PRRN14A
PRELIMINARY COPY, DATED JUNE 4, 2009 — SUBJECT TO COMPLETION
 
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, DC 20549
 
Amendment No. 2
to
SCHEDULE 14A
Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
 
Filed by the Registrant o
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant þ
Check the appropriate box:
 
þ  Preliminary Proxy Statement
 
o  Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))
 
o  Definitive Proxy Statement
 
o  Definitive Additional Materials
 
o  Soliciting Material Pursuant to § 240.14a-12
 
IPC HOLDINGS, LTD.
(Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)
 
VALIDUS HOLDINGS, LTD.
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)
 
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
 
o  No fee required.
 
o   Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.
 
  (1)   Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:
 
Common Shares, $0.175 par value per share
 
 
  (2)   Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:
 
68,520,737
 
  (3)   Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (Set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):
 
N/A
 
  (4)   Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:
 
$1,482,329,499.84
 
  (5)   Total fee paid:
 
$82,713.99 (based upon the product of $1,482,329,499.84 and the fee rate of $55.80 per million dollars set forth in the Fee Rate Advisory #5 for Fiscal Year 2009)
 
o  Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.
 
þ   Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the form or schedule and the date of its filing.
 
  (1)   Amount previously paid: $84,262.55
 
  (2)   Form, schedule or registration statement no.: Schedule 14A
 
  (3)   Filing party: Validus Holdings, Ltd.
 
  (4)   Date filed: April 16, 2009


 

PRELIMINARY COPY, DATED JUNE 4, 2009 — SUBJECT TO COMPLETION
 
NOTICE OF COURT MEETING
 
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BERMUDA No. [•] of 2009
 
CIVIL JURISDICTION
(COMMERCIAL COURT)
 
IN THE MATTER OF IPC HOLDINGS, LTD
and
IN THE MATTER OF THE COMPANIES ACT 1981
 
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that by an Order dated [ • ] 2009 made in the above matters the Court has directed a meeting (including any adjournments or postponements thereof, the “court-ordered IPC meeting”) to be convened of the holders of the common shares, par value $0.01 per share (the “IPC Shares”), of IPC Holdings, Ltd., a Bermuda exempted company (“IPC”) (other than any IPC Shares that are registered in the name of, or beneficially owned by, Validus, IPC or any of their respective subsidiaries or which Validus, IPC or any of their respective subsidiaries acquires or becomes the beneficial owner of) for the purpose of considering and, if the IPC shareholders so determine, approving a scheme of arrangement (the “Scheme of Arrangement”) to be made between IPC and the holders of such IPC Shares, in the form attached as Annex A hereto, and that the court-ordered IPC meeting will be held at [ • ] on [ • ] 2009, at [10:00] a.m., Atlantic time.
 
The proxy statement that accompanies this notice constitutes the explanatory statement required to be furnished pursuant to Part VII of The Companies Act of 1981 of Bermuda, as amended.
 
If you are a shareholder of record, please complete, sign, date and return the enclosed proxy in the return envelope furnished for that purpose, as promptly as possible, whether or not you plan to attend the meeting. If you own your IPC Shares through a bank, broker or other nominee, you should follow the instructions provided by your bank, broker or other nominee when voting your IPC Shares.
 
In the case of joint holders, the vote of the senior who tenders a vote, whether in person or by proxy, will be accepted to the exclusion of the vote(s) of the other joint holder(s) and, for this purpose, seniority will be determined by the order in which the names stand in the register of members of IPC in respect of the joint holding.
 
Entitlement to attend and vote at the court-ordered IPC meeting and the number of votes which may be cast thereat will be determined by reference to the register of members of IPC as of [ • ], 2009. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the holders of any IPC Shares owned by Validus, IPC or their respective subsidiaries will not be entitled to vote these Shares at the court-ordered IPC meeting.
 
Voting at the court-ordered IPC meeting will be conducted on a poll rather than a show of hands.
 
By the said Order, the Court has appointed [ • ] or, failing him, [ • ] or, failing him, [ • ] to act as Chairman of the court-ordered IPC meeting and has directed the Chairman to report the result thereof to the Court.
 
The Scheme of Arrangement will be subject to the subsequent sanction of the Supreme Court of Bermuda and the satisfaction or, where relevant, waiver of the other conditions thereto.
 
Dated [ • ] 2009


 

 
COURT-ORDERED MEETING OF THE SHAREHOLDERS
OF
IPC HOLDINGS, LTD.
 
TO BE HELD ON [ • ], 2009
 
PROXY STATEMENT
OF
VALIDUS HOLDINGS, LTD.
 
This proxy statement (the “proxy statement”) and the enclosed BLUE proxy card are furnished by Validus Holdings, Ltd., a Bermuda exempted company (“Validus”), in connection with Validus’ solicitation of proxies to be used at the court-ordered meeting (including any adjournments or postponements thereof, the “court-ordered IPC meeting”) of holders of common shares, par value $0.01 per share (the “IPC Shares”), of IPC Holdings, Ltd., a Bermuda exempted company (“IPC”) (other than any IPC Shares owned by Validus, IPC or their respective subsidiaries) to be held on [ • ], 2009, at [ • ] at [ • ] Atlantic Time, for the purpose of giving such holders of IPC Shares the opportunity to consider and, if the IPC shareholders so determine, approve a scheme of arrangement (the “Scheme of Arrangement”) under Bermuda law to effect the acquisition of IPC by Validus (the “Acquisition”) pursuant to the Scheme of Arrangement set forth in Annex A attached hereto.
 
On March 1, 2009, IPC entered into an Agreement and Plan of Amalgamation, as amended on March 5, 2009, among Max Capital Group Ltd. (“Max”), IPC and IPC Limited (the “Max Amalgamation Agreement”) which would result in the amalgamation of Max with IPC Limited, a wholly-owned subsidiary of IPC that was formed for the purpose of the amalgamation (the “Proposed Max Amalgamation”).
 
On March 31, 2009, Validus publicly announced that it had delivered to IPC an offer (the “Initial Validus Offer”) to acquire each outstanding IPC Share in exchange for 1.2037 Validus voting common shares, par value $0.175 per share (the “Validus Shares”). IPC announced on April 7, 2009 that its board of directors had determined that the Initial Validus Offer did not constitute a superior proposal to the Proposed Max Amalgamation and reaffirmed its support of the Proposed Max Amalgamation. On May 18, 2009, Validus publicly announced that it had delivered to IPC an increased offer (the “Validus Amalgamation Offer”) to acquire each outstanding IPC Share in exchange for (i) 1.1234 Validus Shares and (ii) $3.00 in cash (less any applicable withholding taxes and without interest). Validus has also delivered a proposed agreement and plan of amalgamation and an amendment thereto (as amended, the “Validus Amalgamation Agreement”) signed by Validus so that, upon a termination of the Max Amalgamation Agreement, IPC would have the certainty of Validus’ transaction and would be able to sign the Validus Amalgamation Agreement. IPC announced on May 21, 2009 that its board of directors had determined that the Validus Amalgamation Offer did not constitute a superior proposal to the Proposed Max Amalgamation and reaffirmed its support of the Proposed Max Amalgamation. Additionally, Max has not released IPC from the prohibition in the Max Amalgamation Agreement that prevents IPC from even discussing the Validus Amalgamation Offer with Validus. Based upon closing market prices as of May 15, 2009, the day prior to the announcement of the increased offer, the Validus Amalgamation Offer represented a 13.2% premium to IPC’s closing price that day and a 21.9% premium based on IPC’s and Validus’ closing prices on March 30, 2009, the last trading day before the announcement of the Initial Validus Offer.
 
In order to implement the Scheme of Arrangement, the IPC shareholders must approve the Scheme of Arrangement at the court-ordered IPC meeting, IPC must separately approve the Scheme of Arrangement and the Scheme of Arrangement must be sanctioned by the Supreme Court of Bermuda. If the IPC shareholders approve the Scheme of Arrangement at the court-ordered IPC meeting, the separate approval of IPC of the Scheme of Arrangement can be provided by either (i) the IPC board of directors voluntarily complying with the will of the IPC shareholders as expressed at the court-ordered IPC meeting, or (ii) the shareholders of IPC approving resolutions at a subsequent requisitioned special general meeting of IPC shareholders (the “IPC special general meeting”), including resolutions for IPC to approve and to be bound by the Scheme of Arrangement and to terminate the Max Amalgamation Agreement. On May 12, 2009, Validus filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) a preliminary proxy statement which, when filed in its definitive form, will be used to solicit written requisitions from the IPC shareholders to compel the IPC board of directors to call the IPC special general meeting. Following IPC shareholder approval at both the court-ordered IPC meeting and the IPC special general meeting, the satisfaction or, where relevant, waiver of the other conditions to the effectiveness of the Scheme of Arrangement, and the granting of a court order from the Supreme Court of Bermuda sanctioning the Scheme of Arrangement, a copy of the court order sanctioning the Scheme of Arrangement will be delivered to the Bermuda Registrar of Companies, at which time (the “closing” or the “effective time”) the Scheme of Arrangement will be effective.


 

VALIDUS IS DISTRIBUTING THIS PROXY STATEMENT IN ORDER TO URGE IPC’S SHAREHOLDERS TO VOTE “FOR” THE SCHEME OF ARRANGEMENT AT THE COURT-ORDERED IPC MEETING. WE BELIEVE THAT THE ACQUISITION OF IPC BY VALIDUS OFFERS GREATER VALUE TO THE IPC SHAREHOLDERS THAN THE PROPOSED MAX AMALGAMATION.
 
The court-ordered IPC meeting is being held in accordance with an order of the Supreme Court of Bermuda issued on [ • ], 2009, at the request of Validus in accordance with Bermuda law. The record date for determining the IPC shareholders who will be entitled to vote at the court-ordered IPC meeting is [ • ], 2009. The Scheme of Arrangement must be approved by a majority in number of the holders of IPC Shares voting at the court-ordered IPC meeting, whether in person or by proxy, representing 75% or more in value of the IPC Shares voting at the court-ordered IPC meeting, whether in person or by proxy. The presence at the court-ordered IPC meeting of two or more persons present in person and representing in person or by proxy in excess of 50% of the total issued and outstanding IPC Shares throughout the meeting is required to constitute a quorum thereat.
 
Based on Validus’ and IPC’s respective capitalizations as of March 31, 2009 and the exchange ratio of 1.1234, Validus estimates that former IPC shareholders would own, in the aggregate, approximately 41.3% of the issued and outstanding Validus Shares on a fully-diluted basis following closing of the Acquisition.
 
Validus Shares are quoted on the New York Stock Exchange (the “NYSE”) under the symbol “VR.” The closing price of a Validus common share on the NYSE on June [ • ], 2009, the last practicable date prior to the filing of this proxy statement, was $[ • ]. IPC Shares, which are currently quoted on the NASDAQ Global Select Market (“NASDAQ”) under the symbol “IPCR” and the Bermuda Stock Exchange under the symbol “IPCR BH,” would be delisted upon completion of the Acquisition. The closing price of an IPC Share on NASDAQ on June [ • ], 2009, the last practicable date prior to the filing of this proxy statement, was $[ • ]. All references to “dollars” and “$” in this proxy statement refer to U.S. dollars.
 
This proxy statement provides IPC shareholders with detailed information about the court-ordered IPC meeting and the Scheme of Arrangement and is intended to satisfy the requirement, under Section 100 of The Companies Act of 1981 of Bermuda, as amended (the “Companies Act”), of a statement explaining the effect of the proposed Scheme of Arrangement. You can also obtain information from publicly available documents filed by Validus and IPC with the SEC. Validus encourages you to read this entire document carefully, including the section entitled Risk Factors beginning on page [ • ].
 
Your vote is very important. Whether or not you plan to attend the court-ordered IPC meeting, please take time to vote by completing and mailing your enclosed BLUE proxy card or by following the voting instructions provided to you if you own your shares through a bank, broker or other nominee. If you do not receive such instructions, you may request them from that firm. If you have any questions or need additional copies of the proxy materials, please call Georgeson Inc. at the phone numbers listed below.
 
(GEORGESON LOGO)
 
199 Water Street
26th Floor
New York, New York 10038
Banks and Brokers should call: (212) 440-9800
or
Toll Free: at (888) 274-5119
Email: validusIPC@georgeson.com
 
Neither the SEC nor any state securities regulatory agency has approved or disapproved the Scheme of Arrangement, passed upon the merits or fairness thereof or passed upon the adequacy or accuracy of the disclosure in this proxy statement. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal offense.
 
This proxy statement is dated [ • ], 2009
and is first being mailed to IPC shareholders on or about [ • ], 2009
 
Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the court-ordered IPC meeting to be held on [ • ], 2009.
 
This proxy statement and the related proxy materials are available free of charge on Validus’ website at www.validusre.bm.


 

 
SOURCES OF ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
 
This proxy statement includes information, including important business and financial information, also set forth in documents filed by Validus and IPC with the SEC, and those documents include information about Validus and IPC that is not included in or delivered with this proxy statement. You can obtain any of the documents filed by Validus or IPC, as the case may be, with the SEC from the SEC or, without charge, from the SEC’s website at http://www.sec.gov. IPC shareholders also may obtain documents filed by IPC or Validus with the SEC or documents incorporated by reference in this proxy statement free of cost, by directing a written or oral request to Validus at:
 
Validus Holdings, Ltd.
19 Par-La-Ville Road
Hamilton HM11
Bermuda
Attention: Jon Levenson
(441) 278-9000
 
If you would like to request documents, in order to ensure timely delivery, you must do so at least five business days before the date of the meeting. This means you must request this information no later than [ • ], 2009. Validus will mail properly requested documents to requesting shareholders by first class mail, or another equally prompt means, within one business day after receipt of such request.
 
The information concerning IPC, its business, management and operations presented or incorporated by reference in this proxy statement has been taken from, or is based upon, publicly available information on file with the SEC and other publicly available information. Although Validus has no knowledge that would indicate that statements and information relating to IPC contained or incorporated by reference in this proxy statement, in reliance upon publicly available information, are inaccurate or incomplete, to date it has not had access to the full books and records of IPC, was not involved in the preparation of such information and statements and is not in a position to verify any such information or statements.
 
The consolidated financial statements of IPC appearing in its annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 (including schedules appearing therein), and IPC management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2008 included therein, have been audited by an independent registered public accounting firm, as set forth in their reports thereon, included therein, and included and/or incorporated herein by reference. Validus has not obtained the authorization of IPC’s independent auditors to incorporate by reference the audit reports relating to this information.
 
Pursuant to Rule 12b-21 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), Validus requested that IPC provide Validus with information required for complete disclosure regarding the businesses, operations, financial condition and management of IPC. Validus will amend or supplement this proxy statement to provide any and all information Validus receives from IPC, if Validus receives the information before the court-ordered IPC meeting and Validus considers it to be material, reliable and appropriate.
 
See Where You Can Find More Information on page [ • ].


 

TABLE OF CONTENTS
 
         
    Page
 
    1  
    9  
    16  
    19  
    21  
    37  
    39  
    40  
    41  
    41  
    43  
    43  
    43  
    45  
    45  
    47  
    68  
    71  
    72  
    72  
    73  
    73  
    73  
    73  
    74  
    74  
    75  
    75  
    75  
    77  
    78  
    78  
    79  
    79  
    83  
    83  
    84  
    85  
    88  
    89  


-i-


 

         
    Page
 
    90  
    90  
    90  
    92  
    105  
    107  
    107  
    108  
    110  
    113  
    114  
    114  
    114  
IPC
    115  
    116  
    117  
    118  
    I-1  
    A-1  


-ii-


 

 
QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE ACQUISITION
AND THE COURT-ORDERED IPC MEETING
 
The following questions and answers highlight selected information from this proxy statement and may not contain all the information that is important to you. Validus encourages you to read this entire document carefully.
 
Q: When and where is the court-ordered IPC meeting?
 
A: The court-ordered IPC meeting is scheduled to take place at [ • ], Atlantic Time, on [ • ], 2009, at [ • ].
 
Q: What is the purpose of the court-ordered IPC meeting?
 
A: The purpose of the meeting is to seek IPC shareholder approval of the Scheme of Arrangement. IPC shareholder approval is a necessary step toward consummation of the Acquisition without the cooperation of the IPC board of directors.
 
Q: What am I being asked to vote on at the court-ordered IPC meeting?
 
A: At the court-ordered IPC meeting, IPC shareholders will be asked to consider and vote upon a proposal to approve the Scheme of Arrangement.
 
Q: What would happen under the Scheme of Arrangement?
 
A: If the Scheme of Arrangement becomes effective, Validus will effect the Acquisition of IPC by the transfer of all outstanding IPC Shares (excluding any IPC Shares owned by Validus, IPC or their respective subsidiaries) to Validus in exchange for Validus Shares at a ratio of 1.1234 (the “exchange ratio”) Validus Shares and $3.00 in cash (less any applicable withholding taxes and without interest) for each IPC Share. IPC would thereby become a wholly-owned subsidiary of Validus.
 
Q: Why is Validus proposing the Acquisition?
 
A: Based on a number of factors described below under The Acquisition — Reasons to Vote “FOR” the Scheme of Arrangement, Validus believes that the Acquisition represents a compelling combination and excellent strategic fit that will enable Validus to capitalize on opportunities in the global reinsurance market. Successful completion of the Acquisition would allow IPC shareholders to benefit from the superior growth potential of a combined company that would be a leading carrier in Bermuda’s short-tail reinsurance and insurance markets, with a strong balance sheet and quality diversification in profitable business lines.
 
Q: Why is the Scheme of Arrangement better than the Proposed Max Amalgamation?
 
A: Validus believes that the combination of Validus and IPC offers a number of benefits to holders of IPC Shares, including the following:
 
• The Scheme of Arrangement provides a premium to IPC shareholders.
 
• The Validus Shares to be issued to IPC shareholders as a portion of the Acquisition Consideration (as defined below) pursuant to the Scheme of Arrangement represent what we believe is an attractive investment.
 
• A Validus/IPC combination will have a strong balance sheet with minimal exposure to risky asset classes.
 
• Validus offers IPC a highly experienced, first class management team.
 
• The Scheme of Arrangement provides IPC shareholders with an opportunity for stable, profitable diversification into attractive business lines and further growth.
 
See The Acquisition — Reasons to vote “FOR” the Scheme of Arrangement below.
 
Q: Is Validus pursuing multiple acquisition strategies?
 
A: Yes, in addition to proposing the Scheme of Arrangement, Validus is soliciting votes against the Proposed Max Amalgamation, has made an offer to amalgamate with IPC and has launched an exchange offer (the “Exchange Offer”) for all of the issued and outstanding IPC Shares. The Validus Amalgamation Offer, the Scheme of Arrangement and the Exchange Offer are alternative methods for Validus to acquire all of the issued and


-1-


 

outstanding IPC Shares on the same economic terms. Ultimately, only one of these transaction structures can be pursued to completion. Validus intends to seek to acquire all IPC Shares by whichever method Validus determines is most effective and efficient.
 
Q: How will the Scheme of Arrangement become effective?
 
A: A Scheme of Arrangement under Bermuda law is an arrangement between a company and its shareholders. In order to implement the Scheme of Arrangement, the IPC shareholders must approve the Scheme of Arrangement at the court-ordered IPC meeting, IPC must separately approve the Scheme of Arrangement and the Scheme of Arrangement must be sanctioned by the Supreme Court of Bermuda. If the IPC shareholders approve the Scheme of Arrangement at the court-ordered IPC meeting, the separate approval of IPC of the Scheme of Arrangement can be provided by either (i) the IPC board of directors voluntarily complying with the will of the IPC shareholders as expressed at the court-ordered IPC meeting, or (ii) the shareholders of IPC approving resolutions at the IPC special general meeting, including resolutions for IPC to approve and to be bound by the Scheme of Arrangement and to terminate the Max Amalgamation Agreement. On May 12, 2009, Validus filed with the SEC a preliminary proxy statement which, when filed in its definitive form, will be used to solicit written requisitions from the IPC shareholders to compel the IPC board of directors to call the IPC special general meeting. In order to compel the IPC board of directors to call the IPC special general meeting, written requisitions from the holders of 10% of the IPC Shares must be deposited with IPC. Following IPC shareholder approval at both the court-ordered IPC meeting and the IPC special general meeting, the satisfaction or, where relevant, waiver of the other conditions to the effectiveness of the Scheme of Arrangement, and the granting of a court order from the Supreme Court of Bermuda sanctioning the Scheme of Arrangement, a copy of the court order sanctioning the Scheme of Arrangement will be delivered to the Bermuda Registrar of Companies, at which time the Scheme of Arrangement will be effective.
 
Q: How would the Scheme of Arrangement work?
 
A: Procedurally, the Scheme of Arrangement can be divided into the following stages:
 
(1) Applying to the Supreme Court of Bermuda for an order giving directions for the holding and conduct of the court-ordered IPC meeting.
 
(2) Requisitioning the IPC special general meeting. On May 12, 2009, Validus filed with the SEC a preliminary proxy statement which, when filed in its definitive form, will be used to solicit written requisitions from the IPC shareholders to compel the IPC board of directors to call the IPC special general meeting.
 
(3) Holding the court-ordered IPC meeting to which this proxy statement relates to consider and, if the IPC shareholders so determine, approve the Scheme of Arrangement. The Scheme of Arrangement must be approved by a majority in number of the holders of IPC Shares voting at the court-ordered IPC meeting, whether in person or by proxy, representing 75% or more in value of the IPC Shares voting at the court-ordered IPC meeting, whether in person or by proxy.
 
(4) Holding the IPC special general meeting to approve resolutions determined by Validus to be reasonably necessary in connection with implementation of the Scheme of Arrangement, including resolutions for IPC to approve and to be bound by the Scheme of Arrangement and to terminate the Max Amalgamation Agreement. Approval of each resolution at the IPC special general meeting requires the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the IPC Shares voting at the meeting, whether in person or by proxy.
 
(5) Applying to the Supreme Court of Bermuda to sanction the Scheme of Arrangement.
 
(6) Delivering a copy of the order of the Supreme Court of Bermuda sanctioning the Scheme of Arrangement to the Bermuda Registrar of Companies.
 
Q: When do you expect the Scheme of Arrangement to become effective?
 
A: Assuming the Scheme of Arrangement is approved by the requisite vote of IPC’s shareholders at the court-ordered IPC meeting, the Scheme of Arrangement could become effective in July 2009. However, it is possible that the IPC board of directors will seek to take measures which would extend this time frame. Even if the Scheme of Arrangement has been approved by the IPC shareholders, Validus may terminate the


-2-


 

Scheme of Arrangement at any time prior to the commencement of the hearing of the Supreme Court of Bermuda to sanction the Scheme of Arrangement without obtaining the approval of the IPC shareholders, if any event or condition occurs which would cause any of the conditions to the effectiveness of the Scheme of Arrangement not to be satisfied by November 30, 2009 (or such later date, if any, as Validus may agree and the Supreme Court of Bermuda may allow).
 
Q: What would IPC shareholders receive in the Scheme of Arrangement?
 
A: Under the terms of the Scheme of Arrangement, each outstanding IPC Share (excluding any IPC Shares owned by Validus, IPC or their respective subsidiaries), would be transferred to Validus in exchange for (i) 1.1234 Validus Shares and (ii) $3.00 in cash (less any applicable withholding taxes and without interest) upon the effectiveness of the Scheme of Arrangement. IPC shareholders would not receive any fractional Validus Shares in the Scheme of Arrangement. Instead, IPC shareholders would be paid cash in lieu of the fractional share interest to which such shareholders would otherwise be entitled (together with the Validus Shares and other cash payable, the “Acquisition Consideration”) as described under Summary — The Scheme of Arrangement — Acquisition Consideration on page [ • ].
 
Q: How does the Scheme of Arrangement relate to the amalgamation agreement contained in the Validus Amalgamation Offer?
 
A: On March 31, 2009, Validus publicly announced that it had delivered to IPC an offer to consummate the Acquisition on the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in the Initial Validus Offer. IPC announced on April 7, 2009 that its board of directors had determined that the Initial Validus Offer did not constitute a superior proposal to the Proposed Max Amalgamation and reaffirmed its support of the Proposed Max Amalgamation. On May 18, 2009, Validus publicly announced that it had delivered to IPC an increased offer to acquire each outstanding IPC Share for (i) 1.1234 Validus Shares and (ii) $3.00 in cash (less any applicable withholding taxes and without interest). In addition, IPC shareholders will receive cash in lieu of any fractional Validus Share to which they may be entitled. Validus has also delivered the Validus Amalgamation Agreement signed by Validus so that, upon a termination of the Max Amalgamation Agreement, IPC would have the certainty of Validus’ transaction and would be able to sign the Validus Amalgamation Agreement. IPC announced on May 21, 2009 that its board of directors had determined that the Validus Amalgamation Offer did not constitute a superior proposal to the Proposed Max Amalgamation and reaffirmed its support of the Proposed Max Amalgamation. Additionally, Max has not released IPC from the prohibition in the Max Amalgamation Agreement that prevents IPC from even discussing the Validus Amalgamation Offer with Validus.
 
Q: How does the Scheme of Arrangement relate to the Exchange Offer commenced by Validus for all IPC Shares?
 
A: On May 12, 2009, Validus commenced the Exchange Offer whereby Validus is offering to exchange (i) 1.1234 Validus Shares and (ii) $3.00 in cash (less any applicable withholding taxes and without interest) for each IPC Share tendered by participating IPC shareholders. Validus commenced the Exchange Offer as an alternative method to acquire all the issued and outstanding IPC Shares. The Exchange Offer is intended to be pursued in parallel with the Scheme of Arrangement, since it may provide a means to acquire all the issued and outstanding IPC Shares on the same economic terms as the Validus Amalgamation Offer. We intend to effect the Acquisition by whichever method we determine is most effective and efficient. The Exchange Offer is subject to the condition, among others, that a minimum of 90% of the then-outstanding IPC Shares on a fully-diluted basis (excluding any IPC Shares owned by Validus, its subsidiaries or IPC) be tendered. If this condition is satisfied and the Exchange Offer completed, we intend, promptly after completion of the Exchange Offer, to acquire the IPC Shares of those shareholders who choose not to tender their IPC Shares pursuant to the Exchange Offer in a second-step acquisition pursuant to the Companies Act.
 
Q: What percentage of Validus Shares will the former holders of IPC Shares own after the Acquisition?
 
A: Based on Validus’ and IPC’s respective capitalizations as of March 31, 2009 and the exchange ratio of 1.1234, Validus estimates that former IPC shareholders would own, in the aggregate, approximately 41.3% of the issued and outstanding Validus Shares on a fully-diluted basis following closing of the Acquisition.


-3-


 

 
Q: If the Scheme of Arrangement becomes effective, do I have to take any action to exchange my IPC Shares for Acquisition Consideration?
 
A: Validus will appoint BNY Mellon Shareowner Services as exchange agent to transfer and pay the Acquisition Consideration to persons holding IPC Shares outstanding immediately prior to the effective time (other than Validus, IPC or their respective subsidiaries) in exchange for share certificates representing IPC Shares or for non-certificated shares represented by book-entry (“book-entry shares”). At or about the effective time, Validus will deposit with the exchange agent the cash payable and the Validus Shares issuable as Acquisition Consideration and will provide for the cash issuable in lieu of fractional shares. Promptly after the effective time, the exchange agent will mail each holder of IPC Shares outstanding immediately prior to the effective time (other than Validus, IPC or their respective subsidiaries) instructions for surrendering share certificates and book-entry shares. The exchange agent will transfer and pay the Acquisition Consideration, less any applicable withholding taxes, to the persons holding IPC Shares outstanding immediately prior to the effective time (other than Validus, IPC or their respective subsidiaries) promptly following the exchange agent’s receipt of the share certificates (or book-entry shares). No interest will be paid or accrued on the cash payable upon the surrender of any share certificate (or book-entry shares). Until so surrendered, each such IPC Share certificate (or book-entry share) will represent after the effective time for all purposes only evidence of the right to receive such Acquisition Consideration.
 
Q: What is the market value of my IPC Shares as of a recent date?
 
A: On March 30, 2009, the last trading day before Validus made the Validus Amalgamation Offer, the closing price of an IPC Share was $25.41. On June [ • ], 2009, the last practicable date prior to the filing of this proxy statement, the closing price of an IPC Share was $[ • ]. IPC shareholders are encouraged to obtain a recent quotation for IPC Shares before deciding how to vote at the court-ordered IPC meeting.
 
Q: Are IPC shareholders able to dissent?
 
A: IPC shareholders will be entitled to be present and be heard at the Supreme Court of Bermuda hearing to sanction the Scheme of Arrangement. Any IPC shareholder who wishes to may oppose the sanctioning of the Scheme of Arrangement and may make presentations to the court on the hearing of the petition. IPC shareholders may also vote against the Scheme of Arrangement at the court-ordered IPC meeting.
 
Q: Are IPC shareholders able to exercise appraisal rights?
 
A: No. If the Scheme of Arrangement becomes effective, it will be binding on all IPC shareholders whether or not they voted in favor of the Scheme of Arrangement at the court-ordered IPC meeting or of the resolutions proposed at the IPC special general meeting, and IPC shareholders will not be entitled to exercise any appraisal rights. Please see The Scheme of Arrangement — Dissenters’ and Appraisal Rights of IPC Shareholders on page [ • ].
 
Q: What are the closing conditions set forth in the Scheme of Arrangement?
 
A: In addition to the requisite approval by IPC shareholders at the court-ordered IPC meeting, the approval by IPC shareholders at the IPC special general meeting of resolutions determined by Validus to be reasonably necessary in connection with implementation of the Scheme of Arrangement, including resolutions for IPC to approve and to be bound by the Scheme of Arrangement and to terminate the Max Amalgamation Agreement, the sanction of the Scheme of Arrangement by the Supreme Court of Bermuda and the filing of a copy of the court sanction order with the Bermuda Registrar of Companies (collectively, the “Procedural Conditions”), the effectiveness of the Scheme of Arrangement is subject to the satisfaction or, where relevant, waiver of certain other conditions, including the following:
 
• The Max Amalgamation Agreement shall have been validly terminated, and Validus shall reasonably believe that IPC could not have any liability, and Max shall not have asserted any claim of liability or breach against IPC in connection with the Max Amalgamation Agreement other than with respect to the possible payment of the $50 million termination fee thereunder (the “Max Termination Fee”).


-4-


 

 
• The shareholders of Validus shall have approved the issuance of the Validus Shares pursuant to the Scheme of Arrangement as required under the rules of the NYSE. All of the Validus officers, directors and those shareholders which Validus refers to as its “qualified sponsors” (as defined in this proxy statement), in each case who own Validus Shares, have indicated that they intend to vote the Validus Shares beneficially owned by them in favor of such approval. As of April 30, 2009, these persons and entities beneficially owned 42.4% of the voting interests relating to the Validus Shares.
 
• The Validus Shares to be issued to IPC shareholders pursuant to the Scheme of Arrangement shall have been authorized for listing on the NYSE, subject to official notice of issuance.
 
• There shall be no threatened or pending litigation, suit, claim, action, proceeding or investigation before any governmental authority that, in the judgment of Validus, is reasonably likely to, directly or indirectly, restrain or prohibit (or which alleges a violation of law in connection with) the Scheme of Arrangement or is reasonably likely to prohibit or limit the full rights of ownership of IPC Shares by Validus or any of its affiliates.
 
• Since December 31, 2008, there shall not have been any material adverse effect on IPC and its subsidiaries, taken as a whole. A more than 50% decline in IPC’s book value or a more than 20% decline in IPC’s book value relative to Validus’ book value shall be deemed to have a material adverse effect on IPC.
 
• Each of IPC and its subsidiaries shall have carried on their respective businesses in the ordinary course consistent with past practice at all times on or after the date of this proxy statement and prior to the commencement of the hearing of the Supreme Court of Bermuda to sanction the Scheme of Arrangement.
 
• All amendments or waivers under Validus’ credit facilities necessary to consummate the Scheme of Arrangement and the other transactions contemplated by this proxy statement shall be in full force and effect.
 
The Scheme of Arrangement is subject to additional conditions referred to below in The Scheme of Arrangement — Conditions to the Scheme of Arrangement, including that IPC shareholders shall not have approved the Max Amalgamation Agreement and that there shall have been no business combination consummated between IPC and Max. The Scheme of Arrangement is not conditioned on the receipt of regulatory approvals or the elimination of the Max Termination Fee. The conditions to the effectiveness of the Scheme of Arrangement are for the sole benefit of Validus and, other than the “Procedural Conditions,” the “Registration Condition,” the “Shareholder Approval Condition” and the “NYSE Listing Condition” described below in The Scheme of Arrangement — Conditions to the Scheme of Arrangement, may be waived by Validus prior to the commencement of the hearing of the Supreme Court of Bermuda to sanction the Scheme of Arrangement in its discretion.
 
Q: What will be the composition of the board of directors of Validus following the effectiveness of the Scheme of Arrangement?
 
A: Upon the effectiveness of the Scheme of Arrangement, Validus’ board of directors would consist of the directors serving on the board of directors of Validus before the Acquisition; however, Validus has publicly expressed to the IPC directors that if they desire to participate in the leadership of Validus after the Acquisition, Validus would consider that.
 
Q: How will Validus be managed following the effectiveness of the Scheme of Arrangement?
 
A: Upon the effectiveness of the Scheme of Arrangement, the officers of Validus will be the officers serving Validus before the Acquisition.
 
Q: What shareholder vote is required to approve the Scheme of Arrangement at the court-ordered IPC meeting and how many votes must be present to hold the meeting?
 
A: The Scheme of Arrangement must be approved by a majority in number of the holders of IPC Shares voting at the court-ordered IPC meeting, whether in person or by proxy, representing 75% or more in value of the IPC Shares voting at the court-ordered IPC meeting, whether in person or by proxy. Therefore, abstentions and “broker non-votes” will not have the effect of a vote for or against the Scheme of Arrangement, but will reduce


-5-


 

the number of votes cast and therefore increase the relative influence of those shareholders voting. The presence at the court-ordered IPC meeting of two or more persons present in person and representing in person or by proxy in excess of 50% of the total issued and outstanding IPC Shares throughout the meeting is required to constitute a quorum thereat.
 
