NOTICE OF INTENDED PROXY CONTEST OVER SHAREHOLDER PROPOSALS 
  
First released to shareholders  March/__/05
  
UNITE HERE
1630 S. Commerce St.
Las Vegas, NV 89102
Tel.: (702) 386-5231
Fax: (702) 386-5241
  
RE: ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS OF STATION CASINOS, INC.
(NYSE:  STN)
Est. Date:          May 18, 2005 
Est. Location:     Las Vegas, NV 
  
STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS WILL BE PRESENTED TO: 
             (1) Strengthen shareholder rights by changing
             the "supermajority" voting provisions in the
             bylaws to simple majority;
             (2) Declassify the Board and institute annual
             election of Directors; and
             (3) Allow shareholders to vote on the
             Company's "poison pill" or redeem it.
          
To Fellow Station Casino, Inc. Shareholders:
          
          We will be putting three proposals up for a vote
          at the next shareholders meeting. If you think
          you might support one of them, then please hold
          off returning a proxy card to management (unless
          such  card gives you the opportunity to vote on
          the proposals). Instead, wait until you receive
          our proxy card containing these
          proposals. 
          
          Station Casinos has been one of the leading
          performers in the gaming industry. However, we
          are concerned about the Company's poor corporate
          governance practices and restrictions on
          shareholder rights.  We believe the Company's
          arsenal of anti-takeover devices   a classified
          board, a stockholder rights plan (or "poison
          pill"), blank check preferred stock,
          supermajority voting requirements, and
          restrictions on shareholders' ability to call
          special meetings or act by written consent  
          serve to potentially entrench management and 
          the Board of Directors from shareholders.  
          
          It is our opinion that enhancing shareholder
          rights at Station Casinos, rather than
          maintaining the Company's current entrenchment
          devices, is the best guarantee to ensure the
          continuing success of the Company.
          
          Removing the Company's draconian anti-takeover
          devices is especially important given the
          unprecedented merger-and-acquisition activity in
          the gaming industry.  In 2004, over $22 billion
          in gaming deals were announced, and Boyd Gaming
          completed its $1.4 billion acquisition of Coast
          Resorts, a major Station Casinos' competitor.
          
          We believe the trend of consolidation among
          gaming operators is likely to continue   a view
          backed by top gaming industry analysts:
          
                         "We believe that the industry
                  could continue to experience
                  consolidation, particularly among the
                  small-cap operators, as the gap between
                  them and the large caps continues to
                  widen." (Lehman Brothers Global Equity
                  Research, "Opportunity Knocks", Aug. 24, 
                  2004)
-----------------------------------------------
          : None of the publications or authors cited
          in this proxy statement are participants in this
          proxy solicitation. We have not requested nor
          obtained the consent of any of these sources for
          referring to these materials in our proxy 
          statement.
--------------------------------------------------              
                         "We expect consolidation to
                  continue as smaller operators need scale
                  to compete with the larger casino
                  operators, although we anticipate that
                  the rate of M&A will slow from 2004's
                  torrid pace." (Bear Stearns Equity
                  Research, "U.S. Gaming: Let the Games
                  Begin", January, 2005)
          
                         "Casino operators remain in a
                  period of strong secular growth but are
                  likely to face momentum concerns as
                  growth slows....In this environment,
                  consolidation will likely become an
                  increasingly important component of
                  growth, which presents both opportunity
                  and risk." (Citigroup Smith Barney
                  Equity Research, "United States, Gaming
                  and Lodging, 2004 Midyear Update: What's
                  Next?"  Jun. 18, 2004)
          
          Given this environment, we believe that the
          Company's current anti-takeover devices provide
          our Board of Directors and management with too
          much power to potentially reject offers that may
          be in the best interests of shareholders.  
          
          ACCORDINGLY, WE URGE SHAREHOLDERS TO VOTE FOR
          OUR PROPOSALS RECOMMENDING THE BOARD TO DO THE 
          FOLLOWING:
          
                  1.  Strengthen shareholder rights by
                  changing the "supermajority" voting
                  provisions in the bylaws to simple 
                  majority.
                  
                  2.  Declassify the Board and institute
                  annual election of Directors.
                  
                  3.  Allow shareholders to vote on the
                  Company's "poison pill" or redeem it.
          
          Below is the full text of our proposals, along
          with supporting statements for each proposal.
          
