DEF 14A
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
SCHEDULE 14A
Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment
No. )
Filed by the
Registrant þ
Filed by a Party other than the
Registrant o
Check the
appropriate box:
|
|
|
o Preliminary
Proxy Statement
|
o Confidential,
for Use of the SEC Only (as permitted by Rule
14a-6(e)(2))
|
þ Definitive
Proxy Statement
|
o Definitive
Additional Materials
|
o Soliciting
Material Pursuant to §240.14a-12
|
PHH CORPORATION
(Name of Registrant as Specified In
Its Charter)
N/A
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy
Statement, if other than the Registrant)
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
o Fee
computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules
14a-6(i)(4)
and 0-11.
|
|
(1) |
Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:
|
|
|
(2) |
Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:
|
|
|
(3) |
Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed
pursuant to Exchange Act
Rule 0-11
(Set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and
state how it was determined):
|
|
|
(4) |
Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:
|
|
|
o
|
Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.
|
|
o
|
Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by
Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which
the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous
filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule
and the date of its filing.
|
|
|
(1) |
Amount Previously Paid:
|
|
|
(2) |
Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:
|
December 28, 2007
Dear Fellow Stockholder:
You are cordially invited to attend the Annual Meeting of
Stockholders for 2007 (the Annual Meeting) of PHH
Corporation (the Company), which will be held at the
Companys offices located at 3000 Leadenhall Road,
Mt. Laurel, New Jersey 08054, on March 18, 2008 at
10:00 a.m., eastern daylight time. Please note that
directions to the meeting location are provided on the last page
of the Proxy Statement.
At the Annual Meeting, stockholders will be asked to elect two
Class II Directors to hold office until the Annual Meeting
of Stockholders for 2010 and to transact such other business as
may properly come before the meeting. The accompanying Notice of
Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement describe in more detail the
business to be conducted at the Annual Meeting and provide other
information concerning the Company of which you should be aware
when you vote your shares. Also enclosed is a copy of the
Companys Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2006. You may also refer to
Appendix A to the Proxy Statement for selected financial
data from the Companys Quarterly Reports on
Form 10-Q
for the quarters ended March 31, 2007, June 30, 2007
and September 30, 2007.
Admission to the Annual Meeting will be by ticket only. If you
are a registered stockholder planning to attend the meeting,
please check the appropriate box on the proxy card and retain
the bottom portion of the card as your admission ticket. If your
shares are held through an intermediary, such as a bank or
broker, please follow the instructions under the About the
Annual Meeting of Stockholders section of the Proxy
Statement to obtain a ticket.
Your participation in the Companys Annual Meeting is
important, regardless of the number of shares you own. In order
to ensure that your shares are represented at the Annual
Meeting, whether you plan to attend or not, please vote in
accordance with the enclosed instructions. As a stockholder of
record, you can vote your shares by telephone, electronically
via the Internet or by submitting the enclosed proxy card. If
you vote using the proxy card, you must sign, date and mail the
proxy card in the enclosed envelope. If you decide to attend the
Annual Meeting and wish to modify your vote, you may revoke your
proxy and vote in person at the meeting.
The Board of Directors appreciates your time and attention in
reviewing the accompanying Proxy Statement. Thank you for your
continued interest in PHH Corporation. We look forward to seeing
you at the meeting.
Sincerely,
A. B. Krongard
Non-Executive Chairman of the Board
Terence W. Edwards
President and Chief Executive Officer
TABLE OF
CONTENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page
|
|
|
NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS FOR 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
|
A-1
|
|
|
|
|
B-1
|
|
PHH
CORPORATION
3000 Leadenhall Road
Mt. Laurel, New Jersey 08054
NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS FOR
2007
To Be Held on March 18,
2008
To Our Stockholders:
The Annual Meeting of Stockholders of PHH Corporation (the
Company) for 2007 will be held at the Companys
offices located at 3000 Leadenhall Road, Mt. Laurel, New Jersey
08054, on March 18, 2008 at 10:00 a.m., eastern
daylight time (the Annual Meeting), to consider and
vote upon the following matters:
1. To elect two Class II Directors to hold office
until the Annual Meeting of Stockholders for 2010, and until
their successors are duly elected and qualified; and
2. To transact such other business as may properly come
before the Annual Meeting or any adjournment or postponement
thereof.
The Board of Directors has fixed the close of business on
December 21, 2007 as the record date for the Annual
Meeting. Only stockholders of record as of the record date are
entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the Annual Meeting and
any adjournment or postponement thereof.
By Order of the Board of Directors
William F. Brown
Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary
December 28, 2007
PLEASE VOTE YOUR SHARES IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE INSTRUCTIONS
PROVIDED IN THE PROXY STATEMENT. IF VOTING USING THE ENCLOSED
PROXY CARD, PLEASE MARK, SIGN, DATE AND PROMPTLY RETURN THE
PROXY IN THE ADDRESSED REPLY ENVELOPE WHICH IS FURNISHED FOR
YOUR CONVENIENCE. THE ENVELOPE NEEDS NO POSTAGE IF MAILED WITHIN
THE UNITED STATES.
PHH
CORPORATION
3000 Leadenhall Road
Mt. Laurel, New Jersey 08054
ANNUAL MEETING OF
STOCKHOLDERS
TO BE HELD ON MARCH 18,
2008
ABOUT
THE ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
Who is
soliciting my vote?
The Board of Directors of PHH Corporation, a Maryland
corporation (we, our, us,
PHH or the Company), is soliciting your
vote at our Annual Meeting of Stockholders for 2007, and any
adjournment or postponement thereof (the Annual
Meeting), to be held on the date at the time and place,
and for the purposes set forth in the accompanying notice. This
Proxy Statement and appendices, the accompanying notice of
annual meeting, the enclosed proxy card and our Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2006 (the 2006 Annual
Report) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(SEC) on May 24, 2007 are being mailed to
stockholders on or about December 28, 2007.
What is
the purpose of the Annual Meeting?
At the Annual Meeting, stockholders will act on the matters
outlined in the accompanying notice. The only matter scheduled
to be acted upon at the Annual Meeting is the Election of
Directors (see page 7 of this Proxy Statement).
Who can
attend the Annual Meeting?
Only stockholders as of December 21, 2007 (the Record
Date), or their duly appointed proxies, may attend the
Annual Meeting. Registration and seating will begin at
9:00 a.m. Stockholders will be asked to present valid
picture identification, such as a drivers license or
passport. Cameras, recording devices and other electronic
devices will not be permitted at the Annual Meeting.
Please note that if you hold your shares in street
name (that is, through a broker or other nominee), you
must bring either a copy of the voting instruction card provided
by your broker or nominee or a copy of a brokerage statement
reflecting your stock ownership as of the record date and check
in at the registration desk at the Annual Meeting.
A list of stockholders entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting
will be available for examination by any stockholder for any
purpose germane to the Annual Meeting beginning ten days prior
to the Annual Meeting during ordinary business hours at 3000
Leadenhall Road, Mt. Laurel, New Jersey 08054, the
Companys principal place of business, and ending on the
date of the Annual Meeting.
Do I need
a ticket to attend the Annual Meeting?
Yes. Attendance at the Annual Meeting will be limited to
stockholders as of the Record Date, their authorized
representatives and our guests. Admission will be by ticket
only. For registered stockholders, the bottom portion of the
proxy card enclosed with the Proxy Statement is the Annual
Meeting ticket. If you are a beneficial owner and hold your
shares in street name, or through an intermediary,
such as a bank or broker, you should request tickets in writing
from PHH Corporation, Attention: Investor Relations, 3000
Leadenhall Road, Mt. Laurel, New Jersey 08054, and include proof
of ownership, such as a bank or brokerage firm account statement
or letter from the broker, trustee, bank or nominee holding your
stock, confirming your beneficial ownership. Stockholders who do
not obtain
1
tickets in advance may obtain them on the Annual Meeting date at
the registration desk upon verifying their stock ownership as of
the Record Date. In accordance with our security procedures, all
persons attending the Annual Meeting must present a picture
identification along with their admission ticket or proof of
beneficial ownership in order to gain admission. Admission to
the Annual Meeting will be expedited if tickets are obtained in
advance. Tickets may be issued to others at our discretion.
How many
votes do I have?
You will have one vote for every share of PHH Corporation common
stock, par value $0.01 per share (Common
Stock), you owned on the Record Date.
How many
votes can be cast by all stockholders?
54,077,064 votes may be cast at the Annual Meeting, representing
one vote for each share of our Common Stock that was outstanding
on the Record Date. There is no cumulative voting, and the
holders of our Common Stock vote together as a single class.
How many
votes must be present to hold the Annual Meeting?
A majority of the outstanding shares of our Common Stock
entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting must be present, in
person or by proxy, to constitute a quorum at the Annual
Meeting. Stockholders of record who are present at the Annual
Meeting, in person or by proxy, and who abstain from voting,
including brokers holding customers shares of record who
cause abstentions to be recorded at the Annual Meeting, will be
included in the number of stockholders present at the Annual
Meeting for purposes of determining whether a quorum is present.
How many
votes are required to elect Directors and adopt any other
proposals?
Directors are elected by the affirmative vote of a plurality of
the shares of our Common Stock cast at the Annual Meeting, in
person or by proxy, and entitled to vote in the election of
Directors. Under applicable Maryland law, in determining whether
such nominees have received the requisite number of affirmative
votes, abstentions and broker non-votes will not be counted and
will have no effect on the outcome of the vote.
Approval of any other matter that may come before the Annual
Meeting generally requires the affirmative vote of a majority of
the shares of our Common Stock cast, in person or by proxy, and
entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting. Under applicable
Maryland law, in determining whether such proposals have
received the requisite number of affirmative votes, abstentions
and broker non-votes will not be counted and will have no effect
on the outcome of the vote.
How do I
vote?
You can vote in person or by valid proxy received by telephone,
via the Internet or by mail. If voting by mail, you must:
|
|
|
|
|
indicate your instructions on the proxy;
|
|
|
|
date and sign the proxy;
|
|
|
|
mail the proxy promptly in the enclosed envelope; and
|
|
|
|
allow sufficient time for the proxy to be received before the
date of the Annual Meeting.
|
Alternatively, in lieu of returning signed proxy cards, our
stockholders of record can vote their shares by telephone or via
the Internet. If you are a registered stockholder (that is, if
you hold your stock in certificate form), you may vote by
telephone or electronically through the Internet by following
the instructions included with your proxy card. The deadline for
voting by telephone or electronically through the Internet is
11:59 p.m., eastern daylight time, on March 17, 2008.
If your shares are held in street name such as in a
stock brokerage account or by a bank or other nominee, please
check your proxy card or contact your broker or nominee to
determine whether you will be able to vote by telephone or
electronically through the Internet.
2
How do
participants in our employee savings plans vote?
For participants in the PHH Corporation Employee Savings Plan
and the PHH Home Loans, LLC Employee Savings Plan (the
Savings Plans) with shares of our Common Stock
credited to their accounts, voting instructions for the trustees
of the Savings Plans are also being solicited through this Proxy
Statement. In accordance with the provisions of the Savings
Plans, the respective trustees will vote shares of our Common
Stock in accordance with instructions received from the
participants to whose accounts such shares are credited. To the
extent such instructions are not received prior to 11:59 p.m.
eastern daylight time, on March 14, 2008, the trustees of
the Savings Plans will vote the shares with respect to which it
has not received instructions proportionately in accordance with
the shares for which it has received instructions. Instructions
given with respect to shares in accounts of the Savings Plans
may be changed or revoked only in writing, and no such
instructions may be revoked after 11:59 p.m., eastern daylight
time, on March 14, 2008. Participants in the Savings Plans
are not entitled to vote in person at the Annual Meeting. If a
participant in the Savings Plans has shares of our Common Stock
credited to his or her account and also owns other shares of our
Common Stock, he or she should receive separate proxy cards for
shares credited to his or her account in the Savings Plans and
any other shares that he or she owns. All such proxy cards
should be completed, signed and returned to the transfer agent
to register voting instructions for all shares owned by him or
her or held for his or her benefit in the Savings Plans.
Can I
change my vote?
Yes. A proxy may be revoked at any time prior to the voting at
the Annual Meeting by submitting a later dated proxy (including
a proxy by telephone or electronically through the Internet), by
giving timely written notice of such revocation to our Corporate
Secretary or by attending the Annual Meeting and voting in
person. However, if you hold shares in street name,
you may not vote these shares in person at the Annual Meeting
unless you bring with you a legal proxy from the stockholder of
record.
What if I
do not vote for some of the matters listed on my proxy
card?
Shares of our Common Stock represented by proxies received by us
(whether through the return of the enclosed proxy card, by
telephone or through the Internet), where the stockholder has
specified his or her choice with respect to the proposals
described in this Proxy Statement, including the election of
Directors, will be voted in accordance with the specification(s)
so made.
If your proxy is properly executed but does not contain voting
instructions, or if you vote by telephone or via the Internet
without indicating how you want to vote, your shares will be
voted:
|
|
|
|
|
FOR the election of the two Class II
Director nominees for the Board of Directors.
|
Could
other matters be decided at the Annual Meeting?
The Board of Directors does not intend to bring any matter
before the Annual Meeting other than those set forth above, and
the Board is not aware of any matters that anyone else proposes
to present for action at the Annual Meeting. However, if any
other matters properly come before the Annual Meeting, the
persons named in the enclosed proxy, or their duly constituted
substitutes acting at the Annual Meeting, will be authorized to
vote or otherwise act thereon in accordance with their judgment
on such matters.
Who will
pay for the cost of this proxy solicitation?
We will pay the cost of soliciting proxies. Our Directors,
officers and employees may solicit proxies on behalf of the
Company in person or by telephone, facsimile or other electronic
means. We have engaged Georgeson Shareholder Communications Inc.
to assist us in the distribution and solicitation of proxies for
a fee of $6,500 plus expenses. In accordance with the
regulations of the SEC and the New York Stock Exchange, we also
reimburse brokerage firms and other custodians, nominees and
fiduciaries for their expenses incurred in sending proxies and
proxy materials to beneficial owners of our Common Stock as of
the Record Date.
3
How can I
access the Companys proxy materials and annual report
electronically?
Copies of the 2006 Annual Report, the Proxy Statement,
Quarterly Reports on
Form 10-Q
for the quarters ended March 31, 2007, June 30, 2007
and September 30, 2007, and other materials filed by the
Company with the SEC are available without charge to
stockholders on our website at www.phh.com or upon
written request to PHH Corporation, Attention: Investor
Relations, 3000 Leadenhall Road, Mt. Laurel, New Jersey 08054.
You can elect to receive future annual reports and proxy
statements electronically by marking the appropriate box on your
proxy card or by following the instructions provided if you vote
via the Internet or by telephone.
What
financial information is accompanying the Proxy
Statement?
Accompanying the Proxy Statement is the 2006 Annual Report. The
2006 Annual Report includes our audited consolidated financial
statements as of December 31, 2005 and 2006 and for the
years ended December 31, 2004, 2005 and 2006. Due to the
delay in holding the Annual Meeting, we are also including
selected financial data in Appendix A to the Proxy
Statement. The selected financial data includes certain
financial information included in our Quarterly Reports on
Form 10-Q
for the quarters ended March 31, 2007, June 30, 2007
and September 30, 2007, including comparable periods in
2006, as previously filed with the SEC. Based on the inherent
uncertainties of our business, the historical financial
information included in the 2006
Form 10-K
and selected financial data may not be indicative of what our
results of operations and financial position will be in the
future.
NO PERSON IS AUTHORIZED TO GIVE ANY INFORMATION OR TO MAKE
ANY REPRESENTATION OTHER THAN THOSE CONTAINED IN THIS PROXY
STATEMENT, AND, IF GIVEN OR MADE, SUCH INFORMATION MUST NOT BE
RELIED UPON AS HAVING BEEN AUTHORIZED AND THE DELIVERY OF THIS
PROXY STATEMENT SHALL, UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES, CREATE ANY
IMPLICATION THAT THERE HAS BEEN NO CHANGE IN THE AFFAIRS OF THE
COMPANY SINCE THE DATE OF THIS PROXY STATEMENT.
Board of Directors
Our Board of Directors currently consists of seven members. Our
charter divides our Board of Directors into three classes of
Directors having staggered terms, with one class being elected
each year for a new three-year term and until their successors
are elected and qualified. The term for Class I Directors
expires at the annual meeting of our stockholders for 2009, the
term for Class II Directors expires at the annual meeting
of our stockholders for 2007 and the term for Class III
Directors expires at the annual meeting of our stockholders for
2008. The following table sets forth certain information with
respect to the members of our Board of Directors:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Term Expires
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
at Annual
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Meeting Held
|
|
Name
|
|
Age
|
|
|
Position(s)
|
|
for the Year
|
|
|
A.B. Krongard
|
|
|
71
|
|
|
Non-Executive Chairman of the Board of Directors
|
|
|
2009
|
|
Terence W. Edwards
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
Director; President and Chief Executive Officer; President
and Chief Executive Officer PHH Mortgage
Corporation (PHH Mortgage)
|
|
|
2009
|
|
George J. Kilroy
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
Director; President and Chief Executive
Officer PHH Vehicle
Management Services Group LCC (PHH Arval)
|
|
|
2007
|
|
James W. Brinkley
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
Director
|
|
|
2008
|
|
Ann D. Logan
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
Director
|
|
|
2007
|
|
Jonathan D. Mariner
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
Director
|
|
|
2008
|
|
Francis J. Van Kirk
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
Director
|
|
|
2009
|
|
A.B. Krongard was elected Non-Executive Chairman
of the Board of Directors effective upon our spin-off from
Cendant Corporation (our former parent company, now known as
Avis Budget Group, Inc., referred to herein as
Cendant) in the first quarter of 2005 (the
Spin-Off). Since December 2004, Mr. Krongard
has been pursuing personal interests. From March 2001 until
December 2004, Mr. Krongard served as Executive Director of
the Central Intelligence Agency. From February 1998 until March
2001, Mr. Krongard served as Counselor to the Director of
Central Intelligence. Mr. Krongard previously worked in
various capacities at Alex. Brown, Incorporated (Alex.
Brown). In 1991, Mr. Krongard was elected as Chief
Executive Officer of Alex. Brown and assumed the additional
duties of Chairman of the Board of Alex. Brown in 1994. Upon the
merger of Alex. Brown with Bankers Trust Corporation
(Bankers Trust) in September 1997, Mr. Krongard
became Vice Chairman of the Board of Bankers Trust and served in
such capacity until joining the Central Intelligence Agency.
Since July 2005, Mr. Krongard has served as a member of the
Board of Directors of Under Armour, Inc. and is the Chairman of
its Audit Committee. Under Armour, Inc. files reports pursuant
to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the
Exchange Act).
James W. Brinkley was elected as a Director
effective upon the Spin-Off. In December 2005, Mr. Brinkley
became Vice Chairman of Smith Barneys Global Private
Client Group following Citigroup Inc.s acquisition of Legg
Mason Wood Walker, Incorporated (LMWW).
Mr. Brinkley served as a Director of Legg Mason, Inc., a
holding company that, through its subsidiaries, provides
financial services to individuals, institutions, corporations,
governments and government agencies since its formation in 1981.
Mr. Brinkley has served as a Senior Executive Vice
President of Legg Mason, Inc. since December 1983.
Mr. Brinkley became Chairman of LMWW, Legg Mason
Inc.s principal brokerage subsidiary, in February 2004.
Mr. Brinkley previously served as LMWWs Vice Chairman
and Chief Executive Officer from July 2003 through February
2004, as its President from 1985 until July 2003 and as its
Chief Operating Officer from February 1998 until July 2003.
