UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-Q
(Mark One)
þ | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2012
OR
¨ | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission File Number: 1-5097
JOHNSON CONTROLS, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Wisconsin | 39-0380010 | |
(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization) |
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) | |
5757 North Green Bay Avenue Milwaukee, Wisconsin |
53209 | |
(Address of principal executive offices) | (Zip Code) |
(414) 524-1200
(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)
Not Applicable
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes þ No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer | þ | Accelerated filer | ¨ | |||
Non-accelerated filer | ¨ (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) | Smaller reporting company | ¨ |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No þ
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.
Class |
Shares Outstanding at June 30, 2012 | |
Common Stock: $0.01 7/18 par value per share |
683,909,056 |
JOHNSON CONTROLS, INC.
FORM 10-Q
2
ITEM 1. | FINANCIAL STATEMENTS |
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Financial Position
(in millions; unaudited)
June 30, 2012 |
September 30, 2011 |
June 30, 2011 |
||||||||||
Assets |
||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 602 | $ | 257 | $ | 335 | ||||||
Accounts receivablenet |
7,155 | 7,151 | 7,094 | |||||||||
Inventories |
2,362 | 2,316 | 2,451 | |||||||||
Other current assets |
2,447 | 2,291 | 2,678 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Current assets |
12,566 | 12,015 | 12,558 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Property, plant and equipmentnet |
6,116 | 5,616 | 5,185 | |||||||||
Goodwill |
6,953 | 7,016 | 7,093 | |||||||||
Other intangible assetsnet |
949 | 945 | 822 | |||||||||
Investments in partially-owned affiliates |
1,007 | 811 | 952 | |||||||||
Other noncurrent assets |
3,411 | 3,273 | 3,259 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Total assets |
$ | 31,002 | $ | 29,676 | $ | 29,869 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Liabilities and Equity |
||||||||||||
Short-term debt |
$ | 925 | $ | 596 | $ | 592 | ||||||
Current portion of long-term debt |
110 | 17 | 65 | |||||||||
Accounts payable |
6,062 | 6,159 | 6,104 | |||||||||
Accrued compensation and benefits |
1,000 | 1,315 | 1,329 | |||||||||
Other current liabilities |
2,714 | 2,695 | 3,064 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Current liabilities |
10,811 | 10,782 | 11,154 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Long-term debt |
5,624 | 4,533 | 4,519 | |||||||||
Pension, postretirement health and other benefits |
744 | 1,102 | 625 | |||||||||
Other noncurrent liabilities |
1,866 | 1,819 | 1,863 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Long-term liabilities |
8,234 | 7,454 | 7,007 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Commitments and contingencies (Note 18) |
||||||||||||
Redeemable noncontrolling interests |
214 | 260 | 229 | |||||||||
Shareholders equity attributable to Johnson Controls, Inc. |
11,596 | 11,042 | 11,361 | |||||||||
Noncontrolling interests |
147 | 138 | 118 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Total equity |
11,743 | 11,180 | 11,479 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Total liabilities and equity |
$ | 31,002 | $ | 29,676 | $ | 29,869 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.
3
Consolidated Statements of Income
(in millions, except per share data; unaudited)
Three Months Ended June 30, |
Nine Months Ended June 30, |
|||||||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | 2012 | 2011 | |||||||||||||
Net sales |
||||||||||||||||
Products and systems* |
$ | 8,464 | $ | 8,202 | $ | 25,293 | $ | 23,904 | ||||||||
Services* |
2,117 | 2,162 | 6,270 | 6,141 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
10,581 | 10,364 | 31,563 | 30,045 | |||||||||||||
Cost of sales |
||||||||||||||||
Products and systems* |
7,289 | 6,954 | 21,753 | 20,455 | ||||||||||||
Services* |
1,755 | 1,860 | 5,192 | 5,152 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
9,044 | 8,814 | 26,945 | 25,607 | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Gross profit |
1,537 | 1,550 | 4,618 | 4,438 | ||||||||||||
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
(992 | ) | (1,094 | ) | (3,115 | ) | (3,055 | ) | ||||||||
Restructuring costs |
(52 | ) | | (52 | ) | | ||||||||||
Net financing charges |
(59 | ) | (43 | ) | (171 | ) | (124 | ) | ||||||||
Equity income |
70 | 56 | 269 | 183 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Income before income taxes |
504 | 469 | 1,549 | 1,442 | ||||||||||||
Provision for income taxes |
62 | 89 | 260 | 274 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Net income |
442 | 380 | 1,289 | 1,168 | ||||||||||||
Income attributable to noncontrolling interests |
25 | 23 | 98 | 82 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Net income attributable to Johnson Controls, Inc. |
$ | 417 | $ | 357 | $ | 1,191 | $ | 1,086 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Earnings per share |
||||||||||||||||
Basic |
$ | 0.61 | $ | 0.53 | $ | 1.75 | $ | 1.60 | ||||||||
Diluted |
$ | 0.61 | $ | 0.52 | $ | 1.73 | $ | 1.58 |
* | Products and systems consist of automotive experience and power solutions products and systems and building efficiency installed systems. Services are building efficiency technical and global workplace solutions. |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.
4
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(in millions; unaudited)
Three Months Ended June 30, |
Nine Months Ended June 30, |
|||||||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | 2012 | 2011 | |||||||||||||
Operating Activities |
||||||||||||||||
Net income attributable to Johnson Controls, Inc. |
$ | 417 | $ | 357 | $ | 1,191 | $ | 1,086 | ||||||||
Income attributable to noncontrolling interests |
25 | 23 | 98 | 82 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Net income |
442 | 380 | 1,289 | 1,168 | ||||||||||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to cash provided by operating activities: |
||||||||||||||||
Depreciation |
190 | 180 | 561 | 511 | ||||||||||||
Amortization of intangibles |
17 | 13 | 42 | 36 | ||||||||||||
Equity in earnings of partially-owned affiliates, net of dividends received |
(45 | ) | (7 | ) | (206 | ) | (80 | ) | ||||||||
Deferred income taxes |
33 | (95 | ) | 59 | (95 | ) | ||||||||||
Impairment charges |
| | 14 | | ||||||||||||
Gain on divestitures - net |
| | (35 | ) | | |||||||||||
Fair value adjustment of equity investment |
| | (12 | ) | | |||||||||||
Equity-based compensation |
11 | 13 | 46 | 49 | ||||||||||||
Other |
20 | 14 | 61 | 14 | ||||||||||||
Changes in assets and liabilities, excluding acquisitions and divestitures: |
||||||||||||||||
Receivables |
16 | 99 | (55 | ) | (416 | ) | ||||||||||
Inventories |
(61 | ) | (133 | ) | (130 | ) | (432 | ) | ||||||||
Other assets |
(48 | ) | (59 | ) | (243 | ) | (196 | ) | ||||||||
Restructuring reserves |
39 | (14 | ) | 24 | (83 | ) | ||||||||||
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities |
71 | (200 | ) | (393 | ) | (75 | ) | |||||||||
Accrued income taxes |
(66 | ) | 169 | (257 | ) | 88 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Cash provided by operating activities |
619 | 360 | 765 | 489 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Investing Activities |
||||||||||||||||
Capital expenditures |
(447 | ) | (365 | ) | (1,433 | ) | (900 | ) | ||||||||
Sale of property, plant and equipment |
6 | 18 | 12 | 36 | ||||||||||||
Acquisition of businesses, net of cash acquired |
| (458 | ) | (30 | ) | (1,087 | ) | |||||||||
Business divestitures |
| | 91 | | ||||||||||||
Settlement of cross-currency interest rate swaps |
| | (19 | ) | | |||||||||||
Changes in long-term investments |
(6 | ) | (78 | ) | (104 | ) | (128 | ) | ||||||||
Warrant redemption |
| | 25 | | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Cash used by investing activities |
(447 | ) | (883 | ) | (1,458 | ) | (2,079 | ) | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Financing Activities |
||||||||||||||||
Increase in short-term debt - net |
403 | 486 | 305 | 499 | ||||||||||||
Increase in long-term debt |
18 | 94 | 1,253 | 1,829 | ||||||||||||
Repayment of long-term debt |
(14 | ) | (5 | ) | (30 | ) | (764 | ) | ||||||||
Stock repurchases |
(9 | ) | | (42 | ) | | ||||||||||
Payment of cash dividends |
(122 | ) | (108 | ) | (354 | ) | (304 | ) | ||||||||
Proceeds from the exercise of stock options |
7 | 10 | 28 | 95 | ||||||||||||
Settlement of interest rate swaps |
| | | 24 | ||||||||||||
Cash paid to acquire noncontrolling interest |
(96 | ) | | (115 | ) | | ||||||||||
Other |
(29 | ) | (14 | ) | (50 | ) | (22 | ) | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Cash provided by financing activities |
158 | 463 | 995 | 1,357 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents |
32 | (6 | ) | 43 | 8 | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
362 | (66 | ) | 345 | (225 | ) | ||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
240 | 401 | 257 | 560 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
$ | 602 | $ | 335 | $ | 602 | $ | 335 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.
5
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
June 30, 2012
(unaudited)
1. | Financial Statements |
In the opinion of management, the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements contain all adjustments (which include normal recurring adjustments) necessary to present fairly the financial position, results of operations and cash flows for the periods presented. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (U.S. GAAP) have been condensed or omitted pursuant to the rules and regulations of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). These condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited financial statements and notes thereto included in the Johnson Controls, Inc. (the Company) Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2011. The results of operations for the three and nine month periods ended June 30, 2012 are not necessarily indicative of results for the Company's 2012 fiscal year because of seasonal and other factors.
Certain amounts as of June 30, 2011 have been revised to conform to the current years presentation. Recoverable customer engineering expenditures are included in the changes in other assets line within the operating activities section of the consolidated statements of cash flows. In prior years, these cash flows were included in the investing activities section. Also, the long-term portion of pension liabilities is now reclassified into the pension, postretirement health and other benefits line within the long-term liabilities section of the condensed consolidated statements of financial position. In prior years, these liabilities were included in the other noncurrent liabilities line.
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Johnson Controls, Inc. and its domestic and non-U.S. subsidiaries that are consolidated in conformity with U.S. GAAP. All significant intercompany transactions have been eliminated. Investments in partially-owned affiliates are accounted for by the equity method when the Companys interest exceeds 20% and the Company does not have a controlling interest.
Under certain criteria as provided for in Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 810, Consolidation, the Company may consolidate a partially-owned affiliate. To determine whether to consolidate a partially-owned affiliate, the Company first determines if the entity is a variable interest entity (VIE). An entity is considered to be a VIE if it has one of the following characteristics: 1) the entity is thinly capitalized; 2) residual equity holders do not control the entity; 3) equity holders are shielded from economic losses or do not participate fully in the entitys residual economics; or 4) the entity was established with non-substantive voting. If the entity meets one of these characteristics, the Company then determines if it is the primary beneficiary of the VIE. The party with the power to direct activities of the VIE that most significantly impact the VIEs economic performance and the potential to absorb benefits or losses that could be significant to the VIE is considered the primary beneficiary and consolidates the VIE. If the entity is not considered a VIE, then the Company applies the voting interest model to determine whether or not the Company shall consolidate the partially-owned affiliate.
Consolidated VIEs
Based upon the criteria set forth in ASC 810, the Company has determined that it was the primary beneficiary in three VIEs for the reporting period ended June 30, 2012 and two VIEs for the reporting periods ended September 30, 2011 and June 30, 2011, as the Company absorbs significant economics of the entities and has the power to direct the activities that are considered most significant to the entities.
Two of the VIEs manufacture products in North America for the automotive industry. The Company funds the entities short term liquidity needs through revolving credit facilities and has the power to direct the activities that are considered most significant to the entities through its key customer supply relationships.
During the three month period ended December 31, 2011, a pre-existing VIE accounted for under the equity method was reorganized into three separate investments as a result of the counterparty exercising its option to put its interest to the Company. The Company acquired additional interests in two of the reorganized group entities. The reorganized group entities are considered to be VIEs as the other owner party has been provided decision making rights but does not have equity at risk. The Company is considered the primary beneficiary of one of the entities due
6
Johnson Controls, Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
June 30, 2012
(unaudited)
to the Companys power pertaining to decisions over significant activities of the entity. As such, the VIE has been consolidated within the Companys condensed consolidated statements of financial position. The impact of the consolidation of the entity on the Companys consolidated statements of income for the three and nine month periods ended June 30, 2012 was not material. The VIE is named as a co-obligor under a third party debt agreement of $135 million, maturing in fiscal 2019, in which it could become subject to paying more than its allocated share of the third party debt in the event of bankruptcy of one or more of the other co-obligors. The other co-obligors, all related parties in which the Company is an equity investor, consist of the remaining group entities involved in the reorganization. As part of the overall reorganization transaction, the Company has also provided financial support to the group entities in the form of loans totaling $101 million, which are subordinate to the third party debt agreement. The Company is a significant customer of certain co-obligors, resulting in a remote possibility of loss. Additionally, the Company is subject to a floor guaranty expiring in fiscal 2022; in the event that the other owner party no longer owns any part of the group entities due to sale or transfer, the Company has guaranteed that the proceeds received from the sale or transfer will not be less than $25 million. The Company has partnered with the group entities to design and manufacture battery components for the power solutions business.
The carrying amounts and classification of assets (none of which are restricted) and liabilities included in the Companys condensed consolidated statements of financial position for the consolidated VIEs are as follows (in millions):
June 30, 2012 |
September 30, 2011 |
June 30, 2011 |
||||||||||
Current assets |
$ | 212 | $ | 207 | $ | 179 | ||||||
Noncurrent assets |
147 | 55 | 55 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Total assets |
$ | 359 | $ | 262 | $ | 234 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Current liabilities |
$ | 162 | $ | 144 | $ | 132 | ||||||
Noncurrent liabilities |
25 | | | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Total liabilities |
$ | 187 | $ | 144 | $ | 132 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonconsolidated VIEs
During the three month period ended June 30, 2011, the Company acquired a 40% interest in an equity method investee. The investee produces and sells lead-acid batteries of which the Company will both purchase and supply certain batteries to complement each investment partners portfolio. Commencing on the third anniversary of the closing date, the Company has a contractual right to purchase the remaining 60% equity interest in the investee (the call option). If the Company does not exercise the call option on or before the fifth anniversary of the closing date, for a period of six months thereafter the Company is subject to a contractual obligation at the counterpartys option to sell the Companys equity investment in the investee to the counterparty (the repurchase option). The purchase price is fixed under both the call option and the repurchase option. Based upon the criteria set forth in ASC 810, the Company has determined that the investee is a VIE as the equity holders, through their equity investments, may not participate fully in the entitys residual economics. The Company is not the primary beneficiary as the Company does not have the power to make key operating decisions considered to be most significant to the VIE. Therefore, the investee is accounted for under the equity method of accounting as the Companys interest exceeds 20% and the Company does not have a controlling interest. The investment balance included within investments in partially-owned affiliates in the condensed consolidated statements of financial position at June 30, 2012, September 30, 2011 and June 30, 2011 was $53 million, $49 million and $48 million, respectively, which represents the Companys maximum exposure to loss. Current assets and liabilities related to the VIE are immaterial and represent normal course of business trade receivables and payables for all presented periods.
As mentioned previously within the Consolidated VIEs section above, during the three month period ended December 31, 2011, a pre-existing VIE was reorganized into three separate investments as a result of the counterparty exercising its option to put its interest to the Company. The reorganized group entities are considered
7
Johnson Controls, Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
June 30, 2012
(unaudited)
to be VIEs as the other owner party has been provided decision making rights but does not have equity at risk. The Company is not considered to be the primary beneficiary of two of the entities as the Company cannot make key operating decisions considered to be most significant to the VIEs. Therefore, the entities are accounted for under the equity method of accounting as the Companys interest exceeds 20% and the Company does not have a controlling interest. The Companys maximum exposure to loss, which included the partially-owned affiliate investment balance and a note receivable, approximated $43 million at September 30, 2011 and June 30, 2011. The Companys maximum exposure to loss at June 30, 2012 includes the partially-owned affiliate investment balance of $49 million as well as the subordinated loan from the Company, third party debt agreement and floor guaranty mentioned previously within the Consolidated VIEs section above. Current liabilities due to the VIEs are not material and represent normal course of business trade payables for all presented periods.