          1. ESTABLISH SIMPLE MAJORITY VOTING BY SHAREHOLDERS
          
          RESOLVED, that the shareholders of Station
          Casinos, Inc. urge the Board of Directors to
          increase shareholder rights by lowering the
          voting requirement to amend the Company's
          Restated Bylaws from the current "supermajority"
          to a simple majority.
          
          Supporting Statement
          
          We believe shareholders' ability to exercise
          their rights to be fundamental to good corporate
          governance, including the ability of
          shareholders to enact bylaw amendments or take
          other action by a majority of shares
          outstanding.  A simple majority of shareholder
          votes should be sufficient to mandate changes to
          the Company's bylaws. 
          
          Currently, the Company has a "supermajority" requirement
          for bylaw amendments (66 2/3% of the outstanding shares).  We
          believe this requirement unduly limit shareholders'
          influence and role in our company, particularly given
          the significant insider ownership (more than 20%) of
          the Company's common stock. The supermajority 
          requirement creates an unreasonably high threshold for 
          outside shareholders to affect fundamental changes to the 
          Company's Restated Bylaws.  
          
          We believe the restoration of simple majority
          rule by shareholders is the first step toward
          meaningful corporate governance reform at the
          Company.  We urge the Board of Directors to
          increase shareholder rights and establish simple
          majority voting by shareholders with respect to
          amending the Company's Restated Bylaws.
          
          2. INSTITUTE ANNUAL ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
          
          RESOLVED, that shareholders of Station Casinos,
          Inc. urge the Board of Directors to take
          necessary steps, in compliance with state law,
          to declassify the board and institute annual
          election of directors. The board's new election
          system shall be instituted in a manner that does
          not affect the unexpired terms of directors
          previously elected.
          
          Supporting Statement
          
          Station Casinos' Board of Directors is divided
          into three classes of directors serving
          staggered three-year terms.  This means an
          individual director faces election only once
          every three years, and shareholders only vote on
          approximately a third of the board each year.
          
          We believe this director classification system
          is not in the best interests of shareholders
          because it reduces the accountability of the
          board to shareholders and is an unnecessary
          takeover defense.  Shareholders should have the
          opportunity to vote on the performance of the
          entire Board each year.  Replacing the current
          classification system with annual elections of
          all directors would give shareholders an
          opportunity to register their views on the
          performance of the board collectively and each
          director individually.
          
          A study by researchers at Harvard Business
          School and the University of Pennsylvania's
          Wharton School titled "Corporate Governance and
          Equity Prices" (Quarterly Journal of Economics,
          February 2003) looked at the relationship
          between corporate governance practices
          (including classified boards) and firm
          performance. The study found a significant
          positive link between governance practices
          favoring shareholders (such as annual director
          elections) and firm value, though the study did
          not break out the impact of individual
          governance practices.
          
          Many institutional investors increasingly favor
          requiring annual elections for all directors. 
          The Council of Institutional Investors, the
          California Public Employees' Retirement System,
          and Institutional Shareholder Services support
          this reform.  
          
          We urge shareholders to demand that Station
          Casinos, Inc. declassify its Board of Directors
          and adopt annual director elections.
          
          3.  SHAREHOLDER APPROVAL OF POISON PILLS
          
          RESOLVED, that shareholders of Station Casinos,
          Inc. urge the Board of Directors to submit the
          Company's Rights Agreement to shareholders for
          approval or, if such approval is not granted by
          a majority vote of shareholders, redeem it, and
          to seek shareholder approval for extending this
          "poison pill" or adopting other similar plans in
          the future.
          
          Supporting Statement
          
          On October 6, 1997, the Company's Board of
          Directors adopted, without shareholder approval,
          a "Rights Agreement" (which was last amended on
          December 1, 1998).  The agreement provides that
          the Board can thwart a potential takeover bid by
          giving all other shareholders an additional one
          one-hundredth share of preferred stock for each
          share owned. The Board adopted this agreement
          unilaterally and without seeking prior approval
          of shareholders.  Unless redeemed, the share
          purchase rights set forth in the Rights
          Agreement will expire on October 21, 2007,
          unless the expiration date is extended or the
          rights are earlier redeemed.  
          