Q: What is the record date for the court-ordered IPC meeting?
 
A: Only shareholders of record, as shown by the transfer books of IPC at the close of business on [ • ], 2009 (the “record date”) are entitled to receive notice of and to vote at the court-ordered IPC meeting.
 
Q: How many votes do I have and how many votes can be cast by all IPC shareholders?
 
A: As of [ • ], 2009, there were [ • ] outstanding IPC Shares entitled to vote. Each IPC Share (other than any IPC Shares owned by Validus, IPC or their respective subsidiaries) entitles the holder of record thereof to one vote at the court-ordered IPC meeting.
 
Q: What do I need to do now?
 
A: Validus urges you to read carefully this proxy statement, including its annexes and the documents incorporated by reference herein. You also may want to review the documents referenced under Where You Can Find More Information on page [ • ] and consult with your accounting, legal and tax advisors. Once you have considered all relevant information, Validus encourages you to fill in and return the attached proxy card (if you are a shareholder of record) or voting instruction form you receive from your bank, broker or other nominee (if you hold your IPC Shares in street name).
 
Q: How can I vote my shares in person at the court-ordered IPC meeting?
 
A: If your IPC Shares are registered directly in your name as of the record date with the transfer agent, Computershare Investor Services, you are considered the “shareholder of record” with respect to those shares, and the proxy materials and proxy card are being sent directly to you. As the shareholder of record, you have the right to vote in person at the meeting. If you choose to do so, you can bring the enclosed proxy card. Most shareholders of IPC hold their shares through a bank, broker or other nominee (that is, in “street name”) rather than directly in their own name. If you hold your shares in street name, you are a “beneficial holder,” and the proxy materials are being forwarded to you by your bank, broker or other nominee together with a voting instruction form. Because a beneficial holder is not the shareholder of record, you may not vote these shares in person at the meeting unless you have previously either arranged for the IPC Shares beneficially owned by you to be transferred of record into your name by the record date for the court-ordered IPC meeting or secured a valid proxy or power of attorney from the bank, broker or other nominee that holds your shares as of the record date for the court-ordered IPC meeting (and who has received a valid proxy or power of attorney from the shareholder of record pursuant to a “legal proxy” with a power of subdelegation from the shareholder of record as of the record date). Even if you plan to attend the court-ordered IPC meeting, we recommend that you vote your shares in advance as described below so that your vote will be counted if you later decide not to attend the court-ordered IPC meeting.
 
Q: How can I vote my shares without attending the court-ordered IPC meeting?
 
A: If you are the shareholder of record, you may direct your vote without attending the court-ordered IPC meeting by completing and mailing your proxy card in the enclosed pre-paid envelope. If you hold your IPC Shares in street name, you should complete and return the voting instruction form you receive from your bank, broker or other nominee in accordance with the instructions you receive from your bank, broker or other nominee. Your voting instruction form may contain instructions from your bank, broker or other nominee that allow you to vote your shares using the Internet or by telephone. Please consult with your bank, broker or other nominee if you have any questions regarding the voting of shares held in street name.
 
Q: What do I need for admission to the court-ordered IPC meeting?
 
A: You are entitled to attend the court-ordered IPC meeting only if you are (i) a shareholder of record or (ii) a beneficial owner or other person holding a valid proxy or power of attorney from the bank, broker or other nominee that holds your shares (and who has received a valid proxy or power of attorney from the shareholder of


-6-


 

record pursuant to a “legal proxy” with power of subdelegation from the shareholder of record as of the record date). If you are the shareholder of record, your name will be verified against the list of shareholders of record prior to your admittance to the court-ordered IPC meeting. You should be prepared to present photo identification for admission. If you hold your shares in street name and would like to be admitted to the meeting, you will need to provide a valid proxy or power of attorney from the bank, broker or other nominee that holds your shares (and who has received a valid proxy or power of attorney from the shareholder of record pursuant to a “legal proxy” with power of subdelegation from the shareholder of record as of the record date) and proof of beneficial ownership on the record date, such as a brokerage account statement showing that you owned IPC Shares as of the record date, a copy of the voting instruction form provided by your bank, broker or other nominee, or other similar evidence of ownership as of the record date, as well as your photo identification. If you do not comply with the procedures outlined above, you may not be admitted to the court-ordered IPC meeting.
 
Q: If my IPC Shares are held in a brokerage account or in “street name,” will my broker vote my shares for me?
 
A: If you own your shares through a bank, broker or other nominee, you will receive instructions from that institution on how to instruct them to vote your shares. If you do not receive such instructions, you may contact that institution to request them. In accordance with NYSE rules, brokers and nominees who hold IPC Shares in street name for customers may not exercise their voting discretion with respect to the Scheme of Arrangement. Accordingly, if you do not provide your bank, broker or other nominee with instructions on how to vote your street name shares, your bank, broker or other nominee will not be permitted to vote them at the court-ordered IPC meeting, possibly resulting in a “broker non-vote.”
 
A “broker non-vote” with respect to the court-ordered IPC meeting will not be considered as a vote cast with respect to any matter presented at the court-ordered IPC meeting, but will be counted for purposes of establishing a quorum, provided that your bank, broker or other nominee is in attendance in person or by proxy. A broker non-vote with respect to any proposal to be voted on at the court-ordered IPC meeting will not have the effect of a vote for or against the proposal, but will reduce the number of votes cast and therefore increase the relative influence of those shareholders voting.
 
Q: What effect do abstentions and broker non-votes have on the Scheme of Arrangement?
 
A: Abstentions and “broker non-votes” will be counted toward the presence of a quorum at, but will not be considered votes cast on any proposal brought before the court-ordered IPC meeting. Because the vote required to approve the Scheme of Arrangement is the affirmative vote of a majority in number of the holders of IPC Shares voting at the court-ordered IPC meeting, whether in person or by proxy, representing 75% or more in value of the IPC Shares voting at the court-ordered IPC meeting, whether in person or by proxy, a broker non-vote with respect to any proposal to be voted on at the court-ordered IPC meeting will not have the effect of a vote for or against the relevant proposal, but will reduce the number of votes cast and therefore increase the relative influence of those shareholders voting. See also The Court-Ordered IPC Meeting — Record Date and Shares Entitled to Vote.
 
Q: How will my shares be voted if I sign and return a proxy card or voting instruction form without specifying how to vote my shares?
 
A. If you sign and return a proxy card or voting instruction form without giving specific voting instructions, your shares will be voted “FOR” the Scheme of Arrangement and as the persons named as proxies may determine in their discretion with respect to any other matters properly presented for a vote before the court-ordered IPC meeting.
 
Q: What do I do if I want to change my vote or revoke my proxy?
 
A: You may change your vote or revoke your proxy at any time before your proxy is voted at the court-ordered IPC meeting. If you are a shareholder of record, you may change your vote or revoke your proxy by: (1) delivering to IPC (Attention: General Counsel) at American International Building, 29 Richmond Road, Pembroke HM 08, Bermuda a written notice of revocation of your proxy; (2) delivering to IPC an authorized proxy bearing a later


-7-


 

date; or (3) attending the court-ordered IPC meeting and voting in person as described above under How can I vote my shares in person at the court-ordered IPC meeting? Attendance at the court-ordered IPC meeting in and of itself, without voting in person at the court-ordered IPC meeting, will not cause your previously granted proxy to be revoked. For shares you hold in street name, you should follow the instructions of your bank, broker or other nominee or, if you have obtained a valid proxy or power of attorney from the bank, broker or other nominee that holds your shares (and who has received a valid proxy or power of attorney from the shareholder of record pursuant to a “legal proxy” with power of subdelegation from the shareholder of record as of the record date) giving you the right to vote your shares at the court-ordered IPC meeting, by attending the court-ordered IPC meeting and voting in person.
 
Q: What are the material U.S. federal income tax consequences of the Scheme of Arrangement?
 
A: Following the Scheme of Arrangement, as part of an overall plan, Validus intends to complete a short-form amalgamation between IPC and another wholly-owned subsidiary of Validus pursuant to Section 107 of the Companies Act. The Scheme of Arrangement and subsequent short-form amalgamation are intended to constitute a single integrated transaction that qualifies as a reorganization within the meaning of Section 368(a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”). Assuming it does so qualify, U.S. holders of IPC Shares will generally recognize gain (but not loss) in an amount equal to the lesser of (i) the amount of the cash received by such U.S. holder (excluding any cash received in lieu of a fractional share) and (ii) the excess, if any, of (a) the sum of the cash and the fair market value of the Validus Shares received by such U.S. holder (including any fractional shares deemed received by such U.S. holder), over (b) the U.S. holder’s tax basis in the IPC Shares exchanged pursuant to the Scheme of Arrangement. Subject to the passive foreign investment company rules or the potential application of Section 1248 of the Code, any gain recognized upon the Scheme of Arrangement generally will be capital gain, unless the receipt of cash by a U.S. holder has the effect of a distribution of a dividend for U.S. federal income tax purposes. For more information, please see the section of this proxy statement under the caption “Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences.”
 
Tax matters are complicated and the tax consequences of the transaction to you will depend upon the facts of your particular circumstances. Because individual circumstances may differ, Validus urges you to consult with your own tax advisor as to the specific tax consequences of the Scheme of Arrangement and short-form amalgamation to you, including the applicability of U.S. federal, state, local, non-U.S. and other tax laws.
 
Q: Who can I contact with any additional questions?
 
If you have additional questions about the Acquisition, if you would like additional copies of this proxy statement, or if you need assistance voting your IPC Shares, you should contact Georgeson Inc. at:
 
Georgeson Inc.
199 Water Street
26th Floor
New York, New York 10038
Banks and Brokers should call: (212) 440-9800
All Others Call Toll Free: at (888) 274-5119
Email: validusIPC@georgeson.com
 
Q: Where can I find more information about the companies?
 
A: You can find more information about Validus and IPC in the documents described under Where You Can Find More Information on page [ • ].


-8-


 

 
SUMMARY
 
This summary highlights the material information in this proxy statement. To fully understand the Scheme of Arrangement, and for a more complete description of the terms of the Acquisition, you should read carefully this entire document, including the annexes and documents incorporated by reference herein, and the other documents referred to herein. For information on how to obtain the documents that are on file with the SEC, see Where You Can Find More Information on page [ • ].
 
Validus (page [ • ])
 
Validus is a Bermuda exempted company, with its principal executive offices located at 19 Par-La-Ville Road, Hamilton HM11, Bermuda. The telephone number of Validus is (441) 278-9000. Validus is a provider of reinsurance and insurance, conducting its operations worldwide through two wholly-owned subsidiaries, Validus Reinsurance, Ltd. (“Validus Re”) and Talbot Holdings Ltd. (“Talbot”). Validus Re is a Bermuda-based reinsurer focused on short-tail lines of reinsurance. Talbot is the Bermuda parent of the specialty insurance group primarily operating within the Lloyd’s Insurance market through Syndicate 1183. At March 31, 2009, Validus had total shareholders’ equity of $2.023 billion and total assets of $4.763 billion. Validus Shares are traded on the NYSE under the symbol “VR” and, as of June [•], 2009, the last practicable date prior to the filing of this proxy statement, Validus had a market capitalization of approximately $[ • ] billion. Validus has approximately 280 employees.
 
As of the date this proxy statement was first mailed to IPC shareholders, Validus was the registered holder of 100 IPC Shares, or less than 1% of the outstanding IPC Shares, and Validus was entitled to vote as to all of the IPC Shares it owns.
 
Information for the director and executive officers of Validus who are considered to be participants in this proxy solicitation and certain other information is set forth in Schedule I hereto. Other than as set forth herein, none of Validus, or any of the participants set forth on Schedule I hereto have any interest, direct or indirect, by security holdings or otherwise, in the Acquisition.
 
IPC (page [ • ])
 
The following description of IPC is taken from the Registration Statement on Form S-4 filed by IPC with the SEC in connection with the Proposed Max Amalgamation (as amended from time to time, the “IPC/Max S-4”). See Sources of Additional Information above.
 
IPC, a Bermuda exempted company, provides property catastrophe reinsurance and, to a limited extent, property-per-risk excess, aviation (including satellite) and other short-tail reinsurance on a worldwide basis. During 2008, approximately 93% of its gross premiums written, excluding reinstatement premiums, covered property catastrophe reinsurance risks. Property catastrophe reinsurance covers against unpredictable events such as hurricanes, windstorms, hailstorms, earthquakes, volcanic eruptions, fires, industrial explosions, freezes, riots, floods and other man-made or natural disasters. The substantial majority of the reinsurance written by IPCRe, IPC’s Bermuda-based property catastrophe reinsurance subsidiary, has been, and continues to be, written on an excess of loss basis for primary insurers rather than reinsurers, and is subject to aggregate limits on exposure to losses. During 2008, IPC had approximately 258 clients from whom it received either annual/deposit or adjustment premiums, including many of the leading insurance companies around the world. In 2008, approximately 36% of those clients were based in the United States, and approximately 53% of gross premiums written, excluding reinstatement premiums, related primarily to U.S. risks. IPC’s non-U.S. clients and its non-U.S. covered risks are located principally in Europe, Japan, Australia and New Zealand. During 2008, no single ceding insurer accounted for more than 3.7% of its gross premiums written, excluding reinstatement premiums. IPC did not disclose gross premiums written by class of business in its Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2009. Therefore, comparable disclosure of property catastrophe premiums cannot be presented. At March 31, 2009, IPC had total shareholders’ equity of $1.849 billion and total assets of $2.453 billion.
 
IPC Shares are quoted on NASDAQ under the ticker symbol “IPCR” and the Bermuda Stock Exchange under the symbol “IPCR BH.” IPC’s principal executive offices are located at American International Building, 29 Richmond Road, Pembroke HM 08, Bermuda and its telephone number is (441) 298-5100.


-9-


 

The Court-Ordered IPC Meeting (page [ • ])
 
The court-ordered IPC meeting is being held in accordance with an order of the Supreme Court of Bermuda issued on [ • ], 2009, to give the IPC shareholders the opportunity to consider and, if they so determine, approve the Scheme of Arrangement. The record date for determining the IPC shareholders who will be entitled to vote at the court-ordered IPC meeting is [ • ], 2009. The Scheme of Arrangement must be approved by a majority in number of the holders of IPC Shares voting at the court-ordered IPC meeting, whether in person or by proxy, representing 75% or more in value of the IPC Shares voting at the court-ordered IPC meeting, whether in person or by proxy. The court-ordered IPC meeting will be held on [ • ], 2009, at [ • ], Atlantic time, at [ • ]. The holders of any IPC Shares owned by Validus, IPC or their respective subsidiaries will not be entitled to vote those shares at the court-ordered IPC meeting.
 
The Acquisition (page [ • ])
 
General Description (page [ • ])
 
If the Scheme of Arrangement becomes effective, Validus will effect the Acquisition of IPC by the transfer of all outstanding IPC Shares (excluding any IPC Shares owned by Validus, IPC or their respective subsidiaries) to Validus in exchange for Validus Shares at a ratio of 1.1234 Validus Shares (together with cash in lieu of the fractional Validus Share interest to which such shareholders would otherwise be entitled) and $3.00 in cash (less any applicable withholding taxes and without interest) for each IPC Share. IPC would thereby become a wholly-owned subsidiary of Validus.
 
Based on Validus’ and IPC’s respective capitalizations as of March 31, 2009 and the exchange ratio of 1.1234, Validus estimates that former IPC shareholders would own, in the aggregate, approximately 41.3% of the issued and outstanding Validus Shares on a fully-diluted basis following closing of the Acquisition. The Scheme of Arrangement is attached as Annex A to this proxy statement. You should read the Scheme of Arrangement in its entirety because it, and not this proxy statement or Validus’ proxy statement for the IPC special general meeting, is the legal document that would govern the Acquisition.
 
Following the Acquisition, as part of an overall plan, Validus intends to complete a short-form amalgamation between IPC and another wholly-owned subsidiary of Validus pursuant to Section 107 of the Companies Act. Following the short-form amalgamation, IPC and the Validus subsidiary would continue as one amalgamated company in accordance with the Companies Act.
 
Completing the Acquisition
 
On March 31, 2009, Validus publicly announced that it had delivered to IPC an offer to consummate the Acquisition on the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in the Initial Validus Offer. IPC announced on April 7, 2009 that its board of directors had determined that the Initial Validus Offer did not constitute a superior proposal to the Proposed Max Amalgamation and reaffirmed its support of the Proposed Max Amalgamation. On May 18, 2009, Validus publicly announced that it had delivered to IPC an increased offer to acquire each outstanding IPC Share for (i) 1.1234 Validus Shares and (ii) $3.00 in cash (less any applicable withholding taxes and without interest). In addition, IPC shareholders will receive cash in lieu of any fractional Validus Share to which they may be entitled. Validus has also delivered the Validus Amalgamation Agreement signed by Validus so that, upon a termination of the Max Amalgamation Agreement, IPC would have the certainty of Validus’ transaction and would be able to sign the Validus Amalgamation Agreement. IPC announced on May 21, 2009 that its board of directors had determined that the Validus Amalgamation Offer did not constitute a superior proposal to the Proposed Max Amalgamation and reaffirmed its support of the Proposed Max Amalgamation. Additionally, Max has not released IPC from the prohibition in the Max Amalgamation Agreement that prevents IPC from even discussing the Validus Amalgamation Offer with Validus.


-10-


 

In order to consummate the Acquisition without the cooperation of the IPC board of directors, Validus is pursuing a three-part plan.
 
First, Validus is soliciting proxies from IPC shareholders to vote against the Proposed Max Amalgamation. If the Proposed Max Amalgamation is voted down by IPC shareholders, IPC’s board of directors will be able to terminate the Max Amalgamation Agreement and enter into the Validus Amalgamation Agreement. If IPC’s board of directors were to enter into the Validus Amalgamation Agreement following the termination of the Max Amalgamation Agreement, Validus believes the amalgamation contemplated by the Validus Amalgamation Offer could be completed in mid-to-late July 2009 based on the assumption that IPC terminates the Max Amalgamation Agreement promptly following its June 12, 2009 annual general meeting, allowing approximately one month to hold a special general meeting of IPC shareholders to obtain the required shareholder approval and to satisfy the other conditions in the Validus Amalgamation Agreement.
 
Second, Validus has commenced the Exchange Offer. The Exchange Offer is subject to the terms and conditions described in the Offer to Exchange relating thereto. Under Bermuda law, if Validus acquires at least 90% of the IPC Shares which it is seeking to acquire in the Exchange Offer, Validus will have the right to acquire the remaining IPC Shares on the same terms in a second-step acquisition. Validus believes that it would be able to complete the Exchange Offer in June 2009, promptly following termination of the Max Amalgamation Agreement (and subject to the satisfaction or waiver of the other conditions to the Exchange Offer), based on the following. The expiration time of the exchange offer will be June 26, 2009, unless extended. As a result, if the conditions of the Exchange Offer are satisfied or waived at the expiration time of the Exchange Offer, Validus would be able to acquire all of the IPC Shares that are validly tendered pursuant to the Exchange Offer.
 
Third, Validus is pursuing the Scheme of Arrangement. In order to implement the Scheme of Arrangement, the IPC shareholders must approve the Scheme of Arrangement at the court-ordered IPC meeting, IPC must separately approve the Scheme of Arrangement and the Scheme of Arrangement must be sanctioned by the Supreme Court of Bermuda. If the IPC shareholders approve the Scheme of Arrangement at the court-ordered IPC meeting, the separate approval of IPC of the Scheme of Arrangement can be provided by either (i) the IPC board of directors voluntarily complying with the will of the IPC shareholders as expressed at the court-ordered IPC meeting, or (ii) the shareholders of IPC approving resolutions at the IPC special general meeting, including resolutions for IPC to approve and to be bound by the Scheme of Arrangement and to terminate the Max Amalgamation Agreement. On May 12, 2009, Validus filed with the SEC a preliminary proxy statement which, when filed in its definitive form, will be used to solicit written requisitions from the IPC shareholders to compel the IPC board of directors to call the IPC special general meeting. Following IPC shareholder approval at both the court-ordered IPC meeting and the IPC special general meeting, the satisfaction or, where relevant, waiver of the other conditions to the effectiveness of the Scheme of Arrangement, and the granting of a court order from the Supreme Court of Bermuda sanctioning the Scheme of Arrangement, a copy of the court order sanctioning the Scheme of Arrangement will be delivered to the Bermuda Registrar of Companies, at which time the Scheme of Arrangement will be effective. In a decision rendered on May 29, 2009, the Supreme Court of Bermuda has determined that it has jurisdiction to sanction the Scheme of Arrangement without approval of the IPC board of directors. However, the Court has determined not to exercise its discretion to order the court-ordered IPC meeting in advance of the vote on the Proposed Max Amalgamation at the IPC annual general meeting and evidence of IPC shareholder support for the Scheme of Arrangement. Validus believes that, under the Scheme of Arrangement, it would be able to close the Acquisition in July 2009 based on the assumptions that: (1) the Supreme Court of Bermuda will be able to accommodate the preferred hearings schedule and meeting dates and other procedural matters; (2) IPC shareholders holding at least one-tenth of the issued IPC Shares have requisitioned the IPC special general meeting to be held in July 2009; and (3) the IPC directors, following the rejection of the Max Amalgamation Agreement, or IPC shareholders, convene the IPC special general meeting, allowing it to be held in July 2009.
 
The Validus Amalgamation Offer, the Exchange Offer and the Scheme of Arrangement are alternative methods for Validus to acquire all of the issued and outstanding IPC Shares on the same economic terms. Ultimately, only one of these transaction structures can be pursued to completion. Validus intends to seek to acquire all IPC Shares by whichever method Validus determines is most effective and efficient.


-11-


 

Reasons to Vote “FOR” the Scheme of Arrangement (page [ • ])
 
Validus recommends approval of the Scheme of Arrangement in order to enable the consummation of the Acquisition. Validus believes that the Acquisition represents a compelling combination and excellent strategic fit that will enable Validus to capitalize on opportunities in the global reinsurance market. Successful completion of the Acquisition would allow IPC shareholders to benefit from the superior growth potential of a combined company that would be a leading carrier in Bermuda’s short-tail reinsurance and insurance markets, with a strong balance sheet and quality diversification in profitable business lines. The Validus Shares to be issued and cash to be paid to IPC shareholders pursuant to the Scheme of Arrangement will provide IPC shareholders with an immediate premium for their shares, and will allow IPC shareholders to participate in the growth and opportunities of Validus following the Acquisition.
 
In reaching these conclusions Validus’ board of directors consulted with Validus management as well as legal and financial advisors and considered a number of factors. Those factors included, but were not limited to, those set forth under The Acquisition — Reasons to Vote “FOR” the Scheme of Arrangement below.
 
Interests of Validus Directors and Executive Officers in the Acquisition (page [ • ])
 
The consummation of the Acquisition would not be deemed to be a change in control impacting grants under any of Validus’ long-term incentive or stock option plans, or a change in control under any employment agreement between Validus and any of its employees. As a result, no options or other equity grants held by such persons will vest as a result of the Acquisition. Pursuant to the Scheme of Arrangement, upon the effective time all of Validus’ current directors and officers will continue as the directors and officers of Validus. For more information, see The Acquisition — Interests of Validus Directors and Executive Officers in the Acquisition below.
 
Interests of IPC Directors and Executive Officers in the Acquisition (page [ • ])
 
The consummation of the Acquisition would likely be deemed to be a change in control under the existing employment agreements of certain executive officers of IPC. In addition, IPC shareholders should be aware that James P. Bryce, John R. Weale, Peter J. A. Cozens, and Stephen F. Fallon, individually, and all the members of IPC’s board of directors as a group, have interests in the Acquisition that are different from, and/or in addition to, the interests of IPC shareholders generally. For more information, see The Acquisition — Interests of IPC Directors and Executive Officers in the Acquisition below.
 
Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences (page [ • ])
 
Following the Scheme of Arrangement, as part of an overall plan, Validus intends to complete a short-form amalgamation between IPC and another wholly-owned subsidiary of Validus pursuant to Section 107 of the Companies Act. The Scheme of Arrangement and subsequent short-form amalgamation are intended to constitute a single integrated transaction that qualifies as a reorganization within the meaning of Section 368(a) of the Code. Assuming it does so qualify, U.S. holders of IPC Shares will generally recognize gain (but not loss) in an amount equal to the lesser of (i) the amount of the cash received by such U.S. holder (excluding any cash received in lieu of a fractional share) and (ii) the excess, if any, of (a) the sum of the cash and the fair market value of the Validus Shares received by such U.S. holder (including any fractional shares deemed received by such U.S. holder), over (b) the U.S. holder’s tax basis in the IPC Shares exchanged pursuant to the Scheme of Arrangement. Subject to the passive foreign investment company rules or the potential application of Section 1248 of the Code, any gain recognized upon the Scheme of Arrangement generally will be capital gain, unless the receipt of cash by a U.S. holder has the effect of a distribution of a dividend for U.S. federal income tax purposes. For more information, please see the section of this proxy statement under the caption “Material U.S. Federal Income Tax consequences.”
 
Tax matters are complicated and the tax consequences of the transaction to you will depend upon the facts of your particular circumstances. Because individual circumstances may differ, Validus urges you to consult with your own tax advisor as to the specific tax consequences of the Scheme of Arrangement and short-form amalgamation to you, including the applicability of U.S. federal, state, local, non-U.S. and other tax laws.


-12-


 

Anticipated Accounting Treatment (page [ • ])
 
The Acquisition will be accounted for under the purchase method of accounting in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“FAS”) No. 141R, “Business Combinations,” (“FAS 141(R)”) under which the total consideration paid in the Acquisition will be allocated among acquired tangible and intangible assets and assumed liabilities based on the fair values of the tangible and intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed. In the event there is an excess of the total consideration paid in the Acquisition over the fair values, the excess will be accounted for as goodwill. Intangible assets with definite lives will be amortized over their estimated useful lives. Goodwill resulting from the Acquisition will not be amortized but instead will be tested for impairment at least annually (more frequently if certain indicators are present). In the event that management of Validus determines that the value of goodwill has become impaired, an accounting charge will be taken in the fiscal quarter in which such determination is made. In the event there is an excess of the fair values of the acquired assets and liabilities assumed over the total consideration paid in the Acquisition, the excess will be accounted for as a gain to be recognized through the income statement at the consummation of the Acquisition in accordance with FAS 141(R). Validus anticipates the Scheme of Arrangement will result in an excess of the fair values of the acquired assets and liabilities assumed over the total consideration paid.
 
The Scheme of Arrangement (page [ • ])
 
The form of Scheme of Arrangement is attached as Annex A to this proxy statement. You should read that document in its entirety because it, and not this proxy statement or Validus’ proxy statement for the IPC special general meeting, is the legal document that would govern the Scheme of Arrangement.
 
Purpose; Effective Time (page [ • ])
 
The Supreme Court of Bermuda ordered the court-ordered IPC meeting to be held to give the IPC shareholders (other than the holders of any IPC Shares owned by Validus, IPC or their respective subsidiaries) the opportunity to consider and, if they so determine, approve the Scheme of Arrangement. Assuming the Scheme of Arrangement receives the approval of the IPC shareholders and the sanction of the Supreme Court of Bermuda, and all the other conditions to the effectiveness of the Scheme of Arrangement are satisfied or, where relevant, waived, including approval of the Scheme of Arrangement by IPC either by vote of the IPC board of directors or a vote of IPC shareholders at the IPC special general meeting, an office copy of the court order sanctioning the Scheme of Arrangement will be delivered to the Bermuda Registrar of Companies, at which time the Scheme of Arrangement will be effective.
 
Implementing the Scheme of Arrangement (page [ • ])
 
The steps involved in the Scheme of Arrangement are as follows:
 
(1) Applying to the Supreme Court of Bermuda for an order giving directions for the holding and conduct of the court-ordered IPC meeting.
 
(2) Requisitioning the IPC special general meeting. On May 12, 2009, Validus filed with the SEC a preliminary proxy statement which, when filed in its definitive form, will be used to solicit written requisitions from the IPC shareholders to compel the IPC board of directors to call the IPC special general meeting.
 
(3) Holding the court-ordered IPC meeting to which this proxy statement relates to consider and, if the IPC shareholders so determine, approve the Scheme of Arrangement. The Scheme of Arrangement must be approved by a majority in number of the holders of IPC Shares voting at the court-ordered IPC meeting, whether in person or by proxy, representing 75% or more in value of the IPC Shares voting at the court-ordered IPC meeting, whether in person or by proxy.
 
(4) Holding the IPC special general meeting to approve resolutions determined by Validus to be reasonably necessary in connection with implementation of the Scheme of Arrangement, including resolutions for IPC to approve and to be bound by the Scheme of Arrangement and to terminate the Max Amalgamation Agreement. Approval of each resolution at the IPC special general meeting requires the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the IPC Shares voting at the meeting, whether in person or by proxy.


-13-


 

(5) Applying to the Supreme Court of Bermuda to sanction the Scheme of Arrangement.
 
(6) Delivering a copy of the order of the Supreme Court of Bermuda sanctioning the Scheme of Arrangement to the Bermuda Registrar of Companies.
 
Acquisition Consideration (page [ • ])
 
Under the Scheme of Arrangement, at the closing, each IPC Share issued and outstanding immediately prior to the closing (excluding any IPC Shares owned by Validus, IPC or their respective subsidiaries) will be transferred to Validus in exchange for (i) 1.1234 Validus Shares and (ii) $3.00 in cash (less any applicable withholding taxes and without interest).
 
Validus will not issue any fractional Validus Shares in connection with the Acquisition. Instead, any IPC shareholder who would otherwise have been entitled to a fraction of a Validus Share in connection with the Acquisition will receive cash (rounded to the nearest whole cent) in an amount (without interest) equal to the product obtained by multiplying (i) the fractional share interest to which such shareholder would otherwise be entitled (after aggregating all fractional Validus Shares that would otherwise be received by such shareholder) by (ii) the closing price of Validus Shares as reported on the NYSE on the last trading day immediately prior to the closing of the Acquisition.
 
Amendment and Termination of the Scheme of Arrangement (page [ • ])
 
The Scheme of Arrangement contains a provision for Validus to consent, on behalf of all persons concerned, to any modification of or addition to the Scheme of Arrangement or any condition to the effectiveness of the Scheme of Arrangement that the Supreme Court of Bermuda may approve or impose. If there is any modification of or addition to the Scheme of Arrangement or any condition to the effectiveness of the Scheme of Arrangement that is material to the interests of IPC shareholders, Validus will amend this proxy statement and advise the IPC shareholders of such modification, addition or condition in advance of the court-ordered IPC meeting, in accordance with applicable law.
 
Prior to approval by the IPC shareholders at the court-ordered IPC meeting, Validus may terminate the Scheme of Arrangement at any time. Following approval by the IPC shareholders at the court-ordered IPC meeting, Validus may terminate the Scheme of Arrangement at any time prior to commencement of the hearing of the Supreme Court of Bermuda to sanction the Scheme of Arrangement without obtaining the approval of the IPC shareholders if any event or condition occurs which would cause any of the conditions to its effectiveness not to be satisfied by November 30, 2009 (or such later date, if any, as Validus may agree and the Supreme Court of Bermuda may allow).
 
Conditions to the Scheme of Arrangement (page [ • ])
 
In addition to the requisite approval by IPC shareholders at the court-ordered IPC meeting, the approval by IPC shareholders at the IPC special general meeting of resolutions determined by Validus to be reasonably necessary in connection with implementation of the Scheme of Arrangement, including resolutions for IPC to approve and to be bound by the Scheme of Arrangement and to terminate the Max Amalgamation Agreement, the sanction of the Scheme of Arrangement by the Supreme Court of Bermuda and the filing of a copy of the court sanction order with the Bermuda Registrar of Companies, the effectiveness of the Scheme of Arrangement is subject to the satisfaction or, where relevant, waiver of certain other conditions, including the following:
 
  •  The Max Amalgamation Agreement shall have been validly terminated, and Validus shall reasonably believe that IPC could not have any liability, and Max shall not have asserted any claim of liability or breach against IPC in connection with the Max Amalgamation Agreement other than with respect to the possible payment of the Max Termination Fee.
 
  •  The shareholders of Validus shall have approved the issuance of the Validus Shares pursuant to the Scheme of Arrangement as required under the rules of the NYSE. All of the Validus officers, directors and those shareholders which Validus refers to as its “qualified sponsors” (as defined in this proxy statement), in each case who own Validus Shares, have indicated that they intend to vote the Validus Shares beneficially owned


-14-


 

  by them in favor of such approval. As of April 30, 2009, these persons and entities beneficially owned 42.4% of the voting interests relating to the Validus Shares.
 
  •  The Validus Shares to be issued to IPC shareholders pursuant to the Scheme of Arrangement shall have been authorized for listing on the NYSE, subject to official notice of issuance.
 
  •  There shall be no threatened or pending litigation, suit, claim, action, proceeding or investigation before any governmental authority that, in the judgment of Validus, is reasonably likely to, directly or indirectly, restrain or prohibit (or which alleges a violation of law in connection with) the Scheme of Arrangement or is reasonably likely to prohibit or limit the full rights of ownership of IPC Shares by Validus or any of its affiliates.
 
  •  Since December 31, 2008, there shall not have been any material adverse effect on IPC and its subsidiaries, taken as a whole. A more than 50% decline in IPC’s book value or a more than 20% decline in IPC’s book value relative to Validus’ book value shall be deemed to have a material adverse effect on IPC.
 
  •  Each of IPC and its subsidiaries shall have carried on their respective businesses in the ordinary course consistent with past practice at all times on or after the date of this proxy statement and prior to the commencement of the hearing of the Supreme Court of Bermuda to sanction the Scheme of Arrangement.
 
  •  All amendments or waivers under Validus’ credit facilities necessary to consummate the Scheme of Arrangement and the other transactions contemplated by this proxy statement shall be in full force and effect.
 