The Company did not have a significant variable interest in any other unconsolidated VIEs for the presented reporting periods.
2. | New Accounting Standards |
In December 2011, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2011-11, Balance Sheet (Topic 210): Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities. ASU No. 2011-11 requires additional quantitative and qualitative disclosures of gross and net information regarding financial instruments and derivative instruments that are offset or eligible for offset in the consolidated statement of financial position. ASU No. 2011-11 will be effective for the Company for the quarter ending December 31, 2013. The adoption of this guidance will have no impact on the Companys consolidated financial condition and results of operations.
In September 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-09, Compensation Retirement Benefits Multiemployer Plans (Subtopic 715-80): Disclosures about an Employers Participation in a Multiemployer Plan. ASU No. 2011-09 requires additional quantitative and qualitative disclosures about an employers participation in multiemployer pension plans, including disclosure of the name and identifying number of the significant multiemployer plans in which the employer participates, the level of the employers participation in the plans, the financial health of the plans and the nature of the employer commitments to the plans. ASU No. 2011-09 will be effective for the Company for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2012. The adoption of this guidance will have no impact on the Companys consolidated financial condition and results of operations.
In September 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-08, Intangibles Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Testing Goodwill for Impairment. ASU No. 2011-08 provides companies an option to perform a qualitative assessment to determine whether further goodwill impairment testing is necessary. If, as a result of the qualitative assessment, it is determined that it is more likely than not that a reporting units fair value is less than its carrying amount, the two-step quantitative impairment test is required. Otherwise, no further testing is required. ASU No. 2011-08 will be effective for the Company for goodwill impairment tests performed in the fiscal year ending September 30, 2013, with early adoption permitted. The adoption of this guidance will have no impact on the Companys consolidated financial condition and results of operations.
In June 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-05, Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Presentation of Comprehensive Income. ASU No. 2011-05 eliminates the option to present components of other comprehensive income as part of the statement of shareholders equity. All non-owner changes in shareholders equity instead must be presented either in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements. ASU No. 2011-05 will be effective for the Company for the quarter ending December 31, 2012. The adoption of this guidance will have no impact on the Companys consolidated financial condition and results of operations.
In May 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-04, Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820): Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRSs. ASU No. 2011-04 clarifies and changes the application of various fair value measurement principles and disclosure requirements, and was effective for the Company beginning in the second quarter of fiscal 2012 (January 1, 2012). The adoption of this guidance had no impact on the Companys consolidated financial condition and results of operations. Refer to Note
8
Johnson Controls, Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
June 30, 2012
(unaudited)
15, Fair Value Measurements, of the notes to condensed consolidated financial statements for disclosures surrounding the Companys fair value measurements.
3. | Acquisitions and Divestitures |
In the first nine months of fiscal 2012, the Company completed three acquisitions for a combined purchase price, net of cash acquired, of $38 million, all of which was paid in the nine months ended June 30, 2012. The acquisitions in the aggregate were not material to the Companys consolidated financial statements. In connection with the acquisitions, the Company recorded goodwill of $52 million. As a result of two of the acquisitions, each of which increased the Companys ownership from a noncontrolling to controlling interest, the Company recorded an aggregate non-cash gain of $12 million, of which $9 million was recorded within power solutions equity income and $3 million was recorded in automotive experience Europe equity income, to adjust the Companys existing equity investments in the partially-owned affiliates to fair value. Also, in the first nine months of fiscal 2012, the Company recorded an increase to goodwill of $6 million related to a purchase price allocation for a fiscal 2011 acquisition. The purchase price allocations may be subsequently adjusted to reflect final valuation studies.
In the second quarter of fiscal 2012, the Company completed two divestitures for a combined sales price of $91 million, all of which was received in the three months ended March 31, 2012. The divestitures in the aggregate were not material to the Companys consolidated financial statements. In connection with the divestitures, the Company recorded a gain, net of transaction costs, of $35 million and reduced goodwill by $29 million in the building efficiency business.
During the third quarter of fiscal 2011, the Company completed its acquisition of Keiper/Recaro Automotive, a leader in recliner system technology with engineering and manufacturing expertise in metals and mechanisms for automobile seats, based in Kaiserslautern, Germany. The total purchase price, net of cash acquired, was approximately $442 million, of which $450 million was paid during the three months ended June 30, 2011 and $8 million was received in the three months ended December 31, 2011 as a result of a true-up to the purchase price. In connection with the Keiper/Recaro Automotive acquisition, the Company recorded goodwill of $171 million primarily in the automotive experience Europe segment, of which $45 million was recorded in fiscal 2012.
During the second quarter of fiscal 2011, the Company completed its acquisition of the C. Rob. Hammerstein Group (Hammerstein), a leading global supplier of high-quality metal seat structures, components and mechanisms based in Solingen, Germany. The total purchase price, net of cash acquired, was approximately $529 million, all of which was paid during the nine months ended June 30, 2011. In connection with the Hammerstein acquisition, the Company recorded goodwill of $200 million primarily in the automotive experience Europe segment, of which $7 million was recorded in fiscal 2012.
In the first nine months of fiscal 2011, the Company completed three additional acquisitions for a combined purchase price, net of cash acquired, of $80 million, of which $108 million was paid in the nine months ended June 30, 2011 prior to purchase price true-ups from the seller. The acquisitions in the aggregate were not material to the Companys consolidated financial statements. In connection with the acquisitions, the Company recorded goodwill of $73 million, of which $14 million was recorded in fiscal 2012.
There were no business divestitures for the nine months ended June 30, 2011.
4. | Percentage-of-Completion Contracts |
The building efficiency business records certain long-term contracts under the percentage-of-completion method of accounting. Under this method, sales and gross profit are recognized as work is performed based on the relationship between actual costs incurred and total estimated costs at completion. The Company records costs and earnings in excess of billings on uncompleted contracts within accounts receivable net and billings in excess of costs and earnings on uncompleted contracts within other current liabilities in the condensed consolidated statements of financial position. Amounts included within accounts receivable net related to these contracts were $899 million, $773 million and $798 million at June 30, 2012, September 30, 2011 and June 30, 2011, respectively. Amounts
9
Johnson Controls, Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
June 30, 2012
(unaudited)
included within other current liabilities were $740 million, $730 million and $769 million at June 30, 2012, September 30, 2011 and June 30, 2011, respectively.
5. | Inventories |
Inventories consisted of the following (in millions):
June 30, 2012 |
September 30, 2011 |
June 30, 2011 |
||||||||||
Raw materials and supplies |
$ | 1,146 | $ | 1,136 | $ | 1,144 | ||||||
Work-in-process |
454 | 434 | 428 | |||||||||
Finished goods |
883 | 867 | 1,013 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
FIFO inventories |
2,483 | 2,437 | 2,585 | |||||||||
LIFO reserve |
(121 | ) | (121 | ) | (134 | ) | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Inventories |
$ | 2,362 | $ | 2,316 | $ | 2,451 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
Johnson Controls, Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
June 30, 2012
(unaudited)
6. | Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets |
The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill in each of the Companys reporting segments for the three month period ended September 30, 2011 and the nine month period ended June 30, 2012 were as follows (in millions):
June 30, 2011 |
Business Acquisitions |
Business Divestitures |
Currency Translation and Other |
September 30, 2011 |
||||||||||||||||
Building efficiency |
||||||||||||||||||||
North America systems |
$ | 519 | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | 519 | ||||||||||
North America service |
676 | 33 | | 1 | 710 | |||||||||||||||
Global workplace solutions |
184 | | | | 184 | |||||||||||||||
Asia |
391 | | | | 391 | |||||||||||||||
Other |
1,121 | | | (56 | ) | 1,065 | ||||||||||||||
Automotive experience |
||||||||||||||||||||
North America |
1,382 | (2 | ) | | (1 | ) | 1,379 | |||||||||||||
Europe |
1,639 | (58 | ) | | (78 | ) | 1,503 | |||||||||||||
Asia |
243 | 16 | | 2 | 261 | |||||||||||||||
Power solutions |
938 | 93 | | (27 | ) | 1,004 | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Total |
$ | 7,093 | $ | 82 | $ | | $ | (159 | ) | $ | 7,016 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2011 |
Business Acquisitions |
Business Divestitures |
Currency Translation and Other |
June 30, 2012 |
||||||||||||||||
Building efficiency |
||||||||||||||||||||
North America systems |
$ | 519 | $ | | $ | | $ | 1 | $ | 520 | ||||||||||
North America service |
710 | | (2 | ) | | 708 | ||||||||||||||
Global workplace solutions |
184 | | | | 184 | |||||||||||||||
Asia |
391 | | | | 391 | |||||||||||||||
Other |
1,065 | | (27 | ) | (45 | ) | 993 | |||||||||||||
Automotive experience |
||||||||||||||||||||
North America |
1,379 | 12 | | 26 | 1,417 | |||||||||||||||
Europe |
1,503 | 60 | | (115 | ) | 1,448 | ||||||||||||||
Asia |
261 | 7 | | (5 | ) | 263 | ||||||||||||||
Power solutions |
1,004 | 45 | | (20 | ) | 1,029 | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Total |
$ | 7,016 | $ | 124 | $ | (29 | ) | $ | (158 | ) | $ | 6,953 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11
Johnson Controls, Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
June 30, 2012
(unaudited)
The Companys other intangible assets, primarily from business acquisitions, were valued based on independent appraisals and consisted of (in millions):
June 30, 2012 | September 30, 2011 | June 30, 2011 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gross Carrying Amount |
Accumulated Amortization |
Net | Gross Carrying Amount |
Accumulated Amortization |
Net | Gross Carrying Amount |
Accumulated Amortization |
Net | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amortized intangible assets |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Patented technology |
$ | 185 | $ | (108 | ) | $ | 77 | $ | 298 | $ | (209 | ) | $ | 89 | $ | 287 | $ | (215 | ) | $ | 72 | |||||||||||||||
Customer relationships |
510 | (108 | ) | 402 | 487 | (91 | ) | 396 | 440 | (85 | ) | 355 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Miscellaneous |
199 | (43 | ) | 156 | 184 | (38 | ) | 146 | 113 | (35 | ) | 78 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Total amortized intangible assets |
894 | (259 | ) | 635 | 969 | (338 | ) | 631 | 840 | (335 | ) | 505 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Unamortized intangible assets |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Trademarks |
314 | | 314 | 314 | | 314 | 317 | | 317 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Total intangible assets |
$ | 1,208 | $ | (259 | ) | $ | 949 | $ | 1,283 | $ | (338 | ) | $ | 945 | $ | 1,157 | $ | (335 | ) | $ | 822 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of other intangible assets for the three month periods ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 was $17 million and $13 million, respectively. Amortization of other intangible assets for the nine month periods ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 was $42 million and $36 million, respectively. Excluding the impact of any future acquisitions, the Company anticipates amortization for fiscal 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016 and 2017 will be approximately $59 million, $57 million, $53 million, $48 million and $48 million per year, respectively.
7. | Product Warranties |
The Company offers warranties to its customers depending upon the specific product and terms of the customer purchase agreement. A typical warranty program requires that the Company replace defective products within a specified time period from the date of sale. The Company records an estimate for future warranty-related costs based on actual historical return rates and other known factors. Based on analysis of return rates and other factors, the Companys warranty provisions are adjusted as necessary. The Company monitors its warranty activity and adjusts its reserve estimates when it is probable that future warranty costs will be different than those estimates.
The Companys product warranty liability is recorded in the condensed consolidated statements of financial position in other current liabilities if the warranty is less than one year and in other noncurrent liabilities if the warranty extends longer than one year.
The changes in the carrying amount of the Companys total product warranty liability for the nine months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 were as follows (in millions):
Nine Months Ended June 30, |
||||||||
2012 | 2011 | |||||||
Balance at beginning of period |
$ | 301 | $ | 337 | ||||
Accruals for warranties issued during the period |
166 | 150 | ||||||
Accruals from acquisitions and divestitures |
(1 | ) | | |||||
Accruals related to pre-existing warranties (including changes in estimates) |
(21 | ) | (32 | ) | ||||
Settlements made (in cash or in kind) during the period |
(163 | ) | (165 | ) | ||||
Currency translation |
(5 | ) | 5 | |||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Balance at end of period |
$ | 277 | $ | 295 | ||||
|
|
|
|
12
Johnson Controls, Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
June 30, 2012
(unaudited)
8. | Significant Restructuring Costs |
To improve profitability in the Companys building efficiency and automotive experience businesses and address the softness in certain underlying markets, the Company committed to a restructuring plan in the third quarter of fiscal 2012 and recorded a $52 million restructuring charge, of which $41 million was recorded for the building efficiency business and $11 million was recorded for the automotive experience business.
The following table summarizes the changes in the Companys restructuring reserve, included within other current liabilities in the condensed consolidated statements of financial position (in millions):
Employee Severance and Termination Benefits |
Other | Total | ||||||||||
Original reserve |
$ | 47 | $ | 5 | $ | 52 | ||||||
Utilizedcash |
(4 | ) | (2 | ) | (6 | ) | ||||||
Utilizednoncash |
| (3 | ) | (3 | ) | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Balance at June 30, 2012 |
$ | 43 | $ | | $ | 43 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
9. | Income Taxes |
Effective Tax Rate
In calculating the provision for income taxes, the Company uses an estimate of the annual effective tax rate based upon the facts and circumstances known at each interim period. On a quarterly basis, the actual effective tax rate is adjusted, as appropriate, based upon changed facts and circumstances, if any, as compared to those forecasted at the beginning of the fiscal year and each interim period thereafter. For the three and nine months ended June 30, 2012, the Company decreased its estimated annual effective income tax rate from continuing operations from 19% to 18.2% due to a reduction of income as well as a geographical shift in income. For the three and nine months ended June 30, 2011, the Companys estimated annual effective income tax rate from continuing operations was 19%.
Valuation Allowance
The Company reviews the realizability of its deferred tax assets on a quarterly basis, or whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that a review is required. In determining the requirement for a valuation allowance, the historical and projected financial results of the legal entity or consolidated group recording the net deferred tax asset are considered, along with any other positive or negative evidence. Since future financial results may differ from previous estimates, periodic adjustments to the Company's valuation allowances may be necessary.
It is reasonably possible that over the next twelve months, valuation allowances against deferred tax assets in certain jurisdictions may result in a net increase to tax expense of up to $100 million.
Uncertain Tax Positions
At September 30, 2011, the Company had gross tax effected unrecognized tax benefits of $1,357 million of which $1,164 million, if recognized, would impact the effective tax rate. Total net accrued interest at September 30, 2011 was approximately $77 million (net of tax benefit). The net change in interest and penalties during the nine months ended June 30, 2012 was $7 million, and for the same period in fiscal 2011 was $27 million. The Company recognizes interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits as a component of income tax expense.
13
Johnson Controls, Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
June 30, 2012
(unaudited)
As a result of certain recent events related to prior tax planning initiatives, during the third quarter of fiscal 2012, the Company reduced the reserve for uncertain tax positions by $22 million, including $13 million of interest and penalties, which impacts the effective tax rate for the quarter.
