e10vq
UNITED
STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C.
20549
Form 10-Q
|
|
|
þ
|
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
For the quarterly period ended
September 30, 2007
|
Or
|
o
|
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
For the transition period
from to
|
Commission file number
000-24821
eBay Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as
specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
74-0430924
|
(State or other jurisdiction
of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification Number)
|
2145 Hamilton Avenue
San Jose, California
(Address of principal
executive offices)
|
|
95125
(Zip Code)
|
(408) 376-7400
(Registrants
telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has
filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has
been subject to such filing requirements for the past
90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large
accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated
filer. See definition of accelerated filer and large
accelerated filer in
Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange Act (Check one):
Large accelerated
filer þ Accelerated
filer o Non-accelerated
filer o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company
(as defined in
Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange
Act). Yes o No þ
As of October 24, 2007 there were 1,353,529,279 shares
of the registrants common stock, $0.001 par value,
outstanding, which is the only class of common or voting stock
of the registrant issued.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PART I:
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
|
|
Item 1:
|
Financial
Statements
|
eBay
Inc.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except
|
|
|
|
par value amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
Current assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
2,662,792
|
|
|
$
|
3,912,591
|
|
Short-term investments
|
|
|
542,103
|
|
|
|
76,108
|
|
Accounts receivable, net
|
|
|
393,195
|
|
|
|
411,168
|
|
Funds receivable
|
|
|
399,297
|
|
|
|
565,438
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
973,199
|
|
|
|
1,396,446
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
4,970,586
|
|
|
|
6,361,751
|
|
Long-term investments
|
|
|
277,853
|
|
|
|
455,281
|
|
Property and equipment, net
|
|
|
998,196
|
|
|
|
1,059,607
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
6,544,278
|
|
|
|
6,180,413
|
|
Intangible assets, net
|
|
|
682,977
|
|
|
|
642,468
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
20,121
|
|
|
|
87,292
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
13,494,011
|
|
|
$
|
14,786,812
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
|
Current liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
$
|
83,392
|
|
|
$
|
98,712
|
|
Funds payable and amounts due to customers
|
|
|
1,159,952
|
|
|
|
1,597,159
|
|
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities
|
|
|
681,669
|
|
|
|
1,319,617
|
|
Deferred revenue and customer advances
|
|
|
128,964
|
|
|
|
156,183
|
|
Income taxes payable
|
|
|
464,418
|
|
|
|
101,196
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
2,518,395
|
|
|
|
3,272,867
|
|
Deferred and other tax liabilities, net
|
|
|
31,784
|
|
|
|
592,390
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
39,200
|
|
|
|
48,863
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
2,589,379
|
|
|
|
3,914,120
|
|
Stockholders equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock, $0.001 par value; 3,580,000 shares
authorized; 1,368,512 and 1,352,634 shares outstanding
|
|
|
1,431
|
|
|
|
1,451
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
8,034,282
|
|
|
|
8,750,370
|
|
Treasury stock at cost, 62,250 and 98,207 shares
|
|
|
(1,669,428
|
)
|
|
|
(2,870,283
|
)
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
3,842,150
|
|
|
|
3,659,660
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income
|
|
|
696,197
|
|
|
|
1,331,494
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
10,904,632
|
|
|
|
10,872,692
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity
|
|
$
|
13,494,011
|
|
|
$
|
14,786,812
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed
consolidated financial statements.
2
eBay
Inc.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME (LOSS)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30,
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
Net revenues
|
|
$
|
1,448,637
|
|
|
$
|
1,889,220
|
|
|
$
|
4,249,840
|
|
|
$
|
5,491,723
|
|
Cost of net revenues
|
|
|
319,995
|
|
|
|
446,521
|
|
|
|
900,475
|
|
|
|
1,256,999
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
1,128,642
|
|
|
|
1,442,699
|
|
|
|
3,349,365
|
|
|
|
4,234,724
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales and marketing
|
|
|
385,497
|
|
|
|
485,240
|
|
|
|
1,158,528
|
|
|
|
1,406,260
|
|
Product development
|
|
|
120,405
|
|
|
|
164,879
|
|
|
|
363,447
|
|
|
|
450,411
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
236,511
|
|
|
|
287,447
|
|
|
|
702,639
|
|
|
|
849,284
|
|
Amortization of acquired intangible assets
|
|
|
47,196
|
|
|
|
51,888
|
|
|
|
151,680
|
|
|
|
150,791
|
|
Impairment of goodwill
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,390,938
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,390,938
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
789,609
|
|
|
|
2,380,392
|
|
|
|
2,376,294
|
|
|
|
4,247,684
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from operations
|
|
|
339,033
|
|
|
|
(937,693
|
)
|
|
|
973,071
|
|
|
|
(12,960
|
)
|
Interest and other income, net
|
|
|
41,230
|
|
|
|
38,363
|
|
|
|
92,618
|
|
|
|
102,350
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(553
|
)
|
|
|
(2,728
|
)
|
|
|
(2,229
|
)
|
|
|
(10,004
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
379,710
|
|
|
|
(902,058
|
)
|
|
|
1,063,460
|
|
|
|
79,386
|
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
(98,814
|
)
|
|
|
(33,577
|
)
|
|
|
(284,288
|
)
|
|
|
(262,021
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
280,896
|
|
|
$
|
(935,635
|
)
|
|
$
|
779,172
|
|
|
$
|
(182,635
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
0.20
|
|
|
$
|
(0.69
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.55
|
|
|
$
|
(0.13
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
0.20
|
|
|
$
|
(0.69
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.54
|
|
|
$
|
(0.13
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
1,406,382
|
|
|
|
1,354,786
|
|
|
|
1,405,837
|
|
|
|
1,360,830
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
1,426,112
|
|
|
|
1,354,786
|
|
|
|
1,433,247
|
|
|
|
1,360,830
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed
consolidated financial statements.
3
eBay
Inc.
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30,
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
280,896
|
|
|
$
|
(935,635
|
)
|
|
$
|
779,172
|
|
|
$
|
(182,635
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income (loss):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation
|
|
|
72,159
|
|
|
|
301,135
|
|
|
|
354,540
|
|
|
|
464,375
|
|
Unrealized gains on investments, net
|
|
|
2,153
|
|
|
|
285,756
|
|
|
|
7,162
|
|
|
|
286,441
|
|
Unrealized gains (losses) on hedging activities
|
|
|
2,213
|
|
|
|
(839
|
)
|
|
|
(698
|
)
|
|
|
(1,319
|
)
|
Tax provision on above items
|
|
|
(1,654
|
)
|
|
|
(114,120
|
)
|
|
|
(2,566
|
)
|
|
|
(114,200
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net change in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
|
|
|
74,871
|
|
|
|
471,932
|
|
|
|
358,438
|
|
|
|
635,297
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income (loss)
|
|
$
|
355,767
|
|
|
$
|
(463,703
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,137,610
|
|
|
$
|
452,662
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed
consolidated financial statements.
4
eBay
Inc.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
Cash flows from operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
779,172
|
|
|
$
|
(182,635
|
)
|
Adjustments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for doubtful accounts and authorized credits
|
|
|
74,193
|
|
|
|
66,848
|
|
Provision for transaction losses
|
|
|
81,696
|
|
|
|
100,848
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
400,936
|
|
|
|
441,891
|
|
Impairment of goodwill
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,390,938
|
|
Stock-based compensation related to stock options and employee
stock purchases
|
|
|
242,745
|
|
|
|
232,160
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
(131,457
|
)
|
|
|
(68,934
|
)
|
Tax benefits from stock-based compensation
|
|
|
108,790
|
|
|
|
112,883
|
|
Excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation
|
|
|
(77,263
|
)
|
|
|
(69,026
|
)
|
Changes in assets and liabilities, net of acquisition effects:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
(117,031
|
)
|
|
|
(86,316
|
)
|
Funds receivable
|
|
|
(54,372
|
)
|
|
|
(163,732
|
)
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
(339,278
|
)
|
|
|
(437,012
|
)
|
Other non-current assets
|
|
|
10,869
|
|
|
|
(79,069
|
)
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
63,901
|
|
|
|
12,707
|
|
Funds payable and amounts due to customers
|
|
|
387,466
|
|
|
|
420,817
|
|
Accrued expenses and other liabilities
|
|
|
(50,230
|
)
|
|
|
5,642
|
|
Deferred revenue and customer advances
|
|
|
36,664
|
|
|
|
27,477
|
|
Income taxes payable and other tax liabilities
|
|
|
205,029
|
|
|
|
123,076
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
1,621,830
|
|
|
|
1,848,563
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of property and equipment, net
|
|
|
(418,875
|
)
|
|
|
(326,035
|
)
|
Purchases of investments
|
|
|
(547,413
|
)
|
|
|
(205,298
|
)
|
Maturities and sales of investments
|
|
|
882,279
|
|
|
|
783,816
|
|
Acquisitions, net of cash acquired
|
|
|
(45,505
|
)
|
|
|
(320,195
|
)
|
Other
|
|
|
(8,796
|
)
|
|
|
5,523
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(138,310
|
)
|
|
|
(62,189
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of common stock, net
|
|
|
209,075
|
|
|
|
365,199
|
|
Repurchases of common stock, net
|
|
|
(666,541
|
)
|
|
|
(1,170,699
|
)
|
Excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation
|
|
|
77,263
|
|
|
|
69,026
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in financing activities
|
|
|
(380,203
|
)
|
|
|
(736,474
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
65,360
|
|
|
|
199,899
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
1,168,677
|
|
|
|
1,249,799
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
|
|
1,313,580
|
|
|
|
2,662,792
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
|
|
$
|
2,482,257
|
|
|
$
|
3,912,591
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental cash flow disclosures:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for interest
|
|
$
|
1,306
|
|
|
$
|
6,381
|
|
Cash paid for income taxes
|
|
$
|
107,368
|
|
|
$
|
281,657
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed
consolidated financial statements.
5
eBay
Inc.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
|
|
Note 1
|
The
Company and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
|
The
Company
eBay Inc. (eBay) was incorporated in California in
May 1996, and reincorporated in Delaware in April 1998.
eBays purpose is to pioneer new communities around the
world, built on commerce, sustained by trust and inspired by
opportunity. eBay brings together millions of buyers and sellers
every day on a local, national and international basis through
an array of websites. eBay provides online marketplaces for the
sale of goods and services, online payment services and online
communication offerings to a diverse community of individuals
and businesses.
eBay has three operating segments: Marketplaces, Payments and
Communications. The Marketplaces segment enables online commerce
through a variety of different platforms, including the
traditional eBay auction-style site, our classifieds websites,
our comparison shopping site, Shopping.com, our secondary
tickets platform, StubHub, and Rent.com. The Payments segment,
which consists of our PayPal, Inc. (PayPal)
business, enables individuals and businesses to securely, easily
and quickly send and receive payments online. The Communications
segment, which consists of our Skype Technologies SA
(Skype) business, enables Voice over Internet
Protocol (VoIP) communications between Skype users,
and provides low-cost connectivity to traditional fixed-line and
mobile telephones.
When we refer to we, our, us
or eBay in this document, we mean the current
Delaware corporation (eBay Inc.) and its California predecessor,
as well as all of our consolidated subsidiaries.
Use of
estimates
The preparation of consolidated financial statements in
conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting
principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions
that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of
the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts
of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. On an
ongoing basis, we evaluate our estimates, including those
related to provisions for doubtful accounts and authorized
credits, the provision for transaction losses, legal
contingencies, income taxes, advertising and other net revenues,
stock-based compensation expense and goodwill and intangible
assets. We base our estimates on historical experience and on
various other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under
the circumstances. Actual results could differ from those
estimates.
Principles
of consolidation and basis of presentation
The accompanying financial statements are consolidated and
include the financial statements of eBay and our majority-owned
subsidiaries. All significant intercompany balances and
transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
The consolidated financial statements include 100% of the assets
and liabilities of majority-owned subsidiaries, and the
ownership interests of minority investors are recorded as
minority interests. Investments in entities where we hold more
than a 20%, but less than a 50%, ownership interest and have the
ability to significantly influence the operations of the
investee are accounted for using the equity method of accounting
and the investment balance is included in long-term investments,
while our share of the investees results of operations is
included in interest and other income, net. For the three and
nine months ended September 30, 2006 and 2007, the equity
method income recorded in interest and other income, net was not
material to our operating results. Investments in private
entities where we hold less than a 20% ownership interest and
where we do not have the ability to significantly influence the
operations of the investee are accounted for using the cost
method of accounting and are included in long-term investments.
6
eBay
Inc.
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
These unaudited interim financial statements reflect our
condensed consolidated financial position as of
December 31, 2006 and September 30, 2007. These
statements also show our condensed consolidated statement of
income (loss) and condensed consolidated statement of
comprehensive income (loss) for the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2006 and 2007 and our condensed consolidated
statement of cash flows for the nine months ended
September 30, 2006 and 2007. These statements include all
normal recurring adjustments that we believe are necessary to
fairly state our financial position, operating results and cash
flows. Because all of the disclosures required by
U.S. generally accepted accounting principles for annual
consolidated financial statements are not included herein, these
interim financial statements should be read in conjunction with
the audited financial statements and the notes thereto for the
year ended December 31, 2006, included in our Annual Report
on
Form 10-K
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
February 28, 2007. The condensed consolidated balance sheet
as of December 31, 2006 was derived from our audited
financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2006,
but does not include all disclosures required by
U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. The
condensed consolidated statements of income (loss) and cash
flows for the periods presented are not necessarily indicative
of results that we expect for any future period.
Certain prior period balances have been reclassified to conform
to the current period presentation.
Recent
accounting pronouncements
In September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board
(FASB) issued Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards (SFAS) No. 157, Fair Value
Measurements (FAS 157). FAS 157
establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands
disclosures about fair value measurements. The changes to
current practice resulting from the application of this
statement relate to the definition of fair value, the methods
used to measure fair value, and the expanded disclosures about
fair value measurements. We will be required to adopt the
provisions on FAS 157 on January 1, 2008. We are
currently evaluating the impact of adopting the provisions of
FAS 157, but we do not currently believe that the adoption
of FAS 157 will materially impact our financial position,
cash flows, or results of operations.
In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159,
The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial
Liabilities Including an Amendment of FASB Statement
No. 115, which is effective for fiscal years
beginning after November 15, 2007. This statement permits
an entity to choose to measure many financial instruments and
certain other items at fair value at specified election dates.
Subsequent unrealized gains and losses on items for which the
fair value option has been elected will be reported in earnings.
We are currently evaluating the potential impact of this
statement.
7
eBay
Inc.
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
Note 2
|
Net
Income (Loss) Per Share
|
Basic net income (loss) per share is computed by dividing the
net income (loss) for the period by the weighted average number
of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted net
income per share is computed by dividing the net income for the
period by the weighted average number of shares of common stock
and potentially dilutive common stock outstanding during the
period. The dilutive effect of outstanding options and
restricted stock is reflected in diluted earnings per share by
application of the treasury stock method. The following table
sets forth the computation of basic and diluted net income
(loss) per share for the periods indicated (in thousands, except
per share amounts):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30,
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Numerator:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
280,896
|
|
|
$
|
(935,635
|
)
|
|
$
|
779,172
|
|
|
$
|
(182,635
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares
|
|
|
1,410,647
|
|
|
|
1,355,231
|
|
|
|
1,409,848
|
|
|
|
1,361,333
|
|
Weighted average nonvested common stock subject to
forfeiture/repurchase
|
|
|
(4,265
|
)
|
|
|
(445
|
)
|
|
|
(4,011
|
)
|
|
|
(503
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator for basic calculation
|
|
|
1,406,382
|
|
|
|
1,354,786
|
|
|
|
1,405,837
|
|
|
|
1,360,830
|
|
Weighted average effect of dilutive securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average nonvested common stock subject to
forfeiture/repurchase
|
|
|
4,265
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,011
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee stock options
|
|
|
15,465
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,399
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator for diluted calculation
|
|
|
1,426,112
|
|
|
|
1,354,786
|
|
|
|
1,433,247
|
|
|
|
1,360,830
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
0.20
|
|
|
$
|
(0.69
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.55
|
|
|
$
|
(0.13
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
0.20
|
|
|
$
|
(0.69
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.54
|
|
|
$
|
(0.13
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The calculation of diluted net income (loss) per share excludes
all anti-dilutive shares. For the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2006, approximately 90.4 million and
69.1 million common stock equivalents, respectively, were
not included in the computation of diluted net income per share
because the effect would have been anti-dilutive. For the three
and nine months ended September 30, 2007, approximately
139.6 million and 142.4 million common stock
equivalents, respectively, were not included in the computation
of diluted net income (loss) per share because the effect would
have been anti-dilutive.
|
|
Note 3
|
Business
Combinations, Goodwill and Intangible Assets
|
Acquisition
of StubHub, Inc.
On February 13, 2007, we acquired all of the outstanding
shares of StubHub, Inc. (StubHub) for a total
purchase price of $292.4 million. The purchase price was
comprised of cash totaling $283.2 million,
$1.1 million in estimated acquisition-related expenses and
the assumption of StubHubs outstanding common stock
options, valued at approximately $8.1 million. The fair
value of StubHub stock options assumed was determined using a
Black-Scholes model. StubHub is an online marketplace that
facilitates the resale of event tickets and is included within
our Marketplaces segment.
8
eBay
Inc.
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
We accounted for the acquisition as a taxable purchase
transaction and, accordingly, the purchase price has been
allocated to the tangible assets, liabilities assumed, and
identifiable intangible assets acquired based on their estimated
fair values on the acquisition date. The excess of the purchase
price over the aggregate fair values was recorded as goodwill.
The fair value assigned to identifiable intangible assets
acquired is determined using the income approach, which
discounts expected future cash flows to present value using
estimates and assumptions determined by management. Purchased
intangible assets are amortized on a straight-line basis over
the respective useful lives. Our preliminary allocation of the
purchase price is summarized below (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Net liabilities assumed, net of cash of $25,780
|
|
$
|
(15,663
|
)
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
221,604
|
|
Trade name
|
|
|
44,400
|
|
User base
|
|
|
29,000
|
|
Developed technology
|
|
|
13,100
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
292,441
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The estimated useful economic lives of the identifiable
intangible assets acquired are three years for the trade name
and developed technology and five years for the user base. The
final purchase price allocation will depend upon the completion
of our integration plan by the end of the first quarter of 2008,
although we do not expect it to differ materially from the above
amounts.
The results of operations for the acquired business have been
included in our condensed consolidated statement of income
(loss) for the period subsequent to our acquisition of StubHub.
StubHubs results of operations for periods prior to this
acquisition were not material to our condensed consolidated
statement of income (loss) and, accordingly, pro forma financial
information has not been presented.
Goodwill
The following table presents goodwill balances and the movements
for each of our reportable segments during the nine months ended
September 30, 2007 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
Earn Out
|
|
|
Impairment
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Acquired
|
|
|
Settlement
|
|
|
of Goodwill
|
|
|
Adjustments
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Reportable segments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Marketplaces
|
|
$
|
2,648,027
|
|
|
$
|
276,071
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
81,268
|
|
|
$
|
3,005,366
|
|
Payments
|
|
|
1,348,633
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(260
|
)
|
|
|
1,348,373
|
|
Communications
|
|
|
2,574,979
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
530,334
|
|
|
|
(1,390,938
|
)
|
|
|
139,659
|
|
|
|
1,854,034
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
6,571,639
|
|
|
$
|
276,071
|
|
|
$
|
530,334
|
|
|
$
|
(1,390,938
|
)
|
|
$
|
220,667
|
|
|
$
|
6,207,773
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments accounted for under the equity method of accounting
are classified on our balance sheet as long-term investments.
Such investments include identifiable intangible assets,
deferred tax liabilities and goodwill. As of December 31,
2006 and September 30, 2007, the goodwill related to our
equity investments, included above, was approximately
$27.4 million.
The changes in goodwill during the nine months ended
September 30, 2007 were substantially due to the recording
of goodwill for completed acquisitions, the settlement of the
earn out with Skype, impairment charges related to Skype and
foreign currency translation adjustments.
We conducted our annual impairment test of goodwill as of
August 31, 2007 in accordance with SFAS No. 142,
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets. As a result of
this test, we concluded that the carrying amount of our
Communications reporting unit exceeded its fair value and
recorded an impairment loss of approximately $1.4 billion
during the quarter ended September 30, 2007. The impairment
charge includes the impact of the
9
eBay
Inc.
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
earn out settlement payment described below and was determined
by comparing the carrying value of goodwill in our
Communications reporting unit with the implied fair value of the
goodwill. We determined the fair value of the Communications
reporting unit using the income approach, which requires
estimates of future operating results and cash flows discounted
using an estimated discount rate. Our estimates resulted from an
updated long-term financial outlook developed as part of our
strategic planning cycle conducted annually during our third
quarter. Our estimates of future operating results for our
Communications reporting unit are for an early stage business
with limited financial history, as well as developing revenue
models. These factors increase the risk of differences between
projected and actual performance that could impact future
estimates of fair value of the Communications reporting unit.
In conjunction with our acquisition of Skype in 2005, we agreed
to certain performance-based earn out payments. During the three
months ended September 30, 2007, we entered into an earn
out settlement agreement with each of the former shareholders of
Skype who had elected the earn out alternative at the time of
the acquisition, under which we were relieved of all obligations
under the original earn out agreement in exchange for an
aggregate cash payment of 375.1 million, or
approximately $530.3 million. Payments under the earn out
settlement agreements will be paid during the fourth quarter of
2007 and as such are included as a component of accrued expenses
and other current liabilities as of September 30, 2007.
Goodwill was recorded because the earn out settlement amount was
considered additional purchase price. Based on our impairment
analysis, the goodwill recorded as part of the earn out
settlement was included as a component of the goodwill
impairment charge.
Intangible
Assets
The components of acquired identifiable intangible assets are as
follows (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2006
|
|
|
September 30, 2007
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
Average Useful
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
Average Useful
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
Amount)
|
|
|
Economic Life
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
Amount)
|
|
|
Economic Life
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Years)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Years)
|
|
|
Intangible assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customer lists and user base
|
|
$
|
545,527
|
|
|
$
|
(240,340
|
)
|
|
$
|
305,187
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
$
|
583,805
|
|
|
$
|
(311,500
|
)
|
|
$
|
272,305
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
Trademarks and trade names
|
|
|
480,358
|
|
|
|
(171,390
|
)
|
|
|
308,968
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
560,644
|
|
|
|
(259,511
|
)
|
|
|
301,133
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
Developed technologies
|
|
|
103,351
|
|
|
|
(63,912
|
)
|
|
|
39,439
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
123,751
|
|
|
|
(80,595
|
)
|
|
|
43,156
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
All other
|
|
|
58,115
|
|
|
|
(26,232
|
)
|
|
|
31,883
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
62,015
|
|
|
|
(34,467
|
)
|
|
|
27,548
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,187,351
|
|
|
$
|
(501,874
|
)
|
|
$
|
685,477
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,330,215
|
|
|
$
|
(686,073
|
)
|
|
$
|
644,142
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2006 and September 30, 2007, the
net carrying amount of intangible assets related to our equity
investments included above was approximately $2.5 million
and $1.7 million, respectively. All of our acquired
identifiable intangible assets are subject to amortization.
Aggregate amortization expense for intangible assets was
$52.6 million and $56.7 million for the three months
ended September 30, 2006 and 2007, respectively. Aggregate
amortization expense for intangible assets was
$169.3 million and $167.6 million for the nine months
ended September 30, 2006 and 2007, respectively.
10
eBay
Inc.
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
As of September 30, 2007, expected future intangible asset
amortization was as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Years:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007 (remaining three months)
|
|
$
|
58,172
|
|
2008
|
|
|
229,291
|
|
2009
|
|
|
207,894
|
|
2010
|
|
|
114,691
|
|
2011
|
|
|
24,858
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
9,236
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
644,142
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating segments are based upon our internal organization
structure, the manner in which our operations are managed, the
criteria used by our Chief Operating Decision Maker
(CODM) to evaluate segment performance and the
availability of separate financial information. We have three
operating segments: Marketplaces, Payments and Communications.
The following tables summarize the financial performance of our
operating segments (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, 2006
|
|
|
|
Marketplaces
|
|
|
Payments
|
|
|
Communications
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
Net revenues from external customers
|
|
$
|
1,049,039
|
|
|
$
|
349,577
|
|
|
$
|
50,021
|
|
|
$
|
1,448,637
|
|
Direct costs
|
|
|
616,470
|
|
|
|
274,788
|
|
|
|
59,688
|
|
|
|
950,946
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Direct contribution
|
|
$
|
432,569
|
|
|
$
|
74,789
|
|
|
$
|
(9,667
|
)
|
|
|
497,691
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses and indirect costs of net revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
158,658
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
339,033
|
|
Interest and other income, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41,230
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(553
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
379,710
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, 2007
|
|
|
|
Marketplaces
|
|
|
Payments
|
|
|
Communications
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
Net revenues from external customers
|
|
$
|
1,320,632
|
|
|
$
|
470,396
|
|
|
$
|
98,192
|
|
|
$
|
1,889,220
|
|
Direct costs
|
|
|
760,918
|
|
|
|
386,474
|
|
|
|
83,758
|
|
|
|
1,231,150
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Direct contribution
|
|
$
|
559,714
|
|
|
$
|
83,922
|
|
|
$
|
14,434
|
|
|
|
658,070
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses and indirect costs of net revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,595,763
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(937,693
|
)
|
Interest and other income, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38,363
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,728
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(902,058
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11
eBay
Inc.
