e424b3
Filed Pursuant to Rule 424(b)(3)
File
No. 333-140268
Prospectus
699,298 Shares
PDF Solutions, Inc.
Common Stock
This prospectus relates to the sale of up to 699,298 shares
of our common stock. These shares may be offered and sold from
time to time by certain of our stockholders, as identified below
in the section titled Selling Stockholders. We will
not receive any proceeds from the sale of the shares by the
selling stockholders. On October 31, 2006, 580,228 of the
shares were issued to the selling stockholders in connection
with the acquisition of Si Automation, S.A., a privately held
Fault Detection and Classification software and services
provider, based in Montpellier, France (SIA),
and an additional 119,070 may be issued to the selling
stockholders if certain milestones are met. The selling
stockholders may sell the shares from time to time on the Nasdaq
National Market in regular brokerage transactions, in
transactions directly with market makers or in certain privately
negotiated transactions. For additional information on the
methods of sale, you should refer to the section titled
Plan of Distribution. Each selling stockholder has
advised us that no sale or distribution other than as disclosed
herein will be effected until after this prospectus shall have
been appropriately amended or supplemented, if required, to set
forth the terms thereof. Selling commissions, brokerage fees,
any applicable stock transfer taxes and any fees and
disbursements of counsel to the selling stockholders are payable
individually by the selling stockholders.
On March 19, 2007, the last sale price of our common stock
on the Nasdaq National Market was $10.11 per share. Our
common stock is listed for quotation on the Nasdaq National
Market under the symbol PDFS.
Investing in our common stock
involves certain risks. See Risk Factors beginning
on page 2.
These securities have not been approved or disapproved by the
Securities and Exchange Commission or any state securities
commission nor has the Securities and Exchange Commission or any
state securities commission passed upon the accuracy or adequacy
of this prospectus. Any representation to the contrary is a
criminal offense.
The date of this Prospectus is March 20, 2007
TABLE OF
CONTENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
i
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
No person has been authorized to give any information or make
any representations in connection with this offering other than
those contained in this prospectus and, if given or made, such
information or representations must not be relied upon as having
been authorized by us. This prospectus does not constitute an
offer to sell or a solicitation of any offer to buy any of the
securities offered hereby by anyone in any jurisdiction in which
it is unlawful to make such offer or solicitation. Neither the
delivery of this prospectus nor any sale made hereunder shall,
under any circumstances, create any implication that the
information contained herein is correct as of any time
subsequent to the date of the prospectus.
INFORMATION
REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
Some of the statements contained or incorporated by reference in
this prospectus are forward-looking statements within the
meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and
Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Words
such as anticipate, continue,
could, projected, expects,
believes, intends, and
assumes, the negative of these terms and similar
expressions are used to identify forward-looking statements.
These statements are made based upon current expectations and
projections about our business and the semiconductor industry
and assumptions made by our management are not guarantees of
future performance, nor do we assume any obligation to update
such forward-looking statements after the date this report is
filed. Our actual results could differ materially from those
projected in the forward-looking statements for many reasons,
including the risk factors listed in the Risk Factors section.
All forward-looking statements in this prospectus are based on
information available to us at the date of this report and we
assume no obligation to update any such statements.
The following information should be read in conjunction with the
Consolidated Financial Statements and notes thereto included in
our Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2006, as filed with the SEC
on March 16, 2007. All references to fiscal year apply to
our fiscal year which ends on December 31.
i
THE
COMPANY
Our technologies and services enable semiconductor companies to
improve the yield and performance of integrated circuits, or
ICs, by integrating the design and manufacturing processes. We
believe that our solutions improve a semiconductor
companys
time-to-market,
yield and ultimately product profitability. Our solutions
combine proprietary manufacturing process simulation software,
yield and performance modeling software,
design-for-manufacturability
software, test chips, a proprietary electrical wafer test
system, yield and performance enhancement methodologies, yield
management systems, and professional services. We analyze yield
loss mechanisms to identify, quantify and correct the issues
that cause yield loss, as an integral part of the IC design
process. This drives IC design and manufacturing improvements
that enable our customers to have higher initial yields and
achieve and exceed targeted IC yield and performance throughout
product life cycles. Our solution is designed to increase the
initial yield when a design first enters a manufacturing line,
to increase the rate at which that yield improves, and to allow
subsequent product designs to be added to manufacturing lines
more quickly and easily.
The result of implementing our solutions is the creation of
value that can be measured based on improvements to our
customers actual yield. We align our financial interests
with the yield and performance improvements realized by our
customers, and receive revenue based on this value. To date, we
have sold our technologies and services to semiconductor
companies including leading integrated device manufacturers,
fabless semiconductor companies and foundries.
From our incorporation in 1992 through late 1995, we were
primarily focused on research and development of our proprietary
manufacturing process simulation and yield and performance
modeling software. From late 1995 through late 1998, we
continued to refine and sell our software, while expanding our
offering to include yield and performance improvement consulting
services. In late 1998, we began to sell our software and
consulting services, together with our newly developed
proprietary technologies, as
Design-to-Silicon-Yield
solutions, reflecting our current business model. In April 2000,
we expanded our research and development team and gained
additional technology by acquiring AISS, now operating as PDF
Solutions, GmbH, which continues to develop software and provide
development services to the semiconductor industry. In July
2001, we completed the initial public offering of our common
stock. In 2003, we enhanced our product and service offerings
through the acquisitions of IDS and WaferYield. In 2006, we
further complimented our technology offering through the
acquisition of Si Automation S.A.
Our
address:
PDF
Solutions, Inc.
333 West San Carlos Street, Suite 700
San Jose, California 95110
(408) 280-7900
As used in this prospectus, we, us,
our, the Company, and PDF
refer to PDF Solutions, Inc., a Delaware corporation.
1
RISK
FACTORS
An investment in our common stock involves a high degree of
risk. You should carefully consider the information contained in
the sections titled Risk Factors in
Part I Item 1A of our Annual Report on
Form 10-K,
Risk Factors in Part II
Item 1A of our Quarterly Reports on
Form 10-Q
and the risks described below, together with the other
information contained in, or incorporated by reference into,
this prospectus, before you decide whether to buy our common
stock. If any of the events described in these risks actually
occurs, the market price of our common stock could decline, and
you may lose all or part of the money you paid to buy our common
stock.
