FORM N-CSR
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM N-CSR
CERTIFIED SHAREHOLDER REPORT OF REGISTERED
MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANIES
Investment Company Act file number 811-7404
Van Kampen California Value Municipal Income Trust
(Exact name of registrant as specified in charter)
522 Fifth Avenue, New York, New York 10036
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip code)
Edward C. Wood III
522 Fifth Avenue, New York, New York 10036
(Name and address of agent for service)
Registrants telephone number, including area code: 212-762-4000
Date of fiscal year end: 10/31
Date of reporting period: 10/31/08
Item 1. Report to
Shareholders.
The
Trusts annual report transmitted to shareholders pursuant
to
Rule 30e-1 under the Investment Company Act of 1940 is as
follows:
Welcome, Shareholder
In this report, youll learn about how your investment in
Van Kampen California Value Municipal Income Trust
performed during the annual period. The portfolio management
team will provide an overview of the market conditions and
discuss some of the factors that affected investment performance
during the reporting period. In addition, this report includes
the trusts financial statements and a list of trust
investments as of October 31, 2008.
Market forecasts provided in this report may not necessarily
come to pass. There is no assurance that the trust will achieve
its investment objective. Trusts are subject to market risk,
which is the possibility that the market values of securities
owned by the trust will decline and that the value of trust
shares may therefore be less than what you paid for them.
Accordingly, you can lose money investing in this trust.
Income may subject certain individuals to the federal
Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOT FDIC INSURED
|
|
|
OFFER NO BANK GUARANTEE
|
|
|
MAY LOSE VALUE
|
NOT INSURED BY ANY FEDERAL GOVERNMENT AGENCY
|
|
|
NOT A DEPOSIT
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Performance
Summary as
of 10/31/08
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
California
Value Municipal Income Trust
|
Symbol:
VCV
|
Average Annual
|
|
|
Based on
|
|
|
Based on
|
Total
Returns
|
|
|
NAV
|
|
|
Market
Price
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Since Inception (4/30/93)
|
|
|
|
3.74
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
3.86
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10-year
|
|
|
|
1.36
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5-year
|
|
|
|
3.40
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.77
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1-year
|
|
|
|
29.96
|
|
|
|
|
|
28.65
|
|
|
|
Performance data
quoted represents past performance, which is no guarantee of
future results, and current performance may be lower or higher
than the figures shown. For the most recent month-end
performance figures, please visit vankampen.com or speak with
your financial advisor. Investment returns, net asset value
(NAV) and common share market price will fluctuate and trust
shares, when sold, may be worth more or less than their original
cost.
NAV per share is
determined by dividing the value of the trusts portfolio
securities, cash and other assets, less all liabilities and
preferred shares, by the total number of common shares
outstanding. The common share market price is the price the
market is willing to pay for shares of the trust at a given
time. Common share market price is influenced by a range of
factors, including supply and demand and market conditions.
Total return assumes an investment at the beginning of the
period, reinvestment of all distributions for the period in
accordance with the trusts dividend reinvestment plan, and
sale of all shares at the end of the period. The Trusts
advisor has waived or reimbursed fees and expenses from time to
time; absent such waivers/reimbursements the Trusts
returns would have been lower.
The Lehman Brothers
California Municipal Bond Index is a broad-based statistical
composite of California municipal bonds. The Index is unmanaged
and its returns do not include any sales charges or fees. Such
costs would lower performance. It is not possible to invest
directly in an index.
1
Trust Report
For
the 12-month
period ended October 31, 2008
Market
Conditions
The broad financial markets were highly volatile throughout the
reporting period as the credit crisis intensified, the housing
market continued to decline, and the economy appeared headed
into recession. In early September 2008, investor confidence
plummeted and the markets began a downward spiral following the
governments takeover of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac and the
bankruptcy of Lehman Brothers. In the weeks that followed,
several other financial institutions were forced into mergers,
rescued by government loans, or failed altogether as the value
of their assets severely eroded. The credit markets became
paralyzed as banks refused to lend while investors fled risky
assets in favor of Treasury securities. In an effort to unlock
the credit markets, the federal government interceded with
various supportive measures including a $700 billion
bailout plan.
The municipal bond market had already been under pressure for
several months prior to September, due in part to the credit
rating downgrades of various monoline bond insurers and the
deterioration of the auction rate and variable rate markets. The
failure of Lehman Brothers, however, prompted a wave of forced
selling in the municipal market as leveraged buyers, mutual
funds and brokerage firms began deleveraging, putting
significant pressure on prices and severely eroding liquidity.
As a result, municipal yields rose, particularly on the long end
of the yield curve, far exceeding those of comparable Treasuries
by the end of the period. For the three-month period ended
October 31, 2008, the short end of the curve outperformed
the long end by roughly 1,000 basis points. The disparity in
performance was even greater over the one-year reporting period
as the short end outperformed by more than 1,800 basis points.
As would be expected in the risk-averse and volatile
environment, higher-quality municipal bonds outperformed
lower-quality issues. For the overall period, high yield
municipal spreads widened from approximately 170 basis points to
410 basis points.
The state of California still benefits from its large and
diverse economic base, above average wealth levels, and
historically strong employment growth. However, the state faces
many challenges from its large exposure to the housing crisis,
falling tax revenues, and recent budgetary shortfalls. The state
typically leads the national economy and its financial
performance will be monitored closely.
2
Performance
Analysis
The Trusts return can be calculated based upon either the
market price or the net asset value (NAV) of its shares. NAV per
share is determined by dividing the value of the Trusts
portfolio securities, cash and other assets, less all
liabilities and preferred shares, by the total number of common
shares outstanding, while market price reflects the supply and
demand for the shares. As a result, the two returns can differ,
as they did during the reporting period. On an NAV and a market
price basis, the Trust underperformed the Lehman Brothers
California Municipal Bond Index (the Index).
Total return for
the 12-month
period ended October 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Based on
|
|
|
Based on
|
|
|
Lehman Brothers
California
|
|
|
|
|
NAV
|
|
|
Market
Price
|
|
|
Municipal
Bond Index
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29.96
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
28.65
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
4.32
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Performance data
quoted represents past performance, which is no guarantee of
future results, and current performance may be lower or higher
than the figures shown. Investment return, net asset value and
common share market price will fluctuate and Trust shares, when
sold, may be worth more or less than their original cost. See
Performance Summary for additional performance information and
index definition.
The Trust held an overweight to lower- and non-rated bonds
relative to the Index, which is comprised entirely of
investment-grade issues. This allocation to the lower-quality
segment of the market hindered performance as the flight to
quality that persisted throughout most of the reporting period
led higher-quality issues to outperform. In particular,
overweights to lower-rated dedicated tax and tobacco bonds held
back relative returns as these sectors struggled during the
period. Additionally, holdings in triple-B rated hospital bonds
detracted as spreads in the sector widened from 100 basis points
to 300 basis points by the end of October. The Trusts
yield-curve positioning was also disadvantageous. We maintained
an overweight exposure to the longer end of the municipal yield
curve, which underperformed the short end of the curve as the
curve steepened.
Other positions, however, were additive to performance for the
period. Holdings in municipal auction rate securities with zero
durations (a measure of interest-rate sensitivity) were additive
to performance as the yield on these securities remained well
above those of long-maturity municipal bonds.
The Trustees have approved a procedure whereby the Trust may,
when appropriate, repurchase its shares in the open market or in
privately negotiated transactions at a price not above market
value or NAV, whichever is lower at the time of purchase. This
may help support the market value of the Trusts shares.
There is no guarantee that any sectors mentioned will
continue to perform as discussed herein or that securities in
such sectors will be held by the Trust in the future.
3
|
|
|
|
|
Ratings
Allocations as of 10/31/08 (Unaudited)
|
|
AAA/Aaa
|
|
|
20.0
|
%
|
AA/Aa
|
|
|
43.8
|
|
A/A
|
|
|
6.3
|
|
BBB/Baa
|
|
|
18.8
|
|
B/B
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
Non-Rated
|
|
|
11.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top
5 Sectors as of 10/31/08 (Unaudited)
|
|
Tax Allocation/Increment
|
|
|
15.3
|
%
|
Single-Family
|
|
|
10.9
|
|
Special Tax Districts
|
|
|
9.1
|
|
Public Education
|
|
|
8.6
|
|
Master Tobacco Settlement
|
|
|
7.9
|
|
Subject to change daily. Provided for informational purposes
only and should not be deemed as a recommendation to buy or sell
the securities mentioned or securities in the sectors shown
above. Ratings are as a percentage of total investments. Sectors
are as a percentage of total long-term investments. Securities
are classified by sectors that represent broad groupings of
related industries. Van Kampen is a wholly owned subsidiary
of a global securities firm which is engaged in a wide range of
financial services including, for example, securities trading
and brokerage activities, investment banking, research and
analysis, financing and financial advisory services. Rating
allocations based upon ratings as issued by Standard and
Poors and Moodys, respectively.
4
Portfolio
Management Changes
Van Kampen California Value Municipal Income Trust is managed by
members of the Advisers Municipal Fixed Income team. The
Municipal Fixed Income team consists of portfolio managers and
analysts. Current members of the team jointly and primarily
responsible for the day-to-day management of the Trusts
portfolio are Robert W. Wimmel, William Black, and Mark
Paris, each an Executive Director of the Adviser.
Mr. Wimmel has been associated with the Adviser in an
investment management capacity since 1996 and began managing the
Trust in November 2001. Mr. Black has been associated with
the Adviser in an investment management capacity since 1998 and
began managing the Trust in December 2007. Mr. Paris has
been associated with the Adviser in an investment management
capacity since 2002 and began managing the Trust in May 2008.
For
More Information About Portfolio Holdings
Each Van Kampen trust provides a complete schedule of
portfolio holdings in its semiannual and annual reports within
60 days of the end of the trusts second and fourth
fiscal quarters. The semiannual reports and the annual reports
are filed electronically with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (SEC) on
Form N-CSRS
and
Form N-CSR,
respectively. Van Kampen also delivers the semiannual and
annual reports to fund shareholders, and makes these reports
available on its public Web site, www.vankampen.com. In addition
to the semiannual and annual reports that Van Kampen
delivers to shareholders and makes available through the
Van Kampen public Web site, each fund files a complete
schedule of portfolio holdings with the SEC for the trusts
first and third fiscal quarters on
Form N-Q.
Van Kampen does not deliver the reports for the first and
third fiscal quarters to shareholders, nor are the reports
posted to the Van Kampen public Web site. You may, however,
obtain the
Form N-Q
filings (as well as the
Form N-CSR
and N-CSRS filings) by accessing the SECs Web site,
http://www.sec.gov.
You may also review and copy them at the SECs Public
Reference Room in Washington, D.C. Information on the
operation of the SECs Public Reference Room may be
obtained by calling the SEC at
(800) SEC-0330.
You can also request copies of these materials, upon payment of
a duplicating fee, by electronic request at the SECs
e-mail
address (publicinfo@sec.gov) or by writing the Public Reference
section of the SEC, Washington, DC
20549-0102.
You may obtain copies of a trusts fiscal quarter filings
by contacting Van Kampen Client Relations at
(800) 341-2929.
5
Proxy
Voting Policy and Procedures and Proxy Voting Record
You may obtain a copy of the Trusts Proxy Voting Policy
and Procedures without charge, upon request, by calling toll
free
(800) 341-2929
or by visiting our Web site at www.vankampen.com. It is also
available on the Securities and Exchange Commissions Web
site at
http://www.sec.gov.
You may obtain information regarding how the Trust voted proxies
relating to portfolio securities during the most recent
twelve-month period ended June 30 without charge by visiting our
Web site at www.vankampen.com. This information is also
available on the Securities and Exchange Commissions Web
site at
http://www.sec.gov.
6
Investment Advisory Agreement Approval
Both the Investment Company Act of 1940 and the terms of the
Funds investment advisory agreement require that the
investment advisory agreement between the Fund and its
investment adviser be approved annually both by a majority of
the Board of Trustees and by a majority of the independent
trustees voting separately.
At meetings held on April 15, 2008 and May 8, 2008,
the Board of Trustees, and the independent trustees voting
separately, considered and ultimately determined that the terms
of the investment advisory agreement are fair and reasonable and
approved the continuance of the investment advisory agreement as
being in the best interests of the Fund and its shareholders. In
making its determination, the Board of Trustees considered
materials that were specifically prepared by the investment
adviser at the request of the Board and Fund counsel, and by an
independent provider of investment company data contracted to
assist the Board, relating to the investment advisory agreement
review process. The Board also considered information received
periodically about the portfolio, performance, the investment
strategy, portfolio management team and fees and expenses of the
Fund. Finally, the Board considered materials it had received in
connection with fee waivers currently in place for the Fund and
materials it had received in connection with the share
repurchase program currently in place for the Fund. The Board of
Trustees considered the investment advisory agreement over a
period of several months and the trustees held sessions both
with the investment adviser and separate from the investment
adviser in reviewing and considering the investment advisory
agreement.
In approving the investment advisory agreement, the Board of
Trustees considered, among other things, the nature, extent and
quality of the services provided by the investment adviser, the
performance, fees and expenses of the Fund compared to other
similar funds and other products, the investment advisers
expenses in providing the services and the profitability of the
investment adviser and its affiliated companies. The Board of
Trustees considered the extent to which any economies of scale
experienced by the investment adviser are shared with the
Funds shareholders, and the propriety of breakpoints in
the Funds investment advisory fee schedule. The Board of
Trustees considered comparative advisory fees of the Fund and
other investment companies
and/or other
products at different asset levels, and considered the trends in
the industry. The Board of Trustees evaluated other benefits the
investment adviser and its affiliates derive from their
relationship with the Fund. The Board of Trustees reviewed
information about the foregoing factors and considered changes,
if any, in such information since its previous approval. The
Board of Trustees discussed the financial strength of the
investment adviser and its affiliated companies and the
capability of the personnel of the investment adviser, and
specifically the strength and background of its portfolio
management personnel. The Board of Trustees reviewed the
statutory and regulatory requirements for approval and
disclosure of investment advisory agreements. The Board of
Trustees, including
7
the independent trustees, evaluated all of the foregoing and
does not believe any single factor or group of factors control
or dominate the review process, and, after considering all
factors together, has determined, in the exercise of its
business judgment, that approval of the investment advisory
agreement is in the best interests of the Fund and its
shareholders. The following summary provides more detail on
certain matters considered but does not detail all matters
considered.
Nature, Extent and Quality of the Services Provided. On a
regular basis, the Board of Trustees considers the roles and
responsibilities of the investment adviser as a whole and for
those specific portfolio management, support and trading
functions servicing the Fund. The trustees discuss with the
investment adviser the resources available and used in managing
the Fund and changes made in the Funds portfolio
management team and the Funds portfolio management
strategy over time. The trustees also discuss certain other
services which are provided on a cost-reimbursement basis by the
investment adviser or its affiliates to the Van Kampen
funds including certain accounting, administrative and legal
services. The Board has determined that the nature, extent and
quality of the services provided by the investment adviser
support its decision to approve the investment advisory
agreement.
Performance, Fees and Expenses of the Fund. On a regular basis,
the Board of Trustees reviews the performance, fees and expenses
of the Fund compared to its peers and to appropriate benchmarks.
In addition, the Board spends more focused time on the
performance of the Fund and other funds in the Van Kampen
complex, paying specific attention to underperforming funds. The
trustees discuss with the investment adviser the performance
goals and the actual results achieved in managing the Fund. When
considering a funds performance, the trustees and the
investment adviser place emphasis on trends and longer-term
returns (focusing on one-year, three-year and five-year
performance with special attention to three-year performance)
and, when a funds weighted performance is under the
funds benchmark, they discuss the causes and where
necessary seek to make specific changes to investment strategy
or investment personnel. The Fund discloses more information
about its performance elsewhere in this report. The trustees
discuss with the investment adviser the level of advisory fees
for this Fund relative to comparable funds and other products
advised by the adviser and others in the marketplace. The
trustees review not only the advisory fees but other fees and
expenses (whether paid to the adviser, its affiliates or others)
and the Funds overall expense ratio. The Board has
determined that the performance, fees and expenses of the Fund
support its decision to approve the investment advisory
agreement.
Investment Advisers Expenses in Providing the Service and
Profitability. At least annually, the trustees review the
investment advisers expenses in providing services to the
Fund and other funds advised by the investment adviser and the
profitability of the investment adviser. These profitability
reports are put together by the investment adviser with the
oversight of the Board. The trustees discuss
8
with the investment adviser its revenues and expenses, including
among other things, revenues for advisory services, portfolio
management-related expenses, revenue sharing arrangement costs
and allocated expenses both on an aggregate basis and per fund.
The Board has determined that the analysis of the investment
advisers expenses and profitability support its decision
to approve the investment advisory agreement.
Economies of Scale. On a regular basis, the Board of Trustees
considers the size of the Fund and how that relates to the
Funds expense ratio and particularly the Funds
advisory fee rate. In conjunction with its review of the
investment advisers profitability, the trustees discuss
with the investment adviser how more (or less) assets can affect
the efficiency or effectiveness of managing the Funds
portfolio and whether the advisory fee level is appropriate
relative to current asset levels
and/or
whether the advisory fee structure reflects economies of scale
as asset levels change. The Board has determined that its review
of the actual and potential economies of scale of the Fund
support its decision to approve the investment advisory
agreement.
Other Benefits of the Relationship. On a regular basis, the
Board of Trustees considers other benefits to the investment
adviser and its affiliates derived from its relationship with
the Fund and other funds advised by the investment adviser.
These benefits include, among other things, fees for transfer
agency services provided to the funds, in certain cases research
received by the adviser generated from commission dollars spent
on funds portfolio trading, and in certain cases
distribution or service related fees related to funds
sales. The trustees review with the investment adviser each of
these arrangements and the reasonableness of its costs relative
to the services performed. The Board has determined that the
other benefits received by the investment adviser or its
affiliates support its decision to approve the investment
advisory agreement.