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2006
|
|
|
|
Marketplaces
|
|
|
Payments
|
|
|
Communications
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
Net revenues from external customers
|
|
$
|
3,096,767
|
|
|
$
|
1,023,734
|
|
|
$
|
129,339
|
|
|
$
|
4,249,840
|
|
Direct costs
|
|
|
1,808,182
|
|
|
|
774,530
|
|
|
|
155,311
|
|
|
|
2,738,023
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Direct contribution
|
|
$
|
1,288,585
|
|
|
$
|
249,204
|
|
|
$
|
(25,972
|
)
|
|
|
1,511,817
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses and indirect costs of net revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
538,746
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
973,071
|
|
Interest and other income, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
92,618
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,229
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,063,460
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2007
|
|
|
|
Marketplaces
|
|
|
Payments
|
|
|
Communication
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
Net revenues from external customers
|
|
$
|
3,861,384
|
|
|
$
|
1,363,904
|
|
|
$
|
266,435
|
|
|
$
|
5,491,723
|
|
Direct costs
|
|
|
2,180,678
|
|
|
|
1,104,055
|
|
|
|
239,429
|
|
|
|
3,524,162
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Direct contribution
|
|
$
|
1,680,706
|
|
|
$
|
259,849
|
|
|
$
|
27,006
|
|
|
|
1,967,561
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses and indirect costs of net revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,980,521
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12,960
|
)
|
Interest and other income, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
102,350
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10,004
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
79,386
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Direct costs of operating segments include specific costs of net
revenues, sales and marketing expenses, and general and
administrative expenses over which segment managers have direct
discretionary control, such as advertising and marketing
programs, customer support expenses, bank charges, site
operations expenses, product development expenses, billing
operations, certain technology and facilities expenses,
transaction expenses, provisions for doubtful accounts,
authorized credits and transaction losses. Segment managers do
not have discretionary control over expenses such as our
corporate center costs (consisting of costs related to corporate
management, human resources, finance and legal), amortization of
intangible assets, stock-based compensation expenses and
impairment of goodwill as they are not evaluated in the
measurement of segment performance.
12
eBay
Inc.
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
Note 5
|
Balance
Sheet Components
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Other current assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customer accounts
|
|
$
|
763,757
|
|
|
$
|
1,031,721
|
|
Prepaid expenses
|
|
|
64,003
|
|
|
|
223,126
|
|
Deferred tax asset, net
|
|
|
67,879
|
|
|
|
40,870
|
|
Restricted cash
|
|
|
12,738
|
|
|
|
17,795
|
|
Other
|
|
|
64,822
|
|
|
|
82,934
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
973,199
|
|
|
$
|
1,396,446
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customer accounts for certain PayPal foreign subsidiaries
include liquid assets set aside for certain customer liabilities
as required by regulations in those jurisdictions. These assets
may only be held in specified types of highly liquid
investments. The customer liabilities represent claims on those
foreign subsidiaries and generally against these assets. These
assets are included on our balance sheet as current assets with
an offsetting current liability in funds payable and amounts due
to customers. Customer funds held by PayPal as an agent or
custodian for the benefit of its customers are not reflected in
our condensed consolidated balance sheet.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation and related benefits
|
|
$
|
162,889
|
|
|
$
|
206,109
|
|
Accrued earn out settlement
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
530,334
|
|
Other accrued expenses and current liabilities
|
|
|
518,780
|
|
|
|
583,174
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
681,669
|
|
|
$
|
1,319,617
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term
investments
Effective during the three months ended September 30, 2007,
we began to account for our investment in MercadoLibre as an
available-for-sale marketable security due to
MercadoLibres initial public offering of its common stock
in August of 2007. Our investment is reported at fair value of
$294.7 million as of September 30, 2007, as a
long-term investment with unrealized gains, net of tax, excluded
from earnings and reported as a component of accumulated other
comprehensive income.
|
|
Note 6
|
Commitments
and Contingencies
|
Litigation
and Other Legal Matters
In April 2001, two of our European subsidiaries, eBay GmbH and
eBay International AG, were sued by Montres Rolex S.A. and
certain of its affiliates in the regional court of Cologne,
Germany. The suit subsequently was transferred to the regional
court in Düsseldorf, Germany. Rolex alleged that our
subsidiaries were infringing Rolexs trademarks as a result
of users selling counterfeit Rolex watches through our German
website. The suit also alleged unfair competition. Rolex sought
an order enjoining the sale of Rolex-branded watches on the
website as well as damages. In December 2002, a trial was held
in the matter, and the court ruled in favor of eBay on all
causes of action. Rolex appealed the ruling to the Higher
Regional Court of Düsseldorf, and the appeal was heard in
October 2003. In February 2004, the court rejected Rolexs
appeal and ruled in our favor. Rolex appealed the ruling to the
German Federal Supreme Court, a hearing took place before that
court in December 2006, and a written decision was issued in
June 2007. The courts decision found that eBay must take
reasonable measures to prevent
13
eBay
Inc.
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
recurrence once it is informed of clearly identified
infringement, and that eBay may in certain circumstances be
liable upon first notice of infringement. The court referred the
case back to the Higher Regional Court to determine
(i) whether, in some circumstances, a low starting listing
price was sufficient to indicate that a listing was infringing
and (ii) under what circumstances online sellers are
commercial dealers within the meaning of the German
intellectual property laws. In July 2007, the German Federal
Supreme Court extended the reach of the Rolex decision in
IVD v. eBay. The court held that (i) in certain
circumstances, a duty of care could be found to exist to
competitors requiring eBay to take reasonable measures to
prevent illegal items from being listed (even where the
competitors were not directly harmed) and (ii) such duty
would extend to listings by the same seller in the same category
(not just identical listings). Prior to these decisions, we had
implemented proactive measures to find and remove illegal
listings from our sites; these decisions may require us to
undertake further efforts and will subject us to liability if
our efforts are deemed to be insufficient. We expect that this
ruling will likely result in increased costs and litigation
against us in Germany although we do not currently believe that
it will require a major change in our business practices.
In August 2006, Louis Vuitton Malletier and Christian Dior
Couture filed two lawsuits in the Paris Court of Commerce
against eBay Inc. and eBay International AG. The complaint
alleges that we violated French tort law by negligently
broadcasting listings posted by third parties offering
counterfeit items bearing plaintiffs trademarks, and by
purchasing certain advertising keywords. The plaintiffs seek
approximately 35 million in damages. Around September
2006, Parfums Christian Dior, Kenzo Parfums, Parfums Givenchy,
and Guerlain Société also filed a lawsuit in the Paris
Court of Commerce against eBay Inc. and eBay International AG.
The complaint alleges that we have interfered with the selective
distribution network the plaintiffs established in France and
the European Union by allowing third parties to post listings
offering genuine perfumes and cosmetics for sale on our sites.
The plaintiffs in this suit seek approximately
9 million in damages and injunctive relief. We filed
our initial briefs responding to the first complaint in February
2007, and initial briefs in response to the second complaint
were filed in April 2007. We believe that we have meritorious
defenses to these suits and intend to defend ourselves
vigorously. Other luxury brand owners have also filed suit
against us or have threatened to do so, seeking to hold us
liable for counterfeit items listed on our sites by third
parties, for tester and other not for resale
consumer products listed on our sites by third parties, for the
misuse of trademarks in listings, for alleged violations of
selective distribution channel laws, for non-compliance of
consumer protection laws or in connection with paid search
advertisements.
In September 2001, MercExchange LLC filed a complaint against
us, our Half.com subsidiary and ReturnBuy, Inc. in the
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia
(No. 2:01-CV-736)
alleging infringement of three patents (relating to online
consignment auction technology, multiple database searching and
electronic consignment systems) and seeking a permanent
injunction and damages (including treble damages for willful
infringement). Following a trial in 2003, the jury returned a
verdict finding that we had willfully infringed the patents
relating to multiple database searching and electronic
consignment systems, and the court entered judgment for
MercExchange in the amount of approximately $30 million,
plus pre-judgment interest and post-judgment interest. The
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit later reduced
the award to $25.5 million. In May 2006, following appeals
to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit and
the U.S. Supreme Court, the Supreme Court remanded the case
back to the district court for further action. In parallel with
the federal court proceedings, at our request, the
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office agreed to reexamine each
of the patents in suit, finding that substantial questions
existed regarding the validity of the claims contained in them.
In separate actions in 2005, the Patent and Trademark Office
initially rejected all of the claims contained in the three
patents in suit. The Patent and Trademark Office has given
notice of approval of same claims (and rejection of others)
under the patent relating to online consignment auction
technology and in September 2007, it tentatively approved some
of the claims and rejected others contained in the patent that
underlies the jury verdict, which relates to electronic
consignment systems. We requested that the district court stay
all proceedings in the case pending the final outcome of the
reexamination proceedings, and MercExchange has renewed its
request that the district court grant an injunction. In July
2007, the court denied MercExchanges request for an
injunction and ruled that the proceedings related to one of the
patents will be stayed and another of the patents will not be
stayed pending action by the Patent and
14
eBay
Inc.
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Trademark Office. MercExchange is appealing the courts
order denying the injunction, and we have filed a motion seeking
that the court find the non-stayed patent invalid. Even if
successful, our litigation of these matters will continue to be
costly. As a precautionary measure, we have modified certain
functionality of our websites and business practices in a manner
which we believe avoids any infringement of the consignment
patent. For this reason, we believe that any injunction that
might ultimately be issued will not have any impact on our
business. We also believe we have appropriate reserves for this
litigation. Nonetheless, if the modifications to the
functionality of our websites and business practices are not
sufficient to make them non-infringing, we would likely be
forced to pay significant additional damages and licensing fees
and/or
modify our business practices in an adverse manner.
In June 2006, Net2Phone, Inc. filed a lawsuit in the
U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey
(No. 06-2469)
alleging that eBay Inc., Skype Technologies S.A., and Skype Inc.
infringed five patents owned by Net2Phone relating to
point-to-point Internet protocol. The suit seeks an injunction
against continuing infringement, unspecified damages, including
treble damages for willful infringement, and interest, costs,
and fees. We have filed an answer and counterclaims asserting
that the patents are invalid, unenforceable, and were not
infringed. The parties are in the process of conducting
discovery and claim construction briefing, and we expect a trial
date to be scheduled for the second half of 2008. We believe
that we have meritorious defenses and intend to defend ourselves
vigorously.
In August 2006, Peer Communications Corporation filed a lawsuit
in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of
Texas
(No. 6-06CV-370)
alleging that eBay Inc., Skype Technologies S.A., and Skype Inc.
infringed two patents owned by Peer Communications relating to
uniform network access. The suit seeks an injunction against
continuing infringement, unspecified damages, and interest,
costs, and fees. The parties are in the process of conducting
discovery, and a trial date has been scheduled for October 2008.
We believe that we have meritorious defenses and intend to
defend ourselves vigorously.
In September 2006, Mangosoft Intellectual Property, Inc. filed a
lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District
of Texas
(No. 2-06CV-390)
alleging that eBay Inc., Skype Technologies S.A., and Skype
Software S.a.r.l. infringed a patent owned by Mangosoft relating
to dynamic directory services. The suit seeks an injunction
against continuing infringement, unspecified damages, and
interest, costs, and fees. We have filed an answer and
counterclaims asserting that the patents are invalid,
unenforceable, and not infringed. We received an initial
scheduling order from the court that sets some discovery
deadlines, but not a trial date. We believe that we have
meritorious defenses and intend to defend ourselves vigorously.
In February 2007, our StubHub subsidiary was sued in the
U.S. District Court for the Central District of California
(No. CV-07-1328)
in a purported class action lawsuit alleging that StubHub
violated the Fair and Accurate Credit Transaction Act by
allegedly printing receipts containing more than the last five
digits of a credit card number or the expiration date. The
complaint seeks compensatory and punitive damages and attorneys
fees. We believe that we have meritorious defenses and intend to
defend ourselves vigorously.
In March 2007, a plaintiff filed a purported antitrust class
action lawsuit against eBay in the Western District of Texas
alleging that eBay, through its wholly owned subsidiary PayPal,
used illegal tie-in and steering practices to improperly
monopolize the forms of payment that sellers can use
on eBay. The plaintiff alleges claims under sections 1 and
2 of the Sherman Act, as well as related state law claims. The
complaint seeks treble damages and an injunction. In April 2007,
the plaintiff re-filed the complaint in the U.S. District
Court for the Northern District of California
(No. 07-CV-01882-RS),
and dismissed the Texas action. In June 2007, we filed a motion
to dismiss the class action complaint. We believe that we have
meritorious defenses and intend to defend ourselves vigorously.
In May 2007, Netcraft Corporation filed a lawsuit in the Western
District of Wisconsin
(No. 07-C-0254C)
alleging that eBay and PayPal infringed two of its patents
entitled Internet billing methods. The suit seeks an
injunction against continuing infringement, unspecified damages,
and interest, costs, and fees. The parties are in the process of
conducting discovery. We have filed a motion for summary
judgment of noninfringement on both patents. The claim
construction hearing is currently scheduled for November 2007.
The trial is expected to be
15
eBay
Inc.
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
scheduled for June or July 2008. We believe that we have
meritorious defenses and intend to defend ourselves vigorously.
Other third parties have from time to time claimed, and others
may claim in the future, that we have infringed their
intellectual property rights. We are subject to additional
patent disputes, and expect that we will increasingly be subject
to patent infringement claims as our services expand in scope
and complexity. In particular, we expect that we may face
additional patent infringement claims involving various aspects
of our Marketplaces, Payments and Communications businesses. We
have in the past been forced to litigate such claims. We may
also become more vulnerable to third-party claims as laws such
as the Digital Millennium Copyright Act, the Lanham Act and the
Communications Decency Act are interpreted by the courts, and as
we become subject to laws in jurisdictions where the underlying
laws with respect to the potential liability of online
intermediaries like ourselves are either unclear or less
favorable. We believe that additional lawsuits alleging that we
have violated copyright or trademark laws will be filed against
us, especially in Europe. Intellectual property claims, whether
meritorious or not, are time consuming and costly to resolve,
could require expensive changes in our methods of doing
business, or could require us to enter into costly royalty or
licensing agreements.
From time to time, we are involved in other disputes or
regulatory inquiries that arise in the ordinary course of
business. The number and significance of these disputes and
inquiries are increasing as our business expands and our company
grows larger. Any claims or regulatory actions against us,
whether meritorious or not, could be time consuming, result in
costly litigation, require significant amounts of management
time, and result in the diversion of significant operational
resources.
As part of the earn out settlement agreement with the former
shareholders of Skype who had elected the earn out alternative
at the time of the acquisition (See Note 3 Business
Combinations, Goodwill and Intangible Assets in these
condensed consolidated financial statements for further
details), we agreed that if, on or prior to March 31, 2008,
eBay sells or transfers to an unaffiliated third party
securities representing greater than 50% of the outstanding
voting power of, or economic interest in, Skype or all or
substantially all of the assets of Skype and its subsidiaries,
taken as a whole, we would pay up to an additional
138.4 million, or approximately $195.2 million,
in the aggregate, to these former shareholders of Skype.
Credit
Agreement
In August 2007, we entered into an amendment to our 2006 Credit
Agreement. The amendment increased the lender commitments and
borrowing capacity under the Credit Agreement from its prior
level of $1.0 billion to $2.0 billion, maintained an
option to increase borrowing capacity by an additional
$1.0 billion (after giving effect to the $1.0 billion
increase described above) and extended the maturity date by an
additional year to November 7, 2012.
Indemnification
Provisions
In the ordinary course of business, we have included limited
indemnification provisions in certain of our agreements with
parties with whom we have commercial relations, including our
standard marketing, promotions and
application-programming-interface license agreements. Under
these contracts, we generally indemnify, hold harmless, and
agree to reimburse the indemnified party for losses suffered or
incurred by the indemnified party in connection with claims by a
third party with respect to domain names, trademarks, logos and
other branding elements to the extent that such marks are
applicable to our performance under the subject agreement. In a
limited number of agreements, we have provided an indemnity for
other types of third-party claims, which are indemnities mainly
related to copyrights, trademarks, and patents. In our PayPal
business, we have provided an indemnity to our payment
processors in the event of certain third-party claims or card
association fines against the processor arising out of conduct
by PayPal or PayPals customers. It is not possible to
determine the maximum potential loss under these indemnification
provisions due to our limited history of prior indemnification
claims and the unique facts and
16
eBay
Inc.
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
circumstances involved in each particular provision. To date, no
significant costs have been incurred, either individually or
collectively, in connection with our indemnification provisions.
|
|
Note 7
|
Stock
Repurchase Program
|
In 2006, our Board of Directors (Board) authorized a
stock repurchase program for $2.0 billion of our common
stock, excluding broker commissions. In January 2007, our Board
authorized the expansion of the stock repurchase program to
provide for the repurchase of up to an additional
$2.0 billion of our common stock by January 2009. The stock
repurchase activity under the program during the first nine
months of 2007 is summarized as follows (in thousands, except
per-share amounts):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Value of
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Price per
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
|
Repurchased
|
|
|
Share
|
|
|
Repurchased
|
|
|
Authorized
|
|
|
Balance at January 1, 2007
|
|
|
54,526
|
|
|
$
|
30.54
|
|
|
$
|
1,665,450
|
|
|
$
|
334,550
|
|
Additional authorization in January 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,000,000
|
|
Repurchase of common stock
|
|
|
35,327
|
|
|
$
|
33.31
|
|
|
|
1,176,915
|
|
|
|
(1,176,915
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at September 30, 2007
|
|
|
89,853
|
|
|
$
|
31.63
|
|
|
$
|
2,842,365
|
|
|
$
|
1,157,635
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
These repurchased shares are recorded as treasury stock and are
accounted for under the cost method. No repurchased shares have
been retired.
During the nine months ended September 30, 2007, we entered
into structured equity hedging transactions as described below.
According to the terms of the transactions, on the maturity
date, if the market price of our common stock exceeded a
pre-determined price, we had the option to settle the
transaction in cash or shares of our common stock. If the market
price of our common stock was below that pre-determined price,
we were required to settle the transactions in shares of our
common stock.
During the three months ended March 31, 2007, we paid
$99.6 million to enter into a structured equity hedging
transaction that matured on March 30, 2007. On the maturity
date, based on the market price of our stock, we chose to settle
for the receipt of $102.3 million in cash. Our premium of
approximately $2.7 million was recorded as additional
paid-in capital. During the three month ended June 30,
2007, we paid $93.7 million to enter into a structured
equity hedging transaction that matured on June 29, 2007.
On the maturity date, based on the market price of our stock, we
settled for the receipt of approximately 3.0 million shares
of our common stock at an effective per share price of $31.40.
During the three months ended September 30, 2007, we paid
$98.2 million to enter into a structured equity hedging
transaction that matured on September 28, 2007. On the
maturity date, based on the market price of our stock, we chose
to settle for the receipt of $103.1 million in cash. Our
premium of approximately $5.0 million was recorded as
additional paid-in capital.
During the three months ended September 30, 2007, we
entered into a $200 million volume weighted average price
share repurchase agreement. As a result of this agreement, we
repurchased approximately 5.8 million shares of our common
stock at an effective price per share of $34.24 during the third
quarter of 2007.
17
eBay
Inc.
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
Note 8
|
Stock-Based
Plans
|
Stock-Based
Compensation Expense
The impact on our results of operations of recording stock-based
compensation for the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2006 and 2007 was as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30,
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Cost of net revenues
|
|
$
|
8,001
|
|
|
$
|
9,132
|
|
|
$
|
25,108
|
|
|
$
|
27,543
|
|
Sales and marketing
|
|
|
23,149
|
|
|
|
22,192
|
|
|
|
74,933
|
|
|
|
64,501
|
|
Product development
|
|
|
19,010
|
|
|
|
21,374
|
|
|
|
62,702
|
|
|
|
56,751
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
23,359
|
|
|
|
27,891
|
|
|
|
80,002
|
|
|
|
83,365
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stock-based compensation expense
|
|
|
73,519
|
|
|
|
80,589
|
|
|
|
242,745
|
|
|
|
232,160
|
|
Tax benefit
|
|
|
(22,600
|
)
|
|
|
(24,922
|
)
|
|
|
(73,139
|
)
|
|
|
(70,524
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation expense, net of tax
|
|
$
|
50,919
|
|
|
$
|
55,667
|
|
|
$
|
169,606
|
|
|
$
|
161,636
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stock-based compensation included in capitalized
development costs was $2.3 million and $2.2 million
for the three months ended September 30, 2006 and 2007,
respectively. Total stock-based compensation included in
capitalized development costs was $6.8 million and
$6.4 million for the nine months ended September 30,
2006 and 2007, respectively.
Valuation
Assumptions
We calculated the fair value of each option award on the date of
grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. The
following weighted average assumptions were used for each
respective period:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2007
|
|
|
September 30, 2007
|
|
|
Risk-free interest rates
|
|
|
4.5
|
%
|
|
|
4.5
|
%
|
Expected lives (in years)
|
|
|
3.4
|
|
|
|
3.5
|
|
Dividend yield
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
Expected volatility
|
|
|
40
|
%
|
|
|
36
|
%
|
Our computation of expected volatility is based on a combination
of historical and market-based implied volatility from traded
options on our common stock. Our computation of expected life
was determined based on historical experience of similar awards,
giving consideration to the contractual terms of the stock-based
awards, vesting schedules and expectations of future employee
behavior. The interest rate for periods within the contractual
life of the award is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve
in effect at the time of grant.
18
eBay
Inc.
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Stock
Options
The following table summarizes stock option activity for the
nine months ended September 30, 2007 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Outstanding at January 1, 2007
|
|
|
136,614
|
|
Granted and assumed
|
|
|
19,584
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(19,013
|
)
|
Forfeited/expired/cancelled
|
|
|
(12,046
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at September 30, 2007
|
|
|
125,139
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock options granted under our equity incentive plans generally
vest 25% one year from the date of grant (or 12.5% six months
from the date of grant for existing employees) and the remainder
generally vest at a rate of 2.08% per month thereafter, and
generally expire seven to ten years from the date of grant. The
weighted average exercise price of stock options granted and
assumed during the period was $32.27 per share and the related
weighted average grant date fair value was $10.51 per share.
Restricted
Stock Units and Nonvested Shares
The following table summarizes restricted stock unit activity
for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Units
|
|
|
Outstanding at January 1, 2007
|
|
|
508
|
|
Awarded
|
|
|
8,280
|
|
Vested
|
|
|
(124
|
)
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(545
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at September 30, 2007
|
|
|
8,119
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In general, restricted stock units vest over three to five years
and are subject to an employees continuing service to
eBay. The cost of restricted stock units is determined using the
fair value of our common stock on the date of the grant. The
weighted average grant date fair value for restricted stock
units awarded during the period was $32.59 per share. During the
first quarter of 2007, restricted stock units were awarded as
part of our annual incentive compensation review for the first
time.
During the nine months ended September 30, 2007, there was
no significant activity in nonvested shares.
On January 1, 2007, we adopted the provisions of FASB
Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in
Income Taxes. As of January 1, 2007, we had
$385.7 million of liabilities for unrecognized tax
benefits. If recognized, the portion of liabilities for
unrecognized tax benefits that would decrease our provision for
income taxes and increase our net income is $279.6 million.
The impact on net income reflects the liabilities for
unrecognized tax benefits net of certain deferred tax assets and
the federal tax benefit of state income tax items. The adoption
resulted in a reclassification of certain tax liabilities from
current to non-current and had no significant cumulative impact
to retained earnings.
As of September 30, 2007, our liabilities for unrecognized
tax benefits were $489.5 million and are included in
deferred and other tax liabilities, net. The total liabilities
for unrecognized tax benefits and the increase for the current
period of these liabilities relate primarily to the allocations
of revenue and costs among our global
19
eBay
Inc.
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
operations. Over the next twelve months, our existing tax
positions will continue to generate an increase in liabilities
for unrecognized tax benefits. We recognize interest
and/or
penalties related to uncertain tax positions in income tax
expense. The amount of interest and penalties accrued at
September 30, 2007 was approximately $9.4 million.
We are subject to taxation in the U.S. and various states
and foreign jurisdictions. We are under examination by certain
tax authorities for the 2003 tax year. The material
jurisdictions that are subject to examination by tax authorities
for tax years after 2002 primarily include the U.S., California,
Switzerland and Singapore.
During the three months ended September 30, 2007, our
effective tax rate was impacted by the non-deductible goodwill
impairment charge and a tax benefit, including amounts related
to prior periods, from a favorable ruling issued by a tax
authority.
20
|
|
Item 2:
|
Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
|
FORWARD-LOOKING
STATEMENTS
This report contains statements that involve expectations,
plans or intentions (such as those relating to future business
or financial results, new features or services, or management
strategies). These statements are forward-looking and are
subject to risks and uncertainties, so actual results may vary
materially. You can identify these forward-looking statements by
words such as may, should,
expect, anticipate, believe,
estimate, intend, plan and
other similar expressions. You should consider our forward
looking statements in light of the risks discussed under the
heading Risk Factors That May Affect Results of Operations
and Financial Condition below, as well as our consolidated
financial statements, related notes, and the other financial
information appearing elsewhere in this report and our other
filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. We assume
no obligation to update any forward-looking statements.
