Document
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
|
| |
þ | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended December 31, 2016
OR
|
| |
¨ | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission file number: 001-34249
FARMER BROS. CO.
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
|
| | |
Delaware | | 95-0725980 |
(State of Incorporation) | | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
| | |
1912 Farmer Brothers Drive, Northlake, Texas 76262 |
(Address of Principal Executive Offices; Zip Code) |
|
888-998-2468 |
(Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code) |
|
13601 North Freeway, Suite 200, Fort Worth, Texas 76177 |
(Former Address, if Changed Since Last Report |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. YES ý NO ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). YES ý NO ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
| | | | | | |
Large accelerated filer | | ¨ | | Accelerated filer | | ý |
Non-accelerated filer | | ¨ (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) | | Smaller reporting company | | ¨ |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
YES ¨ NO ý
As of February 8, 2017, the registrant had 16,823,226 shares outstanding of its common stock, par value $1.00 per share, which is the registrant’s only class of common stock.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
|
| |
| Page |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 2016 and June 30, 2016 | |
| |
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Three and Six Months Ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 | |
| |
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the Three and Six Months Ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 | |
| |
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Six Months Ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION (UNAUDITED)
Item 1. Financial Statements
FARMER BROS. CO.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (UNAUDITED)
(In thousands, except share and per share data) |
| | | | | | | |
| December 31, 2016 | | June 30, 2016 |
ASSETS | | | |
Current assets: | | | |
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 8,443 |
| | $ | 21,095 |
|
Short-term investments | 26,190 |
| | 25,591 |
|
Accounts and notes receivable, net | 50,277 |
| | 44,364 |
|
Inventories | 56,559 |
| | 46,378 |
|
Income tax receivable | 274 |
| | 247 |
|
Short-term derivative assets | — |
| | 3,954 |
|
Prepaid expenses | 4,457 |
| | 4,557 |
|
Assets held for sale | — |
| | 7,179 |
|
Total current assets | 146,200 |
| | 153,365 |
|
Property, plant and equipment, net | 165,110 |
| | 118,416 |
|
Goodwill | 2,143 |
| | 272 |
|
Intangible assets, net | 14,696 |
| | 6,219 |
|
Other assets | 7,390 |
| | 9,933 |
|
Deferred income taxes | 67,147 |
| | 80,786 |
|
Total assets | $ | 402,686 |
| | $ | 368,991 |
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY | | | |
Current liabilities: | | | |
Accounts payable | 53,446 |
| | 23,919 |
|
Accrued payroll expenses | 17,559 |
| | 24,540 |
|
Short-term borrowings under revolving credit facility | 18,532 |
| | 109 |
|
Short-term obligations under capital leases | 1,214 |
| | 1,323 |
|
Short-term derivative liabilities | 437 |
| | — |
|
Other current liabilities | 7,348 |
| | 6,946 |
|
Total current liabilities | 98,536 |
| | 56,837 |
|
Accrued pension liabilities | 67,408 |
| | 68,047 |
|
Accrued postretirement benefits | 20,361 |
| | 20,808 |
|
Accrued workers’ compensation liabilities | 10,248 |
| | 11,459 |
|
Other long-term liabilities-capital leases | 449 |
| | 1,036 |
|
Other long-term liabilities | 100 |
| | 28,210 |
|
Total liabilities | $ | 197,102 |
| | $ | 186,397 |
|
Commitments and contingencies (Note 20) |
| |
|
Stockholders’ equity: | | | |
Preferred stock, $1.00 par value, 500,000 shares authorized and none issued | — |
| | — |
|
Common stock, $1.00 par value, 25,000,000 shares authorized; 16,826,377 and 16,781,561 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2016 and June 30, 2016, respectively | 16,826 |
| | 16,782 |
|
Additional paid-in capital | 39,406 |
| | 39,096 |
|
Retained earnings | 218,476 |
| | 196,782 |
|
Unearned ESOP shares | (4,289 | ) | | (6,434 | ) |
Accumulated other comprehensive loss | (64,835 | ) | | (63,632 | ) |
Total stockholders’ equity | $ | 205,584 |
| | $ | 182,594 |
|
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity | $ | 402,686 |
| | $ | 368,991 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
FARMER BROS. CO.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (UNAUDITED)
(In thousands, except share and per share data)
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Three Months Ended December 31, | | Six Months Ended December 31, |
| 2016 | | 2015 | | 2016 | | 2015 |
Net sales | $ | 139,025 |
| | $ | 142,307 |
| | $ | 269,513 |
| | $ | 275,752 |
|
Cost of goods sold | 83,929 |
| | 89,399 |
| | 163,219 |
| | 172,265 |
|
Gross profit | 55,096 |
| | 52,908 |
| | 106,294 |
| | 103,487 |
|
Selling expenses | 39,097 |
| | 37,853 |
| | 77,535 |
| | 74,294 |
|
General and administrative expenses | 13,793 |
| | 9,509 |
| | 22,729 |
| | 18,974 |
|
Restructuring and other transition expenses | 3,965 |
| | 5,236 |
| | 6,995 |
| | 10,686 |
|
Net gain from sale of Torrance Facility | (37,449 | ) | | — |
| | (37,449 | ) | | — |
|
Net gains from sale of Spice Assets | (334 | ) | | (5,106 | ) | | (492 | ) | | (5,106 | ) |
Net losses (gains) from sales of other assets | 114 |
| | 55 |
| | (1,439 | ) | | (159 | ) |
Operating expenses | 19,186 |
| | 47,547 |
| | 67,879 |
| | 98,689 |
|
Income from operations | 35,910 |
| | 5,361 |
| | 38,415 |
| | 4,798 |
|
Other (expense) income: | | | | | | | |
Dividend income | 270 |
| | 259 |
| | 535 |
| | 552 |
|
Interest income | 159 |
| | 116 |
| | 288 |
| | 220 |
|
Interest expense | (524 | ) | | (109 | ) | | (913 | ) | | (230 | ) |
Other, net | (2,323 | ) | | 297 |
| | (2,132 | ) | | (578 | ) |
Total other (expense) income | (2,418 | ) | | 563 |
| | (2,222 | ) | | (36 | ) |
Income before taxes | 33,492 |
| | 5,924 |
| | 36,193 |
| | 4,762 |
|
Income tax expense | 13,416 |
| | 363 |
| | 14,499 |
| | 275 |
|
Net income | $ | 20,076 |
| | $ | 5,561 |
| | $ | 21,694 |
| | $ | 4,487 |
|
Net income per common share—basic | $ | 1.21 |
| | $ | 0.34 |
| | $ | 1.31 |
| | $ | 0.28 |
|
Net income per common share—diluted | $ | 1.20 |
| | $ | 0.34 |
| | $ | 1.30 |
| | $ | 0.27 |
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding—basic | 16,584,106 |
| | 16,313,312 |
| | 16,573,545 |
| | 16,291,324 |
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding—diluted | 16,707,003 |
| | 16,452,499 |
| | 16,695,687 |
| | 16,426,837 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
FARMER BROS. CO.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (UNAUDITED)
(In thousands)
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Three Months Ended December 31, | | Six Months Ended December 31, |
| 2016 | | 2015 | | 2016 | | 2015 |
Net income | $ | 20,076 |
| | $ | 5,561 |
| | $ | 21,694 |
| | $ | 4,487 |
|
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax: | | | | | | | |
Unrealized (losses) gains on derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges | (1,800 | ) | | 310 |
| | (1,356 | ) | | (4,330 | ) |
(Losses) gains on derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges reclassified to cost of goods sold | (132 | ) | | 3,859 |
| | 153 |
| | 8,827 |
|
Total comprehensive income, net of tax | $ | 18,144 |
| | $ | 9,730 |
| | $ | 20,491 |
| | $ | 8,984 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
|
| | | | | | | |
FARMER BROS. CO. |
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (UNAUDITED) |
(In thousands) |
| Six Months Ended December 31, |
| 2016 | | 2015 |
Cash flows from operating activities: | | | |
Net income | $ | 21,694 |
| | $ | 4,487 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: | | |
Depreciation and amortization | 10,086 |
| | 10,487 |
|
(Recovery of) provision for doubtful accounts | (44 | ) | | 217 |
|
Interest on sale-leaseback financing obligation | 681 |
| | — |
|
Restructuring and other transition expenses, net of payments | 1,082 |
| | 3,617 |
|
Deferred income taxes | 13,640 |
| | 72 |
|
Net gain from sale of Torrance Facility | (37,449 | ) | | — |
|
Net gains from sales of Spice Assets and other assets | (1,931 | ) | | (5,265 | ) |
ESOP and share-based compensation expense | 2,094 |
| | 2,651 |
|
Net losses on derivative instruments and investments | 2,583 |
| | 9,426 |
|
Change in operating assets and liabilities: | | | |
Restricted cash | — |
| | 1,002 |
|
Purchases of trading securities held for investment | (2,959 | ) | | (4,050 | ) |
Proceeds from sales of trading securities held for investment | 1,268 |
| | 3,497 |
|
Accounts and notes receivable | (4,545 | ) | | (5,646 | ) |
Inventories | (10,071 | ) | | (2,763 | ) |
Income tax receivable | (27 | ) | | (75 | ) |
Derivative assets (liabilities), net | 4,329 |
| | (8,822 | ) |
Prepaid expenses and other assets | 33 |
| | 518 |
|
Accounts payable | 18,356 |
| | (1,048 | ) |
Accrued payroll expenses and other current liabilities | (5,210 | ) | | (4,076 | ) |
Accrued postretirement benefits | (447 | ) | | (197 | ) |
Other long-term liabilities | (1,849 | ) | | (72 | ) |
Net cash provided by operating activities | $ | 11,314 |
| | $ | 3,960 |
|
Cash flows from investing activities: | | | |
Acquisition of business, net of cash acquired | $ | (11,183 | ) | | $ | — |
|
Purchases of property, plant and equipment | (26,864 | ) | | (11,383 | ) |
Purchases of construction-in-progress assets for New Facility | (21,783 | ) | | (5,738 | ) |
Proceeds from sales of property, plant and equipment | 3,332 |
| | 5,826 |
|
Net cash used in investing activities | $ | (56,498 | ) | | $ | (11,295 | ) |
(continued on next page) |
|
| | | | | | | |
FARMER BROS. CO. |
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (UNAUDITED) |
(In thousands) |
| Six Months Ended December 31, |
| 2016 | | 2015 |
Cash flows from financing activities: | | | |
Proceeds from revolving credit facility | $ | 34,323 |
| | $ | 193 |
|
Repayments on revolving credit facility | (15,900 | ) | | (87 | ) |
Proceeds from sale-leaseback financing obligation | 42,455 |
| | — |
|
Proceeds from New Facility lease financing | 7,662 |
| | 5,738 |
|
Repayments of New Facility lease financing | (35,772 | ) | | — |
|
Payments of capital lease obligations | (641 | ) | | (1,723 | ) |
Payment of financing costs | — |
| | (8 | ) |
Proceeds from stock option exercises | 405 |
| | 1,267 |
|
Tax withholding payment - net share settlement of equity awards | — |
| | (159 | ) |
Net cash provided by financing activities | $ | 32,532 |
| | $ | 5,221 |
|
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents | $ | (12,652 | ) | | $ | (2,114 | ) |
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period | 21,095 |
| | 15,160 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period | $ | 8,443 |
| | $ | 13,046 |
|
|
| | | | | | | |
Supplemental disclosure of non-cash investing activities: | | | |
Equipment acquired under capital leases | $ | — |
| | $ | 9 |
|
Net change in derivative assets and liabilities included in other comprehensive income, net of tax | $ | (1,203 | ) | | $ | 4,497 |
|
Construction-in-progress assets under New Facility lease | $ | — |
| | $ | 2,321 |
|
New Facility lease obligation | $ | — |
| | $ | 2,321 |
|
Non-cash additions to property, plant and equipment | $ | 11,253 |
| | $ | 644 |
|
Non-cash portion of earnout receivable recognized-Spice Assets sale | $ | 492 |
| | $ | — |
|
Non-cash portion of earnout payable recognized-China Mist acquisition | $ | 500 |
| | $ | — |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
FARMER BROS. CO.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note 1. Introduction and Basis of Presentation
Overview
Farmer Bros. Co., a Delaware corporation (including its consolidated subsidiaries unless the context otherwise requires, the “Company,” or “Farmer Bros.”), is a national coffee roaster, wholesaler and distributor of coffee, tea and culinary products. The Company serves a wide variety of customers, from small independent restaurants and foodservice operators to large institutional buyers like restaurant and convenience store chains, hotels, casinos, hospitals, and gourmet coffee houses, as well as grocery chains with private brand coffee and consumer-facing branded coffee and tea products. The Company’s product categories consist of roast and ground coffee; frozen liquid coffee; flavored and unflavored iced and hot teas; culinary products; spices; and other beverages including cappuccino, cocoa, granitas, and ready-to-drink iced coffee. The Company was founded in 1912, incorporated in California in 1923, and reincorporated in Delaware in 2004. The Company operates in one business segment.