9
Van Kampen
California Value Municipal Income Trust
Portfolio of
Investments n October 31,
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Par
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(000)
|
|
Description
|
|
Coupon
|
|
Maturity
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Municipal Bonds 200.2%
California 194.2%
|
$
|
2,000
|
|
|
Abag Fin Auth For Nonprofit Corp CA Insd Rev Ctf Lincoln Glen
Manor Sr Citizens (CA MTG Insd)
|
|
|
6.100
|
%
|
|
02/15/25
|
|
$
|
1,968,580
|
|
|
1,205
|
|
|
Alameda Cnty, CA Wtr Dist Rev Rfdg (MBIA Insd)
|
|
|
4.750
|
|
|
06/01/20
|
|
|
1,172,513
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
Aliso Viejo, CA Cmnty Fac Dist Spl Tax
No 2005-01
Glenwood at Aliso
|
|
|
6.000
|
|
|
09/01/38
|
|
|
1,522,580
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
Allan Hancock CA Jt Cmnty College Dist Election 2006, Ser A
(FSA Insd)
|
|
|
4.375
|
|
|
08/01/31
|
|
|
817,760
|
|
|
3,540
|
|
|
Anaheim, CA Pub Fin Auth Lease Rev Cap Apprec Pub Impt Proj,
Ser C (FSA Insd)
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
09/01/32
|
|
|
756,640
|
|
|
4,250
|
|
|
Anaheim, CA Redev Agy Tax Alloc Rfdg Merged Redev Proj Area,
Ser A (FSA Insd) (a)
|
|
|
5.000
|
|
|
02/01/31
|
|
|
3,907,344
|
|
|
4,120
|
|
|
Apple Valley, CA Redev Agy Tax Alloc Proj Area No 2 (AMBAC
Insd)
|
|
|
5.000
|
|
|
06/01/37
|
|
|
3,485,767
|
|
|
2,790
|
|
|
Banning, CA Cmnty Redev Agy Tax Alloc Merged Downtown
(Radian Insd)
|
|
|
5.000
|
|
|
08/01/23
|
|
|
2,365,892
|
|
|
2,510
|
|
|
Bay Area Govt Assn CA Lease West Sacramento, Ser A (Syncora Gtd)
|
|
|
5.000
|
|
|
09/01/24
|
|
|
2,308,497
|
|
|
895
|
|
|
Benicia, CA Uni Sch Dist, Ser B (MBIA Insd)
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
08/01/18
|
|
|
535,291
|
|
|
1,510
|
|
|
Brea & Olinda, CA Uni Sch Dist Ctf Partn Rfdg,
Ser A (FSA Insd)
|
|
|
5.500
|
|
|
08/01/20
|
|
|
1,528,195
|
|
|
3,535
|
|
|
Brea, CA Redev Agy Tax Alloc Rfdg, Ser A
(AMBAC Insd)
|
|
|
5.500
|
|
|
08/01/20
|
|
|
3,559,639
|
|
|
865
|
|
|
Burbank, CA Pub Fin Auth Rev Golden St Redev, Ser A
(AMBAC Insd)
|
|
|
5.250
|
|
|
12/01/23
|
|
|
826,767
|
|
|
3,000
|
|
|
California Cnty, CA Tob Sec Agy Tob Asset Bkd Los Angeles Cnty
Sec (c)
|
|
|
0/5.450
|
|
|
06/01/28
|
|
|
1,769,340
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
California Cnty, CA Tob Sec Agy Tob Merced Cnty Rfdg, Ser A
|
|
|
5.125
|
|
|
06/01/38
|
|
|
1,223,000
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
|
California Cnty, CA Tob Sec Agy Tob Merced Cnty Rfdg, Ser A
|
|
|
5.250
|
|
|
06/01/45
|
|
|
3,014,850
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
California Ed Fac Auth Rev CA College Arts
|
|
|
5.000
|
|
|
06/01/35
|
|
|
1,314,640
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
California Ed Fac Auth Rev Pitzer College, Ser A
|
|
|
5.000
|
|
|
04/01/30
|
|
|
868,340
|
|
|
1,445
|
|
|
California Ed Fac Auth Rev Pooled College &
Univ, Ser B
|
|
|
5.250
|
|
|
04/01/24
|
|
|
1,118,791
|
|
|
170
|
|
|
California Ed Fac Auth Rev Pooled College & Univ, Ser
B (Prerefunded @ 6/01/10)
|
|
|
6.625
|
|
|
06/01/20
|
|
|
182,590
|
|
|
345
|
|
|
California Ed Fac Auth Rev Pooled College & Univ, Ser
B (Prerefunded @ 6/01/10)
|
|
|
6.750
|
|
|
06/01/30
|
|
|
371,217
|
|
|
1,500
|
|
|
California Ed Fac Auth Rev Univ of Redlands, Ser A
|
|
|
5.000
|
|
|
10/01/31
|
|
|
1,266,705
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
California Hlth Fac Fin Auth Rev Providence Hlth &
Svc, Ser C (d)
|
|
|
6.500
|
|
|
10/01/33
|
|
|
1,013,710
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
California Hlth Fac Fin Auth Rev Sutter
Hlth, Ser A (a)
|
|
|
5.000
|
|
|
11/15/42
|
|
|
8,068,800
|
|
10
See Notes to Financial
Statements
Van Kampen
California Value Municipal Income Trust
Portfolio of
Investments n October 31,
2008 continued
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Par
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(000)
|
|
Description
|
|
Coupon
|
|
Maturity
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
California (Continued)
|
$
|
2,300
|
|
|
California Hsg Fin Agy Rev Home Mtg, Ser E
(FGIC Insd) (AMT)
|
|
|
5.000
|
%
|
|
02/01/24
|
|
$
|
1,914,359
|
|
|
8,480
|
|
|
California Hsg Fin Agy Rev Home Mtg,
Ser G (AMT) (a)
|
|
|
4.950
|
|
|
08/01/23
|
|
|
6,922,945
|
|
|
13,400
|
|
|
California Hsg Fin Agy Rev Home Mtg,
Ser I (AMT) (a)
|
|
|
4.800
|
|
|
08/01/36
|
|
|
9,355,478
|
|
|
7,000
|
|
|
California Hsg Fin Agy Rev Home Mtg,
Ser I (AMT) (a)
|
|
|
4.875
|
|
|
08/01/41
|
|
|
4,857,475
|
|
|
2,500
|
|
|
California Hsg Fin Agy Rev Home Mtg, Ser J (AMT)
|
|
|
5.050
|
|
|
08/01/27
|
|
|
2,000,550
|
|
|
5,150
|
|
|
California Hsg Fin Agy Rev Home Mtg,
Ser M (AMT) (a)
|
|
|
4.700
|
|
|
08/01/36
|
|
|
3,520,617
|
|
|
3,000
|
|
|
California Hsg Fin Agy Rev Multi-Family Hsg III, Ser A
(MBIA Insd) (AMT)
|
|
|
5.850
|
|
|
08/01/17
|
|
|
2,958,360
|
|
|
3,755
|
|
|
California Hsg Fin Agy Rev, Ser B (AMT)
|
|
|
5.000
|
|
|
02/01/28
|
|
|
3,004,150
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
California Muni Fin Auth Ed High Tech High Chula Vista, Ser
B (e)
|
|
|
6.000
|
|
|
07/01/28
|
|
|
794,180
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
California Pollutn Ctl Fin Auth Pollutn Ctl Rev Gas &
Elec Rfdg, Ser A (MBIA-IBC Insd)
|
|
|
5.900
|
|
|
06/01/14
|
|
|
1,078,060
|
|
|
4,500
|
|
|
California Pollutn Ctl Fin Auth Solid Waste Disp Rev Waste Mgmt
Inc Proj, Ser B (AMT)
|
|
|
5.000
|
|
|
07/01/27
|
|
|
3,025,710
|
|
|
2,500
|
|
|
California Pollutn Ctl Fin Auth Solid Waste Disp Rev Waste Mgmt
Inc Proj, Ser C (AMT) (f)
|
|
|
5.125
|
|
|
11/01/23
|
|
|
1,792,975
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
California Rural Home Mtg Fin Auth Single Family Mtg Rev Mtg Bkd
Sec Pgm, Ser B
(GNMA Collateralized) (AMT)
|
|
|
6.150
|
|
|
06/01/20
|
|
|
25,413
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
California Rural Home Mtg Fin Auth Single Family Mtg Rev Mtg Bkd
Sec Pgm, Ser B
(GNMA Collateralized) (AMT)
|
|
|
6.250
|
|
|
12/01/31
|
|
|
40,694
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
California Rural Home Mtg Fin Auth Single Family Mtg Rev Mtg Bkd
Sec Pgm, Ser C
(GNMA Collateralized) (AMT)
|
|
|
7.500
|
|
|
08/01/27
|
|
|
5,086
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
California Rural Home Mtg Fin Auth Single Family Mtg Rev, Ser C
(GNMA Collateralized) (AMT)
|
|
|
7.800
|
|
|
02/01/28
|
|
|
15,274
|
|
|
1,060
|
|
|
California Spl Dist Assn Fin Corp Ctf Part Spl Dist Fin
Pgm, Ser KK (FSA Insd)
|
|
|
5.800
|
|
|
11/01/29
|
|
|
1,064,039
|
|
|
9,000
|
|
|
California St Dept Vet Affairs Home Pur Rev,
Ser A (AMT) (a)
|
|
|
4.950
|
|
|
12/01/37
|
|
|
6,793,560
|
|
|
3,000
|
|
|
California St Dept Vet Affairs Home Pur Rev,
Ser B (AMT)
|
|
|
5.150
|
|
|
12/01/27
|
|
|
2,523,600
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
California St Pub Wks Brd Dept Corrections, Ser C
|
|
|
5.500
|
|
|
06/01/23
|
|
|
1,005,670
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
California St Univ Rev Syswide, Ser D
(FSA Insd) (a)
|
|
|
4.500
|
|
|
11/01/37
|
|
|
7,932,000
|
|
|
960
|
|
|
California St Vet, Ser BJ (AMT)
|
|
|
5.700
|
|
|
12/01/32
|
|
|
852,010
|
|
|
10,650
|
|
|
California St Vet, Ser CD (AMT) (a)
|
|
|
4.600
|
|
|
12/01/32
|
|
|
7,511,339
|
|
11
See Notes to Financial
Statements
Van Kampen
California Value Municipal Income Trust
Portfolio of
Investments n October 31,
2008 continued
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Par
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(000)
|
|
Description
|
|
Coupon
|
|
Maturity
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
California (Continued)
|
$
|
2,500
|
|
|
California Statewide Cmnty Dev Auth CHF Irvine LLC UCI East
Campus
|
|
|
5.750
|
%
|
|
05/15/32
|
|
$
|
2,029,050
|
|
|
2,230
|
|
|
California Statewide Cmnty Dev Auth CHF Irvine LLC UCI East Rfdg
|
|
|
5.000
|
|
|
05/15/38
|
|
|
1,526,167
|
|
|
1,250
|
|
|
California Statewide Cmnty Dev Auth Rev CA Baptist Univ, Ser A
|
|
|
5.500
|
|
|
11/01/38
|
|
|
795,000
|
|
|
12,000
|
|
|
California Statewide Cmnty Dev Auth Rev Daughters of Charity
Hlth, Ser A (a)
|
|
|
5.000
|
|
|
07/01/39
|
|
|
7,780,200
|
|
|
1,500
|
|
|
California Statewide Cmnty Dev Auth Rev Front Porch
Cmnty & Svc, Ser A (e)
|
|
|
5.125
|
|
|
04/01/37
|
|
|
1,046,520
|
|
|
2,750
|
|
|
California Statewide Cmnty Dev Auth Rev Insd Enloe Med Ctr (CA
MTG Insd)
|
|
|
6.250
|
|
|
08/15/28
|
|
|
2,652,980
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
California Statewide Cmnty Dev Auth Rev Windrush Sch
|
|
|
5.500
|
|
|
07/01/37
|
|
|
688,870
|
|
|
1,280
|
|
|
California Statewide Cmnty Dev Auth Wtr Rev Pooled Fin Pgm, Ser
C (FSA Insd)
|
|
|
5.250
|
|
|
10/01/28
|
|
|
1,241,498
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
California Statewide Cmntys Dev Auth Spl Tax Cmnty Fac Dist
2007-1 Orinda
|
|
|
6.000
|
|
|
09/01/29
|
|
|
807,240
|
|
|
260
|
|
|
Carlsbad, CA Spl Tax Escrow Cmnty Fac 3 Impt Area 2
|
|
|
6.050
|
|
|
09/01/28
|
|
|
216,016
|
|
|
845
|
|
|
Carlsbad, CA Spl Tax Escrow Cmnty Fac 3 Impt Area 2
|
|
|
6.150
|
|
|
09/01/38
|
|
|
675,451
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
Carson, CA Redev Agy Tax Alloc Rfdg, Ser A (MBIA Insd)
|
|
|
5.000
|
|
|
10/01/23
|
|
|
1,958,760
|
|
|
1,085
|
|
|
Cathedral City, CA Pub Fin Auth Rev Cap Apprec, Ser A (MBIA Insd)
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
08/01/27
|
|
|
318,795
|
|
|
1,085
|
|
|
Cathedral City, CA Pub Fin Auth Rev Cap Apprec, Ser A (MBIA Insd)
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
08/01/28
|
|
|
298,635
|
|
|
1,085
|
|
|
Cathedral City, CA Pub Fin Auth Rev Cap Apprec, Ser A (MBIA Insd)
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
08/01/30
|
|
|
260,411
|
|
|
1,085
|
|
|
Cathedral City, CA Pub Fin Auth Rev Cap Apprec, Ser A (MBIA Insd)
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
08/01/31
|
|
|
242,270
|
|
|
1,085
|
|
|
Cathedral City, CA Pub Fin Auth Rev Cap Apprec, Ser A (MBIA Insd)
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
08/01/32
|
|
|
225,778
|
|
|
1,085
|
|
|
Cathedral City, CA Pub Fin Auth Rev Cap Apprec, Ser A (MBIA Insd)
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
08/01/33
|
|
|
210,327
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
Central Vly Fin Auth CA Cogeneration Proj Rev Carson Ice Gen
Proj Rfdg (MBIA Insd)
|
|
|
5.000
|
|
|
07/01/17
|
|
|
2,006,020
|
|
|
220
|
|
|
Cerritos, CA Cmnty College Dist Election 2004,
Ser A (MBIA Insd)
|
|
|
5.000
|
|
|
08/01/27
|
|
|
211,189
|
|
|
2,500
|
|
|
Chaffey, CA Uni High Sch Dist, Ser C (FSA Insd)
|
|
|
5.000
|
|
|
05/01/27
|
|
|
2,386,725
|
|
|
3,000
|
|
|
Chaffey Cmnty College Dist CA Election 2002,
Ser C (MBIA Insd)
|
|
|
5.000
|
|
|
06/01/32
|
|
|
2,743,830
|
|
|
1,700
|
|
|
Chino Vly Uni Sch Dist CA Ctf Partn Rfdg, Ser A (FSA Insd)
|
|
|
5.375
|
|
|
09/01/20
|
|
|
1,713,617
|
|
12
See Notes to Financial
Statements
Van Kampen
California Value Municipal Income Trust
Portfolio of
Investments n October 31,
2008 continued
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Par
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(000)
|
|
Description
|
|
Coupon
|
|
Maturity
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
California (Continued)
|
$
|
2,000
|
|
|
Chula Vista, CA Cmnty Fac Dist Spl Tax No
01-1 Impt
Area San Miguel, Ser B
|
|
|
5.350
|
%
|
|
09/01/26
|
|
$
|
1,564,240
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
Chula Vista, CA Indl Dev Rev San Diego Gas, Ser A
|
|
|
5.300
|
|
|
07/01/21
|
|
|
1,830,320
|
|
|
1,540
|
|
|
Chula Vista, CA Redev Agy Tax Alloc Sub Bayfront Rfdg, Ser B
|
|
|
5.250
|
|
|
10/01/27
|
|
|
1,184,953
|
|
|
1,605
|
|
|
Coachella, CA Fin Auth Tax Alloc Rev Redev Proj 4 Rfdg, Ser
B (Syncora Gtd)
|
|
|
5.250
|
|
|
09/01/34
|
|
|
1,362,404
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
Coachella, CA Redev Agy Tax Alloc Proj Area
No 3 Rfdg
|
|
|
5.875
|
|
|
12/01/28
|
|
|
802,780
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
Colton, CA Redev Agy Tax Alloc Mt Vernon Corridor Redev Proj
|
|
|
6.300
|
|
|
09/01/36
|
|
|
1,733,420
|
|
|
1,600
|
|
|
Commerce, CA Jt Pwr Fin Auth Lease Rev Cmnty Ctr Proj
(Syncora Gtd)
|
|
|
5.000
|
|
|
10/01/29
|
|
|
1,361,616
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
Commerce, CA Jt Pwr Fin Auth Lease Rev Cmnty Ctr Proj
(Syncora Gtd)
|
|
|
5.000
|
|
|
10/01/34
|
|
|
1,630,580
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
Daly City, CA Hsg Dev Fin Agy Mobile Home Pk Rev Third
Tier Franciscan Rfdg, Ser C
|
|
|
6.500
|
|
|
12/15/47
|
|
|
1,427,060
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
Desert Hot Springs, CA Redev Agy Tax Alloc Merged Proj, Ser
A-2
|
|
|
5.750
|
|
|
09/01/38
|
|
|
1,690,680
|
|
|
1,220
|
|
|
Duarte, CA Multi-Family Rev Hsg Heritage Pk Apt, Ser A (FNMA
Collateralized) (AMT)
|
|
|
5.850
|
|
|
05/01/30
|
|
|
1,072,587
|
|
|
1,280
|
|
|
El Cerrito, CA Redev Agy Tax Alloc Redev Proj Area Rfdg, Ser B
(MBIA Insd) (AMT)
|
|
|
5.250
|
|
|
07/01/15
|
|
|
1,321,805
|
|
|
1,220
|
|
|
Emeryville, CA Pub Fin Auth Rev Assmt Dist Refin
|
|
|
5.900
|
|
|
09/02/21
|
|
|
1,072,624
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
Emeryville, CA Pub Fin Auth Rev Shellmound Pk Redev &
Hsg Proj, Ser B (MBIA Insd)
|
|
|
5.000
|
|
|
09/01/19
|
|
|
990,050
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
Fairfield, CA Cmnty Fac Dist Spl Tax No
2007-1
Fairfield Commons
|
|
|
6.875
|
|
|
09/01/38
|
|
|
829,420
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
Fairfield, CA Ctf Partn Wtr, Ser A
(MBIA-IBC Insd)
|
|
|
5.000
|
|
|
04/01/42
|
|
|
1,744,780
|
|
|
5,155
|
|
|
Florin, CA Res Consv Dist Cap Impt Elk Grove Wtr Svc, Ser A
(MBIA Insd)
|
|
|
5.000
|
|
|
09/01/33
|
|
|
4,324,426
|
|
|
3,000
|
|
|
Folsom, CA Pub Fin Auth Spl Tax Rev, Ser A (AMBAC Insd)
|
|
|
5.000
|
|
|
09/01/28
|
|
|
2,601,330
|
|
|
3,000
|
|
|
Folsom, CA Spl Tax Cmnty Fac Dist No 2 Rfdg (Connie Lee Insd)
|
|
|
5.250
|
|
|
12/01/19
|
|
|
3,003,930
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
Fontana, CA Redev Agy Tax Alloc Southwest Indl Park Proj (MBIA
Insd)
|
|
|
5.000
|
|
|
09/01/22
|
|
|
970,780
|
|
|
1,950
|
|
|
Fontana, CA Redev Agy Tax Alloc Southwest Indl Park Proj (MBIA
Insd)
|
|
|
5.200
|
|
|
09/01/30
|
|
|
1,831,245
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
|
Fontana, CA Uni Sch Dist Ctf Partn Fin Proj (FSA Insd)
|
|
|
4.500
|
|
|
09/01/35
|
|
|
4,034,950
|
|
|
2,950
|
|
|
Foothill/Eastern Corridor Agy CA
Toll Rd Rev (g)
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
01/01/27
|
|
|
1,072,089
|
|
13
See Notes to Financial
Statements
Van Kampen
California Value Municipal Income Trust
Portfolio of
Investments n October 31,
2008 continued
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Par
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(000)
|
|
Description
|
|
Coupon
|
|
Maturity
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
California (Continued)
|
$
|
10,000
|
|
|
Foothill/Eastern Corridor Agy CA Toll Rd Rev Cap Apprec Rfdg
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
01/15/25
|
|
$
|
2,774,600
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
|
Foothill/Eastern Corridor Agy CA Toll Rd Rev Cap Apprec Rfdg
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
01/15/26
|
|
|
3,807,300
|
|
|
11,000
|
|
|
Foothill/Eastern Corridor Agy CA Toll Rd Rev Cap Apprec Rfdg
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
01/15/30
|
|
|
1,993,090
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
|
Foothill/Eastern Corridor Agy CA Toll Rd Rev Cap Apprec Rfdg
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
01/15/31
|
|
|
826,950
|
|
|
5,500
|
|
|
Foothill/Eastern Corridor Agy CA Toll Rd Rev Conv Cap Apprec
Rfdg (c)
|
|
|
0/5.875
|
%
|
|
01/15/27
|
|
|
4,845,555
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
Foothill/Eastern Corridor Agy CA Toll Rd Rev Rfdg
|
|
|
5.750
|
|
|
01/15/40
|
|
|
783,110
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
Galt Schs Jt Pwrs Auth CA Rev High Sch & Elem Sch
Rfdg, Ser A (MBIA Insd)
|
|
|
5.750
|
|
|
11/01/16
|
|
|
1,010,000
|
|
|
2,015
|
|
|
Garden Grove, CA Agy Cmnty Dev Sub Nt
(Acquired 5/27/08, Cost $1,755,166) (h)
|
|
|
6.000
|
|
|
10/01/27
|
|
|
1,541,797
|
|
|
1,115
|
|
|
Garden Grove, CA Pub Fin Auth Rev Ctf Partn Wtr Svc Cap Impt Pgm
(FSA Insd)
|
|
|
5.000
|
|
|
12/15/23
|
|
|
1,092,923
|
|
|
2,500
|
|
|
Glendale, CA Uni Sch Dist, Ser C (FSA Insd)
|
|
|
5.500
|
|
|
09/01/19
|
|
|
2,570,250
|
|
|
9,000
|
|
|
Golden St Tob Sec Corp CA Tob Settlement Rev Asset Bkd Sr, Ser
A-1
|
|
|
5.750
|
|
|
06/01/47
|
|
|
5,924,520
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
|
Hawthorne, CA Spl Tax Cmnty Fac
Dist No
2006-1
|
|
|
5.000
|
|
|
09/01/36
|
|
|
3,319,650
|
|
|
3,000
|
|
|
Imperial Irr Dist CA Ctf Partn Elec Sys Proj (FSA Insd)
|
|
|
5.250
|
|
|
11/01/23
|
|
|
3,005,220
|
|
|
250
|
|
|
Independent Cities, CA Lease Fin Auth Mobile Home Pk Rev
Westlake Mobile Home Pk
Rfdg, Ser A
|
|
|
4.500
|
|
|
10/15/37
|
|
|
162,905
|
|
|
3,000
|
|
|
Indio, CA Redev Agy Tax Alloc Sub Merged Proj Area, Ser A
|
|
|
5.625
|
|
|
08/15/35
|
|
|
2,779,350
|
|
|
3,435
|
|
|
Irvine, CA Pub Fac & Infrastructure Auth Assmt Rev,
Ser B (AMBAC Insd)
|
|
|
5.000
|
|
|
09/02/22
|
|
|
3,185,001
|
|
|
1,410
|
|
|
Jurupa, CA Cmnty Svc Dist Spl Tax Cmnty Fac Dist No 21, Ser A
|
|
|
5.000
|
|
|
09/01/26
|
|
|
1,024,393
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
Jurupa, CA Cmnty Svc Dist Spl Tax Cmnty Fac Dist No 24, Ser A
|
|
|
6.375
|
|
|
09/01/27
|
|
|
853,430
|
|
|
1,325
|
|
|
Jurupa, CA Cmnty Svc Dist Spl Tax Cmnty Fac Dist No 24, Ser A
|
|
|
6.625
|
|
|
09/01/38
|
|
|
1,117,452
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
La Quinta, CA Fin Auth Loc, Ser A (AMBAC Insd)
|
|
|
5.250
|
|
|
09/01/24
|
|
|
984,090
|
|
|
1,420
|
|
|
La Quinta, CA Redev Agy Tax Alloc Redev Proj Area No 1
