INDUSTRIAL DISTRIBUTION GROUP, INC.
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 2006
OR
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
FOR THE TRANSITION PERIOD FROM _________ TO __________
COMMISSION FILE NUMBER 001-13195
INDUSTRIAL DISTRIBUTION GROUP, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
58-2299339 |
|
|
|
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.) |
950 East Paces Ferry Road, Suite 1575 Atlanta, Georgia 30326
(Address of principal executive offices and zip code)
(404) 949-2100
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
(Former Name, Former Address and Formal Fiscal Year, if Changed Since Last Report)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer,
or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of accelerated filer and large accelerated filer in
Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
Large Accelerated Filer o
|
|
Accelerated Filer x
|
|
Non-Accelerated Filer o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act). Yes o No x
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of common stock, as of
the latest practicable date:
|
|
|
Class
|
|
Outstanding at July 19, 2006 |
|
|
|
Common Stock, $0.01 par value
|
|
9,510,905 |
INDUSTRIAL DISTRIBUTION GROUP, INC.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
2
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
INDUSTRIAL DISTRIBUTION GROUP, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands, except share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
JUNE 30, |
|
|
DECEMBER 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CURRENT ASSETS: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
455 |
|
|
$ |
721 |
|
Accounts receivable, net |
|
|
76,035 |
|
|
|
65,661 |
|
Inventory, net |
|
|
56,820 |
|
|
|
58,485 |
|
Deferred tax assets |
|
|
3,613 |
|
|
|
3,652 |
|
Prepaid and other current assets |
|
|
4,011 |
|
|
|
3,324 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
140,934 |
|
|
|
131,843 |
|
PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT, NET |
|
|
4,265 |
|
|
|
4,672 |
|
INTANGIBLE ASSETS, NET |
|
|
180 |
|
|
|
201 |
|
DEFERRED TAX ASSETS |
|
|
1,919 |
|
|
|
2,158 |
|
OTHER ASSETS |
|
|
1,091 |
|
|
|
1,454 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
148,389 |
|
|
$ |
140,328 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES & STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CURRENT LIABILITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current portion of long-term debt |
|
$ |
28 |
|
|
$ |
83 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
53,332 |
|
|
|
47,684 |
|
Accrued compensation |
|
|
2,586 |
|
|
|
2,891 |
|
Other accrued liabilities |
|
|
5,861 |
|
|
|
5,545 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
61,807 |
|
|
|
56,203 |
|
LONG-TERM DEBT, NET OF CURRENT PORTION |
|
|
12,109 |
|
|
|
12,818 |
|
OTHER LONG-TERM LIABILITIES |
|
|
874 |
|
|
|
996 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
74,790 |
|
|
|
70,017 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (NOTE 10) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, $0.10 par value per share;
10,000,000 shares authorized, no shares
issued or outstanding in 2006 and 2005 |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
Common stock, par value $0.01 per share,
50,000,000 shares authorized; 9,463,286
shares issued and outstanding in 2006;
9,382,515 shares issued and outstanding in
2005 |
|
|
95 |
|
|
|
94 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
100,627 |
|
|
|
100,401 |
|
Accumulated deficit |
|
|
(27,123 |
) |
|
|
(30,184 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
73,599 |
|
|
|
70,311 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
148,389 |
|
|
$ |
140,328 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
3
INDUSTRIAL DISTRIBUTION GROUP, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(In thousands, except share data)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
THREE MONTHS ENDED |
|
|
|
JUNE 30, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
NET SALES |
|
$ |
137,005 |
|
|
$ |
135,618 |
|
COST OF SALES |
|
|
107,721 |
|
|
|
105,823 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
29,284 |
|
|
|
29,795 |
|
SELLING, GENERAL, AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES |
|
|
26,374 |
|
|
|
26,791 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
2,910 |
|
|
|
3,004 |
|
INTEREST EXPENSE, net |
|
|
302 |
|
|
|
425 |
|
OTHER INCOME, net |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EARNINGS BEFORE INCOME TAXES |
|
|
2,611 |
|
|
|
2,579 |
|
PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES |
|
|
1,091 |
|
|
|
1,013 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET EARNINGS |
|
$ |
1,520 |
|
|
$ |
1,566 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
0.16 |
|
|
$ |
0.17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
0.16 |
|
|
$ |
0.16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WEIGHTED AVERAGE SHARES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
9,441,741 |
|
|
|
9,352,985 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
|
9,721,465 |
|
|
|
9,726,781 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
4
INDUSTRIAL DISTRIBUTION GROUP, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(In thousands, except share data)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SIX MONTHS ENDED |
|
|
|
JUNE 30, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
NET SALES |
|
$ |
277,281 |
|
|
$ |
273,566 |
|
COST OF SALES |
|
|
217,865 |
|
|
|
214,820 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
59,416 |
|
|
|
58,746 |
|
SELLING, GENERAL, AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES |
|
|
53,611 |
|
|
|
53,344 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
5,805 |
|
|
|
5,402 |
|
INTEREST EXPENSE, net |
|
|
613 |
|
|
|
850 |
|
OTHER (INCOME) EXPENSE, net |
|
|
(21 |
) |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EARNINGS BEFORE INCOME TAXES |
|
|
5,213 |
|
|
|
4,551 |
|
PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES |
|
|
2,152 |
|
|
|
1,760 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET EARNINGS |
|
$ |
3,061 |
|
|
$ |
2,791 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
0.32 |
|
|
$ |
0.30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
0.31 |
|
|
$ |
0.29 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WEIGHTED AVERAGE SHARES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
9,439,711 |
|
|
|
9,354,777 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
|
9,723,232 |
|
|
|
9,728,001 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
5
INDUSTRIAL DISTRIBUTION GROUP, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SIX MONTHS ENDED |
|
|
|
JUNE 30, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings |
|
$ |
3,061 |
|
|
$ |
2,791 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net earnings to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
551 |
|
|
|
639 |
|
Gain on sale of assets |
|
|
(219 |
) |
|
|
(408 |
) |
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
278 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
Excess tax benefit from exercise of stock options |
|
|
(327 |
) |
|
|
0 |
|