You should read the following Managements Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in
conjunction with the unaudited condensed consolidated financial
statements and the related notes that appear elsewhere in this
report.
Overview
About
eBay
We operate three primary business segments: Marketplaces,
Payments and Communications. The Marketplaces segment enables
online commerce through a variety of different platforms,
including the traditional eBay auction-style site, our
classifieds websites, our comparison shopping site,
Shopping.com, our secondary tickets platform, StubHub, and
Rent.com. Our Payments segment, which consists of PayPal,
enables individuals and businesses to securely, easily and
quickly send and receive payments online. Our Communications
segment, which consists of Skype, enables VoIP communications
between Skype users and also provides Skype users low-cost
connectivity to traditional fixed-line and mobile telephones.
Executive
Operating and Financial Summary
Our focus
is on understanding our key operating and financial
metrics
Members of our senior management team regularly review key
operating metrics such as registered users, active users,
listings, gross merchandise volume (GMV), total
accounts, active accounts, total number of payments, total
payment volume, and transaction rates. Members of our senior
management also regularly review key financial information
including net revenues, operating income margins, earnings per
share, cash flows from operations and free cash flows, which we
define as operating cash flows less purchases of property and
equipment, net. These operating and financial measures allow us
to monitor the health and vibrancy of our Marketplaces,
Payments, and Communications segments and the profitability of
our business and to evaluate the effectiveness of investments
that we have made and continue to make in the areas of
marketing, product development, international expansion,
customer support and site operations. We believe that an
understanding of these key operating and financial measures and
how they change over time is important to investors, analysts
and other parties analyzing our business results and future
market opportunities.
Financial
summary
Net revenues for the three months ended September 30, 2007
were $1.9 billion, representing a growth rate of 30% year
over year. Operating loss for the three months ended
September 30, 2007 was $937.7 million. Net loss for
the three months ended September 30, 2007 was
$935.6 million, or $0.69 loss per diluted share. Both the
operating loss and net loss for the quarter were driven by a
goodwill impairment charge in our Communications segment of
$1.4 billion resulting from our annual goodwill impairment
test that is performed during the third quarter. The impairment
resulted from an updated long-term financial outlook for the
Skype business generated through our annual long-term strategic
planning cycle and our settlement payment with respect to the
Skype earn out agreement.
21
During the third quarter of 2007, we repurchased
14.8 million shares of our common stock under our
repurchase program for an aggregate purchase price of
$500.1 million.
Our
expectations for growth
For the remainder of 2007, we expect that our net transaction
revenues will increase as we continue to grow GMV, our non-GMV
based businesses (Shopping.com, Rent.com and our classified
websites), total payment volume and Skype user activity.
Additionally, we expect our advertising revenue to continue to
grow. We expect to continue our investments in the areas of
product development, customer support, marketing and
international expansion across all segments. We believe these
investments are necessary to support the long-term demands of
our growing business. In addition, to the extent that the
U.S. dollar fluctuates against foreign currencies, and, in
particular, the Euro, British pound, Australian dollar and
Korean won, the remeasurement of these foreign currency
denominated transactions into U.S. dollars will impact our
consolidated net revenues and, to the extent that they are not
hedged, our net income (loss).
The discussion of our consolidated financial results in this
report is intended to assist those reading this report to better
understand the key operating and financial measures summarized
above, as well as the changes in our consolidated results of
operations from year to year, and the primary factors that
accounted for those changes.
Seasonality
The following table sets forth, for the periods presented, our
total net revenues and the sequential quarterly growth of these
net revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31
|
|
|
June 30
|
|
|
September 30
|
|
|
December 31
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except percentages)
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenues
|
|
$
|
1,031,724
|
|
|
$
|
1,086,303
|
|
|
$
|
1,105,515
|
|
|
$
|
1,328,859
|
|
Current quarter vs prior quarter
|
|
|
10
|
%
|
|
|
5
|
%
|
|
|
2
|
%
|
|
|
20
|
%
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenues
|
|
$
|
1,390,419
|
|
|
$
|
1,410,784
|
|
|
$
|
1,448,637
|
|
|
$
|
1,719,901
|
|
Current quarter vs prior quarter
|
|
|
5
|
%
|
|
|
1
|
%
|
|
|
3
|
%
|
|
|
19
|
%
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenues
|
|
$
|
1,768,074
|
|
|
$
|
1,834,429
|
|
|
$
|
1,889,220
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
Current quarter vs prior quarter
|
|
|
3
|
%
|
|
|
4
|
%
|
|
|
3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
We expect transaction activity patterns on our websites to
increasingly mirror general consumer buying patterns, both
online and offline, as our business expands, with the strongest
sequential growth occurring in the fourth quarter.
22
Results
of Operations
The following table sets forth, for the periods presented, the
breakdown of net revenues by type, segment and geography. In
addition, we have provided a table of key operating metrics that
we believe are significant factors affecting our net revenues.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except percent changes)
|
|
|
Net Revenues by Type:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net transaction revenues Marketplaces
|
|
$
|
1,017,274
|
|
|
$
|
1,267,463
|
|
|
|
25
|
%
|
|
$
|
3,004,922
|
|
|
$
|
3,715,843
|
|
|
|
24
|
%
|
Payments
|
|
|
340,032
|
|
|
|
447,952
|
|
|
|
32
|
%
|
|
|
998,866
|
|
|
|
1,299,238
|
|
|
|
30
|
%
|
Communications
|
|
|
50,021
|
|
|
|
96,772
|
|
|
|
93
|
%
|
|
|
129,339
|
|
|
|
262,983
|
|
|
|
103
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net transaction revenues
|
|
|
1,407,327
|
|
|
|
1,812,187
|
|
|
|
29
|
%
|
|
|
4,133,127
|
|
|
|
5,278,064
|
|
|
|
28
|
%
|
Advertising and other net revenues
|
|
|
41,310
|
|
|
|
77,033
|
|
|
|
86
|
%
|
|
|
116,713
|
|
|
|
213,659
|
|
|
|
83
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net revenues
|
|
$
|
1,448,637
|
|
|
$
|
1,889,220
|
|
|
|
30
|
%
|
|
$
|
4,249,840
|
|
|
$
|
5,491,723
|
|
|
|
29
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Revenues by Segment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Marketplaces
|
|
$
|
1,049,039
|
|
|
$
|
1,320,632
|
|
|
|
26
|
%
|
|
$
|
3,096,767
|
|
|
$
|
3,861,384
|
|
|
|
25
|
%
|
Payments
|
|
|
349,577
|
|
|
|
470,396
|
|
|
|
35
|
%
|
|
|
1,023,734
|
|
|
|
1,363,904
|
|
|
|
33
|
%
|
Communications
|
|
|
50,021
|
|
|
|
98,192
|
|
|
|
96
|
%
|
|
|
129,339
|
|
|
|
266,435
|
|
|
|
106
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net revenues
|
|
$
|
1,448,637
|
|
|
$
|
1,889,220
|
|
|
|
30
|
%
|
|
$
|
4,249,840
|
|
|
$
|
5,491,723
|
|
|
|
29
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Revenues by Geography:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S.
|
|
$
|
763,864
|
|
|
$
|
929,605
|
|
|
|
22
|
%
|
|
$
|
2,236,699
|
|
|
$
|
2,710,334
|
|
|
|
21
|
%
|
International
|
|
|
684,773
|
|
|
|
959,615
|
|
|
|
40
|
%
|
|
|
2,013,141
|
|
|
|
2,781,389
|
|
|
|
38
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net revenues
|
|
$
|
1,448,637
|
|
|
$
|
1,889,220
|
|
|
|
30
|
%
|
|
$
|
4,249,840
|
|
|
$
|
5,491,723
|
|
|
|
29
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except percent changes)
|
|
|
Supplemental Operating Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Marketplaces Segment(1):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Confirmed registered users(2)
|
|
|
211.9
|
|
|
|
247.6
|
|
|
|
17
|
%
|
|
|
211.9
|
|
|
|
247.6
|
|
|
|
17
|
%
|
Active users(3)
|
|
|
79.8
|
|
|
|
83.0
|
|
|
|
4
|
%
|
|
|
79.8
|
|
|
|
83.0
|
|
|
|
4
|
%
|
Number of listings(4)
|
|
|
583.7
|
|
|
|
555.6
|
|
|
|
(5
|
)%
|
|
|
1,755.1
|
|
|
|
1,703.1
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)%
|
GMV(5)
|
|
$
|
12,639
|
|
|
$
|
14,395
|
|
|
|
14
|
%
|
|
$
|
38,039
|
|
|
$
|
43,140
|
|
|
|
13
|
%
|
Payments Segment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total accounts(6)
|
|
|
122.5
|
|
|
|
164.0
|
|
|
|
34
|
%
|
|
|
122.5
|
|
|
|
164.0
|
|
|
|
34
|
%
|
Active accounts(7)
|
|
|
30.9
|
|
|
|
37.5
|
|
|
|
21
|
%
|
|
|
30.9
|
|
|
|
37.5
|
|
|
|
21
|
%
|
Number of payments(8)
|
|
|
146.2
|
|
|
|
177.4
|
|
|
|
21
|
%
|
|
|
438.7
|
|
|
|
527.3
|
|
|
|
20
|
%
|
Total payment volume(9)
|
|
$
|
9,123
|
|
|
$
|
12,217
|
|
|
|
34
|
%
|
|
$
|
26,748
|
|
|
$
|
35,267
|
|
|
|
32
|
%
|
Communications Segment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Registered users(10)
|
|
|
135.9
|
|
|
|
245.7
|
|
|
|
81
|
%
|
|
|
135.9
|
|
|
|
245.7
|
|
|
|
81
|
%
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Rent.com, Shopping.com, and our classifieds websites are not
included in these metrics. |
23
|
|
|
(2) |
|
Cumulative total of all users who have completed the
registration process on one of eBay Marketplaces trading
platforms. Users may register more than once and as a result,
may have more than one account. |
|
(3) |
|
All users, excluding users of Half.com, StubHub and Internet
Auction, who bid on, bought, or listed an item within the
previous
12-month
period. Users may register more than once and as a result, may
have more than one account. |
|
(4) |
|
Listings on eBay Marketplaces trading platforms during the
period, regardless of whether the listing subsequently closed
successfully. |
|
(5) |
|
Total value of all successfully closed items between users on
eBay Marketplaces trading platforms during the period,
regardless of whether the buyer and seller actually consummated
the transaction. |
|
(6) |
|
Cumulative total of all accounts opened, including users who
made payments using PayPal but have not registered, excluding
accounts that have been closed or locked and the payment gateway
business accounts. Users may register more than once and as a
result, may have more than one account. |
|
(7) |
|
All accounts, and users whether registered or not, that sent or
received at least one payment through the PayPal system during
the period. Users may register more than once and as a result,
may have more than one account. |
|
(8) |
|
Total number of payments initiated through the PayPal system
during the period, excluding the payment gateway business,
regardless of whether the payment was actually sent
successfully, or was reversed, rejected, or pending at the end
of the period. |
|
(9) |
|
Total dollar volume of payments initiated through the PayPal
system during the period, excluding the payment gateway
business, regardless of whether the payment was actually sent
successfully, or was reversed, rejected, or pending at the end
of the period. |
|
(10) |
|
Cumulative number of user accounts created on Skype as of the
end of the period. Users may register more than once and as a
result, may have more than one account. |
Our net transaction revenues from our Marketplaces segment are
derived primarily from listing, feature and final value fees
paid by sellers and lead referral fees. For our Payments
segment, net transaction revenues are generated primarily by
fees from payment processing services. Our Communications
segment primarily generates net transaction revenues from fees
charged to users to connect Skypes VoIP product to
traditional telecommunication networks. These fees are charged
on a per minute basis or on a subscription basis and we refer to
these minutes as SkypeOut minutes. Net revenues from advertising
are derived principally from the sale of advertisements and from
revenue sharing arrangements. Other net revenues are derived
principally from contractual arrangements with third parties
that provide transaction services to eBay and PayPal users and
interest earned from banks on certain PayPal customer account
balances.
Net revenues are attributed to U.S. and international
geographies based upon the country in which the seller, payment
recipient, Skype users Internet protocol address, online
property that generates advertising, or other service, provider
is located.
Marketplaces
Net Transaction Revenues
Total net transaction revenues from Marketplaces increased 25%
and 24% during the third quarter and the first nine months of
2007, respectively, compared to the same periods of the prior
year. The increase in net transaction revenues was the result of
growth in GMV as well as growth in our non-GMV based businesses
(Shopping.com, Rent.com and our classifieds websites). Our
non-GMV based businesses are growing faster than the overall
Marketplaces businesses.
GMV increased 14% and 13% during the third quarter and the first
nine months of 2007, respectively, compared to the same periods
of the prior year. Although the number of listings declined
during the third quarter and the first nine months of 2007
compared to the same periods in the prior year, GMV growth was
primarily driven by an increase in conversion rates, average
selling prices, a weaker U.S. dollar, and inclusion of our
StubHub results. GMV growth occurred across all major
categories, with the motors, consumer electronics, collectibles,
clothing, home and tickets having the most significant dollar
impact when comparing the first nine months of 2007 to the same
periods in the prior year.
24
Marketplaces net transaction revenues earned internationally
were $651.6 million and $1.9 billion during the third
quarter and the first nine months of 2007, respectively,
representing 51% and 52% of total Marketplaces net transaction
revenues, respectively. Marketplaces net transaction revenues
earned internationally were $497.0 million and
$1.5 billion during the third quarter and the first nine
months of 2006, respectively, representing 49% of total
Marketplaces net transaction revenues in both periods. Based on
changes in foreign currency rates year over year, Marketplaces
net revenues were positively impacted by foreign currency
translation of approximately $46.4 million and
$140.1 million during the third quarter and the first nine
months of 2007, respectively. Changes in foreign currency rates
will impact our operating results and, to the extent that the
U.S. dollar strengthens, our foreign currency denominated
net revenues will be negatively impacted.
For the remainder of 2007, we expect the amount of Marketplaces
net transaction revenues to increase, driven primarily by
increased levels of GMV and continued growth from our non-GMV
based businesses.
Payments
Net Transaction Revenues
Payments net transaction revenues increased 32% and 30% during
the third quarter and the first nine months of 2007,
respectively, compared to the same periods of the prior year.
The increase in net transaction revenue is consistent with our
34% and 32% growth in total payment volume during the third
quarter and first nine months of 2007, respectively, compared to
the same periods of the prior year. Payments net transaction
revenues are still primarily derived from PayPals
penetration of eBay Marketplaces transactions. Payments net
transaction revenues have grown largely as a result of the
increase in our eBay Marketplaces GMV during the third quarter
and first nine months of 2007 as compared to the same periods of
the prior year.
In addition, Payments net transaction revenue growth was due in
part to a 61% and 57% increase in total payment volume in
PayPals merchant services business during the third
quarter and first nine months of 2007, respectively, compared to
the same periods of the prior year. The increase in merchant
services business is the result of more online merchants, both
domestically and internationally, adding PayPal as a payment
option. The total payment volume for PayPals merchant
services transactions was approximately $5.4 billion and
$14.7 billion in the third quarter and the first nine
months of 2007, respectively, which represented 44% and 42% of
PayPals total payment volume, respectively. The total
payment volume for PayPals merchant services transactions
was approximately $3.3 billion and $9.4 billion in the
third quarter and the first nine months of 2006, which
represented 37% and 35% of PayPals total payment volume,
respectively. Our Payments net transaction revenues as a
percentage of total payment volume was 3.7% during each of the
third quarter and the first nine months of 2007 and 2006.
Payments net transaction revenues earned internationally were
$191.1 million and $543.5 million during the third
quarter and the first nine months of 2007, respectively,
representing 43% and 42% of total Payments net transaction
revenues during those periods. Payments net transaction revenues
earned internationally were $127.8 million and
$371.7 million during the third quarter and the first nine
months of 2006, respectively, representing 38% and 37% of total
Payments net transaction revenues during those periods.
International growth in our Payments segment continues to
benefit from the expansion of our geographical footprint and the
number of currencies supported by PayPal over the last twelve
months. Based on changes in foreign currency rates year over
year, Payments net revenues were positively impacted by foreign
currency translation of approximately $0.1 million and
$18.9 million during the third quarter and the first nine
months of 2007, respectively. Changes in foreign currency rates
will impact our operating results and, to the extent that the
U.S. dollar strengthens, our foreign currency denominated
net revenues will be negatively impacted.
For the remainder of 2007, we expect Payments net transaction
revenues to increase in total and net transaction revenues
earned internationally to increase in total and as a percentage
of Payments net transaction revenues. We expect Payments to grow
our merchant services business as the number of merchants
integrating PayPal on their websites increases and as we build
consumer preference for PayPal. In addition, we expect to
benefit from growth in Marketplaces GMV.
25
Communications
Net Transaction Revenues
Communications net transaction revenues increased 93% and 103%
during the third quarter and the first nine months of 2007
compared to the same periods of the prior year. The increase in
net transaction revenues was primarily due to an increase in
SkypeOut minutes to 1.4 billion during the third quarter of
2007, compared to 1.1 billion in the same period of the
prior year. SkypeOut minutes increased to 4.0 billion in
the first nine months of 2007, compared to 2.6 billion in
the same period of the prior year. The increase in SkypeOut
minutes was due primarily to the growth in the cumulative number
of Skype registered users to 245.7 million at
September 30, 2007 from 135.9 million at
September 30, 2006. Prior period SkypeOut minutes have been
adjusted to exclude SkypeCast minutes. The growth in activity
per Skype user has slowed somewhat as Skype has increased its
focus on monetization of users.
Communications net transaction revenues earned internationally
were $80.2 million and $221.4 million in the third
quarter and the first nine months of 2007, respectively,
representing 83% and 84% of total Communications net transaction
revenues, respectively. Communications net transaction revenues
earned internationally were $42.3 million and
$110.4 million in the third quarter and the first nine
months of 2006, respectively, representing 84% and 85% of total
Communications net transaction revenues, respectively. Based on
changes in foreign currency rates year over year, Communications
net revenues were positively impacted by foreign currency
translation of approximately $7.0 million and
$19.6 million during the third quarter and the first nine
months of 2007, respectively. Changes in foreign currency rates
will impact our operating results and, to the extent that the
U.S. dollar strengthens, our foreign currency denominated
net revenues will be negatively impacted.
For the remainder of 2007, we expect an increase in total
Communications net transaction revenues and we expect to
continue our focus on increasing user activity and expanding our
product and feature-set.
Advertising
and Other Net Revenues
Advertising and other net revenues represented 4% of total net
revenues during each of the third quarter and the first nine
months of 2007. Advertising and other net revenues represented
3% of total net revenues during each of the third quarter and
the first nine months of 2006. Advertising and other net
revenues increased 86% and 83% during the third quarter and the
first nine months of 2007, respectively, compared to the same
periods of the prior year due to advertising initiatives in our
Marketplaces segment and interest earned from banks on certain
U.S. PayPal customer account balances. Prior to the fourth
quarter of 2006, certain U.S. PayPal customer account
balances were maintained in non-interest bearing accounts. As we
continue to view our business as primarily transaction-revenue
driven, we expect advertising and other net revenues to continue
to represent a relatively small proportion of total net revenues
during the remainder of 2007. We expect advertising and other
net revenues to increase in total as we continue to benefit from
the significant number of users on our Marketplaces platforms.
Cost
of Net Revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except percentages)
|
|
|
Cost of net revenues
|
|
$
|
319,995
|
|
|
$
|
446,521
|
|
|
|
40
|
%
|
|
$
|
900,475
|
|
|
$
|
1,256,999
|
|
|
|
40
|
%
|
As a percentage of net revenues
|
|
|
22.1
|
%
|
|
|
23.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21.2
|
%
|
|
|
22.9
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of net revenues consists primarily of costs associated with
payment processing, customer support and site operations, and
Skype telecommunications costs. Significant cost components
include bank transaction fees, credit card interchange,
assessments, other payment processing costs, employee
compensation, contractor costs, facilities costs for our
customer support and site operations, depreciation of equipment,
amortization of capitalized product development costs and
amortization of acquired developed technology.
The increase in cost of net revenues in the third quarter and
the first nine months of 2007 of $126.5 million and
$356.5 million, respectively, compared to the same periods
in the prior year, was primarily due to an increase in payment
processing costs, Skype telecommunications costs, and customer
support and site operations costs as we
26
continue to grow our lower margin businesses, PayPal and Skype.
Payment processing costs increased $63.7 million and
$173.0 million during the third quarter and the first nine
months of 2007, respectively, compared to the same periods of
the prior year. Payment processing costs are driven by an
increase in PayPal total payment volume and Marketplaces
transaction activity. The increase in payment processing costs
was also due to an increase in the number of PayPal customers
using credit cards for payments over bank or PayPal transfers.
Skype telecommunications costs increased $17.4 million and
$59.6 million during the third quarter and the first nine
months of 2007, respectively, compared to the same periods of
the prior year, primarily due to an increase in SkypeOut
minutes. Aggregate customer support and site operations costs
increased approximately $36.6 million and
$113.9 million during the third quarter and the first nine
months of 2007, respectively, compared to the same periods of
the prior year, due to the development and expansion of our
customer support and site operations infrastructure as a result
of our growth in transaction volume as demonstrated through the
increase in the number of users, GMV and total payment volume.
Cost of net revenues has increased as a percentage of net
revenues during the third quarter and first nine months of 2007
primarily as a result of the growth of our lower gross margin
businesses, PayPal and Skype.
For the remainder of 2007, cost of net revenues is expected to
increase in total and as a percentage of net revenues primarily
due to growth in our Payments and Communications segments, each
of which is growing faster and has a lower gross margin than our
Marketplaces segment.
Sales
and Marketing
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except percentages)
|
|
|
Sales and marketing
|
|
$
|
385,497
|
|
|
$
|
485,240
|
|
|
|
26
|
%
|
|
$
|
1,158,528
|
|
|
$
|
1,406,260
|
|
|
|
21
|
%
|
As a percentage of net revenues
|
|
|
26.6
|
%
|
|
|
25.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27.3
|
%
|
|
|
25.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Sales and marketing expense consists primarily of advertising
costs, marketing programs, contractor costs and employee
compensation for sales and marketing staff.
The increase in sales and marketing expense in the third quarter
and the first nine months of 2007 of $99.7 million and
$247.7 million, respectively, compared to the same periods
in the prior year, was primarily due to our continued investment
in growing and retaining our active user base. We direct
customers to our websites primarily through a number of online
marketing channels such as sponsored search, portal advertising,
e-mail
campaigns and other initiatives. Our marketing expenses are
largely variable, based on growth in sales and changes in rates.
Combined advertising and marketing costs increased
$66.1 million and $193.5 million in the third quarter
and first nine months of 2007, respectively, compared to same
periods in the prior year. Employee related costs, including the
use of contractors, increased $20.2 million and
$35.4 million in the third quarter and first nine months of
2007, respectively, compared to the same periods in the prior
year due to an increase in staffing.
For the remainder of 2007, sales and marketing expense is
expected to increase in total due to an expected increase in our
marketing expenses to attract new customers and increase user
activity across all of our segments. However, sales and
marketing expense as a percentage of net revenues is expected to
slightly decrease due to improved sales and marketing expense
leverage in our Marketplaces segment and the relative growth in
our Payments and Communications segments, each of which
generally has lower relative sales and marketing expense as a
percentage of net revenues than our Marketplaces segment.
Product
Development
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except percentages)
|
|
|
Product development
|
|
$
|
120,405
|
|
|
$
|
164,879
|
|
|
|
37
|
%
|
|
$
|
363,447
|
|
|
$
|
450,411
|
|
|
|
24
|
%
|
As a percentage of net revenues
|
|
|
8.3
|
%
|
|
|
8.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.6
|
%
|
|
|
8.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
27
Product development expense consists primarily of employee
compensation, contractor costs, facilities costs and
depreciation on equipment. Product development expense is net of
required capitalization of major site and other product
development efforts, including the development of our next
generation platform architecture, migration of certain
platforms, seller tools and Payment-services projects.
Capitalized site and product development costs were
$22.3 million and $61.2 million in the third quarter
and the first nine months of 2007, respectively, and
$16.6 million and $52.0 million in the third quarter
and the first nine months of 2006, respectively. Capitalized
site and product development costs are reflected as a cost of
net revenues when amortized in future periods.
The increase in product development expense in the third quarter
and the first nine months of 2007 of $44.5 million and
$87.0 million, respectively, compared to the same periods
in the prior year, was primarily due to an increase in staffing
and contractor costs to support several platform development
initiatives to enhance the user experience and expand our
existing product offerings.
For the remainder of 2007, product development expense is
expected to increase in total and as a percentage of net
revenues, as we develop new site features and functionality and
continue to improve and expand operations across all businesses.
General
and Administrative
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except percentages)
|
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
$
|
236,511
|
|
|
$
|
287,447
|
|
|
|
22
|
%
|
|
$
|
702,639
|
|
|
$
|
849,284
|
|
|
|
21
|
%
|
As a percentage of net revenues
|
|
|
16.3
|
%
|
|
|
15.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16.5
|
%
|
|
|
15.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
General and administrative expense consists primarily of
employee compensation, contractor costs, provisions for
transaction losses associated with PayPal, facilities costs,
depreciation of equipment, provision for doubtful accounts,
payroll taxes on employee stock options, insurance and
professional fees.