(AMBAC Insd)
|
|
|
5.000
|
|
|
09/01/22
|
|
|
1,378,508
|
|
|
1,500
|
|
|
La Quinta, CA Redev Agy Tax Redev Proj Area No 1 (AMBAC
Insd)
|
|
|
5.125
|
|
|
09/01/32
|
|
|
1,327,665
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
Laguna Hills, CA Ctf Partn Cmnty Ctr Proj (MBIA Insd)
|
|
|
5.000
|
|
|
12/01/18
|
|
|
1,007,050
|
|
14
See Notes to Financial
Statements
Van Kampen
California Value Municipal Income Trust
Portfolio of
Investments n October 31,
2008 continued
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Par
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(000)
|
|
Description
|
|
Coupon
|
|
Maturity
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
California (Continued)
|
$
|
1,000
|
|
|
Lathrop, CA Impt Bd Act 1915 Mossdale Vlg Assmt Dist
03-1
|
|
|
5.000%
|
|
|
09/02/25
|
|
$
|
737,650
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
Lemon Grove, CA Cmnty Dev Agy Tax Alloc Redev Proj Area
(AMBAC Insd)
|
|
|
4.500
|
|
|
08/01/37
|
|
|
1,478,560
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
Loma Linda, CA Redev Agy Tax Loma Linda Redev Proj Rfdg
(MBIA Insd)
|
|
|
5.125
|
|
|
07/01/30
|
|
|
896,820
|
|
|
145
|
|
|
Long Beach, CA Bd Fin Auth Tax Alloc Rev North Long Beach Redev
Proj, Ser A (AMBAC Insd)
|
|
|
5.375
|
|
|
08/01/21
|
|
|
144,260
|
|
|
3,555
|
|
|
Long Beach, CA Hbr Rev, Ser A
(FGIC Insd) (AMT)
|
|
|
5.250
|
|
|
05/15/18
|
|
|
3,378,956
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
Long Beach, CA Spl Tax Long Beach
Towne Ctr
|
|
|
5.750
|
|
|
10/01/25
|
|
|
1,664,140
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
Los Angeles, CA Cmnty Redev Agy Cmnty Redev Fin Auth Rev Bunker
Hill Proj, Ser A (FSA Insd)
|
|
|
5.000
|
|
|
12/01/27
|
|
|
1,873,660
|
|
|
2,215
|
|
|
Los Angeles, CA Cmnty Redev Agy Multi-Family Hsg Rev Grand Cent
Square Rfdg, Ser B
(AMBAC Insd) (AMT)
|
|
|
4.750
|
|
|
12/01/26
|
|
|
1,709,958
|
|
|
1,900
|
|
|
Los Angeles, CA Ctf Partn
|
|
|
5.700
|
|
|
02/01/18
|
|
|
1,702,571
|
|
|
3,000
|
|
|
Los Angeles, CA Ctf Partn Sr Sonnenblick Del Rio W LA
(AMBAC Insd)
|
|
|
6.000
|
|
|
11/01/19
|
|
|
3,147,870
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
Los Angeles, CA Dept Wtr & Pwr Sys, Ser C
(MBIA Insd)
|
|
|
5.000
|
|
|
07/01/26
|
|
|
1,927,140
|
|
|
1,475
|
|
|
Los Angeles Cnty, CA Metro Trans Auth Rev ARS Cap Grant Rcpt
Goldline, Ser B-1
(MBIA Insd) (f) (i)
|
|
|
11.000
|
|
|
10/01/10
|
|
|
1,475,000
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
Los Angeles Cnty, CA Metro Tran Auth Sales Tax Rev Prop A First
Tier Sr Rfdg, Ser C
(AMBAC Insd)
|
|
|
5.000
|
|
|
07/01/23
|
|
|
1,959,160
|
|
|
1,200
|
|
|
Los Angeles Cnty, CA Sch Regionalized Business Svc Ctf Partn Cap
Apprec Pooled Fin, Ser A (AMBAC Insd)
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
08/01/26
|
|
|
401,808
|
|
|
1,250
|
|
|
Los Angeles Cnty, CA Sch Regionalized Business Svc Ctf Partn Cap
Apprec Pooled Fin, Ser A (FSA Insd)
|
|
|
5.000
|
|
|
09/01/28
|
|
|
1,170,712
|
|
|
1,190
|
|
|
Lynwood, CA Util Auth Enterp Rev
(FSA Insd)
|
|
|
5.000
|
|
|
06/01/25
|
|
|
1,131,964
|
|
|
700
|
|
|
Maywood, CA Cmnty Dev Commn Tax Alloc Merged Maywood Redev Proj
Area (Radian Insd)
|
|
|
4.500
|
|
|
08/01/27
|
|
|
526,505
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
Mendocino Cnty, CA Ctf Partn Cnty Pub Fac Corp (MBIA Insd)
|
|
|
5.250
|
|
|
06/01/30
|
|
|
1,773,300
|
|
|
3,400
|
|
|
Metropolitan Wtr Dist Southn CA Auth, Ser B-2 (MBIA Insd)
|
|
|
5.000
|
|
|
10/01/26
|
|
|
3,348,456
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
Montclair, CA Redev Agy Mobile Home Pk Rev Hacienda Mobile Home
Pk Proj
|
|
|
6.000
|
|
|
11/15/22
|
|
|
1,714,300
|
|
|
2,325
|
|
|
Morongo Band of Mission Indians CA Enterprise Rev Indians
Enterprise Casino, Ser B (e)
|
|
|
5.500
|
|
|
03/01/18
|
|
|
2,049,069
|
|
15
See Notes to Financial
Statements
Van Kampen
California Value Municipal Income Trust
Portfolio of
Investments n October 31,
2008 continued
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Par
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(000)
|
|
Description
|
|
Coupon
|
|
Maturity
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
California (Continued)
|
$
|
2,175
|
|
|
Morongo Band Of Mission Indians CA Enterprise Rev Indians
Enterprise Casino, Ser B (e)
|
|
|
6.500
|
%
|
|
03/01/28
|
|
$
|
1,811,449
|
|
|
3,180
|
|
|
Mount Diablo, CA Uni Sch Dist (FSA Insd) (a)
|
|
|
5.000
|
|
|
08/01/26
|
|
|
3,021,747
|
|
|
1,730
|
|
|
National City, CA Cmnty Dev Commn Tax Alloc National City Redev
Proj, Ser A
(AMBAC Insd)
|
|
|
5.500
|
|
|
08/01/32
|
|
|
1,608,675
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
Needles, CA Pub Util Auth Util Sys Acquisition
Proj, Ser A
|
|
|
6.500
|
|
|
02/01/22
|
|
|
1,814,860
|
|
|
1,500
|
|
|
Norco, CA Spl Tax Cmnty Fac Dist No
97-1 Rfdg
(AGL Insd)
|
|
|
4.875
|
|
|
10/01/30
|
|
|
1,294,020
|
|
|
940
|
|
|
Oceanside, CA Cmnty Fac No
2001-1 Morro
Hills Dev
|
|
|
5.500
|
|
|
09/01/34
|
|
|
689,669
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
Oxnard, CA Uni High Sch Dist Rfdg, Ser A (MBIA Insd)
|
|
|
6.200
|
|
|
08/01/30
|
|
|
1,008,170
|
|
|
1,230
|
|
|
Palm Desert, CA Fin Auth Tax Alloc Rev Proj Area No 2 Rfdg, Ser
A (MBIA Insd)
|
|
|
5.000
|
|
|
08/01/21
|
|
|
1,181,686
|
|
|
250
|
|
|
Palm Springs, CA Arpt Sub Palm Springs Intl Arpt Rfdg (AMT)
|
|
|
5.450
|
|
|
07/01/20
|
|
|
212,837
|
|
|
485
|
|
|
Palm Springs, CA Arpt Sub Palm Springs Intl Arpt Rfdg (AMT)
|
|
|
5.550
|
|
|
07/01/28
|
|
|
367,931
|
|
|
250
|
|
|
Palm Springs, CA Arpt Sub Palm Springs Intl Arpt Rfdg (AMT)
|
|
|
6.000
|
|
|
07/01/18
|
|
|
215,085
|
|
|
250
|
|
|
Palm Springs, CA Arpt Sub Palm Springs Intl Arpt Rfdg (AMT)
|
|
|
6.400
|
|
|
07/01/23
|
|
|
220,535
|
|
|
550
|
|
|
Palm Springs, CA Arpt Sub Palm Springs Intl Arpt Rfdg (AMT)
|
|
|
6.500
|
|
|
07/01/27
|
|
|
471,828
|
|
|
3,000
|
|
|
Palomar Pomerado Hlthcare Dist CA Ctf Partn,
Ser B (FSA Insd) (f) (i)
|
|
|
8.750
|
|
|
11/01/36
|
|
|
3,000,000
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
Palomar Pomerado Hlthcare Dist CA Ctf Partn,
Ser C (FSA Insd) (f) (i)
|
|
|
7.000
|
|
|
11/01/36
|
|
|
2,000,000
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
Perris, CA Pub Fin Auth Loc Agy Rev Perris Vly Vistas IA 3, Ser B
|
|
|
6.625
|
|
|
09/01/38
|
|
|
1,657,700
|
|
|
4,350
|
|
|
Perris, CA Pub Fin Auth Rev Tax Alloc
|
|
|
5.350
|
|
|
10/01/36
|
|
|
3,077,364
|
|
|
1,040
|
|
|
Perris, CA Pub Fin Auth Rev Tax Alloc, Ser A (MBIA Insd)
|
|
|
5.000
|
|
|
10/01/24
|
|
|
995,904
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
Perris, CA Pub Fin Auth Rev Tax Alloc, Ser A (MBIA Insd)
|
|
|
5.000
|
|
|
10/01/31
|
|
|
875,160
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
Pico Rivera, CA Wtr Auth Rev Wtr Sys Proj, Ser A (MBIA Insd)
|
|
|
5.500
|
|
|
05/01/19
|
|
|
1,037,890
|
|
|
1,375
|
|
|
Pittsburg, CA Redev Agy Tax Alloc Los Medanos Cmnty Dev Proj
(AMBAC Insd)
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
08/01/26
|
|
|
434,995
|
|
|
2,500
|
|
|
Port Oakland, CA Rfdg, Ser N
(MBIA Insd) (AMT)
|
|
|
5.000
|
|
|
11/01/22
|
|
|
2,081,850
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
Poway, CA Redev Agy Tax Alloc Paguay Redev Proj, Ser A
(MBIA Insd)
|
|
|
5.000
|
|
|
06/15/33
|
|
|
911,600
|
|
16
See Notes to Financial
Statements
Van Kampen
California Value Municipal Income Trust
Portfolio of
Investments n October 31,
2008 continued
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Par
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(000)
|
|
Description
|
|
Coupon
|
|
Maturity
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
California (Continued)
|
$
|
2,000
|
|
|
Rancho Cordova Cmnty Fac Dist CA Spl Tax
No 2003-1
Sunridge Anatolia
|
|
|
6.000
|
%
|
|
09/01/24
|
|
$
|
1,714,520
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
Rancho Cucamonga, CA Redev Agy Tax Alloc Rancho Redev Proj
(FSA Insd)
|
|
|
5.250
|
|
|
09/01/20
|
|
|
1,001,830
|
|
|
1,220
|
|
|
Rancho Mirage, CA Redev Agy Tax Alloc Redev Plan 1984 Proj, Ser
A-1
(MBIA Insd)
|
|
|
5.000
|
|
|
04/01/26
|
|
|
1,145,641
|
|
|
2,540
|
|
|
Rancho Mirage, CA Redev Agy Tax Alloc Redev Plan 1984 Proj, Ser
A-E (MBIA Insd)
|
|
|
5.250
|
|
|
04/01/33
|
|
|
2,399,767
|
|
|
3,800
|
|
|
Redlands, CA Redev Agy Tax Alloc Redev Proj Rfdg, Ser A
(MBIA Insd)
|
|
|
4.750
|
|
|
08/01/21
|
|
|
3,445,840
|
|
|
4,000
|
|
|
Redwood City, CA Sch Dist (MBIA Insd)
|
|
|
5.000
|
|
|
07/15/23
|
|
|
3,918,160
|
|
|
3,000
|
|
|
Redwood City, CA Sch Dist (MBIA Insd)
|
|
|
5.000
|
|
|
07/15/27
|
|
|
2,782,860
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
|
Riverside, CA Cmnty College Dist Election 2004, Ser C (MBIA
Insd) (a)
|
|
|
5.000
|
|
|
08/01/32
|
|
|
4,595,950
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
RNR Sch Fin Auth CA Spl Tax Cmnty Fac
Dist No 92 1, Ser A (AMBAC Insd)
|
|
|
5.000
|
|
|
09/01/36
|
|
|
1,697,480
|
|
|
9,630
|
|
|
Rohnert Park, CA Cmnty Dev Commons Tax Alloc Rev Hsg Redev Proj,
Ser H (MBIA Insd)
|
|
|
4.375
|
|
|
08/01/37
|
|
|
7,098,273
|
|
|
1,650
|
|
|
Roseville, CA Jt Uni High Sch Dist, Ser B (MBIA Insd)
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
06/01/20
|
|
|
868,197
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
Roseville, CA Spl Tax Fountain Cmnty Fac
Dist No 1
|
|
|
6.125
|
|
|
09/01/38
|
|
|
782,060
|
|
|
265
|
|
|
Sacramento, CA City Fin Auth Rev Cap Impt (AMBAC Insd)
|
|
|
5.000
|
|
|
12/01/33
|
|
|
236,825
|
|
|
900
|
|
|
Sacramento, CA City Fin Auth Rev Tax Alloc, Ser A (MBIA
Insd)
|
|
|
5.000
|
|
|
12/01/34
|
|
|
745,092
|
|
|
4,960
|
|
|
Sacramento, CA Mun Util Dist Elec Rev, Ser U
(FSA Insd) (a)
|
|
|
5.000
|
|
|
08/15/24
|
|
|
4,827,692
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
Sacramento, CA Mun Util Dist Elec Rev, Ser U
(FSA Insd) (a)
|
|
|
5.000
|
|
|
08/15/26
|
|
|
9,612,000
|
|
|
1,500
|
|
|
Sacramento Cnty, CA Spl Tax Cmnty Fac
Dist No
05-2,
Ser A
|
|
|
6.000
|
|
|
09/01/37
|
|
|
1,173,510
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
Salinas Vly, CA Solid Waste Auth Rev
(AMBAC Insd) (AMT)
|
|
|
5.250
|
|
|
08/01/27
|
|
|
820,510
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
Salinas Vly, CA Solid Waste Auth Rev
(AMBAC Insd) (AMT)
|
|
|
5.250
|
|
|
08/01/31
|
|
|
1,589,000
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
San Bernardino, CA Jt Pwr Fin Auth Ctf Partn (MBIA Insd)
|
|
|
5.500
|
|
|
09/01/20
|
|
|
2,010,760
|
|
|
955
|
|
|
San Diego, CA Hsg Auth Multi-Family Hsg Rev Mtg Bkd Sec Pgm, Ser
C
(GNMA Collateralized) (AMT)
|
|
|
5.000
|
|
|
07/20/18
|
|
|
879,593
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
San Diego, CA Pub Fac Fin Auth Swr Rev (MBIA Insd)
|
|
|
5.000
|
|
|
05/15/20
|
|
|
957,510
|
|
|
2,500
|
|
|
San Diego, CA Redev Agy Centre City Redev
Proj, Ser A
|
|
|
6.400
|
|
|
09/01/25
|
|
|
2,237,425
|
|
17
See Notes to Financial
Statements
Van Kampen
California Value Municipal Income Trust
Portfolio of
Investments n October 31,
2008 continued
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Par
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(000)
|
|
Description
|
|
Coupon
|
|
Maturity
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
California (Continued)
|
$
|
840
|
|
|
San Dimas, CA Redev Agy Tax Alloc Creative Growth, Ser A
(FSA Insd)
|
|
|
5.000
|
%
|
|
09/01/16
|
|
$
|
855,137
|
|
|
1,660
|
|
|
San Francisco, CA City & Cnty Arpt Commn Intl Arpt Rev
Spl Fac Lease, Ser A (FSA Insd) (AMT)
|
|
|
6.125
|
|
|
01/01/27
|
|
|
1,522,436
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
San Francisco, CA City & Cnty Arpt Commn Intl Arpt
Second Rfdg, Ser 27A (MBIA Insd) (AMT)
|
|
|
5.250
|
|
|
05/01/26
|
|
|
1,653,500
|
|
|
3,000
|
|
|
San Francisco, CA City & Cnty Arpt Commn Intl Arpt
Second Rfdg, Ser 27A (MBIA Insd) (AMT)
|
|
|
5.250
|
|
|
05/01/31
|
|
|
2,386,620
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
San Francisco, CA City & Cnty Arpt Commn Intl Arpt
Second Rfdg, Ser
A-1
(AMT) (d) (f)
|
|
|
5.500
|
|
|
05/01/19
|
|
|
1,986,100
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
San Joaquin Cnty, CA Pub Fac Fin Corp Rev Ctf Partn Wastewtr
Conveyance Proj
|
|
|
6.000
|
|
|
08/01/37
|
|
|
782,490
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
Sanger, CA Uni Sch Dist Rfdg (MBIA Insd)
|
|
|
5.600
|
|
|
08/01/23
|
|
|
1,981,020
|
|
|
4,820
|
|
|
Santa Ana, CA Uni Sch Dist (MBIA Insd)
|
|
|
5.375
|
|
|
08/01/27
|
|
|
4,738,542
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
Santa Ana, CA Uni Sch Dist Ctf Partn Cap Apprec Fin Proj (FSA
Insd)
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
04/01/36
|
|
|
188,090
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
Santa Clara Cnty, CA Fin Auth Lease Rev Rfdg Lease, Ser
L (a)
|
|
|
5.250
|
|
|
05/15/36
|
|
|
9,294,700
|
|
|
1,500
|
|
|
Sierra View Loc Hlthcare Dist CA Rev
|
|
|
5.250
|
|
|
07/01/32
|
|
|
1,181,115
|
|
|
3,305
|
|
|
South Orange Cnty, CA Pub Fin Auth Reassmt Rev (FSA Insd)
|
|
|
5.800
|
|
|
09/02/18
|
|
|
3,399,787
|
|
|
1,640
|
|
|
South Tahoe, CA Jt Pwr Fin Auth Rev Tahoe Redev Proj Area
1-A Rfdg
(FSA Insd)
|
|
|
5.000
|
|
|
10/01/29
|
|
|
1,517,656
|
|
|
2,250
|
|
|
South Tahoe, CA Jt Pwr Fin Redev Proj Area No 1, Ser A
(AMBAC Insd)
|
|
|
5.000
|
|
|
10/01/28
|
|
|
1,964,407
|
|
|
1,285
|
|
|
Southern CA Logistics Arpt Auth, Ser A
|
|
|
6.000
|
|
|
12/01/38
|
|
|
1,061,192
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
|
Southern CA Pub Pwr Auth Pwr Proj
Rev Multi-Proj
|
|
|
6.750
|
|
|
07/01/12
|
|
|
5,565,250
|
|
|
855
|
|
|
Stanton, CA Multi-Family Rev Hsg Contl Garden Apts (FNMA
Collateralized) (AMT) (f)
|
|
|
5.625
|
|
|
08/01/29
|
|
|
864,901
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
Stockton, CA Uni Sch Dist Ctf Partn Cap Proj (AMBAC Insd)
|
|
|
4.375
|
|
|
02/01/31
|
|
|
781,020
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
Stockton, CA Uni Sch Dist Ctf Partn Cap Proj (AMBAC Insd)
|
|
|
4.500
|
|
|
02/01/36
|
|
|
767,860
|
|
|
1,530
|
|
|
Tejon Ranch, CA Pub Fac Fin Auth Cmnty Fac Dist No
2000-1,
Ser A
|
|
|
5.625
|
|
|
09/01/37
|
|
|
1,130,976
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
Temecula, CA Redev Agy Tax Alloc Rev Sub Lien Redev Proj
No 1
|
|
|
5.500
|
|
|
12/15/38
|
|
|
720,290
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
Tobacco Sec Auth Northn CA Tob Settlement Rev Asset Bkd Bd, Ser
A-1
|
|
|
5.375
|
|
|
06/01/38
|
|
|
6,375,600
|
|
|
10,800
|
|
|
Tobacco Sec Auth Northn CA Tob Settlement Rev Asset Bkd Bd, Ser
A-1
|
|
|
5.500
|
|
|
06/01/45
|
|
|
6,801,300
|
|
|
4,000
|
|
|
Tobacco Sec Auth Southn CA Tob
Settlement Sr, Ser
A-1
|
|
|
5.000
|
|
|
06/01/37
|
|
|
2,406,000
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
|
Tobacco Sec Auth Southn CA Tob
Settlement Sr, Ser
A-1 (a)
|
|
|
5.125
|
|
|
06/01/46
|
|
|
2,940,700
|
|
18
See Notes to Financial
Statements
Van Kampen
California Value Municipal Income Trust
Portfolio of
Investments n October 31,
2008 continued
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Par
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(000)
|
|
Description
|
|
Coupon
|
|
Maturity
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
California (Continued)
|
$
|
8,000
|
|
|
Tobacco Sec Auth Southn CA Tob
Settlement Sr, Ser
A-1
|
|
|
5.125
|
%
|
|
06/01/46
|
|
$
|
4,704,960
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
Turlock, CA Hlth Fac Rev Ctf Partn Emanuel Med Ctr, Ser A
|
|
|
5.125
|
|
|
10/15/31
|
|
|
733,070
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
Turlock, CA Hlth Fac Rev Ctf Partn Emanuel Med Ctr, Ser B
|
|
|
5.125
|
|
|
10/15/37
|
|
|
701,320
|
|
|
3,710
|
|
|
University of CA Rev UCLA Med Ctr, Ser A (AMBAC Insd)
(Prerefunded @ 5/15/12)
|
|
|
5.250
|
|
|
05/15/30
|
|
|
3,530,770
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
Vista, CA Ctf Partn Cmnty Proj (MBIA Insd)
|
|
|
5.000
|
|
|
05/01/37
|
|
|
846,280
|
|
|
2,185
|
|
|
Vista, CA Uni Sch Dist Election 2002, Ser C
(FSA Insd) (a)
|
|
|
5.000
|
|
|
08/01/28
|
|
|
2,087,167
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
Vista, CA Uni Sch Dist, Ser A (FSA Insd)
|
|
|
5.000
|
|
|
08/01/23
|
|
|
979,500
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
Woodland, CA Fin Auth Lease Rev Cap Proj Rfdg (Syncora Gtd)
|
|
|
5.000
|
|
|
03/01/25
|
|
|
1,797,280
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
431,759,564
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guam 0.1%
|
|
385
|
|
|
Guam Govt, Ser A
|
|
|
5.250
|
|
|
11/15/37
|
|
|
258,123
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Puerto Rico 4.5%
|
|
5,000
|
|
|
Puerto Rico Comwlth Hwy & Trans Auth Hwy Rev Rfdg, Ser
Y (FSA Insd) (a)
|
|
|
6.250
|
|
|
07/01/21
|
|
|
5,347,900
|
|
|
1,780
|
|
|
Puerto Rico Elec Pwr Auth Rev, Ser TT (a)
|
|
|
5.000
|
|
|
07/01/32
|
|
|
1,478,192
|
|
|
4,000
|
|
|
Puerto Rico Elec Pwr Auth Rev, Ser TT (a)
|
|
|
5.000
|
|
|
07/01/37
|
|
|
3,224,219
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,050,311
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Virgin Islands 1.4%
|
|
3,000
|
|
|
Virgin Islands Pub Fin Auth Rev Gross Rcpt Taxes Ln Nt,
Ser A
|
|
|
6.375
|
|
|
10/01/19
|
|
|
3,040,680
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Long-Term Investments 200.2%
(Cost $534,408,689)
|
|
|
445,108,678
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Short-Term Investments 4.2%
(Cost $9,420,000)
|
|
|
9,420,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Investments 204.4%
(Cost $543,828,689)
|
|
|
454,528,678
|
|
19
See Notes to Financial
Statements
Van Kampen
California Value Municipal Income Trust
Portfolio of
Investments n October 31,
2008 continued
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Par
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(000)
|
|
Description
|
|
|
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Liability for Floating Rate Note Obligations Related to