The Company operates production facilities in Portland, Oregon, Houston, Texas and Scottsdale, Arizona. Distribution takes place out of the Portland facility, Scottsdale facility and the Company's new facility in Northlake, Texas (the "New Facility") as well as separate distribution centers in Northlake, Illinois; Oklahoma City, Oklahoma; and Moonachie, New Jersey. On July 15, 2016, the Company completed the sale of certain property, including the Company’s former headquarters in Torrance, California (the “Torrance Facility”) and leased it back. The Company vacated the Torrance Facility after transitioning the Company’s remaining Torrance operations to its other facilities and concluded the leaseback arrangement as of December 31, 2016.
The Company’s products reach its customers primarily in two ways: through the Company’s nationwide direct-store-delivery, or DSD, network of 450 delivery routes and 107 branch warehouses as of December 31, 2016, or direct-shipped via common carriers or third-party distributors. The Company operates a large fleet of trucks and other vehicles to distribute and deliver its products, and relies on third-party logistic (“3PL”) service providers for its long-haul distribution. DSD sales are made “off-truck” by the Company to its customers at their places of business.
Basis of Presentation
The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Rule 10-01 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”) for complete condensed consolidated financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring accruals, unless otherwise indicated) considered necessary for a fair presentation of the interim financial data have been included. Operating results for the three and six months ended December 31, 2016 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2017. Events occurring subsequent to December 31, 2016 have been evaluated for potential recognition or disclosure in the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements for the three and six months ended December 31, 2016.
The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and related notes included in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2016, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) on September 14, 2016 (the "2016 Form 10-K").
Principles of Consolidation
The condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its direct and indirect wholly owned subsidiaries FBC Finance Company, a California corporation, Coffee Bean Holding Co., Inc., a Delaware corporation, the parent company of Coffee Bean International, Inc., an Oregon corporation (“CBI”), CBI and China Mist Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. All inter-company balances and transactions have been eliminated.
Farmer Bros. Co.
Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in accordance with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the condensed consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. The Company reviews its estimates on an ongoing basis using currently available information. Changes in facts and circumstances may result in revised estimates and actual results may differ from those estimates.
Note 2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
For a detailed discussion about the Company's significant accounting policies, see Note 1, "Summary of Significant Accounting Policies" to the consolidated financial statements in the 2016 Form 10-K.
During the three months ended December 31, 2016, other than the following, there were no significant updates made to the Company's significant accounting policies.
Business Combinations
The Company accounts for business combinations under the acquisition method of accounting. The purchase price of each business acquired is allocated to the tangible and intangible assets acquired and the liabilities assumed based on information regarding their respective fair values on the date of acquisition. Any excess of the purchase price over the fair value of the separately identifiable assets acquired and the liabilities assumed is allocated to goodwill. Management determines the fair values used in purchase price allocations for intangible assets based on historical data, estimated discounted future cash flows, and expected royalty rates for trademarks and trade names, as well as certain other information. The valuation of assets acquired and liabilities assumed requires a number of judgments and is subject to revision as additional information about the fair value of assets and liabilities becomes available. Additional information, which existed as of the acquisition date but unknown to the Company at that time, may become known during the remainder of the measurement period, a period not to exceed twelve months from the acquisition date. Adjustments in the purchase price allocation may require a recasting of the amounts allocated to goodwill and intangible assets. If such an adjustment is required, the Company will recognize a measurement-period adjustment during the period in which it determines the amount of the adjustment, including the effect on earnings of any amounts it would have recorded in previous periods if the accounting had been completed at the acquisition date. Transaction costs, including legal and accounting expenses, are expensed as incurred and are included in general and administrative expenses in the Company's condensed consolidated statements of operations. Contingent consideration, such as earnout, is deferred as a short-term or long-term liability based on an estimate of the timing of the future payment. The results of operations of businesses acquired are included in the Company's condensed consolidated financial statements from their dates of acquisition. See Note 3. Goodwill and Indefinite-lived Intangible Assets
The Company accounts for its goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets in accordance with ASC 350, “Intangibles-Goodwill and Other” (“ASC 350”). Goodwill and other indefinite-lived intangible assets are not amortized but instead are reviewed for impairment annually, or more frequently if an event occurs or circumstances change which indicate that an asset might be impaired. Pursuant to ASC 350, the Company performs a qualitative assessment of goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets on its consolidated balance sheets, to determine if there is a more likely than not indication that its goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets are impaired as of June 30. If the indicators of impairment are present, the Company performs a quantitative assessment to determine the impairment of these assets as of the measurement date.
Testing for impairment of goodwill is a two-step process. The first step requires the Company to compare the fair value of its reporting units to the carrying value of the reporting units, including goodwill. If the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying value, goodwill of the reporting unit is potentially impaired and the Company then completes step two to measure the impairment loss, if any. The second step requires the calculation of the implied fair value of goodwill, which is the residual fair value remaining after deducting the fair value of all tangible and intangible net assets of the reporting unit from the fair value of the reporting unit. If the implied fair value of goodwill is less than the carrying amount of goodwill, an impairment loss is recognized equal to the difference.
Farmer Bros. Co.
Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
Indefinite-lived intangible assets are tested for impairment by comparing their fair values to their carrying values. An impairment charge is recorded if the estimated fair value of such assets has decreased below their carrying values. There were no intangible asset or goodwill impairment charges recorded in the six months ended December 31, 2016 or 2015.
Other Intangible Assets
Other intangible assets consist of finite-lived intangible assets including acquired recipes, non-compete agreements, customer relationships, trade names and trademarks. These are amortized over their estimated useful lives and are tested for impairment by grouping them with other assets at the lowest level for which identifiable cash flows are largely independent of the cash flows of other groups of assets and liabilities. The estimated future cash flows are based upon, among other things, assumptions about expected future operating performance, and may differ from actual cash flows. If the sum of the projected undiscounted cash flows (excluding interest) is less than the carrying value of the assets, the assets will be written down to the estimated fair value in the period in which the determination is made. The Company reviews the recoverability of its long-lived assets whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of such assets may not be recoverable. There were no other intangible asset impairment charges recorded in the six months ended December 31, 2016 or 2015.
Leases
Leases are categorized as either operating or capital leases at inception. Operating lease costs are recognized on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease. An asset and a corresponding liability for the capital lease obligation are established for the cost of a capital lease. Capital lease obligations are amortized over the life of the lease.
For build-to-suit leases, the Company establishes an asset and liability for the estimated construction costs incurred to the extent that it is involved in the construction of structural improvements or takes construction risk prior to the commencement of the lease. A portion of the lease arrangement is allocated to the land for which the Company accrues rent expense during the construction period. The amount of rent expense to be accrued is determined using the fair value of the leased land at construction commencement and the Company’s incremental borrowing rate, and recognized on a straight-line basis. Upon exercise of the purchase option on a build-to-suit lease, the Company records an asset equal to the value of the option price that includes the value of the land and reverses the rent expense and the asset and liability established to record the construction costs incurred through the date of option exercise. See Note 5. Coffee Brewing Equipment and Service
The Company classifies certain expenses related to coffee brewing equipment provided to customers as cost of goods sold. These costs include the cost of the equipment as well as the cost of servicing that equipment (including service employees’ salaries, cost of transportation and the cost of supplies and parts) and are considered directly attributable to the generation of revenues from its customers. Accordingly, such costs included in cost of goods sold in the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements in the three months ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 were $5.8 million and $6.9 million, respectively. Coffee brewing equipment costs included in cost of goods sold in the six months ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 were $12.3 million and $13.4 million, respectively.
The Company capitalizes coffee brewing equipment and depreciates it over an estimated three or five year period, depending on the assessment of the useful life and reports the depreciation expense in cost of goods sold. Such depreciation expense related to capitalized coffee brewing equipment reported in cost of goods sold in the three months ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 was $2.1 million and $2.6 million, respectively, and $4.5 million and $5.1 million, respectively, in the six months ended December 31, 2016 and 2015. The Company capitalized coffee brewing equipment (included in machinery and equipment) in the amounts of $5.9 million and $3.9 million in the six months ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively.
Net Income Per Common Share
Computation of net income per share ("EPS") for the three months ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 includes the dilutive effect of 122,897 and 139,187 shares, respectively, issuable under stock options with exercise prices below the closing price of the Company's common stock on the last trading day of the applicable period, but excludes the dilutive effect of 29,032 and 13,887 shares, respectively, issuable under stock options with exercise prices above the closing price of the Company's common stock on the last trading day of the applicable period because their inclusion would be anti-dilutive.
Computation of EPS for the six months ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 includes the dilutive effect of 122,142 and 135,513 shares, respectively, issuable under stock options with exercise prices below the closing price of the Company’s
Farmer Bros. Co.
Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
common stock on the last trading day of the applicable period, but excludes 24,804 and 21,723 shares, respectively, issuable under stock options with exercise prices above the closing price of the Company’s common stock on the last trading day of the applicable period because their inclusion would be anti-dilutive. See Note 19. Shipping and Handling Costs
Shipping and handling costs incurred through outside carriers are recorded as a component of the Company's selling expenses and were $6.4 million and $3.4 million, respectively, in the three months ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, and $11.2 million and $5.6 million, respectively, in the six months ended December 31, 2016 and 2015. With the Company’s move to 3PL for its long-haul distribution in the third quarter of fiscal 2016, payroll, benefits, vehicle costs and other costs associated with the Company’s internal operation of its long-haul distribution previously included elsewhere in selling expenses are now represented in outsourced shipping and handling costs in the three and six months ended December 31, 2016. The amount recorded in shipping and handling costs in the three and six months ended December 31, 2016 was less than the comparable aggregate operating costs associated with internally managing the Company’s long-haul distribution in the three and six months ended December 31, 2015.
Recently Adopted Accounting Standards
In December 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (the "FASB") issued ASU No. 2016-19, "Technical Corrections and Improvements" ("ASU 2016-19"). The amendments cover a wide range of topics in the FASB Accounting Standards Codification. The amendments represent changes to make corrections or improvements to the Accounting Standards Codification that are not expected to have a significant effect on current accounting practice or create a significant administrative cost to most entities. ASU 2016-19 is effective for the Company immediately. Adoption of ASU 2016-19 did not have a material effect on the results of operations, financial position or cash flows of the Company.
In September 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-16, “Business Combinations (Topic 805): Simplifying the Accounting for Measurement-Period Adjustments” (“ASU 2015-16”). ASU 2015-16 eliminates the requirement that an acquirer in a business combination account for measurement-period adjustments retrospectively. Instead, an acquirer will recognize a measurement-period adjustment during the period in which it determines the amount of the adjustment, including the effect on earnings of any amounts it would have recorded in previous periods if the accounting had been completed at the acquisition date. The Company adopted ASU 2015-16 beginning July 1, 2016. Adoption of ASU 2015-16 did not have a material effect on the results of operations, financial position or cash flows of the Company.
In July 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-12, “Plan Accounting: Defined Benefit Pension Plans (Topic 960), Defined Contribution Pension Plans (Topic 962), Health and Welfare Benefit Plans (Topic 965), (Part I) Fully Benefit-Responsive Investment Contracts, (Part II) Plan Investment Disclosures, (Part III) Measurement Date Practical Expedient” ("ASU 2015-12”). ASU 2015-12 eliminates requirements that employee benefit plans measure the fair value of fully benefit-responsive investment contracts ("FBRICs") and provide the related fair value disclosures. As a result, FBRICs are measured, presented and disclosed only at contract value. Also, plans will be required to disaggregate their investments measured using fair value by general type, either on the face of the financial statements or in the notes, and self-directed brokerage accounts are one general type. Plans no longer have to disclose the net appreciation/depreciation in fair value of investments by general type or individual investments equal to or greater than 5% of net assets available for benefits. In addition, a plan with a fiscal year end that does not coincide with the end of a calendar month is allowed to measure its investments and investment-related accounts using the month end closest to its fiscal year end. The new guidance for FBRICs and plan investment disclosures should be applied retrospectively. The measurement date practical expedient should be applied prospectively. The guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2015, with early adoption permitted. The Company adopted ASU 2015-12 beginning July 1, 2016. Adoption of ASU 2015-12 did not have a material effect on the results of operations, financial position or cash flows of the Company.
In May 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-07, “Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820): Disclosures for Investments in Certain Entities That Calculate Net Asset Value per Share (or Its Equivalent)” (“ASU 2015-07”). ASU 2015-07 removes the requirement to categorize investments for which the fair values are measured using the net asset value per share practical expedient within the fair value hierarchy. It also limits certain disclosures to investments for which the entity has elected to measure the fair value using the practical expedient. ASU 2015-07 is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2015, with early adoption permitted. The Company adopted ASU 2015-07 beginning July
Farmer Bros. Co.
Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
1, 2016. Adoption of ASU 2015-07 did not have a material effect on the results of operations, financial position or cash flows of the Company.
New Accounting Pronouncements
In November 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-18, "Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230):Restricted Cash" ("ASU 2016-18"). The amendments require that a statement of cash flows explain the change during the period in the total of cash, cash equivalents, and amounts generally described as restricted cash or restricted cash equivalents. As a result, amounts generally described as restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents should be included with cash and cash equivalents when reconciling the beginning-of-period and end-of-period total amounts shown on the statement of cash flows. The amendments do not provide a definition of restricted cash or restricted cash equivalents. ASU 2016-18 is effective for the Company beginning July 1, 2018. Adoption of ASU 2016-18 is not expected to have a material effect on the results of operations, financial position or cash flows of the Company.
