UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
(Mark One)
x | Annual Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013
OR
¨ | Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission File Number 001-34108
DIGIMARC CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Oregon | 26-2828185 | |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
9405 SW Gemini Drive, Beaverton, Oregon 97008
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
(503) 469-4800
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of Each Class |
Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered | |
Common Stock, $0.001 Par Value Per Share | The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC |
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: NONE
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ¨ No x
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes ¨ No x
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrants knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. x
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large accelerated filer, accelerated filer, and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer |
¨ | Accelerated filer | x | |||||
Non-accelerated filer |
¨ | (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) | Smaller reporting company | ¨ |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No x
The aggregate market value of common stock, par value $0.001 per share, held by non-affiliates of the registrant, based on the closing price of our common stock on The Nasdaq Global Market on the last business day of the registrants most recently completed fiscal second quarter (June 28, 2013), was approximately $144 million. Shares of common stock beneficially held by each officer and director have been excluded from this computation because these persons may be deemed to be affiliates. This determination of affiliate status is not necessarily a conclusive determination for any other purposes.
As of February 14, 2014, 7,432,554 shares of the registrants common stock were outstanding.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions of the registrants proxy statement pursuant to Regulation 14A (the Proxy Statement) for its 2014 annual meeting of shareholders are incorporated by reference into Items 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14 of Part III of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. The registrant intends to file the Proxy Statement not later than 120 days after the end of the fiscal year covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
PART I
Unless the context otherwise requires, references in this Annual Report on Form 10-K to Digimarc, we, our and us refer to Digimarc Corporation.
All dollar amounts are in thousands except per share amounts or unless otherwise noted. Percentages within the following tables may not foot due to rounding.
Digimarc Discover and Digimarc Guardian (pending)are registered trademarks of Digimarc Corporation. This Annual Report on Form 10-K also includes trademarks and trade names owned by other parties, and all other such trademarks and trade names mentioned in this Annual Report on Form 10-K are the property of their respective owners.
ITEM 1: | BUSINESS |
The following discussion of Digimarcs business contains forward-looking statements relating to future events or the future financial performance of Digimarc. Our actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements. Please see the discussion regarding forward-looking statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K in Item 7, Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, under the caption Forward-Looking Statements.
The following discussion of our business should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and the related notes and other financial information appearing elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Overview
Digimarc Corporation enables governments and enterprises around the world to give digital identities to media and objects that computers and digital devices can sense and recognize and to which they can react. Our technology provides the means to infuse persistent digital information, Digimarc IDs, perceptible only to computers and digital devices, into all forms of media content. The unique digital identifier placed in media generally persists with it regardless of the distribution path and whether it is copied, manipulated or converted to a different format, and does not affect the quality of the content or the enjoyment or other traditional uses of it. Our technology permits computers and digital devices to quickly and reliably identify all forms of media content.
Our technologies, and those of our licensees, span numerous applications across a wide range of media content, enabling our customers and those of our partners to:
| Improve the speed of retail checkout |
| Provide simple and intuitive mobile customer engagement experiences in stores |
| Quickly and reliably identify and effectively manage music, movies, television programming, digital images, e-books, documents and other printed materials, especially in light of non-linear distribution over the internet; |
| Deter counterfeiting of money, media and goods, and piracy of e-books, movies and music; |
| Support new digital media distribution models and methods to monetize media content; |
| Leverage the power of ubiquitous computing to instantly link consumers to a wealth of information and/or interactive experiences related to the media and objects they encounter each day; |
| Provide consumers with more choice and access to media content when, where and how they want it; |
| Enhance imagery and video by associating metadata or authenticating media content for government and commercial uses; and |
| Better secure identity documents to enhance national security and combat identity theft and fraud. |
1
At the core of our intellectual property is a signal processing innovation known as digital watermarking, which allows imperceptible digital information to be embedded in all forms of digitally designed, produced or distributed media content and some physical objects, including photographs, movies, music, television, personal identification documents, financial instruments, industrial parts and product packages. The digital information can be detected and read by a wide range of computers, mobile phones and other digital devices.
Our technology allows our customers to provide persistent digital identities for any media content that is digitally processed at some point during its lifecycle. The technology can be applied to printed materials, video, audio, and images. The inclusion of these digital signals enables a wide range of improvements in security and media management, and new business models for distribution and consumption of media content. Over the years our technology and intellectual property portfolios have grown to encompass many related technologies.
We provide solutions directly and through our licensees. Our proprietary technology has proven to be a powerful element of document security, giving rise to our long-term relationship with a consortium of central banks, which we refer to as the Central Banks, and many leading companies in the information technology industry. We and our licensees have successfully propagated watermarking technology in music, movies, television broadcasts, images and printed materials. Digimarc IDs have been used in these applications to improve media rights and asset management, reduce piracy and counterfeiting losses, improve marketing programs, permit more efficient and effective distribution of valuable media content and enhance consumer entertainment and commercial experiences.
Banknote counterfeit deterrence was the first commercially successful use of our technologies in a large scale system. Innovations based on our existing digital watermarking technology and experience have been leveraged to create new products to deter counterfeiting and tampering of driver licenses and other government-issued secure credentials. In parallel, our business partners, under patent or technology licenses from us, are delivering digital watermarking solutions to track and monitor the distribution of music, images, television and movies to consumers. In November of 2007, we announced a relationship with The Nielsen Company (US) LLC, or Nielsen, to license our patents in support of Nielsens industry leading television audience measurement.
In October 2010, we entered into a patent licensing arrangement with IV Digital Multimedia Inventions, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company affiliated with Intellectual Ventures (IV), pursuant to which we granted an exclusive license to sublicense, subject to pre-existing encumbrances and a grant-back license, an aggregate of approximately 900 of the 1,200 patents and applications held by us at the time the agreement was entered into, as noted below in the section titled Technology and Intellectual Property. Some of the patents exclusively licensed to IV have expired, while additional patents have been filed, bringing the total number of active patent assets to 775.
In December 2012, we acquired Attributor Corporation (Attributor), a leader in protecting e-books from online piracy. Attributors Guardian services protect book revenue and authors rights by finding, reporting on, and assisting in removing pirated content found on the Internet.
In December 2012, we entered into a renewal and extension of the Counterfeit Deterrence System Development and License Agreement with the Central Banks through 2024, with a 5 year extension option.
Financial information about geographic areas is included in Note 5 of our Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
Customers and Business Partners
Our revenue is generated through commercial and government applications of our technology. We derive our revenue primarily from development services, subscriptions for products and services, and licensing of our technology. During 2013, we generated the majority of our revenue from service and license fees paid to us
2
under long-term contracts with the Central Banks, IV, Nielsen, Verance Corporation (Verance), and Civolution. Subscription revenue increased in 2013 primarily as a result of our e-book product offering, Digimarc Guardian. The remainder of our revenue is generated primarily from patent and technology license fees and royalties paid by commercial business partners providing media identification and management solutions to movie studios and music labels, television broadcasters, creative professionals and other customers around the world.
In 2013, revenue from government contracts accounted for approximately 34% of our total revenue, and revenue generated under our contract with the Central Banks accounted for substantially all of the revenue generated under our government contracts. Our government contracts typically span one or more base years and multiple option years. Government customers generally have the right to not exercise option periods. As part of our work with government customers, we must comply with and are affected by laws and regulations relating to the award, administration and performance of government contracts. Government contract laws and regulations affect how we do business with our government customers and, in some instances, impose added costs on our business.
Information about customers that accounted for 10% or more of revenue in the last three years is included in Note 5 of our Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
Products and Services
We provide media identification and management solutions to commercial entities and government customers and license our technology and patent inventions to other solution providers. Our largest government customer is the Central Banks, with whom we have for the last 15 years been developing, deploying, supporting and continuing to enhance a system to deter digital counterfeiting of currency using personal computers and digital reprographics.
We license primarily to commercial entities who use our technology and patented inventions in the media and entertainment industry. Commercial customers use a range of solutions from our business partners and us to identify, track, manage and protect content as it is distributed and consumedeither digitally or physicallyand to enable new consumer applications to access networks and information from personal computers and mobile devices. Many movie studios, record labels, broadcasters, creative professionals and other customers rely on digital watermarking as a cost-effective means to:
| deter piracy and illegal use of movies, music and images; |
| protect entertainment content from copyright infringement; |
| track and monitor entertainment content for rights usage and licensing compliance; |
| monitor advertisements to verify ad placement and measure return on investment; |
| enhance information access, search and marketing capabilities related to media content; and |
| enable fair and legitimate use of content by consumers. |
Digimarc IDs are easily embedded into all forms of media and are imperceptible to human senses, but quickly detected by computers, networks or other digital devices like smartphones. Unlike traditional barcodes and tags, our solution does not require publishers to give up valuable space in magazines and newspapers; nor does it impact the overall layout or aesthetics of the publication. One of our more recent product offerings is the Digimarc Discover platform, which delivers a range of rich media experiences to its readers on their smartphones across multiple media including print, audio, video and packaging. Unique to the Digimarc Discover platform is its ability to use various content identification technologies as needed, including our patented technology.
3
As part of the Digimarc Discover platform, we recently introduced Digimarc Barcodes, which contain the same type of information found in traditional product UPC codes, but is invisibly repeated multiple times over the entire packaging. We have partnered with Datalogic, a global leader in Automatic Data Capture and Industrial Automation markets and producer of barcode readers, which has enabled its new MagellanTM 9800i multi-plane imaging scanner to detect and process Digimarc Barcodes. Digimarc Barcodes can also connect mobile-enabled consumers directly from packaging to engaging mobile experiences such as additional product information, special offers, recommendations, reviews, social networks and more.
As part of our intellectual property marketing and patent monetization efforts, our key objectives in building relationships with potential customers and partners are to:
| make progress toward the realization of our vision to enrich everyday living via pervasive, intuitive computing; |
| expand the scope of our license program; |
| more effectively monetize our patent assets; |
| encourage large scale adoption of our technologies by industry leaders; |
| improve our financial performance; |
| increase the scale and rate of growth of our products and services business; and |
| lay a foundation for continuing innovation. |
Current patent licensees include, but are not limited to IV, AlpVision SA, Civolution, IV, Monic, Nielsen, Signum Technologies, Verance and Verimatrix, Inc.
Technology and Intellectual Property
We develop intellectual property to differentiate our products and technology, mitigate infringement risks, and develop opportunities for licensing. Our broad patent portfolio covers a wide range of methods, applications, system architectures and business processes.
Most of our patents relate to various methods for embedding and decoding digital information in video, audio and images, whether the content is rendered in analog or digital formats. The digital information is generally embedded by making subtle modifications to the fundamental elements of the content itself, generally at a signal processing level. The changes necessary to embed this information are so subtle that they are generally not noticeable by people during normal use. Because the message is carried by the content itself, it is file-format independent. The embedded digital information generally survives most normal content transformations, including compression, edits, rotation, scaling, re-sampling, file-format transformations, copying, scanning and printing.
Our patent portfolio contains a number of innovations in digital watermarking, pattern recognition (sometimes referred to as fingerprinting), digital rights management and related fields. To protect our significant efforts in creating our technology, we have implemented an extensive intellectual property protection program that relies on a combination of patent, copyright, trademark and trade secret laws, and nondisclosure agreements and other contracts. As a result, we believe we have one of the worlds most extensive patent portfolios in digital watermarking and related fields, with greater than 1,250 U.S. and foreign patents and pending patent applications as of December 31, 2013. We continue to develop and broaden our portfolio of patented inventions in the fields of media identification and management technology and related applications and systems. We devote significant resources to developing and protecting our inventions and continuously seek to identify and evaluate potential licensees for our patents. The patents in our portfolio have a life of approximately 20 years from invention date, and up to 17 years after the patent has been granted.
4
For a discussion of activities and costs related to our research and development in the last three years, please read Research, development and engineering under Part II, Item 7, Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
Markets
Our patented inventions are used in various media identification and management products and solutions supporting a variety of media objects, from movies and music to banknotes, secure credentials and consumer packaged goods. Each media object enabled by our inventions creates the potential for several applications, such as:
| counterfeiting and piracy deterrence; |
| online e-book piracy protection; |
| content identification and media management; |
| authentication and monitoring; |
| retail point of sale transaction processing; |
| linking to networks and providing access to information; and |
| enhanced services in support of mobile commerce. |
We believe the market for most of these applications is in the early stages of development and that existing solutions represent only a small portion of the potential market for our products, services and technology.
Competition
No single competitor or small number of competitors dominate our market. Our competitors vary depending on the application of our products and services. Our business partners and we generally compete with non-digital watermarking technologies for the security or marketing budgets of the producers and distributors of media objects, documents, products and advertising. These alternatives include, among other things, encryption-based security systems and technologies and solutions based on fingerprinting, pattern recognition, and traditional barcodes. Our competitive position in digital watermarking applications is strong because of our large, high quality, sophisticated patent portfolio and our substantial and growing amount of intellectual property in related media security and management innovations that span basic technologies, applications, system designs and business processes. Our intellectual property portfolio allows us to use proprietary technologies that are well regarded by our customers and partners and not available to our competitors. We compete based on the variety of features we offer and a traditional cost/benefit analysis against alternative technologies and solutions. We anticipate that our competitive position within some markets may be affected by factors such as reluctance to adopt new technologies and by changes in government regulations.
Backlog
Based on projected commitments we have for the periods under contract with our respective customers, we anticipate our current contracts as of December 31, 2013 will generate a minimum of $31 million in revenue. We expect approximately $18 million of this amount to be recognized as revenue during 2014.
Some factors that lead to increased backlog include:
| contracts with new customers; |
| renewals with current customers; |
| add-on orders to current customers; and |
| contracts with longer contractual periods replacing contracts with shorter contractual periods. |
5
Some factors that lead to decreased backlog include:
| recognition of revenue associated with backlog currently in place; |
| contracts with shorter contractual periods replacing contracts with longer contractual periods; |
| modifications to existing contracts; |
| contract minimum payments ending; and |
| contracts ending with existing customers. |
The mix of these factors, among others, dictates whether our backlog increases or decreases for any given period. Our backlog may not result in actual revenue in any particular period, because the orders, awards and contracts included in our backlog may be subject to modification, cancellation or suspension. We may not realize revenue on certain contracts, orders or awards included in our backlog or the timing of any realization may change.
Employees
At December 31, 2013, we had 149 full-time employees, including 32 in sales, marketing, technical support and customer support; 89 in research, development and engineering, including intellectual property; and 28 in finance, administration, information technology and legal.
Our employees are not covered by any collective bargaining agreement, and we have never experienced a work stoppage. We believe that our relations with our employees are good.
Available Information
We make available free of charge through our website at www.digimarc.com our Annual Reports on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K, and amendments to these and other reports filed or furnished by us pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as soon as reasonably practicable after we file these materials with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
ITEM 1A: | RISK FACTORS |
The following risk factors are those risks of which we are aware and that we consider to be material to our business. If any of the following risks and uncertainties develops into actual events, our business, financial condition or results of operations and cash flows could be materially adversely affected. In that case, the trading price of our common stock could decline. Additionally, we cannot be certain or give any assurance that any actions taken to reduce known risks and uncertainties will be effective.
RISKS RELATED TO OUR BUSINESS
(1) A small number of customers account for a substantial portion of our revenue, and the loss of any large contract could materially disrupt our business.
Historically, we have derived a significant portion of our revenue from a limited number of customers. Five customers, the Bank for International Settlements (acting on behalf of the Central Banks), IV, Nielsen, Verance and Civolution represented approximately 81% of our revenue for the year ended December 31, 2013. Most of our revenue comes from long-term contracts generally having terms of at least three to five years, with some licenses for the life of the associated patents, which could be up to 20 years. The agreements with some of these customers provide minimum or fixed payment obligations that have ceased, in the case of IV, or will cease shortly, in the case of Nielsen in January 2014. Some contracts we enter into contain termination for convenience provisions. If we were to lose such a contract for any reason, or if revenue from variable payment obligations do
6
not replace revenue under the existing fixed payment obligations, our financial results could be adversely affected. For example, in connection with our arrangement with IV, the quarterly license fee payments ended in the second quarter of 2013. We are not able to reasonably estimate the future revenue impact of any profit sharing we may earn from IV.
We expect to continue to depend upon a small number of customers for a significant portion of our revenue for the foreseeable future. The loss of, or decline in, orders or backlog from one or more major customers could reduce our revenue and have a material adverse effect on our financial results.
(2) Although we achieved profitability in prior years, we were not profitable in 2013 and may not be able to return to or sustain profitability in the future, particularly if we were to lose large contracts.
For the year ended December 31, 2012, we generated net income of $8.3 million. Our profit was primarily due to a past due royalties payment received from Verance in the first quarter of 2012 and quarterly license fee payments from IV, which ended in the second quarter of 2013. For the year ended December 31, 2013, we incurred a net loss largely due to the end of the quarterly license fee payments from IV. On a quarterly basis, our operating results have been inconsistent.
Returning to and maintaining profitability in the future will depend upon a variety of factors, including our ability to maintain and obtain more significant partnerships like those we have with the Central Banks, IV, Nielsen, Verance and Civolution. Profitability will also depend on growth in revenue of our licensees and our efficiency in executing our business strategy and capitalizing on new opportunities. Various adverse developments, including the loss of large contracts, the expiration of fixed payment obligations on our contracts or cost overruns on our existing contracts, could have a negative effect on our revenue, margins and profitability.
(3) We may be adversely affected by variability of contracted arrangements.
We have frequently agreed to modify the terms of contractual arrangements with our customers, partners and licensees in response to changes in circumstances underlying the original contractual arrangements, and it is likely that we will do so in the future. As a result of this practice, the terms of our contractual arrangements with our customers, partners and licensees may vary over time and, depending on the particular modification, could have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
Some of our customers and licensees report royalties to us based on their revenue and their interpretation and allocation of contracted royalty obligations. For example, one licensee reports profit sharing to us based on income earned, which is subject to their interpretation and allocation of revenue and expenses, which could be less favorable to us than our own interpretation.
(4) A significant portion of our current and potential future revenue is subject to commercial and government contracts and development of new markets that may involve unpredictable delays and other unexpected changes. Such volatility and uncertainty might limit our actual revenue in any given quarter or year.
We derive substantial portions of our revenue from commercial contracts tied to development schedules or development of new markets, which could shift for months, quarters or years as the needs of our customers and the markets in which they participate change. Government agencies and commercial customers also face budget pressures that introduce added uncertainty. Any shift in development schedules, the markets in which we or our licensees participate, or customer procurement processes, which are outside our control and may not be predictable, could result in delays in bookings forecasted for any particular period, could affect the predictability of our quarterly and annual results, and might limit our actual revenue in any given quarter or year, resulting in reduced and less predictable revenue and adversely affecting profitability.
7
We are also expanding into new markets, which involve inherent risk and unpredictability. Until recent years, our business was focused primarily on digital watermarking and related signal processing technology. Our work in that field dated back to the early 1990s, so that by the time of the 1999 public offering of our predecessor company, we were an established competitor or participant in that area, and had a historical perspective that provided certain advantages. Those advantages continued to grow and serve us as our tenure in the field lengthened.
In recent years, particularly with the proliferation of smartphones and increased demands in the public sector for enhanced covert security options, we have investigated other technologies that may provide attractive future opportunities, for example in the packaging and publishing markets. These generally include technologies that leverage our strength in signal processing and support our vision for intuitive, pervasive computing. As we seek to expand outside our areas of historical expertise, we lack the history and insight that benefited us in the watermarking field. We also lack the size and scale typical of contractors providing products and services to the federal government. While we were in the vanguard of commercial application of digital watermarking, we are not so uniquely poised in these other disciplines. Accordingly, it may be difficult for us to replicate our watermarking success in other technologies we might pursue.
(5) The market for our products is highly competitive, and alternative technologies or larger companies that compete with us may undermine, limit or eliminate the market for our products technologies, which would decrease our revenue and profits.
The markets in which we compete for business are intensely competitive and rapidly evolving. We expect competition to continue from both existing competitors and new market entrants. We face competition from other companies and from alternative technologies, including some of our customers and licensees. We also may face competition from unexpected sources.
Alternative technologies that may directly or indirectly compete with particular applications of our watermarking technologies include:
| Encryptionsecuring data during distribution using a secret code so it cannot be accessed except by authorized users; |
| Containersinserting a media object in an encrypted wrapper, which prevents the media object from being duplicated, used for content distribution and transaction management; |
| Traditional anti-counterfeiting technologiesa number of solutions used by many government agencies (that compete for budgetary outlays) designed to deter counterfeiting, including optically sensitive ink, magnetic threads and other materials used in the printing of currencies; |
| Image recognitionone or several pre-specified or learned objects or object classes that can be recognized, usually together with their two-dimensional positions in the image or three-dimensional poses in the scene, such as Google Goggles, which provides a stand-alone program illustration of this function; |
| Radio frequency tagsembedding a chip that emits a signal when in close proximity with a receiver, used in some photo identification credentials, labels and tags; |
| Internet technologiesnumerous existing and potential Internet access and search methods are competitive with Digimarc Mobile systems and the searching capabilities of Digimarc for Images; |
| Digital fingerprints and signaturesa metric, or metrics, computed solely from a source image or audio or video track, that can be used to identify an image or track, or authenticate the image or track; |
| Smart cardsbadges and cards including a semiconductor memory and /or processor, used for authentication and related purposes; and |
| Bar codes or QR codesdata-carrying codes, typically visible in nature (but may be invisible if printed in ultraviolet- or infrared-responsive inks). |
8
In the competitive environments in which we operate, product generation, development and marketing processes relating to technology are uncertain and complex, and require accurate prediction of demand as well as successful management of various risks inherent in technology development. In light of these uncertainties, it is possible that our failure to successfully accommodate future changes in technologies related to our technology could have a long-term negative effect on our growth and results of operations.
New developments are expected to continue, and discoveries by others, including current and potential competitors, possibly could render our services and products noncompetitive. Moreover, because of rapid technological changes, we may be required to expend greater amounts of time and money than anticipated to develop new products and services, which in turn may require greater revenue streams from those products and services to cover developmental costs. Many of the companies that compete with us for some of our business, as well as other companies with whom we may compete in the future, are larger and may have greater technical, financial, marketing and political resources than we do. These resources could enable these companies to initiate severe price cuts or take other measures in an effort to gain market share or otherwise impede our progress. We may be unable to compete successfully against current or future participants in our market or against alternative technologies, and the competitive pressures we face could decrease our revenue and profits in the future.
(6) We may not receive any profit-sharing from our patent licensing arrangement with Intellectual Ventures.
In connection with our patent licensing arrangement with IV, we granted an exclusive license to sublicense our patent assets existing at that time to IV in exchange for various strategic and financial benefits, including profit participation. We have received all the minimum guaranteed license fees and most of the minimum consulting fees. We may not realize any profit participation revenue from our patent licensing arrangement with IV. We have given IV control over both prosecution and enforcement of these assets. While IV can seek our assistance and has committed to pay for it, we cannot guarantee that IV will seek our assistance in prosecution, nor enforce the patents to the extent we would.
(7) We may acquire or invest in other companies or technologies in the future, which could divert managements attention, result in additional dilution to our stockholders, increase expenses, disrupt our operations and harm our operating results.
We acquired Attributor Corporation in December 2012, and we may in the future acquire or invest in businesses, products or technologies that we believe could complement or expand our current product and service offerings, enhance our technical capabilities, expand our operations into new markets or otherwise offer growth opportunities. We cannot assure you that we will realize the anticipated benefits of our recent or any future acquisition. The pursuit of potential acquisitions may divert the attention of management and cause us to incur various expenses related to identifying, investigating and pursuing suitable acquisitions, whether or not they are consummated.