The Company is subject to income taxes in the U.S. and numerous foreign jurisdictions. Judgment is required in determining its worldwide provision for income taxes and recording the related assets and liabilities. In the ordinary course of the Companys business, there are many transactions and calculations where the ultimate tax determination is uncertain. The Company is regularly under audit by tax authorities, including major jurisdictions noted below:
Tax Jurisdiction |
Statute of Limitations | |
Austria |
5 years | |
Belgium |
3 years | |
Brazil |
5 years | |
Canada |
5 years | |
China |
3 to 5 years | |
Czech Republic |
3 years | |
France |
3 years | |
Germany |
4 to 5 years | |
Italy |
4 years | |
Japan |
5 to 7 years | |
Mexico |
5 years | |
Poland |
5 years | |
Slovakia |
5 years | |
Spain |
4 years | |
United Kingdom |
4 years | |
United StatesFederal |
3 years | |
United StatesState |
3 to 5 years |
In the U.S., the fiscal years 2007 through 2009 are currently under exam by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) and 2004 through 2006 are currently under IRS Appeals. Additionally, the Company is currently under exam in the following major foreign jurisdictions:
Tax Jurisdiction |
Tax Years Covered | |
Austria |
20052008 | |
Brazil |
20042008 | |
Canada |
20072008 | |
Czech Republic |
20072009 | |
France |
20022010 | |
Germany |
20012010 | |
Italy |
20052009 | |
Mexico |
20032004 | |
Poland |
20082009 | |
Slovakia |
20092010 |
It is reasonably possible that certain tax examinations, appellate proceedings and/or tax litigation will conclude within the next twelve months, the impact of which could be up to a $100 million adjustment to tax expense.
14
Johnson Controls, Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
June 30, 2012
(unaudited)
Impacts of Tax Legislation
During the nine month period ended June 30, 2012, tax legislation was adopted in Japan which reduces its income tax rate by 5%, the effect of which is not material to the Companys consolidated financial statements. Also, tax legislation was adopted in various jurisdictions to limit the annual utilization of tax losses that are carried forward.
These and other tax law changes adopted in various jurisdictions during the nine months ended June 30, 2012 will not have a material impact on the Companys consolidated financial statements.
10. | Retirement Plans |
The components of the Companys net periodic benefit costs associated with its defined benefit pension plans and other postretirement health and other benefits are shown in the tables below in accordance with ASC 715, Compensation Retirement Benefits (in millions):
U.S. Pension Plans | ||||||||||||||||
Three Months Ended June 30, |
Nine Months Ended June 30, |
|||||||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | 2012 | 2011 | |||||||||||||
Service cost |
$ | 17 | $ | 16 | $ | 51 | $ | 49 | ||||||||
Interest cost |
37 | 36 | 112 | 108 | ||||||||||||
Expected return on plan assets |
(56 | ) | (53 | ) | (168 | ) | (157 | ) | ||||||||
Amortization of net actuarial loss |
21 | 14 | 63 | 42 | ||||||||||||
Amortization of prior service cost |
| 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Net periodic benefit cost |
$ | 19 | $ | 14 | $ | 59 | $ | 43 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-U.S. Pension Plans | ||||||||||||||||
Three Months Ended June 30, |
Nine Months Ended June 30, |
|||||||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | 2012 | 2011 | |||||||||||||
Service cost |
$ | 9 | $ | 9 | $ | 26 | $ | 26 | ||||||||
Interest cost |
17 | 17 | 53 | 51 | ||||||||||||
Expected return on plan assets |
(19 | ) | (20 | ) | (56 | ) | (58 | ) | ||||||||
Amortization of net actuarial loss |
5 | 3 | 14 | 9 | ||||||||||||
Amortization of prior service cost (credit) |
| | (1 | ) | 1 | |||||||||||
Curtailment gain |
| | | (19 | ) | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Net periodic benefit cost |
$ | 12 | $ | 9 | $ | 36 | $ | 10 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15
Johnson Controls, Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
June 30, 2012
(unaudited)
Postretirement Health and Other Benefits | ||||||||||||||||
Three Months Ended June 30, |
Nine Months Ended June 30, |
|||||||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | 2012 | 2011 | |||||||||||||
Service cost |
$ | 2 | $ | 1 | $ | 4 | $ | 3 | ||||||||
Interest cost |
3 | 3 | 10 | 10 | ||||||||||||
Expected return on plan assets |
(3 | ) | | (9 | ) | | ||||||||||
Amortization of net actuarial loss |
| 1 | 1 | 2 | ||||||||||||
Amortization of prior service credit |
(4 | ) | (4 | ) | (13 | ) | (13 | ) | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Net periodic benefit cost (credit) |
$ | (2 | ) | $ | 1 | $ | (7 | ) | $ | 2 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11. | Debt and Financing Arrangements |
During the quarter ended March 31, 2012, the Company remarketed $46 million aggregate principal amount of 11.5% subordinated notes due in fiscal 2042, on behalf of holders of Corporate Units and holders of separate notes, by issuing $46 million aggregate principal amount of 2.355% senior notes due on March 31, 2017.
During the quarter ended December 31, 2011, the Company issued $400 million aggregate principal amount of 2.6% senior unsecured fixed rate notes due in fiscal 2017, $450 million aggregate principal amount of 3.75% senior unsecured fixed rate notes due in fiscal 2022 and $250 million aggregate principal amount of 5.25% senior unsecured fixed rate notes due in fiscal 2042. Aggregate net proceeds of $1.1 billion from the issuances were used for general corporate purposes, including the retirement of short-term debt and contributions to the Companys pension and postretirement health plans.
During the quarter ended December 31, 2011, the Company entered into two committed, one-year revolving credit facilities totaling $135 million in aggregate. There have been no draws on either facility during fiscal 2012.
During the quarter ended December 31, 2011, the Company entered into a five-year, 75 million euro, floating rate credit facility scheduled to mature in fiscal 2017. The Company drew on the credit facility during the quarter ended March 31, 2012. Proceeds from the facility were used for general corporate purposes.
During the quarter ended June 30, 2011, a 150 million euro revolving credit facility and a 50 million euro revolving credit facility matured.
During the quarter ended June 30, 2011, a total of 157,820 equity units, which had a purchase contract settlement date of March 31, 2012, were early exercised. As a result, the Company issued 766,673 shares of Johnson Controls, Inc. common stock and approximately $8 million of 11.50% notes due 2042.
During the quarter ended March 31, 2011, the Company replaced its $2.05 billion committed five-year credit facility, scheduled to mature in December 2011, with a $2.5 billion committed four-year credit facility scheduled to mature in February 2015. The facility is used to support the Companys outstanding commercial paper. There were no draws on the facility in fiscal 2012 or 2011.
During the quarter ended March 31, 2011, the Company issued $350 million aggregate principal amount of floating rate senior unsecured notes due in fiscal 2014, $450 million aggregate principal amount of 1.75% senior unsecured fixed rate notes due in fiscal 2014, $500 million aggregate principal amount of 4.25% senior unsecured fixed rate notes due in fiscal 2021 and $300 million aggregate principal amount of 5.70% senior unsecured fixed rate notes due in fiscal 2041. Aggregate net proceeds of $1.6 billion from the issues were used for general corporate purposes including the retirement of short-term debt.
16
Johnson Controls, Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
June 30, 2012
(unaudited)
During the quarter ended March 31, 2011, the Company entered into a six-year, 100 million euro, floating rate loan scheduled to mature in February 2017. Proceeds from the facility were used for general corporate purposes.
During the quarter ended March 31, 2011, the Company retired $654 million in principal amount, plus accrued interest, of its 5.25% fixed rate notes that matured on January 15, 2011. The Company used cash to fund the payment.
During the quarter ended March 31, 2011, the Company retired its $100 million committed revolving facility prior to its scheduled maturity date of December 2011. There were no draws on the facility.
During the quarter ended December 31, 2010, the Company repaid debt of $82 million which was acquired as part of an acquisition in the same quarter. The Company used cash to repay the debt.
12. | Earnings Per Share |
The Company presents both basic and diluted earnings per share (EPS) amounts. Basic EPS is calculated by dividing net income attributable to Johnson Controls, Inc. by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the reporting period. Diluted EPS is calculated by dividing net income attributable to Johnson Controls, Inc. by the weighted average number of common shares and common equivalent shares outstanding during the reporting period that are calculated using the treasury stock method for stock options. The treasury stock method assumes that the Company uses the proceeds from the exercise of awards to repurchase common stock at the average market price during the period. The assumed proceeds under the treasury stock method include the purchase price that the grantee will pay in the future, compensation cost for future service that the Company has not yet recognized and any windfall tax benefits that would be credited to capital in excess of par value when the award generates a tax deduction. If there would be a shortfall resulting in a charge to capital in excess of par value, such an amount would be a reduction of the proceeds.
The Companys outstanding Equity Units due 2042 and 6.5% convertible senior notes due 2012 are reflected in diluted earnings per share using the if-converted method. Under this method, if dilutive, the common stock is assumed issued as of the beginning of the reporting period and included in calculating diluted earnings per share. In addition, if dilutive, interest expense, net of tax, related to the outstanding Equity Units and convertible senior notes is added back to the numerator in calculating diluted earnings per share.
17
Johnson Controls, Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
June 30, 2012
(unaudited)
The following table reconciles the numerators and denominators used to calculate basic and diluted earnings per share (in millions):
Three Months Ended June 30, |
Nine Months Ended June 30, |
|||||||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | 2012 | 2011 | |||||||||||||
Income Available to Common Shareholders |
||||||||||||||||
Basic income available to common shareholders |
$ | 417 | $ | 357 | $ | 1,191 | $ | 1,086 | ||||||||
Interest expense, net of tax |
| 1 | 1 | 2 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Diluted income available to common shareholders |
$ | 417 | $ | 358 | $ | 1,192 | $ | 1,088 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Weighted Average Shares Outstanding |
||||||||||||||||
Basic weighted average shares outstanding |
683.4 | 678.6 | 681.1 | 677.1 | ||||||||||||
Effect of dilutive securities: |
||||||||||||||||
Stock options |
5.3 | 8.7 | 5.7 | 8.6 | ||||||||||||
Equity units |
0.1 | 3.9 | 2.5 | 4.3 | ||||||||||||
Convertible senior notes |
| | | | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Diluted weighted average shares outstanding |
688.8 | 691.2 | 689.3 | 690.0 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Antidilutive Securities |
||||||||||||||||
Options to purchase common shares |
1.1 | | 1.1 | |
During the three months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, the Company declared a dividend of $0.18 and $0.16, respectively, per common share. During the nine months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, the Company declared three quarterly dividends totaling $0.54 and $0.48, respectively, per common share. The Company paid all dividends in the month subsequent to the end of each fiscal quarter.
18
Johnson Controls, Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
June 30, 2012
(unaudited)
13. | Equity and Noncontrolling Interests |
The following schedules present changes in consolidated equity attributable to Johnson Controls, Inc. and noncontrolling interests (in millions):
Three Months Ended June 30, 2012 | Three Months Ended June 30, 2011 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Equity Attributable to Johnson Controls, Inc. |
Equity Attributable to Noncontrolling Interests |
Total Equity | Equity Attributable to Johnson Controls, Inc. |
Equity Attributable to Noncontrolling Interests |
Total Equity | |||||||||||||||||||
Beginning balance, March 31 |
$ | 11,595 | $ | 150 | $ | 11,745 | $ | 10,976 | $ | 130 | $ | 11,106 | ||||||||||||
Total comprehensive income: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income |
417 | 20 | 437 | 357 | 10 | 367 | ||||||||||||||||||
Foreign currency translation adjustments |
(347 | ) | 3 | (344 | ) | 131 | (1 | ) | 130 | |||||||||||||||
Realized and unrealized losses on derivatives |
(1 | ) | | (1 | ) | (7 | ) | | (7 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Unrealized losses on marketable common stock |
(3 | ) | | (3 | ) | | | | ||||||||||||||||
Employee retirement plans |
23 | | 23 | (6 | ) | | (6 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Other comprehensive income (loss) |
(328 | ) | 3 | (325 | ) | 118 | (1 | ) | 117 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Comprehensive income |
89 | 23 | 112 | 475 | 9 | 484 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Other changes in equity: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash dividendscommon stock |
(123 | ) | | (123 | ) | (109 | ) | | (109 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Dividends attributable to noncontrolling interests |
| (26 | ) | (26 | ) | | (22 | ) | (22 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Redemption value adjustment attributable to redeemable noncontrolling interests |
(13 | ) | | (13 | ) | (2 | ) | | (2 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Repurchases of common stock |
(9 | ) | | (9 | ) | | | | ||||||||||||||||
Other, including options exercised |
57 | | 57 | 21 | 1 | 22 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Ending balance, June 30 |
$ | 11,596 | $ | 147 | $ | 11,743 | $ | 11,361 | $ | 118 | $ | 11,479 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19
Johnson Controls, Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
June 30, 2012
(unaudited)
Nine Months Ended June 30, 2012 | Nine Months Ended June 30, 2011 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Equity Attributable to Johnson Controls, Inc. |
Equity Attributable to Noncontrolling Interests |
Total Equity | Equity Attributable to Johnson Controls, Inc. |
Equity Attributable to Noncontrolling Interests |
Total Equity | |||||||||||||||||||
Beginning balance, September 30 |
$ | 11,042 | $ | 138 | $ | 11,180 | $ | 10,071 | $ | 106 | $ | 10,177 | ||||||||||||
Total comprehensive income: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income |
1,191 | 48 | 1,239 | 1,086 | 41 | 1,127 | ||||||||||||||||||
Foreign currency translation adjustments |
(400 | ) | 2 | (398 | ) | 301 | | 301 | ||||||||||||||||
Realized and unrealized gains (losses) on derivatives |
28 | | 28 | (5 | ) | | (5 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Unrealized gains on marketable common stock |
5 | | 5 | 7 | | 7 | ||||||||||||||||||
Employee retirement plans |
52 | | 52 | 65 | | 65 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Other comprehensive income (loss) |
(315 | ) | 2 | (313 | ) | 368 | | 368 | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Comprehensive income |
876 | 50 | 926 | 1,454 | 41 | 1,495 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Other changes in equity: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash dividends - common stock |
(369 | ) | | (369 | ) | (326 | ) | | (326 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Dividends attributable to noncontrolling interests |
| (41 | ) | (41 | ) | | (30 | ) | (30 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Redemption value adjustment attributable to redeemable noncontrolling interests |
(12 | ) | | (12 | ) | 3 | | 3 | ||||||||||||||||
Repurchases of common stock |
(42 | ) | | (42 | ) | | | | ||||||||||||||||
Other, including options exercised |
101 | | 101 | 159 | 1 | 160 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Ending balance, June 30 |
$ | 11,596 | $ | 147 | $ | 11,743 | $ | 11,361 | $ | 118 | $ | 11,479 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company consolidates certain subsidiaries in which the noncontrolling interest party has within their control the right to require the Company to redeem all or a portion of its interest in the subsidiary. The redeemable noncontrolling interests are reported at their estimated redemption value. Any adjustment to the redemption value impacts retained earnings but does not impact net income. Redeemable noncontrolling interests which are redeemable only upon future events, the occurrence of which is not currently probable, are recorded at carrying value.
