def14a
SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION
PROXY STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 14(a) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
(AMENDMENT NO.___)
Filed by the Registrant þ
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant o
Check the appropriate box:
|
|
|
o |
|
Preliminary Proxy Statement |
|
|
|
|
þ |
|
Definitive Proxy Statement |
|
|
|
|
o |
|
Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2)) |
|
|
|
|
o |
|
Definitive Additional Materials |
|
|
|
|
o |
|
Soliciting Material Pursuant to §240.14a-12 |
JEFFERIES GROUP, INC.
(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
|
|
|
|
|
þ |
Fee not required. |
|
|
|
|
o |
Fee
computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(4) and 0-11. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2)
|
|
Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3)
|
|
Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction
computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the
amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it
was determined):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4)
|
|
Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5)
|
|
Total fee paid:
|
|
|
|
|
o |
|
Fee paid previously with preliminary materials. |
|
|
|
|
o |
|
Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the
filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration
statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Amount Previously Paid:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2)
|
|
Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3)
|
|
Filing Party:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4)
|
|
Date Filed:
|
JEFFERIES
GROUP, INC.
520 Madison Avenue,
12th Floor
New York, New York 10022
NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF
SHAREHOLDERS
Monday, May 22, 2006
Dear Shareholder:
You are cordially invited to attend our Annual Meeting of
Shareholders. The meeting will be held at our offices at 520
Madison Avenue,
12th Floor,
New York, New York, 10022, on Monday, May 22, 2006, at
9:30 a.m. At the meeting, we will:
1. Elect seven directors to serve until our next Annual
Meeting, and
2. Conduct any other business that properly comes before
the meeting.
You are entitled to notice of the meeting and to vote at the
meeting if you held our common stock at the close of business on
April 3, 2006.
Even if you will not be able to attend, we have taken a number
of steps to make it easy for you to vote. The enclosed proxy
card contains instructions on how to vote by telephone, on the
Internet or by mail. We urge you to vote early using one of
these methods if you do not expect to attend. You can still
attend the meeting and vote in person if you choose.
We have provided this Proxy Statement to help you understand
what your vote means and to review how we have performed during
2005. We hope you will find it interesting and informative.
For the Board of Directors,
Lloyd H. Feller
Secretary
April 12, 2006
JEFFERIES
GROUP, INC.
520 Madison Avenue,
12th Floor
New York, New York 10022
April 12,
2006
PROXY
STATEMENT
The Board of Directors of Jefferies Group, Inc. requests
that each shareholder provide a proxy for use at our Annual
Meeting of Shareholders. The meeting will be held at our
principal executive offices at 520 Madison Avenue,
12th Floor, New York, New York, 10022, on Monday,
May 22, 2006, at 9:30 a.m., local time. You are
entitled to receive notice of the meeting and to vote at the
meeting if you were a shareholder of record at the close of
business on April 3, 2006. We are first mailing this Notice
of Annual Meeting, Proxy Statement and proxy card to
shareholders on or about April 12, 2006.
Eligible shareholders may vote by telephone, on the Internet, by
mail or by attending the meeting and voting by ballot as
described below. If you vote by telephone or on the Internet you
do not need to return a proxy card. Telephone and Internet
voting facilities will be available 24 hours a day, and
will close at 11:59 p.m. on the night before the meeting,
May 21, 2006. To vote by telephone, please call
1-800-PROXIES
(1-800-776-9437).
To vote on the Internet, go to www.voteproxy.com and
follow the on-screen instructions. To vote by mail, simply mark
the enclosed proxy, date and sign it, and return it to American
Stock Transfer & Trust Company in the postage-paid
envelope provided. If the envelope is missing, please mail the
completed proxy card to us at:
Jefferies Group, Inc.
c/o American Stock Transfer & Trust Company
6201
15th Avenue
Brooklyn, NY
11219-9821
We will use any votes received by telephone, internet or mail at
the annual meeting and any adjournment of the meeting if an
adjournment is necessary. If you change your mind after voting
by telephone or on the Internet, simply call the number again or
return to the website again to change your vote. You may also
revoke your vote, whether by telephone, internet or by mail, by
(i) delivering a written notice of revocation to our
Secretary on or before the closing of the polls at the meeting,
(ii) delivering a new proxy card with a later date to our
Secretary on or before the closing of the polls at the meeting,
or (iii) attending the meeting and voting in person.
If you indicate how you would like your shares voted by
returning a proxy card, voting by telephone or voting on the
Internet, we will vote your shares in accordance with your
directions at the meeting. If you do not indicate how you want
your shares voted, but return a proxy card, your shares will be
voted FOR the election of the seven nominees for Director whose
names are listed in this Proxy Statement, and if any other
matters are properly raised at the meeting, your shares will be
voted as directed by Richard Handler, our Chief Executive
Officer, or Brian P. Friedman, the Chairman of the
Executive Committee of Jefferies & Company, Inc.
Each person we list in this Proxy Statement as a nominee for
Director has agreed to serve if elected. Although we expect that
all the nominees will be able to serve if elected, if a nominee
becomes unable to serve between now and the meeting date, we
will vote any shares for which we have received proxies in favor
of a substitute nominee recommended by our Board of Directors.
We are paying for all costs associated with soliciting proxies
from our shareholders. Although there are no formal agreements
to do so, we will reimburse banks, brokerage firms and other
custodians, nominees and fiduciaries for their reasonable
expenses incurred in sending proxy materials and annual reports
to our shareholders. In addition to solicitation by mail, our
directors and officers may solicit proxies in person, by
telephone, or by fax, but they will not receive special
compensation for such solicitation.
On April 3, 2006, the record date for determining which
shareholders are entitled to vote at the annual meeting, there
were 59,251,182 shares of our Common Stock outstanding. We
do not have cumulative voting, and there are no appraisal or
dissenters rights associated with the matters we have scheduled
for a vote at the meeting. Each share
you hold on the record date will give you the right to one vote
for each Director to be elected and one vote on each separate
matter of business properly brought before the meeting.
The seven Directors who receive the most votes from the shares
properly voting at the meeting will be elected, even if one or
more directors does not receive a majority of the votes cast.
Withholding a vote for a particular Director will not count as a
vote against that Director, since there is no minimum number of
votes necessary to elect a Director. However, in accordance with
our Board of Directors Corporate Governance Guidelines, any
nominee for Director who receives a greater number of votes
withheld from his election than votes
for his election is required to promptly tender his
resignation to the Chairman of the Board. The Corporate
Governance and Nominating Committee will promptly consider the
resignation and recommend to the Board whether to accept the
tendered resignation or reject it in accordance with the
Corporate Governance Guidelines.
Approval of other items at the meeting will require a YES vote
from at least a majority of the shares present in person or
represented by proxy that are entitled to vote on the subject
matter at the meeting. Abstaining on a matter that requires a
majority approval will count as a vote against that matter.
If your shares are held in your brokers name and you do
not give your broker timely voting instructions on certain
matters, the broker cannot vote your shares. Such a broker
non-vote will have no effect on the election of
Directors or on the outcome of the vote on any other item
properly raised at the meeting.
We have retained our transfer agent, American Stock
Transfer & Trust Company, as independent inspector of
election to receive and tabulate the votes. Our transfer agent
will also certify the results and perform any other acts
required by the Delaware General Corporation Law.
Security
Ownership Of Certain Beneficial Owners And Management
The following table sets forth certain information regarding
beneficial ownership of our common stock by
|
|
|
|
|
each person we know of who beneficially owns more than 5% of our
common stock,
|
|
|
|
each of our Directors,
|
|
|
|
each Executive Officer named in the Summary Compensation
Table and
|
|
|
|
all Directors and Executive Officers as a group.
|
The information set forth below is as of February 1, 2006,
unless otherwise indicated. Information regarding shareholders
other than Directors, Executive Officers and employee benefit
plans is based upon information contained in Schedules 13G filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).
The number of shares beneficially owned by each shareholder and
the percentage of the outstanding common stock those shares
represent include shares that may be acquired by that
shareholder within 60 days through the exercise of any
option, warrant or right. Unless otherwise indicated, the
mailing address of the parties listed below is our principal
business address and the parties have sole voting power and sole
dispositive power over their shares.
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares of Common
|
|
|
Percentage of
|
|
|
|
Stock Beneficially
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
Name and Address of Beneficial
Owner
|
|
Owned
|
|
|
Beneficially Owned
|
|
|
Earnest Partners, LLC
|
|
|
6,466,385
|
(1)
|
|
|
10.9
|
%
|
75 Fourteenth Street,
Suite 2300
Atlanta, Georgia 30309
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jefferies Group, Inc.
Employee Stock Ownership Plan
|
|
|
5,482,727
|
(2)
|
|
|
9.3
|
%
|
Richard B. Handler
|
|
|
4,191,500
|
(3)
|
|
|
6.8
|
%
|
Baron Capital Group, Inc.
|
|
|
4,006,909
|
(4)
|
|
|
6.8
|
%
|
767 Fifth Avenue
New York, New York 10153
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Brian P. Friedman
|
|
|
909,267
|
(5)
|
|
|
1.5
|
%
|
John C. Shaw, Jr.
|
|
|
466,710
|
(6)
|
|
|
*
|
|
Joseph A. Schenk
|
|
|
221,518
|
(7)
|
|
|
*
|
|
Richard G. Dooley
|
|
|
211,122
|
(8)
|
|
|
*
|
|
Frank J. Macchiarola
|
|
|
173,650
|
(9)
|
|
|
*
|
|
Maxine Syrjamaki
|
|
|
144,507
|
(10)
|
|
|
*
|
|
Lloyd H. Feller
|
|
|
100,267
|
(11)
|
|
|
*
|
|
W. Patrick Campbell
|
|
|
45,001
|
(12)
|
|
|
*
|
|
Robert Joyal
|
|
|
2,000
|
(13)
|
|
|
*
|
|
Michael T. OKane
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Directors and Executive
Officers
|
|
|
6,463,543
|
(14)
|
|
|
10.9
|
%
|
|
|
|
* |
|
The percentage of shares beneficially owned does not exceed one
percent of the class. |
|
(1) |
|
The indicated interest was reported on a Schedule 13G filed
with the SEC by Earnest Partners, LLC on February 8, 2006.
In its Schedule 13G, Earnest Partners reported that as of
December 31, 2005, it had sole voting power over
2,328,753 shares, shared voting power over
2,218,932 shares, sole dispositive power over
6,466,385 shares and shared dispositive power over no
shares. |
|
(2) |
|
Under the Jefferies Group, Inc. Employee Stock Ownership
Plan (the ESOP), shares are allocated to accounts in
the name of the individuals who participate in the ESOP. The
voting rights for shares in each individual participants
account are passed through to that participant. Because
participants can vote shares in their ESOP accounts, but cannot
sell them, participants in the ESOP have sole voting power and
no dispositive power over shares allocated to their accounts. As
of December 31, 2005, 5,482,727 shares were held in
the ESOP Trust, and all of those shares were allocated to the
accounts of ESOP participants. Those shares allocated to the
accounts of Directors and Executive Officers are indicated on
their respective entries in the table and are also included in
the ESOP figure. Because of its role as trustee for the ESOP,
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. may also be deemed to have shared
dispositive power over the shares held by the ESOP. The ESOP is
directed by a committee which serves as its Plan Administrator.
Our Board of Directors appoints the members of the committee,
which currently consist of Gordon McDonnell, Robert Welch, David
Losito and Scott Sullivan. These individuals are each employees
of Jefferies & Company, Inc., and each disclaim
beneficial ownership of the shares held by the ESOP except those
shares allocated to his ESOP account. Wells Fargo &
Company, on behalf of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. and Wells Fargo
Funds Management, LLC has filed a Schedule 13G with the
SEC. In its 13G, Wells Fargo reported that as of
December 31, 2005, it had sole voting power over
6,637 shares, shared voting power over
5,589,906 shares, sole dispositive power over no shares and
shared dispositive power over 60 shares. We believe that
the shares referred to in the Wells Fargo filing include the
shares held by the ESOP. |
|
(3) |
|
Assuming Mr. Handlers continued employment with us
through the expiration of all applicable vesting and deferral
periods, Mr. Handler would beneficially own
5,568,333 shares (representing 9.4% of the currently
outstanding class). The table above includes 600,000 shares
subject to immediately exercisable options; 25,076 shares
subject to immediately exercisable options held under the
Deferred Compensation Plan |
3
|
|
|
|
|
(DCP); 1,773,721 vested restricted stock units
(RSUs) which Mr. Handler has a right to acquire
within 60 days from February 1, 2006;
53,746 shares held under the ESOP; 22,537 RSUs resulting
from dividend reinvestments on unvested RSUs which
Mr. Handler has a right to acquire within 60 days from
February 1, 2006; 41,160 RSUs resulting from dividend
reinvestments on vested RSUs which Mr. Handler has a right
to acquire within 60 days from February 1, 2006; and
20 shares held in an account for the benefit of Mr.