There are inherent risks in integrating and managing acquisitions. We may not be able to assimilate or integrate the acquired personnel, operations and technologies successfully or effectively manage the combined business following an acquisition. We also may not achieve the anticipated benefits from an acquired business due to a number of factors, including:
| unanticipated costs or liabilities associated with the acquisition; |
| incurrence of acquisition-related costs, which would be recognized as a current period expense; |
| inability to generate sufficient revenue to offset acquisition or investment costs; |
| the inability to maintain relationships with customers and partners of the acquired business; |
| the need to implement additional controls, procedures and policies; |
| entry into geographic markets in which we have little or no prior experience, and challenges caused by distance, language and cultural differences; |
9
| differences in foreign labor and employment laws, including classification of employees and contractors; |
| disruption of our ongoing business; |
| the potential loss of key employees; and |
| use of substantial portions of our available cash to consummate the acquisition. |
Acquisitions could also result in dilutive issuances of equity securities or the incurrence of debt, which could adversely affect our operating results. In addition, if an acquired business fails to meet our expectations, our operating results, business and financial condition may suffer.
(8) An increase in our operations outside of the U.S. subjects us to risks additional to those to which we are exposed in our domestic operations.
We believe that revenue from sales of products and services to commercial, governmental and other customers outside the U.S. could represent a growing percentage of our total revenue in the future. In addition, as a result of our acquisition of Attributor Corporation, we perform certain functions in various jurisdictions outside of the U.S. International operations are subject to a number of risks that can adversely affect our sales of products and services to customers outside of the U.S., or expose us to additional expense or liabilities, including the following:
| difficulties and costs of staffing, developing and managing foreign operations as a result of distance, language and cultural differences; |
| the effect of laws governing employee and contractor relationships, and the existence of workers councils and labor unions in some jurisdictions; |
| changes in foreign government regulations and security requirements; |
| export license requirements, tariffs and taxes; |
| trade barriers; |
| difficulty in protecting intellectual property; |
| difficulty in collecting accounts receivable; |
| currency fluctuations; |
| longer payment cycles than those for customers in the U.S; and |
| political and economic instability. |
We do not have an extensive operational infrastructure for international business. We generally depend on local or international business partners and subcontractors for performance of substantial portions of our business. These factors may result in greater risk of performance problems or of reduced profitability with respect to our international programs in these markets. In addition, if foreign customers, in particular foreign government authorities, terminate or delay the implementation of our products and services, it may be difficult for us, or we may not be able, to recover our potential losses.
(9) Our future growth will depend to some extent on our successful implementation of our technology in solutions provided by third parties.
Our business and strategy rely substantially on deployment of our technology by our licensees and other third-party software developers and original equipment manufacturers. For example, one form of our technology is commonly deployed in image editing applications to permit users of these products to read data embedded in imagery, and thereby identify ownership and discern the identities of image owners. Another form of our technology is used in our anti-counterfeiting products. Our patented inventions are also being deployed as part of
10
Digital Cinema systems to theatres around the world by companies that integrate technologies and subsystems. Most recently, our software has been integrated into Point of Sale scanners from Datalogic. In addition, we rely on the ability of IV to license a portion of our patented inventions to third party licensees pursuant to the patent licensing arrangement we entered into with IV in October 2010. If third parties who include our technology in their products or otherwise license our intellectual property for use in their products cease to do so, or we fail to obtain other partners who will incorporate, embed, integrate or bundle our technology, or these partners are unsuccessful in their efforts, our efforts to expand deployment of our technology and increase licensing revenue would be adversely affected. Consequently, our ability to increase revenue would be adversely affected and we may suffer other adverse effects to our business. In addition, if our technology does not perform according to market expectations, our future sales would suffer as customers seek other alternatives.
(10) We depend on our management and key employees for our future success. If we are not able to retain, hire or integrate these employees, we may not be able to meet our commitments.
Our success depends to a significant extent on the performance and continued service of our management and our intellectual property team. The loss of the services of any of these employees could limit our growth or undermine customer relationships.
Due to the high level of technical expertise that our industry requires, our ability to successfully develop, market, sell, license and support our products, services, and intellectual property depends to a significant degree upon the continued contributions of our key personnel in engineering, sales, marketing, operations, legal and licensing, many of whom would be difficult to replace. We believe our future success will depend in large part upon our ability to retain our current key employees and our ability to attract, integrate and retain new personnel in the future. It may not be practical for us to match the compensation some of our employees could garner at other employment. In addition, we may encounter difficulties in hiring and retaining employees because of concerns related to our financial performance or operating results. These circumstances may have a negative effect on the market price of our common stock, and employees and prospective employees may factor in the uncertainties relating to our stability and the value of any equity-based incentives in their decisions regarding employment opportunities and decide to leave our employ. Moreover, our business is based in large part on patented technology, which is a unique and sophisticated signal processing technology. New employees require substantial training, involving significant resources and management attention. Competition for experienced personnel in our business can be intense. If we do not succeed in attracting new, qualified personnel or in integrating, retaining and motivating our current personnel, our growth and ability to deliver products and services that our customers require may be hampered. Although our employees generally have executed agreements containing non-competition clauses, we do not assure you that a court would enforce all of the terms of these clauses or the agreements generally. If these clauses were not fully enforced, our employees could be able to freely join our competitors. Although we generally attempt to control access to and distribution of our proprietary information by our employees, we do not assure you that the confidential nature of our proprietary information will be maintained in the course of such future employment. Any of these events could have a material adverse effect on our financial and business prospects.
(11) If leading companies in our industry or standard-setting bodies or institutions downplay, minimize or reject the use of our technology, deployment may be slowed and we may be unable to achieve revenue growth.
Many of our business endeavors, such as our licensing of intellectual property in support of audio and video copy-control applications, can be impeded or frustrated by larger, more influential companies or by standard-setting bodies or institutions downplaying, minimizing or rejecting the value or use of our technology. A negative position by these companies, bodies or institutions, if taken, may result in obstacles for us that we would be incapable of overcoming and may block or impede the adoption of our technology. In addition, potential customers may delay or reject initiatives that relate to deployment of our technology. Such a development would make the achievement of our business objectives in this market difficult or impossible.
11
(12) We are subject to risks encountered by companies developing and relying upon new technologies, products and services for substantial amounts of their growth or revenue.
Our business and prospects must be considered in light of the risks and uncertainties to which companies with new and rapidly evolving technology, products and services are exposed. These risks include the following:
| we may be unable to develop sources of new revenue or sustainable growth in revenue because our current and anticipated technologies, products and services may be inadequate or may be unable to attract or retain customers; |
| intense competition and rapid technological change could adversely affect the markets acceptance of our existing and new products and services; |
| we may be unable to develop and maintain new technologies upon which our existing and new products and services are dependent which may cause our products and services to be less sustainable and competitive or which could make it harder for us to expand our revenue and business; and |
| our licensees may not be able to successfully enter new markets or grow their businesses, limiting the royalties payable to us and our associated revenue and profits. |
Some of our key technology and solutions from our patent or technology licensees are in the development stage. Consequently, products incorporating our technology and solutions are undergoing technological change and are in the early stages of introduction in the marketplace. Delays in the adoption of these products or adverse competitive developments may result in delays in the development of new revenue sources or the growth in our revenue. In addition, we may be required to incur unanticipated expenditures if product changes or improvements are required. Moreover, new industry standards might redefine the products that we or our licensees are able to sell, especially if these products are only in the prototype stage of development. If product changes or improvements are required, success in marketing these products by us or our licensees and achieving profitability from these products could be delayed or halted. We also may be required to fund any changes or improvements out of operating income, which could adversely affect our profitability.
(13) We may not be able to adequately protect or enforce our intellectual property, and we may be subject to infringement claims and other litigation, which could adversely affect our business.
Our success depends in part on licensing our proprietary technology. To protect our intellectual property portfolio, we rely on a combination of patent, copyright, trademark and trade secret rights, confidentiality procedures and licensing arrangements. Unlicensed copying and use of our intellectual property or infringement of our intellectual property rights may result in the loss of revenue to us. Although we devote significant resources to developing and protecting our technologies, and evaluating potential competitors of our technologies for infringement of our intellectual property rights, these infringements may nonetheless go undetected or may arise in the future.
We face risks associated with our patent position, including the potential need from time to time to engage in significant legal proceedings to enforce our patents, the possibility that the validity or enforceability of our patents may be challenged, and the possibility that third parties will be able to compete against us without infringing our patents. Our resolved litigation with Verance, which brought a declaratory judgment action alleging that certain of our patents are invalid or not infringed, is an example. Budgetary concerns may cause us not to file or continue litigation against known infringers of our patent rights, or may cause us not to file for, or pursue, patent protection for all of our inventive technology, in jurisdictions where they may have value. Some governmental entities that might infringe our intellectual property rights may enjoy sovereign immunity from such claims. Failure to reliably enforce our patent rights against infringers may make licensing more difficult. If we fail to protect our intellectual property rights and proprietary technology adequately, if there are changes in applicable laws that are adverse to our interests, or if we become involved in litigation relating to our intellectual property rights and proprietary technology or relating to the intellectual property rights of others, our business
12
could be seriously harmed because the value ascribed to our intellectual property could diminish and result in a lower stock price, or we may incur significant costs in bringing legal proceedings against third parties who are infringing our patents.
Effective protection of intellectual property rights may be unavailable or limited. Patent protection throughout the world is generally established on a country-by-country basis. We have applied for patent protection in the U.S. and in various other countries. We do not assure you, however, that pending patents will be issued or that issued patents will be valid or enforceable. Failure to obtain these patents or failure to enforce those patents that are obtained may result in a loss of revenue to us. We do not assure you that the protection of our proprietary rights will be adequate or that our competitors will not independently develop similar technologies, duplicate our services or design around any of our patents or other intellectual property rights.
In the ordinary course of building strategic business relationships with potential partners we may encounter companies that we believe are infringing on our patent portfolio. When we encounter these companies we believe are infringing, we try to negotiate a license to our patents. If we are unable to negotiate a license and continue to believe they are infringing on our patents, we may file a lawsuit and incur legal fees in the process.
Patents have finite lives, and our ability to continue to commercially exploit our patents is limited to the term of the patents. Our earliest patents began expiring in July 2012. The size and strength of our portfolio depends on the number of patents that have been granted, offset by the number of patents that expire, in any given year. We continue to grow our patent portfolio, but we do not assure you that we will be able to exploit newer patents to the extent that we have our earlier patents.
We are the exclusive licensee under some third-party patents, and may need the assistance of these parties if we choose to enforce any of these patent rights. The cooperation of these third parties cannot be assured. Although we rely on some of these technologies for our products or for our licenses to third parties to date, the licensed patents have not been material to our operations.
As more companies engage in business activities relating to digital watermarking, and develop corresponding intellectual property rights, it is increasingly likely that claims may arise which assert that some of our products or services infringe upon other parties intellectual property rights. These claims could subject us to costly litigation and divert management resources. These claims may require us to pay significant damages, cease production of infringing products, terminate our use of infringing technology or develop non-infringing technologies. In these circumstances, continued use of our technology may require that we acquire licenses to the intellectual property that is the subject of the alleged infringement, and we might not be able to obtain these licenses on commercially reasonable terms or at all. Our use of protected technology may result in liability that threatens our continuing operation.
Some of our contracts include indemnity and similar provisions regarding our non-infringement of third-party intellectual property rights. As deployment of our technology increases, and more companies enter our markets, the likelihood of a third party lawsuit resulting from these provisions increases. If an infringement arose in a context governed by such a contract, we may have to refund to our customer amounts already paid to us or pay significant damages, or we may be sued by the party whose intellectual property has allegedly been infringed upon.
As part of our confidentiality procedures, we generally enter into non-disclosure agreements with our employees, directors, consultants and corporate partners, and attempt to control access to and distribution of our technology, solutions, documentation and other proprietary information. Despite these procedures, third parties could copy or otherwise obtain and make unauthorized use of our technology, solutions or other proprietary information or independently develop similar technologies, solutions or information. The steps that we have taken to prevent misappropriation of our solutions, technology or other proprietary information may not succeed.
13
(14) If our revenue models and pricing structures relating to products and services that are under development do not gain market acceptance, the products and services may fail to attract or retain customers and we may not be able to generate new revenue or sustain existing revenue.
Some of our business involves embedding digital watermarks in traditional and digital media, including consumer product packaging and related marketing materials, secure documents, audio, video and imagery, and licensing our intellectual property. Our revenues result from a combination of development, consulting, subscription and license fees from a variety of media identification and management applications. We launched our Digimarc Discover initiative during 2011 and the Digimarc Barcode in 2014, both of which incorporates new business and pricing models for licensing access to our online services portal and value added service providers. We have not fully developed revenue models for some applications and licensing endeavors. Because some of our products and services are not yet well-established in the marketplace, and because some of these products and services will not directly displace existing solutions, we cannot be certain that the pricing structure for these products and services will gain market acceptance or be sustainable over time or that the marketing for these products and services will be effective.
(15) If we are unable to respond to regulatory or industry standards effectively, or if we are unable to develop and integrate new technologies effectively, our growth and the development of our products and services could be delayed or limited.
Our future success will depend in part on our ability to enhance and improve the responsiveness, functionality and features of our products and services, and those of our business partners, in accordance with regulatory or industry standards. Our ability to remain competitive will depend in part on our ability to influence and respond to emerging industry and governmental standards in a timely and cost-effective manner. If we are unable to influence these or other standards or respond to these standards effectively, our growth and the development of various products and services could be delayed or limited.
Our market is characterized by new and evolving technologies. The success of our business will depend on our ability to develop and integrate new technologies effectively and address the increasingly sophisticated technological needs of our customers in a timely and cost-effective manner. Our ability to remain competitive will depend in part on our ability to:
| enhance and improve the responsiveness, functionality and other features of the products and services we offer or plan to offer; |
| continue to develop our technical expertise; and |
| develop and introduce new services, applications and technologies to meet changing customer needs and preferences and to integrate new technologies. |
We do not assure you that we will be successful in responding to these technological and industry challenges in a timely and cost-effective manner. If we are unable to develop or integrate new technologies effectively or respond to these changing needs, our margins could decrease, and our release of new products and services and the deployment of our technology could be adversely affected.
(16) We may need to retain additional employees or contract labor in the future in order to take advantage of new business opportunities arising from increased demand, which could increase costs and impede our ability to achieve or sustain profitability in the short term.
We have staffed our company with the intent of accelerating our product development and sales growth initiatives while also focusing on achieving and sustaining profitability. Our current staffing levels could affect our ability to respond to increased demand for our services. In addition, to meet any increased demand and take advantage of new business opportunities in the future, we may need to increase our workforce through additional employees or contract labor. Although we believe that increasing our workforce would potentially support anticipated growth and profitability, it would increase our costs. If we experience such an increase in costs, we may not succeed in achieving or sustaining profitability in the short term.
14
(17) The terms and conditions of our contracts could subject us to damages, losses and other expenses if we fail to meet delivery and other performance requirements.
Our service contracts typically include provisions imposing:
| development, delivery and installation schedules and milestones; |
| customer acceptance and testing requirements; and |
| other performance requirements. |
To the extent these provisions involve performance over extended periods of time, risks of noncompliance may increase. From time to time we have experienced delays in system implementation, timely acceptance of programs, concerns regarding program performance and other contractual disputes. If we fail to meet contractual milestones or other performance requirements as promised, or to successfully resolve customer disputes, we could incur liability for damages, as well as increased costs, lower margins, or compensatory obligations in addition to other losses, such as harm to our reputation. Any unexpected increases in costs to meet our contractual obligations or any other requirements necessary to address claims and damages with regard to our customer contracts could have a material adverse effect on our business and financial results.
(18) Products deploying our technology could have unknown defects or errors, which may give rise to claims against us, divert application of our resources from other purposes or increase our project implementation and support costs.
Products and services as complex as those we offer or develop may contain undetected defects or errors. Furthermore, we often provide complex implementation, integration, customization, consulting and other technical services in connection with the implementation and ongoing maintenance of our products. Despite testing, defects or errors in our products and services may occur, which could result in delays in the development and implementation of products and systems, inability to meet customer requirements or expectations in a timely manner, loss of revenue or market share, increased implementation and support costs, failure to achieve market acceptance, diversion of development resources, injury to our reputation, increased insurance costs, increased service and warranty costs and warranty or breach of contract claims. Although we attempt to reduce the risk of losses resulting from warranty or breach of contract claims through warranty disclaimers and liability limitation clauses in our sales agreements when we can, these contractual provisions are sometimes not included and may not be enforceable in every instance. If a court refuses to enforce the liability limiting provisions of our contracts for any reason, or if liabilities arise that were not contractually limited or adequately covered by insurance, the expense associated with defending these actions or paying the resultant claims could be significant.
(19) The security systems used in our product and service offerings may be circumvented or sabotaged by third parties, which could result in the disclosure of sensitive information or private personal information or cause other business interruptions that could damage our reputation and disrupt our business.
Our business relies on computers and other information technologies, both internal and at customer locations. The protective measures that we use may not prevent security breaches, and failure to prevent security breaches may disrupt our business, damage our reputation, and expose us to litigation and liability. A party who is able to circumvent security measures could misappropriate sensitive or proprietary information or materials or cause interruptions or otherwise damage our products, services and reputation, and the property of our customers. If unintended parties obtain sensitive data and information, or create bugs or viruses or otherwise sabotage the functionality of our systems, we may receive negative publicity, incur liability to our customers or lose the confidence of our customers, any of which may cause the termination or modification of our contracts. Further, our insurance coverage may be insufficient to cover losses and liabilities that may result from these events.
In addition, we may be required to expend significant capital and other resources to protect ourselves against the threat of security breaches or to alleviate problems caused by these breaches. Any protection or remedial measures may not be available at a reasonable price or at all, or may not be entirely effective if commenced.
15
(20) We are periodically involved in the ordinary course of business in litigation, and an adverse resolution of such litigation may adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows.
From time to time, in our normal course of business, we are a party to various legal claims, actions and complaints. As part of our patent licensing program, we bring claims or counterclaims of patent infringement to enforce our patent rights. Given the uncertain nature of litigation, we are not able to estimate the amount or range of gain or loss that could result from an outcome of litigation. Litigation can be expensive, lengthy, and disruptive to normal business operations. The results of complex legal proceedings are often uncertain and difficult to predict. We could incur costs in excess of any currently established accruals and, to the extent available, excess liability insurance. An unfavorable outcome in any legal proceedings could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows.
RISKS RELATED TO OUR CAPITAL STOCK
(21) Our common stock price may be volatile, and you could lose all or part of your investment in shares of our common stock.
The price of shares of our common stock may fluctuate as a result of changes in our operating performance or prospects and other factors. Some specific factors that may have a significant effect on the price of shares of our common stock include:
| the publics reaction to our public disclosures; |
| actual or anticipated changes in our operating results or future prospects; |
| potential unfavorable changes from originally reported royalties by customers resulting from an audit performed by us or a third party, or self-corrected by the customer; |
| strategic actions by us or our competitors, such as acquisitions or restructurings; |
| impact of acquisitions on our liquidity and financial performance; |
| new laws or regulations or new interpretations of existing laws or regulations applicable to our business; |
| changes in accounting standards, policies, guidance, interpretations or principles applicable to us; |
| conditions of the industry as a result of changes in financial markets or general economic or political conditions; |
| the failure of securities analysts to cover our common stock in the future, or changes in financial estimates by analysts; |
| changes in analyst recommendations or earnings estimates regarding us, other comparable companies or the industry generally, and our ability to meet those estimates; |
| changes in the amount of dividends paid; |
| future issuances of our common stock or the perception that future sales could occur; and |
| volatility in the equity securities market. |
(22) Our common stock price may increase or decrease on material news or developments.
As a thinly-traded microcap company, volatility in the equity securities market may disproportionately affect swings in our stock price, upward and downward, on positive and negative developments. We suspect that the effects of computerized trading also exacerbate fluctuations in our stock price.
16
(23) Our corporate governance documents, our rights agreement and Oregon law may delay or prevent an acquisition of us that shareholders may consider favorable, which could decrease the value of your shares.
Our articles of incorporation and bylaws and Oregon law contain provisions that could make it more difficult for a third party to acquire us without the consent of our board of directors. These provisions include supermajority voting requirements for shareholders to amend our organizational documents and limitations on actions by our shareholders by written consent. In addition, our board of directors has the right to issue preferred stock without shareholder approval, which could be used to dilute the stock ownership of a potential hostile acquirer. In July 2008, our Board of Directors adopted a rights agreement pursuant to which one one-hundredth (1/100) of a preferred stock purchase right will be issued for each outstanding share of our common stock. In general terms, our rights agreement works by imposing a significant penalty upon any person or group that acquires 15% or more of our outstanding common stock without the approval of our Board of Directors. Oregon law also restricts the ability to vote shares of stock acquired in a transaction that causes the acquiring person to control at least one-fifth, one-third or one-half of the votes entitled to be cast in the election of directors. Shares acquired in a control share acquisition have no voting rights except as authorized by a vote of the shareholders. Although we believe these provisions protect our shareholders from coercive or otherwise unfair takeover tactics and thereby provide for an opportunity to receive a higher bid by requiring potential acquirers to negotiate with our board of directors, these provisions apply even if the offer may be considered beneficial by some shareholders.
ITEM 1B: UNRESOLVED | STAFF COMMENTS |
None.
ITEM 2: | PROPERTIES |
We lease our principal administrative, marketing, research, and intellectual property development facility, which is approximately 46,000 square feet in size and located in Beaverton, Oregon. In May 2011, we entered into an amendment with the landlord to extend the length of our facilities lease through August 2016.
In June 2013, we entered into a new facilities lease agreement for Attributor in San Mateo, California, which is approximately 3,700 square feet in size, with a lease term through November 2016.
See Note 9 of our Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for further lease related disclosures.
ITEM 3: | LEGAL PROCEEDINGS |
We are subject from time to time to legal proceedings and claims arising in the ordinary course of business.
Our subsidiary, Attributor, is a defendant in a patent infringement lawsuit brought by Blue Spike, LLC (E.D. Texas, Civil Action No: 6:12-cv-540). The case was brought against Attributor in August 2012, and was consolidated with other lawsuits brought by Blue Spike into Civil Action No. 6:12-cv-00499.
Blue Spike asserted infringement by Attributor of four patents. Attributor filed an answer denying that it has infringed any valid claim of the patents in suit, and asserting specified defenses, including non-infringement and invalidity. The court has consolidated the cases that Blue Spike has brought against over ninety defendants into one case. A schedule for the case has recently been set and trial is scheduled for October 2015. Blue Spike has not alleged a specific amount of monetary damages in its complaint.
In May 2013, we instituted an arbitration proceeding against IV regarding IVs calculation of potential profit sharing payments under our license agreement with IV. The action was settled on January 17, 2014. The settlement did not result in profit sharing payments to us. The next profit participation report from IV is due to us in March 2014, covering 2013 licensing activities.
ITEM 4: | MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES |
Not applicable.
17
PART II
ITEM 5: | MARKET FOR REGISTRANTS COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURTIES |
Our common stock began trading on the Nasdaq Stock Market LLC in October 2008 under the symbol DMRC. The closing price of our common stock on the Nasdaq Global Market was $32.56 on February 14, 2014. The following table lists the high and low sales prices of our common stock for the periods indicated, as reported by The Nasdaq Global Market.
Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||||||
2013 | 2012 | |||||||||||||||
High | Low | High | Low | |||||||||||||
First quarter |
$ | 26.79 | $ | 20.72 | $ | 32.10 | $ | 24.34 | ||||||||
Second quarter |
$ | 26.00 | $ | 19.05 | $ | 30.25 | $ | 23.55 | ||||||||
Third quarter |
$ | 22.46 | $ | 18.86 | $ | 28.05 | $ | 21.06 | ||||||||
Fourth quarter |
$ | 22.72 | $ | 17.85 | $ | 22.80 | $ | 17.68 |
At February 14, 2014, we had 221 shareholders of record of our common stock, as shown in the records of our transfer agent. Since many holders hold shares in street name, we believe that there is a significantly larger number of beneficial owners of our common stock than the number of record holders.
