United States
Securities And Exchange Commission
FORM 10-Q/A
x | Quarterly Report Pursuant To Section 13 Or 15(D) Of The | ||
Securities Exchange Act Of 1934 For The | |||
Quarterly Period Ended October 2, 2004 | |||
Or |
o | Transition Report Pursuant To Section 13 Or 15(D) Of The | ||
Securities Exchange Act Of 1934 |
Commission file number 1-416
SEARS, ROEBUCK AND CO.
New York | 36-1750680 | |
(State of Incorporation) | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) | |
3333 Beverly Road, Hoffman Estates, Illinois | 60179 | |
(Address of principal executive offices) | (Zip Code) |
Registrants Telephone Number, Including Area Code: (847) 286-2500
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant [1] has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months and [2] has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes x | No o |
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 12b-2).
Yes x | No o |
As of October 30, 2004, the Registrant had 206,814,704 common shares, $.75 par value, outstanding.
SEARS, ROEBUCK AND CO.
INDEX TO QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q
13 weeks and 39 Weeks Ended October 2, 2004
Explanatory Note
This Form 10-Q/A is being filed to correct a computational error in the pro forma disclosure of stock-based compensation contained in Note 10 of the Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements. For ease of reference, this Form 10-Q/A restates the Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended October 2, 2004 in its entirety. In order to preserve the nature and character of the disclosures set forth in such items as originally filed, no attempt has been made in this amendment to modify or update the disclosures in the original Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q except the restatement of Note 10. As a result, this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A contains forward-looking information which has not been updated for events subsequent to the date of the original filing, and the Company directs you to its SEC filings made subsequent to the original filing date for additional information.
SEARS, ROEBUCK AND CO.
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations
(Unaudited)
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements
millions, except per common share data | 13 Weeks Ended | 39 Weeks Ended | ||||||||||||||
October 2, | September 27, | October 2, | September 27, | |||||||||||||
2004 | 2003 | 2004 | 2003 | |||||||||||||
Merchandise sales and services |
$ | 8,210 | $ | 8,409 | $ | 24,613 | $ | 24,734 | ||||||||
Credit and financial products revenues |
85 | 1,385 | 257 | 4,136 | ||||||||||||
Total revenues |
8,295 | 9,794 | 24,870 | 28,870 | ||||||||||||
COSTS AND EXPENSES |
||||||||||||||||
Cost of sales, buying and occupancy |
6,062 | 6,137 | 17,965 | 18,013 | ||||||||||||
Selling and administrative |
2,009 | 2,229 | 5,967 | 6,638 | ||||||||||||
Provision for uncollectible accounts |
16 | 567 | 43 | 1,511 | ||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
227 | 226 | 717 | 681 | ||||||||||||
Interest, net |
66 | 281 | 210 | 847 | ||||||||||||
Special charges and impairments |
-- | 112 | 41 | 140 | ||||||||||||
Total costs and expenses |
8,380 | 9,552 | 24,943 | 27,830 | ||||||||||||
Operating (loss)/income |
(85 | ) | 242 | (73 | ) | 1,040 | ||||||||||
Other income, net |
6 | 2 | 58 | 16 | ||||||||||||
(Loss)/income before income taxes, minority interest and cumulative
effect of change in accounting principle |
(79 | ) | 244 | (15 | ) | 1,056 | ||||||||||
Income tax benefit/(expense) |
25 | (91 | ) | 2 | (392 | ) | ||||||||||
Minority interest |
(7 | ) | (6 | ) | (15 | ) | (16 | ) | ||||||||
(Loss)/income before cumulative effect of change in accounting
principle |
(61 | ) | 147 | (28 | ) | 648 | ||||||||||
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle |
-- | -- | (839 | ) | -- | |||||||||||
NET (LOSS)/INCOME |
$ | (61 | ) | $ | 147 | $ | (867 | ) | $ | 648 | ||||||
(LOSS)/EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE |
||||||||||||||||
BASIC |
||||||||||||||||
(Loss)/earnings per share before cumulative effect of change in
accounting principle |
$ | (0.29 | ) | $ | 0.53 | $ | (0.13 | ) | $ | 2.18 | ||||||
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle |
-- | -- | (3.90 | ) | -- | |||||||||||
(Loss)/earnings per share |
$ | (0.29 | ) | $ | 0.53 | $ | (4.03 | ) | $ | 2.18 | ||||||
DILUTED |
||||||||||||||||
(Loss)/earnings per share before cumulative effect of change in
accounting principle |
$ | (0.29 | ) | $ | 0.52 | $ | (0.13 | ) | $ | 2.17 | ||||||
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle |
-- | -- | (3.90 | ) | -- | |||||||||||
(Loss)/earnings per share |
$ | (0.29 | ) | $ | 0.52 | $ | (4.03 | ) | $ | 2.17 | ||||||
Cash dividends declared per common share |
$ | 0.23 | $ | 0.23 | $ | 0.69 | $ | 0.69 | ||||||||
Average common equivalent shares outstanding |
210.7 | 281.0 | 215.0 | 298.7 |
See accompanying notes.
1
SEARS, ROEBUCK AND CO.
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
(Unaudited) | |||||||||||||||
millions | October 2, | September 27, | January 3, | ||||||||||||
2004 | 2003 | 2004 | |||||||||||||
ASSETS |
|||||||||||||||
Current assets
|
|||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 2,734 | $ | 1,546 | $ | 9,057 | |||||||||
Credit card receivables (net of allowance for uncollectible accounts of $33, $54, and $42, respectively) |
1,896 | 1,920 | 1,956 | ||||||||||||
Other receivables |
567 | 600 | 733 | ||||||||||||
Merchandise inventories, net |
6,400 | 6,243 | 5,335 | ||||||||||||
Prepaid expenses, deferred charges and other current assets |
645 | 517 | 407 | ||||||||||||
Deferred income taxes |
674 | 818 | 708 | ||||||||||||
Assets held for sale |
-- | 27,818 | -- | ||||||||||||
Total current assets |
12,916 | 39,462 | 18,196 | ||||||||||||
Property and equipment, net |
6,632 | 6,660 | 6,788 | ||||||||||||
Deferred income taxes |
295 | 443 | 378 | ||||||||||||
Goodwill |
956 | 945 | 943 | ||||||||||||
Tradenames and other intangible assets |
709 | 710 | 710 | ||||||||||||
Other assets |
1,144 | 870 | 708 | ||||||||||||
TOTAL ASSETS |
$ | 22,652 | $ | 49,090 | $ | 27,723 | |||||||||
LIABILITIES |
|||||||||||||||
Current liabilities
|
|||||||||||||||
Short-term borrowings, primarily 90 days or less |
$ | 823 | $ | 6,179 | $ | 1,033 | |||||||||
Current portion of long-term debt and capitalized lease
obligations |
786 | 2,595 | 2,950 | ||||||||||||
Merchandise payables |
3,123 | 3,305 | 3,106 | ||||||||||||
Income taxes payable |
558 | 607 | 1,867 | ||||||||||||
Other liabilities |
3,075 | 3,146 | 2,950 | ||||||||||||
Unearned revenues |
1,262 | 1,245 | 1,244 | ||||||||||||
Other taxes |
487 | 472 | 609 | ||||||||||||
Liabilities held for sale |
-- | 10,602 | -- | ||||||||||||
Total current liabilities |
10,114 | 28,151 | 13,759 | ||||||||||||
Long-term debt and capitalized lease obligations |
4,070 | 12,121 | 4,218 | ||||||||||||
Pension and postretirement benefits |
1,619 | 2,010 | 1,956 | ||||||||||||
Minority interest and other liabilities |
1,431 | 1,319 | 1,389 | ||||||||||||
Total Liabilities |
17,234 | 43,601 | 21,322 | ||||||||||||
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENT LIABILITIES |
|||||||||||||||
SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY |
|||||||||||||||
Common shares |
323 | 323 | 323 | ||||||||||||
Capital in excess of par value |
3,502 | 3,503 | 3,519 | ||||||||||||
Retained earnings |
10,623 | 8,945 | 11,636 | ||||||||||||
Treasury stock at cost |
(8,942 | ) | (6,306 | ) | (7,945 | ) | |||||||||
Deferred ESOP expense |
(6 | ) | (27 | ) | (26 | ) | |||||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
(82 | ) | (949 | ) | (1,106 | ) | |||||||||
Total Shareholders Equity |
5,418 | 5,489 | 6,401 | ||||||||||||
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY |
$ | 22,652 | $ | 49,090 | $ | 27,723 | |||||||||
Total common shares outstanding |
207.6 | 263.3 | 230.4 |
See accompanying notes.
2
SEARS, ROEBUCK AND CO.
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(Unaudited)
39 Weeks Ended | ||||||||
millions | October 2, | September 27, | ||||||
2004 | 2003 | |||||||
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES |
||||||||
Net (loss)/income |
$ | (867 | ) | $ | 648 | |||
Adjustments to reconcile net (loss)/income to net cash (used in) provided by operating activities |
||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
717 | 681 | ||||||
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle |
839 | -- | ||||||
Provision for uncollectible accounts |
43 | 1,511 | ||||||
Gain on sales of property and investments |
(37 | ) | (4 | ) | ||||
Income tax benefit on nonqualified stock options |
5 | 5 | ||||||
Change in: |
||||||||
Deferred income taxes |
(454 | ) | 254 | |||||
Credit card receivables |
65 | 527 | ||||||
Merchandise inventories |
(1,031 | ) | (1,088 | ) | ||||
Other operating assets |
208 | (52 | ) | |||||
Other operating liabilities(1) |
(1,292 | ) | (793 | ) | ||||
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities |
(1,804 | ) | 1,689 | |||||
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES |
||||||||
Acquisitions of businesses, net of cash acquired |
(17 | ) | -- | |||||
Acquisition of leasehold interest |
(172 | ) | -- | |||||
Purchases of property and equipment |
(570 | ) | (567 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from sales of property and investments |
1,246 | 24 | ||||||
Purchases of investments |
(1,303 | ) | (25 | ) | ||||
Net cash used in investing activities |
(816 | ) | (568 | ) | ||||
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES |
||||||||
Proceeds from long-term debt |
297 | 2,932 | ||||||
Repayments of long-term debt |
(2,617 | ) | (4,073 | ) | ||||
(Decrease)/increase in short term borrowings, primarily 90 days or less |
(219 | ) | 1,633 | |||||
Repayments from ESOP notes receivable |
-- | 2 | ||||||
Common shares repurchased |
(1,077 | ) | (1,911 | ) | ||||
Common shares issued for employee stock plans |
58 | 72 | ||||||
Dividends paid to shareholders |
(147 | ) | (210 | ) | ||||
Net cash used in financing activities |
(3,705 | ) | (1,555 | ) | ||||
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents |
2 | 18 | ||||||
NET DECREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS |
(6,323 | ) | (416 | ) | ||||
BALANCE AT BEGINNING OF YEAR |
9,057 | 1,962 | ||||||
BALANCE AT END OF PERIOD |
$ | 2,734 | $ | 1,546 | ||||
(1)
|
For the 39 weeks ended October 2, 2004 and September 27, 2003, the Company paid income taxes of $1.3 billion and $0.4 billion, respectively. |
See accompanying notes.
3
SEARS, ROEBUCK AND CO.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
NOTE 1 CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of October 2, 2004 and September 27, 2003, the related Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the 13 and 39 weeks ended October 2, 2004 and September 27, 2003, and the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the 39 weeks ended October 2, 2004 and September 27, 2003, are unaudited. The interim financial statements reflect all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring accruals) which are, in the opinion of management, necessary for a fair statement of the results for the interim periods presented. The condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in the Sears, Roebuck and Co. (Sears, and together with its consolidated subsidiaries, the Company) 2003 Annual Report on Form 10-K. The results of operations for the interim periods should not be considered indicative of results to be expected for the full year. The Company typically earns a disproportionate share of its operating income in the fourth quarter due to seasonal customer buying patterns.
