Form 6-K
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 6-K
Report of Foreign Private Issuer
Pursuant to Rule 13a-16 or 15d-16 of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2010
Commission file number 1-12874
TEEKAY CORPORATION
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
4th Floor, Belvedere Building
69 Pitts Bay Road
Hamilton, HM 08 Bermuda
(Address of principal executive office)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant files or will file annual reports under cover Form
20-F or Form 40-F.
Form 20-F þ Form 40- F o
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper as permitted by
Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(1).
Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper as permitted by
Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(7).
Yes o No þ
TEEKAY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
REPORT ON FORM 6-K FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 2010
INDEX
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PAGE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page 2 of 46
ITEM 1 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
TEEKAY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
UNAUDITED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME (LOSS)
(in thousands of U. S. dollars, except share and per share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
REVENUES |
|
|
544,947 |
|
|
|
532,473 |
|
|
|
1,109,484 |
|
|
|
1,149,024 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OPERATING EXPENSES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Voyage expenses |
|
|
66,367 |
|
|
|
62,925 |
|
|
|
138,917 |
|
|
|
153,594 |
|
Vessel operating expenses (note 16) |
|
|
150,792 |
|
|
|
144,004 |
|
|
|
305,327 |
|
|
|
296,764 |
|
Time-charter hire expense |
|
|
68,106 |
|
|
|
116,451 |
|
|
|
139,019 |
|
|
|
253,279 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
111,234 |
|
|
|
108,192 |
|
|
|
219,464 |
|
|
|
214,745 |
|
General and administrative (note 16) |
|
|
50,256 |
|
|
|
49,220 |
|
|
|
98,347 |
|
|
|
96,928 |
|
Loss (gain) on sale of vessels and equipment net of write-downs (note 13) |
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
(11,083 |
) |
|
|
782 |
|
|
|
(10,125 |
) |
Restructuring charge (note 3) |
|
|
4,195 |
|
|
|
5,003 |
|
|
|
7,978 |
|
|
|
10,561 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
450,972 |
|
|
|
474,712 |
|
|
|
909,834 |
|
|
|
1,015,746 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from vessel operations |
|
|
93,975 |
|
|
|
57,761 |
|
|
|
199,650 |
|
|
|
133,278 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OTHER ITEMS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(33,926 |
) |
|
|
(37,280 |
) |
|
|
(66,078 |
) |
|
|
(81,470 |
) |
Interest income |
|
|
2,209 |
|
|
|
5,023 |
|
|
|
6,483 |
|
|
|
11,701 |
|
Realized and unrealized (loss) gain on non-designated derivative instruments (note 16) |
|
|
(219,225 |
) |
|
|
157,485 |
|
|
|
(307,072 |
) |
|
|
204,730 |
|
Equity (loss) income from joint ventures (note 11b) |
|
|
(21,827 |
) |
|
|
27,380 |
|
|
|
(24,493 |
) |
|
|
38,802 |
|
Foreign exchange gain (loss) (notes 8 and 16) |
|
|
27,488 |
|
|
|
(25,165 |
) |
|
|
56,514 |
|
|
|
(13,853 |
) |
Loss on bond repurchase (note 8) |
|
|
(537 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12,645 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Other income (note 14) |
|
|
1,277 |
|
|
|
3,823 |
|
|
|
3,699 |
|
|
|
6,481 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income before income taxes |
|
|
(150,566 |
) |
|
|
189,027 |
|
|
|
(143,942 |
) |
|
|
299,669 |
|
Income tax recovery (expense) (note 18) |
|
|
5,147 |
|
|
|
4,598 |
|
|
|
12,454 |
|
|
|
(1,270 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income |
|
|
(145,419 |
) |
|
|
193,625 |
|
|
|
(131,488 |
) |
|
|
298,399 |
|
Less: Net income attributable to non-controlling interests |
|
|
(7,729 |
) |
|
|
(34,266 |
) |
|
|
(35,662 |
) |
|
|
(57,535 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income attributable to stockholders of Teekay Corporation |
|
|
(153,148 |
) |
|
|
159,359 |
|
|
|
(167,150 |
) |
|
|
240,864 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per common share of Teekay Corporation (note 17) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic (loss) earnings attributable to stockholders of Teekay Corporation |
|
|
(2.10 |
) |
|
|
2.20 |
|
|
|
(2.29 |
) |
|
|
3.32 |
|
Diluted (loss) earnings attributable to stockholders of Teekay Corporation |
|
|
(2.10 |
) |
|
|
2.19 |
|
|
|
(2.29 |
) |
|
|
3.30 |
|
Cash dividends declared |
|
|
0.3163 |
|
|
|
0.3163 |
|
|
|
0.6325 |
|
|
|
0.6325 |
|
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding (note 17) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
72,961,471 |
|
|
|
72,535,899 |
|
|
|
72,875,508 |
|
|
|
72,526,101 |
|
Diluted |
|
|
72,961,471 |
|
|
|
72,798,023 |
|
|
|
72,875,508 |
|
|
|
72,887,474 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the unaudited consolidated financial statements.
Page 3 of 46
TEEKAY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
UNAUDITED
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(in thousands of U.S. dollars, except share and per share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As at |
|
|
As at |
|
|
|
June 30, 2010 |
|
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents (note 8) |
|
|
641,467 |
|
|
|
422,510 |
|
Restricted cash (note 9) |
|
|
33,601 |
|
|
|
36,068 |
|
Accounts receivable, including non-trade of $21,744 (2009 $19,521) |
|
|
247,844 |
|
|
|
234,676 |
|
Vessels held for sale (note 13) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,250 |
|
Net investment in direct financing leases (note 4) |
|
|
27,313 |
|
|
|
27,210 |
|
Prepaid expenses |
|
|
96,556 |
|
|
|
96,549 |
|
Current portion of derivative assets (note 16) |
|
|
18,139 |
|
|
|
29,996 |
|
Advances to joint venture partner |
|
|
6,900 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets |
|
|
8,509 |
|
|
|
7,119 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
1,080,329 |
|
|
|
864,378 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted cash non-current (note 9) |
|
|
564,265 |
|
|
|
579,243 |
|
Vessels and equipment (note 8) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At cost, less accumulated depreciation of $1,836,848 (2009 $1,673,380) |
|
|
5,655,150 |
|
|
|
5,793,864 |
|
Vessels under capital leases, at cost, less accumulated amortization of $155,186 (2009 $138,569) (note 9) |
|
|
891,748 |
|
|
|
903,521 |
|
Advances on newbuilding contracts (notes 11a and 11b) |
|
|
215,407 |
|
|
|
138,212 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total vessels and equipment |
|
|
6,762,305 |
|
|
|
6,835,597 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment in direct financing leases non-current (note 4) |
|
|
475,479 |
|
|
|
485,202 |
|
Marketable securities |
|
|
13,831 |
|
|
|
18,904 |
|
Loans to joint ventures, bearing interest between 4.4% to 6.5% |
|
|
19,022 |
|
|
|
21,998 |
|
Derivative assets (note 16) |
|
|
75,762 |
|
|
|
18,119 |
|
Deferred income tax asset (note 18) |
|
|
16,529 |
|
|
|
6,516 |
|
Investment in joint ventures (note 11b) |
|
|
126,623 |
|
|
|
139,790 |
|
Other non-current assets |
|
|
123,734 |
|
|
|
130,624 |
|
Intangible assets net (note 6) |
|
|
200,181 |
|
|
|
213,870 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
203,191 |
|
|
|
203,191 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
|
9,661,251 |
|
|
|
9,517,432 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
47,776 |
|
|
|
57,242 |
|
Accrued liabilities (note 16) |
|
|
285,503 |
|
|
|
280,947 |
|
Current portion of derivative liabilities (note 16) |
|
|
147,089 |
|
|
|
136,454 |
|
Current portion of long-term debt (note 8) |
|
|
284,556 |
|
|
|
231,209 |
|
Current obligation under capital leases (note 9) |
|
|
39,568 |
|
|
|
41,016 |
|
Current portion of in-process revenue contracts (note 6) |
|
|
46,945 |
|
|
|
56,758 |
|
Loan from joint venture partners |
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
1,294 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
851,467 |
|
|
|
804,920 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt, including amounts due to joint venture partners of $13,500 (2009 $16,410) (note 8) |
|
|
4,083,874 |
|
|
|
4,187,962 |
|
Long-term obligation under capital leases (note 9) |
|
|
725,922 |
|
|
|
743,254 |
|
Derivative liabilities (note 16) |
|
|
504,433 |
|
|
|
223,025 |
|
Deferred income tax liability (note 18) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,628 |
|
Asset retirement obligation |
|
|
21,238 |
|
|
|
22,092 |
|
In-process revenue contracts (note 6) |
|
|
172,591 |
|
|
|
187,602 |
|
Other long-term liabilities |
|
|
230,681 |
|
|
|
241,279 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
6,590,206 |
|
|
|
6,421,762 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies (notes 4, 9, 11 and 16) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Redeemable non-controlling interest (note 11d) |
|
|
42,676 |
|
|
|
|
|
Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock and additional paid-in capital ($0.001 par value; 725,000,000 shares authorized;
72,978,460 shares outstanding (2009 72,694,345); 73,477,660 shares issued
(2009 73,193,545)) (note 10) |
|
|
672,820 |
|
|
|
656,193 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
1,398,106 |
|
|
|
1,585,431 |
|
Non-controlling interest |
|
|
978,942 |
|
|
|
855,580 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss (note 15) |
|
|
(21,499 |
) |
|
|
(1,534 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total equity |
|
|
3,028,369 |
|
|
|
3,095,670 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and equity |
|
|
9,661,251 |
|
|
|
9,517,432 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the unaudited consolidated financial statements.
Page 4 of 46
TEEKAY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
UNAUDITED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(in thousands of U.S. dollars)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
Cash and cash equivalents provided by (used for) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OPERATING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income |
|
|
(131,488 |
) |
|
|
298,399 |
|
Non-cash items: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
219,464 |
|
|
|
214,745 |
|
Amortization of in-process revenue contracts |
|
|
(24,824 |
) |
|
|
(37,769 |
) |
Loss (gain) on sale of vessels and equipment |
|
|
261 |
|
|
|
(27,634 |
) |
Write-down of intangible assets and other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,076 |
|
Write-down of vessels and equipment |
|
|
521 |
|
|
|
16,433 |
|
Loss on repurchase of bonds |
|
|
12,645 |
|
|
|
|
|
Equity loss (income), net of dividends received |
|
|
24,493 |
|
|
|
(35,860 |
) |
Income tax (recovery) expense |
|
|
(12,454 |
) |
|
|
1,270 |
|
Employee stock option compensation |
|
|
8,110 |
|
|
|
6,059 |
|
Foreign exchange and other |
|
|
(53,761 |
) |
|
|
7,920 |
|
Unrealized loss (gain) on derivative instruments |
|
|
227,402 |
|
|
|
(271,471 |
) |
Change in operating assets and liabilities (note 7) |
|
|
(25,983 |
) |
|
|
82,343 |
|
Expenditures for drydocking |
|
|
(24,072 |
) |
|
|
(26,243 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net operating cash flow |
|
|
220,314 |
|
|
|
229,268 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FINANCING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt (note 8) |
|
|
845,106 |
|
|
|
297,224 |
|
Debt issuance costs |
|
|
(12,538 |
) |
|
|
(664 |
) |
Scheduled repayments of long-term debt |
|
|
(107,077 |
) |
|
|
(137,777 |
) |
Prepayments of long-term debt |
|
|
(741,898 |
) |
|
|
(632,910 |
) |
Repayments of capital lease obligations |
|
|
(1,759 |
) |
|
|
(4,617 |
) |
Proceeds from loans from joint venture partner |
|
|
591 |
|
|
|
|
|
Repayment of loans from joint venture partner |
|
|
(1,264 |
) |
|
|
(4,973 |
) |
(Increase) decrease in restricted cash |
|
|
(1,769 |
) |
|
|
5,805 |
|
Net proceeds from issuance of Teekay LNG Partners L.P. units |
|
|
|
|
|
|
67,095 |
|
Net proceeds from issuance of Teekay Offshore Partners L.P. units (note 5) |
|
|
94,491 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net proceeds from issuance of Teekay Tankers Ltd. shares (note 5) |
|
|
103,036 |
|
|
|
65,556 |
|
Issuance of Common Stock upon exercise of stock options |
|
|
2,437 |
|
|
|
160 |
|
Distribution from subsidiaries to non-controlling interests |
|
|
(73,736 |
) |
|
|
(53,093 |
) |
Cash dividends paid |
|
|
(46,058 |
) |
|
|
(45,861 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net financing cash flow |
|
|
59,562 |
|
|
|
(444,055 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INVESTING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenditures for vessels and equipment |
|
|
(92,428 |
) |
|
|
(344,888 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of vessels and equipment |
|
|
27,591 |
|
|
|
198,837 |
|
Investment in joint ventures |
|
|
(306 |
) |
|
|
(7,522 |
) |
Advances to joint ventures and joint venture partner |
|
|
(4,868 |
) |
|
|
(1,420 |
) |
Investment in direct financing lease assets |
|
|
(4,199 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Direct financing lease payments received |
|
|
13,819 |
|
|
|
3,251 |
|
Other investing activities |
|
|
(528 |
) |
|
|
25,035 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investing cash flow |
|
|
(60,919 |
) |
|
|
(126,707 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
218,957 |
|
|
|
(341,494 |
) |
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of the period |
|
|
422,510 |
|
|
|
814,165 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of the period |
|
|
641,467 |
|
|
|
472,671 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental cash flow information (note 7)
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the unaudited consolidated financial statements.
Page 5 of 46
TEEKAY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
UNAUDITED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN TOTAL EQUITY
(in thousands of U.S. dollars)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thousands |
|
|
Stock and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of Common |
|
|
Additional |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
Non- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Paid-in |
|
|
Retained |
|
|
Income |
|
|
controlling |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding |
|
|
Capital |
|
|
Earnings |
|
|
(Loss) |
|
|
Interest |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
# |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
Balance as at December 31, 2009 |
|
|
72,694 |
|
|
|
656,193 |
|
|
|
1,585,431 |
|
|
|
(1,534 |
) |
|
|
855,580 |
|
|
|
3,095,670 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(167,150 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
35,662 |
|
|
|
(131,488 |
) |
Other comprehensive income (loss): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized loss on marketable securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,073 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,073 |
) |
Pension adjustments, net of taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
413 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
413 |
|
Unrealized net loss on qualifying cash flow hedging instruments (note 16) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(16,742 |
) |
|
|
(3,200 |
) |
|
|
(19,942 |
) |
Realized net loss on qualifying cash flow hedging instruments (note 16) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,437 |
|
|
|
460 |
|
|
|
1,897 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income (loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32,922 |
|
|
|
(154,193 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends declared |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(46,077 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(73,736 |
) |
|
|
(119,813 |
) |
Reinvested dividends |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19 |
|
Exercise of stock options and other |
|
|
282 |
|
|
|
2,437 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,437 |
|
Employee stock option compensation and other (note 10) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,171 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,171 |
|
Dilution gain on equity offerings of Teekay Offshore and Teekay Tankers (note 5) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31,078 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31,078 |
|
Dilution loss on initiation of majority owned subsidiary (note 11d) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,176 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,256 |
) |
|
|
(7,432 |
) |
Addition of non-controlling interest from share and unit issuances and other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
166,432 |
|
|
|
166,432 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as at June 30, 2010 |
|
|
72,978 |
|
|
|
672,820 |
|
|
|
1,398,106 |
|
|
|
(21,499 |
) |
|
|
978,942 |
|
|
|
3,028,369 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page 6 of 46
TEEKAY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
UNAUDITED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
(in thousands of U.S. dollars)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income |
|
|
(145,419 |
) |
|
|
193,625 |
|
|
|
(131,488 |
) |
|
|
298,399 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive (loss) income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized (loss) gain on marketable securities |
|
|
(3,296 |
) |
|
|
3,531 |
|
|
|
(5,073 |
) |
|
|
1,090 |
|
Pension adjustments, net of taxes |
|
|
64 |
|
|
|
437 |
|
|
|
413 |
|
|
|
874 |
|
Unrealized (loss) gain on qualifying cash flow hedging instruments |
|
|
(16,002 |
) |
|
|
21,047 |
|
|
|
(19,942 |
) |
|
|
20,930 |
|
Realized loss on qualifying cash flow hedging instruments |
|
|
884 |
|
|
|
5,943 |
|
|
|
1,897 |
|
|
|
18,687 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive (loss) income |
|
|
(18,350 |
) |
|
|
30,958 |
|
|
|
(22,705 |
) |
|
|
41,581 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive (loss) income |
|
|
(163,769 |
) |
|
|
224,583 |
|
|
|
(154,193 |
) |
|
|
339,980 |
|
Less: Comprehensive income attributable to non-controlling interests |
|
|
(5,446 |
) |
|
|
(37,020 |
) |
|
|
(32,922 |
) |
|
|
(62,246 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive (loss) income attributable to stockholders of Teekay Corporation |
|
|
(169,215 |
) |
|
|
187,563 |
|
|
|
(187,115 |
) |
|
|
277,734 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page 7 of 46
TEEKAY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(all tabular amounts stated in thousands of U.S. dollars, except share data)
1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Basis of Presentation
The unaudited interim consolidated financial statements have been prepared in conformity with
United States generally accepted accounting principles (or GAAP). They include the accounts of
Teekay Corporation (or Teekay), which is incorporated under the laws of the Republic of the
Marshall Islands, and its wholly-owned or controlled subsidiaries (collectively, the Company).
Certain information and footnote disclosures required by GAAP for complete annual financial
statements have been omitted and, therefore, it is suggested that these interim financial
statements be read in conjunction with the Companys audited financial statements for the year
ended December 31, 2009, included in the Companys Annual Report on Form 20-F. In the opinion of
management, these unaudited financial statements reflect all adjustments, of a normal recurring
nature, necessary to present fairly, in all material respects, the Companys consolidated financial
position, results of operations, and cash flows for the interim periods presented. The results of
operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, are not necessarily indicative of
those for a full fiscal year. Significant intercompany balances and transactions have been
eliminated upon consolidation.
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make
estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and
accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Given the current credit
markets, it is possible that the amounts recorded as derivative assets and liabilities could vary
by material amounts.
Certain of the comparative figures have been reclassified to conform with the presentation adopted
in the current period, primarily relating to the reclassification of unrecognized tax benefits of
$40.9 million at December 31, 2009 from accrued liabilities to other long-term liabilities in the
consolidated balance sheets, and certain crew training expenses of $3.5 million and $6.9 million,
respectively, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 from general and administrative
expenses to vessel operating expenses in the consolidated statements of income (loss).
Adoption of New Accounting Pronouncements
In January 2010, the Company adopted an amendment to Financial Accounting Standards Board (or FASB)
Accounting Standards Codification (or ASC) 810, Consolidations that eliminates certain exceptions
to consolidating qualifying special-purpose entities, contains new criteria for determining the
primary beneficiary, and increases the frequency of required reassessments to determine whether a
company is the primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity. This amendment also contains a
new requirement that any term, transaction, or arrangement that does not have a substantive effect
on an entitys status as a variable interest entity, a companys power over a variable interest
entity, or a companys obligation to absorb losses or its right to receive benefits of an entity
must be disregarded. The elimination of the qualifying special-purpose entity concept and its
consolidation exceptions means more entities will be subject to consolidation assessments and
reassessments. During February 2010, the scope of the revised standard was modified to indefinitely
exclude certain entities from the requirement to be assessed for consolidation. The adoption of
this amendment did not have an impact on the Companys consolidated financial statements.
2. Segment Reporting
The Company has five operating segments and four reportable segments: its shuttle tanker and
floating storage and offtake (or FSO) segment (or Teekay Navion Shuttle Tankers and Offshore), its
floating production, storage and offloading (or FPSO) segment (or Teekay Petrojarl), its liquefied
gas segment (or Teekay Gas Services) and its conventional tanker segment (or Teekay Tanker
Services). The Companys shuttle tanker and FSO segment consists of shuttle tankers and FSO units.
The Companys FPSO segment consists of FPSO units and other vessels used to service its FPSO
contracts. The Companys liquefied gas segment consists of liquefied natural gas (or LNG) and
liquefied petroleum gas (or LPG) carriers. The Companys conventional tanker segment consists of
conventional crude oil and product tankers that are subject to: long-term, fixed-rate time-charter
contracts, which have an original term of one year or more; operate in the spot tanker market; or
are subject to time-charters or contracts of affreightment that are priced on a spot-market basis
or are short-term, fixed-rate contracts, which have an original term of less than one year. Segment
results are evaluated based on income from vessel operations. The accounting policies applied to
the reportable segments is the same as those used in the preparation of the Companys consolidated
financial statements.