Stock-based compensation expense |
|
|
320 |
|
|
|
238 |
|
Income tax benefit of stock options exercised |
|
|
448 |
|
|
|
100 |
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable, net |
|
|
(10,374 |
) |
|
|
(2,606 |
) |
Inventories, net |
|
|
1,665 |
|
|
|
38 |
|
Prepaid and other assets |
|
|
(324 |
) |
|
|
(422 |
) |
Accounts payable |
|
|
5,648 |
|
|
|
(1,512 |
) |
Accrued compensation |
|
|
(305 |
) |
|
|
(1,926 |
) |
Other accrued liabilities |
|
|
194 |
|
|
|
1,970 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total adjustments |
|
|
(2,445 |
) |
|
|
(3,968 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities |
|
|
616 |
|
|
|
(1,177 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additions to property and equipment, net |
|
|
(647 |
) |
|
|
(55 |
) |
Proceeds from the sale of property and equipment |
|
|
743 |
|
|
|
2,246 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by investing activities |
|
|
96 |
|
|
|
2,191 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of common stock, net of issuance costs |
|
|
831 |
|
|
|
347 |
|
Purchase of common stock |
|
|
(1,372 |
) |
|
|
(457 |
) |
Excess tax benefit from exercise of stock options |
|
|
327 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
Repayments on revolving credit facility |
|
|
(90,754 |
) |
|
|
(63,825 |
) |
Borrowings on revolving credit facility |
|
|
90,029 |
|
|
|
61,000 |
|
Payments for deferred loan costs |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
(125 |
) |
Short-term debt repayments |
|
|
(55 |
) |
|
|
0 |
|
Short-term debt borrowings |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
Long-term debt repayments |
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
(64 |
) |
Long-term debt borrowings |
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in financing activities |
|
|
(978 |
) |
|
|
(3,120 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET CHANGE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS |
|
|
(266 |
) |
|
|
(2,106 |
) |
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, beginning of period |
|
|
721 |
|
|
|
3,164 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, end of period |
|
$ |
455 |
|
|
$ |
1,058 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental Disclosures: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest paid |
|
$ |
546 |
|
|
$ |
536 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income taxes paid |
|
$ |
1,578 |
|
|
$ |
1,069 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
6
INDUSTRIAL DISTRIBUTION GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS JUNE 30, 2006 (Unaudited)
Industrial Distribution Group, Inc. (IDG or the Company), a Delaware corporation, was formed on
February 12, 1997 to create a nationwide supplier of cost-effective, Flexible Procurement
Solutions (FPS) for manufacturers and other users of maintenance, repair, operating, and
production (MROP) products. The Company conducts business in 49 states and two foreign countries,
providing expertise in the procurement, management, and application of MROP products to a wide
range of industries.
1. BASIS OF PRESENTATION
The accompanying unaudited interim consolidated financial statements are prepared pursuant to the
Securities and Exchange Commissions rules and regulations for reporting on Form 10-Q. Accordingly,
certain information and footnotes required by U. S. generally accepted accounting principles for
complete financial statements are not included herein. The Company believes all adjustments
necessary for a fair presentation of these interim statements have been included and are of a
normal and recurring nature.
These interim statements should be read in conjunction with the Companys financial statements and
notes thereto, included in its Annual Report on Form 10-K, for the fiscal year ended December 31,
2005.
Certain reclassifications have been made to prior year amounts to conform to the current year
presentation.
2. NEW ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
In July 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Interpretation No. 48,
Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxesan interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109. This
Interpretation prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the financial
statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax
return, and provides guidance on derecognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting
in interim periods, disclosure, and transition. This Interpretation is effective for fiscal years
beginning after December 15, 2006. The Company is currently assessing the impact of the
Interpretation on its financial statements.
3. ADOPTION OF NEW ACCOUNTING STANDARDS
In December 2004, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123R (SFAS No.
123R) Shared Based Payment, which requires companies to measure compensation cost for all
share-based payments, including employee stock options. The effective date of SFAS No. 123R is
January 1, 2006, for calendar year companies. The Company adopted SFAS No. 123R on January 1, 2006,
and the adoption did not have a material impact on the Companys financial statements. See Note 8
to these consolidated financial statements for further discussion regarding stock-based
compensation.
4. SALE OF PROPERTY
During the second quarter of 2006, the Company sold real property located in Tonawanda, New York in
a continuing effort to consolidate warehouse facilities, improve logistic efficiencies and reduce
assets. The property sold for $0.7 million, net of closing costs, resulting in a gain of $0.3
million. The gain on the sale of assets is included as a reduction of selling, general and
administrative expenses. There were no relocation or severance costs associated with the sale. A
sales office was leased in Amherst, New York to serve customers in the Buffalo, New York area.
During the first quarter of 2005, the Company sold real property, located in Greensboro, North
Carolina. The property sold for $2.2 million, net of closing costs. The gain associated with this
sale was $0.4 million and is classified as a reduction of selling, general, and administrative
expenses. There were no relocation or severance costs associated with this sale of property. A new
location was leased in Greensboro to serve customers.
5. DIVESTITURES
During the third quarter of 2005, the Company sold the net assets of its Cardinal Machinery
business unit. Assets and liabilities with a net book value of approximately $0.7 million were sold
for total consideration of $0.8 million resulting in a gain of $0.1 million.
7
Revenues for Cardinal Machinery were $2.3 million and $4.6 million for the three months and six
months ended June 30, 2005, respectively, which represented less than 2% of total revenues in both
periods.
6. CREDIT FACILITY
In December 2000, the Company entered into a $100.0 million revolving credit facility with a five
financial institution syndicate. On July 18, 2005, the Company amended its agreement with the
existing syndicate. The agreement provides a $75.0 million credit facility with an accordion option
enabling the Company to expand the facility to $110.0 million and extends through July 18, 2010.