Certain reclassifications have been made to the 2003 financial statements to conform with the current year presentation.
NOTE 2 ACQUISITIONS/DISPOSITIONS
On September 29, 2004, the Company closed the acquisition of ownership or leasehold interest in 50 off-mall stores from Kmart Holding Corporation for $575.9 million plus the assumption of existing real estate leases. As of October 2, 2004, the Company has paid 30 percent ($171.8 million) of the purchase price and will pay the remaining 70 percent ($404.1 million) upon taking possession of the stores in 2005. A liability for the remaining 70 percent is reported within other liabilities on the balance sheet. The acquisitions include real estate and Kmart store fixtures, but exclude inventory and liabilities not related to leases. The Company will take possession of the stores in the spring of 2005 and expects to convert the stores to Sears nameplates by the fourth quarter of 2005. ESL Partners, L.P., and certain affiliated entities combined own greater than ten percent of both the Company and Kmart Holding Corporation.
During the third quarter of 2004, the Company agreed to sublease six stores from Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. Sears has taken possession of two stores and is targeting to take possession of two stores in 2005 and two stores in 2006.
On July 10, 2004, the Company acquired Standards of Excellence, a San Diego-based supplier of premium appliances, designer fixtures and decorative hardware. The Company paid $17 million in cash. The acquisition has been accounted for using the purchase method in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 141, Business Combinations. Accordingly, the total purchase price has been allocated to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their estimated fair values at acquisition.
On November 3, 2003, the Company completed the sale of its domestic Credit and Financial Products business, including its clubs and services business (Credit), to Citigroup. On November 29, 2003, the Company sold National Tire & Battery (NTB) to TBC Corporation. The following table illustrates the impact the estimated results of the divested businesses had on the reported results for the 13- and 39-week periods ended September 27, 2003:
13 Weeks Ended September 27, 2003 | 39 Weeks Ended September 27, 2003 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
millions, except per share data | As | Divested | As | Divested | ||||||||||||||||||||
Reported | Businesses | Pro forma | Reported | Businesses | Pro forma | |||||||||||||||||||
Revenues |
$ | 9,794 | $ | 1,430 | $ | 8,364 | $ | 28,870 | $ | 4,249 | $ | 24,621 | ||||||||||||
Net income |
147 | 171 | (24 | ) | 648 | 539 | 109 | |||||||||||||||||
Diluted earnings per share |
0.52 | 0.61 | (0.09 | ) | 2.17 | 1.80 | 0.37 |
4
SEARS, ROEBUCK AND CO.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
NOTE 3 SECURITIZED ASSETS
A summary of the Companys securitized assets at October 2, 2004, September 27, 2003 and January 3, 2004 is as follows:
October 2, | September 27, | January 3, | ||||||||||
millions | 2004 | 2003 | 2004 | |||||||||
Credit card receivables |
||||||||||||
Domestic(1) |
$ | -- | $ | 22,815 | $ | -- | ||||||
Sears Canada |
1,015 | 1,053 | 1,093 | |||||||||
Total credit card receivables |
1,015 | 23,868 | 1,093 | |||||||||
Property and equipment, net |
489 | -- | 500 | |||||||||
Total securitized assets |
$ | 1,504 | $ | 23,868 | $ | 1,593 | ||||||
The Company securitizes certain of its credit card receivables through master trusts (trusts). Under the Sears Canada securitization program, trusts purchase undivided interests in the receivable balances, funded by issuing short-term and long-term debt, primarily commercial paper and senior and subordinated receivables-backed notes. The trusts related to the domestic receivables securitized the receivable balances by issuing certificates representing undivided interests in the trusts receivables both to outside investors and to the Company. These certificates entitled the holder to a series of scheduled cash flows under preset terms and conditions, the receipt of which was dependent upon cash flows generated by the related trusts assets. The Company accounts for credit card securitizations as secured borrowings.
Certain real estate assets were transferred to a wholly-owned consolidated subsidiary of Sears and segregated into a trust owned by the consolidated subsidiary. These assets are related to an inter-company loan agreement.
NOTE 4 INVESTMENTS
millions | October 2, 2004 | |||||||
Cost | Fair Value | |||||||
Available-for-sale securities: |
||||||||
State and political subdivisions obligations |
$ | 118 | $ | 118 | ||||
U.S. treasury and federal agencies obligations |
20 | 20 | ||||||
Total available-for-sale securities |
$ | 138 | $ | 138 | ||||
The available-for-sale securities of $138 million are due within one year and are reported within prepaid expenses, deferred charges and other current assets on the balance sheet.
The Company did not have available-for-sale securities with maturities greater than 90 days during any period in 2003.
NOTE 5 BORROWINGS
Total borrowings outstanding at October 2, 2004, September 27, 2003 and January 3, 2004 were $5.6 billion, $30.8 billion and $8.1 billion, respectively. Total borrowings are presented on the balance sheet as follows:
5
SEARS, ROEBUCK AND CO.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
October 2, | September 27, | January 3, | ||||||||||
millions | 2004 | 2003 | 2004 | |||||||||
Short-term borrowings: |
||||||||||||
Unsecured commercial paper |
$ | 754 | $ | 3,249 | $ | 719 | ||||||
Asset-backed commercial paper |
69 | 1,475 | 314 | |||||||||
Asset-backed facility |
-- | 1,400 | -- | |||||||||
Bank loans |
-- | 55 | -- | |||||||||
Total short-term borrowings |
823 | 6,179 | 1,033 | |||||||||
Long-term debt(1): |
||||||||||||
Notes and debentures outstanding |
3,373 | 12,856 | 5,825 | |||||||||
Securitizations(2) |
923 | 11,240 | 756 | |||||||||
Capital lease obligations |
480 | 511 | 497 | |||||||||
Total borrowings |
$ | 5,599 | $ | 30,786 | $ | 8,111 | ||||||
SFAS No. 133 Hedge Accounting Adjustment |
80 | 510 | 90 | |||||||||
Total debt |
$ | 5,679 | $ | 31,296 | $ | 8,201 | ||||||
Memo: Sears Canada debt |
$ | 1,634 | $ | 1,632 | $ | 1,701 |
The Company maintains committed credit facilities to support its commercial paper borrowings. The Companys domestic wholly-owned financing subsidiary, Sears Roebuck Acceptance Corp. (SRAC), has an unsecured, three-year revolving credit facility in the amount of $2.0 billion. This facility and other debt agreements require SRAC to maintain specified fixed charge coverage ratios, and the credit facility requires the Companys domestic segment to maintain a minimum level of tangible net worth and a minimum interest coverage ratio. SRAC and the Company were in compliance with these covenants at October 2, 2004. In addition, Sears Canada has a $0.5 billion committed credit facility.
During the 13- and 39-week periods ended October 2, 2004, the Company retired approximately $23 million and $2.5 billion of domestic term debt, respectively.
NOTE 6 SPECIAL CHARGES AND IMPAIRMENTS
During the second quarter of 2004, the Company recorded a pretax charge of $41 million for the estimated costs of severance associated with the termination of approximately 3,300 associates related to the streamlining of the Companys headquarters organization as well as other productivity initiatives identified in its field operations. The identified associates will be terminated by the end of 2004 and the related severance paid out by the end of 2005.
Following is a summary of the activity in the 2004 reserve established for employee termination costs:
Balance, | Balance, | |||||||||||||||
Beginning | 2004 | Cash | October 2, | |||||||||||||
millions |
of Year | Charge | Payments | 2004 | ||||||||||||
2004 employee termination costs |
$ | -- | $ | 41 | $ | (12 | ) | $ | 29 | |||||||
6
SEARS, ROEBUCK AND CO.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
NOTE 7 SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
Dividend Payments
Under an agreement pursuant to which the Company has provided a credit facility in support of certain tax increment revenue bonds issued by the Village of Hoffman Estates, Illinois, in connection with the construction of its headquarters facility, the Company cannot take specified actions, including the declaration of cash dividends, that would cause its unencumbered assets, as defined, to fall below 150% of its liabilities, as defined. At October 2, 2004, approximately $4.1 billion could be paid in dividends to shareholders under this covenant.
Share Repurchase Program
The Company repurchased 6 million common shares at a cost of $225 million and 25 million common shares at a cost of $1.1 billion, during the 13- and 39-week periods ended October 2, 2004 under a common share repurchase program approved by the Board of Directors. As of October 2, 2004, the Company had remaining authorization under the existing share repurchase program to repurchase up to $501 million of shares by December 31, 2006.
Comprehensive (Loss)/Income and Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss
The following table shows the computation of comprehensive (loss)/income:
13 Weeks Ended | 39 Weeks Ended | |||||||||||||||
October 2, | September 27, | October 2, | September 27, | |||||||||||||
millions | 2004 | 2003 | 2004 | 2003 | ||||||||||||
Net (loss)/income |
$ | (61 | ) | $ | 147 | $ | (867 | ) | $ | 648 | ||||||
Other comprehensive (loss)/income: |
||||||||||||||||
Minimum pension liability (1) |
-- | -- | 999 | -- | ||||||||||||
Amounts amortized into interest expense from OCI |
(2 | ) | 4 | 4 | 12 | |||||||||||
Change in fair value of cash flow hedges |
-- | (2 | ) | -- | (1 | ) | ||||||||||
Foreign currency translation adjustments |
37 | 5 | 21 | 96 | ||||||||||||
Total other comprehensive income |
35 | 7 | 1,024 | 107 | ||||||||||||
Total comprehensive (loss)/income |
$ | (26 | ) | $ | 154 | $ | 157 | $ | 755 | |||||||
The following table displays the components of accumulated other comprehensive loss:
October 2, | September 27, | January 3, | ||||||||||
millions | 2004 | 2003 | 2004 | |||||||||
Accumulated derivative loss |
$ | (5 | ) | $ | (190 | ) | $ | (9 | ) | |||
Currency translation adjustments |
2 | (48 | ) | (19 | ) | |||||||
Minimum pension liability, net of tax (1) |
(79 | ) | (711 | ) | (1,078 | ) | ||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
$ | (82 | ) | $ | (949 | ) | $ | (1,106 | ) | |||
7
SEARS, ROEBUCK AND CO.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
NOTE 8 (LOSS)/EARNINGS PER SHARE
The following table sets forth the computations of basic and diluted (loss)/earnings per share:
13 Weeks Ended | 39 Weeks Ended | |||||||||||||||
October 2, | September 27, | October 2, | September 27, | |||||||||||||
millions, except per share data | 2004 | 2003 | 2004 | 2003 | ||||||||||||
Net (loss)/income (1) |
$ | (61 | ) | $ | 147 | $ | (867 | ) | $ | 648 | ||||||
Average common shares outstanding |
210.7 | 277.1 | 215.0 | 297.1 | ||||||||||||
Dilutive effect of stock options |
-- | 3.9 | -- | 1.6 | ||||||||||||
Average common equivalent shares outstanding |
210.7 | 281.0 | 215.0 | 298.7 | ||||||||||||
(Loss)/earnings per share
|
||||||||||||||||
Basic |
$ | (0.29 | ) | $ | 0.53 | $ | (4.03 | ) | $ | 2.18 | ||||||
Diluted |
$ | (0.29 | ) | $ | 0.52 | $ | (4.03 | ) | $ | 2.17 |
In each period, certain options were excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per share because they would have been anti-dilutive. Due to the net loss recognized for the 13- and 39-week periods ended October 2, 2004, all options to purchase 32.4 and 31.5 million common shares were excluded from the 13- and 39-week 2004 calculations, respectively. At September 27, 2003, options to purchase 5.2 million common shares at prices ranging from $41 to $64 per share, and 19.1 million common shares at prices ranging from $32 to $64 per share, were excluded from the 13- and 39-week 2003 calculations, respectively.