The increase in general and administrative expense in the third
quarter of 2007 of $50.9 million, compared to the same
period of the prior year, was primarily due to an increase in
employee related costs, facilities costs and professional
services, partially offset by a slight decrease in the provision
for transaction losses associated with PayPal. Employee related
and facilities costs increased $34.4 million during the
third quarter of 2007, compared to the same period in the prior
year due to an increase in staff. Professional services costs
increased $10.7 million during the third quarter of 2007,
compared to the same period in the prior year. PayPals
transaction loss expense decreased $0.7 million during the
third quarter of 2007, compared to the same period in the prior
year. During the third quarter of 2007, we refined our estimate
for chargeback losses, which resulted in a $10.9 million
reduction in transaction loss expense. The benefit from our
refined estimate was offset by loss increases in chargebacks and
protection programs. As such, PayPals transaction loss
rate, which is the transaction loss expense as a percentage of
PayPals total payment volume, decreased to 0.25% during
the third quarter of 2007, compared to 0.35% during the third
quarter of 2006. We continue to expect our transaction loss rate
to fluctuate depending on many factors, such as historical
experience of losses, funding mix and total payment volume. The
funding mix reflects how senders fund their payment transactions
(credit cards, electronic funds transfers, or existing PayPal
account balances).
The increase in general and administrative expense in the first
nine months of 2007 of $146.6 million, compared to the same
period of the prior year, was primarily due to an increase in
employee-related costs, facilities costs, professional services
and an increase in the provision for transaction losses
associated with PayPal. Employee-related and facilities costs
increased $85.9 million during the first nine months of
2007, compared to the same period in the prior year due to an
increase in staff. Professional services costs increased
$22.2 million during the first nine months of 2007,
compared to the same period in the prior year. Transaction loss
expense increased $19.2 million during the first nine
months of 2007, compared to the same period in the prior year.
Our transaction loss rate decreased to 0.29% during the first
nine months of 2007, compared to 0.31% during the first nine
months of 2006. Our transaction loss rate for the first nine
months ended 2007 was positively impacted by the refined
estimate mentioned above.
28
For the remainder of 2007, we expect general and administrative
expense to increase due to our continued investment across all
areas of our business and related corporate functions,
particularly in our consumer protection programs, as well as
costs associated with transaction losses. However, general and
administrative expense is expected to decrease as a percentage
of net revenues due to leverage in our traditional general and
administrative functions, which we expect will be partially
offset by investments in our consumer protection programs.
Amortization
of Acquired Intangible Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except percentages)
|
|
|
Amortization of acquired intangible assets
|
|
$
|
47,196
|
|
|
$
|
51,888
|
|
|
|
10
|
%
|
|
$
|
151,680
|
|
|
$
|
150,791
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)%
|
As a percentage of net revenues
|
|
|
3.3
|
%
|
|
|
2.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.6
|
%
|
|
|
2.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
From time to time we have purchased, and we expect to continue
to purchase, assets or businesses to accelerate category and
geographic expansion, increase the features, functions, and
formats available to our users and maintain a leading role in
e-commerce,
payments and communications. These purchase transactions
generally result in the creation of acquired intangible assets
with finite lives and lead to a corresponding increase in our
amortization expense in future periods. We amortize intangible
assets over the period of estimated benefit, using the
straight-line method and estimated useful lives ranging from one
to eight years. The increase in amortization of acquired
intangibles during the third quarter of 2007, as compared to the
same period of the prior year, is due primarily to the business
acquisitions we consummated during 2007. The slight decrease in
amortization of acquired intangibles for the first nine months
of 2007, as compared to the same period of 2006, is due to a
$10.4 million charge for in-process research and
development taken in the second quarter of 2006 related to an
acquisition completed during that period, offset by the
amortization related to the business acquisitions we consummated
during 2007.
Amortization of acquired intangible assets will likely increase
should we continue to make acquisitions in the future.
Impairment
of Goodwill
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except percentages)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment of goodwill
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
1,390,938
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
1,390,938
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As a percentage of net revenues
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
73.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
25.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment of goodwill was $1.4 billion in both the three
and nine months ended September 30, 2007. We conducted our
annual impairment test of goodwill as of August 31 in accordance
with SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible
Assets. As a result of this test, we concluded that the
carrying amount of our Communications segment exceeded its fair
value and recorded an impairment loss of approximately
$1.4 billion (including a $530.3 million payment
related to the earn out settlement agreement) during the quarter
ended September 30, 2007. The impairment resulted from an
updated long-term financial outlook for the Skype business
developed as part of our strategic planning cycle conducted
annually during our third quarter. See Note 3
Business Combinations, Goodwill and Intangible
Assets in the condensed consolidated financial statements
for further details. There were no impairment charges in the
three and nine months ended September 30, 2006. For the
remainder of 2007, we do not expect an additional impairment of
goodwill charge.
29
Interest
and Other Income, Net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except percentages)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest and other income, net
|
|
$
|
41,230
|
|
|
$
|
38,363
|
|
|
|
(7
|
)%
|
|
$
|
92,618
|
|
|
$
|
102,350
|
|
|
|
11
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
As a percentage of net revenues
|
|
|
2.8
|
%
|
|
|
2.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.2
|
%
|
|
|
1.9
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest and other income, net, consists of interest earned on
cash, cash equivalents and investments as well as foreign
exchange transaction gains and losses, our portion of
unconsolidated joint venture results and other miscellaneous
transactions not related to our primary operations.
Interest and other income, net, decreased during the third
quarter of 2007 as compared to the same period of the prior year
due to losses from our portion of unconsolidated joint ventures,
partially offset by higher cash, cash equivalents, and
investments balances and higher interest rates. The
weighted-average interest rate of our portfolio was
approximately 4.3% in the third quarter of 2007 as compared to
4.1% in the same period of the prior year.
Interest and other income, net, increased during the first nine
months of 2007 as compared to the same periods of the prior
year, due primarily to higher cash, cash equivalents and
investments balances and higher interest rates. The
weighted-average interest rate of our portfolio was
approximately 4.1% in the first nine months of 2007, compared to
3.8% in the same period of the prior year.
For the remainder of 2007, interest and other income, net, will
vary primarily based on future interest rates and the level of
invested assets, and our portion of the results of investments
in unconsolidated joint ventures.
Interest
Expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except percentages)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
$
|
553
|
|
|
$
|
2,728
|
|
|
|
393
|
%
|
|
$
|
2,229
|
|
|
$
|
10,004
|
|
|
|
349
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
As a percentage of net revenues
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
0.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
%
|
|
|
0.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense consists of interest charges on the amount
drawn under our line of credit and certain accrued
contingencies. The increase in interest expense in the third
quarter and the first nine months of 2007, compared to the same
periods of the prior year, is primarily due to interest charges
associated with our line of credit and certain accrued
contingencies. For the remainder of 2007, our use of the line of
credit to fund our working capital needs will result in interest
charges during the fourth quarter of 2007.
Provision
for Income Taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except percentages)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
$
|
98,814
|
|
|
$
|
33,577
|
|
|
|
(66
|
)%
|
|
$
|
284,288
|
|
|
$
|
262,021
|
|
|
|
(8
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
As a percentage of net revenues
|
|
|
6.8
|
%
|
|
|
1.8
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.7
|
%
|
|
|
4.8
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effective tax rate
|
|
|
26
|
%
|
|
|
(4
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27
|
%
|
|
|
(330
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The provision for income taxes differs from the amount computed
by applying the statutory U.S. federal rate principally due
to foreign income with lower tax rates and from tax credits that
lower the effective tax rate, offset by state taxes, subsidiary
losses and impairment charges for which we have not provided a
benefit and other factors that impact the effective tax rate.
30
The change in the effective tax rate for the three and nine
months ended September 30, 2007, compared to the same
period of the prior year primarily resulted from the goodwill
impairment charge recorded in the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2007 which is non-deductible for tax
purposes. In addition, the change in our effective tax rate was
due to a tax benefit from a ruling issued by a tax authority
related to prior periods and changes in the estimated geographic
mix of our taxable income for the year.
For the remainder of 2007, we are projecting a lower effective
tax rate than we experienced during the first half of the year.
Foreign
Exchange Hedging Policy
We are a growing company, with an increasing proportion of our
operations outside the U.S. Accordingly, our foreign
currency exposures have increased substantially and are expected
to continue to grow. The objective of our foreign exchange
exposure management program is to identify material foreign
currency exposures and to manage these exposures to minimize the
potential effects of currency fluctuations on our reported cash
flow and results of operations.
Our primary foreign currency exposures are transaction, economic
and translation:
Transaction Exposure: Around the world, we
have certain assets and liabilities, primarily receivables,
investments and accounts payable (including inter-company
transactions), that are denominated in currencies other than the
relevant entitys functional currency. In certain
circumstances, changes in the functional currency value of these
assets and liabilities create fluctuations in our reported
consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash
flows. We may enter into foreign exchange contracts to minimize
the short-term foreign currency fluctuations on such assets and
liabilities. The gains and losses on the foreign exchange
contracts offset the transaction gains and losses on certain
foreign currency receivables, investments and payables, all of
which are recognized in interest and other income, net.
Economic Exposure: We also have anticipated
future cash flows, including revenues and expenses, denominated
in currencies other than the relevant entitys functional
currency. Our primary economic exposures include future royalty
receivables, customer fees, and vendor payments. Changes in the
relevant entitys functional currency value will cause
fluctuations in the cash flows we expect to receive when these
cash flows are realized or settled. We may enter into foreign
exchange contracts to hedge the value of a portion of these cash
flows. We account for these foreign exchange contracts as cash
flow hedges. The effective portion of the derivatives gain
or loss is initially reported as a component of accumulated
other comprehensive income (loss) and subsequently reclassified
into earnings when the transaction is settled.
Earnings Translation Exposure: As our
international operations grow, fluctuations in the foreign
currencies create volatility in our reported results of
operations because we are required to consolidate the results of
operations of our foreign denominated subsidiaries. We may
decide to purchase foreign exchange contracts to offset the
earnings impact of currency fluctuations. Such contracts will be
marked-to-market on a monthly basis and any unrealized gain or
loss will be recorded in interest and other income, net.
31
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
Cash
Flows
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating activities
|
|
$
|
1,621,830
|
|
|
$
|
1,848,563
|
|
Investing activities
|
|
|
(138,310
|
)
|
|
|
(62,189
|
)
|
Financing activities
|
|
|
(380,203
|
)
|
|
|
(736,474
|
)
|
Effect of exchange rates on cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
65,360
|
|
|
|
199,899
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
1,168,677
|
|
|
$
|
1,249,799
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We generated cash from operating activities in amounts greater
than the net income (loss) for the nine months ended
September 30, 2006 and 2007, mainly due to non-cash charges
to earnings and tax benefits from stock-based compensation.
Non-cash charges to earnings included depreciation and
amortization on our long-term assets, stock-based compensation,
provision for doubtful accounts and authorized credits resulting
from increasing revenues and the provision for transaction
losses resulting from increased total payment volumes processed
by our PayPal subsidiary. Non-cash charges in the nine months
ended September 30, 2007 also included a $1.4 billion
goodwill impairment, whereas there was no impairment charge in
the same period of the prior year. As a substantial portion of
the companys net operating losses and tax credits have now
been utilized, cash is now required for tax payments in the
U.S. For the remainder of 2007, total U.S. and foreign
income tax payments will be dependent on our taxable income and
are estimated to be in the range of $50-100 million. For
the remainder of 2007, we expect net cash provided by operating
activities to increase primarily from higher net income.
The net cash used in investing activities of $138.3 million
during the first nine months of 2006 consisted primarily of the
cash payment for computer equipment and software to support our
site operations, customer support and international expansion.
Net cash used in investing activities of $62.2 million
during the first nine months of 2007 consisted primarily of cash
paid to acquire businesses totaling $320.2 million, the
purchase of computer equipment and software to support our site
operations, customer support and international expansion
totaling $326.0 million, purchases of investments of
$205.3 million, offset by net cash provided by our
investment activities of $783.8 million. For the remainder
of 2007, we expect to continue to purchase property and
equipment, we may acquire other businesses for cash, and we will
pay $530.3 million for the earn out settlement which would
reduce investing cash flows or increase investing cash usage.
The net cash used in financing activities of $380.2 million
during the first nine months of 2006 was due to the repurchase
of common stock for an aggregate purchase price of
$666.5 million, offset by proceeds from the issuance of
common stock under our employee stock purchase plan and the
exercise of stock options of $209.1 million and the excess
tax benefits from stock-based compensation of
$77.3 million. Net cash flows used in financing activities
of $736.5 million during the first nine months of 2007 were
primarily due to the repurchase of approximately
35.3 million shares of common stock for an aggregate
purchase price of approximately $1.2 billion, offset by
proceeds from the issuance of common stock under our employee
stock purchase plan and the exercise of stock options of
$365.2 million and the excess tax benefits from stock-based
compensation of $69.0 million. For the remainder of 2007,
we may continue to repurchase common stock, which would reduce
financing cash flows or increase financing cash usage.
The positive effect of exchange rates on cash and cash
equivalents during the nine months ended September 30, 2006
and 2007 was due to the weakness of the U.S. dollar during
the respective periods against other foreign currencies,
primarily the Euro.
In August 2007, we entered into an Amendment Agreement to our
Credit Agreement dated as of November 7, 2006. The
Amendment Agreement increased the lender commitments and
borrowing capacity under the Credit Agreement from its prior
level of $1.0 billion to $2.0 billion, maintained an
option to increase borrowing capacity by an additional
$1.0 billion (after giving effect to the $1.0 billion
increase described above) and extended the
32
maturity date by an additional year to November 7, 2012. As
of September 30, 2007, $2.0 billion was available
under the Credit Agreement.
Stock
Repurchases
In July 2006, our Board authorized the repurchase of up to
$2.0 billion of our common stock within two years from the
date of authorization. In January 2007, our Board authorized an
expansion of the stock repurchase program to provide for the
repurchase of up to an additional $2.0 billion of our
common stock over the next two years. During the nine months
ended September 30, 2007, we repurchased $1.2 billion
of our common stock. As of September 30, 2007, we have
repurchased approximately $2.8 billion of our common stock
under our stock repurchase program in the aggregate and we may
repurchase up to an additional $1.2 billion of our common
stock through January 2009.
Off-Balance
Sheet Arrangements
As of September 30, 2007, we had no off-balance sheet
arrangements that have, or are reasonably likely to have, a
current or future material effect on our consolidated financial
condition, results of operations, liquidity, capital
expenditures or capital resources. Customer funds held by PayPal
as an agent or custodian on behalf of our customers are not
reflected in our consolidated balance sheets. These funds
include funds held on behalf of U.S. customers that are
deposited in bank accounts insured by the Federal Deposit
Insurance Corporation and funds that U.S. customers choose
to invest in PayPals Money Market Fund, which totaled
approximately $1.7 billion and $1.5 billion as of
September 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006, respectively.
Indemnification
Provisions
In the ordinary course of business, we have included limited
indemnification provisions in certain of our agreements with
parties with whom we have commercial relations, including our
standard marketing, promotions and
application-programming-interface license agreements. Under
these contracts, we generally indemnify, hold harmless, and
agree to reimburse the indemnified party for losses suffered or
incurred by the indemnified party in connection with claims by a
third party with respect to domain names, trademarks, logos and
other branding elements to the extent that such marks are
applicable to our performance under the subject agreement. In a
limited number of agreements, we have provided an indemnity for
other types of third-party claims, which are indemnities mainly
related to copyrights, trademarks, and patents. In our PayPal
business, we have provided an indemnity to our payment
processors in the event of certain third-party claims or card
association fines against the processor arising out of conduct
by PayPal or PayPals customers. It is not possible to
determine the maximum potential loss under these indemnification
provisions due to our limited history of prior indemnification
claims and the unique facts and circumstances involved in each
particular provision. To date, no significant costs have been
incurred, either individually or collectively, in connection
with our indemnification provisions.
Liquidity
and Capital Resource Requirements
We believe that existing cash, cash equivalents and investments
of approximately $4.4 billion, together with cash generated
from operations and available borrowings under our credit
facility, will be sufficient to fund our operating activities,
capital expenditures, stock repurchases and other obligations
for the foreseeable future.
Recent
Accounting Pronouncements
In September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board
(FASB) issued Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards (SFAS) No. 157, Fair Value
Measurements (FAS 157). FAS 157
establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands
disclosures about fair value measurements. The changes to
current practice resulting from the application of this
statement relate to the definition of fair value, the methods
used to measure fair value, and the expanded disclosures about
fair value measurements. We will be required to adopt the
provisions on FAS 157 on January 1, 2008. We are
currently evaluating the impact of adopting the provisions of
FAS 157 but we do not currently believe that the adoption
of FAS 157 will materially impact our financial position,
cash flows, or results of operations.
33
In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159,
The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial
Liabilities Including an Amendment of FASB Statement
No. 115, which is effective for fiscal years
beginning after November 15, 2007. This statement permits
an entity to choose to measure many financial instruments and
certain other items at fair value at specified election dates.
Subsequent unrealized gains and losses on items for which the
fair value option has been elected will be reported in earnings.
We are currently evaluating the potential impact of this
statement.
|
|
Item 3:
|
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
|
Interest
Rate Risk
The primary objective of our investment activities is to
preserve principal while at the same time maximizing yields
without significantly increasing risk. To achieve this
objective, we maintain our portfolio of cash equivalents and
short-term and long-term investments in a variety of securities,
including government and corporate securities, time deposits,
and money market funds. These securities are generally
classified as available for sale and consequently are recorded
on the balance sheet at fair value with unrealized gains or
losses reported as a separate component of accumulated other
comprehensive income (loss), net of estimated tax.
Investments in both fixed-rate and floating-rate
interest-earning instruments carry varying degrees of interest
rate risk. The fair market value of our fixed-rate securities
may be adversely impacted due to a rise in interest rates. In
general, securities with longer maturities are subject to
greater interest-rate risk than those with shorter maturities.
While floating rate securities generally are subject to less
interest-rate risk than fixed-rate securities, floating-rate
securities may produce less income than expected if interest
rates decrease. Due in part to these factors, our investment
income may fall short of expectations or we may suffer losses in
principal if securities are sold that have declined in market
value due to changes in interest rates. As of September 30,
2007, our fixed-income investments subject to interest rate risk
(representing approximately 3% of our total cash, cash
equivalents and investments) earned a pretax yield of
approximately 5.4%, with a weighted average maturity of two
months. If interest rates were to instantaneously increase
(decrease) by 100 basis points, the fair market value of
our total investment portfolio could decrease (increase) by
approximately $0.2 million.
Equity
Price Risk
We are exposed to equity price risk on the marketable portion of
equity instruments and equity method investments we hold,
typically as the result of strategic investments in third
parties that are subject to considerable market risk due to
their volatility. We typically do not attempt to reduce or
eliminate our market exposure in these equity investments. We
did not record an impairment charge during either of the three
and nine months ended September 30, 2006 or 2007 relating
to the other-than-temporary impairment in the fair value of
equity investments. At September 30, 2007, the total
carrying value of our equity instruments and equity method
investments, included in long-term investments, was
$401.3 million.
Foreign
Currency Risk
During the third quarter and the first nine months of 2007, our
international net revenues, based upon the country in which the
seller, payment recipient, advertiser or other service provider
is located, accounted for approximately 51% of our net revenues,
an increase from 47% of net revenues for each the same periods
of 2006. The growth in our international operations has
increased our exposure to foreign currency fluctuations. Net
revenues and related expenses generated from international
locations are denominated in the functional currencies of the
local countries, and primarily include Euros, British pounds,
Korean won, Canadian dollars, Taiwanese dollars, Australian
dollars, Chinese renminbi, and Indian rupee. The results of
operations and certain of our inter-company balances associated
with our international locations are exposed to foreign exchange
rate fluctuations. The statements of income of our international
operations are translated into U.S. dollars at the average
exchange rates in each applicable period. To the extent the
U.S. dollar weakens against foreign currencies, the
translation of these foreign currency denominated transactions
results in increased consolidated net revenues, operating
expenses and net income. We expect our international operations
will continue to grow in significance as we develop and deploy
our global marketplaces and global payments platform. As a
result, the impact of foreign currency
34
fluctuations in future periods could become more significant and
may have a negative impact on our consolidated net revenues and
net income in the event the U.S. dollar strengthens
relative to other currencies.
If the U.S. dollar weakens against foreign currencies, the
translation of these foreign-currency-denominated transactions
will result in increased net revenues, operating expenses, and
net income. Similarly, our net revenues, operating expenses, and
net income will decrease if the U.S. dollar strengthens
against foreign currencies. The change in weighted average
foreign currency exchange rates in the third quarter of 2007, as
compared to the same period in the prior year, resulted in
higher net revenues of approximately $53.6 million and
higher aggregate cost of revenues and operating expenses of
approximately $29.7 million. The change in weighted average
foreign currency exchange rates in the first nine months of
2007, as compared to the same period in the prior year, resulted
in higher net revenues of approximately $178.8 million and
higher aggregate cost of revenues and operating expenses of
approximately $82.5 million. In addition, at
September 30, 2007, we held balances in cash, cash
equivalents and investments outside the U.S. totaling
approximately $3.7 billion.
Furthermore, our international operations are subject to risks
typical of international operations, including, but not limited
to, differing economic conditions, changes in political climate,
differing tax structures, other regulations and restrictions,
and foreign exchange rate volatility. Accordingly, our future
results could be materially adversely impacted by changes in
these or other factors.
Transaction
Exposure
As of September 30, 2007, we had outstanding foreign
exchange hedge contracts with notional values equivalent to
approximately $175.4 million with maturity dates within
31 days. The hedge contracts are used to offset changes in
the functional currency value of assets and liabilities
denominated in foreign currencies as a result of currency
fluctuations. Transaction gains and losses on the contracts and
the assets and liabilities are recognized each period in our
consolidated statement of income (loss).
Translation
Exposure
Foreign exchange rate fluctuations may adversely impact our
financial position as the assets and liabilities of our foreign
operations are translated into U.S. dollars in preparing
our consolidated balance sheet. The effect of foreign exchange
rate fluctuations on our consolidated financial position for the
nine months ended September 30, 2007, was a net translation
gain of approximately $464.4 million. This gain is
recognized as an adjustment to stockholders equity through
accumulated other comprehensive income. Additionally, foreign
exchange rate fluctuations may adversely impact our consolidated
results of operations as exchange rate fluctuations on
transactions denominated in currencies other than our functional
currencies result in gains and losses that are reflected in our
consolidated statement of income (loss).
We consolidate the earnings of our international subsidiaries by
converting them into U.S. dollars in accordance with
SFAS No. 52, Foreign Currency Translation.
Such earnings will fluctuate when there is a change in foreign
currency exchange rates. We enter into transactions to hedge
portions of our foreign currency denominated earnings
translation exposure using foreign exchange contracts. All
contracts that hedge translation exposure mature ratably over
the quarter in which they are executed. During the three months
ended September 30, 2007, the realized gains and losses
related to these hedges were not significant.
Economic
Exposure
We enter into various intercompany arrangements primarily
denominated in Euros and British pounds. To reduce foreign
exchange risk related to these inter-company arrangements for
2007, we entered into foreign exchange contracts during the
three and nine months ended September 30, 2007. The
objective of the foreign exchange contracts is to ensure that
the U.S. dollar-equivalent cash flows are not adversely
affected by changes in the Euro/U.S. dollar or the British
pound/U.S. dollar exchange rates. Pursuant to
SFAS No. 133, Accounting for Derivative
Instruments and Hedging Activities, we expect the hedge of
certain of these forecasted transactions using the foreign
exchange contracts to be highly effective in offsetting
potential changes in cash flows attributed to a change in the
Euro/U.S. dollar or the British pound/U.S. dollar
exchange rates. During the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2006 and 2007, the realized gains and losses
related to these hedges were not significant. The
35
notional amount of our hedges receiving cash flow hedge
accounting treatment was $135.3 million and the net loss
related to these hedges recorded to accumulated other
comprehensive income (loss) as of September 30, 2007 was
not significant.
|
|
Item 4:
|
Controls
and Procedures
|
(a) Evaluation of disclosure controls and
procedures. Based on the evaluation of our
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Securities
Exchange Act of 1934
Rules 13a-15(e)
and
15d-15(e))
required by Securities Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(b)
or
15d-15(b),
our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer have
concluded that as of the end of the period covered by this
report, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective.