Securities Held (33.6%)
(Cost ($74,800,000))
|
|
|
|
|
$(74,800) Notes with interest rates ranging from
1.770% to 3.320% at October 31, 2008 and contractual
maturities of collateral ranging from 2021 to 2046 (See
Note 1) (b)
|
|
$
|
(74,800,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Net Investments 170.8%
(Cost $469,028,689)
|
|
|
379,728,678
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Assets in Excess of Liabilities 1.3%
|
|
|
2,794,695
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred Shares (including accrued
distributions) (72.1%)
|
|
|
(160,224,319
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Assets Applicable to Common Shares 100.0%
|
|
$
|
222,299,054
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentages are calculated as a percentage of net assets
applicable to common shares.
|
|
|
*
|
|
Zero coupon bond
|
|
(a)
|
|
Underlying security related to
Inverse Floaters entered into by the Trust. See Note 1.
|
|
(b)
|
|
Floating rate notes. The interest
rates shown reflect the rates in effect at October 31, 2008.
|
|
(c)
|
|
Security is a
step-up
bond where the coupon increases or steps up at a predetermined
date.
|
|
(d)
|
|
Security purchased on a when-issued
or delayed delivery basis.
|
|
(e)
|
|
144A-Private Placement security
which is exempt from registration under Rule 144A of the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended. This security may only be
resold in transactions exempt from registration which are
normally those transactions with qualified institutional buyers.
|
|
(f)
|
|
Variable Rate Coupon
|
|
(g)
|
|
Escrowed to Maturity
|
|
(h)
|
|
Security is restricted and may be
resold only in transactions exempt from registration which are
normally those transactions with qualified institutional buyers.
Restricted securities comprise 0.7% of net assets applicable to
common shares.
|
|
(i)
|
|
Security includes a feature
allowing the Trust an option on any interest rate payment date
to offer the security for sale at par. The sale is contingent
upon market conditions.
|
20
See Notes to Financial
Statements
Van Kampen
California Value Municipal Income Trust
Portfolio of
Investments n October 31,
2008 continued
AGLAssured Guaranty Ltd.
AMBACAMBAC Indemnity Corp.
AMTAlternative Minimum Tax
CA MTGCalifornia Mortgage
Insurance
Connie LeeConnie Lee
Insurance Co.
FGICFinancial Guaranty
Insurance Co.
FNMAFederal National Mortgage
Association
FSAFinancial Security
Assurance Inc.
GNMAGovernment National
Mortgage Association
MBIAMunicipal Bond Investors
Assurance Corp.
MBIA-IBCMBIA Insured Bond
Certificates
RadianRadian Asset Assurance
SyncoraSyncora Guarantee Inc.
21
See Notes to Financial
Statements
Van Kampen
California Value Municipal Income Trust
Financial Statements
Statement
of Assets and Liabilities
October 31,
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Investments (Cost $543,828,689)
|
|
$
|
454,528,678
|
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
|
168,063
|
|
|
|
Receivables:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
6,986,888
|
|
|
|
Investments Sold
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
5,899
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Assets
|
|
|
461,704,528
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payables:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Floating Rate Note Obligations
|
|
|
74,800,000
|
|
|
|
Investments Purchased
|
|
|
2,970,270
|
|
|
|
Investment Advisory Fee
|
|
|
163,127
|
|
|
|
Other Affiliates
|
|
|
30,661
|
|
|
|
Trustees Deferred Compensation and Retirement Plans
|
|
|
1,026,698
|
|
|
|
Accrued Expenses
|
|
|
190,399
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities
|
|
|
79,181,155
|
|
|
|
Preferred Shares (including accrued distributions)
|
|
|
160,224,319
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Assets Applicable to Common Shares
|
|
$
|
222,299,054
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Asset Value Per Common Share ($222,299,054 divided by
21,996,525 shares outstanding)
|
|
$
|
10.11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Assets Consist of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Shares ($0.01 par value with an unlimited number of
shares authorized, 21,996,525 shares issued
and outstanding)
|
|
$
|
219,965
|
|
|
|
Paid in Surplus
|
|
|
331,216,557
|
|
|
|
Accumulated Undistributed Net Investment Income
|
|
|
269,847
|
|
|
|
Accumulated Net Realized Loss
|
|
|
(20,107,304
|
)
|
|
|
Net Unrealized Depreciation
|
|
|
(89,300,011
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Assets Applicable to Common Shares
|
|
$
|
222,299,054
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred Shares ($0.01 par value, authorized
100,000,000 shares, 6,400 issued with liquidation
preference of $25,000 per share)
|
|
$
|
160,000,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Assets Including Preferred Shares
|
|
$
|
382,299,054
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22
See Notes to Financial
Statements
Van Kampen
California Value Municipal Income Trust
Financial
Statements continued
Statement
of Operations
For the Year
Ended October 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment Income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
$
|
32,029,461
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest and Residual Trust Expenses
|
|
|
3,197,059
|
|
|
|
Investment Advisory Fee
|
|
|
2,767,165
|
|
|
|
Preferred Share Maintenance
|
|
|
506,780
|
|
|
|
Professional Fees
|
|
|
112,715
|
|
|
|
Accounting and Administrative Expenses
|
|
|
110,978
|
|
|
|
Custody
|
|
|
80,312
|
|
|
|
Transfer Agent Fees
|
|
|
50,158
|
|
|
|
Reports to Shareholders
|
|
|
37,112
|
|
|
|
Registration Fees
|
|
|
21,576
|
|
|
|
Trustees Fees and Related Expenses
|
|
|
15,681
|
|
|
|
Depreciation in Trustees Deferred
Compensation Accounts
|
|
|
(261,111
|
)
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
17,614
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Expenses
|
|
|
6,656,039
|
|
|
|
Investment Advisory Fee Reduction
|
|
|
503,122
|
|
|
|
Less Credits Earned on Cash Balances
|
|
|
2,588
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Expenses
|
|
|
6,150,329
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Investment Income
|
|
$
|
25,879,132
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Realized and Unrealized Gain/Loss:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Realized Gain/Loss:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments
|
|
$
|
(17,339,660
|
)
|
|
|
Futures
|
|
|
(3,625,859
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Realized Loss
|
|
|
(20,965,519
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized Appreciation/Depreciation:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning of the Period
|
|
|
5,809,887
|
|
|
|
End of the Period
|
|
|
(89,300,011
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Unrealized Depreciation During the Period
|
|
|
(95,109,898
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Realized and Unrealized Loss
|
|
$
|
(116,075,417
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distributions to Preferred Shareholders
|
|
$
|
(6,947,323
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Decrease in Net Assets Applicable to Common Shares from
Operations
|
|
$
|
(97,143,608
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23
See Notes to Financial
Statements
Van Kampen
California Value Municipal Income Trust
Financial
Statements continued
Statements
of Changes in Net Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For
The
|
|
For
The
|
|
|
Year
Ended
|
|
Year
Ended
|
|
|
October
31, 2008
|
|
October
31, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
From Investment Activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Investment Income
|
|
$
|
25,879,132
|
|
|
$
|
24,871,287
|
|
Net Realized Gain/Loss
|
|
|
(20,965,519
|
)
|
|
|
604,973
|
|
Net Unrealized Depreciation During the Period
|
|
|
(95,109,898
|
)
|
|
|
(28,365,839
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distributions to Preferred Shareholders:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Investment Income
|
|
|
(6,947,323
|
)
|
|
|
(6,576,384
|
)
|
Net Realized Gain
|
|
|
-0-
|
|
|
|
(379,200
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in Net Assets Applicable to Common Shares
from Operations
|
|
|
(97,143,608
|
)
|
|
|
(9,845,163
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distributions to Common Shareholders:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Investment Income
|
|
|
(18,656,681
|
)
|
|
|
(17,697,185
|
)
|
Net Realized Gain
|
|
|
-0-
|
|
|
|
(1,251,061
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Change in Net Assets Applicable to Common Shares from
Investment Activities
|
|
|
(115,800,289
|
)
|
|
|
(28,793,409
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
From Capital Transactions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Value of Common Shares Issued Through
Dividend Reinvestment
|
|
|
827,309
|
|
|
|
387,863
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Change in Net Assets Applicable to Common Shares from
Capital Transactions
|
|
|
(114,972,980
|
)
|
|
|
(28,405,546
|
)
|
Net Assets Applicable to Common Shares:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning of the Period
|
|
|
337,272,034
|
|
|
|
365,677,580
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
End of the Period (Including accumulated undistributed net
investment income of $269,847 and
$170,704, respectively)
|
|
$
|
222,299,054
|
|
|
$
|
337,272,034
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24
See Notes to Financial
Statements
Van Kampen
California Value Municipal Income Trust
Financial
Statements continued
Statement
of Cash Flows
For the Year
Ended October 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in Net Assets from Operations (including Preferred
Share Distributions)
|
|
$
|
(97,143,608
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustments to Reconcile the Change in Net Assets from
Operations to Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of Investments
|
|
|
(195,507,991
|
)
|
|
|
Proceeds from Sales of Investments
|
|
|
290,687,038
|
|
|
|
Net Purchases of Short-Term Investments
|
|
|
(9,420,000
|
)
|
|
|
Amortization of Premium
|
|
|
456,771
|
|
|
|
Accretion of Discount
|
|
|
(1,752,712
|
)
|
|
|
Net Realized Loss on Investments
|
|
|
17,339,660
|
|
|
|
Net Change in Unrealized Depreciation on Investments
|
|
|
95,309,186
|
|
|
|
Decrease in Variation Margin on Futures
|
|
|
666,000
|
|
|
|
Decrease in Interest Receivables
|
|
|
918,362
|
|
|
|
Decrease in Other Assets
|
|
|
949
|
|
|
|
Decrease in Receivable for Investments Sold
|
|
|
895,760
|
|
|
|
Change in Custodian Bank Payable
|
|
|
(3,863,486
|
)
|
|
|
Decrease in Investment Advisory Fee Payable
|
|
|
(42,875
|
)
|
|
|
Increase in Accrued Expenses
|
|
|
53,067
|
|
|
|
Decrease in Distributor and Affiliates Payable
|
|
|
(3,567
|
)
|
|
|
Decrease in Trustees Deferred Compensation and
Retirement Plans
|
|
|
(255,222
|
)
|
|
|
Decrease in Investments Purchased Payable
|
|
|
(4,007,492
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Adjustments
|
|
|
191,473,448
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities
|
|
|
94,329,840
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows From Financing Activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends Paid (net of reinvested dividends $827,309)
|
|
|
(17,791,777
|
)
|
|
|
Proceeds from and Repayments of Floating Rate
Note Obligations
|
|
|
(36,370,000
|
)
|
|
|
Retirement of Preferred Shares
|
|
|
(40,000,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Cash Provided by Financing Activities
|
|
|
(94,161,777
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Increase in Cash
|
|
|
168,063
|
|
|
|
Cash at the Beginning of the Period
|
|
|
-0-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash at the End of the Period
|
|
$
|
168,063
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental Disclosures of Cash Flow Information
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Paid During the Year for Interest
|
|
$
|
3,197,059
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25
See Notes to Financial
Statements
Van Kampen
California Value Municipal Income Trust
Financial
Highlights
The
following schedule presents financial highlights for one common
share of the Trust
outstanding throughout the periods indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year
Ended October 31,
|
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
2005
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
|
Net Asset Value, Beginning of the Period
|
|
$
|
15.38
|
|
|
$
|
16.69
|
|
|
$
|
16.47
|
|
|
$
|
16.95
|
|
|
$
|
16.84
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Investment Income
|
|
|
1.18
|
(a)
|
|
|
1.13
|
(a)
|
|
|
1.09
|
(a)
|
|
|
1.04
|
|
|
|
1.07
|
|
Net Realized and Unrealized Gain/Loss
|
|
|
(5.28
|
)
|
|
|
(1.25
|
)
|
|
|
0.44
|
|
|
|
(0.30
|
)
|
|
|
0.54
|
|
Common Share Equivalent of Distributions Paid to Preferred
Shareholders:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Investment Income
|
|
|
(0.32
|
)
|
|
|
(0.30
|
)
|
|
|
(0.26
|
)
|
|
|
(0.18
|
)
|
|
|
(0.08
|
)
|
Net Realized Gain
|
|
|
-0-
|
|
|
|
(0.02
|
)
|
|
|
(0.03
|
)
|
|
|
(0.01
|
)
|
|
|
(0.03
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total from Investment Operations
|
|
|
(4.42
|
)
|
|
|
(0.44
|
)
|
|
|
1.24
|
|
|
|
0.55
|
|
|
|
1.50
|
|
Distributions Paid to Common Shareholders:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Investment Income
|
|
|
(0.85
|
)
|
|
|
(0.81
|
)
|
|
|
(0.85
|
)
|
|
|
(0.94
|
)
|
|
|
(1.03
|
)
|
Net Realized Gain
|
|
|
-0-
|
|
|
|
(0.06
|
)
|
|
|
(0.17
|
)
|
|
|
(0.09
|
)
|
|
|
(0.36
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Asset Value, End of the Period
|
|
$
|
10.11
|
|
|
$
|
15.38
|
|
|
$
|
16.69
|
|
|
$
|
16.47
|
|
|
$
|
16.95
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Share Market Price at End of the Period
|
|
$
|
10.34
|
|
|
$
|
15.44
|
|
|
$
|
15.86
|
|
|
$
|
14.81
|
|
|
$
|
15.50
|
|
Total
Return* (b)
|
|
|
28.65%
|
|
|
|
2.80%
|
|
|
|
14.36%
|
|
|
|
2.25%
|
|
|
|
1.32%
|
|
Net Assets Applicable to Common Shares at End of the Period
(In millions)
|
|
$
|
222.3
|
|
|
$
|
337.3
|
|
|
$
|
365.7
|
|
|
$
|
329.1
|
|
|
$
|
102.4
|
|
Ratio of Expenses to Average Net Assets Applicable to Common
Shares* (c)
|
|
|
2.03%
|
|
|
|
1.91%
|
|
|
|
1.23%
|
|
|
|
1.34%
|
|
|
|
1.42%
|
|
Ratio of Net Investment Income to Average Net Assets Applicable
to Common
Shares* (c)
|
|
|
8.52%
|
|
|
|
7.04%
|
|
|
|
6.66%
|
|
|
|
6.34%
|
|
|
|
6.40%
|
|
Portfolio Turnover
|
|
|
33%
|
|
|
|
38%
|
|
|
|
25%
|
|
|
|
30%
|
|
|
|
11%
|
|
* If
certain expenses had not been voluntarily assumed by
Van Kampen, total return would have been lower and the
ratios would have been as follows:
|
Ratio of
Expenses to Average Net Assets Applicable to Common
Shares (c)
|
|
|
2.19%
|
|
|
|
2.05%
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
Ratio of Net
Investment Income to Average Net Assets Applicable to Common
Shares (c)
|
|
|
8.36%
|
|
|
|
6.89%
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental Ratios:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ratio of Expenses (Excluding Interest and Residual Trust
Expenses) to Average Net Assets Applicable to Common
Shares (c)
|
|
|
0.97%
|
|
|
|
1.03%
|
|
|
|
1.21%
|
|
|
|
1.34%
|
|
|
|
1.42%
|
|
Ratio of Expenses (Excluding Interest and Residual
Trust Expenses) to Average Net Assets Including Preferred
Shares (c)
|
|
|
0.60%
|
|
|
|
0.66%
|
|
|
|
0.78%
|
|
|
|
0.86%
|
|
|
|
0.89%
|
|
Ratio of Net Investment Income to Average Net Assets Applicable
to Common Shares (d)
|
|
|
6.23%
|
|
|
|
5.18%
|
|
|
|
5.09%
|
|
|
|
5.22%
|
|
|
|
5.94%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Preferred Shares Outstanding
|
|
|
6,400
|
|
|
|
8,000
|
|
|
|
8,000
|
|
|
|
7,200
|
|
|
|
2,400
|
|
Asset Coverage Per Preferred Share (e)
|
|
$
|
59,769
|
|
|
$
|
67,182
|
|
|
$
|
70,730
|
|
|
$
|
70,713
|
|
|
$
|
67,686
|
|
Involuntary Liquidating Preference Per Preferred Share
|
|
$
|
25,000
|
|
|
$
|
25,000
|
|
|
$
|
25,000
|
|
|
$
|
25,000
|
|
|
$
|
25,000
|
|
Average Market Value Per Preferred Share
|
|
$
|
25,000
|
|
|
$
|
25,000
|
|
|
$
|
25,000
|
|
|
$
|
25,000
|
|
|
$
|
25,000
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Based on average shares outstanding. |
|
(b) |
|
Total return assumes an investment at the common share market
price at the beginning of the period indicated, reinvestment of
all distributions for the period in accordance with the
Trusts dividend reinvestment plan, and sale of all shares
at the closing common share market price at the end of the
period indicated. |
|
(c) |
|
Ratios do not reflect the effect of dividend payments to
preferred shareholders. |
|
(d) |
|
Ratios reflect the effect of dividend payments to preferred
shareholders. |
|
(e) |
|
Calculated by subtracting the Trusts total liabilities
(not including the preferred shares) from the Trusts total
assets and dividing this by the number of preferred shares
outstanding. |
N/A=Not Applicable
26
See Notes to Financial
Statements
Van Kampen
California Value Municipal Income Trust
Notes to Financial
Statements n October 31,
2008
1. Significant
Accounting Policies
Van Kampen California Value Municipal Income Trust (the
Trust) is registered as a diversified, closed-end
management investment company under the Investment Company Act
of 1940, as amended (the 1940 Act). The Trusts
investment objective is to seek to provide a high level of
current income exempt from federal and California income taxes,
consistent with preservation of capital. The Trust will invest
in a portfolio consisting substantially of California municipal
obligations rated investment grade at the time of investment.