If
semiconductor designers and manufacturers do not continue to
adopt our
Design-to-Silicon-Yield
solutions, we may be unable to increase or maintain our
revenue.
If semiconductor designers and manufacturers do not continue to
adopt our
Design-to-Silicon-Yield
solutions, our revenue could decline. To date, we have worked
with a limited number of semiconductor companies on a limited
number of IC products and processes. To be successful, we will
need to continue to enter into agreements covering a larger
number of IC products and processes with existing customers and
new customers. Our existing customers are primarily large
integrated device manufacturers, or IDMs. We target as new
customers additional IDMs, fabless semiconductor companies, and
foundries, as well as system manufacturers. Factors that may
limit adoption of our
Design-to-Silicon-Yield
solutions by semiconductor companies include:
|
|
|
|
|
our customers failure to achieve satisfactory yield
improvements using our
Design-to-Silicon-Yield
solutions;
|
|
|
|
a decrease in demand for semiconductors generally or the demand
for deep submicron semiconductors failing to grow as rapidly as
expected;
|
|
|
|
the industry may develop alternative methods to enhance the
integration between the semiconductor design and manufacturing
processes due to a rapidly evolving market and the likely
emergence of new technologies;
|
|
|
|
our existing and potential customers reluctance to
understand and accept our innovative gain share fee component;
and
|
|
|
|
our customers concern about our ability to keep highly
competitive information confidential.
|
We
generate a large percentage of our total revenue from a limited
number of customers, so the loss of any one of these customers
could significantly reduce our revenue and results of operations
below expectations.
Historically, we have had a small number of large customers for
our core
Design-to-Silicon-Yield
solutions and we expect this to continue in the near term. In
the year ended December 31, 2006, two customers accounted
for 37% of our total net revenue, with International Business
Machines Corporation representing 25% and Toshiba Corporation
representing 12%. In the year ended December 31, 2005, four
customers accounted for 49% of our total net revenue, with Texas
Instruments representing 15%, International Business Machines
representing 13%, Matsushita representing 11% and Toshiba
representing 10%. We could lose a customer due to such
customers decision not to engage us on future process
nodes, its decision not to develop its own future process node,
or as a result of industry consolidation. The loss of any of
these customers or a decrease in the sales volumes of their
products could significantly reduce our total revenue below
expectations. In particular, such a loss could cause significant
fluctuations in results of operations because our expenses are
fixed in the short term and it takes us a long time to replace
customers.
2
If
integrated device manufacturers of logic integrated circuits
reduce investment in new process technology as a result of a
shift to a fabless manufacturing business model, the pool of
potential logic customers for our yield ramp solutions will
shrink and our results of operations may suffer.
Historically, the majority of our revenue from integrated yield
ramps has been derived from integrated device manufacturers
(IDMs) of logic integrated circuits (ICs). If IDMs decide to
discontinue or significantly cut back their investment in the
development of new process technology as a result of a shift to
a model of outsourcing a larger proportion, or all, of the mass
production of their ICs, there may be fewer IDMs that are
potential customers for our solutions that integrate product
designs with in-house manufacturing processes. As a result, the
revenue we are able to generate from integrated yield ramps for
logic ICs could fall below levels that are currently expected.
Also, because our expenses are fixed in the short term and it
takes a long time for us to replace customers, such a reduction
in revenue could cause significant fluctuations in results of
operations.
We must
effectively manage and support our operations and recent and
planned growth in order for our business strategy to
succeed.
We will need to continue to grow in all areas of operation and
successfully integrate and support our existing and new
employees into our operations, or we may be unable to implement
our business strategy in the time frame we anticipate, if at
all. We have in the past, and may in the future, experience
interruptions in our information systems on which our global
operations depend. Further, physical damage to, failure of, or
digital damage (such as significant viruses or worms) to, our
information systems could disrupt and delay time-sensitive
services or computing operations that we perform for our
customers, which could negatively impact our business results
and reputation. We may need to switch to a new accounting system
in the near future, which could disrupt our business operations
and distract management. In addition, we will need to expand our
intranet to support new data centers to enhance our research and
development efforts. Our intranet is expensive to expand and
must be highly secure due to the sensitive nature of our
customers information that we transmit. Building and
managing the support necessary for our growth places significant
demands on our management and resources. These demands may
divert these resources from the continued growth of our business
and implementation of our business strategy. Further, we must
adequately train our new personnel, especially our client
service and technical support personnel, to effectively and
accurately, respond to and support our customers. If we fail to
do this, it could lead to dissatisfaction among our customers,
which could slow our growth.
If we
fail to protect our intellectual property rights, customers or
potential competitors may be able to use our technologies to
develop their own solutions which could weaken our competitive
position, reduce our revenue, or increase our costs.
Our success depends largely on the proprietary nature of our
technologies. We currently rely primarily on copyright,
trademark, and trade secret protection. Whether or not patents
are granted to us, litigation may be necessary to enforce our
intellectual property rights or to determine the validity and
scope of the proprietary rights of others. As a result of any
such litigation, we could lose our proprietary rights and incur
substantial unexpected operating costs. Litigation could also
divert our resources, including our managerial and engineering
resources. In the future, we intend to rely primarily on a
combination of patents, copyrights, trademarks, and trade
secrets to protect our proprietary rights and prevent
competitors from using our proprietary technologies in their
products. These laws and procedures provide only limited
protection. Our pending patent applications may not result in
issued patents, and even if issued, they may not be sufficiently
broad to protect our proprietary technologies. Also, patent
protection in foreign countries may be limited or unavailable
where we need such protection.
Competition
in the market for solutions that address yield improvement and
integration between IC design and manufacturing may intensify in
the future, which could slow our ability to grow or execute our
strategy.