The following table sets forth the computations of basic and diluted earnings per share before the cumulative effect of the change in accounting principle:
39 Weeks Ended | ||||||||
millions, except per share data | October 2, | September 27, | ||||||
2004 | 2003 | |||||||
(Loss)/income before cumulative effect of change in accounting
principle (1) |
$ | (28 | ) | $ | 648 | |||
Average common shares outstanding |
215.0 | 297.1 | ||||||
Dilutive effect of stock options |
-- | 1.6 | ||||||
Average common and common equivalent shares outstanding |
215.0 | 298.7 | ||||||
Earnings per share
|
||||||||
Basic |
$ | (0.13 | ) | $ | 2.18 | |||
Diluted |
$ | (0.13 | ) | $ | 2.17 |
NOTE 9 RETIREMENT BENEFIT PLANS
Certain domestic full-time and part-time employees are eligible to participate in noncontributory defined benefit plans after meeting age and service requirements. Substantially all full-time Canadian employees as well as some part-time employees are eligible to participate in contributory defined benefit plans. Pension benefits are based on length of service, compensation and, in certain plans, social security or other benefits. Funding for the various plans is determined using various actuarial cost methods.
8
SEARS, ROEBUCK AND CO.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
In addition to providing pension benefits, the Company provides domestic and Canadian employees certain medical and life insurance benefits for retired employees. Employees may become eligible for medical benefits if they retire in accordance with the Companys established retirement policy and are continuously insured under the Companys group medical plans or other approved plans for 10 or more years immediately prior to retirement. The Company shares the cost of the retiree medical benefits with retirees based on years of service. Generally, the Companys share of these benefit costs will be capped at the Company contribution calculated during the year of retirement. The Companys postretirement benefit plans are not funded. The Company has the right to modify or terminate these plans. The Company does not expect to contribute to the domestic pension plan in 2004.
The components of net periodic benefit cost/(benefit) are as follows:
13 Weeks Ended | 39 Weeks Ended | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pension | Postretirement | Pension | Postretirement | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
millions | Benefits | Benefits | Benefits | Benefits | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Oct. 2, | Sept. 27, | Oct. 2, | Sept. 27, | Oct. 2, | Sept. 27, | Oct. 2, | Sept. 27, | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
2004 | 2003 | 2004 | 2003 | 2004 | 2003 | 2004 | 2003 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Components of net periodic benefit cost/(benefit): |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Benefits earned during the period |
$ | 26 | $ | 23 | $ | 1 | $ | 2 | $ | 78 | $ | 69 | $ | 3 | $ | 4 | ||||||||||||||||
Interest cost |
59 | 49 | 13 | 12 | 177 | 147 | 39 | 35 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Expected return on plan assets |
(63 | ) | (53 | ) | (1 | ) | -- | (189 | ) | (159 | ) | (3 | ) | -- | ||||||||||||||||||
Amortization of unrecognized net prior
service benefit |
(2 | ) | (1 | ) | (19 | ) | (24 | ) | (6 | ) | (3 | ) | (57 | ) | (72 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Recognized net (gain)/loss |
(1 | ) | 21 | 1 | (5 | ) | (3 | ) | 63 | 3 | (15 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Other |
1 | (2 | ) | -- | -- | -- | (6 | ) | (30 | )(1) | -- | |||||||||||||||||||||
Net periodic benefit cost/(benefit) |
$ | 20 | $ | 37 | $ | (5 | ) | $ | (15 | ) | $ | 57 | $ | 111 | $ | (45 | ) | $ | (48 | ) | ||||||||||||
Accounting Change
Subsequent to the sale of Credit, the Company initiated a project to review its domestic employee retirement benefits cost structure and programs. The Company assessed its retirement benefits programs in the context of comparable programs in the retail industry. As a result of this review, in January 2004, the Company announced a series of benefit plan changes which included the enhancement of the Companys 401(k) defined contribution plan and the phasing out of participation in its domestic pension plan. Associates hired in 2004 and those under the age of 40 as of December 31, 2004, will receive an increased Company-matching contribution to the 401(k) plan of 110%, but will no longer earn additional pension benefits effective January 1, 2005. Pension benefits continue to accrue for associates age 40 and older as of December 31, 2004, unless they elect to participate in the enhanced 401(k) defined contribution plan.
In addition, the Company eliminated its domestic retiree medical insurance contribution for associates hired in 2004 and those under the age of 40 as of December 31, 2004, and capped the contribution at the 2004 level for associates age 40 and older. A curtailment gain of $30 million is included within selling and administrative costs for the 39-week period ended October 2, 2004 as a result of the change in the domestic retiree medical benefit.
In connection with the domestic pension and postretirement plan changes discussed above, the Company believed it was preferable to change its accounting methods, which under SFAS Nos. 87 and 106 delay recognition of past events. Therefore, in the first quarter of 2004, the Company changed its method for determining the market-related value of plan assets used in determining the expected return-on-assets component of annual net pension costs and its method for recognizing gains and losses for both its domestic pension and postretirement benefit
9
SEARS, ROEBUCK AND CO.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
plans. Under the previous accounting method, the market-related value of the domestic pension plan assets was determined by averaging the value of equity assets over a five-year period. The new method recognizes equity assets at fair value. Further, under its previous accounting method, all unrecognized gains and losses in excess of the 10% corridor were amortized over the expected working lifetime of active employees (approximately 10 years). Under the new methodology, the portion of the total gain or loss outside the 10% corridor will be immediately recognized. As a result of this accounting change, the Company recorded an after-tax charge of $839 million in the first quarter of 2004 for the cumulative effect of the change in accounting principle. The charge represents the recognition of unamortized experience losses at the beginning of 2004 in accordance with the new methods.
The new method of determining market-related value of plan assets and recognizing gains and losses is preferable because it produces results that more closely match the current economic position of the Companys domestic retirement benefit plans by not delaying the recognition of past events.
The cumulative effect of the accounting changes related to fiscal 2004 is presented in the following table:
2004 | ||||||||
millions, except per share data | Pretax | After-tax | ||||||
Domestic Pension |
$ | 1,574 | $ | 999 | ||||
Domestic Postretirement |
(253 | ) | (160 | ) | ||||
Total |
$ | 1,321 | $ | 839 | ||||
Loss per share |
$ | (3.90 | ) |
Presented below is pro forma net income and earnings per share for the quarters ended March 29, 2003, June 28, 2003, September 27, 2003 and January 3, 2004 and for the full-year ended January 3, 2004 showing the estimated effects as if the accounting change were applied retroactively:
2003 | ||||||||||||||||||||
First | Second | Third | Fourth | |||||||||||||||||
millions, except per share data | Quarter | Quarter | Quarter | Quarter | Year | |||||||||||||||
Net income as reported |
$ | 192 | $ | 309 | $ | 147 | $ | 2,749 | $ | 3,397 | ||||||||||
Impact of change in accounting for domestic
retirement plans |
10 | 11 | 11 | (373 | ) | (341 | ) | |||||||||||||
Net income pro forma |
$ | 202 | $ | 320 | $ | 158 | $ | 2,376 | $ | 3,056 | ||||||||||
Earnings per share basic: |
||||||||||||||||||||
As reported |
$ | 0.60 | $ | 1.04 | $ | 0.53 | $ | 11.06 | $ | 11.95 | ||||||||||
Pro forma |
$ | 0.63 | $ | 1.08 | $ | 0.57 | $ | 9.56 | $ | 10.75 | ||||||||||
Earnings per share diluted: |
||||||||||||||||||||
As reported |
$ | 0.60 | $ | 1.04 | $ | 0.52 | $ | 10.84 | $ | 11.86 | ||||||||||
Pro forma |
$ | 0.63 | $ | 1.08 | $ | 0.56 | $ | 9.37 | $ | 10.67 |
The Company uses October 31 as the measurement date for determining retirement plan assets, obligations and experience gains or losses. Under the new accounting method for domestic plans, the Company will recognize the portion of experience gain or loss in excess of the 10% corridor at the measurement date, which falls in the fourth quarter of the fiscal year. Had the Company used this accounting method in 2003, an experience loss would have been recognized in the fourth quarter of 2003 which would have reduced net income by $373 million.
10
SEARS, ROEBUCK AND CO.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
NOTE 10 STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION
The Company has various stock-based employee compensation plans which are described more fully in Note 10 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in the Companys 2003 Annual Report on Form 10-K. The Company accounts for those plans in accordance with Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, Accounting For Stock Issued to Employees, and related Interpretations. No stock-based employee compensation cost is reflected in net income/(loss), as no options granted under those plans had an exercise price less than the market value of the underlying common stock on the date of grant.
Subsequent to the issuance of its condensed consolidated financial statements for the 13 and 39 weeks ended October 2, 2004, the Company determined it had used an incorrect vesting period for certain stock options granted in 2004 in the calculation of its pro forma stock-based employee compensation expense determined under the fair value based method. As a result, the following pro forma information has been restated to increase the pro forma stock-based employee compensation expense determined under the fair value method and pro forma net loss by $20 million ($0.09 per share basic and diluted) and $54 million ($0.25 per share basic and diluted) for the 13 and 39 weeks ended October 2, 2004, respectively, from the amounts previously reported.
13 Weeks Ended | 39 Weeks Ended | |||||||||||||||
October 2, | September 27, | October 2, | September 27, | |||||||||||||
millions, except per share data | 2004 | 2003 | 2004 | 2003 | ||||||||||||
Net (loss)/income as reported |
$ | (61 | ) | $ | 147 | $ | (867 | ) | $ | 648 | ||||||
Less: Total stock-based employee
compensation expense determined
under fair value based method for
all awards, net of related taxes |
34 | 10 | 97 | 33 | ||||||||||||
Net (loss)/income pro forma |
$ | (95 | ) | $ | 137 | $ | (964 | ) | $ | 615 | ||||||
(Loss)/earnings per share basic
|
||||||||||||||||
As reported |
$ | (0.29 | ) | $ | 0.53 | $ | (4.03 | ) | $ | 2.18 | ||||||
Pro forma |
(0.45 | ) | 0.49 | (4.48 | ) | 2.07 | ||||||||||
(Loss)/earnings per share diluted |
||||||||||||||||
As reported |
$ | (0.29 | ) | $ | 0.52 | $ | (4.03 | ) | $ | 2.17 | ||||||
Pro forma |
(0.45 | ) | 0.49 | (4.48 | ) | 2.06 |
NOTE 11 LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
Pending against the Company and certain of its officers and directors are a number of lawsuits that relate to the credit card business and public statements about it. The Company believes that all of these claims lack merit and is defending against them vigorously.