During the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, our Board of Directors declared and paid the following dividends per common share (in thousands, except per share data):
Declaration Date |
Dividend Per Common Share |
Record Date | Total Amount |
Payment Date | ||||||||
October 22, 2013 |
$ | 0.11 | November 4, 2013 | $ | 802 | November 12, 2013 | ||||||
July 25, 2013 |
$ | 0.11 | August 5, 2013 | $ | 799 | August 12, 2013 | ||||||
April 30, 2013 |
$ | 0.11 | May 13, 2013 | $ | 800 | May 20, 2013 | ||||||
February 20, 2013 |
$ | 0.11 | March 4, 2013 | $ | 801 | March 11, 2013 | ||||||
October 23, 2012 |
$ | 0.11 | November 6, 2012 | $ | 783 | November 20, 2012 | ||||||
July 26, 2012 |
$ | 0.11 | August 10, 2012 | $ | 782 | August 24, 2012 | ||||||
April 26, 2012 |
$ | 0.11 | May 11, 2012 | $ | 779 | May 25, 2012 |
In November 2011, our Board of Directors approved a stock repurchase programs authorizing the purchase, at the discretion of management, up to $5.0 million of shares of our common stock for a one year period through periodic open-market or private transactions at then-prevailing market prices. In November 2013, the program was extended through December 31, 2014. As of December 31, 2013, we had repurchased 43,293 shares under this program at an aggregate purchase price of $1.0 million.
On January 26, 2011, we repurchased 552,536 shares of our common stock from Koninklijke Philips Electronics, N.V. (Philips), in a privately negotiated transaction. The shares were purchased for an aggregate price of $14.9 million, including transaction fees.
In addition to the stock repurchase program described above, we withhold (repurchase) shares of common stock in connection with the vesting of restricted shares to cover taxes, and we repurchase shares in connection with stock option exercises, to cover the exercise prices and taxes. For the three-month period ended December 31, 2013, we withheld 15,233 shares in connection with stock option exercises, covering both the exercise prices and taxes, for an aggregate purchase price of $336.
18
The following table sets forth information regarding purchases of our equity securities during the three-month period ended December 31, 2013:
Period |
(a) Total number of shares purchased (1) |
(b) Average price paid per share (1) |
(c) Total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs |
(d) Approximate dollar value) of shares that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs |
||||||||||||
Month 1 |
||||||||||||||||
October 1, 2013 to October 31, 2013 |
| $ | | | $ | 4.0 million | ||||||||||
Month 2 |
||||||||||||||||
November 1, 2013 to November 30, 2013 |
46,560 | $ | 18.48 | | $ | 4.0 million | ||||||||||
Month 3 |
||||||||||||||||
December 1, 2013 to December 31, 2013 |
| $ | | | $ | 4.0 million | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Total |
46,560 | $ | 18.48 | |
(1) | Fully vested shares of common stock withheld (purchased) by us in satisfaction of required withholding tax liability upon vesting of restricted stock. |
19
STOCK PERFORMANCE GRAPH
The following graph compares the performance of our common stock with the performance of (i) the Nasdaq U.S. Index and (ii) a peer group selected by us. The comparison assumes $100 was invested in our common stock on December 31, 2008 and in each of the two indices at the closing price on that date, and assumes reinvestment of any dividends. We believe that the companies in the peer group are comparable to us in terms of line-of-business, market capitalization, revenue, and number of employees, and therefore, comprise an appropriate peer group for purposes of comparing stock performance. The comparisons in the graph are based on historical data and are not indicative of, nor intended to forecast, future performance of our common stock.
Company Name / Index |
Base Period 12/31/08 |
INDEXED RETURNS Years Ending |
||||||||||||||||||||||
12/31/09 | 12/31/10 | 12/31/11 | 12/31/12 | 12/31/13 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Digimarc Corporation |
100 | $ | 149.60 | $ | 299.50 | $ | 238.42 | $ | 209.80 | $ | 199.28 | |||||||||||||
Nasdaq Index |
100 | $ | 145.32 | $ | 171.50 | $ | 170.08 | $ | 199.76 | $ | 279.90 | |||||||||||||
Peer Group |
100 | $ | 155.87 | $ | 240.02 | $ | 202.87 | $ | 247.66 | $ | 371.48 |
20
Companies included in the Peer Group index of the stock performance graph are as follows(1):
8X8 INC AWARE INC BRIGHTCOVE INC CALLIDUS SOFTWARE INC CINEDIGM CORP DATAWATCH CORPORATION |
DTS INC eGain CORPORATION EVOLVING SYSTEMS INC GLU MOBILE INC GUIDANCE SOFTWARE IMMERSION CORPORATION |
ORBCOMM INC PDF SOLUTIONS INC SPARK NETWORKS INC SUPPORT.COM INC TOWERSTREAM CORPORATION ZIX CORPORATION |
(1) | The peer group does not include four companies from our 2012 peer group: Keynote Systems Inc, Pervasive Software Inc, PROS Holdings Inc. and Wave Systems Corp, each of which no longer meet the criteria to be included in our peer group. |
ITEM 6: | SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA |
The selected financial data set forth below should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and the notes to the consolidated financial statements and Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, which are included elsewhere in this report.
The following tables set forth our selected financial information as of and for each of the years in the five-year period ended December 31, 2013, which has been derived from audited financial statements as of December 31, 2013, 2012, 2011, 2010 and 2009 and years ended December 31, 2013, 2012, 2011, 2010 and 2009.
Statement of Operations Data
Year Ended December 31, |
||||||||||||||||||||
2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | ||||||||||||||||
Revenue |
$ | 34,964 | $ | 44,375 | $ | 36,039 | $ | 31,150 | $ | 19,071 | ||||||||||
Gross profit percentage |
77 | % | 85 | % | 81 | % | 78 | % | 67 | % | ||||||||||
Operating income (loss) |
$ | (2,412 | ) | $ | 14,594 | $ | 6,389 | $ | 6,151 | $ | (2,565 | ) | ||||||||
Net income (loss) |
$ | (507 | ) | $ | 8,272 | $ | 5,656 | $ | 4,174 | $ | (2,757 | ) | ||||||||
Earnings (loss) per common share: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Earnings (loss) per common sharebasic |
$ | (0.10 | ) | $ | 1.16 | $ | 0.84 | $ | 0.59 | $ | (0.39 | ) | ||||||||
Earnings (loss) per common sharediluted |
$ | (0.10 | ) | $ | 1.12 | $ | 0.76 | $ | 0.55 | $ | (0.39 | ) | ||||||||
Weighted average common shares outstandingbasic |
6,866 | 6,757 | 6,741 | 7,120 | 7,140 | |||||||||||||||
Weighted average common shares outstandingdiluted (in thousands) |
6,866 | 6,989 | 7,430 | 7,623 | 7,140 | |||||||||||||||
Cash dividends declared per common share |
$ | 0.44 | $ | 0.33 | $ | | $ | | $ | |
Balance Sheet Data
As of December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||
2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | ||||||||||||||||
Cash, cash equivalents and short-term marketable securities |
$ | 29,662 | $ | 32,269 | $ | 25,663 | $ | 34,781 | $ | 42,786 | ||||||||||
Long-term marketable securities |
$ | 5,302 | $ | 6,787 | $ | 7,715 | $ | 11,163 | $ | | ||||||||||
Total assets |
$ | 57,197 | $ | 57,331 | $ | 45,793 | $ | 55,765 | $ | 50,483 | ||||||||||
Long-term liabilities |
$ | 496 | $ | 673 | $ | 464 | $ | 525 | $ | 99 | ||||||||||
Redeemable preferred stock |
$ | 50 | $ | 50 | $ | 50 | $ | 50 | $ | 50 |
21
ITEM 7: | MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS |
The following Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations contains forward-looking statements relating to future events or the future financial performance of Digimarc, which involve risks and uncertainties. Our actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements. Please see the discussion regarding forward-looking statements included at the end of this discussion, under the caption Forward-Looking Statements and Item 1A, Risk Factors for a discussion of some of the uncertainties, risks and assumptions associated with these statements.
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and the related notes and other financial information appearing elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
All dollar amounts are in thousands except per share amounts or unless otherwise noted. Percentages within the following tables may not foot due to rounding.
Overview
Digimarc Corporation enables governments and enterprises around the world to give digital identities to media and objects that computers and digital devices can sense and recognize and to which they can react. Our technology provides the means to infuse persistent digital information, perceptible only to computers and digital devices, into all forms of media content. The unique digital identifier placed in media generally persists with it regardless of the distribution path and whether it is copied, manipulated or converted to a different format, and does not affect the quality of the content or the enjoyment or other traditional uses of it. Our technology permits computers and digital devices to quickly identify relevant data from vast amounts of media content.
Our growth strategy encompasses both our government and commercial businesses. We plan to continue investing in research and development and sales and marketing to develop and market our products including Digimarc Discover, Digimarc Barcode and Digimarc Guardian and continue to expand our intellectual property portfolio.
To protect our significant efforts in creating our technology, we have implemented an extensive intellectual property protection program that relies on a combination of patent, copyright, trademark and trade secret laws, and nondisclosure agreements and other contracts. As a result, we believe we have one of the worlds most extensive patent portfolios in the field of digital watermarking and related fields, with greater than 1,250 U.S. and foreign patents and pending patent applications as of December 31, 2013. We continue to develop and broaden our portfolio of patented technology in the fields of media identification and management technology and related applications and systems. We devote significant resources to developing and protecting our inventions and continuously seek to identify and evaluate potential licensees for our patents.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S. (U.S. GAAP) requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenue and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. On an on-going basis, we evaluate our estimates, including those related to bad debts, fixed assets, goodwill, intangible assets, income taxes, revenue recognition on long-term contracts, marketable securities, and contingencies. We base our estimates on historical experience and on other assumptions we believe to be reasonable in the circumstances. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.
Some of our accounting policies require higher degrees of judgment than others in their application. These include revenue recognition on long-term contracts, goodwill, impairment of long-lived assets, contingencies,
22
stock-based compensation and income taxes. We believe the following critical accounting policies affect our more significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements:
Revenue recognition: We derive our revenue primarily from development services, subscriptions and licensing of our patent portfolio:
| Service revenue consists primarily of software development and consulting services. The majority of service revenue arrangements are structured as time and materials consulting agreements and fixed price consulting agreements. |
| Subscription revenue includes subscriptions for products and services, is generally recurring, paid in advance and recognized over the term of the subscription. |
| License revenue, including royalty revenue, originates primarily from licensing our technology and patents where we receive royalties as an income stream. |
Revenue is recognized in accordance with Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 605 Revenue Recognition and 985 Software when the following four criteria are met:
(i) | persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, |
(ii) | delivery has occurred, |
(iii) | the fee is fixed or determinable, and |
(iv) | collection is reasonably assured. |
Some customer arrangements encompass multiple deliverables, such as patent licenses, professional services, software subscriptions, and maintenance fees. For arrangements that include multiple deliverables, we identify separate units of accounting at inception based on the consensus reached under ASC 605-25 Multiple-Element Arrangements, which provides that revenue arrangements with multiple deliverables should be divided into separate units of accounting if certain criteria are met. The consideration for the arrangement is allocated to the separate units of accounting using the relative selling price method.
The relative selling price method allocates the consideration based on our specific assumptions rather than assumptions of a marketplace participant, and any discount in the arrangement proportionally to each deliverable on the basis of each deliverables selling price.
Applicable revenue recognition criteria are considered separately for each separate unit of accounting as follows:
| Revenue from professional service arrangements is generally determined based on time and materials. Revenue for professional services is recognized as the services are performed. Billing for services rendered generally occurs within one month after the services are provided. |
| Subscription revenue, which includes subscriptions for products and services, is generally paid in advance and recognized over the term of the subscription, which is generally one month to twenty-four months. |
| License revenue is recognized when amounts owed to Digimarc have been earned, are fixed or determinable (within our normal 30 to 60 day payment terms), and collection is reasonably assured. If the payment terms extend beyond our normal 30 to 60 days, the fee may not be considered to be fixed or determinable, and the revenue would then be recognized when installments are due. |
| We record revenue from certain license agreements upon cash receipt as a result of collectability not being reasonably assured. |
| Our standard payment terms for license arrangements are 30 to 60 days. Extended payment terms increase the likelihood we will grant a customer a concession, such as reduced license payments |
23
or additional rights, rather than hold firm on minimum commitments in an agreement to the point of losing a potential advocate and licensee of patented technology in the marketplace. Extended payment terms on patent license arrangements are not considered to be fixed or determinable if payments are due beyond our standard payment terms, primarily because of the risk of substantial modification present in our patent licensing business. As such, revenue on license arrangements with extended payment terms are recognized as fees become fixed and determinable. |
Deferred revenue consists of billings in advance for professional services, licenses and subscriptions for which revenue has not been earned.
Goodwill: We account for business combinations under the acquisition method of accounting in accordance with ASC 805, Business Combinations, where the total purchase price is allocated to the tangible and identified intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their estimated fair values. The purchase price is allocated using the information currently available, and may be adjusted, up to one year from acquisition date, after obtaining more information regarding, among other things, asset valuations, liabilities assumed and revisions to preliminary estimates.
Contingent consideration is recorded at the acquisition date based upon the estimated fair value of the contingent payments. The fair value of the contingent consideration is re-measured each reporting period with any adjustments in fair value being recognized in earnings from operations.
The purchase price in excess of the fair value of the tangible and identified intangible assets acquired less liabilities assumed is recognized as goodwill.
We test goodwill for impairment annually in June and whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable. Such reviews assess the fair value of our assets compared to their carrying value. We operate as a single reporting unit. We estimate the fair value of our reporting unit using a market approach, which takes into account our market capitalization plus an estimated control premium.
Impairment of long-lived assets: We assess long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable, in accordance with the provisions of ASC 360 Property, Plant and Equipment. This statement requires that long-lived assets, including definite-lived intangible assets, be reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the assets may not be recoverable. Recoverability of assets to be held and used is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of the assets to future net undiscounted cash flows expected to be generated by the assets over their remaining useful life. If such assets are considered to be impaired, the impairment to be recognized is measured by the amount by which the carrying amount of the assets exceeds the fair value of the assets. Fair value is determined based on discounted cash flows or appraised values, depending on the nature of the assets. Assets to be disposed of are reported at the lower of the carrying amount or fair value less costs to sell.
Contingencies: We evaluate all pending or threatened contingencies or commitments, if any, that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on our operations or financial position. We assess the probability of an adverse outcome and determine if it is remote, reasonably possible or probable as defined in accordance with the provisions of ASC 450 Contingencies. If information available prior to the issuance of our financial statements indicates that it is probable that an asset has been impaired or a liability has been incurred at the date of our financial statements, and the amount of the loss, or the range of probable loss can be reasonably estimated, then the loss is accrued and charged to operations. If no accrual is made for a loss contingency because one or both of the conditions pursuant to ASC 450 are not met, but the probability of an adverse outcome is at least reasonably possible, we will disclose the nature of the contingency and provide an estimate of the possible loss or range of loss, or state that such an estimate cannot be made.
24
Stock-based compensation: We account for stock-based compensation in accordance with ASC 718 CompensationStock Compensation, which requires the measurement and recognition of compensation for all stock-based awards made to employees and directors including stock options and restricted stock based on estimated fair values.
For stock options, we use the Black-Scholes option pricing model as our method of valuation. Our determination of the fair value on the date of grant is affected by our stock price as well as assumptions regarding a number of subjective variables. These variables include, but are not limited to, the expected life of the award, our expected stock price volatility over the term of the award, the risk-free interest rate and the expected dividend yield. Although the fair value of stock-based awards is determined in accordance with ASC 718 and Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB) No. 107 Shared-Based Payment, the Black-Scholes option pricing model requires the input of subjective assumptions, and other reasonable assumptions could provide differing results.
The fair value of restricted stock awards granted is based on the fair market value of our common stock on the date of the grant (measurement date), and is recognized over the vesting period of the related restricted stock using the straight-line method.
Income taxes: We account for income taxes in accordance with ASC 740 Income Taxes utilizing the asset and liability method. Under the asset and liability method, deferred income taxes reflect the future tax consequences of differences between the tax basis of assets and liabilities and their financial reporting amounts. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period of enactment.
Valuation allowances are established when necessary to reduce deferred tax assets to the amount that is more likely than not expected to be realized. A valuation allowance is required for deferred tax assets if, based on available evidence, it is more likely than not that all or some portion of the asset will not be realized due to the inability to generate sufficient taxable income in the period and/or of the character necessary to utilize the benefit of the deferred tax asset. The more-likely-than-not criterion means the likelihood of realization is greater than 50 percent. When evaluating whether it is more likely than not that all or some portion of the deferred tax asset will not be realized, we evaluate all available evidence, both positive and negative, that may affect the realizability of deferred tax assets and that should be identified and considered in determining the appropriate amount of the valuation allowance.
We are subject to federal and state income taxes within the U.S. and in the ordinary course of business, there are transactions and calculations where the ultimate tax determination is uncertain. We are also subject to withholding taxes in various foreign jurisdictions. The withholding taxes are computed by our customers and paid to foreign jurisdictions on our behalf. We report a liability (or contra asset) for unrecognized tax benefits resulting from uncertain tax positions taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. We recognize interest and penalties, if any, related to the unrecognized tax benefits in income tax expense.
25
Results of Operationsthe Years Ended December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012
The following tables present our consolidated statements of operations data for the periods indicated.
Year Ended December 31, 2013 |
Year Ended December 31, 2012 (1) |
|||||||
Revenue: |
||||||||
Service |
$ | 11,631 | $ | 10,792 | ||||
Subscription |
5,591 | 1,481 | ||||||
License |
17,742 | 32,102 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total revenue |
34,964 | 44,375 | ||||||
Cost of revenue: |
||||||||
Service |
5,327 | 5,917 | ||||||
Subscription |
2,491 | 355 | ||||||
License |
387 | 236 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total cost of revenue |
8,205 | 6,508 | ||||||
Gross profit |
26,759 | 37,867 | ||||||
Operating expenses: |
||||||||
Sales and marketing |
6,144 | 3,827 | ||||||
Research, development and engineering |
12,274 | 8,741 | ||||||
General and administrative |
9,624 | 9,457 | ||||||
Intellectual property |
1,129 | 1,248 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total operating expenses |
29,171 | 23,273 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Operating income (loss) |
(2,412 | ) | 14,594 | |||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net loss from joint ventures |
| (1,107 | ) | |||||
Other income, net |
109 | 179 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Income (loss) before income taxes |
(2,303 | ) | 13,666 | |||||
(Provision) benefit for income taxes |
1,796 | (5,394 | ) | |||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net income (loss) |
$ | (507 | ) | $ | 8,272 | |||
|
|
|
|
(1) | Includes the results of operations of Attributor from the date of acquisition, December 3, 2012 to the end of the year. |
26
Year Ended December 31, 2013 |
Year Ended December 31, 2012 |
|||||||
Percentages are percent of revenue | ||||||||
Revenue: |
||||||||
Service |
33 | % | 24 | % | ||||
Subscription |
16 | 3 | ||||||
License |
51 | 72 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total revenue |
100 | 100 | ||||||
Cost of revenue: |
||||||||
Service |
15 | 13 | ||||||
Subscription |
7 | 1 | ||||||
License |
1 | 1 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total cost of revenue |
23 | 15 | ||||||
Gross profit |
77 | 85 | ||||||
Operating expenses: |
||||||||
Sales and marketing |
18 | 9 | ||||||
Research, development and engineering |
35 | 20 | ||||||
General and administrative |
27 | 21 | ||||||
Intellectual property |
3 | 3 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total operating expenses |
83 | 52 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Operating income (loss) |
(7 | ) | 33 | |||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net loss from joint ventures |
| (2 | ) | |||||
Other income, net |
| | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Income (loss) before income taxes |
(7 | ) | 31 | |||||
(Provision) benefit for income taxes |
5 | (12 | ) | |||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net income (loss) |
(1 | )% | 19 | % | ||||
|
|
|
|
Summary
In 2013, we increased the level of our investments in our product development and sales growth initiatives. These initiatives included developing and marketing Digimarc Discover, the Digimarc Barcode and other aspects of our Intuitive Computing Platform as well as further developing our retained patent assets. We also continued research efforts to explore strategic opportunities in the mobile payments market. These investments support our vision of enabling computers, networks and other digital devices to see, hear, understand and respond to their surroundings.
Our revenue decreased 21% to $35.0 million in 2013 from 2012 primarily as a result of the $8.0 million past due royalties payment received from Verance Corporation (Verance) in the first quarter of 2012 and the end of the quarterly license fee payments from Intellectual Ventures (IV) in the second quarter of 2013. The comparative decline was partially offset by increased subscription revenue due to a full year of Attributors operations in 2013 and higher service revenue from the Central Banks.
Total operating expense increased primarily as a result of increased compensation cost due to higher headcount as we accelerated our product development and sales growth initiatives as well as the impact of a full year of Attributors operations in 2013 and related acquisition and integration costs.
27
Revenue
Year Ended December 31, 2013 |
Year Ended December 31, 2012 |
Dollar Increase (Decrease) |
Percent Increase (Decrease) |
|||||||||||||
Revenue: |
||||||||||||||||
Service |
$ | 11,631 | $ | 10,792 | $ | 839 | 8 | % | ||||||||
Subscription |
5,591 | 1,481 | 4,110 | 278 | % | |||||||||||
License |
17,742 | 32,102 | (14,360 | ) | (45 | )% | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Total |
$ | 34,964 | $ | 44,375 | $ | (9,411 | ) | (21 | )% | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Revenue (as % of total revenue): |
||||||||||||||||
Service |
33 | % | 24 | % | ||||||||||||
Subscription |
16 | % | 3 | % | ||||||||||||
License |
51 | % | 72 | % | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Total |
100 | % | 100 | % | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
Service. Service revenue consists primarily of software development and consulting services. The majority of service revenue arrangements are structured as time and materials consulting agreements, or fixed price consulting agreements. Most of our service revenue is derived from contracts with the Central Banks, IV and government agency contractors. The agreements range from several months to several years in length, and our longer term contracts are subject to work plans that are reviewed and agreed upon at least annually. These contracts generally provide for billing hours worked at predetermined rates and, to a lesser extent, reimbursement for third party costs and services. Increases or decreases in the services provided under these contracts are generally subject to both volume and price changes. The volume of work is generally negotiated at least annually and can be modified as the customers needs change. We also have provisions in our longer term contracts that allow for specific hourly rate price increases on an annual basis to account for cost of living variables. Contracts with government agency contractors are generally shorter term in nature, less linear in billings and less predictable than our longer term contracts because the contracts with government agency contractors are subject to government budgets and funding.
The increase in service revenue was due primarily to higher billing rates under our new agreement with the Central Banks, partially offset by suspension of operations in the joint ventures in the first quarter of 2012.
Subscription. Subscription revenue includes subscriptions for products and services, is generally recurring, paid in advance and recognized over the term of the subscription.
The increase in subscription revenue was due primarily to a full year of Attributors operations in 2013.
License. License revenue originates primarily from licensing our technology and patents where we receive fixed license fees and/or royalties as our income stream. The majority of license revenue is derived from contracts with IV, Nielsen, Verance and Civolution. Revenue from our licensed products have minimal associated direct costs, and thus are highly profitable.
The decrease in license revenue was due primarily to the $8.0 million past due royalties payment received from Verance the first quarter of 2012 and the end of the quarterly license fee payments from IV in the second quarter of 2013.