The Scheme of Arrangement is subject to additional conditions referred to below in The Scheme of Arrangement — Conditions to the Scheme of Arrangement, including that IPC shareholders shall not have approved the Max Amalgamation Agreement and that there shall have been no business combination consummated between IPC and Max. The Scheme of Arrangement is not conditioned on the receipt of regulatory approvals or the elimination of the Max Termination Fee. The conditions to the effectiveness of the Scheme of Arrangement are for the sole benefit of Validus and, other than the “Procedural Conditions,” the “Registration Condition,” the “Shareholder Approval Condition” and the “NYSE Listing Condition” described below in The Scheme of Arrangement — Conditions to the Scheme of Arrangement, may be waived by Validus prior to the commencement of the hearing of the Supreme Court of Bermuda to sanction the Scheme of Arrangement in its discretion.
 
Dividends and Distributions (page [ • ])
 
Each of Validus and IPC regularly pays a quarterly cash dividend, i.e., $0.20 per common share in Validus’ case and $0.22 per common share in IPC’s case. Validus expects to continue to pay its regular quarterly dividends consistent with past practice. It is a condition to the effectiveness of the Scheme of Arrangement that IPC shall not have declared, paid or proposed to declare or pay any dividend or other distribution on any share capital of IPC other than (i) any quarterly cash dividends paid in the ordinary course of business consistent with past practice to holders of IPC Shares and (ii) a one-time dividend to the holders of IPC Shares in an aggregate amount not to exceed any reduction in the Max Termination Fee. All mandates and other instructions in force at the effective time in relation to the IPC Shares (including elections for payment of dividends (if any)) will, immediately after the effective time, be deemed to be valid as effective mandates or instructions in respect of the Validus Shares received in consideration of such IPC Shares.
 
Dissenters’ and Appraisal Rights of IPC Shareholders (page [ • ])
 
If the Scheme of Arrangement becomes effective, it will be binding on all IPC shareholders whether or not they voted in favor of the Scheme of Arrangement at the court-ordered IPC meeting or of the resolutions proposed at the IPC special general meeting, and IPC shareholders will not be entitled to exercise any appraisal rights. IPC shareholders will be entitled to be present and be heard at the Supreme Court of Bermuda hearing to sanction the Scheme of Arrangement. Any IPC shareholder who wishes to may oppose the sanctioning of the Scheme of Arrangement and may make presentations to the court on the hearing of the petition. IPC shareholders may also vote against the Scheme of Arrangement at the court-ordered IPC meeting.
 


-15-


 

 
SELECTED HISTORICAL CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA OF VALIDUS
 
Set forth below is certain selected historical consolidated financial data relating to Validus. The financial data has been derived from Validus’ quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2009 (the “Validus 10-Q”) and Validus’ annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 (the “Validus 10-K”). You should not take historical results as necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for any future period.
 
This financial data should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and the related notes and other financial information contained in the Validus 10-K and the Validus 10-Q, each of which is incorporated by reference into this proxy statement. More comprehensive financial information, including “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” is contained in the Validus 10-K and the Validus 10-Q, and the following summary is qualified in its entirety by reference to the Validus 10-K and the Validus 10-Q and all of the financial information and notes contained therein. See Where You Can Find More Information on page [  •  ].
 
                                                 
    Three Months Ended
    Year Ended
    Year Ended
    Year Ended
    Period Ended
 
    March 31,     December 31,
    December 31,
    December 31,
    December 31,
 
    2009     2008     2008     2007     2006     2005  
    (Dollars in thousands, except share and per share amounts)  
 
Revenues
                                               
Gross premiums written
  $ 609,892     $ 521,594     $ 1,362,484     $ 988,637     $ 540,789     $  
Reinsurance premiums ceded
    (72,512 )     (84,900 )     (124,160 )     (70,210 )     (63,696 )      
                                                 
Net premiums written
    537,380       436,694       1,238,324       918,427       477,093        
Change in unearned premiums
    (218,621 )     (144,830 )     18,194       (60,348 )     (170,579 )      
                                                 
Net premiums earned
    318,759       291,864       1,256,518       858,079       306,514        
Net investment income
    26,772       36,043       139,528       112,324       58,021       2,032  
Realized gain on repurchase of debentures
                8,752                    
Net realized gains (losses) on investments
    (23,421 )     7,744       (1,591 )     1,608       (1,102 )     39  
Net unrealized gains on investments(2)
    22,153       (14,977 )     (79,707 )     12,364              
Other income
    757       935       5,264       3,301              
Foreign exchange gains (losses)
    (4,200 )     8,179       (49,397 )     6,696       2,157        
                                                 
Total revenues
    340,820       329,788       1,279,367       994,372       365,590       2,071  
Expenses
                                               
Losses and loss expenses
    131,834       140,024       772,154       283,993       91,323        
Policy acquisition costs
    61,449       56,701       234,951       134,277       36,072        
General and administrative expenses(1)
    38,079       37,107       123,948       100,765       38,354       2,367  
Share compensation expenses
    7,354       6,535       27,097       16,189       7,878       290  
Finance expenses
    7,723       21,517       57,318       51,754       8,789        
Fair value of warrants issued
                      2,893       77       49,122  
                                                 
Total expenses
    246,439       261,884       1,215,468       589,871       182,493       51,779  
                                                 
Net income before taxes
    94,381       67,904       63,899       404,501       183,097       (49,708 )
Taxes
    526       (1,429 )     (10,788 )     (1,505 )            
                                                 
Net income (loss)
    94,907       66,475       53,111       402,996       183,097       (49,708 )
                                                 
Comprehensive income (loss)
                                               
Unrealized gains arising during the period(2)
                            (332 )     144  
Foreign currency translation adjustments
    (196 )     67       (7,809 )     (49 )            
Adjustment for reclassification of losses realized in income
                            1,102       (39 )
                                                 
Comprehensive income (loss)
  $ 94,711     $ 66,542     $ 45,302     $ 402,947     $ 183,867     $ (49,603 )
                                                 
Earnings per share(3)
                                               
Weighted average number of common shares and common share equivalents outstanding
                                               
Basic
    75,744,577       74,209,371       74,677,903       65,068,093       58,477,130       58,423,174  
Diluted
    79,102,643       78,329,727       75,819,413       67,786,673       58,874,567       58,423,174  
Basic earnings per share
  $ 1.23     $ 0.87     $ 0.62     $ 6.19     $ 3.13     $ (0.85 )
                                                 
Diluted earnings per share
  $ 1.20     $ 0.85     $ 0.61     $ 5.95     $ 3.11     $ (0.85 )
                                                 
Cash dividends per share
  $ 0.20     $ 0.20     $ 0.80     $     $     $  
                                                 


-16-


 

                                                 
    Three Months Ended
    Year Ended
    Year Ended
    Year Ended
    Period Ended
 
    March 31,     December 31,
    December 31,
    December 31,
    December 31,
 
    2009     2008     2008     2007     2006     2005  
    (Dollars in thousands, except share and per share amounts)  
 
Selected financial ratios
                                               
Losses and loss expenses ratio(4)
    41.4 %     48.0 %     61.5 %     33.1 %     29.8 %      
Policy acquisition cost ratio(5)
    19.3 %     19.4 %     18.7 %     15.6 %     11.8 %      
General and administrative expense ratio(6)
    14.3 %     15.0 %     12.0 %     13.3 %     15.1 %      
Expense ratio(7)
    33.6 %     34.4 %     30.7 %     28.9 %     26.9 %      
Combined ratio(8)
    75.0 %     82.4 %     92.2 %     62.0 %     56.7 %      
                                                 
Annualized return on average equity(9)
    19.2 %     13.5 %     2.7 %     26.9 %     17.0 %     NM  
                                                 
 
The following table sets forth summarized balance sheet data as of March 31, 2009 and 2008, and as of December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006:
 
                                         
    As of
    As of
    As of
    As of
    As of
 
    March 31,
    March 31,
    December 31,
    December 31,
    December 31,
 
    2009     2008     2008     2007     2006  
    (Dollars in thousands, except share and per share amounts)  
 
Summary Balance Sheet Data:
                                       
Investments at fair value
  $ 2,926,859     $ 2,893,595     $ 2,831,537     $ 2,662,021     $ 1,376,387  
Cash and cash equivalents
    535,798       347,347       449,848       444,698       63,643  
Total assets
    4,762,798       4,535,638       4,322,480       4,144,224       1,646,423  
Reserve for losses and loss expenses
    1,318,732       977,236       1,305,303       926,117       77,363  
Unearned premiums
    795,233       750,257       539,450       557,344       178,824  
Junior subordinated deferrable debentures
    304,300       350,000       304,300       350,000       150,000  
Total liabilities
    2,739,812       2,544,980       2,383,746       2,209,424       453,900  
Total shareholders’ equity
    2,022,986       1,990,658       1,938,734       1,934,800       1,192,523  
Book value per common share(10)
    26.68       26.82       25.64       26.08       20.39  
Diluted book value per common share(11)
    24.65       24.43       23.78       24.00       19.73  
 
 
NM  — Not meaningful
 
(1) General and administrative expenses for the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006 include $4,000,000 and $1,000,000 respectively, related to our advisory agreement with Aquiline Capital Partners LLC, which, together with its related companies, we refer to as “Aquiline.” Our advisory agreement with Aquiline terminated upon completion of our initial public offering, in connection with which Validus recorded general and administrative expense of $3,000,000 in the year ended December 31, 2007.
 
(2) Validus adopted FAS 157 and FAS 159 as of January 1, 2007 and elected the fair value option on all securities previously accounted for as available-for-sale. Unrealized gains and losses on available-for-sale investments at December 31, 2006 of $875,000, previously included in accumulated other comprehensive income, were treated as a cumulative-effect adjustment as of January 1, 2007. The cumulative-effect adjustment transferred the balance of unrealized gains and losses from accumulated other comprehensive income to retained earnings and had no impact on the results of operations for the annual or interim periods beginning January 1, 2007. Validus’ investments were accounted for as trading for the annual or interim periods beginning January 1, 2007 and as such all unrealized gains and losses are included in net income.
 
(3) FAS 123(R) requires that any unrecognized stock-based compensation expense that will be recorded in future periods be included as proceeds for purposes of treasury stock repurchases, which is applied against the unvested restricted shares balance. On March 1, 2007 we effected a 1.75 for 1 reverse stock split of our outstanding common shares. The stock split does not affect our financial statements other than to the extent it decreases the number of outstanding shares and correspondingly increases per share information for all periods presented. The share consolidation has been reflected retroactively in these financial statements.

-17-


 

 
(4) The losses and loss expense ratio is calculated by dividing losses and loss expenses by net premiums earned.
 
(5) The policy acquisition cost ratio is calculated by dividing policy acquisition costs by net premiums earned.
 
(6) The general and administrative expense ratio is calculated by dividing the sum of general and administrative expenses and share compensation expenses by net premiums earned. The general and administrative expense ratio for the year ended December 31, 2007 is calculated by dividing the total of general and administrative expenses plus share compensation expenses less the $3,000,000 termination fee payable to Aquiline by net premiums earned.
 
(7) The expense ratio is calculated by combining the policy acquisition cost ratio and the general and administrative expense ratio.
 
(8) The combined ratio is calculated by combining the losses and loss expense ratio, the policy acquisition cost ratio and the general and administrative expense ratio.
 
(9) Annualized return on average equity is calculated by dividing the net income for the period by the average shareholders’ equity during the period. Annual average shareholders’ equity is the average of the beginning, ending and intervening quarter-end shareholders’ equity balances.
 
(10) Book value per common share is defined as total shareholders’ equity divided by the number of common shares outstanding as at the end of the period, giving no effect to dilutive securities.
 
(11) Diluted book value per common share is calculated based on total shareholders’ equity plus the assumed proceeds from the exercise of outstanding options and warrants, divided by the sum of common shares, unvested restricted shares, options and warrants outstanding (assuming their exercise). Diluted book value per common share is a Non-GAAP financial measure as described under Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial condition and Results of Operations — Financial Measures,” in the Validus Form 10-K.


-18-


 

 
SELECTED HISTORICAL CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA OF IPC
 
The following disclosure is taken from IPC’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2009 (the “IPC 10-Q”) and IPC’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 (the “IPC 10-K”), except in respect of diluted book value per common share (as discussed in footnote 5 below). See Sources of Additional Information above.
 
Set forth below is certain selected historical consolidated financial data relating to IPC. The financial data has been derived from the IPC 10-Q, which is incorporated by reference into this proxy statement, and the IPC 10-K, which is incorporated by reference into this proxy statement. You should not take historical results as necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for any future period.
 
This financial data should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and the related notes and other financial information contained in the IPC 10-K and the IPC 10-Q, each of which is incorporated by reference into this proxy statement. More comprehensive financial information, including “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations”, is contained in other documents filed by IPC with the SEC, and the following summary is qualified in its entirety by reference to such other documents and all of the financial information and notes contained in those documents. See Where You Can Find More Information on page [  •  ].
 
                                                         
    Three months ended March 31,     Year Ended December 31,  
    2009     2008     2008     2007     2006     2005     2004  
    (Dollars in thousands, except share and per share amounts)  
 
Statement of Income (Loss) Data:
                                                       
Gross premiums written
  $ 234,610     $ 197,875     $ 403,395     $ 404,096     $ 429,851     $ 472,387     $ 378,409  
Net premiums earned
    98,708       89,697       387,367       391,385       397,132       452,522       354,882  
Net investment income
    21,866       23,874       94,105       121,842       109,659       71,757       51,220  
Net (losses) gains on investments
    (35,572 )     (6,020 )     (168,208 )     67,555       12,085       (10,556 )     5,946  
Other income
    7       26       65       1,086       3,557       5,234       4,296  
Net loss and loss adjustment expenses incurred
    39,109       5,324       155,632       124,923       58,505       1,072,662       215,608  
Net acquisition costs
    9,838       8,674       36,429       39,856       37,542       39,249       37,682  
General and administrative expenses
    24,281       7,079       26,314       30,510       34,436       27,466       23,151  
Interest expense
    383             2,659                          
Net foreign exchange loss (gain)
    3,146       (303 )     1,848       1,167       (2,635 )     2,979       1,290  
Net income (loss)
  $ 8,252     $ 86,803     $ 90,447     $ 385,412     $ 394,585     $ (623,399 )   $ 138,613  
Preferred dividend
          4,234       14,939       17,128       17,176       2,664        
Net income (loss), available to common shareholders
  $ 8,252     $ 82,569     $ 75,508     $ 368,284     $ 377,409     $ (626,063 )   $ 138,613  
Net income (loss) per common share(1)
  $ 0.15     $ 1.31     $ 1.45     $ 5.53     $ 5.54     $ (12.30 )   $ 2.87  
Weighted average shares outstanding(1)
    55,916,256       66,182,883       59,301,939       69,728,229       71,212,287       50,901,296       48,376,865  
Cash dividend per common share
  $ 0.22     $ 0.22     $ 0.88     $ 0.80     $ 0.64     $ 0.88     $ 0.88  
Other Data:
                                                       
Loss and loss adjustment expense ratio(2)
    39.6 %     5.8 %     40.2 %     31.9 %     14.7 %     237.0 %     60.8 %
Expense ratio(2)
    34.6 %     17.1 %     16.2 %     18.0 %     18.1 %     14.8 %     17.1 %
Combined ratio(2)
    74.2 %     22.9 %     56.4 %     49.9 %     32.8 %     251.8 %     77.9 %
Return on average equity(3)
    1.8 %     15.5 %     4.2 %     20.1 %     24.0 %     (38.0 )%     8.6 %
Balance Sheet Data (at end of period):
                                                       
Total cash and investments
  $ 2,189,966     $ 2,475,860     $ 2,235,187     $ 2,473,244     $ 2,485,525     $ 2,560,146     $ 1,901,094  
Reinsurance premiums receivable
    199,241       161,474       108,033       91,393       113,811       180,798       85,086  
Total assets
    2,453,085       2,712,037       2,388,688       2,627,691       2,645,429       2,778,281       2,028,290  
Reserve for losses and loss adjustment expenses
    354,467       355,276       355,893       395,245       548,627       1,072,056       274,463  
Unearned premiums
    219,641       181,889       85,473       75,980       80,043       66,311       68,465  
Total liabilities
    603,611       563,904       537,741       501,946       654,474       1,161,881       359,851  
Total shareholders’ equity
  $ 1,849,474     $ 2,148,133     $ 1,850,947     $ 2,125,745     $ 1,990,955     $ 1,616,400     $ 1,668,439  
Diluted book value per common share(4)
  $ NA     $ NA     $ 32.85 (5)   $ 32.42     $ 27.94     $ 22.26     $ 34.44  


-19-


 

 
NA — Not available
 
(1) Net income per common share is calculated upon the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the relevant year. The weighted average number of shares includes common shares and the dilutive effect of employee stock options and stock grants, using the treasury stock method and convertible preferred shares. The net loss per common share for the year ended December 31, 2005 is calculated on the weighted average number of shares outstanding during the year, excluding the anti-dilutive effect of employee stock options, stock grants and convertible preferred shares. The net income per common share for the year ended December 31, 2008 is calculated on the weighted average number of shares outstanding during the year, excluding the anti-dilutive effect of stock-based compensation and convertible preferred shares.
 
(2) The loss and loss adjustment expense ratio is calculated by dividing the net losses and loss expenses incurred by the net premiums earned. The expense ratio is calculated by dividing the sum of acquisition costs and general and administrative expenses by net premiums earned. The combined ratio is the sum of the loss and loss expense ratio and the expense ratio.
 
(3) Return on average equity is calculated as the annual net income (loss), available to common shareholders divided by the average of the common shareholders’ equity, which is total shareholders’ equity, excluding convertible preferred shares, on the first and last day of the respective year.
 
(4) Diluted book value per common share is calculated as shareholders’ equity divided by the number of common shares outstanding on the balance sheet date, after considering the dilutive effects of stock-based compensation, calculated using the treasury stock method. At December 31, 2008 the average weighted number of shares outstanding, including the dilutive effect of employee stock-based compensation and convertible preferred shares (which were converted on November 15, 2008) using the treasury stock method was 59,301,939.
 
(5) IPC reported diluted book value per common share as $33.07 in IPC’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 and amended it to $32.85 in an amendment to the IPC/Max S-4 filed with the SEC on April 13, 2009.


-20-


 

 
UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED PRO FORMA FINANCIAL INFORMATION
 
The following unaudited condensed consolidated pro forma financial information is intended to provide you with information about how the acquisition of IPC might have affected the historical financial statements of Validus if it had been consummated at an earlier time. The unaudited condensed consolidated pro forma information has been prepared using IPC’s publicly available financial statements and disclosures, without the benefit of inspection of IPC’s books and records. Therefore, certain pro forma adjustments, such as recording fair value of assets and liabilities and adjustments for consistency of accounting policy, are not reflected in these unaudited condensed consolidated pro forma financial statements. The following unaudited condensed consolidated pro forma financial information does not necessarily reflect the financial position or results of operations that would have actually resulted had the acquisition occurred as of the dates indicated, nor should they be taken as necessarily indicative of the future financial position or results of operations of Validus.
 
The unaudited condensed consolidated pro forma financial information should be read in conjunction with the Validus 10-Q, the Validus 10-K, the IPC 10-Q and the IPC 10-K, each as filed with the SEC. The unaudited condensed consolidated pro forma financial information gives effect to the proposed acquisition as if it had occurred at March 31, 2009 for the purposes of the unaudited consolidated pro forma balance sheet and at January 1, 2008 for the purposes of the unaudited condensed consolidated pro forma statements of operations for the year ended December 31, 2008 and the three months ended March 31, 2009. For a summary of the proposed business combination contemplated by the Acquisition, see the section of this proxy statement entitled “The Acquisition.”


-21-


 

 
The following table presents unaudited condensed consolidated pro forma balance sheet data at March 31, 2009 (expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars, except share and per share data) giving effect to the proposed acquisition of IPC Shares as if it had occurred at March 31, 2009.
 
                                     
    Historical
          Pro Forma
           
    Validus
    Historical IPC
    Purchase
        Pro Forma
 
    Holdings Ltd.     Holdings Ltd.     adjustments     Notes   Consolidated  
 
Assets
                                   
Fixed maturities, at fair value
  $ 2,644,496     $ 1,772,805     $         $ 4,417,301  
Short-term investments, at fair value
    282,363                       282,363  
Equity investments, at fair value
          295,091                 295,091  
Cash and cash equivalents
    535,798       122,070       (245,706 )   3(a), 3(b), 4     412,162  
                                     
Total investments and cash
    3,462,657       2,189,966       (245,706 )         5,406,917  
Premiums receivable
    600,943       199,241       (160 )   3(e)     800,024  
Deferred acquisition costs
    143,510       23,302                 166,812  
Prepaid reinsurance premiums
    59,510       3,585       (199 )   3(e)     62,896  
Securities lending collateral
    99,727                       99,727  
Loss reserves recoverable
    204,197       4,274                 208,471  
Paid losses recoverable
    4,438                       4,438  
Accrued investment income
    20,511       27,907                 48,418  
Current taxes recoverable
    1,244                       1,244  
Intangible assets
    126,177                       126,177  
Goodwill
    20,393                       20,393  
Other assets
    19,491       4,810                 24,301  
                                     
Total assets
  $ 4,762,798     $ 2,453,085     $ (246,065 )       $ 6,969,818  
                                     
Liabilities
                                   
Unearned premiums
  $ 795,233     $ 219,641     $ (199 )   3(e)   $ 1,014,675  
Reserve for losses and loss expense
    1,318,732       354,467                 1,673,199  
Reinsurance balances payable
    66,180       4,483       (160 )   3(e)     70,503  
Deferred taxation
    20,914                       20,914  
Securities lending payable
    105,369                       105,369  
Net payable for investments purchased
    57,434                       57,434  
Accounts payable and accrued expenses
    71,650       25,020                 96,670  
Debentures payable
    304,300                       304,300  
                                     
Total liabilities
    2,739,812       603,611       (359 )         3,343,064  
                                     
Shareholders’ equity
                                   
Ordinary shares
    13,271       561       10,547     3(a), 3(c), 3(d)     24,379  
Additional paid-in capital
    1,419,602       1,091,491       430,938     3(a), 3(c), 3(d)     2,942,031  
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
    (8,054 )     (876 )     876     3(d)     (8,054 )
Retained earnings
    598,167       758,298       (688,067 )   3(b), 3(d), 3(f)     668,398  
                                     
Total shareholders’ equity
    2,022,986       1,849,474       (245,706 )         3,626,754  
                                     
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity
  $ 4,762,798     $ 2,453,085     $ (246,065 )       $ 6,969,818  
                                     
                                     
Common shares outstanding
    75,828,922       55,948,821       62,852,906           138,681,828  
Common shares and common share equivalents outstanding
    90,317,793       56,501,900       63,474,234           153,792,027  
Book value per share
  $ 26.68     $ 33.06             8   $ 26.15  
Diluted book value per share
  $ 24.65     $ 32.73             8   $ 24.90  
Diluted tangible book value per share
  $ 23.03     $ 32.73                 $ 23.95  


-22-


 

 
The following table sets forth unaudited condensed consolidated pro forma results of operations for the year ended December 31, 2008 (expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars, except share and per share data) giving effect to the proposed acquisition of IPC Shares as if it had occurred at January 1, 2008:
 
                                     
    Historical
          Pro Forma
           
    Validus
    Historical IPC
    Purchase
        Pro Forma
 
    Holdings, Ltd.     Holdings, Ltd.     adjustments     Notes   Consolidated  
 
Revenues
                                   
Gross premiums written
  $ 1,362,484     $ 403,395     $ (251 )   3(e), 5   $ 1,765,628  
Reinsurance premiums ceded
    (124,160 )     (6,122 )     251     3(e)     (130,031 )
                                     
Net premiums written
    1,238,324       397,273                 1,635,597  
Change in unearned premiums
    18,194       (9,906 )               8,288  
                                     
Net premiums earned
    1,256,518       387,367                 1,643,885  
Net investment income
    139,528       94,105       (9,731 )   3(b)     223,902  
Realized gain on repurchase of debentures
    8,752                       8,752  
Net realized (losses) gains on investments
    (1,591 )     (168,208 )               (169,799 )
Net unrealized (losses) gains on investments
    (79,707 )                     (79,707 )
Other income
    5,264       65                 5,329  
Foreign exchange losses
    (49,397 )     (1,848 )               (51,245 )
                                     
Total revenues
    1,279,367       311,481       (9,731 )         1,581,117  
Expenses
                                   
Losses and loss expense
    772,154       155,632           6     927,786  
Policy acquisition costs
    234,951       36,429                 271,380  
General and administrative expenses
    123,948       20,689                 144,637  
Share compensation expense
    27,097       5,625                 32,722  
Finance expenses
    57,318       2,659                 59,977  
                                     
Total expenses
    (1,215,468 )     (221,034 )               (1,436,502 )
                                     
Income before taxes
    63,899       90,447       (9,731 )         144,615  
Income tax expense
    (10,788 )                     (10,788 )
                                     
Income before taxes
  $ 53,111     $ 90,447     $ (9,731 )       $ 133,827  
                                     
Preferred dividend and warrant dividend
    6,947       14,939       (14,939 )   3(g)     6,947  
Net income available to common shareholders
  $ 46,164     $ 75,508     $ 5,208         $ 126,880  
                                     
Earnings per share
                                   
Weighted average number of common shares and common share equivalents outstanding
                                   
Basic
    74,677,903       52,124,034       62,852,906           137,530,809  
Diluted
    75,819,413       59,301,939       63,474,234           139,293,647  
Basic earnings per share
  $ 0.62     $ 1.45             7   $ 0.92  
                                     
Diluted earnings per share
  $ 0.61     $ 1.45             7   $ 0.91  
                                     


-23-


 

 
The following table sets forth unaudited condensed consolidated pro forma results of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2009 (expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars, except share and per share data) giving effect to the proposed acquisition of IPC Shares as if it had occurred at January 1, 2008:
 
                                     
    Historical
          Pro Forma
           
    Validus
    Historical IPC
    Purchase
        Pro Forma
 
    Holdings Ltd.     Holdings Ltd.     adjustments     Notes   Consolidated  
 
Revenues
                                   
Gross premiums written
  $ 609,892     $ 234,610     $ (265 )   3(e), 5   $ 844,237  
Reinsurance premiums ceded
    (72,512 )     (3,154 )     265     3(e)     (75,401 )
                                     
Net premiums written
    537,380       231,456                 768,836  
Change in unearned premiums
    (218,621 )     (132,748 )               (351,369 )
                                     
Net premiums earned
    318,759       98,708                 417,467  
Net investment income
    26,772       21,866       (1,953 )   3(b)     46,685  
Net realized (losses) gains on investments
    (23,421 )     (35,572 )               (58,993 )
Net unrealized (losses) gains on investments
    22,153                       22,153  
Other income
    757       7                 764  
Foreign exchange gains (losses)
    (4,200 )     (3,146 )               (7,346 )
                                     
Total revenues
    340,820       81,863       (1,953 )         420,730  
Expenses
                                   
Losses and loss expense
    131,834       39,109           6     170,943  
Policy acquisition costs
    61,449       9,838                 71,287  
General and administrative expenses
    38,079       21,792       (13,800 )   3(b)     46,071  
Share compensation expense
    7,354       2,489                 9,843  
Finance expenses
    7,723       383                 8,106  
                                     
Total expenses
    (246,439 )     (73,611 )     13,800           (306,250 )
                                     
Income before taxes
    94,381       8,252       11,847           114,480  
Income tax credit
    526                       526  
                                     
Income after taxes
  $ 94,907     $ 8,252     $ 11,847         $ 115,006  
                                     
Preferred dividend and warrant dividend
    1,736                       1,736  
                                     
Net income available to common shareholders
  $ 93,171     $ 8,252     $ 11,847         $ 113,270  
                                     
Earnings per share
                                   
Weighted average number of common shares and common share equivalents outstanding
                                   
Basic
    75,744,577       55,903,740       62,852,906           138,597,483  
Diluted
    79,102,643       55,916,256       63,474,234           142,576,877  
Basic earnings per share
  $ 1.23     $ 0.15             7   $ 0.82  
                                     
Diluted earnings per share
  $ 1.20     $ 0.15             7   $ 0.81  
                                     


-24-


 

Validus Holdings, Ltd.
 
Notes To Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Pro Forma Financial Statements (unaudited)
(Expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars, except share and per share data)
 
1.   Basis of Presentation
 
The unaudited condensed consolidated pro forma financial information gives effect to the Acquisition as if it had occurred at March 31, 2009 for the purposes of the unaudited condensed consolidated pro forma balance sheet and at January 1, 2008 for the purposes of the unaudited condensed consolidated pro forma statements of operations for the year ended December 31, 2008 and three months ended March 31, 2009. The unaudited condensed consolidated pro forma financial information has been prepared by Validus’ management and is based on Validus’ historical consolidated financial statements and IPC’s historical consolidated financial statements. Certain amounts from IPC’s historical consolidated financial statements have been reclassified to conform to the Validus presentation. The unaudited condensed consolidated pro forma financial statements have been prepared using IPC’s publicly available financial statements and disclosures, without the benefit of inspection of IPC’s books and records or discussion with the IPC management team. Therefore, certain pro forma adjustments, such as recording fair value of assets and liabilities and adjustments for consistency of accounting policy, are not reflected in these unaudited condensed consolidated pro forma financial statements. Additional reclassifications of IPC data to conform to the Validus presentation may also be required.
 
This unaudited condensed consolidated pro forma financial information is prepared in conformity with US GAAP. The unaudited condensed consolidated pro forma balance sheet as of March 31, 2009 and the unaudited condensed consolidated pro forma statements of operations for the year ended December 31, 2008 and the three months ended March 31, 2009 have been prepared using the following information:
 
(a) Audited historical consolidated financial statements of Validus as of December 31, 2008 and for the year ended December 31, 2008;
 
(b) Audited historical consolidated financial statements of IPC as of December 31, 2008 and for the year ended December 31, 2008;
 
(c) Unaudited historical consolidated financial statements of Validus as of March 31, 2009 and for the three months ended March 31, 2009;
 
(d) Unaudited historical consolidated financial statements of IPC as of March 31, 2009 and for the three months ended March 31, 2009;
 
(e) Such other known supplementary information as considered necessary to reflect the Acquisition in the unaudited condensed consolidated pro forma financial information.
 
The pro forma adjustments reflecting the Acquisition of IPC under the purchase method of accounting are based on certain estimates and assumptions. The unaudited condensed consolidated pro forma adjustments may be revised as additional information becomes available. The actual adjustments upon consummation of the Acquisition and the allocation of the final purchase price of IPC will depend on a number of factors, including additional financial information available at such time, changes in values and changes in IPC’s operating results between the date of preparation of this unaudited condensed consolidated pro forma financial information and the effective date of the Acquisition. Therefore, it is likely that the actual adjustments will differ from the pro forma adjustments and it is possible the differences may be material. Validus’ management believes that its assumptions provide a reasonable basis for presenting all of the significant effects of the transactions contemplated based on information available to Validus at the time and that the pro forma adjustments give appropriate effect to those assumptions and are properly applied in the unaudited condensed consolidated pro forma financial information.
 
The unaudited condensed consolidated pro forma financial information does not include any financial benefits, revenue enhancements or operating expense efficiencies arising from the Acquisition. In addition, the unaudited condensed consolidated pro forma financial information does not include any additional expenses that may result


-25-


 

 
Validus Holdings, Ltd.
 
Notes To Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Pro Forma Financial Statements (unaudited) — (Continued)
(Expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars, except share and per share data)
 
from the Acquisition. Estimated costs of the transaction as well as the benefit of the negative goodwill have been reflected in the unaudited condensed consolidated pro forma balance sheets, but have not been included on the pro forma income statement due to their non-recurring nature.
 
The unaudited condensed consolidated pro forma financial information is not intended to reflect the results of operations or the financial position that would have resulted had the Acquisition been effected on the dates indicated and if the companies had been managed as one entity. The unaudited condensed consolidated pro forma financial information should be read in conjunction with the Validus 10-Q, the Validus 10-K, the IPC 10-Q and the IPC 10-K, as filed with the SEC. See Where You Can Find More Information on page [  •  ].
 
2.   Recent Accounting Pronouncements
 
In December 2007, the FASB issued Statement No. 141(R), “Business Combinations” (“FAS 141(R)”) and No. 160, “Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements, an amendment of ARB No. 51” (“FAS 160”) which are effective for business combinations for which the Acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the first annual reporting period beginning on or after December 15, 2008. On April 1, 2009 the FASB finalized and issued FSP FAS 141(R)-1 which amended and clarified FAS 141 (R) and is effective for business combinations whose Acquisition date is on or after January 1, 2009.
 
FSP FAS 141(R)-1 has amended FAS 141(R)’s guidance on the initial recognition and measurement, subsequent measurement and accounting, and disclosure of assets acquired and liabilities assumed in a business combination that arise from contingencies.
 
Significant changes arising from FAS 141 (R) and FSP FAS 141(R)-1 which will impact any future acquisitions include the determination of the purchase price and treatment of transaction expenses, restructuring charges and negative goodwill as follows:
 
  •  Purchase Price — Under FAS 141(R), the purchase price is determined as of the acquisition date, which is the date that the acquirer obtains control. Previously, the date the business combination was announced was used as the effective date in determining the purchase price;
 
  •  Transactions Expenses — Under FAS 141(R), all costs associated with purchase transactions must be expensed as incurred. Previously, all such costs could be capitalized and included as part of transaction purchase price, adding to the amount of goodwill recognized;
 
  •  Restructuring Costs — Under FAS 141(R), expected restructuring costs are not recorded at the closing date, but rather after the transaction. The only costs to be included as a liability at the closing date are those for which an acquirer is obligated at the time of the closing. Previously, restructuring costs that were planned to occur after the closing of the transaction were recognized and recorded at the closing date as a liability;
 
  •  Negative Goodwill/Bargain Purchases — Under FAS 141(R), where total fair value of net assets acquired exceeds consideration paid (creating “negative goodwill”), the acquirer will record a gain as a result of the bargain purchase, to be recognized through the income statement at the close of the transaction. Previously, negative goodwill was recognized as a pro rata reduction of the assets assumed to allow the net assets acquired to equal the consideration paid; and
 
  •  Noncontrolling Interests — Under FAS 141(R), in a partial or step acquisition where control is obtained, 100% of goodwill and identifiable net assets are recognized at fair value and the noncontrolling (sometimes called minority interest) interest is also recorded at fair value. Previously, in a partial acquisition only the controlling interest’s share of goodwill was recognized, the controlling interest’s share of identifiable net assets was recognized at fair value and the noncontrolling interest’s share of identifiable net assets was


-26-


 

 
Validus Holdings, Ltd.
 