The Trust commenced investment operations on April 30, 1993.
The following is a summary of significant accounting policies
consistently followed by the Trust in the preparation of its
financial statements. The preparation of the financial
statements in conformity with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America requires management to
make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts
of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets
and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the
reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting
period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
A. Security Valuation Municipal bonds
are valued by independent pricing services or dealers using the
mean of the last reported bid and asked prices or, in the
absence of market quotations, at fair value based upon yield
data relating to municipal bonds with similar characteristics
and general market conditions. Securities which are not valued
by independent pricing services or dealers are valued at fair
value using procedures established in good faith by the Board of
Trustees. Futures contracts are valued at the settlement price
established each day on the exchange on which they are traded.
Short-term securities with remaining maturities of 60 days
or less are valued at amortized cost, which approximates market
value.
B. Security Transactions Security
transactions are recorded on a trade date basis. Realized gains
and losses are determined on an identified cost basis. The Trust
may purchase and sell securities on a when-issued or
delayed delivery basis with settlement to occur at a
later date. The value of the security so purchased is subject to
market fluctuations during this period. The Trust will segregate
assets with the custodian having an aggregate value at least
equal to the amount of the when-issued or delayed delivery
purchase commitments until payment is made. At October 31,
2008, the Trust had $2,970,270 of when-issued or delayed
delivery purchase commitments.
C. Investment Income Interest income is
recorded on an accrual basis. Bond premium is amortized and
discount is accreted over the expected life of each applicable
security.
D. Federal Income Taxes It is the
Trusts policy to comply with the requirements of
Subchapter M of the Internal Revenue Code applicable to
regulated investment companies and to distribute substantially
all of its taxable income to its shareholders. Therefore, no
provision for federal income taxes is required. The Trust
adopted the provisions of the Financial Accounting Standards
Board (FASB) Interpretation No. 48
(FIN 48) Accounting for Uncertainty in
Income Taxes on April 30, 2008. FIN 48 sets forth
a minimum threshold for financial statement recognition of the
benefit of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax
return. The implementation of FIN 48 did not result in any
unrecognized tax benefits in the accompanying financial
statements. If applicable, the Trust recognizes interest accrued
27
Van Kampen
California Value Municipal Income Trust
Notes to Financial
Statements n October 31,
2008 continued
related to unrecognized tax
benefits in Interest Expense and penalties in
Other expenses on the Statement of Operations. The
Trust files tax returns with the U.S. Internal Revenue Service
and various states. Generally, each of the tax years in the four
year period ended October 31, 2008, remains subject to
examination by taxing authorities.
The Trust intends to utilize provisions of the federal income
tax laws which allow it to carry a realized capital loss forward
for eight years following the year of the loss and offset such
losses against any future realized capital gains. At
October 31, 2008, the Trust had an accumulated capital loss
carryforward for tax purposes of $22,031,379 which will expire
according to the following schedule:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
|
Expiration
|
|
$
|
1,441,133
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 31, 2015
|
|
|
20,590,246
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 31, 2016
|
|
At October 31, 2008, the cost and related gross unrealized
appreciation and depreciation were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of investments for tax purposes
|
|
$
|
466,796,855
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross tax unrealized appreciation
|
|
$
|
2,394,924
|
|
|
|
Gross tax unrealized depreciation
|
|
|
(89,463,101
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net tax unrealized depreciation on investments
|
|
$
|
(87,068,177
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
E. Distribution of Income and Gains The
Trust declares and pays monthly dividends from net investment
income to common shareholders. Net realized gains, if any, are
distributed at least annually on a pro rata basis to common and
preferred shareholders. Distributions from net realized gains
for book purposes may include short-term capital gains and a
portion of futures gains, which are included as ordinary income
for tax purposes.
The tax character of distributions paid during the years ended
October 31, 2008 and 2007 was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
Distributions paid from:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ordinary income
|
|
$
|
165
|
|
|
$
|
31,627
|
|
Tax exempt income
|
|
|
25,566,244
|
|
|
|
24,289,502
|
|
Long-term capital gain
|
|
|
-0-
|
|
|
|
1,627,026
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
25,566,409
|
|
|
$
|
25,948,155
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Permanent differences, primarily due to book to tax accretion
differences, resulted in the following reclassifications among
the Trusts components of net assets at October 31,
2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
Undistributed
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
Net Investment
Income
|
|
Net Realized
Loss
|
|
Paid in
Surplus
|
|
$
|
(175,985
|
)
|
|
$
|
175,985
|
|
|
|
-0-
|
|
28
Van Kampen
California Value Municipal Income Trust
Notes to Financial
Statements n October 31,
2008 continued
As of October 31, 2008, the components of distributable
earnings on a tax basis were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Undistributed ordinary income
|
|
$
|
65,317
|
|
Undistributed tax-exempt income
|
|
|
1,145,832
|
|
Undistributed long-term capital gain
|
|
|
-0-
|
|
Net realized gains or losses may differ for financial reporting
and tax purposes primarily as a result of gains or losses
recognized on securities for tax purposes but not for book
purposes.
F. Credits Earned on Cash
Balances During the year ended October 31,
2008, the Trusts custody fee was reduced by $2,588 as a
result of credits earned on cash balances.
G. Floating Rate Note Obligations Related to
Securities Held The Trust enters into transactions
in which it transfers to dealer trusts fixed rate bonds in
exchange for cash and residual interests in the dealer
trusts assets and cash flows, which are in the form of
inverse floating rate investments. The dealer trusts fund the
purchases of the fixed rate bonds by issuing floating rate notes
to third parties and allowing the Trust to retain residual
interests in the bonds. The Trust enters into shortfall
agreements with the dealer trusts, which commit the Trust to pay
the dealer trusts, in certain circumstances, the difference
between the liquidation value of the fixed rate bonds held by
the dealer trusts and the liquidation value of the floating rate
notes held by third parties, as well as any shortfalls in
interest cash flows. The residual interests held by the Trust
(inverse floating rate investments) include the right of the
Trust (1) to cause the holders of the floating rate notes
to tender their notes at par at the next interest rate reset
date, and (2) to transfer the municipal bond from the
dealer trusts to the Trust, thereby collapsing the dealer
trusts. The Trust accounts for the transfer of bonds to the
dealer trusts as secured borrowings, with the securities
transferred remaining in the Trusts investment assets, and
the related floating rate notes reflected as Trust liabilities
under the caption Floating Rate
Note Obligations on the Statement of Assets and
Liabilities. The Trust records the interest income from the
fixed rate bonds under the caption Interest and
records the expenses related to floating rate note obligations
and any administrative expenses of the dealer trusts under the
caption Interest and Residual Trust Expenses on
the Trusts Statement of Operations. The notes issued by
the dealer trusts have interest rates that reset weekly and the
floating rate note holders have the option to tender their notes
to the dealer trusts for redemption at par at each reset date.
At October 31, 2008, Trust investments with a value of
$113,080,025 are held by the dealer trusts and serve as
collateral for the $74,800,000 in floating rate notes
outstanding at that date. Contractual maturities of the floating
rate notes and interest rates in effect at October 31, 2008
are presented on the Portfolio of Investments. The average
floating rate notes outstanding and average annual interest and
fee rate related to residual interests during the fiscal year
ended October 31, 2008 were $108,367,875 and 3.00%,
respectively.
2. Investment
Advisory Agreement and Other Transactions with
Affiliates
Under the terms of the Trusts Investment Advisory
Agreement, Van Kampen Asset Management (the
Adviser) provides investment advice and facilities
to the Trust for an annual fee payable monthly of .55% of the
average daily net assets including current preferred
29
Van Kampen
California Value Municipal Income Trust
Notes to Financial
Statements n October 31,
2008 continued
shares and leverage of $40,000,000
entered into to retire previously issued preferred shares of the
Trust. The Adviser has agreed to waive investment advisory fees
equal to .10% of the average daily net assets including current
preferred shares and leverage of $40,000,000 entered into to
retire previously issued preferred shares of the Trust. During
the year ended October 31, 2008, the Adviser waived
approximately $503,100 of its investment advisory fees. This
waiver is voluntary and can be discontinued at any time.
For the year ended October 31, 2008, the Trust recognized
expenses of approximately $40,400 representing legal services
provided by Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP,
of which a trustee of the Trust is a partner of such firm and he
and his law firm provide legal services as legal counsel to the
Trust.
Under separate Legal Services, Accounting Services and Chief
Compliance Officer (CCO) Employment agreements, the Adviser
provides accounting and legal services and the CCO provides
compliance services to the Trust. The costs of these services
are allocated to each trust. For the year ended October 31,
2008, the Trust recognized expenses of approximately $75,800
representing Van Kampen Investments Inc.s or its
affiliates (collectively Van Kampen) cost
of providing accounting and legal services to the Trust, as well
as the salary, benefits and related costs of the CCO and related
support staff paid by Van Kampen. Services provided
pursuant to the Legal Services agreement are reported as part of
Professional Fees on the Statement of Operations.
Services provided pursuant to the Accounting Services and CCO
Employment agreement are reported as part of Accounting
and Administrative Expenses on the Statement of Operations.
Certain officers and trustees of the Trust are also officers and
directors of Van Kampen. The Trust does not compensate its
officers or trustees who are also officers of Van Kampen.
The Trust provides deferred compensation and retirement plans
for its trustees who are not officers of Van Kampen. Under
the deferred compensation plan, trustees may elect to defer all
or a portion of their compensation to a later date. Benefits
under the retirement plan are payable upon retirement for a
ten-year period and are based upon each trustees years of
service to the Trust. The maximum annual benefit per trustee
under the plan is $2,500.
3. Capital
Transactions
For the years ended October 31, 2008 and 2007, transactions
in common shares were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
October 31,
2008
|
|
October 31,
2007
|
|
Beginning Shares
|
|
|
21,934,705
|
|
|
|
21,909,989
|
|
Shares Issued Through Dividend Reinvestment
|
|
|
61,820
|
|
|
|
24,716
|
|
Shares Repurchased *
|
|
|
-0-
|
|
|
|
-0-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending Shares
|
|
|
21,996,525
|
|
|
|
21,934,705
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
On February 28, 2007, the
Trust commenced a shares repurchase program for purposes of
enhancing stockholder value and reducing the discount at which
the Trusts shares trade from their net asset value. For
the years ended October 31, 2008 and 2007, the Trust
repurchased none of its shares. The Trust may repurchase its
outstanding shares at such time and in such amounts as it
believes such activity will further the accomplishment of the
foregoing objectives, subject to review of the Trustees.
|
30
Van Kampen
California Value Municipal Income Trust
Notes to Financial
Statements n October 31,
2008 continued
4. Investment
Transactions
During the period, the cost of purchases and proceeds from sales
of investments, excluding short-term investments, were
$195,507,991 and $290,687,038, respectively.
5. Derivative
Financial Instruments
A derivative financial instrument in very general terms refers
to a security whose value is derived from the value
of an underlying asset, reference rate or index.
In order to seek to manage the interest rate exposure of the
Trusts portfolio in a changing interest rate environment,
the Trust may purchase or sell financial futures contracts or
engage in transactions involving caps, floors or collars. The
Trust expects to enter into these transactions primarily as a
hedge against anticipated interest rate or fixed-income market
changes, for duration management or for risk management
purposes, but may also enter into these transactions to generate
additional income. All of the Trusts portfolio holdings,
including derivative instruments, are marked to market each day
with the change in value reflected in the unrealized
appreciation/depreciation. Upon disposition, a realized gain or
loss is generally recognized. Risks may arise as a result of the
potential inability of the counterparties to meet the terms of
their contracts.
Summarized below are the specific types of derivative financial
instruments used by the Trust.
A. Futures Contracts A futures contract
is an agreement involving the delivery of a particular asset on
a specified future date at an agreed upon price. The Trust
generally invests in exchange traded futures contracts on U.S.
Treasury securities and typically closes the contract prior to
the delivery date. These contracts are generally used to manage
the Trusts effective maturity and duration. Upon entering
into futures contracts, the Trust maintains an amount of cash or
liquid securities with a value equal to a percentage of the
contract amount with either a futures commission merchant
pursuant to the rules and regulations promulgated under the 1940
Act, or with its custodian in an account in the brokers
name. This amount is known as initial margin. During the period
the futures contract is open, payments are received from or made
to the broker based upon changes in the value of the contract
(the variation margin). The risk of loss associated with a
futures contract is in excess of the variation margin reflected
on the Statement of Assets and Liabilities.
Transactions in futures contracts for the year ended
October 31, 2008 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contracts
|
|
Outstanding at October 31, 2007
|
|
|
666
|
|
Futures Opened
|
|
|
890
|
|
Futures Closed
|
|
|
(1,556
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at October 31, 2008
|
|
|
-0-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
B. Inverse Floating Rate Securities The
Trust may invest a portion of its assets in inverse floating
rate instruments, either through outright purchases of inverse
floating rate securities or through the transfer of bonds to a
dealer trust in exchange for cash and residual interests in the
dealer trust. These investments are typically used by the Trust
in seeking to enhance the yield of the portfolio or used as an
alternative form of leverage in order to redeem a portion of the
Trusts preferred shares. These instruments typically
involve greater risks than a fixed
31
Van Kampen
California Value Municipal Income Trust
Notes to Financial
Statements n October 31,
2008 continued
rate municipal bond. In particular,
these instruments are acquired through leverage or may have
leverage embedded in them and therefore involve many of the
risks associated with leverage. Leverage is a speculative
technique that may expose the Trust to greater risk and
increased costs. Leverage may cause the Trusts net asset
value to be more volatile than if it had not been leveraged
because leverage tends to magnify the effect of any increases or
decreases in the value of the Trusts portfolio securities.
The use of leverage may also cause the Trust to liquidate
portfolio positions when it may not be advantageous to do so in
order to satisfy its obligations with respect to inverse
floating rate instruments.
6. Preferred
Shares
As of October 31, 2008, the Trust has outstanding 6,400
Auction Preferred Shares (APS). Series A contains
1,920 shares, Series B contains 2,400 shares,
Series C contains 1,440 shares and Series D
contains 640 shares. Dividends are cumulative and the
dividend rates are generally reset every 7 days for
Series A, while Series B, Series C and
Series D are generally reset every 28 days through an
auction process. Beginning on February 12, 2008 and
continuing through October 31, 2008, all series of
preferred shares of the Trust were not successfully remarketed.
As a result, the dividend rates of these preferred shares were
reset to the maximum applicable rate on APS. The average rate in
effect on October 31, 2008 was 4.099%. During the year
ended October 31, 2008, the rates ranged from 2.481% to
12.565%.
The Trust pays annual fees equivalent to .25% of the preferred
share liquidation value for the remarketing efforts associated
with the preferred auctions. These fees are included as a
component of the Preferred Share Maintenance expense
on the Statement of Operations.
The APS are redeemable at the option of the Trust in whole or in
part at the liquidation value of $25,000 per share plus
accumulated and unpaid dividends. The Trust is subject to
certain asset coverage tests and the APS are subject to
mandatory redemption if the tests are not met.
The Trust entered into additional inverse floating rate
securities as an alternative form of leverage in order to redeem
and retire a portion of its preferred shares. For the year ended
October 31, 2008, transactions in preferred shares were as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Series
A
|
|
|
Series
B
|
|
|
Series
C
|
|
|
Series
D
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Value
|
|
Outstanding at 10/31/07
|
|
|
2,400
|
|
|
$
|
60,000,000
|
|
|
|
3,000
|
|
|
$
|
75,000,000
|
|
|
|
1,800
|
|
|
$
|
45,000,000
|
|
|
|
800
|
|
|
$
|
20,000,000
|
|
Amount Retired
|
|
|
(480
|
)
|
|
|
(12,000,000
|
)
|
|
|
(600
|
)
|
|
|
(15,000,000
|
)
|
|
|
(360
|
)
|
|
|
(9,000,000
|
)
|
|
|
(160
|
)
|
|
|
(4,000,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at 10/31/08
|
|
|
1,920
|
|
|
$
|
48,000,000
|
|
|
|
2,400
|
|
|
$
|
60,000,000
|
|
|
|
1,440
|
|
|
$
|
36,000,000
|
|
|
|
640
|
|
|
$
|
16,000,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7. Indemnifications
The Trust enters into contracts that contain a variety of
indemnifications. The Trusts maximum exposure under these
arrangements is unknown. However, the Trust has not had prior
claims or losses pursuant to these contracts and expects the
risk of loss to be remote.