28
Revenue by geography
Year Ended December 31, 2013 |
Year Ended December 31, 2012 |
Dollar Increase (Decrease) |
Percent Increase (Decrease) |
|||||||||||||
Revenue by geography: |
||||||||||||||||
Domestic |
$ | 18,857 | $ | 30,736 | $ | (11,879 | ) | (39 | )% | |||||||
International |
16,107 | 13,639 | 2,468 | 18 | % | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Total |
$ | 34,964 | $ | 44,375 | $ | (9,411 | ) | (21 | )% | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Revenue (as % of total revenue): |
||||||||||||||||
Domestic |
54 | % | 69 | % | ||||||||||||
International |
46 | % | 31 | % | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Total |
100 | % | 100 | % |
The decrease in domestic revenue was primarily the result of the $8.0 million past due royalties payment received from Verance, the end of the quarterly license fee payments from IV and the suspension of operations in the joint ventures, partially offset by a full year of Attributors operations in 2013 and an increase in government agency related work in 2013.
The increase in international revenue was due primarily to a full year of Attributors operations in 2013 and higher billing rates under our new agreement with the Central Banks.
We anticipate a decrease in revenue in 2014 compared to 2013 primarily due to the absence of quarterly license fee payments from IV that ended in the second quarter of 2013 and the quarterly license fee payments from Nielsen that will end in the first quarter of 2014; partially offset by increased revenue from our other existing customers and new customers as we continue to expand the marketing and monetization of our intellectual property portfolio and related products and services.
Cost of revenue
Service. Cost of service revenue primarily includes costs that are allocated from research, development and engineering, sales and marketing and intellectual property that relate directly to performing services under our customer contracts, and, to a lesser extent, direct costs of program delivery for both personnel and operating expenses. Allocated costs include:
| compensation, benefits, incentive compensation in the form of stock-based compensation and related costs of our software developers, quality assurance personnel, product managers, business development managers and other personnel where we bill our customers for time and materials costs; |
| payments to outside contractors that are billed to customers; |
| charges for equipment directly used by customers; |
| depreciation and other charges for machinery, equipment and software directly used by customers; |
| travel costs directly attributable to service and development contracts; and |
| charges for infrastructure and centralized costs of facilities and information technology. |
Subscription. Cost of subscription revenue primarily includes:
| compensation, benefits, incentive compensation in the form of stock-based compensation and related costs of operations personnel and the cost of contractors to provide our Digimarc Guardian subscription service; |
29
| Internet service provider connectivity charges and image search data fees to support the services offered to our subscription customers; and |
| charges for infrastructure and centralized costs of facilities and information technology. |
License. Cost of license revenue primarily includes:
| amortization of capitalized patent costs and patent maintenance fees; |
| patent or software license costs for any patents licensed from third parties where the party receives a portion of royalties or license revenue received by Digimarc; and |
| charges for infrastructure and centralized costs of facilities and information technology. |
Gross profit
Year Ended December 31, 2013 |
Year Ended December 31, 2012 |
Dollar Increase (Decrease) |
Percent Increase (Decrease) |
|||||||||||||
Gross Profit: |
||||||||||||||||
Service |
$ | 6,304 | $ | 4,875 | $ | 1,429 | 29 | % | ||||||||
Subscription |
3,100 | 1,126 | 1,974 | 175 | % | |||||||||||
License |
17,355 | 31,866 | (14,511 | ) | (46 | )% | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Total |
$ | 26,759 | $ | 37,867 | $ | (11,108 | ) | (29 | )% | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Gross Profit (as % of related revenue components): |
||||||||||||||||
Service |
54 | % | 45 | % | ||||||||||||
Subscription |
55 | % | 76 | % | ||||||||||||
License |
98 | % | 99 | % | ||||||||||||
Total |
77 | % | 85 | % |
The decrease in total gross profit was due primarily to the receipt of the $8.0 million past due royalties payment from Verance in the first quarter of 2012 and the end of the quarterly license fee payments from IV in the second quarter of 2013, partially offset by a full year of Attributors operations in 2013.
The increase in service gross profit as a percentage of service revenue resulted primarily from higher billing rates under our new agreement with the Central Banks and a favorable change in service revenue mix.
The decrease in subscription gross profit as a percentage of subscription revenue resulted primarily from the impact of a full year of Attributors operations in 2013, which has a higher cost component than other subscriptions.
The slight decrease in license gross profit as a percentage of license revenue was due primarily to lower license revenue.
Operating expenses
We allocate certain operating costs of sales and marketing, research, development and engineering and intellectual property to cost of service revenue when they relate directly to our customer contracts.
We record all remaining, or residual operating costs as sales and marketing, research, development and engineering, general and administrative, and intellectual property expenses.
We expect operating expenses for 2014 to be higher than 2013, as we continue to increase spending in research and development and sales and marketing to further our product development and sales growth initiatives.
30
Sales and marketing
Year Ended December 31, 2013 |
Year Ended December 31, 2012 |
Dollar Increase |
Percent Increase |
|||||||||||||
Sales and marketing |
$ | 6,144 | $ | 3,827 | $ | 2,317 | 61 | % | ||||||||
Sales and marketing (as % of total revenue) |
18 | % | 9 | % |
Sales and marketing expenses consist primarily of:
| compensation, benefits, incentive compensation in the form of stock-based compensation and related costs of sales and marketing employees and product managers; |
| travel and market research costs, and costs associated with marketing programs, such as trade shows, public relations and new product launches; |
| professional services and outside contractors for product and marketing initiatives; and |
| charges for infrastructure and centralized costs of facilities and information technology. |
The increase in sales and marketing expenses resulted primarily from:
| increased headcount and compensation-related expenses of $0.9 million primarily related to the operations of Attributor; |
| increased marketing and professional fees of $0.6 million related to our sales growth initiatives; and |
| amortization of acquired intangible assets of $0.5 million related to the Attributor acquisition. |
We anticipate that we will continue to incur sales and marketing costs at higher levels through 2014 to support ongoing sales and marketing growth initiatives.
Research, development and engineering
Year Ended December 31, 2013 |
Year Ended December 31, 2012 |
Dollar Increase |
Percent Increase |
|||||||||||||
Research, development and engineering |
$ | 12,274 | $ | 8,741 | $ | 3,533 | 40 | % | ||||||||
Research, development and engineering (as % of total revenue) |
35 | % | 20 | % |
Research, development and engineering expenses arise primarily from three areas that support our business model:
| Fundamental Research: |
| investigation of new watermarking algorithms to increase robustness and/or computational efficiency; |
| mobile device usage models and imaging sub-systems in camera-phones; |
| industry conference participation and authorship of papers for industry journals; |
| survey and study of human and computer interaction models with a focus on mobile devices and modeling of intent; |
| development of new intellectual property, including documentation of claims and production of supporting diagrams and materials; |
| research in fingerprinting and other content identification technologies; |
| metadata ranking algorithms for matching Internet file content against reference database; and |
| investigation of substrates, printing techniques, and printing technology relating to consumer packaged goods. |
31
| Platform Development: |
| tuning and optimization of implementation models to improve resistance to non-malicious attacks and routine transformations, such as JPEG, cropping and printing; |
| mobile platform creation to leverage device specific capabilities (e.g., instruction sets and Graphics Processing Units); |
| tuning big data analytics transformation and metrics aggregation engine; |
| tuning data-driven Internet crawling infrastructure with policy-driven feedback loop; and |
| assembly of master book publishing catalog based on aggregation and reconciliation of multiple public data sources. |
| Product Development: |
| delivering the Digimarc Barcode feature of Digimarc Discover; |
| maintaining the Online Services Portal to provide campaign management and routing services for the Digimarc Discover platform; |
| maintaining the web-hosted image watermark embedder in support of Digimarc Discover platform; |
| iterative development and release of the Digimarc Discover application for the iTunes and Android marketplaces; |
| real-time analytics portal to support anti-piracy services for the book industry; and |
| consumer book discovery application based on social network connections and shared interests. |
Research, development and engineering expenses consist primarily of:
| compensation, benefits, incentive compensation in the form of stock-based compensation expense, recruiting and related costs of software and hardware developers and quality assurance personnel; |
| payments to outside contractors; |
| the purchase of materials and services for product development; and |
| charges for infrastructure and centralized costs of facilities and information technology. |
The increase in research, development and engineering expense resulted primarily from:
| higher headcount and compensation-related expenses of $2.9 million, of which $1.4 million related to accelerating our product development initiatives and $1.5 million related to the operations of Attributor; |
| increased recruiting expenses of $0.3 million related to increased hiring in 2013; and |
| increased contract labor and professional fees of $0.3 million related to our product development initiatives. |
We anticipate that we will continue to invest in research, development and engineering expenses at higher levels through 2014 to support our ongoing research and product development initiatives.
General and administrative
Year Ended December 31, 2013 |
Year Ended December 31, 2012 |
Dollar Increase |
Percent Increase |
|||||||||||||
General and administrative |
$ | 9,624 | $ | 9,457 | $ | 167 | 2 | % | ||||||||
General and administrative (as % of total revenue) |
28 | % | 21 | % |
32
We incur general and administrative costs in the functional areas of finance, legal, human resources, executive and board of directors. Costs for facilities and information technology are also managed as part of the general and administrative processes and are allocated based on headcount to this area as well as each of the areas in costs of services, sales and marketing, research, development and engineering and intellectual property.
General and administrative expenses consist primarily of:
| compensation, benefits and incentive compensation in the form of stock-based compensation expense and related costs of general and administrative personnel; |
| third party and professional fees associated with legal, accounting, human resources and costs associated with being a public company; and |
| charges for infrastructure and centralized costs of facilities and information technology. |
The increase in general and administrative expenses resulted primarily from:
| increase expenses of $0.8 million related to a full year of Attributors operations in 2013; |
| increased accounting and tax fees of $0.2 million associated with the Attributor acquisition, partially offset by |
| decreased compensation related expenses of $0.5 million, related to the initial new hire stock based awards granted in October 2008 becoming full vested in October 2012, partially offset by the impact of new stock based awards; |
| the reversal of $0.2 million of the liability for contingent merger consideration related to the acquisition of Attributor; and |
| decreased legal fees of $0.1 million due to settlement with Verance in 2012, partially offset by legal costs associated with the licensing audit of IV in 2013. |
We anticipate that we will continue to incur general and administrative expenses at approximately existing levels through 2014 while continuing to examine means to reduce general and administrative expenses as a percentage of revenue in the longer term.
Intellectual property
Year Ended December 31, 2013 |
Year Ended December 31, 2012 |
Dollar Decrease |
Percent Decrease |
|||||||||||||
Intellectual property |
$ | 1,129 | $ | 1,248 | $ | (119 | ) | (10 | )% | |||||||
Intellectual property (as % of total revenue) |
3 | % | 3 | % |
We incur intellectual property expenses that arise primarily from costs associated with documenting, applying for, and maintaining domestic and international patents and trademarks.
Gross expenditures for intellectual property costs, before reflecting the effect of capitalized patent costs, primarily consist of:
| compensation, benefits and incentive compensation in the form of stock-based compensation expense and related costs of attorneys and legal assistants; |
| third party costs, including filing and governmental regulatory fees and fees for outside legal counsel and translation costs, each incurred in the patent process; and |
| charges for infrastructure and centralized costs of facilities and information technology. |
33
Intellectual property expenses can vary from period to period based on:
| the level of capitalized patent activity, and |
| prosecution costs and direct labor hours (compensation, benefits and incentive compensation) related to the patents that were exclusively licensed to IV that are allocated to cost of revenue. |
Intellectual property expenses remained relatively consistent.
We anticipate through 2014 that we will incur intellectual property expenses at existing levels.
Stock-based compensation
Year Ended December 31, 2013 |
Year Ended December 31, 2012 |
Dollar Increase (Decrease) |
Percent Increase (Decrease) |
|||||||||||||
Cost of revenue |
$ | 533 | $ | 603 | $ | (70 | ) | (12 | )% | |||||||
Sales and marketing |
422 | 409 | 13 | 3 | % | |||||||||||
Research, development and engineering |
1,116 | 840 | 276 | 33 | % | |||||||||||
General and administrative |
2,183 | 3,148 | (965 | ) | (30 | )% | ||||||||||
Intellectual property |
248 | 256 | (8 | ) | (3 | )% | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Total |
$ | 4,502 | $ | 5,256 | $ | (754 | ) | (14 | )% | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
The net decrease in stock-based compensation expense was primarily related to the initial new hire stock based awards granted in October 2008 that became fully vested in October 2012, partially offset by the impact of new stock based awards. We anticipate incurring an additional $9,711 stock-based compensation expense through December 2017 for awards outstanding as of December 31, 2013.
Net loss from joint ventures
Year Ended December 31, 2013 |
Year Ended December 31, 2012 |
Dollar Decrease |
Percent Decrease |
|||||||||||||
Net loss from joint ventures |
$ | | $ | (1,107 | ) | $ | 1,107 | 0 | % | |||||||
Net loss from joint ventures (as % of total revenue) |
| (2 | )% |
There was no activity from the joint ventures due to the suspension of operations of both joint ventures in March 2012.
Other income, net
Year Ended December 31, 2013 |
Year Ended December 31, 2012 |
Dollar Decrease |
Percent Decrease |
|||||||||||||
Other income, net |
$ | 109 | $ | 179 | $ | (70 | ) | (39 | )% | |||||||
Other income, net (as % of total revenue) |
* | * |
* | Less than 1% |
The decrease in other income, net was primarily due to lower interest income resulting from a combination of lower cash and investment balances and interest rates on cash and investments, and gains and losses on foreign currency.
34
Provision (benefit) for income taxes
The provision (benefit) for income taxes reflects current tax, deferred tax and withholding tax in certain foreign jurisdictions.
For the year ended December 31, 2013, we recognized an income tax benefit of $1.8 million on a pretax loss of $2.3 million, resulting in an effective tax rate of 78%. The effective tax rate was higher than our statutory tax rate of 39% due to the realization of federal research and experimentation credits for the tax years 2012 and 2013.
For the year ended December 31, 2012, we recognized an income tax provision of $5.4 million on pretax income of $13.7 million, resulting in an effective tax rate of 39%. The effective tax rate equaled our statutory tax rate of 39% as no federal research and experimentation credit was realized in 2012 as the credit had not been extended.
Results of Operationsthe Years Ended December 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011
The following tables present our consolidated statements of operations data for the periods indicated.
Year Ended December 31, 2012 (1) |
Year Ended December 31, 2011 |
|||||||
Revenue: |
||||||||
Service |
$ | 10,792 | $ | 12,395 | ||||
Subscription |
1,481 | 1,378 | ||||||
License |
32,102 | 22,266 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total revenue |
44,375 | 36,039 | ||||||
Cost of revenue: |
||||||||
Service |
5,917 | 6,638 | ||||||
Subscription |
355 | 177 | ||||||
License |
236 | 122 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total cost of revenue |
6,508 | 6,937 | ||||||
Gross profit |
37,867 | 29,102 | ||||||
Operating expenses: |
||||||||
Sales and marketing |
3,827 | 4,336 | ||||||
Research, development and engineering |
8,741 | 7,327 | ||||||
General and administrative |
9,457 | 9,956 | ||||||
Intellectual property |
1,248 | 1,094 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total operating expenses |
23,273 | 22,713 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Operating income |
14,594 | 6,389 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net loss from joint ventures |
(1,107 | ) | (2,714 | ) | ||||
Other income, net |
179 | 195 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Income before income taxes |
13,666 | 3,870 | ||||||
(Provision) benefit for income taxes |
(5,394 | ) | 1,786 | |||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net income |
$ | 8,272 | $ | 5,656 | ||||
|
|
|
|
(1) | Includes the results of operations of Attributor from the date of acquisition, December 3, 2012 to the end of the year. |
35
Year Ended December 31, 2012 |
Year Ended December 31, 2011 |
|||||||
Percentages are percent of revenue | ||||||||
Revenue: |
||||||||
Service |
24 | % | 34 | % | ||||
Subscription |
3 | 4 | ||||||
License |
72 | 62 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total revenue |
100 | 100 | ||||||
Cost of revenue: |
||||||||
Service |
13 | 18 | ||||||
Subscription |
1 | | ||||||
License |
1 | | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total cost of revenue |
14 | 19 | ||||||
Gross profit |
85 | 81 | ||||||
Operating expenses: |
||||||||
Sales and marketing |
9 | 12 | ||||||
Research, development and engineering |
20 | 20 | ||||||
General and administrative |
21 | 28 | ||||||
Intellectual property |
3 | 3 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total operating expenses |
52 | 63 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Operating income |
33 | 18 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net loss from joint ventures |
(2 | ) | (8 | ) | ||||
Other income, net |
| 1 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Income before income taxes |
31 | 11 | ||||||
(Provision) benefit for income taxes |
(12 | ) | 5 | |||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net income |
19 | % | 16 | % | ||||
|
|
|
|
Summary
Our revenue increased in 2012 from 2011 primarily as a result of the $8.0 million past due royalties payment from Verance received in the first quarter of 2012 in connection with the resolution of our litigation with Verance and increased license payments from IV and Verance, offset by lower revenue from the joint ventures with Nielsen due to the suspension of their operations in the first quarter of 2012.
Total operating expense increased slightly primarily as a result of increased investment in research and development and increased stock-based compensation, due to higher headcount and an additional layer of stock-based awards, partially offset by lower legal costs associated with the settlement of the Verance litigation in January 2012. In 2012, we continued to invest in the marketing and enhancing of Digimarc Discover.
36
Revenue
Year Ended December 31, 2012 |
Year Ended December 31, 2011 |
Dollar Increase (Decrease) |
Percent Increase (Decrease) |
|||||||||||||
Revenue: |
||||||||||||||||
Service |
$ | 10,792 | $ | 12,395 | $ | (1,603 | ) | (13 | )% | |||||||
Subscription |
1,481 | 1,378 | 103 | 7 | % | |||||||||||
License |
32,102 | 22,266 | 9,836 | 44 | % | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Total |
$ | 44,375 | $ | 36,039 | $ | 8,336 | 23 | % | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Revenue (as % of total revenue): |
||||||||||||||||
Service |
24 | % | 34 | % | ||||||||||||
Subscription |
3 | % | 4 | % | ||||||||||||
License |
72 | % | 62 | % | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Total |
100 | % | 100 | % | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
The decrease in service revenue was due primarily to lower activity in the joint ventures, due to the suspension of operations, offset by increased program work from the Central Banks.
The increase in subscription revenue was due primarily to the inclusion of Attributors operations.
The increase in license revenue was due primarily to the $8.0 million past due royalties payment from Verance received in the first quarter of 2012 in connection with the resolution of our litigation with Verance and increased license payments from IV and Verance.
Revenue by geography
Year Ended December 31, 2012 |
Year Ended December 31, 2011 |
Dollar Increase |
Percent Increase |
|||||||||||||
Revenue by geography: |
||||||||||||||||
Domestic |
$ | 30,736 | $ | 22,660 | $ | 8,076 | 36 | % | ||||||||
International |
13,639 | 13,379 | 260 | 2 | % | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Total |
$ | 44,375 | $ | 36,039 | $ | 8,336 | 23 | % | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Revenue (as % of total revenue): |
||||||||||||||||
Domestic |
69 | % | 63 | % | ||||||||||||
International |
31 | % | 37 | % | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Total |
100 | % | 100 | % |
Domestic revenue increased primarily as a result higher license and royalty payments from Verance and IV, partially offset by lower activity in the joint ventures.
International revenue increased primarily due to increased program work from the Central Banks.
37
Gross profit
Year Ended December 31, 2012 |
Year Ended December 31, 2011 |
Dollar Increase (Decrease) |
Percent Increase (Decrease) |
|||||||||||||
Gross Profit: |
||||||||||||||||
Service |
$ | 4,875 | $ | 5,757 | $ | (882 | ) | (15 | )% | |||||||
Subscription |
1,126 | 1,201 | (75 | ) | (6 | )% | ||||||||||
License |
31,866 | 22,144 | 9,722 | 44 | % | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Total |
$ | 37,867 | $ | 29,102 | $ | 8,765 | 30 | % | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Gross Profit (as % of related revenue components): |
||||||||||||||||
Service |
45 | % | 46 | % | ||||||||||||
Subscription |
76 | % | 87 | % | ||||||||||||
License |
99 | % | 99 | % | ||||||||||||
Total |
85 | % | 81 | % |
The decrease in service gross profit was due primarily to lower activity in the joint ventures.
The decrease in subscription gross profit resulted primarily from the impact of Attributors operations, which has a higher cost component than other subscriptions.
The increases in license gross profit was due primarily to the payments from IV and Verance.
The increase in total gross profit as a percentage of revenue was due primarily to changes in revenue mix with higher license revenue, which carries a higher margin than service revenue, as a percent of total revenue. The slight decrease in service gross profit as a percentage of revenue resulted from changes in services cost mix. The slight decrease in subscription gross profit as a percentage of revenue resulted from lower subscription margins from our Guardian product.
Operating expenses
Sales and marketing
Year Ended December 31, 2012 |
Year Ended December 31, 2011 |
Dollar Decrease |
Percent Decrease |
|||||||||||||
Sales and marketing |
$ | 3,827 | $ | 4,336 | $ | (509 | ) | (12 | )% | |||||||
Sales and marketing (as % of total revenue) |
9 | % | 12 | % |
The decrease in sales and marketing expenses resulted primarily from:
| decreased marketing and professional fees of $0.6 million related to the introduction of our Digimarc Discover Platform in 2011; partially offset by |
| increased compensation-related expenses of $0.1 million related to an additional layer of stock-based awards. |
Research, development and engineering
Year Ended December 31, 2012 |
Year Ended December 31, 2011 |
Dollar Increase |
Percent Increase |
|||||||||||||
Research, development and engineering |
$ | 8,741 | $ | 7,327 | $ | 1,414 | 19 | % | ||||||||
Research, development and engineering (as % of total revenue) |
20 | % | 20 | % |
38
The increase in research, development and engineering expense resulted primarily from:
| increased compensation-related expenses of $1.7 million from hiring engineers and scientists in second half of 2011 to facilitate growth in our product and service offerings, and an additional layer of stock-based awards; offset partially by |
| decreased recruiting expenses of $0.2 million due to lower hiring in 2012; and |
| decreased professional fees of $0.1 million due to increased use of internal resources. |
General and administrative
Year Ended December 31, 2012 |
Year Ended December 31, 2011 |
Dollar Decrease |
Percent Decrease |
|||||||||||||
General and administrative |
$ | 9,457 | $ | 9,956 | $ | (499 | ) | (5 | )% | |||||||
General and administrative (as % of total revenue) |
21 | % | 28 | % |
The decrease in general and administrative expenses resulted primarily from:
| decreased legal fees of $1.0 million related to the litigation matter with Verance; and |
| decreased accounting fees of $0.2 million related to the transition to our new auditors; partially offset by |
| increased compensation-related expenses of $0.6 million related to an additional layer of stock-based awards, and |
| increased fees of $0.3 million related to licensee audits. |
Intellectual property
Year Ended December 31, 2012 |
Year Ended December 31, 2011 |
Dollar Increase |
Percent Increase |
|||||||||||||
Intellectual property |
$ | 1,248 | $ | 1,094 | $ | 154 | 14 | % | ||||||||
Intellectual property (as % of total revenue) |
3 | % | 3 | % |
The increases in intellectual property expenses primarily resulted from increased compensation-related expenses related to an additional layer of stock-based awards.
Stock-based compensation
Year Ended December 31, 2012 |
Year Ended December 31, 2011 |
Dollar Increase |
Percent Increase |
|||||||||||||
Cost of revenue |
$ | 603 | $ | 593 | $ | 10 | 2 | % | ||||||||
Sales and marketing |
409 | 302 | 107 | 35 | % | |||||||||||
Research, development and engineering |
840 | 560 | 280 | 50 | % | |||||||||||
General and administrative |
3,148 | 2,568 | 580 | 23 | % | |||||||||||
Intellectual property |
256 | 193 | 63 | 33 | % | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Total |
$ | 5,256 | $ | 4,216 | $ | 1,040 | 25 | % | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
The increases in stock-based compensation expense were primarily due to an additional layer of stock-based awards.