Notes To Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Pro Forma Financial Statements (unaudited) — (Continued)
(Expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars, except share and per share data)
 
recognized at carrying value. Under FAS 160, a noncontrolling interest is now recognized in the equity section, presented separately from the controlling interest’s equity. Previously, noncontrolling interest in general was recorded in the mezzanine section.
 
3.   Purchase Adjustments
 
On April 30, 2009, Validus announced a three-part plan to acquire IPC. The three-part plan, involves (1) soliciting IPC shareholders to vote against the Proposed Max Amalgamation, (2) commencing an Exchange Offer for all IPC Shares and (3) petitioning the Supreme Court of Bermuda to approve a Scheme of Arrangement under Bermuda law. If the Acquisition is consummated, former IPC shareholders will no longer have any ownership interest in IPC and will be shareholders of Validus. Validus intends, promptly following the Scheme of Arrangement, to amalgamate IPC with a newly-formed, wholly-owned subsidiary of Validus in accordance with Section 107 of the Companies Act.
 
In connection with the Acquisition, transaction costs currently estimated at $40,000 will be incurred and expensed. Of this amount, $20,000 relates to Validus expenses as set forth in “The Acquisition — Sources of Funds, Fees and Expenses” and $20,000 is our estimate of IPC’s expenses based on the IPC/Max S-4. In addition, upon termination of the Max Amalgamation Agreement, the Max Termination Fee will be incurred and expensed. The data in the following sentence is taken from “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” contained in the IPC 10-Q, where such disclosure was not made in “thousands of U.S. dollars,” and the data has been reproduced here as it was originally presented. Approximately $13.8 million of expenses, including legal and financial advisory services, were associated with IPC’s strategic initiatives designed to increase shareholder value and which resulted in the Max Amalgamation Agreement. Therefore, Validus is estimating that approximately $13,800 of the estimated $40,000 total transaction costs have been incurred and expensed by IPC in the three months ended March 31, 2009.
 
As discussed above, these pro forma purchase adjustments are based on certain estimates and assumptions made as of the date of the unaudited condensed consolidated pro forma financial information. The actual adjustments will depend on a number of factors, including changes in the estimated fair value of net balance sheet assets and operating results of IPC between March 31, 2009 and the effective date of the Acquisition. Validus expects to make such adjustments at the effective date of the Acquisition. These adjustments are likely to be different from the adjustments made to prepare the unaudited condensed consolidated pro forma financial information and such differences may be material.


-27-


 

 
Validus Holdings, Ltd.
 
Notes To Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Pro Forma Financial Statements (unaudited) — (Continued)
(Expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars, except share and per share data)
 
The share prices for both Validus and IPC used in determining the preliminary estimated purchase price are based on the closing share prices on May 15, 2009. The preliminary total purchase price is calculated as follows:
 
         
Calculation of Total Purchase Price
     
 
IPC common shares outstanding as of May 8, 2009
    55,948,821  
IPC common shares issued pursuant to option exercises
    3,804  
IPC common shares issued following vesting of restricted shares, RSUs and PSUs
    549,275  
         
Total IPC common shares and share equivalents prior to transaction
    56,501,900  
Exchange ratio
    1.1234  
         
Total Validus common shares to be issued
    63,474,234  
Validus closing share price on May 15, 2009
  $ 24.16  
         
Total value of Validus common shares to be issued
  $ 1,533,537  
Total cash consideration paid at $3.00 per IPC share
  $ 169,506  
Total Purchase Price
  $ 1,703,043  
         
 
The allocation of the purchase price is as follows:
 
         
Allocation of Purchase Price
     
 
IPC shareholders’ equity(B)
  $ 1,849,474  
Total purchase price(A)
  $ 1,703,043  
         
Negative goodwill (A — B)
  $ 146,431  
         
 
 
(a) In connection with the Acquisition, 63,474,234 Validus Shares are expected to be issued as a portion of the Acquisition Consideration for all of IPC’s Shares, IPC Shares issued pursuant to option exercises, and IPC Shares issued following vesting of restricted shares, restricted share units and performance share units resulting in additional share capital of $11,108 and Additional Paid-In Capital of $1,522,429. In addition, cash consideration of $3.00 per IPC Share, or $169,506 in total, is expected to be paid to IPC shareholders.
 
(b) It is expected that total transaction costs currently estimated at $40,000 and the Max Termination Fee of $50,000 will be incurred and expensed by the consolidated entity. Based on an expected investment return of 3.75% per annum, investment income of $9,731 would have been foregone during the year end December 31, 2008 had these payments of $259,506 been made.
 
The data in the following sentence is taken from “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” contained in the IPC 10-Q, where such disclosure was not made in “thousands of U.S. dollars,” and the data has been reproduced here as it was originally presented. Approximately $13.8 million of expenses, including legal and financial advisory services, were associated with IPC’s strategic initiatives, designed to increase shareholder value, and which resulted in the Agreement and Plan of Amalgamation with Max. Therefore, Validus is estimating that approximately $13,800 of the estimated $40,000 total transaction costs have been incurred and expensed by IPC in the three months ended March 31, 2009. These expenses have been eliminated from the unaudited condensed consolidated pro forma results of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2009. In addition, an adjustment of $76,200 was recorded to cash and to retained earnings as at March 31, 2009 to reflect the remaining transaction costs and Max Termination Fee. Based on an expected investment return of 3.18% per annum, investment income of $1,953 would have been foregone during the three months ended March 31, 2009 had these remaining payments of $245,706 been made.


-28-


 

 
Validus Holdings, Ltd.
 
Notes To Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Pro Forma Financial Statements (unaudited) — (Continued)
(Expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars, except share and per share data)
 
 
(c) Employees of IPC hold 427,000 options to purchase IPC Shares. These options would vest upon a change in control, and would be exercisable. The exercise price range of these options is from $13 to $49, with a weighted average of $34.68. It is expected that 3,804 net shares would be issued upon exercise of these options.
 
(d) Elimination of IPC ordinary shares of $561, Additional Paid-in Capital of $1,091,491, Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss of $876 and Retained Earnings of $758,298.
 
(e) A related party balance of $265 for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and $251 for the year ended December 31, 2008 representing reinsurance ceded to IPC by Validus was eliminated from gross premiums written and reinsurance ceded. Corresponding prepaid reinsurance premiums and unearned premiums of $199 and premiums receivable and reinsurance balances payable of $160 have been eliminated from the pro forma balance sheet.
 
(f) The unaudited condensed consolidated pro forma financial statements have been prepared using IPC’s publicly available financial statements and disclosures, without the benefit of inspection of IPC’s books and records. Therefore, the carrying value of assets and liabilities in IPC’s financial statements are considered to be a proxy for fair value of those assets and liabilities, with the difference between the net assets and the total purchase price considered to be negative goodwill. In addition, certain pro forma adjustments, such as recording fair value of assets and liabilities and adjustments for consistency of accounting policy, are not reflected in these unaudited pro forma consolidated financial statements. In December 2007, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Statement No. 141(R), Business Combinations (“FAS 141(R)”). This Statement defines a bargain purchase as a business combination in which the total fair value of the identifiable net assets acquired on the date of acquisition of IPC Shares exceeds the fair value of the consideration transferred plus any noncontrolling interest in the acquiree, and it requires the acquirer to recognize that excess in earnings as a gain attributable to the acquirer. Negative goodwill of $146,431 has been recorded as a credit to retained earnings as upon completion of the acquisition of IPC Shares negative goodwill will be treated as a gain in the consolidated statement of operations.
 
(g) On November 15, 2008, IPC’s 9,000,000 Series A Mandatory Convertible preferred shares automatically converted pursuant to their terms into 9,129,600 common shares. Therefore, dividends of $14,939 on these preferred shares of IPC have been eliminated from the unaudited pro forma results of operations for the year ended December 31, 2008.
 
(h) The share prices of both Validus and IPC used in preparing these unaudited condensed consolidated pro forma financial statements are based on the closing share prices on May 15, 2009, and were $24.16 and $26.63, respectively. As of June 3, 2009, the share prices were $24.27 and $26.74, respectively. The effect of using the June 3, 2009 closing share price in preparation of these unaudited condensed consolidated pro forma financial statements would have resulted in an entry to additional paid in capital of $6,983 reflecting reduced purchase price and an offsetting entry to retained earnings of $6,983 reflecting additional negative goodwill. Using June 3, 2009 share prices would have had no effect on calculation of book value per share, diluted book value per share, basic earnings per share and diluted earnings per share.
 
4.   Adjustments to cash and cash equivalents
 
The Acquisition will result in the payment of cash and cash equivalents by IPC of $56,200 and by Validus of $189,506.
 
The unaudited condensed consolidated pro forma statements of operations reflect the impact of these reductions in cash and cash equivalents. Actual transaction costs may vary from such estimates which are based on the best information available at the time the unaudited condensed consolidated pro forma financial information was prepared.


-29-


 

 
Validus Holdings, Ltd.
 
Notes To Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Pro Forma Financial Statements (unaudited) — (Continued)
(Expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars, except share and per share data)
 
For purposes of presentation in the unaudited condensed consolidated pro forma financial information, the sources and uses of funds of the acquisition are as follows:
 
Sources of funds
 
         
IPC cash and cash equivalents
  $ 56,200  
Validus cash and cash equivalents
    189,506  
Total
  $ 245,706  
 
Uses of funds
 
         
Cash consideration for IPC shares
  $ 169,506  
IPC transaction costs
    6,200  
Validus transaction costs
    20,000  
Max termination fee
    50,000  
Total
  $ 245,706  


-30-


 

 
Validus Holdings, Ltd.
 
Notes To Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Pro Forma Financial Statements (unaudited) — (Continued)
(Expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars, except share and per share data)
 
5.   Gross Premiums Written
 
IPC did not disclose gross premiums written by class of business in the IPC 10-Q. Therefore, a table of gross premiums written by Validus, IPC and pro forma combined cannot be presented.
 
The following table sets forth the gross premiums written for the year ended December 31, 2008 by Validus, IPC and pro forma combined:
 
                                 
Validus Re
  Validus     IPC(a)     Purchase Adjustments     Combined  
 
Property Cat XOL(b)
  $ 328,216     $ 333,749     $     $ 661,965  
Property Per Risk XOL
    54,056       10,666             64,722  
Property Proportional(c)
    110,695                   110,695  
Marine
    117,744                   117,744  
Aerospace
    39,323       18,125       (151 )     57,297  
Life and A&H
    1,009                   1,009  
Financial Institutions
    4,125                   4,125  
Other
          8,318       (100 )     8,218  
Terrorism
    25,502                   25,502  
Workers’ Comp
    7,101                   7,101  
                                 
                                 
Total Validus Re Segment
    687,771       370,858       (251 )     1,058,378  
                                 
Talbot
                               
Property
    152,143                   152,143  
Marine
    287,694                   287,694  
Aviation & Other
    40,028                   40,028  
Accident & Health
    18,314                   18,314  
Financial Institutions
    42,263                   42,263  
War
    128,693                   128,693  
Contingency
    22,924                   22,924  
Bloodstock
    16,937                   16,937  
                                 
                                 
Total Talbot Segment
    708,996                   708,996  
                                 
                                 
Intersegment revenue
                               
Property
    (21,724 )                 (21,724 )
Marine
    (8,543 )                 (8,543 )
Specialty
    (4,016 )                 (4,016 )
                                 
Total Intersegment Revenue Eliminated
    (34,283 )                 (34,283 )
                                 
Adjustments for reinstatement premium
          32,537             32,537  
                                 
                                 
Total
  $ 1,362,484     $ 403,395     $ (251 )   $ 1,765,628  
                                 
 
 
(a) For IPC, this includes annual (deposit) and adjustment premiums. Excludes reinstatement premiums of $32,537 which are not classified by class of business by IPC.
 
(b) For Validus, Cat XOL is comprised of Catastrophe XOL, Aggregate XOL, RPP, Per Event XOL, Second Event and Third Event covers. For IPC, this includes Catastrophe XOL and Retrocessional.


-31-


 

 
Validus Holdings, Ltd.
 
Notes To Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Pro Forma Financial Statements (unaudited) — (Continued)
(Expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars, except share and per share data)
 
 
(c) Proportional is comprised of Quota Share and Surplus Share.
 
6.   Selected Ratios
 
Selected ratios of Validus, IPC and pro forma combined are as follows:
 
                                                 
    Year Ended
    Three Months Ended
 
    December 31, 2008     March 31, 2009  
                Pro forma
                Pro forma
 
    Validus     IPC     combined     Validus     IPC     combined  
 
Losses and loss expense ratios
    61.5 %     40.2 %     56.4 %     41.4 %     39.6 %     40.9 %
Policy acquisition costs ratios
    18.7       9.4       16.5       19.3       10.0       17.1  
General and administrative cost ratios
    12.0       6.8       10.8       14.3       24.6       13.4  
                                                 
Combined ratio
    92.2 %     56.4 %     83.7 %     75.0 %     74.2 %     71.4 %
 
 
(a) Factors affecting the losses and loss expense ratio for the year ended December 31, 2008
 
Validus’ losses and loss expense ratio, which is defined as losses and loss expenses divided by net premiums earned, for the year ended December 31, 2008 was 61.5%. During the year ended December 31, 2008, the frequency and severity of worldwide losses that materially affected Validus’ losses and loss expense ratio increased. During the year ended December 31, 2008, Validus incurred $260,567 and $22,141 of loss expense attributable to Hurricanes Ike and Gustav, which represent 20.7 and 1.8 percentage points of the losses and loss expense ratio, respectively. Other notable loss events added $45,895 of 2008 loss expense or 3.7 percentage points of the losses and loss expense ratio bringing the total effect of aforementioned events on the 2008 losses and loss expense ratio to 26.2 percentage points. Favorable loss development on prior years totaled $69,702. Favorable loss reserve development benefited Validus’ losses and loss expense ratio for the year ended December 31, 2008 by 5.5 percentage points.
 
The data in the following paragraph is taken from “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” contained in the IPC 10-K. Such disclosure was not made in “thousands of U.S. dollars,” and the data has been reproduced here as it was originally presented.
 
IPC’s losses and loss expense ratio, which is defined as losses and loss expenses divided by net premiums earned, for the year ended December 31, 2008 was 40.2%. IPC incurred net losses and loss adjustment expenses of $155.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2008. Total net losses for the year ended December 31, 2008 relating to the current year were $206.6 million, while reductions to estimates of ultimate net loss for prior year events were $50.9 million. During 2008, IPC’s incurred losses included: $23.0 million from the Alon Refinery explosion in Texas, a storm that affected Queensland, Australia, and Windstorm Emma that affected parts of Europe, which all occurred in the first quarter of 2008; $10.5 million from the flooding in Iowa in June and tornadoes that affected the mid-west United States in May 2008; together with $160.0 million from Hurricane Ike and $7.6 million from Hurricane Gustav, which both occurred in September 2008. The impact on IPC’s 2008 losses and loss expense ratio from these events was 51.9 percentage points. The losses from these events were partly offset by reductions to IPC’s estimates of ultimate loss for a number of prior year events, including $11.0 million for Hurricane Katrina, $18.6 million for the storm and flooding that affected New South Wales, Australia in 2007 and $22.8 million for the floods that affected parts of the U.K. in June and July 2007. The cumulative $52.4 million of favorable loss reserve development benefited the IPC’s losses and loss expense ratio for the year ended December 31, 2008 by 13.5 percentage points.
 
(b) Factors affecting the losses and loss expense ratio for the three months ended March 31, 2009
 
Validus’ losses and loss expense ratio, which is defined as losses and loss expenses divided by net premiums earned, for the three months ended March 31, 2009, was 41.4%. During the three months ended March 31,


-32-


 

 
Validus Holdings, Ltd.
 
Notes To Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Pro Forma Financial Statements (unaudited) — (Continued)
(Expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars, except share and per share data)
 
2009, Validus incurred $6,889 and $6,625 of loss expense attributable to Windstorm Klaus and Australian wildfires, respectively, which represent 2.2 and 2.1 percentage points of the losses and loss expense ratio, respectively. Favorable loss development on prior years totaled $8,079. Favorable loss reserve development benefited Validus’ losses and loss expense ratio for the months ended March 31, 2009 by 2.5 percentage points.
 
The data in the following paragraph is taken from “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” contained in the IPC 10-Q. Such disclosure was not made in “thousands of U.S. dollars,” and the data has been reproduced here as it was originally presented.
 
IPC’s losses and loss expense ratio, which is defined as losses and loss expenses divided by net premiums earned, for the three months ended March 31, 2009, was 39.6%. In the quarter ended March 31, 2009, IPC incurred net losses and loss adjustment expenses of $39.1 million, compared to $5.3 million in the first quarter of 2008. Net losses incurred in the first quarter of 2009 included $15.0 million from Winter Storm Klaus that affected southern France and $13.3 million from the bushfires in south eastern Australia, as well as net adverse development to their estimates of ultimate losses for several prior year events. The impact on IPC’s losses and loss expense ratio from these events was 28.7 percentage points.
 
7.   Earnings per Common Share
 
(a) Pro forma earnings per common share for the year ended December 31, 2008 and the three months ended March 31, 2009 have been calculated based on the estimated weighted average number of common shares outstanding on a pro forma basis, as described in 7(b) below. The historical weighted average number of common shares outstanding of Validus was 74,677,903 and 75,819,413 basic and diluted, respectively, for the year ended December 31, 2008 and 75,744,577 and 79,102,643 basic and diluted, respectively, for the three months ended March 31, 2009.
 
(b) The pro forma weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the year ended December 31, 2008 and three months ended March 31, 2009, after giving effect to the exchange of shares as if the exchange offer had been issued and outstanding for the whole year, is 137,530,809 and 139,293,647, basic and diluted, and 138,597,483 and 142,576,877, basic and diluted, respectively.
 
(c)  In the basic earnings per share calculation, dividends and distributions declared on warrants are deducted from net income. In calculating diluted earnings per share, we consider the application of the treasury stock method and the two-class method and which ever is more dilutive is included into the calculation of diluted earnings per share.
 
The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings per share for the three months ended March 31, 2009:
 
                 
    Historical
       
    Validus
    Pro Forma
 
    Holdings     Consolidated  
 
Net income
  $ 94,907     $ 115,006  
                 
Weighted average shares — basic ordinary shares outstanding
    75,744,577       138,597,483  
Share Equivalents
           
Warrants
    2,307,094       2,307,094  
Restricted Shares
    683,468       1,300,523  
Options
    367,504       371,777  
                 
Weighted average shares — diluted
    79,102,643       142,576,877  
Basic earnings per share
  $ 1.23     $ 0.82  
                 
Diluted earnings per share
  $ 1.20     $ 0.81  
                 


-33-


 

 
Validus Holdings, Ltd.
 
Notes To Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Pro Forma Financial Statements (unaudited) — (Continued)
(Expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars, except share and per share data)
 
The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings per share for the year ended December 31, 2008:
 
                 
    Historical
       
    Validus
    Pro Forma
 
    Holdings     Consolidated  
 
Net income available to common shareholders
  $ 46,164     $ 126,880  
                 
Weighted average shares — basic ordinary shares outstanding
    74,677,903       137,530,809  
Share equivalents
               
Warrants
           
Restricted Shares
    1,004,809       1,621,864  
Options
    136,701       140,974  
                 
Weighted average shares — diluted
    75,819,413       139,293,647  
Basic earnings per share
  $ 0.62     $ 0.92  
                 
Diluted earnings per share
  $ 0.61     $ 0.91  
                 


-34-


 

 
Validus Holdings, Ltd.
 
Notes To Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Pro Forma Financial Statements (unaudited) — (Continued)
(Expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars, except share and per share data)
 
8.   Book Value per Share
 
Validus calculates diluted book value per share using the “as-if-converted” method, where all proceeds received upon exercise of warrants and stock options would be retained by Validus and the resulting common shares from exercise remain outstanding. In its public records, IPC calculates diluted book value per share using the “treasury stock” method, where proceeds received upon exercise of warrants and stock options would be used by IPC to repurchase shares from the market, with the net common shares from exercise remaining outstanding. Accordingly, for the purposes of the Pro Forma Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements and notes thereto, IPC’s diluted book value per share has been recalculated based on the “as-if-converted” method to be consistent with Validus’ calculation.
 
The following table sets forth the computation of book value and diluted book value per share adjusted for the Acquisition as of March 31, 2009:
 
                 
    Historical
       
    Validus
    Pro Forma
 
    Holdings     Consolidated  
 
Book value per common share calculation
               
Total shareholders’ equity
  $ 2,022,986     $ 3,626,754  
Shares
    75,828,922       138,681,828  
                 
Book value per common share
  $ 26.68     $ 26.15  
                 
Diluted book value per common share calculation
               
Total Shareholders’ equity
  $ 2,022,986     $ 3,626,754  
Proceeds of assumed exercise of outstanding warrants
  $ 152,316     $ 152,316  
Proceeds of assumed exercise of outstanding stock options
  $ 50,969     $ 50,969  
Unvested restricted shares
           
                 
    $ 2,226,271     $ 3,830,039  
                 
Shares
    75,828,922       138,681,828  
Warrants
    8,680,149       8,680,149  
Options
    2,795,868       2,800,141  
Unvested restricted shares
    3,012,854       3,629,909  
                 
      90,317,793       153,792,027  
                 
Diluted book value per common share
  $ 24.65     $ 24.90  
                 


-35-


 

 
Validus Holdings, Ltd.
 
Notes To Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Pro Forma Financial Statements (unaudited) — (Continued)
(Expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars, except share and per share data)
 
9.   Capitalization
 
The following table sets forth the computation of debt to total capitalization and debt (excluding debentures payable) to total capitalization at March 31, 2009, adjusted for the Acquisition:
 
                 
    Historical
       
    Validus
    Pro Forma
 
    Holdings     Consolidated  
 
Total debt
               
Borrowings drawn under credit facility
  $     $  
Debentures payable
    304,300       304,300  
                 
Total debt
  $ 304,300     $ 304,300  
                 
Total capitalization
               
Total shareholders’ equity
  $ 2,022,986     $ 3,626,754  
Borrowings drawn under credit facility
           
Debentures payable
    304,300       304,300  
                 
Total capitalization
  $ 2,327,286     $ 3,931,054  
                 
Total debt to total capitalization
    13.1 %     7.7 %
Debt (excluding debentures payable) to total capitalization
    0.0 %     0.0 %


-36-


 

 
COMPARATIVE PER-SHARE DATA
 
The IPC historical per share data is taken from the IPC/Max S-4. See Sources of Additional Information above. The pro forma combined data is taken from the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Pro Forma Financial Information above.
 
The historical earnings per share, dividends, and book value of Validus and IPC shown in the table below are derived from their respective audited consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2008 and as of and for the three months ended March 31, 2009. The unaudited pro forma comparative basic and diluted earnings per share data give effect to the Acquisition using the purchase method of accounting as if the Acquisition had been completed on January 1, 2008. The unaudited pro forma book value and diluted book value per share information was computed as if the Acquisition had been completed on December 31, 2008 and March 31, 2009.
 
The historical earnings per share, dividends, and book value of Validus and IPC shown in the table below are derived from their respective audited consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2008 and as of and for the three months ended March 31, 2009. The unaudited pro forma comparative basic and diluted earnings per share data give effect to the Acquisition using the purchase method of accounting as if the Acquisition had been completed on January 1, 2008. The unaudited pro forma book value and diluted book value per share information was computed as if the Acquisition had been completed on December 31, 2008 and March 31, 2009. You should read this information in conjunction with the historical financial information of Validus and of IPC included or incorporated elsewhere in this proxy statement, including Validus’ and IPC’s financial statements and related notes. The unaudited pro forma data is not necessarily indicative of actual results had the Acquisition occurred during the periods indicated. The unaudited pro forma data is not necessarily indicative of future operations of Validus.
 
This pro forma information is subject to risks and uncertainties, including those discussed in Risk Factors below.
 
                                         
    Per share data at or for the
    year ended December 31, 2008
            Validus
       
    Historical
  Historical
  Pro Forma
  Equivalent Per
  IPC Max
    Validus   IPC   combined   IPC Share(2)   Pro Forma(4)
 
Basic earnings per common share
  $ 0.62     $ 1.45     $ 0.92     $ 1.03     $ (0.63 )
Diluted earnings per common share(1)
  $ 0.61     $ 1.45     $ 0.91     $ 1.02     $ (0.63 )
Cash dividends declared per common share
  $ 0.80     $ 0.88     $ 0.80     $ 0.90     $ 0.73  
Book value per common
share
  $ 25.64     $ 33.00     $ 25.49     $ 31.64 (3)   $ 32.30  
Diluted book value per common share
  $ 23.78     $ 32.85 (5)   $ 24.31     $ 30.31 (3)     NA  
 
                                 
    Per share data at or for the
    three months ended March 31, 2009
            Validus
   
    Historical
  Historical
  Pro Forma
  Equivalent Per
    Validus   IPC   combined   IPC Share(2)
 
Basic earnings per common share
  $ 1.23     $ 0.15     $ 0.82     $ 0.92  
Diluted earnings per common share
  $ 1.20     $ 0.15     $ 0.81     $ 0.91  
Cash dividends declared per common share
  $ 0.20     $ 0.22     $ 0.20     $ 0.22  
Book value per common share (at period end)
  $ 26.68     $ 33.06     $ 26.15     $ 32.38 (3)
Diluted book value per common share
  $ 24.65     $ 32.73     $ 24.90     $ 30.97 (3)
 
 
(1) Anti-dilution provisions apply to 2008. There is no effect of stock-based compensation and preference shares because they are anti-dilutive.


-37-


 

 
(2) Equivalent per share amounts are calculated by multiplying Validus pro forma per share amounts by the Acquisition exchange ratio of 1.1234.
 
(3) For purposes of calculating equivalent per IPC share values for book value per common share and diluted book value per common share, the $3.00 per common share cash consideration is added to the equivalent per share amounts.
 
(4) Source: IPC/Max Joint Proxy Statement/Prospectus dated May 7, 2009 at p.22.
 
(5) IPC reported diluted book value per common share as $33.07 in the IPC 10-K and amended it to $32.85 in an amendment to the IPC/Max S-4 filed with the SEC on April 13, 2009.


-38-


 

 
COMPARATIVE MARKET PRICE AND DIVIDEND INFORMATION
 
Validus’ and IPC’s Shares are quoted on the NYSE and NASDAQ, respectively, under the ticker symbol “VR” and “IPCR,” respectively. The following table sets forth the high and low closing prices per share of Validus Shares and IPC Shares for the periods indicated (commencing, in the case of Validus, from Validus’ initial public offering on July 25, 2007) as reported on the consolidated tape of the NYSE or NASDAQ Global Select Market, as applicable, as well as cash dividends per common share, as reported in the Validus 10-K and IPC’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, respectively, with respect to the years 2007 and 2008, and thereafter as reported in publicly available sources. The IPC dividend information was taken from the IPC/Max S-4. See Sources of Additional Information above.
 
                                                 
    Validus     IPC  
    High     Low     Dividend     High     Low     Dividend  
 
Year ended December 31, 2009
                                               
First Quarter
  $ 26.30     $ 21.25     $ 0.20     $ 30.25     $ 20.89     $ 0.22  
Second Quarter (through June [•], 2009)
  $ [ • ]     $ [ • ]       N/A     $ [ • ]     $ [ • ]       N/A  
December 31, 2008
                                               
First Quarter
  $ 26.22     $ 23.00     $ 0.20     $ 28.25     $ 24.82     $ 0.22  
Second Quarter
  $ 23.72     $ 20.11     $ 0.20     $ 30.38     $ 26.55     $ 0.22  
Third Quarter
  $ 24.70     $ 20.00     $ 0.20     $ 33.00     $ 26.58     $ 0.22  
Fourth Quarter
  $ 26.16     $ 14.84     $ 0.20     $ 29.90     $ 19.52     $ 0.22  
Year ended December 31, 2007
                                               
First Quarter
    N/A       N/A       N/A     $ 31.53     $ 27.82     $ 0.20  
Second Quarter
    N/A       N/A       N/A     $ 32.53     $ 28.57     $ 0.20  
Third Quarter
  $ 25.28     $ 21.11       N/A     $ 33.01     $ 24.01     $ 0.20  
Fourth Quarter
  $ 26.59     $ 24.73       N/A     $ 30.13     $ 26.87     $ 0.20  
 
The following table sets out the trading information for Validus Shares and IPC Shares on March 30, 2009, the last full trading day before Validus’ public announcement of delivery of the Initial Validus Offer to the board of directors of IPC, and June [•], 2009, the last practicable trading day for which information was available before first mailing of this proxy statement.
 
                         
                Equivalent
 
                Validus
 
    Validus Common
    IPC Common
    Per-Share
 
    Share Close     Share Close     Amount  
 
March 30, 2009
  $ 24.91     $ 25.41     $ 30.98  
June [•], 2009
  $ [ • ]     $ [ • ]     $ [ • ]  
 
Equivalent per-share amounts are calculated by multiplying Validus per-share amounts by the Acquisition exchange ratio of 1.1234 and adding $3.00 in cash per IPC Share.
 
The value of the Scheme of Arrangement will change as the market prices of Validus Shares and IPC Shares fluctuate prior to the consummation of the Scheme of Arrangement, and may therefore be different from the prices set forth above at the effective time and at the time you receive the Acquisition Consideration. See Risk Factors above. IPC shareholders are encouraged to obtain current market quotations for Validus Shares and IPC Shares prior to making any decision with respect to the Scheme of Arrangement.
 
Please also see The Acquisition — Delisting of IPC Shares for a discussion of the possibility that IPC Shares will cease to be listed on the NASDAQ Global Select Market and on the Bermuda Stock Exchange.
 
As of April 30, 2009, directors and executive officers of Validus (exclusive of those shareholders who Validus deems to be “qualified sponsors” (as defined in this proxy statement)) held and were entitled to vote approximately 1.76% of the outstanding Validus Shares. As of March 26, 2009, directors and executive officers of IPC held and were entitled to vote approximately 1.4% of the outstanding IPC Shares.


-39-


 

 
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
 
This proxy statement may include forward-looking statements, both with respect to us and our industry, that reflect our current views with respect to future events and financial performance. Statements that include the words “expect,” “intend,” “plan,” “believe,” “project,” “anticipate,” “will,” “may” and similar statements of a future or forward-looking nature identify forward-looking statements. All forward-looking statements address matters that involve risks and uncertainties, many of which are beyond our control. Accordingly, there are or will be important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those indicated in such statements and, therefore, you should not place undue reliance on any such statements. We believe that these factors include, but are not limited to, the following: 1) uncertainty as to whether Validus will be able to enter into and to consummate the proposed acquisition on the terms set forth in the Validus amalgamation offer; 2) uncertainty as to the actual premium that will be realized by IPC shareholders in connection with the proposed acquisition; 3) uncertainty as to the long-term value of Validus Shares; 4) unpredictability and severity of catastrophic events; 5) rating agency actions; 6) adequacy of Validus’ or IPC’s risk management and loss limitation methods; 7) cyclicality of demand and pricing in the insurance and reinsurance markets; 8) Validus’ limited operating history; 9) Validus’ ability to implement its business strategy during “soft” as well as “hard” markets; 10) adequacy of Validus’ or IPC’s loss reserves; 11) continued availability of capital and financing; 12) retention of key personnel; 13) competition; 14) potential loss of business from one or more major insurance or reinsurance brokers; 15) Validus’ or IPC’s ability to implement, successfully and on a timely basis, complex infrastructure, distribution capabilities, systems, procedures and internal controls, and to develop accurate actuarial data to support the business and regulatory and reporting requirements; 16) general economic and market conditions (including inflation, volatility in the credit and capital markets, interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates); 17) the integration of Talbot or other businesses we may acquire or new business ventures we may start; 18) the effect on Validus’ or IPC’s investment portfolios of changing financial market conditions including inflation, interest rates, liquidity and other factors; 19) acts of terrorism or outbreak of war; 20) availability of reinsurance and retrocessional coverage; 21) failure to realize the anticipated benefits of the proposed acquisition, including as a result of failure or delay in integrating the businesses of Validus and IPC; and 22) the outcome of litigation arising from Validus’ offer for IPC, as well as management’s response to any of the aforementioned factors.
 
The foregoing review of important factors should not be construed as exhaustive and should be read in conjunction with the other cautionary statements that are included herein and elsewhere, including the Risk Factors included in our most recent reports on Form 10-K and Form 10-Q and the risk factors included in IPC’s most recent reports on Form 10-K and Form 10-Q and other documents of Validus and IPC on file with the SEC. Any forward-looking statements made in this proxy statement are qualified by these cautionary statements, and there can be no assurance that the actual results or developments anticipated by Validus will be realized or, even if substantially realized, that they will have the expected consequences to, or effects on, us or our business or operations. Except as required by law, we undertake no obligation to update publicly or revise any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future developments or otherwise.


-40-


 

 
RISK FACTORS
 
In addition to the other information included or incorporated by reference in this proxy statement (including the matters addressed under Forward-Looking Statements above), you should carefully consider the following risk factors before deciding whether to vote to approve the Scheme of Arrangement. In addition to the risk factors set forth below, you should read and consider other risk factors specific to each of the Validus and IPC businesses that will also affect Validus after the effectiveness of the Scheme of Arrangement, described in Part I, Item 1A of each company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, and the other documents that have been filed with the SEC and all of which are incorporated by reference into this proxy statement. If any of the risks described below or in the reports incorporated by reference into this proxy statement actually occurs, the respective businesses, financial results, financial conditions, operating results or share prices of Validus or IPC could be materially adversely affected.
 
Risks Related to the Scheme of Arrangement
 
The value of the Validus Shares that the IPC shareholders receive in the Scheme of Arrangement will vary as a result of the fixed exchange ratio and possible fluctuations in the price of Validus Shares.
 