| On and after October 18, 2002, several actions were filed in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois against the Company and certain current and former officers alleging that certain public announcements by the Company concerning its credit card business violated Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder. The Court has consolidated the actions and certified the consolidated action as a class action. Discovery is underway. Trial is scheduled to begin on August 8, 2005. | |||
| On and after November 15, 2002, several actions were filed in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois against the Company, certain officers and directors, and alleged fiduciaries of Sears 401(k) Savings Plan (the Plan), seeking damages and equitable relief under the Employee Retirement |
11
SEARS, ROEBUCK AND CO.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA). The plaintiffs purport to represent participants in the Plan, and allege breaches of fiduciary duties under ERISA in connection with the Plans investment in the Companys common shares and alleged communications made to Plan participants regarding the Companys financial condition. These actions have been consolidated into a single action. Discovery is underway. No trial date has been set. |
| On October 23, 2002, a purported derivative action was filed in the Supreme Court of the State of New York against the Company (as a nominal defendant) and certain current and former directors seeking damages on behalf of the Company. The complaint purports to allege a breach of fiduciary duty by the directors with respect to the Companys management of the credit card business. On June 21, 2004, the Court dismissed the complaint because the plaintiff had filed the suit without having demanded that the Board of Directors bring the suit. The plaintiff has filed a notice of appeal from that ruling. Two similar actions (the Cook County actions) were filed in the Circuit Court of Cook County, Illinois (the Illinois state court), and a third (the federal derivative action) was filed in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois. All three actions were stayed pending the disposition of the action in New York. In light of the New York courts decision, the Illinois state court lifted the stay of the Cook County actions and reinstated a motion to dismiss which the defendants had filed prior to the stay. On September 30, 2004, the Illinois state court granted the defendants motion to dismiss on the ground that the plaintiff had filed the suit without having demanded that the Board of Directors bring the suit. The plaintiffs in the federal derivative action appealed the stay order in that case to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit. On July 19, 2004, the Court of Appeals affirmed the stay of the federal derivative action, and that stay remains in effect. | |||
| On June 17, 2003, an action was filed in the Northern District of Illinois against the Company and certain officers, purportedly on behalf of a class of all persons who, between June 21, 2002 and October 17, 2002, purchased the 7% notes that SRAC issued on June 21, 2002. An amended complaint has been filed, naming as additional defendants certain former officers, SRAC and several investment banking firms who acted as underwriters for SRACs March 18, May 21 and June 21, 2002 notes offerings. The amended complaint alleges that the defendants made misrepresentations or omissions concerning its credit business during the class period and in the registration statements and prospectuses relating to the offerings. The amended complaint alleges that these misrepresentations and omissions violated Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder, and Sections 11, 12 and 15 of the Securities Act of 1933 and purports to be brought on behalf of a class of all persons who purchased any security of SRAC between October 24, 2001 and October 17, 2002, inclusive. The defendants filed motions to dismiss the action. On September 24, 2004, the court granted these motions in part, and denied them in part. The court dismissed the claims related to the March 18 and May 21, 2002 note offerings because the plaintiff did not purchase notes in those offerings. The court dismissed the Section 10(b) and Rule 10b-5 claims against several of the individual defendants because the plaintiff failed to adequately plead such claims. The court sustained the remaining claims. By invitation of the court, on October 1, 2004, defendants moved to dismiss the Section 10(b), Rule 10b-5 and Section 20(a) claims not dismissed in the courts ruling. On October 5, 2004, the court granted the plaintiff leave to file a second amended complaint. |
The Company is subject to various other legal and governmental proceedings, many involving litigation incidental to the businesses. Some matters contain class action allegations, environmental and asbestos exposure allegations and other consumer-based claims that involve compensatory, punitive or treble damage claims in very large amounts as well as other types of relief. The consequences of these matters are not presently determinable but, in the opinion of management of the Company after consulting with legal counsel, and taking into account insurance and reserves, the ultimate liability is not expected to have a material adverse effect on annual results of operations, financial position, liquidity or capital resources of the Company.
12
SEARS, ROEBUCK AND CO.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
NOTE 12 FINANCIAL GUARANTEES
The Company issues various types of guarantees in the normal course of business. The Company had the following guarantees outstanding:
millions | ||||
October 2, | ||||
2004 | ||||
Parent guarantee of SRAC debt |
$ | 3,604 | ||
Import letters of credit |
298 | |||
Standby letters of credit |
141 | |||
Secondary lease obligations |
104 | |||
Performance guarantee |
59 |
The debt obligations of SRAC are reflected in the Companys balance sheets. As a result of the Companys sale of Credit, Sears was required to issue a guarantee of SRACs outstanding public debt in order to maintain SRACs exemption from being deemed an investment company under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended. Sears also guarantees any outstanding borrowings under SRACs three-year, unsecured credit facility. As of October 2, 2004, no borrowings were outstanding under this facility. These guarantees would require Sears to repay such debt should SRAC default in payment.
The secondary lease obligations relate to certain store leases of previously divested businesses. The Company remains secondarily liable if the primary obligor defaults. As of October 2, 2004, the Company had an $8 million liability recorded in other liabilities which represents the Companys current estimate of potential obligation related to these leases.
The performance guarantee relates to certain municipal bonds issued in connection with the Companys headquarters building. This guarantee expires in 2007.
NOTE 13 SEGMENT DISCLOSURES
With the sale of Credit, the Companys financial reporting segments for fiscal 2004 have been changed to reflect two operating segments a Domestic segment and a Sears Canada segment.
The Domestic segment consists of merchandise sales and related services, including product protection agreements, delivery and product installation and repair services. It includes all Sears selling channels, Specialty and Full-line Stores as well as Direct to Customer operations encompassing online, catalogs, and the Lands End online and catalog business. The results of operations for the divested businesses, Credit and Financial Products and NTB, are included within the Domestic segment for the 13- and 39-week periods ended September 27, 2003.
The Sears Canada segment includes retail, credit and corporate operations conducted by Sears Canada, a 54.3% owned subsidiary.
Prior to the sale of Credit, the Company organized its business into three domestic segments: Retail and Related Services, Credit and Financial Products and Corporate and Other; and one international segment: Sears Canada.
| The Retail and Related Services segment consisted of merchandise sales and related services, including product protection agreements, delivery and product installation and repair services. It included all Sears selling channels, including Specialty and Full-line Stores as well as Direct to Customer operations which includes online, catalogs, and Lands End online and catalog business. Beginning November 3, 2003, this |
13
SEARS, ROEBUCK AND CO.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
segment also included the revenues earned under the long-term marketing and servicing alliance with Citigroup. | ||||
| The Credit and Financial Products segment managed the Companys domestic portfolio of Sears Card and MasterCard receivables. This segment also included related financial products, such as credit protection and insurance products. The domestic Credit and Financial Products business was sold on November 3, 2003, and thus the segment results include its results of operations through November 2, 2003. | |||
| The Corporate and Other segment included activities that are of an overall holding company nature primarily consisting of administrative activities supporting the Domestic operations. This segment also included Home Improvement Services which installs siding and windows. | |||
| External revenues and expenses were allocated between the applicable segments. For zero-percent financing promotions in which customers received free financing, Retail and Related Services reimbursed Credit and Financial Products over the life of the financing period at a 10% annual rate. The cost was reported as selling expense by Retail and Related Services and an offsetting benefit was recognized by Credit and Financial Products. With the sale of the domestic Credit and Financial Products business, the allocation of these costs is included in the results of operations through November 2, 2003. Under the terms of the long-term marketing and servicing alliance with Citigroup, Citigroup will support the Companys historical level zero-percent receivable balances at no cost to the Company. | |||
| The domestic segments participated in a centralized funding program. Interest expense was allocated to the Credit and Financial Products segment based on its funding requirements. Funding included unsecured debt reflected on the balance sheet and investor certificates related to credit card receivables transferred to trusts through securitizations. The remainder of net domestic interest expense was reported in the Retail and Related Services segment through November 3, 2003. Subsequent to the sale of Credit, the allocation of interest expense was changed such that net interest expense associated with approximately $3.8 billion of outstanding domestic term debt remaining from the Credit and Financial Products segment, also referred to as Credit legacy debt, was allocated to the Corporate and Other Segment. As of October 2, 2004, approximately $1.4 billion of Credit legacy debt remained outstanding. |
The 2003 segment information has been presented on the 2004 basis Domestic and Sears Canada. In addition, the Company has provided, for 2003, information on the operating segments comprising the Domestic segment in 2003.
14
SEARS, ROEBUCK AND CO.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
For the 13 weeks ended October 2, 2004
Sears | ||||||||||||
millions | Domestic | Canada | Consolidated | |||||||||
Merchandise sales and services |
$ | 7,141 | $ | 1,069 | $ | 8,210 | ||||||
Credit and financial products revenues |
-- | 85 | 85 | |||||||||
Total revenues |
7,141 | 1,154 | 8,295 | |||||||||
Costs and expenses
|
||||||||||||
Cost of sales, buying and occupancy |
5,289 | 773 | 6,062 | |||||||||
Selling and administrative |
1,720 | 289 | 2,009 | |||||||||
Provision for uncollectible accounts |
-- | 16 | 16 | |||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
199 | 28 | 227 | |||||||||
Interest, net |
39 | 27 | 66 | |||||||||
Special charges |
-- | -- | -- | |||||||||
Total costs and expenses |
7,247 | 1,133 | 8,380 | |||||||||
Operating (loss)/income |
$ | (106 | ) | $ | 21 | $ | (85 | ) | ||||
Total assets |
$ | 18,442 | $ | 4,210 | $ | 22,652 | ||||||
For the 13 weeks ended September 27, 2003
Domestic | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Retail and | Credit and | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Related | Financial | Corporate | Total | Sears | ||||||||||||||||||||
millions | Services | Products | and Other | Domestic | Canada | Consolidated | ||||||||||||||||||
Merchandise sales and services |
$ | 7,342 | $ | -- | $ | 107 | $ | 7,449 | $ | 960 | $ | 8,409 | ||||||||||||
Credit and financial products revenues |
-- | 1,307 | -- | 1,307 | 78 | 1,385 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total revenues |
7,342 | 1,307 | 107 | 8,756 | 1,038 | 9,794 | ||||||||||||||||||
Costs and expenses
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cost of sales, buying and occupancy |
5,415 | -- | 42 | 5,457 | 680 | 6,137 | ||||||||||||||||||
Selling and administrative |
1,694 | 157 | 111 | 1,962 | 267 | 2,229 | ||||||||||||||||||
Provision for uncollectible accounts |
-- | 550 | -- | 550 | 17 | 567 | ||||||||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
182 | 4 | 13 | 199 | 27 | 226 | ||||||||||||||||||
Interest, net |
24 | 230 | -- | 254 | 27 | 281 | ||||||||||||||||||
Special charges |
112 | -- | -- | 112 | -- | 112 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total costs and expenses |
7,427 | 941 | 166 | 8,534 | 1,018 | 9,552 | ||||||||||||||||||
Operating (loss)/income |
$ | (85 | ) | $ | 366 | $ | (59 | ) | $ | 222 | $ | 20 | $ | 242 | ||||||||||
Total assets |
$ | 13,456 | $ | 29,693 | $ | 1,931 | $ | 45,080 | $ | 4,010 | $ | 49,090 | ||||||||||||
15
For the 39 weeks ended October 2, 2004
Sears | ||||||||||||
millions | Domestic | Canada | Consolidated | |||||||||
Merchandise sales and services |
$ | 21,603 | $ | 3,010 | $ | 24,613 | ||||||
Credit and financial products revenues |
-- | 257 | 257 | |||||||||
Total revenues |
21,603 | 3,267 | 24,870 | |||||||||
Costs and expenses
Cost of sales, buying and occupancy |
15,795 | 2,170 | 17,965 | |||||||||
Selling and administrative |
5,107 | 860 | 5,967 | |||||||||
Provision for uncollectible accounts |
-- | 43 | 43 | |||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
634 | 83 | 717 | |||||||||
Interest, net |
129 | 81 | 210 | |||||||||
Special charges |
41 | -- | 41 | |||||||||
Total costs and expenses |
21,706 | 3,237 | 24,943 | |||||||||
Operating (loss)/income |
$ | (103 | ) | $ | 30 | $ | (73 | ) | ||||
Total assets |
$ | 18,442 | $ | 4,210 | $ | 22,652 | ||||||
For the 39 weeks ended September 27, 2003
Domestic | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Retail and | Credit and | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Related | Financial | Corporate | Total | Sears | ||||||||||||||||||||
millions | Services | Products | and Other | Domestic | Canada | Consolidated | ||||||||||||||||||
Merchandise sales and services |
$ | 21,757 | $ | -- | $ | 270 | $ | 22,027 | $ | 2,707 | $ | 24,734 | ||||||||||||
Credit and financial products revenues |
-- | 3,903 | -- | 3,903 | 233 | 4,136 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total revenues |
21,757 | 3,903 | 270 | 25,930 | 2,940 | 28,870 | ||||||||||||||||||
Costs and expenses
Cost of sales, buying and occupancy |
15,991 | -- | 107 | 16,098 | 1,915 | 18,013 | ||||||||||||||||||
Selling and administrative |
4,962 | 590 | 321 | 5,873 | 765 | 6,638 | ||||||||||||||||||
Provision for uncollectible accounts |
-- | 1,467 | -- | 1,467 | 44 | 1,511 | ||||||||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
552 | 13 | 34 | 599 | 82 | 681 | ||||||||||||||||||
Interest, net |
49 | 717 | -- | 766 | 81 | 847 | ||||||||||||||||||
Special charges |
128 | -- | 12 | 140 | -- | 140 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total costs and expenses |
21,682 | 2,787 | 474 | 24,943 | 2,887 | 27,830 | ||||||||||||||||||
Operating income/(loss) |
$ | 75 | $ | 1,116 | $ | (204 | ) | $ | 987 | $ | 53 | $ | 1,040 | |||||||||||
Total assets |
$ | 13,456 | $ | 29,693 | $ | 1,931 | $ | 45,080 | $ | 4,010 | $ | 49,090 | ||||||||||||
16
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of
Sears, Roebuck and Co.
