subsidiary, Teekay Offshore Partners L.P. (or
Teekay Offshore), and through our acquisition of a 65% interest in Teekay Petrojarl AS (or
Petrojarl). With a fleet of over 200 vessels, offices in 22 countries and approximately 6,300
seagoing and shore-based employees, we provide comprehensive marine services to the worlds leading
oil and gas companies, helping them seamlessly link their upstream energy production to their
downstream processing operations. Our goal is to create the industrys leading asset management
company, focused on the Marine Midstream space.
SIGNIFICANT DEVELOPMENTS IN 2008
Strategic Transaction with ConocoPhillips
In January 2008, we entered into a multi-vessel transaction with ConocoPhillips, in which we
acquired ConocoPhillips rights in six double-hull Aframax tankers. Of the six Aframax tankers
acquired, two are owned and four are bareboat chartered-in from third parties for periods ranging
from five to ten years. The total cost of the transaction was $83.8 million. Two of the Aframax
tankers have been chartered back to ConocoPhillips for a period of five years. Commencing in the
second quarter of 2008, we have also chartered to ConocoPhillips a Very Large Crude Carrier, or
VLCC, for three years and two of our Medium Range product tankers for five years.
Sale of LNG Vessels to Teekay LNG
In accordance with existing agreements, in April 2008, we sold two 1993-built LNG vessels to Teekay
LNG for $230.0 million and chartered them back for ten years with three five-year option periods.
We acquired these vessels in December 2007 from a joint venture between Marathon Oil Corporation
and ConocoPhillips for a total cost of $230.0 million. The specialized ice-strengthened vessels
were purpose-built to carry LNG from Alaskas Kenai LNG plant to Japan. The vessels have been
time-chartered back to the joint venture until April 2009 with charterers option to extend the
contracts up to an additional seven years. We believe that these specialized vessels will provide
us with the prospect of a new service offering following the completion of the Kenai project such
as delivering partial cargoes at multiple ports or as a potential project vessel such as serving as
a floating offshore re-gasification or production facility, subject to conversion.
Sale of RasGas 3 LNG Vessels to Teekay LNG
On May 6, 2008, the first of four newbuilding carriers (the RasGas 3 LNG Carriers) delivered that
will service expansion of an LNG project in Qatar. Based on a November 1, 2006 agreement that
Teekay LNG entered into with us, upon delivery of that vessel, we sold to Teekay LNG our 100%
interest in Teekay Nakilat (III) Holdings Corporation (or Teekay Nakilat (III)), which owns a 40%
interest in Teekay Nakilat (III) Corporation (or RasGas 3 Joint Venture), in exchange for a
non-interest bearing and unsecured promissory note from Teekay LNG. The estimated purchase price of
$110.2 million is subject to refinement upon determination of the final construction costs of all
four LNG carriers.
Sale of Suezmax Tankers to Teekay Tankers
During April 2008, we sold two Suezmax tankers to our subsidiary Teekay Tankers Ltd. (or Teekay
Tankers) for a total cost of $186.9 million. During June 2008, Teekay offered to sell two
additional Suezmax-class oil tankers to Teekay Tankers.
Page 25 of 42
Public Offering by Teekay LNG Partners L.P.
During April 2008, Teekay LNG completed a follow-on public offering of 5.0 million common units at
a price of $28.75 per unit, for gross proceeds of $143.75 million. Subsequently on May 8, 2008,
the underwriters exercised 50 percent, or 375,000 common units, of their 30-day over-allotment
option resulting in an additional $10.8 million in gross proceeds to Teekay LNG.
Concurrent with the public offering, we acquired 1.74 million common units of Teekay LNG at the
same public offering price for a total cost of $50.0 million. As a result of the above
transactions, Teekay LNG has raised gross equity proceeds of $208.7 million (including the general
partners proportionate capital contribution), and our ownership of Teekay LNG has been reduced
from 63.7 percent to 57.7 percent (including our 2 percent general partner interest).
The total net proceeds from the offering of approximately $202.5 million were used to reduce
amounts outstanding under Teekay LNGs revolving credit facilities which were, and will be used to
fund the acquisitions of the interests in the Kenai and RasGas 3 LNG carriers.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
We use a variety of financial and operational terms and concepts when analyzing our results of
operations, which can be found in Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects in our
Annual Report on Form 20-F/A for the year ended December 31, 2007. In accordance with United States
generally accepted accounting principles (or GAAP), we report gross revenues in our income
statements and include voyage expenses among our operating expenses. However, ship-owners base
economic decisions regarding the deployment of their vessels upon anticipated time-charter
equivalent (or TCE) rates, and industry analysts typically measure bulk shipping freight rates in
terms of TCE rates. This is because under time-charter contracts and floating production, storage
and offloading (or FPSO) service contracts the customer usually pays the voyage expenses, while
under voyage charters and contracts of affreightment the ship-owner usually pays the voyage
expenses, which typically are added to the hire rate at an approximate cost. Accordingly, the
discussion of revenue below focuses on net revenues and TCE rates of our four reportable segments
where applicable.
We manage our business and analyze and report our results of operations on the basis of four
segments: the offshore segment, the fixed-rate segment, the liquefied gas segment and the spot
tanker segment. Please read Item 1 Financial Statements: Note 2 Segment Reporting.
Offshore Segment
Our offshore segment includes our shuttle tankers, FPSO units, and floating storage and offtake (or
FSO) units. The offshore segment has four shuttle tankers under construction. Please read Item 1
Financial Statements: Note 9 Commitments and Contingencies. We took delivery of one FPSO during
February 2008 and acquired one shuttle tanker during March 2008. We use the vessels in this segment
to provide transportation, production, processing and storage services to oil companies operating
offshore oil field installations. These services are typically provided under long-term, fixed-rate
time-charter contracts, contracts of affreightment or FPSO service contracts. Historically, the
utilization of shuttle tankers and FPSO units in the North Sea is higher in the winter months, as
favorable weather conditions in the summer months provide opportunities for repairs and maintenance
to our vessels and the offshore oil platforms, which generally reduces oil production.
The following table presents our offshore segments operating results and compares its net revenues
(which is a non-GAAP financial measure) to revenues, the most directly comparable GAAP financial
measure. The following table also provides a summary of the changes in calendar-ship-days by owned
and chartered-in vessels for our offshore segment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
% Change |
|
(in thousands of U.S. dollars, except calendar-ship-days and percentages) |
|
(restated) |
|
|
(restated) |
|
|
(restated) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
|
258,788 |
|
|
|
248,875 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
Voyage expenses |
|
|
38,901 |
|
|
|
28,726 |
|
|
|
35.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenues |
|
|
219,887 |
|
|
|
220,149 |
|
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
Vessel operating expenses |
|
|
83,820 |
|
|
|
60,290 |
|
|
|
39.0 |
|
Time-charter hire expense |
|
|
35,038 |
|
|
|
41,173 |
|
|
|
(14.9 |
) |
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
46,074 |
|
|
|
45,722 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
General and administrative (1) |
|
|
27,062 |
|
|
|
24,904 |
|
|
|
8.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from vessel operations |
|
|
27,893 |
|
|
|
48,060 |
|
|
|
(42.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Calendar Ship Days |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Owned Vessels |
|
|
3,342 |
|
|
|
3,060 |
|
|
|
9.2 |
|
Chartered-in Vessels |
|
|
1,002 |
|
|
|
1,163 |
|
|
|
(13.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
4,344 |
|
|
|
4,223 |
|
|
|
2.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes direct general and administrative expenses and indirect general and administrative
expenses (allocated to the offshore segment based on estimated use of corporate resources). |
Page 26 of 42
The average fleet size of our offshore segment (including vessels chartered-in) increased for the
three months ended March 31, 2008, compared to the same period last year, primarily due to:
|
|
|
the delivery of a new FPSO unit in February 2008 (or the FPSO Delivery); |
|
|
|
|
the transfer of the Navion Saga from the fixed-rate segment to the offshore segment in
connection with the completion of its conversion to an FSO unit in May 2007; and |
|
|
|
|
the delivery of two new shuttle tankers, the Navion Bergen and the Navion Gothenburg, in
April and July 2007, respectively (collectively, the Shuttle Tanker Deliveries); |
partially offset by
|
|
|
a decline in the number of chartered-in shuttle tankers; and |
|
|
|
the sale of a 1987-built shuttle tanker in May 2007 (or the Shuttle Tanker Disposition). |
Net Revenues. Net revenues decreased for the three months ended March 31, 2008 compared to
the same period in 2007, primarily due to:
|
|
|
a decrease of $5.2 million from the amortization of contract value liability relating to
FPSO service contracts (as discussed below), which was recognized on the date of the
acquisition of Petrojarl in 2006 and adjusted in the second quarter of 2007; |
|
|
|
a decrease of $4.9 million in shuttle tanker revenue due to an increased number of
scheduled drydockings and unexpected repairs performed during the three months ended March
31, 2008, compared to the same period last year; |
|
|
|
a relative decrease of $4.3 million due to a shuttle tanker serving as a temporary
floating storage unit during the three months ended March 31, 2007, at rates that were
higher than the rates earned while employed as a shuttle tanker; |
|
|
|
a decrease of $3.4 million in shuttle tanker revenue due to fewer revenue days for
shuttle tankers servicing contracts of affreightment in the conventional spot market during
the three months ended March 31, 2008, compared to the same period last year; |
|
|
|
a decrease of $2.2 million in shuttle tanker revenue due to customer performance claims
under the terms of charter party agreements; and |
|
|
|
a decrease of $1.7 million in FPSO revenue due to lower net production volumes and
increased downtime during the three months ended March 31, 2008 compared to the same period
last year; |
partially offset by
|
|
|
an increase of $7.6 million from the transfer of the Navion Saga to the offshore
segment; |
|
|
|
an increase of $6.8 million from the FPSO Delivery; and |
|
|
|
an increase of $5.6 million from the Shuttle Tanker Deliveries. |
As part of our acquisition of Petrojarl, we assumed certain FPSO service contracts that have terms
that are less favourable than prevailing market terms at the time of the acquisition. This contract
value liability, which was recognized on the date of acquisition, is being amortized to revenue
over the remaining firm period of the current FPSO contracts, on a weighted basis based on the
projected revenue to be earned under the contracts. The amount of amortization relating to these
contracts included in revenue for the three months ended March 31, 2008 and 2007 was $18.3 million
and $23.5 million, respectively. Please read Item 1 Financial Statements: Note 4 Goodwill,
Intangible Assets and In-Process Revenue Contracts.