(b) Changes in internal controls. There
were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting
that occurred during our most recent fiscal quarter that have
materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially
affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
PART II:
OTHER INFORMATION
|
|
Item 1:
|
Legal
Proceedings
|
In April 2001, two of our European subsidiaries, eBay GmbH and
eBay International AG, were sued by Montres Rolex S.A. and
certain of its affiliates in the regional court of Cologne,
Germany. The suit subsequently was transferred to the regional
court in Düsseldorf, Germany. Rolex alleged that our
subsidiaries were infringing Rolexs trademarks as a result
of users selling counterfeit Rolex watches through our German
website. The suit also alleged unfair competition. Rolex sought
an order enjoining the sale of Rolex-branded watches on the
website as well as damages. In December 2002, a trial was held
in the matter, and the court ruled in favor of eBay on all
causes of action. Rolex appealed the ruling to the Higher
Regional Court of Düsseldorf, and the appeal was heard in
October 2003. In February 2004, the court rejected Rolexs
appeal and ruled in our favor. Rolex appealed the ruling to the
German Federal Supreme Court, a hearing took place before that
court in December 2006, and a written decision was issued in
June 2007. The courts decision found that eBay must take
reasonable measures to prevent recurrence once it is informed of
clearly identified infringement, and that eBay may in certain
circumstances be liable upon first notice of infringement. The
court referred the case back to the Higher Regional Court to
determine (i) whether, in some circumstances, a low
starting listing price was sufficient to indicate that a listing
was infringing and (ii) under what circumstances online
sellers are commercial dealers within the meaning of
the German intellectual property laws. In July 2007, the German
Federal Supreme Court extended the reach of the Rolex
decision in IVD v. eBay. The court held that
(i) in certain circumstances, a duty of care could be found
to exist to competitors requiring eBay to take reasonable
measures to prevent illegal items from being listed (even where
the competitors were not directly harmed) and (ii) such
duty would extend to listings by the same seller in the same
category (not just identical listings). Prior to these
decisions, we had implemented proactive measures to find and
remove illegal listings from our sites; these decisions may
require us to undertake further efforts and will subject us to
liability if our efforts are deemed to be insufficient. We
expect that this ruling will likely result in increased costs
and litigation against us in Germany although we do not
currently believe that it will require a major change in our
business practices.
In August 2006, Louis Vuitton Malletier and Christian Dior
Couture filed two lawsuits in the Paris Court of Commerce
against eBay Inc. and eBay International AG. The complaint
alleges that we violated French tort law by negligently
broadcasting listings posted by third parties offering
counterfeit items bearing plaintiffs trademarks, and by
purchasing certain advertising keywords. The plaintiffs seek
approximately 35 million in damages. Around September
2006, Parfums Christian Dior, Kenzo Parfums, Parfums Givenchy,
and Guerlain Société also filed a lawsuit in the Paris
Court of Commerce against eBay Inc. and eBay International AG.
The complaint alleges that we have interfered with the selective
distribution network the plaintiffs established in France and
the European Union by allowing third parties to post listings
offering genuine perfumes and cosmetics for sale on our sites.
The plaintiffs in this suit seek approximately
9 million in damages and injunctive relief. We filed
our initial briefs responding to the first complaint in February
2007, and initial briefs in response to the second complaint
were filed in April 2007.
36
We believe that we have meritorious defenses to these suits and
intend to defend ourselves vigorously. Other luxury brand owners
have also filed suit against us or have threatened to do so,
seeking to hold us liable for counterfeit items listed on our
sites by third parties, for tester and other not for
resale consumer products listed on our sites by third parties,
for the misuse of trademarks in listings, for alleged violations
of selective distribution channel laws, for non-compliance of
consumer protection laws or in connection with paid search
advertisements.
In September 2001, MercExchange LLC filed a complaint against
us, our Half.com subsidiary and ReturnBuy, Inc. in the
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia
(No. 2:01-CV-736)
alleging infringement of three patents (relating to online
consignment auction technology, multiple database searching and
electronic consignment systems) and seeking a permanent
injunction and damages (including treble damages for willful
infringement). Following a trial in 2003, the jury returned a
verdict finding that we had willfully infringed the patents
relating to multiple database searching and electronic
consignment systems, and the court entered judgment for
MercExchange in the amount of approximately $30 million,
plus pre-judgment interest and post-judgment interest. The
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit later reduced
the award to $25.5 million. In May 2006, following appeals
to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit and
the U.S. Supreme Court, the Supreme Court remanded the case
back to the district court for further action. In parallel with
the federal court proceedings, at our request, the
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office agreed to reexamine each
of the patents in suit, finding that substantial questions
existed regarding the validity of the claims contained in them.
In separate actions in 2005, the Patent and Trademark Office
initially rejected all of the claims contained in the three
patents in suit. The Patent and Trademark Office has given
notice of approval of some claims (and rejection of others)
under the patent relating to online consignment auction
technology and in September 2007, it tentatively approved some
of the claims and rejected others contained in the patent that
underlies the jury verdict, which relates to electronic
consignment systems. In July 2007, the court denied
MercExchanges request for an injunction and ruled that the
proceedings related to one of the patents will be stayed and
another of the patents will not be stayed pending action by the
Patent and Trademark Office. MercExchange is appealing the
courts order denying the injunction, and we have filed a
motion seeking that the court find the non-stayed patent
invalid. Even if successful, our litigation of these matters
will continue to be costly. As a precautionary measure, we have
modified certain functionality of our websites and business
practices in a manner which we believe avoids any infringement
of the consignment patent. For this reason, we believe that any
injunction that might ultimately be issued will not have any
impact on our business. We also believe we have appropriate
reserves for this litigation. Nonetheless, if the modifications
to the functionality of our websites and business practices are
not sufficient to make them non-infringing, we would likely be
forced to pay significant additional damages and licensing fees
and/or
modify our business practices in an adverse manner.
In June 2006, Net2Phone, Inc. filed a lawsuit in the
U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey
(No. 06-2469)
alleging that eBay Inc., Skype Technologies S.A., and Skype Inc.
infringed five patents owned by Net2Phone relating to
point-to-point Internet protocol. The suit seeks an injunction
against continuing infringement, unspecified damages, including
treble damages for willful infringement, and interest, costs,
and fees. We have filed an answer and counterclaims asserting
that the patents are invalid, unenforceable, and were not
infringed. The parties are in the process of conducting
discovery and claim construction briefing, and we expect a trial
date to be scheduled for the second half of 2008. We believe
that we have meritorious defenses and intend to defend ourselves
vigorously.
In August 2006, Peer Communications Corporation filed a lawsuit
in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of
Texas
(No. 6-06CV-370)
alleging that eBay Inc., Skype Technologies S.A., and Skype Inc.
infringed two patents owned by Peer Communications relating to
uniform network access. The suit seeks an injunction against
continuing infringement, unspecified damages, and interest,
costs, and fees. The parties are in the process of conducting
discovery, and a trial date has been scheduled for October 2008.
We believe that we have meritorious defenses and intend to
defend ourselves vigorously.
In September 2006, Mangosoft Intellectual Property, Inc. filed a
lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District
of Texas
(No. 2-06CV-390)
alleging that eBay Inc., Skype Technologies S.A., and Skype
Software S.a.r.l. infringed a patent owned by Mangosoft relating
to dynamic directory services. The suit seeks an injunction
against continuing infringement, unspecified damages, and
interest, costs, and fees. We have filed an answer and
counterclaims asserting that the patents are invalid,
unenforceable, and not infringed. We received an initial
37
scheduling order from the court that sets some discovery
deadlines, but not a trial date. We believe that we have
meritorious defenses and intend to defend ourselves vigorously.
In February 2007, our StubHub subsidiary was sued in the
U.S. District Court for the Central District of California
(No. CV-07-1328)
in a purported class action lawsuit alleging that StubHub
violated the Fair and Accurate Credit Transaction Act by
allegedly printing receipts containing more than the last five
digits of a credit card number or the expiration date. The
complaint seeks compensatory and punitive damages and attorneys
fees. We believe that we have meritorious defenses and intend to
defend ourselves vigorously.
In March 2007, a plaintiff filed a purported antitrust class
action lawsuit against eBay in the Western District of Texas
alleging that eBay, through its wholly owned subsidiary PayPal,
used illegal tie-in and steering practices to improperly
monopolize the forms of payment that sellers can use
on eBay. The plaintiff alleges claims under sections 1 and
2 of the Sherman Act, as well as related state law claims. The
complaint seeks treble damages and an injunction. In April 2007,
the plaintiff re-filed the complaint in the U.S. District
Court for the Northern District of California
(No. 07-CV-01882-RS),
and dismissed the Texas action. In June 2007, we filed a motion
to dismiss the class action complaint. We believe that we have
meritorious defenses and intend to defend ourselves vigorously.
In May 2007, Netcraft Corporation filed a lawsuit in the Western
District of Wisconsin
(No. 07-C-0254C)
alleging that eBay and PayPal infringed two of its patents
entitled Internet billing methods. The suit seeks an
injunction against continuing infringement, unspecified damages,
and interest, costs, and fees. The parties are in the process of
conducting discovery. We have filed a motion for summary
judgment of noninfringement on both patents. The claim
construction hearing is currently scheduled for November 2007.
The trial is expected to be scheduled for June or July 2008. We
believe that we have meritorious defenses and intend to defend
ourselves vigorously.
Other third parties have from time to time claimed, and others
may claim in the future, that we have infringed their
intellectual property rights. We are subject to additional
patent disputes, and expect that we will increasingly be subject
to patent infringement claims as our services expand in scope
and complexity. In particular, we expect that we may face
additional patent infringement claims involving various aspects
of our Marketplaces, Payments and Communications businesses. We
have in the past been forced to litigate such claims. We may
also become more vulnerable to third-party claims as laws such
as the Digital Millennium Copyright Act, the Lanham Act and the
Communications Decency Act are interpreted by the courts, and as
we become subject to jurisdictions where the underlying laws
with respect to the potential liability of online intermediaries
like ourselves are either unclear or less favorable. We believe
that additional lawsuits alleging that we have violated
copyright or trademark laws will be filed against us, especially
in Europe. Intellectual property claims, whether meritorious or
not, are time consuming and costly to resolve, could require
expensive changes in our methods of doing business, or could
require us to enter into costly royalty or licensing agreements.
From time to time, we are involved in other disputes or
regulatory inquiries that arise in the ordinary course of
business. The number and significance of these disputes and
inquiries are increasing as our business expands and our company
grows larger. Any claims or regulatory actions against us,
whether meritorious or not, could be time consuming, result in
costly litigation, require significant amounts of management
time, and result in the diversion of significant operational
resources.
Risk
Factors That May Affect Results of Operations and Financial
Condition
The risks and uncertainties described below are not the only
ones facing us. Other events that we do not currently anticipate
or that we currently deem immaterial also may affect our results
of operations and financial condition.
38
Our
operating results may fluctuate.
Our operating results have varied on a quarterly basis during
our operating history. Our operating results may fluctuate
significantly as a result of a variety of factors, many of which
are outside our control. Factors that may affect our operating
results include the following:
|
|
|
|
|
our ability to retain an active user base, attract new users,
and encourage existing users to list items for sale, purchase
items through our websites, or use our payment service or
communication software and products;
|
|
|
|
our ability to grow activity and activation of the users of our
traditional Marketplace businesses, especially with respect to
our most active buyers and sellers, in our most mature
geographies, especially the U.S., Germany and the U.K.;
|
|
|
|
the volume, size, timing, monetization, and completion rates of
transactions using our websites or technology;
|
|
|
|
the amount and timing of operating costs and capital
expenditures relating to the maintenance and expansion of our
businesses, operations, and infrastructure;
|
|
|
|
regulatory and legal actions imposing obligations on our
businesses or our users;
|
|
|
|
the actions of our competitors, including the introduction of
new sites, services, and products;
|
|
|
|
our ability to expand PayPals product offerings outside of
the U.S. (including our ability to obtain any necessary
regulatory approvals);
|
|
|
|
our ability to manage PayPals transaction loss rate and
payment funding mix;
|
|
|
|
consumer confidence in the safety and security of transactions
using our websites or technology and our ability to manage the
costs of our user protection programs;
|
|
|
|
the costs and results of litigation that involves us;
|
|
|
|
our ability to integrate, manage, and profitably expand and more
effectively monetize the Skype business;
|
|
|
|
our ability to successfully integrate and manage businesses that
we acquire;
|
|
|
|
the cost and availability of online and traditional advertising,
and the success of our brand building and marketing campaigns;
|
|
|
|
new laws or regulations, or interpretations of existing laws or
regulations, that impose liability on us for actions of our
users or otherwise harm our business models or restrict the
Internet, electronic commerce, online payments, or online
communications;
|
|
|
|
our ability to comply with the requirements of entities whose
services are required for our operations, such as credit card
associations and banks;
|
|
|
|
our ability to develop product enhancements, programs, and
features at a reasonable cost in a timely manner;
|
|
|
|
our ability to upgrade and develop our systems, infrastructure,
and customer service capabilities to accommodate growth and to
improve our websites at a reasonable cost while maintaining 24/7
operations;
|
|
|
|
technical difficulties or service interruptions involving our
websites or services provided to us or our users by third
parties;
|
|
|
|
our ability to increase the acceptance of PayPal by online
merchants outside of the eBay Marketplaces, which may require
long implementation cycles and incentives to merchants that are
initially dilutive;
|
|
|
|
our ability to attract new personnel in a timely and effective
manner and to retain key employees;
|
|
|
|
the continued financial strength of our technology suppliers and
other parties with whom we have commercial relations;
|
39
|
|
|
|
|
continued consumer acceptance of the Internet as a medium for
commerce and communication in the face of increasing publicity
about fraud, spoofing, viruses, and other dangers of the
Internet;
|
|
|
|
general economic conditions and those economic conditions
specific to the Internet and
e-commerce
industries; and
|
|
|
|
geopolitical events such as war, threat of war, or terrorist
actions.
|
The increased variety of services offered on our websites makes
it difficult for us to forecast the level or source of our
revenues or earnings accurately. In view of the rapidly evolving
nature of our business and our limited operating history, we
believe that period-to-period comparisons of our operating
results may not be meaningful, and you should not rely upon them
as an indication of future performance. We do not have backlog,
and substantially all of our net revenues each quarter come from
transactions involving sales or payments during that quarter.
Due to the inherent difficulty in forecasting revenues, it is
also difficult to forecast income statement expenses as a
percentage of net revenues. Quarterly and annual income
statement expenses as a percentage of net revenues may be
significantly different from historical or projected rates. Our
operating results in one or more future quarters may fall below
the expectations of securities analysts and investors. In that
event, the trading price of our common stock would almost
certainly decline.
We may
not maintain our level of profitability or rates of
growth.
We believe that our continued profitability and growth will
depend in large part on our ability to do the following:
|
|
|
|
|
attract new users, keep existing users active and reactivate
former users on our websites and services, and increase the
activity levels of our active users;
|
|
|
|
react to changes in consumer use of the Internet and develop new
services, as well as new sources of revenues from our existing
services;
|
|
|
|
manage the costs of our business, including the costs associated
with our workforce and with maintaining and enhancing our
websites, customer support, transaction loss rate, user
protection programs, and international and product expansion;
|
|
|
|
maintain sufficient transaction volume to attract buyers and
sellers;
|
|
|
|
cost effectively increase the awareness of our brands; and
|
|
|
|
provide our customers with superior community, customer support,
and trading, communication, and payment experiences.
|
We invest heavily in marketing and promotion, customer support,
and further development of the operating infrastructure for our
core and recently acquired operations. Some of this investment
entails long-term contractual commitments. As a result, we may
be unable to adjust our spending rapidly enough to compensate
for any unexpected revenue shortfall, which may harm our
profitability. In addition, we are spending in advance of
anticipated growth, which may also harm our profitability.
Growth rates in our most established markets, such as Germany
and the U.S., have continued to decline over time. Despite our
efforts to stem these declines, growth rates may continue to
decline as the existing base of users and transactions becomes
larger. As our penetration in established markets grows, we will
increasingly need to rely on keeping existing users active and
increasing their activity level on our sites for growth in those
markets. In addition, our Marketplaces business is facing
increased competitive pressure. Because a large percentage of
PayPal transactions originate on the eBay platform, declines in
growth rates in major eBay Marketplace markets also adversely
affect PayPals growth rate. The growth in Skypes
user activity has slowed somewhat as Skype has increased its
focus on monetization of users. The expected future growth of
our PayPal, Skype, StubHub, Shopping.com, and other lower margin
businesses may also cause downward pressure on our profit margin
because those businesses have lower gross margins than our eBay
trading platforms.
40
We are
exposed to fluctuations in currency exchange
rates.
Because we conduct a significant and growing portion of our
business outside the United States but report our results in
U.S. dollars, we face exposure to adverse movements in
currency exchange rates. In connection with its multi-currency
service, PayPal fixes exchange rates twice per day, and may face
financial exposure if it incorrectly fixes the exchange rate or
if exposure reports are delayed. PayPal also holds some
corporate and customer funds in
non-U.S. currencies,
and thus its financial results are affected by the translation
of these
non-U.S. currencies
into U.S. dollars. In addition, the results of operations
of many of our internationally focused websites are exposed to
foreign exchange rate fluctuations as the financial results of
the applicable subsidiaries are translated from the local
currency into U.S. dollars upon consolidation. If the
U.S. dollar weakens against foreign currencies, the
translation of these foreign currency denominated transactions
will result in increased net revenues, operating expenses, and
net income. Similarly, our net revenues, operating expenses, and
net income will decrease if the U.S. dollar strengthens
against foreign currencies. Net revenues in the nine months
ended September 30, 2007 were positively impacted by
foreign currency translation of $53.6 million, compared to
the same period of the prior year. Operating income in the nine
months ended September 30, 2007 was positively impacted by
foreign currency translation of $23.9 million, compared to
the same period of the prior year. As exchange rates vary, net
sales and other operating results, when translated, may differ
materially from expectations. In particular, to the extent the
U.S. dollar strengthens against the Euro, British pound,
Australian dollar, and Korean won, our foreign revenues and
profits will be reduced as a result of these translation
adjustments. In addition, to the extent the U.S. dollar
strengthens against the Euro, the British pound, the Australian
dollar, and the Korean won, cross-border trade related to
purchases of dollar-denominated goods by
non-U.S. purchasers
may decrease, and that decrease may not be offset by a
corresponding increase in cross-border trade involving purchases
by U.S. buyers of goods denominated in other currencies.
While from time to time we enter into transactions to hedge
portions of our foreign currency translation exposure, it is
impossible to perfectly predict or completely eliminate the
effects of this exposure.
We are
subject to patent litigation.
We have repeatedly been sued for allegedly infringing other
parties patents. Some of these suits are ongoing, and some
of the ongoing suits are described under the heading
Item 1: Legal Proceedings, above. We are a
defendant in other patent suits and we have been notified of
several other potential patent disputes, and expect that we will
increasingly be subject to patent infringement claims as our
services expand in scope and complexity. In particular, we
expect that we may face additional patent infringement claims
involving various aspects of our Marketplaces, Payments and
Communications businesses. These claims, whether meritorious or
not, are time consuming and costly to resolve, and could require
expensive changes in our methods of doing business, could
require us to enter into costly royalty or licensing agreements,
or could require us to cease conducting certain operations.
Government
inquiries may lead to charges or penalties.
A large number of transactions occur on our websites. We believe
that government regulators have received a substantial number of
consumer complaints about both eBay and PayPal, which, while
small as a percentage of our total transactions, are large in
aggregate numbers. As a result, from time to time we have been
contacted by various foreign and domestic governmental
regulatory agencies that have questions about our operations and
the steps we take to protect our users from fraud. PayPal has
received inquiries regarding its restriction and disclosure
practices from the Federal Trade Commission and regarding these
and other business practices from the attorneys general of a
number of states. In September 2006, PayPal entered into a
settlement agreement with the attorneys general of a number of
states under which it agreed to pay $1.7 million to the
attorneys general, shorten and streamline its user agreement,
increase educational messaging to users about funding choices,
and communicate more information regarding protection programs
to users. We are likely to receive additional inquiries from
regulatory agencies in the future, which may lead to action
against us. We have responded to all inquiries from regulatory
agencies by describing our current and planned antifraud
efforts, customer support procedures, operating procedures and
disclosures. If one or more of these agencies is not satisfied
with our response to current or future inquiries, we could be
subject to enforcement actions, fines or other penalties, or
forced to change our operating practices in ways that could harm
our business.
41
We are subject to laws relating to the use and transfer of
personally identifiable information about our users, especially
for financial information and for users located outside of the
U.S. New laws in this area have been passed by several
jurisdictions, and other jurisdictions are considering imposing
additional restrictions. Violation of these laws, which in many
cases apply not only to third-party transactions but also to
transfers of information between ourselves and our subsidiaries,
and between ourselves, our subsidiaries, and other parties with
which we have commercial relations, could subject us to
significant penalties and negative publicity and could adversely
affect us.
The
listing or sale by our users of pirated or counterfeit items may
harm our business.
We have received in the past, and we anticipate receiving in the
future, communications alleging that certain items listed or
sold through our service by our users infringe third-party
copyrights, trademarks and trade names, or other intellectual
property rights. Although we have sought to work actively with
the owners of intellectual property rights to eliminate listings
offering infringing items on our websites, some rights owners
have expressed the view that our efforts are insufficient.
Content owners and other intellectual property rights owners
have been active in asserting their rights against online
companies, including eBay. Allegations of infringement of
intellectual property rights have resulted in threats of
litigation and actual litigation against us from time to time,
including litigation brought by Tiffany & Co. in the
U.S., Rolex S.A. in Germany, Louis Vuitton Malletier and
Christian Dior Couture in France, LOréal SA,
Lancôme Parfums et Beauté & Cie, and Laboratoire
Garnier & Cie in several European countries, and a
number of other owners of intellectual property rights. The
plaintiffs in these cases seek to hold eBay liable for
counterfeit items listed on our sites by third parties, for
tester and other not for resale consumer products
listed on our sites by third parties, for the misuse of
trademarks in listings or in connection with paid search
advertisements, or for alleged violations of selective
distribution channel laws. Such plaintiffs seek, among other
things, injunctive relief and damages. In the aggregate, these
suits could result in significant damage awards and could
adversely affect our business. Other luxury brand owners have
also filed suit against us or have threatened to do so. In
addition to litigation from rights owners, we may be subject to
criminal penalties if the authorities feel we have aided in the
sale of counterfeit goods. While we have had some early success
in defending against such litigation, more recent cases have
been based, at least in part, on different legal theories than
those of earlier cases, and there is no guarantee that we will
continue to be successful in defending against such litigation.
For example, the German Federal Supreme Court has ruled against
us in the Rolex and IVD cases. Plaintiffs in
recent cases have argued that we are not entitled to safe
harbors under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act in the
U.S. or as a hosting provider in the European Union because
of the active nature of our involvement with our sellers, and
that, whether or not such safe harbors are available, we should
be found liable because we have not adequately removed
counterfeit listings or effectively suspended users who have
created such listings. Litigation and negative publicity has
increased as our sites gain prominence in markets outside of the
U.S., where the laws may be unsettled or less favorable to us.
Such litigation is costly for us, could result in damage awards,
injunctive relief, or increased costs of doing business through
adverse judgment or settlement, could require us to change our
business practices in expensive ways, or could otherwise harm
our business. Litigation against other online companies could
result in interpretations of the law that could also require us
to change our business practices or otherwise increase our
costs. In addition, a public perception that counterfeit or
pirated items are commonplace on our site could damage our
reputation and our business.
We are
subject to general litigation and regulatory
disputes.
From time to time, we are involved in other disputes or
regulatory inquiries that arise in the ordinary course of
business. The number and significance of these disputes and
inquiries are increasing as our business expands and our company
grows larger. We have in the past been forced to litigate such
claims. We may also become more vulnerable to third-party claims
as laws such as the Digital Millennium Copyright Act, the Lanham
Act and the Communications Decency Act are interpreted by the
courts and as we expand geographically into jurisdictions where
the underlying laws with respect to the potential liability of
online intermediaries such as ourselves are either unclear or
less favorable. In Germany, the German Federal Supreme Court has
ruled that we owe duties, under certain circumstances, to
content owners and competitors relating to taking reasonable
steps to prevent the listing of illegal, counterfeit, and
pirated items. Any claims or regulatory actions against us,
whether meritorious or not, could be time consuming, result in
costly litigation, require significant amounts of management
time, and result in the diversion of significant operational
resources.
42
Acquisitions
could result in operating difficulties, dilution, and other
harmful consequences.
We have acquired a number of businesses in the past, including,
most recently, StumbleUpon and ViA-Online GmbH. We expect to
continue to evaluate and consider a wide array of potential
strategic transactions, including business combinations,
acquisitions and dispositions of businesses, technologies,
services, products and other assets. At any given time we may be
engaged in discussions or negotiations with respect to one or
more of these types of transactions. Any of these transactions
could be material to our financial condition and results of
operations. The process of integrating any acquired business may
create unforeseen operating difficulties and expenditures and is
itself risky. The areas where we may face difficulties include:
|
|
|
|
|
diversion of management time, as well as a shift of focus from
operating the businesses to issues related to integration and
administration, particularly given the large number and size and
varying scope of our recent acquisitions;
|
|
|
|
declining employee morale and retention issues resulting from
changes in, or acceleration of, compensation, or changes in
management, reporting relationships, future prospects, or the
direction of the business;
|
|
|
|
the need to integrate each companys accounting,
management, information, human resource and other administrative
systems to permit effective management, and the lack of control
if such integration is delayed or not implemented;
|
|
|
|
the need to implement controls, procedures and policies
appropriate for a larger public company at companies that prior
to acquisition had lacked such controls, procedures and policies;
|
|
|
|
in the case of foreign acquisitions, the need to integrate
operations across different cultures and languages and to
address the particular economic, currency, political, and
regulatory risks associated with specific countries; and
|
|
|
|
in some cases, the need to transition operations, users, and
customers onto our existing platforms.
|
Moreover, we may not realize the anticipated benefits of any or
all of our acquisitions, or may not realize them in the time
frame expected. For example, in connection with the Skype
transaction, we recorded a goodwill impairment charge of
approximately $1.4 billion in our financial statements for
the period ended September 30, 2007. Future acquisitions or
mergers may result in a need to issue additional equity
securities, spend our cash, or incur debt, liabilities, or
amortization expenses related to intangible assets, any of which
could reduce our profitability and harm our business.