The following tables present results for these segments for the three and six months ended June 30,
2010 and 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shuttle |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liquefied |
|
|
Conventional |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tanker and FSO |
|
|
FPSO |
|
|
Gas |
|
|
Tanker |
|
|
|
|
Three months ended June 30, 2010 |
|
Segment |
|
|
Segment |
|
|
Segment |
|
|
Segment |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues (1) |
|
|
167,502 |
|
|
|
124,223 |
|
|
|
60,797 |
|
|
|
192,425 |
|
|
|
544,947 |
|
Voyage expenses |
|
|
35,761 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
122 |
|
|
|
30,484 |
|
|
|
66,367 |
|
Vessel operating expenses |
|
|
41,494 |
|
|
|
50,433 |
|
|
|
11,356 |
|
|
|
47,509 |
|
|
|
150,792 |
|
Time-charter hire expense |
|
|
23,433 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44,673 |
|
|
|
68,106 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
33,456 |
|
|
|
23,754 |
|
|
|
15,885 |
|
|
|
38,139 |
|
|
|
111,234 |
|
General and administrative (2) |
|
|
14,145 |
|
|
|
4,521 |
|
|
|
5,558 |
|
|
|
26,032 |
|
|
|
50,256 |
|
(Gain) loss on sale of vessels and equipment, net
of write-downs |
|
|
(736 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
758 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
Restructuring charge |
|
|
349 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
195 |
|
|
|
3,651 |
|
|
|
4,195 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from vessel operations |
|
|
19,600 |
|
|
|
45,515 |
|
|
|
27,681 |
|
|
|
1,179 |
|
|
|
93,975 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets of operating segments at June 30, 2010 |
|
|
1,709,084 |
|
|
|
1,177,321 |
|
|
|
2,860,598 |
|
|
|
2,797,403 |
|
|
|
8,544,406 |
|
Page 8 of 46
TEEKAY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(all tabular amounts stated in thousands of U.S. dollars, except share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shuttle |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liquefied |
|
|
Conventional |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tanker and FSO |
|
|
FPSO |
|
|
Gas |
|
|
Tanker |
|
|
|
|
Three months ended June 30, 2009 |
|
Segment |
|
|
Segment |
|
|
Segment |
|
|
Segment |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
|
138,324 |
|
|
|
97,572 |
|
|
|
57,265 |
|
|
|
239,312 |
|
|
|
532,473 |
|
Voyage expenses |
|
|
16,167 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(34 |
) |
|
|
46,792 |
|
|
|
62,925 |
|
Vessel operating expenses |
|
|
42,941 |
|
|
|
47,301 |
|
|
|
12,434 |
|
|
|
41,328 |
|
|
|
144,004 |
|
Time charter hire expense |
|
|
25,695 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
90,756 |
|
|
|
116,451 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
28,738 |
|
|
|
25,745 |
|
|
|
15,471 |
|
|
|
38,238 |
|
|
|
108,192 |
|
General and administrative (2) |
|
|
12,868 |
|
|
|
7,273 |
|
|
|
5,055 |
|
|
|
24,024 |
|
|
|
49,220 |
|
Loss (gain) on sale of vessels and equipment, net of write-downs |
|
|
941 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12,024 |
) |
|
|
(11,083 |
) |
Restructuring charge |
|
|
2,536 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,030 |
|
|
|
1,437 |
|
|
|
5,003 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from vessel operations |
|
|
8,438 |
|
|
|
17,253 |
|
|
|
23,309 |
|
|
|
8,761 |
|
|
|
57,761 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets of operating segments at June 30, 2009 |
|
|
1,683,936 |
|
|
|
1,285,098 |
|
|
|
2,676,786 |
|
|
|
3,076,582 |
|
|
|
8,722,402 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shuttle |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liquefied |
|
|
Conventional |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tanker and FSO |
|
|
FPSO |
|
|
Gas |
|
|
Tanker |
|
|
|
|
Six months ended June 30, 2010 |
|
Segment |
|
|
Segment |
|
|
Segment |
|
|
Segment |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues (1) |
|
|
323,450 |
|
|
|
256,221 |
|
|
|
123,331 |
|
|
|
406,482 |
|
|
|
1,109,484 |
|
Voyage expenses |
|
|
65,064 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
95 |
|
|
|
73,758 |
|
|
|
138,917 |
|
Vessel operating expenses |
|
|
84,815 |
|
|
|
98,398 |
|
|
|
22,726 |
|
|
|
99,388 |
|
|
|
305,327 |
|
Time-charter hire expense |
|
|
48,471 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
90,548 |
|
|
|
139,019 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
64,014 |
|
|
|
47,502 |
|
|
|
31,412 |
|
|
|
76,536 |
|
|
|
219,464 |
|
General and administrative (2) |
|
|
26,290 |
|
|
|
13,347 |
|
|
|
10,329 |
|
|
|
48,381 |
|
|
|
98,347 |
|
(Gain) loss on sale of vessels and equipment, net of write-downs |
|
|
(736 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,518 |
|
|
|
782 |
|
Restructuring charge |
|
|
674 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
314 |
|
|
|
6,990 |
|
|
|
7,978 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from vessel operations |
|
|
34,858 |
|
|
|
96,974 |
|
|
|
58,455 |
|
|
|
9,363 |
|
|
|
199,650 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shuttle |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liquefied |
|
|
Conventional |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tanker and FSO |
|
|
FPSO |
|
|
Gas |
|
|
Tanker |
|
|
|
|
Six months ended June 30, 2009 |
|
Segment |
|
|
Segment |
|
|
Segment |
|
|
Segment |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
|
288,189 |
|
|
|
189,498 |
|
|
|
114,848 |
|
|
|
556,489 |
|
|
|
1,149,024 |
|
Voyage expenses |
|
|
34,575 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
258 |
|
|
|
118,761 |
|
|
|
153,594 |
|
Vessel operating expenses |
|
|
89,331 |
|
|
|
93,187 |
|
|
|
24,459 |
|
|
|
89,787 |
|
|
|
296,764 |
|
Time charter hire expense |
|
|
57,873 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
195,406 |
|
|
|
253,279 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
57,991 |
|
|
|
51,525 |
|
|
|
30,068 |
|
|
|
75,161 |
|
|
|
214,745 |
|
General and administrative (2) |
|
|
25,391 |
|
|
|
15,602 |
|
|
|
9,975 |
|
|
|
45,960 |
|
|
|
96,928 |
|
Loss (gain) on sale of vessels and equipment, net of write-downs |
|
|
941 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11,066 |
) |
|
|
(10,125 |
) |
Restructuring charge |
|
|
5,298 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,212 |
|
|
|
2,051 |
|
|
|
10,561 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from vessel operations |
|
|
16,789 |
|
|
|
29,184 |
|
|
|
46,876 |
|
|
|
40,429 |
|
|
|
133,278 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
FPSO segment includes $29.2 and $59.2 million in revenue for the three and six months ended
June 30, 2010, respectively, related to operations in previous years as a result of executing
a contract amendment in March 2010. |
|
(2) |
|
Includes direct general and administrative expenses and indirect general and administrative
expenses (allocated to each segment based on estimated use of corporate resources). |
Page 9 of 46
TEEKAY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(all tabular amounts stated in thousands of U.S. dollars, except share data)
A reconciliation of total segment assets to amounts presented in the accompanying consolidated
balance sheets is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2010 |
|
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
Total assets of all segments |
|
|
8,544,406 |
|
|
|
8,640,315 |
|
Cash and restricted cash |
|
|
641,467 |
|
|
|
422,510 |
|
Accounts receivable and other assets |
|
|
475,378 |
|
|
|
454,607 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated total assets |
|
|
9,661,251 |
|
|
|
9,517,432 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3. Restructuring Charge
During the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, the Company incurred $4.2 million and $8.0
million, respectively, of restructuring costs. The restructuring costs primarily relate to the
reflagging of certain vessels, crew changes, and global staffing changes. At June 30, 2010 and
December 31, 2009, $nil and $2.0 million, respectively, of restructuring liability were recorded in
accrued liabilities on the consolidated balance sheet.
4. Operating and Direct Financing Leases
Operating Lease Obligations
Teekay Tangguh Subsidiary
On November 1, 2006, the Companys subsidiary, Teekay LNG Partners, L.P. (or Teekay LNG) entered
into an agreement with Teekay to purchase its 100% interest in Teekay Tangguh Borrower LLC (or
Teekay Tangguh), which owns a 70% interest in Teekay BLT Corporation (or Teekay Tangguh
Subsidiary). As at June 30, 2010, the Teekay Tangguh Subsidiary was a party to operating leases (or
Head Leases) whereby it is the lessor and is leasing its two LNG carriers (or the Tangguh LNG
Carriers) to a third party company. The Teekay Tangguh Subsidiary is then leasing back the LNG
carriers from the same third party company (or Subleases). Under the terms of these leases, the
third party company claims tax depreciation on the capital expenditures it incurred to lease the
vessels. As is typical in these leasing arrangements, tax and change of law risks are assumed by
the Teekay Tangguh Subsidiary. Lease payments under the Subleases are based on certain tax and
financial assumptions at the commencement of the leases. If an assumption proves to be incorrect,
the third party company is entitled to increase the lease payments under the Sublease to maintain
its agreed after-tax margin. The Teekay Tangguh Subsidiarys carrying amount of this tax
indemnification was $10.6 million at June 30, 2010, and is included as part of other long-term
liabilities in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of the Company. The tax indemnification
is for the duration of the lease contract with the third party plus the years it would take for the
lease payments to be statute barred, and ends in 2033. Although there is no maximum potential
amount of future payments, the Teekay Tangguh Subsidiary may terminate the lease arrangements on a
voluntary basis at any time. If the lease arrangements terminate, the Teekay Tangguh Subsidiary
will be required to pay termination sums to the third party company sufficient to repay the third
party companys investment in the vessels and to compensate it for the tax effect of the
terminations, including recapture of any tax depreciation. The Head Leases and the Subleases have
20 year terms and are classified as operating leases. The Head Lease and the Sublease for each of
the two Tangguh LNG Carriers commenced in November 2008 and March 2009, respectively.
As at June 30, 2010, the total estimated future minimum rental payments to be received and paid
under the lease contracts are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Head Lease |
|
|
Sublease |
|
Year |
|
Receipts(1) |
|
|
Payments(1) |
|
Remainder of 2010 |
|
$ |
14,444 |
|
|
$ |
12,536 |
|
2011 |
|
$ |
28,875 |
|
|
$ |
25,072 |
|
2012 |
|
$ |
28,860 |
|
|
$ |
25,072 |
|
2013 |
|
$ |
28,843 |
|
|
$ |
25,072 |
|
2014 |
|
$ |
28,828 |
|
|
$ |
25,072 |
|
Thereafter |
|
$ |
303,735 |
|
|
$ |
357,387 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
433,585 |
|
|
$ |
470,211 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The Head Leases are fixed-rate operating leases while the Subleases have a small
variable-rate component. As at June 30, 2010, the Company has received $76.8 million of Head Lease
receipts and has paid $29.4 million of Sublease payments. |
Page 10 of 46
TEEKAY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(all tabular amounts stated in thousands of U.S. dollars, other than share data)
Net Investment in Direct Financing Leases
The time-charters for two of the Companys LNG carriers, one FSO unit and equipment that reduce
volatile organic compound emissions (or VOC equipment) are accounted for as direct financing
leases. The following table lists the components of the net investments in direct financing leases:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total minimum lease payments to be received |
|
|
831,994 |
|
|
|
869,268 |
|
Estimated unguaranteed residual value of leased properties |
|
|
203,465 |
|
|
|
203,465 |
|
Initial direct costs and other |
|
|
1,849 |
|
|
|
1,134 |
|
Less unearned revenue |
|
|
(534,516 |
) |
|
|
(561,455 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
502,792 |
|
|
|
512,412 |
|
Less current portion |
|
|
27,313 |
|
|
|
27,210 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
475,479 |
|
|
|
485,202 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As at June 30, 2010, minimum lease payments to be received by the Company in each of the next five
succeeding fiscal years are approximately $35.6 million (remainder of 2010), $68.5 million (2011),
$62.4 million (2012), $49.5 million (2013) and $48.1 million (2014). The VOC equipment lease is
scheduled to expire in 2014, the FSO contract is scheduled to expire in 2017, and the LNG
time-charters are both scheduled to expire in 2029.
5. Equity Offerings by Subsidiaries
In March 2010, the Companys subsidiary Teekay Offshore Partners L.P. (or Teekay Offshore)
completed a public offering of 5.06 million common units (including 660,000 units issued upon the
exercise of the underwriters overallotment option) at a price of $19.48 per unit, for total gross
proceeds of $100.6 million (including the general partners $2.0 million proportionate capital
contribution). As a result, the Companys ownership of Teekay Offshore was reduced from 40.5% to
35.9% (including the Companys 2% general partner interest). Teekay maintains control of Teekay
Offshore by virtue of its control of the general partner and continues to consolidate this
subsidiary. As a result of the offering, the Company recorded an increase to retained earnings of
$23.3 million, which represents the Companys dilution gain from the issuance of units in Teekay
Offshore during the six months ended June 30, 2010.
In April 2010, the Companys subsidiary Teekay Tankers Ltd. (or Teekay Tankers) completed a public
offering of 8.78 million common shares of its Class A Common Stock (including 1,079,000 commons
shares issued upon the partial exercise of the underwriters overallotment option) at a price of
$12.25 per share, for gross proceeds of $107.5 million. The Company concurrently purchased
2,612,244 unregistered common shares at the April 2010 offering price. As a result, the Companys
ownership of Teekay Tankers was reduced from 42.2% to 37.1%. Teekay maintains voting control of
Teekay Tankers through its ownership of shares of Teekay Tankers Class A and Class B common stock
and continues to consolidate this subsidiary. As a result of the offering, the Company recorded an
increase to retained earnings of $7.9 million, which represents the Companys dilution gain from
the issuance of share in Teekay Tankers during the six months ended June 30, 2010.
See Notes 20(a) and 20(c) to these unaudited consolidated financial statements for information
relating to equity offerings by the Companys subsidiaries Teekay LNG in July 2010 and Teekay
Offshore in August 2010.
6. Intangible Assets and In-Process Revenue Contracts
Intangible Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-Average |
|
|
Gross Carrying |
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
Net Carrying |
|
|
|
Amortization Period |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Amortization |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
|
(Years) |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
As at June 30, 2010: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contracts of affreightment |
|
|
10.2 |
|
|
|
124,251 |
|
|
|
(92,044 |
) |
|
|
32,207 |
|
Time-charter contracts |
|
|
16.0 |
|
|
|
230,668 |
|
|
|
(91,848 |
) |
|
|
138,820 |
|
Vessel purchase options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,900 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,900 |
|
Other intangible assets |
|
|
4.5 |
|
|
|
11,430 |
|
|
|
(6,176 |
) |
|
|
5,254 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12.9 |
|
|
|
390,249 |
|
|
|
(190,068 |
) |
|
|
200,181 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As at December 31, 2009: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contracts of affreightment |
|
|
10.2 |
|
|
|
124,251 |
|
|
|
(88,015 |
) |
|
|
36,236 |
|
Time-charter contracts |
|
|
16.0 |
|
|
|
231,221 |
|
|
|
(83,823 |
) |
|
|
147,398 |
|
Vessel purchase options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,900 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,900 |
|
Other intangible assets |
|
|
2.8 |
|
|
|
20,731 |
|
|
|
(14,395 |
) |
|
|
6,336 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12.6 |
|
|
|
400,103 |
|
|
|
(186,233 |
) |
|
|
213,870 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aggregate amortization expense of intangible assets for the three and six months ended June 30,
2010, was $7.0 million (2009 $8.5 million) and $14.2 million (2009 $17.1 million),
respectively, which is included in depreciation and amortization. Amortization of intangible assets
for the next five fiscal years is expected to be $12.6 million (remainder of 2010), $23.2 million
(2011), $31.4 million (2012), $14.2 million (2013), $13.2 million (2014) and $105.6 million
(thereafter).
Page 11 of 46
TEEKAY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(all tabular amounts stated in thousands of U.S. dollars, except share data)
In-Process Revenue Contracts
As part of the Companys previous acquisitions of Petrojarl ASA (subsequently renamed Teekay
Petrojarl AS, or Teekay Petrojarl) and OMI Corporation (or OMI), the Company assumed certain FPSO
service contracts and time charter-out contracts with terms that were less favorable than the then
prevailing market terms. The Company has recognized a liability based on the estimated fair value
of these contracts. The Company is amortizing this liability over the remaining terms of the
contracts on a weighted basis based on the projected revenue to be earned under the contracts.
Amortization of in-process revenue contracts for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 was
$11.4 million (2009 $18.7 million) and $24.8 million (2009 $37.8 million), respectively, which
is included in revenues on the consolidated statements of income (loss). Amortization for the next
five years is expected to be $23.6 million (remainder of 2010), $43.4 million (2011), $41.0 million
(2012) and $37.7 million (2013), $26.3 million (2014) and $47.5 million (thereafter).
7. Supplemental Cash Flow Information
During the six months ended June 30, 2010, an unrelated party contributed a shuttle tanker with a
value of $35.0 million to a subsidiary of the Company in exchange for a 33% equity interest in the
subsidiary as described in Note 11(d) to these unaudited consolidated financial statements. This
contribution has been treated as a non-cash transaction in the Companys consolidated statement of
cash flows.
8. Long-Term Debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2010 |
|
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revolving Credit Facilities |
|
|
1,861,339 |
|
|
|
1,975,360 |
|
Senior Notes (8.875%) due July 15, 2011 |
|
|
16,201 |
|
|
|
177,004 |
|
Senior Notes (8.5%) due January 15, 2020 |
|
|
446,434 |
|
|
|
|
|
USD-denominated Term Loans due through 2022 |
|
|
1,683,977 |
|
|
|
1,837,980 |
|
Euro-denominated Term Loans due through 2023 |
|
|
346,979 |
|
|
|
412,417 |
|
USD-denominated Unsecured Demand Loan due to Joint Venture Partners |
|
|
13,500 |
|
|
|
16,410 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,368,430 |
|
|
|
4,419,171 |
|
Less current portion |
|
|
284,556 |
|
|
|
231,209 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,083,874 |
|
|
|
4,187,962 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of June 30, 2010, the Company had 14 long-term revolving credit facilities (or the Revolvers)
available, which, as at such date, provided for aggregate borrowings of up to $3.4 billion, of
which $1.6 billion was undrawn. Interest payments are based on LIBOR plus margins; at June 30,
2010, the margins ranged between 0.45% and 3.25% (2009 0.45% and 3.25%). At June 30, 2010 and
December 31, 2009, the three-month LIBOR was 0.53% and 0.25%, respectively. The total amount
available under the Revolvers reduces by $103.4 million (remainder of 2010), $239.2 million (2011),
$349.2 million (2012), $756.1 million (2013), $770.4 million (2014) and $1.2 billion (thereafter).
The Revolvers are collateralized by first-priority mortgages granted on 63 of the Companys
vessels, together with other related security, and include a guarantee from Teekay or its
subsidiaries for all outstanding amounts.
In January 2010, the Company completed a public offering of $450 million senior unsecured notes due
January 15, 2020 (or the 8.5% Notes). The 8.5% Notes were sold at a price equal to 99.181% of par
and the discount is accreted using the effective interest rate of 8.625% per year. The Company
capitalized issuance costs of $8.6 million, which is recorded in other non-current assets in the
consolidated balance sheet, and is amortized over the term of the senior unsecured notes. The 8.5%
Notes and the 8.875% senior unsecured notes due July 15, 2011 (or the 8.875% Notes) rank equally in
right of payment with all of Teekays existing and future senior unsecured debt and senior to any
future subordinated debt of Teekay. The 8.5% Notes and 8.875% Notes are not guaranteed by any of
Teekays subsidiaries and effectively rank behind all existing and future secured debt of Teekay
and other liabilities, secured and unsecured, of its subsidiaries. During the six months ended June
30, 2010, the Company repurchased a principal amount of $160.5 million (2009 $17.4 million) of
the 8.875% Notes, using a portion of the proceeds of the 8.5% Notes offering, and recognized a loss
on repurchase of $12.6 million.
The Company may redeem the 8.5% Notes in whole or in part at any time before their maturity date at
a redemption price equal to the greater of (i) 100% of the principal amount of the 8.5% Notes to be
redeemed and (ii) the sum of the present values of the remaining scheduled payments of principal
and interest on the 8.5% Notes to be redeemed (excluding accrued interest) discounted to the
redemption date on a semi-annual basis, at the treasury yield plus 50 basis points, plus accrued
and unpaid interest to the redemption date. In addition, at any time or from time to time prior to
January 15, 2013, the Company may redeem up to 35% of the aggregate principal amount of the 8.5%
Notes issued under the indenture with the net cash proceeds of one or more qualified equity
offerings at a redemption price equal to 108.5% of the principal amount of the 8.5% Notes to be
redeemed, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to the redemption date; provided certain
conditions are met.
Page 12 of 46
TEEKAY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(all tabular amounts stated in thousands of U.S. dollars, except share data)
As of June 30, 2010, the Company had 15 U.S. Dollar-denominated term loans outstanding, which
totaled $1.7 billion (2009 $1.8 billion). Certain of the term loans with a total outstanding
principal balance of $453.2 million, as at June 30, 2010 (December 31, 2009 $480.1 million) bear
interest at a weighted-average fixed rate of 5.2% (December 31, 2009 5.2%). Interest payments on
the remaining term loans are based on LIBOR plus a margin. At June 30, 2010, the margins ranged
between 0.3% and 3.25% (December 31, 2009 0.3% and 3.25%). At June 30, 2010 and December 31,
2009, the three-month LIBOR was 0.53% and 0.25%, respectively. The term loan payments are made in
quarterly or semi-annual payments commencing three or six months after delivery of each newbuilding
vessel financed thereby, and 14 of the term loans have balloon or bullet repayments due at
maturity. The term loans are collateralized by first-priority mortgages on 29 (December 31, 2009
30) of the Companys vessels, together with certain other security. In addition, at June 30, 2010,
all but $128.4 million (December 31, 2009 $134.3 million) of the outstanding term loans were
guaranteed by Teekay or its subsidiaries.
The Company has two Euro-denominated term loans outstanding, which, as at June 30, 2010, totaled
283.5 million Euros ($347.0 million). The Company repays the loans with funds generated by two
Euro-denominated long-term time-charter contracts. Interest payments on the loans are based on
EURIBOR plus a margin. At June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the margins ranged between 0.6% and
0.66% and the one-month EURIBOR at June 30, 2010, was 0.49% (December 31, 2009 0.45%). The
Euro-denominated term loans reduce in monthly payments with varying maturities through 2023 and are
collateralized by first-priority mortgages on two of the Companys vessels, together with certain
other security, and are guaranteed by a subsidiary of Teekay.
Both Euro-denominated term loans are revalued at the end of each period using the then prevailing
Euro/U.S. Dollar exchange rate. Due substantially to this revaluation, the Company recognized an
unrealized foreign exchange gain (loss) of $27.5 million and $56.5 million (2009 $(25.2) million
and $(13.9) million) during the three and six months ended June 30, 2010.
The Company has one U.S. Dollar-denominated loan outstanding owing to a joint venture partner,
which, as at June 30, 2010, totaled $13.5 million, including accrued interest. Interest payments on
the loan, which are based on a fixed interest rate of 4.84%, commenced in February 2008. This loan
is repayable on demand no earlier than February 27, 2027.
The weighted-average effective interest rate on the Companys long-term aggregate debt as at June
30, 2010, was 2.4% (December 31, 2009 2.0%). This rate does not reflect the effect of the
Companys interest rate swaps (see Note 16).
Among other matters, the Companys long-term debt agreements generally provide for maintenance of
certain vessel market value-to-loan ratios and minimum consolidated financial covenants. Certain
loan agreements require that a minimum level of free cash be maintained and as at June 30, 2010 and
December 31, 2009, this amount was $100.0 million. Certain of the loan agreements also require that
the Company maintain an aggregate level of free liquidity and undrawn revolving credit lines with
at least six months to maturity, of at least 7.5% of total debt. As at June 30, 2010, this amount
was $231.8 million (December 31, 2009 $230.3 million).
The aggregate annual long-term debt principal repayments required to be made by the Company
subsequent to June 30, 2010, are $114.9 million (remainder of 2010), $330.0 million (2011), $470.5
million (2012), $456.7 million (2013), $876.3 million (2014) and $2.1 billion (thereafter).
As at June 30, 2010, the Company was in compliance with all covenants related to the credit
facilities and long-term debt.
9. Capital Lease Obligations and Restricted Cash
Capital Lease Obligations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RasGas II LNG Carriers |
|
|
470,439 |
|
|
|
470,138 |
|
Spanish-Flagged LNG Carrier |
|
|
104,735 |
|
|
|
119,068 |
|
Suezmax Tankers |
|
|
190,316 |
|
|
|
195,064 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
765,490 |
|
|
|
784,270 |
|
Less current portion |
|
|
39,568 |
|
|
|
41,016 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
725,922 |
|
|
|
743,254 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RasGas II LNG Carriers. As at June 30, 2010, the Company was a party, as lessee, to 30-year capital
lease arrangements for the three LNG carriers (or the RasGas II LNG Carriers) that operate under
time-charter contracts with Ras Laffan Liquefied Natural Gas Co. Limited (II) (or RasGas II), a
joint venture between Qatar Petroleum and ExxonMobil RasGas Inc., a subsidiary of ExxonMobil
Corporation. The Company has a 70% share in the leases for the RasGas II LNG Carriers. All amounts
below relating to the RasGas II LNG Carrier capital leases include the non-controlling interests
30% share.
Under the terms of the RasGas II LNG Carriers capital lease arrangements, the lessor claims tax
depreciation on the capital expenditures it incurred to acquire these vessels. As is typical in
these leasing arrangements, tax and change of law risks are assumed by the lessee. Lease payments
under the lease arrangements are based on tax and financial assumptions at the commencement of the
leases. If an assumption proves to be incorrect, the lessor is entitled to increase the lease
payments to maintain its agreed after-tax margin. At inception of the leases the Companys best
estimate of the fair value of the guarantee liability was $18.6 million. The Companys carrying
amount of the remaining tax indemnification guarantee is $9.1 million and is included as part of
other long-term liabilities in the Companys consolidated balance sheets.