Vessel Operating Expenses. Vessel operating expenses increased during the three months
ended March 31, 2008, compared to the same period in 2007, primarily due to:
|
|
|
an increase of $7.0 million primarily due to weakening of the U.S. Dollar compared to
other major currencies; |
|
|
|
an increase of $5.6 million from increases in crew manning and repairs and maintenance
costs; |
|
|
|
an increase of $5.3 million from the FPSO Delivery; and |
|
|
|
an increase of $2.6 million relating to the transfer of the Navion Saga to the offshore
segment. |
Time-Charter Hire Expense. Time-charter hire expense decreased for the three months ended
March 31, 2008, compared to the same period in 2007, primarily due to a net decrease in the number
of vessels chartered-in.
Depreciation and Amortization. Depreciation and amortization expense for the three months
ended March 31, 2008, remained substantially unchanged compared to the same period in 2007,
primarily due to:
|
|
|
an increase of $2.5 million relating to the transfer of the Navion Saga to the offshore
segment; and |
|
|
|
an increase of $1.7 million from the Shuttle Tanker Deliveries; |
Page 27 of 42
partially offset by
|
|
|
a decrease of $4.1 million from the refinement of preliminary estimates of fair value
assigned to certain assets acquired as a result of the acquisition of Petrojarl. |
Fixed-Rate Tanker Segment
Our fixed-rate tanker segment includes conventional crude oil and product tankers on long-term,
fixed-rate time-charters.
The following table presents our fixed-rate tanker segments operating results and compares its net
revenues (which is a non-GAAP financial measure) to revenues, the most directly comparable GAAP
financial measure. The following table also provides a summary of the changes in calendar-ship-days
by owned and chartered-in vessels for our fixed-rate tanker segment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
% Change |
|
(in thousands of U.S. dollars, except calendar-ship-days and percentages) |
|
(restated) |
|
|
(restated) |
|
|
(restated) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
|
60,815 |
|
|
|
44,589 |
|
|
|
36.4 |
|
Voyage expenses |
|
|
680 |
|
|
|
560 |
|
|
|
21.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenues |
|
|
60,135 |
|
|
|
44,029 |
|
|
|
36.6 |
|
Vessel operating expenses |
|
|
16,370 |
|
|
|
11,690 |
|
|
|
40.0 |
|
Time-charter hire expense |
|
|
11,720 |
|
|
|
3,837 |
|
|
|
205.4 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
9,673 |
|
|
|
8,468 |
|
|
|
14.2 |
|
General and administrative (1) |
|
|
5,290 |
|
|
|
4,633 |
|
|
|
14.2 |
|
Restructuring charge |
|
|
1,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from vessel operations |
|
|
15,582 |
|
|
|
15,401 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Calendar Ship Days |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Owned Vessels |
|
|
1,453 |
|
|
|
1,350 |
|
|
|
7.6 |
|
Chartered-in Vessels |
|
|
630 |
|
|
|
179 |
|
|
|
252.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
2,083 |
|
|
|
1,529 |
|
|
|
36.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes direct general and administrative expenses and indirect general and administrative
expenses (allocated to the fixed-rate tanker segment based on estimated use of corporate
resources). |
The average fleet size of our fixed-rate tanker segment (including vessels chartered-in) increased
for the three months ended March 31, 2008, compared to the same period last year, primarily due to:
|
|
|
the acquisition of two Suezmax tankers from OMI on August 1, 2007 (collectively, the OMI
Acquisition); |
|
|
|
the addition of two new chartered-in Aframax tankers in January 2008 as part of the
multi-vessel transaction with ConocoPhillips, in which we acquired ConocoPhillips rights
in six double-hull Aframax tankers (collectively, the ConocoPhillips Acquisition); |
|
|
|
the delivery of two new Aframax tankers during January and March 2008 (collectively, the
Aframax Deliveries); and |
|
|
|
the transfer of one Aframax tanker, on a net basis, from the spot tanker segment in 2007
upon commencement of long-term time-charters (the Aframax Transfers). |
Net Revenues. Net revenues increased for the three months ended March 31, 2008, compared to
the same period last year, primarily due to:
|
|
|
an increase of $5.8 million from the Aframax Transfers; |
|
|
|
an increase of $5.8 million from the OMI Acquisition; |
|
|
|
an increase of $4.3 million from the ConocoPhillips Acquisition; and |
|
|
|
an increase of $1.2 million from the Aframax Deliveries. |
Vessel Operating Expenses. Vessel operating expenses increased for the three months ended
March 31, 2008, compared to the same period last year, primarily due to:
|
|
|
an increase of $2.0 million form the ConocoPhillips Acquisition; |
|
|
|
an increase of $1.0 million in crew manning expenses; |
Page 28 of 42
|
|
|
an increase of $0.6 million due to the effect on our Euro-denominated vessel operating
expenses from the strengthening of the Euro against the U.S. Dollar during the period
compared to the same period last year (a majority of our vessel operating expenses on five of
our Suezmax tankers are denominated in Euros, which is primarily a function of the
nationality of our crew: our Euro-denominated revenues currently generally approximate our
Euro-denominated expenses and Euro-denominated loan and interest payments); |
|
|
|
an increase of $0.5 million from the Aframax Deliveries; and |
|
|
|
an increase of $0.5 million from the OMI Acquisition; |
partially offset by
|
|
|
a decrease of $0.3 million from the Aframax Transfers. |
Time-Charter Hire Expense. Time-charter hire expense increased for the three months ended
March 31, 2008, compared to the same period in 2007, primarily due to:
|
|
|
an increase of $3.1 million from the Aframax Transfers; |
|
|
|
an increase of $2.4 million from the OMI Acquisition; and |
|
|
|
an increase of $1.8 million from the ConocoPhillips Acquisition. |
Depreciation and Amortization. Depreciation and amortization expense increased for the
three months ended March 31, 2008, compared to the same period last year, primarily due to the OMI
Acquisition.
Restructuring Charges. We incurred restructuring charges of $1.5 million during the three
months ended March 31, 2008 relating to costs incurred to change the crew of the Samar Spirit from
Australian crew to International crew. We do not expect to incur any additional restructuring cost
relating to this change in operations.
Liquefied Gas Segment
Our liquefied gas segment consists of LNG and LPG carriers subject to long-term, fixed-rate
time-charter contracts. We accepted delivery of one new LNG carrier during May 2008. In addition
we have five LNG carriers under construction that are scheduled for delivery between June 2008 and
January 2009, four LNG carriers under construction that are scheduled for delivery between August
2011 and January 2012, and two multigas carriers under construction that are scheduled for delivery
between late 2008 and mid-2009. We also have three LPG carriers under construction that are
scheduled for delivery between October 2008 and July 2009. Upon delivery, all of these vessels will
commence operation under long-term, fixed-rate time-charters. Please read Item 1 Financial
Statements: Note 9(a) Commitments and Contingencies Vessels Under Construction and Note 9(b) -
Commitments and Contingencies Joint Ventures.