Terence W. Edwards serves as our President and
Chief Executive Officer, a position he has held since February
2005 and President and Chief Executive Officer of PHH Mortgage,
a position he has held since August 2005. Prior to the Spin-Off,
Mr. Edwards served as President and Chief Executive Officer
of Cendant Mortgage Corporation (Cendant Mortgage,
now known as PHH Mortgage) since February 1996, and as such, was
responsible for overseeing its entire mortgage banking
operations. From 1995 to 1996, Mr. Edwards served as Vice
President of Investor Relations and Treasurer and was
responsible for investor, banking and rating agency relations,
financing resources, cash management, pension investment
management and internal financial structure. Mr. Edwards
joined
5
us in 1980 as a treasury operations analyst and has held
positions of increasing responsibility, including Director,
Mortgage Finance and Senior Vice President, Secondary Marketing.
George J. Kilroy serves as President and Chief
Executive Officer of PHH Arval, a position he has held since
March 2001. Mr. Kilroy is responsible for the management of
PHH Arval. From May 1997 to March 2001, Mr. Kilroy served
as Senior Vice President, Business Development and was
responsible for new client sales, client relations and
marketing for PHH Arvals United States operations.
Mr. Kilroy joined PHH Arval in 1976 as an
Account Executive in the Truck and Equipment Division and
has held positions of increasing responsibility, including head
of Diversified Services and Financial Services.
Ann D. Logan was elected as a Director effective
upon the Spin-Off. Since July 2000, Ms. Logan has worked
with various non-profit organizations and is currently Chair of
the Annual Fund at Bryn Mawr College and a member of that
colleges campaign steering committee. Ms. Logan was
an Executive Vice President at the Federal National Mortgage
Association (Fannie Mae) from January 1993 to July
2000. Ms. Logan ran the single-family mortgage business at
Fannie Mae from 1998 to 2000 and was the Chief Credit Officer
from 1993 to 1998. From 1989 to 1993, Ms. Logan was a
Senior Vice President in charge of Fannie Maes Northeast
Regional Office in Philadelphia. Prior to joining Fannie Mae,
Ms. Logan was Assistant Vice President at
Standard & Poors Corporation in New York.
From 1976 to 1980, Ms. Logan worked for the
U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee and served as the Committee
Staff Director in 1980.
Jonathan D. Mariner was elected as a Director
effective upon the Spin-Off. Mr. Mariner has been the
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Major
League Baseball since January 2004. From March 2002 to January
2004, Mr. Mariner served as the Senior Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer of Major League Baseball. From December
2000 to March 2002, Mr. Mariner served as the Chief
Operating Officer of Charter Schools U.S.A., a charter school
development and management company. Mr. Mariner was the
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the
Florida Marlins Baseball Club from February 1992 to December
2000. Mr. Mariner served on the Boards of Directors of
BankAtlantic Bancorp, Inc. (BankAtlantic) through
May 2006 and Steiner Leisure, Limited through June 2006, both of
which file reports pursuant to the Exchange Act.
Francis J. Van Kirk was elected as a Director
effective July 1, 2005. Since November 2005, Mr. Van
Kirk has been a partner with Heidrick & Struggles, an
international executive search and leadership consulting
services company. Prior to joining Heidrick &
Struggles, Mr. Van Kirk served as the Managing Partner of
the Philadelphia office of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
(PricewaterhouseCoopers) from 1996 through June
2005. In this role, Mr. Van Kirk oversaw the integration
and coordination of PricewaterhouseCoopers lines of
service and industry groups to ensure seamless service to its
clients. Mr. Van Kirk began his career with
PricewaterhouseCoopers in 1971 as a Staff Auditor and was
employed in positions of increasing responsibility during his
35-year
career with that firm.
Independence
of the Board of Directors
Under the rules of the New York Stock Exchange (the
NYSE), our Board of Directors is required to
affirmatively determine which Directors are independent and to
disclose such determination in the 2006
Form 10-K
and in the proxy statement for each annual meeting of
stockholders going forward. On April 24, 2007 and
December 18, 2007, our Board of Directors reviewed each
Directors relationships with us in conjunction with our
previously adopted Independence Standards for Directors (the
Independence Standards) and Section 303A of the
NYSEs Listed Company Manual (the NYSE Listing
Standards). A copy of our Independence Standards is
attached to this Proxy Statement as Appendix B and is
available on our corporate website at www.phh.com under the
heading Investor Relations Corporate
Governance. A copy of our Independence Standards is also
available to stockholders upon request, addressed to the
Corporate Secretary at 3000 Leadenhall Road, Mt. Laurel,
New Jersey, 08054 (telephone number: 1-866-PHH-INFO or
1-856-917-1PHH). At the meeting, the Board affirmatively
determined that all non-employee Directors
Messrs. Brinkley, Krongard, Mariner and Van
Kirk and Ms. Logan meet the categorical
standards under the Independence Standards and are independent
Directors under the NYSE Listing Standards.
6
In the course of its determination of the independence of each
non-management Director, the Board considered the following
transactions, relationships and arrangements as required by our
Independence Standards:
|
|
|
|
|
Mr. Brinkley became Vice Chairman of Smith Barneys
Global Private Client Group following Citigroup Inc.s
acquisition of LMWW in December 2005. We have certain
relationships with the Corporate and Investment Banking segment
of Citigroup Inc. (Citigroup), including financial
services, commercial banking and other transactions. The Board
specifically evaluated our transactions with Citigroup, the fees
paid to Citigroup and the amount of indebtedness to Citigroup
during 2006 and determined that the fees paid to Citigroup were
less than 0.1% of its annual revenues and the amount of
indebtedness was less than 0.1% of its total consolidated
assets. Based on this evaluation and the nature of
Mr. Brinkleys position, our Board determined that
this was not a material relationship for the purposes of
determining his independence. In addition,
Mr. Brinkleys son is a principal at Colliers Pinkard,
a member firm of Colliers International (Colliers),
which provides certain lease management services to us. The
Board evaluated the relationship between Colliers and us,
including the fees paid to Colliers, which were less than 0.1%
of its annual revenues. The Board determined that this was not a
material relationship for the purpose of determining his
independence.
|
|
|
|
Mr. Krongard is an outside director of the global Board of
Directors for DLA Piper, our principal outside law firm. The
Board reviewed the fees paid by us to DLA Piper and determined
that such fees represented less than 0.4% of DLA Pipers
annual revenues for 2006. Based on the nature of his position,
our Board considered Mr. Krongards relationship with
DLA Piper and determined that it was not a material relationship
for the purpose of determining his independence.
|
|
|
|
Ms. Logan has a mortgage loan with us, which was originated
prior to her appointment to our Board of Directors. The Board
considered the terms of the mortgage loan, including the
interest rate and collateral requirements, which were
substantially the same as those prevailing at the time for
comparable transactions, and determined that this was not a
material relationship for the purpose of determining her
independence.
|
|
|
|
Mr. Mariner served as director of BankAtlantic until May
2006. PHH Mortgage has certain mortgage banking relationships
with BankAtlantic, the fees for which did not exceed 0.2% of
BankAtlantics annual revenues. Based on this evaluation,
the Board determined that this was not a material relationship
for the purpose of determining his independence.
|
See Certain Relationships and Related Transactions
below for more information. Our Board also determined that
Messrs. Edwards and Kilroy, who serve as executive
officers, are not independent Directors. Accordingly, more than
two-thirds of the members of our Board of Directors are
independent as required by our Corporate Governance Guidelines.
Non-Executive
Chairman
Mr. Krongard serves as our Non-Executive Chairman. The
Non-Executive Chairman is not a corporate officer and leads all
meetings of our Board of Directors at which he is present. The
Non-Executive Chairman serves on appropriate committees as
requested by the Board of Directors, sets meeting schedules and
agendas and manages information flow to the Board of Directors
to assure appropriate understanding of, and discussion regarding
matters of interest or concern to the Board of Directors. The
Non-Executive Chairman also has such additional powers and
performs such additional duties consistent with organizing and
leading the actions of the Board of Directors as the Board of
Directors may from
time-to-time
prescribe.
PROPOSAL NO.
1 ELECTION OF CLASS II DIRECTORS
The Board of Directors has nominated Ms. Ann D. Logan and Mr.
George J. Kilroy to be elected at the Annual Meeting to serve as
Class II Directors for a three-year term ending at the
annual meeting of stockholders for 2010 and until their
successors are duly elected and qualified. Both nominees are
currently incumbent Directors of the Company. The terms of the
remaining Class I and Class III Directors expire at
the annual meeting of stockholders for 2009 and 2008,
respectively.
7
Both nominees have consented to being named in this Proxy
Statement and to serve if elected. If, prior to the Annual
Meeting, either nominee should become unavailable to serve, the
shares of our Common Stock represented by a properly executed
and returned proxy (whether through the return of the enclosed
proxy card, by telephone or electronically through the Internet)
will be voted for such additional person as shall be designated
by the Board of Directors, unless the Board of Directors
determines to reduce the number of Directors in accordance with
our amended and restated articles of incorporation and by-laws.
Directors shall be elected by the affirmative vote of a
plurality of the shares of our Common Stock cast at the Annual
Meeting, in person or by proxy, and entitled to vote in the
election of Directors. Pursuant to applicable Maryland law, in
determining whether such nominees have received the requisite
number of affirmative votes, abstentions and broker non-votes
will have no effect on the outcome of the vote.
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR THE
ELECTION OF EACH NOMINEE AS A CLASS II DIRECTOR. UNLESS
MARKED TO THE CONTRARY, PROXIES RECEIVED BY THE COMPANY WILL BE
VOTED FOR THE ELECTION OF THE TWO NOMINEES LISTED
ABOVE.
The Board of Directors has a standing Audit Committee,
Compensation Committee and Corporate Governance Committee
consisting of Directors who have been affirmatively determined
to be independent as defined in the NYSE Listing
Standards. Each of these Committees operates pursuant to a
written charter approved by the Board of Directors and available
on our corporate website at www.phh.com under the heading
Investor Relations Corporate Governance.
A copy of each Committee charter is also available to
stockholders upon request, addressed to the Corporate Secretary
at 3000 Leadenhall Road, Mt. Laurel, New Jersey, 08054
(telephone number:
1-866-PHH-INFO
or
1-856-917-1PHH).
In addition, the Board of Directors has a standing Executive
Committee which may take certain actions on behalf of the Board
of Directors when the Board is not in session.
Audit
Committee
The Audit Committee assists our Board of Directors in the
oversight of the integrity of our financial statements, our
independent registered public accountants qualifications
and independence, the performance of our independent registered
public accountants and our internal audit function and our
compliance with legal and regulatory requirements. The Committee
is a separately-designated standing audit committee established
in accordance with Section 3(a)(58)(A) of the Exchange Act.
The Committee also oversees our corporate accounting and
reporting practices by:
|
|
|
|
|
meeting with our financial management and independent registered
public accountants to review our financial statements, quarterly
earnings releases and financial data;
|
|
|
|
appointing and pre-approving all services provided by the
independent registered public accountants that will audit our
financial statements;
|
|
|
|
reviewing the selection of the internal auditors that provide
internal audit services;
|
|
|
|
reviewing the scope, procedures and results of our
audits; and
|
|
|
|
evaluating our key financial and accounting personnel.
|
The Audit Committee is comprised of Messrs. Van Kirk
(Chairman) and Mariner and Ms. Logan. Each member of the
Audit Committee is required to have the ability to read and
understand fundamental financial statements. The Audit Committee
is also required to have at least one member that qualifies as
an audit committee financial expert as defined by
the rules of the SEC. Our Board of Directors has determined that
Messrs. Mariner and Van Kirk qualify as audit committee
financial experts and are non-employee, independent Directors.
During 2006, the Audit Committee met 26 times.
8
Compensation
Committee
The Compensation Committee determines and approves all elements
of compensation for our Chief Executive Officer and senior
management; reviews and approves our compensation strategy,
including the elements of total compensation for senior
management; reviews and approves the annual bonus and long-term
bonus incentive plans, and reviews and grants equity awards for
our employees. The Compensation Committee also assists us in
developing compensation and benefit strategies to attract,
develop and retain qualified employees. See Executive
Compensation below for additional information regarding
the process for the determination and consideration of executive
compensation. The Compensation Committee is comprised of
Messrs. Brinkley (Chairman) and Krongard and
Ms. Logan. During 2006, the Compensation Committee met
seven times and acted by unanimous written consent on one
occasion.
Corporate
Governance Committee
The Corporate Governance Committees responsibilities with
respect to its governance function include considering matters
of corporate governance and reviewing and revising our Board of
Directors Corporate Governance Guidelines, Code of
Business Conduct and Ethics for Directors and our Code of
Conduct for Employees and Officers. The Corporate Governance
Committee identifies, evaluates and recommends nominees for our
Board of Directors for each annual meeting (see Nomination
Process and Qualifications for Director Nominees below);
evaluates the composition, organization and governance of our
Board of Directors and its committees; and develops and
recommends corporate governance principles and policies
applicable to us. The Committee is comprised of
Messrs. Krongard (Chairman), Brinkley and Mariner. During
2006, the Corporate Governance Committee met two times.
Executive
Committee
The Executive Committee may exercise all of the powers of our
Board of Directors when the Board is not in session, including
the power to authorize the issuance of stock, except that the
Executive Committee has no power to alter, amend or repeal our
by-laws or any resolution or resolutions of the Board of
Directors, declare any dividend or make any other distribution
to our stockholders, appoint any member of the Executive
Committee or take any other action which legally may be taken
only by the full Board of Directors. The Executive Committee is
comprised of Messrs. Krongard (Chairman), Edwards and
Kilroy. During 2006, the Executive Committee did not meet.
During 2006, our Board of Directors held 16 meetings and acted
by unanimous written consent on four occasions. In addition, the
standing Committees of the Board of Directors held an aggregate
of 35 meetings and acted by unanimous written consent on one
occasion in that period. In 2006, all incumbent Directors
attended at least 75% of the aggregate number of meetings of the
Board of Directors and Committees of the Board of Directors on
which they served. All Directors are expected to attend each
regularly scheduled Board of Directors meeting as well as each
annual meeting of our stockholders (subject to certain limited
exceptions). All of our Directors attended the annual meeting of
stockholders for 2006 held on January 24, 2007.
9
The Corporate Governance Committee is responsible for reviewing
and recommending to the Board of Directors the compensation of
our non-employee Directors. Members of our Board of Directors
who are also our officers or employees do not receive
compensation for serving as a Director (other than
travel-related expenses for Board meetings held outside of our
corporate offices). The following table sets forth the
non-employee Director retainer and stipend schedule for 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation
|
|
|
Annual Non-Executive Chairman of the Board Retainer
|
|
$
|
170,000
|
|
Annual Non-Executive Board Member Retainer
|
|
|
120,000
|
|
New Director Equity Grant
|
|
|
60,000
|
|
Audit Committee Chair Stipend
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
Audit Committee Member Stipend
|
|
|
12,000
|
|
Compensation Committee Chair Stipend
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
Compensation Committee Member Stipend
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
Corporate Governance Committee Chair Stipend
|
|
|
9,000
|
|
Corporate Governance Committee Member Stipend
|
|
|
7,000
|
|
The non-employee Director retainers and stipends set forth in
the table above are paid in arrears at the end of each quarter
(the Fee Payment Date), half in cash and half in
restricted stock units (the Director RSUs) of PHH
Common Stock, which are issued under our 2005 Equity and
Incentive Plan and are required to be deferred under our
Non-Employee Directors Deferred Compensation Plan. The Director
RSUs may not be sold or otherwise transferred for value prior to
the Directors termination of service on the Board. These
Director RSUs are immediately vested and are paid in shares of
our Common Stock one year after the Director is no longer a
member of the Board of Directors. A non-employee Director may
also elect to receive all or a portion of the cash retainer,
stipends or any other compensation for service as a non-employee
Director in the form of additional Director RSUs. These Director
RSUs are also immediately vested and are paid in shares of our
Common Stock 200 days after the Director is no longer a
member of the Board of Directors. We do not maintain a pension
plan for non-employee Directors, and they did not receive any
other compensation for 2006.
10
Director
Compensation Table
The following table sets forth the compensation paid to or
earned by each non-employee Director for 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fees
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earned or
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Employee Director
|
|
Paid in Cash
|
|
|
Awards(1)
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
James W. Brinkley
|
|
$
|
71,133
|
|
|
$
|
70,864
|
|
|
$
|
141,997
|
|
A.B. Krongard
|
|
|
94,710
|
(2)
|
|
|
94,386
|
|
|
|
189,096
|
|
Ann D. Logan
|
|
|
71,133
|
|
|
|
70,864
|
|
|
|
141,997
|
|
Jonathan D. Mariner
|
|
|
69,648
|
|
|
|
69,373
|
|
|
|
139,021
|
|
Francis J. Van Kirk
|
|
|
70,097
|
|
|
|
69,870
|
|
|
|
139,967
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Following the announcement of the delay in filing our Annual
Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2005, the Board of
Directors determined that the award of Director RSUs to be
granted to non-employee Directors will be postponed until the
expiration of the blackout period for our executive officers and
directors pursuant to Regulation BTR (the Blackout
Period). (See our Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed with the SEC on July 2, 2007 for more information
regarding the Blackout Period.) We have included these amounts
in the Director Compensation Table above because they have been
earned and will be awarded upon the earlier of the consummation
of the proposed merger (the Merger) of Jade Merger
Sub, Inc. (Jade), an indirect wholly owned
subsidiary of General Electric Capital Corporation (GE
Capital), with and into the Company pursuant to the
Agreement and Plan of Merger (the Merger Agreement),
dated as of March 15, 2007, by and between the Company, GE
Capital and Jade or the expiration of the Blackout Period. The
amounts shown reflect the fair value of the Director RSUs
earned, but not awarded to Directors for 2006, and are
calculated using the closing price for our Common Stock on the
Fee Payment Date. The table below sets forth the fair value for
the Director RSUs earned for each quarter of 2006: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Employee Director
|
|
3/31/2006
|
|
|
6/30/2006
|
|
|
9/30/2006
|
|
|
12/31/2006
|
|
|
James W. Brinkley
|
|
$
|
17,702
|
|
|
$
|
17,708
|
|
|
$
|
17,728
|
|
|
$
|
17,726
|
|
A.B. Krongard
|
|
|
23,577
|
|
|
|
23,602
|
|
|
|
29,591
|
|
|
|
23,617
|
|
Ann D. Logan
|
|
|
17,702
|
|
|
|
17,708
|
|
|
|
17,728
|
|
|
|
17,726
|
|
Jonathan D. Mariner
|
|
|
17,328
|
|
|
|
17,350
|
|
|
|
17,344
|
|
|
|
17,351
|
|
Francis J. Van Kirk
|
|
|
17,462
|
|
|
|
17,460
|
|
|
|
17,481
|
|
|
|
17,467
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During 2006, the number of Director RSUs was calculated by
dividing the amount of deferred compensation by the average of
the highest and lowest price for our Common Stock on the last
trading day prior to the Fee Payment Date. The Board has revised
the method for calculating the number of Director RSUs for all
future awards by using the closing price for our Common Stock on
the Fee Payment Date. As of December 31, 2006,
Messrs. Brinkley, Krongard, Mariner and Van Kirk and
Ms. Logan had an aggregate of 7,834, 14,396, 7,724, 5,981
and 7,834 Director RSUs, respectively, including those
earned but not awarded in 2006. |
|
(2) |
|
Mr. Krongard elected to defer $65,450 of the cash portion
of his retainer and stipends pursuant to the Non-Employee
Directors Deferred Compensation Plan and received
2,375 Director RSUs which will vest 200 days after he
is no longer a member of our Board of Directors. The number of
Director RSUs was calculated by dividing the amount of cash
deferred by the average of the highest and lowest price for our
Common Stock on the last trading day prior to the Fee Payment
Date. The fair values of these Director RSUs were $16,340 on
March 31, 2006, $16,359 on June 30, 2006, $16,358 on
September 30, 2006 and $16,340 on December 31, 2006,
which were less than the amount of cash deferred on each Fee
Payment Date. |
11
Executive
Sessions of Non-Management Directors
Executive sessions of non-management Directors without
management present are held regularly by the Board of Directors
and its Committees to discuss the criteria upon which the
performance of the Chief Executive Officer and other senior
executives is based, the performance of the Chief Executive
Officer and other senior executives against such criteria, the
compensation of the Chief Executive Officer and other senior
executives and any other relevant matters. In 2006, the
non-management Directors met in executive session without
management eight times.