Page 13 of 46
TEEKAY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(all tabular amounts stated in thousands of U.S. dollars, except share data)
During 2008, the Company agreed under the terms of its tax lease indemnification guarantee to
increase its capital lease payments for the three RasGas II LNG Carriers to compensate the lessor
for losses suffered as a result of changes in tax rates. The estimated increase in lease payments
is approximately $8.1 million over the term of the leases, with a carrying value of $7.8 million as
at June 30, 2010. This amount is included as part of other long-term liabilities in the Companys
consolidated balance sheets.
The tax indemnification is for the duration of the lease contract with the third party plus the
years it would take for the lease payments to be statute barred, and ends in 2041. Although there
is no maximum potential amount of future payments, the Company may terminate the lease arrangements
at any time. If the lease arrangements terminate, the Company will be required to pay termination
sums to the lessor sufficient to repay the lessors investment in the vessels and to compensate it
for the tax-effect of the terminations, including recapture of any tax depreciation.
At their inception, the weighted-average interest rate implicit in these leases was 5.2%. These
capital leases are variable-rate capital leases. As at June 30, 2010, the commitments under these
capital leases approximated $1.0 billion, including imputed interest of $0.6 billion, repayable as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Year |
|
Commitment |
|
Remainder of 2010 |
|
$ |
12,000 |
|
2011 |
|
$ |
24,000 |
|
2012 |
|
$ |
24,000 |
|
2013 |
|
$ |
24,000 |
|
2014 |
|
$ |
24,000 |
|
Thereafter |
|
$ |
929,284 |
|
As the payments in the next five years only cover a portion of the estimated interest expense, the
lease obligation will continue to increase. Starting 2024, the lease payments will increase to
cover both interest and principal to commence reduction of the principal portion of the lease
obligations.
Spanish-Flagged LNG Carrier. As at June 30, 2010, the Company was a party, as lessee, to a capital
lease on one Spanish-flagged LNG carrier (the Spanish Flagged Carrier), which is structured as a
Spanish tax lease. Under the terms of the Spanish tax lease, the Company will purchase the vessel
at the end of the lease term in December 2011. The purchase obligation has been fully funded with
restricted cash deposits described below. At its inception, the implicit interest rate was 5.8%. As
at June 30, 2010, the commitments under this capital lease, including the purchase obligation,
approximated 91.7 million Euros ($112.2 million), including imputed interest of 6.2 million Euros
($7.5 million), repayable as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Year |
|
Commitment |
Remainder of 2010 |
|
26,918 Euros ($32,942) |
2011 |
|
64,825 Euros ($79,300) |
Suezmax Tankers. As at June 30, 2010, the Company was a party, as lessee, to capital leases on five
Suezmax tankers. Under the terms of the lease arrangements, the Company is required to purchase
these vessels after the end of their respective lease terms for fixed prices as well as assuming
the existing vessel financing subject to the lenders consent. At their inception, the
weighted-average interest rate implicit in these leases was 7.4%. These capital leases are
variable-rate capital leases; however, any change in the lease payments resulting from changes in
interest rates is offset by a corresponding change in the charter hire payments received by the
Company. As at June 30, 2010, the remaining commitments under these capital leases, including the
purchase obligations, approximated $209.7 million, including imputed interest of $19.4 million,
repayable as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Year |
|
Commitment |
|
Remainder of 2010 |
|
$ |
11,812 |
|
2011 |
|
$ |
197,854 |
|
The Companys capital leases do not contain financial or restrictive covenants other than those
relating to operation and maintenance of the vessels.
FPSO Units. As at June 30, 2010, the Company was a party, as lessee, to capital leases on one FPSO
unit, the Petrojarl Foinaven, and the topside production equipment for another FPSO unit, the
Petrojarl Banff. However, prior to being acquired by Teekay, Teekay Petrojarl legally defeased its
future charter obligations for these assets by making up-front, lump-sum payments to unrelated
banks, which have assumed Teekay Petrojarls liability for making the remaining periodic payments
due under the long-term charters (or Defeased Rental Payments) and termination payments under the
leases.
The Defeased Rental Payments for the Petrojarl Foinaven were based on assumed Sterling LIBOR of 8%
per annum. If actual interest rates are greater than 8% per annum, the Company receives rental
rebates; if actual interest rates are less than 8% per annum, the Company is required to pay
rentals in excess of the Defeased Rental Payments. For accounting purposes, this contract feature
is an embedded derivative, and has been separated from the host contract and is separately
accounted for as a derivative instrument.
Page 14 of 46
TEEKAY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(all tabular amounts stated in thousands of U.S. dollars, except share data)
As is typical for these types of leasing arrangements, the Company has indemnified the lessors of
the Petrojarl Foinaven for the tax consequence resulting from changes in tax laws or interpretation
of such laws or adverse rulings by authorities and for fluctuations in actual interest rates from
those assumed in the leases.
Restricted Cash
Under the terms of the capital leases for the RasGas II LNG Carriers and the Spanish-Flagged LNG
Carrier described above, the Company is required to have on deposit with financial institutions an
amount of cash that, together with interest earned on the deposits, will equal the remaining
amounts owing under the leases, including the obligations to purchase the Spanish-Flagged LNG
Carrier at the end of the lease period, where applicable. These cash deposits are restricted to
being used for capital lease payments and have been fully funded primarily with term loans (see
Note 8).
As at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the amount of restricted cash on deposit for the three
RasGas II LNG Carriers was $478.1 million and $479.4 million, respectively. As at June 30, 2010 and
December 31, 2009, the weighted-average interest rates earned on the deposits were 0.6% and 0.4%,
respectively.
As at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the amount of restricted cash on deposit for the
Spanish-Flagged LNG carrier was 86.5 million Euros ($105.8 million) and 84.3 million Euros ($120.8
million), respectively. As at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the weighted-average interest
rate earned on these deposits was 5.0%.
The Company also maintains restricted cash deposits relating to certain term loans and other
obligations, which totaled $14.0 million and $15.1 million as at June 30, 2010 and December 31,
2009, respectively.
10. Capital Stock
The authorized capital stock of Teekay at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, was 25.0 million
shares of Preferred Stock, with a par value of $1 per share, and 725.0 million shares of Common
Stock, with a par value of $0.001 per share. During the six months ended June 30, 2010, the Company
issued 0.2 million common shares upon the exercise of stock options, and had no share repurchases.
As at June 30, 2010, Teekay had 73,477,660 shares of Common Stock (December 31, 2009 73,193,545)
and no shares of Preferred Stock issued. As at June 30, 2010, Teekay had 72,978,460 shares of
Common Stock outstanding (December 31, 2009 72,694,345).
During 2008, Teekay announced that its Board of Directors had authorized the repurchase of up to
$200 million of shares of its Common Stock in the open market, subject to cancellation upon
approval by the Board of Directors. As at June 30, 2010, Teekay had not repurchased any shares of
Common Stock pursuant to such authorizations. The total remaining share repurchase authorization at
June 30, 2010, was $200 million.
On July 2, 2010, the Company amended and restated its Stockholder Rights Agreement (the Rights
Agreement), which was originally adopted by the Board of Directors in September 2000. In September
2000, the Board of Directors declared a dividend of one common share purchase right (a Right) for
each outstanding share of the Companys common stock. These Rights continue to remain outstanding
and will not be exercisable and will trade with the shares of the Companys common stock until
after such time, if any, as a person or group becomes an acquiring person as set forth in the
amended Rights Agreement. A person or group will be deemed to be an acquiring person, and the
Rights generally will become exercisable, if a person or group acquires 20% or more of the
Companys common stock, or if a person or group commences a tender offer that could result in that
person or group owning more than 20% of the Companys common stock, subject to certain higher
thresholds for existing stockholders that currently own in excess of 15% of the Companys common
stock. Once exercisable, each Right held by a person other than the acquiring person would
entitle the holder to purchase, at the then-current exercise price, a number of shares of common
stock of the Company having a value of twice the exercise price of the Right. In addition, if the
Company is acquired in a merger or other business combination transaction after any such event,
each holder of a Right would then be entitled to purchase, at the then-current exercise price,
shares of the acquiring companys common stock having a value of twice the exercise price of the
Right. The amended Rights Agreement will expire on July 1, 2020, unless the expiry date is extended
or the Rights are earlier redeemed or exchanged by the Company. No shareholder has exercised this
Right as of June 30, 2010.
During March 2010, the Company granted 733,167 stock options with an exercise price of $24.42 per
share, 263,620 restricted stock units with a fair value of $6.4 million, 87,054 performance shares
with a fair value of $2.1 million and 27,028 shares of restricted stock with a fair value of $0.7
million to certain of the Companys employees and directors.
Each stock option has a ten-year term and vests equally over three years from the grant date. Each
restricted stock unit and performance share is equal in value to one share of the Companys common
stock plus reinvested dividends from the grant date to the vesting date. The restricted stock units
vest equally over two or three years from the grant date and the performance shares vest three
years from the grant date. Upon vesting, the value of the restricted stock units and performance
shares are paid to each grantee in the form of shares. The number of performance share units that
vest will range from zero to three times the original number granted, based on certain performance
and market conditions.
The weighted-average grant-date fair value of stock options granted during March 2010 was $8.16 per
option. The fair value of each stock option granted was estimated on the date of the grant using
the Black-Scholes option pricing model. The following weighted-average assumptions were used in
computing the fair value of the stock options granted: expected volatility of 52.7%; expected life
of four years; dividend yield of 3.3%; risk-free interest rate of 2.6%; and estimated forfeiture
rate of 9.8%. The expected life of the stock options granted was estimated using the historical
exercise behavior of employees. The expected volatility was generally based on historical
volatility as calculated using historical data during the five years prior to the grant date.
Page 15 of 46
TEEKAY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(all tabular amounts stated in thousands of U.S. dollars, except share data)
During February 2010, the Company modified settlement terms for its then outstanding restricted
stock units, such that all restricted stock units will be paid in the form of shares. This
modification decreased accrued liabilities by $4.0 million, decreased other long-term liabilities
by $2.0 million, and increased additional paid-in capital by $6.0 million.
11. Commitments and Contingencies
a) Vessels Under Construction
As at June 30, 2010, the Company was committed to the construction of three LPG carriers and four
shuttle tankers, at a total cost of approximately $586.8 million, excluding capitalized interest.
One shuttle tanker delivered in July 2010 and the remaining three shuttle tankers are scheduled for
delivery between September 2010 and July 2011. As at June 30, 2010, payments made towards these
commitments totaled $192.6 million (excluding $23.1 million of capitalized interest and other
miscellaneous construction costs), and long-term financing arrangements existed for $394.2 million
of the unpaid cost of these vessels. As at June 30, 2010, the remaining payments required to be
made under these newbuilding contracts were $213.0 million (remainder of 2010) and $181.2 million
(2011).
b) Joint Ventures
The Company has a 33% interest in a joint venture that will charter four newbuilding 160,400-cubic
meter LNG carriers for a period of 20 years to the Angola LNG Project, which is being developed by
subsidiaries of Chevron Corporation, Sociedade Nacional de Combustiveis de Angola EP, BP Plc, Total
S.A. and ENI SpA. Final award of the charter was made in December 2007. The vessels will be
chartered at fixed rates, with inflation adjustments, commencing in 2011. The remaining members of
the joint venture are Mitsui & Co., Ltd. and NYK Bulkship (Europe) Ltd., which hold 34% and 33%
interests in the joint venture, respectively. In connection with this award, the joint venture has
entered into agreements with Samsung Heavy Industries Co. Ltd. to construct the four LNG carriers
at a total cost of approximately $906.0 million (of which the Companys 33% portion is $299.0
million), excluding capitalized interest. As at June 30, 2010, payments made towards these
commitments by the joint venture company totaled $181.2 million (of which the Companys 33%
contribution was $59.8 million), excluding capitalized interest and other miscellaneous
construction costs. As at June 30, 2010, the remaining payments required to be made under these
contracts were $113.2 million (remainder of 2010), $475.6 million (2011) and $135.9 million (2012),
of which the Companys share is 33% of these amounts. In accordance with existing agreements, the
Company is required to offer to its subsidiary Teekay LNG Partners L.P. (or Teekay LNG) its 33%
interest in these vessels and related charter contracts, no later than 180 days before the
scheduled delivery dates of the vessels. Deliveries of the vessels are scheduled between August
2011 and January 2012. The Company has also provided certain guarantees in relation to the
performance of the joint venture company.
For the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, the Company recorded equity (loss) income of
$(21.8) million and $(24.5) million (2009 $27.4 and $38.8 million), respectively. This amount is
included in equity (loss) income from joint ventures in the consolidated statements of income
(loss). The income or loss was primarily comprised of the Companys share of the Angola LNG Project
net income (loss) and the operations of the Companys 40% interest in four carriers that are
accounted for under the equity method (or the RasGas 3 LNG Carriers). For the three and six months
ended June 30, 2010, $(24.6) million and $(30.7) million (2009 $25.5 million and $33.3 million),
respectively, of the equity (loss) gain relates to the Companys share of unrealized (loss) gain on
interest rate swaps.
c) Legal Proceedings and Claims
The Company may, from time to time, be involved in legal proceedings and claims that arise in the
ordinary course of business. The Company believes that any adverse outcome of existing claims,
individually or in the aggregate, would not have a material effect on its financial position,
results of operations or cash flows, when taking into account its insurance coverage and
indemnifications from charterers.
d) Redeemable Non-Controlling Interest
During the six months ended June 30, 2010, an unrelated party contributed a shuttle tanker with a
value of $35.0 million to a subsidiary of Teekay Offshore for a 33% equity interest in the
subsidiary. The equity issuance resulted in a dilution loss of $7.4 million. The non-controlling
interest owner of Teekay Offshores 67% owned subsidiary holds a put option which, if exercised,
would obligate Teekay Offshore to purchase the non-controlling interest owners 33% share in the
entity for cash in accordance with a defined formula. The redeemable non-controlling interest is
subject to remeasurement if the formulaic redemption amount exceeds the carrying value. No
remeasurement was required as at June 30, 2010.
e) Other
The Company enters into indemnification agreements with certain officers and directors. In
addition, the Company enters into other indemnification agreements in the ordinary course of
business. The maximum potential amount of future payments required under these indemnification
agreements is unlimited. However, the Company maintains what it believes is appropriate liability
insurance that reduces its exposure and enables the Company to recover future amounts paid up to
the maximum amount of the insurance coverage, less any deductible amounts pursuant to the terms of
the respective policies, the amounts of which are not considered material.
Page 16 of 46
TEEKAY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(all tabular amounts stated in thousands of U.S. dollars, except share data)
12. Fair Value Measurements
The following methods and assumptions were used to estimate the fair value of each class of
financial instruments and other non-financial assets.
Cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash and marketable securities The fair value of the
Companys cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, and marketable securities approximates their
carrying amounts reported in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.
Vessels held for sale The fair value of the Companys vessels held for sale is based on selling
prices of similar vessels and approximates their carrying amounts reported in the accompanying
consolidated balance sheets.
Loans to and loans from joint ventures and joint venture partners The fair value of the
Companys loans to and loans from joint ventures and joint venture partners approximates their
carrying amounts reported in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.
Long-term debt The fair value of the Companys fixed-rate and variable-rate long-term debt is
either based on quoted market prices or estimated using discounted cash flow analyses, based on
current rates currently available for debt with similar terms and remaining maturities and the
current credit worthiness of the Company.
Derivative instruments The fair value of the Companys derivative instruments is the estimated
amount that the Company would receive or pay to terminate the agreements at the reporting date,
taking into account, as applicable, fixed interest rates on interest rate swaps, current interest
rates, foreign exchange rates, and the current credit worthiness of both the Company and the
derivative counterparties. For the Foinaven embedded derivative (see Note 9), the calculation of
the fair value takes into account the fixed rate in the contract, current interest rates and
foreign exchange rates. Given the current volatility in the credit markets, it is reasonably
possible that the amounts recorded as derivative assets and liabilities could vary by material
amounts in the near term.
The Company categorizes its fair value estimates using a fair value hierarchy based on the inputs
used to measure fair value. The fair value hierarchy has three levels based on the reliability of
the inputs used to determine fair value as follows:
Level 1. Observable inputs such as quoted prices in active markets;
Level 2. Inputs, other than the quoted prices in active markets, that are observable either
directly or indirectly; and
Level 3. Unobservable inputs in which there is little or no market data, which require the
reporting entity to develop its own assumptions.
The estimated fair value of the Companys financial instruments and other non-financial assets and
categorization using the fair value hierarchy for those financial instruments that are measured at
fair value on a recurring basis is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2010 |
|
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
|
Fair Value |
|
Amount |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Value |
|
|
|
Hierarchy |
|
Asset (Liability) |
|
|
Asset (Liability) |
|
|
Asset (Liability) |
|
|
Asset (Liability) |
|
|
|
Level(1) |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, restricted
cash, and marketable securities |
|
Level 1 |
|
|
1,253,164 |
|
|
|
1,253,164 |
|
|
|
1,056,725 |
|
|
|
1,056,725 |
|
Vessels held for sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,250 |
|
|
|
10,250 |
|
Loans to joint ventures |
|
|
|
|
19,022 |
|
|
|
19,022 |
|
|
|
21,998 |
|
|
|
21,998 |
|
Loans from joint venture partners |
|
|
|
|
(30 |
) |
|
|
(30 |
) |
|
|
(1,294 |
) |
|
|
(1,294 |
) |
Long-term debt |
|
|
|
|
(4,368,430 |
) |
|
|
(4,080,879 |
) |
|
|
(4,419,171 |
) |
|
|
(4,055,367 |
) |
Derivative instruments (note 16) (2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swap agreements (3) |
|
Level 2 |
|
|
(649,397 |
) |
|
|
(649,397 |
) |
|
|
(378,407 |
) |
|
|
(378,407 |
) |
Interest rate swap agreements (3) |
|
Level 2 |
|
|
95,481 |
|
|
|
95,481 |
|
|
|
36,744 |
|
|
|
36,744 |
|
Foreign currency contracts |
|
Level 2 |
|
|
(25,470 |
) |
|
|
(25,470 |
) |
|
|
10,461 |
|
|
|
10,461 |
|
Bunker fuel swap contracts |
|
Level 2 |
|
|
(1,417 |
) |
|
|
(1,417 |
) |
|
|
612 |
|
|
|
612 |
|
Forward freight agreements |
|
Level 2 |
|
|
552 |
|
|
|
552 |
|
|
|
(504 |
) |
|
|
(504 |
) |
Foinaven embedded derivative |
|
Level 2 |
|
|
(9,837 |
) |
|
|
(9,837 |
) |
|
|
(8,769 |
) |
|
|
(8,769 |
) |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The fair value hierarchy level is only applicable to each financial instrument on the
consolidated balance sheets that are recorded at fair value on a recurring basis. |
|
(2) |
|
The Company transacts all of its derivative instruments through investment-grade rated
financial institutions at the time of the transaction and requires no collateral from these
institutions. |
|
(3) |
|
The fair value of the Companys interest rate swap agreements at June 30, 2010 includes
$32.5 million (December 31, 2009 $28.5 million) of net accrued interest which is recorded
in accrued liabilities on the consolidated balance sheet. |
The Company has determined that other than vessels held for sale at December 31, 2009, there are no
other non-financial assets or non-financial liabilities carried at fair value at June 30, 2010 and
December 31, 2009. See Note 13 to these unaudited consolidated financial statements.
Page 17 of 46
TEEKAY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(all tabular amounts stated in thousands of U.S. dollars, except share data)
13. Vessel Sales
During February 2010, the Company sold a 1992-built Aframax tanker, which was presented on the
December 31, 2009 consolidated balance sheet as vessel held for sale. The vessel was part of the
Companys conventional tanker segment. The Company realized a loss of $0.2 million as a result of
this vessel sale.
During April 2010, Company sold a 1995-built Aframax tanker for $17.3 million, which approximated
the vessel net book value. The vessel was part of the Companys conventional tanker segment.
14. Other Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
Volatile organic compound emission plant lease income |
|
|
1,135 |
|
|
|
1,708 |
|
|
|
2,565 |
|
|
|
3,602 |
|
Miscellaneous income |
|
|
142 |
|
|
|
2,115 |
|
|
|
1,134 |
|
|
|
2,879 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income |
|
|
1,277 |
|
|
|
3,823 |
|
|
|
3,699 |
|
|
|
6,481 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15. Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss
As at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the Companys accumulated other comprehensive loss
consisted of the following components:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
Unrealized (loss) gain on qualifying cash flow hedging instruments |
|
|
(12,381 |
) |
|
|
2,923 |
|
Pension adjustments, net of tax recoveries |
|
|
(9,882 |
) |
|
|
(10,294 |
) |
Unrealized gain on marketable securities |
|
|
764 |
|
|
|
5,837 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(21,499 |
) |
|
|
(1,534 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16. Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities
The Company uses derivatives to manage certain risks in accordance with its overall risk management
policies.
Foreign Exchange Risk
The Company economically hedges portions of its forecasted expenditures denominated in foreign
currencies with foreign currency forward contracts. Certain foreign currency forward contracts are
designated, for accounting purposes, as cash flow hedges of forecasted foreign currency
expenditures.
As at June 30, 2010, the Company was committed to the following foreign currency forward contracts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value / Carrying Amount |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contract Amount |
|
|
|
|
|
|
of Asset / (Liability) |
|
|
Expected Maturity |
|
|
|
In Foreign |
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remainder of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currency |
|
|
Forward |
|
|
Hedge |
|
|
Non-Hedge |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2012 |
|
|
|
(millions) |
|
|
Rate(1) |
|
|
(in millions of U.S. Dollars) |
|
|
(in millions of U.S. Dollars) |
|
Norwegian Kroner |
|
|
1,543.9 |
|
|
|
6.19 |
|
|
$ |
(10.8 |
) |
|
$ |
(4.2 |
) |
|
$ |
79.9 |
|
|
$ |
120.5 |
|
|
$ |
48.8 |
|
Euro |
|
|
67.4 |
|
|
|
0.73 |
|
|
|
(2.1 |
) |
|
|
(7.6 |
) |
|
|
33.1 |
|
|
|
45.0 |
|
|
|
14.2 |
|
Canadian Dollar |
|
|
36.4 |
|
|
|
1.09 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20.1 |
|
|
|
13.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
British Pounds |
|
|
51.6 |
|
|
|
0.66 |
|
|
|
(1.2 |
) |
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
|
|
30.0 |
|
|
|
37.2 |
|
|
|
11.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(13.4 |
) |
|
$ |
(12.1 |
) |
|
$ |
163.1 |
|
|
$ |
216.1 |
|
|
$ |
74.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Average forward rate represents the contracted amount of foreign currency one U.S. Dollar
will buy. |
Page 18 of 46
TEEKAY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(all tabular amounts stated in thousands of U.S. dollars, except share data)
Interest Rate Risk
The Company enters into interest rate swaps which exchange a receipt of floating interest for a
payment of fixed interest to reduce the Companys exposure to interest rate variability on its
outstanding floating-rate debt. In addition, the Company holds interest rate swaps which exchange a
payment of floating rate interest for a receipt of fixed interest in order to reduce the Companys
exposure to the variability of interest income on its restricted cash deposits. The Company has not
designated its interest rate swaps as cash flow hedges for accounting purposes.