The following table presents our liquefied gas segments operating results and compares its net
revenues (which is a non-GAAP financial measure) to revenues, the most directly comparable GAAP
financial measure. The following table also provides a summary of the changes in calendar-ship-days
by owned vessels and vessels under capital lease for our liquefied gas segment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
% Change |
|
(in thousands of U.S. dollars, except calendar-ship-days and percentages) |
|
(restated) |
|
|
(restated) |
|
|
(restated) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
|
56,132 |
|
|
|
37,477 |
|
|
|
49.8 |
|
Voyage expenses |
|
|
150 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
2,900.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenues |
|
|
55,982 |
|
|
|
37,472 |
|
|
|
49.4 |
|
Vessel operating expenses |
|
|
11,623 |
|
|
|
6,458 |
|
|
|
80.0 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
14,195 |
|
|
|
10,794 |
|
|
|
31.5 |
|
General and administrative (1) |
|
|
5,485 |
|
|
|
5,000 |
|
|
|
9.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from vessel operations |
|
|
24,679 |
|
|
|
15,220 |
|
|
|
62.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Calendar Ship Days |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Owned Vessels and Vessels under Capital Lease |
|
|
910 |
|
|
|
662 |
|
|
|
37.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes direct general and administrative expenses and indirect general and administrative
expenses (allocated to the liquefied gas segment based on estimated use of corporate
resources). |
The increase in the average fleet size of our liquefied gas segment was primarily due to the
acquisition of two 1993-built LNG vessels during December 2007 (collectively the Kenai LNG
Carriers) and the delivery of two new LNG carriers in January and February 2007 (collectively the
2007 RasGas II Deliveries).
Net Revenues. Net revenues increased for the three months ended March 31, 2008, compared to
the same period in 2007, primarily due to:
|
|
|
an increase of $10.2 million from the acquisition of the Kenai LNG Carriers; |
|
|
|
an increase of $5.9 million from the 2007 RasGas II Deliveries; and |
Page 29 of 42
|
|
|
an increase of $2.9 million due to the effect on our Euro-denominated revenues from the
strengthening of the Euro against the U.S. Dollar during such period compared to the same
period last year; |
partially offset by
|
|
|
a decrease of $0.5 million due to the Catalunya Spirit being off-hire for 5.5 days
during the first quarter of 2008 for unscheduled repairs. |
Vessel Operating Expenses. Vessel operating expenses increased for the three months ended
March 31, 2008, compared to the same period in 2007, primarily due to:
|
|
|
an increase of $3.0 million from the acquisition of the Kenai LNG Carriers; |
|
|
|
an increase of $1.0 million from the 2007 RasGas II Deliveries; and |
|
|
|
an increase of $0.6 million due to the effect on our Euro-denominated vessel operating
expenses from the strengthening of the Euro against the U.S. Dollar during such period
compared to the same period last year (a majority of our vessel operating expenses are
denominated in Euros, which is primarily a function of the nationality of our crew; our
Euro-denominated revenues currently generally approximate our Euro-denominated expenses and
Euro-denominated loan and interest payments). |
Depreciation and Amortization. Depreciation and amortization expense increased for the
three months ended March 31, 2008, compared to the same period in 2007, primarily due to:
|
|
|
an increase of $2.7 million from the acquisition of the Kenai LNG Carriers; and |
|
|
|
an increase of $0.7 million from the 2007 RasGas II Deliveries. |
Spot Tanker Segment
Our spot tanker segment consists of conventional crude oil tankers and product carriers operating
on the spot market or subject to time-charters or contracts of affreightment that are priced on a
spot-market basis or are short-term, fixed-rate contracts. We also have ten Suezmax tankers under
construction which are scheduled to be delivered between June 2008 and August 2009 and are expected
to be included in this segment. We consider contracts that have an original term of less than
three years in duration to be short term. Substantially all of our conventional Aframax, Suezmax,
large product, medium product and small product tankers are among the vessels included in the spot
tanker segment.
Our spot market operations contribute to the volatility of our revenues, cash flow from operations
and net income. Historically, the tanker industry has been cyclical, experiencing volatility in
profitability and asset values resulting from changes in the supply of, and demand for, vessel
capacity. In addition, tanker spot markets historically have exhibited seasonal variations in
charter rates. Tanker spot markets are typically stronger in the winter months as a result of
increased oil consumption in the northern hemisphere and unpredictable weather patterns that tend
to disrupt vessel scheduling.
The following table presents our spot tanker segments operating results and compares its net
revenues (which is a non-GAAP financial measure) to revenues, the most directly comparable GAAP
financial measure. The following table also provides a summary of the changes in calendar-ship-days
by owned and chartered-in vessels for our spot tanker segment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
% Change |
|
(in thousands of U.S. dollars, except calendar-ship-days and percentages) |
|
(restated) |
|
|
(restated) |
|
|
(restated) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
|
367,637 |
|
|
|
247,307 |
|
|
|
48.7 |
|
Voyage expenses |
|
|
129,730 |
|
|
|
88,188 |
|
|
|
47.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenues |
|
|
237,907 |
|
|
|
159,119 |
|
|
|
49.5 |
|
Vessel operating expenses |
|
|
31,236 |
|
|
|
16,752 |
|
|
|
86.5 |
|
Time-charter hire expense |
|
|
97,726 |
|
|
|
53,347 |
|
|
|
83.2 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
27,765 |
|
|
|
14,279 |
|
|
|
94.4 |
|
General and administrative (1) |
|
|
26,802 |
|
|
|
24,443 |
|
|
|
9.7 |
|
Gain on sale of vessels |
|
|
(496 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from vessel operations |
|
|
54,874 |
|
|
|
50,298 |
|
|
|
9.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Calendar Ship Days |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Owned Vessels |
|
|
3,627 |
|
|
|
2,568 |
|
|
|
41.2 |
|
Chartered-in Vessels |
|
|
4,243 |
|
|
|
2,609 |
|
|
|
62.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
7,870 |
|
|
|
5,177 |
|
|
|
52.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes direct general and administrative expenses and indirect general and administrative
expenses (allocated to the spot tanker segment based on estimated use of corporate resources). |
Page 30 of 42
The average fleet size of our spot tanker fleet (including vessels chartered-in) increased for the
three months ended March 31, 2008, compared to the same period last year, primarily due to:
|
|
|
the acquisition of 12 vessels from OMI Corporation on August 1, 2007 (collectively, the
OMI Acquisition); |
|
|
|
the addition of two owned and two chartered-in Aframax tankers in January 2008 as part
of the multi-vessel transaction with ConocoPhillips, in which we acquired ConocoPhillips
rights in six double-hull Aframax tankers (collectively, the ConocoPhillips Acquisition); |
|
|
|
the delivery of two new Large product tankers in February and May 2007 (or the Spot
Tanker Deliveries); and |
|
|
|
a net increase in the number of chartered-in vessels, primarily Aframax and product
tankers. |
In addition, during April 2007 we sold and leased back two older Aframax tankers and during July
2007 we sold and leased back one Aframax tanker. This had the effect of decreasing the number of
calendar days for our owned vessels and increasing the number of calendar-ship-days for our
chartered-in vessels.
Tanker Market and TCE Rates.
During the first quarter of 2008, spot tanker freight rates strengthened from the previous quarter
primarily driven by growing tanker demand, limited fleet growth, and increasing discrimination
against single-hull tankers. Early in the second quarter of 2008, freight rates for crude tankers
experienced a considerable counter seasonal increase and have thus far averaged above those
experienced during the first quarter of 2008. The strength of the spot tanker markets is being
driven primarily by higher volumes of crude imports into China (up approximately 15 percent from
the prior year), which in turn is driving higher volumes of ton-mile intensive Atlantic to Pacific
crude oil movements.
In its May 2008 report, the International Energy Agency (or IEA) estimated 2008 oil demand growth
of 1.0 million barrels per day (mb/d), a 1.2 percent increase from 2007. Nearly all of the growth
in global oil demand in 2008 is expected to originate from energy intensive developing economies
which have so far been only marginally affected by the economic slowdown in the United States.
The trend of tanker sales for conversion to offshore units and dry bulk vessels continues to dampen
tanker supply growth. In addition, record-high scrap steel prices have led to an increase in oil
tankers being sold for demolition. We expect that the removal of these tankers will help keep
tanker supply and demand balanced during the remainder of 2008.
TCE rates for the vessels in our spot tanker segment primarily depend on global oil production and
consumption levels, the number of vessels in the worldwide tanker fleet scrapped, the number of
newbuildings delivered and charterers preference for modern tankers. As a result of our exposure
to the tanker spot market, any fluctuations in TCE rates affect our revenues and earnings.