Competition in our market may intensify in the future, which
could slow our ability to grow or execute our strategy and
increase pricing pressure. Our current and potential customers
may choose to develop their own solutions internally,
particularly if we are slow in deploying our solutions. Many of
these companies have the financial and technical capability to
develop their own solutions. Also, competitors could establish
non-domestic
3
operations with a lower cost structure than our engineering
organization, which, unless we also establish lower cost
non-domestic operations, would give any such competitors
products a competitive advantage over our solutions. There may
be other providers of commercial solutions for systematic IC
yield and performance enhancement of which we are not aware. We
currently face indirect competition from the internal groups at
IC companies and some direct competition from providers of yield
management or prediction software such as Ponte Solutions,
Predictions Software, Syntricity Inc., Spotfire Inc., Synopsys
Inc. (through their acquisition of HPL Technologies), and Yield
Dynamics, Inc., and process control software, such as Triant
Holdings Inc., Straatum Processware Ltd., and
MKS Instruments Inc. Some providers of yield management
software or inspection equipment may seek to broaden their
product offerings and compete with us. For example, KLA-Tencor
has announced adding the use of test structures to one of their
inspection product lines. In addition, we believe that the
demand for solutions that address the need for better
integration between the silicon design and manufacturing
processes may encourage direct competitors to enter into our
market. For example, large integrated organizations, such as
IDMs, electronic design automation software providers, IC design
service companies or semiconductor equipment vendors, may decide
to spin-off a business unit that competes with us. Other
potential competitors include fabrication facilities that may
decide to offer solutions competitive with ours as part of their
value proposition to their customers. In addition, Synopsys,
Inc. now appears to offer directly competing DFM capability,
while other EDA suppliers provide alternative DFM solutions that
may compete for the same budgetary funds. If these potential
competitors change the pricing environment or are able to
attract industry partners or customers faster than we can, we
may not be able to grow and execute our strategy as quickly or
at all. In addition, customer preferences may shift away from
our solutions as a result of the increase in competition.
We face
operational and financial risks associated with international
operations.
We derive a majority of our revenue from international sales,
principally from customers based in Asia. Revenue generated from
customers in Asia accounted for 50% of total revenue in the year
ended December 31, 2006. During the year ended
December 31, 2005 revenue generated from customers in Asia
was 55% of total revenue. We expect that a significant portion
of our total future revenue will continue to be derived from
companies based in Asia. In addition, we have expanded our
non-U.S. operations
recently and plan to continue such expansion by establishing
overseas subsidiaries, offices, or contractor relationships in
locations, and when deemed appropriate by our management. The
success of our business is subject to risks inherent in doing
business internationally, including third-party vendors that
provide certain software quality assurance and other services
that have operations in the Middle East. These risks include:
|
|
|
|
|
some of our key engineers and other personnel who are foreign
nationals may have difficulty gaining access to the United
States and other countries in which our customers or our offices
may be located and it may be difficult for us to recruit and
retain qualified technical and managerial employees in foreign
offices;
|
|
|
|
greater difficulty in collecting account receivables resulting
in longer collection periods;
|
|
|
|
language and other cultural differences may inhibit our sales
and marketing efforts and create internal communication problems
among our U.S. and foreign research and development teams,
increasing the difficulty of managing multiple, remote locations
performing various development, quality assurance, and yield
ramp analysis projects;
|
|
|
|
compliance with, and unexpected changes in, a wide variety of
foreign laws and regulatory environments with which we are not
familiar, including, among other issues, with respect to
protection of our intellectual property, and a wide variety of
trade and export controls under domestic, foreign, and
international law;
|
|
|
|
currency risk due to the fact that expenses for our
international offices are denominated in the local currency,
including the Euro, while virtually all of our revenue is
denominated in U.S. dollars;
|
|
|
|
quarantine, private travel limitation, or business disruption in
regions affecting our operations, stemming from actual, imminent
or perceived outbreak of human pandemic or contagious disease;
|
|
|
|
in the event a larger portion of our revenue becomes denominated
in foreign currencies, we would be subject to a potentially
significant exchange rate risk; and
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
economic or political instability, including but not limited to
armed conflict, terrorism, and the resulting disruption to
economic activity and business operations.
|
In Japan, in particular, we face the following additional risks:
|
|
|
|
|
any recurrence of an overall downturn in Asian economies could
limit our ability to retain existing customers and attract new
ones in Asia; and
|
|
|
|
if the U.S. dollar increases in value relative to the
Japanese Yen, the cost of our solutions will be more expensive
to existing and potential Japanese customers and therefore less
competitive.
|
Our
earnings per share and other key operating results may be
unusually high in a given quarter, thereby raising
investors expectations, and then unusually low in the next
quarter, thereby disappointing investors, which could cause our
stock price to drop.
Historically, our quarterly operating results have fluctuated.
Our future quarterly operating results will likely fluctuate
from time to time and may not meet the expectations of
securities analysts and investors in some future period. The
price of our common stock could decline due to such
fluctuations. The following factors may cause significant
fluctuations in our future quarterly operating results:
|
|
|
|
|
the size and timing of sales volumes achieved by our
customers products;
|
|
|
|
the loss of any of our large customers or an adverse change in
any of our large customers businesses;
|
|
|
|
the size of improvements in our customers yield and the
timing of agreement as to those improvements;
|
|
|
|
our long and variable sales cycle;
|
|
|
|
changes in the mix of our revenue;
|
|
|
|
changes in the level of our operating expenses needed to support
our projected growth; and
|
|
|
|
delays in completing solution implementations for our customers.
|
Our gain
share revenue is dependent on factors outside of our control,
including the volume of integrated circuits, or ICs, our
customers are able to sell to their customers.
Our gain share revenue for a particular product is largely
determined by the volume of that product that our customer is
able to sell to its customers, which is outside of our control.