Handlers immediate family. The table above excludes
1,250,449 RSUs which do not represent a right to acquire within
60 days from February 1, 2006; 1,562 share
denominated deferrals under Mr. Handlers deferred
compensation plan which do not represent a right to acquire
within 60 days from February 1, 2006; 100 deferred
shares of restricted stock held by the trustee of the ESPP as to
which Mr. Handler has neither voting nor dispositive power;
and 124,721 share denominated deferrals under the DCP. |
|
(4) |
|
The indicated interest was reported on a Schedule 13G filed
on February 14, 2006, with the SEC by Baron Capital Group,
Inc. (BCG) on behalf of itself, BAMCO, Inc., Baron
Capital Management, Inc. (BCM) and Ronald Baron. In
its Schedule 13G, the entities reported beneficial
ownership as of December 31, 2005 as follows:
BCG 4,005,387 shares;
BAMCO 3,798,000 shares;
BCM 207,387 shares; and Ronald
Baron 4,006,909 shares. Only Ronald Baron
reported any sole voting or dispositive power, in each case over
1,522 shares. The entities reported shared voting power as
follows: BCG 3,586,987 shares;
BAMCO 3,398,000 shares,
BCM 188,987 shares; and Ronald
Baron 3,586,987 shares. BCG, BCM, BAMCO
and Baron also reported shared dispositive power as follows:
BCG 4,005,387 shares;
BAMCO 3,798,000 shares,
BCM 207,387 shares; and Ronald
Baron 4,005,387 shares. |
|
(5) |
|
Assuming Mr. Friedmans continued employment with us
through the expiration of all applicable vesting and deferral
periods, Mr. Friedman would beneficially own
1,373,218 shares (representing 2.32% of the currently
outstanding class). The table above includes 320,000 shares
which Mr. Friedman has a right to acquire within
60 days from February 1, 2006 in connection with the
closing of Fund IV, as described in Certain Relationships
and Related Transactions below; 95,000 shares subject to
options which became exercisable on February 1, 2006;
3,320 shares subject to immediately exercisable options
held under the DCP; 578 shares held under the ESOP; and
2,835 shares held by the Trustee of our profit sharing plan
(the PSP). Participants in the PSP have sole voting
power and limited dispositive power over shares allocated to
their PSP accounts. The table above excludes 417,119 unvested
RSUs which do not represent a right to acquire within
60 days from February 1, 2006; 36,499 shares
resulting from dividend reinvestments on vested RSUs which
Mr. Friedman does not have a right to acquire within
60 days from February 1, 2006; 10,334 share
denominated deferrals under the DCP; and an additional
200,000 shares Mr. Friedman may acquire in connection
with the closing of Fund IV, as discussed in Certain
Relationships and Related Transactions below. |
|
(6) |
|
The table above includes 222,403 shares of restricted stock
as to which Mr. Shaw has voting but no dispositive power;
134,514 shares held under the ESOP; and 1,771 shares
held under the PSP. |
|
(7) |
|
Assuming Mr. Schenks continued employment with us
through the expiration of all applicable vesting and deferral
periods, Mr. Schenk would beneficially own
358,877 shares (representing less than 1% of the currently
outstanding class). The table above includes 105,466 shares
subject to immediately exercisable options; 11,948 shares
subject to immediately exercisable options held under the DCP;
25,616 vested RSUs which Mr. Schenk has a right to acquire
within 60 days after February 1, 2006;
1,234 shares reflecting dividend resinvestments on unvested
RSUs which reflect a right to acquire within 60 days from
February 1, 2006; 1,841 shares held under the ESOP;
10,425 shares held under the PSP; and 60 shares held
in accounts for the benefit of Mr. Schenks immediate
family. The table above excludes 83,055 unvested RSUs which do
not represent a right to acquire within 60 days from
February 1, 2006; 5,329 shares resulting from vested
and deferred dividend reinvestments which do not represent a
right to acquire within 60 days from February 1, 2006;
137 deferred shares of restricted stock held by the trustee of
the ESPP as to which Mr. Schenk has neither voting nor
dispositive power; and 48,638 share denominated deferrals
under the DCP. |
|
(8) |
|
Assuming the expiration of all applicable vesting and deferral
periods, Mr. Dooley would beneficially own
252,191 shares (representing less than 1% of the currently
outstanding class). The table above includes 66,730 shares
subject to immediately exercisable options and 2,188 shares
of restricted stock as to which Mr. Dooley has sole voting
and no dispositive power. The table above excludes 21,733
deferred shares and 19,336 RSUs under our Director Stock
Compensation Plan (the DSCP), which do not represent
a right to acquire within 60 days after February 1,
2006. |
4
|
|
|
(9) |
|
Assuming the expiration of all applicable vesting and deferral
periods, Mr. Macchiarola would beneficially own
189,850 shares (representing less than 1% of the currently
outstanding class). The table above includes 86,306 shares
subject to immediately exercisable options and 3,874 restricted
shares under the DSCP as to which Mr. Macchiarola has sole
voting and no dispositive power. The table above excludes 5,094
deferred shares and 11,106 RSUs under the DSCP, which do not
reflect a right to acquire within 60 days after
February 1, 2006. |
|
(10) |
|
Assuming Ms. Syrjamakis continued employment with us
through the expiration of all applicable vesting and deferral
periods, Ms. Syrjamaki would beneficially own
155,761 shares (representing less than 1% of the currently
outstanding class). The table above includes 1,708 shares
subject to immediately exercisable options held under the DCP;
79,005 shares held under the ESOP; 25 shares
representing dividend reinvestments on unvested RSUs which
Ms. Syrjamaki has a right to acquire within 60 days
from February 1, 2006; and 28,482 shares under the
PSP. The table above excludes 4,419 unvested and 248 vested RSUs
which do not represent a right to acquire within 60 days
from February 1, 2006; 16 dividend reinvestments on
unvested RSUs which do not represent a right to acquire within
60 days from February 1, 2006; and 6,571 share
denominated deferrals under the DCP. |
|
(11) |
|
Assuming Mr. Fellers continued employment with us
through the expiration of all applicable vesting and deferral
periods, Mr. Feller would beneficially own
126,030 shares (representing less than 1% of the currently
outstanding class). The table above includes 20,000 shares
of unvested restricted stock as to which Mr. Feller has
sole voting and no dispositive power; and 50,000 shares
subject to immediately exercisable options. The table above
excludes 18,271 unvested RSUs, 7,492 share denominated
deferrals under the DCP and 267 shares held under the ESOP. |
|
(12) |
|
Assuming the expiration or termination of all applicable vesting
and deferral periods, Mr. Campbell would beneficially own
52,328 shares (representing less than 1% of the currently
outstanding class). The table above includes 37,284 shares
subject to immediately exercisable options and 3,874 restricted
shares under the DSCP as to which Mr. Campbell has voting
but no dispositive power. The table above excludes 7,096 RSUs
and 164 deferred shares under the DSCP which do not reflect a
right to acquire within 60 days after February 1, 2006. |
|
(13) |
|
Information regarding Mr. Joyal is as of February 10,
2006. |
|
(14) |
|
Includes 945,786 shares subject to immediately exercisable
options; 95,000 options which became exercisable on
February 1, 2006; 1,809,530 vested RSUs which employees
have a right to acquire within 60 days from
February 1, 2006; 71,258 unvested RSUs which will become
vested within 60 days from February 1, 2006 and as a
result of which employees will have a right to acquire within
60 days from February 1, 2006; 9,936 restricted shares
under the DSCP, 42,052 options held under the DCP;
269,951 shares held under the ESOP; and 43,513 shares
under the PSP for the listed directors and executive officers as
a group. Assuming the expiration of all applicable vesting and
deferral periods, the directors and named executive officers as
a group would beneficially own 8,605,868 shares
(representing 14.57% of the currently outstanding class). |
Election
Of Directors
Under our By-Laws, the Board of Directors may determine its own
size so long as it remains not less than five nor more than
seventeen Directors. Our Board currently consists of six
members, but has determined to increase the size of the Board to
seven members effective at the time of the Annual Meeting and to
propose the election of seven directors at this years
Annual Meeting. The directors elected at this Annual Meeting
will serve a term that lasts until the directors elected at next
years Annual Meeting of Shareholders assume their duties.
Information
Concerning Nominees For Director And Executive
Officers
Nominees
The following information relates to the nominees for election
as Directors:
Richard B. Handler,
44, a nominee, has been our Chairman since February 2002,
and our Chief Executive Officer since January 2001.
Mr. Handler has also served as Chief Executive Officer of
Jefferies since January 2001, and as Co-President and Co-Chief
Operating Officer of both companies during 2000.
Mr. Handler was first elected to our Board in May 1998. He
was Managing Director of High Yield Capital
5
Markets at Jefferies from May 1993 until February 2000, after
co-founding that group as an Executive Vice President in April
1990. He is also the President and Chief Executive Officer of
the Jefferies Partners Opportunity family of funds.
Mr. Handler received an MBA from Stanford University in
1987 and a BA in Economics from the University of Rochester in
1983 where he also serves on the Board of Trustees.
Brian P. Friedman,
age 50, a nominee, was appointed to serve as a
Director in July 2005 and has been Chairman of the Executive
Committee of Jefferies & Company, Inc., our principal
operating subsidiary (Jefferies) since 2002. Since
1997, Mr. Friedman has also been President of
Jefferies Capital Partners, formerly known as FS Private
Investments and also of Furman Selz Investments, LLC, which he
founded after heading the investment banking division of Furman
Selz LLC for seven years. Prior to his 17 years with Furman
Selz and its successors, Mr. Friedman was an attorney with
the New York City law firm of Wachtell Lipton Rosen &
Katz. As a result of his management of various funds and the
significant equity positions those funds hold in their portfolio
companies, Mr. Friedman serves on numerous boards of
directors of private and public portfolio companies. In
particular, Mr. Friedman has served on the Board of the
general partner of K-Sea Transportation L.P. since 2004, as a
board member of Telex Communications since 2001 and as chairman
of its board since 2003, on the Board of Iowa Telecommunications
Services, Inc. from June 2000 through September 2005, on the
Board of Real Mex Restaurants, Inc. since 1998 and on the Board
of Pacific Basin Shipping Limited since July 2004.
W. Patrick
Campbell, age 60, a nominee, has been one of our
Directors since January 2000. Mr. Campbell was Chairman and
Chief Executive Officer of Magex Limited from August 2000
through April 2002 and is currently an independent consultant in
the media and telecom field. From 1994 until October 1999,
Mr. Campbell was Executive Vice President of Corporate
Strategy and Business Development at Ameritech Corp. where he
was a member of the Management Committee and directed all
corporate strategy and merger and acquisition activity. From
1989 to 1994, Mr. Campbell served as President and Chief
Executive Officer of Columbia TriStar Home Video, a Sony
Pictures Entertainment Company, and has previously been
President of RCA/Columbia Pictures International Video.
Mr. Campbell has also been a director of Black &
Veatch since November 1999. Mr. Campbell is Chairman of our
Audit Committee, and a member of our Compensation Committee and
Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee.
Richard G. Dooley,
age 76, a nominee, has been one of our Directors since
November 1993. From 1978 until his retirement in June 1993,
Mr. Dooley was Executive Vice President and Chief
Investment Officer of Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance
Company (Mass Mutual). Mr. Dooley was a
consultant to Mass Mutual from 1993 to 2003. Mr. Dooley has
been a director of Kimco Realty Corporation since 1990 and is a
member of its Compensation Committee. Mr. Dooley is
Chairman of our Compensation Committee and a member of our Audit
Committee and Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee.
Robert E. Joyal,
age 61, a nominee, was appointed by the Board to
serve as a Director in January 2006. Previously, Mr. Joyal
was the President of Babson Capital Management LLC, an
investment management firm, a position that he held from 2001
until his retirement in June 2003. Mr. Joyal served as
Managing Director of Babson from 2000 to 2001. He also served as
Executive Director
(1997-1999)
and Vice President and Managing Director
(1987-1997)
of the Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance Company.
Mr. Joyal is a trustee of each of MassMutual Corporate
Investors and MassMutual Participation Investors (Closed End
Investment Companies) and a director of MassMutual Select Funds
and the MML Series Investment Funds (Open End Investment
Companies). Mr. Joyal is also a director of Pemco Aviation
Group, Inc. (Aircraft Maintenance and Overhaul), York Enhanced
Strategies Fund (a Closed End Investment Company) and various
private equity, mezzanine and turn around funds sponsored by
First Israel Mezzanine Investors.