In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-09, "Compensation—Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting" ("ASU 2016-09"). ASU 2016-09 is being issued as part of the FASB's Simplification Initiative. The areas for simplification in ASU 2016-09 involve several aspects of the accounting for share-based payment transactions, including the income tax consequences, classification of awards as either equity or liabilities, and classification on the statement of cash flows. ASU 2016-09 is effective for the Company beginning July 1, 2017. Adoption of ASU 2016-09 is not expected to have a material effect on the results of operations, financial position or cash flows of the Company.
In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, "Leases (Topic 842)" ("ASU 2016-02"), which introduces a new lessee model that brings substantially all leases onto the balance sheet. Under the new guidance, lessees are required to recognize a lease liability, which represents the discounted obligation to make future minimum lease payments and a related right-of-use asset. For public business entities, ASU 2016-02 is effective for financial statements issued for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2018, and interim periods within those annual periods. Early application is permitted. ASU 2016-02 is effective for the Company beginning July 1, 2019. The Company is evaluating the impact this guidance will have on its consolidated financial statements and expects the adoption will have a significant impact on the Company's financial position resulting from the increase in assets and liabilities.
In January 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-01, “Financial Instruments-Overall (Subtopic 825-10): Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities” (“ASU 2016-01”). ASU 2016-01 requires equity investments (except those accounted for under the equity method of accounting or those that result in consolidation of the investee) at fair value, with changes in fair value recognized in net income. Under ASU 2016-01, entities will no longer be able to recognize unrealized holding gains and losses on available-for-sale equity securities in other comprehensive income, and they will no longer be able to use the cost method of accounting for equity securities that do not have readily determinable fair values. The guidance to classify equity securities with readily determinable fair values into different categories (that is trading or available for sale) is no longer required. ASU 2016-01 eliminates certain disclosure requirements related to financial instruments measured at amortized cost and adds disclosures related to the measurement categories of financial assets and financial liabilities. The guidance is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those fiscal years. ASU 2016-01 is effective for the Company beginning July 1, 2018. Adoption of ASU 2016-01 is not expected to have a material effect on the results of operations, financial position or cash flows of the Company.
In July 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-11, “Inventory (Topic 330): Simplifying the Measurement of Inventory” (“ASU 2015-11”). ASU 2015-11 simplifies the subsequent measurement of inventory by requiring inventory to be measured at the lower of cost and net realizable value. Entities will continue to apply their existing impairment models to inventories that are accounted for using last-in first-out or LIFO and the retail inventory method or RIM. Under current guidance, net realizable value is one of several calculations an entity needs to make to measure inventory at the lower of cost or market. ASU 2015-11 is effective for public business entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted, and the guidance must be applied prospectively after the date of adoption. ASU 2015-11 is effective for the Company beginning July 1, 2017. Adoption of ASU 2015-11 is not expected to have a material effect on the results of operations, financial position or cash flows of the Company.
In May 2014, the FASB issued accounting guidance which requires an entity to recognize the amount of revenue to which it expects to be entitled for the transfer of promised goods or services to customers under ASU No. 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers” ("ASU 2014-09"). ASU 2014-09 will replace most existing revenue recognition guidance in GAAP
Farmer Bros. Co.
Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
when it becomes effective. On July 9, 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-14, "Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Deferral of the Effective Date," which defers the effective date of ASU 2014-09 by one year allowing early adoption as of the original effective date of January 1, 2017. The deferral results in the new accounting standard being effective for public business entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 31, 2017, including interim periods within those fiscal years. ASU 2014-09 is effective for the Company beginning July 1, 2018. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of ASU 2014-09 along with the related amendments and interpretations issued under ASU 2016-08, ASU 2016-10, ASU 2016-12 and ASU 2016-20 on its results of operations, financial position and cash flows.
Note 3. Acquisition
On October 11, 2016, the Company, through a wholly owned subsidiary, completed the acquisition of substantially all of the assets and certain specified liabilities of China Mist Brands, Inc. dba China Mist Tea Company (“China Mist”), a provider of flavored iced teas and iced green teas. The acquisition of China Mist is expected to extend the Company's tea product offerings and give the Company a greater presence in the high-growth premium tea industry. As part of the transaction, the Company assumed the lease on China Mist’s existing production, distribution and warehouse facility in Scottsdale, Arizona which is terminable upon twelve months’ notice. The aggregate purchase price of $11.7 million, included $11.2 million in cash paid at closing and $0.5 million in contingent consideration to be paid as earnout if certain sales levels are achieved in the calendar years of 2017 or 2018. In the three and six months ended December 31, 2016, the Company incurred $0.2 million in transaction costs related to the China Mist acquisition, consisting primarily of legal and accounting expenses, which are included in general and administrative expenses in the Company's condensed consolidated statements of operations. The Company recorded the contingent consideration of $0.5 million in earnout in other current liabilities on the Company's consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2016. The earnout is estimated to be paid within the next twelve months.
The financial effect of this acquisition was not material to the Company’s consolidated financial statements. The Company has not presented pro forma results of operations for the acquisition because it is not material to the Company's condensed consolidated results of operations.
The acquisition was accounted for as a business combination. The fair value of consideration transferred was allocated to the tangible and intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their estimated fair values on the acquisition date, with the remaining unallocated amount recorded as goodwill. The purchase price allocation is preliminary as the Company is in the process of finalizing the valuation.
The following table summarizes the preliminary allocation of consideration transferred as of the acquisition date:
|
| | | | | |
(In thousands) | Fair Value | | Estimated Useful Life (years) |
Intangible assets: | | | |
Recipes | $ | 930 |
| | 7 |
Non-compete agreement | 100 |
| | 5 |
Customer relationships | 450 |
| | 10 |
Trade name/Trademark—finite-lived | 7,100 |
| | 10 |
Goodwill | 1,871 |
| | |
Current assets net of current liabilities assumed | 1,232 |
| | |
Total consideration, net of cash acquired | $ | 11,683 |
| | |
In connection with this acquisition, the Company recorded goodwill of $1.9 million, which is deductible for tax purposes. The Company also recorded $8.6 million in finite-lived intangible assets that included recipes, a non-compete agreement, customer relationships and a trade name/trademark. The weighted average amortization period for the finite-lived intangible assets is 9.6 years.
The determination of the fair value of intangible assets acquired was primarily based on significant inputs not observable in an active market and thus represent Level 3 fair value measurements as defined under GAAP.
The fair value assigned to the recipes was determined utilizing the replacement cost method, which captures the direct cost of the development effort plus lost profits over the time to re-create the recipes.
Farmer Bros. Co.
Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
The fair value assigned to the non-compete agreement was determined utilizing the with and without method. Under the with and without method, the fair value of the intangible asset is estimated based on the difference in projected earnings with the agreement in place versus projected earnings based on starting with no agreement in place. Revenue and earnings projections were significant inputs into estimating the value of China Mist's non-compete agreement.
The fair value assigned to the customer relationships was determined based on management's estimate of the retention rate and utilizing certain benchmarks. Revenue and earnings projections were also significant inputs into estimating the value of customer relationships.
The fair value assigned to the trade name/trademark was determined utilizing a multi-period excess earnings approach. Under the multi-period excess earnings approach, the fair value of the intangible asset is estimated to be the present value of future earnings attributable to the asset and this method utilizes revenue and cost projections including an assumed contributory asset charge.
Note 4. Corporate Relocation Plan
On February 5, 2015, the Company announced a plan (the “Corporate Relocation Plan”) to close the Torrance Facility and relocate its corporate headquarters, product development lab, and manufacturing and distribution operations from Torrance, California to the New Facility housing these operations in Northlake, Texas. Approximately 350 positions were impacted as a result of the Torrance Facility closure. The Company’s decision resulted from a comprehensive review of alternatives designed to make the Company more competitive and better positioned to capitalize on growth opportunities.
The Company estimates that it will incur approximately $31 million in cash costs in connection with the exit of the Torrance Facility consisting of $18 million in employee retention and separation benefits, $5 million in facility-related costs and $8 million in other related costs. Expenses related to the Corporate Relocation Plan in the six months ended December 31, 2016 consisted of $0.7 million in employee retention and separation benefits, $5.3 million in facility-related costs including lease of temporary office space, costs associated with the move of the Company's headquarters and the relocation of certain distribution operations and $1.0 million in other related costs including travel, legal, consulting and other professional services. Facility-related costs also included $2.5 million in non-cash charges, including $1.1 million in depreciation expense associated with the Torrance production facility resulting from the consolidation of coffee production operations with the Houston and Portland production facilities and $1.4 million in non-cash rent expense recognized in the sale-leaseback of the Torrance Facility.
The following table sets forth the activity in liabilities associated with the Corporate Relocation Plan for the six months ended December 31, 2016: |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(In thousands) | | Balances, June 30, 2016 | | Additions | | Payments | | Non-Cash Settled | | Adjustments | | Balances, December 31, 2016 |
Employee-related costs(1) | | $ | 2,342 |
| | $ | 732 |
| | $ | 2,103 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 971 |
|
Facility-related costs(2) | | — |
| | 5,288 |
| | 2,835 |
| | 2,453 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
Other(3) | | 200 |
| | 975 |
| | 1,175 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
Total(2) | | $ | 2,542 |
| | $ | 6,995 |
| | $ | 6,113 |
| | $ | 2,453 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 971 |
|
Current portion | | $ | 2,542 |
| | | | | | | | | | $ | 971 |
|
Non-current portion | | $ | — |
| | | | | | | | | | $ | — |
|
Total | | $ | 2,542 |
| | | | | | | | | | $ | 971 |
|
_______________
(1) Included in “Accrued payroll expenses” on the Company's condensed consolidated balance sheets.
(2) Non-cash settled facility-related costs represent (a) depreciation expense associated with the Torrance production facility resulting from the consolidation of coffee production operations with the Houston and Portland production facilities and included in "Property, plant and equipment, net" on the Company's condensed consolidated balance sheets and (b) non-cash rent expense recognized in the sale-leaseback of the Torrance Facility.
(3) Included in “Accounts payable” on the Company's condensed consolidated balance sheets.
Since the adoption of the Corporate Relocation Plan through December 31, 2016, the Company has recognized a total of $30.3 million of the estimated $31 million in aggregate cash costs including $17.0 million in employee retention and separation benefits, $6.2 million in facility-related costs related to the temporary office space, costs associated with the
Farmer Bros. Co.
Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
move of the Company's headquarters, relocation of the Company’s Torrance operations and certain distribution operations and $7.1 million in other related costs. The remainder is expected to be recognized in the third quarter of fiscal 2017. The Company also recognized from inception through December 31, 2016 non-cash depreciation expense of $2.3 million associated with the Torrance production facility resulting from the consolidation of coffee production operations with the Houston and Portland production facilities and $1.4 million in non-cash rent expense recognized in the sale-leaseback of the Torrance Facility. The Company may incur certain pension-related costs in connection with the Corporate Relocation Plan.
The following table sets forth the activity in liabilities associated with the Corporate Relocation Plan from the time of adoption of the Corporate Relocation Plan through the six months ended December 31, 2016: |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(In thousands) | Balances, June 30, 2014 | | Additions | | Payments | | Non-Cash Settled | | Adjustments | | Balances, December 31, 2016 |
Employee-related costs(1) | $ | — |
| | $ | 16,975 |
| | $ | 16,004 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 971 |
|
Facility-related costs(2) | — |
| | 9,880 |
| | 6,171 |
| | 3,709 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
Other | — |
| | 7,105 |
| | 7,105 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
Total(2) | $ | — |
| | $ | 33,960 |
| | $ | 29,280 |
| | $ | 3,709 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 971 |
|
_______________
(1) Included in “Accrued payroll expenses” on the Company's condensed consolidated balance sheets.
(2) Non-cash settled facility-related costs represent (a) depreciation expense associated with the Torrance production facility resulting from the consolidation of coffee production operations with the Houston and Portland production facilities and included in "Property, plant and equipment, net" on the Company's condensed consolidated balance sheets and (b) non-cash rent expense recognized in the sale-leaseback of the Torrance Facility.
Note 5. New Facility
Lease Agreement and Purchase Option Exercise
On June 15, 2016, the Company exercised the purchase option to purchase the land and the partially constructed New Facility located thereon pursuant to the terms of the lease agreement dated as of July 17, 2015, as amended (the "Lease Agreement"). On September 15, 2016 ("Purchase Option Closing Date"), the Company closed the purchase option and acquired the land and the partially constructed New Facility located thereon for an aggregate purchase price of $42.5 million (the “Purchase Price”), consisting of the purchase option price of $42.0 million based on actual construction costs incurred as of the Purchase Option Closing Date plus the option exercise fee, plus amounts paid in respect of real estate commissions, title insurance, and recording fees. Upon closing of the purchase option, the Company recorded the aggregate purchase price of the New Facility in "Property, plant and equipment, net" on its consolidated balance sheet. The asset related to the New Facility lease obligation included in "Property, plant and equipment, net," the offsetting liability for the lease obligation included in "Other long-term liabilities" and the rent expense related to the land were reversed. Concurrent with the purchase option closing, on September 15, 2016, the Company terminated the Lease Agreement. The Company did not pay any early termination penalties in connection with the termination of the Lease Agreement.