We have reviewed the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets of Sears, Roebuck and Co. as of October 2, 2004 and September 27, 2003, and the related Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations and Cash Flows for the thirteen-week and thirty-nine-week periods ended October 2, 2004 and September 27, 2003. These interim condensed consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Companys management.
We conducted our reviews in accordance with standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). A review of interim financial information consists principally of applying analytical procedures and making inquiries of persons responsible for financial and accounting matters. It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in accordance with standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the objective of which is the expression of an opinion regarding the financial statements taken as a whole. Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.
Based on our reviews, we are not aware of any material modifications that should be made to such condensed consolidated financial statements for them to be in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
As discussed in Note 10, the pro forma disclosure of stock-based compensation required by Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123 has been restated.
We have previously audited, in accordance with standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the Consolidated Balance Sheet of Sears, Roebuck and Co. as of January 3, 2004, and the related Consolidated Statements of Income, Shareholders Equity, and Cash Flows for the year then ended (not presented herein); and in our report dated March 9, 2004, we expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements. In our opinion, the information set forth in the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet as of January 3, 2004, is fairly stated, in all material respects, in relation to the Consolidated Balance Sheet from which it has been derived.
/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP |
DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP |
Chicago, Illinois |
November 8,
2004 (December 1, 2004 as to the effects of the restatement discussed
in Note 10) |
17
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
With the sale of the domestic Credit and Financial Products business in the fourth quarter of 2003, the Companys financial reporting segments for fiscal 2004 were changed to reflect two operating segments a Domestic segment and a Sears Canada segment.
Domestic consisting of:
- | Full-line Stores: includes merchandise sales as well as the operations of Sears Auto Centers and Sears Grands, and online revenues of sears.com | |||
- | Specialty Stores: includes the operations of Dealer Stores, Hardware Stores, The Great Indoors (TGI), Commercial Sales and Outlet stores. National Tire & Battery (NTB) operations are reflected in the 2003 results through November 29, 2003 | |||
- | Direct to Customer: includes Lands End online, catalog and retail store operations as well as direct marketing of goods and services through specialty catalogs and other direct channels | |||
- | Home Services: includes product repair services, product protection agreements and installation services for all major brands of home products; also includes home improvement services, primarily siding, windows and cabinet refacing, carpet cleaning and the installation and servicing of residential heating and cooling systems |
- | Sears Financial Services: includes revenues earned under the long-term marketing and servicing alliance with Citigroup | |||
- | Corporate: includes activities that are of an overall holding company nature of its Domestic operations, primarily consisting of administrative activities | |||
- | Credit and Financial Products: includes the 2003 results of operations of the domestic Credit and Financial Products business (sold on November 3, 2003) |
Sears Canada conducts retail, credit and corporate operations through Sears Canada Inc. (Sears Canada), a consolidated, 54.3% owned subsidiary of Sears
OVERVIEW AND CONSOLIDATED OPERATIONS
Sears, Roebuck and Co., together with its consolidated subsidiaries (the Company), is one of the largest retailers in the United States and Canada with a 118-year history of providing high quality merchandise and related services to a broad array of customers. The Companys vision is to be the preferred and most trusted resource for products and services that enhance its customers homes and family life. The Companys mission is to grow the business by providing quality products and services at a great value. We aspire to make these products and services available to customers through a wide network of multiple channels, including 2,300 Sears-branded and affiliated stores in the United States and Canada, a home services network with over 10,000 technicians, leading internet sites including sears.com, sears.ca and landsend.com and direct to customer catalog programs.
Fiscal 2003 was an important transition year for the Company. On November 3, 2003, the Company completed the sale of its domestic Credit and Financial Products business, including its clubs and services business (Credit), to Citigroup and entered into a long-term marketing and servicing alliance with Citigroup. Additionally, on November 29, 2003, the Company sold NTB to TBC Corporation.
These divestitures, along with the beginning of a new strategic relationship with Citigroup, have created a Company with a pure retail focus who can offer strong proprietary and national brands and unparalleled services.
18
While the Companys focus in 2004 was to achieve more consistent revenue growth with improved margins, results through the third quarter have been disappointing.
Third quarter results and comparisons to the prior year were negatively impacted by a number of factors, including:
| a challenging macroeconomic environment, particularly the current year impact of fuel prices on consumer spending and the prior year benefit to consumers from tax rebates; | ||
| less than favorable weather conditions for much of the quarter; | ||
| disruption caused by business resets and product transitions completed in the current year quarter, followed by a slower than expected ramp up of sales following the resets; and | ||
| deeper than expected markdowns in order to clear seasonal and slower moving inventory as a result of the lower than expected sales trends. |
The Company is taking actions to address the below expectations profit level and Company-specific issues experienced during the quarter. These actions, some of which will contribute to near-term improvements, but more importantly aimed at improving the long-term performance of the business, include:
| strengthening product assortments by: |
- | introducing a number of innovative products within home appliances and home improvement that offer both high-performance and high-efficiency, and | ||
- | increasing the fashion content within its apparel offering, including the introduction of two new proprietary brands Structure and A|Line; |
| focusing on improved gross margin performance by: |
- | better leveraging its preferred vendor relationships, | ||
- | increasing the amount of product that is sourced directly, | ||
- | introducing Profit Logic, a system that provides innovative inventory analytics, to certain parts of the apparel business, and | ||
- | over time, transitioning to an allocation process allowing us to better assort product to store-specific demographics as well as more effectively replenish product during the selling season based upon rate of sale; and |
| identifying ways to reduce the level of capital invested in store remodels to improve overall efficiency of the Companys capital expenditures. |
Another important component of improving the Companys long-term performance is to provide better access to its products. The Company has aggressively focused on increasing its presence outside of the traditional mall-based formats. During the third quarter, the Company expanded its off-mall presence by:
| acquiring ownership or leasehold interest in 50 off-mall stores in key Sears markets from Kmart Holding Corporation for approximately $576 million. Sears expects to take possession of the stores in the Spring of 2005 and is targeting to open the stores under Sears nameplates by the end of 2005; | ||
| subleasing six stores from Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. Sears has taken possession of two stores and is targeting to take possession of two stores in 2005 and two stores in 2006; and | ||
| accelerating the development of its new Sears Grand format from three locations to up to 10 locations by the end of 2005 with further growth in 2006. |
The acquired stores are a unique opportunity to rapidly enter attractive markets for the Company. The newly acquired stores will offer a relevant subset of traditional categories, including apparel, home appliances, home electronics, home improvement and home fashions, plus consumables and transactional items. Where possible, the floor design of the new stores will be on one level, utilizing a common layout similar to the open-racetrack design of existing Sears Grand stores, with exit cashiering near the front entrance/exit.
19
SEARS, ROEBUCK AND CO.
The initial results of the Companys three Sears Grand stores have been encouraging as the customer response to the new format has been favorable and revenue levels have been above expectations. Including the four Sears Grand stores opened as of October 31, 2004, the Company expects to be operating up to 10 Sears Grand stores by the end of 2005.
While management believes it is taking the necessary actions to address the Companys near-term issues, the Company undertook a review of its business plans, specifically focusing on Full-line Stores, for the remainder of the year. Based upon that review, the Company concluded it was appropriate to lower the fourth quarter sales and gross margin assumptions and to adjust the business plans for the upcoming holiday season. This revision, coupled with the sales and gross margin performance over the past two quarters, resulted in the Company lowering its full-year guidance.
Overall, the Companys operating results for the 13 and 39 weeks ended October 2, 2004 reflect the challenges faced this year. A summary of the consolidated results of operations is as follows:
13 Weeks Ended | 39 Weeks Ended | |||||||||||||||
millions, except per share data | October 2, | September 27, | October 2, | September 27, | ||||||||||||
2004 | 2003 | 2004 | 2003 | |||||||||||||
Merchandise sales and services revenues |
$ | 8,210 | $ | 8,409 | $ | 24,613 | $ | 24,734 | ||||||||
Domestic comparable store sales |
-4.0 | % | +1.2 | % | -1.9 | % | -2.9 | % | ||||||||
Credit and financial products revenues |
85 | 1,385 | 257 | 4,136 | ||||||||||||
Total revenues |
$ | 8,295 | $ | 9,794 | $ | 24,870 | $ | 28,870 | ||||||||
Gross margin rate |
26.2 | % | 27.0 | % | 27.0 | % | 27.2 | % | ||||||||
Selling and administrative expense as a percentage of total revenues |
24.2 | % | 22.8 | % | 24.0 | % | 23.0 | % | ||||||||
Operating (loss)/income |
$ | (85 | ) | $ | 242 | $ | (73 | ) | $ | 1,040 | ||||||
Other income, net |
$ | 6 | $ | 2 | $ | 58 | $ | 16 | ||||||||
(Loss)/income before income taxes, minority interest and cumulative effect of change in accounting principle |
$ | (79 | ) | $ | 244 | $ | (15 | ) | $ | 1,056 | ||||||
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle |
$ | -- | $ | -- | $ | (839 | ) | $ | -- | |||||||
Net (loss)/income |
$ | (61 | ) | $ | 147 | $ | (867 | ) | $ | 648 | ||||||
(Loss)/earnings
per share diluted |
$ | (0.29 | ) | $ | 0.52 | $ | (4.03 | ) | $ | 2.17 | ||||||
(Loss)/earnings per share before cumulative effect of change in accounting principle |
$ | (0.29 | ) | $ | 0.52 | $ | (0.13 | ) | $ | 2.17 |
Effective January 4, 2004, the Company changed its method for recognizing gains and losses for both its domestic pension and postretirement benefit plans. The Company began recognizing experience gains and losses on a more current basis, while under its previous methods, the Company amortized experience gains and losses over future service periods. As a result of this accounting change, the Company recorded an after-tax charge of $839 million, or $3.81 per share, in the first quarter of 2004 for the cumulative effect of change in accounting principle. The charge represents the recognition of unamortized experience losses at the beginning of 2004 in accordance with the new accounting methods.
The results of operations for the 13- and 39-week periods ended September 27, 2003 include the results of operations for the divested businesses, Credit and NTB.
20
SEARS, ROEBUCK AND CO.
The Company believes that an understanding of its reported results and its ongoing financial performance is not complete without considering the impact the following items had on the results of operations for the 13- and 39-week periods ended October 2, 2004 and September 27, 2003. These items relate to (i) significant divestitures, (ii) changes in accounting method, and (iii) significant restructuring activities. Items like these affect the Companys results from time to time. However, the amounts of these types of items may vary significantly from period to period and have a disproportionate effect on the periods presented, which affects the comparability of the Companys financial performance. Management considers the total impact of these items, along with reported results, when they review and evaluate the Companys financial performance.