The agreement requires a first security interest in certain assets of the Company. The annual
commitment fee on the unused portion of the amended facility is 25 basis points (0.25%) of the
average daily unused portion of the available capacity, which may range from $75.0 million up to
$110.0 million depending upon how much of the accordion option is used. The agreement provides that
the facility may be used for operations and acquisitions, and provides $7.5 million for swinglines
and $10.0 million for letters of credit. Amounts outstanding under the amended credit facility bear
interest at either the lead banks corporate rate or LIBOR, as selected by the Company from time to
time, plus applicable margins. This rate was 7.7% and 5.7% at June 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005,
respectively.
The amounts outstanding under the facility at June 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005 were $12.1
million and $12.8 million, respectively, which have been classified as long-term liabilities in the
consolidated balance sheets. Additionally, the Company had outstanding letters of credit of $1.2
million under the facility at June 30, 2006 and $1.6 million at December 31, 2005. The credit
facility contains a requirement for a fixed charge coverage ratio to be met if monthly average
excess availability under the facility falls below $15.0 million. The Company has the ability to
repurchase up to $5.0 million of its common stock during any one fiscal year under the terms of the
agreement. Covenants under the credit facility prohibit the payment of cash dividends, among
various other restrictions. The Company was in compliance with these covenants as of June 30, 2006
and December 31, 2005.
7. CAPITAL STOCK
During the respective three month periods ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, the Company issued 6,825
shares and 16,434 shares, respectively, of its common stock through its employee stock purchase
plan and issued 179,917 shares and 36,486 shares, respectively, of its common stock pursuant to the
exercise of options. For the six month periods ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, the Company issued
14,637 shares and 27,151 shares of its common stock through its employee stock purchase plan and
issued 227,134 shares and 41,803 shares of its common stock pursuant to the exercise of options.
Options are included in the computation of diluted earnings per share where the options exercise
price is less than the average market price of the common stock during the period. The number of
options outstanding during the three months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005 had a dilutive effect of
279,724 shares and 373,796 shares, respectively, to the weighted average common stock outstanding.
The number of options outstanding during the six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005 had a dilutive
effect of 283,521 shares and 373,224 shares, respectively, to the weighted average common shares
outstanding. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, options where the
exercise price exceeded the average market price of the common stock totaled 39,050 and 57,095,
respectively. Such shares were not included in the calculation of weighted average shares
outstanding because they were antidilutive.
On February 23, 2005, the Companys Board of Directors approved a program for the Company to
repurchase up to $5.0 million of its outstanding common stock over a 24-month period from the
adoption of the program. During the three months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, the Company
repurchased 71,300 shares and 41,000 shares of its common stock, respectively, for an average price
per share of $9.21 and $8.28, respectively. During the six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, the
Company repurchased 161,000 shares and 54,300 shares, respectively, for an average price per share
of $8.54 and $8.43, respectively. Based on the Companys repurchases of its common stock through
June 30, 2006, the Company is authorized to repurchase an additional $2.5 million of its
outstanding shares of common stock under the current terms of the repurchase program.
8. STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION
Effective January 1, 2006, the Company adopted the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS No.
123R, using the modified prospective transition method. Accordingly, prior year amounts have not
been restated. Under this transition method, compensation cost recognized commencing on January 1,
2006 includes: (a) compensation cost for all share-based payments granted prior to, but not yet
vested as of January 1, 2006, based on the grant-date fair value estimated in accordance with the
original provisions of SFAS No. 123, and (b) compensation cost for all share-based payments granted
subsequent to January 1, 2006, based on the grant-date fair value estimated in accordance with the
provisions of SFAS No. 123R. Prior to January 1, 2006, as permitted by SFAS No. 123, the
8
Company accounted for share-based payments using the prospective method described in SFAS No. 148,
Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation-Transition and Disclosure. The Company uses the
Black-Scholes-Merton formula to estimate the value of stock options granted and recognizes stock
compensation costs over the explicit vesting period.
As the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS No. 123 and SFAS No. 123R were materially
consistent, the adoption of SFAS No. 123R did not have a significant impact on the Companys
financial position or results of operations. Prior to the adoption of SFAS No. 123R, the Company
presented all tax benefits from deductions resulting from the exercise of stock options as
operating cash flows in the Statement of Cash Flows. SFAS No. 123R requires that the portion of
benefits resulting from tax deductions in excess of recognized compensation (the excess tax
benefits) be presented as financing cash flows. The excess tax benefits were approximately $0.3
million for the six month period ended June 30, 2006, and would have been presented as an operating
cash flow prior to the adoption of SFAS 123R. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2006,
we recorded less than $0.1 million and $0.3 million, respectively, in compensation expense related
to our share-based payment awards.
The fair value of each option grant is estimated on the date of grant using the
Black-Scholes-Merton option-pricing model with the following weighted average assumptions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SIX MONTHS ENDED |
|
|
|
JUNE 30, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Expected life (years) |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
Dividend yield |
|
|
0 |
% |
|
|
0 |
% |
Expected stock price volatility |
|
|
50 |
% |
|
|
57 |
% |
Risk-free interest rate (low-high) |
|
|
4.29% - 5.23 |
% |
|
|
3.74% - 4.48 |
% |
The Black-Scholes-Merton option-pricing model was developed for use in estimating the fair value of
traded options, which have no vesting restrictions and are fully transferable. In addition, option
valuation models require the input of highly subjective assumptions including the expected stock
price volatility. Because the Companys employee stock options have characteristics significantly
different from those of traded options, and because changes in the subjective input assumptions can
materially affect the fair value estimate, in managements opinion, the existing models do not
necessarily provide a reliable single measure of the fair value of the Companys employee stock
options.
Expected volatilities are based on the historical volatility of our stock. We believe that
historical volatility is the best indicator of future volatility. We also use historical data to
estimate the term options are expected to be outstanding and to estimate forfeitures of options
granted. The risk-free rate for the expected life of the option is based on the U.S. Treasury yield
in effect at the time of grant.