As at June 30, 2010, the Company was committed to the following interest rate swap agreements
related to its LIBOR-based debt, restricted cash deposits and EURIBOR-based debt, whereby certain
of the Companys floating-rate debt and restricted cash deposits were swapped with fixed-rate
obligations or fixed-rate deposits:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value / |
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying Amount |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Fixed |
|
|
|
Interest |
|
Principal |
|
|
of Asset / |
|
|
Remaining |
|
|
Interest |
|
|
|
Rate |
|
Amount |
|
|
(Liability)(1) |
|
|
Term |
|
|
Rate |
|
|
|
Index |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
(Years) |
|
|
(%)(2) |
|
LIBOR-Based Debt: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Dollar-denominated interest rate swaps (3) |
|
LIBOR |
|
|
445,231 |
|
|
|
(79,215 |
) |
|
|
26.6 |
|
|
|
4.9 |
|
U.S. Dollar-denominated interest rate swaps |
|
LIBOR |
|
|
3,407,360 |
|
|
|
(492,404 |
) |
|
|
9.2 |
|
|
|
4.7 |
|
U.S. Dollar-denominated interest rate swaps (4) |
|
LIBOR |
|
|
200,000 |
|
|
|
(43,415 |
) |
|
|
20.0 |
|
|
|
5.7 |
|
LIBOR-Based Restricted Cash Deposit: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Dollar-denominated interest rate swaps (3) |
|
LIBOR |
|
|
472,524 |
|
|
|
95,481 |
|
|
|
26.6 |
|
|
|
4.8 |
|
EURIBOR-Based Debt: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Euro-denominated interest rate swaps (5) (6) |
|
EURIBOR |
|
|
346,979 |
|
|
|
(34,363 |
) |
|
|
14.0 |
|
|
|
3.8 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The fair value of the Companys interest rate swap agreements includes $32.5 million of
accrued interest which is recorded in accrued liabilities on the consolidated balance sheet. |
|
(2) |
|
Excludes the margins the Company pays on its variable-rate debt, which at of June 30, 2010
ranged between 0.30% to 3.25%. |
|
(3) |
|
Principal amount reduces quarterly. |
|
(4) |
|
Inception dates of swaps in 2011 ($200.0 million). |
|
(5) |
|
Principal amount reduces monthly to 70.1 million Euros ($85.8 million) by the maturity dates
of the swap agreements. |
|
(6) |
|
Principal amount is the U.S. Dollar equivalent of 283.5 million Euros. |
Spot Tanker Market Risk
In order to reduce variability in revenues from fluctuations in certain spot tanker market rates,
from time to time the Company has entered into forward freight agreements (or FFAs). FFAs involve
contracts to move a theoretical volume of freight at fixed-rates, thus attempting to reduce the
Companys exposure to spot tanker market rates. As at June 30, 2010, the FFAs had an aggregate
notional value of $22.1 million, which is an aggregate of both long and short positions. The FFAs
expire between July 2010 and December 2010. The Company has not designated these contracts as cash
flow hedges for accounting purposes.
Commodity Price Risk
The Company enters into bunker fuel swap contracts relating to a portion of its bunker fuel
expenditures. The Company has not designated its bunker fuel swap contracts as cash flow hedges for
accounting purposes. As at June 30, 2010, the Company was committed to contracts totalling 27,270
metric tonnes with a weighted-average price of $455.65 per tonne. These bunker fuel swap contracts
expire between July 2010 and December 2010. The Company has not designated these contracts as cash
flow hedges for accounting purposes.
Page 19 of 46
TEEKAY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(all tabular amounts stated in thousands of U.S. dollars, except share data)
Tabular Disclosure
The following table presents the location and fair value amounts of derivative instruments,
segregated by type of contract, on the Companys consolidated balance sheets.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Portion of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Portion of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative |
|
|
Derivative |
|
|
Accrued |
|
|
Derivative |
|
|
Derivative |
|
|
|
Assets |
|
|
Assets |
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
As at June 30, 2010: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives designated as a cash flow hedge: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency contracts |
|
|
1,314 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,962 |
) |
|
|
(4,800 |
) |
Derivative not designated as a cash flow hedge: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency contracts |
|
|
601 |
|
|
|
476 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,199 |
) |
|
|
(3,900 |
) |
Interest rate swaps |
|
|
15,672 |
|
|
|
75,286 |
|
|
|
(32,467 |
) |
|
|
(126,511 |
) |
|
|
(485,896 |
) |
Forward freight agreements |
|
|
552 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bunker fuel swap contracts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,417 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Foinaven embedded derivative |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,837 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,139 |
|
|
|
75,762 |
|
|
|
(32,467 |
) |
|
|
(147,089 |
) |
|
|
(504,433 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As at December 31, 2009: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives designated as a cash flow hedge: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency contracts |
|
|
11,697 |
|
|
|
250 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,021 |
) |
|
|
(71 |
) |
Derivative not designated as a cash flow hedge: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency contracts |
|
|
1,351 |
|
|
|
174 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(705 |
) |
|
|
(214 |
) |
Interest rate swaps |
|
|
16,336 |
|
|
|
17,695 |
|
|
|
(28,499 |
) |
|
|
(133,224 |
) |
|
|
(213,971 |
) |
Forward freight agreements |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(504 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Bunker fuel swap contracts |
|
|
612 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foinaven embedded derivative |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,769 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29,996 |
|
|
|
18,119 |
|
|
|
(28,499 |
) |
|
|
(136,454 |
) |
|
|
(223,025 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the periods indicated, the following table presents the effective portion of gains (losses) on
foreign currency contracts designated and qualifying as cash flow hedges that was recognized in (1)
other accumulated comprehensive income (or AOCI), (2) recorded in accumulated other comprehensive
income (loss) during the term of the hedging relationship and reclassified to earnings, and (3) the
ineffective portion of gains (losses) on derivative instruments designated and qualifying as cash
flow hedges.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, 2010 |
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, 2009 |
|
Balance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sheet |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sheet |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(AOCI) |
|
|
Statement of Income (Loss) |
|
|
(AOCI) |
|
|
Statement of Income (Loss) |
|
Effective |
|
|
Effective |
|
|
Ineffective |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effective |
|
|
Effective |
|
|
Ineffective |
|
|
|
|
|
Portion |
|
|
Portion |
|
|
Portion |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Portion |
|
|
Portion |
|
|
Portion |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(16,002 |
) |
|
|
(177 |
) |
|
|
(1,433 |
) |
|
Vessel operating expenses |
|
|
|
21,047 |
|
|
|
(2,845 |
) |
|
|
6,919 |
|
|
Vessel operating expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(707 |
) |
|
|
(844 |
) |
|
General and administrative expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,098 |
) |
|
|
1,692 |
|
|
General and administrative expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(16,002 |
) |
|
|
(884 |
) |
|
|
(2,277 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,047 |
|
|
|
(5,943 |
) |
|
|
8,611 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, 2010 |
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, 2009 |
|
Balance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance |
|
|
|
|
Sheet |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sheet |
|
|
|
|
(AOCI) |
|
|
Statement of Income (Loss) |
|
|
(AOCI) |
|
|
Statement of Income (Loss) |
|
Effective |
|
|
Effective |
|
|
Ineffective |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effective |
|
|
Effective |
|
|
Ineffective |
|
|
|
|
|
Portion |
|
|
Portion |
|
|
Portion |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Portion |
|
|
Portion |
|
|
Portion |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(19,942 |
) |
|
|
(551 |
) |
|
|
(3,515 |
) |
|
Vessel operating expenses |
|
|
|
20,930 |
|
|
|
(11,299 |
) |
|
|
6,696 |
|
|
Vessel operating expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,346 |
) |
|
|
(1,736 |
) |
|
General and administrative expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,388 |
) |
|
|
3,690 |
|
|
General and administrative expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(19,942 |
) |
|
|
(1,897 |
) |
|
|
(5,251 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,930 |
|
|
|
(18,687 |
) |
|
|
10,386 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page 20 of 46
TEEKAY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(all tabular amounts stated in thousands of U.S. dollars, except share data)
Realized and unrealized (losses) gains from derivative instruments that are not designated for
accounting purposes as cash flow hedges, are recognized in earnings and reported in realized and
unrealized (losses) gains on non-designated derivatives in the consolidated statements of income
(loss). The effect of the (loss) gain on derivatives not designated as hedging instruments in the
statements of income (loss) are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
Realized (losses) gains relating to: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swaps |
|
|
(40,634 |
) |
|
|
(29,528 |
) |
|
|
(79,220 |
) |
|
|
(50,416 |
) |
Foreign currency forward contracts |
|
|
(1,022 |
) |
|
|
(2,448 |
) |
|
|
(1,345 |
) |
|
|
(7,945 |
) |
Forward freight agreements and
bunker fuel swap contracts |
|
|
(2,207 |
) |
|
|
4,294 |
|
|
|
(4,356 |
) |
|
|
2,005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(43,863 |
) |
|
|
(27,682 |
) |
|
|
(84,921 |
) |
|
|
(56,356 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized (losses) gains relating to: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swaps |
|
|
(164,032 |
) |
|
|
182,471 |
|
|
|
(209,838 |
) |
|
|
245,447 |
|
Foreign currency forward contracts |
|
|
(8,836 |
) |
|
|
6,416 |
|
|
|
(12,053 |
) |
|
|
13,167 |
|
Forward freight agreements and
bunker fuel swap contracts |
|
|
(4,118 |
) |
|
|
(2,805 |
) |
|
|
(973 |
) |
|
|
4,889 |
|
Foinaven embedded derivative |
|
|
1,624 |
|
|
|
(915 |
) |
|
|
713 |
|
|
|
(2,417 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(175,362 |
) |
|
|
185,167 |
|
|
|
(222,151 |
) |
|
|
261,086 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total realized and unrealized
(losses) gains on non-designated
derivative instruments |
|
|
(219,225 |
) |
|
|
157,485 |
|
|
|
(307,072 |
) |
|
|
204,730 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As at June 30, 2010, the Companys accumulated other comprehensive loss included $12.4 million of
unrealized losses on foreign currency forward contracts designated as cash flow hedges. As at June
30, 2010, the Company estimated, based on then current foreign exchange rates, that it would
reclassify approximately $8.1 million of net losses on foreign currency forward contracts from
accumulated other comprehensive loss to earnings during the next 12 months.
The Company is exposed to credit loss in the event of non-performance by the counterparties to the
foreign currency forward contracts, interest rate swap agreements, FFAs and bunker fuel swap
contracts; however, the Company does not anticipate non-performance by any of the counterparties.
In order to minimize counterparty risk, the Company only enters into derivative transactions with
counterparties that are rated A- or better by Standard & Poors or A3 or better by Moodys at the
time of the transaction. In addition, to the extent possible and practical, interest rate swaps are
entered into with different counterparties to reduce concentration risk.
17. (Loss) Earnings Per Share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income attributable to
stockholders of Teekay Corporation |
|
|
(153,148 |
) |
|
|
159,359 |
|
|
|
(167,150 |
) |
|
|
240,864 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of common shares |
|
|
72,961,471 |
|
|
|
72,535,899 |
|
|
|
72,875,508 |
|
|
|
72,526,101 |
|
Dilutive effect of stock-based compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
262,124 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
361,373 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock and common stock equivalents |
|
|
72,961,471 |
|
|
|
72,798,023 |
|
|
|
72,875,508 |
|
|
|
72,887,474 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) earnings per common share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Basic |
|
|
(2.10 |
) |
|
|
2.20 |
|
|
|
(2.29 |
) |
|
|
3.32 |
|
- Diluted |
|
|
(2.10 |
) |
|
|
2.19 |
|
|
|
(2.29 |
) |
|
|
3.30 |
|
For the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, the anti-dilutive effect attributable to
outstanding stock-based compensation was 3.3 million and 6.5 million shares, respectively. For the
three and six months ended June 30, 2009, the anti-dilutive effect of 2.3 million and 4.6 million
shares, respectively, attributable to outstanding stock based compensation was excluded from the
calculation of diluted earnings per share.
Page 21 of 46
TEEKAY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(all tabular amounts stated in thousands of U.S. dollars, except share data)
18. Income Tax Recovery (Expense)
The legal jurisdictions in which Teekay and several of its subsidiaries are incorporated do not
impose income taxes upon shipping-related activities. However, among others, the Companys
Australian ship-owing subsidiaries and its Norwegian subsidiaries are subject to income taxes.
The following is a roll-forward of the Companys unrecognized tax benefits, recorded in other
long-term liabilities as at June 30, 2010, and December 31, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
Balance of unrecognized tax benefits as at December 31, 2009 |
|
$ |
40,943 |
|
Increase for positions related to the current period |
|
|
1,880 |
|
Increase for positions taken in prior years |
|
|
8,979 |
|
Decrease for positions taken in prior years |
|
|
(5,847 |
) |
Decrease related to statute of limitations |
|
|
(1,600 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Balance of unrecognized tax benefits as at June 30, 2010 |
|
$ |
44,355 |
|
|
|
|
|
The majority of the net increase for positions for the six months ended June 30, 2010 relates to
potential tax on freight income.
The Company does not presently anticipate such uncertain tax positions will significantly increase
or decrease in the next 12 months; however, actual developments could differ from those currently
expected. The tax years 2006 through 2009 remain open to examination by some of the major taxing
jurisdictions in which the Company is subject to tax.
The components of the provision for income tax recovery (expense) are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
Current |
|
|
(7,662 |
) |
|
|
450 |
|
|
|
(9,449 |
) |
|
|
(397 |
) |
Deferred |
|
|
12,809 |
|
|
|
4,148 |
|
|
|
21,903 |
|
|
|
(873 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax recovery (expense) |
|
|
5,147 |
|
|
|
4,598 |
|
|
|
12,454 |
|
|
|
(1,270 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19. Accounting Pronouncements Not Yet Adopted
In September 2009, the FASB issued an amendment to FASB ASC 605 Revenue Recognition that provides
for a new methodology for establishing the fair value for a deliverable in a multiple-element
arrangement. When vendor specific objective or third-party evidence for deliverables in a
multiple-element arrangement cannot be determined, the Company will be required to develop a best
estimate of the selling price of separate deliverables and to allocate the arrangement
consideration using the relative selling price method. This amendment will be effective for the
Company on January 1, 2011, although earlier adoption is allowed. The Company is currently
assessing the potential impact, if any, of adoption of this standard on its consolidated financial
statements.
In July 2010, the FASB issued an amendment to FASB ASC 310, Receivables, that requires companies to
provide more information in their disclosures about the credit quality of their financing
receivables and the credit reserves held against them. The amendments that require disclosures as
of the end of a reporting period are effective for periods ending on or after December 15, 2010.
The amendments that require disclosures about activity that occurs during a reporting period are
effective for periods beginning on or after December 15, 2010. The Company is currently assessing
the potential impacts, if any, of these amendments on its consolidated financial statements.
20. Subsequent Events
a) |
|
On July 15, 2010, Teekay LNG completed a direct equity placement of approximately 1.7 million
common units at the price of $29.18 per unit, for net proceeds (including the general
partners proportionate capital contribution) of approximately $51 million. As a result, the
Companys ownership of Teekay LNG has been reduced from 49.2% to 47.7% (including the
Companys 2% general partner interest). Teekay maintains control of Teekay LNG by virtue of
its control of the general partner and will continue to consolidate this subsidiary. |
b) |
|
On July 16, 2010, Teekay Tankers made loans totaling $115 million to a third party ship-owner
(the Loans). The Loans bear interest at an annual interest rate of 9% per annum and have a
fixed term of three years. The Loans are repayable in full, together with a 3% premium of the
Loans then outstanding, on maturity and are collateralized by first priority mortgages on two
2010-built Very Large Crude Carriers owned by the ship-owner. |
c) |
|
On August 20, 2010, Teekay Offshore completed a public offering of approximately 6.0 million
common units (including 787,500 common units issued upon the exercise of the underwriters
overallotment option) at a price of $22.15 per unit, for gross proceeds (including the general
partners proportionate capital contribution) of approximately $136.5 million. As a result,
the Companys ownership of Teekay Offshore has been reduced from 35.9% to 31.7% (including the
Companys 2% general partner interest). Teekay maintains control of Teekay Offshore by virtue
of its control of the general partner and will continue to consolidate this subsidiary. |
Page 22 of 46
TEEKAY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
JUNE 30, 2010
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 2 MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
OVERVIEW
Teekay Corporation (Teekay or the Company) is a leading provider of international crude oil and gas
marine transportation services and we also offer offshore oil production, storage and offloading
services, primarily under long-term, fixed-rate contracts. Over the past decade, we have undergone
a major transformation from being primarily an owner of ships in the cyclical spot tanker business
to being a growth-oriented asset manager in the Marine Midstream sector. This transformation has
included the expansion into the liquefied natural gas (or LNG) and liquefied petroleum gas (or LPG)
shipping sectors through our publicly-listed subsidiary Teekay LNG Partners L.P. (or Teekay LNG),
further growth of our operations in the offshore production, storage and transportation sector
through our publicly-listed subsidiary Teekay Offshore Partners L.P. (or Teekay Offshore) and
through Teekay Petrojarl AS (or Teekay Petrojarl), and expansion of our conventional tanker
business through our publicly-listed subsidiary Teekay Tankers Ltd. (or Teekay Tankers). With a
fleet of over 150 vessels, offices in 16 countries and approximately 6,100 seagoing and shore-based
employees, Teekay provides comprehensive marine services to the worlds leading oil and gas
companies, helping them link their upstream energy production to their downstream processing
operations. Our goal is to create the industrys leading asset management company focused on the
Marine Midstream space.
SIGNIFICANT DEVELOPMENTS IN 2010
Public Offering of $450 Million Senior Unsecured Notes
In January 2010, we completed a public offering of $450 million senior unsecured notes due 2020,
which bear interest at a rate of 8.5% per year. We used a portion of the offering proceeds to
repurchase the majority of our outstanding 8.875% senior notes due 2011, and the remainder to repay
amounts outstanding under a term loan and a portion of outstanding debt under one of our revolving
credit facilities. Please read Item 1 Financial Statements: Note 8 Long-Term Debt.
Sale of Vessels to Teekay LNG
During March 2010, Teekay LNG acquired from us two 2009-built Suezmax tankers, the Bermuda Spirit
and the Hamilton Spirit, and one 2007-built Handy-max product tanker, the Alexander Spirit, for a
total purchase price of $160 million. Teekay LNG financed the purchase by assuming $126 million of
existing debt related to two of the vessels and borrowing under one of its revolving credit
facilities for the remainder. In addition, Teekay LNG acquired approximately $15 million of working
capital in exchange for a short-term vendor loan from us. The Bermuda Spirit and the Hamilton
Spirit are currently operating under 12-year fixed-rate contracts to Centrofin, an international
owner of 28 vessels, and the Alexander Spirit is currently employed on a 10-year fixed-rate
contract to Caltex Australia Petroleum Pty Ltd.
Private Placement by Teekay LNG
During July 2010, Teekay LNG completed a direct equity placement of approximately 1.7 million
common units at a price of $29.18 per unit, for net proceeds of approximately $51 million
(including its general partners $1.0 million proportionate capital contribution). As a result, our
ownership of Teekay LNG has been reduced from 49.2% to 47.7% (including our 2% general partner
interest). We maintain control of Teekay LNG by virtue of our control of the general partner and
will continue to consolidate this subsidiary.
Public Offerings by Teekay Offshore
During March 2010, Teekay Offshore completed a public offering of approximately 5.1 million common
units (including 660,000 units issued upon the exercise of the underwriters overallotment option)
at a price of $19.48 per unit, for gross proceeds of $100.6 million (including the general
partners $2.0 million proportionate capital contribution). Teekay Offshore used the total net
proceeds from the offering to repay the vendor financing of $60.0 million we provided for the
acquisition from us of the floating production, storage and offloading (or FPSO) unit, the
Petrojarl Varg and to finance a portion of the April 2010 acquisition from us of the floating
storage and offtake (or FSO) unit, the Falcon Spirit,
for $44.1 million.
During August 2010, Teekay Offshore completed a public offering of approximately 6.0 million common
units (including 787,500 units issued upon the exercise of the underwriters overallotment option)
at the price of $22.15 per unit, for gross proceeds of approximately $136.5 million (including the
general partners $2.7 million proportionate capital contribution). As a result of the above
transactions, our ownership of Teekay Offshore was reduced from 40.5% to 31.7% (including our 2%
general partner interest). We maintain control of Teekay Offshore by virtue of our control of the
general partner and will continue to consolidate this subsidiary.
Public Offering by and Sale of Vessels to Teekay Tankers
During April 2010, Teekay Tankers completed a public offering of approximately 8.8 million common
shares of its Class A Common Stock (including 1,079,500 common shares issued upon the partial
exercise of the underwriters overallotment option) at a price of $12.25 per share, for gross
proceeds of $107.5 million. Teekay Tankers used the total net proceeds from the offering to acquire
from us for a total purchase price of $168.7 million the following three vessels: the Suezmax
tanker, the Yamuna Spirit, the Suezmax tanker, the Kaveri Spirit, and the Aframax tanker, the Helga
Spirit. As part of the purchase price for these vessels, Teekay Tankers issued to us 2.6 million
unregistered common shares at an amount equivalent to the public offering price of $12.25. As a
result of these transactions, we hold a 37.1% ownership interest in Teekay Tankers. We maintain
voting control of Teekay Tankers through our ownership of shares of Class A and Class B Common
Stock and continue to consolidate this subsidiary.
Page 23 of 46
Teekay
Tankers First Priority Ship Mortgage Loans
During July 2010, Teekay Tankers made loans totaling $115 million investment to a third party
ship-owner (the Loans). The Loans bear interest at an annual interest rate of 9% per annum and have
a fixed term of three years. The Loans are repayable in full, together with a 3% premium of the
Loans then outstanding, on maturity and are secured by first priority mortgages on two 2010-built
Very Large Crude Carriers owned by the ship-owner. The Loans include a repayment premium feature
which is expected to provide Teekay Tankers with a total return of approximately 10% per annum over
the term of the Loans.
Foinaven FPSO Contract Amendment
In March 2010, we signed an agreement with the operator (Britoil plc) of the Foinaven FPSO unit and
Foinaven co-venturers (Britoil plc and certain of its affiliates and Marathon Petroleum) to amend
the operating contract for the FPSO unit, which also includes transportation services provided by
two shuttle tankers. The amended contract provides for operating services for the Foinaven field
until at least 2021 and includes operating performance incentives that may increase the revenue
generated by the Foinaven FPSO unit.
The amended contract, which applied from January 1, 2010, is comprised of the following components:
a daily rate, part of which is earned based on agreed operating performance incentives (adjusted
annually based on industry indices); a production tariff based on the volume of oil produced; and a
supplemental tariff based on both the volume of oil produced and the annual average Brent Crude Oil
price. Based on crude oil prices at the time the agreement was signed, we expect that under the amended contract the Foinaven
FPSO unit will generate incremental operating cash flow and net income of approximately $30 million
to $40 million per annum over the anticipated life of the contract period.
Under the amended contract, we received two payments totaling approximately $59.2 million relating
to the Foinaven FPSO units operations in previous years. The first installment of approximately
$30 million was paid in April 2010 and the balance was paid in the July 2010. We recognized
approximately $30 million in revenue in the first quarter of 2010 in conjunction with the signing
of the amended agreement and approximately $29.2 million in revenue in the second quarter of 2010
upon the completion of certain conditions.