13 Weeks Ended | 39 Weeks Ended | |||||||||||||||
millions | October 2, | September 27, | October 2, | September 27, | ||||||||||||
2004 | 2003 | 2004 | 2003 | |||||||||||||
Negative carry related to Credit legacy debt and related debt retirement costs |
$ | 14 | $ | -- | $ | 71 | $ | -- | ||||||||
Curtailment gain on post-retirement medical plans |
-- | -- | (30 | ) | -- | |||||||||||
Employment termination costs |
-- | -- | 41 | 28 | ||||||||||||
Charges associated with the refinement of TGI business strategy |
-- | 141 | -- | 141 | ||||||||||||
Accelerated depreciation resulting from CSC purchased services transaction |
-- | -- | 39 | -- | ||||||||||||
Pro forma effects on the prior year: |
||||||||||||||||
Divested businesses: |
||||||||||||||||
Operating income |
-- | (375 | ) | -- | (1,144 | ) | ||||||||||
Zero-percent financing costs |
-- | 67 | -- | 184 | ||||||||||||
Pro forma revenues earned under Citigroup alliance |
-- | 39 | -- | 112 | ||||||||||||
Total divested businesses |
-- | (269 | ) | -- | (848 | ) | ||||||||||
Domestic retirement plan accounting change |
-- | 18 | -- | 51 | ||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 14 | $ | (110 | ) | $ | 121 | $ | (628 | ) | ||||||
| The decrease in merchandise sales and services revenues for the 13- and 39-week periods ended October 2, 2004 was primarily due to domestic comparable store sales declines, as well as the prior years results including $115 and $320 million, respectively, of revenues attributable to the divested NTB business. Third quarter domestic revenues were unfavorably impacted by several significant factors, including challenging weather conditions for much of the quarter, disruption caused by business resets and product transitions and prior year comparisons to strong consumer spending following tax rebates. | |||
| Credit and Financial Products revenues were lower than the prior year for the 13- and 39-week periods ended October 2, 2004, as a result of the sale of Credit in the fourth quarter of 2003. Domestic revenues generated in the 13- and 39-week periods ended September 27, 2003 were $1.3 billion and $3.9 billion, respectively. The current year revenues reflect solely the credit business of Sears Canada. | |||
| The decline in the gross margin rates for the 13- and 39-week periods ended October 2, 2004 is reflective of higher levels of clearance activity coupled with the need to take deeper markdowns in order to clear seasonal and slower moving inventory as a result of the weak sales trends. |
21
SEARS, ROEBUCK AND CO.
| Selling and administrative expenses as a percentage of total revenues increased for the 13- and 39-week periods ended October 2, 2004 primarily due to the divestiture of Credit and NTB, as well as lower overall sales in its domestic retail channels. |
SEGMENT OPERATIONS
The Company is organized into two principal business segments Domestic and Sears Canada. Following is a discussion of results of operations by business segment.
Domestic
Domestic results and key statistics were as follows:
13 Weeks Ended | 39 Weeks Ended | |||||||||||||||
October 2, | September 27, | October 2, | September 27, | |||||||||||||
millions | 2004 | 2003 (2) | 2004 | 2003 (2) | ||||||||||||
Full-line Stores |
$ | 4,984 | $ | 5,178 | $ | 15,122 | $ | 15,291 | ||||||||
Specialty Stores |
1,168 | 1,268 | 3,527 | 3,757 | ||||||||||||
Direct to Customer |
314 | 337 | 997 | 1,078 | ||||||||||||
Home Services |
675 | 666 | 1,957 | 1,901 | ||||||||||||
Merchandise sales and services revenues |
7,141 | 7,449 | 21,603 | 22,027 | ||||||||||||
Credit and financial products revenues |
-- | 1,307 | -- | 3,903 | ||||||||||||
Total Domestic revenues |
7,141 | 8,756 | 21,603 | 25,930 | ||||||||||||
Cost of sales, buying and occupancy |
5,289 | 5,457 | 15,795 | 16,098 | ||||||||||||
Gross margin rate |
25.9 | % | 26.7 | % | 26.9 | % | 26.9 | % | ||||||||
Selling and administrative |
1,720 | 1,962 | 5,107 | 5,873 | ||||||||||||
Selling and administrative expense as a percentage
of total revenues |
24.1 | % | 22.4 | % | 23.6 | % | 22.6 | % | ||||||||
Provision for uncollectible accounts |
-- | 550 | -- | 1,467 | ||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
199 | 199 | 634 | 599 | ||||||||||||
Interest, net |
39 | 254 | 129 | 766 | ||||||||||||
Special charges |
-- | 112 | 41 | 140 | ||||||||||||
Total costs and expenses |
7,247 | 8,534 | 21,706 | 24,943 | ||||||||||||
Operating (loss)/income |
$ | (106 | ) | $ | 222 | $ | (103 | ) | $ | 987 | ||||||
Number of: |
||||||||||||||||
Full-line Stores |
871 | 869 | ||||||||||||||
Specialty Stores |
1,115 | 1,314 | ||||||||||||||
Lands End Retail Stores |
17 | 16 | ||||||||||||||
Total Retail Stores |
2,003 | 2,199 | ||||||||||||||
Comparable store sales percentage increase/(decrease) (1) |
||||||||||||||||
Home Group |
-2.9 | % | +2.7 | % | -0.5 | % | -2.3 | % | ||||||||
Apparel/accessories |
-8.1 | % | +1.7 | % | -6.4 | % | -3.5 | % | ||||||||
Full-line Stores |
-4.7 | % | +1.4 | % | -2.5 | % | -3.0 | % | ||||||||
Specialty Stores |
+0.3 | % | +0.3 | % | +1.2 | % | -2.6 | % | ||||||||
Total |
-4.0 | % | +1.2 | % | -1.9 | % | -2.9 | % |
(2) Includes the results of operations for the divested businesses of Credit and NTB.
22
SEARS, ROEBUCK AND CO.
Domestic merchandise sales and services revenues decreased 4.1% and 1.9%, respectively, in the 13 and 39 weeks ended October 2, 2004 due to domestic comparable store sales declines and a reduction in revenues of $115 and $320 million, respectively, due to the divestiture of NTB in the fourth quarter of 2003.
Full-line Stores revenues decreased 3.7% in the 13-week period ended October 2, 2004, due to declines in both the Home and Apparel businesses. Within Apparel, sales decreases were observed in all major categories, with more significant declines occurring in seasonal, weather-related product lines. A lower than expected back-to-school season coupled with unseasonably warm weather in September negatively impacted apparel sales. Within the Home Group, sales declines were due to a number of factors, including the favorable impact to last years revenues following tax rebates, greater than anticipated sales disruption associated with the reset of the consumer electronics business and cooler weather in July and August, which negatively impacted home appliance sales.
The decrease in Specialty Stores revenues for the 13- and 39-week periods ended October 2, 2004 is due to the divestiture of NTB, which contributed $115 and $320 million of sales, respectively, during the same periods last year. On July 10, 2004, the Company acquired Standards of Excellence, a San Diego-based supplier of premium appliances, designer fixtures and decorative hardware. Standards of Excellence reported $18 million of sales during the 13 weeks ended October 2, 2004. Comparable store sales for the 13-week period ended October 2, 2004 were flat as increases at The Great Indoors were offset by declines in hardware and dealer stores.
Direct to Customer revenues for the 13- and 39-week periods ended October 2, 2004 declined primarily due to the Lands End direct to customer business experiencing softer customer response, versus prior year, to its Spring/Summer catalog offerings, the continued channel shift of business to the Full-line Stores and lower comparable levels of clearance inventory.
Home Services revenues increased for the 13- and 39-week periods ended October 2, 2004 resulting from increases in product repair services, specifically product protection agreements and parts sales, as well as increases in the windows and kitchen remodeling categories within the Sears Home Improvement business.
The decrease in the gross margin rate for the 13-week period ended October 2, 2004 was due to increased markdowns taken in consumer electronics, home appliances and apparel more than offsetting the $39 million of revenues earned under the long-term alliance with Citigroup. Within consumer electronics, the Company aggressively marked down discontinued inventory in anticipation of its business reset. Within home appliances, clearance markdowns were taken in advance of new product arrivals and to eliminate excess outlet store inventory. Within apparel, the Company accelerated markdowns of in-season products to clear slow-moving and seasonal items. The gross margin rate for the 39-week period ended October 2, 2004 was flat as the $109 million of revenues earned under the long-term alliance with Citigroup were offset by declines in gross margin experienced in the third quarter.
The increase in selling and administrative expense as a percentage of total revenues for the 13 and 39 weeks ended October 2, 2004 was primarily due to the divestitures of Credit and NTB coupled with lower overall sales.
The decline in interest expense was primarily due to the prior year results including $231 million and $717 million of interest expense associated with the divested Credit business for the 13 and 39 weeks ended September 27, 2003, respectively. Interest expense for the 13- and 39-week periods ended October 2, 2004 included $14 million and $71 million, respectively, related to the negative carrying costs associated with the Credit legacy debt.
Special charges and impairments for the 39-week period ended October 2, 2004 included a severance charge of $41 million associated with the termination of 3,300 associates resulting from the Companys extensive review of its headquarters and field operations following the sale of Credit. Special charges and impairments for the 13-week period ended September 27, 2003 included costs related to asset impairment, contractual obligations and
23
SEARS, ROEBUCK AND CO.
employee terminations incurred in connection with the Companys refinement of its TGI business. The total pretax charge associated with the refinement was $141 million. $29 million of this charge was related to inventory clearance costs and was recorded in cost of sales, buying and occupancy. During the second quarter of 2003, the Company recorded a $28 million pretax charge for severance costs associated with the Companys productivity improvement initiatives.
Sears Canada
Sears Canada results were as follows:
millions | 13 Weeks Ended | 39 Weeks Ended | ||||||||||||||
October 2, | September 27, | October 2, | September 27, | |||||||||||||
2004 | 2003 | 2004 | 2003 | |||||||||||||
Merchandise sales and services |
$ | 1,069 | $ | 960 | $ | 3,010 | $ | 2,707 | ||||||||
Credit revenues |
85 | 78 | 257 | 233 | ||||||||||||
Total revenues |
1,154 | 1,038 | 3,267 | 2,940 | ||||||||||||
Cost of sales, buying and occupancy |
773 | 680 | 2,170 | 1,915 | ||||||||||||
Gross margin rate |
27.7 | % | 29.2 | % | 27.9 | % | 29.3 | % | ||||||||
Selling and administrative |
289 | 267 | 860 | 765 | ||||||||||||
Selling and administrative expense as a percentage
of total revenues |
25.0 | % | 25.7 | % | 26.3 | % | 26.0 | % | ||||||||
Provision for uncollectible accounts |
16 | 17 | 43 | 44 | ||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
28 | 27 | 83 | 82 | ||||||||||||
Interest |
27 | 27 | 81 | 81 | ||||||||||||
Total costs and expenses |
1,133 | 1,018 | 3,237 | 2,887 | ||||||||||||
Operating income |
$ | 21 | $ | 20 | $ | 30 | $ | 53 | ||||||||
Foreign exchange rate (quarterly average) (US$/C$) |
0.7650 | 0.7234 | 0.7532 | 0.6974 |
Merchandise sales and services increased by 11.4% and 11.2%, respectively, for the 13 and 39 weeks ended October 2, 2004 as compared to the prior year due to the strengthening of the Canadian dollar as well as an overall increase in local currency sales over the prior year periods. Foreign currency accounted for approximately 6.1% and 8.2%, respectively, of the increase in merchandise sales and services, resulting in an underlying Canadian dollar increase of 5.3% and 3.0%, respectively. For the 13 weeks ended October 2, 2004, sales improved in home and hardlines categories such as appliances and seasonal goods, while sales of apparel and accessories were mixed primarily due to unseasonable weather conditions. For the 39 weeks ended October 2, 2004, sales improved in the home and hardlines categories, particularly, appliances and furniture, with sales in apparel and accessories posting an overall decrease as compared to the prior year.