The weighted average grant-date fair value of options granted during the three months ended June
30, 2006 and 2005 was $4.93 and $5.34, respectively. The weighted average grant-date fair value of
options granted during the six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005 was $4.57 and $5.05,
respectively. The total intrinsic value of options exercised during the three months ended June
30, 2006 and 2005 was $1.1 million and $0.2 million, respectively. The total intrinsic value of
options exercised during the six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005 was $1.3 million and $0.2
million, respectively. The total weighted average grant-date fair value of options exercised during
the quarters ended June 30, 2006 and 2005 was $2.07 and $2.29, respectively. The total weighted
average grant-date fair value of options exercised during the six months ended June 30, 2006 and
2005 was $2.05 and $2.32, respectively. As of June 30, 2006, unrecognized compensation cost related
to unvested stock option awards totaled $0.3 million and is expected to be recognized over a
weighted average period of 1.85 years.
The Company may issue stock options and restricted stock under its stock incentive plan, management
incentive plan and non-shareholder approved equity arrangements. Under all plans, stock options
expire ten years from the date of grant and vest ratably over three-to-four year periods. Under all
plans, restricted stock vests (ceases to be subject to forfeiture) on the third anniversary of the
date of grant.
The stock incentive plan was adopted to provide key employees, officers, and directors an
opportunity to own common stock of the Company and to provide incentives for such persons to
promote the financial success of the Company. Awards under the stock incentive plan may be
structured in a variety of ways, including incentive and nonqualified stock options, and shares of
common stock subject to terms and conditions set by the Board of Directors (restricted stock
awards). Incentive stock options may be granted only to full-time employees (including officers)
of the Company and any subsidiaries. Nonqualified options, restricted stock awards, and other
permitted forms of awards may be granted to any person employed by or performing services for the
Company, including directors. The stock incentive plan provides for the issuance of an aggregate
number of shares of common stock equal to 15% of the
9
total issued and outstanding shares as of the date any award is granted; provided, that the number
of shares available for grant as ISOs under the plan shall not exceed an aggregate of 1,000,000
shares. The Company currently has 245,479 shares available for issuance under the stock incentive
plan.
Under the management incentive plan, management may be awarded shares of stock or restricted stock
based on attaining certain performance goals. The Company issued shares in 2006 for 2005
performance based on the terms of the management incentive plan. A maximum of 250,000 shares of
common stock may be issued at fair market value under this fixed plan. The Company has issued
209,190 shares under the management incentive plan as of June 30, 2006.
A summary of changes in outstanding stock options for the six months ended June 30, 2006 is as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WEIGHTED |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AVERAGE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WEIGHTED |
|
|
REMAINING |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AVERAGE |
|
|
CONTRACTUAL |
|
|
AGGREGATE |
|
|
|
SHARES |
|
|
EXERCISE PRICE |
|
|
LIFE |
|
|
INTRINSIC VALUE |
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2005 |
|
|
943,847 |
|
|
$ |
4.86 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted |
|
|
44,000 |
|
|
$ |
7.94 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited and surrendered |
|
|
(22,278 |
) |
|
$ |
10.61 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised |
|
|
(227,134 |
) |
|
$ |
3.18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at June 30, 2006 |
|
|
738,435 |
|
|
$ |
5.39 |
|
|
|
5.09 |
|
|
$ |
2,593,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vested/Exercisable at June 30, 2006 |
|
|
646,102 |
|
|
$ |
5.07 |
|
|
|
4.55 |
|
|
$ |
2,517,000 |
|
Cash received from stock options exercised for the six months ended June 30, 2006 was $0.7 million.
The income tax benefit from share-based arrangements for the six months ended June 30, 2006 totaled
approximately $0.4 million.
A summary of changes in unvested shares of restricted stock for the six months ended June 30, 2006
is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WEIGHTED |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AVERAGE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GRANT DATE |
|
|
|
SHARES |
|
|
FAIR VALUE |
|
Outstanding, unvested at December 31, 2005 |
|
|
112,911 |
|
|
$ |
8.35 |
|
Granted |
|
|
75,383 |
|
|
$ |
7.82 |
|
Forfeited and surrendered |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
Vested |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding, unvested at June 30, 2006 |
|
|
188,294 |
|
|
$ |
8.14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of June 30, 2006, unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested restricted stock awards
totaled $1.0 million and is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 1.95 years.
No shares vested during the six month period ended June 30, 2006.
9. DEFERRED TAXES
The Companys net deferred tax assets totaled approximately $5.5 million at June 30, 2006 and $5.8
million at December 31, 2005, and are subject to periodic recoverability assessments. The
realization of the Companys deferred tax assets is principally dependent upon the Company being
able to generate sufficient future taxable income in certain tax jurisdictions. Factors used to
assess the likelihood of realization are the Companys forecast of future taxable income (which is
based upon estimates and assumptions) and available tax planning strategies that could be
implemented to realize the net deferred tax assets.
On the basis of the Companys operating results and projections for future taxable income,
management believes it is more likely than not that future operations will generate sufficient
taxable income to realize the net deferred tax assets. The valuation allowance for net deferred tax
assets was $0.6 million as of June 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005. The valuation allowance for
deferred tax assets at June 30, 2006 is primarily for state net operating loss carryforwards for
which the Company believes sufficient taxable income will not be realized prior to expiration.
10. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
The Company is subject to various claims and legal actions, which arise in the ordinary course of
business. The Company has and will continue to vigorously defend itself in these matters. The
Company believes, based upon information available at this time, that the
ultimate resolution of such matters will not have a material adverse effect on the Companys
financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
10
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following discussion is based upon our historical financial results. In this discussion, most
percentages and dollar amounts have been rounded to aid presentation; as a result, all such figures
are approximations. References to such approximations have generally been omitted.
This discussion may contain certain forward-looking statements concerning our operations,
performance, and financial condition, including, in particular, the likelihood of our success in
developing and expanding our business. These statements are based upon a number of assumptions and
estimates that are inherently subject to significant uncertainties and contingencies, many of which
are beyond our control. Actual results may differ materially from those expressed or implied by
such forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause actual results to differ, include but are
not limited to: our ability to compete successfully in the highly competitive and diverse MROP
market, our ability to renew profitable contracts, the availability of key personnel for employment
by us, our reliance on the expertise of our senior management, our reliance on regional information
systems, the interruption of business due to our system consolidation efforts, the uncertainty of
customers demand for our products and services, our relationships with and dependence upon
third-party suppliers and manufacturers, discontinuance of our distribution rights, failure to
successfully implement efficiency improvements and other factors discussed in more detail under
Item 1A Risk Factors in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal year 2005.