Frank J. Macchiarola,
64, a nominee, has been one of our Directors since August
1991. He is currently the President of St. Francis College,
where he has served in that capacity since July 1996. He also
serves as special counsel to the law firm of Tannenbaum,
Halpern, Syracuse & Hirschtritt, LLP. Previously,
Mr. Macchiarola was a Professor of Law and Political
Science and the Dean of the Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law at
Yeshiva University in New York City from 1991 to 1996, Professor
of Business in the Graduate School of Business at Columbia
University from 1987 to 1991, and President and Chief Executive
Officer of the New York City Partnership, Inc. from 1983 to
1987. Prior to 1985, Mr. Macchiarola was a faculty member
at the
6
City University of New York and Chancellor of the New York City
Public School System. Mr. Macchiarola has been a Trustee of
the Manville Personal Injury Trust since 1991. Mr. Macchiarola
is Chairman of our Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee
and a member of our Audit Committee and Compensation Committee.
Michael T.
OKane, age 60, a nominee, will begin to serve
as a Director in May of 2006 if elected. From 1986 through 2004,
Mr. OKane served in various capacities for TIAA-CREF,
first as a Managing Director Private Placements
from 1986 through 1990, then as Managing
Director Structured Finance from 1990 through
1996 and finally as Senior Managing
Director Securities Division from 1986 through
2004, when he was responsible for approximately
$120 billion of fixed income and $3.5 billion of
private equity assets under management. Since August 2005,
Mr. OKane has also served on the Board of Directors
and on the Audit and Finance Committee of Assured Guaranty, Ltd.
Mr. OKane has also served as a director of
Scholarship America since 2003.
Other
Executive Officers
Our Executive Officers are appointed by the Board of Directors
and serve at the discretion of the Board. Other than
Messrs. Handler and Friedman, for whom information is
provided above, the following sets forth information as to the
Executive Officers:
Joseph A. Schenk,
age 47, has been our Chief Financial Officer and Executive
Vice President since January 2000, Executive Vice President of
Jefferies since January 2000, and was a Senior Vice President,
Corporate Services, of Jefferies from September 1997 through
December 1999. From January 1996 through September 1997,
Mr. Schenk was Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of
Tel-Save Holdings, Inc., now Talk America Holdings, Inc. From
September 1993 to January 1996, Mr. Schenk was Vice
President, Capital Markets Group, with Jefferies.
Lloyd H. Feller, 63,
has been our Executive Vice President, General Counsel
and Secretary since December 2002. Mr. Feller was a Senior
Vice President, Secretary and General Counsel of SoundView
Technology Group, Inc. from 1999 to December 2002. Prior to
joining SoundViews predecessor, Wit Capital Group Inc., in
1999, Mr. Feller was a partner at Morgan Lewis &
Bockius LLP, where he was the leader of that firms
securities regulation practice group. Before joining Morgan
Lewis in 1979, Mr. Feller worked at the SEC as the
Associate Director of the Division of Market Regulation, a
position in which he was in charge of the Office of Market
Structure and Trading Practices.
Maxine Syrjamaki, 61,
has been our Controller since May 1987, an Executive Vice
President of Jefferies since November 1986, and Chief Financial
Officer of Jefferies since September 1984. Ms. Syrjamaki
was also Chief Financial Officer of Bonds Direct Securities LLC
from 2001 through 2004, and Chief Financial Officer of
Quarterdeck Investment Partners, LLC since 2001. Prior to
joining Jefferies in 1983, Ms. Syrjamaki was a C.P.A. in
the audit group of Peat Marwick (now KPMG) specializing in
financial institutions.
7
Equity
Compensation Plan Information
The following table provides information regarding our
compensation plans (other than certain tax qualified plans, such
as our 401(k) and ESOP), under which our equity securities were
authorized for issuance as of December 31, 2005.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Securities
|
|
|
|
Number of Securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining Available for
|
|
|
|
to be Issued Upon
|
|
|
Weighted-Average
|
|
|
Future Issuance Under
|
|
|
|
Exercise of
|
|
|
Exercise Price of
|
|
|
Equity Compensation Plans
|
|
|
|
Outstanding Options,
|
|
|
Outstanding Options,
|
|
|
(Excluding Securities
|
|
|
|
Warrants and Rights
|
|
|
Warrants and Rights
|
|
|
Reflected in Column (a))
|
|
Plan Category
|
|
(a)
|
|
|
(b)
|
|
|
(c)
|
|
|
Equity compensation plans approved
by security holders
|
|
|
2,137,363
|
|
|
$
|
19.54
|
|
|
|
7,756,856
|
|
Equity compensation plans not
approved by security holders
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
2,137,363
|
|
|
$
|
19.54
|
|
|
|
7,756,856
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The weighted average exercise price of outstanding options,
warrants and rights is calculated based solely on those awards
that have a specified exercise price. If outstanding RSUs and
similar rights were included, and deemed to have an exercise
price of zero, the weighted average exercise price for plans
approved by security holders would be $1.96. |
|
(2) |
|
Of the shares remaining available for future issuance, as of
December 31, 2005, the numbers of shares that may be issued
as restricted stock, RSUs or deferred stock were as follows:
570,257 shares under the 2003 Incentive Compensation Plan
(the 2003 Plan) for general use;
3,913,424 shares under the 2003 Plan designated for use
under the DCP; and 708,662 shares under the Director Stock
Compensation Plan. These plans also authorize the grant of
options and other types of equity awards. The number of shares
available for future grants under the 2003 Plan changes pursuant
to a formula set forth in the plan. The formula establishes that
the number of shares available for grant under the plan shall be
equal to 30% of the total number of shares outstanding
immediately prior to the grant, less shares subject to
outstanding awards under the 2003 Plan and the 1999 Incentive
Compensation Plan. For this purpose, an option is
outstanding until it is exercised and any other
award is outstanding in the calendar year in which
it is granted and for so long thereafter as it remains subject
to any vesting condition requiring continued employment. The DCP
provides eligible employees with the opportunity to defer
receipt of cash compensation for five years, with an optional
deferral of an additional five years. Participants chose whether
their deferred compensation is allocated to a cash denominated
investment subaccount, to an equity subaccount which permits a
combination of restricted share equivalents or other specified
equity investment vehicles. Credits of RSUs to a
participants subaccount occur at a predetermined discount
of up to 15% of the volume weighted average market price per
share of our Common Stock on the last day of the quarter. The
predetermined discount amount for 2005 was 10%. A maximum of
8,000,000 shares are reserved for restricted share units
and options under the DCP. Restricted share equivalent units
will be credited with dividend equivalents on the last day of
each quarter, which will be converted into additional share
units in accordance with the terms of the DCP. Restricted share
units and options, and the terms thereof, are subject to
equitable adjustment by the Compensation Committee in the event
of certain extraordinary corporate events. The discounted
portion of any amounts credited is forfeitable upon termination
of employment until the earliest of the time the participant has
participated in the DCP for three consecutive years, the
participants age plus the number of years of service
equals 65, the participants death or a change in control.
Options will become exercisable on the first anniversary of the
third year after the year in which the option was granted, or
earlier upon the participants death or retirement. Options
expire at the end of the fifth year after the year of grant or
60 days after termination of employment other than due to
death. |
Corporate
Governance
The Board of Directors is responsible for supervision of our
business. During 2005, the Board held five regular meetings and
two special meetings. To assist in carrying out its duties, the
Board has three committees: an Audit Committee, a Compensation
Committee and a Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee.
Each incumbent
8
member of the Board of Directors attended all of the 2005
meetings of the Board of Directors and its committees that he
was required to attend. Though we do not have a policy regarding
attendance by Directors at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders,
three of the six directors attended the Annual Meeting of
Shareholders in 2005.
The Board has adopted Corporate Governance Guidelines that
contain categorical standards for the determination of director
independence, which are available to the public through the
Jefferies website at www.jefferies.com and are
attached as Appendix 1. The Board has determined that
directors who comply with the standards in the Corporate
Governance Guidelines have no material relationship with us as
required by New York Stock Exchange Rules. The Board has noted
relationships by and among its Board members and nominees that
may give rise to conflicts, in particular, that
Mr. Campbell also serves on the Compensation Committee of
Black & Veatch, Mr. Dooley also serves on the
Compensation Committee of Kimco Realty Corp. and Mr. Dooley
was an associate of Mr. Joyal prior to
Mr. Dooleys retirement from Mass Mutual. The Board
has determined that these facts do not impair the independence
of these directors or lessen their qualifications to serve on
the Board or any committees. The Board has determined that
Messrs. Campbell, Dooley, Joyal, Macchiarola and
OKane each meet the independence standards as set forth in
the Corporate Governance Guidelines and is a Financial
Expert as defined by applicable New York Stock Exchange
and Securities and Exchange Commission rules.
The current Audit Committee members are W. Patrick Campbell,
Chairman, Richard G. Dooley and Frank J. Macchiarola. The Audit
Committee is appointed by the Board to assist the Board in
monitoring (1) the integrity of our financial statements,
(2) our independent auditors qualifications and
independence, (3) the performance of our internal audit
function and independent auditors, and (4) our compliance
with legal and regulatory requirements. The Audit Committee has
adopted a written charter which is available on our website as
described below. During 2005, there were 14 meetings of the
Audit Committee.
The current Compensation Committee members are Richard G.
Dooley, Chairman, W. Patrick Campbell and Frank J. Macchiarola.
The Compensation Committee is appointed by the Board to
(1) advise senior management on the administration of our
compensation programs, (2) review and approve corporate
goals and objectives relevant to CEO compensation, evaluate the
CEOs performance in light of those goals and objectives,
and determine and approve the CEOs compensation level
based on this evaluation, (3) make recommendations to the
board with respect to non-CEO executive officer compensation,
and incentive-compensation and equity-based plans that are
subject to board approval; and (4) produce a compensation
committee report on executive compensation required by the rules
and regulations of the SEC. The Compensation Committee has
adopted a written charter which is available on our website as
described below. During 2005, there were eight meetings of the
Compensation Committee.
The current Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee
members are Frank J. Macchiarola, Chairman, W. Patrick Campbell
and Richard G. Dooley. The Corporate Governance and Nominating
Committee (1) identifies individuals to the Board who are
qualified to become board members consistent with criteria
approved by the board, (2) recommends individuals to the
Board for nomination as members of the Board and its committees,
(3) develops and recommends to the Board a set of corporate
governance principles applicable to the corporation, and
(4) oversees the evaluation of the board and management. In
nominating candidates, the Committee takes into consideration
such factors as it deems appropriate, which may include
judgment, skill, diversity, experience with businesses and other
organizations of comparable size, the interplay of the
candidates experience with the experience of other Board
members, and the extent to which the candidate would be a
desirable addition to the Board and any committees of the Board.
Like candidates proposed by management, the Committee may
consider candidates proposed by shareholders, but is not
required to do so. To suggest a nominee, address your
correspondence to Lloyd H. Feller, our corporate Secretary, at
our address listed at the top of the front page of this Proxy
Statement. The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee has
adopted a written charter which is available on our website as
described below. During 2005, there were six meetings of the
Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee.
The non-management directors of the Board of Directors meet in
executive session at each meeting of the Board of Directors.
These executive sessions are led by the chairman of the Audit,
Compensation or Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee on
a rotating basis. The non-management directors have the
authority to retain outside consultants and to schedule
additional meetings.
9
Important documents related to our corporate governance are
posted on our website at http://www.jefferies.com/
and may be viewed by following the About Us link
near the top of the left menu, and then the Corporate
Governance link in the menu that follows. Documents posted
include our Code of Ethics, Corporate Governance Guidelines and
the Charters for each of the board committees mentioned above,
which may be accessed directly at
http://www.jefferies.com/charters/. We will also provide
you with any of these documents in print upon request without
charge. You may direct your request to Investor Relations,
Jefferies & Company, Inc., 520 Madison Avenue,
12th Floor,
New York, NY 10022, or by calling 203-708-5975 or sending an
email to info@jefferies.com.
We have established a process by which shareholders can contact
our Board of Directors, the non-management directors as a group,
or a committee of the Board of Directors. To contact our Board,
you can send an email to Lloyd H. Feller, our General Counsel,
at lfeller@jefferies.com, or write to: Lloyd H.
Feller, Executive Vice President and General Counsel,
Jefferies Group, Inc., 520 Madison Avenue,
12th Floor,
New York, NY, 10022. To contact our non-management directors as
a group or a committee of the Board of Directors directly, write
to the party you wish to contact, c/o the General
Counsels Office, Attention: Corporate Secretary,
Jefferies Group, Inc. 520 Madison Avenue, 12th Floor,
New York, NY, 10022.