Credit revenues increased 9.0% and 10.3%, respectively, for the 13 and 39 weeks ended October 2, 2004 primarily due to the strengthening of the Canadian dollar. Within the Sears Canada credit operations, the net charge-off rate decreased to 4.7% in the third quarter of 2004 from 6.3% in the third quarter of 2003. For the 39-week periods ended October 2, 2004 and September 27, 2003, the net charge-off rates were 4.9% and 5.6%, respectively.
The decrease in gross margin rate for the 13 and 39 weeks ended October 2, 2004 reflects a shift in sales mix from higher margin categories, such as apparel and catalog sales, to sales of lower margin products, such as home appliances, in its stores. In addition, Sears Canada took additional promotional and clearance markdowns to reduce seasonal inventories.
24
SEARS, ROEBUCK AND CO.
The decrease in selling and administrative expenses as a percentage of total revenues for the 13 weeks ended October 2, 2004 is primarily due to a decrease in advertising expense in the quarter, lower headcount and stronger expense management. These factors were partially offset by expenses related to additional restructuring activities that occurred during the third quarter of 2004. The increase in selling and administrative expenses as a percentage of total revenues for the 39 weeks ended October 2, 2004 was primarily due to a $12 million pretax charge recorded in the first quarter of 2004 related to Sears Canadas decision to license Sears Canada Auto Centers to three auto service providers and other restructuring activities.
ANALYSIS OF CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL CONDITION
The Company ended the third quarter of 2004 with approximately $2.9 billion of cash and available-for-sale securities, a decrease of $6.2 billion from year-end 2003. During the 39-week period ended October 2, 2004, the Company utilized cash proceeds from the sale of Credit for working capital needs as well as to retire $2.5 billion of domestic term debt and repurchase $1.1 billion of common shares. The Company also used proceeds to pay approximately $1.3 billion of taxes associated with the sale of Credit. The Company expects to continue its share repurchase activities and to retire an additional $150 million of domestic term debt in the fourth quarter of 2004. The Company is currently targeting, exclusive of seasonal working capital requirements, domestic funded term debt, less cash and investments, of approximately $1.5 billion. The Company may from time to time consider selective strategic transactions to create value and improve performance, which may include acquisitions, dispositions, restructurings, joint ventures and partnerships.
Financing Activities
The Companys financing activities include net borrowings, dividend payments and share issuances and repurchases. The Companys total debt balances as of October 2, 2004, September 27, 2003 and January 3, 2004 were as follows:
October 2, 2004 | September 27, 2003 | January 3, 2004 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Sears | Sears | Sears | ||||||||||||||||||||||
millions | Domestic | Canada | Domestic | Canada | Domestic | Canada | ||||||||||||||||||
Short-term borrowings |
$ | 754 | $ | 69 | $ | 6,004 | $ | 175 | $ | 719 | $ | 314 | ||||||||||||
Long-term debt (including current portion): |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Long-term borrowings |
2,870 | 1,426 | 22,779 | 1,317 | 5,336 | 1,245 | ||||||||||||||||||
Capitalized lease obligations |
341 | 139 | 371 | 140 | 355 | 142 | ||||||||||||||||||
SFAS No. 133 hedge accounting adjustment |
80 | -- | 510 | -- | 90 | -- | ||||||||||||||||||
Total debt |
$ | 4,045 | $ | 1,634 | $ | 29,664 | $ | 1,632 | $ | 6,500 | $ | 1,701 | ||||||||||||
The decrease in total debt from January 3, 2004 is primarily due to the retirement of $2.5 billion of domestic term debt.
The Company continues to use interest rate derivatives to synthetically convert fixed rate debt to variable rate debt. The interest rate derivatives qualify as fair value hedges in accordance with SFAS No. 133 Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, and as such are recorded on the balance sheet at market value with an offsetting entry to the underlying hedged item, which is debt.
25
SEARS, ROEBUCK AND CO.
Liquidity
Historically, the Company has been an active borrower in various capital markets due to the funding needs of its domestic credit card receivables portfolio. As a result of the sale of Credit, the Companys need to access the capital markets has been greatly reduced. The Companys primary need for liquidity will be to fund the seasonal working capital requirements of its retail businesses and capital expenditures. These needs will be funded primarily with the Companys cash and investment portfolio as well as operating cash flows.
The Companys total cash and available-for-sale investment portfolio as of October 2, 2004, September 27, 2003 and January 3, 2004 were as follows:
October 2, 2004 | September 27, 2003 | January 3, 2004 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Sears | Sears | Sears | ||||||||||||||||||||||
millions | Domestic | Canada | Domestic | Canada | Domestic | Canada | ||||||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 2,628 | $ | 106 | $ | 1,469 | $ | 77 | $ | 8,959 | $ | 98 | ||||||||||||
Available-for-sale securities |
138 | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | ||||||||||||||||||
Total cash and available-for-sale investments |
$ | 2,766 | $ | 106 | $ | 1,469 | $ | 77 | $ | 8,959 | $ | 98 | ||||||||||||
In order to ensure liquidity and provide additional capacity, the Company intends to maintain access to capital markets. The Companys domestic wholly-owned financing subsidiary, Sears Roebuck Acceptance Corp. (SRAC), has an unsecured, three-year revolving credit facility in the amount of $2.0 billion. This committed credit facility provides support for SRACs domestic direct-issue commercial paper program and is available for other general corporate purposes. No borrowings were outstanding under this credit facility at the end of the third quarter of 2004. This facility and other debt agreements require SRAC to maintain specified fixed charge coverage ratios, and the credit facility requires the Companys domestic segment to maintain a minimum level of tangible net worth and a minimum interest coverage ratio. SRAC and the Company were in compliance with these covenants at October 2, 2004. This credit facility does not contain provisions that would restrict borrowings based on material adverse changes or credit ratings. In addition, Sears Canada has a $0.5 billion committed credit facility.
The ratings of the Companys domestic debt securities are as follows:
Moody's | Standard & | |||||
Investors | Fitch | Poor's Ratings | ||||
Service | Ratings | Services | ||||
Unsecured long-term debt
|
Baa1 | BBB- | BBB | |||
Unsecured commercial paper
|
P-2 | F3 | A-2 |
On October 25, 2004, Fitch Ratings lowered the Companys long-term debt from BBB and its short-term debt rating from F2, with a negative rating outlook. On October 21, 2004, Standard & Poors Ratings Services (Standards & Poors) placed both the Companys short- and long-term debt ratings on CreditWatch with negative implications, and Moodys Investors Services (Moodys) placed the Companys unsecured long-term debt rating on review for possible downgrade and affirmed its short-term rating at P-2. The Company expects the Standard & Poors and Moodys ratings reviews to be completed following the fourth quarter.
A downgrade of the Companys short-term rating by Standard & Poors would reduce its flexibility to issue commercial paper, affecting the cost, placement term and, potentially, the amount of short-term debt available. However, the Company has cash and investments to refund all commercial paper outstanding as well as to meet near term working capital needs. Although Moodys affirmed the Companys short-term debt rating, a downgrade of that rating by Moodys would have a similar effect on the Companys short-term borrowing flexibility.
26
SEARS, ROEBUCK AND CO.
The Company does not expect that a one notch downgrade of its long-term debt by either Standard & Poors or Moodys would substantially affect its ability to access the term debt capital markets. However, depending upon market conditions, the amount, timing, and pricing of new borrowings could be adversely affected. If two or more of the Companys domestic long-term debt ratings are downgraded to below BBB-/Baa3, the Companys flexibility to access the term debt capital markets would be reduced. In the event of a downgrade of the Companys long-term debt, the cost of borrowing and fees payable under SRACs credit facility could increase.
None of the Companys borrowing arrangements have provisions that would require repayment of principal prior to maturity due to a ratings downgrade.
SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND CRITICAL ESTIMATES
The Companys significant accounting policies are discussed in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements that are included in the Companys 2003 Annual Report on Form 10-K that is filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. In most cases, the accounting policies utilized by the Company are the only ones permissible under U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles for businesses in its industry. However, the application of certain of these policies requires significant judgment or a complex estimation process that can affect the results of operations and financial position of the Company, as well as additional information provided in its related footnote disclosures. The Company bases its estimates on historical experience and other assumptions that it believes are reasonable. If actual amounts are ultimately different from previous estimates, the revisions are included in the Companys results of operations for the period in which the actual amounts become known. The accounting policies and estimates that can have a significant impact on the operating results, financial position and footnote disclosures of the Company are described in the Management Discussion and Analysis in the Companys 2003 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Defined benefit retirement plans
The fundamental components of accounting for defined benefit retirement plans consist of the compensation cost of the benefits earned, the interest cost from deferring payment of those benefits into the future and the results of investing any assets set aside to fund the obligation. Such retirement benefits are earned by associates ratably over their service careers; therefore the amounts reported in the income statement for these retirement plans have historically followed the same pattern. Accordingly, changes in the obligations or the value of assets to fund it have been recognized systematically and gradually over the associates estimated period of service. This systematic and gradual recognition of changes has been accomplished by amortizing experience gains/losses in excess of the 10% corridor into expense over the associate service period and by recognizing the difference between actual and expected asset returns over a five-year period.
As discussed in Note 9 of the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, the Company changed its method of accounting for its domestic defined benefit plans to immediately recognize any experience gains or loss in excess of the 10% corridor and to value plan assets at fair value. The Company believes that the new method is preferable in light of changes made to its domestic benefit plans to discontinue providing pension and retiree medical benefits to associates under the age of 40 as the new policy accelerates recognition of events which have already occurred. As a result of this accounting method change, the Company recorded an after-tax charge of $839 million in the first quarter of 2004 for the cumulative effect of the change in accounting principle.
Under its new accounting method, the Companys pension expense in future periods may be more volatile as this method accelerates recognition of actual experience. Furthermore, because the domestic pension plans unrecognized loss will be at the 10% corridor limit at the beginning of 2004, additional pension expense will be
27
SEARS, ROEBUCK AND CO.
recognized in 2004 for the full amount of any experience losses realized in 2004. The largest drivers of experience losses in recent years have been the discount rate used to determine the present value of the obligation and the actual return on pension assets.
CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS AND OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS
During the 13- and 39- week periods ended October 2, 2004, the Company retired $23 million and $2.5 billion, respectively, of domestic term debt. In addition, the Company issued a guarantee of SRACs borrowings outstanding under its three-year unsecured credit facility. As of October 2, 2004, there were no outstanding borrowings under this facility.
STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION
As discussed in the Companys 2003 Annual Report on Form 10-K, the Company follows Accounting Principles Board Opinion (APB) No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, which does not require recognition of expense for stock options when the exercise price of an option equals, or exceeds, the fair market value of the common stock on the date of grant.
The Financial Accounting Standards Board has released an Exposure Draft, Share-Based Payment An Amendment to FASB Statements No. 123 and 95, which revises the rules governing stock option accounting. The exposure draft requires expense recognition of stock options and certain employee stock purchase plans in the statements of operations. The comment period ended June 30, 2004. The effective date for this statement is expected to be third quarter fiscal 2005. The Company will adopt any new rules required by the FASB when they are effective. The pro forma impact on the 13- and 39- week periods ended October 2, 2004 of expensing unvested stock options is disclosed, as required under FASB Statement No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, in Note 10 of the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
OUTLOOK
For the full year, the Company now expects earnings per share, before the cumulative effect of change in accounting principle, but including $0.24 per share related to the second quarter severance related costs and additional depreciation, to be between $1.46 and $1.66. This outlook reflects the lower than expected year-to-date results, assumes fourth quarter domestic comparable store sales to be flat and lowers the projected fourth quarter gross margin rates. This outlook also includes the negative carrying cost of approximately $0.20 to $0.25 per share on the Companys remaining legacy debt related to Credit.