Cidade de Rio das Ostras FPSO Contract Extension
In June 2010, we signed an agreement with the operator to extend the operating contract for the
Cidade de Rio das Ostras FPSO (the Rio das Ostras FPSO, previously known as the Siri FPSO) unit for
an additional seven years through the end of 2017 in the Brazilian offshore sector. The Rio das
Ostras FPSO, which has operated at the Siri reservoir on the Badejo field in Brazils Campos Basin
since 2008, will be re-deployed to the Aruana field in the Campos Basin following upgrades to
prepare the unit for its new field. The upgrades are expected to be completed during the fourth
quarter of 2010.
Pursuant to an omnibus agreement that Teekay Offshore entered into with us in connection with its
initial public offering in December 2006, we are obligated to offer to Teekay Offshore our interest
in certain shuttle tankers, FSO units and FPSO units and joint ventures we may acquire in the
future, provided the vessels are servicing contracts in excess of three years in length. On August
31, 2010, we offered to sell the Rio das Ostras FPSO to Teekay Offshore at fair market value
in accordance with the omnibus agreement and if accepted, the acquisition of this unit is expected
to take place in the fourth quarter of 2010.
New Master Agreement with Statoil
On August 18, 2010, Teekay Offshore Operating L.P. (or OPCO), a subsidiary of Teekay Offshore
signed a master agreement with Statoil ASA (or Statoil) to replace its existing volume-dependent
contract of affreightment (or CoA), and covers fixed-rate, life-of-field time-charter contracts
initially for seven dedicated shuttle tankers. This new master agreement is effective September 1,
2010. Under the terms of the master agreement, the vessels will be chartered under individual
fixed-rate life-of-field time-charter contracts to service Tampen and Haltenbanken fields on the
Norwegian Continental Shelf. The number of shuttle tankers covered by the master agreement may be
adjusted annually, based on the requirements of the fields serviced under the master agreement. The
fixed-rate nature of time-charter contracts is expected to provide Teekay Offshore with more
seasonally stable and predictable cash flows compared to the CoA arrangement. The vessels chartered
under this agreement would include the three newbuilding shuttle tankers that Teekay Corporation
has recently offered to OPCO as further discussed below.
Teekay Corporation recently took delivery of one Aframax shuttle tanker newbuilding and has three
additional Aframax shuttle tanker newbuildings that are scheduled to be delivered in late 2010 and
2011, for a total delivered cost of approximately $500 million. Pursuant to the omnibus agreement,
Teekay Corporation is obligated to offer to OPCO its interest in these vessels within 365 days of
their delivery provided the vessels are servicing charter contracts in excess of three years in
length. On August 31, 2010, Teekay Corporation offered OPCO to acquire three newbuilding shuttle
tankers at fully built-up cost which would be used to service the new master agreement with
Statoil. If Teekay Corporations offer for the three newbuilding shuttle tankers is accepted by
OPCO, the purchases of the Amundsen Spirit, the Nansen Spirit and the Peary Spirit are expected to
coincide with the commencement of their time-charter contracts under the Statoil master agreement
in October 2010, January 2011 and July 2011, respectively.
OTHER SIGNIFICANT PROJECTS
Angola LNG Project
We have a 33% interest in a joint venture that will charter four newbuilding 160,400-cubic meter
LNG carriers for a period of 20 years to the Angola LNG Project, which is being developed by
subsidiaries of Chevron Corporation, Sociedade Nacional de Combustiveis de Angola EP, BP Plc, Total
S.A., and Eni SpA. Final award of the charter contract was made in December 2007. The vessels will
be chartered at fixed rates, with inflation adjustments, commencing in 2011. Mitsui & Co., Ltd. and
NYK Bulkship (Europe) Ltd., have 34% and 33% interests in the joint venture, respectively. In
accordance with existing agreements, we are required to offer to Teekay LNG our 33% interest in
these vessels and related charter contracts no later than 180 days before the scheduled delivery
dates of the vessels. Deliveries of the vessels are scheduled between August 2011 and January 2012.
Please read Item 1 Financial Statements: Note 11(b) Commitments and Contingencies Joint
Ventures.
Page 24 of 46
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
We use a variety of financial and operational terms and concepts when analyzing our results of
operations. In addition, you should consider certain factors when evaluating our historical
financial performance and assessing our future prospects. These items can be found in Item 5
Operating and Financial Review and Prospects in our Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended
December 31, 2009.
In accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States (or GAAP), we
report gross revenues in our income statements and include voyage expenses among our operating
expenses. However, ship-owners base economic decisions regarding the deployment of their vessels
upon anticipated time-charter equivalent (or TCE) rates and industry analysts typically measure
bulk shipping freight rates in terms of TCE rates. This is because under time-charter contracts and
FPSO service contracts the customer usually pays the voyage expenses, while under voyage charters
and contracts of affreightment the ship-owner usually pays the voyage expenses, which typically are
added to the hire rate at an approximate cost. Accordingly, the discussion of revenue below focuses
on net revenues and TCE rates of our four reportable segments where applicable.
We manage our business and analyze and report our results of operations on the basis of four
reportable segments: the shuttle tanker and FSO segment, the FPSO segment, the liquefied gas
segment, and the conventional tanker segment. In order to provide investors with additional
information about our conventional tanker segment, we have divided this operating segment into the
fixed-rate tanker sub-segment and the spot tanker sub-segment. Please read Item 1 Financial
Statements: Note 2 Segment Reporting.
Shuttle Tanker and FSO Segment
Our shuttle tanker and FSO segment (which includes our Teekay Navion Shuttle Tankers and Offshore
business unit) includes our shuttle tankers and FSO units. The shuttle tanker and FSO segment had
four shuttle tankers under construction as at June 30, 2010. One shuttle tanker delivered in July
2010 and the remaining three shuttle tankers are scheduled for delivery between September 2010 and
July 2011. Please read Item 1 Financial Statements: Note 11(a) Commitments and Contingencies
Vessels Under Construction. We use these vessels to provide transportation and storage services
to oil companies operating offshore oil field installations. All of these shuttle tankers provide
transportation services to energy companies, primarily in the North Sea and Brazil. Our shuttle
tankers service the conventional spot market from time to time.
The following table presents our shuttle tanker and FSO segments operating results and compares
its net revenues (which is a non-GAAP financial measure) to revenues, the most directly comparable
GAAP financial measure. The following table also provides a summary of the changes in
calendar-ship-days by owned and chartered-in vessels for our shuttle tanker and FSO segment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
(in thousands of U.S. dollars, except |
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
|
calendar-ship-days and percentages) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
% Change |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
% Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
|
167,502 |
|
|
|
138,324 |
|
|
|
21.1 |
|
|
|
323,450 |
|
|
|
288,189 |
|
|
|
12.2 |
|
Voyage expenses |
|
|
35,761 |
|
|
|
16,167 |
|
|
|
121.2 |
|
|
|
65,064 |
|
|
|
34,575 |
|
|
|
88.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenues |
|
|
131,741 |
|
|
|
122,157 |
|
|
|
7.8 |
|
|
|
258,386 |
|
|
|
253,614 |
|
|
|
1.9 |
|
Vessel operating expenses |
|
|
41,494 |
|
|
|
42,941 |
|
|
|
(3.4 |
) |
|
|
84,815 |
|
|
|
89,331 |
|
|
|
(5.1 |
) |
Time-charter hire expense |
|
|
23,433 |
|
|
|
25,695 |
|
|
|
(8.8 |
) |
|
|
48,471 |
|
|
|
57,873 |
|
|
|
(16.2 |
) |
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
33,456 |
|
|
|
28,738 |
|
|
|
16.4 |
|
|
|
64,014 |
|
|
|
57,991 |
|
|
|
10.4 |
|
General and administrative (1) |
|
|
14,145 |
|
|
|
12,868 |
|
|
|
9.9 |
|
|
|
26,290 |
|
|
|
25,391 |
|
|
|
3.5 |
|
(Gain) loss on sale of vessels and
equipment, net of write-downs |
|
|
(736 |
) |
|
|
941 |
|
|
|
(178.2 |
) |
|
|
(736 |
) |
|
|
941 |
|
|
|
(178.2 |
) |
Restructuring charge |
|
|
349 |
|
|
|
2,536 |
|
|
|
(86.2 |
) |
|
|
674 |
|
|
|
5,298 |
|
|
|
(87.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from vessel operations |
|
|
19,600 |
|
|
|
8,438 |
|
|
|
132.3 |
|
|
|
34,858 |
|
|
|
16,789 |
|
|
|
107.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Calendar-Ship-Days |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Owned Vessels |
|
|
2,669 |
|
|
|
2,641 |
|
|
|
9.9 |
|
|
|
5,550 |
|
|
|
5,431 |
|
|
|
6.5 |
|
Chartered-in Vessels |
|
|
624 |
|
|
|
593 |
|
|
|
(34.6 |
) |
|
|
1,300 |
|
|
|
1,553 |
|
|
|
(31.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
3,293 |
|
|
|
3,234 |
|
|
|
1.7 |
|
|
|
6,850 |
|
|
|
6,984 |
|
|
|
(2.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes direct general and administrative expenses and indirect general and administrative
expenses (allocated to the shuttle tanker and FSO segment based on estimated use of corporate
resources). For further discussion, please read Other Operating Results General and
Administrative Expenses. |
Page 25 of 46
The average fleet size of our shuttle tanker and FSO segment (including vessels chartered-in)
decreased for the three months and six months ended June 30, 2010, compared to the same periods
last year, primarily due to a decline in the number of chartered-in shuttle tankers.
Net Revenues. Net revenues increased for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010
compared to the same periods last year, primarily due to:
|
|
|
increases of $4.5 million and $5.1 million, respectively, for the three and six months
ended June 30, 2010, due to increased rates on certain contracts of affreightment, bareboat
and time-charter contracts; |
|
|
|
an increase of $3.0 million for the three months ended June 30, 2010, from an increase
in shuttle tanker revenue days due to the impact on revenue generated by our shuttle
tankers operating in the conventional spot market from increased demand for conventional
crude transportation, partially offset by fewer revenue days from our shuttle tankers due
to declining oil production at mature oil fields in the North Sea, compared to the same
period last year; |
|
|
|
increases of $2.6 million and $5.2 million, respectively, for the three and six months
ended June 30, 2010, due to the inclusion of the Falcon Spirit FSO unit commencing in
December 2009; |
|
|
|
increases of $1.0 million and $3.1 million, respectively, for the three and six months
ended June 30, 2010, due to foreign currency exchange differences as compared to the same
periods last year; and |
|
|
|
an increase of $0.8 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, due to an
agreement with one of our joint venture partners to receive compensation as the number of
drydocking days for their vessel exceeded the maximum allowed; |
partially offset by
|
|
|
decreases of $3.0 million and $6.3 million, respectively, for the three and six months
ended June 30, 2010, due to the redelivery of one in-chartered vessel in June 2009 as it
completed its time-charter contract; |
|
|
|
decreases of $1.2 million and $0.3 million, respectively, for the three and six months
ended June 30, 2010, due to a lower charter rate on the Navion Saga in accordance with the
charter contract that took effect in the second quarter of 2010 as compared to the same
periods last year, partially offset by a one-time reimbursement from customers for certain
crewing costs in the three months ended March 31, 2010; |
|
|
|
a decrease of $1.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010, from fewer shuttle
tanker revenue days due to declining oil production at mature oil fields in the North Sea,
partially offset by an increase in revenue days from our shuttle tankers due to the impact
on revenue generated by our shuttle tankers operating in the conventional spot market from
increased demand for conventional crude transportation; and |
|
|
|
a decrease of $1.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010, from a reduction in
the number of cargo liftings due to declining oil production at the Heidrun field, a mature
oil field in the North Sea that is serviced by certain shuttle tankers on contracts of
affreightment. |
Vessel Operating Expenses. Vessel operating expenses decreased for the three and six months
ended June 30, 2010, compared to the same periods last year, primarily due to:
|
|
|
decreases of $2.3 million and $4.6 million, respectively, for the three and six months
ended June 30, 2010, due to a decrease in the number of vessels drydocked, and the cost of
services, spares and consumables during 2010. Certain repair and maintenance items are more
efficient to complete while a vessel is in drydock. (Consequently, repair and maintenance
costs will typically increase in periods when there is an increase in the number of vessels
drydocked); |
|
|
|
decreases of $2.1 million and $5.6 million, respectively, for the three and six months
ended June 30, 2010, relating to the net realized and unrealized changes in fair value of
our foreign currency forward contracts that are or have been designated as hedges for
accounting purposes; |
|
|
|
decreases of $1.9 million and $1.5 million, respectively, for the three and six months
ended June 30, 2010, in crewing costs resulting primarily from cost saving initiatives
which commenced in 2009; and |
|
|
|
decreases of $0.8 million and $1.6 million, respectively, for the three and six months
ended June 30, 2010, due to the redelivery of one in-chartered vessel in June 2009 as it
completed its time-charter agreement; |
partially offset by
|
|
|
increases of $2.7 million and $3.6 million, respectively, for the three and six months
ended June 30, 2010, due to the acquisition of a shuttle tanker in February 2010; |
|
|
|
increases of $1.4 million and $1.2 million, respectively, for the three and six months
ended June 30, 2010, relating to repairs and maintenance performed for certain vessels; |
|
|
|
increases of $0.9 million and $1.7 million, respectively, for the three and six months
ended June 30, 2010, due to the inclusion of an FSO unit in December 2009; and |
|
|
|
increases of $0.3 million and $1.5 million, respectively, for the three and six months
ended June 30, 2010, due to weakening of the U.S. Dollar against the Australian Dollar
compared to the same periods last year. |
Page 26 of 46
Time-Charter Hire Expense. Time-charter hire expense decreased for the three and six months
ended June 30, 2010, compared to the same periods last year, primarily due to:
|
|
|
decreases of $6.9 million and $14.2 million, respectively, for the three and six months
ended June 30, 2010, from the redelivery of three in-chartered shuttles to their respective
owners in June 2009, November 2009 and February 2010, whose in-charter contracts expired; |
partially offset by
|
|
|
increases of $4.4 million and $5.2 million, respectively, for the three and six months
ended June 30, 2010, due primarily to less off-hire in the in-chartered fleet and an
increase in spot in-chartering of vessels, compared to the same periods last year. |
Depreciation and Amortization. Depreciation and amortization expense increased for the
three and six months ended June 30, 2010, compared to the same periods last year, primarily due to
capitalized drydock and vessel upgrade costs incurred in the second half of 2009 and depreciation
on the shuttle tanker acquired in February 2010, partially offset by lower amortization on our FSO
units as certain conversion costs were fully depreciated at the end of a fixed term contract in
April 2010.
Restructuring Charges. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, we incurred
restructuring charges of $0.3 million and $0.7 million, respectively, primarily resulting from the
completion of the reflagging of certain vessels and a change in the nationality mix of our crews.
FPSO Segment
Our FPSO segment (which includes our Teekay Petrojarl business unit) includes our FPSO units and
other vessels used to service our FPSO contracts. We use these units and vessels to provide
transportation, production, processing and storage services to oil companies operating offshore oil
field installations. These services are typically provided under long-term fixed-rate time-charter
contracts, contracts of affreightment or FPSO service contracts. Historically, the utilization of
FPSO units and other vessels in the North Sea is higher in the winter months, as favorable weather
conditions in the summer months provide opportunities for repairs and maintenance to our offshore
oil platforms, which generally reduces oil production.
The following table presents our FPSO segments operating results and also provides a summary of
the changes in calendar-ship-days for our FPSO segment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
(in thousands of U.S. dollars, except |
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
|
calendar-ship-days and percentages) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
% Change |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
% Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
|
124,223 |
|
|
|
97,572 |
|
|
|
27.3 |
|
|
|
256,221 |
|
|
|
189,498 |
|
|
|
35.2 |
|
Vessel operating expenses |
|
|
50,433 |
|
|
|
47,301 |
|
|
|
6.6 |
|
|
|
98,398 |
|
|
|
93,187 |
|
|
|
5.6 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
23,754 |
|
|
|
25,745 |
|
|
|
(7.7 |
) |
|
|
47,502 |
|
|
|
51,525 |
|
|
|
(7.8 |
) |
General and administrative (1) |
|
|
4,521 |
|
|
|
7,273 |
|
|
|
(37.8 |
) |
|
|
13,347 |
|
|
|
15,602 |
|
|
|
(14.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from vessel operations |
|
|
45,515 |
|
|
|
17,253 |
|
|
|
163.8 |
|
|
|
96,974 |
|
|
|
29,184 |
|
|
|
232.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Calendar-Ship-Days |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Owned Vessels |
|
|
728 |
|
|
|
819 |
|
|
|
(11.1 |
) |
|
|
1,448 |
|
|
|
1,629 |
|
|
|
(11.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
728 |
|
|
|
819 |
|
|
|
(11.1 |
) |
|
|
1,448 |
|
|
|
1,629 |
|
|
|
(11.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes direct general and administrative expenses and indirect general and administrative
expenses (allocated to the FPSO segment based on estimated use of corporate resources). For
further discussion, please read Other Operating Results General and Administrative
Expenses. |
The average fleet size of our FPSO segment (including vessels chartered-in) decreased for the six
months ended June 30, 2010, compared to the same period last year. This was the result of one
shuttle tanker that was converted to a FSO unit and transferred to the shuttle tanker and FSO
segment in the fourth quarter of 2009.
Revenues. Revenues increased for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, compared to
the same periods last year, primarily due to:
|
|
|
increases of $29.2 million and $59.2 million, respectively, for the three and six months
ended June 30, 2010, from payments under the amended operating contract for our Foinaven
FPSO unit related to operations in previous years (as discussed above); |
|
|
|
increases of $2.8 million and $5.8 million, respectively, for the three and six months
ended June 30, 2010, due to supplemental efficiency payments also made
under the amended Foinaven FPSO contract; |
|
|
|
increases of $2.7 million and $6.5 million, respectively, for the three and six months
ended June 30, 2010, from the Petrojarl Varg FPSO unit commencing operations under a new
four-year fixed-rate contract extension beginning in the third quarter of 2009; and |
|
|
|
an increase of $5.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010, from increased daily
rates, tariff and incentive payments; |
partially offset by
|
|
|
decreases of $6.3 million and $10.3 million, respectively, for the three and six months
ended June 30, 2010, from the decrease in amortization of contract value liabilities
relating to FPSO service contracts (as discussed below) due to extensions to the duration
of
the firm periods of certain contracts. |
Page 27 of 46
As part of our acquisition of Teekay Petrojarl, we assumed certain FPSO service contracts that had
terms that were less favorable than prevailing market terms at the time of acquisition. This
contract value liability, which was initially recognized on the date of acquisition, is being
amortized to revenue over the remaining firm period of the current FPSO contracts on a weighted
basis based on the projected revenue to be earned under the contracts. The amount of amortization
relating to these contracts included in revenue for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010,
was $11.2 million and $24.3 million (2009 $17.5 million and $34.6 million), respectively. Please
read Item 1 Financial Statements: Note 6 Intangible Assets and In-Process Revenue Contracts.
Vessel Operating Expenses. Vessel operating expenses increased during the three and six
months ended June 30, 2010, compared to the same periods last year, primarily due to increases in
crewing costs related to changes in crew classifications and wage increases and an increase in
services and repairs due to the timing of certain projects.
Depreciation and Amortization. Depreciation and amortization expense decreased for the
three and six months ended June 30, 2010, compared to the same periods last year, primarily due to
a reassessment of the residual value of the units in 2010.
Liquefied Gas Segment
Our liquefied gas segment (which includes our Teekay Gas Services business unit) consists of LNG
and LPG carriers subject to long-term, fixed-rate time-charter contracts. At June 30, 2010, we had
one LPG carrier under construction and scheduled for delivery in 2010 and two multi-gas carriers
under construction, both of which are scheduled for delivery in 2011. In addition, we have a 33%
interest in four LNG carriers under construction that are scheduled for delivery between August
2011 and January 2012, and will be accounted for under the equity basis. Upon delivery, all of
these vessels will commence operation under long-term, fixed-rate time-charters. Please read Item 1
Financial Statements: Note 11(a) Commitments and Contingencies Vessels Under Construction
and Note 11(b) Commitments and Contingencies Joint Ventures.
The following table presents our liquefied gas segments operating results and compares its net
revenues (which is a non-GAAP financial measure) to revenues, the most directly comparable GAAP
financial measure. The following table also provides a summary of the changes in calendar-ship-days
by owned vessels and vessels under direct financing lease for our liquefied gas segment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
(in thousands of U.S. dollars, except |
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
|
calendar-ship-days and percentages) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
% Change |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
% Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
|
60,797 |
|
|
|
57,265 |
|
|
|
6.2 |
|
|
|
123,331 |
|
|
|
114,848 |
|
|
|
7.4 |
|
Voyage expenses |
|
|
122 |
|
|
|
(34 |
) |
|
|
(458.8 |
) |
|
|
95 |
|
|
|
258 |
|
|
|
(63.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenues |
|
|
60,675 |
|
|
|
57,299 |
|
|
|
5.9 |
|
|
|
123,236 |
|
|
|
114,590 |
|
|
|
7.5 |
|
Vessel operating expenses |
|
|
11,356 |
|
|
|
12,434 |
|
|
|
(8.7 |
) |
|
|
22,726 |
|
|
|
24,459 |
|
|
|
(7.1 |
) |
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
15,885 |
|
|
|
15,471 |
|
|
|
2.7 |
|
|
|
31,412 |
|
|
|
30,068 |
|
|
|
4.5 |
|
General and administrative (1) |
|
|
5,558 |
|
|
|
5,055 |
|
|
|
10.0 |
|
|
|
10,329 |
|
|
|
9,975 |
|
|
|
3.5 |
|
Restructuring charge |
|
|
195 |
|
|
|
1,030 |
|
|
|
(81.1 |
) |
|
|
314 |
|
|
|
3,212 |
|
|
|
(90.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from vessel operations |
|
|
27,681 |
|
|
|
23,309 |
|
|
|
18.8 |
|
|
|
58,455 |
|
|
|
46,876 |
|
|
|
24.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Calendar-Ship-Days |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Owned Vessels and Vessels under
Direct Financing Lease |
|
|
1,274 |
|
|
|
1,182 |
|
|
|
7.8 |
|
|
|
2,534 |
|
|
|
2,187 |
|
|
|
15.9 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes direct general and administrative expenses and indirect general and administrative
expenses (allocated to the liquefied gas segment based on estimated use of corporate
resources). For further discussion, please read Other Operating Results General and
Administrative Expenses. |
The increase in the average fleet size of our liquefied gas segment was primarily due to the
deliveries of one LNG carrier in March 2009 (the Tangguh LNG Delivery) and two new LPG carriers in
April 2009 and November 2009, respectively (the LPG Deliveries).
During the six months ended June 30, 2010 two of our LNG carriers, the Arctic Spirit and Dania
Spirit, were off-hire for a total of 196 days, of which approximately 22 days and 15 days,
respectively, related to scheduled drydockings, with the remainder due to the Arctic Spirit being
offhire.