At the effective time, each IPC Share issued and outstanding immediately prior to the effective time (excluding any IPC Shares owned by Validus, IPC or their respective subsidiaries) will be exchanged for Validus Shares equal to the exchange ratio, $3.00 in cash (less any applicable withholding taxes and without interest) and cash in lieu of fractional shares. Because the exchange ratio is fixed at 1.1234 of a Validus Share for each IPC Share, the market value of the Validus Shares issued in the Scheme of Arrangement will depend upon the market price of a Validus Share at the effective time. If the price of Validus Shares declines, IPC shareholders could receive less value for their shares upon the consummation of the Scheme of Arrangement than the value calculated pursuant to the exchange ratio on the date the Scheme of Arrangement is approved by the IPC shareholders. Share price changes may result from a variety of factors that are beyond the companies’ control, including general market conditions, changes in business prospects, catastrophic events, both natural and man-made, and regulatory considerations. In addition, the ongoing business of Validus may be adversely affected by actions taken by Validus in connection with the Scheme of Arrangement, including as a result of (i) the attention of management of Validus having been diverted to the Scheme of Arrangement instead of being directed solely to Validus’ own operations and pursuit of other opportunities that could have been beneficial to Validus prior to and after the effectiveness of the Scheme of Arrangement and (ii) payment by Validus of certain costs relating to the Acquisition, including certain legal, accounting and financial and capital market advisory fees.
 
Because the Scheme of Arrangement will not be completed until certain conditions have been satisfied or, where relevant, waived (see The Scheme of Arrangement — Conditions to the Scheme of Arrangement below), a period of time may pass which may be significant between the filing of this proxy statement and the effectiveness of the Scheme of Arrangement. Therefore, at the time when you vote with respect to the court-ordered IPC meeting, you will not know the exact market value of the Validus Shares that will be issued if the Scheme of Arrangement becomes effective. Please see Comparative Market Price and Dividend Information above for the historical high and low closing prices per share of Validus Shares and IPC Shares, as well as cash dividends per share of Validus Shares and IPC Shares respectively for each quarter of the period 2007 through 2009.
 
Furthermore, in connection with the Scheme of Arrangement, Validus estimates that it will need to issue approximately 63,474,234 Validus Shares. The increase in the number of Validus Shares may lead to sales of such shares or the perception that such sales may occur, either of which may adversely affect the market for, and the market price of, Validus Shares.
 
IPC shareholders are urged to obtain market quotations for Validus Shares and IPC Shares when they consider whether to tender their IPC Shares pursuant to the Exchange Offer.


-41-


 

The Scheme of Arrangement is subject to conditions that Validus cannot control which may result in the Scheme of Arrangement being terminated.
 
The Scheme of Arrangement is subject to conditions, including the termination of the Max Amalgamation Agreement, the approval by our shareholders of the issuance of Validus Shares pursuant to the Scheme of Arrangement, the sanctioning of the Scheme of Arrangement by the Supreme Court of Bermuda, no material adverse effect having occurred with respect to IPC and its subsidiaries, IPC and its subsidiaries continuing to operate in the ordinary course of business consistent with past practice and the consent of the lenders under Validus’ credit agreements. There are no assurances that all of such conditions will be satisfied, or where relevant, waived. In addition, the IPC board of directors may take actions that will delay, or frustrate, the satisfaction of one or more conditions. If the conditions are not met, then Validus may terminate the Scheme of Arrangement. Please see The Scheme of Arrangement — Conditions to the Scheme of Arrangement on page [ • ] for a complete description of the conditions to the effectiveness of the Scheme of Arrangement.
 
Validus may waive one or more of the conditions to the effectiveness of the Scheme of Arrangement or modify the Scheme of Arrangement without resoliciting or seeking additional shareholder approval.
 
Except for the unwaivable conditions described below in The Scheme of Arrangement — Conditions to the Scheme of Arrangement, each of the conditions to the effectiveness of the Scheme of Arrangement may be waived, in whole or in part by Validus. Validus may consent on behalf of all persons concerned to any modification of or addition to the Scheme of Arrangement or any condition to the effectiveness of the Scheme of Arrangement which the Supreme Court of Bermuda may approve or impose. The board of directors of Validus will evaluate the materiality of any such modification, addition or condition to determine whether resolicitation of proxies is necessary, or if shareholder approval has been received, whether further shareholder approval is necessary. In the event that any such modification, addition or condition is not determined to be significant enough to require resolicitation or additional approval of shareholders, the Scheme of Arrangement may be consummated without seeking further shareholder approval.
 
The effectiveness of the Scheme of Arrangement is conditioned on termination of the Max Amalgamation Agreement, which could under certain circumstances result in the payment of the Max Termination Fee.
 
While Validus believes the provision of the Max Amalgamation Agreement providing for the possible payment of the Max Termination Fee is invalid and is seeking a ruling of the Supreme Court of Bermuda to that effect, if the proposals related to the Max Amalgamation Agreement are not approved by IPC shareholders, a court may determine that IPC is required, or IPC may otherwise be bound, to pay all, or a portion, of the Max Termination Fee, including in the circumstance where IPC subsequently agrees to enter into an agreement with a third party in respect of another business combination.
 
The Scheme of Arrangement and subsequent short-form amalgamation may fail to qualify as a reorganization within the meaning of Section 368(a) of the Code, resulting in your full recognition of taxable gain or loss in respect of your IPC Shares.
 
The Scheme of Arrangement and subsequent short-form amalgamation are intended to constitute a single integrated transaction that qualifies as a reorganization within the meaning of Section 368(a) of the Code. No legal opinion from U.S. legal counsel or ruling from the U.S. Internal Revenue Service (the “IRS”) has been requested, or is expected to be obtained, regarding the U.S. federal income tax consequences of the Scheme of Arrangement and short-form amalgamation. No assurance can be given that the IRS will not assert, or that a court would not sustain, that the transaction does not qualify as a reorganization. If the transaction fails to qualify as a reorganization, you generally would recognize gain or loss equal to the difference, if any, between the sum of the fair market value of the Validus Shares received in the Scheme of Arrangement and the cash received and your adjusted tax basis in IPC Shares surrendered in exchange therefor. For more information, please see the section of this proxy statement under the caption “Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences.” U.S. holders of IPC Shares should consult their own


-42-


 

tax advisors as to the tax consequences to them of the Scheme of Arrangement and short-form amalgamation, including any U.S. federal, state, local, non-U.S. or other tax consequences, and any tax return filing or other reporting requirements.
 
Risks Related to IPC’s Businesses
 
You should read and consider other risk factors specific to IPC’s businesses that will also affect Validus after the effectiveness of the Scheme of Arrangement, described in Part I, Item 1A of the IPC 10-K and other documents that have been filed by IPC with the SEC and which are incorporated by reference into this proxy statement.
 
Risks Related to Validus’ Businesses
 
You should read and consider other risk factors specific to Validus’ businesses that will also affect Validus after the effectiveness of the Scheme of Arrangement, described in Part I, Item 1A of the Validus 10-K and other documents that have been filed by Validus with the SEC and which are incorporated by reference into this proxy statement.
 
Risks Related to Validus Following the Effectiveness of the Scheme of Arrangement
 
Validus may experience difficulties integrating IPC’s businesses, which could cause Validus to fail to realize the anticipated benefits of the Scheme of Arrangement.
 
If the Scheme of Arrangement is consummated, achieving the anticipated benefits of the Acquisition will depend in part upon whether the two companies integrate their businesses in an effective and efficient manner. The companies may not be able to accomplish this integration process smoothly or successfully. The integration of certain operations following the Acquisition will take time and will require the dedication of significant management resources, which may temporarily distract management’s attention from the routine business of Validus. Any delay or inability of management to successfully integrate the operations of the two companies could compromise Validus’ potential to achieve the anticipated long-term strategic benefits of the Acquisition and could have a material adverse effect on the business, financial condition, operating results and market value of Validus Shares after the effectiveness of the Scheme of Arrangement.
 
Validus has only conducted a review of IPC’s publicly available information and has not had access to IPC’s non-public information. Therefore, Validus may be subject to unknown liabilities of IPC which may have a material adverse effect on Validus’ profitability, financial condition and results of operations
 
To date, Validus has only conducted a due diligence review of IPC’s publicly available information. The consummation of the Scheme of Arrangement may constitute a default, or an event that, with or without notice or lapse of time or both, would constitute a default, or result in the termination, cancellation, acceleration or other change of any right or obligation (including, without limitation, any payment obligation) under agreements of IPC that are not publicly available. As a result, after the consummation of the Scheme of Arrangement, Validus may be subject to unknown liabilities of IPC, which may have a material adverse effect on Validus’ profitability, financial condition and results of operations.
 
The Scheme of Arrangement may also permit a counter-party to an agreement with IPC to terminate that agreement because completion of the Scheme of Arrangement would cause a default or violate an anti-assignment, change of control or similar clause. If this happens, Validus may have to seek to replace that agreement with a new agreement. Validus cannot assure you that it will be able to replace a terminated agreement on comparable terms or at all. Depending on the importance of a terminated agreement to IPC’s business, failure to replace that agreement on similar terms or at all may increase the costs to Validus of operating IPC’s business or prevent Validus from operating part or all of IPC’s business.
 
In respect of all information relating to IPC presented in, incorporated by reference into or omitted from, this proxy statement, Validus has relied upon publicly available information, including information publicly filed by IPC with the SEC. Although Validus has no knowledge that would indicate that any statements contained herein regarding IPC’s condition, including its financial or operating condition (based upon such publicly filed reports and


-43-


 

documents) are inaccurate, incomplete or untrue, Validus was not involved in the preparation of such information and statements. For example, Validus has made adjustments and assumptions in preparing the pro forma financial information presented in this proxy statement that have necessarily involved Validus’ estimates with respect to IPC’s financial information. Any financial, operating or other information regarding IPC that may be detrimental to Validus following the effectiveness of the Scheme of Arrangement that has not been publicly disclosed by IPC, or errors in Validus’ estimates due to the lack of access to IPC, may have a material adverse effect on Validus’ financial condition or the benefits Validus expects to achieve through the consummation of the Scheme of Arrangement.
 
The Scheme of Arrangement may result in ratings downgrades of one or more of Validus’ insurance or reinsurance subsidiaries (including the newly acquired IPC insurance and reinsurance operating companies) which may adversely affect Validus’ business, financial condition and operating results, as well as the market price of Validus Shares.
 
Ratings with respect to claims paying ability and financial strength are important factors in maintaining customer confidence in Validus and its ability to market insurance and reinsurance products and compete with other insurance and reinsurance companies. Rating organizations regularly analyze the financial performance and condition of insurers and reinsurers and will likely reevaluate the ratings of Validus and its reinsurance subsidiaries following the effectiveness of the Scheme of Arrangement. While each of Standard & Poor’s and A.M. Best have not taken any action with respect to Validus’ ratings following the announcement of the Initial Validus Offer or the Validus Amalgamation Offer, Moody’s has changed the outlook to negative with respect to the A3 insurance financial strength rating of Validus’ reinsurance subsidiary, Validus Reinsurance, Ltd., and the Baa2 long-term issuer rating of Validus. Additionally, although A.M. Best has assigned the reinsurance subsidiaries of IPC (including IPCRe Limited and IPCRe Europe Limited) the financial strength rating of “A” (Excellent) and issuer credit ratings of “a” and IPC the issuer credit rating of “bbb”, A.M. Best has also indicated that each of these IPC ratings is under review with negative implications in connection with the Proposed Max Amalgamation. A.M. Best and the other ratings agencies would most likely provide similar scrutiny and analysis of the Scheme of Arrangement. Following the consummation of the Scheme of Arrangement, any ratings downgrades, or the potential for ratings downgrades, of Validus or its subsidiaries (including the newly acquired IPC operating companies) could adversely affect Validus’ ability to market and distribute products and services and successfully compete in the marketplace, which could have a material adverse effect on its business, financial condition and operating results, as well as the market price for Validus Shares.
 
The occurrence of severe catastrophic events after consummation of the Scheme of Arrangement could cause Validus’ net income to be more volatile than if the consummation of the Scheme of Arrangement did not take place.
 
For the year ended December 31, 2008, Validus’ gross premiums written (excluding reinstatement premiums) on property catastrophe business were $328.2 million or 24.1% of total gross premiums written. For the year ended December 31, 2008, 93% of IPC’s gross premiums written covered property catastrophe reinsurance risks. For the year ended December 31, 2008, after giving effect to the Scheme of Arrangement as if it had been consummated on December 31, 2008, gross premiums written on property catastrophe business would have been $661.9 million or 37.5% of total gross premiums of Validus on a pro forma basis. Because Validus after the Scheme of Arrangement will, among other things, have larger aggregate exposures to natural and man-made disasters than it does today, Validus’ aggregate loss experience could have a significant influence on Validus’ net income. See Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Pro Forma Financial Information.


-44-


 

 
THE ACQUISITION
 
General Description
 
In order to consummate the Acquisition, Validus is simultaneously pursuing the following alternative transaction structures:
 
(1) the Validus Amalgamation Offer;
 
(2) the Exchange Offer; and
 
(3) the Scheme of Arrangement to which this proxy statement relates.
 
The Validus Amalgamation Offer, the Exchange Offer and the Scheme of Arrangement are alternative methods for Validus to acquire all of the issued and outstanding IPC Shares on the same economic terms. Ultimately, only one of these transaction structures can be pursued to completion. Validus intends to seek to acquire all IPC Shares by whichever method Validus determines is most effective and efficient.
 
On March 31, 2009, Validus publicly announced that it had delivered to IPC an offer to consummate the Acquisition on the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in the Initial Validus Offer. IPC announced on April 7, 2009 that its board of directors had determined that the Initial Validus Offer did not constitute a superior proposal to the Proposed Max Amalgamation and reaffirmed its support of the Proposed Max Amalgamation. On May 18, 2009, Validus publicly announced that it had delivered to IPC an increased offer to acquire each outstanding IPC Share for (i) 1.1234 Validus Shares and (ii) $3.00 in cash (less any applicable withholding taxes and without interest). In addition, IPC shareholders will receive cash in lieu of any fractional Validus Share to which they may be entitled. Validus has also delivered the Validus Amalgamation Agreement signed by Validus so that, upon a termination of the Max Amalgamation Agreement, IPC would have the certainty of Validus’ transaction and would be able to sign the Validus Amalgamation Agreement. IPC announced on May 21, 2009 that its board of directors had determined that the Validus Amalgamation Offer did not constitute a superior proposal to the Proposed Max Amalgamation and reaffirmed its support of the Proposed Max Amalgamation. Additionally, Max has not released IPC from the prohibition in the Max Amalgamation Agreement that prevents IPC from even discussing the Validus Amalgamation Offer with Validus. As of the date of this proxy statement, IPC has not been willing to meet or negotiate with Validus.
 
In order to consummate the Acquisition without the cooperation of the IPC board of directors, Validus is pursuing a three-part plan.
 
First, Validus is soliciting proxies from IPC shareholders to vote against the Proposed Max Amalgamation. If the Proposed Max Amalgamation is voted down by IPC shareholders, IPC’s board of directors will be able to terminate the Max Amalgamation Agreement and enter into the Validus Amalgamation Agreement. If IPC’s board of directors were to enter into the Validus Amalgamation Agreement following the termination of the Max Amalgamation Agreement, Validus believes the amalgamation contemplated by the Validus Amalgamation Offer could be completed in mid-to-late July 2009 based on the assumption that IPC terminates the Max Amalgamation Agreement promptly following its June 12, 2009 annual general meeting, allowing approximately one month to hold a special general meeting of IPC shareholders to obtain the required shareholder approval and to satisfy the other conditions in the Validus Amalgamation Agreement.
 
Second, Validus has commenced the Exchange Offer. The Exchange Offer is subject to the terms and conditions described in the Offer to Exchange relating thereto. Under Bermuda law, if Validus acquires at least 90% of the IPC Shares which it is seeking to acquire in the Exchange Offer, Validus will have the right to acquire the remaining IPC Shares on the same terms in a second-step acquisition. Validus believes that it would be able to complete the Exchange Offer in June 2009, promptly following termination of the Max Amalgamation Agreement (and subject to the satisfaction or waiver of the other conditions to the Exchange Offer), based on the following. The expiration time of the exchange offer will be June 26, 2009, unless extended. As a result, if the conditions of the Exchange Offer are satisfied or waived at the expiration time of the Exchange Offer, Validus would be able to acquire all of the IPC Shares that are validly tendered pursuant to the Exchange Offer.


-45-


 

Third, Validus is pursuing the Scheme of Arrangement. In order to implement the Scheme of Arrangement, the IPC shareholders must approve the Scheme of Arrangement at the court-ordered IPC meeting, IPC must separately approve the Scheme of Arrangement and the Scheme of Arrangement must be sanctioned by the Supreme Court of Bermuda. If the IPC shareholders approve the Scheme of Arrangement at the court-ordered IPC meeting, the separate approval of IPC of the Scheme of Arrangement can be provided by either (i) the IPC board of directors voluntarily complying with the will of the IPC shareholders as expressed at the court-ordered IPC meeting, or (ii) the shareholders of IPC approving resolutions at the IPC special general meeting, including resolutions for IPC to approve and to be bound by the Scheme of Arrangement and to terminate the Max Amalgamation Agreement. On May 12, 2009, Validus filed with the SEC a preliminary proxy statement which, when filed in its definitive form, will be used to solicit written requisitions from the IPC shareholders to compel the IPC board of directors to call the IPC special general meeting. Following IPC shareholder approval at both the court-ordered IPC meeting and the IPC special general meeting, the satisfaction or, where relevant, waiver of the other conditions to the effectiveness of the Scheme of Arrangement, and the granting of a court order from the Supreme Court of Bermuda sanctioning the Scheme of Arrangement, a copy of the court order sanctioning the Scheme of Arrangement will be delivered to the Bermuda Registrar of Companies, at which time the Scheme of Arrangement will be effective. In a decision rendered on May 29, 2009, the Supreme Court of Bermuda has determined that it has jurisdiction to sanction the Scheme of Arrangement without approval of the IPC board of directors. However, the Court has determined not to exercise its discretion to order the court-ordered IPC meeting in advance of the vote on the Proposed Max Amalgamation at the IPC annual general meeting and evidence of IPC shareholder support for the Scheme of Arrangement. Validus believes that, under the Scheme of Arrangement, it would be able to close the Acquisition in July 2009 based on the assumptions that: (1) the Supreme Court of Bermuda will be able to accommodate the preferred hearings schedule and meeting dates and other procedural matters; (2) IPC shareholders holding at least one-tenth of the issued shares of IPC have requisitioned the special general meeting to be held in July 2009; and (3) the IPC directors, following the rejection of the Max Amalgamation Agreement, or IPC shareholders, convene the IPC special general meeting, allowing it to be held in July 2009.
 
Based on Validus’ and IPC’s respective capitalizations as of March 31, 2009 and the exchange ratio of 1.1234, Validus estimates that former IPC shareholders would own, in the aggregate, approximately 41.3% of the issued and outstanding Validus Shares on a fully-diluted basis following closing of the Acquisition.
 
Further details relating to the structure of the Scheme of Arrangement are described in The Scheme of Arrangement below.


-46-


 

 
Background of the Acquisition
 
On March 2, 2009, IPC and Max announced that they had entered into the Max Amalgamation Agreement. The IPC/Max S-4 provides a summary of the events leading to Max and IPC entering into the Max Amalgamation Agreement.
 
In the morning of March 31, 2009, Edward J. Noonan, the Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the board of directors of Validus, placed a telephone call to James P. Bryce, the Chief Executive Officer and President of IPC. Mr. Noonan spoke with Mr. Bryce and explained that Validus intended to make an offer to exchange each outstanding IPC Share for 1.2037 Validus Shares, subject to the termination of the Max Amalgamation Agreement.
 
Following this telephone call, in the morning of March 31, 2009, Validus delivered a proposal letter containing the Initial Validus Offer to IPC’s board of directors in care of Mr. Bryce and issued a press release announcing the Initial Validus Offer. The letter reads as follows:
 
March 31, 2009
 
The Board of Directors of IPC Holdings, Ltd.
c/o James P. Bryce, President and Chief Executive Officer
American International Bldg.
29 Richmond Road
Pembroke, HM 08
Bermuda
 
  Re:   Superior Amalgamation Proposal by Validus Holdings, Ltd. (“Validus”) to
IPC Holdings, Ltd. (“IPC”)
 
Dear Sirs:
 
On behalf of Validus, I am writing to submit a binding offer1 pursuant to which Validus and IPC would amalgamate in a share-for-share exchange valuing IPC shares at an 18.0% premium to yesterday’s closing market price. We believe that an amalgamation of Validus and IPC would represent a compelling combination and excellent strategic fit and create superior value for our respective shareholders.
 
We unquestionably would have preferred to work cooperatively with you to complete a negotiated transaction. However, it was necessary to communicate our binding offer to you by letter because of the provisions of the Agreement and Plan of Amalgamation between IPC and Max Capital Group Ltd. (“Max”), dated as of March 1, 2009, as amended on March 5, 2009 (the “Max Plan of Amalgamation”). We have reviewed the Max Plan of Amalgamation and see that it contemplates your receipt of acquisition proposals. Given the importance of our binding offer to our respective shareholders, we have decided to make this letter public.
 
Our binding offer involves a share-for-share exchange valuing IPC shares at an 18.0% premium to yesterday’s closing market price. Consistent with that, we are prepared to amalgamate with IPC at a fixed exchange ratio of 1.2037 Validus shares per IPC share.
 
Our board of directors has unanimously approved the submission of our binding offer and delivery of the enclosed signed amalgamation agreement, so that, upon termination of the Max Plan of Amalgamation, you will be able to sign the enclosed agreement with the certainty of an agreed transaction. Our offer is structured as a tax-free share-for-share transaction and does not require any external financing. It is not conditioned on due diligence. The only conditions to our offer are those contained in the enclosed executed amalgamation agreement.
 
 
1 Throughout this letter we refer to our “binding offer” because, as of the date of this letter, we had indicated to IPC that our offer could not be withdrawn prior to April 15, 2009. As of the date of this proxy statement, we have revised our offer. The terms of our offer do not prevent us from withdrawing it.


-47-


 

 
Our binding offer is clearly superior to the Max transaction for your shareholders and is a Superior Proposal as defined in section 5.5(f) of the Max Plan of Amalgamation for the reasons set forth below.
 
Superior Current Value.  Our proposed transaction will provide superior current value for your shareholders. Our fixed exchange ratio of 1.2037 represents a value of $29.98 per IPC share, which is a premium of 18.0% to the closing price of IPC’s common shares on March 30, 2009.2
 
Superior Trading Characteristics.  Validus’ common shares have superior trading characteristics to those of Max as noted in the table below.
 
         
    Validus   Max
 
Share Price Change Since Validus IPO(1)
  +13.2%   −36.5%
Mkt. Cap as of 3/30/09
  $2.0 billion   $0.9 billion
Average Daily Trading Volume(2)
  $11.3 million   $6.7 million
Price / Book(3)
  1.05x   0.76x
Price / Tangible Book(3)
  1.13x   0.77x
 
 
(1) Based on the closing prices on March 30, 2009 and July 24, 2007.
 
(2) Three months prior to March 2, 2009, date of announcement of Max and IPC amalgamation.
 
(3) Based on December 31, 2008 GAAP book value per diluted share and diluted tangible GAAP book value per share using closing prices on March 30, 2009.
 
Less Balance Sheet Risk.3  The combined investment portfolio of IPC/Validus is more stable than that of IPC/Max4. Pro forma for the proposed IPC/Max combination, “alternative investments” represent 12% of investments and 29% of shareholders’ equity. In contrast, Validus does not invest in “alternatives” and pro forma for a Validus/IPC combination, “alternative investments” represent 3% of investments and 4% of shareholders’ equity, providing greater safety for shareholders and clients.
 
Superior Long-term Prospects. A combined Validus and IPC would be a superior company to IPC/Max with greater growth prospects and synergies with:
 
  1.  Superior size and scale, with pro forma December 31, 2008 shareholders’ equity of $3.7 billion and total GAAP capitalization of $4.1 billion;
 
 
2 The Validus Amalgamation Offer, as increased on May 18, 2009, provides IPC shareholders with total consideration of $30.14 per IPC Share based on the closing price of Validus Shares on May 15, 2009, a 13.2% premium to the closing price of IPC Shares that day and a 21.9% premium based on the closing prices of IPC Shares and Validus Shares on March 30, 2009, the last trading day before the announcement of the Initial Validus Offer.
3 The occurrence of severe catastrophic events after an amalgamation with IPC could cause Validus’ net income to be more volatile than if the amalgamation did not take place. For the year ended December 31, 2008, Validus’ gross premiums written (excluding reinstatement premiums) on property catastrophe business were $328.2 million or 24.1% of total gross premiums written. For the year ended December 31, 2008, 93% of IPC’s gross premiums written (excluding reinstatement premiums) covered property catastrophe reinsurance risks. For the year ended December 31, 2008, after giving effect to the amalgamation of Validus and IPC as if it had been consummated on December 31, 2008, gross premiums written on property catastrophe business would have been $661.9 million or 37.5% of total gross premiums of Validus on a pro forma basis. Because Validus after the amalgamation will, among other things, have larger aggregate exposures to natural and man-made disasters than it does today, Validus’ aggregate loss experience could have a significant influence on Validus’ net income. IPC did not disclose gross premiums written by class of business in the IPC 10-Q. Therefore, comparable disclosure of property catastrophe premiums cannot be presented.
4 Despite Max’s announced plan to reduce its exposure to alternative investments to 10-12% of its portfolio, according to recent Max disclosures, as a result of the Proposed Max Amalgamation, IPC’s investment in alternative investments would increase from 7% of its total portfolio at December 31, 2008 to 12% of its total portfolio on a pro forma basis after giving effect to the Proposed Max Amalgamation, an increase of 5%.


-48-


 

 
  2.  Superior financial flexibility, with debt/total capitalization of only 1.8% and total leverage including hybrid securities of only 9.1%;
 
  3.  A global platform, with offices and underwriting facilities in Bermuda, at Lloyd’s in London, Dublin, Singapore, New York and Miami;
 
  4.  Superior diversified business mix, with lines of business concentrated in short-tail lines where pricing momentum is strongest; and
 
  5.  An experienced, proven and stable management team with substantial expertise operating in IPC’s core lines of business.
 
Our superior growth prospects are evidenced by our historical track record. Between December 31, 2005 and December 31, 2008, Validus grew its book value per share (including accumulated dividends) at a 13.2% compound annual rate vs. Max’s 8.8% growth over the same period. In 2008, we grew our book value per share (including accumulated dividends) by 2.4% vs. Max’s 10.8% decline over the same period.
 
Expedited Closing Process.  We will be able to close an amalgamation with IPC more quickly than Max because we will not require the approval of U.S. insurance regulators.5
 
Substantially the Same Contractual Terms and Conditions.  Our proposed amalgamation agreement contains substantially the same terms and conditions as those in the Max Plan of Amalgamation, and for your convenience we have included a markup of our amalgamation agreement against the Max Plan of Amalgamation.
 
Superior Outcome for Bermuda Community.  The combination of Validus and IPC creates a larger, stronger entity than a combination of Max and IPC which will benefit the Bermuda community.6
 
Superior Outcome for IPC Clients.  Validus has a greater commitment to the lines of business underwritten by IPC and has superior technical expertise and capacity to provide IPC customers with continuing reinsurance coverage. Max has consistently stated its intention to reduce its commitment to IPC’s business. Therefore, a combination with Validus will be less disruptive to IPC’s client base.
 
Our binding offer is clearly a Superior Proposal, within the meaning of the Max Plan of Amalgamation. We and our financial advisors, Greenhill & Co., LLC, and our legal advisors, Cahill Gordon & Reindel llp, are prepared to move forward immediately. We believe that our offer presents a compelling opportunity for both our companies and our respective shareholders, and look forward to your prompt response. We respectfully request that the Board of IPC reach a determination by 5:00 p.m., Bermuda time, on Wednesday, April 15, 2009, that (i) our binding offer constitutes a Superior Proposal, (ii) it is withdrawing its recommendation for the transaction contemplated by the Max Plan of Amalgamation and (iii) it is making a recommendation for the transaction contemplated by this binding offer.
 
We reserve the right to withdraw this offer if the Board of IPC has not reached a determination (i) that our binding offer constitutes a Superior Proposal, (ii) to withdraw its recommendation for the transaction contemplated by the Max Plan of Amalgamation and (iii) to make a recommendation for the transaction contemplated by this binding offer by 5:00 p.m., Bermuda time, on Wednesday, April 15, 2009. We further reserve the right to withdraw this binding offer if you subsequently withdraw your recommendation in favor of our offer or if you do not sign the enclosed amalgamation agreement within two business days after the termination of the Max Plan of Amalgamation.
 
 
5 As of the date of this letter, our belief that we could close an amalgamation with IPC more quickly than Max was based on the observation that the Validus amalgamation with IPC would not require the approval of U.S. insurance regulators because neither IPC nor Validus operates a U.S.-regulated insurance business that would require any such approval while the Proposed Max Amalgamation requires such approvals.
6 We believe that a larger, stronger entity will benefit the Bermuda community because it offers greater stability.


-49-


 

We look forward to your prompt response.
 
Sincerely,
 
/s/  Edward J. Noonan
Edward J. Noonan
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
 
cc:   Robert F. Greenhill
Greenhill & Co., LLC
 
John J. Schuster
Cahill Gordon & Reindel LLP
 
In the afternoon on March 31, 2009, IPC issued a press release acknowledging receipt of the letter from Validus outlining the Initial Validus Offer. The text of the press release reads as follows:
 
IPC Holdings, Ltd. (NASDAQ: IPCR) (“IPC”) acknowledges receipt of an unsolicited letter dated today, March 31, 2009, from Validus Holdings, Ltd. (NYSE: VR) (“Validus”) outlining a proposed transaction.
 
On March 2, 2009, IPC entered into an Agreement and Plan of Amalgamation (the “Amalgamation Agreement”) with its wholly-owned subsidiary IPC Limited and Max Capital Group Ltd. (“Max”) which provides that Max will amalgamate with IPC Limited. IPC continues to be bound by the terms of the Amalgamation Agreement and the parties have recently filed a joint proxy statement/prospectus with the Securities & Exchange Commission.
 
IPC’s Board of Directors will review the terms of the proposal submitted by Validus in a manner consistent with its obligations under the Amalgamation Agreement and applicable Bermuda law.
 
IPC will have no further comment on this matter until IPC’s Board of Directors makes a determination regarding Validus’ offer.
 
Also in the afternoon on March 31, 2009, Max issued a press release announcing that it had received from IPC a copy of the letter from Validus outlining the Initial Validus Offer. The text of the press release reads as follows:
 
Max Capital Group Ltd. (NASDAQ: MXGL; BSX: MXGL BH) today announced that it has received a copy of Validus Holdings, Ltd.’s unsolicited, stock-for-stock, proposal for IPC Holdings, Ltd.
 
As previously announced on March 2, 2009, Max and IPC entered into an Agreement and Plan of Amalgamation pursuant to which Max will amalgamate with IPC Limited. The Boards of both companies have previously stated that the combination of Max with IPC would create a strong company with a balanced, diversified portfolio of risk across a mix of geographies and business lines with the opportunity to generate more stable and attractive returns on capital. Max’s pending merger with IPC is expected to be completed late in the second quarter or early in the third quarter of this year.
 
W. Marston (Marty) Becker, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Max Capital, said: “In today’s unprecedented business environment and cycle, we believe that diversification, in terms of global presence and both short and long-tail exposures, significantly reduces risk and provides a more solid platform for building sustained long-term value. The merger of IPC and Max was founded on a shared vision of allowing the combined group of shareholders to enjoy the benefits of a strong, diversified operating platform with a proven track record. While we have not yet had the opportunity to review Validus’ proposal carefully, we believe that combining two short-tailed property catastrophe oriented companies would appear to do little for true shareholder diversification. By contrast, Max’s track record of building a diversified platform without diluting shareholder value should lead to better long-term growth prospects and value creation following completion of the pending IPC-Max merger.”


-50-


 

 
In the morning on April 2, 2009, Max sent a letter to IPC’s board of directors purporting to outline the relative advantages of the pending Proposed Max Amalgamation as well as the business and financial issues raised by the Initial Validus Offer and issued a press release announcing the letter. The text of the letter reads as follows:
 
Dear Members of the Board:
 
We are writing regarding the many business and financial issues raised by the public proposal by Validus Holdings Ltd. (“Validus”) to acquire IPC Holdings, Ltd. (“IPC”) in lieu of the pending IPC amalgamation with Max Capital Group Ltd. (“Max”). The IPC/Max amalgamation was founded on a shared vision of allowing our combined group of shareholders to enjoy the benefits of a strong, diversified operating platform with a proven track record. The Validus proposal does not offer that.
 
Rather, in light of the Validus proposal, the IPC Board faces two starkly contrasting choices:
 
A. You can agree to be taken over by Validus at a price that is below IPC’s book value. The result of this takeover for your shareholders would be a minority equity stake in an entity that offers substantially similar product lines to those offered by IPC today, with little risk diversification, and apparently no ability by the IPC Board to steward the longer term prospects of the company.
 
OR
 
B. You can complete the planned merger of equals with Max at a price that is below Max’s book value. We believe that this transaction will create a more stable entity that will provide significant product, geographic and risk diversification and over which IPC’s Board will continue to have significant influence, which in turn will provide superior shareholder value.
 
For the reasons set forth below, and in the accompanying exhibits, we do not agree with Validus that its proposal represents a “Superior Proposal” or is a proposal that can reasonably be expected to lead to a Superior Proposal pursuant to the IPC/Max Plan of Amalgamation dated March 1, 2009 (the “IPC/Max Plan”).
 