We have limited ability to predict the success or failure of our
customers IC products. Further, our customers may
implement changes to their manufacturing processes during the
gain share period, which could negatively affect yield results,
which is beyond our control. We may commit a significant amount
of time and resources to a customer who is ultimately unable to
sell as many units as we had anticipated when contracting with
them or who makes unplanned changes to their processes. Since we
currently work on a small number of large projects, any product
that does not achieve commercial viability or a significant
increase in yield could significantly reduce our revenue and
results of operations below expectations. In addition, if we
work with two directly competitive products, volume in one may
offset volume, and any of our related gain share, in the other
product. Further, decreased demand for semiconductor products
decreases the volume of products our customers are able to sell,
which may adversely affect our gain share revenue.
Gain
share measurement requires data collection and is subject to
customer agreement, which can result in uncertainty and cause
quarterly results to fluctuate.
We can only recognize gain share revenue once we have reached
agreement with our customers on their level of yield performance
improvements. Because measuring the amount of yield improvement
is inherently complicated and dependent on our customers
internal information systems, there may be uncertainty as to
some components of measurement. This could result in our
recognition of less revenue than expected. In addition, any
delay in measuring gain share could cause all of the associated
revenue to be delayed until the next quarter. Since we
5
currently have only a few large customers and we are relying on
gain share as a significant component of our total revenue, any
delay could significantly harm our quarterly results.
Changes
in the structure of our customer contracts, including the mix
between fixed and variable revenue and the mix of elements, can
adversely affect the size and timing of our total
revenue.
Our long-term success is largely dependent upon our ability to
structure our future customer contracts to include a larger gain
share component relative to the fixed fee component. If we are
successful in increasing the gain share component of our
customer contracts, we will experience an adverse impact on our
operating results in the short term as we reduce the fixed fee
component, which we typically recognize earlier than gain share
fees. Due to acquisitions and expanded business strategies, the
mix of elements in some of our contracts has changed recently
and the relative importance of the software component in some of
our contracts has increased. We have experienced, and may in the
future experience, delays in the expected recognition of revenue
associated with generally accepted accounting principles
regarding the timing of revenue recognition in multi-element
software arrangements, including the effect of acceptance
criteria as a result of the change in our contracts. If we fail
to meet contractual acceptance criteria on time or at all, the
total revenue we receive under a contract could be delayed or
decline. In addition, by increasing the gain share or the
software component, we may increase the variability or timing of
recognition of our revenue, and therefore increase the risk that
our total future revenue will be lower than expected and
fluctuate significantly from period to period.
It
typically takes us a long time to sell our unique solutions to
new customers, which can result in uncertainty and delays in
generating additional revenue.
Because our gain share business model is unique and our
Design-to-Silicon-Yield
solutions are unfamiliar, our sales cycle is lengthy and
requires a significant amount of our senior managements
time and effort. Furthermore, we need to target those
individuals within a customers organization who have
overall responsibility for the profitability of an IC. These
individuals tend to be senior management or executive officers.
We may face difficulty identifying and establishing contact with
such individuals. Even after initial acceptance, due to the
complexity of structuring the gain share component, the
negotiation and documentation processes can be lengthy. It can
take nine months or more to reach a signed contract with a
customer. Unexpected delays in our sales cycle could cause our
revenue to fall short of expectations.
We have a
history of losses, we may incur losses in the future and we may
be unable to maintain profitability.
While we have been profitable in some prior quarters and certain
fiscal years, we have experienced losses in the past and in the
fiscal year ended December 31, 2006. We may not achieve and
thereafter maintain profitability if our revenue increases more
slowly than we expect or not at all. In addition, virtually all
of our operating expenses are fixed in the short term, so any
shortfall in anticipated revenue in a given period could
significantly reduce our operating results below expectations.
Our accumulated deficit was $13.5 million as of
September 30, 2006. We expect to continue to incur
significant expenses in connection with:
|
|
|
|
|
funding for research and development;
|
|
|
|
expansion of our solution implementation teams;
|
|
|
|
expansion of our sales and marketing efforts; and
|
|
|
|
additional non-cash charges relating to amortization of
intangibles and stock-based compensation.
|
As a result, we will need to significantly increase revenue to
maintain profitability on a quarterly or annual basis. Any of
these factors could cause our stock price to decline.
6
We may
experience significant fluctuations in operating results due to
the cyclical nature of the semiconductor industry.
Our revenue is highly dependent upon the overall condition of
the semiconductor industry, especially in light of our gain
share revenue component. The semiconductor industry is highly
cyclical and subject to rapid technological change and has been
subject to significant economic downturns at various times,
characterized by diminished product demand, accelerated erosion
of average selling prices, and production overcapacity. The
semiconductor industry also periodically experiences increased
demand and production capacity constraints. As a result, we may
experience significant fluctuations in operating results due to
general semiconductor industry conditions and overall economic
conditions.
We must
continually attract and retain highly talented executives,
engineers, and research and development personnel or we will be
unable to expand our business as planned.
We will need to continue to hire highly talented executives,
engineers, and research and development personnel to support our
planned growth. We have experienced, and we expect to continue
to experience, delays and limitations in hiring and retaining
highly skilled individuals with appropriate qualifications. We
intend to continue to hire foreign nationals, particularly as we
expand our operations internationally. We have had, and expect
to continue to have, difficulty in obtaining visas permitting
entry into the United States for several of our key personnel,
which disrupts our ability to strategically locate our
personnel. If we lose the services of any of our key executives
or a significant number of our engineers, it could disrupt our
ability to implement our business strategy. Competition for
executives and qualified engineers can be intense, especially in
Silicon Valley where we are principally based.
If our
products, technologies, services, and integrated solutions fail
to keep pace with the rapid technological changes in the
semiconductor industry, we could lose customers and
revenue.
We must continually devote significant engineering resources to
enable us to keep up with the rapidly evolving technologies and
equipment used in the semiconductor design and manufacturing
processes. These innovations are inherently complex and require
long development cycles. Not only do we need the technical
expertise to implement the changes necessary to keep our
technologies current, we also rely heavily on the judgment of
our advisors and management to anticipate future market trends.
Our customers expect us to stay ahead of the technology curve
and expect that our products, technologies, services, and
integrated solutions will support any new design or
manufacturing processes or materials as soon as they are
deployed. If we are not able to timely predict industry changes,
or if we are unable to modify our products, technologies,
services, and integrated solutions on a timely basis, our
existing solutions will be rendered obsolete and we may lose
customers. If we do not keep pace with technology, our existing
and potential customers may choose to develop their own
solutions internally as an alternative to ours and we could lose
market share, which could adversely affect our operating results.