Our discussions below in this Item 2 are based upon the more detailed discussions about our
business, operations and financial condition included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
fiscal year ended December 31, 2005, under Item 7. Our discussions here focus on our results during
or as of the three-month and six-month periods ended June 30, 2006, and the comparable periods of
2005 and, to the extent applicable, any material changes from the information discussed in that
Form 10-K or other important intervening developments or information since that time. These
discussions should be read in conjunction with that Form 10-K for more detailed and background
information.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Implementation of Centralized Back Office Computer System
During the second quarter of 2006, we completed the first of two phases of the implementation of
our centralized back office computer operating system (Infor ERP SX.enterprise, or SX.e). As a
result of the conversion, we now have 65% of our operations running on the same back office
platform. Since the conversion on May 1st, we have resolved post-conversion issues with
our Electronic Data Interchange (EDI) processes that temporarily disrupted the receipt of automated
orders from certain customers. We believe all EDI related issues were resolved prior to the second
quarter end. The temporary disruption in receipt of such automated orders reduced sales for the
second quarter by an estimated $2.8 million to $3.2 million. We will substantially complete our
remaining conversions in the fourth quarter of 2006.
THREE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2006 AND 2005
The following table sets forth a summary of our operating data and shows such data as a percentage
of net sales for the periods indicated (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
THREE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Net Sales |
|
$ |
137,005 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
135,618 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
Cost of Sales |
|
|
107,721 |
|
|
|
78.6 |
|
|
|
105,823 |
|
|
|
78.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Profit |
|
|
29,284 |
|
|
|
21.4 |
|
|
|
29,795 |
|
|
|
22.0 |
|
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses |
|
|
26,374 |
|
|
|
19.3 |
|
|
|
26,791 |
|
|
|
19.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Income |
|
|
2,910 |
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
|
3,004 |
|
|
|
2.2 |
|
Interest Expense, net |
|
|
302 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
425 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
Other Income, net |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings Before Taxes |
|
|
2,611 |
|
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
|
2,579 |
|
|
|
1.9 |
|
Provision for Income Taxes |
|
|
1,091 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
1,013 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Earnings |
|
$ |
1,520 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
% |
|
$ |
1,566 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11
Net sales
Net sales increased $1.4 million or 1.0% to $137.0 million for the three months ended June 30, 2006
from $135.6 million for the three months ended June 30, 2005. Our FPS revenues comprised 58.7% of
our total revenue for the quarter. Total FPS revenue grew $4.6 million or 6.0% to $80.4 million as
compared to $75.8 million in the prior year quarter. As of June 30, 2006 the total number of FPS
sites under management was 340, of which 103 were storeroom management sites, representing a net
increase of nine sites since June 30, 2005. FPS revenue grew despite an estimated loss of $1.4
million to $1.6 million of sales from delays in receipt and processing certain automated orders as
a result of interruption of our EDI transactions following the IT system conversion. General MROP
revenue decreased $3.2 million or 5.3% to $56.6 million for the three months ended June 30, 2006,
from $59.8 million for the same period in 2005. Over 70% of that decline was attributable to the
disposition of the former Cardinal Machinery business unit in late 2005, which had provided $2.3
million in revenue in the second quarter of 2005. The remainder of the decrease resulted from an
estimated loss of $1.4 million to $1.6 million in sales volume due to the IT system conversion
issues, which masked a $2.4 million increase in General MROP revenue over the second quarter of
2005 without the results of the former Cardinal Machinery business unit.
Cost of Sales
Cost of sales increased $1.9 million or 1.8% to $107.7 million for the three months ended June 30,
2006, from $105.8 million for the three months ended June 30, 2005. As a percentage of sales, cost
of sales increased to 78.6% for the three months ended June 30, 2006, from 78.0% in 2005. A portion
of the increase in cost of sales was due to a shift in sales mix (an increase in the volume of FPS
sales relative to General MROP sales), and due to the elimination of higher gross margin associated
with the 2005 period revenue of our Cardinal Machinery business unit, which was disposed of in
September 2005. In addition, both inventory reserves and freight-in costs increased by a total of
$0.2 million.
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses
Selling, general and administrative expenses decreased $0.4 million or 1.6% to $26.4 million for
the three months ended June 30, 2006, from $26.8 million for the three months ended June 30, 2005.
As a percentage of sales, total selling, general and administrative expenses decreased to 19.3% for
the second quarter of 2006 from 19.8% for the second quarter of 2005. The decline in selling,
general and administrative expenses was primarily due to (i) a gain on the sale of real property of
$0.3 million; and (ii) the aforementioned sale of the Cardinal Machinery business unit which
eliminated $0.7 million of expense associated with its operations in the prior year quarter. These
favorable variances were partially offset by a net increase in salaries and benefits expense of
$0.2 million which reflects a $0.7 million increase in salaries expense and a decrease of $0.5
million in healthcare costs resulting from a favorable change in healthcare providers. The
increase in salaries expense was due to additional personnel associated with nine new storeroom
management sites since the prior year, coupled with an increase in overtime and temporary labor
associated with the IT system conversion. In addition, freight-out and delivery increased $0.2
million and bad debt expense increased $0.3 million over the prior period.
Operating Income
Operating income was $2.9 million, or 2.1% of sales, for the three months ended June 30, 2006, as
compared to $3.0 million, or 2.2% of sales, for the three months ended June 30, 2005. Despite
sales growth, cost of sales grew at a slightly higher rate and was not offset completely by the
improvements in selling, general and administrative expenses.