The following schedules present changes in the redeemable noncontrolling interests (in millions):
Three Months Ended June 30, 2012 |
Three Months Ended June 30, 2011 |
|||||||
Beginning balance, March 31 |
$ | 318 | $ | 223 | ||||
Net income |
5 | 13 | ||||||
Foreign currency translation adjustments |
| (3 | ) | |||||
Dividends |
(4 | ) | (6 | ) | ||||
Redemption value adjustment |
13 | 2 | ||||||
Change in noncontrolling interest share |
(118 | ) | | |||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Ending balance, June 30 |
$ | 214 | $ | 229 | ||||
|
|
|
|
20
Johnson Controls, Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
June 30, 2012
(unaudited)
Nine Months Ended June 30, 2012 |
Nine Months Ended June 30, 2011 |
|||||||
Beginning balance, September 30 |
$ | 260 | $ | 196 | ||||
Net income |
50 | 41 | ||||||
Foreign currency translation adjustments |
| 1 | ||||||
Dividends |
(13 | ) | (6 | ) | ||||
Redemption value adjustment |
12 | (3 | ) | |||||
Change in noncontrolling interest share |
(95 | ) | | |||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Ending balance, June 30 |
$ | 214 | $ | 229 | ||||
|
|
|
|
14. | Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities |
The Company selectively uses derivative instruments to reduce market risk associated with changes in foreign currency, commodities, stock-based compensation liabilities and interest rates. Under Company policy, the use of derivatives is restricted to those intended for hedging purposes; the use of any derivative instrument for speculative purposes is strictly prohibited. A description of each type of derivative utilized by the Company to manage risk is included in the following paragraphs. In addition, refer to Note 15, Fair Value Measurements, of the notes to condensed consolidated financial statements for information related to the fair value measurements and valuation methods utilized by the Company for each derivative type.
The Company has global operations and participates in the foreign exchange markets to minimize its risk of loss from fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates. The Company primarily uses foreign currency exchange contracts to hedge certain of its foreign exchange rate exposures. The Company hedges 70% to 90% of the nominal amount of each of its known foreign exchange transactional exposures.
The Company has entered into cross-currency interest rate swaps to selectively hedge portions of its net investment in Japan. The currency effects of the cross-currency interest rate swaps are reflected in the accumulated other comprehensive income (AOCI) account within shareholders equity attributable to Johnson Controls, Inc. where they offset gains and losses recorded on the Companys net investment in Japan. At June 30, 2012, September 30, 2011 and June 30, 2011, the Company had three cross currency interest rate swaps outstanding totaling 20 billion yen.
The Company uses commodity contracts in the financial derivatives market in cases where commodity price risk cannot be naturally offset or hedged through supply base fixed price contracts. Commodity risks are systematically managed pursuant to policy guidelines. As cash flow hedges, the effective portion of the hedge gains or losses due to changes in fair value are initially recorded as a component of AOCI and are subsequently reclassified into earnings when the hedged transactions, typically sales or costs related to sales, occur and affect earnings. Any ineffective portion of the hedge is reflected in the consolidated statement of income. The maturities of the commodity contracts coincide with the expected purchase of the commodities. The Company had the following outstanding commodity hedge contracts that hedge forecasted purchases:
Volume Outstanding as of | ||||||||
Commodity |
Units |
June 30, 2012 |
September 30, 2011 |
June 30, 2011 | ||||
Copper |
Pounds | 12,733,000 | 18,760,000 | 13,150,000 | ||||
Lead |
Metric Tons | 23,200 | 25,600 | 26,517 | ||||
Aluminum |
Metric Tons | 1,071 | 5,398 | 1,134 | ||||
Tin |
Metric Tons | | 260 | |
The Company selectively uses equity swaps to reduce market risk associated with certain of its stock-based compensation plans, such as its deferred compensation plans. These equity compensation liabilities increase as the Companys stock price increases and decrease as the Companys stock price decreases. In contrast, the value of the
21
Johnson Controls, Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
June 30, 2012
(unaudited)
swap agreement moves in the opposite direction of these liabilities, allowing the Company to fix a portion of the liabilities at a stated amount. As of June 30, 2012, September 30, 2011 and June 30, 2011, the Company had hedged approximately 4.3 million shares of its common stock.
The Company selectively uses interest rate swaps to reduce market risk associated with changes in interest rates for its fixed-rate notes. As fair value hedges, the interest rate swaps and related debt balances are valued under a market approach using publicized swap curves. Changes in the fair value of the swap and hedged portion of the debt are recorded in the consolidated statements of income. In the second quarter of fiscal 2011, the Company entered into a fixed to floating interest rate swap totaling $100 million to hedge the coupon of its 5.8% bond maturing November 15, 2012, two fixed to floating interest rate swaps totaling $300 million to hedge the coupon of its 4.875% bond maturing September 15, 2013 and five fixed to floating interest rate swaps totaling $450 million to hedge the coupon of its 1.75% bond maturing March 1, 2014. These eight interest rate swaps were outstanding as of June 30, 2012, September 30, 2011 and June 30, 2011.
In September 2005, the Company entered into three forward treasury lock agreements to reduce the market risk associated with changes in interest rates associated with the Companys anticipated fixed-rate note issuance to finance the acquisition of York International Corp. (cash flow hedge). The three forward treasury lock agreements, which had a combined notional amount of $1.3 billion, fixed a portion of the future interest cost for 5-year, 10-year and 30-year notes. The fair value of each treasury lock agreement, or the difference between the treasury lock reference rate and the fixed rate at time of note issuance, is amortized to interest expense over the life of the respective note issuance. In January 2006, in connection with the Companys debt refinancing, the three forward treasury lock agreements were terminated.
The following table presents the location and fair values of derivative instruments and hedging activities included in the Companys condensed consolidated statements of financial position (in millions):
Derivatives and Hedging Activities Designated as Hedging Instruments under ASC 815 |
Derivatives and Hedging Activities Not Designated as Hedging Instruments under ASC 815 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
June 30, 2012 |
September 30, 2011 |
June 30, 2011 |
June 30, 2012 |
September 30, 2011 |
June 30, 2011 |
|||||||||||||||||||
Other current assets |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Foreign currency exchange derivatives |
$ | 12 | $ | 28 | $ | 8 | $ | 8 | $ | 18 | $ | | ||||||||||||
Commodity derivatives |
1 | | 8 | | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Cross-currency interest rate swaps |
8 | | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Other noncurrent assets |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest rate swaps |
7 | 15 | 15 | | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Equity swap |
| | | 118 | 112 | 177 | ||||||||||||||||||
Foreign currency exchange derivatives |
| 11 | 1 | | 16 | 1 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Total assets |
$ | 28 | $ | 54 | $ | 32 | $ | 126 | $ | 146 | $ | 178 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Other current liabilities |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Foreign currency exchange derivatives |
$ | 18 | $ | 49 | $ | 7 | $ | 8 | $ | 21 | $ | 1 | ||||||||||||
Net investment hedges |
| 20 | 8 | | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Commodity derivatives |
5 | 32 | 1 | | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Current portion of long-term debt |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fixed rate debt swapped to floating |
100 | | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Long-term debt |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fixed rate debt swapped to floating |
757 | 865 | 865 | | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Other noncurrent liabilities |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Foreign currency exchange derivatives |
| 19 | 1 | | 11 | | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Total liabilities |
$ | 880 | $ | 985 | $ | 882 | $ | 8 | $ | 32 | $ | 1 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22
Johnson Controls, Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
June 30, 2012
(unaudited)
The following tables present the location and amount of the effective portion of gains and losses gross of tax on derivative instruments and related hedge items reclassified from AOCI into the Companys consolidated statements of income for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 and amounts recorded in AOCI net of tax in the condensed consolidated statements of financial position (in millions):
Amount of Gain (Loss) Reclassified from AOCI into Income | ||||||||||||||||||
Derivatives in ASC 815 Cash Flow Hedging Relationships |
Location of Gain (Loss) Reclassified from AOCI into Income |
Three Months Ended June 30, | Nine Months Ended June 30, | |||||||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | 2012 | 2011 | |||||||||||||||
Foreign currency exchange derivatives |
Cost of sales | $ | (6 | ) | $ | 2 | $ | (16 | ) | $ | 6 | |||||||
Commodity derivatives |
Cost of sales | (4 | ) | 7 | (20 | ) | 26 | |||||||||||
Forward treasury locks |
Net financing charges | | | 1 | 1 | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Total |
$ | (10 | ) | $ | 9 | $ | (35 | ) | $ | 33 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives in ASC 815 Cash Flow Hedging Relationships |
Amount of Gain (Loss) Recognized in AOCI on Derivative | |||||||||||
June 30, 2012 | September 30, 2011 | June 30, 2011 | ||||||||||
Foreign currency exchange derivatives |
$ | (3 | ) | $ | (16 | ) | $ | 1 | ||||
Commodity derivatives |
(4 | ) | (20 | ) | 5 | |||||||
Forward treasury locks |
8 | 9 | 9 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Total |
$ | 1 | $ | (27 | ) | $ | 15 | |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of Gain (Loss) Recognized in Income on Derivative | ||||||||||||||||||
Derivatives in ASC 815 Fair Value Hedging Relationships |
Location of Gain (Loss) Recognized in Income on Derivative |
Three Months Ended June 30, | Nine Months Ended June 30, | |||||||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | 2012 | 2011 | |||||||||||||||
Interest rate swap |
Net financing charges | $ | (2 | ) | $ | 12 | $ | (8 | ) | $ | 14 | |||||||
Fixed rate debt swapped to floating |
Net financing charges | 3 | (11 | ) | 9 | (14 | ) | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Total |
$ | 1 | $ | 1 | $ | 1 | $ | | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of Gain (Loss) Recognized in Income on Derivative | ||||||||||||||||||
Derivatives Not Designated as Hedging Instruments under ASC 815 |
Location of Gain (Loss) Recognized in Income on Derivative |
Three Months Ended June 30, | Nine Months Ended June 30, | |||||||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | 2012 | 2011 | |||||||||||||||
Foreign currency exchange derivatives |
Cost of sales | $ | (1 | ) | $ | 8 | $ | 22 | $ | 18 | ||||||||
Foreign currency exchange derivatives |
Net financing charges | 21 | (7 | ) | (9 | ) | (9 | ) | ||||||||||
Foreign currency exchange derivatives |
Provision for income taxes | 15 | | 15 | | |||||||||||||
Equity swap |
Selling, general and administrative | (20 | ) | | 6 | 42 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Total |
$ | 15 | $ | 1 | $ | 34 | $ | 51 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The amount of gains (losses) recognized in cumulative translation adjustment (CTA) within AOCI on the effective portion of outstanding net investment hedges was $5 million, ($12) million and ($5) million at June 30, 2012, September 30, 2011 and June 30, 2011, respectively. For the three and nine months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, no gains or losses were reclassified from CTA into income for the Companys outstanding net investment hedges, and no gains or losses were recognized in income for the ineffective portion of cash flow hedges.
23
Johnson Controls, Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
June 30, 2012
(unaudited)
15. | Fair Value Measurements |
ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures, defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. ASC 820 also establishes a three-level fair value hierarchy that prioritizes information used in developing assumptions when pricing an asset or liability as follows:
Level 1: Observable inputs such as quoted prices in active markets;
Level 2: Inputs, other than quoted prices in active markets, that are observable either directly or indirectly; and
Level 3: Unobservable inputs where there is little or no market data, which requires the reporting entity to develop its own assumptions.
ASC 820 requires the use of observable market data, when available, in making fair value measurements. When inputs used to measure fair value fall within different levels of the hierarchy, the level within which the fair value measurement is categorized is based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement.
Recurring Fair Value Measurements
The following tables present the Companys fair value hierarchy for those assets and liabilities measured at fair value as of June 30, 2012, September 30, 2011 and June 30, 2011 (in millions):
Fair Value Measurements Using: | ||||||||||||||||
Total as of June 30, 2012 |
Quoted Prices in Active Markets (Level 1) |
Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2) |
Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) |
|||||||||||||
Other current assets |
||||||||||||||||
Foreign currency exchange derivatives |
$ | 20 | $ | 20 | $ | | $ | | ||||||||
Commodity derivatives |
1 | | 1 | | ||||||||||||
Cross-currency interest rate swaps |
8 | | 8 | | ||||||||||||
Other noncurrent assets |
||||||||||||||||
Interest rate swaps |
7 | | 7 | | ||||||||||||
Investments in marketable common stock |
34 | 34 | | | ||||||||||||
Equity swap |
118 | 118 | | | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total assets |
$ | 188 | $ | 172 | $ | 16 | $ | | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Other current liabilities |
||||||||||||||||
Foreign currency exchange derivatives |
$ | 26 | $ | 26 | $ | | $ | | ||||||||
Commodity derivatives |
5 | | 5 | | ||||||||||||
Current portion of long-term debt |
||||||||||||||||
Fixed rate debt swapped to floating |
100 | | 100 | | ||||||||||||
Long-term debt |
||||||||||||||||
Fixed rate debt swapped to floating |
757 | | 757 | | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total liabilities |
$ | 888 | $ | 26 | $ | 862 | $ | | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24
Johnson Controls, Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
June 30, 2012
(unaudited)
Fair Value Measurements Using: | ||||||||||||||||
Total as of September 30, 2011 |
Quoted Prices in Active Markets (Level 1) |
Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2) |
Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) |
|||||||||||||
Other current assets |
||||||||||||||||
Foreign currency exchange derivatives |
$ | 46 | $ | 46 | $ | | $ | | ||||||||
Other noncurrent assets |
||||||||||||||||
Interest rate swaps |
15 | | 15 | | ||||||||||||
Investments in marketable common stock |
34 | 34 | | | ||||||||||||
Equity swap |
112 | 112 | | | ||||||||||||
Foreign currency exchange derivatives |
27 | 27 | | | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total assets |
$ | 234 | $ | 219 | $ | 15 | $ | | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Other current liabilities |
||||||||||||||||
Foreign currency exchange derivatives |
$ | 70 | $ | 70 | $ | | $ | | ||||||||
Cross-currency interest rate swaps |
20 | | 20 | | ||||||||||||
Commodity derivatives |
32 | | 32 | | ||||||||||||
Long-term debt |
||||||||||||||||
Fixed rate debt swapped to floating |
865 | | 865 | | ||||||||||||
Other noncurrent liabilities |
||||||||||||||||
Foreign currency exchange derivatives |
30 | 30 | | | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total liabilities |
$ | 1,017 | $ | 100 | $ | 917 | $ | | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25
Johnson Controls, Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
June 30, 2012
(unaudited)
Fair Value Measurements Using: | ||||||||||||||||
Total as of June 30, 2011 |
Quoted Prices in Active Markets (Level 1) |
Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2) |
Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) |
|||||||||||||
Other current assets |
||||||||||||||||
Foreign currency exchange derivatives |
$ | 8 | $ | 8 | $ | | $ | | ||||||||
Commodity derivatives |
8 | | 8 | | ||||||||||||
Other noncurrent assets |
||||||||||||||||
Interest rate swaps |
15 | | 15 | | ||||||||||||
Investments in marketable common stock |
38 | 38 | | | ||||||||||||
Equity swap |
177 | 177 | | | ||||||||||||
Foreign currency exchange derivatives |
2 | 2 | | | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total assets |
$ | 248 | $ | 225 | $ | 23 | $ | | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Other current liabilities |
||||||||||||||||
Foreign currency exchange derivatives |
$ | 8 | $ | 8 | $ | | $ | | ||||||||
Cross-currency interest rate swaps |
8 | | 8 | | ||||||||||||
Commodity derivatives |
1 | | 1 | | ||||||||||||
Long-term debt |
||||||||||||||||
Fixed rate debt swapped to floating |
865 | | 865 | | ||||||||||||
Other noncurrent liabilities |
||||||||||||||||
Foreign currency exchange derivatives |
1 | 1 | | | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total liabilities |
$ | 883 | $ | 9 | $ | 874 | $ | | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Valuation Methods
Foreign currency exchange derivatives The Company selectively hedges anticipated transactions that are subject to foreign exchange rate risk primarily using foreign currency exchange hedge contracts. The foreign currency exchange derivatives are valued under a market approach using publicized spot and forward prices. As cash flow hedges under ASC 815, the effective portion of the hedge gains or losses due to changes in fair value are initially recorded as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income and are subsequently reclassified into earnings when the hedged transactions occur and affect earnings. Any ineffective portion of the hedge is reflected in the consolidated statements of income. These contracts were highly effective in hedging the variability in future cash flows attributable to changes in currency exchange rates at June 30, 2012, September 30, 2011 and June 30, 2011. The fair value of foreign currency exchange derivatives that are designated as fair value hedges under ASC 815, as well as those not designated as hedging instruments under ASC 815 are recorded in the consolidated statements of income.