Development Management Agreement
In conjunction with the Lease Agreement, the Company also entered into a Development Management Agreement with an affiliate of Stream Realty Partners (the "DMA") to manage, coordinate, represent, assist and advise the Company on matters from the pre-development through construction of the New Facility. Pursuant to the DMA, the Company will pay the developer a development fee, an oversight fee and a development services fee the amounts of which are included in the construction costs incurred-to-date. An incentive fee, the amount of which will be determined by the developer and the Company, will also be payable if final completion occurs prior to the scheduled completion date.
Amended Building Contract
On September 17, 2016, the Company and The Haskell Company (“Builder”) entered into a Change Order, which, among other things, amended the building contract previously entered into between the Company and Builder to provide a
Farmer Bros. Co.
Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
guaranteed maximum price and the basis for the price and the scope of Builder’s services in connection with the construction of the New Facility (the "Amended Building Contract").
Pursuant to the Amended Building Contract, Builder will provide pre-construction and construction services, including specialized industrial design and construction work in connection with Builder’s construction of certain production equipment that will be installed in portions of the New Facility (the “Project”). The Company has engaged other designers and builders to provide traditional construction work on the Project site, including for the foundation, building envelope and roof of the New Facility. Pursuant to the Amended Building Contract, the Company will pay Builder up to $21.9 million for Builder’s services in connection with the Project. This amount is a guaranteed maximum price and is subject to adjustment in accordance with the terms of the Amended Building Contract. The extended date for substantial completion of Builder’s work on the Project is February 24, 2017, which is also subject to adjustment in accordance with the terms of the Amended Building Contract. The Amended Building Contract includes an “IDB Work Contract Schedule,” which sets forth interim milestones, durations and material dates in relation to the performance and timing of Builder’s work. The Amended Building Contract includes remedies for the Company in the event agreed milestone dates relating to Builder’s services are not met. The Amended Building Contract is subject to customary undertakings, covenants, obligations, rights and conditions.
New Facility Costs
Based on the final budget, the Company estimates that the total construction costs including the cost of land for the New Facility will be approximately $55 million to $60 million of which the Company has paid an aggregate of $49.9 million as of December 31, 2016 and has outstanding contractual obligations of $9.9 million as of December 31, 2016 (see Note 20). In addition to the costs to complete the construction of the New Facility, the Company estimates that it will incur approximately $35 million to $39 million for machinery and equipment, furniture and fixtures and related expenditures of which the Company has paid an aggregate of $17.9 million as of December 31, 2016, including $11.1 million under the Amended Building Contract, and has outstanding contractual obligations of $10.8 million as of December 31, 2016 (see Note 20). The majority of the capital expenditures associated with machinery and equipment, furniture and fixtures, and related expenditures for the New Facility are expected to be incurred in the first three quarters of fiscal 2017. Construction of and relocation to the New Facility are expected to be completed in the third quarter of fiscal 2017.
Note 6. Sales of Assets
Sale of Spice Assets
In order to focus on its core products, on December 8, 2015, the Company completed the sale of the Spice Assets to Harris Spice Company ("Harris"). Harris acquired substantially all of the Company’s personal property used exclusively in connection with the manufacture, processing and distribution of raw, processed and blended spices and certain other culinary products (collectively, the "Spice Assets"), including certain equipment; trademarks, tradenames and other intellectual property assets; contract rights under sales and purchase orders and certain other agreements; and a list of certain customers, other than the Company’s DSD customers, and assumed certain liabilities relating to the Spice Assets. The Company received $6.0 million in cash at closing, and is eligible to receive an earnout amount of up to $5.0 million over a three-year period based upon a percentage of certain institutional spice sales by Harris following the closing. The Company recognized $0.4 million and $0.5 million in earnout during the three and six months ended December 31, 2016, respectively, a portion of which is included in "Net gains from sale of Spice Assets" in the Company's condensed consolidated statements of operations. The sale of the Spice Assets does not represent a strategic shift for the Company and is not expected to have a material impact on the Company's results of operations because the Company will continue to sell a complete portfolio of spice and other culinary products purchased from Harris under a supply agreement to its DSD customers.
Sale of Torrance Facility
On July 15, 2016, the Company completed the previously-announced sale of the Torrance Facility, consisting of approximately 665,000 square feet of buildings located on approximately 20.33 acres of land, for an aggregate cash sale price of $43.0 million, which sale price was subject to customary adjustments for closing costs and documentary transfer taxes. Cash proceeds from the sale of the Torrance Facility were $42.5 million.
Farmer Bros. Co.
Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
Following the closing of the sale, the Company leased back the Torrance Facility on a triple net basis through October 31, 2016 at zero base rent, and exercised two one-month extensions at a base rent of $100,000 per month. In accordance with ASC 840, “Leases,” due to the Company’s continuing involvement with the property, the Company accounted for the transaction as a financing transaction, deferred the gain on sale of the Torrance Facility and recorded the net sale proceeds of $42.5 million and accrued non-cash interest expense on the financing transaction in "Sale-leaseback financing obligation" on the Company's consolidated balance sheet at September 30, 2016. The Company vacated the Torrance Facility in December 2016 and concluded the leaseback transaction. See Note 7. As a result, at December 31, 2016, the financing transaction qualified for sales recognition under ASC 840. Accordingly, in the three and six months ended December 31, 2016, the Company recognized the net gain from sale of the Torrance Facility in the amount of $37.4 million, including non-cash interest expense of $0.4 million and $0.7 million, respectively, and non-cash rent expense of $0.5 million and $1.4 million, respectively, representing the rent for the zero base rent period previously recorded in "Other current liabilities" and removed the amounts recorded in "Assets held for sale" and the "Sale-leaseback financing obligation" on its consolidated balance sheet. Sale of Northern California Branch Property
On September 30, 2016, the Company completed the sale of its branch property in Northern California for a sale price of $2.2 million and leased it back through March 31, 2017, at a base rent of $10,000 per month. The Company recognized a net gain on sale of the Northern California property in the six months ended December 31, 2016 in the amount of $2.0 million.
Note 7. Assets Held for Sale
The Company had designated its Torrance Facility and one of its branch properties in Northern California as assets held for sale and recorded the carrying values of these properties in the aggregate amount of $7.2 million in "Assets held for sale" on the Company's consolidated balance sheet at June 30, 2016. As of December 31, 2016, these assets were sold (see Note 6).
Note 8. Derivative Instruments
Derivative Instruments Held
Coffee-Related Derivative Instruments
The Company is exposed to commodity price risk associated with its price to be fixed green coffee purchase contracts, which are described further in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements in the 2016 Form 10-K. The Company utilizes forward and option contracts to manage exposure to the variability in expected future cash flows from forecasted purchases of green coffee attributable to commodity price risk. Certain of these coffee-related derivative instruments utilized for risk management purposes have been designated as cash flow hedges, while other coffee-related derivative instruments have not been designated as cash flow hedges or do not qualify for hedge accounting despite hedging the Company's future cash flows on an economic basis.
The following table summarizes the notional volumes for the coffee-related derivative instruments held by the Company at December 31, 2016 and June 30, 2016: |
| | | | | | |
(In thousands) | | December 31, 2016 | | June 30, 2016 |
Derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges: | | | | |
Long coffee pounds | | 17,250 |
| | 32,550 |
|
Derivative instruments not designated as cash flow hedges: | | | | |
Long coffee pounds | | 1,658 |
| | 1,618 |
|
Less: Short coffee pounds | | — |
| | (188 | ) |
Total | | 18,908 |
| | 33,980 |
|
Farmer Bros. Co.
Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
Coffee-related derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges outstanding as of December 31, 2016 will expire within 12 months.
Effect of Derivative Instruments on the Financial Statements
Balance Sheets
Fair values of derivative instruments on the Company's condensed consolidated balance sheets: |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Derivative Instruments Designated as Cash Flow Hedges | | Derivative Instruments Not Designated as Accounting Hedges |
| | December 31, 2016 | | June 30, 2016 | | December 31, 2016 | | June 30, 2016 |
(In thousands) | | | | | | | | |
Financial Statement Location: | | | | | | | | |
Short-term derivative assets: | | | | | | | | |
Coffee-related derivative instruments | | $ | 1,118 |
| | $ | 3,771 |
| | $ | 24 |
| | $ | 183 |
|
Long-term derivative assets(1): | | | | | | | | |
Coffee-related derivative instruments | | $ | — |
| | $ | 2,575 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 57 |
|
Short-term derivative liabilities: | | | | | | | | |
Coffee-related derivative instruments | | $ | 440 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 1,139 |
| | $ | — |
|
________________
(1) Included in "Other assets" on the Company's condensed consolidated balance sheets.
Statements of Operations
The following table presents pretax net gains and losses for the Company's coffee-related derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges, as recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) “AOCI,” “Cost of goods sold” and “Other, net”: |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended December 31, | | Six Months Ended December 31, | | Financial Statement Classification |
(In thousands) | | 2016 | | 2015 | | 2016 | | 2015 | |
Net (losses) gains recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) (effective portion) | | $ | (2,943 | ) | | $ | 310 |
| | $ | (2,217 | ) | | $ | (4,330 | ) | | AOCI |
Net gains (losses) recognized in earnings (effective portion) | | $ | 215 |
| | $ | (3,859 | ) | | $ | (250 | ) | | $ | (8,827 | ) | | Costs of goods sold |
Net losses recognized in earnings (ineffective portion) | | $ | (41 | ) | | $ | (128 | ) | | $ | (28 | ) | | $ | (484 | ) | | Other, net |
For the three and six months ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, there were no gains or losses recognized in earnings as a result of excluding amounts from the assessment of hedge effectiveness or as a result of reclassifications to earnings following the discontinuance of any cash flow hedges.
Gains and losses on derivative instruments not designated as accounting hedges are included in “Other, net” in the Company's condensed consolidated statements of operations and in “Net losses on derivative instruments and investments” in the Company's condensed consolidated statements of cash flows.
Farmer Bros. Co.
Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
Net gains and losses recorded in “Other, net” are as follows: |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended December 31, | | Six Months Ended December 31, |
(In thousands) | | 2016 | | 2015 | | 2016 | | 2015 |
Net (losses) gains on coffee-related derivative instruments | | $ | (1,204 | ) | | $ | 32 |
| | $ | (1,240 | ) | | $ | (695 | ) |
Net (losses) gains on investments | | (1,320 | ) | | 265 |
| | (1,092 | ) | | 118 |
|
Net (losses) gains on derivative instruments and investments(1) | | (2,524 | ) | | 297 |
| | (2,332 | ) | | (577 | ) |
Other gains (losses), net | | 201 |
| | — |
| | 200 |
| | (1 | ) |
Other, net | | $ | (2,323 | ) | | $ | 297 |
| | $ | (2,132 | ) | | $ | (578 | ) |
___________
(1) Excludes net losses and net gains on coffee-related derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges recorded in cost of goods sold in the three and six months ended December 31, 2016 and 2015.
Offsetting of Derivative Assets and Liabilities
The Company has agreements in place that allow for the financial right of offset for derivative assets and liabilities at settlement or in the event of default under the agreements. Additionally, the Company maintains accounts with its brokers to facilitate financial derivative transactions in support of its risk management activities. Based on the value of the Company’s positions in these accounts and the associated margin requirements, the Company may be required to deposit cash into these broker accounts.
The following table presents the Company’s net exposure from its offsetting derivative asset and liability positions as of the reporting dates indicated: |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(In thousands) | | | | Gross Amount Reported on Balance Sheet | | Netting Adjustments | | Cash Collateral Posted | | Net Exposure |
December 31, 2016 | | Derivative Assets | | $ | 1,142 |
| | $ | (1,057 | ) | | $ | — |
| | $ | 85 |
|
| | Derivative Liabilities | | $ | 1,579 |
| | $ | (1,057 | ) | | $ | — |
| | $ | 522 |
|
June 30, 2016 | | Derivative Assets | | $ | 6,586 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 6,586 |
|
Cash Flow Hedges
Changes in the fair value of the Company's coffee-related derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges, to the extent effective, are deferred in AOCI and reclassified into cost of goods sold in the same period or periods in which the hedged forecasted purchases affect earnings, or when it is probable that the hedged forecasted transaction will not occur by the end of the originally specified time period. Based on recorded values at December 31, 2016, $2.6 million of net gains on coffee-related derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges are expected to be reclassified into cost of goods sold within the next twelve months. These recorded values are based on market prices of the commodities as of December 31, 2016. Due to the volatile nature of commodity prices, actual gains or losses realized within the next twelve months will likely differ from these values.