          We do not believe the possibility of an
          unsolicited bid justifies the unilateral
          implementation of such a device by the board. 
          Therefore, we urge the board to submit the
          Rights Agreement to a shareholder vote for
          approval and not to extend it or adopt other
          poison pills in the future without first seeking
          shareholder approval.
          
          According to the 1991 book Power and
          Accountability by Nell Minow and Robert Monks:
          "All poison pills raise questions of shareholder
          democracy and the robustness of the corporate
          governance process. They amount to major de
          facto shifts of voting rights away from
          shareholders to management, on matters
          pertaining to the sale of the corporation. They
          give target boards of directors absolute veto
          power over any proposed business combination, no
          matter how beneficial it might be for the
          shareholders. "
          
          We urge all shareholders to vote FOR this 
          resolution.
          
          
         









-------------------------------------------------------------------------
          
          VOTING PROCEDURES:
          
          IF YOU THINK YOU MIGHT SUPPORT ANY OF OUR
          PROPOSALS, DO NOT RETURN A PROXY CARD TO
          MANAGEMENT UNLESS IT GIVES YOU THE RIGHT TO VOTE
          ON THE PROPOSAL.  YOU SHOULD INSTEAD WAIT UNTIL
          YOU RECEIVE OUR PROXY CARD. We cannot release
          our proxy card until after management announces
          what else will be up for a vote this year
          including the names of the nominees for director
          so that you can direct us how to vote your stock
          on such matters. That means you probably will
          not receive our proxy card until after you
          receive management's card. In corporate
          elections, simply submitting a new proxy card
          with a later date on it revokes your prior card.
          A proxy vote may be revoked any time prior to
          the tally at the shareholders meeting by signing
          and submitting a new proxy card, by sending
          written notice of revocation to the proxy
          holder, or by appearing at the meeting and
          voting in person. If management provides you a
          card which does not list these proposals, then
          by returning it you may be giving management
          discretion to vote against these proposals.  
          
          We intend to solicit at least a majority of the
          voting power of the outstanding stock. The
          record date for eligibility to vote will be
          announced by the Board in its proxy statement,
          but based on past dates, it will fall in late
          February. We do not have a candidate we intend
          to support against the incumbent board's
          nominees, nor will we seek any discretionary
          voting authority for the meeting (meaning that
          we will vote all proxy cards strictly as you
          direct, and if matters come up on which you have
          not given us instructions, we will not vote your
          shares on those matters.  The board  election
          and these proposals are the only matters we
          believe will come up for a vote at the meeting
          this year.) We incorporate by reference all
          other information concerning the board of
          directors and voting procedures contained in
          management's last proxy statement at pages 1-8.
          More current information will be contained in
          the proxy statement you will receive from the
          Company in the next few weeks. 
          
          INFORMATION ON PARTICIPANTS IN THIS SOLICITATION:
          
          The participants in this solicitation will be
          UNITE HERE, its research analyst Chris Bohner,
          Culinary Workers Union Local 226 (a UNITE HERE
          affiliate commonly known as "The Culinary") and
          its research analyst Ken Liu.  All have offices
          at the above address.  UNITE HERE represents
          approximately 440,000 active members and more
          than 400,000 retirees throughout North America.
          UNITE HERE owns 262 shares of Station Casino
          Inc. common stock.  UNITE HERE and its
          affiliates have engaged in shareholder
          solicitations on corporate governance issues at
          several companies over the past decade.
          
          Station Casino Inc.'s workforce is not
          unionized.  The Culinary, which represents
          approximately 50,000 employees of Las Vegas
          resorts in collective bargaining, has an ongoing
          organizing drive at Station properties in Las
          Vegas. Neither UNITE HERE nor the Culinary have
          undertaken picketing or boycott activities
          against the Company.  We do not seek your
          support in labor matters, and do not believe
          that enactment of the proposals would have any
          impact on such matters. The proposals and UNITE
          HERE's proxy cards will be presented at the
          meeting regardless of any developments in such 
          matters.
          
          UNITE HERE and the Culinary will bear all
          solicitation costs (anticipated at $10,000) and
          will not seek reimbursement from the Company. 
          They will solicit proxies by mail, phone,
          e-mail, fax and in person using its regular
          staff, who shall not receive any additional
          compensation, but they may also hire an outside
          solicitor. They will reimburse banks, brokers,
          and other custodians, nominees or fiduciaries
          for reasonable expenses incurred in forwarding
          proxy material to beneficial owners.