We intend
to pursue additional strategic relationships, which are
necessary to maximize our growth, but could substantially divert
management attention and resources.
In order to establish and maintain strategic relationships with
industry leaders at each stage of the IC design and
manufacturing processes, we may need to expend significant
resources and will need to commit a significant amount of
managements time and attention, with no guarantee of
success. If we are unable to enter into strategic relationships
with these companies, we will not be as effective at modeling
existing technologies or at keeping ahead of the technology
curve as new technologies are introduced. In the past, the
absence of an established working relationship with key
companies in the industry has meant that we have had to exclude
the effect of their component parts from our modeling analysis,
which reduces the overall effectiveness of our analysis and
limits our ability to improve yield. We may be unable to
establish key industry strategic relationships if any of the
following occur:
|
|
|
|
|
potential industry partners become concerned about our ability
to protect their intellectual property;
|
|
|
|
potential industry partners develop their own solutions to
address the need for yield improvement;
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
our potential competitors establish relationships with industry
partners with which we seek to establish a relationship; or
|
|
|
|
potential industry partners attempt to restrict our ability to
enter into relationships with their competitors.
|
Our
solution implementations may take longer than we anticipate,
which could cause us to lose customers and may result in
adjustments to our operating results.
Our solution implementations require a team of engineers to
collaborate with our customers to address complex yield loss
issues by using our software and other technologies. We must
estimate the amount of time needed to complete an existing
solution implementation in order to estimate when the engineers
will be able to commence a new solution implementation. In
addition, our accounting for solution implementation contracts,
which generate fixed fees, sometimes require adjustments to
profit and loss based on revised estimates during the
performance of the contract. These adjustments may have a
material effect on our results of operations in the period in
which they are made. The estimates giving rise to these risks,
which are inherent in fixed-price contracts, include the
forecasting of costs and schedules, and contract revenues
related to contract performance.
Key
executives, including our chief executive officer and our chief
strategy officer, are critical to our business and we cannot
guarantee that they will remain with us indefinitely.
Our future success will depend to a significant extent on the
continued services of our key executives, including John
Kibarian, our President and Chief Executive Officer, and David
Joseph, our Chief Strategy Officer. If we lose the services of
any of our key executives, it could slow execution of our
business plan, hinder our product development processes and
impair our sales efforts. Searching for replacements could
divert other senior managements time and increase our
operating expenses. In addition, our industry partners and
customers could become concerned about our future operations,
which could injure our reputation. We do not have long-term
employment agreements with our executives and we do not maintain
any key person life insurance policies on their lives.
Inadvertent
disclosure of our customers confidential information could
result in costly litigation and cause us to lose existing and
potential customers.
Our customers consider their product yield information and other
confidential information, which we must gather in the course of
our engagement with the customer, to be extremely competitively
sensitive. If we inadvertently disclosed or were required to
disclose this information, we would likely lose existing and
potential customers and could be subject to costly litigation.
In addition, to avoid potential disclosure of confidential
information to competitors, some of our customers may, in the
future, ask us not to work with key competitive products.
Our
technologies could infringe the intellectual property rights of
others causing costly litigation and the loss of significant
rights.
Significant litigation regarding intellectual property rights
exists in the semiconductor industry. It is possible that a
third party may claim that our technologies infringe their
intellectual property rights or misappropriate their trade
secrets. Any claim, even if without merit, could be time
consuming to defend, result in costly litigation, or require us
to enter into royalty or licensing agreements, which may not be
available to us on acceptable terms, or at all. A successful
claim of infringement against us in connection with the use of
our technologies could adversely affect our business.
Defects
in our proprietary technologies, hardware and software tools,
and the cost of support to remedy any such defects could
decrease our revenue and our competitive market share.
If the software, hardware, or proprietary technologies we
provide to a customer contain defects that increase our
customers cost of goods sold and time to market, these
defects could significantly decrease the market acceptance of
our solutions. Further, the cost of support resources required
to remedy any defects in our technologies, hardware, or software
tools could exceed our expectations. Any actual or perceived
defects with
8
our software, hardware, or proprietary technologies may also
hinder our ability to attract or retain industry partners or
customers, leading to a decrease in our revenue. These defects
are frequently found during the period following introduction of
new software, hardware, or proprietary technologies or
enhancements to existing software, hardware, or proprietary
technologies. Our software, hardware, and proprietary
technologies may contain errors not discovered until after
customer implementation of the silicon design and manufacturing
process recommended by us. If our software, hardware, or
proprietary technologies contain errors or defects, it could
require us to expend significant resources to alleviate these
problems, which could reduce margins and result in the diversion
of technical and other resources from our other development
efforts.
We may
have difficulty maintaining the effectiveness of our internal
control over financial reporting.
Pursuant to Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, we are
required to furnish a report on our managements assessment
of the design and effectiveness of our system of internal
control over financial reporting as part of our Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
Our auditors are also required to attest to, and report on, our
managements assessment. In order to issue their report,
our management is required to document both the design of our
system of internal controls and our testing processes that
support our managements evaluation and conclusion. While
our management and independent auditors have been able to
conclude that our internal control over financial reporting has
been effective in each of the last two years, during the course
of future testing, we may identify deficiencies, including those
arising from turnover of qualified personnel or arising as a
result of acquisitions, which we may not be able to remediate in
time to meet the continuing reporting deadlines imposed by
Section 404 and the costs of which may harm our results of
operations. In addition, if we fail to maintain the adequacy of
our internal controls, as such standards are modified,
supplemented or amended from time to time, we may not be able to
ensure that our management can conclude on an ongoing basis that
we have effective internal controls. We also may not be able to
retain independent auditors with sufficient resources to attest
to and report on our internal controls in a timely manner.