39
Net loss from joint ventures
Year Ended December 31, 2012 |
Year Ended December 31, 2011 |
Dollar Decrease |
Percent Decrease |
|||||||||||||
Net loss from joint ventures |
$ | (1,107 | ) | $ | (2,714 | ) | $ | 1,607 | 59 | % | ||||||
Net loss from joint ventures (as % of total revenue) |
(2 | )% | (8 | )% |
The decreases in the net loss from joint ventures resulted primarily due to the suspension of operations of both joint ventures in March 2012. In connection with this suspension of operations, the joint ventures accrued estimated expenses for the first quarters operations and severance costs for joint venture employees. Digimarcs share of the one-time severance and suspension costs was approximately $500. Pursuant to the plan of suspending operations of the joint ventures with Nielsen, in April 2012 we received $104 of remaining cash from TVaura LLC and contributed $796 to TVaura Mobile LLC to fund both the first quarters operating expenses as well as the suspension related costs. Payment of all expenses incurred after the suspension of operations of each joint venture is the responsibility of the majority member.
Other income, net
Year Ended December 31, 2012 |
Year Ended December 31, 2011 |
Dollar Decrease |
Percent Decrease |
|||||||||||||
Other income, net |
$ | 179 | $ | 195 | $ | (16 | ) | (8 | )% | |||||||
Other income, net (as % of total revenue) |
* | * |
* | Less than 1% |
The decrease in other income, net was primarily due to lower interest rates on cash and investments.
Provision (benefit) for income taxes
For the year ended December 31, 2012, we recognized an income tax provision of $5.4 million on pretax income of $13.7 million, resulting in an effective tax rate of 39%. The effective tax rate equaled our statutory tax rate of 39% as no federal research and experimentation credit was realized in 2012 as the credit had not been extended.
For the year ended December 31, 2011, we recognized an income tax benefit of $1.8 million on pretax income of $3.9 million. The income tax benefit resulted from the release of $2.6 million of valuation allowance on deferred tax assets and realization of the federal research and experimentation credit for the 2011 tax year. Management concluded, based on an analysis of all the facts, including projections of future income, that it was more likely than not that all of our deferred tax assets would be realized.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
December 31, 2013 |
December 31, 2012 |
|||||||
Working capital |
$ | 31,380 | $ | 33,846 | ||||
Current (liquidity) ratio (1) |
6.4:1 | 10.3:1 | ||||||
Cash, cash equivalents and short-term marketable securities |
$ | 29,662 | $ | 32,269 | ||||
Long-term marketable securities |
$ | 5,302 | $ | 6,787 | ||||
Total cash, cash equivalents and all marketable securities |
$ | 34,964 | $ | 39,056 |
(1) | The current (liquidity) ratio is calculated by dividing total current assets by total current liabilities. |
40
The $4.1 million decrease in cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities at December 31, 2013 from December 31, 2012 resulted primarily from:
| investments in our business for both capital and intellectual property initiatives; |
| payment of dividends; |
| purchases of common stock related to the exercise of stock options and vesting of restricted stock; partially offset by |
| cash flows provided by operating activities. |
Financial instruments that potentially subject us to concentrations of credit risk consist primarily of cash and cash equivalents, marketable securities, and accounts receivable. We place our cash and cash equivalents with major banks and financial institutions and at times deposits may exceed insured limits. Both short- and long-term marketable securities include pre-refunded municipal bonds, company notes, commercial paper and U.S. federal agency notes. Our investment policy requires the portfolio to be invested to ensure that the greater of $3 million or 7% of the invested funds will be available within 30 days notice.
Other than cash used for operating needs, which may include short-term marketable securities with our principal banks, our investment policy limits our credit exposure to any one financial institution or type of financial instrument by limiting the maximum of 5% of our cash equivalents and marketable securities or $1 million, whichever is greater, to be invested in any one issuer except for the U.S. government, U. S. federal agencies and U.S. backed securities, which have no limits, at the time of purchase. Our investment policy also limits our credit exposure by limiting to a maximum of 40% of our cash equivalents and marketable securities, or $15 million, whichever is greater, to be invested in any one industry category (e.g., financial or energy industries) at the time of purchase. As a result, we believe our credit risk associated with cash and investments to be minimal. A decline in the market value of any security below cost that is deemed to be other-than-temporary results in a reduction in carrying amount to fair value. To determine whether an impairment is other-than-temporary, we consider whether we have the ability and intent to hold the investment until a market price recovery and evidence indicating that the cost of the investment is recoverable outweighs evidence to the contrary. There have been no other-than-temporary impairments identified or recorded by us.
Cash flows from operating activities
The components of operating cash flows were:
Year Ended December 31, 2013 |
Year Ended December 31, 2012 |
Dollar Increase (Decrease) |
Percent Increase (Decrease) |
|||||||||||||
Net income (loss) |
$ | (507 | ) | $ | 8,272 | $ | (8,779 | ) | (106 | )% | ||||||
Non-cash items |
4,575 | 7,708 | (3,133 | ) | (41 | )% | ||||||||||
Changes in operating assets and liabilities |
(595 | ) | (379 | ) | (216 | ) | 57 | % | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
$ | 3,473 | $ | 15,601 | $ | (12,128 | ) | (78 | )% | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2012 |
Year Ended December 31, 2011 |
Dollar Increase (Decrease) |
Percent Increase (Decrease) |
|||||||||||||
Net income |
$ | 8,272 | $ | 5,656 | $ | 2,616 | 46 | % | ||||||||
Non-cash items |
7,708 | 4,851 | 2,857 | 59 | % | |||||||||||
Changes in operating assets and liabilities |
(379 | ) | (254 | ) | (125 | ) | 49 | % | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
$ | 15,601 | $ | 10,253 | $ | 5,348 | 52 | % | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows provided by operating activities in 2013 compared to 2012 decreased by $12.1 million primarily as the result of a net loss in 2013 compared to net income in 2012, adjusting for non-cash items.
41
Cash flows provided by operating activities in 2012 compared to 2011 increased by $5.4 million primarily as the result of higher net income and non-cash items. The increase in non-cash items was primarily the result of higher stock compensation expense due to an additional layer of stock-based awards, partially offset by the change in deferred tax assets primarily from the reversal of the valuation allowance in 2011.
Cash flows from investing activities
Cash flows used in investing activities in 2013 compared to 2012 decreased by $8.0 million from $9.7 million to $1.7 million. The decrease was primarily the result of the acquisition of Attributor in December 2012 and net maturities of marketable securities in 2013 compared to net purchases in 2012. Additionally, pursuant to the plan for suspending operations of the joint ventures with Nielsen, in April 2012 we received $104 of remaining cash from TVaura LLC and contributed $796 to TVaura Mobile LLC to fund both the first quarters operating expenses as well as the suspension-related costs.
Cash flows from investing activities in 2012 compared to 2011 decreased by $15.9 million from $6.1 million of cash provided to $9.8 million of cash used. The decrease was primarily the result of net purchases of marketable securities in 2012 compared to net maturities in 2011 and our acquisition of Attributor.
Cash flows from financing activities
Cash flows used in financing activities in 2013 compared to 2012 increased $2.4 million from $2.4 million to $4.8 million. The increase was primarily the result of lower excess tax benefits generated on stock-based awards and higher cash dividends paid, partially offset by fewer purchases of common stock.
Cash flows used in financing activities in 2012 compared to 2011 decreased $16.9 million from $19.3 million to $2.4 million. The decrease was the result of fewer purchases of common stock by us primarily from the privately negotiated repurchase of our common stock from Philips in 2011 and higher excess tax benefits generated on stock-based awards, partially offset by cash dividends paid.
Future cash expectations
In connection with our patent license agreement with IV, the quarterly license fee payments by IV ended in the second quarter of 2013. We are not able to estimate the future cash flow impact of any profit sharing we may earn from IV.
Our Board of Directors has approved a stock repurchase program of which we had $3,998 available as of December 31, 2013. Shares of our common stock may be purchased in the open market or through privately negotiated transactions, subject to market conditions. This repurchase program does not obligate us to acquire any specific number of shares or to acquire shares over any specified period of time.
On February 20, 2014, the Board of Directors declared a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share, payable on March 10, 2014 to shareholders of record on March 3, 2014. The aggregate amount of the quarterly dividend payment is expected to be approximately $814.
We believe that our current cash, cash equivalents, and short-term marketable securities balances will satisfy our projected working capital and capital expenditure requirements for at least the next 12 months. Thereafter, we anticipate continuing to use cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities balances to satisfy our projected working capital and capital expenditure requirements.
We may use cash resources to fund acquisitions or investments in complementary businesses, technologies or product lines. In order to take advantage of opportunities, we may find it necessary to obtain additional equity financing, debt financing, or credit facilities. We do not believe at this time, however, that our long-term working
42
capital and capital expenditures would require us to take steps to remedy any such potential deficiencies. If it were necessary to obtain additional financing or credit facilities, we may not be able to do so, or if these funds are available, they may not be available on satisfactory terms.
Contractual Obligations
The following table presents our contractual obligations as of December 31, 2013:
Payment Due by Period | ||||||||||||||||||||
Total | Less than 1 year |
1-3 years | 3-5 years | More than 5 years |
||||||||||||||||
Total operating lease obligations |
$ | 2,997 | $ | 1,074 | $ | 1,920 | $ | 3 | $ | | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In June 2013, we entered into a new facilities lease agreement for Attributor in San Mateo, California. The lease term runs through November 2016 and total rent payments are $0.5 million.
We cannot make a reasonably reliable estimate of the period of potential cash settlement of our unrecognized tax benefits of $0.2 million and, therefore have not included the unrecognized tax benefits in the table of contractual obligations as of December 31, 2013.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
Other than the contractual obligations noted above, we do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenue or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources that is material to investors.
Forward-Looking Statements
This Annual Report on Form 10-K includes forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933. Words such as may, plan, should, could, expect, anticipate, intend, believe, project, forecast, estimate, continue, variations of such terms or similar expressions are intended to identify such forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These forward-looking statements, or other statements made by us, are made based on our expectations and beliefs concerning future events impacting us, and are subject to uncertainties and factors (including those specified below), which are difficult to predict and, in many instances, are beyond our control. As a result, our actual results could differ materially from those expressed in or implied by any such forward-looking statements, and investors are cautioned not to place undue reliance on such statements. We believe that the following factors, among others (including those described in Item 1A. Risk Factors), could affect our future performance and the liquidity and value of our securities and cause our actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied by forward-looking statements made by us:
| concentration of revenue with few customers comprising a large majority of the revenue; |
| revenue trends and expectations; |
| our future level of investment in our business, including investment in research, development and engineering of products and technology, development of our intellectual property, the acquisition of new customers and development of new market opportunities; |
| our ability to improve margins; |
| anticipated expenses, costs, margins, provision for income taxes and investment activities in the foreseeable future; |
43
| anticipated revenue to be generated from current contracts and as a result of new programs; |
| variability of contracted arrangements; |
| our profitability in future periods; |
| business opportunities that could require that we seek additional financing; |
| the size and growth of our markets; |
| the existence of international growth opportunities and our future investment in such opportunities; |
| the source of our future revenue; |
| our expected short-term and long-term liquidity positions; |
| our capital expenditure and working capital requirements and our ability to fund our capital expenditure and working capital needs through cash flow from operations; |
| capital market conditions, including the recent economic crisis, interest rate volatility and other limitations on the availability of capital, which could have an impact on our cost of capital and our ability to access the capital markets; |
| our use of cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities in upcoming quarters; |
| anticipated levels of backlog in future periods; |
| the success of our arrangements with Intellectual Ventures; |
| the success of our acquisition of Attributor Corporation; |
| protection, development and monetization of our intellectual property portfolio; and |
| other risks detailed in our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including the risk factors set forth in Item 1A. Risk Factors. |
We believe that the factors specified above and the risk factors contained in Item 1A, among others, could affect our future performance and the liquidity and value of our securities and cause our actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied by forward-looking statements made by us or on our behalf. Investors should understand that it is not possible to predict or identify all risk factors and that there may be other factors that may cause our actual results to differ materially from the forward-looking statements. All forward-looking statements made by us or by persons acting on our behalf apply only as of the date of this Annual Report. We do not undertake any obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements to reflect future events, information or circumstances that arise after the date of the filing of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
ITEM 7A: | QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK |
Our exposure to market risk for changes in interest rates relates primarily to the increase or decrease in the amount of interest income we can earn on our investment portfolio. We do not use derivative financial instruments in our investment portfolio. We attempt to ensure the safety and preservation of our invested principal funds by limiting default risk, market risk and investment risk. We mitigate default risk by investing in low-risk securities. At December 31, 2013, we had an investment portfolio of money market securities, commercial securities and U.S. government securities, including those classified as cash equivalents, and short- and long-term marketable securities, totaling $33.6 million. The original maturities of our investment portfolio range from 43 to 1,000 plus days with an average interest rate of 0.44%. If market interest rates were to decrease immediately and uniformly by 10% from levels as of December 31, 2013, the decline of the fair market value of the fixed income portfolio would not be material.
44
ITEM 8: | FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA |
Our Consolidated Financial Statements and the accompanying Notes that are filed as part of this Annual Report are listed under Part III, Item 15, Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules and are set forth beginning on page F-1 immediately following the signature page of this Form 10-K.
ITEM 9: | CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE |
None
ITEM 9A: | CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES |
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Our management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, have carried out an evaluation of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) as of the end of the period covered by this Form 10-K.
Based on our evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this Form 10-K, were effective in ensuring that information required to be disclosed by us in reports that we file or submit under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is (i) recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SECs rules and forms, and (ii) accumulated and communicated to our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
Managements Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Our internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with U.S. GAAP.
Any control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, and because of inherent limitations, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Management is committed to continue monitoring our internal controls over financial reporting and will modify or implement additional controls and procedures that may be required to ensure the ongoing integrity of our consolidated financial statements.
With the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, management conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting based on the framework established in Internal ControlIntegrated Framework (1992) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission, (COSO). Based on this evaluation, management has concluded that internal control over financial reporting was effective as of the end of the period covered by this Form 10-K based on those criteria.
There was no change in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the quarter ended December 31, 2013 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
Our independent auditors have issued an audit report on the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2013, which is included herein.
45
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Board of Directors and Shareholders
Digimarc Corporation:
We have audited Digimarc Corporations (the Company) internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2013, based on criteria established in Internal ControlIntegrated Framework (1992) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Companys management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Managements Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Companys internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audit also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
A companys internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A companys internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the companys assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
In our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2013, based on criteria established in Internal ControlIntegrated Framework (1992) issued by COSO.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets of Digimarc Corporation and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2013 and 2012, and the related consolidated statements of operations, shareholders equity, and cash flows for the three years ended December 31, 2013, and our report dated February 21, 2014 expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements.
/s/ KPMG LLP
Portland, Oregon
February 21, 2014
46
ITEM 9B: | OTHER INFORMATION |
None
47
PART III
Certain information required by Part III of this Annual Report on Form 10-K is incorporated herein by reference to the Proxy Statement for our 2014 annual meeting of shareholders, which we intend to file no later than 120 days after the end of the fiscal year covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
ITEM 10: | DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE |
Code of Ethics
We have adopted a Code of Business Conduct that applies to our principal executive officer, principal financial officer and controller, as well as a Code of Ethics for Financial Professionals that applies to our principal financial officer and controller. We have made these codes available in the Corporate Governance section of our website at www.digimarc.com/company/corporate-governance. If we waive, or implicitly waive, any material provision of the codes, or substantively amend the codes, we will disclose that fact on our website within four business days.
The other information required by this item is incorporated herein by reference to the information in the Proxy Statement, which we intend to file with the SEC no later than 120 days after the end of the fiscal year covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K under the captions Election of Directors, Management, Report of the Governance Committee of the Board of DirectorsAudit Committee, and Other MattersSection 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance.
ITEM 11: | EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION |
The information required by this item is incorporated herein by reference to the information in the Proxy Statement, which we intend to file with the SEC no later than 120 days after the end of the fiscal year covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K, under the captions Director Compensation, Executive Compensation, Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation and Compensation Committee Report.
ITEM 12: | SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS |
The information required by this item is incorporated herein by reference to the information in the Proxy Statement, which we intend to file with the SEC no later than 120 days after the end of the fiscal year covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K, under the captions Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Equity Compensation Plan Information.
ITEM 13: | CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE |
The information required by this item is incorporated herein by reference to the information in the Proxy Statement, which we intend to file with the SEC no later than 120 days after the end of the fiscal year covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K under the caption Election of DirectorsDetermination of Independence, and Related Person Transactions.
ITEM 14: | PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES |
The information required by this item is incorporated herein by reference to the information in the Proxy Statement, which we intend to file with the SEC no later than 120 days after the end of the fiscal year covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K, under the caption Audit Fees.
48
ITEM 15: | EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES |
(a)(1) Financial Statements
The following documents are filed as part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K:
(i) | Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm |
(ii) | Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2013 and 2012 |
(iii) | Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011 |
(iv) | Consolidated Statements of Shareholders Equity for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011 |
(v) | Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011 |
(vi) | Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements |
(a)(2) Financial Statement Schedules
All schedules have been omitted since they are not required or are not applicable or the required information is shown in the consolidated financial statements or related notes.
(a)(3) Exhibits
See the Exhibit Index at page E-1 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
49
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
DIGIMARC CORPORATION | ||||||
Date: February 21, 2014 | By: | /S/ CHARLES BECK | ||||
Charles Beck Title: Chief Financial Officer |
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated:
Signature |
Title |
Date | ||
/S/ BRUCE DAVIS Bruce Davis |
Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors (Principal Executive Officer) |
February 21, 2014 | ||
/S/ CHARLES BECK Charles Beck |
Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |
February 21, 2014 | ||
/S/ PETER W. SMITH Peter W. Smith |
Director |
February 21, 2014 | ||
/S/ JAMES T. RICHARDSON James T. Richardson |
Director |
February 21, 2014 | ||
/S/ WILLIAM J. MILLER William J. Miller |
Director |
February 21, 2014 | ||
/S/ BERNARD WHITNEY Bernard Whitney |
Director |
February 21, 2014 |
50
DIGIMARC CORPORATION INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Page | ||||
F-2 | ||||
F-3 | ||||
F-4 | ||||
F-5 | ||||
F-6 | ||||
F-7 |
F-1
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Board of Directors and Shareholders
Digimarc Corporation:
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Digimarc Corporation and subsidiaries (the Company) as of December 31, 2013 and 2012 and the related consolidated statements of operations, shareholders equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2013. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Companys management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Digimarc Corporation and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2013 and 2012, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2013, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the Companys internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2013, based on criteria established in Internal ControlIntegrated Framework (1992) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) and our report dated February 21, 2014 expressed an unqualified opinion on the effectiveness of the Companys internal control over financial reporting.