Note 9. Investments
The following table shows gains and losses on trading securities held for investment by the Company:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended December 31, | | Six Months Ended December 31, |
(In thousands) | | 2016 | | 2015 | | 2016 | | 2015 |
Total (losses) gains recognized from trading securities held for investment | | $ | (1,350 | ) | | $ | 265 |
| | $ | (1,091 | ) | | $ | 118 |
|
Less: Realized losses from sales of trading securities held for investment | | (2 | ) | | (26 | ) | | (2 | ) | | (27 | ) |
Unrealized (losses) gains from trading securities held for investment | | $ | (1,348 | ) | | $ | 291 |
| | $ | (1,089 | ) | | $ | 145 |
|
Note 10. Fair Value Measurements
Assets and liabilities measured and recorded at fair value on a recurring basis were as follows:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(In thousands) | | Total | | Level 1 | | Level 2 | | Level 3 |
December 31, 2016 | | | | | | | | |
Preferred stock(1) | | $ | 26,190 |
| | $ | 23,341 |
| | $ | 2,849 |
| | $ | — |
|
Derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges: | | | | | | | | |
Coffee-related derivative assets(2) | | $ | 678 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 678 |
| | $ | — |
|
Derivative instruments not designated as accounting hedges: | | | | | | | | |
Coffee-related derivative liabilities(2) | | $ | (1,115 | ) | | $ | — |
| | $ | (1,115 | ) | | $ | — |
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | Total | | Level 1 | | Level 2 | | Level 3 |
June 30, 2016 | | | | | | | | |
Preferred stock(1) | | $ | 25,591 |
| | $ | 21,976 |
| | $ | 3,615 |
| | $ | — |
|
Derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges: | | | | | | | | |
Coffee-related derivative assets(2) | | $ | 6,346 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 6,346 |
|
| $ | — |
|
Derivative instruments not designated as accounting hedges: | | | | | | | | |
Coffee-related derivative assets(2) | | $ | 240 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 240 |
| | $ | — |
|
____________________
| |
(1) | Included in “Short-term investments” on the Company's condensed consolidated balance sheets. |
| |
(2) | The Company's coffee-related derivative instruments are traded over-the-counter and, therefore, classified as Level 2. |
During the three months ended December 31, 2016, there were no transfers of preferred stock from Level 1 to Level 2.
Note 11. Accounts and Notes Receivable, Net |
| | | | | | | | |
| | December 31, 2016 | | June 30, 2016 |
(In thousands) | | | | |
Trade receivables | | $ | 46,926 |
| | $ | 43,113 |
|
Other receivables(1) | | 4,037 |
| | 1,965 |
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts | | (686 | ) | | (714 | ) |
Accounts and notes receivable, net | | $ | 50,277 |
| | $ | 44,364 |
|
__________
(1) At December 31, 2016 and June 30, 2016, respectively, the Company had recorded $1.1 million and $0.5 million, in "Other receivables" included in "Accounts and notes receivable, net" on its condensed consolidated balance sheets representing earnout receivable from Harris.
Farmer Bros. Co.
Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
Note 12. Inventories |
| | | | | | | | |
(In thousands) | | December 31, 2016 | | June 30, 2016 |
Coffee | | | | |
Processed | | $ | 11,001 |
| | $ | 12,362 |
|
Unprocessed | | 20,746 |
| | 13,534 |
|
Total | | $ | 31,747 |
| | $ | 25,896 |
|
Tea and culinary products | | | | |
Processed | | $ | 20,900 |
| | $ | 15,384 |
|
Unprocessed | | 87 |
| | 377 |
|
Total | | $ | 20,987 |
| | $ | 15,761 |
|
Coffee brewing equipment parts | | $ | 3,825 |
| | $ | 4,721 |
|
Total inventories | | $ | 56,559 |
| | $ | 46,378 |
|
In addition to product cost, inventory costs include expenditures such as direct labor and certain supply and overhead expenses incurred in bringing the inventory to its existing condition and location. The “Unprocessed” inventory values as stated in the above table represent the value of raw materials and the “Processed” inventory values represent all other products consisting primarily of finished goods.
Because the Company anticipates that its inventory levels at June 30, 2017 will decrease from June 30, 2016 levels, primarily from a reduction in spice products inventories, the Company recorded $0.8 million and $1.7 million in expected beneficial effect of the liquidation of LIFO inventory quantities in cost of goods sold in the three and six months ended December 31, 2016, respectively, which increased income before taxes for the three and six months ended December 31, 2016 by $0.8 million and $1.7 million, respectively. The Company recorded $0.3 million in expected beneficial effect of the liquidation of LIFO inventory quantities in cost of goods sold in each of the three and six months ended December 31, 2015, which increased income before taxes for the three and six months ended December 31, 2015 by $0.3 million. Interim LIFO calculations must necessarily be based on management's estimates of expected fiscal year-end inventory levels and costs. Because these estimates are subject to many forces beyond management's control, interim results are subject to the final fiscal year-end LIFO inventory valuation.
Note 13. Property, Plant and Equipment
|
| | | | | | | | |
(In thousands) | | December 31, 2016 | | June 30, 2016 |
Buildings and facilities | | $ | 53,388 |
| | $ | 54,768 |
|
Machinery and equipment | | 172,267 |
| | 177,784 |
|
Buildings and facilities—New Facility | | 51,332 |
| | 28,110 |
|
Machinery and equipment—New Facility | | 17,515 |
| | 4,443 |
|
Equipment under capital leases | | 8,821 |
| | 11,982 |
|
Capitalized software | | 21,307 |
| | 21,545 |
|
Office furniture and equipment | | 10,661 |
| | 16,077 |
|
| | $ | 335,291 |
| | $ | 314,709 |
|
Accumulated depreciation | | (186,517 | ) | | (206,162 | ) |
Land | | 16,336 |
| | 9,869 |
|
Property, plant and equipment, net(1) | | $ | 165,110 |
| | $ | 118,416 |
|
______________
(1) Includes in the periods ended December 31, 2016 and June 30, 2016, expenditures for items that have not been placed in service in the amounts of $76.9 million and $39.3 million, respectively.
Farmer Bros. Co.
Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
Note 14. Employee Benefit Plans
The Company provides benefit plans for most full-time employees, including 401(k), health and other welfare benefit plans and, in certain circumstances, pension benefits. Generally, the plans provide benefits based on years of service and/or a combination of years of service and earnings. In addition, the Company contributes to two multiemployer defined benefit pension plans, one multiemployer defined contribution pension plan and ten multiemployer defined contribution plans other than pension plans that provide medical, vision, dental and disability benefits for active, union-represented employees subject to collective bargaining agreements. In addition, the Company sponsors a postretirement defined benefit plan that covers qualified non-union retirees and certain qualified union retirees and provides retiree medical coverage and, depending on the age of the retiree, dental and vision coverage. The Company also provides a postretirement death benefit to certain of its employees and retirees.
The Company is required to recognize the funded status of a benefit plan in its consolidated balance sheets. The Company is also required to recognize in other comprehensive income (“OCI”) certain gains and losses that arise during the period but are deferred under pension accounting rules.
Single Employer Pension Plans
The Company has a defined benefit pension plan, the Farmer Bros. Co. Pension Plan for Salaried Employees (the “Farmer Bros. Plan”), for Company employees hired prior to January 1, 2010, who are not covered under a collective bargaining agreement. The Company amended the Farmer Bros. Plan, freezing the benefit for all participants effective June 30, 2011. After the plan freeze, participants do not accrue any benefits under the Farmer Bros. Plan, and new hires are not eligible to participate in the Farmer Bros. Plan. As all plan participants became inactive following this pension curtailment, net (gain) loss is now amortized based on the remaining life expectancy of these participants instead of the remaining service period of these participants.
The Company also has two defined benefit pension plans for certain hourly employees covered under collective bargaining agreements (the “Brewmatic Plan” and the “Hourly Employees' Plan”). Effective October 1, 2016, the Company froze benefit accruals and participation in the Hourly Employees' Plan, a defined benefit pension plan for certain hourly employees covered under collective bargaining agreements. After the plan freeze, participants do not accrue any benefits under the plan, and new hires are not eligible to participate in the plan. After the freeze the participants in the plan are eligible to receive the Company's matching contributions to their 401(k).
The net periodic benefit cost for the defined benefit pension plans is as follows: |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended December 31, | | Six Months Ended December 31, |
| | 2016 | | 2015 | | 2016 | | 2015 |
(In thousands) | | | | |
Service cost | | $ | 124 |
| | $ | 97 |
| | $ | 248 |
| | $ | 194 |
|
Interest cost | | 1,397 |
| | 1,546 |
| | 2,794 |
| | 3,092 |
|
Expected return on plan assets | | (1,607 | ) | | (1,710 | ) | | (3,214 | ) | | (3,420 | ) |
Amortization of net loss(1) | | 508 |
| | 370 |
| | 1,016 |
| | 740 |
|
Net periodic benefit cost | | $ | 422 |
| | $ | 303 |
| | $ | 844 |
| | $ | 606 |
|
___________
(1) These amounts represent the estimated portion of the net loss in AOCI that is expected to be recognized as a component of net periodic benefit cost over the current fiscal year.
Weighted-Average Assumptions Used to Determine Net Periodic Benefit Cost
|
| | | |
| Fiscal |
| 2017 | | 2016 |
Discount rate | 3.55% | | 4.40% |
Expected long-term rate of return on plan assets | 7.75% | | 7.50% |
Farmer Bros. Co.
Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
Basis Used to Determine Expected Long-Term Return on Plan Assets
The expected long-term return on plan assets assumption was developed as a weighted average rate based on the target asset allocation of the plan and the Long-Term Capital Market Assumptions (CMA) 2014. The capital market assumptions were developed with a primary focus on forward-looking valuation models and market indicators. The key fundamental economic inputs for these models are future inflation, economic growth, and interest rate environment. Due to the long-term nature of the pension obligations, the investment horizon for the CMA 2014 is 20 to 30 years. In addition to forward-looking models, historical analysis of market data and trends was reflected, as well as the outlook of recognized economists, organizations and consensus CMA from other credible studies.
Multiemployer Pension Plans
The Company participates in two multiemployer defined benefit pension plans that are union sponsored and collectively bargained for the benefit of certain employees subject to collective bargaining agreements, of which the Western Conference of Teamsters Pension Plan (“WCTPP”) is individually significant. The Company makes contributions to these plans generally based on the number of hours worked by the participants in accordance with the provisions of negotiated labor contracts.
The risks of participating in multiemployer pension plans are different from single-employer plans in that: (i) assets contributed to a multiemployer plan by one employer may be used to provide benefits to employees of other participating employers; (ii) if a participating employer stops contributing to the plan, the unfunded obligations of the plan may be borne by the remaining participating employers; and (iii) if the Company stops participating in the multiemployer plan, the Company may be required to pay the plan an amount based on the underfunded status of the plan, referred to as a withdrawal liability.
In fiscal 2012, the Company withdrew from the Local 807 Labor-Management Pension Fund (“Pension Fund”) and recorded a charge of $4.3 million associated with withdrawal from this plan, representing the present value of the estimated withdrawal liability expected to be paid in quarterly installments of $0.1 million over 80 quarters. On November 18, 2014, the Pension Fund sent the Company a notice of assessment of withdrawal liability in the amount of $4.4 million, which the Pension Fund adjusted to $4.9 million on January 5, 2015. The Company is in the process of negotiating a reduced liability amount. The Company has commenced quarterly installment payments to the Pension Fund of $91,000 pending the final settlement of the liability. The total estimated withdrawal liability of $3.6 million and $3.8 million is reflected in the Company's condensed consolidated balance sheets at December 31, 2016 and June 30, 2016, respectively, with the short-term and long-term portions reflected in current and long-term liabilities, respectively.
The Company may incur certain pension-related costs in connection with the Corporate Relocation Plan. Future collective bargaining negotiations may result in the Company withdrawing from the remaining multiemployer pension plans in which it participates and, if successful, the Company may incur a withdrawal liability, the amount of which could be material to the Company's results of operations and cash flows.
Multiemployer Plans Other Than Pension Plans
The Company participates in ten multiemployer defined contribution plans other than pension plans that provide medical, vision, dental and disability benefits for active, union-represented employees subject to collective bargaining agreements. The plans are subject to the provisions of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, and provide that participating employers make monthly contributions to the plans in an amount as specified in the collective bargaining agreements. Also, the plans provide that participants make self-payments to the plans, the amounts of which are negotiated through the collective bargaining process. The Company's participation in these plans is governed by collective bargaining agreements which expire on or before January 31, 2020.
401(k) Plan
The Company's 401(k) Plan is available to all eligible employees who have worked more than 1,000 hours during a calendar year and were employed at the end of the calendar year. Participants in the 401(k) Plan may choose to contribute a percentage of their annual pay subject to the maximum contribution allowed by the Internal Revenue Service. The Company's matching contribution is discretionary, based on approval by the Company's Board of Directors. For the calendar years 2017 and 2016, the Company's Board of Directors approved a Company matching contribution of 50% of an employee's annual contribution to the 401(k) Plan, up to 6% of the employee's eligible income. The matching contributions (and any earnings thereon) vest at the rate of 20% for each of the participant's first 5 years of vesting service, so that a participant is fully vested in his or her matching contribution account after 5 years of vesting service, subject to accelerated vesting under certain
Farmer Bros. Co.
Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
circumstances in connection with the Corporate Relocation Plan due to the closure of the Company’s Torrance Facility or a reduction-in-force at another Company facility designated by the Administrative Committee of the Farmer Bros. Co. Qualified Employee Retirement Plans. A participant is automatically vested in the event of death, disability or attainment of age 65 while employed by the Company. Employees are 100% vested in their contributions. For employees subject to a collective bargaining agreement, the match is only available if so provided in the labor agreement.