The following table outlines the TCE rates earned by the vessels in our spot tanker segment for the
three months ended March 31, 2008 and 2007.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, 2008 |
|
|
March 31, 2007 |
|
|
|
Net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
TCE |
|
|
Net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
TCE |
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
|
Revenue |
|
|
Rate |
|
|
Revenues |
|
|
Revenue |
|
|
Rate |
|
Vessel Type |
|
($000s) |
|
|
Days |
|
|
$ |
|
|
($000s) |
|
|
Days |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Spot Fleet (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Suezmax Tankers (2) |
|
|
25,273 |
|
|
|
553 |
|
|
|
45,672 |
|
|
|
12,308 |
|
|
|
242 |
|
|
|
50,860 |
|
Aframax Tankers (2) |
|
|
134,412 |
|
|
|
3,708 |
|
|
|
36,253 |
|
|
|
101,778 |
|
|
|
2,678 |
|
|
|
38,006 |
|
Large/Medium Product Tankers (2) |
|
|
29,273 |
|
|
|
1,062 |
|
|
|
27,585 |
|
|
|
21,014 |
|
|
|
859 |
|
|
|
24,470 |
|
Small Product Tankers (2) |
|
|
12,399 |
|
|
|
902 |
|
|
|
13,745 |
|
|
|
14,351 |
|
|
|
896 |
|
|
|
16,017 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Time-Charter Fleet (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Suezmax Tankers (2) |
|
|
18,793 |
|
|
|
668 |
|
|
|
28,138 |
|
|
|
4,970 |
|
|
|
182 |
|
|
|
27,307 |
|
Aframax Tankers (2) |
|
|
4,510 |
|
|
|
142 |
|
|
|
31,759 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large/Medium Product Tankers (2) |
|
|
18,525 |
|
|
|
813 |
|
|
|
22,794 |
|
|
|
7,622 |
|
|
|
261 |
|
|
|
29,171 |
|
Small Product Tankers (2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other (restated) (3) |
|
|
(5,278 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,924 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Totals |
|
|
237,907 |
|
|
|
7,848 |
|
|
|
30,314 |
|
|
|
159,119 |
|
|
|
5,118 |
|
|
|
31,090 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Spot fleet includes short-term time-charters and fixed-rate contracts of affreightment
less than 1 year and gains and losses from FFAs less than 1 year and time-charter fleet
includes short-term time-charters and fixed-rate contracts of affreightment between 1-3
years and gains and losses from synthetic time-charters and FFAs between 1-3 years. |
|
(2) |
|
Includes realized gains and losses from STCs and FFAs. |
|
(3) |
|
Includes broker commissions, the cost of spot in-charter vessels servicing fixed-rate
COA cargoes, unrealized gains and losses from STCs and FFAs, the amortization of in-process
revenue contracts and cost of fuel while offhire. |
Page 31 of 42
Net Revenues. Net revenues increased for the three months ended March 31, 2008, compared to
the same period in 2007, primarily due to:
|
|
|
an increase of $51.4 million from the OMI Acquisition; |
|
|
|
an increase of $25.7 million from a net increase in the number of chartered-in vessels; |
|
|
|
an increase of $10.8 million from the ConocoPhillips Acquisition; |
|
|
|
an increase of $5.2 million from the transfer of two Aframax tankers from the fixed-rate
tanker segment in January 2008; |
|
|
|
an increase of $4.0 million from the Spot Tanker Deliveries; and |
|
|
|
an increase of $1.8 million from the effect of STCs and FFAs; |
partially offset by
|
|
|
a decrease of $10.8 million from a 4.6% decrease in our average TCE rate during the
three months ended March 31, 2008, compared to the same period in 2007; |
|
|
|
a decrease of $7.3 million from the transfer of an Aframax tanker to the offshore
segment in May 2007 and the transfer of a Suezmax tanker to the fixed-rate tanker segment
in December 2007; and |
|
|
|
a decrease of $2.0 million from an increase in the number of days our vessels were
off-hire due to regularly scheduled maintenance. |
Vessel Operating Expenses. Vessel operating expenses increased for the three months ended
March 31, 2008, compared to the same period in 2007, primarily due to:
|
|
|
an increase of $6.7 million from the OMI Acquisition; |
|
|
|
an increase of $4.6 million from the ConocoPhillips Acquisition; |
|
|
|
an increase of $2.3 million from higher crew manning and repairs, maintenance and
consumables costs; |
|
|
|
an increase of $1.3 million from the transfer of two Aframax tankers from the fixed-rate
tanker segment in January 2008; and |
|
|
|
an increase of $1.2 million from the Spot Tanker Deliveries; |
partially offset by
|
|
|
a decrease of $1.4 million from the transfer of an Aframax tanker to the offshore
segment in May 2007 and the transfer of a Suezmax tanker to the fixed-rate tanker segment
in December 2007. |
Time-Charter Hire Expense. Time-charter hire expense increased for the three months ended
March 31, 2008, compared to the same period in 2007, primarily due to:
|
|
|
an increase of $18.8 million from an increase in the number of chartered-in tankers
(excluding OMI and ConocoPhillips vessels) during the three months ended March 31, 2008
compared to the same period in 2007 ; |
|
|
|
an increase of $14.1 million from the OMI Acquisition; |
|
|
|
an increase of $4.3 million from the ConocoPhillips Acquisition; |
|
|
|
an increase of $4.2 from the increase in the average in-charter rate; and |
|
|
|
an increase of $3.0 million due to the sale and leaseback of the Aframax tankers during
April and July 2007. |
Depreciation and Amortization. Depreciation and amortization expense increased for the
three months ended March 31, 2008, compared to the same period in 2007, primarily due to:
|
|
|
an increase of $15.6 million from the OMI Acquisition; |
|
|
|
an increase of $0.6 million from the ConocoPhillips Acquisition; and |
|
|
|
an increase of $0.5 million from the Spot Tanker Deliveries; |
partially offset by
|
|
|
a decrease of $2.0 million from the sale and leaseback of the Aframax tankers during
April and July 2007; and |
|
|
|
a decrease of $1.1 million from the transfer of an Aframax tanker to the offshore
segment in May 2007 and the transfer of a Suezmax tanker to the fixed-rate tanker segment
in December 2007. |
Page 32 of 42
Other Operating Results
The following table compares our other operating results for the three months ended March 31, 2008
and 2007.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
% Change |
|
(in thousands of U.S. dollars, except percentages) |
|
(restated) |
|
|
(restated) |
|
|
(restated) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General and administrative |
|
|
(64,639 |
) |
|
|
(58,980 |
) |
|
|
9.6 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(282,248 |
) |
|
|
(55,905 |
) |
|
|
404.9 |
|
Interest income |
|
|
60,609 |
|
|
|
14,954 |
|
|
|
305.3 |
|
Foreign exchange loss |
|
|
(31,992 |
) |
|
|
(1,676 |
) |
|
|
1,808.8 |
|
Minority interest income (expense) |
|
|
26,560 |
|
|
|
(7,755 |
) |
|
|
(442.5 |
) |
Other net |
|
|
(1,086 |
) |
|
|
6,386 |
|
|
|
(117.0 |
) |
General and Administrative Expenses. General and administrative expenses increased for the
three months ended March 31, 2008, compared to the same period in 2007, primarily due to:
|
|
|
an increase of $6.4 million in compensation for shore-based employees and other
personnel expenses, primarily due to weakening of the U.S. Dollar compared to other major
currencies and increases in headcount and compensation levels; |
|
|
|
an increase of $2.2 million in corporate-related expenses, including costs associated
with Teekay Tankers becoming a public entity in December 2007; |
|
|
|
an increase of $1.8 million in fleet overhead from the timing of seafarer training
initiatives and higher training activity in the LNG segment; and |
|
|
|
an increase of $1.8 million in travel costs due to business development and other
project initiatives; |
partially offset by
|
|
|
a decrease of $6.4 million relating to the costs associated with our equity-based
compensation and long-term incentive program for management (please read Item 1 Financial
Statements: Note 9(c) Commitments and Contingencies Long-Term Incentive Program). |
Interest Expense. Interest expense increased for the three months ended March 31, 2008,
compared to the same period in 2007, primarily due to:
|
|
|
an increase of $207.9 million from the change in fair value of non-designated interest
rate swaps and swaptions (please read Item 1 Financial Statements: Note 14 Derivative
Instruments and Hedging Activities); |
|
|
|
an increase of $8.6 million relating to the increase in debt used to finance our
acquisition of 50% of OMI; |
|
|
|
an increase of $3.2 million for the three months ended March 31, 2008, relating to debt
of Teekay Nakilat (III) used by the RasGas 3 Joint Venture to fund shipyard construction
installment payments (this increase in interest expense from debt is offset by a
corresponding increase in interest income from advances to joint venture see below; and |
|
|
|
an increase of $3.4 million due to additional debt drawn under long-term revolving
credit facilities and term loans relating to the Shuttle Tanker Deliveries, the Aframax
Deliveries, the Spot Tanker Deliveries and other investing activities. |
Interest Income. Interest income increased for the three months ended March 31, 2008,
compared to the same period in 2007, primarily due to:
|
|
|
an increase of $41.7 million from change in fair value of derivative instruments; |
|
|
|
increases of $1.4 million resulting from interest-bearing loans we made to a 50% joint
venture between us and TORM, which were used during the second quarter of 2007, together
with comparable loans made by TORM, to acquire 100% of the outstanding shares of OMI; and |
|
|
|
an increase of $3.2 million relating to interest-bearing advances made by us to the
RasGas 3 Joint Venture for shipyard construction installment payments; |
partially offset by
|
|
|
a decrease of $0.7 million relating to a decrease in restricted cash used to fund
capital lease payments for the RasGas II LNG Carriers (please read Item 1 Financial
Statements: Note 7 Capital Leases and Restricted Cash). |
Page 33 of 42
Foreign Exchange Gains (Losses). The changes in our foreign exchange gains (losses) are
primarily attributable to the revaluation of our Euro-denominated term loans at the end of each
period for financial reporting purposes, and substantially all of the gains or losses are
unrealized. Gains reflect a stronger U.S. Dollar against the Euro on the date of revaluation.