Interest Expense
As compared to the prior year quarter, we reduced our quarterly average debt outstanding under our
Credit Facility from $24.8 million to $16.0 million for the three months ended June 30, 2006, a
35.6% reduction. Interest expense decreased $0.1 million or 28.9% as compared to the prior year
quarter due to improved borrowing terms under the Credit Facility in combination with the lower
debt outstanding. This impact was partially offset by a 1.2 percentage point increase in the
average quarterly interest rate to 6.7% from 5.5% driven by higher LIBOR rates.
12
Provision for Income Taxes
The provision for income taxes increased by less than $0.1 million, to a provision of $1.1 million
for the three months ended June 30, 2006, compared to $1.0 million for the three months ended June
30, 2005. Our effective tax rate was 41.8% as compared to 39.3% due to an increase in
non-deductible items as a percentage of pre-tax income.
SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2006 AND 2005
The following table sets forth a summary of our operating data and shows such data as a percentage
of net sales for the periods indicated (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Net Sales |
|
$ |
277,281 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
273,566 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
Cost of Sales |
|
|
217,865 |
|
|
|
78.6 |
|
|
|
214,820 |
|
|
|
78.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Profit |
|
|
59,416 |
|
|
|
21.4 |
|
|
|
58,746 |
|
|
|
21.5 |
|
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses |
|
|
53,611 |
|
|
|
19.3 |
|
|
|
53,344 |
|
|
|
19.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Income |
|
|
5,805 |
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
|
5,402 |
|
|
|
2.0 |
|
Interest Expense, net |
|
|
613 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
850 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
Other (Income) Expense, net |
|
|
(21 |
) |
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings Before Taxes |
|
|
5,213 |
|
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
|
4,551 |
|
|
|
1.6 |
|
Provision for Income Taxes |
|
|
2,152 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
1,760 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Earnings |
|
$ |
3,061 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
% |
|
$ |
2,791 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Sales
For the six months ended June 30, 2006, net sales increased by $3.7 million or 1.4% to $277.3
million from $273.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2005. On a per day basis, sales
increased by 0.6% as there was one additional selling day in 2006. Total FPS revenue grew $10.3
million or 6.9% from $150.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2005 to $161.0 million in the
current year. The increase in FPS revenue was driven by the implementation of nine new storeroom
management sites since the prior year, in addition to increased production and increased market
share at existing sites. At June 30, 2006, we had 340 total FPS sites as compared to 339 total FPS
sites at June 30, 2005. There was a decrease in revenue for our General MROP customers of $6.6
million or 5.4% to $116.3 million from $122.9 million in the prior period. Approximately 70% of
the decline was attributable to the disposition of the former Cardinal Machinery business unit in
late 2005, which had provided $4.6 million in revenue for the six months ended June 30, 2005. The
remaining $2.0 million decline was primarily due to an estimated loss of $1.4 million to $1.6
million of sales volume related to the IT system conversion issues as previously discussed, in
addition to declines in smaller market customers.
Cost of Sales
Cost of sales for the six months ended June 30, 2006 increased $3.0 million or 1.1% to $217.9
million from $214.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2005. Cost of sales, as a percentage
of net sales, reflected an increase from 78.5% for the six months ended June 30, 2005 to 78.6% for
2006. Contributing to the slight increase in gross profit was a shift in sales mix and a $0.2
million increase in freight-in expense for the six months ended June 30, 2006 as compared to the
previous year, which factors were partially offset by a $0.1 million decrease in inventory reserve
expense.
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses
Selling, general and administrative expenses for the six months ended June 30, 2006 increased $0.3
million or 0.5% to $53.6 million as compared to $53.3 million for the six months ended June 30,
2005. The increase in expense was due to: (i) an increase of $0.6 million in bad debt expense, net
of recoveries, due to the combination of added expense of $0.3 million in 2006 and a benefit of
$0.3 million in the prior year; (ii) a $0.2 million increase in freight-out and delivery expense;
and (iii) property sales for a gain in the prior year of $0.4 million and a gain in the current
year of $0.3 million, resulting in a net decline of $0.1 million in 2006. In addition, there was a
net increase in salaries and benefits expense of $0.7 million, which reflects the offsetting
effects of a $0.9 million increase in salaries expense and a decrease of $0.2 million due to a
favorable change in healthcare providers. The increase in salaries expense
13
was due to additional personnel associated with nine new storeroom management sites since the prior
year, coupled with an increase in overtime and temporary labor associated with the IT system
conversion. These factors more than offset the elimination of $1.3 million of expense that was
associated with the former Cardinal Machinery business unit sold in the prior year third quarter.
As a percentage of net sales, total selling, general and administrative expenses improved to 19.3%
for the six months ended June 30, 2006 from 19.5% for the same period in the prior year.
Operating Income
Operating income increased $0.4 million or 7.5% to $5.8 million, or 2.1% of sales, for the six
months ended June 30, 2006 from $5.4 million, or 2.0% of sales, for the six months ended June 30,
2005.
Interest Expense
As compared to a year ago, we reduced our year-to-date average debt outstanding under our Credit
Facility from $26.7 million to $16.7 million, for a 37.8% reduction for the six months ended June
30, 2006. Interest expense decreased from $0.9 million to $0.6 million, a $0.2 million or 27.9%
reduction, despite an increase in the year-to-date average interest rate to 6.5% as of June 30,
2006, which was an increase of 1.3 percentage points over the prior year six month average.
Provision for Income Taxes
Our effective tax rate increased to 41.3% in 2006 from 38.7% in 2005 due to an increase in
non-deductible items as a percentage of pre-tax income. The rate increase accounts for 34.4% of
the $0.4 million of the increase in tax; the remainder was attributable to increased pre-tax
income.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Capital Availability and Requirements
At June 30, 2006, our total working capital was $79.1 million, which included $0.5 million in cash
and cash equivalents. We had an aggregate of $75.0 million of borrowing capacity under our Credit
Facility. Based upon our current asset base (which serves as our collateral under the Credit
Facility) and outstanding borrowings under the Credit Facility, we had borrowing availability under
the Credit Facility of $60.5 million. We continue to comply with all applicable financial covenants
under the Credit Facility.