Net Revenues. Net revenues increased for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010,
compared to the same periods last year, primarily due to:
|
|
|
increases of $5.6 million and $14.6 million, respectively, for the three and six months
ended June 30, 2010, due to the commencement of the time-charters from the Tangguh LNG
Delivery and the LPG Deliveries; |
partially offset by
|
|
|
decreases of $0.2 million and $5.3 million, respectively, for the three and six months
ended June 30, 2010, due to the Arctic Spirit being off-hire during the first half of 2010
primarily due to the vessel being off-hire and in part due to a scheduled drydocking; |
Page 28 of 46
|
|
|
decreases of $1.3 million and $0.3 million, respectively, for the three and six months
ended June 30, 2010, due to the effect on our
Euro-denominated revenues from the weakening of the Euro against the U.S. Dollar compared to
the same periods last year; and |
|
|
|
a decrease of $0.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2010, due to the Dania
Spirit being off-hire for 15 days in the second quarter of 2010 for a scheduled drydocking. |
Vessel Operating Expenses. Vessel operating expenses decreased for the three and six months
ended June 30, 2010, compared to the same periods last year, primarily due to:
|
|
|
decreases of $1.8 million and $2.1 million, respectively, for the three and six months
ended June 30, 2010, relating to lower crewing, insurance, repairs and maintenance costs;
and |
|
|
|
decreases of $0.7 million and $1.0 million, respectively, for the three and six months
ended June 30, 2010, due to our cancellation of loss-of-hire insurance in 2009 and
reduction in crewing levels for certain of our LNG carriers; |
partially offset by
|
|
|
an increase of $1.4 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, due to
additional crew training expenses relating to the three newly delivered LNG carriers. |
Depreciation and Amortization. Depreciation and amortization expense increased for the
three and six months ended June 30, 2010, compared to the same periods last year, primarily due to:
|
|
|
increases of $1.3 million and $1.7 million, respectively, for the three and six months
ended June 30, 2010, relating to amortization of capitalized drydocking expenditures
incurred during the third and fourth quarters of 2009 and the first quarter of 2010; and |
|
|
|
increases of $0.3 million and $0.8 million, respectively, for the three and six months
ended June 30, 2010, from the LPG Deliveries; |
partially offset by
|
|
|
decreases of $0.9 million and $1.1 million, respectively, for the three and six months
ended June 30, 2010, from the commencement of the time-charter contracts for the Tangguh
Hiri and Tangguh Sago in January 2009 and May 2009, respectively, which are accounted for
as direct financing leases. |
Conventional Tankers Segment
Our conventional tanker segment consists of conventional crude oil and product tankers that are
subject to: long-term, fixed-rate time-charter contracts, which have an original term of one year
or more; operate in the spot tanker market; or are subject to time-charters or contracts of
affreightment that are priced on a spot-market basis or are short-term, fixed-rate contracts, which
have an original term of less than one year.
Effective January 1, 2010, the operating results of vessels that were employed on fixed rate
time-charters and contracts of affreightment that had an original duration of more than one year
but less than three years have been included in the fixed-rate tanker sub-segment of the
conventional tankers segment. Previously, these operating results were included in our spot tanker
sub-segment. The following operating results, TCE rates and related period to period comparisons
have been retroactively adjusted to reflect this change as if it had been made on January 1, 2009.
a) Fixed-Rate Tanker Sub-Segment
Our fixed-rate tanker sub-segment, a subset of our conventional tanker segment (which includes our
Teekay Tankers Services business unit), includes conventional crude oil and product tankers on
fixed-rate time charters with an original duration of more than one year.
Page 29 of 46
The following table presents our fixed-rate tanker sub-segments operating results and compares its
net revenues (which is a non-GAAP financial measure) to revenues, the most directly comparable GAAP
financial measure. The following table also provides a summary of the changes in calendar-ship-days
by owned and chartered-in vessels for our fixed-rate tanker sub-segment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
(in thousands of U.S. dollars, except |
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
|
calendar-ship-days and percentages) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
% Change |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
% Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
|
95,139 |
|
|
|
100,858 |
|
|
|
(5.7 |
) |
|
|
189,171 |
|
|
|
194,538 |
|
|
|
(2.8 |
) |
Voyage expenses |
|
|
1,381 |
|
|
|
1,758 |
|
|
|
(21.4 |
) |
|
|
2,077 |
|
|
|
3,062 |
|
|
|
(32.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenues |
|
|
93,758 |
|
|
|
99,100 |
|
|
|
(5.4 |
) |
|
|
187,094 |
|
|
|
191,476 |
|
|
|
(2.3 |
) |
Vessel operating expenses |
|
|
31,000 |
|
|
|
21,246 |
|
|
|
45.9 |
|
|
|
56,997 |
|
|
|
43,617 |
|
|
|
30.7 |
|
Time-charter hire expense |
|
|
14,064 |
|
|
|
21,369 |
|
|
|
(34.2 |
) |
|
|
29,203 |
|
|
|
41,479 |
|
|
|
(29.6 |
) |
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
19,367 |
|
|
|
16,526 |
|
|
|
17.2 |
|
|
|
39,184 |
|
|
|
31,598 |
|
|
|
24.0 |
|
General and administrative (1) |
|
|
8,872 |
|
|
|
10,271 |
|
|
|
(13.6 |
) |
|
|
17,851 |
|
|
|
18,753 |
|
|
|
(4.8 |
) |
Loss on sale of vessels and equipment,
net of write-downs |
|
|
401 |
|
|
|
3,280 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,166 |
|
|
|
3,280 |
|
|
|
|
|
Restructuring charge |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
354 |
|
|
|
(98.6 |
) |
|
|
111 |
|
|
|
505 |
|
|
|
(78.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from vessel operations |
|
|
20,049 |
|
|
|
26,054 |
|
|
|
(23.0 |
) |
|
|
42,582 |
|
|
|
52,244 |
|
|
|
(18.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Calendar-Ship-Days |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Owned Vessels |
|
|
2,990 |
|
|
|
2,600 |
|
|
|
15.0 |
|
|
|
5,856 |
|
|
|
5,210 |
|
|
|
12.4 |
|
Chartered-in Vessels |
|
|
688 |
|
|
|
945 |
|
|
|
(27.2 |
) |
|
|
1,399 |
|
|
|
1,775 |
|
|
|
(21.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
3,678 |
|
|
|
3,545 |
|
|
|
3.8 |
|
|
|
7,255 |
|
|
|
6,985 |
|
|
|
3.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes direct general and administrative expenses and indirect general and administrative
expenses (allocated to the fixed-rate tanker sub-segment based on estimated use of corporate
resources). For further discussion, please read Other Operating Results General and
Administrative Expenses. |
The average fleet size of our fixed-rate tanker sub-segment (including vessels chartered-in)
increased for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, compared to the same periods last year,
primarily due to:
|
|
|
the delivery of two new Suezmax tankers in June 2009 (the Suezmax Deliveries); |
|
|
|
the purchase of a 2007-built product tanker which commenced a 10-year fixed-rate
time-charter to Caltex Australia Petroleum Pty Ltd. during September 2009; |
|
|
|
the transfer of five Suezmax tankers from the spot tanker sub-segment between September
2009 and April 2010 (the Suezmax Transfers); and |
|
|
|
the transfer of two Aframax tankers, on a net basis, from the spot tanker sub-segment in
2009 and 2010 upon commencement of long-term time-charters, which have an original term of
one year or more (the Aframax Transfers); |
partially offset by
|
|
|
the transfer of two product tankers to the spot tanker sub-segment in July 2009 and
January 2010 (the Product Tanker Transfers); |
|
|
|
the sale of one product tanker in October 2009 and two Aframax tankers in November 2009
and January 2010 (the Vessel Sales); and |
|
|
|
|
an overall decrease in the number of in-chartered vessels. |
The Aframax Transfers, discussed above, consist of the transfer of two owned vessels and two
in-chartered vessels from the spot tanker sub-segment, and the transfer of one owned vessel and one
in-chartered vessel to the spot tanker sub-segment. The effect of the transactions are to increase
the fixed tanker sub-segments net revenues, time-charter expenses, vessel operating expenses, and
depreciation and amortization expenses.
Net Revenues. Net revenues decreased for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010,
compared to the same periods last year, primarily due to:
|
|
|
decreases of $10.7 million and $20.0 million, respectively, for the three and six months
ended June 30, 2010, from the redelivery of in-chartered vessels to their owners upon the
expiration of the related in-charter contracts; |
|
|
|
decreases of $10.0 million and $19.4 million, respectively, for the three and six months
ended June 30, 2010, from the Vessel Sales; |
|
|
|
decreases of $2.2 million and $6.2 million, respectively, for the three and six months
ended June 30, 2010, from the Product Tanker Transfers; and |
|
|
|
a decrease of $0.9 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, due to
interest-rate adjustments to the daily charter rates under the time-charter contracts for
five of our Suezmax tankers (however, under the terms of the capital lease for these
vessels, we had corresponding decreases in our lease payments, which are reflected as
decreases to interest expense; therefore, these and future interest rate adjustments do not
and will not affect our cash flow or net income); |
Page 30 of 46
partially offset by
|
|
|
increases of $13.0 million and $28.5 million, respectively, for the three and six months
ended June 30, 2010, from the Aframax Transfers and the Suezmax Transfers; |
|
|
|
increases of $4.5 million and $8.7 million, respectively, for the three and six months
ended June 30, 2010, from the Suezmax Deliveries; and |
|
|
|
increases of $3.2 million and $6.3 million, respectively, for the three and six months
ended June 30, 2010, from the purchase of the product tanker. |
Vessel Operating Expenses. Vessel operating expenses increased for the three and six months
ended June 30, 2010, compared to the same periods last year, primarily due to:
|
|
|
increases of $6.2 million and $6.8 million, respectively, for the three and six months
ended June 30, 2010, relating to higher crewing costs, higher insurance renewal rates upon
annual renewal, and timing of repairs and maintenance costs; |
|
|
|
increases of $3.8 million and $7.4 million, respectively, for the three and six months
ended June 30, 2010, from the Aframax Transfers and Suezmax Transfers; |
|
|
|
increases of $1.7 million and $3.6 million, respectively, for the three and six months
ended June 30, 2010, from the purchase of the product tanker; and |
|
|
|
increases of $1.3 million and $1.7 million, respectively, for the three and six months
ended June 30, 2010, from the Suezmax Deliveries; |
partially offset by
|
|
|
decreases of $3.2 million and $6.1 million, respectively, for the three and six months
ended June 30, 2010, from the Vessel Sales. |
Time-Charter Hire Expense. Time-charter hire expense decreased for the three and six months
ended June 30, 2010, compared to the same periods last year, primarily due to a decrease in the
number of in-chartered vessel days as vessels were redelivered to their owners upon expiration of
in-charter contracts.
Depreciation and Amortization. Depreciation and amortization expense increased for the
three and six months ended June 30, 2010, compared to the same periods last year, primarily due:
|
|
|
increases of $4.2 million and $8.5 million, respectively, for the three and six months
ended June 30, 2010, from the Aframax and Suezmax Transfers; |
|
|
|
increases of $1.6 million and $3.1 million, respectively, for the three and six months
ended June 30, 2010, from the Suezmax Deliveries; and |
|
|
|
increases of $0.5 million and $1.1 million, respectively, for the three and six months
ended June 30, 2010, from an increase in capitalized drydocking expenditures being
amortized; |
partially offset by
|
|
|
decreases of $2.6 million and $5.0 million, respectively, for the three and six months
ended June 30, 2010, from the Vessel Sales and Product Tanker Transfers. |
b) Spot Tanker Sub-Segment
Our spot tanker sub-segment, a subset of our conventional tanker segment (which includes our Teekay
Tankers Services business unit), consists of conventional crude oil tankers and product carriers
operating on the spot tanker market or subject to time-charters or contracts of affreightment that
are priced on a spot-market basis or are short-term, fixed-rate contracts. We consider contracts
that have an original term of less than one year in duration to be short-term. Our conventional
Aframax, Suezmax, and large and medium product tankers are among the vessels included in the spot
tanker sub-segment.
Our spot tanker market operations contribute to the volatility of our revenues, cash flow from
operations and net income. Historically, the tanker industry has been cyclical, experiencing
volatility in profitability and asset values resulting from changes in the supply of, and demand
for, vessel capacity. In addition, spot tanker markets historically have exhibited seasonal
variations in charter rates. Spot tanker markets are typically stronger in the winter months as a
result of increased oil consumption in the Northern Hemisphere and unpredictable weather patterns
that tend to disrupt vessel scheduling.
Page 31 of 46
The following table presents our spot tanker sub-segments operating results and compares its net
revenues (which is a non-GAAP financial measure) to revenues, the most directly comparable GAAP
financial measure. The following table also provides a summary of the changes in calendar-ship-days
by owned and chartered-in vessels for our spot tanker sub-segment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
(in thousands of U.S. dollars, except |
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
|
calendar-ship-days and percentages) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
% Change |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
% Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
|
97,286 |
|
|
|
138,454 |
|
|
|
(29.7 |
) |
|
|
217,310 |
|
|
|
361,951 |
|
|
|
(40.0 |
) |
Voyage expenses |
|
|
29,103 |
|
|
|
45,034 |
|
|
|
(35.4 |
) |
|
|
71,681 |
|
|
|
115,699 |
|
|
|
(38.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenues |
|
|
68,183 |
|
|
|
93,420 |
|
|
|
(27.0 |
) |
|
|
145,629 |
|
|
|
246,252 |
|
|
|
(40.9 |
) |
Vessel operating expenses |
|
|
16,509 |
|
|
|
20,082 |
|
|
|
(17.8 |
) |
|
|
42,391 |
|
|
|
46,170 |
|
|
|
(8.2 |
) |
Time-charter hire expense |
|
|
30,609 |
|
|
|
69,387 |
|
|
|
(55.9 |
) |
|
|
61,345 |
|
|
|
153,927 |
|
|
|
(60.1 |
) |
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
18,772 |
|
|
|
21,712 |
|
|
|
(13.5 |
) |
|
|
37,352 |
|
|
|
43,563 |
|
|
|
(14.3 |
) |
General and administrative (1) |
|
|
17,160 |
|
|
|
13,753 |
|
|
|
24.8 |
|
|
|
30,530 |
|
|
|
27,207 |
|
|
|
12.2 |
|
(Gain) loss on sale of vessels and
equipment, net of write-downs |
|
|
357 |
|
|
|
(15,304 |
) |
|
|
(102.3 |
) |
|
|
352 |
|
|
|
(14,346 |
) |
|
|
(102.5 |
) |
Restructuring charge |
|
|
3,646 |
|
|
|
1,083 |
|
|
|
236.7 |
|
|
|
6,879 |
|
|
|
1,546 |
|
|
|
345.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) income from vessel operations |
|
|
(18,870 |
) |
|
|
(17,293 |
) |
|
|
9.1 |
|
|
|
(33,220 |
) |
|
|
(11,815 |
) |
|
|
181.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Calendar-Ship-Days |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Owned Vessels |
|
|
2,113 |
|
|
|
2,453 |
|
|
|
(13.9 |
) |
|
|
4,400 |
|
|
|
5,128 |
|
|
|
(14.2 |
) |
Chartered-in Vessels |
|
|
1,422 |
|
|
|
2,520 |
|
|
|
(43.6 |
) |
|
|
2,859 |
|
|
|
5,392 |
|
|
|
(47.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
3,535 |
|
|
|
4,973 |
|
|
|
(28.9 |
) |
|
|
7,259 |
|
|
|
10,520 |
|
|
|
(31.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes direct general and administrative expenses and indirect general and administrative
expenses (allocated to the spot tanker sub-segment based on estimated use of corporate
resources). For further discussion, please read Other Operating Results General and
Administrative Expenses. |
The average size of our spot tanker fleet (including vessels chartered-in) decreased for the three
and six months ended June 30, 2010, compared to the same periods last year, primarily due to:
|
|
|
the sale of two product tankers in May 2009 (the Spot Product Tanker Sales); |
|
|
|
the transfer of five Suezmax tankers to the fixed-rate tanker sub-segment between
September 2009 and April 2010 (the Spot Suezmax Transfers); |
|
|
|
the net transfer of two Aframax tankers to the fixed-rate tanker sub-segment in 2009 and
2010 (the Spot Aframax Tanker Transfers); and |
|
|
|
|
an overall decrease in the number of in-chartered vessels; |
partially offset by
|
|
|
the delivery of five new Suezmax tankers between January 2009 to December 2009 (the Spot
Suezmax Deliveries); and |
|
|
|
the transfer of two product tankers from the fixed-rate tanker sub-segment in July 2009
and January 2010 (the Product Tanker Transfers). |
Tanker Market and TCE Rates
The average freight rates for crude oil tankers during the second quarter of 2010 were relatively
unchanged from the previous quarter, in contrast to the seasonal decline which typically occurs at
the end of the winter season. Second quarter tanker rate strength was primarily driven by the
continued recovery in global oil demand, led by China, where crude oil imports reached a record
high of 5.4 million barrels per day (or mb/d) in June 2010. Large crude oil tanker rates were aided
by the temporary removal from the active trading fleet of approximately 25 Very Large Crude
Carriers to be used as floating storage off the coast of Iran while the Suezmax sector was
supported by strong Asian demand for crude oil sourced from West Africa, a relatively ton-mile
intensive trade route.
The world tanker fleet grew by 11.9 million deadweight tonnes (or mdwt), or approximately 2.7%, in
the first half of 2010. This compares to fleet growth of 20.3 mdwt, or 5.0%, in the same period of
2009. A higher level of fleet removals compared to recent years has dampened tanker fleet growth in
2010 to date. In total, 10.6 mdwt of tanker capacity was removed for scrapping or conversion in the
first half of the year. The ongoing phase-out of the worlds remaining single-hull tankers should
continue to dampen tanker fleet growth in the near- to medium-term. Tanker freight rates have
declined during the third quarter to date due to seasonal factors such as increased oil field
maintenance in the North Sea, and the unwinding of floating storage contracts which has the effect
of increasing the actively trading tanker fleet.
In July 2010, the International Monetary Fund raised its forecast for global GDP growth in 2010
from 4.2% to 4.6%, its fifth upward revision since its April 2009 forecast of 1.9% GDP growth. The
International Energy Agency is forecasting 2010 global oil demand of 86.5 mb/d which constitutes
growth of 1.8 mb/d, or 2.1%, over 2009 levels, the fastest rate of oil demand growth since 2004.
China is expected to account for approximately 40% of global oil demand growth this year.
Page 32 of 46
The following table outlines the TCE rates earned by the vessels in our spot tanker sub-segment for
the three and months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, and excludes the realized results of synthetic
time-charters (or STCs) and forward freight agreements (or FFAs), which we enter into at times as
hedges against a portion of our exposure to spot tanker market rates or for speculative purposes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, 2010 |
|
|
June 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
Net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
TCE |
|
|
Net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
TCE |
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
|
Revenue |
|
|
Rate |
|
|
Revenues |
|
|
Revenue |
|
|
Rate |
|
Vessel Type |
|
($000s) |
|
|
Days |
|
|
$ |
|
|
($000s) |
|
|
Days |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Spot Fleet (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Suezmax Tankers |
|
|
29,797 |
|
|
|
976 |
|
|
|
30,528 |
|
|
|
27,633 |
|
|
|
1,099 |
|
|
|
25,139 |
|
Aframax Tankers |
|
|
32,300 |
|
|
|
1,787 |
|
|
|
18,076 |
|
|
|
53,324 |
|
|
|
3,106 |
|
|
|
17,165 |
|
Large/Medium Product Tankers |
|
|
7,233 |
|
|
|
511 |
|
|
|
14,147 |
|
|
|
11,041 |
|
|
|
663 |
|
|
|
16,643 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other (2) |
|
|
(1,147 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,422 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Totals |
|
|
68,183 |
|
|
|
3,274 |
|
|
|
20,824 |
|
|
|
93,420 |
|
|
|
4,868 |
|
|
|
19,186 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, 2010 |
|
|
June 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
Net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
TCE |
|
|
Net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
TCE |
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
|
Revenue |
|
|
Rate |
|
|
Revenues |
|
|
Revenue |
|
|
Rate |
|
Vessel Type |
|
($000s) |
|
|
Days |
|
|
$ |
|
|
($000s) |
|
|
Days |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Spot Fleet (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Suezmax Tankers |
|
|
59,273 |
|
|
|
1,945 |
|
|
|
30,474 |
|
|
|
67,910 |
|
|
|
2,111 |
|
|
|
32,166 |
|
Aframax Tankers |
|
|
74,492 |
|
|
|
3,981 |
|
|
|
18,712 |
|
|
|
146,179 |
|
|
|
6,727 |
|
|
|
21,729 |
|
Large/Medium Product Tankers |
|
|
14,355 |
|
|
|
1,006 |
|
|
|
14,265 |
|
|
|
30,952 |
|
|
|
1,540 |
|
|
|
20,093 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other (2) |
|
|
(2,491 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,211 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Totals |
|
|
145,629 |
|
|
|
6,932 |
|
|
|
21,008 |
|
|
|
246,252 |
|
|
|
10,378 |
|
|
|
23,726 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Spot fleet includes short-term time-charters and fixed-rate contracts of affreightment
less than 1 year. |
|
(2) |
|
Includes the cost of spot in-charter vessels servicing fixed-rate contract of
affreightment cargoes, the amortization of in-process revenue contracts and the cost of
fuel while offhire. |
Spot tanker rates increased for the three months ended June 30, 2010, and declined for the six
months ended June 30, 2010, compared to the same periods last year. The TCE rates for the three and
six months ended June 30, 2010 generally reflect continued weak global oil demand caused by the
global economic slowdown. Partially in response to this slowdown, we reduced our exposure to the
spot tanker market through the sale of certain vessels that were trading on the spot market,
entered into fixed-rate time charters for certain tankers that were previously trading in the spot
market, and re-delivered in-chartered vessels. This shift away from our spot tanker employment to
fixed-rate employment provided increased cash flow stability through a volatile spot tanker market.
Net Revenues. Net revenues decreased for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010,
compared to the same periods last year, primarily due to:
|
|
|
decreases of $17.6 million and $43.1 million, respectively, for the three and six months
ended June 30, 2010, from a decrease in the number of in-chartered vessels as we continued
to reduce our exposure to the spot tanker market; |
|
|
|
a decrease of $42.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010, primarily from
decreases in our average spot tanker TCE rate due to spot tanker market weakness; |
|
|
|
decreases of $9.5 million and $27.0 million, respectively, for the three and six months
ended June 30, 2010, from the Spot Aframax and Spot Suezmax Transfers; |
|
|
|
decreases of $2.5 million and $2.8 million, respectively, for the three and six months
ended June 30, 2010, from a change in the number of days our vessels were off-hire due to
regularly scheduled maintenance; and |
|
|
|
decreases of $1.3 million and $6.7 million, respectively, for the three and six months
ended June 30, 2010, from the Spot Product Tanker Sales; |
Page 33 of 46
partially offset by
|
|
|
increases of $8.9 million and $17.2 million, respectively, for the three and six months
ended June 30, 2010, from the Spot Suezmax Deliveries; and |
|
|
|
increases of $2.1 million and $4.0 million, respectively, for the three and six months
ended June 30, 2010, from the Product Tanker
Transfers. |
Vessel Operating Expenses. Vessel operating expenses decreased for the three and six months
ended June 30, 2010, compared to the same periods last year, primarily due to:
|
|
|
decreases of $3.1 million and $5.8 million, respectively, for the three and six months
ended June 30, 2010, from the Spot Aframax Transfers and Suezmax Transfers; |
|
|
|
decreases of $2.8 million and $2.4 million, respectively, for the three and six months
ended June 30, 2010, from lower crewing costs due to the positive impact of foreign
currency exchange rate fluctuations, a reduction in the number of crew on some vessels, as
well as lower repairs and maintenance, and consumable costs resulting from the review and
renegotiation of several key supplier contracts during 2009; and |
|
|
|
decreases of $0.6 million and $1.8 million, respectively, for the three and six months
ended June 30, 2010, from the Spot Product Tanker Sales; |
partially offset by
|
|
|
increases of $2.0 million and $4.0 million, respectively, for the three and six months
ended June 30, 2010, from the Spot Suezmax Deliveries; and |
|
|
|
increases of $0.8 million and $2.2 million, respectively, for the three and six months
ended June 30, 2010, from the Product Tanker Transfers. |
Time-Charter Hire Expense. Time-charter hire expense decreased for the three and six months
ended June 30, 2010, compared to the same periods last year, primarily due to the decrease in the
number of in-chartered vessels due to redelivery of these vessels to their owners upon expiration
of in-charter contracts.