Presiding
Director of Executive Sessions
Our Board of Directors has designated Mr. Krongard, our
Non-Executive Chairman and Chairman of the Corporate Governance
Committee, as the presiding Director of executive sessions of
the non-management Directors of the Board of Directors.
Corporate
Governance Guidelines
The Board of Directors has adopted Corporate Governance
Guidelines to assist the Board of Directors in monitoring the
effectiveness of decision-making, both at the Board of Directors
and management levels, to enhance long-term stockholder value.
The Corporate Governance Guidelines outline the following:
|
|
|
|
|
the responsibilities of the Board of Directors;
|
|
|
|
the composition of the Board of Directors, including the
requirement that two-thirds of the Directors are independent as
defined by the NYSE Listing Standards;
|
|
|
|
Director duties, tenure, retirement and succession;
|
|
|
|
conduct of Board of Directors and Committee meetings; and
|
|
|
|
the selection and evaluation of the Chief Executive Officer.
|
Our Corporate Governance Guidelines are available on our
corporate website at www.phh.com under the heading
Investor Relations Corporate Governance.
A copy of our Corporate Governance Guidelines is available to
stockholders upon request, addressed to the Corporate Secretary
at 3000 Leadenhall Road, Mt. Laurel, New Jersey, 08054
(telephone number: 1-866-PHH-INFO or 1-856-917-1PHH).
Code of
Business Conduct and Ethics for Directors
We are committed to conducting business in accordance with the
highest standards of business ethics and complying with
applicable laws, rules and regulations. In furtherance of this
commitment, our Board of Directors promotes ethical behavior and
has adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics for Directors
(the Directors Code) that is applicable to all of
our Directors. The Directors Code provides, among other things:
|
|
|
|
|
guidelines for Directors with respect to what constitutes a
conflict of interest between a Directors private interests
and interests of PHH;
|
|
|
|
a set of standards that must be followed whenever we contemplate
a business relationship between us and a Director;
|
|
|
|
restrictions on competition between our Directors and PHH and
the use of our confidential information by Directors for their
personal benefit; and
|
|
|
|
disciplinary measures for violations of the Directors Code and
any other applicable rules and regulations.
|
The Directors Code is available on our corporate website at
www.phh.com under the heading Investor
Relations Corporate Governance. We will post
any amendments to the Directors Code, or waivers of the
provisions thereof, to our website under the heading
Investor Relations Corporate Governance.
A copy of the
12
Directors Code is also available to stockholders upon request,
addressed to the Corporate Secretary at 3000 Leadenhall Road,
Mt. Laurel, New Jersey, 08054 (telephone number:
1-866-PHH-INFO
or
1-856-917-1PHH).
Code of
Conduct for Employees and Officers
Our Board of Directors has also adopted a Code of Conduct for
Employees and Officers (the Employees and Officers
Code) that is applicable to all of our officers and
employees, including our Chief Executive Officer, Chief
Financial Officer and Chief Accounting Officer. The Employees
and Officers Code provides, among other things:
|
|
|
|
|
guidelines for our officers and employees with respect to
ethical handling of conflicts of interest, including examples of
the most common types of conflicts of interest that should be
avoided (e.g., receipt of improper personal benefits from us,
having an ownership interest in other businesses that may
compromise an officers loyalty to us, obtaining outside
employment with a competitor of ours, etc.);
|
|
|
|
a set of standards to promote full, fair, accurate, timely and
understandable disclosure in periodic reports required to be
filed by us, including, for example, a specific requirement that
all accounting records must be duly preserved and must
accurately reflect our assets and liabilities;
|
|
|
|
a requirement to comply with all applicable laws, rules and
regulations;
|
|
|
|
guidance promoting prompt internal communication of any
suspected violations of the Employees and Officers Code to the
appropriate person or persons identified in the Employees and
Officers Code; and
|
|
|
|
disciplinary measures for violations of the Employees and
Officers Code and any other applicable rules and regulations.
|
The Employees and Officers Code is available on our corporate
website at www.phh.com under the heading Investor
Relations Corporate Governance. We will post
any amendments to the Employees and Officers Code, or waivers of
the provisions thereof for any of our executive officers, to our
website under the heading Investor Relations
Corporate Governance. A copy of the Employees and Officers
Code is also available to stockholders upon request, addressed
to the Corporate Secretary at 3000 Leadenhall Road,
Mt. Laurel, New Jersey, 08054 (telephone number:
1-866-PHH-INFO
or
1-856-917-1PHH).
Nomination
Process and Qualifications for Director Nominees
The Board of Directors has established certain procedures and
criteria for the selection of nominees for election to our Board
of Directors. Pursuant to its charter, the Corporate Governance
Committee is required to identify individuals qualified to
become members of the Board, which shall be consistent with the
Boards criteria for selecting new Directors. The Committee
considers criteria such as diversity, age, skills and experience
so as to enhance the Board of Directors ability to manage
and direct our affairs and business, including, when applicable,
to enhance the ability of Committees of the Board to fulfill
their duties
and/or to
satisfy any independence requirements imposed by law, regulation
or NYSE requirement. The Committee is also responsible for
conducting a review of the credentials of individuals it wishes
to recommend to the Board of Directors as a Director nominee,
recommending Director nominees to the Board of Directors for
submission for a stockholder vote at either an annual meeting of
stockholders or at any special meeting of stockholders called
for the purpose of electing Directors, reviewing the suitability
for continued service as a Director of each Board member when
his or her term expires and when he or she has a significant
change in status, including but not limited to an employment
change, and recommending whether such a Director should be
re-nominated to the Board or continue as a Director.
Our by-laws provide the procedure for stockholders to make
Director nominations either at any annual meeting of
stockholders or at any special meeting of stockholders called
for the purpose of electing Directors. A stockholder who is a
stockholder of record on the date of notice as provided for in
our by-laws and on the record date for the determination of
stockholders entitled to vote at such meeting who gives timely
notice can nominate persons for election to our Board of
Directors either for an annual meeting of stockholders or at any
special meeting of stockholders called for the purpose of
13
electing Directors. The notice must be delivered to or mailed
and received by the Corporate Secretary at 3000 Leadenhall Road,
Mt. Laurel, New Jersey, 08054 (telephone number: 1-866-PHH-INFO
or 1-856-917-1PHH):
|
|
|
|
|
in the case of an annual meeting, not less than 90 days nor
more than 120 days prior to the first anniversary of the
preceding years annual meeting; provided, however, that in
the event that the date of the annual meeting is advanced by
more than 30 days or delayed by more than 60 days from
the anniversary date of the preceding years annual
meeting, notice by the stockholder must be so delivered not
earlier than the
90th day
prior to such annual meeting and not later than the close of
business on the later of the
60th day
prior to such annual meeting or the tenth day following the day
on which public announcement of the date of such annual meeting
is first made; and
|
|
|
|
in the case of a special meeting of stockholders called for the
purpose of electing Directors, not later than the close of
business on the tenth day following the day on which notice of
the date of the special meeting was mailed or public
announcement of the date of the special meeting was made,
whichever first occurs.
|
|
|
required to be disclosed in connection with solicitations of
proxies for election of Directors pursuant to
Regulation 14A of the Exchange Act and the rules and
regulations promulgated thereunder and (ii) as to the
stockholder giving the notice:
|
|
|
|
the name and address of the stockholder as they appear on our
books and of the beneficial owner, if any, on whose behalf the
nomination is made;
|
|
|
|
the class or series and number of shares of our capital stock
which are owned beneficially or of record by the stockholder and
beneficial owner;
|
|
|
|
a description of all arrangements or understandings between the
stockholder and each proposed nominee and any other person or
persons (including their names) pursuant to which the
nomination(s) are to be made by the stockholder;
|
|
|
|
a representation that the stockholder intends to appear in
person or by proxy at the meeting to nominate the person(s)
named in its notice; and
|
|
|
|
any other information relating to the stockholder that would be
required to be disclosed in a proxy statement or other filings
required to be made in connection with solicitations of proxies
for election of Directors pursuant to Regulation 14A of the
Exchange Act and the rules and regulations promulgated
thereunder.
|
In addition, the notice must be accompanied by a written consent
of each proposed nominee to be named as a nominee and to serve
as a Director if elected.
Communication
with Non-Management Directors
In accordance with our Corporate Governance Guidelines, all
stockholder and interested party communications to any Director,
the non-management Directors as a group or the Board of
Directors shall be forwarded to the attention of the Chairman of
the Corporate Governance Committee, c/o the Corporate
Secretary, 3000 Leadenhall Road, Mt. Laurel, New Jersey, 08054.
The Corporate Secretary shall review all such stockholder and
interested party communications and discard those which
(i) are not related to our business or governance of our
company, (ii) are commercial solicitations which are not
relevant to the Boards responsibilities and duties,
(iii) pose a threat to health or safety or (iv) the
Chairman of the Corporate Governance Committee has otherwise
instructed the Corporate Secretary not to forward. The Corporate
Secretary will then forward all relevant stockholder and
interested party communications to the Chairman of the Corporate
Governance Committee for review and dissemination.
14
Our executive officers are set forth in the table below. All
executive officers are appointed by and serve at the pleasure of
the Board of Directors.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Age
|
|
Position(s)
|
|
Terence W. Edwards
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
President and Chief Executive Officer
President and Chief Executive Officer PHH
Mortgage
|
Clair M. Raubenstine
|
|
|
66
|
|
|
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|
George J. Kilroy
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
President and Chief Executive Officer PHH Arval
|
Mark R. Danahy
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer PHH Mortgage
|
William F. Brown
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate
Secretary
Senior Vice President, General Counsel and
Secretary PHH Mortgage
|
Mark E. Johnson
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
Vice President and Treasurer
|
Michael D. Orner
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
Vice President and Controller
|
Clair M. Raubenstine serves as our Executive Vice
President and Chief Financial Officer, a position he has held
since February 2006. From October 1998 through June 2002,
Mr. Raubenstine served as a national independence
consulting partner with PricewaterhouseCoopers. He also
previously served as an Accounting, Auditing and SEC consulting
partner and as an assurance and business advisory services
partner to various public and private companies.
Mr. Raubenstines career at PricewaterhouseCoopers
spanned 39 years until his retirement in June 2002. From
July 2002 through February 2006, Mr. Raubenstine provided
accounting and financial advisory services to various charitable
and educational organizations.
Mark R. Danahy serves as Senior Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer of PHH Mortgage, a position he has held
since April 2001. Mr. Danahy is responsible for directing
the mortgage accounting and financial planning teams, which
include financial reporting, asset valuation and capital markets
accounting, planning and forecasting. Mr. Danahy joined
Cendant Mortgage in December 2000 as Controller. From 1999 to
2000, Mr. Danahy served as Senior Vice President, Capital
Market Operations for GE Capital Market Services, Inc.
William F. Brown serves as our Senior Vice
President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary, a position
he has held since February 2005 and Senior Vice President,
General Counsel and Secretary of PHH Mortgage. Mr. Brown
has served as Senior Vice President and General Counsel of
Cendant Mortgage since June 1999 and oversees its legal,
contract, licensing and regulatory compliance functions. From
June 1997 to June 1999, Mr. Brown served as Vice President
and General Counsel of Cendant Mortgage. From January 1995 to
June 1997, Mr. Brown served as Counsel in the PHH Corporate
Legal Department.
Mark E. Johnson serves as our Vice President and
Treasurer, a position he has held since February 2005. Prior to
the Spin-Off, Mr. Johnson served as Vice President,
Secondary Marketing of Cendant Mortgage since May 2003 and was
responsible for various funding initiatives and financial
management of certain subsidiary operations. From May 1997 to
May 2003, Mr. Johnson served as Assistant Treasurer of
Cendant, where he had a range of responsibilities including
banking and rating agency relations and management of unsecured
funding and securitization.
Michael D. Orner serves as our Vice President and
Controller, a position he has held since March 2005. Prior to
joining us, Mr. Orner was employed by Millennium Chemicals,
Inc. as Corporate Controller from January 2003 through March
2005 and Director of Accounting and Financial Reporting from
December 1999 through December 2002. Prior to joining Millennium
Chemicals, Inc., Mr. Orner served as a Senior Manager,
Audit and Business Advisory Services for PricewaterhouseCoopers,
where he was employed from September 1989 through November 1999.
15
SECURITY
OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
The following table sets forth the beneficial ownership of our
outstanding Common Stock, as of December 5, 2007, by those
persons who are known to us to be beneficial owners of 5% or
more of our Common Stock, by each of our Directors, by each of
our Named Executive Officers (as defined on page 25) and by
our Directors and Executive Officers as a group.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
Percent of
|
|
|
Beneficially
|
|
Common Stock
|
Name
|
|
Owned(1)
|
|
Outstanding(2)
|
|
Principal Stockholders:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hotchkis and Wiley Capital Management, LLC(3)
|
|
|
4,827,700
|
|
|
|
8.93
|
%
|
725 South Figueroa Street, 39th Floor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Los Angeles, CA 90017
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pennant Capital Management, LLC(4)
|
|
|
4,687,607
|
|
|
|
8.67
|
%
|
40 Main Street
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chatham, NJ 07928
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dimensional Fund Advisors Inc.(5)
|
|
|
3,781,440
|
|
|
|
6.99
|
%
|
1299 Ocean Avenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Santa Monica, CA 90401
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Appaloosa Management L.P.(6)
|
|
|
3,015,381
|
|
|
|
5.58
|
%
|
26 Main Street
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chatham, NJ 07928
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Luxor Capital Partners, LP(7)
|
|
|
2,710,504
|
|
|
|
5.01
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
767 Fifth Avenue, 19th Floor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New York, NY 10153
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Directors and Named Executive Officers:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Terence W. Edwards(8)
|
|
|
403,887
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Clair M. Raubenstine
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
George J. Kilroy(9)
|
|
|
36,812
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Mark R. Danahy(10)
|
|
|
99,143
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
William F. Brown(11)
|
|
|
82,946
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Neil J. Cashen(12)
|
|
|
126,810
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
James W. Brinkley(13)
|
|
|
9,906
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
A.B. Krongard(14)
|
|
|
18,503
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Ann D. Logan(15)
|
|
|
9,656
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Jonathan D. Mariner(16)
|
|
|
9,507
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Francis J. Van Kirk(17)
|
|
|
7,777
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
All Directors and Executive Officers as a Group (13 persons)
|
|
|
852,918
|
|
|
|
1.55
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
Represents less than one percent.
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Based upon information furnished to us by the respective
stockholders or contained in filings made with the SEC. For
purposes of this table, if a person has or shares voting or
investment power with respect to any of our Common Stock, then
such Common Stock is considered beneficially owned by that
person under the SEC rules. Shares of our common stock
beneficially owned include direct and indirect ownership of
shares, stock options and restricted stock units granted to
executive officers and director restricted stock units granted
to our directors which are vested or are expected to vest within
60 days of November 30, 2007. Due to the delay in the
filing of our financial statements with the SEC, from March 2006
through June 2007 and during the blackout period, the issuance
of Earned Shares and the availability for exercise of certain
earned stock options have been postponed for our directors and
executive officers until the earlier of the consummation of the
Merger or the expiration of the Blackout Period. These Earned
Shares and stock options have been included in |
16
|
|
|
|
|
the table in accordance with
Rule 13d-3
of the SEC rules. Unless otherwise indicated in the table, the
address of all listed stockholders is
c/o PHH
Corporation, 3000 Leadenhall Road, Mt. Laurel, New Jersey, 08054. |
|
(2) |
|
Based upon 54,073,393 shares of our Common Stock
outstanding as of December 5, 2007. Shares which vest or
are expected to vest within 60 days of December 5,
2007 are deemed outstanding for the purpose of computing the
percentage ownership for the named stockholder. |
|
(3) |
|
Reflects beneficial ownership of shares of our Common Stock as
reported in a Form 13F filed with the SEC by Hotchkis and
Wiley Capital Management, LLC on behalf of itself and its
affiliates on November 16, 2007. |
|
(4) |
|
Reflects beneficial ownership of shares of our Common Stock as
reported in a Form 13F filed with the SEC by Pennant Capital
Management, LLC on behalf of itself and its affiliates on
November 14, 2007. |
|
(5) |
|
Reflects beneficial ownership of shares of our Common Stock as
reported in a Form 13F filed with the SEC by Dimensional
Fund Advisors Inc. on behalf of itself and its affiliates
on October 25, 2007. |
|
(6) |
|
Reflects beneficial ownership of shares of our Common Stock as
reported in a Form 13F filed with the SEC by Appaloosa
Management L.P. on behalf of itself and its affiliates on
November 14, 2007. |
|
(7) |
|
Reflects beneficial ownership of shares of our Common Stock as
reported in a Schedule 13G filed with the SEC by Luxor Capital
Partners, LP on behalf of itself and its affiliates on
December 17, 2007. |
|
(8) |
|
Represents 10,056 shares of our Common Stock directly held
by Mr. Edwards, options to purchase 367,021 shares of
our Common Stock and 26,810 Earned Shares. |
|
(9) |
|
Represents 9,184 shares of our Common Stock directly held
by Mr. Kilroy, 635 shares of our Common Stock held in
his 401(k) account, options to purchase 3,468 shares of our
Common Stock and 23,525 Earned Shares. |
|
(10) |
|
Represents 4,925 shares of our Common Stock directly held
by Mr. Danahy, options to purchase 79,556 shares of
our Common Stock and 14,662 Earned Shares. |
|
(11) |
|
Represents 3,722 shares of our Common Stock directly held
by Mr. Brown, options to purchase 67,696 shares of our
Common Stock and 11,528 Earned Shares. |
|
(12) |
|
Represents 4,974 shares of our Common Stock directly held
by Mr. Cashen, 144 shares of our Common Stock held in
his 401(k) account, options to purchase 108,377 shares of
our Common Stock and 13,315 Earned Shares. |
|
(13) |
|
Represents 5,260 Director RSUs, 250 shares of our Common
Stock held by Brinkley Investments, LLC, a partnership among
Mr. Brinkley, his wife and his children and 4,396 Earned
Shares. |
|
(14) |
|
Represents 8,594 Director RSUs and 9,909 Earned Shares. |
|
(15) |
|
Represents 5,260 Director RSUs and 4,396 Earned Shares. |
|
(16) |
|
Represents 5,205 Director RSUs and 4,302 Earned Shares. |
|
(17) |
|
Represents 3,442 Director RSUs and 4,335 Earned Shares. |
17
SECTION 16(a)
BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE
Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires our officers and
directors, and persons who own more than ten percent of a
registered class of our equity securities, to file reports of
ownership and changes in ownership on Forms 3, 4 and 5 with
the SEC and the NYSE. Officers, directors and greater than ten
percent beneficial owners are required to furnish us with copies
of all Forms 3, 4 and 5 they file. Based solely on our
review of the copies of such forms we have received, we believe
that all of our officers, directors and greater than ten percent
beneficial owners complied with all filing requirements
applicable to them with respect to transactions during 2006.