1. A combination with Max delivers 29% more tangible book value per share to IPC. As we operate in an industry where the primary valuation driver is a multiple of book value (and tangible book value), we believe that a transaction that maximizes the book value to shareholders provides the best opportunity to generate shareholder value. The IPC combination with Max is a truly superior proposal versus the takeover proposal by Validus. The takeover proposal by Validus would result in IPC receiving only $28.35 in diluted book value per IPC share and $26.19 of diluted tangible book value per IPC share from Validus. In contrast, our combination delivers $34.93 of diluted book value per IPC share (a 23.2% premium to Validus) and $33.83 of diluted tangible book value per IPC share from Max (a 29.2% premium to Validus). A combination with Max provides greater underlying value to IPC’s shareholders, which we believe will result in greater upside for both IPC and Max shareholders.
 
2. The IPC/Max Plan creates significant value for IPC shareholders. As we indicated during our discussions, we believe that the IPC/Max Plan provides an attractive financial outcome for IPC. The IPC/Max Plan is expected to be accretive to both earnings per share and return on equity. In addition, as you consider the historical trading multiples of Max and IPC, there is significant opportunity to create substantial value for all shareholders of the combined company. We believe the Validus proposal prioritizes an immediate “premium” in the form of stock for IPC shareholders, while compromising a value creation opportunity for IPC shareholders. Importantly, the written proposal by Validus does not contemplate any participation by the IPC board of directors, whose participation remains an important consideration for Max in the amalgamation and provides continuity to shareholders and clients.
 
3. Max is a truly diversified underwriting platform. The IPC/Max Plan offers IPC’s shareholders superior current and future value by combining IPC with a truly diversified underwriting platform, with a strong and well established track record. Max enjoys a diversified portfolio of business across many dimensions — by class, geography, customers and distribution. We believe that Max’s diversified underwriting platform, with its strong emphasis on profitable longer-tail casualty business, will generate more stable returns on capital through underwriting cycles, compared to the volatility embedded in the Validus short-tail portfolio. Validus, whose 2008 gross premiums written are 94% concentrated in short- tail lines of business, claims that its


-51-


 

portfolio represents “diversification.” Validus’ ability to deliver anything approaching true diversification seems to be constrained by its limited underwriting platforms in Bermuda and at Lloyd’s and lack of underwriting capabilities in longer-tail casualty classes.
 
Combining two short-tailed property catastrophe companies as proposed by Validus does little for shareholder diversification. Validus’ stated intention to take advantage of currently strong rates in the property market is a short-term strategy that is capital intensive, creates greater volatility for shareholders, and is one which IPC could have continued on a stand-alone basis but elected not to do so. By contrast, Max remains committed to an underwriting strategy that produces attractive results across market cycles, by continuing to expand its specialty insurance business in selected underwriting classes and limiting volatility in its underwriting results.
 
4. Max has a proven, long-term, operating history. Max’s underwriting has been tested through the tragic events of 9/11, the active 2004 hurricane season and the confluence of Hurricanes Katrina, Rita, and Wilma in 2005. Validus’ operating history, by contrast, does not extend beyond the past three years, during which time the industry as a whole has experienced both strong property catastrophe pricing and limited catastrophe activity. The first test of Validus’ portfolio of business and risk management capabilities since its formation three years ago came in 2008 with Hurricanes Ike and Gustav. In our view, the results speak for themselves: the net loss reported by Validus for these events represented 12.4% of its June 30, 2008 shareholders’ equity, the largest percentage loss of its broad peer group which averaged 7.2% of shareholders’ equity. The loss was almost double the net loss incurred by IPC, which represented just 6.7% of IPC’s June 30, 2008 shareholders’ equity. The losses recorded by Validus included a 42% increase in its initial loss estimate for Hurricane Ike (from $165 million to $235 million) during the fourth quarter of 2008. By comparison, Max’s net incurred losses from Hurricanes Ike and Gustav were limited to 3.4% of June 30, 2008 shareholders’ equity, the lowest among the broader peer group, demonstrating the lower embedded volatility of Max’s underwriting results versus Validus.
 
5. IPC and Max can complete an amalgamation more quickly, and with greater certainty.
 
(a) IPC and Max can close our amalgamation expeditiously.  Max believes that the IPC/Max Plan can close as soon as June 2009. By contrast, we believe that Validus would not be in a position to close a transaction with IPC until September 2009 at the earliest, notwithstanding its public prediction of a second quarter close. As you are well aware, the IPC/Max Plan requires that shareholders have the opportunity to vote on our amalgamation before IPC’s Board can terminate our agreement and thereafter begin discussions with a bidder such as Validus. We anticipate that we will be able to hold our respective shareholder meetings in June, and only after those shareholder votes would Validus be able to pursue its proposal. Validus’ inability to close before September 2009, the middle of hurricane season, adds meaningful uncertainly to Validus’ proposal, as IPC shareholders and the transaction itself would be put at risk by the significant catastrophe exposures of Validus and Validus’ ability to terminate the transaction based upon changes in shareholders’ equity. Much has been made by Validus regarding US regulatory approvals required to complete the IPC/Max amalgamation. As you know, these approvals are well underway and we do not foresee such requisite approvals adversely impacting a possible June closing.
 
(b) IPC has conducted extensive diligence on Max.  IPC was given complete and open access to Max to afford you and your outside advisors and consultants with the ability to conduct extensive due diligence on Max. The Validus proposal seeks to have IPC enter into a transaction for which IPC has not conducted due diligence. We also note that certain of Validus’ disclosure schedules will not be provided to IPC until after IPC and Max’s shareholders have the opportunity to vote upon our amalgamation.
 
6. Max’s business is complementary to IPC. Clients seek a diversified program of reinsurers. As you were able to confirm in your due diligence, Max has very limited overlap with the customers of IPC and neither party expects a combination of IPC and Max to lead to any meaningful disruption of either business. In addition, the continuity of the underwriters at IPC will maximize the opportunity for IPC to continue to write this business in the future, assuming market conditions support it. By contrast, Validus acknowledges that it writes business with many of the same clients as IPC, which we would expect to result in a loss of business as clients seek to diversify their reinsurance placements.


-52-


 

7. Max’s complementary and diversified platform is appreciated by our ratings agencies.  Max currently has a financial strength rating of A- by A.M. Best, with its outlook changed to positive in December 2008. As IPC and Max have jointly presented to our ratings agencies, IPC’s Board has the comfort of knowing that the ratings agencies view our combination, and its diversifying impact on IPC’s business, positively. In contrast, we believe that the agencies would not look as favorably on combining two short-tailed property-oriented platforms.
 
8. Max maintains less underwriting volatility through greater diversification of its portfolio of risks. Max seeks to limit its exposure to catastrophic events (probable maximum loss based on a 1 in 250 year event) to a maximum of 20% of its shareholders’ equity, often operating below this level. As part of the IPC/Max Plan, we have discussed continuing to have a significant presence in the property catastrophe market while on a combined equity basis adhering to this same 20% risk tolerance. In contrast, Validus maintains peak exposures where the probable maximum loss based on a 1 in 250 year event runs at a stated 33% of shareholders’ equity. Max believes that combining this risk profile with IPC would expose IPC shareholders to an even greater level of volatility than at present and would not change the markets perception of IPC as being a property catastrophe company. The volatility of Validus’ results would also seem to be cause for concern, particularly when the net losses from Hurricanes Ike and Gustav (which approximated a 1 in 15 year event) was 12.4% of shareholders’ equity, the highest among its broader peer group. This compared to a net loss of 6.7% of shareholders’ equity for IPC and 3.4% for Max.
 
9. Max has a proven, long-term history of successful acquisitions without incurring goodwill. We believe IPC’s shareholders can take comfort in Max’s demonstrated history of successfully entering new business lines through acquisitions and start-ups without incurring meaningful goodwill. For example, when Max entered the Lloyds’ market, we booked intangible assets of $8 million upon closing our acquisition of Imagine Group (UK) Limited, which stands in contrast to the $154 million of intangible assets booked by Validus in their acquisition of Talbot.
 
10. Max has a diversified shareholder base. We believe having a shareholder base dominated by five private equity owners controlling 64.9% of Validus’ total beneficial ownership (as of March 13, 2009) will limit the potential upside in the value of Validus over time as these private shareholders seek to exit their investment. Max has a diversified shareholder base with an 84% public float. In addition, Max has a well diversified shareholder base of high quality institutional shareholders.
 
11. IPC and Max have compatible cultures. IPC and Max have compatible cultures that will help ease the integration of the two companies. IPC and Max share a common focus on underwriting, claims and actuarial disciplines, and on running our respective businesses as meritocracies.
 
12. Max’s higher asset leverage provides greater investment income over time. Max believes that investment leverage (invested assets as a multiple of shareholders’ equity) is a positive in driving earnings and stability of returns on capital over time. Based on 2008 figures, Max had total investment to equity of 4.2x versus 1.7x for Validus. As Validus continues to pursue a short-tail strategy, Validus will be limited in its ability to increase its asset leverage. This deprives IPC of the meaningful investment income derived from longer-tail casualty lines and continues to leave IPC shareholders exposed to increased volatility from catastrophes. Validus has commented on Max’s investment portfolio, particularly its alternative investment portfolio. Max’s year end allocation to alternative investments was 14% of total invested assets, which is expected to reduce to 10% to 12% in 2009. In looking at results, Max’s total investment return, including realized and unrealized gains and losses, during the very volatile period of 2007 / 2008 has outperformed Validus’ in 6 of the last 8 quarters.
 
We believe that the facts regarding the proposal submitted by Validus and the attempt by Validus to present a one-sided proposal to IPC shareholders make it clear that Validus has not presented a Superior Proposal, nor one that can be reasonably expected to lead to a Superior Proposal. We believe Validus has created an unnecessary and unproductive disruption for its own opportunistic purposes, which should not distract either IPC’s or Max’s employees and customers from our amalgamation, which we both believe to be in the best interests of our shareholders.


-53-


 

Lastly, Max remains both steadfast in its commitment and excited to complete its planned amalgamation with IPC. We continue to believe that the amalgamation of IPC and Max represents the best strategic and financial opportunity for our collective shareholders.
 
Very truly yours,
 
/s/  W. Marston Becker
W. Marston Becker
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Max Capital Group Ltd.
 
In the afternoon on April 2, 2009, Validus sent a letter to IPC’s board of directors addressing the claims made by Max in its letter to IPC’s board of directors in the morning on April 2, 2009. The text of our letter reads as follows:
 
April 2, 2009
 
The Board of Directors of IPC Holdings, Ltd.
c/o James P. Bryce, President and Chief Executive Officer
American International Bldg.
29 Richmond Road
Pembroke, HM 08
Bermuda
 
Dear Members of the Board:
 
We are writing to respond to the letter sent to you by Mr. Becker of Max Capital Group Ltd. (“Max”) dated April 2, 2009, regarding the purported benefits of the proposed combination of IPC Holdings, Ltd. (“IPC”) with Max (pursuant to an Amalgamation Agreement between Max and IPC dated as of March 2, 2009 (the “Amalgamation Agreement”)), as compared to the benefits presented by a combination of IPC with Validus Holdings, Ltd. (“Validus”) on the terms we proposed to you in our letter dated March 31, 2009 (the “Validus Proposal”).
 
First, we would like to reiterate our sincere belief that the Validus Proposal is in every respect a Superior Proposal as defined in the Amalgamation Agreement. In fact, as you have undoubtedly seen, the markets have already endorsed our proposal: the IPC share price has increased significantly since the announcement of our proposal, in recognition of the fact that our proposal delivers superior value to the IPC shareholders — an irrefutable fact. Our proposal offers the IPC shareholders superior value (an 18% premium to the value of the IPC stock on the date prior to our announcement), a currency with superior trading characteristics (Validus shares trade at a premium to book value, as opposed to the Max shares, which trade at a discount to book value), less balance sheet risk, and most importantly, superior long term prospects.
 
Max suggests that the choice you are facing is between (i) a combined company based on a shared vision in which you, the IPC Board, can continue your stewardship, and (ii) an entity which offers you few benefits over what you have today, with no ability to continue your stewardship. We view the choice quite differently: you can choose to combine with a company which, on almost every metric, is a worse choice for your shareholders, or ours, which delivers, immediately and in the long term, superior value for your shareholders. To the extent that you, the members of the IPC Board, have an interest in continuing involvement in the affairs of the combined company, we would be happy to discuss continued Board representation with you.
 
Turning now to the assertions in the Max letter, we note that Max has made a number of statements which distort the facts and present an incomplete picture. We would like to respond to each of these in turn.
 
1. “A combination with Max delivers 29% more tangible book value per share to IPC.”  Max believes book value per share is a very important measure in our industry, and we do not disagree. The relevant question


-54-


 

for the IPC Board, however, is not, as Max suggests, the relative percentage of book value being delivered to IPC shareholders in the two proposals, but the absolute value of the shares themselves. On this measure, the Validus proposal is clearly superior, as it offers IPC shareholders a significant premium over the current value of their shares. Moreover, Max does not explain in its letter why Max’s shares are trading at such a deep discount to its book value. We can only guess that the market assigns such a discount because of Max’s stewardship of its business or because so much of Max’s investment portfolio is tied up in risky alternative assets. Indeed, of Max’s $1.2 billion of tangible common equity, $754 million is in alternative assets, which in 2008 generated mark downs of $233 million, greater than the entirety of Max’s underwriting income, and $476 million is in non-agency asset/mortgage backed securities. We believe it is a far better value proposition for the IPC shareholders to receive Validus shares, a currency which the market values at a premium to book.
 
2. “The IPC/Max Plan creates significant value for IPC shareholders.”  This statement is simply incorrect. According to data calculated from the proxy statement filed by IPC on March 27, 2009, IPC’s book value per share would decrease from $33.00 to $32.30, or 2.1% as a result of the combination with Max (this obviously implies the deal is accretive to Max at your expense). That can hardly be described as the “best opportunity to deliver shareholders value.” Moreover, while it is true that the Validus proposal delivers an immediate premium for IPC shareholders, it wrong of Max to suggest that such a premium will compromise value creation for IPC shareholders in the longer term. We believe that receiving a better currency, in a stronger, better capitalized company, offers a more likely starting point for long term value creation than retaining shares in IPC, whose previously conservatively managed balance sheet will be negatively impacted by assets of questionable value in the IPC/Max combination.
 
3. “Max is a truly diversified underwriting platform.”  We think the relevant question for IPC is not whether its merger partner has a diversified platform, but rather the quality of that diversification. In terms of the quality of diversification, Validus offers far superior characteristics than Max, as evidenced by 2008 results for Max’s “diversified” businesses. Max’s 2008 reported 91.9% property and casualty GAAP combined ratio benefited from $107.0 million of prior-year reserve releases. The true 2008 accident-year GAAP combined ratio was 103.4%.7Max’s “diversified” businesses represent diversification without profit. Max’s chief source of diversifying growth, Max US Specialty, generated a 138.5% combined ratio in 2008. Results such as those cannot create value for shareholders.8 Max is not a leader in any category of business, and moreover, it has chosen to focus on volatile lines of business which yield low margins.9 In contrast, Validus is a global leader in very profitable business lines, including marine, energy and war and terrorism.10 Furthermore, Max’s statement that Validus is constrained by its limited underwriting platforms is demonstrably untrue. Validus has the global licenses and other capabilities in place to write long tail insurance if and when it believes doing so would be profitable. In fact, today, Validus writes non-catastrophe business in 143 countries around the
 
 
7 Upon verification of the calculations used to prepare this letter we have determined that Max’s true 2008 accident year GAAP combined ratio is in fact 110.6% rather than 103.4% as set forth in our letter reprinted above. The combined ratio, expressed as a percentage, is a key measurement of profitability traditionally used in the property-casualty insurance business. The combined ratio, also referred to as the “calendar year combined ratio,” is the sum of the losses and loss adjustment expense ratio and the underwriting and other operating expense ratio. The losses and loss adjustment expense ratio is the percentage of net losses and loss adjustment expenses incurred to net premiums earned. The underwriting and other operating expense ratio is the percentage of underwriting and other operating expenses to net premiums earned. When the calendar year combined ratio is adjusted to exclude prior period items, such as loss reserve development, it becomes the “accident year combined ratio”.
8 As described elsewhere in this proxy statement, a combined ratio of greater than 100% indicates that premiums are less than aggregate claims and expenses. Validus believes that unprofitable operations do not create value for shareholders.
9 As of the date of this proxy statement, this statement should be qualified as an expression of our opinion based on our experience and knowledge of the industry
10 As of the date of this proxy statement, this statement should be qualified as an expression of our opinion based on our experience and knowledge of the industry.


-55-


 

world.11 And, as demonstrated by Validus superior financial results and lower combined ratio, Validus does so profitably.
 
4. “Max has a proven, long-term, operating history.”  Max may have a longer history than Validus, but even a cursory look at the decline in Max’s book value, its weak growth, volatile results and general underperformance will quash any notion that the length of its operating history trumps the superior abilities of the deeply experienced Validus management team to generate best in class performance.
 
By focusing on the net loss reported by Validus based on hurricanes Ike and Gustav, Max is yet again ignoring the larger benefit of Validus’ conservative risk management and diversification. Validus assumed that the hurricane season in 2008 would generate a market loss of $18 to $21 billion, and we set our reserve levels accordingly. IPC, by contrast, assumed $14.5 billion of losses. Notwithstanding the severity of the events of that hurricane season, Validus was easily able to absorb the loss (yielding a combined ratio of 92.2%, with a corresponding combined ratio at Validus Re of 86.0%). As a result, Validus was profitable, notwithstanding the losses associated with hurricanes Gustav and Ike. Its highly touted diversification notwithstanding, Max sustained a loss for the year in excess of $200 million, demonstrating beyond a shadow of a doubt that its “greater diversification” is not a guarantee of profitability.
 
We at Validus believe that our diversification is of a higher quality, our underwriting decisions are made more carefully, our risks are managed more prudently, and we exercise a more conservative stewardship over our capital, all of which would inure to the long term benefit of the IPC shareholders in our proposed combination.
 
5. “IPC and Max can complete an amalgamation more quickly, with greater certainty.”  Max now claims (contrary to the statements it made prior to the Validus Proposal)12 that Max and IPC will be able to close their amalgamation in June 2009. Max freely admits, however, that it does not control the time table: the SEC must clear the proxy statement/prospectus filed by IPC, it must clear the proxy statement for Max, and the parties must obtain shareholders approval (which we believe will be difficult to do while our Superior Proposal is pending). Most importantly, the closing of the IPC/Max transaction requires regulatory approvals from several different state insurance departments in the United States. Implicit in Max’s prediction of a closing date is a presumption of the receipt of regulatory approvals, which simply cannot be taken for granted given the likely timing of regulatory review and the public hearing process. Thus there is absolutely no guarantee that the IPC/Max deal can be consummated in the second quarter. Finally, it is important for the IPC Board not to lose sight of the fact that the Amalgamation Agreement cedes to Max the power to delay the closing of a Validus/IPC combination.13
 
Max also tries to make an issue of the fact that IPC has not had a chance to conduct due diligence on Validus. Validus would welcome the opportunity to provide IPC with customary due diligence information. Validus stands ready to respond to any requests IPC may make on an expedited basis, and would be more than happy to meet with IPC to answer any questions IPC may have about Validus, its operations, its financial health or any other matter relevant to the Board of IPC in considering Validus’ Superior Proposal. We call upon Max to permit IPC’s Board to exercise its fiduciary duties by releasing IPC from the extraordinarily restrictive
 
 
11 Upon verification, the statement should refer to 134 countries, rather than 143.
12 IPC and Max may update their predictions as to timing as new information becomes available to each party. For example, in a recent letter to shareholders filed on May 1, 2009, Max discloses that it expects “the transaction to close late in the second quarter or early in the third quarter of 2009”.
13 As of the date of this proxy statement, the Max Amalgamation Agreement cedes to Max the power to delay the closing of a Validus/IPC combination because IPC has no right to terminate the Max Amalgamation Agreement until after the vote of the IPC shareholders at the Annual General Meeting, even if the IPC Board changes its recommendation and recommends a vote “FOR” the Validus Amalgamation Offer. Accordingly, should the IPC Board choose to recommend a vote “FOR” the Validus Amalgamation Offer, Max would have the power to delay the closing of a Validus/IPC combination by not terminating the IPC/Max agreement until after the shareholders vote down the Proposed Max Amalgamation.


-56-


 

prohibition in the Amalgamation Agreement which prevents it from even talking to Validus regarding the terms of its Superior Proposal.14
 
6. “Max’s business is complementary to IPC.”  Max’s assertions that a combination of Validus and IPC would result in a loss of customers are without merit and are particularly surprising, given that Max has publicly stated its intention to significantly reduce IPC’s core reinsurance activities. As we are both aware, the current reinsurance market is in the midst of a capacity shortage.15 As a result, we do not believe that clients will actively seek to diversify their reinsurance placements away from our combined company. In fact, our combined financial strength and clout should only serve to make a combined Validus/IPC a “go-to” player for reinsurance placements.16
 
7. “Max’s complementary and diversified platform is appreciated by our ratings agencies.”  We have been in dialogue with our ratings agencies with regard to our proposal. We encourage the Board of IPC to focus its attention on what the ratings agencies actually say, rather than on Max’s speculations.17
 
8. “Max maintains less underwriting volatility through greater diversification in its portfolio of risks.”  Due to the significant investment losses Max sustained in 2008, it is unsurprising that Max is attempting to focus on underwriting volatility alone. Selectively focusing on underwriting volatility wholly ignores the other various risks and uncertainties that IPC’s shareholders would be assuming by combining with Max and its risky balance sheet. With respect to underwriting performance, in 2008, Validus successfully weathered its exposures from Hurricanes Ike and Gustav with a combined ratio of 92.2% and net income of $63.9 million. This performance was generated despite the fact that Validus reserved for those events more conservatively than its industry peers, as discussed in paragraph 4 above. Validus’ disclosures offer the highest level of transparency with regard to its probable maximum losses, zonal aggregates and realistic disaster scenarios and we would challenge Max to provide the same level of transparency to its shareholders before presumptuously speculating on the impacts of various potential events.
 
9. “Max has a proven, long term history of successful acquisitions without incurring good will.”  Validus has a proven track record of acquiring a high quality premier business with a leading position in its market. Max’s pointing to its acquisition of Imagine Group (UK) Limited as an example of a successful acquisition is ironic, especially relative to our successful acquisition of Talbot. In that transaction, Validus acquired a strong balance sheet with excess reserves at a multiple of 3.1x earnings demonstrating Validus’ commitment to creating value for our shareholders. When we acquired Talbot, Validus booked $154 million of goodwill and intangible assets; however, from acquisition closing until December 31, 2008, we benefited from
 
 
14 The agreement governing the Initial Validus Offer retained this restrictive prohibition. Validus’ board of directors determined that proposing substantially similar agreement terms with what we believed to be improved economic terms would facilitate IPC’s board of directors’ evaluation of the Initial Validus Offer. On May 18, 2009, Validus amended this provision in the Validus Amalgamation Offer to permit IPC and its subsidiaries and their respective personnel and representatives to participate or engage in discussions relating to an acquisition proposal for IPC so long as IPC’s board of directors has concluded in good faith that such action is required in order for IPC’s directors to comply with fiduciary duties under applicable law and IPC complies with certain notification and confidentiality requirements.
15 A reinsurance industry commentator has recently stated that, taking reinsurer capital as the nearest proxy for capacity, it is estimated that reinsurer capital, which was down 8 to 10 percent from January 1, 2008 through September 30, 2008, will be down 15 to 20 percent for the year ending December 31, 2008 when reported. In addition, the same commentator observed that capital markets capacity for insurance risk has declined in similar proportions.
16 We believe that a combined Validus/IPC would be a “go-to” player for reinsurance placements because Validus will be better capitalized (as measured by pro forma shareholders equity) than many of the members of its peer group.
17 As of the date of this proxy statement, this statement is intended to emphasize that Validus believes the statement being referred to, in the April 2, 2009 Max letter to IPC’s Board, is based upon speculation by Max, since, to Validus knowledge, the rating agencies have not made a determination in this regard.


-57-


 

$105 million in reserve releases from the Talbot business, emanating from periods prior to the acquisition. Max’s acquisition history, on the other hand, is that of acquiring subscale small businesses that significantly lag the leaders in their respective markets.18
 
10. “Max has a diversified shareholder base.”  Max’s attempt to characterize our shareholder base as a liability is baseless. What is relevant is the relative liquidity of Max and Validus shares. As previously mentioned in our letter dated March 31, 2009, Validus’ daily average trading volume was $11.3 million vs. $6.7 million for Max for the three months prior to announcement of the IPC/Max transaction. Additionally, since our shareholder base is publicly disclosed, if the market viewed it as an “overhang,” such information would already be embedded in the market price of our common shares. The combination of our trading volume and the premium pricing of our shares compared to either Max or IPC should put to rest any concerns IPC shareholders may have regarding liquidity of the combined company.
 
11. “IPC and Max have compatible cultures.”  Max has mentioned that it has a compatible culture with IPC. If that is in fact the case, we find the paucity of IPC management that will continue in senior roles at IPC/Max curious and an indication that such cultural fit may be only skin deep. We have successfully integrated large acquisitions in the past, and believe that experience is most relevant in this regard.
 
12. “Max’s higher asset leverage provides greater investment income over time.”  Max’s asset leverage has been a significant liability given its risky investment strategy.19 This leverage would similarly expose a combined IPC/Max to significant volatility. Max’s alternative investments and non-agency asset/mortgage backed securities alone comprise 99% of its tangible equity, indicating a massive amount of embedded risk.20 Max’s $233 million loss in 2008 on their alternative investment portfolio is entirely indicative of that risk. Its so-called “outperformance in 6 of the last 8 quarters” ignores the abject underperformance it experienced in other periods.21 In 2007, when the global credit crisis began, Max’s current management had the opportunity to liquidate its alternative assets. Max chose to continue holding those risky investments, which have led to massive losses. Combined, we believe these factors highlight Max’s poor history as stewards of shareholder capital.
 
* * *
 
In closing, I would like to reiterate that we have submitted to you a proposal which we are confident the IPC Board will agree is a “Superior Proposal” as defined in your Amalgamation Agreement. We have submitted this proposal because we deeply and honestly believe that the combination of IPC and Validus will result in a far better value proposition for the IPC shareholders than the combination of IPC and Max. Validus is absolutely committed to our Superior Proposal and we simply do not understand how Max can characterize our actions as “opportunistic.” If Max truly believes its combination with IPC is superior, we call upon Max to free
 
 
18 As of the date of this proxy statement, we are aware of only three small acquisitions by Max and we believe, based on our experience and knowledge of the industry, that the acquired entities were not leaders in their markets.
19 As of the date of this proxy statement, we believe that the investment strategy that has been employed by Max, and is expected to be employed by Max management who will control the combined IPC/Max, and that according to Max’s public information is expected to include a 10% to 12% concentration in alternative investments, should be considered a risky investment strategy that could amount to a significant liability when compared with an investment strategy, like Validus’, that does not allow for such investments in alternative investments.
20 As of the date of this proxy statement, this statement is intended to emphasize that Max’s alternative investments alone comprised 61% of tangible equity, indicating what we believe to be a significant amount of embedded risk.
21 As of the date of this proxy statement, this statement should be qualified as an expression of our opinion based on our experience and knowledge of the industry and on Max’s investment performance in the third and fourth quarters of 2008, which was worse than the average for its peer group but better than the investment performance of several of its peers.


-58-


 

the IPC Board from the shackles that your Amalgamation Agreement has placed on the ability of the members of the IPC Board to exercise their fiduciary duties under Bermuda law, so as to create a level playing field on which the shareholders of IPC will be able to decide which of the two proposals is indeed superior.
 
Sincerely,
 
/s/  Edward J. Noonan
Edward J. Noonan
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer


-59-


 

 
In the afternoon on April 5, 2009, Validus sent a letter to IPC’s board of directors regarding an error that Max had made in its calculation of pro forma tangible book value under the terms of the Initial Validus Offer. The text of our letter reads as follows:
 
April 5, 2009
 
The Board of Directors of IPC Holdings, Ltd.
c/o James P. Bryce, President and Chief Executive Officer
American International Bldg.
29 Richmond Road
Pembroke, HM 08
Bermuda
 
Dear Members of the Board:
 
We are writing to call to your attention an error contained in the publicly disseminated letter sent to you by Mr. Becker of Max Capital Group Ltd. (“Max”) dated April 2, 2009 and the accompanying presentation materials, regarding the purported benefits of the proposed combination of IPC Holdings, Ltd. (“IPC”) with Max (pursuant to an Amalgamation Agreement between Max and IPC dated as of March 2, 2009 (the “Amalgamation Agreement”)), as compared to the benefits presented by a combination of IPC with Validus Holdings, Ltd. (“Validus”) on the terms we proposed to you in our letter dated March 31, 2009 (the “Validus Proposal”).
 
In his letter, Mr. Becker states (and he has been widely quoted in the media stating) that “[a] combination with Max delivers 29% more tangible book value per share to IPC.” This is not correct. We, and our financial advisors and SEC counsel, have reviewed this calculation and we would like to provide you with the correct figures. Specifically, Mr. Becker’s calculation understates the pro forma IPC share of Validus tangible book value per share by $2.74, which results in overstating the premium calculated on this basis quite significantly. We have attached some materials that illustrate the correct calculation. Our SEC counsel has advised us that this error is material and that Max will be required to amend its SEC filings to correct its error.
 
As we noted in our letter dated April 2, 2009, putting aside this error, we believe that this measure is the wrong framework on which to analyze whether the IPC/Max plan is superior to the IPC/Validus plan, and refer you to the analysis in our earlier letter. We remain confident that the IPC Board will agree the Validus Proposal is a “Superior Proposal” as defined in your Amalgamation Agreement.
 
We look forward to your response to the Validus Proposal.
 
Sincerely,
 
/s/  Edward J. Noonan
Edward J. Noonan
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
 
cc: Marty Dolan, J.P. Morgan Securities, Inc.
 
In the afternoon on April 5, 2009, Validus also posted the material referenced in the letter on its website.
 
On the morning of April 6, 2009, Max issued a press release reaffirming its prior disclosure regarding the Initial Validus Offer and stating that it “continues to believe that Validus had not presented a Superior Proposal, nor


-60-


 

one that can be reasonably expected to lead to a Superior Proposal (as such term is defined in the [Max Amalgamation Agreement])”. The text of the press release reads as follows:
 
Max Capital Group Ltd. (NASDAQ:MXGL; BSX: MXGL BH) today confirmed that the calculations of diluted book value per IPC share and diluted tangible book value per IPC share included in Max’s April 2, 2009 letter to the Board of Directors of IPC Holdings, Ltd. (“IPC”) are true and correct. Max has consulted with its financial advisors and SEC counsel.
 
In a press release dated April 5, 2009, Validus alleged that Max had made a “substantial error” in its calculation of “pro forma” tangible book value under the proposed terms of Validus’s unsolicited takeover of IPC. However, Validus’s allegation is incorrect and misleading. The calculations that Max presented accurately represent what an IPC shareholder would receive on a stand alone basis from either Max or Validus, without giving effect to what IPC itself contributes to a transaction. The Max presentation allows IPC shareholders to compare the value received under each transaction on an “apples-to-apples” basis. Max believes this is an important measure in comparing the value received today by an IPC shareholder under the agreement with Max and the proposed Validus transaction. The pro forma calculations Validus is utilizing include the additional benefit derived from issuing Validus’ shares to purchase IPC at a discount to book value.
 
“One has to question whether the IPC shareholders are being well served by the non-substantive claims being initiated by Validus. They have made certain statements that completely misrepresent and falsely characterize the information presented by Max. Since Validus initially made its below book value, unsolicited takeover offer for IPC, it has demonstrated a lack of understanding of what is important to the shareholders of IPC in allowing them to assess the relative value being delivered by Max versus Validus,” stated W. Marston (Marty) Becker, Max Chairman and CEO.
 
The facts presented in Max’s April 2, 2009 letter to IPC have not changed and are clear:
 
  (i)   Max delivers to IPC $33.83 of diluted tangible book value per IPC share — a 29.2% premium versus $26.19 delivered by Validus, and
 
  (ii)  Max delivers to IPC $34.93 of diluted book value per IPC share — a 23.2% premium versus $28.35 delivered by Validus.
 
As noted above, these figures represent the book value per IPC share being delivered to IPC’s shareholders on a standalone basis, without giving effect to what IPC itself contributes to a transaction.
 
The conclusion remains clear — a combination with Max provides greater underlying value to IPC’s shareholders today, with true diversification of underwriting exposures and without an over-concentration in short-tail catastrophe oriented business, and will result in greater upside for IPC shareholders as compared to the hostile takeover proposal by Validus.
 
Max continues to believe that Validus has not presented a Superior Proposal, nor one that can be reasonably expected to lead to a Superior Proposal (as such term is defined in the IPC/Max Plan of Amalgamation dated March 1, 2009).
 
Additional details on the Max calculations referred to above are posted on [Max’s] website: www.maxcapgroup.com.


-61-


 

In the afternoon on April 6, 2009, Validus sent a letter to IPC’s board of directors regarding the Max press release and issued a press release announcing the letter. The text of our letter reads as follows:
 
April 6, 2009
 
The Board of Directors of IPC Holdings, Ltd.
c/o James P. Bryce, President and Chief Executive Officer
American International Bldg.
29 Richmond Road
Pembroke, HM 08
Bermuda
 
Dear Members of the Board:
 
The difficulty of being unable to speak directly has lead to an exchange of press releases, which is unfortunate. In this context, we would like to respond to the Max statement issued this morning by describing the analytical framework we believe is appropriate.
 
In today’s press release, Max modified its description of its calculation of pro forma book value per share. In essence, the Max calculation now describes what an IPC shareholder would receive on a standalone basis from either Validus or Max. We disagree with this basis for valuation. Our approach is focused on a comparison of what an IPC shareholder would own as a result of either transaction.
 
However, if we were to follow the Max approach, we would note that there are a number of adjustments contemplated in the proposed IPC/Max Amalgamation Agreement, which would reduce the standalone value22 that Max delivers by $117.4 million. The joint proxy statement/prospectus filed by IPC and Max references, among other adjustments, the need to increase Max’ loss reserves for annuity claims as well as property and casualty claims by $130.0 million. As a result, the Max book value delivered would be reduced by $2.06 per Max share, resulting in a book value delivered of $20.40 per share, on the basis of Max’s calculation of diluted book value.
 