The Company recorded matching contributions of $0.3 million and $0.4 million in operating expenses for the three months ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively, and $0.8 million in operating expenses in each of the six months ended December 31, 2016 and 2015.
Postretirement Benefits
The Company sponsors a postretirement defined benefit plan that covers qualified non-union retirees and certain qualified union retirees (“Retiree Medical Plan”). The plan provides medical, dental and vision coverage for retirees under age 65 and medical coverage only for retirees age 65 and above. Under this postretirement plan, the Company’s contributions toward premiums for retiree medical, dental and vision coverage for participants and dependents are scaled based on length of service, with greater Company contributions for retirees with greater length of service, subject to a maximum monthly Company contribution.
The Company also provides a postretirement death benefit (“Death Benefit”) to certain of its employees and retirees, subject, in the case of current employees, to continued employment with the Company until retirement and certain other conditions related to the manner of employment termination and manner of death. The Company records the actuarially determined liability for the present value of the postretirement death benefit. The Company has purchased life insurance policies to fund the postretirement death benefit wherein the Company owns the policy but the postretirement death benefit is paid to the employee's or retiree's beneficiary. The Company records an asset for the fair value of the life insurance policies which equates to the cash surrender value of the policies.
Retiree Medical Plan and Death Benefit
The following table shows the components of net periodic postretirement benefit cost for the Retiree Medical Plan and Death Benefit for the three and six months ended December 31, 2016 and 2015. Net periodic postretirement benefit cost for the three and six months ended December 31, 2016 was based on employee census information and asset information as of July 1, 2016.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended December 31, | | Six Months Ended December 31, |
| | 2016 | | 2015 | | 2016 | | 2015 |
(In thousands) | | | | | | | | |
Service cost | | $ | 190 |
| | $ | 347 |
| | $ | 380 |
| | $ | 694 |
|
Interest cost | | 207 |
| | 299 |
| | 414 |
| | 598 |
|
Amortization of net gain | | (157 | ) | | (49 | ) | | (314 | ) | | (98 | ) |
Amortization of net prior service credit | | (439 | ) | | (439 | ) | | (878 | ) | | (878 | ) |
Net periodic postretirement benefit (credit) cost | | $ | (199 | ) | | $ | 158 |
| | $ | (398 | ) | | $ | 316 |
|
Weighted-Average Assumptions Used to Determine Net Periodic Postretirement Benefit Cost
|
| | | |
| Fiscal |
| 2017 | | 2016 |
Retiree Medical Plan discount rate | 3.73% | | 4.69% |
Death Benefit discount rate | 3.79% | | 4.74% |
Farmer Bros. Co.
Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
Note 15. Bank Loan
The Company maintains a $75.0 million senior secured revolving credit facility (“Revolving Facility”) with JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. and SunTrust Bank (collectively, the “Lenders”), with a sublimit on letters of credit and swingline loans of $30.0 million and $15.0 million. respectively. The Revolving Facility includes an accordion feature whereby the Company may increase the Revolving Commitment by up to an additional $50.0 million, subject to certain conditions. Advances are based on the Company’s eligible accounts receivable, eligible inventory, and the value of certain real property and trademarks, less required reserves. The commitment fee ranges from 0.25% to 0.375% per annum based on average revolver usage. Outstanding obligations are collateralized by all of the Company’s assets, excluding certain real property not included in the borrowing base, machinery and equipment (other than inventory), and the Company's preferred stock portfolio. Borrowings under the Revolving Facility bear interest based on average historical excess availability levels with a range of PRIME - 0.25% to PRIME + 0.50% or Adjusted LIBO Rate + 1.25% to Adjusted LIBO Rate + 2.00%. The Company is subject to a variety of affirmative and negative covenants of types customary in an asset-based lending facility, including financial covenants relating to the maintenance of a fixed charge coverage ratio in certain circumstances, and the right of the Lenders to establish reserve requirements, which may reduce the amount of credit otherwise available to the Company. The Company is allowed to pay dividends, provided, among other things, certain excess availability requirements are met, and no event of default exists or has occurred and is continuing as of the date of any such payment and after giving effect thereto. The Revolving Facility expires on March 2, 2020.
At December 31, 2016, the Company was eligible to borrow up to a total of $62.4 million under the Revolving Facility and had outstanding borrowings of $18.5 million, utilized $4.5 million of the letters of credit sublimit, and had excess availability under the Revolving Facility of $39.4 million. At December 31, 2016, the weighted average interest rate on the Company's outstanding borrowings under the Revolving Facility was 3.33% and the Company was in compliance with all of the restrictive covenants under the Revolving Facility.
Note 16. Share-based Compensation
Non-qualified stock options with time-based vesting (“NQOs”)
In the six months ended December 31, 2016, the Company granted no shares issuable upon the exercise of NQOs.
The following table summarizes NQO activity for the six months ended December 31, 2016: |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Outstanding NQOs: | | Number of NQOs | | Weighted Average Exercise Price ($) | | Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value ($) | | Weighted Average Remaining Life (Years) | | Aggregate Intrinsic Value ($ in thousands) |
Outstanding at June 30, 2016 | | 219,629 |
| | 13.87 | | 6.28 | | 3.7 | | 3,995 |
|
Granted | | — |
| | — | | — | | — | | — |
|
Exercised | | (37,344 | ) | | 9.41 | | 4.24 | | — | | 909 |
|
Cancelled/Forfeited | | (3,278 | ) | | 14.60 | | 6.02 | | — | | — |
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2016 | | 179,007 |
| | 14.79 | | 6.71 | | 3.4 | | 3,923 |
|
Vested and exercisable at December 31, 2016 | | 146,472 |
| | 12.16 | | 5.66 | | 3.0 | | 3,594 |
|
Vested and expected to vest at December 31, 2016 | | 177,402 |
| | 14.67 | | 6.66 | | 3.4 | | 3,908 |
|
The aggregate intrinsic values outstanding at the end of each fiscal period in the table above represent the total pretax intrinsic value, based on the Company’s closing stock price of $36.70 at December 30, 2016 and $32.06 at June 30, 2016, representing the last trading day of the fiscal periods, which would have been received by NQO holders had all award holders exercised their NQOs that were in-the-money as of those dates. The aggregate intrinsic value of NQO exercises in the six months ended December 31, 2016 represents the difference between the exercise price and the value of the Company’s common stock at the time of exercise. NQOs outstanding that are expected to vest are net of estimated forfeitures.
Farmer Bros. Co.
Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
During the six months ended December 31, 2016, 6,196 NQO shares vested and 37,344 NQO shares were exercised. Total fair value of NQOs vested during the six months ended December 31, 2016 was $0.1 million. The Company received $0.4 million and $1.1 million in proceeds from exercises of vested NQOs in the six months ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively.
At December 31, 2016 and June 30, 2016, respectively, there was $0.3 million and $0.4 million of unrecognized compensation cost related to NQOs. The unrecognized compensation cost related to NQOs at December 31, 2016 is expected to be recognized over the weighted average period of 1.7 years. Total compensation expense for NQOs in the three months ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 was $47,000 and $0.1 million, respectively. Total compensation expense for NQOs in each of the six months ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 was $0.1 million.
Non-qualified stock options with performance-based and time-based vesting (“PNQs”)
In the six months ended December 31, 2016, the Company granted 149,223 shares issuable upon the exercise of PNQs to eligible employees under the Farmer Bros. Co. Amended and Restated 2007 Long-Term Incentive Plan (the “LTIP”), with 20% of each such grant subject to forfeiture if a target modified net income goal for fiscal 2017 is not attained. For this purpose, “Modified Net Income” is defined as net income (GAAP) before taxes and excluding any gains or losses from sales of assets, and excluding the effect of restructuring and other transition expenses related to the relocation of the Company’s corporate headquarters to Northlake, Texas. These PNQs have an exercise price of $32.85, which was the closing price of the Company’s common stock as reported on Nasdaq on the date of grant. One-third of the total number of shares subject to each such stock option vest ratably on each of the first three anniversaries of the grant date, contingent on continued employment, and subject to accelerated vesting in certain circumstances.
Following are the weighted average assumptions used in the Black-Scholes valuation model for PNQs granted during the six months ended December 31, 2016.
|
| |
| Six Months Ended December 31, 2016 |
Weighted average fair value of PNQs | $11.42 |
Risk-free interest rate | 1.53% |
Dividend yield | —% |
Average expected term | 4.9 years |
Expected stock price volatility | 37.7% |
The following table summarizes PNQ activity for the six months ended December 31, 2016:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Outstanding PNQs: | | Number of PNQs | | Weighted Average Exercise Price ($) | | Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value ($) | | Weighted Average Remaining Life (Years) | | Aggregate Intrinsic Value ($ in thousands) |
Outstanding at June 30, 2016 | | 288,599 |
| | 25.83 | | 10.82 | | 5.7 | | 1,798 |
|
Granted | | 149,223 |
| | 32.85 | | 11.42 | | 6.9 | | — |
|
Exercised | | (2,366 | ) | | 22.60 | | 10.30 | | — | | 24 |
|
Cancelled/Forfeited | | — |
| | — | | — | | — | | — |
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2016 | | 435,456 |
| | 28.25 | | 11.03 | | 5.8 | | 3,678 |
|
Vested and exercisable at December 31, 2016 | | 127,858 |
| | 24.22 | | 10.73 | | 4.8 | | 1,596 |
|
Vested and expected to vest at December 31, 2016 | | 414,443 |
| | 28.11 | | 11.02 | | 5.8 | | 3,560 |
|
The aggregate intrinsic values outstanding at the end of each fiscal period in the table above represent the total pretax intrinsic values, based on the Company’s closing stock price of $36.70 at December 30, 2016 and $32.06 at June 30, 2016 representing the last trading day of the respective fiscal periods, which would have been received by PNQ holders had all award holders exercised their PNQs that were in-the-money as of those dates. The aggregate intrinsic value of PNQ exercises in the six months ended December 31, 2016 represents the difference between the exercise price and the value of the Company’s common stock at the time of exercise. PNQs outstanding that are expected to vest are net of estimated forfeitures.
Farmer Bros. Co.
Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
During the six months ended December 31, 2016, 82,092 PNQ shares vested and 2,366 PNQ shares were exercised. Total fair value of PNQs vested during the six months ended December 31, 2016 was $0.9 million. The Company received $0.1 million and $0.2 million in proceeds from exercises of vested PNQs in the six months ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively.
As of December 31, 2016, the Company met the performance target for the second and final tranche of the fiscal 2014 awards and the first tranche of the fiscal 2015 and fiscal 2016 awards and expects that it will achieve the performance targets set forth in the PNQ agreements for the remainder of the fiscal 2015 and 2016 awards, and the fiscal 2017 awards.
At December 31, 2016 and June 30, 2016, there was $3.0 million and $1.9 million, respectively, of unrecognized compensation cost related to PNQs. The unrecognized compensation cost related to PNQs at December 31, 2016 is expected to be recognized over the weighted average period of 1.6 years. Total compensation expense related to PNQs in the three months ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 was $0.4 million and $0, respectively. Total compensation expense related to PNQs in the six months ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 was $0.6 million and $0.1 million, respectively.
Restricted Stock
During the six months ended December 31, 2016, the Company granted 5,106 shares of restricted stock to non-employee directors under the LTIP with a grant date fair value of $35.25 per share. Unlike prior-year awards to non-employee directors, which vest ratably over a period of three years, the fiscal 2017 restricted stock awards cliff vest on the first anniversary of the date of grant subject to continued service to the Company through the vesting date and the acceleration provisions of the LTIP and restricted stock agreement. No shares of restricted stock were granted to employees during the six months ended December 31, 2016.
During the six months ended December 31, 2016, 4,896 shares of restricted stock vested.
The following table summarizes restricted stock activity for the six months ended December 31, 2016: |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Outstanding and Nonvested Restricted Stock Awards: | | Shares Awarded | | Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value ($) | | Weighted Average Remaining Life (Years) | | Aggregate Intrinsic Value ($ in thousands) |
Outstanding at June 30, 2016 | | 23,792 |
| | 26.00 |
| | 1.8 | | 763 |
|
Granted | | 5,106 |
| | 35.25 |
| | 0.9 | | 180 |
|
Exercised/Released | | (4,896 | ) | | 24.53 |
| | — | | 168 |
|
Cancelled/Forfeited | | — |
| | — |
| | — | | — |
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2016 | | 24,002 |
| | 28.27 |
| | 1.4 | | 881 |
|
Expected to vest at December 31, 2016 | | 22,778 |
| | 28.24 |
| | 1.4 | | 836 |
|
The aggregate intrinsic value of shares outstanding at the end of each fiscal period in the table above represent the total pretax intrinsic values, based on the Company’s closing stock price of $36.70 at December 30, 2016 and $32.06 at June 30, 2016, representing the last trading day of the respective fiscal periods. Restricted stock that is expected to vest is net of estimated forfeitures.
At December 31, 2016 and June 30, 2016, there was $0.5 million of unrecognized compensation cost related to restricted stock. The unrecognized compensation cost related to restricted stock at December 31, 2016 is expected to be recognized over the weighted average period of 1.4 years. Total compensation expense for restricted stock was $0.1 million and $39,000 for the three months ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively. Total compensation expense for restricted stock was $0.1 million in each of the six months ended December 31, 2016 and 2015.