In March and April 2006, several purported class actions were
filed against us, our Chief Executive Officer and our former
Chief Financial Officer in the U.S. District Court for the
District of New Jersey. The first of these putative class
actions was voluntarily dismissed without prejudice by the
plaintiff on November 7, 2007. In the other two cases, the
remaining plaintiffs seek to represent an alleged class
consisting of all persons (other than our officers and directors
and their affiliates) who purchased our Common Stock during
certain time periods beginning March 15, 2005 in one case
and May 12, 2005 in the other and ending March 1,
2006. The plaintiffs allege, among other matters, that the
defendants violated Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act and
Rule 10b-5
thereunder. Additionally, two derivative actions were filed in
the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey
against us, our former Chief Financial Officer and each member
of our Board of Directors. Both of these derivative actions have
since been voluntarily dismissed by the plaintiffs.
Following the announcement of the Merger in March 2007, two
purported class actions were filed against us and each member of
our Board of Directors in the Circuit Court for Baltimore
County, Maryland (the Court). The first of these
actions also named GE Capital and Blackstone as defendants. The
plaintiffs sought to represent an alleged class consisting of
all persons (other than our officers and Directors and their
affiliates) holding our Common Stock. In support of their
request for injunctive and other relief, the plaintiffs alleged,
among other matters, that the members of the Board of Directors
breached their fiduciary duties by failing to maximize
stockholder value in approving the Merger Agreement. On or about
April 10, 2007, the claims against Blackstone were
dismissed without prejudice. On May 11, 2007, the Court
consolidated the two cases into one action. On July 27,
2007, the plaintiffs filed a consolidated amended complaint.
This pleading did not name GE Capital or Blackstone as
defendants. It essentially repeated the allegations previously
made against the members of our Board of Directors and added
allegations that the disclosures made in the preliminary proxy
statement filed with the SEC on June 18, 2007 omitted
certain material facts. On August 7, 2007, the Court
dismissed the consolidated amended complaint on the ground that
the plaintiffs were seeking to assert their claims directly,
whereas, as a matter of Maryland law, claims that directors have
breached their fiduciary duties can only be asserted by a
stockholder derivatively. The plaintiffs have the right to
appeal this decision.
Compensation
Discussion and Analysis
Compensation
Committee Oversight of Executive Compensation
The Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors is
comprised of three independent, non-executive directors and is
responsible for overseeing our executive compensation policies,
including evaluating and approving the compensation of our Named
Executive Officers (as defined in Summary
Compensation Table below). The Board of Directors has
adopted a Compensation Committee Charter which sets forth the
purpose, composition, authority and responsibilities of the
Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee reviews and
determines the base salary, annual and long-term incentive
awards, equity awards and other compensation for each Named
Executive Officer, including our President and Chief Executive
Officer, and evaluates our compensation policies. The
Compensation Committee also has the authority to engage and
retain executive compensation consultants to assist with such
evaluations.
18
Executive
Compensation Objectives
The primary objective of our executive compensation policies is
to attract, retain and motivate qualified executive officers to
manage our business in order to maximize stockholder value. Our
executive compensation policies are intended to facilitate the
achievement of our short-term and long-term business strategies
through aligning compensation with performance by:
|
|
|
|
§
|
providing base salaries and other compensation that are
competitive and designed to attract and retain executive talent;
|
|
|
§
|
rewarding executive performance through variable, at-risk
compensation that is dependant upon meeting specified
performance targets; and
|
|
|
§
|
aligning the interests of our executive officers with the
interests of our stockholders by providing equity-based
compensation as a component of total compensation.
|
The Compensation Committee does not rely upon a fixed formula or
specific numerical criteria in determining each Named Executive
Officers total compensation or the allocation of
compensation among the various components of compensation
described below. Moreover, we do not have a specific policy for
the allocation of compensation between short-term and long-term
compensation or cash and equity compensation. Rather, the
Compensation Committee exercises its business judgment in
determining total compensation based upon the following criteria
|
|
|
|
§
|
our long-term strategic objectives, financial and other
performance criteria and individual performance goals;
|
|
|
§
|
the competitive compensation levels for executive officers at
companies in similar businesses
and/or of
similar size;
|
|
|
§
|
the overall economic environment and industry
conditions; and
|
|
|
§
|
the recommendations of executive compensation consultants.
|
Based upon its analysis of these criteria, the Compensation
Committee determines on an annual basis each component of
executive compensation (as discussed below) for the Named
Executive Officers taking into consideration the total
compensation relative to the median for the Peer Group (as
defined in Benchmarking below).
Role
of Management in Executive Compensation Decisions
The Compensation Committee is responsible for reviewing and
approving the compensation for our Named Executive Officers and
stock equity awards for all employees. Generally, our Chief
Executive Officer makes recommendations to the Compensation
Committee as it relates to the compensation of the other
executive officers. In addition, our executive officers,
including our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer
and Senior Vice Presidents of Human Resources, provide input and
make proposals regarding the design, operation, objectives and
values of the various components of compensation in order to
provide appropriate performance and retention incentives for key
employees. These proposals may be made on the initiative of the
executive officers or upon the request of the Compensation
Committee.
Executive
Compensation Consultants
The Compensation Committee retained Mercer Human Resource
Consulting, Inc. (Mercer) to assist it with the
evaluation of executive compensation for 2006. Mercer analyzes
and provides comparative executive compensation data and
compensation program proposals for the Compensation
Committees consideration in evaluating and setting the
compensation of the Named Executive Officers and the overall
structure of our compensation policies. Upon the Compensation
Committees prior approval, Mercer also provides human
resource consulting services to management from
time-to-time.
The Compensation Committee does not believe that these other
services compromise Mercers ability to provide the
Compensation Committee with an independent perspective on
executive compensation.
19
Benchmarking
To ensure that we are competitive in attracting and retaining
executive talent, during 2006 we benchmarked our executive
compensation against a peer group consisting of
14 companies in similar businesses, including mortgage,
leasing and financial services companies,
and/or of
similar size based on total sales and total assets (the
Peer Group). The Peer Group consisted of the
following companies:
|
|
|
|
|
§ AMERCO
|
|
§ Fiserv,
Inc.
|
|
§ Radian
Group, Inc.
|
§ American
Home Mortgage
|
|
§ GATX
Corp.
|
|
§ Rent-A-Center,
Inc.
|
Investment Corp.
|
|
§ Golden
West Financial Corp.
|
|
§ Ryder
System, Inc.
|
§ Astoria
Financial Corporation
|
|
§ IndyMac
Bancorp, Inc.
|
|
§ Sovereign
Bancorp, Inc.
|
§ CIT
Group Inc.
|
|
§ MGIC
Investment Corp.
|
|
§ Westcorp,
Inc.
|
Mercer provided the Compensation Committee with executive
compensation information for the Peer Group as well as survey
data from multiple national compensation surveys (the
Survey Data) in order to assist in the compensation
evaluation due to the unique nature of our business segments and
the lack of peer companies with a similar business segment mix
for comparison. The Compensation Committee evaluated the base
salary, short-term and long-term incentives and actual and
target total compensation levels for the Peer Group and Survey
Data, including the median and percentile ranges for each
compensation component, for comparison with that of our Named
Executive Officers. The Compensation Committee determined that
total executive compensation for the Named Executive Officers
should be targeted at or slightly above the median of the
compensation of the Peer Group in order to be competitive with
the compensation structure of the Peer Group and to attract and
retain executive talent. These targets may be adjusted based
upon the specific responsibilities, experience and performance
of each Named Executive Officer as well as other factors in the
Compensation Committees discretion.
Components
of Executive Compensation
The primary components of the executive compensation
arrangements for our Named Executive Officers are base salaries,
variable compensation programs and long-term incentive awards.
Base Salaries. The Compensation
Committee is responsible for determining the base salary of our
Chief Executive Officer and other Named Executive Officers,
which includes the review and approval of annual adjustments to
their base compensation. Base salaries are intended to provide a
level of cash compensation that is externally competitive in
relation to the responsibilities of the executives
position in order to attract and retain executive talent. The
Compensation Committee determines salary levels based upon
competitive compensation levels for companies in the Peer Group
and Survey Data as well as consideration of the nature of the
executive officers position and the contribution,
achievement, experience and tenure of the executive officer.
Mr. Edwards has served as our President and Chief Executive
Officer since the Spin-Off and prior to that was the President
and Chief Executive Officer of PHH Mortgage from February 1996
until the Spin-Off. In August 2005, Mr. Edwards resumed his
role as President and Chief Executive Officer of PHH Mortgage in
addition to his corporate role. Each of our other Named
Executive Officers, except for Mr. Raubenstine, has been in
their current position since the Spin-Off. Mr. Raubenstine
was appointed to serve as our Executive Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer on February 23, 2006. See Executive
Officers for more information regarding positions held by
each Named Executive Officer in the past five years. Our Named
Executive Officers do not have employment agreements with us in
accordance with the policy adopted by the Board following the
Spin-Off. See Employment, Termination,
Severance and Change in Control Arrangements
Employment Agreements below for more information.
For 2006, the Compensation Committee evaluated our financial
performance, the performance of our Named Executive Officers and
Peer Group and Survey Data with regard to the base salaries and
total compensation of executive officers in comparable
positions. The Compensation Committee reviewed
Mr. Edwards compensation and, upon his request, made
no adjustments to his base salary for 2006, which remained at
the 2005 level of $564,635. Based upon its review of the Peer
Group and Survey Data, the Compensation Committee increased the
base salaries for Messrs. Kilroy, Danahy and Brown to the
amounts set forth in the table below, effective
February 25, 2006, to bring their base salaries in line
with the median base salaries of executive officers holding
comparable positions in the Peer Group. The Compensation
Committee set Mr. Raubenstines annual base salary at
$1,000,000 for 2006, effective on February 23, 2006. See
Executive Compensation Decisions in 2006 and
20
2007 for more information regarding
Mr. Raubenstines compensation arrangements. The
following table sets forth the annual base salaries for the
Named Executive Officers for 2006.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annual Base
|
|
Name
|
|
Title
|
|
Salary for 2006
|
|
|
Terence W. Edwards
|
|
President and Chief Executive Officer; President and Chief
Executive Officer PHH Mortgage
|
|
$
|
564,635
|
|
Clair M. Raubenstine
|
|
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|
|
|
1,000,000
|
|
George J. Kilroy
|
|
President and Chief Executive Officer PHH Arval
|
|
|
450,000
|
|
Mark R. Danahy
|
|
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
PHH Mortgage
|
|
|
325,000
|
|
William F. Brown
|
|
Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary;
Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary
PHH Mortgage
|
|
|
300,000
|
|
Variable Compensation Programs. Our
Named Executive Officers may receive additional cash
compensation through participation in our annual management
incentive plans (MIPs) that are designed to motivate
eligible recipients to achieve our short-term objectives. Each
executive officer is eligible to receive an annual cash
incentive payout calculated as a percentage of the executive
officers base salary and based upon the achievement of
performance targets for the individual executive officer and
operating segment, consolidated results
and/or other
performance goals established by the Compensation Committee in
its discretion. The payout target increases as a percentage of
base salary with the executive officers duties and
responsibilities in order to tie a greater percentage of the
executive officers compensation to the achievement of our
annual performance objectives.
The Compensation Committee generally sets the performance
targets under the MIPs at levels which are considered to be
challenging based on historical performance, industry and market
conditions and adjusts such targets each year to coincide with
our overall strategy, financial performance targets and other
factors. For the three years prior to 2006, the performance
targets established for the PHH Mortgage MIPs were met or
exceeded in two of the three years, and the performance targets
established for the PHH Arval MIPs were met or exceeded in all
three years. Prior to 2006, we had one corporate MIP for which
the performance target was exceeded.
In consultation with management and Mercer, the Compensation
Committee approved the 2006 PHH Corporation Management Incentive
Plan (the 2006 PHH MIP), the 2006 PHH Arval
Management Incentive Plan (the 2006 Fleet MIP) and
the 2006 PHH Mortgage Management Incentive Plan (the 2006
Mortgage MIP) (collectively, the 2006 MIPs)
and established performance targets for the Named Executive
Officers based on the 2006 pre-tax income after minority
interest for us, PHH Arval and PHH Mortgage, respectively.
Pursuant to the terms of the 2006 MIPs, in the event that the
performance targets were achieved or exceeded, the participating
Named Executive Officer would receive a cash payment in an
amount equal to the Named Executive Officers base salary
multiplied by the target payout percentage multiplied by the
percentage by which the performance target for such plan was met
or exceeded. The minimum payout is 100% of the target payout and
the maximum payout is 125% of the target payout although the
performance targets must be exceeded by more than 10% for a
payout above the target payout level to occur. From 110% to 125%
of the performance target, the payout is proportionate to the
percentage by which the performance target is exceeded.
The Compensation Committee reviewed the roles and
responsibilities of each Named Executive Officer and the Peer
Group and Survey Data in evaluating the percentage of base
salary for target payouts to the Named Executive Officers under
the 2006 MIPs. In 2006, the Compensation Committee determined
that the current payout targets for Messrs. Edwards, Kilroy
and Brown were appropriate and that the target payout amount for
Mr. Danahy be increased to 75% to bring his target payout
level in line with the median target levels for comparable
executives
21
in the Peer Group. The table below sets forth the target payout
as a percentage of base salary for each of the Named Executive
Officers participating in the 2006 MIPs:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payout
|
|
|
|
Target as
|
|
|
|
Percentage
|
|
|
|
of Base
|
|
Name
|
|
Salary
|
|
|
Terence W. Edwards
|
|
|
100%
|
|
George J. Kilroy
|
|
|
100%
|
|
Mark R. Danahy
|
|
|
75%
|
|
William F. Brown
|
|
|
50%
|
|
Mr. Raubenstine did not participate in the 2006 MIPs.
Messrs. Edwards and Brown participated in the 2006 PHH MIP;
Mr. Danahy participated in the 2006 Mortgage MIP and
Mr. Kilroy participated in the 2006 PHH MIP and 2006 Fleet
MIP with 50% of his target payout determined under each plan.
See Grants of Plan-Based Awards for 2006
for additional information regarding the target payout amounts
under the 2006 MIPs for the Named Executive Officers.
In 2007, the Compensation Committee reviewed the 2006 pre-tax
income after minority interest for us, PHH Mortgage and PHH
Arval and determined that the performance targets for the Named
Executive Officers under the 2006 PHH MIP and 2006 Mortgage MIP
had not been achieved and that PHH Arval exceeded its
performance target under the 2006 Fleet MIP. As a result,
Messrs. Edwards, Danahy and Brown did not receive payouts
under the 2006 MIPs, and Mr. Kilroy received a payout of
$267,461 based upon the 2006 Fleet MIP upon the filing of the
2006 Form 10-K.
Long-Term Incentive Awards. The
Compensation Committee administers our 2005 Equity and Incentive
Plan, which provides for equity awards, including restricted
stock units (PHH RSUs) and options to purchase our
Common Stock (Stock Options). The Compensation
Committee considers equity awards to our Named Executive
Officers an appropriate and effective method of retaining key
management employees and aligning their interests with the
interests of our stockholders. Eligibility for stock awards, the
number of shares underlying each award and the terms and
conditions of each award are determined by the Compensation
Committee upon consultation with management and Mercer. In June
2005, the Compensation Committee granted an annual award of PHH
RSUs and Stock Options to our Named Executive Officers, which
vest beginning on the fourth anniversary of the grant date, with
the opportunity to accelerate the vesting of 25% of the total
award for each year prior to the fourth anniversary of the grant
date based on the achievement of performance targets established
by the Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee made
these awards in PHH RSUs for Messrs. Danahy and Brown.
These awards were split equally between PHH RSUs and Stock
Options for Messrs. Edwards and Kilroy in order to further
tie their compensation to the creation of stockholder value. The
Compensation Committee establishes these performance targets
annually for these and certain other equity awards with
performance-based vesting converted from Cendant awards at the
time of the Spin-Off. The performance targets for these awards
were determined generally in the same manner as those for the
annual MIPs and were based on our 2006 pre-tax income after
minority interest. See Variable Compensation
Programs for additional information regarding establishing
performance targets. In 2007, the Compensation Committee
reviewed our 2006 pre-tax income after minority interest and
determined that the performance targets had not been met. During
2006, the Compensation Committee did not make any equity awards
under the 2005 Equity and Incentive Plan due to the delay in the
filing of our financial statements with the SEC, which resulted
in our Registration Statement on
Form S-8
for our 2005 Equity and Incentive Plan not being effective until
we became a current filer with the SEC on June 28, 2007.
Executive
Compensation Decisions in 2006 and 2007
In February 2006, the Compensation Committee, in consultation
with the Board of Directors and management, approved the
compensation for Mr. Raubenstine, who was appointed by the
Board of Directors on February 23, 2006 to serve as
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. Upon
discussions with Mr. Raubenstine, management and Mercer,
the Compensation Committee set Mr. Raubenstines base
salary for 2006 at $1,000,000 and determined that he would not
be eligible to participate in the 2006 MIPs. The Compensation
Committee
22
considered the need for Mr. Raubenstine to split his time
between our offices in Maryland and New Jersey in this role and
agreed to reimburse him for any travel, meals and lodging
expenses which might otherwise not be a deductible business
expense and to provide a tax
gross-up on
any such amounts. As an inducement to his employment, the
Compensation Committee agreed to award Mr. Raubenstine
shares of our Common Stock equivalent to $250,000. During 2006,
our intention was to make this grant in two equal installments:
the first when we became current in our filing obligations with
the SEC and were permitted to issue shares of our Common Stock
from our 2005 Equity and Incentive Plan and the second on the
later of February 23, 2007 or the date on which we became a
current filer with the SEC. Due to the delay in the filing of
our financial statements with the SEC and the announcement of
the Merger, this stock award was never granted. In 2007, the
Compensation Committee, with Mr. Raubenstines
consent, determined to satisfy this arrangement through a cash
payment of $250,000 which was paid upon the filing of the 2006
Form 10-K.
In September 2006, the Compensation Committee reviewed and
approved the Release and Restrictive Covenants Agreement (the
Cashen Release) between us and our former Chief
Financial Officer, Mr. Neil J. Cashen, prior to its
execution on September 20, 2006. The Compensation Committee
considered the restrictive covenants, including certain
non-compete and non-solicitation provisions to which
Mr. Cashen would be subject, his length of service and his
role and position with both us and PHH Arval in evaluating and
approving the terms of the Cashen Release. The Compensation
Committee also reviewed the other terms of the Cashen Release,
including the total amounts to be paid to Mr. Cashen and
the retention of vesting and exercise rights for certain
previously awarded PHH RSUs and Stock Options, and determined
that the approval and execution of the Cashen Release was
appropriate and in our best interest.
In August 2007, the Compensation Committee reviewed and approved
the deferral of shares to be issued to the Named Executive
Officers to satisfy the conversion of PHH RSUs earned, but
not awarded during the Blackout Period until the earlier of the
consummation of the Merger or the expiration of the Blackout
Period.
Retirement
Benefits
Certain of our Named Executive Officers are participants in
defined benefit plans that were available to all of our
employees prior to the Spin-Off, including the PHH Corporation
Pension Plan (the PHH Pension Plan) and PHH
Corporation Retiree Medical Plan (the PHH Retiree Medical
Plan) (collectively, the Retirement Plans).
The benefits payable under these plans have been frozen for the
Named Executive Officers and the other plan participants. See
Pension Benefits for 2006 for more
information regarding benefits available to the Named Executive
Officers under these plans. In addition, all of our Named
Executive Officers participate in the PHH Corporation
Employee Savings Plan (the PHH Savings Plan) on the
same basis as other employees. The PHH Savings Plan is a
tax-qualified retirement savings plan that provides for employee
contributions made on a pre-tax basis and matching contributions
by us of up to six percent of the employees compensation
contributed to the PHH Savings Plan up to the statutory limit.