Depreciation and Amortization. Depreciation and amortization expense decreased for the
three and six months ended June 30, 2010, compared to the same periods last year, primarily due to:
|
|
|
decreases of $4.2 million and $8.4 million, respectively, for the three and six months
ended June 30, 2010, from the Spot Aframax and Spot Suezmax Transfers; and |
|
|
|
decreases of $0.3 million and $1.2 million, respectively, for the three and six months
ended June 30, 2010, from the Spot Product Tanker Sales; |
partially offset by
|
|
|
increases of $1.7 million and $4.0 million, respectively, for the three and six months
ended June 30, 2010, from the Spot Suezmax Tanker Deliveries. |
Restructuring Charges. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, we incurred
restructuring charges of $3.6 million and $6.9 million, respectively, primarily relating to costs
incurred for certain vessel crew changes relating to three of our vessels. We changed the crew
operations being managed by an external management company to our own international seafarers.
Other Operating Results
The following table compares our other operating results for the three and six months ended June
30, 2010 and 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
(in thousands of U.S. dollars, except |
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
|
percentages) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
% Change |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
% Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General and administrative |
|
|
(50,256 |
) |
|
|
(49,220 |
) |
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
|
(98,347 |
) |
|
|
(96,928 |
) |
|
|
1.5 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(33,926 |
) |
|
|
(37,280 |
) |
|
|
(9.0 |
) |
|
|
(66,078 |
) |
|
|
(81,470 |
) |
|
|
(18.9 |
) |
Interest income |
|
|
2,209 |
|
|
|
5,023 |
|
|
|
(56.0 |
) |
|
|
6,483 |
|
|
|
11,701 |
|
|
|
(44.6 |
) |
Realized and unrealized (losses) gains on
non-designated derivative instruments |
|
|
(219,225 |
) |
|
|
157,485 |
|
|
|
(239.2 |
) |
|
|
(307,072 |
) |
|
|
204,730 |
|
|
|
(250.0 |
) |
Equity (loss) income from joint ventures |
|
|
(21,827 |
) |
|
|
27,380 |
|
|
|
(179.7 |
) |
|
|
(24,493 |
) |
|
|
38,802 |
|
|
|
(163.1 |
) |
Foreign exchange gain (loss) |
|
|
27,488 |
|
|
|
(25,165 |
) |
|
|
(209.2 |
) |
|
|
56,514 |
|
|
|
(13,853 |
) |
|
|
(508.0 |
) |
Loss on bond repurchase |
|
|
(537 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12,645 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income |
|
|
1,277 |
|
|
|
3,823 |
|
|
|
(66.6 |
) |
|
|
3,699 |
|
|
|
6,481 |
|
|
|
(42.9 |
) |
Income tax recovery (expense) |
|
|
5,147 |
|
|
|
4,598 |
|
|
|
11.9 |
|
|
|
12,454 |
|
|
|
(1,270 |
) |
|
|
(1,080.6 |
) |
Page 34 of 46
General and Administrative. General and administrative expenses increased to $50.3 million
and $98.3 million, respectively, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, from $49.2
million and $96.9 million, respectively, for the same periods last year, primarily due to:
|
|
|
increases of $2.1 million and $3.1 million, respectively, for the three and six months
ended June 30, 2010, associated with our equity-based compensation and long-term incentive
program for management; |
|
|
|
an increase of $1.7 million in compensation for the six months ended June 30, 2010 for
shore-based employees and other personnel expenses primarily due to the weakening of the
U.S. dollar against the Canadian dollar and the increase in the number of personnel,
compared to the same period last year; and |
|
|
|
increases of $0.7 million and $0.9 million, respectively, for the three and six months
ended June 30, 2010, from timing of travel costs; |
partially offset by
|
|
|
decreases of $0.7 million and $2.3 million, respectively, for the three and six months
ended June 30, 2010, in corporate-related expenses; and |
|
|
|
decreases of $0.3 million and $2.0 million, respectively, for the three and six months
ended June 30, 2010, in unrealized and realized losses on foreign currency forward
contracts. |
During 2009, we initiated a company-wide review of our general and administrative expenses. We
implemented various cost reduction initiatives, including the relocation of shore-based positions
to lower cost jurisdictions. These initiatives, as well as a reduction in business development
activities, also contributed to the decreases in corporate-related expenses compared to the prior
periods.
Interest Expense. Interest expense decreased to $33.9 million and $66.1 million,
respectively, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, from $37.3 million and $81.5
million, respectively, for the same periods last year, primarily due to:
|
|
|
decreases of $7.1 million and $21.7 million, respectively, for the three and six months
ended June 30, 2010, primarily due to repayments of debt drawn under long-term revolving
credit facilities and term loans and decreases in interest rates relating to long-term
debt, which is explained in further detail below; |
|
|
|
decreases of $2.1 million and $3.4 million, respectively, for the three and six months
ended June 30, 2010, from the scheduled loan payments on the LNG carrier, the Catalunya
Spirit, and scheduled capital lease repayments on the LNG carrier, the Madrid Spirit (the
Madrid Spirit is financed pursuant to a Spanish tax lease arrangement, under which we
borrowed under a term loan and deposited the proceeds into a restricted cash account and
entered into a capital lease for the vessel; as a result, this decrease in interest expense
from the capital lease is offset by a corresponding decrease in the interest income from
restricted cash); and |
|
|
|
decreases of $0.2 million and $0.4 million, respectively, for the three and six months
ended June 30, 2010, from declining interest rates on our five Suezmax tanker capital lease
obligations; |
partially offset by
|
|
|
increases of $6.0 million and $10.1 million, respectively, for the three and six months
ended June 30, 2010, primarily due to the effect of the public offering of $450 million
8.5% senior unsecured notes due January 2020, partially offset by the repurchase of a
majority of our 8.875% senior notes due 2011 in January 2010. |
The debt repayments under long-term revolving credit facilities that contributed to our decreased
interest expense were primarily funded with net proceeds from the issuance of equity securities by
our publicly-listed subsidiaries and from the sale of assets to third parties. When one of our
publicly-listed subsidiaries acquires an asset from Teekay Corporation, a significant portion of
the acquisition typically has been financed through the issuance to the public of equity securities
by the subsidiary. To the extent that there are no immediate investment opportunities, the proceeds
from the issuance of these equity offerings and from the sale of assets to third parties generally
have been applied towards debt reduction.
Interest Income. Interest income decreased to $2.2 million and $6.5 million, respectively,
for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, from $5.0 million and $11.7 million,
respectively, for the same periods last year, primarily due to:
|
|
|
decreases of $1.1 million and $2.8 million, respectively, for the three and six months
ended June 30, 2010, due to decreases in LIBOR rates relating to the restricted cash in
Teekay Nakilat Corporation (or Teekay Nakilat) that is used to fund capital lease payments
for its three LNG carriers; |
|
|
|
decreases of $0.9 million and $1.2 million, respectively, for the three and six months
ended June 30, 2010, primarily from scheduled capital lease repayments on one of our LNG
carriers which was funded from restricted cash deposits; and |
|
|
|
decreases of $0.8 million and $1.2 million, respectively, for the three and six months
ended June 30, 2010, primarily relating to lower interest rates earned on our cash
balances. |
Page 35 of 46
Realized and unrealized (losses) gains on non-designated derivative instruments. Net
realized and unrealized (losses) gains on non-designated derivatives was a loss of $219.2 million
and $307.1 million, respectively, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, compared to net
realized and unrealized gain on non-designated derivatives of $157.5 million and $204.7 million,
respectively, for the same periods last year, as detailed in the table below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
(in thousands of U.S. Dollars) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Realized (losses) gains relating to: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swaps |
|
|
(40,634 |
) |
|
|
(29,528 |
) |
|
|
(79,220 |
) |
|
|
(50,416 |
) |
Foreign currency forward contracts |
|
|
(1,022 |
) |
|
|
(2,448 |
) |
|
|
(1,345 |
) |
|
|
(7,945 |
) |
Forward freight agreements and bunker fuel swap contracts |
|
|
(2,207 |
) |
|
|
4,294 |
|
|
|
(4,356 |
) |
|
|
2,005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(43,863 |
) |
|
|
(27,682 |
) |
|
|
(84,921 |
) |
|
|
(56,356 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized (losses) gains relating to: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swaps |
|
|
(164,032 |
) |
|
|
182,471 |
|
|
|
(209,838 |
) |
|
|
245,447 |
|
Foreign currency forward contracts |
|
|
(8,836 |
) |
|
|
6,416 |
|
|
|
(12,053 |
) |
|
|
13,167 |
|
Forward freight agreements and bunker fuel swap contracts
and other |
|
|
(2,494 |
) |
|
|
(3,720 |
) |
|
|
(260 |
) |
|
|
2,472 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(175,362 |
) |
|
|
185,167 |
|
|
|
(222,151 |
) |
|
|
261,086 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total realized and unrealized (losses) gains on
non-designated derivative instruments |
|
|
(219,225 |
) |
|
|
157,485 |
|
|
|
(307,072 |
) |
|
|
204,730 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign Exchange Gain (Loss). Foreign currency exchange gain was $27.5 million and $56.5
million, respectively, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, compared to a foreign
currency exchange loss of $(25.2) million and $(13.9) million, respectively, for the same periods
last year. The changes in our foreign exchange gains or loss was primarily attributable to the
revaluation of our Euro-denominated term loans at the end of each period for financial reporting
purposes, and substantially all of the gains or losses are unrealized. Gains reflect a stronger
U.S. Dollar against the Euro on the date of revaluation. Losses reflect a weaker U.S. Dollar
against the Euro on the date of revaluation. Currently, our Euro-denominated revenues generally
approximate our Euro-denominated operating expenses and our Euro-denominated interest and principal
repayments.
Equity (Loss) Income from Joint Ventures. Equity (loss) income from joint ventures were
losses of $(21.8) million and $(24.5) million, respectively, for the three and six months ended
June 30, 2010, compared to gains of $27.4 million and $38.8 million for the same periods last year.
The income or loss was primarily comprised of our share of the Angola LNG Project earnings (losses)
and the operations of the four RasGas 3 LNG Carriers. For the three and six months ended June 30,
2010, $(24.6) million and $(30.7) million, respectively, of the equity loss relates to our share of
unrealized losses on interest rate swaps, compared to unrealized gains on interest rate swaps of
$25.5 million and $33.3 million, respectively, included in equity income for the same periods last
year.
Income Tax Recovery (Expense). Income tax recovery (expense) were recoveries of $5.1
million and $12.5 million, respectively, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, compared
to a recovery (expense) of $4.6 million and $(1.3) million, respectively, for the same periods last
year. The increases to income tax recoveries of $0.5 million and $13.7 million, respectively, were
primarily due to an increase in deferred income tax recovery relating to unrealized foreign
exchange translation losses.
Other Income. Other income of $1.3 million and $3.7 million, respectively, for the three
and six months ended June 30, 2010, was primarily comprised of leasing income from our volatile
organic compound emissions equipment and the amortization of certain restructuring gains.
Net (Loss) Income. As a result of the foregoing factors, net loss amounted to $(145.4)
million and $(131.5) million, respectively, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010,
compared to net income of $193.6 million and $298.4 million, for the same periods last year.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Liquidity and Cash Needs
Our primary sources of liquidity are cash and cash equivalents, cash flows provided by our
operations and our undrawn credit facilities. Our short-term liquidity requirements are for the
payment of operating expenses, debt servicing costs, dividends, the scheduled repayments of
long-term debt, as well as funding our working capital requirements. As at June 30, 2010, our total
cash and cash equivalents totaled $641.5 million, compared to $422.5 million as at December 31,
2009. Our total liquidity, including cash and undrawn credit facilities, was $2.2 billion as at
June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009.
Our spot tanker market operations contribute to the volatility of our net operating cash flow.
Historically, the tanker industry has been cyclical, experiencing volatility in profitability and
asset values resulting from changes in the supply of, and demand for, vessel capacity. In addition,
spot tanker markets historically have exhibited seasonal variations in charter rates. Spot tanker
markets are typically stronger in the winter months as a result of increased oil consumption in the
Northern Hemisphere and unpredictable weather patterns that tend to disrupt vessel scheduling.
As at June 30, 2010, we had $284.6 million of scheduled debt repayments and $39.6 million of
capital lease obligations coming due within the next 12 months. We believe that our existing cash
and cash equivalents and undrawn long-term borrowings, in addition to other sources of cash such as
cash from operations, will be sufficient to meet our existing liquidity needs for at least the next
12 months.
In March 2010, we signed an agreement with the operator (Britoil plc) of the Foinaven FPSO unit and
Foinaven co-venturers (Britoil plc and certain of its affiliates and Marathon Petroleum) to amend
the operating contract for the FPSO unit. As a result of the amended agreement, based on crude oil prices
at the time the amended agreement was signed, we expect that under the amended contract the Foinaven FPSO unit will
generate incremental operating cash flow of approximately $30 million to $40 million per annum over
the anticipated life of the contract period.
Page 36 of 46
Our operations are capital intensive. We finance the purchase of our vessels primarily through a
combination of borrowings from commercial banks or our joint venture partners, the issuance of
equity securities and cash generated from operations. In addition, we may use sale and lease-back
arrangements as a source of long-term liquidity. Occasionally, we use our revolving credit
facilities to temporarily finance capital expenditures until longer-term financing is obtained, at
which time we typically use all or a portion of the proceeds from the longer-term financings to
prepay outstanding amounts under the revolving credit facilities. As of June 30, 2010, pre-arranged
debt facilities were in place for all of our then remaining capital commitments relating to our
portion of newbuildings currently on order. Our pre-arranged newbuilding debt facilities are in
addition to our undrawn credit facilities. We continue to consider strategic opportunities,
including the acquisition of additional vessels and expansion into new markets. We may choose to
pursue such opportunities through internal growth, joint ventures or business acquisitions. We
intend to finance any future acquisitions through various sources of capital, including
internally-generated cash flow, existing credit facilities, additional debt borrowings, or the
issuance of additional debt or equity securities or any combination thereof.
As at June 30, 2010, our revolving credit facilities provided for borrowings of up to $3.4 billion,
of which $1.6 billion was undrawn. The amount available under these revolving credit facilities
reduces by $103.4 million (remainder of 2010), $239.2 million (2011), $349.2 million (2012), $756.1
million (2013), $770.4 million (2014) and $1.2 billion (thereafter). The revolving credit
facilities are collateralized by first-priority mortgages granted on 63 of our vessels, together
with other related security, and are guaranteed by Teekay or our subsidiaries.
Our outstanding term loans reduce in monthly, quarterly or semi-annual payments with varying
maturities through 2023. Some of the term loans also have bullet or balloon repayments at maturity
and are collateralized by first-priority mortgages granted on 31 of our vessels, together with
other related security, and are generally guaranteed by Teekay or our subsidiaries. Our unsecured
8.875% Senior Notes are due July 15, 2011. In January 2010, we completed a public offering of $450
million senior unsecured notes due 2020, which bear interest at a rate of 8.5% per year. We used
the offering proceeds to repurchase $160.5 million of our outstanding 8.875% Senior Notes due July
15, 2011, $150 million of the proceeds to repay amounts under a term loan and the remainder of the
offering proceeds to repay a portion of our outstanding debt under one of our revolving credit
facilities.
Among other matters, our long-term debt agreements generally provide for the maintenance of certain
vessel market value-to-loan ratios and minimum consolidated financial covenants and prepayment
privileges, in some cases with penalties. Certain of the loan agreements require that we maintain a
minimum level of free cash and as at June 30, 2010, this amount was $100.0 million. Certain of the
loan agreements also require that we maintain an aggregate level of free liquidity and undrawn
revolving credit lines (with at least six months to maturity) of at least 7.5% of total debt and as
at June 30, 2010, this amount was $231.8 million. We were in compliance with all loan covenants at
June 30, 2010.
We conduct our funding and treasury activities within corporate policies designed to minimize
borrowing costs and maximize investment returns while maintaining the safety of the funds and
appropriate levels of liquidity for our purposes. We hold cash and cash equivalents primarily in
U.S. Dollars, with some balances held in Japanese Yen, Singapore Dollars, Canadian Dollars,
Australian Dollars, British Pounds, Euros and Norwegian Kroner.
We are exposed to market risk from foreign currency fluctuations and changes in interest rates,
spot tanker market rates for vessels and bunker fuel prices. We use forward foreign currency
contracts, interest rate swaps, forward freight agreements and bunker fuel swap contracts to manage
currency, interest rate, spot tanker rates and bunker fuel price risks. With the exception of some
of our forward freight agreements, we do not use these financial instruments for trading or
speculative purposes. Please read Item 3 Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market
Risk.
The passage of any climate control legislation or other regulatory initiatives that restrict
emissions of greenhouse gases could have a significant financial and operational impact on our
business, which we cannot predict with certainty at this time. Such regulatory measures could
increase our costs related to operating and maintaining our vessels and require us to install new
emission controls, acquire allowances or pay taxes related to our greenhouse gas emissions, or
administer and manage a greenhouse gas emissions program. In addition, increased regulation of
greenhouse gases may, in the long term, lead to reduced demand for oil and reduced demand for our
services.
Cash Flows
The following table summarizes our cash and cash equivalents provided by (used for) operating,
financing and investing activities for the periods presented:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
(in thousands of U.S. Dollars) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Net operating cash flows |
|
|
220,314 |
|
|
|
229,268 |
|
Net financing cash flows |
|
|
59,562 |
|
|
|
(444,055 |
) |
Net investing cash flows |
|
|
(60,919 |
) |
|
|
(126,707 |
) |
Page 37 of 46
Operating Cash Flows
Our net cash flow from operating activities fluctuates primarily as a result of tanker utilization
and TCE rates, changes in interest rates, fluctuations in working capital balances, timing and
amount of drydocking expenditures, repairs and maintenance activities, vessel additions and
dispositions, and foreign currency rates. Our exposure to the spot tanker market contributes
significantly to fluctuations in operating cash flows historically as a result of highly cyclical
spot tanker rates and more recently as a result of the reduction in global oil demand that was
caused by a slow-down in global economic activity that began in the latter part of 2008.
Net cash flow from operating activities decreased to $220.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010, from $229.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009. This decrease was primarily due to a reduction in the net cash flow generated by our spot tanker sub-segment and an increase in interest expense paid. Net cash flow generated by our spot tanker sub-segment decreased due to a reduction in the size of our spot tanker sub-segment fleet and a reduction in the average TCE rate earned by these vessels during the six months ended June 30, 2010, compared to the same period last year. Our interest expense paid increased as a result of an increase in realized losses on our interest rate swaps partially offset by a decrease in interest expense paid due to a reduction in the outstanding balances on our revolving credit facilities and lower interest rates. The decrease in net cash flow from operating activities from our spot tanker sub-segment and increase in interest expense paid was partially offset by an increase in net operating cash flow from our other three segments which includes the two payments totaling $59.2 million related to the Foinaven FPSO contract amendment, and a decrease in drydocking expenditures due to timing of scheduled vessel drydocks.
The results of our spot tanker segment, liquefied gas segment, FPSO segment and shuttle tanker and
FSO segment, and the reduction in interest costs are explained in further detail in Results of
Operations. Our current financial resources, together with cash anticipated to be generated from
operations, are expected to be adequate to meet requirements in the next year.
Financing Cash Flows
During the six months ended June 30, 2010, our net proceeds from long-term debt net of debt
issuance costs were $833.2 million. Our repayments and prepayments of long-term debt were $852.0
million during the six months ended June 30, 2010.
During March 2010, Teekay Offshore completed a public offering of approximately 5.1 million common
units (including 660,000 units issued upon the exercise of the underwriters overallotment option)
at a price of $19.48 per unit, for gross proceeds of $100.6 million (including the general
partners $2.0 million proportionate capital contribution). Please read Item 1 Financial
Statements: Note 5 Equity Offerings by Subsidiaries.
During April 2010, Teekay Tankers completed a public offering of approximately 8.8 million common
shares (including 1,079,500 common shares issued upon the partial exercise of the underwriters
overallotment option) at a price of $12.25 per share, for gross proceeds of $107.5 million. Teekay
Tankers issued to us 2.6 million of unregistered common shares valued on a per-share basis at the
public offering price of $12.25. Please read Item 1 Financial Statements: Note 5 Equity
Offerings by Subsidiaries.
During July 2010, Teekay LNG completed a direct equity placement of approximately 1.7 million
common units at the price of $29.18 per unit, for net proceeds of $51.0 million (including its
general partners $1.0 proportionate capital contribution).
During August 2010, Teekay Offshore completed a public offering of approximately 6.0 million common
units (including 787,500 units issued upon the exercise of the underwriters overallotment option)
at the price of $22.15 per unit, for gross proceeds of $136.5 million (including the general
partners $2.7 million proportionate capital contribution). Please read Item 1 Financial
Statements: Note 20 Subsequent Events.
Dividends paid during the six months ended June 30, 2010, were $46.0 million, or $0.6325 per share.
Subject to financial results and declaration by the Board of Directors, we currently intend to
continue to declare and pay a regular quarterly dividend in such amount per share on our common
stock. We have paid a quarterly dividend since 1995.
Distributions from subsidiaries to non-controlling interests during the six months ended June 30,
2010, were $73.7 million.
Investing Cash Flows
During the six months ended June 30, 2010, we:
|
|
|
incurred capital expenditures for vessels and equipment of $92.4 million, primarily for
capitalized vessel modifications and shipyard construction installment payments on our
newbuilding shuttle tankers; and |
|
|
|
received net proceeds of $27.6 million from the sale of two Aframax tankers. |
Page 38 of 46
Commitments and Contingencies
The following table summarizes our long-term contractual obligations as at June 30, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remainder of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In millions of U.S. Dollars |
|
Total |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 and 2012 |
|
|
2013 and 2014 |
|
|
Beyond 2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Dollar-Denominated Obligations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt (1) |
|
|
4,021.4 |
|
|
|
109.3 |
|
|
|
599.7 |
|
|
|
1,319.1 |
|
|
|
1,993.3 |
|
Chartered-in vessels (operating leases) |
|
|
512.4 |
|
|
|
107.1 |
|
|
|
271.6 |
|
|
|
90.9 |
|
|
|
42.8 |
|
Commitments under capital leases (2) |
|
|
209.7 |
|
|
|
11.8 |
|
|
|
197.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments under capital leases (3) |
|
|
1,037.3 |
|
|
|
12.0 |
|
|
|
48.0 |
|
|
|
48.0 |
|
|
|
929.3 |
|
Commitments under operating leases (4) |
|
|
470.2 |
|
|
|
12.5 |
|
|
|
50.1 |
|
|
|
50.2 |
|
|
|
357.4 |
|
Newbuilding installments (5) (6) |
|
|
633.4 |
|
|
|
250.4 |
|
|
|
383.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset retirement obligation |
|
|
21.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total U.S. Dollar-denominated obligations |
|
|
6,905.6 |
|
|
|
503.1 |
|
|
|
1,550.3 |
|
|
|
1,508.2 |
|
|
|
3,344.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Euro-Denominated Obligations: (7) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt (8) |
|
|
347.0 |
|
|
|
5.6 |
|
|
|
200.6 |
|
|
|
13.9 |
|
|
|
126.9 |
|
Commitments under capital leases (2) (9) |
|
|
112.2 |
|
|
|
32.9 |
|
|
|
79.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Euro-denominated obligations |
|
|
459.2 |
|
|
|
38.5 |
|
|
|
279.9 |
|
|
|
13.9 |
|
|
|
126.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
7,364.8 |
|
|
|
541.6 |
|
|
|
1,830.2 |
|
|
|
1,522.1 |
|
|
|
3,470.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Excludes expected interest payments of $47.9 million (remainder of 2010), $183.3
million (2011 and 2012), $151.0 million (2013 and 2014) and $293.2 million (beyond 2014).