Losses reflect a weaker U.S. Dollar against the Euro on the date of revaluation. Currently, our
Euro-denominated revenues generally approximate our Euro-denominated operating expenses and our
Euro-denominated interest and principal repayments.
Minority Interest (Expense) Income. Minority interest expense decreased for the three
months ended March 31, 2008, compared to the same period in 2007, primarily due to:
|
|
|
a decrease of $21.2 million resulting from a decrease in earnings from Teekay LNG which
was primarily the result of unrealized losses on interest rate swaps and unrealized foreign
exchange losses attributable to the revaluation of its Euro-denominated term loans; |
|
|
|
a decrease of $10.1 million resulting from a decrease in earnings from Teekay Offshore
and certain of our shuttle tanker joint ventures, which was primarily the result of
unrealized losses on interest rates swaps and increasing operating costs due to general
wage escalations, and an increase in repairs and maintenance performed for certain vessels
during the three months ended March 31, 2008, compared to the same period last year; and |
|
|
|
a decrease of $7.0 million resulting from a decrease in earnings from Petrojarl, which
was primarily the result of unrealized losses on interest rate swaps and higher operating
costs; |
partially offset by
|
|
|
an increase of $4.0 million resulting from an increase in earnings from Teekay Tankers
from the initial public offering in December 2007. |
Other Income (Net). Other loss (net) was $1.1 million for the three months ended March 31,
2008 compared to other income (net) of $6.4 million for the three months ended March 31, 2007. This
change of $7.5 million was primarily due to an increase in deferred income tax expense relating to
unrealized foreign exchange translation gains for the three months ended March 31, 2008.
Net Income. As a result of the foregoing factors, net loss was $105.1 million for the three
months ended March 31, 2008, compared to net income of $85.0 million for the same period last year.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Liquidity and Cash Needs
Our primary sources of liquidity are cash and cash equivalents, cash flows provided by our
operations and our undrawn credit facilities. Our short-term liquidity requirements are for the
payment of operating expenses, debt servicing costs, dividends, the scheduled repayments of
long-term debt, as well as funding our working capital requirements. As at March 31, 2008, our
total cash and cash equivalents was $555.7 million, compared to $442.7 million as at December 31,
2007. Our total liquidity, including cash and undrawn credit facilities, was $1.7 billion as at
March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007.
Our spot market operations contribute to the volatility of our net operating cash flow, and, thus,
our ability to generate sufficient cash flows to meet our short-term liquidity needs. Historically,
the tanker industry has been cyclical, experiencing volatility in profitability and asset values
resulting from changes in the supply of, and demand for, vessel capacity. In addition, tanker spot
markets historically have exhibited seasonal variations in charter rates. Tanker spot markets are
typically stronger in the winter months as a result of increased oil consumption in the northern
hemisphere and unpredictable weather patterns that tend to disrupt vessel scheduling.
As at March 31, 2008, we had $395.1 million of scheduled debt repayments coming due within the
following twelve months. We believe that our working capital is sufficient for our present
short-term liquidity requirements.
Our operations are capital intensive. We finance the purchase of our vessels primarily through a
combination of borrowings from commercial banks or our joint venture partners, the issuance of debt
and equity securities and cash generated from operations. In addition, we may use sale and
lease-back arrangements as a source of long-term liquidity. Occasionally we use our revolving
credit facilities to temporarily finance capital expenditures until longer-term financing is
obtained, at which time we typically use all or a portion of the proceeds from the longer-term
financings to prepay outstanding amounts under the revolving credit facilities. Excluding the three
LPG carriers to be delivered between October 2008 and July 2009 and the four vessels to be
constructed and delivered between 2011 and 2012 for the Angola LNG project, pre-arranged debt
facilities were in place as at March 31, 2008 for all of our remaining capital commitments relating
to our portion of newbuildings currently on order. Our pre-arranged debt facilities do not include
our undrawn credit facilities. We regularly consider strategic opportunities, including the
acquisition of additional vessels and expansion into new markets. We may choose to pursue such
opportunities through internal growth, joint ventures or business acquisitions. We intend to
finance any future acquisitions through various sources of capital, including internally-generated
cash flow, existing credit facilities, additional debt borrowings, and the issuance of additional
debt or equity securities or any combination thereof.
As at March 31, 2008, our revolving credit facilities provided for borrowings of up to $3.6
billion, of which $1.1 billion was undrawn. The amount available under these revolving credit
facilities decreases by $163.2 million (remainder of 2008), $188.5 million (2009), $196.0 million
(2010), $781.6 million (2011), $214.1 million (2012) and $2,090.1 million (thereafter). Our
revolving credit facilities are collateralized by first-priority mortgages granted on 62 of our
vessels, together with other related security, and are guaranteed by Teekay or our subsidiaries.
Please read Item 1 Financial Statements: Note 6 Long-Term Debt.
Page 34 of 42
Our unsecured 8.875% Senior Notes are due July 15, 2011. Our outstanding term loans reduce in
monthly, quarterly or semi-annual payments with varying maturities through 2023. Some of our term
loans also have bullet or balloon repayments at maturity and are collateralized by first-priority
mortgages granted on 37 of our vessels, together with other related security, and are generally
guaranteed by Teekay or our subsidiaries.
Among other matters, our long-term debt agreements generally provide for the maintenance of certain
vessel market value-to-loan ratios and minimum consolidated financial covenants and prepayment
privileges, in some cases with penalties. Certain of the loan agreements require that we maintain a
minimum level of free cash. As at March 31, 2008, this amount was $100.0 million. Certain of the
loan agreements also require that we maintain an aggregate level of free liquidity and undrawn
revolving credit lines (with at least six months to maturity) of at least 7.5% of total debt. As at
March 31, 2008, this amount was $349.8 million. We were in compliance with all loan covenants at
March 31, 2008.
We conduct our funding and treasury activities within corporate policies designed to minimize
borrowing costs and maximize investment returns while maintaining the safety of the funds and
appropriate levels of liquidity for our purposes. We hold cash and cash equivalents primarily in
U.S. Dollars, with some balances held in Japanese Yen, Singapore Dollars, Canadian Dollars,
Australian Dollars, British Pounds, Euros and Norwegian Kroner.
We are exposed to market risk from foreign currency fluctuations and changes in interest rates,
spot market rates for vessels and bunker fuel prices. We use forward foreign currency contracts,
interest rate swaps, forward freight agreements and bunker fuel swap contracts to manage currency,
interest rate, spot tanker rates and bunker fuel price risks. With the exception of some of our
forward freight agreements, we do not use these financial instruments for trading or speculative
purposes. Please read Item 3 Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.
Cash Flows
The following table summarizes our cash and cash equivalents provided by (used for) operating,
financing and investing activities for the periods presented:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
(restated) |
|
|
(restated) |
|
|
|
($000s) |
|
|
($000s) |
|
Net operating cash flows |
|
|
72,993 |
|
|
|
81,223 |
|
Net financing cash flows |
|
|
266,929 |
|
|
|
269,239 |
|
Net investing cash flows |
|
|
(226,922 |
) |
|
|
(323,662 |
) |
Operating Cash Flows
The decrease in net operating cash flow mainly reflects a decrease in net operating cash flows
generated by our offshore segment, which was primarily the result of an increase in crew manning
costs and vessel repair costs, and an increase in distributions to minority owners, partially
offset by a decrease in expenditures for drydockings and a decrease in non-cash working capital.