See All Other Compensation Table in
Footnote 7 under Summary Compensation
Table for more information regarding matching
contributions to the PHH Savings Plan made on behalf of each
Named Executive Officer.
Perquisites
We provide a limited number of perquisites to our Named
Executive Officers, which the Compensation Committee believes
are reasonable and consistent with our overall compensation
program for executive officers and necessary to attract and
retain executive talent. Our Named Executive Officers generally
are provided with or have use of company vehicles, fuel for
these vehicles, financial planning services and tax
reimbursements on the foregoing perquisites. See
All Other Compensation Table in
Footnote 7 under Summary Compensation
Table for more information regarding perquisites.
Employment,
Termination, Severance and Change in Control
Arrangements
Employment Agreements. None of our
Named Executive Officers have employment agreements. However,
immediately after the Spin-Off, we did enter into an employment
agreement with Mr. Edwards with a term ending on
February 1, 2008. In addition to providing for a minimum
base salary of $625,000 and participation in employee
23
benefit plans generally available to our executive officers,
Mr. Edwards agreement provided for an annual
incentive award with a target amount equal to no less than 100%
of his base salary, subject to the attainment of performance
goals, and grants of long-term incentive awards upon such terms
and conditions as determined by our Board of Directors or
Compensation Committee. In addition, Mr. Edwards was
entitled to receive an equity incentive award under the
employment agreement relating to our Common Stock that would
have vested based on the achievement of specified performance
goals and would have had a value on the grant date of
$2.5 million, which value would have been based on such
performance criteria determined by the Compensation Committee.
Based upon discussions between management and the Compensation
Committee following the Spin-Off, we adopted a policy not to
enter into employment agreements with any of our executive
officers. In accordance with this policy, we and
Mr. Edwards terminated his employment agreement in February
2005 and Mr. Edwards employment with us has been on
an at-will basis since that time.
Change in Control and Other Severance
Arrangements. During 2006, we did not have
change in control agreements with our Named Executive Officers.
Generally, all unvested Stock Options granted to each of the
Named Executive Officers under our 2005 Equity and Incentive
Plan will become fully and immediately vested and exercisable,
and all PHH RSUs will vest upon the occurrence of a change in
control transaction. If consummated, the proposed Merger would
result in a change in control under the terms of the 2005 Equity
and Incentive Plan. In addition, during 2006, we had certain
severance policies for our executive officers which provide
benefits in the event of their termination without cause. See
Potential Payments upon Termination of
Employment or Change in Control below for additional
information regarding payments in the event of a change in
control or other termination of employment for each Named
Executive Officer.
Deductibility
of Executive Compensation
In accordance with Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue
Code, the deductibility for federal corporate income tax
purposes of compensation paid to certain of our individual
executive officers in excess of $1 million in any year may
be restricted. The Compensation Committee believes that it is in
the best interests of our stockholders to comply with such tax
law, while still maintaining the goals of our compensation
programs. Accordingly, where it is deemed necessary and in our
best interests to attract and retain the best possible executive
talent and to motivate such executives to achieve the goals
inherent in our business strategy, the Compensation Committee
will recommend compensation to executive officers which may
exceed the limits of deductibility. In this regard, certain
portions of compensation paid to the Named Executive Officers
may not be deductible for federal income tax purposes under
Section 162(m).
COMPENSATION
COMMITTEE REPORT ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The Compensation Committee reviewed and discussed the
Compensation Discussion and Analysis with management and, based
on such review, recommended to the Board of Directors that the
Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in the 2006
Form 10-K
and this Proxy Statement.
Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors
James W. Brinkley (Chairman)
A.B. Krongard
Ann D. Logan
COMPENSATION
COMMITTEE INTERLOCKS AND INSIDER PARTICIPATION
The Compensation Committee is comprised entirely of
outside Directors within the meaning of the
regulations under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue
Code of 1986, as amended, non-employee Directors
under SEC
Rule 16b-3,
and independent Directors as affirmatively
determined by the Board of Directors pursuant to the NYSE
Listing Standards. The members of the Compensation Committee are
the individuals named as signatories to the report immediately
preceding this paragraph. None of the members of the
Compensation Committee are our former officers or employees.
24
SUMMARY
COMPENSATION TABLE
The information below sets forth the compensation of our Chief
Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, the three other most
highly compensated executive officers and a former executive
officer who served as our Chief Financial Officer for a portion
of the year ended December 31, 2006 (collectively referred
to as our Named Executive Officers). The form and
amount of the compensation paid or to be paid to our Named
Executive Officers for the year ended December 31, 2006 was
determined by the Compensation Committee of our Board of
Directors.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-
|
|
|
in Pension
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
Value and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incentive
|
|
|
Non-
|
|
|
All
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plan
|
|
|
qualified
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
Name and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
Option
|
|
|
Compen-
|
|
|
Compen-
|
|
|
Compen-
|
|
|
|
|
Principal Position(s)
|
|
Year
|
|
|
Salary(1)
|
|
|
Bonus(2)
|
|
|
Awards(3)
|
|
|
Awards(4)
|
|
|
sation(5)
|
|
|
sation(6)
|
|
|
sation(7)
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Terence W. Edwards
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
$
|
564,635
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
234,757
|
|
|
$
|
210,487
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
13,771
|
|
|
$
|
62,485
|
|
|
$
|
1,086,135
|
|
President and Chief Executive Officer; President and Chief
Executive Officer PHH Mortgage
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clair M. Raubenstine(8)
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
853,846
|
|
|
|
213,191
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
54,302
|
|
|
|
1,121,339
|
|
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
George J. Kilroy
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
438,461
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
185,793
|
|
|
|
83,316
|
|
|
|
267,461
|
|
|
|
10,236
|
|
|
|
17,285
|
|
|
|
1,002,552
|
|
President and Chief Executive Officer PHH Arval
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mark R. Danahy
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
319,943
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
146,788
|
|
|
|
33,258
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41,203
|
|
|
|
541,192
|
|
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
PHH Mortgage
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
William F. Brown
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
293,846
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
123,188
|
|
|
|
31,179
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,403
|
|
|
|
42,003
|
|
|
|
491,619
|
|
Senior Vice President,
General Counsel and Corporate Secretary; Senior Vice President,
General Counsel and Secretary PHH Mortgage
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Neil J. Cashen(9)
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
274,327
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
218,070
|
|
|
|
482,344
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,169
|
|
|
|
1,982,996
|
|
|
|
2,961,906
|
|
Former Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer;
Former Chief Financial Officer PHH Arval
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
On February 22, 2006, the Compensation Committee increased
the annual salary for Messrs. Kilroy, Danahy and Brown to
$450,000, $325,000 and $300,000, respectively, effective on
February 25, 2006. Mr. Edwards annual salary was
not changed for 2006. No increases in annual salary have been
made for the Named Executive Officers for 2007. |
|
(2) |
|
As an inducement to his employment, we agreed to award
Mr. Raubenstine shares of our Common Stock equivalent to
$250,000. During 2006, our intention was to make this grant in
two equal installments: the first when we became current in our
filing obligations with the SEC and were permitted to issue
shares of our Common Stock from our 2005 Equity and Incentive
Plan and the second on the later of February 23, 2007 or
the date on which we became a current filer with the SEC. Due to
the delay in the filing of our financial statements with the SEC
and the announcement of the Merger, this stock award was never
granted. In 2007, we and Mr. Raubenstine agreed to satisfy
this arrangement through a cash payment of $250,000 which was
paid upon the filing of the 2006
Form 10-K.
The amount in this column reflects the proportion of the total
amount of the bonus earned during 2006 on a straight-line basis. |
|
(3) |
|
The amounts shown in this column reflect the amount recognized
by us (exclusive of the effect of estimated forfeitures) for the
year ended December 31, 2006 for financial statement
reporting purposes with respect to awards of PHH RSUs to our
Named Executive Officers, which awards were made prior to 2006
under the 2005 |
25
|
|
|
|
|
Equity and Incentive Plan. There were no awards of PHH RSUs to
our Named Executive Officers in 2006. See
Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End
for 2006 for more information regarding existing awards of
PHH RSUs. See also Note 20, Stock-Based
Compensation in the Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements included in the 2006
Form 10-K
for more information. |
|
(4) |
|
The amounts shown in this column reflect the amount recognized
by us (exclusive of the effect of estimated forfeitures) for the
year ended December 31, 2006 for financial statement
reporting purposes with respect to awards of Stock Options to
our Named Executive Officers, which awards were made prior to
2006 under the 2005 Equity and Incentive Plan. There were no
awards of Stock Options to our Named Executive Officers in 2006.
See Grants of Plan-Based Awards for 2006
and Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal
Year-End for 2006 for more information regarding existing
awards of Stock Options. See also Note 20,
Stock-Based Compensation in the Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements included in the 2006
Form 10-K
for more information. |
|
(5) |
|
For 2006, Messrs. Edwards, Kilroy and Brown were
participants in our 2006 PHH MIP and Mr. Danahy was a
participant in our 2006 Mortgage MIP. Each plan provided for
cash payments based upon the achievement of certain performance
targets established by our Compensation Committee. In 2006, the
performance targets for the 2006 PHH MIP and 2006 Mortgage MIP
were based on our consolidated pre-tax income after minority
interest and the pre-tax income after minority interest for PHH
Mortgage, respectively. Given his role as President and Chief
Executive Officer of PHH Arval, Mr. Kilroys
non-equity incentive plan compensation was split equally between
the achievement of the performance targets set forth in the 2006
PHH MIP and the performance targets set forth in the 2006 Fleet
MIP, which were based on the pre-tax net income after minority
interest of PHH Arval for 2006. See Grants of
Plan-Based Awards for 2006 for more information regarding
the payout levels. Based on our consolidated results and the
results of PHH Arval and PHH Mortgage for 2006, the Compensation
Committee determined that the performance targets for the 2006
PHH MIP and 2006 Mortgage MIP were not achieved and the
performance targets for the 2006 Fleet MIP were exceeded. As a
result, Messrs. Edwards, Danahy and Brown did not receive
non-equity incentive compensation under the 2006 PHH MIP or 2006
Mortgage MIP for 2006, and Mr. Kilroy received payment
under the 2006 Fleet MIP in the amount of $267,461 upon the
filing of the 2006
Form 10-K. |
|
(6) |
|
The amounts in this column reflect the aggregate change in the
actuarial present value of the accumulated benefit under the PHH
Pension Plan and PHH Retiree Medical Plan from December 31,
2005 to December 31, 2006 for each participating Named
Executive Officer. Mr. Edwards is a participant in both the
PHH Pension Plan and the PHH Retiree Medical Plan;
Messrs. Kilroy, Brown and Cashen are participants in the
PHH Pension Plan, and Messrs. Raubenstine and Danahy are
not participants in either plan. Each of these plans was frozen
and the final average compensation and years of service for each
Named Executive Officer participating in the PHH Pension Plan is
based on the years of service and compensation earned prior to
October 31, 1999 (October 31, 2004 for
Mr. Kilroy). See Pension Benefits for
2006 for additional information regarding the benefits
accrued for each of these Named Executive Officers and
Note 15, Pension and Other Post Employment
Benefits in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
included in the 2006
Form 10-K
for more information regarding the calculation of our pension
costs. |
|
(7) |
|
Amounts included in this column are set forth in the following
table: |
All Other
Compensation Table
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Life and
|
|
|
401(k)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Travel,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disability
|
|
|
Matching
|
|
|
Financial
|
|
|
Company
|
|
|
Meals
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Insurance
|
|
|
Contrib-
|
|
|
Planning
|
|
|
Car and
|
|
|
and
|
|
|
Tax
|
|
|
Vacation
|
|
|
Severance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Converage
|
|
|
ution
|
|
|
Services
|
|
|
Fuel
|
|
|
Lodging
|
|
|
Gross-Up
|
|
|
Payout
|
|
|
Payout
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
|
|
(b)
|
|
|
(c)
|
|
|
(d)
|
|
|
(e)
|
|
|
(f)
|
|
|
(g)
|
|
|
(h)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Terence W. Edwards
|
|
$
|
3,229
|
|
|
$
|
13,200
|
|
|
$
|
16,635
|
|
|
$
|
13,830
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
15,591
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
62,485
|
|
Clair M. Raubenstine
|
|
|
5,167
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,840
|
|
|
|
18,295
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
54,302
|
|
George J. Kilroy
|
|
|
2,169
|
|
|
|
9,231
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,315
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,570
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,285
|
|
Mark R. Danahy
|
|
|
1,705
|
|
|
|
13,176
|
|
|
|
10,423
|
|
|
|
8,435
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,464
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41,203
|
|
William F. Brown
|
|
|
1,525
|
|
|
|
12,869
|
|
|
|
12,184
|
|
|
|
6,912
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,513
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42,003
|
|
Neil J. Cashen
|
|
|
1,835
|
|
|
|
12,981
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,297
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,042
|
|
|
|
48,956
|
|
|
|
1,913,885
|
|
|
|
1,982,996
|
|
26
|
|
|
(a) |
|
These amounts include premiums paid for life and long-term
disability insurance coverage for the Named Executive Officers
pursuant to our benefit plans and are paid for all employees. |
|
(b) |
|
These amounts reflect the matching contribution made by us on
behalf of each Named Executive Officer under the PHH Corporation
Employee Savings Plan. This matching contribution is available
to all of our employees up to the amount of their voluntary
contributions to the plan not to exceed the statutory limit,
which was $13,200 in 2006. |
|
(c) |
|
These amounts reflect the value of financial planning services
which were made available to the Named Executive Officers. We
also provided a tax
gross-up to
our Named Executive Officers for this amount. See
Footnote (f) below. |
|
(d) |
|
These amounts include the value of the personal benefit received
by each Named Executive Officer for the use of a company car and
fuel, which values are based on our costs for such benefits. We
also provided a tax
gross-up to
our Named Executive Officers for this amount. See
Footnote (f) below. |
|
(e) |
|
This column reflects the value of hotel accommodations, meals
and a car service to transport Mr. Raubenstine to and from
our Maryland offices during 2006 as part of his employment.