Moreover, our auditors may not agree with our managements
future assessments and may deem our controls as ineffective if
we are unable to remediate on a timely basis. If we are unable
to assert as of December 31, 2006 and beyond, that we
maintain effective internal controls, our investors could lose
confidence in the accuracy and completeness of our financial
reports that in turn could cause our stock price to decline.
We may
not be able to expand our proprietary technologies if we do not
consummate potential acquisitions or investments or successfully
integrate them with our business.
To expand our proprietary technologies, we may acquire or make
investments in complementary businesses, technologies, or
products if appropriate opportunities arise. We may be unable to
identify suitable acquisition or investment candidates at
reasonable prices or on reasonable terms, or consummate future
acquisitions or investments, each of which could slow our growth
strategy. We may have difficulty integrating the acquired
products, personnel or technologies of any acquisitions we might
make. These difficulties could disrupt our ongoing business,
distract our management and employees and increase our expenses.
We may
not be able to raise necessary funds to support our growth or
execute our strategy.
We currently anticipate that our available cash resources will
be sufficient to meet our presently anticipated working capital
and capital expenditure requirements for at least the next
12 months. However, unanticipated efforts to support more
rapid expansion, develop or enhance
Design-to-Silicon-Yield
solutions, respond to competitive pressures or acquire
complementary businesses or technologies could impact our future
capital requirements and the adequacy of our available funds. In
such event, we may need to raise additional funds through public
or private financings, strategic relationships or other
arrangements. We may not be able to raise any necessary funds on
terms favorable to us, or at all.
Recent
acquisitions may adversely affect our business by diverting
managements attention, increasing our expenses or by being
more difficult to integrate than expected.
On October 31, 2006, we completed our acquisition of Si
Automation S.A. Our success in realizing the strategic benefits
and growth opportunities to be gained from incorporating the
operations of Si Automation into PDF and the timing of this
realization depend upon our successful integration of Si
Automation. The integration of
9
Si Automation is a complex, costly and time-consuming process.
The difficulties of combining our operations associated with
this acquisition include:
|
|
|
|
|
consolidating research and development operations;
|
|
|
|
retaining key employees;
|
|
|
|
incorporating acquired products and business technology into our
existing product lines;
|
|
|
|
coordinating effective sales and marketing functions;
|
|
|
|
preserving research and development, marketing, customer and
other important relationships; and
|
|
|
|
minimizing the diversion of managements attention from
ongoing business concerns.
|
USE OF
PROCEEDS
The proceeds from the sale of the common stock offered by this
prospectus are solely for the account of the selling
stockholders. We will not receive any proceeds from the sale of
these shares of common stock.
ISSUANCE
OF COMMON STOCK TO SELLING STOCKHOLDERS
On October 25, 2006, PDF entered into a definitive
agreement (the Purchase Agreement) to acquire Si
Automation S.A. (SIA), a privately held Fault Detection and
Classification (FDC) software and services provider, based in
Montpellier, France. The acquisition closed on October 31,
2006.
Under terms of the Purchase Agreement, the Registrant acquired
SIA for approximately $25.5 million in cash and
699,298 shares of PDF Solutions common stock (the
Shares) valued at $9.4 million, and
transaction costs of $1.7 million, resulting in aggregate
consideration of approximately $36.6 million. This
prospectus covers the resale of the Shares.
10
PLAN OF
DISTRIBUTION
We have filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, or
SEC, a registration statement on
Form S-3,
of which this prospectus forms a part, in connection with the
future resale of these shares. With respect to the shares to be
issued to the selling stockholders, we have agreed to keep the
registration statement effective until April 30, 2010, or
such earlier time as these shares have been sold by the selling
stockholders.
The selling stockholders may sell the shares of common stock
from time to time. When we use the term selling
stockholders in this prospectus, it includes donees,
distributees, pledgees and other transferees who are selling
shares received after the date of this prospectus from a selling
stockholder whose name appears in Selling
Stockholders. If we are notified by a selling stockholder
that a donee, distributee, pledgee or other transferee intends
to sell more than 500 shares, we will file a supplement to
the prospectus if required by law. The selling stockholders will
act independently of us in making decisions regarding the
timing, manner and size of each sale. The selling stockholders
may make these sales on the Nasdaq National Market or otherwise,
at prices and terms that are then-prevailing or at prices
related to the then-current market price, at fixed prices or in
privately negotiated transactions. The selling stockholders may
use one or more of the following methods to sell the shares of
common stock:
|
|
|
|
|
a block trade in which a selling stockholders broker or
dealer will attempt to sell the shares as agent, but may
position and resell all or a portion of the block as a principal
to facilitate the transaction;
|
|
|
|
a broker or dealer may purchase the common stock as a principal
and then resell the common stock for its own account pursuant to
this prospectus;
|
|
|
|
an exchange or
over-the-counter
distribution in accordance with the rules of the applicable
exchange or Nasdaq; and
|
|
|
|
ordinary brokerage transactions and transactions in which the
broker solicits purchasers.
|
The selling stockholders may enter into hedging transactions
with broker-dealers in connection with distributions of the
shares or otherwise. In these transactions, broker-dealers may
engage in short sales of the shares in the course of hedging the
positions they assume with the selling stockholders. The selling
stockholders also may sell shares short and redeliver the shares
to close out short positions. The selling stockholders may enter
into option or other transactions with broker-dealers that
require the delivery to the broker-dealer of the shares. The
broker-dealer may then resell or otherwise transfer the shares
under this prospectus. The selling stockholders also may loan or
pledge the shares to a broker-dealer. The broker-dealer may sell
the loaned shares, or upon a default the broker-dealer may sell
the pledged shares under this prospectus.
In effecting sales, broker-dealers engaged by the selling
stockholders may arrange for other broker-dealers to participate
in the resales. To the extent required, this prospectus will be
amended and supplemented from time to time to describe a
specific plan of distribution.
Broker-dealers or agents may receive compensation in the form of
commissions, discounts or concessions from selling stockholders.
Broker-dealers or agents may also receive compensation from the
purchasers of the shares for whom they act as agents or to whom
they sell as principal, or both. Compensation as to a particular
broker-dealer might be in excess of customary commissions and
will be in amounts to be negotiated in connection with the sale.