Director
Compensation
Each member of the Board of Directors of Jefferies Group,
Inc. who is also a non-employee is entitled to receive the
following compensation under the terms of policies approved by
the Board from time to time and the terms of the
Jefferies Group, Inc. 1999 Directors Stock
Compensation Plan:
|
|
|
|
|
an annual retainer of $50,000;
|
|
|
|
an annual grant of $100,000 in restricted common stock or
deferred shares of Jefferies Group, Inc.;
|
|
|
|
an annual retainer of $7,500 for each committee membership;
|
|
|
|
an annual retainer of $20,000 to the Chairman of the Audit
Committee; and
|
|
|
|
an annual retainer of $10,000 to the Chairman of the
Compensation Committee and the Chairman of the Governance and
Nominating Committee.
|
Annual retainers are paid quarterly in equal installments. Under
our 1999 Directors Stock Compensation Plan (the
DSCP), each non-employee Director may elect to
receive annual retainer fees in the form of cash or deferred
cash. If deferred cash is elected, the Directors account
is credited with interest on deferred cash at the prime interest
rate in effect at the date of each annual meeting of
shareholders. If deferred shares are elected, the
Directors account is credited with the number of deferred
shares having a market value equal to the deferred fees and,
when dividends are declared and paid on our common stock, with
dividend equivalents on deferred shares which are then deemed
reinvested as additional deferred shares.
The amounts set forth above became effective at the beginning of
2006. In 2005, each member of our Board who was also a
non-employee was entitled to receive an annual retainer of
$30,000, paid quarterly; an annual grant of $80,000 in our
restricted common stock or deferred shares; $1,500 for
attendance at each regular meeting of the Board of Directors;
$2,000 for attendance at each special meeting of the Board of
Directors; an annual fee of $3,000 to each Chairman of a
Committee of the Board of Directors; and $1,000 for each
Committee meeting attended.
Directors who are also our employees are not paid
Directors fees and are not granted restricted stock for
serving as Directors.
Each Director may participate in our Charitable Gifts Matching
Program pursuant to which we will match 50% of allowable
charitable contributions made by a Director, up to a maximum
matching contribution of $3,000 per person per year.
Previously, our directors have also been given the opportunity
to participate in certain company investments or investment
funds on the same basis as our other employees.
The children of Directors may also participate (along with the
children of all our employees) in the Boyd & Stephen
Jefferies Educational Grant Program which provides
scholarship awards for secondary and post-secondary
10
education based on factors such as financial need, academic
merit and personal statements. The grants are made by an
independent scholarship committee, none of whose members are
affiliated with us.
Executive
Compensation
Shown below is information concerning the compensation we paid
to those persons who were, during 2005, (a) the Chief
Executive Officer, (b) our other four most highly
compensated Executive Officers as specified by SEC rules, and
(c) up to two additional individuals who were Executive
Officers during 2005 and for whom disclosure would have been
provided but for the fact that the individual was not serving as
an executive officer on December 31, 2005. The compensation
described relates to services provided for us by the individuals
for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2003, 2004 and 2005.
Summary
Compensation Table
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-Term
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Awards
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annual
|
|
|
(f)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation(2)(3)
|
|
|
Restricted
|
|
|
(h)
|
|
(a)
|
|
|
|
|
(c)
|
|
|
(d)
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
All Other
|
|
Name and
|
|
(b)
|
|
|
Salary
|
|
|
Bonus
|
|
|
Award(s)(4)
|
|
|
Compensation(5)
|
|
Principal Position
|
|
Year
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
Richard B. Handler
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
1,000,000
|
|
|
|
4,733,009
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,216,133
|
|
|
|
85
|
|
Chairman & Chief Executive
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
1,000,000
|
|
|
|
6,862,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,000,000
|
|
|
|
17,052
|
|
Officer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consisting of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005 Long Term
|
|
|
8,000,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 Long Term
|
|
|
8,000,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
16,000,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
|
1,000,000
|
|
|
|
4,466,447
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,653,588
|
|
|
|
3,218
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consisting of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2003 Related
|
|
|
8,515,588
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 Long Term
|
|
|
6,138,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
14,653, 588
|
|
|
|
|
|
Brian P. Friedman
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
250,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,429,021
|
(1)
|
|
|
3,772
|
|
Chairman of the Executive Committee
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consisting of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005 Related
|
|
|
3,429,022
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005 Long Term
|
|
|
2,999,999
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 Long Term
|
|
|
2,999,999
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
9,429,021
|
|
|
|
|
|
Joseph A. Schenk
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
275,000
|
|
|
|
975,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
649,962
|
|
|
|
3,772
|
|
Executive V.P. &
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
275,000
|
|
|
|
725,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,333,333
|
|
|
|
14,072
|
|
Chief Financial Officer
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
|
275,000
|
|
|
|
765,492
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,305,805
|
|
|
|
3,218
|
|
Lloyd H. Feller
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
500,000
|
|
|
|
1,005,423
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,132
|
|
Executive V.P., General
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
250,000
|
|
|
|
893,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,207
|
|
Counsel & Secretary
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
|
250,000
|
|
|
|
840,291
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,357
|
|
|
|
3,218
|
|
Maxine Syrjamaki
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
161,500
|
|
|
|
264,432
|
|
|
|
|
|
99,963
|
|
|
|
4,944
|
|
Controller
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
161,500
|
|
|
|
290,365
|
|
|
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
|
|
15,203
|
|
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
|
161,500
|
|
|
|
271,750
|
|
|
|
|
|
72,948
|
|
|
|
3,218
|
|
John C. Shaw, Jr.
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
541,667
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
4,643
|
|
Retired President
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
1,000,000
|
|
|
|
1,532,400
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,021,600
|
|
|
|
13,862
|
|
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
|
1,000,000
|
|
|
|
1,695,696
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,909,572
|
|
|
|
3,218
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
In conjunction with negotiating 2005 and 2006
Pay-for-Performance
Plans for Mr. Friedman in 2005, the Committee had
determined to make grants of restricted stock that would cover
2005 and 2006. The restricted stock grant was made in 2005. As
required by SEC rules, the dollar value of the long term
restricted stock grants for 2005 and 2006 (approximately
$3,000,000 for each) is included in the line showing 2005
compensation in the Table above. As discussed in the
Report of the Compensation Committee on Executive
Compensation, the Compensation Committee considers those
grants as part of 2005 and 2006 compensation. |
|
(2) |
|
The Bonus column in the table above includes current
year deferrals of $100,000 for Mr. Feller through the DCP. |
11
|
|
|
(3) |
|
The amounts shown include cash and non-cash compensation earned
by the Named Executive Officers as well as amounts earned but
deferred under our deferred compensation plans. In addition, we
have established investment entities and permitted executive
officers and others to acquire interests in these entities, or
have permitted deferred bonus amounts shown in the table above
to be deemed invested in those entities. Some of these
investment entities are funds managed by Jefferies or its
affiliates, some hold equity and derivative securities in
companies for which Jefferies or its affiliates have provided
investment banking and other services, and others invest on a
pari passu basis in all trading and investment activities
undertaken by Jefferies High Yield Division. See
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions.
Annual compensation for 2005 excludes the value of perquisites
and personal benefits which, for each executive officer, did not
exceed the lesser of 10% of his or her salary and bonus (as
shown in the Table) or $50,000. |
|
(4) |
|
On December 31, 2005, the six individuals in the table held
our restricted shares or restricted stock units
(RSUs) with an aggregate market value as follows:
Mr. Handler held 1,264,158 with a market value of
$56,861,844; Mr. Friedman held 469,381 with a market value
of $21,112,747; Mr. Schenk held 89,818 with a market value
of $4,040,029; Mr. Feller held 20,000 with a market value of
$899,600; Ms. Syrjamaki held 6,428 with a market value of
$289,116; and Mr. Shaw held 248,165 with a market value of
$11,162,461. The risk of forfeiture of Mr. Shaws
restricted stock and RSUs was based on non-competition and
related obligations in effect following his retirement. |
|
|
|
In the case of Mr. Handler, restrictions on 600,000 RSUs
granted on May 5, 2003 will lapse on May 5, 2006;
restrictions on 62,110 RSUs granted on January 20, 2004
will lapse on January 20, 2007; restrictions on 474,637
RSUs granted on August 20, 2004 will lapse on
January 1, 2008; and restrictions on 104,875 RSUs granted
December 29, 2005 will lapse with respect to 20,975 RSUs on
each December 29 from 2006 through 2010. The totals above do not
include certain vested RSUs whose receipt Mr. Handler has
deferred, including 704,989 RSUs arising upon
Mr. Handlers election to defer the gains from
options, 1,068,732 RSUs arising upon the deferral of the receipt
of restricted stock which have now vested, and 41,160 RSUs
resulting from his deferral of dividends on vested RSUs.
Deferrals on these RSUs will lapse upon the earliest to occur of
his reaching age 65 or termination of employment and
dividends payable on deferred RSUs will continue to be
reinvested in additional vested and deferred RSUs. |
|
|
|
In the case of Mr. Friedman, restrictions on 30,060
restricted shares granted February 7, 2002 lapsed on
February 7, 2005; restrictions on 40,000 shares
granted January 21, 2003 lapsed on January 23, 2006;
restrictions on 65,000 RSUs granted January 20, 2004 will
lapse on December 31, 2006; restrictions on 12,000 RSUs
granted April 12, 2004 will lapse with respect to 3,000
RSUs on each January 20 from 2006 through 2009; restrictions on
150,000 RSUs granted January 16, 2005 will lapse with
respect to 30,000 RSUs on January 18 of each of 2006 through
2009 and the balance on December 16, 2009; restrictions on
147,167 RSUs granted August 18, 2005 will lapse on
August 15, 2008; and restrictions on 52,437 RSUs granted on
December 29, 2005 will lapse on December 29 of each of 2006
through 2010. |
|
|
|
In the case of Mr. Schenk, restrictions on 10,997 RSUs
granted October 18, 2004 will lapse on October 18,
2007; restrictions on 9,327 RSUs granted April 12, 2004
will lapse on April 12, 2007; restrictions on 28,506 RSUs
granted January 20, 2004 will lapse on January 20,
2007; restrictions on 9,164 RSUs granted August 4, 2003
will lapse on August 4, 2006; restrictions on 15,988 RSUs
granted January 18, 2005 will vest 5,329 shares on
each of January 18, 2006 and 2007 and 5,330 RSUs on
December 16, 2007; restrictions on 14,402 RSUs will lapse
with respect to 2,880 RSUs granted December 29, 2005, with
respect to 2,881 shares on each December 29 of 2007 through
2009; and the balance will lapse on December 29, 2010. |
|
|
|
In the case of Mr. Feller, restrictions on 10,000
restricted shares will lapse on December 2 of each of 2006 and
2007. |
|
|
|
In the case of Ms. Syrjamaki, restrictions on 1,460 RSUs
granted January 21, 2003 lapsed on January 23, 2006;
restrictions on 1,211 RSUs granted January 20, 2004
will lapse on January 20, 2007; restrictions on 1,241 RSUs
granted January 18, 2005 lapsed with respect to 248 RSUs on
January 18, 2006, and will vest with respect to an
additional 248 shares on January 18 of each of 2007 through
2009 with restrictions on the balance lapsing on
December 16, 2009. |
|
|
|
In the case of Mr. Shaw, restrictions on
200,000 shares granted January 1, 2003 will lapse on
May 5, 2006; restrictions on 22,403 shares granted
January 20, 2004 will vest January 20, 2007; regarding
restrictions on |
12
|
|
|
|
|
25,438 shares granted January 18, 2005, restrictions
with respect to 8,479 shares lapsed on January 18,
2006, restrictions with respect to 8,479 shares will lapse
on January 18, 2007 and restrictions with respect to
8,480 shares will lapse on December 16, 2007. |
|
|
|
In addition, each of the named executive officers held share
denominated deferrals under the DCP as follows:
Mr. Handler, 124,721 shares; Mr. Friedman,
10,334 shares; Mr. Schenk, 48,638 shares;
Mr. Feller, 7,492 shares, Ms. Syrjamaki
7,244 shares; and Mr. Shaw 43,290 shares. |
|
(5) |
|
The total amounts for 2005 shown in the All Other
Compensation column include the following: |
|
|
|
Matching contributions under our 401(k)/Profit
Sharing Plan (PSP). During the plan year ended
November 30, 2005, Messrs. Friedman, Schenk, Feller, Shaw
and Ms. Syrjamaki each received $3,500 as our matching
contribution.
|
|
|
|
Reallocation of forfeitures under our Employee Stock
Ownership Plan (ESOP). During the plan year ended
November 30, 2005, we credited the accounts of the five
executive officers with 7.1105 shares of Common Stock at an
original cost of $11.895 per share, for a total value of
$84.58 as a result of such forfeitures.