/s/ KPMG LLP
Portland, Oregon
February 21, 2014
F-2
DIGIMARC CORPORATION
(In thousands, except share and per share data)
December 31, 2013 |
December 31, 2012 |
|||||||
ASSETS | ||||||||
Current assets: |
||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 3,811 | $ | 6,866 | ||||
Marketable securities |
25,851 | 25,403 | ||||||
Trade accounts receivable, net |
5,838 | 4,216 | ||||||
Other current assets |
1,658 | 1,016 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total current assets |
37,158 | 37,501 | ||||||
Marketable securities |
5,302 | 6,787 | ||||||
Property and equipment, net |
2,395 | 1,453 | ||||||
Intangibles, net |
6,709 | 6,721 | ||||||
Goodwill |
1,114 | 1,114 | ||||||
Deferred tax assets, net |
3,949 | 3,589 | ||||||
Other assets |
570 | 166 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total assets |
$ | 57,197 | $ | 57,331 | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY | ||||||||
Current liabilities: |
||||||||
Accounts payable and other accrued liabilities |
$ | 1,560 | $ | 1,143 | ||||
Deferred revenue |
4,218 | 2,512 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total current liabilities |
5,778 | 3,655 | ||||||
Deferred rent and other long-term liabilities |
496 | 673 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total liabilities |
6,274 | 4,328 | ||||||
Commitments and contingencies (Note 15) |
||||||||
Shareholders equity: |
||||||||
Preferred stock (par value $0.001 per share, 2,500,000 authorized, 10,000 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2013 and 2012) |
50 | 50 | ||||||
Common stock (par value $0.001 per share, 50,000,000 authorized, 7,401,072 and 7,168,359 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively) |
7 | 7 | ||||||
Additional paid-in capital |
41,498 | 39,869 | ||||||
Retained earnings |
9,368 | 13,077 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total shareholders equity |
50,923 | 53,003 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total liabilities and shareholders equity |
$ | 57,197 | $ | 57,331 | ||||
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
F-3
DIGIMARC CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(In thousands, except per share data)
Year Ended December 31, 2013 |
Year Ended December 31, 2012 |
Year Ended December 31, 2011 |
||||||||||
Revenue: |
||||||||||||
Service |
$ | 11,631 | $ | 10,792 | $ | 12,395 | ||||||
Subscription |
5,591 | 1,481 | 1,378 | |||||||||
License |
17,742 | 32,102 | 22,266 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Total revenue |
34,964 | 44,375 | 36,039 | |||||||||
Cost of revenue: |
||||||||||||
Service |
5,327 | 5,917 | 6,638 | |||||||||
Subscription |
2,491 | 355 | 177 | |||||||||
License |
387 | 236 | 122 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Total cost of revenue |
8,205 | 6,508 | 6,937 | |||||||||
Gross profit |
26,759 | 37,867 | 29,102 | |||||||||
Operating expenses: |
||||||||||||
Sales and marketing |
6,144 | 3,827 | 4,336 | |||||||||
Research, development and engineering |
12,274 | 8,741 | 7,327 | |||||||||
General and administrative |
9,624 | 9,457 | 9,956 | |||||||||
Intellectual property |
1,129 | 1,248 | 1,094 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Total operating expenses |
29,171 | 23,273 | 22,713 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Operating income (loss) |
(2,412 | ) | 14,594 | 6,389 | ||||||||
Net loss from joint ventures |
| (1,107 | ) | (2,714 | ) | |||||||
Other income, net |
109 | 179 | 195 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Income (loss) before income taxes |
(2,303 | ) | 13,666 | 3,870 | ||||||||
(Provision) benefit for income taxes |
1,796 | (5,394 | ) | 1,786 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Net income (loss) |
$ | (507 | ) | $ | 8,272 | $ | 5,656 | |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Earnings (loss) per common share: |
||||||||||||
Earnings (loss) per common sharebasic |
$ | (0.10 | ) | $ | 1.16 | $ | 0.84 | |||||
Earnings (loss) per common sharediluted |
$ | (0.10 | ) | $ | 1.12 | $ | 0.76 | |||||
Weighted average common shares outstandingbasic |
6,866 | 6,757 | 6,741 | |||||||||
Weighted average common shares outstandingdiluted |
6,866 | 6,989 | 7,430 | |||||||||
Cash dividends declared per common share |
$ | 0.44 | $ | 0.33 | $ | |
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
F-4
DIGIMARC CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
(In thousands, except share data)
Preferred Stock |
Common Stock |
Additional Paid-in Capital |
Retained Earnings |
Total Shareholders Equity |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Shares | Amount | Shares | Amount | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
BALANCE AT DECEMBER 31, 2010 |
10,000 | $ | 50 | 7,443,450 | $ | 7 | $ | 49,609 | $ | 1,493 | $ | 51,159 | ||||||||||||||||
Exercise of stock options |
| | 169,420 | | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance of restricted common stock |
| | 190,180 | | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||
Forfeiture of restricted common stock |
| | (18,120 | ) | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||
Purchase and retirement of common stock |
| | (776,899 | ) | | (20,397 | ) | | (20,397 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
Stock-based compensation |
| | | | 4,231 | | 4,231 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Tax benefit from stock-based awards |
| | | | 1,068 | | 1,068 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Net income |
| | | | | 5,656 | 5,656 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
BALANCE AT DECEMBER 31, 2011 |
10,000 | 50 | 7,008,031 | 7 | 34,511 | 7,149 | 41,717 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Exercise of stock options |
| | 172,250 | | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance of restricted common stock |
| | 202,340 | | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||
Forfeiture of restricted common stock |
| | (12,300 | ) | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||
Purchase and retirement of common stock |
| | (201,962 | ) | | (3,100 | ) | | (3,100 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
Stock-based compensation |
| | | | 5,414 | | 5,414 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Tax benefit from stock-based awards |
| | | | 3,044 | | 3,044 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Net income |
| | | | | 8,272 | 8,272 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Cash dividends declared |
| | | | | (2,344 | ) | (2,344 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
BALANCE AT DECEMBER 31, 2012 |
10,000 | 50 | 7,168,359 | 7 | 39,869 | 13,077 | 53,003 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Exercise of stock options |
| | 42,050 | | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance of restricted common stock |
| | 388,190 | | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||
Forfeiture of restricted common stock |
| | (88,633 | ) | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||
Purchase and retirement of common stock |
| | (108,894 | ) | | (1,822 | ) | | (1,822 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
Stock-based compensation |
| | | | 4,639 | | 4,639 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Tax expense from stock-based awards |
| | | | (1,188 | ) | | (1,188 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Net loss |
| | | | | (507 | ) | (507 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Cash dividends declared |
| | | | | (3,202 | ) | (3,202 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
BALANCE AT DECEMBER 31, 2013 |
10,000 | $ | 50 | 7,401,072 | $ | 7 | $ | 41,498 | $ | 9,368 | $ | 50,923 | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
F-5
DIGIMARC CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands)
Year Ended December 31, 2013 |
Year Ended December 31, 2012 |
Year Ended December 31, 2011 |
||||||||||
Cash flows from operating activities: |
||||||||||||
Net income (loss) |
$ | (507 | ) | $ | 8,272 | $ | 5,656 | |||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities: |
||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization of property and equipment |
742 | 600 | 613 | |||||||||
Amortization and write-off of intangibles |
1,247 | 385 | 143 | |||||||||
Increase in allowance for doubtful accounts |
45 | | | |||||||||
Gain on reversal of contingent merger consideration |
(190 | ) | | | ||||||||
Stock-based compensation |
4,502 | 5,256 | 4,216 | |||||||||
Net loss from joint ventures |
| 1,107 | 2,714 | |||||||||
Deferred income taxes |
(715 | ) | (284 | ) | (3,640 | ) | ||||||
Tax benefit (expense) from stock-based awards |
(855 | ) | 3,688 | 1,873 | ||||||||
Excess tax benefit from stock-based awards |
(201 | ) | (3,044 | ) | (1,068 | ) | ||||||
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: |
||||||||||||
Trade accounts receivable, net |
(1,667 | ) | (187 | ) | (21 | ) | ||||||
Other current assets |
(342 | ) | 219 | 240 | ||||||||
Other assets |
(404 | ) | 201 | 107 | ||||||||
Accounts payable and other liabilities |
124 | (228 | ) | (668 | ) | |||||||
Deferred revenue |
1,694 | (384 | ) | 88 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
3,473 | 15,601 | 10,253 | |||||||||
Cash flows from investing activities: |
||||||||||||
Purchase of property and equipment |
(1,644 | ) | (570 | ) | (678 | ) | ||||||
Capitalized patent costs and purchased intellectual property |
(1,098 | ) | (1,170 | ) | (712 | ) | ||||||
Investments in joint ventures, net |
| (692 | ) | (2,100 | ) | |||||||
Business acquisitions, net of cash acquired |
| (5,092 | ) | | ||||||||
Sale or maturity of marketable securities |
55,627 | 144,214 | 74,689 | |||||||||
Purchase of marketable securities |
(54,590 | ) | (146,444 | ) | (65,044 | ) | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities |
(1,705 | ) | (9,754 | ) | 6,155 | |||||||
Cash flows from financing activities: |
||||||||||||
Purchase of common stock |
(1,822 | ) | (3,100 | ) | (20,397 | ) | ||||||
Cash dividends paid |
(3,202 | ) | (2,344 | ) | | |||||||
Excess tax benefit from stock-based awards |
201 | 3,044 | 1,068 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Net cash used in financing activities |
(4,823 | ) | (2,400 | ) | (19,329 | ) | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
(3,055 | ) | 3,447 | (2,921 | ) | |||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
6,866 | 3,419 | 6,340 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
$ | 3,811 | $ | 6,866 | $ | 3,419 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information: |
||||||||||||
Cash paid for income taxes |
$ | 46 | $ | 1,819 | $ | 13 | ||||||
Supplemental schedule of non-cash investing activities: |
||||||||||||
Stock-based compensation capitalized to patent costs |
$ | 137 | $ | 108 | $ | 65 | ||||||
Supplemental schedule of non-cash financing activities: |
||||||||||||
Exercise of stock options |
$ | 405 | $ | 1,660 | $ | 1,651 |
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
F-6
DIGIMARC CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In thousands, except share and per share data)
(1) Description of Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Description of Business
Digimarc Corporation (Digimarc or the Company), an Oregon corporation, enables governments and enterprises around the world to give digital identities to media and objects that computers can sense and recognize and to which they can react. The Companys technology provides the means to infuse persistent digital information, Digimarc IDs, perceptible only to computers and digital devices, into all forms of media content. The unique digital identifier placed in media generally persists with it regardless of the distribution path and whether it is copied, manipulated or converted to a different format, and does not affect the quality of the content or the enjoyment or other traditional uses of it. The Companys technology permits computers and digital devices to quickly and reliably identify all forms of media content.
Principles of Consolidation
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Digimarc and its wholly-owned subsidiaries. All intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of the consolidated financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S. requires Digimarc to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenue and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. Certain of the Companys accounting policies require higher degrees of judgment than others in their application. These include revenue recognition on long-term contracts, goodwill, impairment of long-lived assets, contingencies, stock-based compensation and income taxes. Digimarc bases its estimates on historical experience and on other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable in the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.
Reclassifications
Certain prior period amounts in the accompanying consolidated financial statements and notes thereto have been reclassified to conform to current period presentation. These reclassifications had no material effect on the results of operations or financial position for any period presented. The Company has historically combined license and subscription revenue on the consolidated statements of operations, but given the increase in subscription revenue in the current year, the Company is now presenting license revenue and subscription revenue separately. The Company has reclassified the impact of net shares settled on stock option exercises in the statements of shareholders equity and cash flows on a net basis to conform to current year presentation.
Cash Equivalents
The Company considers all highly liquid marketable securities with original maturities of 90 days or less at the date of acquisition to be cash equivalents. Cash equivalents include money market securities, certificates of deposit, commercial paper, and pre-refunded municipal bonds totaling $2,443 and $5,878 at December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. Cash equivalents are carried at cost or amortized cost, which approximates market.
Marketable Securities
The Company considers all investments with original maturities over 90 days that mature in less than one year from the balance sheet date to be short-term marketable securities. Both short- and long-term marketable
F-7
DIGIMARC CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
(In thousands, except share and per share data)
securities primarily include pre-refunded municipal bonds, corporate notes, commercial paper and U.S. federal agency notes. The Companys marketable securities are classified as held-to-maturity and are reported at amortized cost, which approximates market.
A decline in the market value of any security below amortized cost that is deemed to be other-than-temporary results in a reduction in the carrying amount. The impairment is charged to earnings and a new cost basis for the security is established. To determine whether an impairment is other-than-temporary, the Company considers whether it has the ability and intent to hold the investment until a market price recovery and considers whether evidence indicating that the cost of the investment is recoverable outweighs evidence to the contrary. There have been no other-than-temporary impairments identified or recorded by the Company.
Premiums and discounts are amortized or accreted over the life of the related security as an adjustment to yield using a method that approximates the effective interest method. Under this method, dividend and interest income are recognized when earned.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
Accounting Standards Certification (ASC) 820 Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value under generally accepted accounting principles in the U.S., and enhances disclosures about fair value measurements. ASC 820 describes a fair value hierarchy based on three levels of inputs, of which the first two are considered observable and the last unobservable, that may be used to measure fair value, which are the following:
| Level 1Pricing inputs are quoted prices available in active markets for identical investments as of the reporting date. |
| Level 2Pricing inputs are quoted for similar investments, or inputs that are observable, either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term through corroboration with observable market data. Level 2 includes investments valued at quoted prices adjusted for legal or contractual restrictions specific to these investments. |
| Level 3Pricing inputs are unobservable for the investment; that is, the inputs reflect the reporting entitys own assumptions about the assumptions market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability. |
The estimated fair values of the Companys financial instruments, which include cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable and other accrued liabilities approximate their carrying values due to the short-term nature of these instruments. The Company records marketable securities at amortized cost, which approximates fair value.
F-8
DIGIMARC CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
(In thousands, except share and per share data)
The Companys fair value hierarchy for its cash equivalents and marketable securities as of December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively, was as follows:
December 31, 2013 |
Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | ||||||||||||
Money market securities |
$ | 2,343 | $ | | $ | | $ | 2,343 | ||||||||
Pre-refunded municipal bonds (1) |
| 29,268 | | 29,268 | ||||||||||||
Corporate notes |
| 1,180 | | 1,180 | ||||||||||||
U.S. federal agency notes |
| 331 | | 331 | ||||||||||||
Certificates of deposits |
| 321 | | 321 | ||||||||||||
Other municipals |
| 153 | | 153 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total |
$ | 2,343 | $ | 31,253 | $ | | $ | 33,596 |
December 31, 2012 |
Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | ||||||||||||
Money market securities |
$ | 901 | $ | | $ | | $ | 901 | ||||||||
Pre-refunded municipal bonds (1) |
| 21,878 | | 21,878 | ||||||||||||
Corporate notes |
| 10,100 | | 10,100 | ||||||||||||
Commercial paper |
| 2,614 | | 2,614 | ||||||||||||
U.S. federal agency notes |
| 1,637 | | 1,637 | ||||||||||||
Certificates of deposits |
| 491 | | 491 | ||||||||||||
U.S. treasuries |
| 289 | | 289 | ||||||||||||
Other municipals |
| 158 | | 158 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total |
$ | 901 | $ | 37,167 | $ | | $ | 38,068 |
(1) | Pre-refunded municipal bonds are collateralized by U.S. treasuries. |
The fair value maturities of the Companys cash equivalents and marketable securities as of December 31, 2013 are as follows:
Maturities by Period | ||||||||||||||||||||
Total | Less than 1 year |
1-5 years | 5-10 years | More than 10 years |
||||||||||||||||
Maturities |
$ | 33,596 | $ | 28,294 | $ | 5,302 | $ | | $ | | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Concentrations of Business and Credit Risk
A significant portion of the Companys business depends on a limited number of large contracts. The loss of any large contract may result in loss of revenue and margin on a prospective basis. Financial instruments that potentially subject Digimarc to concentrations of credit risk consist primarily of cash and cash equivalents, marketable securities, and accounts receivable. Digimarc places its cash and cash equivalents with major banks and financial institutions and at times deposits may exceed insured limits. Other than cash used for operating needs, which may include short-term marketable securities with the Companys principal banks, Digimarcs investment policy limits its credit exposure to any one financial institution or type of financial instrument by limiting the maximum of 5% of its cash equivalents and marketable securities or $1,000, whichever is greater, to be invested in any one issuer except for the U.S. government, U.S. federal agencies and U.S. backed securities, which have no limits, at the time of purchase. The Companys investment policy also limits its credit exposure by limiting the maximum of 40% of its cash equivalents and marketable securities, or $15,000, whichever is greater, to be invested in any one industry category, (e.g., financial or energy industries), at the time of purchase. As a result, Digimarcs credit risk associated with cash and cash equivalents and marketable securities is believed to be minimal.
F-9
DIGIMARC CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
(In thousands, except share and per share data)
Contingencies:
The Company evaluates all pending or threatened contingencies or commitments, if any, that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Companys operations or financial position. The Company assesses the probability of an adverse outcome and determines if it is remote, reasonably possible or probable as defined in accordance with the provisions of ASC 450 Contingencies. If information available prior to the issuance of the financial statements indicates that it is probable that an asset has been impaired or a liability has been incurred at the date of the financial statements, and the amount of the loss, or the range of probable loss can be reasonably estimated, then the loss is accrued and charged to operations. If no accrual is made for a loss contingency because one or both of the conditions pursuant to ASC 450 are not met, but the probability of an adverse outcome is at least reasonably possible, the Company will disclose the nature of the contingency and provide an estimate of the possible loss or range of loss, or state that such an estimate cannot be made.
Equity Method Investments
The Company accounts for its joint ventures under the equity method of accounting pursuant to ASC 323 InvestmentsEquity Method and Joint Ventures. Under the equity method, investments are carried at cost, plus or minus the Companys proportionate share, based on present ownership interests, of: (a) the investees profit or loss after the date of acquisition; (b) changes in the Companys equity that have not been recognized in the investees profit or loss; and (c) certain other adjustments. Distributions received from the investee (such as dividends) reduce the carrying amount of the investment.
Goodwill
The Company accounts for business combinations under the acquisition method of accounting in accordance with ASC 805, Business Combinations, where the total purchase price is allocated to the tangible and identified intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their estimated fair values. The purchase price is allocated using the information currently available, and may be adjusted, up to one year from acquisition date, after obtaining more information regarding, among other things, asset valuations, liabilities assumed and revisions to preliminary estimates.
Contingent consideration is recorded at the acquisition date based upon the estimated fair value of the contingent payments. The fair value of the contingent consideration is re-measured each reporting period with any adjustments in fair value being recognized in earnings from operations.
The purchase price in excess of the fair value of the tangible and identified intangible assets acquired less liabilities assumed is recognized as goodwill.
The Company tests goodwill for impairment annually in June and whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable. Such reviews assess the fair value of the Companys assets compared to their carrying value. The Company operates as a single reporting unit. The Company estimated the fair value of its single reporting unit using a market approach, which takes into account the Companys market capitalization plus an estimated control premium.
In connection with the Companys annual impairment test of goodwill as of June 30, 2013, it was concluded that there was no impairment as the estimated fair value of the Companys reporting unit substantially exceeded the carrying value.
F-10
DIGIMARC CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
(In thousands, except share and per share data)
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets
The Company assesses long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicated that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable, in accordance with the provisions of ASC 360 Property, Plant and Equipment. This statement requires that long-lived assets, including definite-lived intangible assets, be reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the assets may not be recoverable. Recoverability of assets to be held and used is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of the assets to future net undiscounted cash flows expected to be generated by the assets over their remaining useful life. If such assets are considered to be impaired, the impairment to be recognized is measured by the amount by which the carrying amount of the assets exceeds the fair value of the assets. Fair value is determined based on discounted cash flows or appraised values, depending on the nature of the assets. Assets to be disposed of are reported at the lower of the carrying amount or fair value less costs to sell. As of December 31, 2013, there have been no such impairment losses.
Research and Development
Research and development costs are expensed as incurred in accordance with ASC 730 Research and Development.
Software Development Costs
Under ASC 985 Software, software development costs are to be capitalized beginning when a products technological feasibility has been established and ending when a product is made available for general release to customers. To date, the establishment of technological feasibility of the Companys products has occurred shortly before general release and, therefore, software development costs qualifying for capitalization have been immaterial. Accordingly, the Company has not capitalized any software development costs and has charged all such costs to research and development expense.
Patent Costs
Costs associated with the application and award of patents in the U.S. and various other countries are capitalized and amortized on a straight-line basis over the term of the patents as determined at award date, which varies depending on the pendency period of the application, generally approximating seventeen years. Capitalized patent costs, also referred to as patent prosecution costs, include internal legal labor, professional legal fees, government filing fees and translation fees related to expanding the Companys patent portfolio.
Costs associated with the maintenance and annuity fees of patents are accounted for as prepaid assets at the time of payment and amortized over the shorter of the maintenance period or remaining life of the related patent.
Revenue Recognition
See Note 2 for detail disclosures of the Companys revenue recognition policy.
Stock-Based Compensation
The Company accounts for stock-based compensation in accordance with ASC 718 CompensationStock Compensation, which requires the measurement and recognition of compensation for all stock-based awards made to employees and directors including stock options and restricted stock based on estimated fair values.
F-11
DIGIMARC CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
(In thousands, except share and per share data)
For stock option awards, the Company uses the Black-Scholes option pricing model as its method of valuation. The Companys determination of the fair value on the date of grant is affected by its stock price as well as assumptions regarding a number of subjective variables. These variables include, but are not limited to, the expected life of the award, the Companys expected stock price volatility over the term of the award, the risk-free interest rate and the expected dividend yield. Although the fair value of stock-based awards is determined in accordance with ASC 718 and SAB No. 107 Shared-Based Payment, the Black-Scholes option pricing model requires the input of subjective assumptions, and other reasonable assumptions could provide differing results.
The fair value of restricted stock awards granted is based on the fair market value of the Companys common stock on the date of the grant (measurement date), and is recognized over the vesting period of the related restricted stock using the straight-line method.
Income Taxes
The Company accounts for income taxes in accordance with ASC 740 Income Taxes utilizing the asset and liability method. Under the asset and liability method, deferred income taxes reflect the future tax consequences of differences between the tax basis of assets and liabilities and their financial reporting amounts. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period of enactment.
Valuation allowances are established when necessary to reduce deferred tax assets to the amount that is more likely than not expected to be realized. A valuation allowance is required for deferred tax assets if, based on available evidence, it is more likely than not that all or some portion of the asset will not be realized due to the inability to generate sufficient taxable income in the period and/or of the character necessary to utilize the benefit of the deferred tax asset. The more-likely-than-not criterion means the likelihood of realization is greater than 50 percent. When evaluating whether it is more likely than not that all or some portion of the deferred tax asset will not be realized, the Company evaluates all available evidence, both positive and negative, that may affect the realizability of deferred tax assets and that should be identified and considered in determining the appropriate amount of valuation allowance.
The Company is subject to federal and state income taxes within the U.S. and in the ordinary course of business, there are transactions and calculations where the ultimate tax determination is uncertain. The Company is also subject to withholding taxes in various foreign jurisdictions. The withholding taxes are computed by the customers and paid to foreign jurisdictions on its behalf. The Company reports a liability (or contra asset) for unrecognized tax benefits resulting from uncertain tax positions taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. The Company recognizes interest and penalties, if any, related to the unrecognized tax benefits in income tax expense.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In July 2013, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2013-11, Income Taxes (Topic 740): Presentation of an Unrecognized Tax Benefit When a Net Operating Loss Carryforward, a Similar Tax Loss, or a Credit Carryforward Exists. ASU No 2013-11 provides explicit guidance on the financial statement presentation of an unrecognized tax benefit when a net operating loss carryforward, a similar tax loss, or a tax credit carry forward exists. The amendments in this update are effective for fiscal years and interim reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2013. Early adoption is permitted. The amendments should be applied prospectively for all unrecognized tax benefits that exist as of the effective date. Retrospective application is permitted. The Company has adopted the provisions of this standard and noted no material impact on the Companys financial condition or results of operations.
F-12
DIGIMARC CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
(In thousands, except share and per share data)
(2) Revenue Recognition
The Company derives its revenue primarily from development services, subscriptions and licensing of its patent portfolio:
| Service revenue consists primarily of software development and consulting services. The majority of service revenue arrangements are structured as time and materials consulting agreements and fixed price consulting agreements. |
| Subscription revenue includes subscriptions for products and services, is generally recurring, paid in advance and recognized over the term of the subscription. |
| License revenue, including royalty revenue, originates primarily from licensing the Companys technology and patents where the Company receives license fees and/or royalties as its income stream. |
Revenue is recognized in accordance with ASC 605 Revenue Recognition and ASC 985 Software when the following four criteria are met:
(i) | persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, |
(ii) | delivery has occurred, |
(iii) | the fee is fixed or determinable, and |
(iv) | collection is reasonably assured. |
Some customer arrangements encompass multiple deliverables, such as patent licenses, professional services, software subscriptions, and maintenance fees. For arrangements that include multiple deliverables, the Company identifies separate units of accounting at inception based on the consensus reached under ASC 605-25 Multiple-Element Arrangements, which provides that revenue arrangements with multiple deliverables should be divided into separate units of accounting if certain criteria are met. The consideration for the arrangement is allocated to the separate units of accounting using the relative selling price method.
The relative selling price method allocates the consideration based on the Companys specific assumptions rather than assumptions of a marketplace participant, and any discount in the arrangement proportionally to each deliverable on the basis of each deliverables selling price.
Applicable revenue recognition criteria is considered separately for each separate unit of accounting as follows:
| Revenue from professional service arrangements is generally determined based on time and materials. Revenue for professional services is recognized as the services are performed. Billing for services rendered generally occurs within one month after the services are provided. |
| Subscription revenue, which includes subscriptions for products and services, is generally paid in advance and recognized over the term of the subscription, which is generally one month to twenty-four months. |
| License revenue is recognized when amounts owed to the Company have been earned, are fixed or determinable (within the Companys normal 30 to 60 day payment terms), and collection is reasonably assured. If the payment terms extend beyond the normal 30 to 60 days, the fee may not be considered to be fixed or determinable, and the revenue would then be recognized when installments are due. |
| The Company records revenue from certain license agreements upon cash receipt as a result of collectability not being reasonably assured. |
F-13
DIGIMARC CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
(In thousands, except share and per share data)
| The Companys standard payment terms for license arrangements are 30 to 60 days. Extended payment terms increase the likelihood the Company will grant a customer a concession, such as reduced license payments or additional rights, rather than hold firm on minimum commitments in an agreement to the point of losing a potential advocate and licensee of patented technology in the marketplace. Extended payment terms on patent license arrangements are not considered to be fixed or determinable if payments are due beyond the Companys standard payment terms, primarily because of the risk of substantial modification present in the Companys patent licensing business. As such, revenue on license arrangements with extended payment terms are recognized as fees become fixed or determinable. |
Deferred revenue consists of billings in advance for professional services, licenses and subscriptions for which revenue has not been earned.
(3) Acquisition of Attributor Corporation (Attributor)
The Company accounted for the acquisition of Attributor in December 2012 using the acquisition method of accounting. Under the acquisition method of accounting, the total purchase price was allocated to the tangible and identifiable intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their estimated fair values. The purchase price was allocated using the information available, pending the completion of the Companys review of the acquired tax assets and liabilities. This review was completed with the filing of the Attributor 2012 tax return in the third quarter of 2013 and resulted in no changes to the purchase price allocation.
Total purchase price |
$ | 5,632 | ||||||
Less: Estimated fair value of net tangible assets acquired and (liabilities assumed): |
||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 350 | ||||||
Trade accounts receivable, net |
527 | |||||||
Other current assets |
18 | |||||||
Property and equipment, net |
102 | |||||||
Deferred tax assets |
1,225 | |||||||
Accounts payable and other accrued liabilities |
(499 | ) | ||||||
Deferred revenue |
(225 | ) | ||||||
Less: Estimated fair value of identifiable intangible assets acquired: |
||||||||
Existing technology |
1,560 | |||||||
Customer relationships |
290 | |||||||
Backlog |
760 | |||||||
Tradenames |
290 | |||||||
Non-solicitation agreements |
120 | |||||||
|
|
|||||||
Goodwill |
$ | 1,114 | ||||||
|
|
The goodwill is not deductible for tax purposes. Key factors that make up the goodwill created by the transaction include knowledge and experience of the acquired workforce and infrastructure and expected synergies from the combination of operations.
The Company recorded a $190 liability in the purchase price allocation reflecting the estimated fair value of the contingent merger consideration on the acquisition date, which was presented in other long-term liabilities at December 31, 2012. At March 31, 2013, the Company determined that the estimated fair value of the contingent merger consideration was $0 based on the Companys most recent projections and therefore reversed the liability.