Mr. Raubenstine split his time between our New Jersey and
Maryland offices, but spent more than 50% of his time in our
Maryland offices during 2006. While Mr. Raubenstine lives
in the greater Philadelphia area, he was treated as being
domiciled in Maryland for tax purposes due to the percentage of
time that he worked in our Maryland offices. As a result, his
normal travel, meals and lodging expenses for performing
services for us in Maryland were not deductible business
expenses and were recognized as compensation. We reimbursed
Mr. Raubenstine for these expenses and provided a tax
gross-up so
that he incurred no additional taxes as a result of these
payments. See Footnote (f) below. |
|
(f) |
|
This column reflects the tax
gross-up
amounts paid during 2006 (i) for the financial planning,
car and fuel costs for Messrs. Edwards, Kilroy, Danahy,
Brown and Cashen and (ii) for hotel accommodations and car
service costs for Mr. Raubenstines travel to and from
our Maryland offices. |
|
(g) |
|
The amount in this column reflects the amount of accrued
vacation and holiday pay which was paid to Mr. Cashen when
his employment with us terminated on September 20, 2006
pursuant to the Cashen Release. |
|
(h) |
|
The amount in this column reflects the severance payout made to
Mr. Cashen, which includes a cash payment of $1,864,800 and
the value of his company car and a laptop computer ($47,582 and
$1,503, respectively) based on our fair value of each on
September 20, 2006, pursuant to the terms of the Cashen
Release. |
|
|
|
(8) |
|
Effective February 23, 2006, Mr. Raubenstine joined us
as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. For
2006, Mr. Raubenstine received an annual salary of
$1,000,000 and was not a participant in the 2006 PHH MIP. |
|
(9) |
|
Effective February 23, 2006, Mr. Cashen ceased serving
as our Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer and
assumed the role of Senior Vice President, Strategic Planning
and Investor Relations. On September 20, 2006,
Mr. Cashen resigned his employment and entered into the
Cashen Release, which provided a release of all claims by
Mr. Cashen, except for certain indemnification and benefit
claims; non-competition restrictions for periods ranging from
three to five years and non-disclosure and non-disparagement
restrictions. The agreement provides for a one-time lump sum
cash payment of $1,864,800, the retention of his company vehicle
and laptop and continued vesting and exercise rights in
previously granted stock-based awards on the same basis and at
the same time as such awards would have vested or been
exercisable had he remained an employee through October 11,
2009, which resulted in the recognition of additional expense
for financial statement reporting purposes for his previously
granted PHH RSU and Stock Option awards. |
27
GRANTS
OF PLAN-BASED AWARDS FOR 2006
The following table sets forth the grants of plan-based awards
for 2006, including non-equity incentive plan awards under the
2006 PHH MIP, 2006 Mortgage MIP and 2006 Fleet MIP. There were
no equity-based awards made to the Named Executive Officers for
2006. Pursuant to the terms of the Cashen Release, vesting and
exercise rights in previously granted stock-based awards were
allowed to continue on the same basis and at the same time as
such awards would have vested or been exercisable had
Mr. Cashen remained an employee through October 11,
2009. These modifications are reflected in the table below as
new awards on September 20, 2006. The number of PHH RSUs
and Stock Options, exercise prices, expiration dates and other
terms of these equity awards were not modified.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Option
|
|
|
Exercise or
|
|
|
Grant
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Awards:
|
|
|
Base Price
|
|
|
Date Fair
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
of Option
|
|
|
Value of
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated Future Payouts Under
|
|
|
Securities
|
|
|
Awards
|
|
|
Stock and
|
|
|
|
Grant
|
|
Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards(1)
|
|
|
Underlying
|
|
|
per
|
|
|
Option
|
|
Name
|
|
Date
|
|
Threshold
|
|
|
Target
|
|
|
Maximum
|
|
|
Options
|
|
|
Share(2)
|
|
|
Awards
|
|
|
Terence W. Edwards
|
|
N/A
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
564,635
|
|
|
$
|
705,794
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Clair M. Raubenstine
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
George J. Kilroy
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
219,031
|
|
|
|
438,461
|
|
|
|
548,076
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mark R. Danahy
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
243,750
|
|
|
|
304,688
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
William F. Brown
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
150,000
|
|
|
|
187,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Neil J. Cashen(3)
|
|
9/20/2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
104,909
|
|
|
|
17.43
|
|
|
|
194,082
|
|
|
|
9/20/2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,247
|
|
|
|
20.78
|
|
|
|
201,079
|
|
|
|
9/20/2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,874
|
|
|
|
24.99
|
|
|
|
20,727
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The target payout amount is determined based on a percentage of
the annual salary of the Named Executive Officer at the time of
grant, except for Mr. Kilroy whose target is based on a
percentage of his actual salary for the prior year pursuant to
the terms of the 2006 Fleet MIP. The target payout level is 100%
of salary for Messrs. Edwards and Kilroy, 75% of salary for
Mr. Danahy and 50% of salary for Mr. Brown. The
maximum payout is 125% of the target payout although the
performance targets must be exceeded by more than 110% for a
payout above target. From 110% to 125% of target, the payout is
proportionate to the percentage by which the performance target
is exceeded. The performance targets for the 2006 PHH MIP, 2006
Mortgage MIP and 2006 Fleet MIP were based on the pre-tax income
after minority interest for us, PHH Mortgage and PHH Arval,
respectively. Messrs. Raubenstine and Cashen did not
participate in the 2006 PHH MIP, 2006 Mortgage MIP or 2006 Fleet
MIP. Mr. Danahy participates in the 2006 Mortgage MIP only
given his role with PHH Mortgage. No payments were made to the
Named Executive Officers under the 2006 PHH MIP or 2006 Mortgage
MIP. Mr. Kilroy participates equally in the 2006 PHH MIP
and 2006 Fleet MIP with a target payout equal to $219,031 under
each plan. As a result, the threshold amount for
Mr. Kilroys non-equity incentive plan award is 50% of
his target payout since the performance target under one, but
not the other, MIP was achieved. See Footnote 5 under
Summary Compensation Table for
information regarding the payout to Mr. Kilroy under the
2006 Fleet MIP. |
|
(2) |
|
The exercise prices shown for Mr. Cashens Stock
Option Awards were not modified by the Cashen Release and
reflect the original exercise prices set at the time of the
grant of these awards. The closing price for our Common Stock on
September 20, 2006 was $27.51. |
|
(3) |
|
The terms of the Cashen Release, including the continued vesting
and exercise rights for previously granted Stock Option and PHH
RSU awards, were approved by the Compensation Committee on
September 19, 2006 and resulted in a modification of the
awards upon execution of the Cashen Release on
September 20, 2006. We did not modify the exercise price,
number of shares and other terms of the awards. As a result of
the modification, we recognized net incremental compensation
cost of $533,375, which includes the amounts set forth for each
Stock Option award in the last column of the table as well as
the net incremental cost of $117,487 for the modification to the
previously granted PHH RSU awards of 15,252 shares. |
28
OUTSTANDING
EQUITY AWARDS AT FISCAL YEAR-END FOR 2006
The following table sets forth the outstanding equity awards,
including PHH RSUs and Stock Options, for each of our Named
Executive Officers as of December 31, 2006. PHH RSUs earned
during 2006 pursuant to the vesting terms of existing award
agreements but not converted to shares of our Common Stock
because we were not a current filer with the SEC are not
presented as outstanding awards in the table. In addition, Stock
Options which were earned during 2006 are included in the table
as exercisable.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Option Awards
|
|
|
Stock Awards
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incentive
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
Plan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incentive
|
|
|
Awards:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plan Awards:
|
|
|
Market
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Value of
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of Shares
|
|
|
Market Value
|
|
|
Unearned
|
|
|
Unearned
|
|
|
|
Securities
|
|
|
Underlying
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
or Units
|
|
|
of Shares or
|
|
|
Shares, Units
|
|
|
Shares,Units
|
|
|
|
Underlying
|
|
|
Unexercised
|
|
|
Option
|
|
|
|
|
|
of Stock
|
|
|
Units of
|
|
|
or Other
|
|
|
or Other
|
|
|
|
Unexercised
|
|
|
Options
|
|
|
Exer-
|
|
|
Option
|
|
|
That Have
|
|
|
Stock That
|
|
|
Rights That
|
|
|
Rights That
|
|
|
|
Options
|
|
|
Unexer-
|
|
|
cise
|
|
|
Expiration
|
|
|
Not
|
|
|
Have Not
|
|
|
Have Not
|
|
|
Have Not
|
|
Name
|
|
Exercisable
|
|
|
cisable
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
Date
|
|
|
Vested(1)
|
|
|
Vested(2)
|
|
|
Vested(3)
|
|
|
Vested(2)
|
|
|
Terence W. Edwards
|
|
|
183,045
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
20.22
|
|
|
|
1/13/2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
157,364
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17.43
|
|
|
|
1/22/2012
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,570
|
|
|
|
6,785
|
(4)
|
|
|
12.48
|
|
|
|
4/22/2013
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49,229
|
(5)
|
|
|
20.78
|
|
|
|
3/3/2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,257
|
|
|
|
18,771
|
(6)
|
|
|
24.99
|
|
|
|
6/28/2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35,448
|
|
|
$
|
1,023,384
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,643
|
|
|
$
|
509,353
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clair M. Raubenstine
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
George J. Kilroy
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,247
|
(5)
|
|
|
20.78
|
|
|
|
3/3/2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,468
|
|
|
|
10,406
|
(6)
|
|
|
24.99
|
|
|
|
6/28/2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35,448
|
|
|
|
1,023,384
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,796
|
|
|
|
369,421
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mark R. Danahy
|
|
|
43,712
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18.55
|
|
|
|
7/17/2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35,844
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17.43
|
|
|
|
1/22/2012
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,504
|
(5)
|
|
|
20.78
|
|
|
|
3/3/2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,497
|
|
|
|
562,878
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,709
|
|
|
|
338,039
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
William F. Brown
|
|
|
19,695
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20.32
|
|
|
|
6/2/2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,085
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20.22
|
|
|
|
1/13/2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,916
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17.43
|
|
|
|
1/22/2012
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,410
|
(5)
|
|
|
20.78
|
|
|
|
3/3/2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,407
|
|
|
|
358,190
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,358
|
|
|
|
299,035
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Neil J. Cashen(7)
|
|
|
104,909
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17.43
|
|
|
|
1/22/2012
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,247
|
(5)
|
|
|
20.78
|
|
|
|
3/3/2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,468
|
|
|
|
10,406
|
(6)
|
|
|
24.99
|
|
|
|
6/28/2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,433
|
|
|
|
532,161
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,110
|
|
|
|
263,006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
This column includes awards of PHH RSUs made (i) on
February 1, 2005 in connection with the Spin-Off to convert
existing awards of restricted stock units of Cendant common
stock granted in 2003 (the 2003 Conversion RSUs) and
(ii) on June 28, 2005 as part of our annual long-term
incentive grant (the 2005 Annual |
29
|
|
|
|
|
Award RSUs). The following table sets forth the number of
2003 Conversion RSUs and 2005 Annual Award RSUs outstanding as
of December 31, 2006 for each Named Executive Officer: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of 2003
|
|
Number of 2005
|
Name
|
|
Conversion RSUs
|
|
Annual Award RSUs
|
|
Terence W. Edwards
|
|
|
9,014
|
|
|
|
8,629
|
|
Clair M. Raubenstine
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
George J. Kilroy
|
|
|
8,012
|
|
|
|
4,784
|
|
Mark R. Danahy
|
|
|
4,506
|
|
|
|
7,203
|
|
William F. Brown
|
|
|
3,605
|
|
|
|
6,753
|
|
Neil J. Cashen
|
|
|
4,326
|
|
|
|
4,784
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The remaining 2003 Conversion RSUs vest on April 22, 2007
subject to continued employment. The 2005 Annual Award RSUs vest
equally in three annual installments beginning on June 28,
2009 subject to continued employment and acceleration of vesting
of 25% of the total award in three installments on June 28,
2007, June 28, 2008 and June 28, 2009 upon the
achievement of financial performance targets for each of the
three fiscal years ending prior to June 28, 2009. We did
not achieve our performance target for 2006. |
|
(2) |
|
Calculated using the closing price of our Common Stock on
December 29, 2006 ($28.87). |
|
(3) |
|
This column includes awards of PHH RSUs made on February 1,
2005 in connection with the Spin-Off to convert existing awards
of restricted stock units of Cendant common stock granted in
2004 (the 2004 Conversion RSUs). The 2004 Conversion
RSUs vest at either 12.5% or 18.75% of the total award on each
of April 27, 2007 and April 27, 2008 to the extent we
achieve either 100% or 150%, respectively, of the financial
performance target for the fiscal year preceding the vesting
date. In the event that the performance targets for a given year
are not achieved, then 12.5% of the award is forfeited. As a
result of not achieving the performance targets for 2006, 12.5%
of the total award of 2004 Conversion RSUs for each
participating Named Executive Officer were forfeited on
April 27, 2007. Any unvested portion of the 2004 Conversion
RSUs not previously forfeited will vest only in the event of a
change in control transaction or the death or disability of the
Named Executive Officer. |
|
(4) |
|
These Stock Options vest on April 22, 2007 subject to
continued employment. |
|
(5) |
|
These Stock Options vest on March 3, 2009 subject to
continued employment. |
|
(6) |
|
These Stock Options vest annually in three equal installments
beginning on June 28, 2009, subject to continued employment
and acceleration of vesting of 25% of the total award in three
installments on June 28, 2007, June 28, 2008 and
June 28, 2009 upon the achievement of financial performance
targets for each of the three fiscal years ending prior to
June 28, 2009. We did not achieve our performance target
for 2006. |
|
(7) |
|
See Grants of Plan-Based Awards for 2006
for information regarding certain amendments made to
Mr. Cashens outstanding equity awards. |
30
OPTION
EXERCISES AND STOCK VESTED FOR 2006
The following table sets forth information regarding the number
and value of our Common Stock that vested during 2006 for our
Named Executive Officers. The shares of our Common Stock listed
in the table below will not be issued to the Named Executive
Officers until we become a current filer with the SEC. There
were no Stock Option exercises by the Named Executive Officers
during 2006.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock Awards(1)
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
Shares Acquired
|
|
|
Realized
|
|
Name
|
|
on Vesting
|
|
|
on Vesting
|
|
|
Terence W. Edwards
|
|
|
17,796
|
|
|
$
|
486,122
|
|
Clair M. Raubenstine
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
George J. Kilroy
|
|
|
15,513
|
|
|
|
424,551
|
|
Mark R. Danahy
|
|
|
10,156
|
|
|
|
276,740
|
|
William F. Brown
|
|
|
7,923
|
|
|
|
215,572
|
|
Neil J. Cashen
|
|
|
8,989
|
|
|
|
245,414
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The shares of our Common Stock shown represent the aggregate
number of shares for each Named Executive Officer that vested
during 2006 pursuant to the terms of the award agreements. The
value realized on vesting reflects the value of the shares on
the vesting date as set forth in the award agreements based on
the closing price of our Common Stock on the vesting date. Since
we were not a current filer with the SEC from March 1, 2006
until June 28, 2007, our Registration Statement on
Form S-8
for our 2005 Equity and Incentive Plan was not effective, and
the Board of Directors determined that these shares will not be
issued to the Named Executive Officers until the earlier of the
consummation of the Merger or the expiration of the Blackout
Period. |
PENSION
BENEFITS FOR 2006
The following table sets forth information relating to the PHH
Pension Plan, which is a defined benefit employee pension plan
adopted as of the Spin-Off. The PHH Pension Plan is identical in
all material respects to the Cendant Corporation Pension Plan
(the Cendant Pension Plan), under which benefits
were frozen for participants including our Named Executive
Officers. The PHH Pension Plan assumed all liabilities and
obligations owed under the Cendant Pension Plan to Cendant
Pension Plan participants who were actively employed by us at
the time of the Spin-Off, including Messrs. Edwards,
Kilroy, Brown and Cashen. Certain of our employees, including
Messrs. Raubenstine and Danahy, were not participants in
the Cendant Pension Plan and are not participants in the PHH
Pension Plan. The benefits under the PHH Pension Plan that are
accrued to the participating Named Executive Officers were
frozen and such officers may not accrue further benefits under
the PHH Pension Plan.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Present
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years of
|
|
|
Value of
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credited
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
Name
|
|
Plan Name
|
|
Service(1)
|
|
|
Benefit(2)
|
|
|
Terence W. Edwards
|
|
PHH Corporation Pension Plan
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
$
|
255,772
|
|
|
|
PHH Corporation Retiree Medical Plan
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
22,927
|
|
Clair M. Raubenstine
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
George J. Kilroy
|
|
PHH Corporation Pension Plan
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
774,949
|
|
Mark R. Danahy
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
William F. Brown
|
|
PHH Corporation Pension Plan
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
104,809
|
|
Neil J. Cashen
|
|
PHH Corporation Pension Plan
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
206,170
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The number of years of credited service shown in this column is
calculated based on the actual years of service with us for each
Named Executive Officer through October 31, 1999
(October 31, 2004 for Mr. Kilroy). |
|
(2) |
|
The valuations included in this column have been calculated as
of December 31, 2006 assuming the Named Executive Officer
will retire at the normal retirement age of 65 and using the
interest rate and other assumptions |
31
|
|
|
|
|
as described in Note 15, Pension and Other Post
Employment Benefits in the Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements included in the 2006
Form 10-K. |
No pension benefits were paid to the Named Executive Officers in
2006. Each of the Named Executive Officers, other than
Messrs. Raubenstine and Danahy, is eligible to receive a
benefit under the PHH Pension Plan based on 2% of their final
average cash compensation times their number of years of benefit
service (up to a maximum of 30 years) minus 50% of their
annualized primary Social Security benefit. For purposes of
determining the participating Named Executive Officers
benefits under the PHH Pension Plan, their final average
compensation and years of benefit service was based on
compensation and service earned prior to October 31, 1999
(October 31, 2004 for Mr. Kilroy). The participating
Named Executive Officers will not accrue any additional benefits
under the PHH Pension Plan or under any other defined benefit
plan sponsored by us or Cendant after October 31, 1999
(October 31, 2004 for Mr. Kilroy).
NON-QUALIFIED
DEFERRED COMPENSATION FOR 2006
The table below sets forth information relating to the PHH
Corporation Executive Deferred Compensation Plan (the
Deferred Compensation Plan) established by our Board
of Directors in 1994 for specified executive officers at that
time. The Deferred Compensation Plan was frozen to further
participation in 1997 and Mr. Edwards is the only Named
Executive Officer eligible to participate in the plan.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings in
|
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|
|
Last Fiscal
|
|
|
Balance as of
|
|
Name
|
|
Year End
|
|
|
Last Fiscal Year
|
|
|
Terence W. Edwards
|
|
$
|
57,836
|
(1)
|
|
$
|
536,942
|
|
Clair M. Raubenstine
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
George J. Kilroy
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mark R. Danahy
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
William F. Brown
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Neil J. Cashen
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The amount reported in this column is not included as
compensation in Summary Compensation
Table because the earnings were not above-market or
preferential pursuant to the applicable SEC rules under the
Exchange Act. |
There were no contributions to, or distributions or withdrawals
from, the Deferred Compensation Plan in 2006. The Deferred
Compensation Plan is a non-qualified deferred compensation plan
pursuant to which participants may elect to defer up to 100% of
their annual salary and any awards under a non-equity incentive
plan. All deferrals by participants are 100% vested at all
times. The Deferred Compensation Plan is unfunded for tax
purposes and a bookkeeping account is established for each
participant. Amounts deferred are credited with any associated
earnings in accordance with hypothetical investment options
elected by the participant from the investment options,
including mutual funds and other funds, available under the PHH
Savings Plan, except for the fund which invests in our Common
Stock. Participants are entitled to a distribution under the
Deferred Compensation Plan when they cease employment with us
for any reason. Distributions may be made in lump sum or in
monthly, quarterly or annual installments for up to ten years at
the election of the participant.
32
POTENTIAL
PAYMENTS UPON TERMINATION OF EMPLOYMENT OR CHANGE IN
CONTROL
The following table sets forth the estimated payments and
benefits that would be provided to each Named Executive Officer
who was employed by us on December 29, 2006, pursuant to
the terms of any contract, agreement, plan or arrangement that
provides for such payments and benefits following, or in
connection with, a termination of the Named Executive Officer,
including by voluntary termination, involuntary termination not
for cause, involuntary termination for cause, retirement, death
or disability or a change in control with or without a
termination of the Named Executive Officer. For purposes of
calculating the amounts in the table, we have assumed that the
termination or change in control event took place on
December 29, 2006, the last business day of our most
recently completed fiscal year, and used the closing price of
our Common Stock on such date ($28.87 per share) for
purposes of calculating the value of any stock awards in
accordance with the SEC rules under the Exchange Act. See the
discussion that follows the table for additional information
regarding the estimated payments and benefits.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Involuntary
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in
|
|
|
Change in
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Termination
|
|
|
Involuntary
|
|
|
Control
|
|
|
Control
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name and Description
|
|
Voluntary
|
|
|
Not for
|
|
|
Termination
|
|
|
without
|
|
|
with
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of Potential Payments
|
|
Termination
|
|
|
Cause
|
|
|
for Cause
|
|
|
Termination
|
|
|
Termination
|
|
|
Death
|
|
|
Disability
|
|
|
Retirement
|
|
|
Terence W. Edwards
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Severance
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
572,135
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
572,135
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Accelerated Vesting of Stock Awards
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,115,037
|
|
|
|
2,115,037
|
|
|
|
2,115,037
|
|
|
|
2,115,037
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accelerated Payout of 2006 MIPs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
564,635
|
|
|
|
564,635
|
|
|
|
564,635
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retirement Plans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
278,699
|
|
Deferred Compensation
|
|
|
536,942
|
|
|
|
536,942
|
|
|
|
536,942
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
536,942
|
|
|
|
536,942
|
|
|
|
536,942
|
|
|
|
536,942
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
536,942
|
|
|
$
|
1,109,077
|
|
|
$
|
536,942
|
|
|
$
|
2,679,672
|
|
|
$
|
3,788,749
|
|
|
$
|
3,216,614
|
|
|
$
|
2,651,979
|
|
|
$
|
815,641
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clair M. Raubenstine
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Severance
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
507,500
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
507,500
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Accelerated Vesting of Stock Awards
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accelerated Payout of 2006 MIPs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retirement Plans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred Compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
507,500
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
507,500
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
George J. Kilroy
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Severance
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
457,500
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
457,500
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Accelerated Vesting of Stock Awards
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,621,248
|
|
|
|
1,621,248
|
|
|
|
1,621,248
|
|
|
|
1,621,248
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accelerated Payout of 2006 MIPs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
438,461
|
|
|
|
438,461
|
|
|
|
438,461
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retirement Plans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
774,949
|
|
Deferred Compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
457,500
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,059,709
|
|
|
$
|
2,517,209
|
|
|
$
|
2,059,709
|
|
|
$
|
1,621,248
|
|
|
$
|
774,949
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mark R. Danahy
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Severance
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
170,000
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
170,000
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Accelerated Vesting of Stock Awards
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,042,525
|
|
|
|
1,042,525
|
|
|
|
1,042,525
|
|
|
|
1,042,525
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accelerated Payout of 2006 MIPs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
243,750
|
|
|
|
243,750
|
|
|
|
243,750
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retirement Plans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred Compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
170,000
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,286,275
|
|
|
$
|
1,456,275
|
|
|
$
|
1,286,275
|
|
|
$
|
1,042,525
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
William F. Brown
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Severance
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
157,500
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
157,500
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Accelerated Vesting of Stock Awards
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
789,982
|
|
|
|
789,982
|
|
|
|
789,982
|
|
|
|
789,982
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accelerated Payout of 2006 MIPs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
150,000
|
|
|
|
150,000
|
|
|
|
150,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retirement Plans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
104,809
|
|
Deferred Compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
157,500
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
939,982
|
|
|
$
|
1,097,482
|
|
|
$
|
939,982
|
|
|
$
|
789,982
|
|
|
$
|
104,809
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The amounts shown in the table above include estimates of what
would be paid to the Named Executive Officers upon the
occurrence of the specified event. The actual amounts to be paid
to the Named Executive Officers can only be determined at the
time of such event. We have included payments related to the
Retirement Plans and the Deferred Compensation Plan in the table
since these are frozen plans and are not available to our
current employees. We have not included payments related to the
Retirement Plans in the specified events other than the
Retirement column, as these payments are not
triggered by termination, death or disability of the Named
33
Executive Officer or a change in control. These amounts would be
payable to the Named Executive Officer at some time after the
specified event once the minimum retirement age and other PHH
Pension Plan requirements were met. In addition, the table does
not include payments of life or disability insurance payable
upon the death or disability of the Named Executive Officers as
these benefits are available to all employees on the same basis.
Potential
Payments and Benefits
Severance. In accordance with our
policy, none of our Named Executive Officers has an employment
agreement or change in control agreement. We provide
post-termination payments of salary or severance to our Named
Executive Officers under a policy applicable to our executive
officers in the event of a reduction in our workforce or the
elimination or discontinuation of their position. Pursuant to
our policy, the minimum severance is 26 weeks of base
salary and the maximum severance is 52 weeks of base salary
for the Named Executive Officers payable in a lump sum amount.