Analysis of Cash Flows
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities was $0.6 million and ($1.2 million) for the six
months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively. As compared to the prior year, the increase in
cash provided by operating activities was primarily due to delays in processing accounts payables
due to IT system conversion issues in receiving EDI invoices during the second quarter. In
addition, lower bonuses were paid for 2005 and a lower rate of bonuses for 2006 have been accrued
due to lower sales growth as compared to the prior year. This was partially offset with cash used
by accounts receivable due to an increase in sales volume in combination with IT system conversion
issues which delayed invoicing, resulting in an increase in accounts receivable at June 30, 2006.
Net cash provided by investing activities for the six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005 was $0.1
million and $2.2 million, respectively. Cash was used to make capital expenditures in connection
with the first phase of the IT system conversion. In addition, $0.7 million was received from the
sale of property during the second quarter of 2006. In the prior year, cash was provided by
investing activities from the sale of property, which resulted in proceeds of $2.2 million.
Net cash used in financing activities was $1.0 million and $3.1 million for the six months ended
June 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively. Cash was used primarily for net repayments on our Credit
Facility of $0.7 million and $2.8 million, respectively, for the six months ended June 30, 2006 and
2005. During the current year, we also used $1.4 million to repurchase 161,000 shares of common
stock pursuant to our stock repurchase plan, as compared to $0.5 million used to repurchase 54,300
shares during the first six months of 2005.
14
CERTAIN ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES
Our consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted
accounting principles. The preparation of these financial statements requires our management to
make estimates and assumptions that affect: the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the
date of the financial statements; the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date
of the financial statements; and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting
period. Our management regularly evaluates its estimates and assumptions. These estimates and
assumptions are based on historical experience and on various other factors that are believed to be
reasonable under the circumstances and form the basis for making judgments about the carrying
values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results
may differ from these estimates under different conditions, and these differences may be material.
While our significant accounting policies are described in Note 2 Summary of Significant
Accounting Policies in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements of our Annual Report on Form
10-K for fiscal 2005, we believe that the following accounting policies and estimates involve a
higher degree of complexity and warrant specific description in this update to the Form 10-K.
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts Methodology
We have established an allowance for doubtful accounts based on our collection experience and an
assessment of the collectability of specific accounts. We evaluate the collectability of accounts
receivable based on a combination of factors. Initially, we estimate an allowance for doubtful
accounts as a percentage of accounts receivable based on historical collections experience. This
initial estimate is periodically adjusted when we become aware of a specific customers inability
to meet its financial obligations (e.g., bankruptcy filing) or as a result of changes in the
overall aging of accounts receivable. We do not believe our estimate of the allowance for doubtful
accounts is likely to be adversely affected by any individual customer or group of customers, since
our customers are geographically and functionally dispersed, and none are individually significant.
The table below depicts our allowance for doubtful accounts, bad debt expense incurred or recovered
and write-offs or recoveries during each of the first two quarters of 2006 and 2005. Write-offs of
accounts receivable have no effect on either our results of operations or cash flows, only expense
impacts our earnings.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
(dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts Balance at December 31 |
|
$ |
1,369 |
|
|
$ |
2,055 |
|
Add: Charges (reductions) to expense, net |
|
|
168 |
|
|
|
(109 |
) |
Deduct: Write-offs, net of recoveries |
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts Balance at March 31 |
|
$ |
1,495 |
|
|
$ |
1,931 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Add: Charges (reductions) to expense, net |
|
|
108 |
|
|
|
(177 |
) |
Deduct: Write-offs, net of recoveries |
|
|
81 |
|
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts Balance at June 30 |
|
$ |
1,522 |
|
|
$ |
1,766 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage of Gross Receivables |
|
|
2.0 |
% |
|
|
2.6 |
% |
Inventories Slow Moving and Obsolescence
In connection with certain contracts, we maintain special inventories for specific customers
needs. In certain contracts, the customers are required to purchase the special inventory at the
point in time the inventory reaches a certain age. However, for other customer relationships and
inventories, we are not protected by our customer from the risk of inventory obsolescence. In such
cases, we rely on available return privileges with vendors, if any. Therefore, in determining the
net realizable value of inventories, we identify slow moving or obsolete inventories that (i) are
not protected by our customer agreements from risk of loss, and (ii) are not eligible for return
under various vendor return programs. Based upon these factors, we estimate the net realizable
value of inventories and record any necessary adjustments as a charge to cost of sales. If our
inventory return privileges were discontinued in the future, or if customers did not honor the
provisions of certain contracts that protect us from inventory losses, our risk of loss associated
with obsolete or slow moving inventories would increase. The table below depicts our reserve for
slow moving and obsolete inventory, incurred or recovered, and write-offs or recoveries during each
of the first two quarters of 2006 and 2005. Write-offs of inventory have no effect on either our
results of operations or cash flows, only expense impacts our earnings.
15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
(dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventory Reserve Balance at December 31 |
|
$ |
5,115 |
|
|
$ |
5,168 |
|
Add: Charges to expense |
|
|
96 |
|
|
|
300 |
|
Deduct: Write-offs |
|
|
255 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventory Reserve Balance at March 31 |
|
$ |
4,956 |
|
|
$ |
5,467 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Add: Charges to expense |
|
|
197 |
|
|
|
90 |
|
Deduct: Write-offs |
|
|
233 |
|
|
|
454 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventory Reserve Balance at June 30 |
|
$ |
4,920 |
|
|
$ |
5,103 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage of Gross Inventory |
|
|
8.0 |
% |
|
|
8.2 |
% |
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets
We periodically evaluate property and equipment for potential impairment indicators. Our judgments
regarding the existence of impairment indicators are based on legal factors, market conditions, and
operational performance. Future events could cause us to conclude that impairment indicators exist
and that assets associated with a particular operation are impaired. Evaluating the impairment also
requires us to estimate future operating results and cash flows, which also requires judgment by
management. Any resulting impairment loss could have a material adverse impact on our financial
condition and results of operations.