Financing Cash Flows
During the three months ended March 31, 2008, our proceeds from long-term debt, net of prepayments,
were $311.6 million. We used a majority of these funds to finance our expenditures for vessels and
equipment, which are explained in more detail below.
During March 2008, we repurchased 0.5 million of our common stock for $20.5 million, or an average
cost of $41.09 per share, pursuant to previously announced share repurchase programs. Please read
Item 1 Financial Statements: Note 8 Capital Stock.
Dividends paid during the three months ended March 31, 2008 were $20.0 million, or $0.2750 per
share. We have paid a quarterly dividend since 1995. We increased our quarterly dividend during
each of the last four years from $0.125 per share in 2003 to $0.2750 per share during the fourth
quarter of 2007. Subject to financial results and declaration by our board of directors, we
currently intend to continue to declare and pay a regular quarterly dividend in such amount per
share on our common stock.
Investing Cash Flows
During the three months ended March 31, 2008, we:
|
|
|
incurred capital expenditures for vessels and equipment of $178.7 million, primarily for
shipyard construction installment payments on our newbuilding Suezmax tankers, Aframax
tankers, shuttle tankers and LNG carriers and for costs to convert a conventional tanker to
an FPSO unit; |
|
|
|
acquired two Aframax tankers for a total cost of approximately $72.5 million as part of
the multi-vessel transaction with ConocoPhillips; |
|
|
|
acquired a shuttle tanker for a total cost of $41.7 million; and |
|
|
|
received proceeds of $36.6 million from the sale of a Handysize product tanker. |
Page 35 of 42
Commitments and Contingencies
The following table summarizes our long-term contractual obligations as at March 31, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 and |
|
|
2011 and |
|
|
|
|
In millions of U.S. Dollars |
|
Total |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2012 |
|
|
Beyond 2012 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Dollar-Denominated Obligations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt (restated) (1) |
|
|
5,134.2 |
|
|
|
323.6 |
|
|
|
746.8 |
|
|
|
1,220.6 |
|
|
|
2,843.2 |
|
Chartered-in vessels (operating leases) |
|
|
1,239.6 |
|
|
|
373.3 |
|
|
|
535.8 |
|
|
|
243.6 |
|
|
|
86.9 |
|
Commitments under capital leases (2) |
|
|
230.6 |
|
|
|
129.7 |
|
|
|
16.9 |
|
|
|
84.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments under capital leases (3) |
|
|
1,091.1 |
|
|
|
18.0 |
|
|
|
48.0 |
|
|
|
48.0 |
|
|
|
977.1 |
|
Newbuilding installments (4) |
|
|
1,068.7 |
|
|
|
350.8 |
|
|
|
554.7 |
|
|
|
163.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
Asset retirement obligation |
|
|
41.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total U.S. Dollar-denominated obligations |
|
|
8,805.7 |
|
|
|
1,195.4 |
|
|
|
1,902.2 |
|
|
|
1,759.4 |
|
|
|
3,948.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Euro-Denominated Obligations: (5) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt (6) |
|
|
476.4 |
|
|
|
9.4 |
|
|
|
27.6 |
|
|
|
258.2 |
|
|
|
181.2 |
|
Commitments under capital leases (2) (7) |
|
|
223.4 |
|
|
|
38.5 |
|
|
|
82.8 |
|
|
|
102.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Euro-denominated obligations |
|
|
699.8 |
|
|
|
47.9 |
|
|
|
110.4 |
|
|
|
360.3 |
|
|
|
181.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
9,505.5 |
|
|
|
1,243.3 |
|
|
|
2,012.6 |
|
|
|
2,119.7 |
|
|
|
4,129.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Excludes expected interest payments of $150.3 million (balance of 2008), $369.4 million (2009
and 2010), $261.9 million (2011 and 2012) and $425.7 million (beyond 2012). Expected interest
payments are based on the existing interest rates (fixed-rate loans) and LIBOR plus margins
that ranged up to 1.0% at March 31, 2008 (variable-rate loans). The expected interest payments
do not reflect the effect of related interest rate swaps that we have used to hedge certain of
our floating-rate debt. |
|
(2) |
|
Includes, in addition to lease payments, amounts we are required to pay to purchase certain
leased vessels at the end of the lease terms. We are obligated to purchase five of our
existing Suezmax tankers upon the termination of the related capital leases, which will occur
at various times from 2008 to 2011. The purchase price will be based on the unamortized
portion of the vessel construction financing costs for the vessels, which we expect to range
from $37.3 million to $40.7 million per vessel. We expect to satisfy the purchase price by
assuming the existing vessel financing. We are also obligated to purchase one of our LNG
carriers upon the termination of the related capital lease on December 31, 2011. The purchase
obligation has been fully funded with restricted cash deposits. Please read Item 1 Financial
Statements: Note 7 Capital Leases and Restricted Cash. |
|
(3) |
|
Existing restricted cash deposits of $489.8 million, together with the interest earned on the
deposits, will equal the remaining amounts we owe under the lease arrangements. |
|
(4) |
|
Represents remaining construction costs (including the joint venture partners 30% interest,
as applicable, but excluding capitalized interest and miscellaneous construction costs) for
four shuttle tankers, ten Suezmax tankers, three LPG carriers, two LNG carriers and one
product tanker. Please read Item 1 Financial Statements: Note 9 Commitments and
Contingencies Vessels Under Construction. |
|
(5) |
|
Euro-denominated obligations are presented in U.S. Dollars and have been converted using the
prevailing exchange rate as of March 31, 2008. |
|
(6) |
|
Excludes expected interest payments of $17.7 million (balance of 2008), $45.4 million (2009
and 2010), $25.0 million (2011 and 2012) and $65.5 million (beyond 2012). Expected interest
payments are based on EURIBOR plus margins that ranged up to 0.66% at March 31, 2008, as well
as the prevailing U.S. Dollar/Euro exchange rate as of March 31, 2008. The expected interest
payments do not reflect the effect of related interest rate swaps that we have used to hedge
certain of our floating-rate debt. |
|
(7) |
|
Existing restricted cash deposits of $196.0 million, together with the interest earned on the
deposits, will equal the remaining amounts we owe under the lease arrangements, including our
obligation to purchase the vessels at the end of the lease terms. |
In addition, we have entered into a joint venture agreement with our 60% partner to construct four
LNG carriers. As at March 31, 2008, the remaining commitments, excluding capitalized interest and
other miscellaneous construction costs, on these vessels totaled $200.3 million, of which our share
is $80.1 million. Pursuant to existing agreements, on November 1, 2006, Teekay LNG agreed to
acquire our ownership interest in these four vessels and related charter contracts upon delivery of
the first LNG carrier, which occurred on May 6, 2008. Please read Item 1 Financial Statements:
Note 9 Commitments and Contingencies Joint Ventures.
We also have a 33% interest in a consortium that has entered into agreements for the construction
of four LNG carriers. As at March 31, 2008, the remaining commitments on these vessels, excluding
capitalized interest and other miscellaneous construction costs, totaled $815.3 million, of which
our share is $269.1 million. Please read Item 1 Financial Statements: Note 9 Commitments and
Contingencies Joint Ventures.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We have no off-balance sheet arrangements that have, or are reasonably likely to have, a current or
future material effect on our financial condition, results of operations, liquidity, capital
expenditures or capital resources.
Page 36 of 42
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES
We prepare our consolidated financial statements in accordance with GAAP, which require us to make
estimates in the application of our accounting policies based on our best assumptions, judgments
and opinions. On a regular basis, management reviews the accounting policies, assumptions,
estimates and judgments to ensure that our consolidated financial statements are presented fairly
and in accordance with GAAP. However, because future events and their effects cannot be determined
with certainty, actual results could differ from our assumptions and estimates, and such
differences could be material. Accounting estimates and assumptions that we consider to be the most
critical to an understanding of our financial statements because they inherently involve
significant judgments and uncertainties, are described in Item 5. Operating and Financial Review
and Prospects in our Annual Report on Form 20-F/A for the year ended December 31, 2007.
