Sign In  |  Register  |  About Walnut Creek Guide  |  Contact Us

Walnut Creek, CA
September 01, 2020 1:43pm
7-Day Forecast | Traffic
  • Search Hotels in Walnut Creek Guide

  • CHECK-IN:
  • CHECK-OUT:
  • ROOMS:

Pro-life students allege discrimination in lawsuit against Las Vegas high school

A pro-life group is suing a Las Vegas high school and school district for allegedly discriminating against their club by suppressing their message and materials.

A group of pro-life students is suing their Las Vegas high school and the surrounding school district, alleging discrimination against their campus club.

One of the plaintiffs, recent ECTA graduate Felipe Avila, who founded the Students for Life chapter at East Career and Technical Academy (ECTA) in 2019, told local news he sensed "animosity" from administrators who "did not like" his group's message.

"We witnessed a lot of animosity from the administrators who I would argue did not like the pro-life message, and so they tried to suppress it as much as possible," Avila said.

Avila accused the school of trying to suppress their materials and, in effect, violating their First Amendment rights.

MEDICAL STUDENTS WALK OUT OVER PRO-LIFE SPEAKER

"One of the biggest aspects that we've had to encounter was we've received a lot of flyer denials, and a lot of it sometimes came from the fact that it was either deemed too controversial because it said pro-life messages, or they just flat out refused to give us a yes or no answer," he alleged.

Avila, former vice president Janelle Rivera, and the Students for Life Club filed a federal lawsuit against the district, the superintendent, the school, and several current and former administrators - seeking a jury trial, and compensatory and punitive damages. The plaintiffs allege that the defendants "made no effort to disguise its antipathy toward SFLC’s pro-life message." The lawsuit was filed on behalf of the students by the attorneys of the Thomas More Society, a legal conservative group.

REPUBLICANS PUSH DOJ TO PROTECT PRO-LIFE CENTERS FROM ‘ASSAULT’ BY VIOLENT ACTIVISTS

The complaint specifically accuses ECTA of denying the pro-life group flyers of pictures regarding health code and other issues with Planned Parenthood in the school newspaper. The principal denied the material, despite other groups being allowed to include pictures in their flyers, the lawsuit read.

The document continues that, during the 2019-2020 school year, ECTA's assistant principal "refused" to allow SFLC to post flyers on the basis that they "promoted" outside organizations due to the flyers including information regarding the services provided by a pregnancy resource center. They also addressed adoption as an option for unexpected pregnancies, providing the name and number of an adoption agency. The assistant principal denied the group's flyers, despite permitting other clubs and student organizations to reference outside organizations in their promotional materials.

"In many schools, the suppression of free speech can be seen in endless delays and a slow walk to nowhere," a Students for Life of America spokesperson told Fox News Digital. "For that Las Vegas school, there seemed to be as many excuses as cards in a deck. But if you can't use your free speech rights, you don't really have free speech rights - which is why we have filed this complaint."

Both East Career and Technical Academy and the Clark County School District told Fox News Digital they do not comment on pending litigation.

The lawsuit added that CCSD has a "prior history of violating the statutory and constitutional rights of students with a pro-life viewpoint," noting a related incident in 2015 when the district allegedly refused to approve a student's application to start a pro-life club at another district's secondary school, West Career Technical Academy. 

The student, Angelique Clark, was allowed to start a "non-curriculum related, non-school sponsored, student-initiated, student-led" chapter of the Students for Life club after a settlement reached by the parties. 

CCSD agreed to approve the pro-life club, to treat the pro-life club the same as other non-curriculum clubs, and to pay fees to the plaintiff’s attorneys, according to the Las Vegas Review-Journal. 

Data & News supplied by www.cloudquote.io
Stock quotes supplied by Barchart
Quotes delayed at least 20 minutes.
By accessing this page, you agree to the following
Privacy Policy and Terms and Conditions.
 
 
Copyright © 2010-2020 WalnutCreekGuide.com & California Media Partners, LLC. All rights reserved.