Commodity derivatives The Company selectively hedges anticipated transactions that are subject to commodity price risk, primarily using commodity hedge contracts, to minimize overall price risk associated with the Companys purchases of lead, copper, tin and aluminum. The commodity derivatives are valued under a market approach using publicized prices, where available, or dealer quotes. As cash flow hedges, the effective portion of the hedge gains or losses due to changes in fair value are initially recorded as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income and are subsequently reclassified into earnings when the hedged transactions, typically sales or cost related to sales, occur and affect earnings. Any ineffective portion of the hedge is reflected in the consolidated statements of income. These contracts were highly effective in hedging the variability in future cash flows attributable to commodity price changes at June 30, 2012, September 30, 2011 and June 30, 2011.
Interest rate swaps and related debt The Company selectively uses interest rate swaps to reduce market risk associated with changes in interest rates for its fixed-rate bonds. As fair value hedges, the interest rate swaps and
26
Johnson Controls, Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
June 30, 2012
(unaudited)
related debt balances are valued under a market approach using publicized swap curves. Changes in the fair value of the swap and hedged portion of the debt are recorded in the consolidated statements of income. In the second quarter of fiscal 2011, the Company entered into a fixed to floating interest rate swap totaling $100 million to hedge the coupons of its 5.80% notes maturing November 15, 2012, two fixed to floating interest rate swaps totaling $300 million to hedge the coupon of its 4.875% notes maturing September 15, 2013 and five fixed to floating interest rate swaps totaling $450 million to hedge the coupon of its 1.75% bond maturing March 1, 2014. These eight interest rate swaps were outstanding as of June 30, 2012, September 30, 2011 and June 30, 2011.
Investments in marketable common stock The Company invests in certain marketable common stock, which is valued under a market approach using publicized share prices. As of June 30, 2012, September 30, 2011 and June 30, 2011, the Company recorded unrealized gains of $11 million, $9 million and $10 million, respectively, in accumulated other comprehensive income. The Company also recorded unrealized losses of $3 million in accumulated other comprehensive income on these investments as of September 30, 2011, and no unrealized losses as of June 30, 2012 and 2011. In the second quarter of fiscal 2012, the Company recorded an impairment charge related to an investment in marketable common stock due to the investees bankruptcy announcement in March 2012. As a result, the Company recorded a $14 million impairment charge within selling, general, and administrative expenses in the power solutions segment. The impairment reduced the investment to zero and was measured under a market approach using the publicized share price. The inputs utilized in the analysis are classified as Level 1 inputs within the fair value hierarchy as defined in ASC 820.
Equity swaps The Company selectively uses equity swaps to reduce market risk associated with certain of its stock-based compensation plans, such as its deferred compensation plans. The equity swaps are valued under a market approach as the fair value of the swaps is equal to the Companys stock price at the reporting period date. Changes in fair value on the equity swaps are reflected in the consolidated statement of income within selling, general and administrative expenses.
Cross-currency interest rate swaps The Company selectively uses cross-currency interest rate swaps to hedge the foreign currency rate risk associated with certain of its investments in Japan. The cross-currency interest rate swaps are valued using observable market data. Changes in the market value of the swaps are reflected in the foreign currency translation adjustments component of accumulated other comprehensive income where they offset gains and losses recorded on the Companys net investment in Japan. At June 30, 2012, September 30, 2011 and June 30, 2011, the Company had three cross currency interest rate swaps outstanding totaling 20 billion yen.
The fair values of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, short-term debt and accounts payable approximate their carrying values. The fair value of long-term debt, which was $6.2 billion, $4.9 billion and $4.9 billion at June 30, 2012, September 30, 2011 and June 30, 2011, respectively, was determined using market quotes classified as Level 1 inputs within the ASC 820 fair value hierarchy.
16. | Impairment of Long-Lived Assets |
The Company reviews long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the assets carrying amount may not be recoverable. The Company conducts its long-lived asset impairment analyses in accordance with ASC 360-10-15, Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets. ASC 360-10-15 requires the Company to group assets and liabilities at the lowest level for which identifiable cash flows are largely independent of the cash flows of other assets and liabilities and evaluate the asset group against the sum of the undiscounted future cash flows. If the undiscounted cash flows do not indicate the carrying amount of the asset group is recoverable, an impairment charge is measured as the amount by which the carrying amount of the asset group exceeds its fair value based on discounted cash flow analysis or appraisals.
In the second quarter of fiscal 2012, the Company recorded an impairment charge related to an equity investment. Refer to Note 15, Fair Value Measurements, of the notes to condensed consolidated financial statements for additional information. The Company concluded it did not have any triggering events requiring assessment of impairment of its long-lived assets at June 30, 2012 and 2011.
27
Johnson Controls, Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
June 30, 2012
(unaudited)
17. | Segment Information |
ASC 280, Segment Reporting, establishes the standards for reporting information about segments in financial statements. In applying the criteria set forth in ASC 280, the Company has determined that it has nine reportable segments for financial reporting purposes. The Companys nine reportable segments are presented in the context of its three primary businesses building efficiency, automotive experience and power solutions.
Building Efficiency
Building efficiency designs, produces, markets and installs heating, ventilating and air conditioning (HVAC) and control systems that monitor, automate and integrate critical building segment equipment and conditions including HVAC, fire-safety and security in commercial buildings and in various industrial applications.
| North America systems designs, produces, markets and installs mechanical equipment that provides heating and cooling in North American non-residential buildings and industrial applications as well as control systems that integrate the operation of this equipment with other critical building systems. |
| North America service provides technical services including inspection, scheduled maintenance, repair and replacement of mechanical and control systems in North America, as well as the retrofit and service components of performance contracts and other solutions. |
| Global workplace solutions provides on-site staff for complete real estate services, facility operation and management to improve the comfort, productivity, energy efficiency and cost effectiveness of building systems around the globe. |
| Asia provides HVAC and refrigeration systems and technical services to the Asian marketplace. |
| Other provides HVAC and refrigeration systems and technical services to markets in Europe, the Middle East and Latin America. Other also designs and produces heating and air conditioning solutions for residential and light commercial applications and markets products to the replacement and new construction markets. |
Automotive Experience
Automotive experience designs and manufactures interior systems and products for passenger cars and light trucks, including vans, pick-up trucks and sport utility/crossover vehicles in North America, Europe and Asia. Automotive experience systems and products include complete seating systems and components; cockpit systems, including instrument panels and clusters, information displays and body controllers; overhead systems, including headliners and electronic convenience features; floor consoles; and door systems.
Power Solutions
Power solutions services both automotive original equipment manufacturers and the battery aftermarket by providing advanced battery technology, coupled with systems engineering, marketing and service expertise.
28
Johnson Controls, Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
June 30, 2012
(unaudited)
Management evaluates the performance of the segments based primarily on segment income, which represents income from continuing operations before income taxes and noncontrolling interests excluding net financing charges and significant restructuring costs. General Corporate and other overhead expenses are allocated to business segments in determining segment income. Financial information relating to the Companys reportable segments is as follows (in millions):
Net Sales | ||||||||||||||||
Three Months Ended June 30, |
Nine Months Ended June 30, |
|||||||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | 2012 | 2011 | |||||||||||||
Building efficiency |
||||||||||||||||
North America systems |
$ | 642 | $ | 633 | $ | 1,774 | $ | 1,711 | ||||||||
North America service |
547 | 601 | 1,565 | 1,639 | ||||||||||||
Global workplace solutions |
1,064 | 1,046 | 3,226 | 3,053 | ||||||||||||
Asia |
516 | 498 | 1,447 | 1,334 | ||||||||||||
Other |
1,031 | 1,115 | 2,886 | 3,068 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
3,800 | 3,893 | 10,898 | 10,805 | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Automotive experience |
||||||||||||||||
North America |
2,320 | 1,772 | 6,554 | 5,517 | ||||||||||||
Europe |
2,466 | 2,800 | 7,791 | 7,693 | ||||||||||||
Asia |
679 | 546 | 1,977 | 1,717 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
5,465 | 5,118 | 16,322 | 14,927 | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Power solutions |
1,316 | 1,353 | 4,343 | 4,313 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total net sales |
$ | 10,581 | $ | 10,364 | $ | 31,563 | $ | 30,045 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Segment Income | ||||||||||||||||
Three Months Ended June 30, |
Nine Months Ended June 30, |
|||||||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | 2012 | 2011 | |||||||||||||
Building efficiency |
||||||||||||||||
North America systems |
$ | 80 | $ | 66 | $ | 189 | $ | 169 | ||||||||
North America service |
52 | 35 | 79 | 69 | ||||||||||||
Global workplace solutions |
13 | 7 | 23 | 17 | ||||||||||||
Asia |
78 | 69 | 190 | 178 | ||||||||||||
Other |
41 | 30 | 67 | 45 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
264 | 207 | 548 | 478 | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Automotive experience |
||||||||||||||||
North America |
154 | 67 | 340 | 328 | ||||||||||||
Europe |
(37 | ) | 24 | 14 | 40 | |||||||||||
Asia |
85 | 51 | 269 | 162 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
202 | 142 | 623 | 530 | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Power solutions |
149 | 163 | 601 | 558 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total segment income |
$ | 615 | $ | 512 | $ | 1,772 | $ | 1,566 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Restructuring costs |
(52 | ) | | (52 | ) | | ||||||||||
Net financing charges |
(59 | ) | (43 | ) | (171 | ) | (124 | ) | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Income before income taxes |
$ | 504 | $ | 469 | $ | 1,549 | $ | 1,442 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29
Johnson Controls, Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
June 30, 2012
(unaudited)
18. | Commitments and Contingencies |
The Company accrues for potential environmental liabilities in a manner consistent with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States; that is, when it is probable a liability has been incurred and the amount of the liability is reasonably estimable. Reserves for environmental liabilities totaled $25 million, $30 million and $42 million at June 30, 2012, September 30, 2011 and June 30, 2011, respectively. The Company reviews the status of its environmental sites on a quarterly basis and adjusts its reserves accordingly. Such potential liabilities accrued by the Company do not take into consideration possible recoveries of future insurance proceeds. They do, however, take into account the likely share other parties will bear at remediation sites. It is difficult to estimate the Company's ultimate level of liability at many remediation sites due to the large number of other parties that may be involved, the complexity of determining the relative liability among those parties, the uncertainty as to the nature and scope of the investigations and remediation to be conducted, the uncertainty in the application of law and risk assessment, the various choices and costs associated with diverse technologies that may be used in corrective actions at the sites, and the often quite lengthy periods over which eventual remediation may occur. Nevertheless, the Company does not currently believe that any claims, penalties or costs in connection with known environmental matters will have a material adverse effect on the Company's financial position, results of operations or cash flows. In addition, the Company has identified asset retirement obligations for environmental matters that are expected to be addressed at the retirement, disposal, removal or abandonment of existing owned facilities, primarily in the power solutions business. At June 30, 2012, September 30, 2011 and June 30, 2011, the Company has recorded conditional asset retirement obligations of $70 million, $91 million and $95 million, respectively.
The Company is involved in a number of product liability and various other casualty lawsuits incident to the operation of its businesses. The Company maintains insurance coverages and records estimated costs for claims and suits of this nature. It is management's opinion that none of these lawsuits will have a material adverse effect on the Company's financial position, results of operations or cash flows. Costs related to such matters were not material to the periods presented.
30
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Board of Directors and Shareholders
of Johnson Controls, Inc.
We have reviewed the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of financial position of Johnson Controls, Inc. and its subsidiaries (the Company) as of June 30, 2012 and 2011, and the related consolidated statements of income and the consolidated statements of cash flows for the three-month and nine-month periods ended June 30, 2012 and 2011. These interim financial statements are the responsibility of the Companys management.
We conducted our review in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). A review of interim financial information consists principally of applying analytical procedures and making inquiries of persons responsible for financial and accounting matters. It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the objective of which is the expression of an opinion regarding the financial statements taken as a whole. Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.
Based on our review, we are not aware of any material modifications that should be made to the accompanying condensed consolidated interim financial statements for them to be in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
We previously audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated statement of financial position as of September 30, 2011, and the related consolidated statements of income, shareholders equity, and cash flows for the year then ended (not presented herein), and in our report dated November 22, 2011, we expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements. In our opinion, the information set forth in the accompanying condensed consolidated statement of financial position as of September 30, 2011 is fairly stated in all material respects in relation to the consolidated statement of financial position from which it has been derived.
/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Milwaukee, Wisconsin
August 2, 2012
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, 100 East Wisconsin Avenue, Milwaukee, WI 53202
T: (414) 212- 1600, F: (414) 212- 1880, www.pwc.com/us
31
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Cautionary Statements for Forward-Looking Information
Unless otherwise indicated, references to Johnson Controls, the Company, we, our and us in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q refer to Johnson Controls, Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries.
Certain statements in this report, other than purely historical information, including estimates, projections, statements relating to our business plans, objectives and expected operating results, and the assumptions upon which those statements are based, are forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. These forward-looking statements generally are identified by the words believe, project, expect, anticipate, estimate, forecast, outlook, intend, strategy, plan, may, should, will, would, will be, will continue, will likely result, guidance or the negative thereof or variations thereon or similar terminology generally intended to identify forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are based on current expectations and assumptions that are subject to risks and uncertainties which may cause actual results to differ materially from the forward-looking statements. A detailed discussion of risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results and events to differ materially from such forward-looking statements is included in the section entitled Risk Factors of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2011, as updated in Part II, Item 1A of our Quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2011. We undertake no obligation to update or revise publicly any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.
Overview
Johnson Controls is a global diversified technology and industrial leader serving customers in more than 150 countries. We create quality products, services and solutions to optimize energy and operational efficiencies of buildings; lead-acid automotive batteries and advanced batteries for hybrid and electric vehicles; and interior systems for automobiles.
Johnson Controls was originally incorporated in the state of Wisconsin in 1885 as Johnson Electric Service Company to manufacture, install and service automatic temperature regulation systems for buildings. The Company was renamed to Johnson Controls, Inc. in 1974. In 1978, we acquired Globe-Union, Inc., a Wisconsin-based manufacturer of automotive batteries for both the replacement and original equipment markets. We entered the automotive seating industry in 1985 with the acquisition of Michigan-based Hoover Universal, Inc. In 2005, we acquired York International Corporation, a global supplier of heating, ventilating, air-conditioning, and refrigeration equipment and services.
Our building efficiency business is a global market leader in designing, producing, marketing and installing integrated heating, ventilating and air conditioning (HVAC) systems, building management systems, controls, security and mechanical equipment. In addition, the building efficiency business provides technical services, energy management consulting and operations of entire real estate portfolios for the non-residential buildings market. We also provide residential air conditioning and heating systems and industrial refrigeration products.
Our automotive experience business is one of the worlds largest automotive suppliers, providing innovative interior systems through our design and engineering expertise. Our technologies extend into virtually every area of the interior including seating and overhead systems, door systems, floor consoles, instrument panels, cockpits and integrated electronics. Customers include most of the worlds major automakers.
Our power solutions business is a leading global supplier of lead-acid automotive batteries for virtually every type of passenger car, light truck and utility vehicle. We serve both automotive original equipment manufacturers (OEMs) and the general vehicle battery aftermarket. We supply batteries to power Start-Stop vehicles, as well as lithium-ion battery technologies to power certain hybrid and electric vehicles.
32
The following information should be read in conjunction with the September 30, 2011 consolidated financial statements and notes thereto, along with managements discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations included in our 2011 Annual Report on Form 10-K. References in the following discussion and analysis to Three Months refer to the three months ended June 30, 2012 compared to the three months ended June 30, 2011, while references to Year-to-Date refer to the nine months ended June 30, 2012 compared to the nine months ended June 30, 2011.