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This Report on Form 6-K/A for the three months ended March 31, 2008 contains certain
forward-looking statements (as such term is defined in Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, as amended) concerning future events and our operations, performance and financial
condition, including, in particular, statements regarding:
|
|
our future growth prospects; |
|
|
|
tanker market fundamentals, including the balance of supply and demand in the tanker market
and spot tanker charter rates; |
|
|
|
the belief that the OMI acquisition will improve the utilization of certain of our existing
vessels; |
|
|
|
the sufficiency of working capital for short-term liquidity requirements; |
|
|
|
future capital expenditure commitments and the financing requirements for such commitments; |
|
|
|
delivery dates of and financing for newbuildings, and the commencement of service of
newbuildings under long-term time-charter contracts; |
|
|
|
the adequacy of restricted cash deposits to fund capital lease obligations; |
|
|
|
our ability to capture some of the value from the volatility of the spot tanker market and
from market imbalances by utilizing FFAs and STCs; |
|
|
|
the ability of the counter-parties to our derivative contracts to fulfill their contractual
obligations; |
|
|
|
our ability to utilize recently acquired LNG vessels in a new service offering; and |
|
|
|
the growth of global oil demand. |
Forward-looking statements include, without limitation, any statement that may predict, forecast,
indicate or imply future results, performance or achievements, and may contain the words believe,
anticipate, expect, estimate, project, will be, will continue, will likely result, or
words or phrases of similar meanings. These statements involve known and unknown risks and are
based upon a number of assumptions and estimates that are inherently subject to significant
uncertainties and contingencies, many of which are beyond our control. Actual results may differ
materially from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Important factors
that could cause actual results to differ materially include, but are not limited to: changes in
production of oil from offshore oil fields; changes in the demand for offshore oil transportation,
processing and storage services; changes in demand for LNG and LPG; greater or less than
anticipated levels of vessel newbuilding orders or greater or less than anticipated rates of vessel
scrapping; changes in trading patterns; changes in applicable industry laws and regulations and the
timing of implementation of new laws and regulations; potential inability to implement our growth
strategy; competitive factors in the markets in which we operate; potential for early termination
of long-term contracts and our potential inability to renew or replace long-term contracts; loss of
any customer, time-charter or vessel; shipyard production or vessel delivery delays; our potential
inability to raise financing to purchase additional vessels; our exposure to currency exchange rate
fluctuations; conditions in the public equity markets; and other factors detailed from time to time
in our periodic reports filed with the SEC, including our Annual Report on Form 20-F/A for the year
ended December 31, 2007. We do not intend to release publicly any updates or revisions to any
forward-looking statements contained herein to reflect any change in our expectations with respect
thereto or any change in events, conditions or circumstances on which any such statement is based.
Page 37 of 42
TEEKAY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
MARCH 31, 2008
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 3 QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
We are exposed to market risk from foreign currency fluctuations and changes in interest rates,
bunker fuel prices and spot tanker market rates for vessels. We use foreign currency forward
contracts, interest rate swaps, bunker fuel swap contracts and forward freight agreements to manage
currency, interest rate, bunker fuel price and spot tanker market rate risks but do not use these
financial instruments for trading or speculative purposes, except as noted below under Spot Tanker
Market Rate Risk. Please read Item 1 Financial Statements: Note 14 Derivative Instruments and
Hedging Activities.
Foreign Currency Fluctuation Risk
Our primary economic environment is the international shipping market. This market utilizes the
U.S. Dollar as its functional currency. Consequently, a substantial majority of our revenues and
most of our operating costs are in U.S. Dollars. We incur certain voyage expenses, vessel operating
expenses, drydocking and overhead costs in foreign currencies, the most significant of which are
Japanese Yen, Singapore Dollar, Canadian Dollar, Australian Dollar, British Pound, Euro and
Norwegian Kroner.
Our primary way of managing this exposure is to enter into foreign currency forward contracts. In
most cases we hedge a substantial majority of our net foreign currency exposure for the following
12 months. We generally do not hedge our net foreign currency exposure beyond 3 years forward.
As at March 31, 2008, we had the following foreign currency forward contracts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expected maturity date |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remainder |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of 2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
Contract |
|
|
Contract |
|
|
Contract |
|
|
Contract |
|
|
Fair value Asset/ |
|
|
|
amount(1) |
|
|
amount(1) |
|
|
amount(1) |
|
|
amount(1) |
|
|
(Liability)(1) |
|
Norwegian Kroner: |
|
$ |
132.6 |
|
|
$ |
74.6 |
|
|
$ |
5.0 |
|
|
$ |
212.2 |
|
|
$ |
33.8 |
|
Average contractual exchange rate(2) |
|
|
6.16 |
|
|
|
5.83 |
|
|
|
6.05 |
|
|
|
6.04 |
|
|
|
|
|
Euro: |
|
$ |
18.1 |
|
|
$ |
4.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
22.2 |
|
|
$ |
2.5 |
|
Average contractual exchange rate(2) |
|
|
0.71 |
|
|
|
0.70 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.71 |
|
|
|
|
|
Canadian Dollar: |
|
$ |
32.4 |
|
|
$ |
14.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
47.1 |
|
|
|
($0.6 |
) |
Average contractual exchange rate(2) |
|
|
1.02 |
|
|
|
1.01 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.02 |
|
|
|
|
|
British Pounds: |
|
$ |
37.6 |
|
|
$ |
18.9 |
|
|
$ |
1.9 |
|
|
$ |
58.4 |
|
|
$ |
0.1 |
|
Average contractual exchange rate(2) |
|
|
0.51 |
|
|
|
0.52 |
|
|
|
0.52 |
|
|
|
0.51 |
|
|
|
|
|
Australian Dollar: |
|
$ |
2.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2.5 |
|
|
$ |
0.3 |
|
Average contractual exchange rate(2) |
|
|
1.24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.24 |
|
|
|
|
|
Singapore Dollar: |
|
$ |
2.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2.6 |
|
|
$ |
0.0 |
|
Average contractual exchange rate(2) |
|
|
1.38 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.38 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Contract amounts and fair value amounts in millions of U.S. Dollars. |
|
(2) |
|
Average contractual exchange rate represents the contractual amount of foreign currency one
U.S. Dollar will buy. |
Although the majority of our transactions, assets and liabilities are denominated in U.S. Dollars,
certain of our subsidiaries have foreign currency-denominated liabilities. There is a risk that
currency fluctuations will have a negative effect on the value of our cash flows. We have not
entered into any forward contracts to protect against the translation risk of our foreign
currency-denominated liabilities. As at March 31, 2008, we had Euro-denominated term loans of 302.4
million Euros ($476.4 million) included in long-term debt and Norwegian Kroner-denominated deferred
income taxes of approximately 391.3 million NOK ($76.8 million). We receive Euro-denominated
revenue from certain of our time-charters. These Euro cash receipts are sufficient to pay the
principal and interest payments on our Euro-denominated term loans. Consequently, we have not
entered into any foreign currency forward contracts with respect to our Euro-denominated term
loans.
Interest Rate Risk
We are exposed to the impact of interest rate changes primarily through our borrowings that require
us to make interest payments based on LIBOR or EURIBOR. Significant increases in interest rates
could adversely affect our operating margins, results of operations and our ability to repay our
debt. We use interest rate swaps to reduce our exposure to market risk from changes in interest
rates. Generally our approach is to hedge a substantial majority of floating-rate debt associated
with our vessels that are operating on long-term fixed-rate contracts. We manage the rest of our
debt based on our outlook for interest rates and other factors.
In order to minimize counterparty risk, we only enter into derivative transactions with
counterparties that are rated A or better by Standard & Poors or Aa3 by Moodys at the time of the
transactions. In addition, to the extent possible and practical, interest rate swaps are entered
into with different counterparties to reduce concentration risk.
Page 38 of 42
The table below provides information about our financial instruments at March 31, 2008, which are
sensitive to changes in interest rates, including our debt and capital lease obligations and
interest rate swaps. For long-term debt and capital lease obligations, the table presents
principal cash flows and related weighted-average interest rates by expected maturity dates. For
interest rate swaps, the table presents notional amounts and weighted-average interest rates by
expected contractual maturity dates.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expected Maturity Date |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remainder |
|
|
|
|
|
There- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset / |
|
|
|
|
|
|
of 2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2012 |
|
|
after |
|
|
Total |
|
|
(Liability) |
|
|
Rate(1) |
|
|
|
(in millions of U.S. dollars, except percentages) |
|
Long-Term Debt: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Variable Rate ($U.S.) (restated)
(2) |
|
|
290.3 |
|
|
|
258.0 |
|
|
|
396.7 |
|
|
|
671.2 |
|
|
|
220.7 |
|
|
|
2,532.1 |
|
|
|
4,369.0 |
|
|
|
(4,369.0 |
) |
|
|
3.6 |
% |
Variable Rate (Euro) (3) (4) |
|
|
9.4 |
|
|
|
13.3 |
|
|
|
14.3 |
|
|
|
250.2 |
|
|
|
8.0 |
|
|
|
181.2 |
|
|
|
476.4 |
|
|
|
(476.4 |
) |
|
|
5.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed-Rate Debt ($U.S.) |
|
|
33.3 |
|
|
|
45.6 |
|
|
|
46.5 |
|
|
|
282.2 |
|
|
|
46.5 |
|
|
|
311.1 |
|
|
|
765.2 |
|
|
|
(711.9 |
) |
|
|
6.2 |
% |
Average Interest Rate |
|
|
5.1 |
% |
|
|
5.1 |
% |
|
|
5.1 |
% |
|
|
8.1 |
% |
|
|
5.1 |
% |
|
|
5.1 |
% |
|
|
6.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital Lease Obligations (5) (6) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed-Rate ($U.S.) (7) |
|
|
123.4 |
|
|
|
3.8 |
|
|
|
3.9 |
|
|
|
80.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
211.2 |
|
|
|
(211.2 |
) |
|
|
7.4 |
% |
Average Interest Rate (8) |
|
|
8.9 |
% |
|
|
5.4 |
% |
|
|
5.4 |
% |
|
|
5.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Rate Swaps: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contract Amount ($U.S.)