Expected interest payments are based on the existing interest rates (fixed-rate loans) and
LIBOR plus margins that ranged up to 3.25% at June 30, 2010 (variable-rate loans). The
expected interest payments do not reflect the effect of related interest rate swaps that we
have used as an economic hedge of certain of our floating-rate debt. |
|
(2) |
|
Includes, in addition to lease payments, amounts we are required to pay to purchase
certain leased vessels at the end of the lease terms. We are obligated to purchase five of
our existing Suezmax tankers upon the termination of the related capital leases, which will
occur in 2011. The purchase price will be based on the unamortized portion of the vessel
construction financing costs for the vessels, which we expect to range from $31.7 million
to $39.2 million per vessel. We expect to satisfy the purchase price by assuming the
existing vessel financing, although we may be required to obtain separate debt or equity
financing to complete the purchases if the lenders do not consent to our assuming the
financing obligations. We are also obligated to purchase one of our existing LNG carriers
upon the termination of the related capital leases on December 31, 2011. The purchase
obligation has been fully funded with restricted cash deposits. Please read Item 1
Financial Statements: Note 9 Capital Lease Obligations and Restricted Cash. |
|
(3) |
|
Existing restricted cash deposits of $478.1 million, together with the interest earned
on the deposits, are expected to be sufficient to repay the remaining amounts we currently
owe under the lease arrangements. |
|
(4) |
|
We have corresponding leases whereby we are the lessor and expect to receive $433.6
million for these leases from 2010 to 2029. |
|
(5) |
|
Represents remaining construction costs (excluding capitalized interest and
miscellaneous construction costs) for one LPG carrier, two multi-gas carriers and four
shuttle tankers as of June 30, 2010. Please read Item 1 Financial Statements: Note 11(a)
Commitments and Contingencies Vessels Under Construction. |
|
(6) |
|
We also have a 33% interest in a joint venture that has entered into agreements for the
construction of four LNG carriers. As at June 30, 2010, the remaining commitments on these
vessels, excluding capitalized interest and other miscellaneous construction costs, totaled
$724.8 million of which our share is $239.2 million. Please read Item 1 Financial
Statements: Note 11(b) Commitments and Contingencies Joint Ventures. |
|
(7) |
|
Euro-denominated obligations are presented in U.S. Dollars and have been converted
using the prevailing exchange rate as at June 30, 2010. |
|
(8) |
|
Excludes expected interest payments of $1.9 million (remainder of 2010), $6.4 million
(2011 and 2012), $3.1 million (2013 and 2014) and $8.6 million (beyond 2014). Expected
interest payments are based on EURIBOR at June 30, 2010, plus margins that ranged up to
0.66%, as well as the prevailing U.S. Dollar/Euro exchange rate as of June 30, 2010. The
expected interest payments do not reflect the effect of related interest rate swaps that we
have used as an economic hedge of certain of our floating-rate debt. |
|
(9) |
|
Existing restricted cash deposits of $105.8 million, together with the interest earned
on these deposits, are expected to equal the remaining amounts we owe under the lease
arrangement, including our obligation to purchase the vessel at the end of the lease term. |
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We have no off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have, a current or
future material effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or
expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources.
Page 39 of 46
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES
We prepare our consolidated financial statements in accordance with GAAP, which require us to make
estimates in the application of our accounting policies based on our best assumptions, judgments
and opinions. On a regular basis, management reviews the accounting policies, assumptions,
estimates and judgments to ensure that our consolidated financial statements are presented fairly
and in accordance with GAAP. However, because future events and their effects cannot be determined
with certainty, actual results could differ from our assumptions and estimates, and such
differences could be material. Accounting estimates and assumptions that we consider to be the most
critical to an understanding of our financial statements because they inherently involve
significant judgments and uncertainties, are described in Item 5 Operating and Financial Review
and Prospects in our Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2009.
Goodwill
As of June 30, 2010, we had four reporting units with goodwill attributable to them. As of the date
of this filing, we do not believe that there is a reasonable possibility that the goodwill
attributable to our other four reporting units with goodwill attributable to them might be impaired
within the next year.
However, certain factors that impact our goodwill impairment tests are inherently difficult to
forecast and as such we cannot provide any assurances that an impairment will or will not occur in
the future. An assessment for impairment involves a number of assumptions and estimates that are
based on factors that are beyond our control. These are discussed in more detail in the following
section entitled Forward-Looking Statements.
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This Report on Form 6-K for the six months ended June 30, 2010, contains certain forward-looking
statements (as such term is defined in Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended) concerning future events and our operations, performance and financial condition,
including, in particular, statements regarding:
|
|
our future growth prospects; |
|
|
tanker market fundamentals, including the balance of supply and demand in the tanker market
and spot tanker charter rates; |
|
|
the impact of the Foinaven amended contract on our future operating results; |
|
|
the expected return on our first priority ship mortgage loans; |
|
|
our belief that the master time charter arrangement with Statoil will provide more
seasonally stable cash flows and predictability and the use of the Aframax newbuilding shuttle
tankers under the new arrangement; |
|
|
the sufficiency of working capital for short-term liquidity requirements; |
|
|
future capital expenditure commitments and the financing requirements for such commitments; |
|
|
delivery dates of and financing for newbuildings, and the commencement of service of
newbuildings under long-term time-charter contracts; |
|
|
potential newbuilding order cancellations; |
|
|
construction and delivery delays in the general tanker industry; |
|
|
the expected timing and costs of upgrades to any vessels; |
|
|
the future valuation of goodwill; |
|
|
our compliance with covenants under our credit facilities; |
|
|
our hedging activities relating to foreign currency exchange and interest rate risks; |
|
|
the adequacy of restricted cash deposits to fund capital lease obligations; |
|
|
the effectiveness of our risk management policies and procedures and the ability of the
counter-parties to our derivative contracts to fulfill their contractual obligations; |
|
|
the condition of financial and economic markets, including the recent credit crisis,
interest rate volatility and the availability and cost of capital; and |
|
|
the growth of global oil demand. |
Page 40 of 46
Forward-looking statements include, without limitation, any statement that may predict, forecast,
indicate or imply future results, performance or achievements, and may contain the words believe,
anticipate, expect, estimate, project, will be, will continue, will likely result, or
words or phrases of similar meanings. These statements involve known and unknown risks and are
based upon a number of assumptions and estimates that are inherently subject to significant
uncertainties and contingencies, many of which are beyond our control. Actual results may differ
materially from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Important factors
that could cause actual results to differ materially include, but are not limited to: changes in
production of oil from offshore oil fields; changes in the demand for offshore oil transportation,
processing and storage services; changes in demand for LNG and LPG; greater or less than
anticipated levels of vessel newbuilding orders or greater or less than anticipated rates of vessel
scrapping; changes in trading patterns; changes in volumes of oil purchased under the Foinaven
contract and the related price of oil; changes in applicable industry laws and regulations and the
timing of implementation of new laws and regulations; potential inability to implement our growth
strategy; competitive factors in the markets in which we operate; potential for early termination
of long-term contracts and our potential inability to renew or replace long-term contracts; loss of
any customer, time-charter or vessel; shipyard production or vessel delivery delays; our potential
inability to raise financing to purchase additional vessels; our exposure to foreign currency
exchange, interest rate and tanker spot market rate fluctuations; conditions in the public equity
markets; and other factors detailed from time to time in our periodic reports filed with the SEC,
including our Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2009. We do not intend to
release publicly any updates or revisions to any forward-looking statements contained herein to
reflect any change in our expectations with respect thereto or any change in events, conditions or
circumstances on which any such statement is based.
Page 41 of 46
TEEKAY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
JUNE 30, 2010
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 3 QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
We are exposed to market risk from foreign currency fluctuations and changes in interest rates,
bunker fuel prices and spot tanker market rates for vessels. We use foreign currency forward
contracts, interest rate swaps, bunker fuel swap contracts and forward freight agreements to manage
currency, interest rate, bunker fuel price and spot tanker market rate risks but do not use these
financial instruments for trading or speculative purposes, except as noted below under Spot Tanker
Market Rate Risk. Please read Item 1 Financial Statements: Note 16 Derivative Instruments and
Hedging Activities.
Foreign Currency Fluctuation Risk
Our primary economic environment is the international shipping market. This market utilizes the
U.S. Dollar as its functional currency. Consequently, a substantial majority of our revenues and
most of our operating costs are in U.S. Dollars. We incur certain voyage expenses, vessel operating
expenses, drydocking and overhead costs in foreign currencies, the most significant of which are
the Singapore Dollar, Canadian Dollar, Australian Dollar, Australian Dollar, British Pound, Euro
and Norwegian Kroner.
We reduce our exposure by entering into foreign currency forward contracts. In most cases, we hedge
a substantial majority of our net foreign currency exposure for the following 12 months. We
generally do not hedge our net foreign currency exposure beyond three years forward.
As at June 30, 2010, we had the following foreign currency forward contracts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expected Maturity Date |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remainder of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2012 |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Fair Value(1) |
|
|
|
Contract |
|
|
Contract |
|
|
Contract |
|
|
Contract |
|
|
Asset |
|
|
|
Amount(1) |
|
|
Amount(1) |
|
|
Amount(1) |
|
|
Amount(1) |
|
|
(Liability) |
|
Norwegian Kroner: |
|
$ |
79.9 |
|
|
$ |
120.5 |
|
|
$ |
48.8 |
|
|
$ |
249.2 |
|
|
$ |
(15.0 |
) |
Average contractual exchange rate(2) |
|
|
6.16 |
|
|
|
6.13 |
|
|
|
6.40 |
|
|
|
6.19 |
|
|
|
|
|
Euro: |
|
$ |
33.1 |
|
|
$ |
45.0 |
|
|
$ |
14.2 |
|
|
$ |
92.3 |
|
|
$ |
(9.7 |
) |
Average contractual exchange rate(2) |
|
|
0.71 |
|
|
|
0.73 |
|
|
|
0.76 |
|
|
|
0.73 |
|
|
|
|
|
Canadian Dollar: |
|
$ |
20.0 |
|
|
$ |
13.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
33.4 |
|
|
$ |
0.7 |
|
Average contractual exchange rate(2) |
|
|
1.11 |
|
|
|
1.05 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.09 |
|
|
|
|
|
British Pounds: |
|
$ |
30.0 |
|
|
$ |
37.2 |
|
|
$ |
11.4 |
|
|
$ |
78.6 |
|
|
$ |
(1.5 |
) |
Average contractual exchange rate(2) |
|
|
0.66 |
|
|
|
0.65 |
|
|
|
0.67 |
|
|
|
0.66 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Contract amounts and fair value amounts in millions of U.S. Dollars. |
|
(2) |
|
Average contractual exchange rate represents the contractual amount of foreign currency one U.S. Dollar will buy. |
Although the majority of our transactions, assets and liabilities are denominated in U.S. Dollars,
certain of our subsidiaries have foreign currency-denominated liabilities. There is a risk that
currency fluctuations will have a negative effect on the value of our cash flows. We have not
entered into any forward contracts to protect against the translation risk of our foreign
currency-denominated liabilities. As at June 30, 2010, we had Euro-denominated term loans of 283.5
million Euros ($347.0 million) included in long-term debt and Norwegian Kroner-denominated deferred
income taxes of approximately 104.7 million ($16.1 million). We receive Euro-denominated revenue
from certain of our time-charters. These Euro cash receipts generally are sufficient to pay the
principal and interest payments on our Euro-denominated term loans. Consequently, we have not
entered into any foreign currency forward contracts with respect to our Euro-denominated term
loans, although there is no assurance that our exposure to fluctuations in the Euro will not
increase in the future.
Interest Rate Risk
We are exposed to the impact of interest rate changes primarily through our borrowings that require
us to make interest payments based on LIBOR or EURIBOR. Significant increases in interest rates
could adversely affect our operating margins, results of operations and our ability to repay our
debt. We use interest rate swaps to reduce our exposure to market risk from changes in interest
rates. Generally our approach is to hedge a substantial majority of floating-rate debt associated
with our vessels that are operating on long-term fixed-rate contracts. We manage the rest of our
debt based on our outlook for interest rates and other factors.
In order to minimize counterparty risk, we only enter into derivative transactions with
counterparties that are rated A- or better by Standard & Poors or A3 by Moodys at the time of the
transactions. In addition, to the extent possible and practical, interest rate swaps are entered
into with different counterparties to reduce concentration risk.
Page 42 of 46
The table below provides information about our financial instruments at June 30, 2010, which are
sensitive to changes in interest rates, including our debt and capital lease obligations and
interest rate swaps. For long-term debt and capital lease obligations, the table presents principal
cash flows and related weighted-average interest rates by expected maturity dates. For interest
rate swaps, the table presents notional amounts and weighted-average interest rates by expected
contractual maturity dates.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expected Maturity Date |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset / |
|
|
|
|
|
|
of 2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2012 |
|
|
2013 |
|
|
2014 |
|
|
Thereafter |
|
|
Total |
|
|
(Liability) |
|
|
Rate(1) |
|
|
|
(in millions of U.S. dollars, except percentages) |
|
Long-Term Debt: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Variable Rate ($U.S.) (2) |
|
|
86.2 |
|
|
|
255.5 |
|
|
|
235.7 |
|
|
|
403.9 |
|
|
|
823.0 |
|
|
|
1,287.8 |
|
|
|
3,092.1 |
|
|
|
(2,843.7 |
) |
|
|
1.2 |
% |
Variable Rate (Euro) (3) (4) |
|
|
5.6 |
|
|
|
11.9 |
|
|
|
188.7 |
|
|
|
6.7 |
|
|
|
7.2 |
|
|
|
126.9 |
|
|
|
347.0 |
|
|
|
(317.2 |
) |
|
|
1.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed-Rate Debt ($U.S.) |
|
|
23.1 |
|
|
|
62.4 |
|
|
|
46.2 |
|
|
|
46.2 |
|
|
|
46.2 |
|
|
|
705.2 |
|
|
|
929.2 |
|
|
|
(920.0 |
) |
|
|
6.9 |
% |
Average Interest Rate |
|
|
5.2 |
% |
|
|
6.1 |
% |
|
|
5.2 |
% |
|
|
5.2 |
% |
|
|
5.2 |
% |
|
|
7.3 |
% |
|
|
6.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital Lease Obligations (5) (6) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed-Rate ($U.S.) (7) |
|
|
4.8 |
|
|
|
185.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
190.3 |
|
|
|
(190.3 |
) |
|
|
7.4 |
% |
Average Interest Rate (8) |
|
|
7.5 |
% |
|
|
7.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Rate Swaps: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contract Amount ($U.S.) (6) (9)(10) |
|
|
239.8 |
|
|
|
170.3 |
|
|
|
276.3 |
|
|
|
82.5 |
|
|
|
96.4 |
|
|
|
2,742.1 |
|
|
|
3,607.4 |
|
|
|
(537.8 |
) |
|
|
4.8 |
% |
Average Fixed Pay Rate (2) |
|
|
4.2 |
% |
|
|
3.5 |
% |
|
|
3.0 |
% |
|
|
4.9 |
% |
|
|
4.8 |
% |
|
|
6.0 |
% |
|
|
4.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contract Amount (Euro) (4) |
|
|
5.6 |
|
|
|
11.9 |
|
|
|
188.7 |
|
|
|
13.7 |
|
|
|
14.7 |
|
|
|
112.4 |
|
|
|
347.0 |
|
|
|
(34.4 |
) |
|
|
3.8 |
% |
Average Fixed Pay Rate (3) |
|
|
3.8 |
% |
|
|
3.8 |
% |
|
|
3.8 |
% |
|
|
3.8 |
% |
|
|
3.8 |
% |
|
|
3.8 |
% |
|
|
3.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Rate refers to the weighted-average effective interest rate for our long-term debt and
capital lease obligations, including the margin we pay on our floating-rate, which as of June
30, 2010, ranged from 0.3% to 3.25%. The average interest rate for our capital lease
obligations is the weighted-average interest rate implicit in our lease obligations at the
inception of the leases. |
|
(2) |
|
Interest payments on U.S. Dollar-denominated debt and interest rate swaps are based on LIBOR.
The average fixed pay rate for our interest rate swaps excludes the margin we pay our
floating-rate debt. |
|
(3) |
|
Interest payments on Euro-denominated debt and interest rate swaps are based on EURIBOR. |
|
(4) |
|
Euro-denominated amounts have been converted to U.S. Dollars using the prevailing exchange
rate as of June 30, 2010. |
|
(5) |
|
Excludes capital lease obligations (present value of minimum lease payments) of 85.5 million
Euros ($104.7 million) on one of our existing LNG carriers with a weighted-average fixed
interest rate of 5.8%. Under the terms of this fixed-rate lease obligation, we are required to
have on deposit, subject to a weighted-average fixed interest rate of 5.0%, an amount of cash
that, together with the interest earned thereon, will fully fund the amount owing under the
capital lease obligation, including a vessel purchase obligation. As at June 30, 2010, this
amount was 86.5 million Euros ($105.8 million). Consequently, we are not subject to interest
rate risk from these obligations or deposits. |
|
(6) |
|
Under the terms of the capital leases for the RasGas II LNG Carriers (see Item 1 Financial
Statements: Note 9 Capital Lease Obligations and Restricted Cash), we are required to have
on deposit, subject to a variable rate of interest, an amount of cash that, together with
interest earned on the deposit, will equal the remaining amounts owing under the variable-rate
leases. The deposits, which as at June 30, 2010, totaled $478.1 million, and the lease
obligations, which as at June 30, 2010, totaled $470.4 million, have been swapped for
fixed-rate deposits and fixed-rate obligations. Consequently, we are not subject to interest
rate risk from these obligations and deposits and, therefore, the lease obligations, cash
deposits and related interest rate swaps have been excluded from the table above. As at June
30, 2010, the contract amount, fair value and fixed interest rates of these interest rate
swaps related to the RasGas II LNG Carriers capital lease obligations and restricted cash
deposits were $445.2 million and $472.5 million, ($79.2) million and $95.5 million, and 4.9%
and 4.8% respectively. |
|
(7) |
|
The amount of capital lease obligations represents the present value of minimum lease
payments together with our purchase obligation, as applicable (see Item 1 Financial
Statements: Note 9 Capital Lease Obligations and Restricted Cash). |
|
(8) |
|
The average interest rate is the weighted-average interest rate implicit in the capital lease
obligations at the inception of the leases. |
|
(9) |
|
The average variable receive rate for our interest rate swaps is set monthly at the 1-month
LIBOR or EURIBOR, quarterly at the 3-month LIBOR or semi-annually at the 6-month LIBOR. |
|
(10) |
|
Includes interest rate swaps of $200.0 million that commence in 2011. |
Page 43 of 46
Commodity Price Risk
From time to time we use bunker fuel swap contracts as economic hedges to protect against changes
in forecasted bunker fuel costs for certain vessels being time-chartered-out and for vessels
servicing certain contracts of affreightment. As at June 30, 2010, we were committed to contracts
totaling 27,270 metric tonnes with a weighted-average price of $455.65 per tonne, and a net fair
value liability of $1.4 million. The bunker fuel swap contracts expire between July 2010 and
December 2010. We have not designated these contracts as cash flow hedges for accounting purposes.
Spot Tanker Market Rate Risk
We use forward freight agreements (or FFAs) as economic hedges to protect against changes in spot
tanker market rates earned by some of our vessels in our spot tanker segment. FFAs involve
contracts to move a theoretical volume of freight at fixed-rates. As at June 30, 2010, the FFAs had
an aggregate notional value of $22.1 million, which is an aggregate of both long and short
positions, and a net fair value asset of $0.6 million. The FFAs expire between July 2010 and
December 2010. We have not designated these contracts as cash flow hedges for accounting purposes.
We use FFAs in speculative transactions to increase or decrease our exposure to spot tanker market
rates within strictly defined limits. Historically, we have used a number of different tools,
including the sale/purchase of vessels and the in-charter/out-charter of vessels, to increase or
decrease this exposure. We believe that we can capture some of the value from the volatility of the
spot tanker market and from market imbalances by utilizing FFAs. As at June 30, 2010, we were not
committed to any speculative related FFAs.
Page 44 of 46
TEEKAY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
JUNE 30, 2010
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1 Legal Proceedings
None
Item 1A Risk Factors
In addition to the risk factors below and other information set forth in this Report on Form 6-K,
you should carefully consider the risk factors discussed in Part I, Item 3. Key Information
Risk Factors in our Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2009, which could
materially affect our business, financial condition or results of operations.
Item 2 Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
None
Item 3 Defaults Upon Senior Securities
None
Item 4 Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
The Companys 2010 Annual Meeting of Shareholders was held on June 23, 2010. The following persons
were elected directors for a term of three years by the votes set forth opposite their names:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Votes Against or |
|
|
Shares which |
|
|
Broker |
|
Terms Expiring in 2013 |
|
Votes For |
|
|
Withheld |
|
|
Abstained |
|
|
Non-Votes |
|
Peter S. Janson |
|
|
59,437,521 |
|
|
|
178,426 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
Eileen A. Mercier |
|
|
56,601,342 |
|
|
|
3,014,605 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
Tore I. Sandvold |
|
|
59,459,293 |
|
|
|
156,654 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
The terms of Directors Dr. Ian D. Blackburne, J. Rod Clark, C. Sean Day, Thomas Kuo-Yuen Hsu, Axel
Karlshoej and Bjorn Moller continued after the meeting.
Item 5 Other Information
None
Item 6 Exhibits
None
THIS REPORT ON FORM 6-K IS HEREBY INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE INTO THE FOLLOWING REGISTRATION
STATEMENTS OF THE COMPANY.
|
|
REGISTRATION STATEMENT ON FORM F-3 (FILE NO. 33-97746) FILED WITH THE SEC ON OCTOBER 4, 1995; |
|
|
REGISTRATION STATEMENT ON FORM S-8 (FILE NO. 333-42434) FILED WITH THE SEC ON JULY 28, 2000; |
|
|
REGISTRATION STATEMENT ON FORM S-8 (FILE NO. 333-119564) FILED WITH THE SEC ON OCTOBER 6, 2004; |
|
|
REGISTRATION STATEMENT ON FORM S-8 (FILE NO. 333-147683) FILED WITH THE SEC ON NOVEMBER 28, 2007; |
|
|
REGISTRATION STATEMENT ON FORM S-8 (FILE NO. 333-166523) FILED WITH THE SEC ON MAY 5, 2010; AND |
|
|
REGISTRATION STATEMENT ON FORM 8-A/A (FILE NO. 001-12874) FILED WITH THE SEC ON JULY 2, 2010. |
Page 45 of 46
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
TEEKAY CORPORATION
|
|
Date: September 13, 2010 |
By: |
/s/ Vincent Lok
|
|
|
|
Vincent Lok |
|
|
|
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |
|
Page 46 of 46