Outlook
On July 19, 2012, the Company stated that due to continued softness in its global markets and expectations for a lower euro, it expects fiscal 2012 fourth quarter earnings to increase zero to five percent from the prior year fourth quarter, versus previous expectations for double-digit earnings improvements. This guidance is exclusive of any restructuring costs and the potential pension and postretirement mark-to-market adjustment in the fiscal 2012 fourth quarter as discussed below. The Company disclosed that it expects additional significant restructuring actions in the fiscal 2012 fourth quarter.
In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2012, the Company plans to change its accounting policy for recognizing pension and postretirement expenses. The current accounting treatment smoothes asset returns and amortizes deferred actuarial gains and losses over a number of years. The adoption of the new mark-to-market accounting method would recognize those gains and losses in the fourth quarter of each fiscal year and would require a retrospective revision of prior years financial statements. The Company believes this new policy would provide greater transparency to on-going operational results. The change would have no impact on pension and postretirement funding or benefits paid to participants. The financial implications of this change are currently under review; however, the fiscal 2012 fourth quarter mark-to-market adjustment would likely be material.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
The Company believes its capital resources and liquidity position at June 30, 2012 are adequate to meet projected needs. The Company believes requirements for working capital, capital expenditures, dividends, minimum pension contributions, debt maturities and any potential acquisitions in fiscal 2012 will continue to be funded from operations, supplemented by short- and long-term borrowings, if required. The Company currently manages its short-term debt position in the U.S. and euro commercial paper markets and bank loan markets. The Company continues to adjust its commercial paper maturities and issuance levels given market reactions to industry events and changes in the Companys credit rating. In the event the Company is unable to issue commercial paper, it would have the ability to draw on its $2.5 billion revolving credit facility, which matures in February 2015. There were no draws on the revolving credit facility as of June 30, 2012. As such, the Company believes it has sufficient financial resources to fund operations and meet its obligations for the foreseeable future.
The Companys debt financial covenants require a minimum consolidated shareholders equity attributable to Johnson Controls, Inc. of at least $3.5 billion at all times and allow a maximum aggregated amount of 10% of consolidated shareholders equity attributable to Johnson Controls, Inc. for liens and pledges. For purposes of calculating the Companys covenants, consolidated shareholders equity attributable to Johnson Controls, Inc. is calculated without giving effect to (i) the application of Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 715-60, Defined Benefit PlansOther Postretirement, or (ii) the cumulative foreign currency translation adjustment. As of June 30, 2012, consolidated shareholders equity attributable to Johnson Controls, Inc. as defined per the Companys debt financial covenants was $11.4 billion and there were no outstanding amounts for liens and pledges. The Company expects to remain in compliance with all covenants and other requirements set forth in its credit agreements and indentures for the foreseeable future. None of the Companys significant debt agreements limit access to stated borrowing levels or require accelerated repayment in the event of a decrease in the Companys credit rating.
The key financial assumptions used in calculating the Companys pension liability are determined annually, or whenever plan assets and liabilities are re-measured as required under accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S., including the expected rate of return on our plan assets. In fiscal 2012, the Company believes the long-term rate of return will approximate 8.50%, 5.25% and 6.30% for U.S. pension, non-U.S. pension, and postretirement health and other benefit plans, respectively. During the first nine months of fiscal 2012, the Company has made approximately $328 million and $60 million in total defined benefit pension and postretirement health contributions,
33
respectively. In total, the Company expects to contribute approximately $350 million and $60 million in cash to its defined benefit pension and postretirement health plans, respectively, in fiscal 2012.
Segment Analysis
Management evaluates the performance of its business units based primarily on segment income, which is defined as income from continuing operations before income taxes and noncontrolling interests excluding net financing charges and significant restructuring costs.
Summary
Three Months Ended June 30, |
Nine Months Ended June 30, |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
(in millions) | 2012 | 2011 | Change | 2012 | 2011 | Change | ||||||||||||||||||
Net sales |
$ | 10,581 | $ | 10,364 | 2 | % | $ | 31,563 | $ | 30,045 | 5 | % | ||||||||||||
Segment income |
615 | 512 | 20 | % | 1,772 | 1,566 | 13 | % |
Three Months:
| The $217 million increase in consolidated net sales was primarily due to higher sales in the automotive experience business ($680 million), power solutions business ($27 million) and building efficiency business ($25 million), partially offset by the unfavorable impact of foreign currency translation ($515 million). |
| The $103 million increase in consolidated segment income was primarily due to higher segment income in the automotive experience business ($56 million) and building efficiency business ($56 million), partially offset by lower segment income in the power solutions business ($7 million) and the unfavorable impact of foreign currency translation ($2 million). |
Year-to-Date:
| The $1.5 billion increase in consolidated net sales was primarily due to higher sales in the automotive experience business ($1.9 billion), building efficiency business ($240 million) and power solutions business ($139 million), partially offset by the unfavorable impact of foreign currency translation ($731 million). |
| The $206 million increase in consolidated segment income was primarily due to higher segment income in the automotive experience business ($91 million), building efficiency business ($66 million) and power solutions business ($55 million), partially offset by the unfavorable impact of foreign currency translation ($6 million). |
34
Building EfficiencyNet Sales
Net
Sales Three Months Ended June 30, |
Net
Sales Nine Months Ended June 30, |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
(in millions) | 2012 | 2011 | Change | 2012 | 2011 | Change | ||||||||||||||||||
North America systems |
$ | 642 | $ | 633 | 1 | % | $ | 1,774 | $ | 1,711 | 4 | % | ||||||||||||
North America service |
547 | 601 | -9 | % | 1,565 | 1,639 | -5 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Global workplace solutions |
1,064 | 1,046 | 2 | % | 3,226 | 3,053 | 6 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Asia |
516 | 498 | 4 | % | 1,447 | 1,334 | 8 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Other |
1,031 | 1,115 | -8 | % | 2,886 | 3,068 | -6 | % | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
$ | 3,800 | $ | 3,893 | -2 | % | $ | 10,898 | $ | 10,805 | 1 | % | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months:
| The increase in North America systems was primarily due to higher volumes of controls systems in the commercial construction and replacement markets ($11 million), partially offset by the unfavorable impact of foreign currency translation ($2 million). |
| The decrease in North America service was primarily due to a reduction in truck-based volumes ($32 million), energy solutions volumes ($30 million) and the unfavorable impact of foreign currency translation ($2 million), partially offset by the incremental sales from a prior year business acquisition ($10 million). |
| The increase in global workplace solutions was primarily due to an increase in services to new and existing customers ($69 million), partially offset by the unfavorable impact of foreign currency translation ($51 million). |
| The increase in Asia was primarily due to higher service volumes including the prior year negative impact of the Japan earthquake and related events ($30 million), and the favorable impact of foreign currency translation ($2 million), partially offset by lower volumes of equipment ($14 million). |
| The decrease in other was primarily due to the unfavorable impact of foreign currency translation ($65 million); lower volumes in Europe ($23 million), Middle East ($20 million) and Latin America ($14 million); and lower volumes due to current year divestitures ($18 million); partially offset by higher volumes in unitary products in North America ($50 million) and higher volumes in other business areas ($6 million). |
Year-to-Date:
| The increase in North America systems was primarily due to higher volumes of equipment and controls systems in the commercial construction and replacement markets ($66 million), partially offset by the unfavorable impact of foreign currency translation ($3 million). |
| The decrease in North America service was primarily due to a reduction in truck-based volumes ($75 million) and energy solutions volumes ($19 million), and the unfavorable impact of foreign currency translation ($4 million), partially offset by incremental sales from a prior year business acquisition ($24 million). |
| The increase in global workplace solutions was primarily due to an increase in services to new and existing customers ($241 million), partially offset by the unfavorable impact of foreign currency translation ($68 million). |
| The increase in Asia was primarily due to higher service volumes including the prior year negative impact of the Japan earthquake and related events ($59 million), higher volumes of equipment and controls systems ($27 million), and the favorable impact of foreign currency translation ($27 million). |
35
| The decrease in other was primarily due to the unfavorable impact of foreign currency translation ($99 million), lower volumes in Latin America ($84 million) and Europe ($23 million), lower volumes due to current year divestitures ($18 million) and lower volumes of unitary products in North America ($16 million), partially offset by higher volumes in other business areas ($36 million) and the Middle East ($22 million). |
Building EfficiencySegment Income
Segment
Income Three Months Ended June 30, |
Segment Income Nine Months Ended June 30, |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
(in millions) | 2012 | 2011 | Change | 2012 | 2011 | Change | ||||||||||||||||||
North America systems |
$ | 80 | $ | 66 | 21 | % | $ | 189 | $ | 169 | 12 | % | ||||||||||||
North America service |
52 | 35 | 49 | % | 79 | 69 | 14 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Global workplace solutions |
13 | 7 | 86 | % | 23 | 17 | 35 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Asia |
78 | 69 | 13 | % | 190 | 178 | 7 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Other |
41 | 30 | 37 | % | 67 | 45 | 49 | % | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
$ | 264 | $ | 207 | 28 | % | $ | 548 | $ | 478 | 15 | % | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months:
| The increase in North America systems was primarily due to lower selling, general and administrative expenses ($8 million), favorable margin rates ($5 million) and higher volumes ($1 million). |
| The increase in North America service was primarily due to lower selling, general and administrative expenses ($19 million) and favorable margin rates ($11 million), partially offset by lower volumes ($13 million). |
| The increase in global workplace solutions was primarily due to lower selling, general and administrative expenses ($6 million) and higher volumes ($4 million), partially offset by unfavorable margin rates ($3 million) and the unfavorable impact of foreign currency translation ($1 million). |
| The increase in Asia was primarily due to favorable margin rates ($5 million), higher volumes ($3 million) and the favorable impact of foreign currency translation ($1 million). |
| The increase in other was primarily due to prior year non-recurring charges related to South America indirect taxes ($29 million), prior year distribution business costs ($11 million), lower selling, general and administrative expenses ($9 million), and the favorable impact of foreign currency translation ($1 million), partially offset by unfavorable margin rates ($18 million), net prior year warranty accrual adjustment due to favorable experience ($17 million) and lower volumes ($4 million). |
Year-to-Date:
| The increase in North America systems was primarily due to higher volumes ($16 million) and lower selling, general and administrative expenses ($7 million), partially offset by unfavorable margin rates ($3 million). |
| The increase in North America service was primarily due to favorable margin rates ($15 million) and lower selling, general and administrative expenses ($14 million), partially offset by lower volumes ($16 million) and a loss on business divestiture ($3 million). |
| The increase in global workplace solutions was primarily due to higher volumes ($13 million) and lower selling, general and administrative expenses ($2 million), partially offset by unfavorable margin rates ($8 million) and the unfavorable impact of foreign currency translation ($1 million). |
36
| The increase in Asia was primarily due to higher volumes ($20 million), the favorable impact of foreign currency translation ($5 million) and favorable margin rates ($4 million), partially offset by higher selling, general and administrative expenses ($17 million). |
| The increase in other was primarily due to a gain on business divestiture net of transaction costs ($38 million), prior year non-recurring charges related to South America indirect taxes ($29 million), prior year distribution business costs ($11 million), lower selling, general and administrative expenses ($5 million), and higher equity income ($7 million), partially offset by unfavorable margin rates ($34 million), net prior year warranty accrual adjustment due to favorable experience ($17 million) and lower volumes ($17 million). |
Automotive ExperienceNet Sales
Net Sales Three Months Ended June 30, |
Net Sales Nine Months Ended June 30, |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
(in millions) | 2012 | 2011 | Change | 2012 | 2011 | Change | ||||||||||||||||||
North America |
$ | 2,320 | $ | 1,772 | 31 | % | $ | 6,554 | $ | 5,517 | 19 | % | ||||||||||||
Europe |
2,466 | 2,800 | -12 | % | 7,791 | 7,693 | 1 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Asia |
679 | 546 | 24 | % | 1,977 | 1,717 | 15 | % | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
$ | 5,465 | $ | 5,118 | 7 | % | $ | 16,322 | $ | 14,927 | 9 | % | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months:
| The increase in North America was primarily due to higher volumes to the Companys major OEM customers ($281 million), the prior year negative impact of the Japan earthquake and related events ($256 million), and incremental sales due to prior year business acquisitions ($20 million), partially offset by net unfavorable pricing and commercial settlements ($9 million). |
| The decrease in Europe was primarily due to the unfavorable impact of foreign currency translation ($326 million), lower volumes despite the prior year negative impact of the Japan earthquake and related events ($109 million), and net unfavorable pricing ($14 million), partially offset by incremental sales due to prior year and current year business acquisitions ($115 million). |
| The increase in Asia was primarily due to higher volumes and new customer awards including the prior year negative impact of the Japan earthquake and related events ($139 million), and incremental sales due to prior year business acquisitions ($16 million), partially offset by net unfavorable pricing and commercial items ($15 million), and the unfavorable impact of foreign currency translation ($7 million). |
Year-to-Date:
| The increase in North America was primarily due to higher volumes to the Companys major OEM customers ($704 million), the prior year negative impact of the Japan earthquake and related events ($256 million), and incremental sales due to prior year business acquisitions ($129 million), partially offset by net unfavorable pricing and commercial items ($52 million). |
| The increase in Europe was primarily due to incremental sales due to prior year and current year business acquisitions ($581 million), and higher volumes including the prior year negative impact of the Japan earthquake and related events ($61 million), partially offset by the unfavorable impact of foreign currency translation ($496 million), and net unfavorable pricing and commercial settlements ($48 million). |
| The increase in Asia was primarily due to higher volumes and new customer awards including the prior year negative impact of the Japan earthquake and related events ($214 million), incremental sales due to prior year business acquisitions ($78 million) and the favorable impact of foreign currency translation ($21 million), partially offset by net unfavorable pricing and commercial items ($28 million), and the negative impact of the flooding in Thailand and related events ($25 million). |
37
Automotive ExperienceSegment Income
Segmen Income Three Months Ended June 30, |
Segment Income Nine Months Ended June 30, |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
(in millions) | 2012 | 2011 | Change | 2012 | 2011 | Change | ||||||||||||||||||
North America |
$ | 154 | $ | 67 | * | $ | 340 | $ | 328 | 4 | % | |||||||||||||
Europe |
(37 | ) | 24 | * | 14 | 40 | -65 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Asia |
85 | 51 | 67 | % | 269 | 162 | 66 | % | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
$ | 202 | $ | 142 | 42 | % | $ | 623 | $ | 530 | 18 | % | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* | Measure not meaningful |
Three Months:
| The increase in North America was primarily due to higher volumes ($78 million), the prior year negative impact of the earthquake in Japan and related events ($59 million), lower purchasing costs ($13 million), lower engineering expenses ($9 million), higher equity income ($5 million), lower selling, general and administrative expenses ($1 million), and incremental operating income of prior year business acquisitions ($1 million), partially offset by higher operating and metals launch costs ($57 million), and net unfavorable commercial settlements and pricing ($22 million). |
| The decrease in Europe was primarily due to higher operating costs ($48 million), lower volumes despite the prior year negative impact of the earthquake in Japan and related events ($27 million), net unfavorable pricing and commercial settlements ($16 million), higher selling, general and administrative expenses ($11 million), and lower equity income ($1 million), partially offset by prior year costs related to business acquisitions ($28 million), lower engineering expenses ($8 million), the favorable impact of foreign currency translation ($4 million) and lower purchasing costs ($2 million). |
| The increase in Asia was primarily due to higher volumes including the prior year negative impact of the earthquake in Japan and related events ($44 million), lower purchasing costs ($8 million), incremental operating income of prior year business acquisitions ($4 million), lower selling, general and administrative expenses ($2 million), and higher equity income ($1 million), partially offset by net unfavorable commercial settlements and pricing ($18 million), higher operating costs ($5 million) and higher engineering expenses ($2 million). |
Year-to-Date:
| The increase in North America was primarily due to higher volumes ($158 million), the prior year negative impact of the earthquake in Japan and related events ($59 million), lower purchasing costs ($37 million), incremental operating income of prior year acquisitions ($3 million) and higher equity income ($1 million), partially offset by higher operating and metals launch costs ($111 million), net unfavorable commercial settlements and pricing ($71 million), and higher selling, general and administrative expenses ($64 million). |
| The decrease in Europe was primarily due to higher operating costs ($80 million), net unfavorable commercial settlements and pricing ($37 million), higher selling, general and administrative expenses ($35 million), lower volumes despite the prior year negative impact of the earthquake in Japan and related events ($27 million), and the unfavorable impact of foreign currency translation ($2 million), partially offset by prior year costs related to business acquisitions ($64 million), incremental operating income of prior year acquisitions ($42 million), lower purchasing costs ($26 million), lower engineering expenses ($21 million) and higher equity income ($2 million). |
| The increase in Asia was primarily due to higher volumes including the prior year negative impact of the earthquake in Japan and related events ($80 million), lower purchasing costs ($27 million), higher equity |
38
income including an equity interest gain ($18 million), incremental operating income of prior year acquisitions ($14 million), the favorable impact of foreign currency translation ($4 million), and lower selling, general and administrative expenses ($3 million), partially offset by net unfavorable commercial settlements and pricing ($28 million), the negative impact of the flooding in Thailand and related events ($5 million), higher operating costs ($3 million) and higher engineering expenses ($3 million). |
Power Solutions
Three Months Ended June 30, |
Nine Months Ended June 30, |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
(in millions) | 2012 | 2011 | Change | 2012 | 2011 | Change | ||||||||||||||||||
Net sales |
$ | 1,316 | $ | 1,353 | -3 | % | $ | 4,343 | $ | 4,313 | 1 | % | ||||||||||||
Segment income |
149 | 163 | -9 | % | 601 | 558 | 8 | % |
Three Months:
| Net sales decreased primarily due to the unfavorable impact of foreign currency translation ($64 million) and the impact of pass through pricing ($61 million), partially offset by higher volumes including the prior year negative impact of the earthquake in Japan and related events ($53 million), favorable price/product mix ($27 million) and incremental sales due to business acquisitions ($8 million). |
| Segment income decreased primarily due to higher costs for battery cores and lead net of favorable pricing and product mix ($28 million), the unfavorable impact of foreign currency translation ($7 million), higher operating and transportation costs ($5 million), and higher selling, general and administrative costs ($3 million), partially offset by an insurance settlement ($12 million), change in asset retirement obligations ($11 million) and higher sales volumes ($6 million). |
Year-to-Date:
| Net sales increased primarily due to favorable price/product mix ($122 million), higher volumes including the prior year negative impact of the earthquake in Japan and related events ($69 million), and incremental sales due to business acquisitions ($29 million), partially offset by the unfavorable impact of foreign currency translation ($109 million) and the impact of pass through pricing ($81 million). |
| Segment income increased primarily due to favorable pricing and product mix including lead net of higher costs for battery cores ($83 million), a gain on redemption of a warrant for an existing partially-owned affiliate ($25 million), business interruption insurance recovery net of related costs and lost profit on sales due to a continued plant shutdown in Asia ($13 million), an insurance settlement ($12 million), higher sales volumes ($11 million), change in asset retirement obligations ($11 million) and a gain on acquisition of a partially-owned affiliate ($9 million), partially offset by higher operating and transportation costs ($44 million), higher selling, general and administrative expenses ($39 million), an impairment of an equity investment ($14 million), the unfavorable impact of foreign currency translation ($12 million), the unfavorable impact of business acquisitions ($9 million) and lower equity income ($3 million). |
Significant Restructuring Costs
To improve profitability in the Companys building efficiency and automotive experience businesses and address the softness in certain underlying markets, the Company committed to a restructuring plan in the third quarter of fiscal 2012 and recorded a $52 million restructuring charge, of which $41 million was recorded for the building efficiency business and $11 million was recorded for the automotive experience business.