|
|
|
|
Reallocation of forfeitures under the PSP. During
the plan year ended November 30, 2005, we credited the
accounts of Friedman, Schenk, Feller, Shaw and Syrjamaki with
$188 as a result of PSP forfeitures.
|
|
|
|
With respect to Mr. Feller and
Ms. Syrjamaki, $8,359 and $1,171 respectively as the value
of discount shares acquired under our deferred compensation plan.
|
Aggregated
Option/SAR Exercises In Last Fiscal Year
And FY-End Option/SAR Values
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Securities
|
|
|
Value of Unexercised
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
Underlying Unexercised
|
|
|
In-The-Money
|
|
|
|
Acquired
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options/SARs at FY-
|
|
|
Options/SARs at FY-
|
|
|
|
on Exercise
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
End (#) Exercisable (E)/
|
|
|
End ($) Exercisable/
|
|
Name
|
|
(#)
|
|
|
Realized ($)
|
|
|
Unexercisable (U)
|
|
|
Unexercisable(1)
|
|
|
Richard B. Handler
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
625,076
|
(E)
|
|
$
|
14,617,111
|
(E)
|
Brian P. Friedman
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
98,320
|
(E)
|
|
$
|
2,357,410
|
(E)
|
Joseph A. Schenk
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
117,414
|
(E)
|
|
$
|
2,727,572
|
(E)
|
Lloyd H. Feller
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50,000
|
(E)
|
|
$
|
1,140,250
|
(E)
|
Maxine Syrjamaki
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,708
|
(E)
|
|
$
|
45,475
|
(E)
|
John C. Shaw, Jr.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
At December 30, 2005, the closing price of our Common Stock
was $44.98, which was the price used to determine the year-end
value tables. |
Section 16(a)
Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance
Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
requires our Directors and Executive Officers, and persons who
beneficially own more than 10% of our outstanding Common Stock,
to file with the SEC, by a specified date, initial reports of
beneficial ownership and reports of changes in beneficial
ownership of our Common Stock and other equity securities on
Forms 3, 4 and 5. Directors, Executive Officers, and
greater-than-10% shareholders are required by SEC regulations to
furnish us with copies of all Section 16(a) forms they file.
Notwithstanding anything to the contrary set forth in any
of our previous filings under the Securities Act of 1933, or the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, that might incorporate future
filings, including this Proxy Statement, in whole or in part,
the following Report Of The Compensation Committee On Executive
Compensation, Report Of The Audit Committee and the Performance
Graph on page 20 shall not be incorporated by reference
into any such filings.
13
Report Of
The Compensation Committee
On Executive Compensation
The Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors, the
members of which in 2005 were Messrs. Campbell, Dooley, and
Macchiarola, has furnished the following report on executive
compensation:
To: The Board of Directors and Shareholders of
Jefferies Group, Inc.
Our Compensation Committee acts on behalf of the Board of
Directors and shareholders to administer the compensation
program for executives. We intend that this compensation program
will promote the Companys long-term success and
profitability, to the benefit of shareholders. Our Committee
operates under a charter adopted by the Board of Directors,
which delegates authority to the Committee and provides for its
governance. Each member of the Committee serving now and
throughout 2005 was independent under New York Stock Exchange
and other applicable standards of independence.
We have established compensation policies, plans and programs
for executive officers that are intended to meet a number of key
objectives:
|
|
|
|
|
Provide incentives that reward productivity and profitability,
and keep expense of the program in line with performance
|
|
|
|
Provide competitive levels of compensation in order to attract
talented employees
|
|
|
|
Provide compensation that is perceived as fair, in comparison to
other companies and within the Company
|
|
|
|
Encourage long-term service and loyalty to the Company
|
|
|
|
Promote our entrepreneurial culture, in which executives and
employees are shareholders and act in the interest of
shareholders.
|
We implement a large part of the executive compensation program
under the 2003 Incentive Compensation Plan, a
shareholder-approved plan which provides for cash-based
incentive awards tied to measures of performance and for grants
of stock options, restricted stock and other share-based awards.
Specifically, cash annual incentive awards provide executives
with an incentive to focus on aspects of Company performance
that we believe are key to its success, while equity-based
awards provide increasing rewards to executives if the value of
the Companys stock rises during the life of the award,
thus encouraging a long-term focus and aligning the interests of
executive officers with the interests of shareholders.
In implementing compensation policies, plans, and programs for
2005, we considered the effects of Section 162(m) of the
Internal Revenue Code. Section 162(m) generally disallows a
public companys tax deduction for compensation to its
chief executive officer and any of the four other most highly
compensated executive officers in excess of $1 million in
any tax year. Under Section 162(m), compensation that
qualifies as performance-based compensation is
excluded from the $1 million deductibility cap, and
therefore remains fully deductible even though such compensation
may (together with other compensation) exceed $1 million in
a given year. We seek to preserve the tax deductibility of most
compensation to executive officers, to the extent that this
objective does not impair the operation and effectiveness of the
Companys compensation policies and programs. To this end,
the 2003 Plan has been designed and implemented in a manner so
that annual incentive awards, stock options, and some restricted
stock/restricted stock unit awards granted to senior executives
can qualify as performance-based compensation that
will remain fully deductible by the Company. We have also
adopted programs permitting deferrals of compensation, so that
potentially non-deductible compensation will be paid following
termination of an executives service, at a time when
payment of such compensation will not be subject to limits on
deductibility under Section 162(m). We retain the
flexibility to enter into arrangements that may result in
nondeductible compensation to executive officers, which may
include non-qualifying awards under the 2003 Plan.
Compensation
Paid to Executive Officers Generally
This report explains our program for paying senior executives
for 2005. We make our decisions on executive compensation
focusing on total direct compensation for a given year. Total
direct compensation includes annual
14
compensation, consisting of base salary and quarterly and annual
bonuses, and long-term compensation. As you read our report,
please keep these key points in mind:
|
|
|
|
|
Many of our determinations concerning the 2005 program were made
before 2005. In this way we can set performance goals for
executives to achieve in the up-coming year, and actual
performance in that year becomes the key determinant of the
amount of compensation earned.
|
|
|
|
We decided in 2004 to grant awards that provide the long-term
component of compensation to our Chairman of the Board and Chief
Executive Officer (the CEO) over a period of two
years. Thus restricted stock units granted in 2004 constituted
part of the total direct compensation of the CEO for 2005 and
2006.
|
|
|
|
Under applicable SEC rules, the Summary Compensation Table shows
equity compensation based on the year restricted stock units
were actually granted. Accordingly, some of the restricted stock
units shown as granted in 2004 are amounts which we view as
equity compensation for 2005 and some of the restricted stock
units shown as granted in 2005 are amounts which we view as
equity compensation for 2006.
|
|
|
|
In 2005, we granted restricted stock units to the Chairman of
the Executive Committee of Jefferies, which constitutes the
long-term component of his compensation for 2005 and 2006. The
entire amount of this grant is shown in the Summary Compensation
Table as a grant in 2005.
|
|
|
|
We pay part of the short-term incentive to our most senior
officers in the form of restricted stock units, which is shown
as long-term compensation in the Summary Compensation Table.
|
|
|
|
We provide benefits to executives and other employees that are
not part of what we consider direct compensation. As discussed
further below, we intend these benefits to be generally
competitive and to promote other compensation program
objectives, but, our evaluation of these benefits generally is
separate from our decisions on total direct compensation.
|
The Company is engaged in a highly competitive business, and its
success depends on the leadership of senior executives and the
talent of its key employees. In order to retain highly capable
individuals, we need to ensure that our compensation program
provides competitive levels of compensation. Therefore, we
review information concerning compensation paid to executive
officers of competitors, including how such compensation
correlates to performance and how the Companys performance
compares to those competitors. To be consistent over time, we
have used a peer group of public companies we
identified in 2000 based on comparable business activities and
competition for clients and executive talent. We also considered
size of the companies in selecting this group, but found it
necessary to include companies that range broadly in size in
order to have a group that met our other criteria.
We used the peer group information to provide general guidance
in our decision making for 2005, particularly regarding levels
of total direct compensation for the CEO, the Chairman of the
Executive Committee, and the CFO, the appropriate levels for
individual components of direct compensation (salary, bonus, and
long-term awards), and the upward and downward variability in
short-term incentives based on specific measures of performance.
However, we do not attempt to target an executive officers
total direct compensation to a particular level or percentile of
the average compensation payable to peer group executives.
Rather, peer-group information provides context for our
decisions on compensation and performance, particularly with
respect to competitiveness of our program. We also consider the
peer group information to identify compensation trends in the
industry.
This non-formulaic approach is appropriate in view of the fact
that the Company is a unique organization, with few, if any,
true peers in the industry. Part of what makes it
unique is its entrepreneurial culture that is driven by highly
talented and productive individuals. In contrast to many other
companies, our two most senior executives have roles that blend
both management and production responsibilities. The level of
compensation of high-performing producers in the industry
generally is high, regardless of executive duties. Our approach
has been to maintain the compensation opportunities of
executives who also are key producers, but to tie these
opportunities to the performance of the Company as a whole.
We have retained Mercer Human Resource Consulting to assist us
as we set the compensation of our most senior executive
officers. Mercer provides data and analysis regarding the peer
companies, and makes recommendations as to the amount and
structure of executive compensation under our program. Mercer
assisted us in
15
reevaluating the peer group, and provided us with a study in
2004 regarding the competitiveness of our total direct
compensation of the CEO based on the revised peer group and that
of the CFO based on the prior peer group. In 2005, Mercer also
provided information and analysis which we used in determining
the compensation of the Chairman of the Executive Committee of
Jefferies.
Annual compensation paid to executive officers in 2005,
generally consisted of a base salary
and/or
quarterly and annual bonuses which were determined in whole or
in part by reference to, for some executives, earnings per
share, return on equity, and pre-tax profit margin. These
financial measures are calculated using consolidated financial
results of Jefferies Group, Inc. Financial results are
adjusted to add back the negative effect of extraordinary
transactions (e.g. mergers, acquisitions, or divestitures), if
any, occurring during 2005. In the case of the two Executive
Vice Presidents, we specified a minimum guaranteed bonus, with
higher levels of bonus potentially earnable based on the
Companys financial performance. In addition, in the case
of the Controller who has predominantly administrative
functions, the amount of annual bonus payable is based on
individual initiative and performance; we have delegated
authority to senior management to make determinations regarding
annual incentive and other components of the Controllers
compensation.
The amount of each executive officers base salary is
intended to provide a predictable level of income to enable the
executive to meet living expenses and financial commitments. In
2003, we determined to set the salary of our CEO at
$1 million, a level not exceeding the permitted level of
non-performance based compensation that is fully deductible by
the Company under Code Section 162(m). This salary level
remained in effect in 2005. Other named executive officers
salaries were unchanged in 2005, except we increased the
Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretarys
salary in connection with our review of compensation for that
position and we set the salary for the newly hired Chairman of
the Executive Committee of Jefferies & Company, Inc. at
a level of 50% of the salary of the CEO. As stated above, our
determination of the appropriate level of base salary is
subjective and not formulaic.
In 2005, we again implemented the 2003 Plans authorization
of cash performance awards by means of the
Pay-For-Performance
Program. Under that Program, we determined formulas for payment
of annual and quarterly bonuses to executive officers by a date
early in 2005, so that the performance goals and potential
rewards could positively influence executives during the year.
The levels potentially earnable in an executives incentive
opportunity are set, taking into account other components of
compensation, with a view to providing an overall compensation
opportunity that is competitive and comparable to our
established levels of recent compensation for similar
performance results. In particular, these formulas provided for
no annual bonus if threshold levels of performance were not
achieved (except for guaranteed minimum bonuses for the two
Executive Vice Presidents), a targeted amount of annual bonus
for achievement of target performance, and greater- or less-than
target payouts for performance that exceeded or fell short of
the specified target levels (as the case may be), up to a
specified maximum payout. For 2005, the program included payouts
of a portion of the bonus authorized for achievement of
performance goals for some fiscal quarters. We received
significant input from the CEO in determining the bonus formulas
for executive officers other than the CEO. We have in some cases
considered requests from the affected executive in setting the
elements and amounts of the executives compensation.
The setting of the levels and other terms of annual bonuses
potentially payable under the
Pay-For-Performance
Incentive Program involves our subjective determinations. In
addition, we reserve the right to adjust bonus amounts downward,
in our discretion, under the Program. As stated above, for 2005
the annual bonus incentives for the named executive officers
other than the Controller were to be earned based on earnings
per share (55% weighting), return on equity (40% weighting) and
pre-tax profit margin performance (5% weighting). For 2005,
performance with respect to earnings per share was outstanding,
the increase in earnings per share (fully diluted) of 12.6% over
2004 exceeded the maximum full-year performance level. In
addition, 2005 performance with respect to return on equity and
pre-tax profit margin were each well in excess of the target
level of performance set for the year. As a result of this
outstanding performance, the annual incentive payout under the
Pay-for-Performance
Incentive Program for 2005 was authorized for the CEO at 166% of
the target payout. For other executive officers, the 2005
performance goals were met and at levels substantially above the
target levels. We retain discretion under the
Pay-For-Performance
Incentive Program to reduce an annual incentive payout based on
an executives individual performance and other
circumstances. Our exercise of this discretion can result in
varying levels of bonus payouts.