Broker-dealers or agents and any other participating
broker-dealers or the selling stockholders may be deemed to be
underwriters within the meaning of
section 2(a)(11) of the Securities Act in connection with
sales of the shares. Accordingly, any such commission, discount
or concession received by them and any profit on the resale of
the shares purchased by them may be deemed to be underwriting
discounts or concessions under the Securities Act. Because
selling stockholders may be deemed underwriters
within the meaning of section 2(a)(11) of the Securities
Act, the selling stockholders will be subject to the prospectus
delivery requirements of the Securities Act.
Any shares covered by this prospectus which qualify for sale
pursuant to Rule 144 under the Securities Act may be sold
under Rule 144 rather than pursuant to this prospectus.
The shares will be sold only through registered or licensed
brokers or dealers if required under applicable state securities
laws. In addition, in certain states the shares may not be sold
unless they have been registered or qualified
11
for sale in the applicable state or an exemption from the
registration or qualification requirement is available and is
complied with.
We will bear all costs, expenses and fees in connection with the
registration of the shares. The selling stockholders will bear
all commissions and discounts, if any, attributable to the sale
of the shares. The selling stockholders may agree to indemnify
any broker-dealer or agent that participates in transactions
involving sales of the shares against certain liabilities,
including liabilities arising under the Securities Act. We have
agreed to indemnify the selling stockholders against certain
liabilities in connection with their offering of the shares,
including liabilities arising under the Securities Act.
SELLING
STOCKHOLDERS
The following table sets forth certain information as of
March 19, 2007, with respect to the selling stockholders.
The following table assumes that the selling stockholders sell
all of the shares offered by this prospectus. We are unable to
determine the exact number of shares, if any, that actually will
be sold.
The number and percentage of shares beneficially owned is based
on shares outstanding at March 19, 2007, determined in
accordance with
Rule 13d-3
of the Exchange Act and assumes that all shares issuable upon
the achievement of certain milestones described in the Merger
Agreement are issued. The information is not necessarily
indicative of beneficial ownership for any other purpose. Under
Rule 13d-3,
beneficial ownership includes any shares as to which an
individual has sole or shared voting power or investment power,
and also includes shares which an individual has the right to
acquire within 60 days of March 19, 2007 through the
exercise of any stock option or other right. Unless otherwise
indicated in the footnotes, each person has sole voting and
investment power (or shares such powers with his or her spouse)
with respect to the shares shown as beneficially owned.
No selling stockholder has had any material relationship with us
or any of our predecessors or affiliates within the last three
years.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares Beneficially
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares Beneficially
|
|
|
|
Owned Prior to
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Owned After
|
|
|
|
the Offering(1)
|
|
|
Offered by
|
|
|
the Offering
|
|
Selling Stockholder
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
this Prospectus
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
Abel Mikati
|
|
|
52,579
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
52,579
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Adrien Raymond
|
|
|
1,073
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
1,073
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
André Moustiés
|
|
|
89
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
89
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Banexi Ventures 2(2)
|
|
|
99,607
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
99,607
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Béatrice Kelly
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Benoit Mousties
|
|
|
1,073
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
1,073
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Bertrand Reversat
|
|
|
179
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
179
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Blaise Mega
|
|
|
716
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
716
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Camille Raymond
|
|
|
1,073
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
1,073
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Caroline Mikati
|
|
|
1,609
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
1,609
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Celiné Romano-Dourlent
|
|
|
2,953
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
2,953
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Christine Fourcade-Raymond
|
|
|
1,629
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
1,629
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Christophe Fraysse
|
|
|
716
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
716
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Credit Lyonnais Ventures Capital(3)
|
|
|
132,482
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
132,482
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Delphine Michon Docteur Sylvain
Massuel
|
|
|
89
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
89
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Didier Cuvillez
|
|
|
1,700
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
1,700
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Didier Vieux
|
|
|
3,848
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
3,848
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Eric Vernede
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Fabien Lupfer
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Fabrice Bellamy
|
|
|
716
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
716
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares Beneficially
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares Beneficially
|
|
|
|
Owned Prior to
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Owned After
|
|
|
|
the Offering(1)
|
|
|
Offered by
|
|
|
the Offering
|
|
Selling Stockholder
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
this Prospectus
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
Fabrice Liabeuf
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
FCPI SOGE INNOVATION 3 / SGAM(4)
|
|
|
78,249
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
78,249
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
FCPI SOGE INNOVATION 5 / SGAM(4)
|
|
|
30,372
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
30,372
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
FCPI SOGE INNOVATION 6 / SGAM(4)
|
|
|
23,861
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
23,861
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Florent Courren
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Francis Romano
|
|
|
3,668
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
3,668
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Francois Jean Fourcade
|
|
|
89
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
89
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Frédéric Lafaye De
Micheaux
|
|
|
5,369
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
5,369
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Frédéric Martin
|
|
|
89
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
89
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Frédéric Rinckwald
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Gilles Huron
|
|
|
716
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
716
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Hubert Baldino
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Iian Murray
|
|
|
358
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
358
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Jean Benoit Hugues
|
|
|
12,527
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
12,527
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Luc Monneret
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Luong Ngo
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Mélanie Debasc
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Myriam Bergogne
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Nicolas Blaszczyk
|
|
|
89
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
89
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Noe Mikati
|
|
|
1,073
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
1,073
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Olivier Rudelle
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Pascale Creissent-Moustiés
|
|
|
1,609
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
1,609
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Patrick Burigo
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Paul Mousties
|
|
|
1,073
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
1,073
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Prisca Ravelojoana
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Raphael Mikati
|
|
|
1,073
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
1,073
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Richard Moustiés
|
|
|
36,480
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
36,480
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Sandrine Benhassan
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Société Civile Mikati(5)
|
|
|
24,137
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
24,137
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Société Civile
Moustiés Invest(6)
|
|
|
40,236
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
40,236
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Société Civile Tr.