CAUTIONARY STATEMENT REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION
The above Outlook and certain other statements made in this quarterly report on Form 10-Q and in other public announcements by the Company are forward-looking statements that are subject to risks and uncertainties that may cause the Companys actual results, performance or achievements to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by these forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements include information concerning the Companys future financial performance, business strategy, plans, goals and objectives. Statements preceded by, followed by or that otherwise include the words believes, expects, anticipates, intends, estimates, plans, forecasts, is likely to, projected and
28
SEARS, ROEBUCK AND CO.
similar expressions or future or conditional verbs such as will, should, would, may and could are generally forward-looking in nature and not historical facts.
Following are some of the risks and uncertainties that could affect its financial condition or results of operations, and could cause actual results, performance or achievements to differ materially from the future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by these forward-looking statements: competitive conditions in retail and related services industries; changes in consumer confidence, tastes, preferences and spending; the availability and level of consumer debt; the successful execution of, and customer response to, the Companys strategic initiatives, including the Full-line Store strategy and the conversion and integration of the Kmart and Wal-Mart stores and other new store locations; the pace of growth in the Companys store locations, which may be higher or lower than anticipated; the possibility that the Company will identify new business and strategic options for one or more of its business segments, potentially including selective acquisitions, dispositions, restructurings, joint ventures and partnerships; trade restrictions, tariffs, and other factors potentially affecting the Companys ability to find qualified vendors and access products in an efficient manner; the Companys ability to successfully implement its initiatives to improve its inventory management capabilities; the outcome of pending legal proceedings; anticipated cash flow; social and political conditions such as war, political unrest and terrorism or natural disasters; the possibility of negative investment returns in the Companys pension plan; changes in interest rates; volatility in financial markets; changes in the Companys debt ratings, credit spreads and cost of funds; the possibility of interruptions in systematically accessing the public debt markets; general economic conditions and normal business uncertainty. In addition, the Company typically earns a disproportionate share of its operating income in the fourth quarter due to seasonal buying patterns, which are difficult to forecast with certainty. Additional discussion of these and other risks and uncertainties is contained elsewhere in this Item 2 and in Item 3, Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.
While the Company believes that its forecasts and assumptions are reasonable, it cautions that actual results may differ materially. The Company intends the forward-looking statements to speak only as of the time first made and does not undertake to update or revise them as more information becomes available.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
The nature of market risks faced by the Company at October 2, 2004 are the same as disclosed in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended January 3, 2004. As of October 2, 2004 and September 27, 2003, 48% and 78%, respectively, of the Companys funding portfolio was variable rate (including fixed rate debt synthetically converted to variable rate through the use of derivative financial instruments). Based on the size of the Companys variable rate funding portfolio at October 2, 2004 and September 27, 2003, which totaled $2.7 billion and $24.1 billion, respectively, an immediate 100 basis point change in interest rates would have affected annual pretax funding costs by approximately $27 million and $241 million, respectively. These estimates do not take into account the effect on revenue resulting from invested cash or the returns on assets being funded. These estimates also assume that the variable rate funding portfolio remains constant for an annual period and that the interest rate change occurs at the beginning of the period. As a result of the sale of Credit, the Companys domestic funding requirements have declined such that it is unlikely that current maturities of domestic term debt will be refinanced and, therefore, such current debt maturities are not considered variable rate in the calculation above. Prior to the sale, it was assumed that these current maturities of fixed rate term debt would be refinanced and were considered variable rate due to the interest rate risk upon refinancing. Under the methodology used prior to the sale, at September 27, 2003, approximately 79% of the Companys funding portfolio was variable rate debt.
29
SEARS, ROEBUCK AND CO.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
The Companys management, including Alan J. Lacy, Chairman of the Board of Directors, President and Chief Executive Officer (principal executive officer), and Glenn R. Richter, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (principal financial officer), have evaluated the effectiveness of the Companys disclosure controls and procedures, as such term is defined in Rule 13a-15(e) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, (the Exchange Act). Based upon their evaluation, the principal executive officer and principal financial officer concluded that, as of the end of the period covered by this report, the Companys disclosure controls and procedures were effective for the purpose of ensuring that the information required to be disclosed in the reports that the Company files or submits under the Exchange Act with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC) (1) is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SECs rules and forms, and (2) is accumulated and communicated to the Companys management, including its principal executive and principal financial officers, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. In addition, based on that evaluation, no change in the Companys internal control over financial reporting occurred during the quarter ended October 2, 2004 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Companys internal control over financial reporting.
30
SEARS, ROEBUCK AND CO.
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
Pending against the Company and certain of its officers and directors are a number of lawsuits that relate to the credit card business and public statements about it. The Company believes that all of these claims lack merit and is defending against them vigorously.
| On and after October 18, 2002, several actions were filed in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois against the Company and certain current and former officers alleging that certain public announcements by the Company concerning its credit card business violated Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder. The Court has consolidated the actions and certified the consolidated action as a class action. Discovery is underway. Trial is scheduled to begin on August 8, 2005. | |||
| On and after November 15, 2002, several actions were filed in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois against the Company, certain officers and directors, and alleged fiduciaries of Sears 401(k) Savings Plan (the Plan), seeking damages and equitable relief under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA). The plaintiffs purport to represent participants in the Plan, and allege breaches of fiduciary duties under ERISA in connection with the Plans investment in the Companys common shares and alleged communications made to Plan participants regarding the Companys financial condition. These actions have been consolidated into a single action. Discovery is underway. No trial date has been set. | |||
| On October 23, 2002, a purported derivative action was filed in the Supreme Court of the State of New York against the Company (as a nominal defendant) and certain current and former directors seeking damages on behalf of the Company. The complaint purports to allege a breach of fiduciary duty by the directors with respect to the Companys management of the credit card business. On June 21, 2004, the Court dismissed the complaint because the plaintiff had filed the suit without having demanded that the Board of Directors bring the suit. The plaintiff has filed a notice of appeal from that ruling. Two similar actions (the Cook County actions) were filed in the Circuit Court of Cook County, Illinois (the Illinois state court), and a third (the federal derivative action) was filed in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois. All three actions were stayed pending the disposition of the action in New York. In light of the New York courts decision, the Illinois state court lifted the stay of the Cook County actions and reinstated a motion to dismiss which the defendants had filed prior to the stay. On September 30, 2004, the Illinois state court granted the defendants motion to dismiss on the ground that the plaintiff had filed the suit without having demanded that the Board of Directors bring the suit. The plaintiffs in the federal derivative action appealed the stay order in that case to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit. On July 19, 2004, the Court of Appeals affirmed the stay of the federal derivative action, and that stay remains in effect. | |||
| On June 17, 2003, an action was filed in the Northern District of Illinois against the Company and certain officers, purportedly on behalf of a class of all persons who, between June 21, 2002 and October 17, 2002, purchased the 7% notes that SRAC issued on June 21, 2002. An amended complaint has been filed, naming as additional defendants certain former officers, SRAC and several investment banking firms who acted as underwriters for SRACs March 18, May 21 and June 21, 2002 notes offerings. The amended complaint alleges that the defendants made misrepresentations or omissions concerning its credit business during the class period and in the registration statements and prospectuses relating to the offerings. The amended complaint alleges that these misrepresentations and omissions violated Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder, and Sections 11, 12 and 15 of the Securities Act of 1933 and purports to be brought on behalf of a class of all persons who purchased |
31
SEARS, ROEBUCK AND CO.
any security of SRAC between October 24, 2001 and October 17, 2002, inclusive. The defendants filed motions to dismiss the action. On September 24, 2004, the court granted these motions in part, and denied them in part. The court dismissed the claims related to the March 18 and May 21, 2002 note offerings because the plaintiff did not purchase notes in those offerings. The court dismissed the Section 10(b) and Rule 10b-5 claims against several of the individual defendants because the plaintiff failed to adequately plead such claims. The court sustained the remaining claims. By invitation of the court, on October 1, 2004, defendants moved to dismiss the Section 10(b), Rule 10b-5 and Section 20(a) claims not dismissed in the courts ruling. On October 5, 2004, the court granted the plaintiff leave to file a second amended complaint. |
The Company is subject to various other legal and governmental proceedings, many involving litigation incidental to the businesses. Some matters contain class action allegations, environmental and asbestos exposure allegations and other consumer-based claims that involve compensatory, punitive or treble damage claims in very large amounts as well as other types of relief. The consequences of these matters are not presently determinable but, in the opinion of management of the Company after consulting with legal counsel, and taking into account insurance and reserves, the ultimate liability is not expected to have a material adverse effect on annual results of operations, financial position, liquidity or capital resources of the Company.
Item 2. Changes in Securities, Use of Proceeds and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities (1) | ||||||||||||||||
millions (except average price paid per | Total Number | |||||||||||||||
share) | of Shares | Dollar Value of | ||||||||||||||
Total | Purchased as | Shares that May | ||||||||||||||
Number of | Average | Part of Publicly | Yet Be Purchased | |||||||||||||
Shares | Price Paid | Announced Plan | Under the Plan or | |||||||||||||
Purchased | per Share | or Programs | Programs | |||||||||||||
July 4, 2004 to July 31, 2004 |
1.3 | $ 35.53 | 1.3 | $ 681 | ||||||||||||
August 1, 2004 to August 28, 2004 |
4.4 | 36.58 | 4.4 | 520 | ||||||||||||
August 29, 2004 to October 2, 2004 |
0.4 | 40.23 | 0.4 | 501 | ||||||||||||
As of October 2, 2004 |
6.1 | $ 36.64 | 6.1 | $ 501 | ||||||||||||
(1) | On October 8, 2003, the Board of Directors approved a new share repurchase program giving the Company authorization to acquire $3.0 billion of the Companys common shares by December 31, 2006. |
Item 5. Other Information
(a) | Reports on Form 8-K. | |||
A Current Report on Form 8-K dated July 22, 2004 was filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 22, 2004 to report, under Item 12, the release of second quarter 2004 earnings of the Registrant. |
Item 6. Exhibits
(a) | Exhibits. | |||
An Exhibit Index has been filed as part of this Report on Page E-1. |
32
SEARS, ROEBUCK AND CO.
SIGNATURE
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
SEARS, ROEBUCK AND CO. (Registrant) |
||||
December 1, 2004 | By | /s/ Michael J. Graham | ||
Michael J. Graham | ||||
Vice President and Controller (Principal Accounting Officer and duly authorized officer of Registrant) |
||||
33
SEARS, ROEBUCK AND CO.
E-1
EXHIBIT INDEX
Exhibit No. | ||
*3(a).
|
Restated Certificate of Incorporation as in effect on May 13, 1996 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3(a) to Registration Statement No. 333-8141 of the Registrant). | |
*3(b).
|
By-laws, as amended to February 14, 2001 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3(ii) to Registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 30, 2000). | |
*4.
|
Registrant agrees to furnish the Commission, upon request, with the instruments defining the rights of holders of each issue of long-term debt of the Registrant and its consolidated subsidiaries. | |
*10.
|
Letter from Registrant to Luis Padilla relating to employment dated August 16, 2004. | |
*12.
|
Computation of ratio of income to fixed charges for Sears, Roebuck and Co. and consolidated subsidiaries for each of the five years ended January 3, 2004 and for the nine-month period ended October 2, 2004. | |
**15.
|
Acknowledgement of awareness from Deloitte & Touche LLP, dated December 1, 2004, concerning unaudited interim financial information. | |
*15.1.
|
Acknowledgement of awareness from Deloitte & Touche LLP, dated November 8, 2004, concerning unaudited interim financial information. | |
**31(a).
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | |
**31(b).
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | |
*31(c).
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | |
*31(d).
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | |
**32.
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | |
*32.1.
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted by section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
* | Incorporated by reference to the similarly numbered Exhibit to Registrants Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended October 2, 2004 (except that Exhibits 31(c), 31(d), 15.1 and 32.1 were originally filed as Exhibits 31(a), 31(b), 15, and 32, respectively). |
** | Filed herewith |
34