I would also note that Validus and Max use differing accounting conventions for calculating diluted book value per share. While each is valid, on the basis upon which Validus calculates diluted book value per share, the Max value delivered would be $19.68 after a $1.81 per share reduction in book value.
 
We have provided the attached schedule of our calculations in an effort to be as transparent as possible in our communication with you.
 
Sincerely,
 
/s/  Edward J. Noonan
Edward J. Noonan
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
 
cc: Marty Dolan, J.P. Morgan Securities, Inc.
 
 
22 If the adjustments to reduce the net asset value of Max were made, it would reduce by $117.4 million the book value that Max contributes to the combined company at closing.


-62-


 

Adjustments to Max Book Value Upon Combination with IPC
 
         
(In millions, except per share values)
     
 
Net book value of net assets acquired prior to fair value adjustments(1)
  $ 1,280.3  
Preliminary adjustments for fair value
       
Adjustment to deferred acquisitions costs(2)
    (51.3 )
Adjustment to goodwill and intangible assets(3)
    (12.0 )
Adjustment to reserve for property and casualty losses and loss adjustment expenses(4)
    (60.0 )
Adjustment to life and annuity benefits(4)
    (70.0 )
Adjustment to unearned property and casualty premiums(5)
    51.3  
Adjustment to senior notes(6)
    24.6  
         
Total adjustments
    (117.4 )
         
Fair value of net assets acquired
  $ 1,162.9  
Total adjustments
  $ (117.4 )
Max diluted shares outstanding(7)
    64.9  
         
Adjustment per diluted share
  $ (1.81 )
         
 
Source: Note 1 to unaudited pro forma consolidated financial information of IPC in Form S-4 filed 3/27/2009 (“S-4”). Notes 1-6 are excerpts from the S-4.
 
  (1)   Represents historical net book value of Max.
 
  (2)   Represents adjustment to reduce the deferred acquisition costs of Max to their estimated fair value at December 31, 2008.
 
  (3)   Represents adjustment to reduce goodwill and intangible assets of Max to their estimated fair value at December 31, 2008.
 
  (4)   The fair value of Max’s reserve for property and casualty losses and loss adjustment expenses, life and annuity benefits, and loss and loss adjustment expenses recoverable were estimated based on the present value of the underlying cash flows of the loss reserves and recoverables. In determining the fair value estimate, IPC’s management estimated a risk premium deemed to be reasonable and consistent with expectations in the marketplace given the nature and the related degree of uncertainty of such reserves. Such risk premium exceeded the discount IPC’s management would use to determine the present value of the underlying cash flows.
 
  (5)   Represents the estimated fair value of the profit within Max’s unearned property and casualty premiums. In determining fair value, IPC’s management estimated the combined ratio associated with Max’s net unearned property and casualty premiums.
 
  (6)   Represents adjustment to record Max’s senior notes to their estimated fair value at December 31, 2008.
 
  (7)   Common shares outstanding plus the gross amount of all warrants, options, restricted shares, RSUs, restricted common shares and performance share units outstanding as of the 12/31/2008 balance sheet date. (Source: Max 2008 Form 10-K)


-63-


 

 
In the afternoon on April 7, 2009, Kenneth L. Hammond, Chairman of IPC’s board of directors, sent a letter to Mr. Noonan indicating that IPC’s board of directors had reaffirmed its recommendation to combine with Max. The text of the letter reads as follows:
 
April 7, 2009
 
Edward J. Noonan
Chairman & Chief Executive Officer
Validus Holdings Ltd.
19 Par-La-Ville Road
Hamilton HM11
Bermuda
 
Dear Mr. Noonan:
 
I am writing to respond to your letter of March 31, 2009, submitting an offer pursuant to which Validus would combine with IPC.
 
IPC’s board of directors, after careful consultation with management and our financial and legal advisors, has unanimously concluded that the Validus proposal does not constitute a Superior Proposal as defined in the Agreement and Plan of Amalgamation with Max Capital Group Ltd. dated March 1, 2009. Furthermore, IPC’s board of directors has unanimously reaffirmed its recommendation that IPC shareholders vote in favor of the transaction with Max.
 
In reaching its decision, IPC’s board of directors considered several factors, including the following:
 
  •  The Validus Offer Fails to Meet IPC’s Diversification Goals — During 2008, IPC’s board of directors concluded that it would be in IPC’s best interest to diversify beyond its monoline property catastrophe business model in order to reduce the volatility inherent in focusing on catastrophe reinsurance and to spread our risk base across less correlated risks. A key factor in our decision to choose Max over other options is our belief that Max’s diversified operations offer the best path to achieve this goal. The decision was the result of a robust and thorough review of strategic alternatives. A transaction with Validus would not accomplish that strategic objective given Validus’ substantial correlated catastrophe exposure.
 
  •  The Max Transaction Has Significant Value Creation Potential and Upside for IPC Shareholders — The combination with Max has the potential to create significant value for IPC shareholders, as detailed in the filed S-4 registration statement dated March 27, 2009. It also provides greater book value per share to IPC shareholders. Furthermore, Max’s balance sheet has significantly lower goodwill and intangibles, resulting in an even greater tangible book value per share to IPC’s shareholders. We are concerned that Validus’ proposal enables Validus to raise capital at a discount to book value at the expense of IPC shareholders, on the other hand, the combination with Max allows deployment of capital under a combined business plan that benefits IPC’s shareholders. Max’s diversified book, when combined with IPC’s, has the potential to reduce earnings volatility. Earnings volatility affects share price volatility, ratings and other important financial measures. A combination with Max carries less risk, as this combination is less exposed to catastrophe events and other risk concentrations. On the other hand, Validus’ earnings and share price are more affected by catastrophe losses. At the time of the Validus offer, its share price was near the high end of its 52-week trading range, resulting in an exchange ratio that poses potential downside risk to IPC shareholders. In contrast, we entered into the transaction with Max at an exchange ratio determined at a time that Max was trading at 53% of its 52-week high.
 
  •  The Validus Amalgamation Proposal Is Less Certain, Is Riskier for IPC’s Shareholders and Would Take Longer to Close — We currently expect to be able to complete the transaction with Max in June, with all regulatory approvals obtained. In contrast, in our view, any transaction with Validus likely could not be completed before September, right in the middle of the wind season. Our transaction with Max would have to be rejected by IPC shareholders before IPC would be able to conduct due diligence on


-64-


 

  and negotiate with Validus. There is no assurance IPC would, at that time, choose to enter into a transaction with Validus. Even if IPC were to proceed with Validus at that time, Validus and IPC would both need to obtain consents under their credit facilities before the deal could close, whereas no such additional consents would be necessary to close the IPC/Max transaction. Validus and IPC would also need to achieve satisfactory indications from the ratings agencies regarding the ratings outcomes of such a combination.
 
Given these considerations and others, the board of directors unanimously determined that the Validus proposal does not constitute a Superior Proposal as defined in our amalgamation agreement with Max. IPC remains committed to completing our transaction with Max, which we believe will create a diversified and balanced platform for growth that should drive stronger performance and value for shareholders for many years.
 
Sincerely,
/s/  Kenneth L. Hammond
Kenneth L. Hammond
Chairman of the Board of Directors
On Behalf of the IPC Holdings Board of Directors
 
In the afternoon on April 8, 2009, Validus sent a letter to Mr. Hammond, the Chairman of IPC’s board of directors, regarding the IPC press release and letter and issued a press release announcing the letter. The text of the letter reads as follows:
 
April 8, 2009
 
Kenneth L. Hammond
Chairman
IPC Holdings, Ltd.
American International Bldg.
29 Richmond Road
Pembroke, HM 08
Bermuda
 
Dear Mr. Hammond,
 
I am writing in response to your letter of April 7, 2009, in which you confirm the continuing support of the IPC board for the Max takeover of IPC’s operations.
 
I am disappointed with the Board’s decision and respectfully disagree with your assessment of our Superior Proposal. I am confident that had your Amalgamation Agreement with Max allowed you to engage in dialogue with us, you would have instead supported the Validus Superior Proposal on behalf of your shareholders. In particular, although you cite a “robust and thorough” review of strategic alternatives, I am greatly disappointed that you never invited us to participate in that process, although you spoke with numerous potential buyers. To the extent that Max will release you from the restrictive terms of the Amalgamation Agreement, we continue to stand ready to discuss your objectives and how our business meets those objectives. Until you agree to discuss our proposal with us, we have no choice except to communicate directly with your shareholders. We believe the facts will demonstrate that our proposal is truly a Superior Proposal.
 
We hereby advise the shareholders of IPC that:
 
1. We have retained Georgeson as our proxy solicitor. We will shortly file proxy solicitation materials with the SEC and those materials will contain, among other things, the many reasons why we believe you should vote against the Max takeover. Once the proxy is effective, Georgeson will be in touch with IPC’s shareholders to solicit their votes AGAINST the Max takeover. If, as we


-65-


 

[hope]23, IPC’s shareholders vote down the Max takeover, you will be unencumbered by the restrictive Amalgamation Agreement and free to execute the Validus Agreement.
 
2. In our capacity as an IPC shareholder, we object to the punitive nature of the $50 million Max Termination Fee. The Termination Fee is an unenforceable penalty under Bermuda law and we are commencing litigation to reduce this penalty. If successful,24 we will permit IPC to pay the amount by which such penalty is reduced as a dividend to IPC shareholders, so that IPC shareholders — and not Max or Validus shareholders — will share in the value obtained.
 
 
I regret that the terms of the Max takeover preclude the management teams of IPC and Validus from cooperating in delivering a superior outcome for IPC shareholders, but we are pleased to work directly with your shareholders to achieve the same end. We remain fully committed to our proposal.
 
Sincerely,
 
/s/  Edward J. Noonan
Edward J. Noonan
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
 
On April 9, 2009, Validus filed a preliminary proxy statement with the SEC which, in its definitive form, is being used to solicit votes from IPC shareholders against the Proposed Max Amalgamation.
 
On April 13, 2009, IPC filed an amendment (“Amendment No. 1”) to the IPC/Max S-4, which, among other things, added to the disclosure regarding the background to the Proposed Max Amalgamation including the reasons as to why Validus was excluded from the process that resulted in the Proposed Max Amalgamation. Amendment No. 1 also contained a correction to IPC’s diluted book value for the year ended December 31, 2008.
 
On April 16, 2009, Validus filed a preliminary proxy statement with respect to soliciting votes from Validus shareholders to approve the issuance of Validus Shares in connection with the Acquisition.
 
On April 21, 2009, Validus filed an amendment with the SEC to the preliminary proxy statement with respect to soliciting votes from IPC shareholders against the Proposed Max Amalgamation.
 
On April 28, 2009, Validus filed the Bermuda Claim (as defined below) in the Supreme Court of Bermuda.
 
On April 28, 2009, IPC filed a second amendment to the IPC/Max S-4 with the SEC.
 
On April 30, 2009, Validus issued a press release outlining its three-part plan to expedite the Acquisition.
 
On April 30, 2009, IPC issued a press release reaffirming its belief that the Initial Validus Offer did not represent a superior proposal and that the IPC board of directors continued to recommend IPC shareholders vote in favor of the proposed Max Amalgamation.
 
On May 1, 2009, Validus filed with the SEC an amendment to its preliminary proxy statement with respect to soliciting votes from IPC shareholders against the Proposed Max Amalgamation.
 
 
23 To clarify, as of the date of this proxy statement, the word “hope” has been inserted to replace the word “expect” in this sentence.
24 To clarify, as of the date of this proxy statement, the reference to “success” in this sentence relates to Validus’ success in pursuing the litigation strategy referenced in the immediately prior sentence followed by the successful consummation of the Acquisition.


-66-


 

On May 1, 2009, Validus filed an application to expedite the trial of the Bermuda Claim.
 
On May 4, 2009, IPC filed a third amendment to the IPC/Max S-4 with the SEC.
 
On May 5, 2009, Validus filed an investor presentation titled “Superior Proposal for IPC Shareholders” with the SEC and on May 6, 2009 filed a revised investor presentation with the SEC.
 
On May 6, 2009, Validus filed an amendment with the SEC to the preliminary proxy statement with respect to soliciting votes from IPC shareholders against the Proposed Max Amalgamation.
 
On May 7, 2009, IPC and Max filed a joint proxy statement/prospectus for the IPC/Max S-4 with the SEC and stated that they would mail the joint proxy statement/prospectus on or about May 7, 2009 to their respective shareholders of record as of the close of business on April 28, 2009.
 
On May 8, 2009, Validus filed the definitive proxy statement with the SEC and commenced mailing definitive proxy materials and proxy cards to IPC shareholders seeking proxies from IPC shareholders to vote against the Proposed Max Amalgamation.
 
On May 11, 2009, Validus filed with the SEC two amendments to its preliminary proxy statement with respect to soliciting votes from Validus shareholders to approve the issuance of Validus Shares in connection with the Acquisition.
 
On May 11-12, 2009, Validus’ application to expedite the trial of the Bermuda Claim was heard by the Supreme Court of Bermuda. Following the hearing, on May 13, 2009, the Court denied the application for expedition of the timetable for the proceedings. While this was not a hearing on the merits of Validus’ claims, the Court acknowledged that Validus had raised serious questions to be tried.
 
On May 12, 2009, in addition to filing the preliminary copy of this proxy statement, Validus filed two preliminary proxy statements with the SEC which, when filed in their definitive forms, will be used to, respectively: (i) solicit written requisitions from IPC shareholders to compel the board of directors of IPC to call the IPC special general meeting and (ii) solicit votes from IPC shareholders to approve the proposals at the IPC special general meeting.
 
On May 12, 2009, Validus commenced the Exchange Offer.
 
On May 14, 2009, IPC filed with the SEC a Solicitation/Recommendation Statement on Schedule 14D-9 in response to the Exchange Offer reporting that IPC’s board of directors had met on May 13, 2009 and stating IPC’s board of directors’ recommendation that IPC’s shareholders reject the Exchange Offer and not tender their IPC Shares to Validus pursuant to the Exchange Offer.
 
On May 14, 2009, Validus amended the registration statement of which the Offer to Exchange is a part.
 
On May 14, 2009, Validus filed an application to the Supreme Court of Bermuda to convene the court-ordered IPC meeting to approve the Scheme of Arrangement. The Court issued its decision on Validus’ application on May 29, 2009. In the decision, the Court rejected IPC’s primary contention that the Court lacked jurisdiction to sanction the Scheme of Arrangement without approval of IPC’s board of directors, and found that the Scheme of Arrangement could be approved on behalf of IPC by its shareholders acting at the IPC special general meeting. The Court, however, determined not to exercise its discretion to order the court-ordered IPC meeting (at which the IPC shareholders may consider and vote on approval of the Scheme of Arrangement) in advance of the vote on the Proposed Max Amalgamation and evidence of IPC shareholder support for the Scheme of Arrangement. Based on this decision, Validus will be able to pursue the Scheme of Arrangement if IPC shareholders reject the Proposed Max Amalgamation at IPC’s annual general meeting on June 12, 2009.
 
On May 18, 2009, Validus delivered an offer letter to IPC advising IPC of the increased economic terms of the Validus Amalgamation Offer and containing the amendment to the Validus Amalgamation Agreement.
 
Later on May 18, 2009, IPC issued a press release announcing that its board of directors, along with its legal and financial advisors, would carefully review the revised terms of the Validus Amalgamation Offer


-67-


 

consistent with its fiduciary duties and make a formal recommendation to IPC shareholders in accordance therewith.
 
Also on May 18, 2009, Validus filed an investor presentation titled “Improved Superior Proposal for IPC Shareholders” with the SEC.
 
On May 19, 2009, IPC filed an amendment to its Solicitation/Recommendation Statement on Schedule 14D-9.
 
Also on May 19, 2009, Validus filed an amendment to its preliminary proxy statement with respect to soliciting votes from Validus shareholders to approve the issuance of the Validus Shares in connection with the Acquisition.
 
On May 21, 2009, IPC filed an amendment to its Solicitation/Recommendation Statement on Schedule 14D-9 reporting that IPC’s board had met on May 20, 2009 and stating IPC’s board of directors’ recommendation that IPC shareholders reject the revised terms of the Exchange Offer and not tender their IPC Shares to Validus pursuant to the Exchange Offer.
 
On May 21, 2009, Validus amended the registration statement of which the Offer to Exchange is a part.
 
On May 26, 2009, Validus filed the definitive proxy statement with the SEC and commenced mailing definitive proxy materials and proxy cards to the Validus shareholders seeking proxies from Validus shareholders to approve the issuance of Validus Shares in connection with the Acquisition.
 
On May 26, 2009, Validus filed an amendment to this proxy statement with the SEC.
 
On June 1, 2009, Validus amended the registration statement of which the Offer to Exchange is a part.
 
On June 4, 2009, Validus filed an amendment to this proxy statement with the SEC.
 
Reasons to Vote “FOR” the Scheme of Arrangement
 
We are still hopeful that IPC’s board of directors will recognize that the Validus Amalgamation Offer, as amended to increase the consideration offered and revise certain other terms, is a “superior proposal” (as defined in the Max Amalgamation Agreement) and that IPC’s board of directors will approve the Validus Amalgamation Agreement if the Max Amalgamation Agreement is terminated. However, we commenced the Scheme of Arrangement as an alternative method to accomplish the Acquisition of the issued and outstanding IPC Shares.
 
Validus encourages IPC shareholders to approve the Acquisition by voting “FOR” the Scheme of Arrangement. Validus believes that the Acquisition represents a compelling combination and excellent strategic fit that will enable the combined company to capitalize on opportunities in the global reinsurance market. Successful completion of the Acquisition would allow IPC shareholders to benefit from the superior growth potential of a combined company that would be a leading carrier in Bermuda’s short-tail reinsurance and insurance markets, with a strong balance sheet and quality diversification in profitable business lines. The Validus Shares to be issued and cash to be paid to IPC shareholders in exchange for IPC Shares in the Scheme of Arrangement will provide IPC shareholders with an immediate premium for their shares and will allow IPC shareholders to participate in the growth and opportunities of the combined company while receiving cash for a portion of their investment in IPC Shares. Validus believes that the combination of Validus and IPC offers a number of benefits to holders of IPC Shares, including the following:
 
The Scheme of Arrangement provides a premium to IPC shareholders.
 
  •  Based upon closing prices of IPC Shares and Validus Shares as of March 30, 2009, the last trading day prior to the announcement of the Initial Validus Offer, the Scheme of Arrangement would have had a value of $30.98 per IPC Share, or approximately $1.75 billion in the aggregate, which represented a 21.9% premium to the trading value of the IPC Shares as of such date and a 27.7% premium over $24.26, which was the average closing price of the IPC Shares between March 2, 2009, the day IPC and Max announced the Proposed Max amalgamation, and March 30, 2009, the last trading day before we announced the Validus Amalgamation Offer. The premium represented by the Scheme of Arrangement may be larger or smaller depending on the market price of each of the IPC Shares and the Validus Shares at the effective time and will fluctuate between now and then depending on the market prices. Based upon the closing prices of IPC Shares


-68-


 

  and Validus Shares on June [ • ], 2009, the last practicable date prior to the filing of this proxy statement, the Scheme of Arrangement had a value of $[ • ] per IPC Share, or $[ • ] billion in the aggregate, which represented a [ • ]% premium to the closing price of the IPC Shares as of such date and a premium of [ • ]% over the March 30, 2009 closing price of the IPC Shares. In addition, the meaningful cash component that has been added to the exchange offer provides IPC shareholders with the opportunity to achieve immediate liquidity on a portion of their investment in IPC Shares.
 
  •  Information with respect to the range of closing prices for the IPC Shares for certain dates and periods is set forth in the section of this proxy statement entitled Comparative Market Price and Dividend Information on page [ • ] of this proxy statement. Validus urges IPC shareholders to obtain a current market quotation for the IPC Shares.
 
The Validus Shares to be issued to IPC shareholders as a portion of the Acquisition Consideration pursuant to the Scheme of Arrangement represent what we believe is an attractive investment.
 
  •  We believe that the relative performance of Validus Shares in the market indicates that the markets view Validus as a more attractive investment than Max. From July 24, 2007 (the date of Validus’ initial public offering) through March 30, 2009 (the last trading day prior to the announcement of the Initial Validus Offer), Validus Shares have appreciated 13.2% whereas Max common shares have declined 36.5% over the same period. Based on the closing prices of Validus Shares and Max common shares on March 30, 2009, the last day of trading prior to Validus’ announcement of the Initial Validus Offer, Validus Shares traded at a premium to their diluted book value and diluted tangible book value of 1.05x and 1.13x, respectively, whereas Max common shares traded at a discount of 0.76x and 0.77x, respectively.
 
  •  Between December 31, 2005 and December 31, 2008, and notwithstanding the significant property catastrophe claim activity during this period (generated, for instance, by Hurricanes Ike and Gustav), Validus grew its book value per share (including accumulated dividends) at a 13.2% rate compared to Max’s 8.8% growth rate over the same period. In 2008, Validus grew its book value per share by 2.4% compared to Max’s decline in book value of 10.8% during the same period. Moreover, Validus Shares are more liquid than Max common shares (as measured by their respective dollar trading volumes in various periods prior to the announcement of the Proposed Max Amalgamation). Further, as a shareholder of Validus following completion of the Scheme of Arrangement, you will receive a dividend payable by Validus at an equivalent annual rate of approximately $0.90 per IPC Share (based on Validus’ current annual rate of $0.80 per Validus Share multiplied by the exchange ratio of 1.1234), compared to the current IPC annual dividend of $0.88 per IPC Share, in both cases based on the most recent quarterly dividends declared and paid by each company.
 
  •  Additionally, Validus Shares are significantly less volatile than Max common shares. As measured by Bloomberg, during the 260 business day (approximately one year) period prior to the announcement of the Proposed Max Amalgamation, the annualized daily volatility of Max’s shares was 79.4 compared to 61.0 for Validus Shares. Volatility represents the standard deviation of the day-over-day difference in the daily share price change. Although we believe that the Scheme of Arrangement would provide the IPC shareholders with a significant premium for their IPC Shares upon consummation, because both the Proposed Max Amalgamation and the Scheme of Arrangement provide for stock consideration with fixed exchange ratios, the respective values of the Proposed Max Amalgamation and the Scheme of Arrangement to IPC shareholders will vary over time based on relative changes in the market prices of the companies’ common shares, which could result in a smaller premium or no premium.
 
A Validus/IPC combination will have a strong balance sheet with minimal exposure to risky asset classes.
 
  •  Under the Proposed Max Amalgamation, IPC will be assuming the entirety of Max’s assets and liabilities. Despite statements by IPC’s board of directors of its desire to reduce earnings volatility through a business combination, it has proposed a transaction in which IPC shareholders will assume an investment portfolio with a significant concentration of risky assets, including alternative investments, and inadequate property and casualty and life and annuity reserves. According to Max’s most recent annual report on Form 10-K, as of December 31, 2008, Max’s holdings of alternative investments totaled 61% of its tangible equity, indicating a significant amount of embedded risk. Despite Max’s announced plan to reduce its exposure to alternative investments to 10% to 12% of its portfolio, (according to recent Max disclosures), as a result of the Proposed Max Amalgamation, IPC’s investment in alternative investments would increase from 7% of its


-69-


 

  total portfolio at December 31, 2008 to 12% of its total portfolio on a pro forma basis after giving effect to the Proposed Max Amalgamation, an increase of 5%. The riskiness of the Max balance sheet is evident in the fact that Max wrote down the value of its alternative assets in 2008 by $233 million, a markdown which exceeded its underwriting income. In contrast, Validus holds no alternative investments in its investment portfolio and has specific investment policies in place prohibiting it from investing in those asset classes, which it believes are unduly risky to its shareholders and policyholders. Validus believes counterparties will view the strength of Validus’ balance sheet very favorably as buyers are rethinking counterparty risk in the current environment, giving Validus a significant advantage over many of its competitors.
 
  •  Also, according to the IPC/Max S-4, IPC will have to reflect a fair value adjustment of $130 million to Max’s property and casualty and life and annuity reserves, which directly and adversely impacts the capitalization of the combined IPC/Max. We believe that this need to adjust reserves is indicative of prior under-reserving by Max in its businesses. Validus does not expect that the combination of Validus and IPC will require additions or adjustments to IPC’s or Validus’ existing insurance reserves. Although IPC discloses that the amount of the fair value adjustment will be amortized into the combined IPC/Max’s income each year and will increase the amount of net income each year during the amortization period, any amortization will be limited to the extent that losses exceed Max’s prior unadjusted reserves.
 
  •  Additionally, an IPC/Validus combination will result in a combined entity with pro forma GAAP shareholders’ equity of approximately $3.5 billion as of December 31, 2008 and $3.6 billion as of March 31, 2009. This compares to a combined IPC/Max pro forma shareholders’ equity of approximately $3.0 billion at December 31, 2008, according to the IPC/Max S-4. Validus believes that a significant capital base provides an important competitive advantage for companies in Validus’ industry, especially given the current economic climate in which companies face limited access to new capital and the demand for reinsurance is increasing.
 
Validus offers IPC a highly experienced, first class management team.
 
  •  Validus offers IPC a highly experienced, first-class management team. Validus’ management team has demonstrated the ability to execute growth strategies successfully, carefully manage risk and deliver enhanced shareholder value. Under the stewardship of its current management, Validus has completed the acquisition of Talbot and established a presence in the energy and aviation markets. Similarly, between December 31, 2005 and December 31, 2008, Validus grew its book value per share (including accumulated dividends) at a 13.2% rate compared to Max’s 8.8% growth rate over the same period. The superior performance of the leadership of the Validus management team is evidenced by the fact that Validus Shares traded at a premium of 1.05x and 1.13x, respectively, to Validus’ diluted book value and diluted tangible book value based on the closing price of Validus Shares on March 30, 2009. In comparison, Max common shares traded at a discount of 0.76x and 0.77x , respectively, to Max’s diluted book value and diluted tangible book value based on the closing price of Max common shares on March 30, 2009. Please see Information Concerning the Director and Officers of Validus Who Are Participants on Schedule I.
 
The Scheme of Arrangement provides IPC shareholders with an opportunity for stable, profitable diversification into attractive business lines and further growth.
 
  •  By entering into the Proposed Max Amalgamation, IPC’s board of directors has chosen to combine with an entity that reported a comprehensive net loss of $200.4 million, or $3.10 per Max diluted share, in 2008. While Max reported a combined ratio of 91.9% in 2008, its underwriting results benefited from $106 million in favorable reserve development. Excluding this benefit, Max’s underwriting activities in the 2008 year generated an underwriting loss and a combined ratio of 110.6%. Max’s U.S. Specialty segment, the centerpiece of its “diversified” businesses, operated in 2008 with a combined ratio of 138.5%. The combined ratio is a commonly used measure of an insurance company’s underwriting profitability. It is calculated as the sum of an insurer’s net loss ratio and its expense ratio. A combined ratio below 100% indicates profitable underwriting; a combined ratio of 100% or higher indicates that premiums are less than aggregate claims and expenses. The net loss ratio is calculated by dividing losses and loss expenses incurred (including estimates for incurred but not reported losses) by net premiums earned. The expense ratio is calculated by dividing acquisition costs combined with general and administrative expenses by net premiums earned. As evidenced by Max’s combined ratio in 2008, Max’s underwriting business was loss-making in 2008. In contrast, the


-70-


 

  combined ratio at Validus in 2008, notwithstanding the unusual concurrence of two major events giving rise to claims (Hurricanes Gustav and Ike) was 92.2%, indicating profitable underwriting results.
 
  •  Max’s results have been significantly more volatile than those of Validus in recent years, despite statements by IPC’s board of directors and Max’s management alleging the reduced volatility that will result from an IPC/Max combination. For example, according to Max’s 2008 annual report on Form 10-K, Max’s return on average shareholders’ equity has varied between -12.2% and 20.4% in the period from 2006 through 2008. In contrast, Validus’ return on average shareholders’ equity has varied between 2.7% and 26.9% in the same period, and has been higher than Max’s in each of those years.
 
  •  The decision of IPC’s board of directors to combine with a volatile, underperforming entity “diversifies” IPC and its shareholders into businesses which have earned returns below what IPC earned on a standalone basis in the same period. In that context, we would urge you to consider that Validus generated comprehensive income of $45.3 million, or net income of $0.61 per Validus diluted share, in 2008.
 
  •  Validus is one of the leading providers of short-tail insurance globally, writing over $1.0 billion of non-catastrophe business in 2008 in 134 countries around the world from offices in Bermuda, London, Singapore, New York and Miami. Validus is a global leader in profitable business lines including marine, energy and war and terrorism. In independent forecasts conducted by Willis Re, the Council of Insurance Agents and Brokers and Aon, the rate trends in business lines which accounted for approximately 86% of Validus’ 2008 non-reinsurance gross written premiums (marine, property, war and terrorism, and financial institutions) are currently positive, whereas the same independent forecasts predict negative rate changes in business lines which accounted for 58% of Max’s 2008 non-reinsurance gross written premiums. Validus believes its diverse businesses would be highly complementary with IPC’s existing operations and provide meaningful, profitable diversification. Validus’ management team has consistently articulated Validus’ business plan: to grow in profitable segments. It has taken significant steps in this direction in the last few years. Its acquisition of Talbot in 2007 gave Validus access to a premier underwriting franchise in the Lloyds’ syndicate, which has already proven a profitable investment. In addition, Validus has set the stage for further organic growth by adding market leading teams in Latin America and the energy and aviation segments. It has global licenses that will permit Validus to expand in other lines if and when the pricing presents a profitable opportunity to do so. Validus believes that the combination of IPC and Validus will bolster all of these initiatives and give the combined company a leading platform and additional opportunities for growth.
 
Litigation
 
On April 28, 2009, Validus filed a claim in the Supreme Court of Bermuda against IPC, IPC Limited and Max (“Bermuda Claim”). The Bermuda Claim challenges the validity of the Max Termination Fee and provisions which restrict the ability of IPC to discuss competing proposals with third parties (“no-talk provisions”) in the Max Amalgamation Agreement. Further, the Bermuda Claim alleges that by entering into the Max Amalgamation Agreement containing the Max Termination Fee and the no talk provisions and continuing to act in accordance with the terms of these provisions, the directors of IPC have acted in breach of their fiduciary or other duties and not in accordance with the constitution of IPC.
 
First, pursuant to the Max Amalgamation Agreement, in the event of an unsolicited alternate offer from a third party, the board of IPC is required to consider whether such a proposal amounts to a “Superior Proposal”. The Bermuda Claim alleges however, that without the ability to engage in any discussions or information exchange with respect to the Acquisition as a result of the no-talk provisions, the board of IPC is restricted and/or precluded from properly exploring or evaluating whether in fact the alternate offer is a “Superior Proposal. Second, in the event that a “Superior Proposal” is being made and the directors of IPC vary or alter their recommendation of the Proposed Max Amalgamation within the contractual closing deadline, pursuant to the Max Amalgamation Agreement, Max would be entitled to terminate the Max Amalgamation Agreement and collect the Max Termination Fee from IPC. Under the Max Amalgamation Agreement, the Max Termination Fee is $50,000,000. The Bermuda Claim alleges that this is equivalent to 4.97% of the aggregate consideration value of $1,005,915,920 of the Proposed Max Amalgamation, based on the price of Max common shares on February 27, 2009, the last trading day before the


-71-


 

signing of the Max Amalgamation Agreement. The Bermuda Claim also alleges that the quantum of the Max Termination Fee is wholly excessive and was not calculated by reference to the costs and expenses that would be expected to be incurred by Max in the event that the Max Amalgamation Agreement was terminated and substantially exceeds Max’s anticipated liability in respect of such costs and expenses, which, based upon disclosure in the IPC/Max Form S-4, is likely to be little more than $10 million. Therefore, the Max Amalgamation Agreement constitutes an unlawful penalty whose predominant function, the Bermuda Claim alleges, is to deter IPC or IPC Limited from breaching the Max Amalgamation Agreement (including by way of recommending a “Superior Proposal” to its board of directors).
 
By agreeing to the Max Amalgamation Agreement containing the Max Termination Fee and no-talk provisions, as well as by continuing to act in accordance with their terms, the Bermuda Claim alleges that the directors of IPC have failed to retain sufficient flexibility to consider and, if thought fit, recommend an offer which may be more advantageous to IPC shareholders, improperly fettering their ability to exercise the powers conferred upon them by the constitution of IPC and/or act in the best interests of IPC and/or its shareholders. And by doing so, the directors of IPC have acted other than bona fide in the best interest of IPC and/or for an improper or collateral purpose, and the Max Termination Fee and no-talk provisions were therefore beyond the actual or implied authority of the board of directors of IPC, and as such, not binding on IPC and unenforceable by Max.
 
The Bermuda Claim requests: (1) declaratory relief that: (a) the Max Termination Fee constitutes an unlawful and unenforceable penalty, (b) in entering into the Max Amalgamation Agreement containing the Max Termination Fee and no-talk provisions, the directors of IPC acted in breach of duty and otherwise than in accordance with the constitution of IPC, (c) in continuing to act in accordance with the Max Termination Fee and no-talk provisions in the Max Amalgamation Agreement the directors of IPC continue to act in breach of duty and otherwise than in accordance with the constitution of IPC; (2) an injunction restraining IPC or IPC Limited from making any direct or indirect payment to Max pursuant to the Max Termination Fee and/or taking any steps, whether itself, or by its directors, servants, agents or otherwise to give effect to the no-talk provisions of the Max Amalgamation Agreement and/or the Max Termination Fee; (3) an order that IPC pay the costs of the proceedings; and (4) any other or further relief the court may deem just and proper.
 
On May 1, 2009, Validus filed an application to expedite the trial of the Bermuda Claim. Validus requested that the Supreme Court of Bermuda set a schedule permitting a trial to be conducted commencing on an earlier date than any date on which IPC seeks to hold its annual general meeting to consider the proposals related to the Proposed Max Amalgamation. Max and IPC opposed the application. On May 13, 2009, the Court denied the application for expedition of the timetable for the proceedings. While this was not a hearing on the merits of Validus’ claims, the Court acknowledged that Validus had raised serious questions to be tried.
 