Investissements(7)
|
|
|
19,040
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
19,040
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Soridec S.A.(8)
|
|
|
58,962
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
58,962
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Thierry Raymond
|
|
|
57,656
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
57,656
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Less than 1% |
|
(1) |
|
Beneficial ownership is determined in accordance with the rules
of the SEC and generally includes sole or shared voting or
investment power with respect to securities. Shares of common
stock subject to options, warrants or shares of convertible
preferred stock currently exercisable or convertible, or
exercisable or convertible within 60 days of March 19,
2007 are deemed outstanding for purposes of computing the
percentage ownership of the person holding such option or
warrant but are not outstanding for purposes of computing the
percentage of any other person. Except as indicated in the
footnotes to this table and pursuant to applicable community
property laws, the persons named in the table have sole voting
and investment power with respect to all shares of our common
stock beneficially owned. |
13
|
|
|
(2) |
|
Michel Dahan, Sophie Pierrin Lepinard and Philippe
Méré have the power to direct the voting and
disposition of securities held by the selling stockholder. |
|
(3) |
|
Jean Prevost and Jean-Philippe Doin have the power to direct the
voting and disposition of securities held by the selling
stockholder. |
|
(4) |
|
Philippe Brosse has the power to direct the voting and
disposition of securities held by the selling stockholder. |
|
(5) |
|
Abel Mikati has the power to direct the voting and disposition
of securities held by the selling stockholder. |
|
(6) |
|
Richard Moustiés has the power to direct the voting and
disposition of securities held by the selling stockholder. |
|
(7) |
|
Thierry Raymond has the power to direct the voting and
disposition of securities held by the selling stockholder |
|
(8) |
|
Anne-Yvonne Le Dain and Bernard Olivier have the power to direct
the voting and disposition of securities held by the selling
stockholder. |
LEGAL
MATTERS
Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP, counsel to PDF, has
passed upon the validity of the common stock offered in this
offering.
EXPERTS
The financial statements, the related financial statement
schedule, and managements report on the effectiveness of
internal control over financial reporting incorporated in this
prospectus by reference from the Companys Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2006 have been audited by
Deloitte & Touche LLP, an independent registered public
accounting firm, as stated in their reports, which are
incorporated herein by reference, and have been so incorporated
in reliance upon the reports of such firm given upon their
authority as experts in accounting and auditing.
The consolidated financial statements of Si Automation S.A. as
of September 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005, for the
nine month period ended September 30, 2006 and the year
ended December 31, 2005 and incorporated in this prospectus
by reference to our Current Report on
Form 8-K/A
filed with the SEC on January 16, 2007, have been so
incorporated in reliance on the report of KPMG S.A., given on
the authority of said firm as experts in accounting and auditing.
WHERE YOU
CAN FIND ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
We have filed a registration statement on
Form S-3
with the SEC under the Securities Act with respect to the shares
of common stock offered in this offering. This prospectus, which
is a part of the registration statement, does not contain all of
the information set forth in the registration statement, or the
exhibits which are part of the registration statement, parts of
which are omitted as permitted by the rules and regulations of
the SEC. For further information about us and the shares of our
common stock to be sold in this offering, please refer to the
registration statement and the exhibits which are part of the
registration statement. Statements contained in this prospectus
as to the contents of any contract or any other document are not
necessarily complete. Each statement in this prospectus
regarding the contents of the referenced contract or other
document is qualified in all respects by our reference to the
copy filed with the registration statement.
For further information about us and our common stock, we refer
you to our registration statement and its attached exhibits,
copies of which may be inspected without charge at the
SECs public reference room at 100 F Street, N.E.,
Washington, D.C. 20549. You can request copies of these
documents by writing to the SEC and paying a duplicating fee.
Please call the SEC at
1-800-SEC-0330
for further information about the public reference rooms. The
SEC maintains a World Wide Web site on the Internet at
http://www.sec.gov that contains reports, proxy and information
statements and other information regarding registrants that file
electronically with the Commission.
The SEC allows us to incorporate by reference
certain of our publicly-filed documents into this prospectus,
which means that information included in those documents is
considered part of this prospectus. Information that we file
with the SEC after the date of the initial filing of the
registration statement will automatically update and
14
supersede this information. We incorporate by reference the
documents listed below and any future filings made with the SEC
under Sections 13(a), 13(c), 14 or 15(d) of the Exchange
Act subsequent to the date of this prospectus and prior to the
closing date of the offering.
The following documents filed with the SEC are incorporated by
reference in this prospectus:
1. Our Current Reports on
Form 8-K
filed September 19, 2006 and November 3, 2006, and our
Current Report on
Form 8-K/A
filed January 16, 2007.
2. Our Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2006.
3. Our definitive Proxy Statement dated April 21,
2006, filed in connection with our May 24, 2006 Annual
Meeting of Stockholders.
4. Our Quarterly Reports on
Form 10-Q
for the quarters ended March 31, 2006, June 30, 2006
and September 30, 2006, as amended.
We incorporate by reference any future filings we make with the
SEC under Section 13(a), 13(c), 14 or 15(d) of the Exchange
Act between the date of the filing of the registration statement
of which this prospectus is a part and prior to the effective
date of the registration statement (other than Current Reports
on
Form 8-K
containing only disclosure furnished under Item 2.02 or
7.01 of
Form 8-K
and exhibits relating to such disclosures, unless otherwise
specifically stated in such Current Report on
Form 8-K).
We also incorporate by reference any future filings we make with
the SEC under Section 13(a), 13(c), 14 or 15(d) of the
Exchange Act between the date of this prospectus and the date
all of the securities offered hereby are sold (other than
Current Reports on
Form 8-K
containing only disclosure furnished under items 2.02 or
7.01 of
Form 8-K
and exhibits relating to such disclosures, unless otherwise
specifically stated in such Current Report on
Form 8-K).
We will furnish without charge to you, on written or oral
request, a copy of any or all of the documents incorporated by
reference, other than exhibits to those documents. You should
direct any requests for documents to P. Steven Melman, PDF
Solutions, Inc., 333 West San Carlos Street,
Suite 700, San Jose, California 95110,
(408) 280-7900.
15