16
We paid a portion of the annual bonus earned by the CEO and
certain other named executive officers under the
Pay-For-Performance
Incentive Program in the form of restricted stock units, which
require continued service after the performance year in order to
vest. These grants in lieu of annual bonus generally vest in
annual increments over five years, although in the case of
death, disability, and termination by the Company without cause
before the vesting date the awards do not lapse. Non-competition
and other covenants intended to protect our business apply for
the full vesting period in the case of termination by the
Company not for cause before a change in control. These grants
of restricted stock units in lieu of annual bonus in some cases
were made with the concurrence of the affected executive officer.
We provide an opportunity for executives to defer receipt of
cash portions of annual bonus awards, and to have deferred
amounts be deemed invested in specified investment vehicles
during the period of deferral. The Company has implemented the
Jefferies Group, Inc. Deferred Compensation Plan (the
DCP), which permits executive officers and other
eligible employees to defer cash compensation, some or all of
which is deemed invested in stock units. A portion of the
deferrals may also be directed to notional investments in a
money market fund or certain of the employee investment
opportunities described under the caption Certain
Relationships and Related Transactions. Stock units are
credited to participants at a discount we establish each year,
which was 10% in 2005. The amounts of 2005 salary and bonus
deferred by named executive officers are reflected in the
Summary Compensation Table without regard to deferral. The
portion of the deferrals under the DCP representing value of the
discount on stock units are reflected in the Summary
Compensation Table in the column captioned All Other
Compensation.
As stated above, we granted equity-based awards as 2005
compensation, apart from the DCP, to certain executive officers,
in the form of restricted stock units. For the CEO and the
Chairman of the Executive Committee of Jefferies &
Company, Inc, we granted restricted stock unit awards as the
long-term component of the executives total direct
compensation. These grants generally are based on our review of
trends in the compensation of executives in the securities
industry and our subjective judgment as to the appropriate level
of total compensation for the executive officer. However, we
consider grant practices of our peer group of companies to
provide context for our decisions. Restricted stock unit grants
to the CEO in 2004 were intended to be a component of total
compensation for both 2005 and 2006, but the value of these
grants is disclosed in the Summary Compensation Table entirely
in 2004, the year of grant. Likewise, an award of restricted
stock units to the Chairman of the Executive Committee of
Jefferies & Company, Inc. in 2005 constitutes the
long-term component of his total direct compensation for 2005
and 2006. Long-term equity-based awards serve both to align the
interests of executive officers with those of shareholders and
to promote retention and long-term service to the Company.
In 2003, the Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards No. 123 (FAS 123) as its method of
accounting for stock-based compensation plans. FAS 123
provides a method by which the fair value of equity awards,
including the fair value of stock options granted in 2003 and
thereafter, can be calculated and reflected in the
Companys financial statements. The Company adopted the
revised version of this accounting standard, FAS 123R, on
January 1, 2006.
We have implemented a program permitting employees and executive
officers to defer equity awards, including restricted stock
units. Deferrals of restricted stock units enable the employee
to specify that shares will be delivered in settlement at a date
later than the date the risk of forfeiture will lapse. This
program encourages long-term ownership of a significant equity
stake in the Company, which we believe is important to promoting
a culture of entrepreneurship. The cost of such a program to the
Company results mainly from deferring the time at which tax
deductions for the equity compensation may be claimed.
In addition to the deferred compensation program, the Company
provides benefits to executives and other employees that are not
part of what we consider direct compensation. We intend these
benefits to be generally competitive, in order to help in our
efforts to recruit and retain talented executives. We have not
implemented severance arrangements with our executive officers,
however. We also have adopted a policy, which was in effect in
2005, under which executives must reimburse the Company for
personal, non-business use of Company property and services. The
amount of this reimbursement is based on our incremental cost;
there is no threshold or permitted level of
perquisites. We provide the CEO with a driver for business
transit, including his commute, and
17
provide fuel and maintenance for the CEOs vehicle in
exchange for the use of the vehicle for other business purposes
when not needed by the CEO.
Compensation
Paid to the Chief Executive Officer in 2005
Our Committee is responsible for evaluating the performance and
establishing the compensation level of the Companys CEO,
Richard B. Handler.
Mr. Handlers compensation package for 2005 was
intended to motivate and reward him for achieving pre-determined
goals with respect to earnings per share, return on average
equity and pre-tax profit margin, and to provide equity-based
compensation that would closely align his interests with those
of shareholders. In setting Mr. Handlers compensation
opportunities for 2005, we intended that such compensation would
be generally competitive with that of chief executive officers
of other comparable companies in the securities industry, with a
large percentage of this compensation based upon achievement of
objective performance goals. As discussed above, the level of
Mr. Handlers compensation also reflects his
significant contributions to the Company as a producer,
particularly with respect to the High Yield Division, investment
banking work, and management of the Jefferies Partners
Opportunity Funds and Jefferies Employees Opportunity Fund
(discussed in Certain Relationships and Related
Transactions below), in addition to his duties as CEO.
Since he assumed the duties of CEO, we have tied his bonus
compensation to performance of the Company as a whole, and
focused on creating long-term shareholder value through an
emphasis on stock awards.
As discussed above, we made a series of decisions before the
beginning of 2005 establishing Mr. Handlers
compensation program for 2005. The following table shows the
total direct compensation we authorized, including the amount of
short-term incentives that would be earned by performance at
target levels with respect to earnings per share, return on
equity, and pre-tax profit margin:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bonus
|
|
|
Equity Incentives(1)
|
|
Totals
|
|
|
|
Salary
|
|
|
Threshold
|
|
|
Target
|
|
|
Superior Plus
|
|
|
Restricted Stock
|
|
At Target
|
|
|
Amount/ Value
|
|
$
|
1,000,000
|
|
|
$
|
1,000,000
|
|
|
$
|
6,000,000
|
|
|
$
|
11,000,000
|
|
|
273,318 shares/$8,000,000
|
|
$
|
15,000,000
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The restricted stock units were granted August 20, 2004,
and are valued in the table at $33.71 per share, the market
value of Company common stock on that date. |
The level of total direct compensation for target level
performance was lower for 2005 as compared to 2004, a
determination we made in 2004 based on our assessment that this
level of total direct compensation would be competitive and
provide an incentive to outstanding performance. By making
equity award grants in advance of 2005, we provided an
opportunity to the executive to benefit from a sustained period
of good performance, which in fact has occurred since 2002.
This total direct compensation for 2005 consisted of base
salary, an incentive award implemented under and subject to the
terms of the
Pay-for-Performance
Program and equity awards under the 2003 Plan. As discussed
above, that salary level of $1 million, established for
2003, continued in 2005. Our aim in setting the CEOs
salary was to provide a non-performance based element of
compensation that was certain as to payment, recognizing that
some trade-off exists between a desire to avoid exposing the CEO
to compensation risk and the desire to align the interests of
the CEO as closely as possible with those of the Companys
shareholders.
As discussed above, Company performance for 2005 substantially
exceeded the target levels for the performance goal as a whole
and for the each of the components, earnings per share, return
on equity and pre-tax profit margin. This resulted in the CEO
becoming entitled to a bonus of $9.949 million under the
Pay-for-Performance
Incentive Program, an amount substantially in excess of the
$6 million target bonus. We made one quarterly payout in
2005 of a portion of the bonus based on achievement of quarterly
performance goals, but did not make a quarterly payout in the
other three quarters although quarterly performance goals were
achieved in all four quarters of 2005.
The long-term incentive component of the CEOs 2005
compensation was granted in the form of restricted stock units
in 2004. In August 2004, we granted 474,637 restricted stock
units to the CEO, with a value of approximately
$16 million, as the long-term incentive component of his
2005 and 2006 compensation. Through this grant, we sought to
provide a substantial component of compensation that would focus
the CEO on long-term
18
growth in the value of the Companys stock. Generally, we
calculate the value of the restricted stock units and determine
the amount of shares to be granted based on our targeted levels
of total compensation for the CEO for the year. The restricted
stock units grants provided for cliff vesting 3 years and
four months after grant. The restricted stock units also were
subject to a performance condition requiring that a minimum
level of earnings per share be attained in 2003, in order to
qualify the award as performance based under
Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code. This
performance requirement was met in 2005. Equity awards provide
compensation linked to the performance of our stock, with a
strong inducement to long-term service, and recognize the
Companys strong long-term performance attributable to the
leadership of the CEO.
The CEO has not sold any stock which was issued to him under
Company plans (or otherwise) since his employment began in 1990.
He has elected to defer equity awards under our deferral
programs, including restricted stock, restricted stock units,
and shares representing the gain from exercises of stock
options. These arrangements provide to him the advantages of tax
deferral, but provide no enhancement by the Company of the net
value of his restricted stock, restricted stock units and
options. In this type of deferral arrangement, the
Companys tax deduction is delayed until the year in which
the executive recognizes income, and is generally based on the
value of shares delivered at the time of settlement of the
deferral arrangement.
The foregoing report has been furnished by:
Richard G. Dooley, Chairman, W. Patrick Campbell and Frank J.
Macchiarola
* * *
Report Of The Audit Committee
The Audit Committee has reviewed and discussed the audited
financial statements with management to ensure that the
financial statements were prepared in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles and accurately reflect our
financial position. The Audit Committee has discussed with our
independent registered public accounting firm the matters
required to be discussed by Statement on Auditing Standards
No. 61, and has received written disclosures and a required
letter from the independent registered public accounting firm
regarding their independence. Based upon its discussions with
management, review of the independent auditors letter,
discussions with the independent registered public accounting
firm and other appropriate investigation, the Audit Committee
has recommended to the Board of Directors that the audited
financial statements be included in our Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
The Audit Committee has reviewed the non-audit fees described
below and has concluded that the amount and nature of those fees
is compatible with maintaining the independent registered public
accounting firms independence.
The foregoing report has been furnished by:
W. Patrick Campbell, Chairman
Frank J. Macchiarola and Richard G. Dooley
* * *
Information Regarding Auditors Fees
We paid our independent registered public accounting firm the
following fees for services rendered during 2004 and 2005:
Audit Fees Our registered public
accounting firm has billed us for audit fees in an aggregate
amount of $3,642,861 for 2005 and $2,223,181 for 2004. These
amounts include fees for professional services rendered as our
principal accountant for the audit of our consolidated financial
statements, review of financial statements included in our
Form 10-Q
filings, the audit of various affiliates and investment funds
managed by Jefferies or its affiliates, the audit of
managements assessment that our internal controls and
procedures are effective, the audit of various investment funds
managed by Jefferies, the attestation required by
Section 404 of Sarbanes-Oxley and for other services that
are normally provided in connection with statutory and
regulatory filings or engagements. The Audit Committee
preapproves all auditing services and permitted non-audit
services to be performed for us by our independent registered
public accounting firm, subject to certain small
19
exceptions for non-audit services, which are approved by the
Audit Committee prior to the completion of the audit. In 2005,
the Audit Committee preapproved all auditing services performed
for us by the independent registered public accounting firm.
Audit-Related Fees Our independent
registered public accounting firm has billed us for
audit-related fees in an aggregate amount of $573,353 for 2005,
and $216,000 for 2004. These amounts include fees for assurance
and related services that are reasonably related to the
performance of the audit or review of our financial statements
and are not reported under Audit Fees above.
Specifically, the services provided included the audit of our
employee benefit plans, accounting questions regarding various
issues including compensation, benefits, stock compensation,
compliance issues regarding funds managed by
Jefferies Asset Management and performing agreed upon
procedures related to specific matters at our request.
Tax Fees Our independent registered
public accounting firm has billed us for tax fees in an
aggregate amount of $389,663 for 2005, and $359,254 for 2004.
These amounts include fees for tax compliance, tax advice and
tax planning.
All Other Fees Our independent
registered public accounting firm did not bill us for any
services during 2005 or 2004 that did not fall within the above
categories.
Shareholder
Return Performance Presentation
Set forth below is a line graph comparing the yearly change in
the cumulative total shareholder return on our Common Stock
against the cumulative total return of the Standard &
Poors 500, and the Financial Service Analytics Brokerage
(FSA Composite) Indices for the period of five
fiscal years, commencing January 1, 2001 (based on prices
at December 31, 2000), and ending December 31, 2005.