Refer to Note 8, Significant Restructuring Costs, of the notes to condensed consolidated financial statements for further disclosure related to the Companys restructuring plans.
39
Net Financing Charges
Three Months Ended June 30, |
Nine Months Ended June 30, |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
(in millions) | 2012 | 2011 | Change | 2012 | 2011 | Change | ||||||||||||||||||
Net financing charges |
$ | 59 | $ | 43 | 37 | % | $ | 171 | $ | 124 | 38 | % |
| The increase in net financing charges for the three and nine month periods ended June 30, 2012 was primarily due to higher debt levels in the current periods. |
Provision for Income Taxes
Three Months Ended June 30, |
Nine Months Ended June 30, |
|||||||||||||||
(in millions) | 2012 | 2011 | 2012 | 2011 | ||||||||||||
Tax provision |
$ | 62 | $ | 89 | $ | 260 | $ | 274 | ||||||||
Effective tax rate |
12.3 | % | 19.0 | % | 16.8 | % | 19.0 | % | ||||||||
Estimated annual base effective tax rate |
18.2 | % | 19.0 | % | 18.2 | % | 19.0 | % |
| In calculating the provision for income taxes, the Company uses an estimate of the annual effective tax rate based upon the facts and circumstances known at each interim period. On a quarterly basis, the annual effective tax rate is adjusted, as appropriate, based upon changed facts and circumstances, if any, as compared to those forecasted at the beginning of the fiscal year and each interim period thereafter. |
| In the third quarter of fiscal 2012, the Company decreased its estimated annual effective income tax rate from 19% to 18.2% due to a reduction of income as well as a geographical shift in income. |
| As a result of certain recent events related to prior tax planning initiatives, during the third quarter of fiscal 2012, the Company reduced the reserve for uncertain tax positions by $22 million, including $13 million of interest and penalties, which impacts the effective tax rate for the quarter. |
Income Attributable to Noncontrolling Interests
Three Months Ended June 30, |
Nine Months Ended June 30, |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
(in millions) | 2012 | 2011 | Change | 2012 | 2011 | Change | ||||||||||||||||||
Income attributable to noncontrolling interests |
$ | 25 | $ | 23 | 9 | % | $ | 98 | $ | 82 | 20 | % |
| The increase in income attributable to noncontrolling interests for the three month period ended June 30, 2012 was primarily due to higher earnings at certain automotive experience and building efficiency partially-owned affiliates in Asia, partially offset by lower earnings at a power solutions partially-owned affiliate. The increase in income attributable to noncontrolling interests for the nine month period ended June 30, 2012 was primarily due to higher earnings at certain automotive experience partially-owned affiliates in North America, building efficiency partially-owned affiliates in Asia and power solutions partially-owned affiliates. |
40
Net Income Attributable to Johnson Controls, Inc.
Three Months Ended June 30, |
Nine Months Ended June 30, |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
(in millions) | 2012 | 2011 | Change | 2012 | 2011 | Change | ||||||||||||||||||
Net income attributable to |
$ | 417 | $ | 357 | 17 | % | $ | 1,191 | $ | 1,086 | 10 | % |
| The increase in net income attributable to Johnson Controls, Inc. for the three months ended June 30, 2012 was primarily due to higher segment income in the automotive experience and building efficiency businesses, and a decrease in the provision for income taxes, partially offset by lower segment income in the power solutions business, restructuring costs, higher net financing charges and the unfavorable impact of foreign currency translation. |
| The increase in net income attributable to Johnson Controls, Inc. for the nine months ended June 30, 2012 was primarily due to higher segment income in the automotive experience, building efficiency and power solutions businesses, and a decrease in the provision for income taxes, partially offset by restructuring costs, higher net finance charges and income attributable to noncontrolling interests, and the unfavorable impact of foreign currency translation. |
Backlog
Building efficiencys backlog relates to its control systems and service activity. At June 30, 2012, the unearned backlog was $5.3 billion, or a 4% increase compared to June 30, 2011. Excluding the negative impact of foreign currency, the backlog was higher by 7% at June 30, 2012 compared to June 30, 2011. The Asia and North America systems backlog increased compared to prior year levels, while there was a decline in other and North America service backlog.
Financial Condition
Working Capital
(in millions) | June 30, 2012 |
September 30, 2011 |
Change | June 30, 2011 |
Change | |||||||||||||||
Current assets |
$ | 12,566 | $ | 12,015 | $ | 12,558 | ||||||||||||||
Current liabilities |
(10,811 | ) | (10,782 | ) | (11,154 | ) | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
1,755 | 1,233 | 42 | % | 1,404 | 25 | % | ||||||||||||||
Less: Cash |
602 | 257 | 335 | |||||||||||||||||
Add: Short-term debt |
925 | 596 | 592 | |||||||||||||||||
Add: Current portion of long-term debt |
110 | 17 | 65 | |||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Working capital |
$ | 2,188 | $ | 1,589 | 38 | % | $ | 1,726 | 27 | % | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Accounts receivable |
7,155 | 7,151 | 0 | % | 7,094 | 1 | % | |||||||||||||
Inventories |
2,362 | 2,316 | 2 | % | 2,451 | -4 | % | |||||||||||||
Accounts payable |
6,062 | 6,159 | -2 | % | 6,104 | -1 | % |
| The Company defines working capital as current assets less current liabilities, excluding cash, short-term debt and the current portion of long-term debt. Management believes that this measure of working capital, which excludes financing-related items, provides a more useful measurement of the Companys operating performance. |
41
| The increase in working capital at June 30, 2012 as compared to September 30, 2011 was primarily due to higher inventory levels to support higher backlog levels and lower accounts payable primarily due to timing of supplier payments. Compared to June 30, 2011, the increase was primarily due to higher accounts receivable from higher sales volumes and lower accounts payable due to timing of supplier payments, partially offset by lower inventory levels based on increased turnover. |
| The Companys days sales in accounts receivable for the three months ended June 30, 2012 were 53, compared to 52 and 55 for the comparable periods ended September 30, 2011 and June 30, 2011, respectively. The increase in accounts receivable compared to June 30, 2011 was primarily due to higher sales volumes in the current quarter compared to the comparable prior quarter. There has been no significant adverse change in the level of overdue receivables or changes in revenue recognition methods. |
| The Companys inventory turns for the three months ended June 30, 2012 were consistent with the comparable period ended September 30, 2011 and higher than the comparable period ended June 30, 2011 primarily due to increased sales volumes and improvements in inventory management. |
| Days in accounts payable at June 30, 2012 were 71 days, consistent with September 30, 2011 and an increase from 69 days at June 30, 2011. This increase was primarily due to the timing of supplier payments. |
Cash Flows
Three Months Ended June 30, |
Nine Months Ended June 30, |
|||||||||||||||
(in millions) | 2012 | 2011 | 2012 | 2011 | ||||||||||||
Cash provided by operating activities |
$ | 619 | $ | 360 | $ | 765 | $ | 489 | ||||||||
Cash used by investing activities |
(447 | ) | (883 | ) | (1,458 | ) | (2,079 | ) | ||||||||
Cash provided by financing activities |
158 | 463 | 995 | 1,357 | ||||||||||||
Capital expenditures |
(447 | ) | (365 | ) | (1,433 | ) | (900 | ) |
| The increase in cash provided by operating activities for the three months ended June 30, 2012 was primarily due to higher net income; favorable working capital changes in accounts payable and accrued liabilities, inventories and restructuring reserves; and lower pension and postretirement contributions; partially offset by unfavorable working capital changes in accrued income taxes and accounts receivable. For the nine months ended June 30, 2012, the increase in cash provided by operating activities was primarily due to higher net income; and favorable working capital changes in accounts receivable, inventories and restructuring reserves; partially offset by unfavorable working capital changes in accrued income taxes, accounts payable and accrued liabilities, and other assets; and higher pension and postretirement contributions. |
| The decrease in cash used by investing activities for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2012 was primarily due to lower cash paid for acquisitions of businesses, partially offset by higher capital expenditures. |
| The decrease in cash provided by financing activities for the three months ended June 30, 2012 was primarily due to net changes in debt levels and higher cash paid to acquire noncontrolling interests. The decrease in cash provided by financing activities for the nine months ended June 30, 2012 was primarily due to a prior year $1.6 billion bond issuance partially offset by a $1.1 billion bond issuance and lower repayments of debt in the current nine month period, and higher cash paid to acquire noncontrolling interests. Refer to Note 11, Debt and Financing Arrangements, of the notes to condensed consolidated financial statements for further discussion on the debt issuances and debt levels. |
| The increase in capital expenditures for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2012 primarily relates to capacity increases and vertical integration efforts in the power solutions business, program spending for new customer launches in the automotive experience business, and increased investments to support customer growth and enhance the Companys strategic footprint primarily in Southeast Asia. |
42
Deferred Taxes
The Company reviews the realizability of its deferred tax assets on a quarterly basis, or whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that a review is required. In determining the potential need for a valuation allowance, the historical and projected financial results of the legal entity or consolidated group recording the net deferred tax asset are considered, along with any other positive or negative evidence. Since future financial results may differ from previous estimates, periodic adjustments to the Company's valuation allowances may be necessary.
The Company has certain subsidiaries, mainly located in France and Spain, which have generated operating and/or capital losses and, in certain circumstances, have limited loss carry forward periods. In accordance with ASC 740, Income Taxes, the Company is required to record a valuation allowance when it is more likely than not the Company will not utilize deductible amounts or net operating losses for each legal entity or consolidated group based on the tax rules in the applicable jurisdiction, evaluating both positive and negative historical evidences as well as expected future events and tax planning strategies.
It is reasonably possible that over the next twelve months, valuation allowances against deferred tax assets in certain jurisdictions may result in a net increase to tax expense of up to $100 million.
Long-Lived Assets
The Company reviews long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the assets carrying amount may not be recoverable. The Company conducts its long-lived asset impairment analyses in accordance with ASC 360-10-15, Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets. ASC 360-10-15 requires the Company to group assets and liabilities at the lowest level for which identifiable cash flows are largely independent of the cash flows of other assets and liabilities and evaluate the asset group against the sum of the undiscounted future cash flows. If the undiscounted cash flows do not indicate the carrying amount of the asset group is recoverable, an impairment charge is measured as the amount by which the carrying amount of the asset group exceeds its fair value based on discounted cash flow analysis or appraisals.
In the second quarter of fiscal 2012, the Company recorded an impairment charge related to an equity investment. Refer to Note 15, Fair Value Measurements, of the notes to condensed consolidated financial statements for additional information. The Company concluded it did not have any triggering events requiring assessment of impairment of its long-lived assets at June 30, 2012 and 2011.