Deferred Income Tax Assets
We have net deferred tax assets, which are subject to periodic recoverability assessments. The
factors used to assess the likelihood of realization of these net deferred tax assets are the
reversal of taxable temporary differences, our forecast of future taxable income, which is based
upon estimates and assumptions, and available tax planning strategies that could be implemented to
realize the net deferred tax assets. On the basis of our operating results and projections for
future taxable income, we believe it is more likely than not that our future operations will
generate sufficient taxable income to realize our net deferred tax assets. If these estimates and
related assumptions change in the future, we may be required to record an additional valuation
allowance against our deferred tax assets resulting in additional income tax expense in our
consolidated statements of income. We evaluate the realizability and appropriateness of our
deferred tax assets and liabilities quarterly and assess the need for any valuation allowance
against deferred tax assets. In the future, if it becomes more likely than not that we will be able
to utilize certain deferred tax benefits that are presently reserved with a valuation allowance, we
may adjust the valuation allowance resulting in a reduction in income tax expense. In addition, if
we experience a decline in earnings in the future, we may have to increase the valuation allowance.
Self Insurance and Related Reserves
We are self-insured for certain losses relating to group health, workers compensation, and
casualty losses, subject to an aggregate stop loss limit of $1.3 million. We utilize third party
administrators to process and administer all related claims. We accrue an estimate for incurred but
not reported claims and related expenses based upon historical experience. The accrual for incurred
but not reported claims relating to group health, workers compensation, and casualty losses
totaled approximately $1.2 million at June 30, 2006 and $1.5 million at December 31, 2005. The
accuracy of our accrual for incurred but not reported claims is entirely dependent on future events
that are subject to change. Because we are self-insured, an increase in the volume (frequency) or
amount (severity) of claims in the future may cause us to record additional expense that was not
estimable at June 30, 2006. We are not aware of any increasing frequency or severity of individual
claims.
16
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
We have no material changes to the disclosure on this matter made in the Companys Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005.
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
An evaluation was performed under the supervision and with the participation of our management,
including our President and Chief Executive Officer and our Executive Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934)
as of the end of the period covered by this report. No system of controls, no matter how well
designed and operated, can provide absolute assurance that the objectives of the system of controls
are met, and no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that the system of controls
has operated effectively in all cases. Our system of disclosure controls and procedures, however,
is designed to provide reasonable assurance that the objectives of disclosure controls and
procedures are met.
Based on the evaluation discussed above, our President and Chief Executive Officer and our
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that our disclosure controls
and procedures were effective as of the end of the period covered by this report to provide
reasonable assurance that the objectives of the disclosure controls and procedures are met.
No change occurred in the Companys internal controls concerning financial reporting during the
most recent fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2006 that has materially affected, or is reasonably
likely to materially affect, the Companys internal controls over financial reporting.
17
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
(c) Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
On February 23, 2005, the Companys Board of Directors approved a repurchase program pursuant to
which the Company is authorized to repurchase up to $5.0 million of its outstanding common shares
(2005 Public Share Repurchase Program) over a period of 24 months from the inception of the 2005
Public Share Repurchase Program. The following table sets forth information about our purchases of
our common stock during the six months ended June 30, 2006.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(d) Maximum Number |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(c ) Total Number |
|
|
(or Approximate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of Common Shares |
|
|
Dollar Value) of |
|
|
|
(a) Total Number of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchased as Part |
|
|
Shares that May Yet |
|
|
|
Common Shares |
|
|
(b) Average Price |
|
|
of Publicly |
|
|
Be Purchased Under |
|
Period |
|
Purchased |
|
|
Paid per Share |
|
|
Announced Program |
|
|
the Program |
|
12/31/05 Balance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
3,848,012 |
|
1/1/2006 1/31/2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
3,848,012 |
|
2/1/2006 2/28/2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
3,848,012 |
|
3/1/2006 3/31/2006 |
|
|
89,700 |
|
|
$ |
8.00 |
|
|
|
89,700 |
|
|
$ |
3,130,667 |
|
4/1/2006 4/30/2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
3,130,667 |
|
5/1/2006 5/31/2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
3,130,667 |
|
6/1/2006 6/30/2006 |
|
|
71,300 |
|
|
$ |
9.21 |
|
|
|
71,300 |
|
|
$ |
2,473,642 |
|
TOTAL |
|
|
161,000 |
|
|
$ |
8.54 |
|
|
|
161,000 |
|
|
$ |
2,473,642 |
|
ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION
On May 31, 2006 a director and former executive officer of the Company developed and implemented a
stock trading plan to sell a portion of his company stock over time as part of his individual
long-term strategy for asset diversification and liquidity. The stock trading plan was developed
and filed in accordance with guidelines specified under Rule 10b5-1 of the Securities and Exchange
Act of 1934. The former executive officer plans to sell an aggregate of up to 156,833 shares of
which 136,833 shares are in respect to vested options that expire on December 31, 2006 and which
are required to be exercised pursuant to the terms of the Companys employee stock option plan
documents. There are 20,000 restricted shares which will be sold pursuant to Rule 144. As of July
19, 2006, 140,069 shares of common stock pursuant to his plan had been sold, which represented a
significant portion of the Companys trading activity in the second quarter of 2006. The plan would
permit sales of the remaining 16,764 shares pursuant to its terms during the period ending on
November 30, 2006. As of July 19, 2006 the former executive officer owns 6% of the Companys
shares outstanding.
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS
Exhibits filed as part of this Form 10-Q:
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
Certification of Charles A. Lingenfelter pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) (Chief Executive Officer) |
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Certification of Jack P. Healey pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) (Chief Financial Officer) |
|
|
|
32.1
|
|
Certification of Charles A. Lingenfelter pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 (Chief Executive Officer) |
|
|
|
32.2
|
|
Certification of Jack P. Healey pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 (Chief Financial Officer) |
18
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
INDUSTRIAL DISTRIBUTION GROUP, INC.
|
|
Date: August 10, 2006 |
/s/ Jack P. Healey
|
|
|
Jack P. Healey |
|
|
Executive Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer (Duly Authorized Officer and
Principal Accounting and Financial Officer) |
|
19