Comparison
Of Five Year Cumulative Total Return*
Jefferies Group, Inc.s Common, Standard &
Poors 500 and FSA Composite Indices
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2000
|
|
|
2001
|
|
|
2002
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2005
|
Jefferies Group Inc.
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
|
136
|
|
|
|
|
136
|
|
|
|
|
216
|
|
|
|
|
266
|
|
|
|
|
301
|
|
FSA Composite
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
|
78
|
|
|
|
|
61
|
|
|
|
|
81
|
|
|
|
|
193
|
|
|
|
|
98
|
|
S&P 500
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
|
88
|
|
|
|
|
69
|
|
|
|
|
88
|
|
|
|
|
98
|
|
|
|
|
103
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Normalized so that the value of our Common Stock and each index
was $100 on December 31, 2000. |
20
Pension
Plan
All persons who were our employees prior to April 1, 1997,
who are citizens or residents of the United States, who are
21 years of age, and who have completed one year of service
are covered by the Jefferies Group, Inc. Employees
Pension Plan (the Pension Plan), a defined benefit
plan, which was originally adopted in 1964 and amended in
January 1987. The Pension Plan is funded through our
contributions and through earnings on existing assets in
conformance with annual actuarial evaluations. The Pension Plan
provides for annual benefits following normal retirement at
age 65 equal to 1% of the employees covered
remuneration from January 1, 1987, until termination of
employment plus 20% of the first $4,800 and 50% of amounts
exceeding $4,800 of annual average covered remuneration for 1985
and 1986, reduced proportionately for service of less than
fifteen years (as of December 31, 1986). Benefits are
payable for the remaining life of the participant, and are not
subject to deduction for Social Security benefits or other
offsets.
Covered remuneration for purposes of the Pension Plan includes
the employees total annual compensation (salaries, bonuses
and commissions) not to exceed $100,000 for 1985 and 1986, and
$200,000 for 1987. From 1988 through 1993, this latter dollar
limitation was adjusted automatically for each plan year to the
amount prescribed by the Secretary of the Treasury, or his
delegate, for such plan year. From 1994 until 1996, the maximum
covered remuneration was $150,000. From 1997 through 1999, the
maximum covered remuneration was $160,000, for 2000 and 2001 the
maximum covered remuneration was $170,000, and for 2002 and
2003, the maximum covered remuneration was $200,000. For 2004
and 2005, the maximum covered remuneration was $210,000. An
employee who retires upon normal retirement at age 65 with
at least four years of service will receive a full vested
benefit. An employee who retires at age 55 with at least
four years of service will receive the normal retirement benefit
reduced by
1/2%
for each month benefit payments commence before age 65.
Employees who terminate employment with us for reasons other
than death or retirement will be entitled to the vested portion
of their benefits at their normal or early retirement age.
Benefits vest at the rate of 0% for the first year of service,
33% for each of the next two years of service, and 34% for the
fourth year of service. The retirement benefits payable at
age 65 for those employees with service prior to
January 1, 1987, will be composed of two items: (1) a
benefit for service up to December 31, 1986, in accordance
with the original Pension Plan formula recognizing pay as the
average of 1985 and 1986 remuneration up to $100,000, and
(2) a benefit for service commencing on January 1,
1987, equal to 1% of covered remuneration through the date of
termination. Total years of credited service apply to both the
original and amended Pension Plans for purposes of determining
vesting and eligibility. Effective December 31, 2005,
benefits under the Pension Plan were frozen. As a result, the
estimated benefits described below are significantly lower than
in prior years.
As of December 31, 2005, the estimated annual benefits
payable upon retirement at normal retirement age for each of the
persons named in the summary compensation table who are entitled
to benefits under the Pension Plan are: Mr. Handler:
$29,811; Mr. Schenk: $19,625; Ms. Syrjamaki: $44,471.
Certain
Relationships And Related Transactions
Through Jefferies, our wholly owned broker-dealer subsidiary, we
have extended credit to Mr. Handler, Mr. Schenk and
Ms. Syrjamaki in margin accounts in the ordinary course of
business, on substantially the same terms, including interest
rates and collateral, as those prevailing at the time for
comparable transactions with other persons and did not involve
more than the normal risk of collectibility or present other
unfavorable features. We believe the foregoing transactions were
on terms no less favorable to us than could have been obtained
from unaffiliated parties.
Our executive officers and directors have been permitted to make
direct and indirect investments in certain high yield funds we
manage on the same basis as we have given our other employees
and investors. Although we commonly refer to these vehicles as
funds, they are registered with the Securities &
Exchange Commission as broker-dealers. These funds are managed
by Jefferies and invest on a pari passu basis in all
trading and investment activities undertaken by Jefferies
High Yield Division. Two of the funds, the
Jefferies Partners Opportunity Funds (the
JPOFs), are principally capitalized with equity
contributions from institutional and high net worth investors.
The third fund, Jefferies Employees Opportunity Fund
(JEOF and, with the JPOFs, the High Yield
Funds), is principally capitalized with equity investments
from our employees. Jefferies and certain executive officers or
other employees have direct investments in all three High Yield
Funds on terms identical to other fund participants, and
21
indirect investments under deferred compensation arrangements
that track the financial returns of direct investments. As a
result of their respective investments, Mr. Handler,
Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and a nominee,
has an aggregate interest of 2.92% in the total members
equity in the High Yield Funds; Mr. Friedman, one of our
Directors, Chairman of the Executive Committee and a nominee,
has an aggregate interest through a family partnership he
controls of 0.26% in such total members equity;
Mr. Schenk, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer, has an aggregate interest of 0.10% in such total
members equity; Ms. Syrjamaki, our Controller, has an
aggregate interest of .01% in such total members equity;
Mr. Feller, Secretary, General Counsel and Executive Vice
President, has an aggregate interest of .03% in such total
members equity; and Mr. Campbell, one of our
Directors and a nominee, has an aggregate interest of .02% in
such total members equity. The High Yield Division and
each of the High Yield Funds share gains or losses on all
trading and investment activities of the High Yield Division on
the basis of a pre-established sharing arrangement related to
the amount of capital each has available for such transactions.
We modify the sharing arrangement from time to time to reflect
changes in the respective amounts of available capital. As of
December 31, 2005, the High Yield Funds were being
allocated an aggregate of 64% of such gains and losses and as of
February 10, 2006, the High Yield Funds were being
allocated an aggregate of 59% of such gains and losses. The High
Yield Funds also reimburse Jefferies for their share of
allocable trading expenses. At year end 2005, the High Yield
Division had in excess of $945 million of combined pari
passu capital available from the High Yield Funds (including
unfunded commitments and availability under the High Yield
Funds revolving credit facility) and Jefferies for use in
the High Yield Divisions investment and trading strategy.
The High Yield Funds have a revolving credit facility that is
collateralized by their investments which is non-recourse to us.
Jefferies receives a management fee from the JPOFs in an amount
equal to 1% per annum of the market value of their
investments and is entitled to a carried interest of 20% of all
distributions once investors have received a specified threshold
return. JEOF pays Jefferies a management fee of 3% per
annum and there is no carried interest. Mr. Handler
actively manages the High Yield Funds but does not receive any
additional compensation from the High Yield Funds or as a direct
result of his management of the High Yield Funds. Investors in
the High Yield Funds would have the right to redeem their
investment should Mr. Handler cease actively managing the
High Yield Funds.
In addition to the High Yield Funds, we have invested in private
equity funds (Private Equity Funds) managed by
companies (the Fund Managers) controlled in part by
Mr. Friedman, one of our directors, Chairman of the
Executive Committee of the Board of Directors of Jefferies and a
nominee. The Fund Managers serve as the managers of the Private
Equity Funds and have varying carried and other interests in
those funds. Mr. Friedman has a substantial economic
interest in the Fund Managers and, indirectly, in the income
they generate from the Private Equity Funds. As of
March 30, 2006, we had committed an aggregate of
approximately $44.5 million to these funds, and had funded
approximately $9.9 million. We have also guaranteed the
obligations of two of these funds which may arise under a
$20 million credit facility and a $4 million credit
facility provided by a third party. We have also guaranteed a
$30 million bank loan issued to a Jefferies employee fund
related to Fund IV discussed below. As a result of those
investments, commitments and guarantees, as of March 31,
2006, we have received distributions of approximately
$10.6 million. Through our subsidiaries, we have performed
investment banking and other services for companies in which the
Private Equity Funds have invested. In some cases, the Private
Equity Funds control those companies in which they have
invested. From January 1, 2005, through March 31,
2006, we received approximately $16 million for investment
banking and other services performed for companies in which the
Private Equity Funds and other funds overseen by Mr. Friedman
have investments.
We employ and provide office space for all of the Fund
Managers employees under an arrangement we entered into
with Mr. Friedman and Jefferies Capital Partners in
2005 and previously under an agreement entered into in 2001.
Jefferies Capital Partners reimburses us on an annual basis
for our direct employee costs, office space costs, other direct
costs, as well as an agreed-upon estimate of indirect costs. In
2005, we billed and received approximately $4.3 million for
such expenses.
On July 18, 2005, we entered into a Share and Membership
Interest Purchase Agreement (the Purchase Agreement)
with Mr. Friedman, a family partnership he controls,
Mr. James L. Luikart, and certain of the Fund Managers.
Jefferies Capital Partners IV L.P., together with its
related parallel funds (Fund IV), is a private
equity fund managed by a team led by Messrs. Friedman and
Luikart. In the Purchase Agreement, we agreed to purchase a 49%
interest in the manager of Fund IV and an amount, not less
than 20% and not more than the percentage
22
allocated to Mr. Friedman, of the carried interest
attributed to Fund IV. In addition, we also acquired the
right to receive similar interests from future private equity
funds overseen by Mr. Friedman, subject to certain
conditions including our commitment of capital to those future
funds. We have mutually agreed with Mr. Friedman that,
subject to certain permitted investments, neither party will
sponsor or become a lead investor in any fund with substantially
similar objectives to Fund IV or the future funds, or make
any investment in a transaction meeting Fund IV or such
future funds investment criteria. In exchange for those
interests and future rights, we agreed to issue an aggregate of
between 320,000 and 520,000 shares of common stock to
Mr. Friedman. The actual number of shares of common stock
to be issued will be based on the amount of capital committed at
the final closing of Fund IV, which has not yet occurred.
As of February 1, 2006, Mr. Friedman would have been
entitled to receive approximately 320,000 shares based on
capital committed at that time, a number that has increased to
400,000 as of March 7, 2006. Shares issued to Mr. Friedman
under the Purchase Agreement are subject to clawback provisions
based upon the size of a subsequent fund, as well as certain
other conditions. The manager of Fund IV has agreed to pay
us a pro rated annual management fee of $1.65 million for
providing management services until the closing of the principal
transactions contemplated by the Purchase Agreement. Through his
interest in the manager of Fund IV, Mr. Friedman has
an interest in the fees paid to the fund manager. A portion of
the management fees are based on loans we guarantee, and on
funds committed by an employee fund that has invested in
Fund IV on both a leveraged and unleveraged basis.
Michael Handler, brother of our Chief Executive Officer,
continues to manage a private investment fund on behalf of
Jefferies Asset Management, one of our subsidiaries. As of
April 1, 2006, Jefferies had an 11.92% interest in the
fund, Richard Handler had a 3.56% interest in the fund,
Mr. Friedman had a 1.09% interest in the fund,
Mr. Schenk had a .04% interest in the fund, and Michael
Handler had a 2.89% interest in the fund. Interests of Richard
and Michael Handler in the fund include direct investments and
indirect investments through our deferred compensation plans.
Pursuant to his employment agreement, Michael Handler received
an annual salary of $200,000. In addition, pursuant to his
employment agreement, Michael Handler and his portfolio
management team participate in a bonus pool based upon an agreed
percentage of the management, administration and incentive fees
received by Jefferies Asset Management from the fund,
including the Jefferies investment. The distribution of the
bonus pool among the funds portfolio management team is
based upon the recommendation of Michael Handler for so long as
Michael Handler remains employed as a portfolio manager of the
fund and is subject to the prior approval of senior management
of Jefferies Asset Management. For 2005, Michael
Handlers share of this bonus pool was $1,876,562 in cash,
and 11,036 RSUs. In addition, during 2005, Mr. Handler
received a residual bonus payment of $83,854 relating to
adjustments to the 2004 bonus pool. Mr. Handler is also
entitled to receive an additional 8,875 RSUs in 2006 based on
the net assets of the fund as of January 1, 2006. Michael
Handlers relationship with Jefferies, his employment
contract, which was based on the recommendation of the
management of Jefferies Asset Management, and the
compensation structure for the members of his group were
reviewed and approved by the Governance and Nominating Committee
of the Board of Directors. In reviewing Michael Handlers
contract, the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee took
into consideration managements statements that the
contract was the result of an arms length negotiation and
that the contract was comparable to a contract that
Jefferies Asset Management would enter into with an
unrelated person having the same background and skills as
Michael Handler. The Chief Executive Officer has recused himself
from all direct or indirect supervision of the fund or Michael
Handlers activities. Jefferies Asset Management is
responsible for the supervision of Michael Handlers
activities and has put in place a supervisory structure designed
to provide reasonable assurances that any conflicts of interest
created by the relationship between Richard and Michael Handler
will be appropriately addressed. In addition to the regular
review of the funds activities by the compliance group at
Jefferies Asset Management, KPMG, our independent auditors,
have audited the funds 2005 year end financial
statements. In addition, as part of its ongoing risk based audit
program, Internal Audit periodically reviews the activities of
the asset management business.