F-14
DIGIMARC CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
(In thousands, except share and per share data)
The reversal of the $190 liability is reflected as a reduction in general and administrative expense within the consolidated statements of operations for the year ended December 31, 2013. The contingency period ended on December 31, 2013 with $0 contingent merger consideration being earned.
(4) Patent Licensing Arrangement with Intellectual Ventures
On October 5, 2010, the Company entered into a patent licensing arrangement with IV Digital Multimedia Inventions, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company affiliated with Intellectual Ventures (IV), pursuant to which the Company granted an exclusive license to sublicense, subject to pre-existing encumbrances and a grant-back license, 597 patents and 288 patent applications held by the Company. As of December 31, 2013, there are approximately 716 patents and 59 patent applications exclusively licensed to IV.
The Company also assigned to IV the related causes of action and other enforcement rights and IV has the sole right, but not the obligation, to prepare, file, prosecute, maintain, defend and enforce the licensed patents at its expense. IV may at any time abandon its license or other rights to all or any of the licensed patents, in which case, certain licensed patents that IV opts to release revert back to the Company.
The Company also entered into a patent rights agreement pursuant to which the Company granted IV an exclusive call option to purchase all or any number of the licensed patents and/or patent applications. The agreement further provides for the grant by IV to the Company the right to put all or any number of patents within the licensed patents to IV if IV threatens or commences an action or proceeding with respect to infringement of a licensed patent.
The financial aspects of the IV agreement for the Company include:
| a license fee of $36 million, paid to the Company in increasing quarterly installments over three years ($11,400 in 2011, $12,550 in 2012 and $6,775 in 2013); |
| 20% of the profits generated from the IV licensing program, which profits consist of sublicensing and other monetization revenue less specified expenses, including the license fee; |
| IV assumes responsibility for approximately $1 million per year in prosecution and maintenance costs previously borne by the Company; |
| a minimum of $4 million of paid support services over five years from the Company to assist IV in maximizing the value of the licensed assets; and |
| a royalty-free grant-back license to the licensed patents to continue the Companys existing business related to those assets, including maintaining and renewing existing patent licenses, and providing software and services. |
The payment terms extend beyond the Companys normal 30 to 60 day payment terms, thus the license revenue was recognized when the installments were due, and the support services are recognized as the services are performed.
(5) Segment Information
Geographic Information
The Company derives its revenue from a single reporting segment: media management solutions. Revenue is generated in this segment through licensing of intellectual property, subscriptions to various products and services, and the delivery of services pursuant to contracts with various customers. The Company markets its products in the U.S. and in non-U.S. countries through its sales and licensing personnel.
F-15
DIGIMARC CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
(In thousands, except share and per share data)
Revenue, based upon the bill-to location, by geographic area is as follows:
Year Ended December 31, 2013 |
Year Ended December 31, 2012 |
Year Ended December 31, 2011 |
||||||||||
Domestic |
$ | 18,857 | $ | 30,736 | $ | 22,660 | ||||||
International (1) |
16,107 | 13,639 | 13,379 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Total |
$ | 34,964 | $ | 44,375 | $ | 36,039 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) | Revenue from the Central Banks, consisting of a consortium of central banks around the world, is classified as international revenue. Reporting revenue by country for this customer is not practicable. |
Major Customers
Customers who accounted for more than 10% of the Companys revenue are as follows:
Year Ended December 31, 2013 |
Year Ended December 31, 2012 |
Year Ended December 31, 2011 |
||||||||||
Central Banks |
33 | % | 23 | % | 27 | % | ||||||
IV |
22 | % | 30 | % | 33 | % | ||||||
The Nielsen Company (Nielsen) |
11 | % | * | 11 | % | |||||||
Verance Corporation (Verance) |
* | 27 | % | * |
* | Less than 10% |
On May 15, 2013, IV made the last quarterly payment of the license fee related to the patent license agreement dated October 5, 2010. No profit sharing under the patent license agreement has been earned to date.
On January 30, 2012, the Company and Verance, a longtime cash-basis customer, settled all disputes regarding breach of contract and patent infringement claims. In connection with the resolution of these matters, Verance paid the Company $8,852 for amounts due to Digimarc through December 31, 2011 and all claims between the parties were dismissed. Revenue from this payment was recorded in the quarter ended March 31, 2012.
(6) Stock-Based Compensation
Stock-based compensation includes expense charges for all stock-based awards to employees and directors. These awards include option grants, restricted stock awards and preferred stock.
Stock-based compensation expense related to internal legal labor is capitalized to patent costs based on direct labor hours charged to capitalized patent costs.
Determining Fair Value
Stock Options
Valuation and Amortization Method. The Company estimates the fair value of stock options granted using the Black-Scholes option valuation model. The Company amortizes the fair value of all awards on a straight-line basis over the requisite service periods, which are generally the vesting periods.
F-16
DIGIMARC CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
(In thousands, except share and per share data)
Expected Life. The expected life of awards granted represents the period of time the awards are expected to be outstanding. The Company determines the expected life based on historical experience with similar awards, giving consideration to the contractual terms, vesting schedules and pre-vesting and post-vesting forfeitures. Stock options granted generally vest over three to four years for employee grants and one to two years for director grants, and have contractual terms of ten years.
Expected Volatility. The Company estimates the volatility of its common stock at the date of grant based on the historical volatility of its common stock based on historical prices over the most recent period commensurate with the expected life of the award.
Risk-Free Interest Rate. The Company determines the risk-free interest rate using current U.S. treasury yields for bonds with a maturity commensurate with the expected life of the award.
Expected Dividend Yield. The expected dividend yield is derived by the Companys expected annual dividend rate over the expected term divided by the fair value of the Companys common stock at the grant date.
There were no stock options granted during the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012.
The Company records stock-based compensation expense for stock option awards only for those awards that are expected to vest.
A summary of the weighted average assumptions and results for options granted are as follows:
Year Ended December 31, 2013 |
Year Ended December 31, 2012 |
Year Ended December 31, 2011 | ||||
Expected life (in years) |
N/A | N/A | 5.28 5.75 | |||
Expected volatility |
N/A | N/A | 42% 44% | |||
Risk-free interest rate |
N/A | N/A | 1.0% 2% | |||
Expected dividend yield |
N/A | N/A | 0% |
Year Ended December 31, 2013 |
Year Ended December 31, 2012 |
Year
Ended December 31, 2011 |
||||||||||
Fair value of stock options granted |
$ | | $ | | $ | 2,464 |
Restricted Stock
The fair value of restricted stock awarded is based on the fair market value of the Companys common stock on the date of the grant (measurement date), and is recognized over the vesting period using the straight-line method.
The Company records stock-based compensation expense for restricted stock awards only for those awards that are expected to vest.
F-17
DIGIMARC CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
(In thousands, except share and per share data)
Stock-based Compensation
Year Ended December 31, 2013 |
Year Ended December 31, 2012 |
Year Ended December 31, 2011 |
||||||||||
Stock-based compensation: |
||||||||||||
Cost of revenue |
$ | 533 | $ | 603 | $ | 593 | ||||||
Sales and marketing |
422 | 409 | 302 | |||||||||
Research, development and engineering |
1,116 | 840 | 560 | |||||||||
General and administrative |
2,183 | 3,148 | 2,568 | |||||||||
Intellectual property |
248 | 256 | 193 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Stock compensation expense |
4,502 | 5,256 | 4,216 | |||||||||
Capitalized to patent costs |
137 | 108 | 65 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Total stock-based compensation |
$ | 4,639 | $ | 5,364 | $ | 4,281 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table sets forth total unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested stock-based awards granted under all equity compensation plans, including stock options and restricted stock:
Year Ended December 31, 2013 |
Year Ended December 31, 2012 |
Year Ended December 31, 2011 |
||||||||||
Unrecognized compensation costs |
$ | 9,711 | $ | 8,333 | $ | 9,463 |
Total unrecognized compensation costs will be adjusted for any future changes in estimated forfeitures.
The Company expects to recognize the unrecognized compensation costs as of December 31, 2013 for stock options and restricted stock over a weighted average periods through December 2017 as follows:
Stock Options |
Restricted Stock |
|||||||
Weighted average period |
0.75 years | 1.66 years |
(7) Earnings Per Common Share
The Company calculates basic and diluted earnings per common share in accordance with ASC 260 Earnings Per Share, using the two-class method because the Companys unvested restricted stock is a participating security since these awards contain non-forfeitable rights to receive dividends. Under the two-class method, earnings are allocated to each class of common stock and participating security as if all of the net earnings for the period had been distributed.
F-18
DIGIMARC CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
(In thousands, except share and per share data)
Basic earnings per common share excludes dilution and is calculated by dividing earnings to common shares by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted earnings per common share is calculated by dividing earnings to common shares by the weighted-average number of common shares, as adjusted for the potentially dilutive effect of stock options. The following table reconciles earnings (loss) per common share for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012:
Year Ended December 31, 2013 |
Year Ended December 31, 2012 |
|||||||
Basic Earnings (Loss) per Common Share: |
||||||||
Numerator: |
||||||||
Net income (loss) |
$ | (507 | ) | $ | 8,272 | |||
Distributed earnings to common shares |
3,013 | 2,214 | ||||||
Distributed earnings to participating securities |
189 | 130 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total distributed earnings |
3,202 | 2,344 | ||||||
Undistributed earnings (loss) allocable to common shares |
(3,709 | ) | 5,639 | |||||
Undistributed earnings allocable to participating securities |
| 289 | ||||||
Total undistributed earnings (loss) |
(3,709 | ) | 5,928 | |||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Earnings (loss) to common sharesbasic |
$ | (696 | ) | $ | 7,853 | |||
Denominator: |
||||||||
Weighted average common shares outstandingbasic (in thousands) |
6,866 | 6,757 | ||||||
Basic earnings (loss) per common share |
$ | (0.10 | ) | $ | 1.16 | |||
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2013 |
Year Ended December 31, 2012 |
|||||||
Diluted Earnings (Loss) per Common Share: |
||||||||
Numerator: |
||||||||
Earnings (loss) to common shares basic |
$ | (696 | ) | $ | 7,853 | |||
Undistributed earnings allocated to participating securities |
| 289 | ||||||
Undistributed earnings reallocated to participating securities |
| (280 | ) | |||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Earnings (loss) to common sharesdiluted |
$ | (696 | ) | $ | 7,862 | |||
Denominator: |
||||||||
Weighted average common shares outstandingbasic (in thousands) |
6,866 | 6,757 | ||||||
Dilutive effect of stock options |
| 232 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Weighted average common shares outstandingdilutive (in thousands) |
6,866 | 6,989 | ||||||
Diluted earnings (loss) per common share |
$ | (0.10 | ) | $ | 1.12 | |||
|
|
|
|
F-19
DIGIMARC CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
(In thousands, except share and per share data)
There were 439,193 common stock equivalents related to stock options that were anti-dilutive and excluded from diluted earnings per common share for the year ended December 31, 2013 as the Company incurred a net loss for the period.
There were 215,000 common stock equivalents related to stock options that were anti-dilutive and excluded from diluted earnings per common share for the years ended December 31, 2012 as their exercise prices were higher than the average market price of the underlying common stock for the period.
Earnings per common share was calculated under the treasury stock method in prior periods because the impact of applying the two-class method for computing basic and diluted earnings per common share was not material. Basic and diluted earnings per common share were computed using the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during each period, with diluted earnings per common share adjusted for the potentially dilutive effect of common shares.
Year Ended December 31, 2011 | ||||||||||||
Income (Numerator) |
Shares (in thousands) (Denominator) |
Per Share Amount |
||||||||||
Basic EPS |
||||||||||||
Income available to common shareholders |
$ | 5,656 | 6,741 | $ | 0.84 | |||||||
Effect of Dilutive Securities |
||||||||||||
Options |
393 | |||||||||||
Restricted stock |
296 | |||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
Diluted EPS |
||||||||||||
Income available to common shareholders |
$ | 5,656 | 7,430 | $ | 0.76 | |||||||
|
|
|
|
There were 136,957 common stock equivalents related to stock options that were anti-dilutive and excluded from diluted earnings per common share for the year ended December 31, 2011 as their exercise prices were higher than the average market price of the underlying common stock for the period.
(8) Trade Accounts Receivable and Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
Trade Accounts Receivable
Trade accounts receivable are recorded at the invoiced amount.
December 31, 2013 | December 31, 2012 | |||||||
Trade accounts receivable |
$ | 5,883 | $ | 4,216 | ||||
Allowance for doubtful accounts |
(45 | ) | | |||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Trade accounts receivable, net |
$ | 5,838 | $ | 4,216 | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Unpaid deferred revenue included in accounts receivable |
$ | 3,319 | $ | 1,589 | ||||
|
|
|
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts
The allowance for doubtful accounts is the Companys best estimate of the amount of probable credit losses in the Companys existing trade accounts receivable. The Company determines the allowance based on historical
F-20
DIGIMARC CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
(In thousands, except share and per share data)
write-off experience and current information. The Company reviews its allowance for doubtful accounts each reporting period. Account balances are charged against the allowance after all means of collection have been exhausted and the potential for recovery is considered remote.
Unpaid deferred revenue
The unpaid deferred revenue that are included in trade accounts receivable are billed in accordance with the provisions of the contracts with the Companys customers. Unpaid deferred revenue from the Companys cash-basis customers are not included in trade accounts receivable nor deferred revenue.
Major customers
Customers who accounted for more than 10% of trade accounts receivable, net are as follows:
December 31, 2013 | December 31, 2012 | |||||||
Central Banks |
47 | % | 30 | % | ||||
Nielsen |
20 | % | 24 | % | ||||
Civolution |
10 | % | 14 | % |
(9) Property and Equipment
Property and Equipment
Property and equipment are stated at cost. Repairs and maintenance are charged to expense when incurred.
Depreciation on property and equipment is calculated using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets, generally two to seven years. Leasehold improvements are amortized using the straight-line method over the shorter of the estimated useful life or the lease term.
December 31, 2013 | December 31, 2012 | |||||||
Office furniture and fixtures |
$ | 762 | $ | 420 | ||||
Equipment |
3,127 | 1,886 | ||||||
Leasehold improvements |
1,137 | 1,083 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Gross property and equipment |
5,026 | 3,389 | ||||||
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization |
(2,631 | ) | (1,936 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Property and equipment, net |
$ | 2,395 | $ | 1,453 | ||||
|
|
|
|
Leases
Future minimum lease payments under non-cancelable operating leases are as follows:
Year ending December 31: |
Operating Leases |
|||
2014 |
$ | 1,074 | ||
2015 |
1,112 | |||
2016 |
808 | |||
2017 |
3 | |||
2018 |
| |||
Thereafter |
| |||
|
|
|||
Total minimum lease payments |
$ | 2,997 | ||
|
|
F-21
DIGIMARC CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
(In thousands, except share and per share data)
Rent expense on the operating leases are as follows:
Year Ended December 31, 2013 |
Year Ended December 31, 2012 |
Year Ended December 31, 2011 |
||||||||||
Rent expense |
$ | 925 | $ | 776 | $ | 866 |
(10) Intangibles
Intangible assets are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable.
Amortization of capitalized patent costs associated with the application and award of patents in the U.S. and various other countries are capitalized and amortized on a straight-line basis over the term of the patents as determined at award date, which varies depending on the pendency period of the application, generally approximating seventeen years.
Amortization of intangible assets acquired is calculated using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets.
Estimated Life (years) |
December 31, 2013 | December 31, 2012 | ||||||||||
Capitalized patent costs |
17-20 | $ | 5,157 | $ | 3,973 | |||||||
Intangible assets acquired: |
||||||||||||
Purchased patents and intellectual property |
3-10 | 250 | 250 | |||||||||
Existing technology |
5 | 1,560 | 1,560 | |||||||||
Customer relationships |
7 | 290 | 290 | |||||||||
Backlog |
2 | 760 | 760 | |||||||||
Tradenames |
3 | 290 | 290 | |||||||||
Non-solicitation agreements |
1 | 120 | 120 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Gross intangible assets |
8,427 | 7,243 | ||||||||||
Accumulated amortization |
(1,718 | ) | (522 | ) | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Intangible assets, net |
$ | 6,709 | $ | 6,721 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
The aggregate amortization expense recorded in the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011 was $1,196, $315 and $124, respectively. For intangible assets recorded at December 31, 2013, the estimated future aggregate amortization expense for the years ending December 31, 2014 through 2018 is approximately:
Year ending December 31: |
Amortization Expense |
|||
2014 |
$ | 1,012 | ||
2015 |
640 | |||
2016 |
507 | |||
2017 |
479 | |||
2018 |
184 |
F-22
DIGIMARC CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
(In thousands, except share and per share data)
(11) Shareholders Equity
Preferred Stock
In June 2008, the Board of Directors authorized 2,500,000 shares of preferred stock, par value $0.001 per share. The Board of Directors has the authority to issue the undesignated preferred stock in one or more series and to determine the powers, preferences and rights and the qualifications, limitations or restrictions granted to or imposed upon any wholly unissued series of undesignated preferred stock and to fix the number of shares constituting any series and the designation of such series, without any further vote or action by the shareholders. The issuance of preferred stock may have the effect of delaying, deferring or preventing a change of control of the Company without further action by shareholders and may adversely affect the voting and other rights of the holders of common stock.
The Board of Directors authorized 10,000 shares of Series A Redeemable Nonvoting Preferred stock (Series A Preferred) that were issued to certain executive officers at the time of formation. The Series A Preferred has no voting rights, except as required by law, and may be redeemed at the option of the Companys Board of Directors at any time on or after June 18, 2013.
The Series A Preferred is redeemable based on the stated fair value of $5.00 per share. The Series A Preferred has no dividend rights and no rights to the undistributed earnings of the Company.
Common Stock
In June 2008, the Board of Directors authorized 50,000,000 shares of common stock, par value $0.001 per share. The holders of Digimarc common stock are entitled to one vote for each share held of record on all matters submitted to a vote of its shareholders, including the election of directors. Subject to preferences that may be granted to any then outstanding preferred stock, holders of common stock are entitled to receive ratably those dividends as may be declared by the Board of Directors out of funds legally available for such purpose, as well as any distributions to the Companys shareholders. The Series A Preferred does not have any dividend preferences. In the event of the Companys liquidation, dissolution or winding up, holders of common stock are entitled to share ratably in all of the Companys assets remaining after payment of liabilities and the liquidation preference of any then outstanding preferred stock. Holders of common stock have no preemptive or other subscription or conversion rights. There are no redemption or sinking fund provisions applicable to the common stock. All outstanding shares of common stock are fully paid and non-assessable.
Stock Incentive Plan
In July 2008 the Companys Board of Directors initially adopted the 2008 Incentive Plan, or the 2008 Plan. The 2008 Plan provides for the grant of stock options, stock appreciation rights, stock awards, restricted stock, stock units, performance shares, performance units, and cash-based awards, which may be granted to officers, directors, employees, consultants, agents, advisors and independent contractors who provide services to the Company and its affiliated companies.
The 2008 Plan authorizes the issuance of up to 2,500,000 shares of common stock. The shares authorized under the 2008 Plan are subject to adjustment in the event of a stock split, stock dividend, recapitalization or similar event. Shares issued under the 2008 Plan will consist of authorized and unissued shares or shares held by the Company as treasury shares. If an award granted under the 2008 Plan lapses, expires, terminates or is forfeited or surrendered without having been fully exercised or without the issuance of all the shares subject to the award, the shares covered by that award will again be available for use under the 2008 Plan. Shares that are (i) tendered by a participant or retained by the Company as payment for the purchase price of an award or to
F-23
DIGIMARC CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
(In thousands, except share and per share data)
satisfy tax withholding obligations or (ii) covered by an award that is settled in cash, or in some manner that some or all of the shares covered by the award are not issued, will be available for issuance under the 2008 Plan. In addition, awards granted as substitute awards in connection with acquisition transactions will not reduce the number of shares authorized for issuance under the 2008 Plan.
Stock Options
As of December 31, 2013, under all of the Companys stock-based compensation plans, equity awards to purchase an additional 609,168 shares were authorized for future grants under the plans. The Company issues new shares upon option exercises.
Options granted, exercised and canceled under the stock incentive plan are summarized as follows:
Number of Shares |
Weighted Average Exercise Price |
Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value |
Aggregate Intrinsic Value |
|||||||||||||
Options outstanding, December 31, 2010 |
993,491 | $ | 10.47 | $ | 6.55 | |||||||||||
Granted |
215,000 | $ | 27.84 | $ | 11.46 | |||||||||||
Exercised |
(169,420 | ) | $ | 9.75 | $ | 6.33 | ||||||||||
Canceled |
(10,833 | ) | $ | 9.64 | $ | 6.28 | ||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Options outstanding, December 31, 2011 |
1,028,238 | $ | 14.23 | $ | 7.61 | |||||||||||
Granted |
| | | |||||||||||||
Exercised |
(172,250 | ) | $ | 9.64 | $ | 6.29 | ||||||||||
Canceled |
| | | |||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Options outstanding, December 31, 2012 |
855,988 | $ | 15.16 | $ | 7.88 | |||||||||||
Granted |
| | | |||||||||||||
Exercised |
(42,050 | ) | $ | 9.64 | $ | 6.30 | ||||||||||
Canceled |
(416 | ) | $ | 14.99 | $ | 8.12 | ||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Options outstanding, December 31, 2013 |
813,522 | $ | 15.44 | $ | 7.96 | $ | 4,950 | |||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Options exercisable, December 31, 2013 |
740,781 | $ | 14.30 | $ | 4,942 | |||||||||||
Options unvested, December 31, 2013 |
72,741 | $ | 27.06 | $ | 8 |
The aggregate intrinsic value is based on the closing price of $19.26 per share of Digimarc common stock on December 31, 2013, which would have been received by the optionees had all of the options with exercise prices less than $19.26 per share been exercised on that date.
The following table summarizes information about stock options outstanding at December 31, 2013:
Options Outstanding | Options Exercisable | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Exercise Price |
Number Outstanding |
Remaining Contractual Life (Years) |
Weighted Average Price |
Number Exercisable |
Remaining Contractual Life (Years) |
Weighted Average Price |
||||||||||||||||||
$9.64 $9.91 |
466,022 | 4.73 | $ | 9.66 | 466,022 | 4.73 | $ | 9.66 | ||||||||||||||||
$14.99 $18.01 |
132,500 | 5.33 | $ | 15.67 | 130,626 | 5.32 | $ | 15.68 | ||||||||||||||||
$24.35 $30.01 |
215,000 | 7.58 | $ | 27.84 | 144,133 | 7.55 | $ | 28.07 | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
$9.64 $30.01 |
813,522 | 5.58 | $ | 15.44 | 740,781 | 5.39 | $ | 14.30 | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
F-24
DIGIMARC CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
(In thousands, except share and per share data)
Restricted Stock
The Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors has awarded restricted stock shares under the Companys 2008 Plan to certain employees. The shares subject to the restricted stock awards will vest over a certain period, usually four years, following the date of the grant. Specific terms of the restricted stock awards are governed by Restricted Stock Agreements between the Company and the award recipients.