Farmer Bros. Co.
Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
Note 17. Other Long-Term Liabilities
Other long-term liabilities include the following: |
| | | | | | | | |
| | December 31, 2016 | | June 30, 2016 |
(In thousands) | | | | |
New Facility lease obligation(1) | | $ | — |
| | $ | 28,110 |
|
Earnout payable—RLC acquisition(2) | | 100 |
| | 100 |
|
Other long-term liabilities | | $ | 100 |
| | $ | 28,210 |
|
___________
(1) Lease obligation associated with construction of the New Facility. The lease obligation was reversed upon termination of the Lease Agreement concurrent with the closing of the purchase option on September 15, 2016 (see Note 5). (2) Earnout payable in connection with the Company's acquisition of substantially all of the assets of Rae' Launo Corporation completed on January 12, 2015.
Note 18. Income Taxes
The Company’ effective tax rates for the three months ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 were 40.1% and 6.1%, respectively. The Company’ effective tax rates for the six months ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 were 40.0% and 5.8%, respectively. The effective tax rates for the three and six months ended December 31, 2016 are higher than the U.S. statutory rate of 35.0% primarily due to state income tax expense. The effective tax rates for the three and six months ended December 31, 2015 are lower than the U.S. statutory rate of 35.0% primarily due to a valuation allowance recorded against the Company's deferred tax assets.
The Company evaluates its deferred tax assets quarterly to determine if a valuation allowance is required. In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2016, the Company considered whether a valuation allowance should be recorded against deferred tax assets based on the likelihood that the benefits of the deferred tax assets would or would not ultimately be realized in future periods. In making such assessment, significant weight was given to evidence that could be objectively verified such as recent operating results and less consideration was given to less objective indicators such as future income projections. After consideration of positive and negative evidence, including the recent history of income, the Company concluded that it is more likely than not that the Company will generate future income sufficient to realize the majority of the Company’s deferred tax assets as of June 30, 2016. Accordingly, the Company recorded a reduction in its valuation allowance in fiscal 2016 in the amount of $83.2 million.
As of December 31, 2016 and June 30, 2016 the Company had no unrecognized tax benefits. During the quarter ended September 30, 2016, the Internal Revenue Service completed its examination of the Company’s tax years ended June 30, 2013 and 2014 and accepted the returns as filed for each of those years.
Farmer Bros. Co.
Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
Note 19. Net Income Per Common Share
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended December 31, | | Six Months Ended December 31, |
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts) | | 2016 | | 2015 | | 2016 | | 2015 |
Net income attributable to common stockholders—basic | | $ | 20,052 |
| | $ | 5,554 |
| | $ | 21,669 |
| | $ | 4,482 |
|
Net income attributable to nonvested restricted stockholders | | 24 |
| | 7 |
| | 25 |
| | 5 |
|
Net income | | $ | 20,076 |
| | $ | 5,561 |
| | $ | 21,694 |
| | $ | 4,487 |
|
| | | | | | | | |
Weighted average common shares outstanding—basic | | 16,584,106 |
| | 16,313,312 |
| | 16,573,545 |
| | 16,291,324 |
|
Effect of dilutive securities: | | | | | | | | |
Shares issuable under stock options | | 122,897 |
| | 139,187 |
| | 122,142 |
| | 135,513 |
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding—diluted | | 16,707,003 |
| | 16,452,499 |
| | 16,695,687 |
| | 16,426,837 |
|
Net income per common share—basic | | $ | 1.21 |
| | $ | 0.34 |
| | $ | 1.31 |
| | $ | 0.28 |
|
Net income per common share—diluted | | $ | 1.20 |
| | $ | 0.34 |
| | $ | 1.30 |
| | $ | 0.27 |
|
Farmer Bros. Co.
Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
Note 20. Commitments and Contingencies
For a detailed discussion about the Company's commitments and contingencies, see Note 22, "Commitments and Contingencies" to the consolidated financial statements in the 2016 Form 10-K. During the six months ended December 31, 2016, other than the following, there were no material changes in the Company’s commitments and contingencies.
Contractual obligations for future fiscal periods are as follows:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Contractual Obligations |
(In thousands) | | Capital Lease Obligations | | Operating Lease Obligations | | New Facility Construction and Equipment Contracts (1) | | Pension Plan Obligations | | Postretirement Benefits Other Than Pension Plans | | Revolving Credit Facility | | Purchase Commitments (2) |
Six months ending June 30, 2017 | | $ | 702 |
| | $ | 2,112 |
| | $ | 20,677 |
| | $ | 3,947 |
| | $ | 540 |
| | $ | 18,532 |
| | $ | 68,777 |
|
Year Ending June 30, | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
2018 | | $ | 861 |
| | $ | 4,067 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 8,304 |
| | $ | 1,102 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 20,215 |
|
2019 | | $ | 107 |
| | $ | 3,158 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 8,554 |
| | $ | 1,143 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
|
2020 | | $ | 51 |
| | $ | 1,617 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 8,844 |
| | $ | 1,176 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
|
2021 | | $ | 4 |
| | $ | 642 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 9,074 |
| | $ | 1,210 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
|
Thereafter | | $ | — |
| | $ | 186 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 47,262 |
| | $ | 6,246 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
|
| | | | $ | 11,782 |
| | $ | 20,677 |
| | $ | 85,985 |
| | $ | 11,417 |
| | $ | 18,532 |
| | $ | 88,992 |
|
Total minimum lease payments | | $ | 1,725 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Less: imputed interest (0.82% to 10.7%) | | $ | (62 | ) | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Present value of future minimum lease payments | | $ | 1,663 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Less: current portion | | $ | 1,214 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Long-term capital lease obligations | | $ | 449 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
___________
(1) Includes $9.9 million in outstanding contractual obligations for construction of the New Facility and $10.8 million in outstanding contractual obligations under the Amended Building Contract as of December 31, 2016. See Note 5. (2) Purchase commitments include commitments under coffee purchase contracts for which all delivery terms have been finalized but the related coffee has not been received as of December 31, 2016. Amounts shown in the table above: (a) include all coffee purchase contracts that the Company considers to be from normal purchases; and (b) do not include amounts related to derivative instruments that are recorded at fair value on the Company’s condensed consolidated balance sheets.
Self-Insurance
At June 30, 2016, the Company had posted a $7.4 million letter of credit as a security deposit with the State of California Department of Industrial Relations Self-Insurance Plans for participation in the alternative security program for California self-insurers for workers’ compensation liability in California. The State of California notified the Company on December 13, 2016 that it had released and authorized the cancellation of the letter of credit. At December 31, 2016 and June 30, 2016, the Company had posted a $4.3 million letter of credit as a security deposit for self-insuring workers’ compensation, general liability and auto insurance coverages outside of California.
Farmer Bros. Co.
Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
Non-cancelable Purchase Orders
As of December 31, 2016, the Company had committed to purchase green coffee inventory totaling $69.0 million under fixed-price contracts, equipment for the New Facility totaling $0.6 million and other purchases totaling $19.4 million under non-cancelable purchase orders.
Legal Proceedings
Council for Education and Research on Toxics (“CERT”) v. Brad Berry Company Ltd., et al., Superior Court of the State of California, County of Los Angeles
On August 31, 2012, CERT filed an amendment to a private enforcement action adding a number of companies as defendants, including CBI, which sell coffee in California. The suit alleges that the defendants have failed to issue clear and reasonable warnings in accordance with Proposition 65 that the coffee they produce, distribute and sell contains acrylamide. This lawsuit was filed in Los Angeles Superior Court (the “Court”). CERT has demanded that the alleged violators remove acrylamide from their coffee or provide Proposition 65 warnings on their products and pay $2,500 per day for each and every violation while they are in violation of Proposition 65.
Acrylamide is produced naturally in connection with the heating of many foods, especially starchy foods, and is believed to be caused by the Maillard reaction, though it has also been found in unheated foods such as olives. With respect to coffee, acrylamide is produced when coffee beans are heated during the roasting process-it is the roasting itself that produces the acrylamide. While there has been a significant amount of research concerning proposals for treatments and other processes aimed at reducing acrylamide content of different types of foods, to our knowledge there is currently no known strategy for reducing acrylamide in coffee without negatively impacting the sensorial properties of the product.
The Company has joined a Joint Defense Group and, along with the other co-defendants, has answered the complaint, denying, generally, the allegations of the complaint, including the claimed violation of Proposition 65 and further denying CERT’s right to any relief or damages, including the right to require a warning on products. The Joint Defense Group contends that based on proper scientific analysis and proper application of the standards set forth in Proposition 65, exposures to acrylamide from the coffee products pose no significant risk of cancer and, thus, these exposures are exempt from Proposition 65’s warning requirement.
To date, the pleadings stage of the case has been completed. The Court has phased trial so that the “no significant risk level” defense, the First Amendment defense, and the preemption defense will be tried first. Fact discovery and expert discovery on these “Phase 1” defenses have been completed, and the parties filed trial briefs. Trial commenced on September 8, 2014, and testimony completed on November 4, 2014, for the three Phase 1 defenses. Following two continuances, the court heard on April 9, 2015 final arguments on the Phase 1 issues. On July 25, 2015, the Court issued its Proposed Statement of Decision with respect to Phase 1 defenses against the defendants, which was confirmed, on September 2, 2015 in the Final Statement of Decision. The Court has stated that all defendants would be included in “Phase 2,” though this remains unresolved, including the extent of the involvement or participation in discovery. Following permission from the Court, on October 14, 2015 the Joint Defense Group filed a writ petition for an interlocutory appeal. In late December 2015, plaintiff’s counsel served letters proposing a new plan to file the anticipated motion for summary adjudication and a new set of discovery on all defendants. On January 14, 2016, the Court of Appeals denied the Joint Defense Group’s writ petition thereby denying the interlocutory appeal. On February 16, 2016, CERT filed a motion for summary adjudication arguing that based upon facts that had been stipulated by defendants, CERT had proven its prima facie case and all that remains is a determination of whether any affirmative defenses are available to defendants. On March 16, 2016, the Court reinstated the stay on discovery for all defendant parties except for the four largest defendants, so the Company is not currently obligated to participate in discovery. Following a hearing on April 20, 2016, the Court granted CERT’s motion for summary adjudication on its prima facie case. Plaintiff filed its motion for summary adjudication of affirmatives defenses on May 16, 2016 and the defendants’ opposition brief was filed on July 22, 2016. Certain discovery responses were scheduled to be due by September 9, 2016. At an August 19, 2016 hearing on Plaintiff’s motion for summary adjudication and defendants’ opposition with respect to the affirmative defenses, the Court denied Plaintiff’s motion, thus the Joint Defense Group will continue to be able to present the affirmative defenses at trial.
The Court has set July 5, 2017 as the trial date for Phase 2. Mediation meetings between Plaintiff and the Joint Defense Group occurred during November 2016. On December 16, 2016, the Court determined that depositions on certain limited matters with respect to both the litigating and the non-litigating Defendants would proceed, which depositions
Farmer Bros. Co.
Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
commenced at the end of January 2017. Also in January 2017, the Plaintiffs served additional discovery on all Defendants. At this time, the Company is not able to predict the probability of the outcome or estimate of loss, if any, related to this matter.
Note 21. Subsequent Events
Acquisition of West Coast Coffee
On February 7, 2017, the Company acquired substantially all of the assets and certain specified liabilities of West Coast Coffee Company, Inc., a manufacturer and distributor of coffee and allied products, for an aggregate purchase price of up to $14.5 million, with $13.5 million paid in cash at closing and $1.0 million to be paid as earnout if certain sales levels are achieved in designated subsequent periods.
|
| |
Item 2. | Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
Certain statements contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q are not based on historical fact and are forward-looking statements within the meaning of federal securities laws and regulations. These statements are based on management’s current expectations, assumptions, estimates and observations of future events and include any statements that do not directly relate to any historical or current fact; actual results may differ materially due in part to the risk factors set forth in Part I, Item 1A of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2016 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC") on September 14, 2016 and Part II, Item 1A of this report. These forward-looking statements can be identified by the use of words like “anticipates,” “estimates,” “projects,” “expects,” “plans,” “believes,” “intends,” “will,” “could,” “assumes” and other words of similar meaning. Owing to the uncertainties inherent in forward-looking statements, actual results could differ materially from those set forth in forward-looking statements. We intend these forward-looking statements to speak only at the time of this report and do not undertake to update or revise these statements as more information becomes available except as required under federal securities laws and the rules and regulations of the SEC. Factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those in forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, the timing and success of implementation of the Company’s Corporate Relocation Plan, completion of construction of the New Facility and the availability of capital resources to fund the construction costs and capital expenditures for the New Facility, the diversion of management time on the Corporate Relocation Plan and other transaction-related issues, the timing and success of the Company in realizing estimated savings from third-party logistics ("3PL") and vendor managed inventory, the realization of the Company’s cost savings estimates, the timing and success of the Company realizing the benefits of recent acquisitions, the relative effectiveness of compensation-based employee incentives in causing improvements in Company performance, the capacity to meet the demands of our large national account customers, the extent of execution of plans for the growth of Company business and achievement of financial metrics related to those plans, the success of the Company to retain and/or attract qualified employees, the effect of the capital markets as well as other external factors on stockholder value, fluctuations in availability and cost of green coffee, competition, organizational changes, changes in the strength of the economy, business conditions in the coffee industry and food industry in general, our continued success in attracting new customers, variances from budgeted sales mix and growth rates, weather and special or unusual events, changes in the quality or dividend stream of third parties’ securities and other investment vehicles in which we have invested our assets, as well as other risks described in this report and other factors described from time to time in our filings with the SEC. The results of operations for the three and six months ended December 31, 2016 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for any future period.