There
are many risks associated with our international
operations.
Our international expansion has been rapid and our international
business, especially in Germany and the U.K., has also become
critical to our revenues and profits. Net revenues outside the
United States accounted for approximately 48% and 51%,
respectively, of our net revenues in fiscal year 2006 and the
first nine months of 2007. Expansion into international markets
requires management attention and resources and requires us to
localize our services to conform to local cultures, standards,
and policies. The commercial, Internet, and transportation
infrastructure in lesser-developed countries may make it
difficult for us to replicate our traditional Marketplace
business model. In many countries, we compete with local
companies that understand the local market better than we do,
and we may not benefit from first-to-market advantages. We may
not be successful in expanding into particular international
markets or in generating revenues from foreign operations. For
example, in 2002 we withdrew our eBay marketplace offering from
the Japanese market, and in 2007 we contributed our business in
China to a joint venture with a local Chinese company. Even if
we are successful in developing new markets, we expect the costs
of operating new sites to exceed our net revenues for at least
12 months in most countries.
As we continue to expand internationally, including through the
expansion of PayPal, Skype, Shopping.com, and Kijiji, we are
subject to risks of doing business internationally, including
the following:
|
|
|
|
|
strong local competitors;
|
|
|
|
regulatory requirements, including regulation of Internet
services, communications, auctioneering, professional selling,
distance selling, data protection, banking, and money
transmitting, that may limit or prevent
|
43
|
|
|
|
|
the offering of our services in some jurisdictions, prevent
enforceable agreements between sellers and buyers, prohibit the
listing of certain categories of goods, require product changes,
require special licensure, subject us to special taxes, or limit
the transfer of information between eBay and our affiliates;
|
|
|
|
|
|
greater liability or legal uncertainty regarding our liability
for the listings and other content provided by our users,
including uncertainty as a result of legal systems that are less
developed with respect to the Internet, unique local laws,
conflicting court decisions and lack of clear precedent or
applicable law;
|
|
|
|
difficulties in integrating with local payment providers,
including banks, credit and debit card associations, and
electronic fund transfer systems or with the local
telecommunications infrastructure;
|
|
|
|
differing levels of retail distribution, shipping,
communications, and Internet infrastructures;
|
|
|
|
different employee/employer relationships and the existence of
workers councils and labor unions;
|
|
|
|
difficulties in staffing and managing foreign operations;
|
|
|
|
challenges associated with joint venture relationships,
including dependence on our joint venture partners;
|
|
|
|
difficulties in implementing and maintaining adequate internal
controls;
|
|
|
|
longer payment cycles, different accounting practices, and
greater problems in collecting accounts receivable;
|
|
|
|
potentially adverse tax consequences, including local taxation
of our fees or of transactions on our websites;
|
|
|
|
higher telecommunications and Internet service provider costs;
|
|
|
|
different and more stringent user protection, data protection,
privacy and other laws;
|
|
|
|
cultural ambivalence towards, or non-acceptance of, online
trading;
|
|
|
|
seasonal reductions in business activity;
|
|
|
|
expenses associated with localizing our products, including
offering customers the ability to transact business in the local
currency;
|
|
|
|
laws and business practices that favor local competitors or
prohibit foreign ownership of certain businesses;
|
|
|
|
profit repatriation restrictions, foreign currency exchange
restrictions, and exchange rate fluctuations;
|
|
|
|
volatility in a specific countrys or regions
political, economic or military conditions; and
|
|
|
|
differing intellectual property laws.
|
Some of these factors may cause our international costs of doing
business to exceed our comparable domestic costs. As we expand
our international operations and have additional portions of our
international revenues denominated in foreign currencies, we
also could become subject to increased difficulties in
collecting accounts receivable, repatriating money without
adverse tax consequences, and risks relating to foreign currency
exchange rate fluctuations. The impact of currency exchange rate
fluctuations is discussed in more detail under We are
exposed to fluctuations in currency exchange rates, above.
We are continuing to expand PayPals services
internationally. In some countries, expansion of PayPals
business may require a close commercial relationship with one or
more local banks, a shared ownership interest with a local
entity or registration as a bank under local law. Such
requirements may reduce our profitability or limit the scope of
our activities in particular countries. Any limitation on our
ability to expand PayPal internationally could harm our business.
We maintain a portion of Shopping.coms research and
development facilities and personnel in Israel, and as a result,
political, economic and military conditions in Israel affect
those operations. During 2006, hostilities escalated between
Israel and Hamas in the Gaza Strip and between Israel and
Hezbollah, based in Lebanon. The future of peace efforts between
Israel and its neighboring countries remains uncertain.
Increased hostilities or terrorism within Israel or armed
hostilities between Israel and neighboring states could make it
more difficult for us
44
to continue our operations in Israel, which could increase our
costs. In addition, many of Shopping.coms employees in
Israel could be required to serve in the military for extended
periods of time under emergency circumstances.
Shopping.coms Israeli operations could be disrupted by the
absence of employees due to military service, which could
adversely affect its business.
System
failures could harm our business.
We have experienced system failures from time to time, and any
interruption in the availability of our websites will reduce our
current revenues and profits, could harm our future revenues and
profits, and could subject us to regulatory scrutiny.
eBays primary website has been interrupted for periods of
up to 22 hours, and our PayPal site has suffered
intermittent unavailability for periods as long as five days. In
August 2007, Skype experienced an interruption during which the
majority of Skypes users were unable to use its products
for approximately two days. Any unscheduled interruption in our
services results in an immediate, and possibly substantial, loss
of revenues. Frequent or persistent interruptions in our
services could cause current or potential users to believe that
our systems are unreliable, leading them to switch to our
competitors or to avoid our sites, and could permanently harm
our reputation and brands. Reliability is particularly critical
for PayPal, especially as it seeks to expand its Merchant
Services business. Because PayPal is a regulated financial
entity, frequent or persistent site interruptions could lead to
fines, penalties, or mandatory changes to PayPals business
practices, and ultimately could cause PayPal to lose existing
licenses it needs to operate or prevent it from obtaining
additional licenses that it needs to expand. Finally, because
our customers may use our products for critical transactions,
any system failures could result in damage to our
customers businesses. These customers could seek
significant compensation from us for their losses. Even if
unsuccessful, this type of claim likely would be time consuming
and costly for us to address.
Although our systems have been designed around industry-standard
architectures to reduce downtime in the event of outages or
catastrophic occurrences, they remain vulnerable to damage or
interruption from earthquakes, floods, fires, power loss,
telecommunication failures, terrorist attacks, computer viruses,
computer denial-of-service attacks, and similar events. Some of
our systems, including our Shopping.com and Skype websites, are
not fully redundant, and our disaster recovery planning is not
sufficient for all eventualities. Our systems are also subject
to break-ins, sabotage, and intentional acts of vandalism.
Despite any precautions we may take, the occurrence of a natural
disaster, a decision by any of our third-party hosting providers
to close a facility we use without adequate notice for financial
or other reasons, or other unanticipated problems at our hosting
facilities could result in lengthy interruptions in our
services. We do not carry business interruption insurance
sufficient to compensate us for losses that may result from
interruptions in our service as a result of system failures.
Our
growth will depend on our ability to develop our brands, and
these efforts may be costly.
Our historical growth has been largely attributable to word of
mouth, and to frequent and high visibility national and local
media coverage. We believe that continuing to strengthen our
brands will be critical to achieving widespread acceptance of
our services, and will require an increased focus on active
marketing efforts across all of our brands. The demand for and
cost of online and traditional advertising have been increasing,
and may continue to increase. Accordingly, we will need to spend
increasing amounts of money on, and devote greater resources to,
advertising, marketing, and other efforts to create and maintain
brand loyalty among users. Since 2004, we have significantly
increased the number of brands we are supporting, adding
Rent.com, Shopping.com, Kijiji, StubHub, and Skype, among
others. Each of these brands requires its own resources,
increasing the costs of our branding efforts. Brand promotion
activities may not yield increased revenues, and even if they
do, any increased revenues may not offset the expenses incurred
in building our brands. If we do attract new users to our
services, they may not conduct transactions using our services
on a regular basis. If we fail to promote and maintain our
brands, or if we incur substantial expenses in an unsuccessful
attempt to promote and maintain our brands, our business would
be harmed.
Our
business and users may be subject to sales tax and other
taxes.
The application of indirect taxes (such as sales and use tax,
value-added tax, or VAT, goods and services tax, business tax,
and gross receipt tax) to
e-commerce
businesses such as eBay and to our users is a complex and
evolving issue. Many of the fundamental statutes and regulations
that impose these taxes were established before
45
the growth of the Internet and
e-commerce.
In many cases, it is not clear how existing statutes apply to
the Internet or electronic commerce or communications conducted
over the Internet. In addition, some jurisdictions have
implemented or may implement laws specifically addressing the
Internet or some aspect of electronic commerce or communications
on the Internet. Some taxing authorities have notified us that
they believe we owe them certain taxes. The application of
existing or future laws could have adverse effects on our
business.
Several proposals have been made at the U.S. state and
local level that would impose additional taxes on the sale of
goods and services or communications through the Internet. These
proposals, if adopted, could substantially impair the growth of
e-commerce,
and could diminish our opportunity to derive financial benefit
from our activities. The U.S. federal governments
moratorium on states and other local authorities imposing access
or discriminatory taxes on the Internet is scheduled to expire
in November 2007. This moratorium does not prohibit federal,
state, or local authorities from collecting taxes on our income
or from collecting taxes that are due under existing tax rules.
In conjunction with the Streamlined Sales Tax
Project an ongoing, multi-year effort by U.S.,
state, and local governments to require collection and
remittance of distant sales tax by out-of-state
sellers bills have been introduced in the
U.S. Congress to overturn the Supreme Courts Quill
decision, which limits the ability of state governments to
require sellers outside of their own state to collect and remit
sales taxes on goods purchased by in-state residents. An
overturning of the Quill decision without a robust small
business exemption would harm our users and our business.
We do not collect taxes on the goods or services sold by users
of our services. One or more states or the federal government or
foreign countries may seek to impose a tax collection or
reporting or record-keeping obligation on companies that engage
in or facilitate
e-commerce.
Such an obligation could be imposed by legislation intended to
improve tax compliance (and legislation to such effect is under
discussion or pending in the U.S. Congress, several states,
and a number of foreign jurisdictions) or if an eBay company was
ever deemed to be the legal agent of the users of our services
by a jurisdiction in which eBay operates. Imposition of a record
keeping or tax collecting requirement would harm our business.
Foreign authorities may also require eBay to help ensure
compliance by our users with local laws regulating professional
sellers, including tax requirements. In addition, we have
periodically received requests from tax authorities in some
jurisdictions for information regarding the transactions of
large classes of sellers on our sites, and in some cases we have
been legally obligated to provide this data. Requirements that
we disclose sellers transaction records to tax
authorities, and any use of those records to investigate,
collect taxes from, or prosecute sellers, could decrease seller
activity on our sites and harm our business. Recently, the
Federal Court of Canada, in a partial judgment, ruled that
certain account and transactional information for persons
qualifying for PowerSeller status under eBays PowerSeller
Program in Canada during the years 2004 and 2005 may be
required to be handed over to the Minister of National Revenue.
The final outcome in this case depends in part on the outcome of
a similar case currently being heard by the same court. If
necessary, we will consider appealing the judgment. To date, no
information has been handed over to the Minister of National
Revenue.
In July 2003, in compliance with the changes brought about by
the European Union VAT directive on electronically
supplied services, eBay began collecting VAT on the fees
charged to EU sellers on eBay sites catering to EU residents.
We also pay input VAT on taxable purchases within the various
countries in which we operate. In most cases, we are entitled to
reclaim input VAT from the various countries. However, because
of our unique business model, the application of the laws and
rules that allow such reclamation is sometimes uncertain. A
successful assertion by one or more countries that we are not
entitled to reclaim VAT would harm our business.
We continue to work with the relevant tax authorities and
legislators to clarify eBays obligations under new and
emerging laws and regulations. Passage of new legislation and
the imposition of additional tax or tax-related reporting
requirements could harm our users and our business. There have
been, and will continue to be, substantial ongoing costs
associated with complying with the various indirect tax
requirements in the numerous markets in which eBay conducts or
will conduct business.
46
Failure
to deal effectively with fraudulent transactions and customer
disputes would increase our loss rate and harm our
business.
PayPals highly automated and liquid payment service makes
PayPal an attractive target for fraud. In configuring its
service, PayPal faces an inherent trade-off between customer
convenience and security. Identity thieves and those committing
fraud using stolen credit card or bank account numbers can
potentially steal large amounts of money from businesses such as
PayPal. We believe that several of PayPals current and
former competitors in the electronic payments business have gone
out of business or significantly restricted their businesses
largely due to losses from this type of fraud. While PayPal uses
advanced anti-fraud technologies, we expect that technically
knowledgeable criminals will continue to attempt to circumvent
PayPals anti-fraud systems. In addition, PayPals
service could be subject to employee fraud or other internal
security breaches, and PayPal may be required to reimburse
customers for any funds stolen as a result of such breaches.
Merchants could also request reimbursement, or stop using
PayPal, if they are affected by buyer fraud.
PayPal incurs substantial losses from merchant fraud, including
claims from customers that merchants have not performed or that
their goods or services do not match the merchants
description. PayPal also incurs losses from claims that the
customer did not authorize the purchase, from buyer fraud, from
erroneous transmissions, and from customers who have closed bank
accounts or have insufficient funds in them to satisfy payments.
In addition to the direct costs of such losses, if they are
related to credit card transactions and become excessive, they
could result in PayPal losing the right to accept credit cards
for payment. If PayPal were unable to accept credit cards, the
velocity of trade on eBay could decrease, in which case our
business would further suffer. PayPal was assessed substantial
fines for excess charge-backs in 2001, and excessive
charge-backs may arise in the future. PayPal has taken measures
to detect and reduce the risk of fraud, but these measures need
to be continually improved and may not be effective against new
forms of fraud or in connection with new product offerings. If
these measures do not succeed, our business will suffer. As
PayPal has expanded its merchant services business, it has had
to deal with new forms of fraud and its fraud loss rates have
increased.
Until January 2007, PayPal offered a buyer protection program
for transactions on eBay.com that refunded up to $1,000 to
buyers who used PayPal in transactions with selected sellers if
the buyer did not receive the goods they purchased or if the
goods differed significantly from what was described by the
seller. In January 2007, PayPal expanded this program to refund
buyers who use PayPal up to $200 in most eBay.com transactions
regardless of the seller, and up to $2,000 in. eBay.com
transactions with selected sellers, if the buyer does not
receive the goods they purchased or if the goods differ
significantly from what was described by the seller. PayPal has
expanded this program to many eBay international marketplaces,
in most cases with lower reimbursement amounts. If PayPal makes
such a refund, it may seek to collect reimbursement from the
seller, but may not be able to receive any funds from the
seller. The PayPal buyer protection program has increased
PayPals loss rate and could cause future fluctuations in
PayPals loss rate. For the full year ended
December 31, 2006 and first nine months of 2007,
PayPals transaction loss (including both direct losses and
buyer protection payouts) totaled $126.4 million and
$100.8 million, representing 0.33% and 0.29% of
PayPals total payment volume, respectively.
eBay faces similar risks with respect to fraudulent activities
on its websites. eBay periodically receives complaints from
users who may not have received the goods that they had
purchased. In some cases individuals have been arrested and
convicted for fraudulent activities using our websites. eBay
also receives complaints from sellers who have not received
payment for the goods that a buyer had contracted to purchase.
Non-payment may occur because of miscommunication, because a
buyer has changed his or her mind and decided not to honor the
contract to purchase the item, or because the buyer bid on the
item maliciously, in order to harm either the seller or eBay. In
some European jurisdictions, buyers may also have the right to
withdraw from a sale made by a professional seller within a
specified time period.
While eBay can suspend the accounts of users who fail to fulfill
their payment or delivery obligations to other users, eBay does
not have the ability to require users to make payment or deliver
goods, or otherwise make users whole other than through our
limited buyer protection programs. Other than through these
programs, eBay does not compensate users who believe they have
been defrauded by other users, although users who pay through
PayPal may have reimbursement rights from their credit card
company or bank, which in turn will seek reimbursement from
PayPal. eBay also periodically receives complaints from buyers
as to the quality of the goods purchased. We
47
expect to continue to receive communications from users
requesting reimbursement or threatening or commencing legal
action against us if no reimbursement is made. Our liability for
these sort of claims is only beginning to be clarified and may
be higher in some
non-U.S. jurisdictions
than it is in the U.S. Litigation involving liability for
third-party actions could be costly for us, divert management
attention, result in increased costs of doing business, lead to
adverse judgments, or otherwise harm our business. In addition,
affected users will likely complain to regulatory agencies that
could take action against us, including imposing fines or
seeking injunctions.
Negative publicity and user sentiment generated as a result of
fraudulent or deceptive conduct by users of our eBay and PayPal
services could damage our reputation, reduce our ability to
attract new users or retain our current users, and diminish the
value of our brand names. We believe that negative user
experiences are one of the primary reasons users stop using our
services.
The
current regulatory environment for Voice over Internet Protocol
(VoIP) is uncertain, and Skypes business could be harmed
by new regulations or the application of existing regulations to
its products.
The current regulatory environment for VoIP is uncertain and
rapidly changing. Skypes voice communications products are
currently subject to few, if any, of the same regulations that
apply to traditional telephony and VoIP-based telephone
replacement services. VoIP companies are generally subject to
different regulatory regimes in different countries, and in most
cases are subject to lower, or no, regulatory fees and lesser,
or no, specific regulatory requirements. Governments may impose
new or increased fees, taxes, and administrative burdens on VoIP
companies, or Skype may change its product offerings in a manner
that makes it become subject to telecommunications regulations.
Increased fees could include access and other charges payable to
local exchange carriers to carry and terminate traffic,
contributions to federal or state Universal Service Funds in the
United States and elsewhere, and other charges. Skype may be
required to meet various emergency service requirements,
disability access requirements, user protection requirements,
number assignment and portability requirements, and interception
or wiretapping requirements, such as the Communications
Assistance for Law Enforcement Act in the U.S. and similar
laws in other jurisdictions. Such regulations could result in
substantial costs depending on the technical changes required to
accommodate the requirements, and any increased costs could
erode Skypes pricing advantage over competing forms of
communication. Regulations that decrease the degree of privacy
for users of Skypes products could also slow its adoption.
The increasing growth and popularity of the VoIP telephony and
Internet communications market heighten the risk that
governments will seek to regulate VoIP and Internet
communications, and Skype has received an increasing number of
inquiries from regulators about its products and services.
Competitors, including the incumbent telephone companies, may
devote substantial lobbying efforts to seek greater protection
for their existing businesses and increased regulation of VoIP.
In the United States, various state legislatures and regulatory
agencies are beginning to impose their own requirements and
taxes on VoIP. Increased regulatory requirements on VoIP would
increase Skypes costs, and, as a result, our business
would suffer.
Regulatory agencies may require Skype to conform to rules that
are difficult or impossible for it to comply with due to the
nature of its communications technologies, which could adversely
affect its business. For example, while suitable alternatives
may be developed in the future, Skype is currently unable to
identify the exact geographic origin of the traffic traversing
the Internet or to provide detailed calling information about
computer-to-computer communications, either of which may make
complying with future regulatory requirements, such as emergency
service requirements, difficult or impossible.
Some countries have prohibited Skype. In many countries in which
Skype products are available, the laws that may relate to its
offerings are unclear. We cannot be certain that Skype or its
customers are currently in full compliance with regulatory or
other legal requirements in all countries in which Skype is
used. Skypes failure or the failure of those with whom
Skype transacts business to comply with these requirements could
materially adversely affect our business, financial condition
and results of operations.
New rules and regulations with respect to VoIP are being
considered in various countries around the world, and at least
some of these rules and regulations are likely to be adopted and
to be applicable to Skype. Such new rules and regulations are
likely to increase our costs of doing business and could prevent
us from delivering our products and offerings over the Internet,
which could adversely affect Skypes customer base, and
thus its revenue.
48
Skype
depends on key technology that is licensed from third
parties.
Skype licenses technology underlying certain key components of
its software from third parties it does not control, including
the technology underlying its peer-to-peer architecture and
firewall traversal technology, and the video
compression/decompression used to provide high video quality.
Although Skype has contracts in place with its third party
technology providers, there can be no assurance that the
licensed technology or other technology that we may seek to
license in the future will continue to be available on
commercially reasonable terms, or at all. The loss of, or
inability to maintain, existing licenses could result in a
decrease in service quality until equivalent technology or
suitable alternatives can be developed, identified, licensed and
integrated. While we believe Skype has the ability to either
extend these licenses on commercially reasonable terms or
identify and obtain or develop suitable alternative products,
the costs associated with licensing or developing such products
could be high. Any failure to maintain these licenses on
commercially reasonable terms or license or develop alternative
technologies would harm Skypes business.
Our
businesses depend on continued and unimpeded access to the
Internet. Internet service providers may be able to block,
degrade, or charge us for our users additional fees for
our offerings.
Our customers rely on access to the Internet to use our products
and services. In many cases that access is provided by companies
that compete with at least some of our offerings, including
incumbent telephone companies, cable companies, mobile
communications companies, and large Internet service providers.
Some of these providers have stated that they may take measures
that could degrade, disrupt, or increase the cost of
customers use of our offerings by restricting or
prohibiting the use of their lines for our offerings, by
filtering, blocking, delaying, or degrading the packets
containing the data associated with our products, or by charging
increased fees to us or our users for use of their lines to
provide our offerings. Some of these providers have
contractually restricted their customers access to VoIP
offerings (which would include Skype) through their terms of
service with their customers. These activities are technically
feasible and may be permitted by applicable law. In addition,
Internet service providers could attempt to charge us each time
our customers use our offerings. Worldwide, a number of
companies have announced plans to take such actions or are
selling products designed to facilitate such actions.
Interference with our offerings or higher charges for access to
our offerings, whether paid by us or by our customers, could
cause us to lose existing customers, impair our ability to
attract new customers, and harm our revenue and growth.
Changes
to credit card association or bank fees, rules, or practices
could harm PayPals business.
PayPal does not belong to or directly access credit card
associations, such as Visa and MasterCard. As a result, PayPal
must rely on banks or other payment processors to process
transactions, and must pay a fee for this service. From time to
time, credit card associations may increase the interchange fees
that they charge for each transaction using one of their cards.
PayPals credit card processors have the right to pass any
increases in interchange fees on to PayPal as well as increase
their own fees for processing. These increased fees increase
PayPals operating costs and reduce its profit margins.
PayPal is also required by its processors to comply with credit
card association operating rules, and PayPal has agreed to
reimburse its processors for any fines they are assessed by
credit card associations as a result of any rule violations by
PayPal or PayPals customers. The credit card associations
set and interpret the credit card rules. Visa, MasterCard,
American Express, or Discover could adopt new operating rules or
re-interpret existing rules that PayPal or its processors might
find difficult or even impossible to follow. As a result, PayPal
could lose its ability to give customers the option of using
credit cards to fund their payments. If PayPal were unable to
accept credit cards, its business would be seriously damaged. In
addition, the velocity of trade on eBay could decrease and our
business would further suffer.
PayPal is required to comply with credit card associations
special operating rules for Internet payment services. PayPal
and its credit card processors have implemented specific
business processes for merchant customers in order to comply
with these rules, but any failure to comply could result in
fines, the amount of which would be within Visas and
MasterCards discretion. PayPal also could be subject to
fines from MasterCard and Visa if it fails to detect that
merchants are engaging in activities that are illegal or that
are considered high risk, primarily the sale of
certain types of digital content. For high risk
merchants, PayPal must either prevent such merchants from using
PayPal or register such merchants with MasterCard and Visa and
conduct additional
49
monitoring with respect to such merchants. PayPal has incurred
fines from its credit card processor relating to PayPals
failure to detect the use of its service by high
risk merchants. The amount of these fines has not been
material, but any additional fines in the future would likely be
for larger amounts, could become material, and could result in a
termination of PayPals ability to accept credit cards or
changes in PayPals process for registering new customers,
which would seriously damage PayPals business.
Changes
in PayPals funding mix could adversely affect
PayPals results.
PayPal pays significant transaction fees when senders fund
payment transactions using credit cards, nominal fees when
customers fund payment transactions by electronic transfer of
funds from bank accounts, and no fees when customers fund
payment transactions from an existing PayPal account balance.
Senders fund a significant portion of PayPals payment
volume using credit cards, and PayPals financial success
will remain highly sensitive to changes in the rate at which its
senders fund payments using credit cards. Senders may prefer
funding using credit cards rather than bank account transfers
for a number of reasons, including the ability to dispute and
reverse charges directly with their credit card provider if
merchandise is not delivered or is not as described, the ability
to earn frequent flier miles or other incentives offered by
credit card issuers, the ability to defer payment, or a
reluctance to provide bank account information to PayPal. In
addition, some of PayPals newer offerings, including the
ability to make a limited number of payments without opening an
account, have a higher rate of credit card funding than
PayPals basic product offering. In September 2006, PayPal
entered into a settlement agreement with the attorneys general
of a number of states under which it agreed to pay
$1.7 million to the attorneys general, shorten and
streamline its user agreement, and communicate more information
regarding protection programs to users. Also in September 2006,
PayPal announced that it had reached a preliminary settlement
agreement under which it agreed to pay approximately
$3.5 million into a settlement fund for the benefit of a
class represented by plaintiffs in a suit that alleged, among
other things, that PayPals disclosure regarding the
effects of users choice of funding mechanism was
deceptive. This settlement was recently rejected by the court.