In addition, the amounts shown in the table include $7,500 in
outplacement services pursuant to our severance policy. These
services may be declined by the Named Executive Officer in lieu
of an equivalent cash payment. The payment of severance is
conditioned upon, among other things, the execution of a general
release of us by the executive officer. If consummated, the
proposed Merger would result in a change in control under our
severance policy.
Accelerated Vesting of Stock
Awards. All of the stock awards made to our
Named Executive Officers have been granted under the 2005 Equity
and Incentive Plan and are subject to the vesting and other
terms set forth in award agreements and the 2005 Equity and
Incentive Plan. Pursuant to the terms of the 2005 Equity and
Incentive Plan, in the event of a Change in Control (defined
below), any Stock Option award carrying a right to exercise that
was not previously vested and exercisable becomes fully vested
and exercisable, and any restrictions, deferral limitations,
payment conditions and forfeiture conditions for PHH RSU awards
lapse and such awards are deemed fully vested. In addition, any
performance conditions imposed with respect to such awards are
deemed to be fully achieved. Pursuant to the terms of the 2005
Equity and Incentive Plan, a Change in Control is deemed to have
occurred if:
|
|
|
|
|
any person, as such term is used in Sections 13(d) and
14(d) of the Exchange Act (other than (i) us, (ii) any
trustee or other fiduciary holding securities under one of our
employee benefit plans and (iii) any corporation owned,
directly or indirectly, by our stockholders in substantially the
same proportions as their ownership of our Common Stock), is or
becomes the beneficial owner (as defined in
Rule 13d-3
under the Exchange Act), directly or indirectly, of our Common
Stock representing 30% or more of the combined voting power of
our then outstanding voting securities (excluding any person who
becomes such a beneficial owner in connection with a transaction
immediately following which the individuals who comprise our
Board of Directors immediately prior thereto constitute at least
a majority of the Board of Directors of the entity surviving
such transaction or, if we or the entity surviving the
transaction is then a subsidiary, the ultimate parent thereof);
|
|
|
|
the following individuals cease for any reason to constitute a
majority of the number of Directors then serving: individuals
who constitute the Board and any new Director (other than a
Director whose initial assumption of office is in connection
with an actual or threatened election contest, including but not
limited to a consent solicitation, relating to the election of
Directors) whose appointment or election by the Board or
nomination for election by our stockholders was approved or
recommended by a vote of at least two-thirds (2/3) of the
Directors then still in office who either were Directors or
whose appointment, election or nomination for election was
previously so approved or recommended;
|
|
|
|
there is consummated a merger or consolidation of us or any of
our direct or indirect subsidiaries with any other corporation,
other than a merger or consolidation immediately following which
the individuals who comprise our Board of Directors immediately
prior thereto constitute at least a majority of the Board of
Directors of the entity surviving such merger or consolidation
or, if we or the entity surviving such merger is then a
subsidiary, the ultimate parent thereof or
|
|
|
|
our stockholders approve a plan of complete liquidation or there
is consummated an agreement for the sale or disposition by us of
all or substantially all of our assets (or any transaction
having a similar effect), other than a sale or disposition by us
of all or substantially all of our assets to an entity,
immediately following which
|
34
|
|
|
|
|
the individuals who comprise our Board of Directors immediately
prior thereto constitute at least a majority of the Board of the
entity to which such assets are sold or disposed of or, if such
entity is a subsidiary, the ultimate parent thereof.
|
The amounts in the table are calculated using the closing price
of our Common Stock on December 29, 2006 and the number of
Stock Options and PHH RSUs used to calculate the amounts in the
table are those unexercisable Stock Options and unvested PHH
RSUs which became exercisable and vested as a result of the
Change in Control event pursuant to the SEC rules under the
Exchange Act. If consummated, the proposed Merger would result
in a change in control under the terms of the 2005 Equity and
Incentive Plan. The following table provides the estimated
payments that each Named Executive Officer would receive as a
result of accelerated vesting of stock awards using a price of
$31.50 per share pursuant to the terms of the proposed
Merger:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accelerated
|
|
|
|
Vesting of
|
|
Name
|
|
Stock Awards
|
|
|
Terence W. Edwards
|
|
$
|
2,451,351
|
|
Clair M. Raubenstine
|
|
|
|
|
George J. Kilroy
|
|
|
1,836,637
|
|
Mark R. Danahy
|
|
|
1,170,632
|
|
William F. Brown
|
|
|
893,013
|
|
Accelerated Payout of 2006 MIPs. Our
short-term cash incentive plans for our executive officers are
the 2006 MIPs, which are governed by the terms of the 2005
Equity and Incentive Plan and the respective 2006 MIPs. As
discussed above with regard to stock awards, in the event of a
Change in Control, the performance conditions imposed with
respect to such awards are deemed to be fully achieved and the
target payout amount is payable to the Named Executive Officers.
If consummated, the proposed Merger would result in a change in
control under the terms of the 2005 Equity and Incentive Plan.
In the event of the death of a Named Executive Officer, the
performance conditions under the 2006 MIPs are deemed to be
fully achieved and the target payout amount, pro rated according
to the time the Named Executive Officer participated in the
performance period, is payable to the Named Executive
Officers estate. See Grants of
Plan-Based Awards for 2006 above for information regarding
the 2006 MIPs.
Retirement Plans. Certain of our Named
Executive Officers were participants in the PHH Pension Plan and
PHH Retiree Medical Plan which were available to all employees
prior to 1999. Participants are entitled to payments in the form
of an annuity upon attaining retirement age. The amounts
reflected in the table are based on the estimated present value
on December 29, 2006 of the payout for each participating
Named Executive Officer assuming he had attained the normal
retirement age of 65. None of the Named Executive Officers had
attained the minimum retirement age under the PHH Pension Plan
as of December 29, 2006. See Pension
Benefits for 2006 above for more information.
Deferred Compensation. Mr. Edwards
is the only Named Executive Officer who is a participant in the
Deferred Compensation Plan. Participants are entitled to a
distribution under the Deferred Compensation Plan when they
cease employment with us for any reason. Distributions may be
made in lump sum or in monthly, quarterly or annual installments
for up to ten years at the election of the participant. See
Non-qualified Deferred Compensation for
2006 above for more information.
35
The following graph and table compare the cumulative total
stockholder return on our Common Stock with (i) the Russell
2000 Index and (ii) the Russell 2000 Financial Services
Index. On January 31, 2005, all shares of our Common Stock
were spun-off from Cendant to the holders of Cendant common
stock on a pro rata basis. Our Common Stock began trading on the
NYSE on February 1, 2005. Cendant distributed one share of
our Common Stock for every 20 shares of Cendant common
stock outstanding on the record date for the distribution.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment Value as of
|
|
|
|
2/1/2005
|
|
|
3/31/2005
|
|
|
6/30/2005
|
|
|
9/30/2005
|
|
|
12/31/2005
|
|
|
3/31/2006
|
|
|
6/30/2006
|
|
|
9/30/2006
|
|
|
12/31/2006
|
|
|
Russell 2000 Index
|
|
$
|
100.00
|
|
|
$
|
98.13
|
|
|
$
|
102.37
|
|
|
$
|
107.17
|
|
|
$
|
108.39
|
|
|
$
|
123.50
|
|
|
$
|
117.29
|
|
|
$
|
117.81
|
|
|
$
|
128.30
|
|
Russell 2000 Financial Services Index
|
|
|
100.00
|
|
|
|
95.35
|
|
|
|
101.60
|
|
|
|
102.28
|
|
|
|
104.42
|
|
|
|
114.61
|
|
|
|
111.72
|
|
|
|
114.16
|
|
|
|
120.83
|
|
PHH Common Stock
|
|
|
100.00
|
|
|
|
99.86
|
|
|
|
117.44
|
|
|
|
125.39
|
|
|
|
127.95
|
|
|
|
121.92
|
|
|
|
125.75
|
|
|
|
125.11
|
|
|
|
131.83
|
|
The graph and chart above assume that $100 was invested in the
Russell 2000 Index, the Russell 2000 Financial Services Index
and our Common Stock on February 1, 2005. Total stockholder
returns assume reinvestment of dividends. The stock price
performance depicted in the graph and table above may not be
indicative of future stock price performance.
36
EQUITY
COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION
The table below reflects the number of securities issued and the
number of securities remaining which were available for issuance
under the 2005 Equity and Incentive Plan as of December 31,
2006.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(c)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining Available
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
|
|
(b)
|
|
|
for Future Issuance
|
|
|
|
Number of Securities
|
|
|
Weighted-Average
|
|
|
Under Equity
|
|
|
|
to be Issued Upon
|
|
|
Exercise Price of
|
|
|
Compensation Plans
|
|
|
|
Exercise of
|
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
|
(Excluding
|
|
|
|
Outstanding Options,
|
|
|
Options, Warrants
|
|
|
Securities Reflected
|
|
Plan Category
|
|
Warrants and Rights
|
|
|
and Rights
|
|
|
in Column (a))
|
|
|
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders(1)
|
|
|
5,012,861
|
(2)
|
|
$
|
19.38
|
(3)
|
|
|
1,388,302
|
|
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
5,012,861
|
|
|
$
|
19.38
|
|
|
|
1,388,302
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Our 2005 Equity and Incentive Plan was approved on
January 14, 2005 by Cendant as our sole stockholder. |
|
(2) |
|
Includes 1,596,223 PHH RSUs and 3,416,638 Stock Options, of
which 912,100 PHH RSUs and 64,438 Stock Options are subject to
performance-based vesting at target levels or upon a change in
control. Depending upon the level of achievement of these
performance goals, all or a portion of the performance-based
stock awards may not vest. The number of PHH RSUs includes
16,008 Earned Shares. |
|
(3) |
|
Because there is no exercise price associated with the PHH RSUs,
those PHH RSUs described in Footnote 2 above are not
included in the weighted-average exercise price calculation. |
CERTAIN
RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
Review
and Approval of Related Person Transactions
We review any relationships or transactions in which we and our
Directors and executive officers, or their immediate family
members, are participants to determine whether these persons
have a direct or indirect material interest. Our Directors Code
and our Employees and Officers Code provide specific provisions
regarding such relationships between our Directors and executive
officers and us. The Corporate Governance Committee and the
Corporate Compliance Officer review any such relationships
identified under the Directors Code and the Employees and
Officers Code, respectively, which are then reviewed and
approved by the Board of Directors at least annually. The
Directors Code sets forth the following guidelines for
relationships that do not require Board approval:
|
|
|
|
§
|
the Directors sole interest in the arrangement is by
virtue of his or her status as a director, executive officer
and/or
holder of less than 10% equity interest (other than a general
partnership interest) in an entity with which we have concluded
such an arrangement;
|
|
|
§
|
the arrangement involves payments to or from the entity that
constitute less than the greater of $1 million or 2% of the
entitys consolidated gross revenues; and
|
|
|
§
|
the Director is not personally involved in (i) the
negotiation and execution of the arrangement,
(ii) performance of the services or provision of the goods
or (iii) the monetary arrangement.
|
See Corporate Governance Code of Business
Conduct and Ethics for Directors and
Code of Conduct for Employees and
Officers for more information. Our legal staff is
responsible for the development and implementation of processes
and controls, including regular director and officer
questionnaires, to obtain information from the directors and
executive officers with respect to related person transactions.
Based on the facts and
37
circumstances identified through these information gathering
processes, the Board of Directors determines whether the company
or a related person has a direct or indirect material interest
in any transactions identified
Certain
Business Relationships
A.B. Krongard, our Non-Executive Chairman, is also an outside
director on the global Board of Directors for our principal
outside law firm, DLA Piper. Our legal fees and disbursements
paid to DLA Piper during 2006 were less than 0.4% of the
firms gross revenues for 2006.
James W. Brinkley, one of our Directors, became Vice Chairman of
Smith Barneys Global Private Client Group following
Citigroups acquisition of LMWW in December 2005. We have
certain relationships with the Corporate and Investment Banking
segment of Citigroup, including financial services, commercial
banking and other transactions. The fees paid to Citigroup,
including interest expense, were approximately $37 million
for 2006, representing less than 0.1% of Citigroups
revenues. Citigroup is a lender, along with various other
lenders, in several of our credit facilities. Our indebtedness
to Citigroup was $843 million as of December 31, 2006,
representing less than 0.1% of Citigroups total
consolidated assets, and was made in the ordinary course of
business upon terms, including interest rates and collateral,
substantially the same as those prevailing at the time for
comparable loans.
Mr. Brinkleys son, Douglas Brinkley, is a principal
at Colliers Pinkard, a member firm of Colliers, which provides
certain lease management services to us. The fees paid to
Colliers during 2006 were approximately $300,000, representing
less than 0.1% of Colliers annual revenues.
Bradford C. Burgess, who serves as a Director, Business
Development at PHH Arval since 2001, is the
son-in-law
of George J. Kilroy, one of our Directors and President and
Chief Executive Officer of PHH Arval. Mr. Burgess received
compensation, including base and bonus payments, of $120,000 for
2006 and was eligible to participate in employee benefit plans
available to employees generally. His compensation and benefits
were commensurate with other employees in comparable positions
at PHH Arval.
Mr. Mariner, one of our directors, served as a director of
BankAtlantic until May 2006. PHH Mortgage has certain mortgage
banking relationships with BankAtlantic, the fees for which did
not exceed 0.2% of BankAtlantics annual revenues.
Indebtedness
of Management
One or more of our mortgage lending subsidiaries has made, in
the ordinary course of business, mortgage loans
and/or home
equity lines of credit to directors and executive officers and
their immediate families. Such mortgage loans
and/or home
equity lines of credit were made on substantially the same
terms, including interest rates and collateral requirements, as
those prevailing at the time for comparable transactions with
our other customers generally, and they did not involve more
than the normal risk of collectibility or present other
unfavorable features. Generally, we sell these mortgage loans
and/or home
equity lines of credit, soon after origination, into the
secondary market in the ordinary course of business.
REPORT
OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE
The purpose of the Audit Committee is to assist the Board of
Directors in its oversight of (i) the integrity of the
Companys financial statements, (ii) the
qualifications and independence of the Companys
independent registered public accounting firm (the
Independent Auditor), (iii) the performance of
the Independent Auditor and the Companys internal audit
function, and (iv) the Companys compliance with legal
and regulatory requirements. Management is responsible for the
financial reporting process, including the preparation of the
financial statements and system of internal controls. The
Companys Independent Auditor is responsible for auditing
the financial statements in accordance with generally accepted
auditing standards and issuing an opinion as to whether the
Companys financial statements are, in all material
respects, presented fairly in conformity with generally accepted
accounting principles. The Committee operates pursuant to a
written charter that is available on our corporate website. See
Committees of the Board above for more information.
38
In this context, the Committee has met and held discussions with
management and the Independent Auditor regarding the fair and
complete presentation of the Companys results, the
assessment of the Companys internal control over financial
reporting and significant accounting policies applied by the
Company in its financial statements, including alternative
treatments. Management represented to the Committee that the
Companys financial statements were prepared in accordance
with accounting principles generally accepted in the United
States, and the Committee has reviewed and discussed the audited
financial statements with management and the Independent
Auditor. The Committee also discussed with the Independent
Auditor those matters required by Statement of Auditing
Standards No. 61, Communications with Audit
Committees, as amended.
In addition, the Committee discussed with the Independent
Auditor the firms independence from the Company and
management, and the Independent Auditor has provided the written
disclosures and letter as required by the Independence Standards
Board Standard No. 1, Independence Discussions with
Audit Committees.
The Committee discussed with the Companys internal auditor
and Independent Auditor the overall scope and plans for their
respective audits. The Committee met with the internal auditor
and the Independent Auditor, with and without management
present, to discuss the results of their examinations, their
evaluations of the Companys internal controls and the
overall quality of the Companys financial reporting.
Based upon the reviews and discussions referred to above, the
Committee recommended to the Board of Directors, and the Board
approved the inclusion of the audited financial statements in
the Companys 2006 Annual Report filed with the SEC.
Audit Committee of the Board of Directors
Francis J. Van Kirk (Chairman)
Ann D. Logan
Jonathan D. Mariner
39
PRINCIPAL
ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES
Our Audit Committee is responsible for pre-approving all audit
services and permitted non-audit services, including the fees
and terms thereof, to be performed for us and our subsidiaries
by our independent registered public accounting firm (the
Independent Auditor). The Audit Committee has
adopted a pre-approval policy and implemented procedures which
provide that all engagements of our Independent Auditor are
reviewed and pre-approved by the Audit Committee, subject to the
de minimis exception for non-audit services described in
Section 10A(i)(1)(B) of the Exchange Act which our Audit
Committee approves prior to the completion of the audit. The
pre-approval policy also permits the delegation of pre-approval
authority to a member of the Audit Committee between meetings of
the Audit Committee, and any such approvals are reviewed and
ratified by the Audit Committee at its next scheduled meeting.
For the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005,
professional services were performed for us by
Deloitte & Touche LLP, our Independent Auditor,
pursuant to the oversight of our Audit Committee. Audit and
audit-related fees aggregated $12.1 million and
$16.8 million for the years ended December 31, 2006
and 2005, respectively. Set forth below are the fees billed to
us by Deloitte & Touche LLP, the member firms of
Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu and their respective affiliates. All
fees and services were approved in accordance with the Audit
Committees pre-approval policy since the Spin-Off.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
Fees by Type
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Audit fees
|
|
$
|
11.4
|
|
|
$
|
16.6
|
|
Audit-related fees
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
Tax fees
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
All other fees
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
12.5
|
|
|
$
|
16.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Audit Fees. The aggregate fees billed
for professional services rendered by the Independent Auditor
were $11.4 million and $16.6 million for the years
ended December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively, and,
primarily related to the annual audits of the Consolidated
Financial Statements included in our Annual Reports on
Form 10-Ks
and our internal control over financial reporting, as required
by Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the
reviews of the consolidated financial statements included in our
Quarterly Reports on
Form 10-Q
and services provided in connection with regulatory and
statutory filings.
Audit-Related Fees. Audit-related fees
billed during the year ended December 31, 2006 and 2005
were $0.7 million and $0.2 million, respectively, and
primarily related to audit fees for our employee benefit plans,
comfort letters related to registration statements and
securitization transactions.
Tax Fees. The aggregate fees billed for
tax services during the years ended December 31, 2006 and
2005 were $0.4 million and $0.1 million, respectively.
These fees related to tax compliance, tax advice and tax
planning for the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005.
All Other Fees. There were no amounts
billed for other services during the year ended
December 31, 2006. The aggregate fees billed for all other
services during the year ended December 31, 2005 were
approximately $2,000 and related to software license fees.
As of December 22, 2007, our Board of Directors is not
aware of any other business to come before the meeting. However,
if any additional matters are presented at the meeting, it is
the intention of the persons named in the accompanying proxy to
vote in accordance with their judgment on those matters.
40
STOCKHOLDER
PROPOSALS FOR ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS FOR 2008
Proposals from stockholders are given careful consideration by
us in accordance with
Rule 14a-8
of the Exchange Act
(Rule 14a-8).
We provide all stockholders with the opportunity, under certain
circumstances and consistent with our by-laws and the rules of
the Securities and Exchange Commission, to participate in the
governance of the Company by submitting stockholder proposals
that they believe merit consideration at the annual meeting of
stockholders for 2008. To enable management to analyze and
respond to proposals stockholders wish to have included in the
Proxy Statement and proxy card for that meeting, our by-laws,
consistent with
Rule 14a-8,
require that any such proposal be received by us in writing no
later than the tenth day following the public announcement of
the date of the annual meeting of stockholders for 2008. Any
stockholder proposal submitted must also be in compliance with
our by-laws. Pursuant to our by-laws, any stockholder proposal
or director nomination for that meeting that is submitted
outside the processes of
Rule 14a-8
will be considered untimely if it is received by us
no later than the tenth day following the public announcement of
the date of the annual meeting of stockholders for 2008.