(restated) (6) (9) (10) |
|
|
78.7 |
|
|
|
626.0 |
|
|
|
358.8 |
|
|
|
59.8 |
|
|
|
60.9 |
|
|
|
3,033.3 |
|
|
|
4,217.5 |
|
|
|
(312.3 |
) |
|
|
5.1 |
% |
Average Fixed Pay Rate (2) |
|
|
5.1 |
% |
|
|
4.7 |
% |
|
|
4.9 |
% |
|
|
5.2 |
% |
|
|
5.2 |
% |
|
|
5.2 |
% |
|
|
5.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contract Amount (Euro) (4) (9) |
|
|
9.4 |
|
|
|
13.3 |
|
|
|
14.3 |
|
|
|
250.2 |
|
|
|
8.0 |
|
|
|
181.2 |
|
|
|
476.4 |
|
|
|
25.3 |
|
|
|
3.8 |
% |
Average Fixed Pay Rate (3) |
|
|
3.8 |
% |
|
|
3.8 |
% |
|
|
3.8 |
% |
|
|
3.8 |
% |
|
|
3.7 |
% |
|
|
3.8 |
% |
|
|
3.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Rate refers to the weighted-average effective interest rate for our long-term debt and
capital lease obligations, including the margin we pay on our floating-rate debt and the
average fixed pay rate for our interest rate swap agreements. The average interest rate for
our capital lease obligations is the weighted-average interest rate implicit in our lease
obligations at the inception of the leases. The average fixed pay rate for our interest rate
swaps excludes the margin we pay on our floating-rate debt, which as of March 31, 2008 ranged
from 0.3% to 1.0%. |
|
(2) |
|
Interest payments on U.S. Dollar-denominated debt and interest rate swaps are based on LIBOR. |
|
(3) |
|
Interest payments on Euro-denominated debt and interest rate swaps are based on EURIBOR. |
|
(4) |
|
Euro-denominated amounts have been converted to U.S. Dollars using the prevailing exchange
rate as of March 31, 2008. |
|
(5) |
|
Excludes capital lease obligations (present value of minimum lease payments) of 121.6 million
Euros ($191.7 million) on one of our existing LNG carriers with a weighted-average fixed
interest rate of 5.8%. Under the terms of this fixed-rate lease obligation, we are required to
have on deposit, subject to a weighted-average fixed interest rate of 5.0%, an amount of cash
that, together with the interest earned thereon, will fully fund the amount owing under the
capital lease obligation, including a vessel purchase obligation. As at March 31, 2008, this
amount was 124.4 million Euros ($196.0 million). Consequently, we are not subject to interest
rate risk from these obligations or deposits. |
|
(6) |
|
Under the terms of the capital leases for the three RasGas II LNG Carriers (see Item 1
Financial Statements: Note 7 Capital Leases and Restricted Cash), we are required to have on
deposit, subject to a variable rate of interest, an amount of cash that, together with
interest earned on the deposit, will equal the remaining amounts owing under the leases. The
deposits, which as at March 31, 2008 totaled $489.8 million, and the lease obligations, which
as at March 31, 2008 totaled $469.0 million, have been swapped for fixed-rate deposits and
fixed-rate obligations. Consequently, we are not subject to interest rate risk from these
obligations and deposits and, therefore, the lease obligations, cash deposits and related
interest rate swaps have been excluded from the table above. As at March 31, 2008, the
contract amount, fair value and fixed interest rates of these interest rate swaps related to
the RasGas II LNG Carrier capital lease obligations and restricted cash deposits were $500.1
million and $480.1 million, ($26.0) million and $23.3 million, and 4.9% and 4.8%,
respectively. |
|
(7) |
|
The amount of capital lease obligations represents the present value of minimum lease
payments together with our purchase obligation, as applicable. (See Item 1 Financial
Statements: Note 7 Capital Leases and Restricted Cash.) |
|
(8) |
|
The average interest rate is the weighted-average interest rate implicit in the capital lease
obligations at the inception of the leases. |
|
(9) |
|
The average variable receive rate for our interest rate swaps is set monthly at the 1-month
LIBOR or EURIBOR, quarterly at the 3-month LIBOR or semi-annually at the 6-month LIBOR. |
|
(10) |
|
Includes interest rate swaps of $30.0 million, $408.5 million, $300.0 million and $200.0
million that have commencement dates of 2008, 2009, 2010 and 2011, respectively. |
Commodity Price Risk
From time to time we use bunker fuel swap contracts as a hedge to protect against changes in
forecasted bunker fuel costs for certain vessels being time-chartered-out and for vessels servicing
certain contracts of affreightment. As at March 31, 2008, we were committed to contracts totaling
20,430 metric tonnes with a weighted-average price of $395.9 per tonne and a fair value of ($0.7)
million. The bunker fuel swap contracts expired in between April and December 2008.
Page 39 of 42
Spot Tanker Market Rate Risk
We use forward freight agreements (or FFAs) and synthetic time-charters (or STCs) as economic
hedges to protect against changes in spot tanker market rates earned by some of our vessels in our
spot tanker segment. FFAs involve contracts to move a theoretical volume of freight at fixed rates.
STCs are a means of achieving the equivalent of a time-charter for a vessel that trades in the spot
tanker market by taking the short position in an FFA. As at March 31, 2008, we had six STCs, which
were equivalent to 3.5 Suezmax vessels. As at March 31, 2008, we were committed to FFAs, which
include STCs, with an aggregate notional principal amount (including both long and short positions)
of $65.7 million and a net fair value of $6.4 million. The FFAs, which include STCs, expire between
April 2008 and September 2009.
We use FFAs in non-hedge-related transactions to increase or decrease our exposure to spot tanker
market rates, within strictly defined limits. Historically, we have used a number of different
tools, including the sale/purchase of vessels and the in-charter/out-charter of vessels, to
increase or decreases this exposure. We believe that we can capture some of the value from the
volatility of the spot tanker market and from market imbalances by utilizing FFAs. As at March 31,
2008, we were committed to non-hedge-related FFAs totaling 5.9 million metric tonnes with a
notional principal amount of $65.2 million and a fair value of $0.3 million. The FFAs expire
between April 2008 and December 2008.
Page 40 of 42
TEEKAY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
MARCH 31, 2008
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1 Legal Proceedings
None
Item 1A Risk Factors
In addition to the other information set forth in this Quarterly Report on Form 6-K/A, you should
carefully consider the risk factors discussed in Part I, Item 3. Key Information Risk Factors
in our Annual Report on Form 20-F/A for the year ended December 31, 2007, which could materially
affect our business, financial condition or results of operations. There has been no material
changes in our risk factors from those disclosed in our 2007 Annual Report on Form 20-F/A.
Item 2 Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
None
Item 3 Defaults Upon Senior Securities
None
Item 4 Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
None
Item 5 Other Information
None
Item 6 Exhibits
None
THIS REPORT ON FORM 6-K/A IS HEREBY INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE INTO THE FOLLOWING REGISTRATION
STATEMENTS OF THE COMPANY.
|
|
REGISTRATION STATEMENT ON FORM F-3 (FILE NO. 33-97746) FILED WITH THE SEC ON OCTOBER 4,
1995; |
|
|
|
REGISTRATION STATEMENT ON FORM S-8 (FILE NO. 333-42434) FILED WITH THE SEC ON JULY 28,
2000; |
|
|
|
REGISTRATION STATEMENT ON FORM S-8 (FILE NO. 333-119564) FILED WITH THE SEC ON OCTOBER 6,
2004; AND |
|
|
|
REGISTRATION STATEMENT ON FORM S-8 (FILE NO. 333-147683) FILED WITH THE SEC ON NOVEMBER 28,
2007 |
Page 41 of 42
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
TEEKAY CORPORATION |
|
|
|
|
Date: April 6, 2009 |
By: |
/s/ Vincent Lok
|
|
|
|
Vincent Lok |
|
|
|
Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |
|
Page 42 of 42