Capitalization
(in millions) | June 30, 2012 |
September 30, 2011 |
Change | June 30, 2011 |
Change | |||||||||||||||
Short-term debt |
$ | 925 | $ | 596 | $ | 592 | ||||||||||||||
Current portion of long-term debt |
110 | 17 | 65 | |||||||||||||||||
Long-term debt |
5,624 | 4,533 | 4,519 | |||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Total debt |
6,659 | 5,146 | 29 | % | 5,176 | 29 | % | |||||||||||||
Shareholders equity attributable to Johnson Controls, Inc. |
11,596 | 11,042 | 5 | % | 11,361 | 2 | % | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Total capitalization |
$ | 18,255 | $ | 16,188 | 13 | % | $ | 16,537 | 10 | % | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Total debt as a % of total capitalization |
36 | % | 32 | % | 31 | % | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| The Company believes the percentage of total debt to total capitalization is useful to understanding the Companys financial condition as it provides a review of the extent to which the Company relies on external debt financing for its funding and is a measure of risk to its shareholders. |
| At June 30, 2012, September 30, 2011 and June 30, 2011, the Company had committed bilateral euro denominated revolving credit facilities totaling 223 million euro, 223 million euro and 100 million euro, |
43
respectively. Additionally, at June 30, 2012 and September 30, 2011, the Company had committed bilateral U.S. dollar denominated revolving credit facilities totaling $185 million and $50 million, respectively, and had no committed revolving credit facilities as of June 30, 2011. There were no draws on any of the revolving facilities for the respective periods. As of June 30, 2012, 123 million euro and $50 million is scheduled to expire in fiscal 2012, $135 million is scheduled to expire in fiscal 2013 and 100 million euro is scheduled to expire in fiscal 2014. |
| In November 2010, the Company repaid debt of $82 million which was acquired as part of an acquisition in the first quarter of fiscal 2011. The Company used cash to repay the debt. |
| In January 2011, the Company retired $654 million in principal amount, plus accrued interest, of its 5.25% fixed rate notes that matured on January 15, 2011. The Company used cash to fund the payment. |
| In February 2011, the Company issued $350 million aggregate principal amount of floating rate senior unsecured notes due in fiscal 2014, $450 million aggregate principal amount of 1.75% senior unsecured fixed rate notes due in fiscal 2014, $500 million aggregate principal amount of 4.25% senior unsecured fixed rate notes due in fiscal 2021 and $300 million aggregate principal amount of 5.70% senior unsecured fixed rate notes due in fiscal 2041. Aggregate net proceeds of $1.6 billion from the issues were used for general corporate purposes including the retirement of short-term debt. |
| In February 2011, the Company entered into a six-year, 100 million euro, floating rate loan scheduled to mature in February 2017. Proceeds from the facility were used for general corporate purposes. |
| In February 2011, the Company replaced its $2.05 billion committed five-year credit facility, scheduled to mature in December 2011, with a $2.5 billion committed four-year credit facility scheduled to mature in February 2015. The facility is used to support the Companys outstanding commercial paper. There were no draws on the facility in fiscal 2012 and 2011. |
| In April 2011, a total of 157,820 equity units, which had a purchase contract settlement date of March 31, 2012, were early exercised. As a result, the Company issued 766,673 shares of Johnson Controls, Inc. common stock and approximately $8 million of 11.50% notes due 2042. |
| In November 2011, the Company issued $400 million aggregate principal amount of 2.6% senior unsecured fixed rate notes due in fiscal 2017, $450 million aggregate principal amount of 3.75% senior unsecured fixed rate notes due in fiscal 2022 and $250 million aggregate principal amount of 5.25% senior unsecured fixed rate notes due in fiscal 2042. Aggregate net proceeds of $1.1 billion from the issues were used for general corporate purposes, including the retirement of short-term debt and contributions to the Companys pension and postretirement health plans. |
| In December 2011, the Company entered into a five-year, 75 million euro, floating rate credit facility scheduled to mature in February 2017. The Company drew on the credit facility during the second quarter of fiscal 2012. Proceeds from the facility were used for general corporate purposes. |
| In March 2012, the Company remarketed $46 million aggregate principal amount of 11.5% subordinated notes due in fiscal 2042, on behalf of holders of Corporate Units and holders of separate notes, by issuing $46 million aggregate principal amount of 2.355% senior notes due on March 31, 2017. |
| The Company also selectively makes use of short-term credit lines. The Company estimates that, as of June 30, 2012, it could borrow up to $1.7 billion at its current debt ratings on committed credit lines. |
| The Company believes its capital resources and liquidity position at June 30, 2012 are adequate to meet projected needs. The Company believes requirements for working capital, capital expenditures, dividends, minimum pension contributions, debt maturities and any potential acquisitions in fiscal 2012 will continue to be funded from operations, supplemented by short- and long-term borrowings, if required. The Company currently manages its short-term debt position in the U.S. and euro commercial paper markets and bank loan markets. The Company continues to adjust its commercial paper maturities and issuance levels given market reactions to industry events and changes in the Companys credit rating. In the event the Company is unable to issue commercial paper, it would have the ability to draw on its $2.5 billion revolving credit facility, which matures in February 2015. There were no draws on the revolving credit facility as of June 30, 2012. As such, the |
44
Company believes it has sufficient financial resources to fund operations and meet its obligations for the foreseeable future. |
| The Company earns a significant amount of its operating income outside the U.S., which is deemed to be permanently reinvested in foreign jurisdictions. The Company currently does not intend nor foresee a need to repatriate these funds. The Company expects existing domestic cash and liquidity to continue to be sufficient to fund its domestic operating activities and cash commitments for investing and financing activities for at least the next twelve months and thereafter for the foreseeable future. In addition, the Company expects existing foreign cash, cash equivalents, short term investments and cash flows from operations to continue to be sufficient to fund its foreign operating activities and cash commitments for investing activities, such as material capital expenditures, for at least the next twelve months and thereafter for the foreseeable future. Should the Company require more capital in the U.S. than is generated by its operations domestically, it could elect to raise capital in the U.S. through debt or equity issuances. This alternative could result in increased interest expense or other dilution of the Companys earnings. The Company has borrowed funds domestically and continues to have the ability to borrow funds domestically at reasonable interest rates. |
| The Companys debt financial covenants require a minimum consolidated shareholders equity attributable to Johnson Controls, Inc. of at least $3.5 billion at all times and allow a maximum aggregated amount of 10% of consolidated shareholders equity attributable to Johnson Controls, Inc. for liens and pledges. For purposes of calculating the Companys covenants, consolidated shareholders equity attributable to Johnson Controls, Inc. is calculated without giving effect to (i) the application of ASC 715-60, Defined Benefit Plans- Other Postretirement, or (ii) the cumulative foreign currency translation adjustment. As of June 30, 2012, consolidated shareholders equity attributable to Johnson Controls, Inc. as defined per the Companys debt financial covenants was $11.4 billion and there were no outstanding amounts for liens and pledges. The Company expects to remain in compliance with all covenants and other requirements set forth in its credit agreements and indentures for the foreseeable future. None of the Companys significant debt agreements limit access to stated borrowing levels or require accelerated repayment in the event of a decrease in the Companys credit rating. |
New Accounting Standards
In December 2011, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2011-11, Balance Sheet (Topic 210): Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities. ASU No. 2011-11 requires additional quantitative and qualitative disclosures of gross and net information regarding financial instruments and derivative instruments that are offset or eligible for offset in the consolidated statement of financial position. ASU No. 2011-11 will be effective for the Company for the quarter ending December 31, 2013. The adoption of this guidance will have no impact on the Companys consolidated financial condition and results of operations.
In September 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-09, Compensation Retirement Benefits Multiemployer Plans (Subtopic 715-80): Disclosures about an Employers Participation in a Multiemployer Plan. ASU No. 2011-09 requires additional quantitative and qualitative disclosures about an employers participation in multiemployer pension plans, including disclosure of the name and identifying number of the significant multiemployer plans in which the employer participates, the level of the employers participation in the plans, the financial health of the plans and the nature of the employer commitments to the plans. ASU No. 2011-09 will be effective for the Company for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2012. The adoption of this guidance will have no impact on the Companys consolidated financial condition and results of operations.
In September 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-08, Intangibles Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Testing Goodwill for Impairment. ASU No. 2011-08 provides companies an option to perform a qualitative assessment to determine whether further goodwill impairment testing is necessary. If, as a result of the qualitative assessment, it is determined that it is more likely than not that a reporting units fair value is less than its carrying amount, the two-step quantitative impairment test is required. Otherwise, no further testing is required. ASU No. 2011-08 will be effective for the Company for goodwill impairment tests performed in the fiscal year ending September 30, 2013, with early adoption permitted. The adoption of this guidance will have no impact on the Companys consolidated financial condition and results of operations.
45
In June 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-05, Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Presentation of Comprehensive Income. ASU No. 2011-05 eliminates the option to present components of other comprehensive income as part of the statement of shareholders equity. All non-owner changes in shareholders equity instead must be presented either in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements. ASU No. 2011-05 will be effective for the Company for the quarter ending December 31, 2012. The adoption of this guidance will have no impact on the Companys consolidated financial condition and results of operations.
In May 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-04, Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820): Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRSs. ASU No. 2011-04 clarifies and changes the application of various fair value measurement principles and disclosure requirements, and was effective for the Company beginning in the second quarter of fiscal 2012 (January 1, 2012). The adoption of this guidance had no impact on the Companys consolidated financial condition and results of operations. Refer to Note 15, Fair Value Measurements, of the notes to condensed consolidated financial statements for disclosures surrounding the Companys fair value measurements.
Other Financial Information
The interim financial information included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q has not been audited by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (PwC). PwC has, however applied limited review procedures in accordance with professional standards for reviews of interim financial information. Accordingly, you should restrict your reliance on their reports on such information. PwC is not subject to the liability provisions of Section 11 of the Securities Act of 1933 for their reports on the interim financial information because such reports do not constitute reports or parts of the registration statements prepared or certified by PwC within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of the Securities Act of 1933.
ITEM 3. | QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK |
As of June 30, 2012, the Company had not experienced any adverse changes in market risk exposures that materially affected the quantitative and qualitative disclosures presented in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2011.
ITEM 4. | CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES |
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, we conducted an evaluation of our disclosure controls and procedures, as such term is defined under Rule 13a-15(e) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (Exchange Act). Based upon their evaluation of these disclosure controls and procedures, the principal executive officer and principal financial officer concluded that the disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of June 30, 2012 to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time period specified in the SECs rules and forms, and to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports it files or submits under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to the Companys management, including its principal executive and principal financial officers, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding disclosure.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
Except as noted below, there have been no significant changes in the Companys internal control over financial reporting during the three months ended June 30, 2012 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Companys internal control over financial reporting.
The Company is undertaking the implementation of new enterprise resource planning (ERP) systems in certain businesses, which will occur over a period of several years. As the phased roll-out of the new ERP systems occurs, the Company may experience changes in its internal control over financial reporting. No significant changes were
46
made to the Companys current internal control over financial reporting as a result of the implementation of the new ERP systems during the three months ended June 30, 2012.
ITEM 1. | LEGAL PROCEEDINGS |
As noted in Item 1 to the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2011, liabilities potentially arise globally under various environmental laws and worker safety laws for activities that are not in compliance with such laws and for the cleanup of sites where Company-related substances have been released into the environment.
Currently, the Company is responding to allegations that it is responsible for performing environmental remediation, or for the repayment of costs spent by governmental entities or others performing remediation, at approximately 42 sites in the United States. Many of these sites are landfills used by the Company in the past for the disposal of waste materials; others are secondary lead smelters and lead recycling sites where the Company returned lead-containing materials for recycling; a few involve the cleanup of Company manufacturing facilities; and the remaining fall into miscellaneous categories. The Company may face similar claims of liability at additional sites in the future. Where potential liabilities are alleged, the Company pursues a course of action intended to mitigate them.
The Company accrues for potential environmental liabilities in a manner consistent with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States; that is, when it is probable a liability has been incurred and the amount of the liability is reasonably estimable. Reserves for environmental liabilities totaled $25 million, $30 million and $42 million at June 30, 2012, September 30, 2011 and June 30, 2011, respectively. The Company reviews the status of its environmental sites on a quarterly basis and adjusts its reserves accordingly. Such potential liabilities accrued by the Company do not take into consideration possible recoveries of future insurance proceeds. They do, however, take into account the likely share other parties will bear at remediation sites. It is difficult to estimate the Company's ultimate level of liability at many remediation sites due to the large number of other parties that may be involved, the complexity of determining the relative liability among those parties, the uncertainty as to the nature and scope of the investigations and remediation to be conducted, the uncertainty in the application of law and risk assessment, the various choices and costs associated with diverse technologies that may be used in corrective actions at the sites, and the often quite lengthy periods over which eventual remediation may occur. Nevertheless, the Company does not currently believe that any claims, penalties or costs in connection with known environmental matters will have a material adverse effect on the Company's financial position, results of operations or cash flows. In addition, the Company has identified asset retirement obligations for environmental matters that are expected to be addressed at the retirement, disposal, removal or abandonment of existing owned facilities, primarily in the power solutions business. At June 30, 2012, September 30, 2011 and June 30, 2011, the Company has recorded conditional asset retirement obligations of $70 million, $91 million and $95 million, respectively.
The Company is involved in a number of product liability and various other casualty lawsuits incident to the operation of its businesses. The Company maintains insurance coverages and records estimated costs for claims and suits of this nature. It is management's opinion that none of these lawsuits will have a material adverse effect on the Company's financial position, results of operations or cash flows. Costs related to such matters were not material to the periods presented.
ITEM 1A. | RISK FACTORS |
There have been no material changes to the disclosure regarding risk factors presented in Item 1A to the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2011, as updated in Part II, Item 1A of the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2011.
ITEM 2. | UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS |
In September 2006, the Companys Board of Directors authorized a stock repurchase program to acquire up to $200 million of the Companys outstanding common stock. Stock repurchases under this program may be made through open market, privately negotiated transactions or otherwise at times and in such amounts as Company management
47
deems appropriate. The stock repurchase program does not have an expiration date and may be amended or terminated by the Board of Directors at any time without prior notice.
The Company entered into an Equity Swap Agreement, dated March 13, 2009, with Citibank, N.A. (Citibank). The Company selectively uses equity swaps to reduce market risk associated with its stock-based compensation plans, such as its deferred compensation plans. These equity compensation liabilities increase as the Companys stock price increases and decrease as the Companys stock price decreases. In contrast, the value of the Equity Swap Agreement moves in the opposite direction of these liabilities, allowing the Company to fix a portion of the liabilities at a stated amount.
In connection with the Equity Swap Agreement, Citibank may purchase unlimited shares of the Companys stock in the market or in privately negotiated transactions. The Company disclaims that Citibank is an affiliated purchaser of the Company as such term is defined in Rule 10b-18(a)(3) under the Securities Exchange Act or that Citibank is purchasing any shares for the Company. The Equity Swap Agreement has no stated expiration date. The net effect of the change in fair value of the Equity Swap Agreement and the change in equity compensation liabilities was not material to the Companys earnings for the three months ended June 30, 2012.
The following table presents information regarding the repurchase of the Companys common stock by the Company as part of the publicly announced program and purchases of the Companys common stock by Citibank in connection with the Equity Swap Agreement during the three months ended June 30, 2012.
Period |
Total Number of Shares Purchased |
Average Price Paid per Share |
Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of the Publicly Announced Program |
Approximate Dollar Value of Shares that May Yet be Purchased under the Programs |
||||||||||||
4/1/124/30/12 |
| | | $ | 69,494,586 | |||||||||||
5/1/125/31/12 |
288,900 | $ | 31.95 | 288,900 | $ | 60,264,751 | ||||||||||
6/1/126/30/12 |
| | | $ | 60,264,751 | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
4/1/124/30/12 |
| | | NA | ||||||||||||
5/1/125/31/12 |
| | | NA | ||||||||||||
6/1/126/30/12 |
| | | NA |
(1) | Repurchases of the Companys common stock by the Company pursuant to its publicly announced program may be intended to partially offset dilution related to the Companys stock option and restricted stock equity compensation plans. |
ITEM 6. | EXHIBITS |
Reference is made to the separate exhibit index contained on page 50 filed herewith.
48
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
JOHNSON CONTROLS, INC. | ||||||
Date: August 2, 2012 | By: | /s/ R. Bruce McDonald | ||||
R. Bruce McDonald | ||||||
Executive Vice President and | ||||||
Chief Financial Officer |
49
JOHNSON CONTROLS, INC.
Form 10-Q
INDEX TO EXHIBITS
Exhibit No. |
Description | |
15 | Letter of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm, dated August 2, 2012, relating to Financial Information. | |
31.1 | Certification by the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | |
31.2 | Certification by the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | |
32 | Certification of Periodic Financial Report by the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | |
101 | The following materials from Johnson Controls, Inc.s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2012, formatted in XBRL (Extensible Business Reporting Language): (i) the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Financial Position, (ii) the Consolidated Statements of Income, (iii) the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, and (iv) Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, filed herewith. |
50