8. Accounting
Pronouncements
In September 2006, Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
No. 157, Fair Value Measurements (FAS 157), was
issued and is effective for fiscal years beginning after
32
Van Kampen
California Value Municipal Income Trust
Notes to Financial
Statements n October 31,
2008 continued
November 15, 2007.
FAS 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for
measuring fair value and expands disclosures about fair value
measurements. As of October 31, 2008, the Adviser does not
believe the adoption of FAS 157 will impact the amounts
reported in the financial statements, however, additional
disclosures will be required about the inputs used to develop
the measurements of fair value and the effect of certain
measurements reported on the Statement of Operations for a
fiscal period.
On March 19, 2008, Financial Accounting Standards Board
released Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
No. 161, Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and
Hedging Activities (FAS 161). FAS 161 requires
qualitative disclosures about objectives and strategies for
using derivatives, quantitative disclosures about fair value
amounts of and gains and losses on derivative instruments, and
disclosures about credit-risk-related contingent features in
derivative agreements. The application of FAS 161 is
required for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after
November 15, 2008. At this time, management is evaluating
the implications of FAS 161 and its impact on the financial
statements has not yet been determined.
33
Van
Kampen California Value Municipal Income Trust
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting
Firm
To the Board of Trustees and Shareholders of Van Kampen
California Value Municipal Income Trust
We have audited the accompanying statement of assets and
liabilities of Van Kampen California Value Municipal Income
Trust (the Trust), including the portfolio of
investments, as of October 31, 2008, the related statements
of operations and cash flows for the year then ended, the
statements of changes in net assets for each of the two years in
the period then ended, and the financial highlights for each of
the five years in the period then ended. These financial
statements and financial highlights are the responsibility of
the Trusts management. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on these financial statements and financial highlights
based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements and
financial highlights are free of material misstatement. The
Trust is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform,
an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our
audits included consideration of internal control over financial
reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are
appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of
expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Trusts
internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we
express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a
test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in
the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles
used and significant estimates made by management, as well as
evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. Our
procedures included confirmation of securities owned as of
October 31, 2008, by correspondence with the custodian and
brokers; where replies were not received from brokers, we
performed other auditing procedures. We believe that our audits
provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements and financial
highlights referred to above present fairly, in all material
respects, the financial position of Van Kampen California
Value Municipal Income Trust as of October 31, 2008, the
results of its operations and cash flows for the year then
ended, the changes in its net assets for each of the two years
in the period then ended, and the financial highlights for each
of the five years in the period then ended, in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America.
DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Chicago, Illinois
December 18, 2008
34
Van
Kampen California Value Municipal Income Trust
Dividend Reinvestment Plan
The dividend reinvestment plan (the Plan) offers you
a prompt and simple way to reinvest your dividends and capital
gains distributions into additional shares of the Trust. Under
the Plan, the money you earn from dividends and capital gains
distributions will be reinvested automatically in more shares of
the Trust, allowing you to potentially increase your investment
over time.
Plan
benefits
Add
to your account
You may increase your shares in the Trust easily and
automatically with the Plan.
Low
transaction costs
Shareholders who participate in the Plan are able to buy shares
at below-market prices when the Trust is trading at a premium to
its net asset value. In addition, transaction costs are low
because when new shares are issued by the Trust, there is no
brokerage fee, and when shares are bought in blocks on the open
market, the brokerage commission is shared among all
participants.
Convenience
You will receive a detailed account statement from Computershare
Trust Company, N.A., which administers the Plan, whenever shares
are reinvested for you. The statement shows your total
distributions, date of investment, shares acquired, and price
per share, as well as the total number of shares in your
reinvestment account. You can also access your account via the
Internet. To do this, please go to vankampen.com.
Safekeeping
Computershare Trust Company, N.A. will hold the shares it has
acquired for you in safekeeping.
How to
participate in the Plan
If you own shares in your own name, you can participate directly
in the Plan. If your shares are held in street
namein the name of your brokerage firm, bank, or
other financial institutionyou must instruct that entity
to participate on your behalf. If they are unable to participate
on your behalf, you may request that they reregister your shares
in your own name so that you may enroll in the Plan.
If you choose to participate in the Plan, your dividends and
capital gains distributions will be promptly reinvested for you,
automatically increasing your shares. If the Trust is trading at
a share price that is equal to its net asset value
35
Van
Kampen California Value Municipal Income Trust
Dividend Reinvestment
Plan continued
(NAV), youll pay that amount for your reinvested shares.
However, if the Trust is trading above or below NAV, the price
is determined by one of two ways:
|
|
|
|
1.
|
Premium If the Trust is trading at a premiuma
market price that is higher than its NAVyoull pay
either the NAV or 95 percent of the market price, whichever
is greater. When the Trust trades at a premium, youll pay
less for your reinvested shares than an ordinary investor
purchasing shares on the stock exchange. Keep in mind, a portion
of your price reduction may be taxable because you are receiving
shares at less than market price.
|
|
2.
|
Discount If the Trust is trading at a
discounta market price that is lower than its
NAVyoull pay the market price for your reinvested
shares.
|
How to
enroll
To enroll in the Plan, please read the Terms and Conditions in
the Plan brochure. You can obtain a copy of the Plan Brochure
and enroll in the Plan by visiting vankampen.com, calling
toll-free
(800) 341-2929
or notifying us in writing at Van Kampen Closed End Funds,
Computershare Trust Company, N.A., P.O. Box 43078,
Providence,
RI 02940-3078.
Please include the Trust name and account number and ensure that
all shareholders listed on the account sign these written
instructions. Your participation in the Plan will begin with the
next dividend or capital gains distribution payable after
Computershare Trust Company, N.A. receives your authorization,
as long as they receive it before the record date,
which is generally ten business days before the dividend is
paid. If your authorization arrives after such record date, your
participation in the Plan will begin with the following dividend
or distribution.
Costs of the
plan
There is no direct charge to you for reinvesting dividends and
capital gains distributions because the Plans fees are
paid by the Trust. However, when applicable, you will pay your
portion of any brokerage commissions incurred when the new
shares are purchased on the open market. These brokerage
commissions are typically less than the standard brokerage
charges for individual transactions, because shares are
purchased for all participants in blocks, resulting in lower
commissions for each individual participant. Any brokerage
commissions or service fees are averaged into the purchase price.
Tax
implications
The automatic reinvestment of dividends and capital gains
distributions does not relieve you of any income tax that may be
due on dividends or distributions.
36
Van
Kampen California Value Municipal Income Trust
Dividend Reinvestment
Plan continued
You will receive tax information annually to help you prepare
your federal and state income tax returns.
Van Kampen does not offer tax advice. The tax
information contained herein is general and is not exhaustive by
nature. It was not intended or written to be used, and it cannot
be used by any taxpayer, for avoiding penalties that may be
imposed on the taxpayer under U.S. federal tax laws.
Federal and state tax laws are complex and constantly changing.
Shareholders should always consult a legal or tax advisor for
information concerning their individual situation.
How to withdraw
from the Plan
To withdraw from the Plan please visit vankampen.com or call
(800) 341-2929
or notify us in writing at the address below.
Van Kampen Closed-End Funds
Computershare Trust Company, N.A.
P.O. Box 43078
Providence, RI 02940-3078
All shareholders listed on the account must sign any written
withdrawal instructions. If you withdraw, you have three options
with regard to the shares held in your account:
|
|
|
|
1.
|
If you opt to continue to hold your non-certificated shares,
they will be held by Computershare Trust Company N.A.
|
|
2.
|
If you opt to sell your shares through Van Kampen, we will
sell all full and fractional shares and send the proceeds via
check to your address of record after deducting brokerage
commissions and a $2.50 service fee.
|
|
3.
|
You may sell your shares through your financial advisor through
the Direct Registration Systems (DRS). DRS is a
service within the securities industry that allows Trust shares
to be held in your name in electronic format. You retain full
ownership of your shares, without having to hold a stock
certificate.
|
The Trust and Computershare Trust Company, N.A. may amend or
terminate the Plan. Participants will receive written notice at
least 30 days before the effective date of any amendment.
In the case of termination, Participants will receive written
notice at least 30 days before the record date for the
payment of any dividend or capital gains distribution by the
Trust. In the case of amendment or termination necessary or
appropriate to comply with applicable law or the rules and
policies of the Securities and Exchange Commission or any other
regulatory authority, such written notice will not be
required.
To obtain a
complete copy of the Dividend Reinvestment Plan, please call our
Client Relations department at
800-341-2929
or visit vankampen.com.
37
Van Kampen
California Value Municipal Income Trust
Board of Trustees, Officers and Important Addresses
|
|
|
Board
of Trustees
David C. Arch
Jerry D. Choate
Rod Dammeyer
Linda Hutton Heagy
R. Craig Kennedy
Howard J Kerr
Jack E. Nelson
Hugo F. Sonnenschein
Wayne W. Whalen* Chairman
Suzanne H. Woolsey
Officers
Edward C. Wood III
President and Principal Executive Officer
Dennis Shea
Vice President
Kevin Klingert
Vice President
Amy R. Doberman
Vice President
Stefanie V. Chang Yu
Vice President and Secretary
John L. Sullivan
Chief Compliance Officer
Stuart N. Schuldt
Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
|
|
Investment
Adviser
Van Kampen Asset Management
522 Fifth Avenue
New York, New York 10036
Custodian
State Street Bank
and Trust Company
One Lincoln Street
Boston, Massachusetts 02111
Transfer
Agent
Computershare Trust Company, N.A.
c/o Computershare Investor Services
P.O. Box 43078
Providence, Rhode Island 02940-3078
Legal
Counsel
Skadden, Arps, Slate,
Meagher & Flom LLP
333 West Wacker Drive
Chicago, Illinois 60606
Independent
Registered Public
Accounting Firm
Deloitte & Touche LLP
111 South Wacker Drive
Chicago, Illinois 60606-4301
|
For
federal income tax purposes, the following information is
furnished with respect to the distributions paid by the Trust
during its taxable year ended October 31, 2008. The Trust
designated 100.0% of the income distributions as a tax-exempt
income distribution. In January, the Trust provides tax
information to shareholders for the preceding calendar year.
|
|
|
*
|
|
Interested persons of
the Trust, as defined in the Investment Company Act of 1940, as
amended.
|
38
Van Kampen
California Value Municipal Income Trust
Results of Shareholder Votes
The Annual Meeting of the Shareholders of the Trust was held on
June 18, 2008, where shareholders voted on the election of
trustees.
With regard to the election of the following trustees by the
common shareholders of the Trust:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# of
Shares
|
|
|
In
Favor
|
|
Withheld
|
|
|
R. Craig Kennedy
|
|
|
20,346,322
|
|
|
|
558,742
|
|
Jack E. Nelson
|
|
|
20,338,124
|
|
|
|
566,940
|
|
With regard to the election of the following trustees by the
preferred shareholders of the Trust:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# of
Shares
|
|
|
In
Favor
|
|
Withheld
|
|
|
Hugo F. Sonnenschein
|
|
|
6,431
|
|
|
|
358
|
|
The other trustees of the Trust whose terms did not expire in
2008 are David C. Arch, Jerry D. Choate, Rod Dammeyer, Linda
Hutton Heagy, Howard J Kerr, Wayne W. Whalen and Suzanne H.
Woosley.
39
Van
Kampen California Value Municipal Income Trust
Trustee
and Officer Information
The business and affairs of the Fund are managed under the
direction of the Funds Board of Trustees and the
Funds officers appointed by the Board of Trustees. The
tables below list the trustees and executive officers of the
Fund and their principal occupations during the last five years,
other directorships held by trustees and their affiliations, if
any, with Van Kampen Investments, the Adviser, the
Distributor, Van Kampen Advisors Inc., Van Kampen
Exchange Corp. and Investor Services. The term Fund
Complex includes each of the investment companies advised
by the Adviser as of the date of this Annual Report. Trustees of
the Fund generally serve three year terms or until their
successors are duly elected and qualified. Officers are annually
elected by the trustees.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Independent
Trustees:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Term of
|
|
|
|
Funds in
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Office and
|
|
|
|
Fund
|
|
|
|
|
Position(s)
|
|
Length of
|
|
|
|
Complex
|
|
|
Name, Age and
Address
|
|
Held with
|
|
Time
|
|
Principal
Occupation(s)
|
|
Overseen
|
|
Other
Directorships
|
of Independent
Trustee
|
|
Fund
|
|
Served
|
|
During Past 5
Years
|
|
By
Trustee
|
|
Held by
Trustee
|
|
David C. Arch (63)
Blistex Inc.
1800 Swift Drive
Oak Brook, IL 60523
|
|
Trustee
|
|
Trustee
since 1993
|
|
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Blistex Inc., a consumer
health care products manufacturer.
|
|
|
81
|
|
|
Trustee/Director/Managing General Partner of funds in the Fund
Complex. Director of the Heartland Alliance, a nonprofit
organization serving human needs based in Chicago. Board member
of the Illinois Manufacturers Association. Member of the
Board of Visitors, Institute for the Humanities, University of
Michigan.
|
40
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Van
Kampen California Value Municipal Income Trust
|
Trustee
and Officer
Information continued
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Term of
|
|
|
|
Funds in
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Office and
|
|
|
|
Fund
|
|
|
|
|
Position(s)
|
|
Length of
|
|
|
|
Complex
|
|
|
Name, Age and
Address
|
|
Held with
|
|
Time
|
|
Principal
Occupation(s)
|
|
Overseen
|
|
Other
Directorships
|
of Independent
Trustee
|
|
Fund
|
|
Served
|
|
During Past 5
Years
|
|
By
Trustee
|
|
Held by
Trustee
|
|
Jerry D. Choate (70)
33971 Selva Road
Suite 130
Dana Point, CA 92629
|
|
Trustee
|
|
Trustee
since 2003
|
|
Prior to January 1999, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
of the Allstate Corporation (Allstate) and Allstate
Insurance Company. Prior to January 1995, President and
Chief Executive Officer of Allstate. Prior to August 1994,
various management positions at Allstate.
|
|
|
81
|
|
|
Trustee/Director/Managing General Partner of funds in the Fund
Complex. Director of Amgen Inc., a biotechnological company, and
Valero Energy Corporation, an independent refining company.
|
Rod Dammeyer (68)
CAC, LLC
4370 LaJolla Village Drive
Suite 685
San Diego, CA 92122-1249
|
|
Trustee
|
|
Trustee
since 1993
|
|
President of CAC, LLC, a private company offering capital
investment and management advisory services.
|
|
|
81
|
|
|
Trustee/Director/Managing General Partner of funds in the Fund
Complex. Director of Quidel Corporation, Stericycle, Inc., and
Trustee of The Scripps Research Institute. Prior to February
2008, Director of Ventana Medical Systems, Inc. Prior to April
2007, Director of GATX Corporation. Prior to April 2004,
Director of TheraSense, Inc. Prior to January 2004, Director of
TeleTech Holdings Inc. and Arris Group, Inc.
|
41
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Van
Kampen California Value Municipal Income Trust
|
Trustee
and Officer
Information continued
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Term of
|
|
|
|
Funds in
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Office and
|
|
|
|
Fund
|
|
|
|
|
Position(s)
|
|
Length of
|
|
|
|
Complex
|
|
|
Name, Age and
Address
|
|
Held with
|
|
Time
|
|
Principal
Occupation(s)
|
|
Overseen
|
|
Other
Directorships
|
of Independent
Trustee
|
|
Fund
|
|
Served
|
|
During Past 5
Years
|
|
By
Trustee
|
|
Held by
Trustee
|
|
Linda Hutton Heagy (60)
4939 South Greenwood
Chicago, IL 60615
|
|
Trustee
|
|
Trustee
since 2003
|
|
Prior to February 2008, Managing Partner of Heidrick &
Struggles, an international executive search firm. Prior to
1997, Partner of Ray & Berndtson, Inc., an executive
recruiting firm. Prior to 1995, Executive Vice President of ABN
AMRO, N.A., a bank holding company. Prior to 1990, Executive
Vice President of The Exchange National Bank.
|
|
|
81
|
|
|
Trustee/Director/Managing General Partner of funds in the Fund
Complex. Trustee on the University of Chicago Medical Center
Board, Vice Chair of the Board of the YMCA of Metropolitan
Chicago and a member of the Womens Board of the University
of Chicago.
|
R. Craig Kennedy (56)
1744 R Street, NW
Washington, DC 20009
|
|
Trustee
|
|
Trustee
since 2003
|
|
Director and President of the German Marshall Fund of the United
States, an independent U.S. foundation created to deepen
understanding, promote collaboration and stimulate exchanges of
practical experience between Americans and Europeans. Formerly,
advisor to the Dennis Trading Group Inc., a managed futures and
option company that invests money for individuals and
institutions. Prior to 1992, President and Chief Executive
Officer, Director and member of the Investment Committee of the
Joyce Foundation, a private foundation.
|
|
|
81
|
|
|
Trustee/Director/Managing General Partner of funds in the Fund
Complex. Director of First Solar, Inc.
|
Howard J Kerr (73)
14 Huron Trace
Galena, IL 61036
|
|
Trustee
|
|
Trustee
since 1993
|
|
Prior to 1998, President and Chief Executive Officer of
Pocklington Corporation, Inc., an investment holding company.
|
|
|
81
|
|
|
Trustee/Director/Managing General Partner of funds in the Fund
Complex. Director of the Lake Forest Bank & Trust.
Director of the Marrow Foundation.
|
42
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Van
Kampen California Value Municipal Income Trust
|
Trustee
and Officer
Information continued
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Term of
|
|
|
|
Funds in
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Office and
|
|
|
|
Fund
|
|
|
|
|
Position(s)
|
|
Length of
|
|
|
|
Complex
|
|
|
Name, Age and
Address
|
|
Held with
|
|
Time
|
|
Principal
Occupation(s)
|
|
Overseen
|
|
Other
Directorships
|
of Independent
Trustee
|
|
Fund
|
|
Served
|
|
During Past 5
Years
|
|
By
Trustee
|
|
Held by
Trustee
|
|
Jack E. Nelson (72)
423 Country Club Drive
Winter Park, FL 32789
|
|
Trustee
|
|
Trustee
since 2003
|
|
President of Nelson Investment Planning Services, Inc., a
financial planning company and registered investment adviser in
the State of Florida. President of Nelson Ivest Brokerage
Services Inc., a member of the Financial Industry Regulatory
Authority (FINRA), Securities Investors Protection
Corp. and the Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board. President
of Nelson Sales and Services Corporation, a marketing and
services company to support affiliated companies.
|
|
|
81
|
|
|
Trustee/Director/Managing General Partner of funds in the Fund
Complex.
|
Hugo F. Sonnenschein (68)
1126 E. 59th Street
Chicago, IL 60637
|
|
Trustee
|
|
Trustee
since 1994
|
|
President Emeritus and Honorary Trustee of the University of
Chicago and the Adam Smith Distinguished Service Professor in
the Department of Economics at the University of Chicago. Prior
to July 2000, President of the University of Chicago.
|
|
|
81
|
|
|
Trustee/Director/Managing General Partner of funds in the Fund
Complex. Trustee of the University of Rochester and a member of
its investment committee. Member of the National Academy of
Sciences, the American Philosophical Society and a fellow of the
American Academy of Arts and Sciences.
|
43
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Van
Kampen California Value Municipal Income Trust
|
Trustee
and Officer
Information continued
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Term of
|
|
|
|
Funds in
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Office and
|
|
|
|
Fund
|
|
|
|
|
Position(s)
|
|
Length of
|
|
|
|
Complex
|
|
|
Name, Age and
Address
|
|
Held with
|
|
Time
|
|
Principal
Occupation(s)
|
|
Overseen
|
|
Other
Directorships
|
of Independent
Trustee
|
|
Fund
|
|
Served
|
|
During Past 5
Years
|
|
By
Trustee
|
|
Held by
Trustee
|
|
Suzanne H. Woolsey, Ph.D. (67)
815 Cumberstone Road
Harwood, MD 20776
|
|
Trustee
|
|
Trustee
since 2003
|
|
Chief Communications Officer of the National Academy of
Sciences/National Research Council, an independent, federally
chartered policy institution, from 2001 to November 2003 and
Chief Operating Officer from 1993 to 2001. Prior to 1993,
Executive Director of the Commission on Behavioral and Social
Sciences and Education at the National Academy of
Sciences/National Research Council. From 1980 through 1989,
Partner of Coopers & Lybrand.
|
|
|
81
|
|
|
Trustee/Director/Managing General Partner of funds in the Fund
Complex. Trustee of Changing World Technologies, Inc., an energy
manufacturing company, since July 2008. Director of Fluor Corp.,
an engineering, procurement and construction organization, since
January 2004. Director of Intelligent Medical Devices, Inc., a
symptom based diagnostic tool for physicians and clinical labs.