Overview
We are a national coffee roaster, wholesaler and distributor of coffee, tea and culinary products manufactured under supply agreements, under our owned brands, as well as under private labels on behalf of certain customers. We were founded in 1912, incorporated in California in 1923, and reincorporated in Delaware in 2004. We operate in one business segment.
We serve a wide variety of customers, from small independent restaurants and foodservice operators to large institutional buyers like restaurants and convenience store chains, hotels, casinos, hospitals, and gourmet coffee houses, as well as grocery chains with private brand coffee and consumer-facing branded coffee and tea products. Through our sustainability, stewardship, environmental efforts, and leadership we are not only committed to serving the finest products available, considering the cost needs of the customer, but also insist on their sustainable cultivation, manufacture and distribution whenever possible. Our product categories consist of a robust line of roast and ground coffee, including organic, Direct Trade, Direct Trade Verified Sustainable ("DTVS") and sustainably-produced offerings; frozen liquid coffee; flavored and unflavored iced and hot teas; culinary products including gelatins and puddings, soup bases, dressings, gravy and sauce mixes, pancake and biscuit mixes, jellies and preserves, and coffee-related products such as coffee filters, sugar and creamers; spices; and other beverages including cappuccino, cocoa, granitas, and ready-to-drink iced coffee. We offer a comprehensive approach to our customers by providing not only a breadth of high-quality products, but also value-added services such as market insight, beverage planning, and equipment placement and service.
We operate production facilities in Portland, Oregon, Houston, Texas and Scottsdale, Arizona. Distribution takes place out of our Portland and Scottsdale facilities and our new facility in Northlake, Texas (the "New Facility") as well as three separate distribution centers in Northlake, Illinois; Oklahoma City, Oklahoma; and Moonachie, New Jersey. On July 15,
2016 we completed the sale of certain property, including our former headquarters in Torrance, California (the “Torrance Facility”) and leased it back. We vacated the Torrance Facility after transitioning our remaining Torrance operations to our other facilities and concluded the leaseback arrangement as of December 31, 2016. The New Facility will serve as a production facility and distribution center for our products.
Our products reach our customers primarily in two ways: through our nationwide DSD network of 450 delivery routes and 107 branch warehouses as of December 31, 2016, or direct-shipped via common carriers or third-party distributors. We operate a large fleet of trucks and other vehicles to distribute and deliver our products, and we rely on 3PL service providers for our long-haul distribution. DSD sales are made “off-truck” to our customers at their places of business.
Corporate Relocation
In an effort to make the Company more competitive and better positioned to capitalize on growth opportunities, in fiscal 2015 we began the process of relocating our corporate headquarters, product development lab, and manufacturing and distribution operations from Torrance, California to the New Facility housing these operations in Northlake, Texas (the “Corporate Relocation Plan”). Approximately 350 positions were impacted as a result of the Torrance Facility closure.
The significant milestones associated with our Corporate Relocation Plan are as follows: |
| | |
Event | | Date |
Announced Corporate Relocation Plan | | Q3 fiscal 2015 |
Transitioned coffee processing and packaging from Torrance production facility and consolidated them with Houston and Portland production facilities | | Q4 fiscal 2015 |
Moved Houston distribution operations to Oklahoma City distribution center | | Q4 fiscal 2015 |
Entered into the lease agreement and development management agreement for New Facility | | Q1 fiscal 2016 |
Commenced construction of New Facility | | Q1 fiscal 2016 |
Transitioned primary administrative offices from Torrance to temporary leased offices in Fort Worth, Texas | | Q1-Q2 fiscal 2016 |
Sold Spice Assets to Harris | | Q2 fiscal 2016 |
Principal design work completed on New Facility | | Q3 fiscal 2016 |
Completed transition services to Harris and ceased spice processing and packaging at Torrance Facility | | Q4 fiscal 2016 |
Entered into purchase and sale agreement to sell Torrance Facility | | Q4 fiscal 2016 |
Exercised purchase option on New Facility | | Q4 fiscal 2016 |
Closed sale of Torrance Facility | | Q1 fiscal 2017 |
Closed purchase option for New Facility | | Q1 fiscal 2017 |
Entered into amended building contract with The Haskell Company | | Q1 fiscal 2017 |
Exited from Torrance Facility | | Q2 fiscal 2017 |
Completion of construction and relocation to New Facility | | Estimated Q3 fiscal 2017 |
Recent Developments
On July 15, 2016, we completed the sale of the Torrance Facility consisting of approximately 665,000 square feet of buildings located on approximately 20.33 acres of land, for an aggregate cash sale price of $43.0 million, which sale price was subject to customary adjustments for closing costs and documentary transfer taxes. Cash proceeds from the sale of the Torrance Facility were $42.5 million. Following the closing of the sale, we leased back the Torrance Facility on a triple net basis through October 31, 2016 at zero base rent, and exercised two one-month extensions at a base rent of $100,000 per month. We vacated the Torrance Facility in December 2016 and concluded the leaseback transaction. Accordingly, in the three and six months ended December 31, 2016, we recognized a net gain from the sale of the Torrance Facility in the
amount of $37.4 million, including non-cash interest expense of $0.4 million and $0.7 million, respectively, and non-cash rent expense of $0.5 million and $1.4 million, respectively, representing the rent for the zero base rent period previously recorded in “Other current liabilities” and removed the amounts recorded in “Assets Held for Sale” and the “Sale-leaseback financing obligation” on our consolidated balance sheet. See Note 6, Sales of Assets—Sale of Torrance Facility, and Note 7, Assets Held for Sale, of the Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part I, Item 1 of this report. On October 11, 2016, we acquired substantially all of the assets and certain specificd liabilities of China Mist Brands, Inc. dba China Mist Tea Company (“China Mist”), a provider of flavored iced teas and iced green teas, for an aggregate purchase price of $11.7 million, with $11.2 million in cash paid at closing and $0.5 million in contingent consideration to be paid as earnout if certain sales levels are achieved in the calendar years of 2017 or 2018. We anticipate that the acquisition of China Mist will extend our tea product offerings and give us a greater presence in the high-growth premium tea industry. As part of the transaction, we assumed the lease on China Mist’s existing production, distribution and warehouse facility in Scottsdale, Arizona which is terminable upon twelve months’ notice. See Note 3, Acquisition, of the Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part I, Item 1 of this report. On September 15, 2016 (the "Purchase Option Closing Date"), we closed the purchase option and acquired the land and the partially constructed New Facility located thereon for an aggregate purchase price of $42.5 million (the “Purchase Price”), consisting of the purchase option price of $42.0 million based on actual construction costs incurred for the partially constructed New Facility as of the Purchase Option Closing Date, plus amounts paid in respect of real estate commissions, title insurance, and recording fees. The Purchase Price was paid in cash from proceeds received from the sale of the Torrance Facility. See Note 5, New Facility, of the Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part I, Item 1 of this report. On September 17, 2016, we and The Haskell Company (“Builder”) entered into a Change Order, which, among other things, amended the building contract previously entered into between us and Builder to provide a guaranteed maximum price and the basis for the price and the scope of Builder’s services in connection with the construction of the New Facility (the "Amended Building Contract"). Pursuant to the Amended Building Contract, we will pay Builder up to $21.9 million for Builder’s services in connection with the pre-construction and construction services, including specialized industrial design and construction work in connection with Builder’s construction of certain production equipment that will be installed in portions of the New Facility. See Note 5, New Facility, and Note 20, Commitments and Contingencies of the Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part I, Item 1 of this report).
Results of Operations
Financial Highlights
| |
• | Volume of green coffee pounds processed and sold increased 5.7% in the three months ended December 31, 2016 as compared to the three months ended December 31, 2015. |
| |
• | Gross profit increased 4.1% to $55.1 million in the three months ended December 31, 2016 from $52.9 million in the three months ended December 31, 2015. Gross profit increased 2.7% to $106.3 million in the six months ended December 31, 2016 from $103.5 million in the six months ended December 31, 2015. |
| |
• | Gross margin increased to 39.6% and 39.4%, respectively, in the three and six months ended December 31, 2016, from 37.2% and 37.5%, respectively, in the three and six months ended December 31, 2015. |
| |
• | Income from operations was $35.9 million and $38.4 million, respectively, including a $37.4 million net gain from the sale of the Torrance Facility, in the three and six months ended December 31, 2016 as compared to $5.4 million and $4.8 million, respectively, in the three and six months ended December 31, 2015, including a net gain of $5.1 million from the sale of spice assets. |
| |
• | Net income was $20.1 million, or $1.20 per diluted common share, in the three months ended December 31, 2016, compared to $5.6 million, or $0.34 per diluted common share, in the three months ended December 31, 2015. Net income was $21.7 million, or $1.30 per diluted common share, in the six months ended December 31, 2016, compared to $4.5 million, or $0.27 per diluted common share, in the six months ended December 31, 2015. |
Net Sales
Net sales in the three months ended December 31, 2016 decreased $(3.3) million, or (2.3)%, to $139.0 million from $142.3 million in the three months ended December 31, 2015 primarily due to a $(2.4) million decrease in net sales of spice products resulting from the sale of our institutional spice assets and a $(1.1) million decrease in net sales of coffee (frozen liquid) products, partially offset by a $1.3 million increase in net sales from tea products primarily from the addition of China Mist net sales from the date of its acquisition. Net sales in the three months ended December 31, 2016 included $(2.3) million in price decreases to customers utilizing commodity-based pricing arrangements, where the changes in the green coffee commodity costs are passed on to the customer, as compared to $(0.6) million in price decreases to customers utilizing such arrangements in the three months ended December 31, 2015.
Net sales in the six months ended December 31, 2016 decreased $(6.3) million, or (2.3)%, to $269.5 million from $275.8 million in the six months ended December 31, 2015 primarily due to a $(4.7) million decrease in net sales of spice products resulting from the sale of our institutional spice assets and a $(1.8) million decrease in net sales of coffee (frozen liquid) products, partially offset by a $1.4 million increase in net sales from tea products primarily from the addition of China Mist net sales from the date of its acquisition. Net sales in the six months ended December 31, 2016 included $(6.6) million in price decreases to customers utilizing commodity-based pricing arrangements, where the changes in the green coffee commodity costs are passed on to the customer, as compared to $0.6 million in price increases to customers utilizing such arrangements in the six months ended December 31, 2015.
The change in net sales in the three and six months ended December 31, 2016 compared to the same period in the prior fiscal year was due to the following: |
| | | | | | | |
(In millions) | Three Months Ended December 31, 2016 vs. 2015 | | Six Months Ended December 31, 2016 vs. 2015 |
Effect of change in unit sales | $ | (4.4 | ) | | $ | 2.4 |
|
Effect of pricing and product mix changes | 1.1 |
| | (8.7 | ) |
Total decrease in net sales | $ | (3.3 | ) | | $ | (6.3 | ) |
Unit sales decreased (0.6)% in the three months ended December 31, 2016 as compared to the same period in the prior fiscal year, and average unit price decreased by (1.7)% resulting in a decrease in net sales of (2.3)%. In the three months ended December 31, 2016, unit sales of roast and ground coffee products, which accounted for approximately 62% of total net sales, increased 5.7%, offset by a (77.6)% decrease in unit sales of spice products, which accounted for approximately 4% of net sales, due to the sale of our institutional spice assets, while the average unit price decreased primarily due to the lower average unit price of roast and ground coffee products primarily driven by the pass-through of lower green coffee commodity purchase costs to our customers. In the three months ended December 31, 2016, we processed and sold approximately 24.5 million pounds of green coffee as compared to approximately 23.2 million pounds of green coffee processed and sold in the three months ended December 31, 2015. There were no new product category introductions in the three months ended December 31, 2016 or 2015 which had a material impact on our net sales.
Unit sales increased 3.3% in the six months ended December 31, 2016 as compared to the same period in the prior fiscal year, but average unit price decreased by (5.4)% resulting in a decrease in net sales of (2.3)%. In the six months ended December 31, 2016, unit sales of our roast and ground coffee products which accounted for approximately 62% of our total net sales increased 6.8%, while the average unit price decreased primarily due to the lower average unit price of roast and ground coffee products primarily driven by the pass-through of lower green coffee commodity purchase costs to our customers. In the six months ended December 31, 2016, we processed and sold approximately 47.8 million pounds of green coffee as compared to approximately 44.8 million pounds of green coffee processed and sold in the six months ended December 31, 2015. There were no new product category introductions in the six months ended December 31, 2016 or 2015 which had a material impact on our net sales.
The following tables present net sales aggregated by product category for the respective periods indicated: |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended December 31, |
| | 2016 | | 2015 |
(In thousands) | | $ | | % of total | | $ | | % of total |
Net Sales by Product Category: | | | | | | | | |
Coffee (Roast & Ground) | | $ | 86,838 |
| | 62 |
|