Interests of Validus Directors and Executive Officers in the Acquisition
 
Executive Officers and Directors
 
The consummation of the Acquisition will not be deemed to be a change in control impacting grants under any of Validus’ long-term incentive or stock option plans, or a change in control under any employment agreement between Validus and any of its employees. As a result, no options or other equity grants held by such persons will vest as a result of the Acquisition.
 
Board and Management Structure of Validus
 
Pursuant to the Scheme of Arrangement, upon the effective time all of Validus’ current directors and officers will continue as the directors and officers of Validus. For more information, see Summary — The Scheme of Arrangement above.
 
Interests of IPC Directors and Executive Officers in the Acquisition
 
Except for the last sentence of Employment Agreements, the following information is taken from the IPC/Max S-4. See Sources of Additional Information above.


-72-


 

Retirement and Consulting Agreement
 
James P. Bryce, Chief Executive Officer, President and a director of IPC, has decided to commence a long contemplated retirement from IPC, both as an employee and as a member of IPC’s board of directors, effective not later than June 30, 2009. Mr. Bryce has agreed to provide consulting services to IPC and to serve as non-executive Chairman of Max IPC Re during the period from his retirement through December 31, 2009, unless the period is extended by mutual agreement of the parties, in order to help accomplish an efficient transition in connection with the Proposed Max Amalgamation. IPC entered into the Retirement and Consulting Agreement with Mr. Bryce. See Compensation of IPC’s Executive Officers — Compensation Discussion and Analysis — Employment and Other Agreements in the IPC/Max S-4.
 
IPC’s Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, John R. Weale, will be appointed acting Chief Executive Officer, effective July 1, 2009, if the Proposed Max Amalgamation has not closed by June 30, 2009. The board of directors will engage an executive search firm to help identify a successor to Mr. Bryce, as Chief Executive Officer and President of IPC, including internal and external candidates, in case the Proposed Max Amalgamation is not completed.
 
Employment Agreements
 
Each of John R. Weale, Peter J. A. Cozens and Stephen F. Fallon has entered into an employment agreement. See Compensation of IPC’s Executive Officers — Compensation Discussion and Analysis — Employment and Other Agreements in the IPC/Max S-4. Given the percentage change in ownership of IPC Shares as a result thereof, the Acquisition would likely constitute a change in control under those agreements.
 
Indemnification and Insurance
 
IPC maintains standard directors’ and officers’ liability insurance policies under which, pursuant to their respective retirement and employment agreements, Messrs. Bryce, Weale, Cozens and Fallon have rights to indemnification by virtue of their positions as officers and/or directors of IPC.
 
Validus Shareholder Approval of Share Issuance
 
The issuance of the Validus Shares in the Acquisition requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast on a proposal to approve such issuance at a meeting of the Validus shareholders. On May 26, 2009, Validus filed a definitive proxy statement with the SEC with respect to soliciting votes from Validus shareholders to approve the issuance of the Validus Shares in the Acquisition. All of the Validus officers, directors and those shareholders which Validus refers to as its “qualified sponsors” (as defined in this proxy statement), in each case who own Validus Shares, have indicated that they intend to vote the Validus Shares beneficially owned by them in favor of such approval. As of April 30, 2009, these persons and entities beneficially owned 42.4% of the voting interests relating to the Validus Shares.
 
Listing of Validus Shares
 
It is a condition to the closing of the Acquisition that the Validus Shares issuable to IPC shareholders in the Acquisition and the Validus Shares to be reserved for issuance upon the exercise of IPC options and the vesting of IPC Shares authorized to be issued under IPC’s outstanding equity compensation plans shall have been authorized for listing on the NYSE, subject to official notice of issuance.
 
Delisting of IPC Shares
 
Upon completion of the Acquisition, IPC Shares, which are currently quoted on NASDAQ under the symbol “IPCR” and the Bermuda Stock Exchange under the symbol “IPCR BH,” will be delisted.
 
Federal Securities Law Consequences
 
The issuance of Validus Shares pursuant to the Scheme of Arrangement will not be registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”). Section 3(a)(10) of the Securities Act exempts securities


-73-


 

issued in exchange for one or more outstanding securities from the general requirement of registration where the terms and conditions of the issuance and exchange of such securities have been approved by any court of competent jurisdiction, after a hearing upon the fairness of the terms and conditions of the issuance and exchange at which all persons to whom such securities will be issued have a right to appear and to whom adequate notice of the hearing has been given. The Validus Shares issued pursuant to the Scheme of Arrangement will be deemed to be registered under Section 12(b) of the Exchange Act by virtue of Rule 12g-3 under the Exchange Act, without the filing of any Exchange Act registration statement.
 
Anticipated Accounting Treatment
 
The Acquisition will be accounted for under the purchase method of accounting in accordance with FAS 141(R) under which the total consideration paid in the Acquisition will be allocated among acquired tangible and intangible assets and assumed liabilities based on the fair values of the tangible and intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed. In the event there is an excess of the total consideration paid in the Acquisition over the fair values, the excess will be accounted for as goodwill. Intangible assets with definite lives will be amortized over their estimated useful lives. Goodwill resulting from the Acquisition will not be amortized but instead will be tested for impairment at least annually (more frequently if certain indicators are present). In the event that management of Validus determines that the value of goodwill has become impaired, an accounting charge will be taken in the fiscal quarter in which such determination is made. In the event there is an excess of the fair values of the acquired assets and liabilities assumed over the total consideration paid in the Acquisition, the excess will be accounted for as a gain to be recognized through the income statement at the consummation of the Acquisition in accordance with FAS 141(R). Validus anticipates the Scheme of Arrangement will result in an excess of the fair value of the acquired assets and liabilities assumed over total consideration paid.
 
Plan of Reorganization
 
Following the Scheme of Arrangement, as part of an overall plan, Validus intends to complete a short-form amalgamation between IPC and another wholly-owned subsidiary of Validus pursuant to Section 107 of the Companies Act. Following the short-form amalgamation, IPC and the Validus subsidiary would continue as one amalgamated company in accordance with the Companies Act.
 
The Scheme of Arrangement is intended to constitute a plan of reorganization within the meaning of Section 368(a) of the Code, which includes the Scheme of Arrangement and short-form amalgamation.


-74-


 

 
THE SCHEME OF ARRANGEMENT
 
The following section contains summaries of selected material provisions of the Scheme of Arrangement. These summaries are qualified in their entirety by reference to the form of Scheme of Arrangement which is incorporated by reference in its entirety and attached to this proxy statement as Annex A. You should read that document in its entirety because it, and not this proxy statement or Validus’ proxy statement for the IPC special general meeting, is the legal document that would govern the Scheme of Arrangement.
 
Purpose; Effective Time
 
The Supreme Court of Bermuda ordered the court-ordered IPC meeting to be held to give the IPC shareholders (other than the holders of any IPC Shares owned by Validus, IPC or their respective subsidiaries) the opportunity to consider and, if they so determine, approve the Scheme of Arrangement. Assuming the Scheme of Arrangement receives the approval of the IPC shareholders and the sanction of the Supreme Court of Bermuda, and all the other conditions to the consummation of the Acquisition are satisfied or, where relevant, waived, including approval of the Scheme of Arrangement by IPC either by vote of the IPC board of directors or a vote of IPC shareholders at the IPC special general meeting, an office copy of the court order sanctioning the Scheme of Arrangement will be delivered to the Bermuda Registrar of Companies, at which time the Scheme of Arrangement will be effective.
 
Implementing the Scheme of Arrangement
 
A Scheme of Arrangement under Bermuda law is an arrangement between a company and its shareholders. In order to implement the Scheme of Arrangement, the IPC shareholders must approve the Scheme of Arrangement at the court-ordered IPC meeting, IPC must separately approve the Scheme of Arrangement and the Scheme of Arrangement must be sanctioned by the Supreme Court of Bermuda. If the IPC shareholders approve the Scheme of Arrangement at the court-ordered IPC meeting, the separate approval of IPC of the Scheme of Arrangement can be provided by either (i) the IPC board of directors voluntarily complying with the will of the IPC shareholders as expressed at the court-ordered IPC meeting, or (ii) the shareholders of IPC approving resolutions at the IPC special general meeting, including resolutions for IPC to approve and to be bound by the Scheme of Arrangement and to terminate the Max Amalgamation Agreement.
 
At the court-ordered IPC meeting, you will be asked to approve the consummation of the Acquisition by means of a court sanctioned scheme of arrangement between IPC and the holders of IPC Shares pursuant to section 99 of the Companies Act. The Scheme of Arrangement is set out in full in Annex A to this proxy statement.
 
The steps involved in the Scheme of Arrangement are as follows:
 
(1) Applying to the Supreme Court of Bermuda for an order giving directions for the holding and conduct of the court-ordered IPC meeting.
 
(2) Requisitioning the IPC special general meeting. On May 12, 2009, Validus filed with the SEC a preliminary proxy statement which, when filed in its definitive form, will be used to solicit written requisitions from the IPC shareholders to compel the IPC board of directors to call the IPC special general meeting.
 
(3) Holding the court-ordered IPC meeting to which this proxy statement relates to consider and, if the IPC shareholders so determine, approve the Scheme of Arrangement. The Scheme of Arrangement must be approved by a majority in number of the holders of IPC Shares voting at the court-ordered IPC meeting, whether in person or by proxy, representing 75% or more in value of the IPC Shares voting at the court-ordered IPC meeting, whether in person or by proxy.
 
(4) Holding the IPC special general meeting to approve resolutions determined by Validus to be reasonably necessary in connection with implementation of the Scheme of Arrangement, including resolutions for IPC to approve and to be bound by the Scheme of Arrangement and to terminate the Max Amalgamation Agreement. Approval of each resolution at the IPC special general meeting requires the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the IPC Shares voting at the meeting, whether in person or by proxy.
 
(5) Applying to the Supreme Court of Bermuda to sanction the Scheme of Arrangement.
 
(6) Delivering a copy of the order of the Supreme Court of Bermuda sanctioning the Scheme of Arrangement to the Bermuda Registrar of Companies.


-75-


 

 
The purpose of the Scheme of Arrangement is to provide for Validus to become the owner of the entire issued and to-be-issued share capital of IPC not already held by Validus, IPC or their respective subsidiaries. This is to be achieved by the transfer to Validus (or its nominee(s)) of the IPC Shares outstanding immediately prior to the effective time (excluding any IPC Shares owned by Validus, IPC or their respective subsidiaries) in exchange for Validus Shares and cash upon the Scheme of Arrangement becoming effective.
 
To become effective, the Scheme of Arrangement requires: (i) the approval of a majority in number of the holders of IPC Shares voting at the court-ordered IPC meeting, whether in person or by proxy, representing 75% or more in value of the IPC Shares voting at the court-ordered IPC meeting, whether in person or by proxy; (ii) the approval of IPC (either by IPC’s board of directors or by the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the IPC Shares voting at the IPC special general meeting, whether in person or by proxy) and the approval of the other resolutions to be proposed at the IPC special general meeting; (iii) the satisfaction or, where relevant, waiver of the other conditions to the effectiveness of the Scheme of Arrangement; (iv) the sanction of the Supreme Court of Bermuda; and (v) the delivery of a copy of the order of the Supreme Court of Bermuda sanctioning the Scheme of Arrangement to the Bermuda Registrar of Companies.
 
If the IPC shareholders approve the Scheme of Arrangement at the court-ordered IPC meeting, the separate approval of IPC of the Scheme of Arrangement can be provided by either (i) the IPC board of directors voluntarily complying with the will of the IPC shareholders as expressed at the court-ordered IPC meeting, or (ii) the shareholders of IPC approving resolutions at the IPC special general meeting, including resolutions for IPC to approve and to be bound by the Scheme of Arrangement and to terminate the Max Amalgamation Agreement. On May 12, 2009, Validus filed with the SEC a preliminary proxy statement which, when filed in its definitive form, will be used to solicit written requisitions from the IPC shareholders to compel the IPC board of directors to call the IPC special general meeting. Following IPC shareholder approval at both the court-ordered IPC meeting and the IPC special general meeting, the satisfaction or, where relevant, waiver of the other conditions to the effectiveness of the Scheme of Arrangement, and the granting of a court order from the Supreme Court of Bermuda sanctioning the Scheme of Arrangement, a copy of the court order sanctioning the Scheme of Arrangement will be delivered to the Bermuda Registrar of Companies, at which time the Scheme of Arrangement will be effective.
 
Upon the Scheme of Arrangement becoming effective, Validus (or its nominee(s)) will acquire the IPC Shares fully paid and free from all liens, equitable interests, charges, encumbrances and rights of pre-emption and any other interests of any nature whatsoever and together with all rights attaching thereto including the right to receive and retain all dividends and other distributions declared, paid or made thereon, on or after the effectiveness of the Scheme of Arrangement (other than a one-time dividend to the holders of IPC Shares in an aggregate amount not to exceed any reduction in the Max Termination Fee).
 
Validus will, in consideration for the transfer of the IPC Shares, and subject as provided in the Scheme of Arrangement, allot and issue, credited as fully paid, to each holder of IPC Shares (as appearing in IPC’s register of members immediately prior to the effective time), new Validus Shares on the following basis:
 
     
for each IPC Share
  1.1234 Validus Shares and $3.00 in cash (less any applicable withholding taxes and without interest)
 
Validus will not issue any fractional Validus Shares in connection with the Scheme of Arrangement. Instead, any IPC shareholder who would otherwise have been entitled to a fraction of a Validus Share in connection with the Scheme of Arrangement will receive cash (rounded to the nearest whole cent) in an amount (without interest) equal to the product obtained by multiplying (i) the fractional share interest to which such shareholder would otherwise be entitled (after aggregating all fractional Validus Shares that would otherwise be received by such shareholder) by (ii) the closing price of Validus Shares as reported on the NYSE on the last trading day immediately prior to the closing of the Acquisition.
 
With effect from and including the effective time, each existing certificate representing a holding of IPC Shares shall cease to be valid in respect of such holding and each holder of IPC Shares shall be bound at the request of Validus to deliver up the same to Validus or to any person appointed by Validus to receive the same for cancellation or to destroy such share certificates.
 
Upon the Scheme of Arrangement becoming effective, it will be binding on all IPC shareholders, whether or not they attended or voted at the court-ordered IPC meeting or the IPC special general meeting (and if they attended and voted, whether or not they voted in favor).


-76-


 

The Scheme of Arrangement contains a provision for Validus to consent, on behalf of all persons concerned, to any modification of or addition to the Scheme of Arrangement or any condition to the effectiveness of the Scheme of Arrangement that the Supreme Court of Bermuda may approve or impose. If there is any modification of or addition to the Scheme of Arrangement or any condition to the effectiveness of the Scheme of Arrangement that is material to the interests of IPC shareholders, Validus will amend this proxy statement and advise the IPC shareholders of such modification, addition or condition in advance of the court-ordered IPC meeting, in accordance with applicable law.
 
Once the Scheme of Arrangement is effective, the Courts of Bermuda will have exclusive jurisdiction to hear and determine any suit, action or proceeding and to settle any dispute which arises out of or is connected with the terms of the Scheme of Arrangement or their implementation or out of any action taken or omitted to be taken under the Scheme of Arrangement or in connection with the administration of the Scheme of Arrangement. An IPC shareholder who wishes to enforce any rights under the Scheme of Arrangement after such time must notify Validus in writing of its intention at least ten business days prior to commencing a new proceeding. After the effective time of the Scheme of Arrangement, no shareholder may commence a proceeding against Validus or IPC in respect of or arising from the Scheme of Arrangement except to enforce its rights under the Scheme of Arrangement where Validus or IPC has failed to perform its obligations under the Scheme of Arrangement.
 
When, under any provision of the Scheme of Arrangement, a matter is to be determined by Validus, Validus will have discretion to interpret those matters under the Scheme of Arrangement in a manner that it considers fair and reasonable, and its decisions will be binding on all concerned.
 
If for any reason the Scheme of Arrangement does not become effective in accordance with its terms, the Scheme of Arrangement will not be consummated and IPC Shareholders will retain their existing holdings of IPC Shares unless either the Validus Amalgamation Offer or the Exchange Offer is consummated.
 
The Meetings to Implement the Scheme of Arrangement
 
Before the Supreme Court of Bermuda’s sanction can be sought for the Scheme of Arrangement, the Scheme of Arrangement will require approval by the IPC shareholders at the court-ordered IPC meeting and the approval of the resolutions to be proposed at the IPC special general meeting. Notice of the court-ordered IPC meeting is being delivered to you concurrently herewith. Notice of the IPC special general meeting will be forwarded to IPC shareholders separately.
 
(a) The Court-Ordered IPC Meeting
 
The court-ordered IPC meeting, which has been convened for [ • ] Atlantic time on [ • ], 2009 at [ • ], is being held at the direction of the Supreme Court of Bermuda to seek the approval of IPC shareholders for the Scheme of Arrangement. Subject to the following paragraph, all holders of IPC Shares whose names appear on the register of members of IPC at [ • ] p.m. (Atlantic time) on [ • ] 2009 will be entitled to attend and vote at the court-ordered IPC meeting in respect of the number of IPC Shares registered in their name at the relevant time.
 
At the court-ordered IPC meeting, voting will be by way of poll and each IPC shareholder (other than holders of any IPC Shares owned by Validus, IPC or their respective subsidiaries) present in person or by proxy will be entitled to one vote for each IPC Share held. The vote required to approve the Scheme of Arrangement at the court-ordered IPC meeting is a majority in number of the holders of IPC Shares voting at the court-ordered IPC meeting, whether in person or by proxy, representing 75% or more in value of the IPC Shares voting at the court-ordered IPC meeting, whether in person or by proxy. The holders of IPC Shares owned by Validus, IPC or their respective subsidiaries will not be able to vote those shares at the court-ordered IPC meeting but Validus will undertake to the Supreme Court of Bermuda to be bound by the Scheme of Arrangement.
 
It is important that, for the court-ordered IPC meeting in particular, as many votes as possible are cast so that the Supreme Court of Bermuda may be satisfied that there is a fair and reasonable representation of opinion of the IPC shareholders. Therefore, whether or not you intend to attend the court-ordered IPC meeting in person, you are strongly urged to sign and return your proxy card or voting instruction form as soon as possible.


-77-


 

(b) The IPC Special General Meeting
 
In addition to the court-ordered IPC meeting, the IPC special general meeting will be convened to consider and, if the IPC shareholders so determine, approve resolutions determined by Validus to be reasonably necessary in connection with implementation of the Scheme of Arrangement, including resolutions for IPC to approve and to be bound by the Scheme of Arrangement and to terminate the Max Amalgamation Agreement. Written requisitions from IPC shareholders holding at least 10% of the issued and outstanding IPC Shares may compel the IPC board of directors to call the IPC special general meeting. On May 12, 2009 Validus filed with the SEC a preliminary proxy statement which, when filed in its definitive form, will be used to solicit such written requisitions.
 
At the IPC special general meeting, a vote by a show of hands will be taken in the first instance on all matters properly brought before the IPC special general meeting unless a poll is requested in accordance with IPC’s bye-laws. Each IPC shareholder as of the record date for the IPC special general meeting, including Validus and its subsidiaries, will be entitled to attend and vote, either in person or by proxy, at the IPC special general meeting. Approval of each resolution at the IPC special general meeting requires the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the IPC Shares voting at the meeting, whether in person or by proxy.
 
Validus will be sending a separate proxy statement and proxy card to IPC shareholders in respect of the IPC special general meeting. We urge you to review those materials carefully.
 
Sanction of the Scheme of Arrangement by the Supreme Court of Bermuda
 
Under the Companies Act, the Scheme of Arrangement also requires the sanction of the Supreme Court of Bermuda. Subject to the prior satisfaction or, where relevant, waiver of the other conditions to the effectiveness of the Scheme of Arrangement set out in this proxy statement, Validus has confirmed that it will be represented by counsel at the hearing of the Supreme Court of Bermuda to sanction the Scheme of Arrangement so as to consent to the Scheme of Arrangement and to undertake to the Supreme Court of Bermuda to be bound thereby.
 
In order to approve the Scheme of Arrangement, the Supreme Court of Bermuda will consider, among other things, whether the Scheme of Arrangement is fair to the IPC shareholders. All IPC shareholders are entitled to attend the Supreme Court of Bermuda hearing in person or through counsel to support or oppose the sanctioning of the Scheme of Arrangement.
 
The Scheme of Arrangement will become effective in accordance with its terms upon the delivery of an office copy of the Supreme Court of Bermuda order to the Bermuda Registrar of Companies for registration.
 
If the Scheme of Arrangement becomes effective, it will be binding on all IPC shareholders whether or not they attended or voted in favor of the Scheme of Arrangement at the court-ordered IPC meeting or of the resolutions proposed at the IPC special general meeting. If the Scheme of Arrangement does not become effective by November 30, 2009 (or such later date, if any, as Validus may agree and the Supreme Court of Bermuda may allow), the Scheme of Arrangement will not become effective and will not be consummated.
 
Acquisition Consideration
 
Under the Scheme of Arrangement, at the closing, each IPC Share issued and outstanding immediately prior to the closing (excluding any IPC Shares owned by Validus, IPC or their respective subsidiaries) will be transferred to Validus in exchange for (i) 1.1234 Validus Shares and (ii) $3.00 in cash (less any applicable withholding taxes and without interest).
 
Validus will not issue any fractional Validus Shares in connection with the Acquisition. Instead, any IPC shareholder who would otherwise have been entitled to a fraction of a Validus Share in connection with the Acquisition will receive cash (rounded to the nearest whole cent) in an amount (without interest) equal to the product obtained by multiplying (i) the fractional share interest to which such shareholder would otherwise be entitled (after aggregating all fractional Validus Shares that would otherwise be received by such shareholder) by (ii) the closing price of Validus Shares as reported on the NYSE on the last trading day immediately prior to the closing of the Acquisition.
 
Validus will appoint BNY Mellon Shareowner Services as exchange agent to transfer and pay the Acquisition Consideration to persons holding IPC Shares outstanding immediately prior to the effective time (other than


-78-


 

Validus, IPC or their respective subsidiaries) in exchange for share certificates representing IPC Shares or for book-entry shares. At or about the effective time of the Scheme of Arrangement, Validus will deposit with the exchange agent the cash payable and the Validus Shares issuable as Acquisition Consideration and will provide for the cash issuable in lieu of fractional shares. Promptly after the effective time, the exchange agent will mail each holder of IPC Shares outstanding immediately prior to the effective time (other than Validus, IPC or their respective subsidiaries) instructions for surrendering share certificates and book-entry shares and a substitute Form W-9. The exchange agent will transfer and pay the Acquisition Consideration, less any applicable withholding taxes, to the persons holding IPC Shares outstanding immediately prior to the effective time (other than Validus, IPC or their respective subsidiaries) promptly following the exchange agent’s receipt of the share certificates (or book-entry shares). No interest will be paid or accrued on the cash payable upon the surrender of any share certificate (or book-entry shares). Until so surrendered, each such IPC Share certificate (or book-entry share) will represent after the effective time for all purposes only evidence of the right to receive such Acquisition Consideration.
 
Under the current “backup withholding” provisions of U.S. federal income tax law, the exchange agent may be required to withhold 28% of the amount of any payments pursuant to the Acquisition. In order to prevent backup withholding with respect to payments of cash to certain shareholders, each such shareholder must provide the exchange agent with such shareholder’s correct taxpayer identification number (“TIN”) and certify that such shareholder is not subject to backup withholding by completing the substitute Form W-9 included in the instructions mailed by the exchange agent to each security holder, or otherwise establish an exemption. Certain shareholders (including, among others, all corporations and certain non-U.S. individuals and entities) are not subject to backup withholding. If a shareholder does not provide its correct TIN or fails to provide the certifications described above, the Internal Revenue Service may impose a penalty on the shareholder and payment of cash to the shareholder pursuant to the Acquisition may be subject to backup withholding. All shareholders surrendering IPC Shares pursuant to the Acquisition that are U.S. persons should complete and sign the substitute Form W-9 included in the instructions mailed by the exchange agent to provide the information necessary to avoid backup withholding. Non-U.S. shareholders should complete and sign an applicable Form W-8 (a copy of which may be obtained from the exchange agent) in order to avoid backup withholding.
 
Amendment and Termination of the Scheme of Arrangement
 
The Scheme of Arrangement contains a provision for Validus to consent, on behalf of all persons concerned, to any modification of or addition to the Scheme of Arrangement or any condition to the effectiveness of the Scheme of Arrangement that the Supreme Court of Bermuda may approve or impose. If there is any modification of or addition to the Scheme of Arrangement or any condition to the effectiveness of the Scheme of Arrangement that is material to the interests of IPC shareholders, Validus will amend this proxy statement and advise the IPC shareholders of such modification, addition or condition in advance of the court-ordered IPC meeting, in accordance with applicable law.
 
Prior to approval by the IPC shareholders at the court-ordered IPC meeting, Validus may terminate the Scheme of Arrangement at any time. Following approval by the IPC shareholders at the court-ordered IPC meeting, Validus may terminate the Scheme of Arrangement at any time prior to commencement of the hearing of the Supreme Court of Bermuda to sanction the Scheme of Arrangement without obtaining the approval of the IPC shareholders if any event or condition occurs which would cause any of the conditions to its effectiveness not to be satisfied by November 30, 2009 (or such later date, if any, as Validus may agree and the Supreme Court of Bermuda may allow).
 
If for any reason the Scheme of Arrangement does not become effective in accordance with its terms, the Scheme of Arrangement will not be consummated and IPC shareholders will retain their existing holdings of IPC Shares unless either the Validus Amalgamation Offer or the Exchange Offer is consummated.
 
Conditions to the Scheme of Arrangement
 
In addition to the requisite approval by IPC shareholders at the court-ordered IPC meeting, the approval by IPC shareholders at the IPC special general meeting of resolutions determined by Validus to be reasonably necessary in connection with implementation of the Scheme of Arrangement, including resolutions for IPC to approve and to be bound by the Scheme of Arrangement and to terminate the Max Amalgamation Agreement, the sanction of the Scheme of Arrangement by the Supreme Court of Bermuda and the delivery of a copy of the court sanction order


-79-


 

with the Bermuda Registrar of Companies, the effectiveness of the Scheme of Arrangement is subject to the satisfaction or, where relevant, waiver of the following other conditions:
 
Max Amalgamation Condition
 
The Max Amalgamation Agreement shall have been validly terminated, and Validus shall reasonably believe that IPC could not have any liability, and Max shall not have asserted any claim of liability or breach against IPC in connection with the Max Amalgamation Agreement other than with respect to the possible payment of the Max Termination Fee.
 
Registration Condition
 
The issuance of Validus Shares to be issued pursuant to the Scheme of Arrangement shall have been registered under the Securities Act pursuant to an effective registration statement, or shall be exempt from the registration requirements thereof. The issuance of Validus Shares to be issued pursuant to the Scheme of Arrangement will be exempt from such registration requirements pursuant to Section 3(a)(10) of the Securities Act.
 
Shareholder Approval Condition
 
The shareholders of Validus shall have approved the issuance of the Validus Shares pursuant to the Scheme of Arrangement as required under the rules of the NYSE. All of the Validus officers, directors and those shareholders which Validus refers to as its “qualified sponsors” (as defined in this proxy statement), in each case who own Validus Shares, have indicated that they intend to vote the Validus Shares beneficially owned by them in favor of such approval. As of April 30, 2009, these persons and entities beneficially owned 42.4% of the voting interests relating to the Validus Shares.
 
NYSE Listing Condition
 
The Validus Shares to be issued pursuant to the Scheme of Arrangement shall have been authorized for listing on the NYSE, subject to official notice of issuance.
 
Pending Litigation Condition
 
There shall be no threatened or pending litigation, suit, claim, action, proceeding or investigation before any supranational, national, state, provincial, municipal or local government, governmental, regulatory or administrative authority, agency, instrumentality or commission or any court, tribunal or judicial or arbitral body (each of which, a “governmental authority”): (1) challenging or seeking to, or which, in the judgment of Validus, is reasonably likely to, make illegal, delay or otherwise, directly or indirectly, restrain or prohibit or in which there are allegations of any violation of law, rule or regulation relating to, the proposing of, or terms or provisions of, the Scheme of Arrangement, or the transfer of all of the outstanding IPC Shares (excluding any IPC Shares owned by Validus, IPC or their respective subsidiaries) to Validus in exchange for Validus Shares; or (2) seeking to, or which in the judgment of Validus, is reasonably likely to, prohibit or limit the full rights of ownership of IPC Shares by Validus or any of its affiliates, including, without limitation, the right to vote any IPC Shares acquired by Validus pursuant to the Scheme of Arrangement or otherwise on all matters properly presented to IPC shareholders.
 
No Material Adverse Change Condition
 
Since December 31, 2008, there shall not have been any change, state of facts, circumstance or event that has had, or would reasonably be expected to have, a material adverse effect on the financial condition, properties, assets, liabilities, obligations (whether accrued, absolute, contingent or otherwise), businesses or results of operations of IPC and its subsidiaries, taken as a whole, excluding any such change, state of facts, circumstance or event to the extent caused by or resulting from: (i) changes in economic, market, business, regulatory or political conditions generally in the United States or in Bermuda or any other jurisdiction in which such party operates or in Bermudan, United States or global financial markets; (ii) changes, circumstances or events generally affecting the property and casualty insurance and reinsurance industry in the geographic areas in which such party operates; (iii) changes, circumstances or events resulting in liabilities under property catastrophe reinsurance, including any effects resulting from any earthquake, hurricane, tornado, windstorm, terrorist act, act of war or other natural or man-made disaster; (iv) changes in any applicable law, statute, ordinance, common law, arbitration award, or any rule, regulation, judgment, order, writ, injunction, decree, agency requirement or published interpretation of any


-80-


 

governmental authority, including all relevant bye-laws and regulations of the Council and Society of Lloyd’s incorporated under the Lloyd’s Act of 1871 to 1982 of England and Wales in each of the jurisdictions in which IPC or its subsidiaries currently conduct business or operate, which we refer to as “specified laws”; (v) changes in generally accepted accounting principles or in statutory accounting principles (or local equivalents in the applicable jurisdiction) prescribed by the applicable insurance regulatory authority, including accounting and financial reporting pronouncements by the Bermuda Monetary Authority (the “BMA”), the SEC, the National Association of Insurance Commissioners and the Financial Accounting Standards Board; (vi) any change or announcement of a potential change in IPC’s or any of its subsidiaries’ credit or claims paying rating or A.M. Best rating or the ratings of any of IPC’s or its subsidiaries’ businesses or securities; (vii) a change in the trading prices or volume of IPC Shares; (viii) the failure to meet any revenue, earnings or other projections, forecasts or predictions for any period ending after the date of this proxy statement; or (ix) the commencement, occurrence or continuation of any war or armed hostilities, except that (A) in the case of the foregoing clauses (vi), (vii) and (viii), such exceptions shall not prevent or otherwise affect a determination that any changes, state of facts, circumstances or events underlying a failure described in any such clause has resulted in, or contributed to, a material adverse effect on IPC and its subsidiaries and (B) in the case of the foregoing clauses (i), (ii), (iv), (v) and (ix), to the extent those changes, state of facts, circumstances or events have a materially disproportionate effect on IPC and its subsidiaries taken as a whole relative to other similarly situated persons in the property and casualty insurance and reinsurance industry. In addition, a material adverse effect shall be deemed to have occurred if IPC’s book value shall have (A) declined by more than 50% from December 31, 2008 to the commencement of the hearing by the Supreme Court of Bermuda to sanction the Scheme of Arrangement or (B) declined from December 31, 2008 to the commencement of the hearing by the Supreme Court of Bermuda to sanction the Scheme of Arrangement by more than 20% greater than the percentage decline of Validus’ book value during the same period, provided that for purposes of measuring the 20% differential book value decline, if Validus has experienced an increase in book value from December 31, 2008 to the commencement of the hearing by the Supreme Court of Bermuda to sanction the Scheme of Arrangement, Validus shall be deemed to have experienced no change in its book value. We refer to any such materially adverse change, state of facts, circumstance or event or decline in IPC’s book value described above as a “material adverse effect.”
 
Conduct of Business Condition
 
Each of IPC and its subsidiaries shall have carried on their respective businesses in the ordinary course consistent with past practice at all times on or after the date of this proxy statement and prior to the commencement of the hearing by the Supreme Court of Bermuda to sanction the Scheme of Arrangement.
 
Validus Credit Facility Condition
 
All amendments or waivers under Validus’ credit facilities necessary to consummate the Scheme of Arrangement and the other transactions contemplated by this proxy statement shall be in full force and effect.
 
Other Conditions
 
None of the following events or facts shall have occurred:
 
(a) there is in effect any order or injunction issued by any court of competent jurisdiction or any action taken, or any specified law enacted, entered, enforced or deemed applicable to the Scheme of Arrangement or the other transactions contemplated by this proxy statement by any governmental authority of competent jurisdiction which imposes any term, condition, obligation or restriction upon Validus, IPC or any of their respective subsidiaries that would, individually or the aggregate, reasonably be likely to (A) have a material adverse effect (assuming all references to IPC in the definition of “material adverse effect” were instead references to Validus) on Validus and its subsidiaries (assuming consummation of the Acquisition) on a consolidated basis following the effective time of the Scheme of Arrangement or (B) directly or indirectly (i) delay or otherwise restrain, impede or prohibit the Scheme of Arrangement or (ii) prohibit or limit the full rights of ownership of IPC Shares by Validus or any of its affiliates, including, without limitation, the right to vote any IPC Shares acquired by Validus pursuant to the Scheme of Arrangement or otherwise on all matters properly presented to IPC shareholders;
 
(b) IPC or any of its subsidiaries has (1) permitted the issuance or sale of any shares of any class of share capital or other securities of any subsidiary of IPC (other than IPC Shares issued pursuant to, and in accordance


-81-


 

with, the terms in effect on the date of this proxy statement of employee stock options, stock units or other similar awards outstanding prior to the date of this proxy statement), (2) declared, paid or proposed to declare or pay any dividend or other distributi