Proxies solicited by the Board of Directors for the annual
meeting of stockholders for 2008 may confer discretionary
authority to vote on any untimely stockholder proposals or
director nominations without express direction from stockholders
giving such proxies. All stockholder proposals and director
nominations must be addressed to the attention of the Secretary
at PHH Corporation, 3000 Leadenhall Road, Mount Laurel, New
Jersey 08054. The Chairman of the annual meeting of stockholders
may refuse to acknowledge the introduction of any stockholder
proposal or director nomination not made in compliance with the
foregoing procedures.
By Order of the Board of Directors
William F. Brown
Senior Vice President, General Counsel and
Secretary
41
PHH
CORPORATION
SELECTED
FINANCIAL DATA
Quarterly
Historical Financial Tables
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
|
|
|
|
9/30/07
|
|
|
9/30/07
|
|
|
6/30/07
|
|
|
3/31/07
|
|
|
9/30/06
|
|
|
9/30/06
|
|
|
6/30/06
|
|
|
3/31/06
|
|
|
|
(In millions, except per share data)
|
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Operations Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenues
|
|
$
|
1,690
|
|
|
$
|
484
|
|
|
$
|
610
|
|
|
$
|
596
|
|
|
$
|
1,673
|
|
|
$
|
535
|
|
|
$
|
589
|
|
|
$
|
549
|
|
Net (loss) income
|
|
|
(24
|
)
|
|
|
(38
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
Basic (loss) earnings per share
|
|
|
(0.44
|
)
|
|
|
(0.69
|
)
|
|
|
(0.02
|
)
|
|
|
0.28
|
|
|
|
(0.32
|
)
|
|
|
(0.13
|
)
|
|
|
0.01
|
|
|
|
(0.20
|
)
|
Diluted (loss) earnings per share
|
|
|
(0.44
|
)
|
|
|
(0.69
|
)
|
|
|
(0.02
|
)
|
|
|
0.27
|
|
|
|
(0.32
|
)
|
|
|
(0.13
|
)
|
|
|
0.01
|
|
|
|
(0.20
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Consolidated Balance Sheets Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
118
|
|
|
$
|
136
|
|
|
$
|
178
|
|
|
$
|
123
|
|
Restricted cash
|
|
|
627
|
|
|
|
599
|
|
|
|
558
|
|
|
|
559
|
|
Mortgage loans held for sale, net
|
|
|
1,836
|
|
|
|
2,921
|
|
|
|
3,012
|
|
|
|
2,936
|
|
Accounts receivable, net
|
|
|
566
|
|
|
|
471
|
|
|
|
458
|
|
|
|
462
|
|
Net investment in fleet leases
|
|
|
4,168
|
|
|
|
4,248
|
|
|
|
4,170
|
|
|
|
4,147
|
|
Mortgage servicing rights
|
|
|
1,969
|
|
|
|
2,249
|
|
|
|
2,022
|
|
|
|
1,971
|
|
Investment securities
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, net
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
|
64
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
86
|
|
|
|
86
|
|
|
|
86
|
|
|
|
86
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
420
|
|
|
|
434
|
|
|
|
386
|
|
|
|
377
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
9,866
|
|
|
$
|
11,246
|
|
|
$
|
10,968
|
|
|
$
|
10,760
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued expenses
|
|
$
|
466
|
|
|
$
|
503
|
|
|
$
|
506
|
|
|
$
|
494
|
|
Debt
|
|
|
6,794
|
|
|
|
7,984
|
|
|
|
7,834
|
|
|
|
7,647
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
758
|
|
|
|
802
|
|
|
|
815
|
|
|
|
766
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
302
|
|
|
|
382
|
|
|
|
251
|
|
|
|
307
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
8,320
|
|
|
|
9,671
|
|
|
|
9,406
|
|
|
|
9,214
|
|
Commitments and contingencies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minority interest
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
1,513
|
|
|
|
1,540
|
|
|
|
1,531
|
|
|
|
1,515
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity
|
|
$
|
9,866
|
|
|
$
|
11,246
|
|
|
$
|
10,968
|
|
|
$
|
10,760
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A-1
Segment
Results
The Companys segment results for the three and nine months
ended September 31, 2007 and 2006 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Revenues
|
|
|
Segment (Loss) Profit(1)
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
|
Ended September 30,
|
|
|
Ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage Production segment
|
|
$
|
(10
|
)
|
|
$
|
74
|
|
|
$
|
(84
|
)
|
|
$
|
(113
|
)
|
|
$
|
(49
|
)
|
|
$
|
(64
|
)
|
Mortgage Servicing segment
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Mortgage Services
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
84
|
|
|
|
(70
|
)
|
|
|
(115
|
)
|
|
|
(56
|
)
|
|
|
(59
|
)
|
Fleet Management Services segment
|
|
|
470
|
|
|
|
451
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total reportable segments
|
|
|
484
|
|
|
|
535
|
|
|
|
(51
|
)
|
|
|
(85
|
)
|
|
|
(32
|
)
|
|
|
(53
|
)
|
Other(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Company
|
|
$
|
484
|
|
|
$
|
535
|
|
|
$
|
(51
|
)
|
|
$
|
(88
|
)
|
|
$
|
(32
|
)
|
|
$
|
(56
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Revenues
|
|
|
Segment (Loss) Profit(1)
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
Ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage Production segment
|
|
$
|
167
|
|
|
$
|
268
|
|
|
$
|
(101
|
)
|
|
$
|
(160
|
)
|
|
$
|
(96
|
)
|
|
$
|
(64
|
)
|
Mortgage Servicing segment
|
|
|
138
|
|
|
|
81
|
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Mortgage Services
|
|
|
305
|
|
|
|
349
|
|
|
|
(44
|
)
|
|
|
(90
|
)
|
|
|
(82
|
)
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
Fleet Management Services segment
|
|
|
1,386
|
|
|
|
1,325
|
|
|
|
61
|
|
|
|
81
|
|
|
|
75
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total reportable segments
|
|
|
1,691
|
|
|
|
1,674
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
Other(2)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Company
|
|
$
|
1,690
|
|
|
$
|
1,673
|
|
|
$
|
17
|
|
|
$
|
(17
|
)
|
|
$
|
(7
|
)
|
|
$
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The following is a reconciliation of Loss before income taxes
and minority interest to segment loss: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
Nine Months
|
|
|
|
Ended September 30,
|
|
|
Ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before income taxes and minority interest
|
|
$
|
(87
|
)
|
|
$
|
(31
|
)
|
|
$
|
(13
|
)
|
|
$
|
(6
|
)
|
Minority interest in income of consolidated entities, net of
income taxes
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment loss
|
|
$
|
(88
|
)
|
|
$
|
(32
|
)
|
|
$
|
(17
|
)
|
|
$
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2) |
|
Net revenues reported under the heading Other for the nine
months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006 represent the
elimination of $1 million of intersegment revenues recorded
by the Mortgage Servicing segment, which are offset in segment
loss by the elimination of $1 million of intersegment
expense recorded by the Fleet Management Services segment.
Segment loss reported under the heading Other for the three and
nine months ended September 30, 2007 represents expenses
related to the proposed merger with General Electric Capital
Corporation and its wholly owned subsidiary, Jade Merger Sub,
Inc. |
A-2
The Companys segment results for the three and six months
ended June 30, 2007 and 2006 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Revenues
|
|
|
Segment (Loss) Profit(1)
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage Production segment
|
|
$
|
106
|
|
|
$
|
106
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(8
|
)
|
|
$
|
(18
|
)
|
|
$
|
10
|
|
Mortgage Servicing segment
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Mortgage Services
|
|
|
145
|
|
|
|
144
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
13
|
|
Fleet Management Services segment
|
|
|
466
|
|
|
|
446
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total reportable segments
|
|
|
611
|
|
|
|
590
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
Other(2)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Company
|
|
$
|
610
|
|
|
$
|
589
|
|
|
$
|
21
|
|
|
$
|
38
|
|
|
$
|
23
|
|
|
$
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Revenues
|
|
|
Segment (Loss) Profit(1)
|
|
|
|
Six Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage Production segment
|
|
$
|
177
|
|
|
$
|
194
|
|
|
$
|
(17
|
)
|
|
$
|
(47
|
)
|
|
$
|
(47
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
Mortgage Servicing segment
|
|
|
114
|
|
|
|
71
|
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
72
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Mortgage Services
|
|
|
291
|
|
|
|
265
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
(26
|
)
|
|
|
51
|
|
Fleet Management Services segment
|
|
|
916
|
|
|
|
874
|
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total reportable segments
|
|
|
1,207
|
|
|
|
1,139
|
|
|
|
68
|
|
|
|
76
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
51
|
|
Other(2)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Company
|
|
$
|
1,206
|
|
|
$
|
1,138
|
|
|
$
|
68
|
|
|
$
|
71
|
|
|
$
|
25
|
|
|
$
|
46
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The following is a reconciliation of Income before income taxes
and minority interest to segment profit: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes and minority interest
|
|
$
|
41
|
|
|
$
|
24
|
|
|
$
|
74
|
|
|
$
|
25
|
|
Minority interest in income of consolidated entities, net of
income taxes
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment profit
|
|
$
|
38
|
|
|
$
|
23
|
|
|
$
|
71
|
|
|
$
|
25
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2) |
|
Net revenues reported under the heading Other for the three and
six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006 represent the
elimination of $1 million of intersegment revenues recorded
by the Mortgage Servicing segment, which are offset in segment
profit by the elimination of $1 million of intersegment
expense recorded by the Fleet Management Services segment.
Segment loss reported under the heading Other for the three and
six months ended June 30, 2007 represents expenses related
to the proposed merger with General Electric Capital Corporation
and its wholly owned subsidiary, Jade Merger Sub, Inc. |
A-3
The Companys segment results for the three months ended
March 31, 2007 and 2006 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Revenues
|
|
|
Segment (Loss) Profit(1)
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended March 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended March 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage Production segment
|
|
$
|
71
|
|
|
$
|
88
|
|
|
$
|
(17
|
)
|
|
$
|
(39
|
)
|
|
$
|
(29
|
)
|
|
$
|
(10
|
)
|
Mortgage Servicing segment
|
|
|
75
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Mortgage Services
|
|
|
146
|
|
|
|
121
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
(22
|
)
|
|
|
38
|
|
Fleet Management Services segment
|
|
|
450
|
|
|
|
428
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total reportable segments
|
|
|
596
|
|
|
|
549
|
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
Other(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Company
|
|
$
|
596
|
|
|
$
|
549
|
|
|
$
|
47
|
|
|
$
|
33
|
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
$
|
31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The following is a reconciliation of Income before income taxes
and minority interest to segment profit: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
|
Ended March 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Income before income taxes and minority interest
|
|
$
|
33
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
Minority interest in loss of consolidated entities, net of
income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment profit
|
|
$
|
33
|
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2) |
|
Segment loss reported under the heading Other for the three
months ended March 31, 2007 represents expenses related to
the proposed merger with General Electric Capital Corporation
and its wholly owned subsidiary, Jade Merger Sub, Inc. |
A-4
PHH
CORPORATION
INDEPENDENCE STANDARDS FOR DIRECTORS
The Board of Directors has adopted Corporate Governance
Guidelines that contain director qualifications including
director independence. No director will be considered
independent unless the Board affirmatively
determines that the director has no material relationship with
PHH Corporation or any of its subsidiaries (together, the
Company), either directly or as a partner,
stockholder or officer of an organization that has a
relationship with the Company. When making independence
determinations, the Board will consider all relevant facts and
circumstances, as well as all applicable legal and regulatory
requirements, including NYSE corporate governance requirements
and the rules and regulations of any other regulatory or
self-regulatory body with jurisdiction over the Company.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, none of the following
relationships shall automatically disqualify any director or
nominee from being considered independent:
(a) More than three years ago, (i) the director was
employed by the Company, or (ii) an immediate family member
of the director was employed by the Company as an executive
officer;
(b) (i) During any twelve-month period during the
preceding three years, the director has received, or has an
immediate family member who has received, less than $100,000 in
direct compensation from the Company; or (ii) during any
twelve-month period during the preceding three years the
director has received, or has an immediate family member who has
received, director and committee fees and pension or other forms
of deferred compensation for prior service (provided such
compensation is not contingent in any way on continued service);
or (iii) more than three years ago, the director has
received, or has an immediate family member who has received,
any such compensation (including amounts over $100,000 per
year);
(c) The director or an immediate family member of the
director is or was employed within the past three years as an
executive officer of another organization for which any of the
Companys present executive officers at the same time
serves or served on that organizations board of directors
(or similar body) or any committee thereof, except that the
foregoing shall not apply to service by such executive officer
on such organizations compensation committee;
(d) (i) The director is or was an employee, executive
officer, partner (other than a limited partner) or significant
equity holder of another organization that made payments to, or
received payments from, the Company for property or services in
an amount which, in any single fiscal year, is less than the
greater of $1.0 million or 2% of such other
organizations consolidated gross revenues, or (ii) an
immediate family member of the director is or was an executive
officer of another company that made payments to, or received
payments from, the Company for property or services in an amount
which, in any single fiscal year, is less than the greater of
$1.0 million or 2% of such other companys
consolidated gross revenues;
(e) The director is or was an executive officer, partner or
significant equity holder of another organization that is
indebted to the Company, or to which the Company is or was
indebted, and the total amount of indebtedness is 2% or less of
the total consolidated assets of such organization; or
(f) The director is or was an executive officer, trustee or
director of a foundation, university or other non-profit or
charitable organization receiving grants, endowments or other
contributions from the Company, in any single fiscal year, less
than the greater of $1.0 million or 2% of such charitable
organizations consolidated gross revenues; or
(g) The director or an immediate family member of the
director owns 10% or less of the equity of the Company or 5% or
less of the equity of an organization that has a relationship
with the Company.
In addition to these guidelines, members of certain committees
of the Board, such as the Audit Committee, are subject to
heightened standards of independence under various rules and
regulations.
For purposes of these guidelines: (1) compensation received
by an immediate family member of a director for service as a
non-executive employee of the Company shall not be considered in
determining independence under
B-1
(b), above; (2) in applying the test under (d), above, both
the payments and the consolidated gross revenues to be measured
shall be those reported in the last completed fiscal year and
the look-back provisions shall apply solely to the financial
relationship between the Company and the director or immediate
family members current employer and not to former
employment of the director or immediate family member;
(3) an immediate family member includes a
persons spouse, parents, children, siblings, mothers and
fathers-in-law,
sons and
daughters-in-law,
brothers and
sisters-in-law,
and anyone (other than domestic employees) who shares such
persons home, but in applying any lookback provisions, the
Company will not consider individuals who are no longer
immediate family members as a result of legal separation or
divorce or those who have died or become incapacitated;
(4) a significant equity holder of an organization will
normally be considered a stockholder, limited partner or member
owning 10% or more of the voting or equity interests in that
organization; and (5) a directors service as a
non-employee Chairman of the Board of Directors of the Company
shall not be deemed employment by the Company under (a)
above.
B-2
PHH CORPORATION
Proxy Solicited on Behalf of the Board of Directors for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be
held on March 18, 2008
The
undersigned stockholder of PHH Corporation hereby appoints Clair M. Raubenstine and
William F. Brown, and each of them individually, with full power of
substitution, attorneys and proxies for the undersigned and authorizes them to represent and vote, as designated on
the reverse side, all of the shares of common stock of PHH Corporation (PHH Common Stock) which the undersigned may be entitled, in any capacity, to vote at the Annual Meeting
of Stockholders for 2007 to be held at PHH Corporations
offices at 3000 Leadenhall Road, Mt Laurel, New Jersey 08054, on March 18, 2008, at 10:00 a.m., eastern daylight time, and
at any adjournments or postponements of such meeting, for the following purposes, and with discretionary authority as to any other matters that may properly come before the meeting,
all in accordance with, and as described in, the accompanying Notice of Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement. The undersigned acknowledges receipt of the Notice of Annual Meeting dated December 28, 2007,
and the accompanying Proxy Statement. IF NO DIRECTION IS GIVEN, THIS PROXY WILL BE VOTED FOR THE ELECTION OF DIRECTORS FOR THE NAMED NOMINEES.
(Continued and to be signed on reverse side please mark, sign, date and return this proxy using the
enclosed envelope.)
|
|
|
|
Address Change/Comments (Mark the corresponding box on the reverse side) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
You can now access your PHH CORPORATION account online.
Access your PHH Corporation stockholder account online via Investor ServiceDirect® (ISD).
Mellon Investor Services LLC, Transfer Agent for PHH Corporation, now makes it easy and convenient
to get current information on your shareholder account.
|
|
|
View account status |
|
|
|
|
View certificate history |
|
|
|
|
View book-entry information |
|
|
View payment history for dividends |
|
|
|
Make address changes |
|
|
|
Obtain a duplicate 1099 tax form |
|
|
|
Establish/change your PIN |
Visit us on the web at http://www.melloninvestor.com
For
Technical Assistance Call 1-877-978-7778 between 9am-7pm
Monday-Friday Eastern Time
Investor ServiceDirect® is a registered trademark of Mellon Investor Services LLC
PHH CORPORATION
THIS IS YOUR PROXY. YOUR VOTE IS IMPORTANT.
ADMISSION TICKET
|
|
|
PHH Corporation
Annual Meeting of Stockholders for 2007
Tuesday, March 18, 2008
10:00 a.m.
|
|
PHH Corporation
3000 Leadenhall Road
Mt. Laurel, New Jersey 08054 |
|
|
|
|
|
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF PHH CORPORATION RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR PROPOSAL NO. 1
|
|
Please Mark Here for Address Change or Comments |
|
o |
|
|
SEE REVERSE SIDE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FOR |
|
WITHHOLD |
|
|
|
|
all nominees listed |
|
AUTHORITY |
|
|
|
|
(except as indicated) |
|
to vote for all nominees |
1. |
|
Election of
Directors Class II Nominees: |
|
o |
|
o |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
01 Ann D. Logan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
02 George J. Kilroy |
|
|
|
|
For all nominees, except vote withheld from the following:
|
|
|
|
|
WILL ATTEND |
|
|
|
If you plan to attend the Annual Meeting,
please mark the WILL ATTEND box.
|
|
o |
Please sign exactly as name appears. If signing for trusts, estates or corporations, capacity or title should be stated. If shares are owned jointly, both owners must sign. THIS PROXY IS SOLICITED ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
WE ENCOURAGE YOU TO TAKE ADVANTAGE OF INTERNET OR TELEPHONE VOTING,
BOTH ARE AVAILABLE 24 HOURS A DAY, 7 DAYS A WEEK.
Internet
and telephone voting is available through 11:59 p.m., eastern
daylight time, on
March 17, 2008.
Your Internet or telephone vote authorizes the named proxies to vote your shares in the same manner as if you marked, signed and returned your proxy card.
INTERNET
http://www.proxyvoting.com/phh
Use the Internet to vote your proxy. Have your proxy card in hand when you access the web
site.
TELEPHONE
1-866-540-5760
Use any touch-tone telephone to vote your proxy. Have your proxycard in hand when you call.
If you vote your proxy by Internet or by telephone, you do NOT need to mail back your proxy card.
To vote by mail, mark, sign and date your proxy card and return it in the enclosed postage-paid
envelope.
Choose MLinkSMfor fast, easy and secure 24/7 online access to your future proxy
materials, investment plan statements, tax documents and more. Simply log on to Investor
ServiceDirect®
at www.melloninvestor.com/isd where step-by-step instructions will prompt you through enrollment.
You can view the Annual Report on Form 10-K and Proxy
Statement on the Internet at www.phh.com