Although PayPal did not admit any liability for any of the
allegations in the two cases, changes to our disclosure
practices could result in increased use of credit card funding,
which would harm PayPals business.
If
PayPal was found to be subject to or in violation of any U.S.
laws or regulations governing banking, money transmission, or
electronic funds transfers, it could be subject to liability and
forced to change its business practices.
A number of U.S. states have enacted legislation regulating
money transmitters. To date, PayPal has obtained licenses in 41
of these jurisdictions and interpretations in six states that
licensing is not required under their existing statutes. PayPal
is applying for licenses in two additional states. As a licensed
money transmitter, PayPal is subject to bonding requirements,
restrictions on its investment of customer funds, reporting
requirements, and inspection by state regulatory agencies. In
July 2005, PayPal entered into a settlement agreement and agreed
to pay $225,000 to the California Department of Financial
Institutions in connection with alleged violations of the
California Financial Code relating to the use of a receipt form
for international payments that had not been pre-approved by the
Department, and incomplete reporting to the Department. If
PayPal was found to be in violation of other money services laws
or regulations, PayPal could be subject to liability, forced to
cease doing business with residents of certain states, or forced
to change its business practices. Any change to PayPals
business practices that makes the service less attractive to
customers or prohibits its use by residents of a particular
jurisdiction could decrease the velocity of trade on eBay, which
would further harm our business. Even if PayPal is not forced to
change its business practices, it could be required to obtain
additional licenses or regulatory approvals that could impose a
substantial cost on PayPal.
Although there have been no definitive interpretations to date,
PayPal has assumed that its service is subject to the Electronic
Fund Transfer Act and Regulation E of the Federal
Reserve Board. As a result, among other things, PayPal must
provide advance disclosure of changes to its service, follow
specified error resolution procedures and reimburse consumers
for losses above $50 from transactions not authorized by the
consumer. PayPal currently voluntarily reimburses consumers for
all financial losses from transactions not authorized by the
consumer, not just losses above $50. PayPal seeks to pass most
of these losses on to the relevant merchants, but PayPal incurs
losses if the merchant does not have sufficient funds in their
PayPal account. In addition, PayPal is subject to the financial
50
privacy provisions of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, state
financial privacy laws, and related regulations. As a result,
some customer financial information that PayPal receives is
subject to limitations on reuse and disclosure. Existing and
potential future privacy laws may limit PayPals ability to
develop new products and services that make use of data gathered
through its service. The provisions of these laws and related
regulations are complicated. Even technical violations of these
laws can result in penalties of up to $1,000 for each
non-compliant transaction. PayPal processed an average of
approximately 1.9 million transactions per day during the
quarter ended September 30, 2007, and any violations could
expose PayPal to significant liability. Any negative change in
the publics perception of PayPals compliance with
privacy laws and policies could also negatively impact
PayPals business.
PayPals
status under banking or financial services laws or other laws in
markets outside the U.S. is unclear.
PayPal currently allows its customers with credit cards to send
payments from 190 markets, and allows its customers to receive
payments in 65 of those markets (including the U.S.). Customers
can only withdraw funds electronically to local bank accounts in
35 of these 65 markets. In 26 of these 65 markets customers can
withdraw funds electronically to their credit or debit card. In
two of these 65 markets customers can only withdraw funds
locally by receiving a bank draft in the mail, and in another
two of these 65 markets, customers cannot withdraw locally and
can only withdraw funds if they have a U.S. bank account.
These limitations affect PayPals ability to grow in these
markets.
PayPal offers customers the ability to send or receive payments
denominated in 17 currencies. Of the 190 markets whose residents
can use the PayPal service, 31 (27 countries plus four French
overseas departments) are members of the European Union. As of
July 2007, PayPal provides localized versions of its service to
customers in the EU through PayPal (Europe) S.A.R.L. et Cie,
SCA., a wholly-owned subsidiary of PayPal that is licensed as a
bank in Luxembourg. Previously, PayPal delivered services in the
EU through a subsidiary in the United Kingdom licensed to
operate as an Electronic Money Institution. PayPal (Europe)
implements its localized services in EU countries through an
expedited passport notification process through the
Luxembourg regulator to regulators in other EU member states,
pursuant to EU Directives. PayPal (Europe) has completed the
passport notice process in all EU member countries.
The regulators in these countries could notify PayPal (Europe)
of local consumer protection laws that will apply to its
business, in addition to Luxembourg consumer protection law. The
regulators in these countries could also seek to persuade the
Luxembourg regulator to order PayPal (Europe) to conduct its
activities in the local country through a branch office. Any
such responses from these regulators could increase the cost of,
or delay, PayPals plans for expanding its business. PayPal
(Europe) is subject to significant fines or other enforcement
action if it violates the disclosure, reporting, anti-money
laundering, capitalization, funds management, corporate
governance or other requirements imposed on Luxembourg banks.
PayPal does not have experience in operating as a bank.
In markets other than the U.S., EU, Australia and China, PayPal
serves its customers through PayPal Private Ltd., a wholly-owned
subsidiary of PayPal that is based in Singapore. In many of
these markets, it is not clear whether PayPals
Singapore-based service is subject to local law or, if it is
subject to local law, whether such local law requires a payment
processor like PayPal to be licensed as a bank or financial
institution or otherwise. Even if PayPal is not currently
required to obtain a license in those countries, other laws of
those countries (such as data protection and anti-money
laundering laws) may apply, and future localization or targeted
marketing of PayPals service in those countries could
require licensure. If PayPal was found to be subject to and in
violation of any foreign laws or regulations, it could be
subject to liability, forced to change its business practices
and forced to suspend providing services to customers in one or
more countries. Alternatively, PayPal could be required to
obtain licenses or regulatory approvals that could impose a
substantial cost on it and involve considerable delay to the
provision or development of its product. Delay or failure to
receive such a license would require PayPal to change its
business practices or features in ways that would adversely
affect PayPals international expansion plans and could
require PayPal to suspend providing services to customers in one
or more countries.
In addition, if PayPal were to seek to expand the financial
products that it offers outside of the U.S., either alone,
through a commercial alliance, or through an acquisition, PayPal
could become subject to additional licensure requirements or
increased regulatory scrutiny, which could impose substantial
costs and delay the introduction of any new products.
51
PayPals
failure to manage customer funds properly would harm its
business.
PayPals ability to manage and account accurately for
customer funds requires a high level of internal controls. In
some of the markets that PayPal serves and currencies that
PayPal offers, PayPal has a limited operating history and
limited management experience in managing these internal
controls. As PayPals business continues to grow, it must
strengthen its internal controls accordingly. PayPals
success requires significant public confidence in its ability to
handle large and growing transaction volumes and amounts of
customer funds. Any failure to maintain necessary controls or to
manage accurately customer funds could diminish customer use of
PayPals product severely.
New
and existing regulations could harm our business.
We are subject to the same foreign and domestic laws as other
companies conducting business on and off the Internet. It is not
clear how existing laws governing issues such as property
ownership, copyrights and other intellectual property issues,
parallel imports and distribution controls, taxation, libel and
defamation, obscenity, and personal privacy apply to online
businesses such as ours. The majority of these laws were adopted
prior to the advent of the Internet and related technologies
and, as a result, do not contemplate or address the unique
issues of the Internet and related technologies. Those laws that
do reference the Internet, such as the U.S. Digital
Millennium Copyright Act and the European Unions Directive
on Distance Selling and Electronic Commerce, are being
interpreted by the courts, but their applicability and scope
remain uncertain. Some of these activities may be perceived as
attempts to de-legitimize our businesses. In addition, as our
activities and the types of goods and services listed on our
websites expand, including through acquisitions such as our
acquisition of StubHub, an online ticket marketplace, in
February 2007, regulatory agencies or courts may claim or hold
that we or our users are either subject to licensure or
prohibited from conducting our business in their jurisdiction,
either with respect to our services in general, or in order to
allow the sale of certain items, such as real estate, event
tickets, cultural goods, boats, and automobiles.
Our success and increased visibility has driven some existing
businesses that perceive our business model to be a threat to
their business to raise concerns about our businesses model to
policymakers and regulators, particularly in the U.S. and
Europe. These established businesses and their trade association
groups employ significant resources in their efforts to shape
the legal and regulatory regimes in countries where we have
significant operations. They may employ these resources in an
effort to change the legal and regulatory regimes in ways
intended to reduce the effectiveness of our businesses and the
ability of users to use our products and services. In
particular, these established businesses have raised concerns
relating to pricing, parallel imports, professional seller
obligations, stolen goods, copyrights and intellectual property
rights, and the liability of the provider of an Internet
marketplace for the conduct of its users related to those and
other issues. Success in changing the legal or regulatory
regimes in a manner that would increase our liability for third
party listings related to these or other issues could negatively
impact our business.
Numerous states and foreign jurisdictions, including the State
of California, where our headquarters are located, have
regulations regarding auctions and the handling of
property by secondhand dealers or
pawnbrokers. Several states and some foreign
jurisdictions, including France, have attempted, and may attempt
in the future, to impose such regulations upon us or our users.
Attempted enforcement of these laws against some of our users
appears to be increasing and such attempted enforcements could
harm our business. In 2002, Illinois amended its auction law to
provide for a special regulatory regime for Internet
auction listing services, and we have registered as an
Internet auction listing service in Illinois. Although this
registration has not had a negative impact on our business to
date, other regulatory and licensure claims could result in
costly litigation or could require us to change the way we or
our users do business in ways that increase costs or reduce
revenues or force us to prohibit listings of certain items for
some locations. We could also be subject to fines or other
penalties, and any of these outcomes could harm our business.
In addition, because our services are accessible worldwide, and
we facilitate sales of goods to users worldwide, foreign
jurisdictions may claim that we are required to comply with
their laws. For example, the Australian high court has ruled
that a U.S. website in certain circumstances must comply
with Australian laws regarding libel. A number of the lawsuits
against us relating to trademark issues seek to have our
websites subject to unfavorable local
52
laws. As we expand and localize our international activities, we
become obligated to comply with the laws of the countries in
which we operate. Laws regulating Internet companies outside of
the U.S. may be less favorable than those in the U.S.,
giving greater rights to consumers, content owners, competitors
and users. Compliance may be more costly or may require us to
change our business practices or restrict our service offerings.
In addition, we may be subject to overlapping legal or
regulatory regimes that impose conflicting requirements on us.
Our failure to comply with foreign laws could subject us to
penalties ranging from criminal prosecution to bans on our
services.
Our
tickets business is subject to regulatory, competitive, and
other risks that could harm this business.
Our tickets business, which includes our StubHub business, is
subject to numerous risks. Many jurisdictions have laws and
regulations covering the resale of event tickets, and some
jurisdictions prohibit the resale of event tickets at prices
above the face value of the tickets. In addition, new laws and
regulations may be passed that would limit our or our
users ability to continue this business. Regulatory
agencies or courts may claim or hold that we are responsible for
ensuring that our users comply with these laws and regulations
or that we or our users are either subject to licensure or
prohibited from reselling event tickets in their jurisdictions.
Some event organizers and professional sports teams have
expressed concern about the resale of their event tickets on our
sites, and in November 2006 the New England Patriots filed suit
against StubHub alleging that StubHubs resale activities
violate Massachusetts ticket resale laws and constitute
intentional interference with the teams relationship with
its season ticket holders. In April 2007, Ticketmaster filed
suit against eBay d/b/a StubHub alleging that StubHub had
improperly interfered with Ticketmasters contracts with
its clients by wrongfully obtaining tickets for sale in
violation of Ticketmasters exclusive contractual rights to
sell such tickets. Such litigation could result in damage
awards, could require us to change our business practices in
harmful ways, or could otherwise negatively affect our tickets
business. Our tickets business is also subject to seasonal
fluctuations and the general economic and business conditions
that impact the sporting events and live entertainment
industries. Our tickets business also faces significant
competition from a number of sources, including ticketing
service companies (such as TicketMaster and Tickets.com), event
organizers (such as professional sports teams and leagues),
ticket brokers, and other online and offline ticket resellers
(such as TicketsNow and RazorGator). If we are unable to
effectively compete with these competitors, our tickets business
could be harmed.
Our
business is subject to online security risks, including security
breaches and identity theft.
To succeed, online commerce and communications must provide a
secure transmission of confidential information over public
networks. Our security measures may not detect or prevent
security breaches that could harm our business. Currently, a
significant number of our users authorize us to bill their
credit card accounts directly for all transaction fees charged
by us. PayPals users routinely provide credit card and
other financial information. We rely on encryption and
authentication technology licensed from third parties to provide
the security and authentication to effect secure transmission of
confidential information, including customer credit card
numbers. Advances in computer capabilities, new discoveries in
the field of cryptography or other developments may result in a
compromise or breach of the technology used by us to protect
transaction data. In addition, any party who is able to
illicitly obtain a users password could access the
users transaction data. An increasing number of websites
have reported breaches of their security. Any compromise of our
security could harm our reputation and, therefore, our business.
In addition, a party that is able to circumvent our security
measures could misappropriate proprietary information, cause
interruption in our operations, damage our computers or those of
our users, or otherwise damage our reputation and business.
Under credit card rules and our contract with our card
processors, if there is a breach of credit card information that
we store, or that is stored by PayPals direct credit card
processing customers, we could be liable to the credit card
issuing banks for their cost of issuing new cards and related
expenses. In addition, if we fail to follow credit card industry
security standards, even if there is no compromise of customer
information, we could incur significant fines or lose our
ability to give customers the option of using credit cards to
fund their payments or pay their fees. If we were unable to
accept credit cards, our business would be seriously damaged.
Our servers are also vulnerable to computer viruses, physical or
electronic break-ins, and similar disruptions, and we have
experienced denial-of-service type attacks on our
system that have made all or portions of our websites
unavailable for periods of time. We may need to expend
significant resources to protect against security breaches or to
address problems caused by breaches. These issues are likely to
become more difficult as we expand
53
the number of places where we operate. Security breaches could
damage our reputation and expose us to a risk of loss or
litigation and possible liability. Our insurance policies carry
low coverage limits, which may not be adequate to reimburse us
for losses caused by security breaches.
Our users, as well as those of other prominent Internet
companies, have been and will continue to be targeted by parties
using fraudulent spoof emails to misappropriate
passwords, credit card numbers, or other personal information or
to introduce viruses through trojan horse programs
to our users computers. These emails appear to be
legitimate emails sent by eBay, PayPal, Skype, or a user of one
of those businesses, but direct recipients to fake websites
operated by the sender of the email or request that the
recipient send a password or other confidential information via
email or download a program. Despite our efforts to mitigate
spoof
e-mails
through product improvements and user education,
spoof remains a serious problem that may damage our
brand, discourage use of our websites, and increase our costs.
Our
failure to manage growth could harm our business.
We are currently expanding our headcount, facilities, and
infrastructure in the U.S. and internationally. We
anticipate that further expansion will be required as we
continue to expand into new lines of business and geographic
areas. This expansion has placed, and we expect it will continue
to place, a significant strain on our management, operational,
and financial resources. The areas that are put under strain by
our growth include the following:
|
|
|
|
|
Website Usability. User activity rates on our
websites depend in part on the quality of our users
experiences on those sites. The rapid growth in the number and
complexity of products and features on our sites has
occasionally caused users to become confused or overwhelmed or
has otherwise impaired users experiences on those sites.
We are in the process of making numerous changes in an attempt
to improve the user experience on our eBay websites. These
attempts at improvement of the user experience could fail, or
could decrease activity among users who had grown used to or
preferred the existing experience on our sites. Any impairment
of customer satisfaction as a result of site usability issues
could lead to a loss of customers or impair our ability to add
customers, either of which would harm our business.
|
|
|
|
Website Stability. We must constantly add new
hardware, update software and add new engineering personnel to
accommodate the increased use of our and our subsidiaries
websites and the new products and features we regularly
introduce. This upgrade process is expensive, and the increased
complexity of our websites and the need to support multiple
platforms as our portfolio of brands grows increases the cost of
additional enhancements. Failure to upgrade our technology,
features, transaction processing systems, security
infrastructure, or network infrastructure to accommodate
increased traffic or transaction volume could harm our business.
Adverse consequences could include unanticipated system
disruptions, slower response times, degradation in levels of
customer support, impaired quality of users experiences of
our services, impaired quality of services for third-party
application developers using our externally accessible
Application Programming Interface, or API, and delays in
reporting accurate financial information. We may be unable to
effectively upgrade and expand our systems in a timely manner or
smoothly integrate any newly developed or purchased technologies
or businesses with our existing systems, and any failure to do
so could result in problems on our sites. For example, in
October 2004, we experienced unscheduled downtime on the PayPal
website over a period of five days related to system upgrades,
and in the second quarter of 2007, PayPal experienced an
interruption during which many of PayPals services were
unavailable for approximately four hours. In August 2007, Skype
experienced an interruption to its services during which the
majority of Skypes users were unable to use its products
for approximately two days. Despite our efforts to increase site
scalability and reliability, our infrastructure could prove
unable to handle a larger volume of customer transactions. Some
of our more recently acquired businesses may be particularly
subject to this risk given their shorter histories and, in some
cases, higher growth rates. Any failure to accommodate
transaction growth could impair customer satisfaction, lead to a
loss of customers, impair our ability to add customers, or
increase our costs, all of which would harm our business.
Further, steps to increase the reliability and redundancy of our
systems are expensive, reduce our margins, and may not be
successful in reducing the frequency or duration of unscheduled
downtime.
|
54
|
|
|
|
|
Customer Account Billing. Our revenues depend
on prompt and accurate billing processes. Our failure to grow
our transaction-processing capabilities to accommodate the
increasing number of transactions that must be billed on any of
our websites would harm our business and our ability to collect
revenue.
|
|
|
|
Customer Support. We are expanding our
customer support operations to accommodate the increased number
of users and transactions on our websites and the increased
level of user protection activity we provide worldwide. If we
are unable to provide these operations in a cost-effective
manner, users of our websites may have negative experiences,
current and future revenues could suffer, and our operating
margins may decrease.
|
We must continue to hire, train, and manage new employees at a
rapid rate. If our new hires perform poorly, if we are
unsuccessful in hiring, training, managing, and integrating
these new employees, or if we are not successful in retaining
our existing employees, our business may be harmed. To manage
the expected growth of our operations and personnel, we will
need to improve our transaction processing, operational and
financial systems, procedures, and controls. This is a special
challenge as we acquire new operations with different systems.
Our current and planned personnel, systems, procedures, and
controls may not be adequate to support our future operations.
The additional headcount and capital investments we are adding
will increase our cost base, which will make it more difficult
for us to offset any future revenue shortfalls by expense
reductions in the short term.
Use of
our services for illegal purposes could harm our
business.
The law relating to the liability of providers of online
services for the activities of their users on their service is
currently unsettled in the United States and internationally. We
are aware that certain goods, such as weapons, adult material,
tobacco products, alcohol, and other goods that may be subject
to regulation, have been listed and traded on our service. We
may be unable to prevent our users from selling unlawful goods
or selling goods in an unlawful manner, and we may be subject to
allegations of civil or criminal liability for unlawful
activities carried out by users through our service. We have
been subject to several lawsuits based upon such allegations. In
December 2004, an executive of Baazee.com, our Indian
subsidiary, was arrested in connection with a users
listing of a pornographic video clip on that site. Similarly,
our Korean subsidiary and one of its employees were found
criminally liable for listings on the Korean subsidiarys
website. The German Federal Supreme Court has ruled that we had
a duty to take reasonable measures to keep prohibited DVDs from
being sold on our site to minors and that competitors could
enforce this duty. In order to reduce our exposure to this
liability, we have prohibited the listing of certain items and
increased the number of personnel reviewing questionable items.
In the future, we may implement other protective measures that
could require us to spend substantial resources or discontinue
certain service offerings, which could harm our business. Any
costs incurred as a result of potential liability relating to
the sale of unlawful goods or the unlawful sale of goods could
harm our business. In addition, we have received significant and
continuing media attention relating to the listing or sale of
unlawful goods using our services. This negative publicity could
damage our reputation and diminish the value of our brand names.
It also could make users reluctant to continue to use our
services.
PayPals payment system is also susceptible to potentially
illegal or improper uses. These may include illegal online
gambling, fraudulent sales of goods or services, illicit sales
of prescription medications or controlled substances, piracy of
software and other intellectual property, money laundering, bank
fraud, child pornography trafficking, prohibited sales of
alcoholic beverages or tobacco products, and online securities
fraud. PayPals acceptable use policy enables PayPal to
fine users in certain jurisdictions up to $500 or take legal
action to recover its losses for certain violations of that
policy, including online gambling and illegal sales of
prescription medications. Despite measures PayPal has taken to
detect and lessen the risk of this kind of conduct, illegal
activities could still be funded using PayPal.
PayPal is subject to anti-money laundering and counter-terrorist
financing laws and regulations that prohibit, among other
things, its involvement in transferring the proceeds of criminal
activities. Although PayPal has adopted a program to comply with
these laws and regulations, any errors or failure to implement
the program properly could lead to lawsuits, administrative
action, and prosecution by the government. In July 2003, PayPal
agreed with the U.S. Attorney for the Eastern District of
Missouri that it would pay $10 million as a civil
forfeiture to settle allegations that its provision of services
to online gambling merchants violated provisions of the USA
PATRIOT Act
55
and further agreed to have its compliance program reviewed by an
independent audit firm. PayPal is also subject to regulations
that require it to report suspicious activities involving
transactions of $2,000 or more and may be required to obtain and
keep more detailed records on the senders and recipients in
certain transfers of $3,000 or more. The interpretation of
suspicious activities in this context is uncertain. Future
regulations under the USA PATRIOT Act may require PayPal to
revise the procedures it uses to verify the identity of its
customers and to monitor international transactions more
closely. As PayPal localizes its service in other countries,
additional verification and reporting requirements may apply,
which in some cases are more stringent. Several countries,
including Australia, Canada and Luxembourg, are in the process
of implementing new anti-money laundering and counter-terrorist
financing laws and regulations, and the impact of these laws and
regulations on PayPals business is uncertain. These
regulations could impose significant costs on PayPal and make it
more difficult for new customers to join its network. PayPal
could be required to learn more about its customers before
opening an account, to obtain additional verification of
customers and to monitor its customers activities more
closely. These requirements, as well as any additional
restrictions imposed by credit card associations, could raise
PayPals costs significantly and reduce the attractiveness
of its product. Failure to comply with federal, state or foreign
country money laundering and counter-terrorist financing laws
could result in significant criminal and civil lawsuits,
penalties, and forfeiture of significant assets.
We are
subject to risks associated with information disseminated
through our service.
The law relating to the liability of online services companies
for information carried on or disseminated through their
services is currently unsettled. Claims could be made against
online services companies under both U.S. and foreign law
for defamation, libel, invasion of privacy, negligence,
copyright or trademark infringement, or other theories based on
the nature and content of the materials disseminated through
their services. Several private lawsuits seeking to impose
liability upon us under a number of these theories have been
brought against us. In addition, domestic and foreign
legislation has been proposed that would prohibit or impose
liability for the transmission over the Internet of certain
types of information. Our service features a Feedback Forum,
which includes information from users regarding other users.
Although all such feedback is generated by users and not by us,
claims of defamation or other injury have been made in the past
and could be made in the future against us for content posted in
the Feedback Forum. Several court decisions have narrowed the
scope of the immunity provided to Internet service providers
like us under the Communications Decency Act. This trend, if
continued, may increase our potential liability to third parties
for the user-provided content on our site. Our liability for
such claims may be higher in jurisdictions outside the
U.S. where laws governing Internet transactions are
unsettled. If we become liable for information provided by our
users and carried on our service in any jurisdiction in which we
operate, we could be directly harmed and we may be forced to
implement new measures to reduce our exposure to this liability.
This may require us to expend substantial resources or to
discontinue certain service offerings, which would negatively
affect our financial results. In addition, the increased
attention focused upon liability issues as a result of these
lawsuits and legislative proposals could harm our reputation or
otherwise impact the growth of our business. Any costs incurred
as a result of this potential liability could harm our business.
Customer
complaints or negative publicity about our customer support or
anti-fraud measures could diminish use of our
services.
Customer complaints or negative publicity about our customer
support could severely diminish consumer confidence in and use
of our services. Measures we sometimes take to combat risks of
fraud and breaches of privacy and security have the potential to
damage relations with our customers or decrease activity on our
sites by making our sites more difficult to use or restricting
the activities of certain users. These measures heighten the
need for prompt and accurate customer support to resolve
irregularities and disputes. Effective customer support requires
significant personnel expense, and this expense, if not managed
properly, could significantly impact our profitability. Failure
to manage or train our customer support representatives properly
could compromise our ability to handle customer complaints
effectively. If we do not handle customer complaints
effectively, our reputation may suffer and we may lose our
customers confidence.