Director of the Institute for Defense Analyses, a federally
funded research and development center, Director of the German
Marshall Fund of the United States, Director of the Rocky
Mountain Institute and Trustee of California Institute of
Technology and the Colorado College.
|
44
Van
Kampen California Value Municipal Income Trust
Trustee
and Officer
Information continued
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interested
Trustee*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Term of
|
|
|
|
Funds in
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Office and
|
|
|
|
Fund
|
|
|
|
|
Position(s)
|
|
Length of
|
|
|
|
Complex
|
|
|
Name, Age and
Address
|
|
Held with
|
|
Time
|
|
Principal
Occupation(s)
|
|
Overseen
|
|
Other
Directorships
|
of Independent
Trustee
|
|
Fund
|
|
Served
|
|
During Past 5
Years
|
|
By
Trustee
|
|
Held by
Trustee
|
|
Wayne W. Whalen* (69)
333 West Wacker Drive
Chicago, IL 60606
|
|
Trustee
|
|
Trustee
since 1993
|
|
Partner in the law firm of Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher &
Flom LLP, legal counsel to funds in the Fund Complex.
|
|
|
81
|
|
|
Trustee/Director/Managing General Partner of funds in the Fund
Complex. Director of the Abraham Lincoln Presidential Library
Foundation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
As indicated above, prior to
February 2008, Ms. Heagy was an employee of Heidrick and
Struggles, an international executive search firm
(Heidrick). Heidrick has been (and may continue to
be) engaged by Morgan Stanley from time to time to perform
executive searches. Such searches have been done by
professionals at Heidrick without any involvement by
Ms. Heagy. Ethical wall procedures exist to ensure that
Ms. Heagy will not have any involvement with any searches
performed by Heidrick for Morgan Stanley. Ms. Heagy does
not receive any compensation, directly or indirectly, for
searches performed by Heidrick for Morgan Stanley.
|
|
*
|
|
Mr. Whalen is an interested
person (within the meaning of Section 2(a)(19) of the
1940 Act) of certain funds in the Fund Complex by reason of he
and his firm currently providing legal services as legal counsel
to such funds in the Fund Complex.
|
45
Van
Kampen California Value Municipal Income Trust
Trustee
and Officer
Information continued
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Officers:
|
|
|
|
|
Term of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Office and
|
|
|
|
|
Position(s)
|
|
Length of
|
|
|
Name, Age and
|
|
Held with
|
|
Time
|
|
Principal
Occupation(s)
|
Address of
Officer
|
|
Fund
|
|
Served
|
|
During Past 5
Years
|
|
Edward C. Wood III (52)
1 Parkview Plaza - Suite 100
Oakbrook Terrace, IL 60181
|
|
President and
Principal Executive
Officer
|
|
Officer
since 2008
|
|
President and Principal Executive Officer of funds in the Fund
Complex since November 2008. Managing Director of Van Kampen
Investments Inc., the Adviser, the Distributor, Van Kampen
Advisors Inc. and Van Kampen Exchange Corp. since December 2003.
Chief Administrative Officer of Van Kampen Investments Inc., the
Adviser, Van Kampen Advisors Inc. and Van Kampen Exchange Corp.
since December 2002. Chief Operating Officer of the Distributor
since December 2002. Director of Van Kampen Advisors Inc., the
Distributor and Van Kampen Exchange Corp. since March 2004.
Director of the Adviser since August 2008. Director of Van
Kampen Investments Inc. and Van Kampen Investor Services Inc.
since June 2008. Previously, Director of the Adviser and Van
Kampen Investments Inc. from March 2004 to January 2005.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dennis Shea (55)
522 Fifth Avenue
New York, NY 10036
|
|
Vice President
|
|
Officer
since 2006
|
|
Managing Director of Morgan Stanley Investment Advisors Inc.,
Morgan Stanley Investment Management Inc., the Adviser and
Van Kampen Advisors Inc. Chief Investment
OfficerGlobal Equity of the same entities since February
2006. Vice President of Morgan Stanley Institutional and Retail
Funds since February 2006. Vice President of funds in the Fund
Complex since March 2006. Previously, Managing Director and
Director of Global Equity Research at Morgan Stanley from April
2000 to February 2006.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kevin Klingert (45)
522 Fifth Avenue
New York, NY 10036
|
|
Vice President
|
|
Officer
since 2008
|
|
Vice President of funds in the Fund Complex since May 2008.
Chief Operating Officer of the Fixed Income portion of Morgan
Stanley Investment Management Inc. since May 2008. Head
of Global Liquidity Portfolio Management and co-Head of
Liquidity Credit Research of Morgan Stanley Investment
Management since December 2007. Managing Director of Morgan
Stanley Investment Management Inc. from December 2007 to March
2008. Previously, Managing Director on the Management Committee
and head of Municipal Portfolio Management and Liquidity at
BlackRock from October 1991 to January 2007. Assistant Vice
President municipal portfolio manager at Merrill Lynch from
March 1985 to October 1991.
|
46
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Van
Kampen California Value Municipal Income Trust
|
Trustee
and Officer
Information continued
|
|
|
|
|
Term of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Office and
|
|
|
|
|
Position(s)
|
|
Length of
|
|
|
Name, Age and
|
|
Held with
|
|
Time
|
|
Principal
Occupation(s)
|
Address of
Officer
|
|
Fund
|
|
Served
|
|
During Past 5
Years
|
|
Amy R. Doberman (46)
522 Fifth Avenue
New York, NY 10036
|
|
Vice President
|
|
Officer
since 2004
|
|
Managing Director and General CounselU.S. Investment
Management; Managing Director of Morgan Stanley Investment
Management Inc., Morgan Stanley Investment Advisors Inc. and the
Adviser. Vice President of the Morgan Stanley Institutional and
Retail Funds since July 2004 and Vice President of funds in the
Fund Complex since August 2004. Previously, Managing Director
and General Counsel of Americas, UBS Global Asset Management
from July 2000 to July 2004 and General Counsel of Aeltus
Investment Management, Inc. from January 1997 to July 2000.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stefanie V. Chang Yu (42)
522 Fifth Avenue
New York, NY 10036
|
|
Vice President
and Secretary
|
|
Officer
since 2003
|
|
Managing Director of Morgan Stanley Investment Management Inc.
Vice President and Secretary of funds in the Fund Complex.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
John L. Sullivan (53)
1 Parkview Plaza - Suite 100
Oakbrook Terrace, IL 60181
|
|
Chief Compliance
Officer
|
|
Officer
since 1998
|
|
Chief Compliance Officer of funds in the Fund Complex since
August 2004. Prior to August 2004, Director and Managing
Director of Van Kampen Investments, the Adviser, Van Kampen
Advisors Inc. and certain other subsidiaries of Van Kampen
Investments, Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and
Treasurer of funds in the Fund Complex and head of Fund
Accounting for Morgan Stanley Investment Management Inc. Prior
to December 2002, Executive Director of Van Kampen
Investments, the Adviser and Van Kampen Advisors Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stuart N. Schuldt (46)
1 Parkview Plaza - Suite 100
Oakbrook Terrace, IL 60181
|
|
Chief Financial
Officer and
Treasurer
|
|
Officer
since 2007
|
|
Executive Director of Morgan Stanley Investment Management Inc.
since June 2007. Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of funds
in the Fund Complex since June 2007. Prior to June 2007, Senior
Vice President of Northern Trust Company, Treasurer and
Principal Financial Officer for Northern Trust U.S. mutual fund
complex.
|
47
Van
Kampen California Value Municipal Income Trust
An Important Notice Concerning Our
U.S.
Privacy Policy
We are required by
federal law to provide you with a copy of our Privacy Policy
annually.
This Policy applies
to current and former individual clients of Van Kampen
Investments Inc., Van Kampen Asset Management,
Van Kampen Advisors Inc., Van Kampen Funds Inc.,
Van Kampen Investor Services Inc. and Van Kampen
Exchange Corp., as well as current and former individual
investors in Van Kampen mutual funds, unit investment
trusts, and related companies.
This Policy is not
applicable to partnerships, corporations, trusts or other
non-individual clients or account holders, nor is this Policy
applicable to individuals who are either beneficiaries of a
trust for which we serve as trustee or participants in an
employee benefit plan administered or advised by us. This Policy
is, however, applicable to individuals who select us to be a
custodian of securities or assets in individual retirement
accounts, 401(k) accounts, 529 Educational Savings Accounts,
accounts subject to the Uniform Gifts to Minors Act, or similar
accounts. Please note that we may amend this Policy at any time,
and will inform you of any changes to this Policy as required by
law.
We Respect Your
Privacy
We appreciate that
you have provided us with your personal financial information
and understand your concerns about safeguarding such
information. We strive to maintain the privacy of such
information while we help you achieve your financial objectives.
This Policy describes what nonpublic personal information we
collect about you, how we collect it, when we may share it with
others, and how others may use it. It discusses the steps you
may take to limit our sharing of information about you with
affiliated Van Kampen companies (affiliated
companies). It also discloses how you may limit our
affiliates use of shared information for marketing
purposes. Throughout this Policy, we refer to the nonpublic
information that personally identifies you or your accounts as
personal information.
1. What
Personal Information Do We Collect About
You?
To better serve you
and manage our business, it is important that we collect and
maintain accurate information about you. We obtain this
information from applications and other forms you submit to us,
from your dealings with us, from consumer reporting agencies and
from third parties and other sources. For example:
|
|
|
|
|
|
We collect
information such as your name, address,
e-mail
address, phone number and account title.
|
|
(continued
on next page)
Van
Kampen California Value Municipal Income Trust
An
Important Notice Concerning Our
U.S. Privacy Policy continued
|
|
|
|
|
|
We may obtain
information about account balances, your use of account(s) and
the types of products and services you prefer to receive from us
through your dealings and transactions with us and other sources.
|
|
|
|
|
We may obtain
information about your creditworthiness and credit history from
consumer reporting agencies.
|
|
|
|
|
We may collect
background information from and through third-party vendors to
verify representations you have made and to comply with various
regulatory requirements.
|
|
|
|
|
If you interact with
us through our public and private Web sites, we may collect
information that you provide directly through online
communications (such as an
e-mail
address). We may also collect information about your Internet
service provider, your domain name, your computers
operating system and Web browser, your use of our Web sites and
your product and service preferences, through the use of
cookies. Cookies recognize your computer
each time you return to one of our sites, and help to improve
our sites content and personalize your experience on our
sites by, for example, suggesting offerings that may interest
you. Please consult the Terms of Use of these sites for more
details on our use of cookies.
|
|
2. When Do
We Disclose Personal Information We Collect About
You?
To provide you with
the products and services you request, to better serve you, to
manage our business and as otherwise required or permitted by
law, we may disclose personal information we collect about you
to other affiliated companies and to nonaffiliated third
parties.
A. Information
We Disclose to Our Affiliated
Companies. In
order to manage your account(s) effectively, including servicing
and processing your transactions, to let you know about products
and services offered by us and affiliated companies, to manage
our business, and as otherwise required or permitted by law, we
may disclose personal information to other affiliated companies.
Offers for products and services from affiliated companies are
developed under conditions designed to safeguard your personal
information.
B. Information
We Disclose to Third
Parties. We
do not disclose personal information that we collect about you
to nonaffiliated third parties except to enable them to provide
marketing services on our behalf, to perform joint marketing
agreements with other financial institutions, and as otherwise
required or permitted by law. For example, some instances where
we may disclose information about you to third
(continued
on next page)
Van
Kampen California Value Municipal Income Trust
An
Important Notice Concerning Our
U.S. Privacy Policy continued
parties
include: for servicing and processing transactions, to offer our
own products and services, to protect against fraud, for
institutional risk control, to respond to judicial process or to
perform services on our behalf. When we share personal
information with a nonaffiliated third party, they are required
to limit their use of personal information to the particular
purpose for which it was shared and they are not allowed to
share personal information with others except to fulfill that
limited purpose.
3. How Do We
Protect the Security and Confidentiality of Personal Information
We Collect About
You?
We maintain
physical, electronic and procedural security measures to help
safeguard the personal information we collect about you. We have
internal policies governing the proper handling of client
information. Third parties that provide support or marketing
services on our behalf may also receive personal information,
and we require them to adhere to confidentiality standards with
respect to such information.
4. How Can
You Limit the Sharing of Certain Types of Personal Information
With Affiliated
Companies?
We respect your
privacy and offer you choices as to whether we share with
affiliated companies personal information that was collected to
determine your eligibility for products and services you request
(eligibility information). Please note that, even if
you direct us not to share eligibility information with
affiliated companies (opt-out), we may still share
personal information, including eligibility information, with
those companies in circumstances excluded from the opt-out under
applicable law, such as to process transactions or to service
your account. We may also share certain other types of personal
information with affiliated companiessuch as your name,
address, telephone number,
e-mail
address and account number(s), and information about your
transactions and experiences with us.
5. How Can
You Limit the Use of Certain Types of Personal Information by
Affiliated Companies for
Marketing?
You may limit
affiliated companies from marketing their products or services
to you based on your personal information that they receive from
affiliated companies. This information includes your income,
assets and account history. Your choice to limit marketing
offers from affiliated companies will apply until you tell us to
change your choice.
(continued
on next page)
Van
Kampen California Value Municipal Income Trust
An
Important Notice Concerning Our
U.S. Privacy Policy continued
If you wish to
opt-out of sharing and to limit marketing offers, you may do so
by:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Calling us at
(800) 847-2424
Monday-Friday between 8 a.m. and 8 p.m. (ET)
|
|
|
|
|
Writing to us at the
following address:
Van Kampen Privacy Department
Harborside Financial Center, Plaza Two, 3rd Floor
Jersey City, NJ 07311
|
|
If you choose to
write to us, your written request should include your name,
address, telephone number and account number(s) to which the
opt-out applies and should not be sent with any other
correspondence. In order to process your request, we require
that the request be provided by you directly and not through a
third party.
If you have
previously notified us about your privacy preferences, it is not
necessary to do so again unless you decide to change your
preferences. Your opt-out preference will remain in effect with
respect to this Policy (as it may be amended) until you notify
us otherwise in writing. If you have a joint account, your
direction for us not to share this information with other
affiliated companies and for those affiliated companies not to
use your personal information for marketing will be applied to
all account holders on that account.
Please understand
that if you opt-out, you and any joint account holders may not
receive information about affiliated company products and
services that could help you manage your financial resources and
achieve your investment objectives.
If you hold more
than one account with Van Kampen, you may receive multiple
privacy policies from us, and would need to follow the
directions stated in each particular policy for each account you
have with us.
SPECIAL NOTICE TO
RESIDENTS OF
VERMONT
This section
supplements our Policy with respect to our individual clients
who have a Vermont address and supersedes anything to the
contrary in the above Policy with respect to those clients
only.
The State of Vermont
requires financial institutions to obtain your consent prior to
sharing personal information that they collect about you with
affiliated companies and nonaffiliated third parties other than
in certain limited circumstances. Except as permitted by law, we
will not share personal information we collect about you with
nonaffiliated third parties or other affiliated companies unless
you provide us with your written consent to share such
information (opt-in).
(continued
on back)
Van
Kampen California Value Municipal Income Trust
An
Important Notice Concerning Our
U.S. Privacy Policy continued
If you wish to
receive offers for investment products and services offered by
or through other affiliated companies, please notify us in
writing at the following address:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Van Kampen
Privacy Department
Harborside Financial Center, Plaza Two, 3rd Floor
Jersey City, NJ 07311
|
|
Your authorization
should include your name, address, telephone number and account
number(s) to which the opt-in applies and should not be sent
with any other correspondence. In order to process your
authorization, we require that the authorization be provided by
you directly and not through a third-party.
522
Fifth Avenue
New
York, New York 10036
www.vankampen.com
Copyright
©2008
Van Kampen Funds Inc.
All
rights reserved. Member FINRA/SIPC
VCVANN
12/08
IU08-06088P-Y10/08
Item 2. Code of Ethics.
(a) The Trust has adopted a code of ethics (the Code of Ethics) that applies to its principal
executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller, or
persons performing similar functions, regardless of whether these individuals are employed by the
Trust or a third party.
(b) |
|
No information need be disclosed pursuant to this paragraph. |
|
(c) |
|
Due to personnel changes at the Adviser, the list of covered officers set forth in Exhibit B
was amended in June 2008 and November 2008 and the general counsels designee set forth in
Exhibit C was amended in January 2008. All three editions of Exhibit B and both editions of
Exhibit C are attached. |
|
(d) |
|
Not applicable. |
|
(e) |
|
Not applicable. |
|
(f) |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The Trusts Code of Ethics is attached hereto as Exhibit 12(1). |
|
|
(2) |
|
Not applicable. |
|
|
(3) |
|
Not applicable. |
Item 3. Audit Committee Financial Expert.
The Trusts Board of Trustees has determined that it has three audit committee financial experts
serving on its audit committee, each of whom are independent Trustees : Rod Dammeyer, Jerry
Choate and R. Craig Kennedy. Under applicable securities laws, a person who is determined to be an
audit committee financial expert will not be deemed an expert for any purpose, including without
limitation for the purposes of Section 11 of the Securities Act of 1933, as a result of being
designated or identified as an audit committee financial expert. The designation or identification
of a person as an audit committee financial expert does not impose on such person any duties,
obligations, or liabilities that are greater than the duties, obligations, and liabilities imposed
on such person as a member of the audit committee and Board of Trustees in the absence of such
designation or identification.
Item 4. Principal Accountant Fees and Services.