We also continue to employ Thomas E. Tarrant, the
brother-in-law
of our Chief Executive Officer, as the Director of Marketing.
For his services during 2005 he was paid $345,000 in a
combination of cash and restricted stock.
23
Annual
Report And Independent Auditors
Our Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005, accompanies
this Proxy Statement, but is not deemed a part of the proxy
soliciting material.
KPMG LLP served as our independent registered public accounting
firm for the year ended December 31, 2005. The appointment
of independent registered public accounting firm is approved
annually by the Audit Committee and is based, in part, on the
recommendations of the Audit Committee. In making its
recommendations, the Audit Committee reviews both the audit
scope and estimated audit fees for the coming year as well as
the qualifications and independence of the audit firm.
Shareholder approval is not sought in connection with this
selection.
A representative of KPMG LLP, the independent registered public
accounting firm who examined our consolidated financial
statements for 2005, is expected to be present at the meeting to
respond to appropriate questions of shareholders and will have
the opportunity to make a statement if he so desires.
Other
Matters
Management has received no shareholder proposal as of applicable
deadlines specified under SEC rules, and otherwise does not know
of any other matters to come before the Annual Meeting. However,
if any additional matters are properly presented to the meeting,
it is the intention of the persons named in the accompanying
proxy to vote such proxy in accordance with their best judgment
on such matters.
Shareholder
Proposals
Shareholder proposals for inclusion in the proxy material
relating to our 2007 Annual Meeting of Shareholders should be
sent to our principal executive offices at 520 Madison Avenue,
12th Floor, New York, New York, 10022. To be considered
timely under federal securities laws, any proposals must be
received no later than December 13, 2006, to be included in
next years proxy statement and proxy card, and no later
than February 26, 2007, if to be presented at the meeting
but not included in the proxy statement or proxy card. Though we
will consider all proposals, we are not required to include any
shareholder proposal in our proxy materials relating next
years annual meeting unless it meets all of the
requirements for inclusion established by the SEC and our
By-Laws.
For the Board of Directors,
Lloyd H. Feller, Secretary
April 12, 2006
24
APPENDIX 1
CATEGORICAL
STANDARDS FOR
DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE
The Board has established the following guidelines to assist it
in determining whether or not directors have a material
relationship with Jefferies for purposes of determining
independence.
A. Family Relationships. A director will
not be independent if, within the preceding five years;
(i) the director was employed by Jefferies; (ii) an
immediate family member of the director was employed by
Jefferies as an officer; (iii) the director was employed by
Jefferies independent auditor; (iv) an immediate
family member of the director was employed by Jefferies
independent auditor as a partner, principal or manager; or
(v) a Jefferies executive officer was on the compensation
committee of the board of directors of a Company that
concurrently employed the Jefferies director, or that
concurrently employed an immediate family member of the director
as an officer. A director will not be independent if his or her
spouse, parent, sibling or child is employed at Jefferies.
B. Commercial Relationships. The
following commercial relationships are not considered material
relationships that would impair a directors independence:
(i) the director is a director of another Company that does
business with Jefferies, or to which Jefferies provides
investment banking services; (ii) if an immediate family
member of a director is a director or employee of another
Company that does business with Jefferies or to which Jefferies
provides investment banking services; (iii) if a director
(or an immediate family member of the director) is an officer of
another Company that does business with Jefferies and the annual
sales to, or purchases from, Jefferies during such
Companys preceding fiscal year are less than five percent
of the annual revenues of such Company; or (iv) if a
director (or an immediate family member of the director) is an
officer of another Company to which Jefferies provides services,
provided that (1) such services are in the ordinary course
of business of Jefferies and are on substantially the same terms
as those prevailing at the time for comparable services provided
to unaffiliated third parties; and (2) with respect to
extensions of credit by Jefferies to such Company, no event of
default has occurred.
C. Charitable Relationships. The following
charitable relationship will not be considered a material
relationship that would impair a directors independence:
if a director (or an immediate family member of the director)
serves as an officer, director or trustee of a charitable
organization, and Jefferies discretionary charitable
contributions to the organization are less than $25,000 or one
percent of the organizations aggregate annual charitable
receipts during the organizations preceding fiscal year,
whichever is lower. (Jefferies automatic matching of
employee charitable contributions are not included in
Jefferies contributions for this purpose and do not affect
a directors independence.)
D. Personal Relationships. The following
personal relationship will not be considered to be a material
relationship that would impair a directors independence:
if a director (or an immediate family member of the director)
receives products or services from Jefferies in the ordinary
course and on substantially the same terms as those prevailing
at the time for comparable products or services provided to
unaffiliated third parties, such as brokerage services,
investment management services, and investments in funds managed
by Jefferies or its affiliates, and
E. Annual Review. The Board will annually
review Jefferies commercial, charitable and personal
relationships with Jefferies directors. For relationships that
are either not covered by or do not satisfy these guidelines,
the determination of whether the relationship is material or
not, and therefore whether the director would be independent or
not, shall be made by the directors satisfying the independence
guidelines set forth in sections (A), (B), (C) and
(D) above. Jefferies will explain in its next proxy
statement thereafter the basis for any board determination that
any such relationship was immaterial.
F. Definitions. For purposes of these
guidelines, the terms officer and immediate
family member shall have the meaning ascribed to them by
the proposed NYSE Listed Company rules.
25
ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS OF
JEFFERIES GROUP, INC.
May 22, 2006
Please date, sign and mail
your proxy card in the
envelope provided as soon
as possible.
ê Please
detach along perforated line and mail in the envelope
provided. ê
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR THE
ELECTION OF DIRECTORS.
PLEASE SIGN, DATE AND RETURN PROMPTLY IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE.
PLEASE MARK YOUR VOTE IN BLUE OR BLACK INK AS SHOWN HERE
|
x |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. |
Election of Directors |
|
2. |
In their discretion, upon such other business as may properly come before the
meeting, or at any adjournment thereof.
|
o |
|
|
NOMINEES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
FOR ALL NOMINEES |
¡ |
Richard B. Handler |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
¡ |
Brian P. Friedman |
|
|
|
TO INCLUDE ANY COMMENTS, USE THE COMMENTS BOX ON THE REVERSE
SIDE OF THIS CARD.
|
o |
|
WITHHOLD AUTHORITY |
¡ |
W. Patrick Campbell |
|
|
|
|
FOR ALL NOMINEES
|
¡ |
Richard G. Dooley |
|
|
|
|
|
|
¡ |
Robert Joyal |
|
|
|
|
|
o
|
|
FOR ALL EXCEPT
(See instructions below) |
¡ ¡ |
Frank J. Macchiarola Michael T. OKane |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INSTRUCTION:
To withhold authority to vote for any individual nominee(s), mark
FOR ALL EXCEPT and fill in the circle next to each
nominee you wish to withhold, as shown here:
=
|
|
|
|
|
|
To change the address on your account, please check the box
at right and indicate your new address in the address space
above. Please note that changes to the registered name(s)
on the account may not be submitted
via this method.
|
o |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Signature of Shareholder
|
|
|
|
Date:
|
|
|
|
Signature of Shareholder
|
|
|
|
Date:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note: |
|
Please sign exactly as your name or names appear on this Proxy. When shares are held jointly, each holder should sign. When signing as executor, administrator, attorney, trustee or guardian, please give full
title as such. If the signer is a corporation, please sign full corporate name by duly authorized officer, giving full title as such. If signer is a partnership, please sign in partnership name by authorized person.
|
|
|
We are proud to have delivered our sixth consecutive year of record revenues, earnings and earnings
per share. Across the board, our firm delivered solid results and our financial position remains strong
as our capital has increased to over $2 billion. We believe we are executing successfully on our
strategy to become the leading Wall Street firm focused on growing and mid-sized companies and their
investors.
We have worked very hard to diversify our revenues by building upon our capital markets
expertise and expanding the breadth of our capabilities and industry reach. Investment banking,
sales and trading, research and asset management remain the cornerstones of our firm as we
look to the future. We remain focused on growth, diversification, and providing the best execution
on all fronts as we continue to to build our special firm. We have a solid foundation for future
growth and scalability, and have tremendous momentum going into 2006.
As always, we are deeply appreciative of the loyalty of our growing client base, the support of our
fellow shareholders, the hard work and dedication of our 2,045 employee-partners, and the vision
of our fellow Executive Committee and Board Members.
|
|
|
Richard B. Handler
Chairman and CEO |
|
Brian P. Friedman
Chairman of the Executive Committee |
1 n
PROXY
JEFFERIES GROUP, INC.
Proxy for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders May 22, 2006
Solicited on Behalf of the Board of Directors of the Company
The undersigned holder(s) of common shares of JEFFERIES GROUP, INC., a Delaware corporation
(the Company), hereby appoints Richard B. Handler and Brian P. Friedman, and each of them,
attorneys of the undersigned, with power of substitution, to vote all shares of the common shares
that the undersigned is entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders of the Company to
be held on Monday, May 22, 2006, at 9:30 a.m. local time, and at any adjournment thereof, as
directed on the reverse hereof, hereby revoking all prior proxies granted by the undersigned.
(Continued and to be signed on the reverse side.)
ANNUAL
MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS OF
JEFFERIES GROUP, INC.
May 22,
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PROXY VOTING INSTRUCTIONS
|
|
|
MAIL
Date, sign and mail your proxy card in the
envelope provided as soon as possible.
- or -
TELEPHONE
Call toll-free 1-800-PROXIES
(1-800-776-9437) from
any touch-tone telephone and follow the instructions.
Have your proxy card available when you call.
- OR -
INTERNET Access www.voteproxy.com and follow
the on-screen instructions. Have your proxy card
available when you access the web page.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
COMPANY NUMBER
|
|
|
|
|
|
ACCOUNT NUMBER
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
You may enter your voting instructions at 1-800-PROXIES or www.voteproxy.com up until 11:59 PM
Eastern Time the day before the cut-off or meeting date.
|
ê Please
detach along perforated line and mail in the envelope provided
IF you are not voting via telephone or the
Internet. ê
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR THE
ELECTION OF DIRECTORS.
PLEASE SIGN, DATE AND RETURN PROMPTLY IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE.
PLEASE MARK YOUR VOTE IN BLUE OR BLACK INK AS SHOWN HERE
|
x |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. |
Election of Directors. |
|
2. |
In their discretion, upon such other business as may properly come before the
meeting, or at any adjournment thereof.
|
o |
|
|
NOMINEES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
FOR ALL NOMINEES |
¡ |
Richard B. Handler |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
¡ |
Brian P. Friedman |
|
|
|
TO INCLUDE ANY COMMENTS, USE THE COMMENTS BOX ON THE REVERSE
SIDE OF THIS CARD.
|
o |
|
WITHHOLD AUTHORITY |
¡ |
W. Patrick Campbell |
|
|
|
|
FOR ALL NOMINEES
|
¡ |
Richard G. Dooley |
|
|
|
|
|
|
¡ |
Robert Joyal |
|
|
|
|
|
o
|
|
FOR ALL EXCEPT
(See instructions below) |
¡ ¡ |
Frank J. Macchiarola Michael T. OKane |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INSTRUCTION:
To withhold authority to vote for any individual nominee(s), mark
FOR ALL EXCEPT and fill in the circle next to each
nominee you wish to withhold, as shown here:
=
|
|
|
|
|
|
To change the address on your account, please check the box
at right and indicate your new address in the address space
above. Please note that changes to the registered name(s)
on the account may not be submitted
via this method.
|
o |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Signature of Shareholder
|
|
|
|
Date:
|
|
|
|
Signature of Shareholder
|
|
|
|
Date:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note:
|
|
Please sign exactly as your name or names appear on this Proxy. When shares are held jointly, each holder should sign. When signing as executor, administrator, attorney, trustee or guardian, please give full
title as such. If the signer is a corporation, please sign full corporate name by duly authorized officer, giving full title as such. If signer is a partnership, please sign in partnership name by authorized person.
|
|
|