Because it is providing a financial service and operating in a
more regulated environment, PayPal, unlike eBay, must provide
telephone as well as email customer support and must resolve
certain customer contacts within shorter
56
time frames. As part of PayPals program to reduce fraud
losses and prevent money laundering, it may temporarily restrict
the ability of customers to withdraw their funds if those funds
or the customers account activity are identified by
PayPals risk models as suspicious. PayPal has in the past
received negative publicity with respect to its customer support
and account restrictions, and has been the subject of purported
class action lawsuits and state attorney general inquiries
alleging, among other things, failure to resolve account
restrictions promptly. If PayPal is unable to provide quality
customer support operations in a cost-effective manner,
PayPals users may have negative experiences, PayPal may
receive additional negative publicity, its ability to attract
new customers may be damaged, and it could become subject to
additional litigation. As a result, current and future revenues
could suffer, or its operating margins may decrease. In
addition, negative publicity about or experiences with
PayPals customer support could cause eBays
reputation to suffer or affect consumer confidence in the eBay
brands as a whole.
Problems
with or price increases by third parties who provide services to
us or to our users could harm our business.
A number of parties provide services to us or to our users that
benefit us. Such services include seller tools that automate and
manage listings, merchant tools that manage listings and
interface with inventory management software, storefronts that
help our users list items, caching services that make our sites
load faster, and shipping providers that deliver goods sold on
our platform, among others. In some cases we have contractual
agreements with these companies that give us a direct financial
interest in their success, while in other cases we have none.
PayPal is dependent on the processing companies and banks that
link PayPal to the credit card and bank clearing networks.
Financial, regulatory, or other problems that prevent these
companies from providing services to us or our users could
reduce the number of listings on our websites or make completing
transactions or payments on our websites more difficult, and
thereby harm our business. Price increases by companies that
provide services to our users could also reduce the number of
listings on our websites or make it more difficult for our users
to complete transactions, thereby harming our business. For
example, we believe recent changes in postal rates that affected
certain lower-weight packages and mailings between the
U.S. and Canada may have reduced listing volume on our
sites in certain categories. Any security breach at one of these
companies could also affect our customers and harm our business.
Although we generally have been able to renew or extend the
terms of contractual arrangements with third parties who provide
services to us on acceptable terms, there can be no assurance
that we will continue to be able to do so in the future, and
there can be no assurance that third parties who provide
services directly to our users will continue to do so at
reasonable rates or at all.
We
depend on key personnel.
Our future performance depends substantially on the continued
services of our senior management and other key personnel and
our ability to retain and motivate them. The loss of the
services of any of our executive officers or other key employees
could harm our business. We do not have long-term employment
agreements with any of our key personnel, we do not maintain any
key person life insurance policies, and our Chief
Executive Officer and many other members of our senior
management team have fully vested the vast majority of their
in-the-money equity incentives. Our new businesses all depend on
attracting and retaining key personnel. On October 1, 2007,
we announced that Skypes Chief Executive Officer resigned
in connection with the termination of the earn out structure
associated with the Skype transaction. If we are unable to
recruit a full-time replacement in a timely manner, our
Communications business could be harmed. Our future success also
will depend on our ability to attract, train, retain and
motivate highly skilled technical, managerial, marketing, and
customer support personnel. Competition for these personnel is
intense, and we may be unable to successfully attract,
integrate, or retain sufficiently qualified personnel. In making
employment decisions, particularly in the Internet and
high-technology industries, job candidates often consider the
value of the stock options they are to receive in connection
with their employment. Fluctuations in our stock price may make
it more difficult to retain and motivate employees whose stock
option strike prices are substantially above current market
prices. Similarly, decreases in the number of unvested
in-the-money stock options held by existing employees, whether
because our stock price has declined, options have vested, or
because the size of follow-on option grants has declined, may
make it more difficult to retain and motivate employees.
57
Our
industry is intensely competitive, and other companies or
governmental agencies may allege that our behavior is
anti-competitive.
Marketplaces
Marketplaces businesses currently or potentially compete with a
number of companies providing both particular categories of
goods and broader ranges of goods. The Internet provides new,
rapidly evolving and intensely competitive channels for the sale
of all types of goods. We expect competition to intensify in the
future. The barriers to entry into these channels are relatively
low and current offline and new competitors can easily launch
online sites at a nominal cost using commercially available
software or partnering with any one of a number of successful
e-commerce
companies.
Our broad-based competitors include the vast majority of
traditional department, warehouse, discount, and general
merchandise stores (as well as the online operations of these
traditional retailers), emerging online retailers, online
classified services, and other shopping channels such as offline
and online home shopping networks. These include most
prominently: Wal-Mart, Target, Sears, Macys, JC Penney,
Costco, Office Depot, Staples, OfficeMax, Sams Club,
Amazon.com, Buy.com, AOL.com, Yahoo! Shopping, MSN, QVC, and
Home Shopping Network.
A number of companies offer a variety of services that provide
channels for buyers to find and buy items from sellers of all
sizes, including online aggregation and classifieds sites such
as craigslist (in which we own an equity stake of approximately
25%), Google Base, Microsoft Live Expo, and Oodle.com. Our
Kijiji websites offers classifieds listings in a variety of
local international markets, and in July 2007 Kijiji launched
local classifieds sites in the U.S. In many markets in
which it operates, including in the U.S., Kijiji competes
against more established classifieds sites.
In 2005, we acquired Shopping.com Ltd., an online shopping
comparison site. Shopping.com competes with sites such as
Buy.com, Googles Product Search, Nextag.com,
Pricegrabber.com, Shopzilla, and Yahoo! Product Search, which
offer shopping search engines that allow consumers to search the
Internet for specified products. Recent legal developments may
affect the utility of shopping comparison sites if manufacturers
begin requiring more uniformity in product pricing. In addition,
sellers are increasingly acquiring new customers by paying for
search-related advertisements on search engine sites such as
Google and Yahoo!. We use product search engines and paid search
advertising to channel users to our sites, but these services
also have the potential to divert users to other online shopping
destinations.
We also compete with many local, regional, and national
specialty retailers and exchanges in each of the major
categories of products offered on our site. For example,
category-specific competitors to offerings in our Motors
category include: Advance Auto Parts, AutoByTel.com,
Autonation.com, AutoTrader.com, Autozone, Barrett-Jackson,
California Classics, Car Parts Wholesale, Car-Part.com, CarMax,
Cars.com, CarsDirect.com, CSK Auto, Discount Auto Parts, Dupont
Registry, eClassics.com, ExpressAutoparts.com, Genuine/NAPA,
Hemmings, iMotors.com, JC Whitney, Kragen, Kruse International,
OpenAuto.com, PartsAmerica.com, Pep Boys, RM Auctions, Inc., The
Tire Rack, TraderOnline, Trader Publishing, newspaper
classifieds, used car dealers, swap meets, car clubs, and
vehicle recyclers.
Our international Marketplaces websites compete with similar
online and offline channels in each of their vertical categories
in most countries. In addition, they compete with general online
e-commerce
sites, such as Quelle and Otto in Germany, Yahoo-Kimo in Taiwan,
Daum and Gmarket in South Korea, and Amazon in the United
Kingdom and other countries. In some of these countries, there
are online sites that have much larger customer bases and
greater brand recognition than we do, and in certain of these
jurisdictions there are competitors that may have a better
understanding of local culture and commerce than we do.
The principal competitive factors for Marketplaces include the
following:
|
|
|
|
|
ability to attract and retain buyers and sellers;
|
|
|
|
volume of transactions and price and selection of goods;
|
|
|
|
customer service; and
|
|
|
|
brand recognition.
|
58
With respect to our online competition, additional competitive
factors include:
|
|
|
|
|
community cohesion, interaction and size;
|
|
|
|
website ease-of-use and accessibility;
|
|
|
|
system reliability;
|
|
|
|
reliability of delivery and payment;
|
|
|
|
level of service fees; and
|
|
|
|
quality of search tools.
|
Some current and potential competitors have longer operating
histories, larger customer bases and greater brand recognition
in other business and Internet sectors than we do. Other online
trading services may be acquired by, receive investments from,
or enter into other commercial relationships with
well-established and well-financed companies. As a result, some
of our competitors with other revenue sources may be able to
devote more resources to marketing and promotional campaigns,
adopt more aggressive pricing policies and devote substantially
more resources to website and systems development than we can.
Some of our competitors have offered services for free and
others may do this as well. We may be unable to compete
successfully against current and future competitors. In
addition, certain offline competitors may encourage
manufacturers to limit or cease distribution of their products
to dealers who sell through online channels such as eBay, or may
attempt to use existing or future government regulation to
prohibit or limit online commerce in certain categories of goods
or services. The adoption by manufacturers or government
authorities of policies or regulations discouraging the sales of
goods or services over the Internet could force eBay users to
stop selling certain products on our websites. Increased
competition or anti-Internet distribution policies or
regulations may result in reduced operating margins, loss of
market share and diminished value of our brand.
Conversely, other companies and government agencies have in the
past and may in the future allege that our actions violate the
antitrust or competition laws of the U.S. or other
countries, or otherwise constitute unfair competition. Such
claims, even if without foundation, typically are very expensive
to defend, involve negative publicity and diversion of
management time and effort, and could result in significant
judgments against us.
In order to respond to changes in the competitive environment,
we may, from time to time, make pricing, service or marketing
decisions or acquisitions that could harm our profitability. For
example, PayPal has implemented a buyer protection program
generally covering losses for eBay.com transactions paid with
PayPal up to $200 and covering losses from selected eBay sellers
up to $2,000, with no deductible. Depending on the amount and
size of claims we receive under these programs, these product
offerings could harm our profitability. In addition, certain
competitors may offer or continue to offer free shipping or
other transaction related services, which could be impractical
or inefficient for eBay users to match. New technologies may
increase the competitive pressures by enabling our competitors
to offer a lower cost service.
Although we have established Internet traffic arrangements with
several large online services and search engine companies, these
arrangements may not be renewed on commercially reasonable terms
or these companies may decide to promote competitive services.
Even if these arrangements are renewed, they may not result in
increased usage of our services. In addition, companies that
control user access to transactions through network access,
Internet browsers, or search engines, could promote our
competitors, channel current or potential users to their
vertically integrated electronic commerce sites or their
advertisers sites, attempt to restrict our access, or
charge us substantial fees for inclusion. Search engines may
increasingly become a starting point for online shopping, and as
the costs of operating an online store decline, online sellers
may increasingly sell goods through multiple channels, which
could reduce the number and value of transactions these sellers
conduct through our sites.
59
PayPal
The market for PayPals product is emerging, intensely
competitive, and characterized by rapid technological change.
PayPal competes with existing online and off-line payment
methods, including, among others:
|
|
|
|
|
credit card merchant processors that offer their services to
online merchants, including American Express, Cardservice
International, Chase Paymentech, First Data, and Wells Fargo;
and payment gateways, including CyberSource and Authorize.net
(which have agreed to merge);
|
|
|
|
money remitters such as MoneyGram and Western Union;
|
|
|
|
bill payment services, including CheckFree;
|
|
|
|
processors that provide online merchants the ability to offer
their customers the option of paying for purchases from their
bank account, including Certegy, PayByTouch and TeleCheck, a
subsidiary of First Data, or to pay on credit, including Bill Me
Later;
|
|
|
|
providers of traditional payment methods, particularly credit
cards, checks, money orders, and Automated Clearing House
transactions;
|
|
|
|
issuers of stored value targeted at online payments, including
VisaBuxx, NetSpend and GreenDot (formerly known as Next Estate);
|
|
|
|
Amazon Payments, which acts as a credit processor and can be
linked to a personal bank account;
|
|
|
|
Google Checkout, which enables the online payment of merchants
using credit cards; and
|
|
|
|
BidPay, an online auction payment service owned by CyberSource.
|
Some of these competitors have longer operating histories,
significantly greater financial, technical, marketing, customer
service and other resources, greater name recognition, or a
larger base of customers in affiliated businesses than PayPal.
PayPals competitors may respond to new or emerging
technologies and changes in customer requirements faster and
more effectively than PayPal. Some of these competitors may also
be subject to lesser licensing, anti-money laundering, and other
regulatory requirements than PayPal. They may devote greater
resources to the development, promotion, and sale of products
and services than PayPal, and they may offer lower prices. For
example, Google Checkout has extended its free payment
processing promotion through the end of 2007. Promotions such as
this may force PayPal to lower its prices in response. Competing
services tied to established banks and other financial
institutions may offer greater liquidity and engender greater
consumer confidence in the safety and efficacy of their services
than PayPal.
Overseas, PayPal faces competition from similar channels and
payment methods. In each country, numerous banks provide
standard online credit card acquiring and processing services,
and these banks typically have leading market share. In
addition, PayPal faces competition from Visas Visa Direct,
MasterCards MoneySend, Royal Bank of Scotlands World
Pay and ClickandBuy in the European Community, NOCHEX,
Moneybookers, NETeller and FirePay in the United Kingdom,
CertaPay and HyperWallet in Canada, Paymate in Australia,
Alipay, YeePay, and 99Bill in China and Inicis in South Korea.
In addition, in certain countries, such as Germany and
Australia, electronic funds transfer is a leading method of
payment for both online and offline transactions. As in the
U.S., established banks and other financial institutions that do
not currently offer online payments could quickly and easily
develop such a service.
Some of PayPals competitors, such as Wells Fargo, First
Data, American Express, and Royal Bank of Scotland, also provide
processing or foreign exchange services to PayPal. If PayPal
were to seek to expand the financial products that it offers,
either alone, through a commercial alliance or an acquisition,
these processing and foreign exchange relationships could be
negatively affected, and these competitors and other processors
could make it more difficult for PayPal to deliver its services.
Skype
The market for Skypes products is also emerging, intensely
competitive, and characterized by rapid technological change.
Many traditional telecommunications carriers, Internet
companies, and cable providers
60
offer, or have indicated that they plan to offer, VoIP products
or services that compete with the software Skype provides.
Microsoft recently announced the expansion of its Office
communications suite to include VoIP. We expect competitors to
continue to improve the performance of their current products
and introduce new products, software, services, and
technologies. If Skypes competitors successfully introduce
new products or enhance their existing products, this could
reduce the market for Skypes products, increase price
competition, or make Skypes products obsolete, which could
lower Skypes adoption rates, decrease its ability to
attract new users or cause its current users to migrate to a
competing company. In addition, some of Skypes
competitors, such as telecommunications carriers and cable
television providers, are bundling services and products that
Skype does not offer. These include various forms of wireless
communications, voice and data services, Internet access, and
cable television. This form of bundling may put Skype at a
competitive disadvantage if these providers can combine a
variety of service offerings at a single attractive price.
Furthermore, competitors may choose to make their services
interoperable with one another, rather than proprietary, which
could increase the attractiveness of their services relative to
Skype and decrease the value of Skypes network of users.
Many of Skypes current and potential competitors have
longer operating histories, are substantially larger, and have
greater financial, marketing, technical, and other resources.
Some also have greater name recognition and a larger installed
base of customers than Skype has. As a result of their greater
resources, many current and potential competitors may be able to
lower their prices substantially, thereby eroding some or all of
Skypes cost advantage.
Our
business may be adversely affected by factors that cause our
users to spend less time on our websites, including seasonal
factors, national events and increased usage of other
websites.
Anything that diverts our users from their customary level of
usage of our websites could adversely affect our business. We
would therefore be adversely affected by geopolitical events
such as war, the threat of war, or terrorist activity, and
natural disasters, such as hurricanes or earthquakes. Similarly,
our results of operations historically have been seasonal
because many of our users reduce their activities on our
websites with the onset of good weather during the summer
months, and on and around national holidays. In addition,
increased usage of social networking or other entertainment
websites may decrease the amount of time users spend on our
websites, which could adversely affect our financial results.
We
depend on the continued growth of online commerce and
communications.
The business of selling goods over the Internet, particularly
through online trading, is dynamic and relatively new. Concerns
about fraud, privacy, and other problems may discourage
additional consumers from adopting the Internet as a medium of
commerce. In countries such as the U.S. and Germany, where
our services and online commerce generally have been available
for some time and the level of market penetration of our
services is high, acquiring new users for our services may be
more difficult and costly than it has been in the past. In order
to expand our user base, we must appeal to and acquire consumers
who historically have used traditional means of commerce to
purchase goods. If these consumers prove to be less active than
our earlier users, and we are unable to gain efficiencies in our
operating costs, including our cost of acquiring new customers,
our business could be adversely impacted.
Our
business depends on the development and maintenance of the
Internet infrastructure.
The success of our services will depend largely on the
development and maintenance of the Internet infrastructure. This
includes maintenance of a reliable network backbone with the
necessary speed, data capacity, and security, as well as timely
development of complementary products, for providing reliable
Internet access and services. The Internet has experienced, and
is likely to continue to experience, significant growth in the
numbers of users and amount of traffic. The Internet
infrastructure may be unable to support such demands. In
addition, increasing numbers of users, increasing bandwidth
requirements, or problems caused by viruses,
worms, and similar programs may harm the performance
of the Internet. The backbone computers of the Internet have
been the targets of such programs. The Internet has experienced
a variety of outages and other delays as a result of damage to
portions of its infrastructure, and it could face outages and
delays in the future. These outages and delays could reduce the
level of Internet usage generally as well as the level of usage
of our services.
61
We may
be unable to protect or enforce our own intellectual property
rights adequately.
We regard the protection of our trademarks, copyrights, patents,
domain names, trade dress, and trade secrets as critical to our
success. We aggressively protect our intellectual property
rights by relying on a combination of trademark, copyright,
patent, trade dress and trade secret laws, and through the
domain name dispute resolution system. We also rely on
contractual restrictions to protect our proprietary rights in
products and services. We have entered into confidentiality and
invention assignment agreements with our employees and
contractors, and confidentiality agreements with parties with
whom we conduct business in order to limit access to and
disclosure of our proprietary information. These contractual
arrangements and the other steps we have taken to protect our
intellectual property may not prevent misappropriation of our
technology or deter independent development of similar
technologies by others. We pursue the registration of our domain
names, trademarks, and service marks in the U.S. and
internationally. Effective trademark, copyright, patent, domain
name, trade dress, and trade secret protection is very expensive
to maintain and may require litigation. We must protect our
trademarks, patents, and domain names in an increasing number of
jurisdictions, a process that is expensive and may not be
successful in every location. For example, Skype is in the
process of applying to register the Skype name as a trademark
worldwide. In the EU, Skypes application is being opposed.
If these oppositions to Skypes applications were to be
successful, Skypes ability to protect its brand against
third-party infringers would be compromised. We have licensed in
the past, and expect to license in the future, certain of our
proprietary rights, such as trademarks or copyrighted material,
to others. These licensees may take actions that diminish the
value of our proprietary rights or harm our reputation.
We are
subject to the risks of owning real property.
We own real property, including land and buildings related to
our operations. We have little experience in managing real
property. Ownership of this property subjects us to risks,
including:
|
|
|
|
|
the possibility of environmental contamination and the costs
associated with fixing any environmental problems;
|
|
|
|
adverse changes in the value of these properties, due to
interest rate changes, changes in the neighborhoods in which the
properties are located, or other factors;
|
|
|
|
the possible need for structural improvements in order to comply
with zoning, seismic, disability act, or other
requirements; and
|
|
|
|
possible disputes with tenants, neighboring owners, or others.
|
Some
anti-takeover provisions may affect the price of our common
stock.
Our Board of Directors has the authority to issue up to
10,000,000 shares of preferred stock and to determine the
preferences, rights and privileges of those shares without any
further vote or action by the stockholders. The rights of the
holders of common stock may be harmed by rights granted to the
holders of any preferred stock that may be issued in the future.
Some provisions of our certificate of incorporation and bylaws
could have the effect of making it more difficult for a
potential acquirer to acquire a majority of our outstanding
voting stock. These include provisions that provide for a
classified board of directors, prohibit stockholders from taking
action by written consent and restrict the ability of
stockholders to call special meetings. We are also subject to
provisions of Delaware law that prohibit us from engaging in any
business combination with any interested stockholder for a
period of three years from the date the person became an
interested stockholder, unless certain conditions are met. This
restriction could have the effect of delaying or preventing a
change of control.
62
|
|
Item 2:
|
Unregistered
Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
|
Stock repurchase activity during the three months ended
September 30, 2007 was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number of
|
|
|
Maximum Dollar
|
|
|
|
Total Number of
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Shares Purchased as
|
|
|
Value that May Yet
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Price Paid
|
|
|
Part of Publicly
|
|
|
be Purchased Under
|
|
Period
|
|
Purchased(2)
|
|
|
per Share
|
|
|
Announced Programs
|
|
|
the Program(1)
|
|
|
July 1, 2007-July 31, 2007
|
|
|
2,016,075
|
|
|
$
|
33.35
|
|
|
|
2,012,501
|
|
|
$
|
1,590,602,071
|
|
August 1,
2007-August 31,
2007
|
|
|
12,773,502
|
|
|
$
|
33.91
|
|
|
|
12,768,140
|
|
|
$
|
1,157,634,966
|
|
September 1, 2007-September 30, 2007
|
|
|
584,880
|
|
|
$
|
38.96
|
(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,157,634,966
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,374,457
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,780,641
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
In July 2006, our Board authorized a stock repurchase program
for up to $2.0 billion of our common stock within two years
from the date of authorization. In January 2007, our Board
authorized the expansion of the stock repurchase program to
provide for the repurchase of up to an additional
$2.0 billion of our common stock by January 2009. Under
this program, as of September 30, 2007, we had repurchased
in the aggregate approximately $2.8 billion of our common
stock at an average price of $31.63 per share. As of
September 30, 2007, $1.2 billion remained available
for further purchases under this program. |
|
(2) |
|
Includes 3,574, 5,362 and 7,150 shares of stock repurchased
from employees and shares of stock withheld from employees to
satisfy tax obligations in July, August and September 2007
respectively. The shares of stock repurchased in September 2007
also includes 577,730 shares of stock returned to us as
part of the settlement agreements that we entered into with
substantially all of Skypes former shareholders to settle
certain claims related to our 2005 acquisition of Skype. We did
not pay any monetary consideration for the return of such shares. |
|
(3) |
|
Represents the average of the recorded value of the shares of
stock returned to us as a part of the settlement agreements
noted above along with the price paid per share for other stock
repurchased or withheld from employees. |
|
|
Item 3:
|
Defaults
Upon Senior Securities
|
Not applicable.
|
|
Item 4:
|
Submission
of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
|
None
|
|
Item 5:
|
Other
Information
|
The Audit Committee of our Board of Directors has adopted a
policy requiring the pre-approval of any non-audit engagement of
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, or PwC, our independent registered
public accounting firm. In the event that we wish to engage PwC
to perform accounting, technical or other permitted services not
related to the services performed by PwC as our independent
registered public accounting firm, our internal finance
personnel will prepare a summary of the proposed engagement,
detailing the nature of the engagement, the reasons why PwC is
the preferred provider of such services and the estimated
duration and cost of the engagement. The report will be provided
to our Audit Committee or a designated committee member, who
will evaluate whether the proposed engagement will interfere
with the independence of PwC in the performance of its auditing
services. We intend to disclose all approved non-audit
engagements in the appropriate quarterly report on
Form 10-Q
or annual report on
Form 10-K.
During the quarter ended September 30, 2007, there were no
pre-approvals of any non-audit engagement work to be performed
by PwC.
63
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit 10
|
.01
|
|
Amendment Agreement, dated as of August 2, 2007, by and
among the Company, Bank of America, N.A., as Administrative
Agent, and the other lenders named from time to time.+
|
|
Exhibit 10
|
.02
|
|
Form of Earn Out Settlement Agreement++
|
|
Exhibit 31
|
.01
|
|
Certification of eBays Chief Executive Officer, as
required by Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
|
Exhibit 31
|
.02
|
|
Certification of eBays Chief Financial Officer, as
required by Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
|
Exhibit 32
|
.01
|
|
Certification of eBays Chief Executive Officer, as
required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
|
Exhibit 32
|
.02
|
|
Certification of eBays Chief Financial Officer, as
required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
|
|
|
+ |
|
Filed as an exhibit to the registrants Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
August 3, 2007, and incorporated herein by reference. |
|
++ |
|
Filed as an exhibit to the registrants Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
October 1, 2007, and incorporated herein by reference. |
64
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on
its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
eBay Inc.
Principal Executive Officer:
|
|
|
|
By:
|
/s/ Margaret
C. Whitman
|
Margaret C. Whitman
President and Chief Executive Officer
Date: October 26, 2007
Principal Financial Officer:
Robert H. Swan
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Date: October 26, 2007
Principal Accounting Officer:
|
|
|
|
By:
|
/s/ H.
Baird Radford, III
|
H. Baird Radford, III
Vice President, Corporate Controller and Interim
Chief Accounting Officer
Date: October 26, 2007
65
INDEX TO
EXHIBITS
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit 10
|
.01
|
|
Amendment Agreement, dated as of August 2, 2007, by and
among the Company, Bank of America, N.A., as Administrative
Agent, and the other lenders named from time to time.+
|
|
Exhibit 10
|
.02
|
|
Form of Earn Out Settlement Agreement++
|
|
Exhibit 31
|
.01
|
|
Certification of eBays Chief Executive Officer, as
required by Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
|
Exhibit 31
|
.02
|
|
Certification of eBays Chief Financial Officer, as
required by Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
|
Exhibit 32
|
.01
|
|
Certification of eBays Chief Executive Officer, as
required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
|
Exhibit 32
|
.02
|
|
Certification of eBays Chief Financial Officer, as
required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
|
|
|
+ |
|
Filed as an exhibit to the registrants Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
August 3, 2007, and incorporated herein by reference. |
|
++ |
|
Filed as an exhibit to the registrants Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
October 1, 2007, and incorporated herein by reference. |