(a)(b)(c)(d) and (g). Based on fees billed for the periods shown:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Registrant |
|
Covered Entities(1) |
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Audit Fees |
|
$ |
31,435 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Audit Fees |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Audit-Related Fees |
|
$ |
415 |
(3) |
|
$ |
215,000 |
(2) |
Tax Fees |
|
$ |
2,750 |
(4) |
|
$ |
0 |
|
All Other Fees |
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
Total Non-Audit Fees |
|
$ |
3,165 |
|
|
$ |
215,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
34,600 |
|
|
$ |
215,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Registrant |
|
Covered Entities(1) |
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Audit Fees |
|
$ |
28,275 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Audit Fees |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Audit-Related Fees |
|
$ |
400 |
(3) |
|
$ |
244,200 |
(2) |
Tax Fees |
|
$ |
1,600 |
(4) |
|
$ |
0 |
|
All Other Fees |
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
Total Non-Audit Fees |
|
$ |
2,000 |
|
|
$ |
244,200 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
30,275 |
|
|
$ |
244,200 |
|
|
|
|
N/A- Not applicable, as not required by Item 4. |
|
(1) |
|
Covered Entities include the Adviser (excluding sub-advisors) and
any entity controlling, controlled by or under common control with the Adviser
that provides ongoing services to the Registrant. |
|
(2) |
|
Audit-Related Fees represent assurance and related services provided
that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit of the financial
statements of the Covered Entities and funds advised by the Adviser or its
affiliates, specifically attestation services provided in connection with a SAS
70 Report. |
|
(3) |
|
Audit-Related Fees represent assurance and related services provided
that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit of the financial
statements of the Registrant, specifically annual agreed upon procedures for
rating agencies. |
|
(4) |
|
Tax Fees represent tax advice and compliance services provided in
connection with the review of the Registrants tax. |
(e)(1) The audit committees pre-approval policies and procedures are as follows:
JOINT AUDIT COMMITTEE
AUDIT AND NON-AUDIT SERVICES
PRE-APPROVAL POLICY AND PROCEDURES
OF THE
VAN KAMPEN FUNDS
AS ADOPTED JULY 23, 2003 AND AMENDED MAY 26, 20041
1. STATEMENT OF PRINCIPLES
The Audit Committee of the Board is required to review and, in its sole discretion,
pre-approve all Covered Services to be provided by the Independent Auditors to the Fund and Covered
Entities in order to assure that services performed by the Independent Auditors do not impair the
auditors independence from the Fund.2
The SEC has issued rules specifying the types of services that an independent auditor may not
provide to its audit client, as well as the audit committees administration of the engagement of
the independent auditor. The SECs rules establish two different approaches to pre-approving
services, which the SEC considers to be equally valid. Proposed services either: may be
pre-approved without consideration of specific case-by-case services by the Audit Committee
(general pre-approval); or require the specific pre-approval of the Audit Committee
(specific pre-approval). The Audit Committee believes that the combination of these two
approaches in this Policy will result in an effective and efficient procedure to pre-approve
services performed by the Independent Auditors. As set forth in this Policy, unless a type of
service has received general pre-approval, it will require specific pre-approval by the Audit
Committee (or by any member of the Audit Committee to which pre-approval authority has been
delegated) if it is to be provided by the Independent Auditors. Any proposed services exceeding
pre-approved cost levels or budgeted amounts will also require specific pre-approval by the Audit
Committee.
For both types of pre-approval, the Audit Committee will consider whether such services are
consistent with the SECs rules on auditor independence. The Audit Committee will also consider
whether the Independent Auditors are best positioned to provide the most effective and efficient
services, for reasons such as its familiarity with the Funds business, people, culture, accounting
systems, risk profile and other factors, and whether the service might enhance the Funds ability
to manage or control risk or improve audit quality. All such factors will be considered as a whole,
and no one factor should necessarily be determinative.
The Audit Committee is also mindful of the relationship between fees for audit and non-audit
services in deciding whether to pre-approve any such services and may determine for each fiscal
year, the appropriate ratio between the total amount of fees for Audit, Audit-related and Tax
services for the Fund (including any Audit-related or Tax service fees for Covered Entities that
were subject to pre-approval), and the total amount of fees for certain permissible non-audit
services classified as All Other services for the Fund (including any such services for Covered
Entities subject to pre-approval).
The appendices to this Policy describe the Audit, Audit-related, Tax and All Other services
that have the general pre-approval of the Audit Committee. The term of any general pre-approval is
12 months from the date of pre-approval, unless the Audit Committee considers and provides a
different period and states otherwise. The Audit Committee will annually review and pre-approve the
services that may be provided by the Independent Auditors without obtaining specific pre-approval
|
|
|
1 |
|
This Joint Audit Committee Audit and Non-Audit Services
Pre-Approval Policy and Procedures (the Policy), amended as of the
date above, supercedes and replaces all prior versions that may have been
amended from time to time. |
|
2 |
|
Terms used in this Policy and not otherwise defined
herein shall have the meanings as defined in the Joint Audit Committee
Charter. |
from the Audit Committee. The Audit Committee will add to or subtract from the list of general
pre-approved services from time to time, based on subsequent determinations.
The purpose of this Policy is to set forth the policy and procedures by which the Audit
Committee intends to fulfill its responsibilities. It does not delegate the Audit Committees
responsibilities to pre-approve services performed by the Independent Auditors to management.
The Funds Independent Auditors have reviewed this Policy and believes that implementation of
the Policy will not adversely affect the Independent Auditors independence.
2. Delegation
As provided in the Act and the SECs rules, the Audit Committee may delegate either type of
pre-approval authority to one or more of its members. The member to whom such authority is
delegated must report, for informational purposes only, any pre-approval decisions to the Audit
Committee at its next scheduled meeting.
3. Audit Services
The annual Audit services engagement terms and fees are subject to the specific pre-approval
of the Audit Committee. Audit services include the annual financial statement audit and other
procedures required to be performed by the Independent Auditors to be able to form an opinion on
the Funds financial statements. These other procedures include information systems and procedural
reviews and testing performed in order to understand and place reliance on the systems of internal
control, and consultations relating to the audit. The Audit Committee will monitor the Audit
services engagement as necessary, but no less than on a quarterly basis, and will also approve, if
necessary, any changes in terms, conditions and fees resulting from changes in audit scope, Fund
structure or other items.
In addition to the annual Audit services engagement approved by the Audit Committee, the Audit
Committee may grant general pre-approval to other Audit services, which are those services that
only the Independent Auditors reasonably can provide. Other Audit services may include statutory
audits and services associated with SEC registration statements (on Forms N-1A, N-2, N-3, N-4,
etc.), periodic reports and other documents filed with the SEC or other documents issued in
connection with securities offerings.
The Audit Committee has pre-approved the Audit services in Appendix B.1. All other Audit
services not listed in Appendix B.1 must be specifically pre-approved by the Audit Committee (or by
any member of the Audit Committee to which pre-approval has been delegated).
4. Audit-related Services
Audit-related services are assurance and related services that are reasonably related to the
performance of the audit or review of the Funds financial statements or, to the extent they are
Covered Services, the Covered Entities financial statements, or that are traditionally performed
by the Independent Auditors. Because the Audit Committee believes that the provision of
Audit-related services does not impair the independence of the auditor and is consistent with the
SECs rules on auditor independence, the Audit Committee may grant general pre-approval to
Audit-related services. Audit-related services include, among others, accounting consultations
related to accounting, financial reporting or disclosure matters not classified as Audit
services; assistance with understanding and implementing new accounting and financial reporting
guidance from rulemaking authorities; agreed-upon or expanded audit procedures related to
accounting and/or billing records required to respond to or comply with financial, accounting or
regulatory reporting matters; and assistance with internal control reporting requirements under
Forms N-SAR and/or N-CSR.
The Audit Committee has pre-approved the Audit-related services in Appendix B.2. All other
Audit-related services not listed in Appendix B.2 must be specifically pre-approved by the Audit
Committee (or by any member of the Audit Committee to which pre-approval has been delegated).
5. Tax Services
The Audit Committee believes that the Independent Auditors can provide Tax services to the
Fund and, to the extent they are Covered Services, the Covered Entities, such as tax compliance,
tax planning and tax advice without impairing the auditors independence, and the SEC has stated
that the Independent Auditors may provide such services. Hence, the Audit Committee believes it may
grant general pre-approval to those Tax services that have historically been provided by the
Independent Auditors, that the Audit Committee has reviewed and believes would not impair the
independence of the Independent Auditors, and that are consistent with the SECs rules on auditor
independence. The Audit Committee will not permit the retention of the Independent Auditors in
connection with a transaction initially recommended by the Independent Auditors, the sole business
purpose of which may be tax avoidance and the tax treatment of which may not be supported in the
Internal Revenue Code and related regulations. The Audit Committee will consult with Director of
Tax or outside counsel to determine that the tax planning and reporting positions are consistent
with this policy.
Pursuant to the preceding paragraph, the Audit Committee has pre-approved the Tax Services in
Appendix B.3. All Tax services involving large and complex transactions not listed in Appendix B.3
must be specifically pre-approved by the Audit Committee (or by any member of the Audit Committee
to which pre-approval has been delegated), including tax services proposed to be provided by the
Independent Auditors to any executive officer or trustee/director/managing general partner of the
Fund, in his or her individual capacity, where such services are paid for by the Fund (generally
applicable only to internally managed investment companies).
6. All Other Services
The Audit Committee believes, based on the SECs rules prohibiting the Independent Auditors
from providing specific non-audit services, that other types of non-audit services are permitted.
Accordingly, the Audit Committee believes it may grant general pre-approval to those permissible
non-audit services classified as All Other services that it believes are routine and recurring
services, would not impair the independence of the auditor and are consistent with the SECs rules
on auditor independence.
The Audit Committee has pre-approved the All Other services in Appendix B.4. Permissible All
Other services not listed in Appendix B.4 must be specifically pre-approved by the Audit Committee
(or by any member of the Audit Committee to which pre-approval has been delegated).
A list of the SECs prohibited non-audit services is attached to this policy as Appendix B.5.
The SECs rules and relevant guidance should be consulted to determine the precise definitions of
these services and the applicability of exceptions to certain of the prohibitions.
7. Pre-Approval Fee Levels or Budgeted Amounts
Pre-approval fee levels or budgeted amounts for all services to be provided by the Independent
Auditors will be established annually by the Audit Committee. Any proposed services exceeding
these levels or amounts will require specific pre-approval by the Audit Committee. The Audit
Committee is mindful of the overall relationship of fees for audit and non-audit services in
determining whether to pre-approve any such services. For each fiscal year, the Audit Committee may
determine the appropriate ratio between the total amount of fees for Audit, Audit-related, and Tax
services for the Fund (including any Audit-related or Tax services fees for Covered Entities
subject to pre-approval), and the total amount of fees for certain permissible non-audit services
classified as All Other services for the Fund (including any such services for Covered Entities
subject to pre-approval).
8. Procedures
All requests or applications for services to be provided by the Independent Auditors that do
not require specific approval by the Audit Committee will be submitted to the Funds Chief
Financial Officer and must include a detailed description of the services to be rendered. The
Funds Chief Financial Officer will determine whether such services are included within the list of
services that have received the general pre-approval of the Audit Committee. The Audit Committee
will be informed on a timely basis of any such services rendered by the Independent Auditors.
Requests or applications to provide services that require specific approval by the Audit Committee
will be submitted to the Audit Committee by both the Independent Auditors and the Funds Chief
Financial Officer, and must include a joint statement as to whether, in their view, the request or
application is consistent with the SECs rules on auditor independence.
The Audit Committee has designated the Funds Chief Financial Officer to monitor the
performance of all services provided by the Independent Auditors and to determine whether such
services are in compliance with this Policy. The Funds Chief Financial Officer will report to the
Audit Committee on a periodic basis on the results of its monitoring. A sample report is included
as Appendix B.7. Both the Funds Chief Financial Officer and management will immediately report to
the chairman of the Audit Committee any breach of this Policy that comes to the attention of the
Funds Chief Financial Officer or any member of management.
9. Additional Requirements
The Audit Committee has determined to take additional measures on an annual basis to meet its
responsibility to oversee the work of the Independent Auditors and to assure the auditors
independence from the Fund, such as reviewing a formal written statement from the Independent
Auditors delineating all relationships between the Independent Auditors and the Fund, consistent
with Independence Standards Board No. 1, and discussing with the Independent Auditors its methods
and procedures for ensuring independence.
10. Covered Entities
Covered Entities include the Funds investment adviser(s) and any entity controlling,
controlled by or under common control with the Funds investment adviser(s) that provides ongoing
services to the Fund(s). Beginning with non-audit service contracts entered into on or after May 6,
2003, the Funds audit committee must pre-approve non-audit services provided not only to the Fund
but also to the Covered Entities if the engagements relate directly to the operations and financial
reporting of the Fund. This list of Covered Entities would include:
|
- |
|
Van Kampen Investments Inc. |
|
|
- |
|
Van Kampen Asset Management |
|
|
- |
|
Van Kampen Advisors Inc. |
|
|
- |
|
Van Kampen Funds Inc. |
|
|
- |
|
Van Kampen Investor Services Inc. |
|
|
- |
|
Morgan Stanley Investment Management Inc. |
|
|
- |
|
Morgan Stanley Trust Company |
|
|
- |
|
Morgan Stanley Investment Management Ltd. |
|
|
- |
|
Morgan Stanley Investment Management Company |
|
|
- |
|
Morgan Stanley Asset & Investment Trust Management Company Ltd. |
(e)(2) Beginning with non-audit service contracts entered into on or after May 6, 2003, the audit
committee also is required to pre-approve services to Covered Entities to the extent that the
services
are determined to have a direct impact on the operations or financial reporting of the Registrant.
100% of such services were pre-approved by the audit committee pursuant to the Audit Committees
pre-approval policies and procedures (included herein).
(f) Not applicable.
(g) See table above.
(h) The audit committee of the Board of Trustees has considered whether the provision of
services other than audit services performed by the auditors to the Registrant and Covered Entities
is compatible with maintaining the auditors independence in performing audit services.
Item 5. Audit Committee of Listed Registrants.
(a) The Trust has a separately-designated standing audit committee established in accordance with
Section 3(a)(58)(A) of the Exchange Act whose members are: R. Craig Kennedy, Jerry Choate and Rod
Dammeyer.
(b) Not applicable.
Item 6. Schedule of Investments.
(a) Please refer to Item #1.
(b) Not applicable.
Item 7. Disclosure of Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures for Closed-End Management Investment Companies.
The Trust invests in exclusively non-voting securities and therefore this item is not applicable to
the Trust.
Item 8. Portfolio Managers of Closed-End Management Investment Companies.
PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT. As of the date of this report, the Fund is managed by members of the
Municipals team. The team consists of portfolio managers and analysts. Current members of the team
jointly and primarily responsible for the day-to-day management of the Funds portfolio and the
overall execution of the strategy of the Fund are Robert W. Wimmel, an Executive Director of the
Adviser and William Black and Mark Paris, each an Executive Director of the Adviser.
Mr. Wimmel has been associated with the Adviser in an investment management capacity since August
1996 and began managing the Fund in November 2001. Mr. Black has been associated with the Adviser
as a High Yield Municipal Analyst since June 1998 and began managing the Fund in December 2007.
Mr. Paris has been associated with the Adviser in an investment management capacity since August
2002 and began managing the Fund in April 2008.
The composition of the team may change from time to time.
OTHER ACCOUNTS MANAGED BY THE PORTFOLIO MANAGERS
As of October 31, 2008:
Mr. Wimmel managed 16 registered investment companies with a total of approximately $7.0 billion in
assets; no pooled investment vehicles other than registered investment companies; and no other
accounts.
Mr. Black managed 12 registered investment companies with a total of approximately $9.4 billion in
assets; no pooled investment vehicles other than registered investment companies; and no other
accounts.
Mr. Paris managed 17 registered investment companies with a total of approximately $10.8 billion in
assets; no pooled investment vehicles other than registered investment companies; and one other
account with a total of approximately $13.6 million in assets.
Because the portfolio managers manage assets for other investment companies, pooled investment
vehicles, and/or other accounts (including institutional clients, pension plans and certain high
net worth individuals), there may be an incentive to favor one client over another resulting in
conflicts of interest. For instance, the Adviser may receive fees from certain accounts that are
higher than the fee it receives from the Fund, or it may receive a performance-based fee on certain
accounts. In those instances, the portfolio managers may have an incentive to favor the higher
and/or performance-based fee accounts over the Fund. The portfolio managers of the Fund do not
currently manage accounts for other investment companies, pooled investment vehicles or other
accounts that charge a performance-based fee. In addition, a conflict of interest could exist to
the extent the Adviser has proprietary investments in certain accounts, where portfolio managers
have personal investments in certain accounts or when certain accounts are investment options in
the Advisers employee benefits and/or deferred compensation plans. The portfolio manager may have
an incentive to favor these accounts over others. If the Adviser manages accounts that engage in
short sales of securities of the type in which the Fund invests, the Adviser could be seen as
harming the performance of the Fund for the benefit of the accounts engaged in short sales if the
short sales cause the market value of the securities to fall. The Adviser has adopted trade
allocation and other policies and procedures that it believes are reasonably designed to address
these and other conflicts of interest.
PORTFOLIO MANAGER COMPENSATION STRUCTURE
Portfolio managers receive a combination of base compensation and discretionary compensation,
comprised of a cash bonus and several deferred compensation programs described below. The
methodology used to determine portfolio manager compensation is applied across all accounts managed
by the portfolio manager.
BASE SALARY COMPENSATION. Generally, portfolio managers receive base salary compensation based on
the level of their position with the Adviser.
DISCRETIONARY COMPENSATION. In addition to base compensation, portfolio managers may receive
discretionary compensation.
Discretionary compensation can include:
- Cash Bonus;
- Morgan Stanleys Long-Term Incentive Compensation Program awards a mandatory program that
defers a portion of discretionary year-end compensation into restricted stock units or other awards
or other investments based on Morgan Stanley common stock that are subject to vesting and other
conditions;
- Investment Management Alignment Plan (IMAP) awards a mandatory program that defers a portion
of discretionary year-end compensation and notionally invests it in designated funds advised by the
Adviser or its affiliates. The award is subject to vesting and other conditions. Portfolio managers
must notionally invest a minimum of 25% to a maximum of 100% of the IMAP deferral into a
combination of the designated open-end funds they manage that are included in the IMAP Fund menu;
- Voluntary Deferred Compensation Plans voluntary programs that permit certain employees to
elect to defer a portion of their discretionary year-end compensation and directly or notionally
invest the deferred amount: (1) across a range of designated investment funds, including funds
advised by the Adviser or its affiliates; and/or (2) in Morgan Stanley stock units.
Several factors determine discretionary compensation, which can vary by portfolio management team
and circumstances. In order of relative importance, these factors include:
- Investment performance. A portfolio managers compensation is linked to the pre-tax investment
performance of the funds/accounts managed by the portfolio manager. Investment performance is
calculated for one-, three- and five-year periods measured against an appropriate securities market
index (or indices) for the funds/accounts managed by the portfolio manager. The assets managed by
the portfolio managers in funds, pooled investment vehicles and other accounts are described in
Other Accounts Managed by the Portfolio Managers above. Generally, the greatest weight is placed
on the three- and five-year periods.
- Revenues generated by the investment companies, pooled investment vehicles and other accounts
managed by the portfolio manager.
- Contribution to the business objectives of the Adviser.
- The dollar amount of assets managed by the portfolio manager.
- Market compensation survey research by independent third parties.
- Other qualitative factors, such as contributions to client objectives.
- Performance of Morgan Stanley and Morgan Stanley Investment Management Inc., and the overall
performance of the investment team(s) of which the portfolio is a member.
SECURITIES OWNERSHIP OF PORTFOLIO MANAGERS
As of October 31, 2008, the portfolio managers did not own any shares of the Fund.
Item 9. Purchase of Equity Securities by Closed-End Management Investment Company and Affiliated Purchasers.
Not Applicable.
Item 10. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.
Not Applicable.
Item 11. Controls and Procedures
(a) The Trusts principal executive officer and principal financial officer have concluded that the
Trusts disclosure controls and procedures are sufficient to ensure that information required to be
disclosed by the Trust in this Form N-CSR was recorded, processed, summarized and reported within
the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commissions rules and forms, based upon
such officers evaluation of these controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days of the
filing date of the report.
(b) There were no changes in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that
occurred during the second fiscal quarter of the period covered by this report that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over
financial reporting.
Item 12. Exhibits.
(1) The Code of Ethics for Principal Executive and Senior Financial Officers is attached hereto.
(2)(a) A certification for the Principal Executive Officer of the registrant is attached hereto as
part of EX-99.CERT.
(2)(b) A certification for the Principal Financial Officer of the registrant is attached hereto as
part of EX-99.CERT.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act
of 1940, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned,
thereunto duly authorized.
(Registrant) Van Kampen California Value Municipal Income Trust
|
|
|
|
|
|
By: |
/s/ Edward C. Wood III
|
|
|
Name: |
Edward C. Wood III |
|
|
Title: Date: |
Principal Executive Officer
December 17, 2008 |
|
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment
Company Act of 1940, this report has been signed by the following persons on behalf of the
registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
By: |
/s/ Edward C. Wood III
|
|
|
Name: |
Edward C. Wood III |
|
|
Title: Date: |
Principal Executive Officer
December 17, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
By: |
/s/ Stuart N. Schuldt
|
|
|
Name: |
Stuart N. Schuldt |
|
|
Title: Date: |
Principal Financial Officer
December 17, 2008 |
|
|