The following table reconciles the unvested balance of restricted stock:
Number of Shares |
Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value |
|||||||
Unvested balance, December 31, 2010 |
197,760 | $ | 14.25 | |||||
Granted |
190,180 | $ | 29.12 | |||||
Vested |
(73,110 | ) | $ | 20.82 | ||||
Canceled |
(18,120 | ) | $ | 19.24 | ||||
|
|
|||||||
Unvested balance, December 31, 2011 |
296,710 | $ | 21.51 | |||||
Granted |
202,340 | $ | 22.51 | |||||
Vested |
(117,667 | ) | $ | 22.52 | ||||
Canceled |
(12,300 | ) | $ | 22.05 | ||||
|
|
|||||||
Unvested balance, December 31, 2012 |
369,083 | $ | 21.72 | |||||
Granted |
388,190 | $ | 20.15 | |||||
Vested |
(220,514 | ) | $ | 23.21 | ||||
Canceled |
(88,633 | ) | $ | 20.35 | ||||
|
|
|||||||
Unvested balance, December 31, 2013 |
448,126 | $ | 19.89 | |||||
|
|
(12) Defined Contribution Pension Plan
The Company sponsors an employee savings plan (the Plan) which qualifies as a deferred salary arrangement under Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code. The Plan combines both an employee savings plan and company matching plan into one plan under Section 401(k), including a 401(k) Roth option. Employees become eligible to participate in the Plan at the beginning of the month following the employees hire date. Employees may contribute up to 75% of their pay to the Plan, subject to the limitations of the Internal Revenue Code. Company matching contributions are mandatory under the Plan.
The Company made matching contributions in the aggregate amount as follows:
Year Ended December 31, 2013 |
Year Ended December 31, 2012 |
Year Ended December 31, 2011 |
||||||||||
Matching contributions |
$ | 396 | $ | 366 | $ | 349 |
(13) Joint Venture and Related Party Transactions
In June 2009, the Company entered into two joint venture agreements with Nielsen to launch two new companies; TVaura LLC (in which Digimarc holds a 51% ownership interest) and TVaura Mobile LLC (in which Digimarc holds a 49% ownership interest). The two joint venture agreements and a revised patent license
F-25
DIGIMARC CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
(In thousands, except share and per share data)
agreement expanded and replaced the previous license and services agreement between the Company and Nielsen that had been in operation since late 2007. Under the joint venture agreements, the Company and Nielsen agreed to work together to develop new products and services, including the expansion and deployment of those products and services that were in development under the prior agreement.
Under the terms of the revised patent license agreement, Nielsen agreed to pay Digimarc $18,750 during the period from July 2009 through January 2014, and Digimarc granted to Nielsen a non-exclusive license to Digimarcs patents for use within Nielsens business. Unless earlier terminated in accordance with the agreement, the license will continue until the expiration of the last to expire of the licensed patents. The payment terms extend beyond the Companys normal 30 to 60 day payment terms, thus the license revenue is being recognized when the installments are due.
The Company provided technical and development services to the joint ventures totaling $6,848 during the period July 2009 through March 2012. Service revenue was recognized as the services were performed.
The Company and Nielsen each made initial cash contributions aggregating $3,500 payable quarterly from July 2009 through July 2011 to fund TVaura LLC and initial cash contributions aggregating $2,500 payable quarterly from July 2009 through July 2011 to fund TVaura Mobile LLC.
In March 2012, Digimarc and Nielsen decided to reduce the investments in their two joint ventures to minimal levels while assessing alternative approaches to achieving each of their goals in the emerging market opportunity of synchronized second screen television. In connection with this plan for the suspension of operations, the joint ventures accrued estimated expenses for the first quarters operations and severance costs for joint venture employees. Digimarcs share of the one-time severance and suspension costs was approximately $500. Pursuant to the plan of suspending operations of the joint ventures with Nielsen, in April 2012 the Company received $104 of remaining cash from TVaura LLC and contributed $796 to TVaura Mobile LLC to fund both the first quarters operating expenses as well as the suspension related costs. Payment of all expenses incurred after the suspension of operations of each joint venture is unconditionally the responsibility of the majority owner, which expenses for TVaura LLC, if any, will be paid by Digimarc. As of December 31, 2013, both Digimarc and Nielsen continued to assess the market opportunities of each of the joint ventures.
The investment in joint ventures balance was $0 as of December 31, 2013 and 2012.
Pursuant to the terms of the agreements and ASC 810 Consolidation, the joint ventures are not consolidated with the Company because the minority member has substantive participating rights, or veto rights, such that no member has majority control.
F-26
DIGIMARC CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
(In thousands, except share and per share data)
Related Party Transactions
Year Ended December 31, 2013 |
Year Ended December 31, 2012 |
Year Ended December 31, 2011 |
||||||||||
TVaura LLC: |
||||||||||||
Capital contributions (return of capital) |
$ | | $ | (104 | ) | $ | 1,200 | |||||
Revenue (1) |
$ | | $ | | $ | 2,640 | ||||||
TVaura Mobile LLC: |
||||||||||||
Capital contributions |
$ | | $ | 796 | $ | 900 | ||||||
Revenue (1) |
$ | | $ | 272 | $ | | ||||||
Total: |
||||||||||||
Capital contributions, net |
$ | | $ | 692 | $ | 2,100 | ||||||
Revenue (1) |
$ | | $ | 272 | $ | 2,640 |
(1) | Technical and development services |
Summarized financial data for TVaura LLC:
December 31, 2013 |
December 31, 2012 |
|||||||
Current assets |
$ | | $ | | ||||
Noncurrent assets |
$ | | $ | | ||||
Current liabilities |
$ | | $ | | ||||
Noncurrent liabilities |
$ | | $ | |
Year Ended December 31, 2013 |
Year Ended December 31, 2012 |
Year Ended December 31, 2011 |
||||||||||
Revenue |
$ | | $ | | $ | | ||||||
Gross profit |
$ | | $ | | $ | | ||||||
Operating expenses |
$ | | $ | 52 | $ | 2,699 | ||||||
Net loss from continuing operations |
$ | | $ | (52 | ) | $ | (2,699 | ) | ||||
The Companys pro-rata sharenet loss |
$ | | $ | (27 | ) | $ | (1,376 | ) | ||||
The Companys gain on investment |
$ | | $ | 70 | $ | |
Summarized financial data for TVaura Mobile LLC:
December 31, 2013 |
December 31, 2012 |
|||||||
Current assets |
$ | 932 | $ | 937 | ||||
Noncurrent assets |
$ | | $ | | ||||
Current liabilities |
$ | 957 | $ | 957 | ||||
Noncurrent liabilities |
$ | | $ | |
Year Ended December 31, 2013 |
Year Ended December 31, 2012 |
Year Ended December 31, 2011 |
||||||||||
Revenue |
$ | | $ | | $ | 105 | ||||||
Gross profit |
$ | | $ | | $ | 105 | ||||||
Operating expenses |
$ | 5 | $ | 2,266 | $ | 2,848 | ||||||
Net loss from continuing operations |
$ | (5 | ) | $ | (2,266 | ) | $ | (2,743 | ) | |||
The Companys pro-rata sharenet loss |
$ | | $ | (1,100 | ) | $ | (1,338 | ) | ||||
The Companys loss on investment |
$ | | $ | (50 | ) | $ | |
F-27
DIGIMARC CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
(In thousands, except share and per share data)
(14) Income Taxes
The provision (benefit) for income taxes reflects current taxes, deferred taxes, and withholding taxes in certain foreign jurisdictions. The withholding taxes are computed by the Companys customers and paid to foreign jurisdictions on the Companys behalf. The effective tax rates for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 were 78% and 39%, respectively. The effective tax rate of 78%, resulting in a tax benefit of $1.8 million, was due mainly to the retroactive extension of the 2012 and 2013 federal research and experimentation credits in January 2013. The Company will be able to carryback current year tax losses for refunds of taxes previously paid.
Components of tax expense (benefit) allocated to continuing operations include the following:
Year Ended December 31, 2013 |
Year Ended December 31, 2012 |
Year Ended December 31, 2011 |
||||||||||
Current: |
||||||||||||
Federal |
$ | (1,420 | ) | $ | 4,699 | $ | 1,066 | |||||
State |
1 | 570 | 3 | |||||||||
Foreign |
5 | 1 | (20 | ) | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Sub-total |
(1,414 | ) | 5,270 | 1,049 | ||||||||
Deferred: |
||||||||||||
Federal |
(204 | ) | 97 | (2,470 | ) | |||||||
State |
(178 | ) | 27 | (365 | ) | |||||||
Foreign |
| | | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Sub-total |
(382 | ) | 124 | (2,835 | ) | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Total tax expense (benefit) |
$ | (1,796 | ) | $ | 5,394 | $ | (1,786 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
The reconciliation of the statutory federal income tax rate to the Companys effective income tax rate is as follows:
Year Ended December 31, 2013 |
% | Year Ended December 31, 2012 |
% | Year Ended December 31, 2011 |
% | |||||||||||||||||||
Income taxes computed at statutory rates |
$ | (783 | ) | 34 | % | $ | 4,647 | 34 | % | $ | 1,316 | 34 | % | |||||||||||
Increases (decreases) resulting from: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
State income taxes, net of federal tax benefit |
(301 | ) | 13 | % | 705 | 5 | % | 194 | 5 | % | ||||||||||||||
Federal and state research and experimentation credits |
(918 | ) | 40 | % | (122 | ) | (1 | )% | (784 | ) | (20 | )% | ||||||||||||
Change in valuation allowance |
187 | (8 | )% | 12 | | (2,581 | ) | (67 | )% | |||||||||||||||
Transaction costs |
| | 65 | 1 | % | | | |||||||||||||||||
Impact of federal graduated rates |
| | 39 | | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Other |
19 | (1 | )% | 48 | | 69 | 2 | % | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Total |
$ | (1,796 | ) | 78 | % | $ | 5,394 | 39 | % | $ | (1,786 | ) | (46 | )% | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-28
DIGIMARC CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
(In thousands, except share and per share data)
Deferred income taxes reflect the net tax effects of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for income tax purposes. The tax effects of significant items comprising the Companys deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities are as follows:
December 31, 2013 |
December 31, 2012 |
|||||||
Deferred tax assets: |
||||||||
Stock based compensation |
$ | 2,305 | $ | 2,636 | ||||
Federal and state net operating losses |
3,153 | 1,900 | ||||||
Goodwill |
1,037 | 1,146 | ||||||
Accrued compensation |
22 | 50 | ||||||
Deferred rent |
158 | 170 | ||||||
Federal and state research and experimentation credits |
92 | | ||||||
Other |
33 | | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total gross deferred tax assets |
6,800 | 5,902 | ||||||
Less valuation allowance |
(371 | ) | (184 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net deferred tax assets |
$ | 6,429 | $ | 5,718 | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Deferred tax liabilities: |
||||||||
Patent expenditures |
$ | (1,695 | ) | $ | (1,385 | ) | ||
Fixed asset differences |
(461 | ) | (167 | ) | ||||
Intangible asset differences |
(233 | ) | (506 | ) | ||||
Other |
(16 | ) | (18 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total deferred tax liabilities |
$ | (2,405 | ) | $ | (2,076 | ) | ||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net deferred tax assets |
$ | 4,024 | $ | 3,642 | ||||
|
|
|
|
In December 2012, the Company acquired 100% of the outstanding stock of Attributor in a non-taxable transaction. Due to Attributors history of losses and the inability to utilize Attributor losses to offset the Companys income for state tax purposes, the Company concluded that it is not more likely than not that the Attributor state deferred tax assets will be realized and a full valuation allowance has been recorded on the state deferred tax assets of Attributor. The valuation allowance recorded as of December 31, 2013 and 2012 is $371 and $184, respectively, all of which relates to the state deferred tax assets of Attributor. The change in valuation allowance for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011 was $187, $184 and $0, respectively.
As of December 31, 2013, the Company has federal and state net operating loss carry-forwards of $7,455 and $11,293, respectively, which have a carry-forward of 7 20 years depending on the jurisdiction. The deferred tax assets, before valuation allowance, for federal and state net operating loss carryforwards acquired in the Attributor acquisition have been reduced to the amount of losses allowed to be utilized in the post-acquisition period before expiration after considering the applicable limitations of IRC Sec. 382. As of December 31, 2013, the Company has federal and state research and experimental tax credits of $1,167 and $156, respectively, which have a carry-forward of 5 20 years depending on the jurisdiction and for which the benefits upon usage will be recorded in additional paid-in capital from the effects of stock options. As of December 31, 2013, the Company has foreign tax credits of $55 which have a carry-forward of 6 9 years and for which the benefits upon usage will be recorded in additional paid-in capital from the effects of stock options.
F-29
DIGIMARC CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
(In thousands, except share and per share data)
The Company records accrued interest and penalties associated with uncertain tax positions in income tax expense in the consolidated statements of operations. For the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, the Company recognized accrued interest and penalties associated with uncertain tax positions of $3, $0 and $0, respectively. The Company does not anticipate any of its unrecognized benefits will significantly increase or decrease within the next 12 months.
A summary reconciliation of the Companys uncertain tax positions is as follows:
For the Year Ended December 31, 2013 |
For the Year Ended December 31, 2012 |
For the Year Ended December 31, 2011 |
||||||||||
Beginning balance |
$ | 108 | $ | 102 | $ | | ||||||
Addition for current year tax positions |
105 | 6 | 30 | |||||||||
Addition for prior year tax positions |
6 | | 72 | |||||||||
Settlements with taxing authorities |
| | | |||||||||
Lapsing of statutes of limitations |
| | | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Ending balance |
$ | 219 | $ | 108 | $ | 102 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
The balance for uncertain tax positions is classified as a long-term liability on the consolidated balance sheets. All uncertain tax positions if reversed would affect the effective tax rate.
The Company is subject to examination in the federal jurisdiction for the 2010 thru 2013 tax years and other state jurisdictions for the 2009 thru 2013 tax years.
(15) Commitments and Contingencies
Certain of the Companys product license and services agreements include an indemnification provision for claims from third parties relating to the Companys intellectual property. Such indemnification provisions are accounted for in accordance with ASC 450 Contingencies. To date, there have been no claims made under such indemnification provisions.
The Companys subsidiary, Attributor, is a defendant in a patent infringement lawsuit brought by Blue Spike, LLC (E.D. Texas, Civil Action No: 6:12-cv-540). The case was brought against Attributor in August 2012, and was consolidated with other lawsuits brought by Blue Spike into Civil Action No. 6:12-cv-00499.
Blue Spike asserted infringement by Attributor of four patents. Attributor filed an answer denying that it has infringed any valid claim of the patents in suit, and asserting specified defenses, including non-infringement and invalidity. The court has consolidated the cases that Blue Spike has brought against over ninety defendants into one case. A schedule for the case has recently been set and trial is scheduled for October 2015. Blue Spike has not alleged a specific amount of monetary damages in its complaint.
In May 2013, the Company instituted an arbitration proceeding against IV regarding IVs calculation of potential profit sharing payments under the Companys license agreement with IV. The action was settled on January 17, 2014. The settlement did not result in profit sharing payments to the Company. The next profit participation report from IV is due to us in March 2014, covering 2013 licensing activities.
The Company is subject from time to time to other legal proceedings and claims arising in the ordinary course of business.
F-30
DIGIMARC CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
(In thousands, except share and per share data)
(16) Stock Repurchases
Summary of common stock shares repurchased:
Year Ended December 31, 2013 |
Year Ended December 31, 2012 |
Year Ended December 31, 2011 |
||||||||||
Private transaction |
| | 552,536 | |||||||||
Repurchase program |
| 50,900 | 104,577 | |||||||||
Exercise of stock options |
18,283 | 69,272 | 48,432 | |||||||||
Tax withholding obligations on stock options |
8,644 | 39,005 | 46,401 | |||||||||
Tax withholding obligations on restricted shares |
81,967 | 42,785 | 24,953 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Total |
108,894 | 201,962 | 766,899 |
Value of common stock shares repurchased:
Year Ended December 31, 2013 |
Year Ended December 31, 2012 |
Year Ended December 31, 2011 |
||||||||||
Private transaction |
$ | | $ | | $ | 14,927 | ||||||
Repurchase program |
| 1,201 | 3,099 | |||||||||
Exercise of stock options |
405 | 1,660 | 1,651 | |||||||||
Tax withholding obligations on stock options |
194 | 949 | 1,658 | |||||||||
Tax withholding obligations on restricted shares |
1,628 | 950 | 713 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Total |
$ | 2,227 | $ | 4,760 | $ | 22,048 |
On January 26, 2011, the Company repurchased 552,536 shares of its common stock from Koninklijke Philips Electronics, N.V., in a privately negotiated transaction. The shares were purchased for an aggregate price of approximately $14,927, including transaction fees.
In each of April 2009 and November 2011, the Board of Directors approved a stock repurchase program authorizing the purchase, at the discretion of management, of shares of the Companys common stock through either periodic open-market or private transactions at then-prevailing market prices. Under the April 2009 program that expired in April 2012, the Company repurchased 223,851 shares at an aggregate purchase price of $4,858. Under the November 2011 program, the Board of Directors approved the repurchase of an additional $5,000 of shares of common stock. In November 2013, the program was extended through December 31, 2014. As of December 31, 2013, the Company had repurchased 43,293 shares under this program at an aggregate purchase price of $1,002.
As part of the Companys 2008 Stock Incentive Plan, stock options are granted and restricted stock shares are awarded to certain employees and directors.
Pursuant to the terms of the stock option grants, the Company withholds (purchases) a number of whole shares of common stock having a fair market value (as determined as of the date of exercise) equal to the amount of the total value of the aggregate exercise price of the options exercised. In addition, the Company withholds (purchases) from shares issued upon exercise of the stock options a number of whole shares of common stock having a fair market value (as determined by the Company as of the date of exercise) equal to the amount of tax required to be withheld by law, in order to satisfy the tax withholding obligations of the Company in connection with the exercise of such options.
F-31
DIGIMARC CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
(In thousands, except share and per share data)
Pursuant to the terms of the restricted stock agreements, the Company withholds (purchases) from fully vested shares of common stock otherwise deliverable to the employee, a number of whole shares of common stock having a fair market value (as determined as of the date of vesting) equal to the amount of tax required to be withheld by law, in order to satisfy the tax withholding obligations of the Company in connection with the vesting of such shares.
(17) Subsequent Events
On February 20, 2014, the Board of Directors declared a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share, payable on March 10, 2014 to shareholders of record on March 3, 2014.
(18) Quarterly Financial InformationUnaudited
Quarter ended: |
March 31 | June 30 | September 30 | December 31 | ||||||||||||
2013 |
||||||||||||||||
Service revenue |
$ | 2,929 | $ | 3,022 | $ | 3,030 | $ | 2,650 | ||||||||
Subscription revenue |
1,384 | 1,433 | 1,424 | 1,350 | ||||||||||||
License revenue |
5,930 | 6,015 | 2,971 | 2,826 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total revenue |
10,243 | 10,470 | 7,425 | 6,826 | ||||||||||||
Total cost of revenue |
2,134 | 2,120 | 1,955 | 1,996 | ||||||||||||
Gross profit |
8,109 | 8,350 | 5,470 | 4,830 | ||||||||||||
Gross profit percent, service revenue |
52 | % | 53 | % | 59 | % | 52 | % | ||||||||
Gross profit percent, subscription revenue |
54 | % | 59 | % | 56 | % | 52 | % | ||||||||
Gross profit percent, license revenue |
98 | % | 98 | % | 97 | % | 97 | % | ||||||||
Gross profit percent, total |
79 | % | 80 | % | 74 | % | 71 | % | ||||||||
Sales and marketing |
$ | 1,277 | $ | 1,563 | $ | 1,482 | $ | 1,822 | ||||||||
Research, development and engineering |
2,725 | 2,822 | 3,277 | 3,450 | ||||||||||||
General and administrative |
2,186 | 2,348 | 2,456 | 2,635 | ||||||||||||
Intellectual property |
277 | 261 | 278 | 313 | ||||||||||||
Operating income (loss) |
1,644 | 1,356 | (2,023 | ) | (3,390 | ) | ||||||||||
Net income (loss) |
971 | 602 | (795 | ) | (1,285 | ) | ||||||||||
Earnings (loss) per common share: |
||||||||||||||||
Earnings (loss) per common sharebasic |
$ | 0.13 | $ | 0.08 | $ | (0.12 | ) | $ | (0.19 | ) | ||||||
Earnings (loss) per common sharediluted |
$ | 0.13 | $ | 0.08 | $ | (0.12 | ) | $ | (0.19 | ) | ||||||
Weighted average common shares outstandingbasic |
6,838 | 6,850 | 6,860 | 6,913 | ||||||||||||
Weighted average common shares outstandingdiluted |
7,058 | 7,090 | 6,860 | 6,913 |
F-32
DIGIMARC CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
(In thousands, except share and per share data)
Quarter ended: |
March 31 | June 30 | September 30 | December 31 | ||||||||||||
2012 |
||||||||||||||||
Service revenue |
$ | 3,048 | $ | 2,609 | $ | 2,616 | $ | 2,519 | ||||||||
Subscription revenue |
278 | 317 | 327 | 559 | ||||||||||||
License revenue |
13,720 | 6,186 | 5,960 | 6,236 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total revenue |
17,046 | 9,112 | 8,903 | 9,314 | ||||||||||||
Total cost of revenue |
1,810 | 1,583 | 1,467 | 1,648 | ||||||||||||
Gross profit |
15,236 | 7,529 | 7,436 | 7,666 | ||||||||||||
Gross profit percent, service revenue |
44 | % | 43 | % | 48 | % | 45 | % | ||||||||
Gross profit percent, subscription revenue |
83 | % | 86 | % | 86 | % | 61 | % | ||||||||
Gross profit percent, license revenue |
99 | % | 99 | % | 99 | % | 99 | % | ||||||||
Gross profit percent, total |
89 | % | 83 | % | 84 | % | 82 | % | ||||||||
Sales and marketing |
$ | 1,007 | $ | 970 | $ | 937 | $ | 913 | ||||||||
Research, development and engineering |
1,998 | 2,146 | 2,320 | 2,277 | ||||||||||||
General and administrative |
2,758 | 2,191 | 2,282 | 2,226 | ||||||||||||
Intellectual property |
319 | 291 | 309 | 329 | ||||||||||||
Operating income |
9,154 | 1,931 | 1,588 | 1,921 | ||||||||||||
Net income |
4,999 | 1,216 | 1,003 | 1,054 | ||||||||||||
Earnings per common share: |
||||||||||||||||
Earnings per common sharebasic |
$ | 0.74 | $ | 0.17 | $ | 0.14 | $ | 0.15 | ||||||||
Earnings per common sharediluted |
$ | 0.70 | $ | 0.17 | $ | 0.14 | $ | 0.14 | ||||||||
Weighted average common shares outstandingbasic |
6,738 | 6,737 | 6,761 | 6,791 | ||||||||||||
Weighted average common shares outstandingdiluted |
7,140 | 6,993 | 6,984 | 6,966 |
F-33
The agreements included or incorporated by reference as exhibits to this report may contain representations and warranties by each of the parties to the applicable agreement. These representations and warranties have been made solely for the benefit of the other party or parties to the applicable agreement and:
| were not intended to be treated as categorical statements of fact, but rather as a means of allocating the risk to one of the parties if those statements prove to be inaccurate; |
| were qualified by disclosures that were made to the other party or parties in connection with the negotiation of the applicable agreement, which disclosures are not necessarily reflected in the agreement; |
| may apply standards of materiality that are different from materiality under the securities laws; and |
| were made only as of the date of the applicable agreement or other date or dates that may be specified in the agreement. |
Accordingly, there representations and warranties may not describe the actual state of affairs as of the date they were made or at any other time. Additional information about Digimarc may be found elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K and in Digimarcs other public filings, which are available without charge through the SECs website at http://www.sec.gov.
Exhibit |
Exhibit Description | |
2.1 | Separation Agreement among DMRC Corporation, DMRC LLC, Digimarc Corporation and, with respect to certain sections, L-1 Identity Solutions, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to Amendment No. 2 to the Companys Registration Statement on Form 10, filed with the Commission on August 13, 2008 (File No. 001-34108)) | |
2.2 | Agreement and Plan of Merger dated April 30, 2010 between Digimarc Corporation, a Delaware corporation, and Digimarc Oregon Corporation, an Oregon corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the Commission on May 4, 2010 (File No. 001-34108)) | |
2.3 | Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated December 3, 2012, by and among Digimarc, DA Sub Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Digimarc Corporation, Attributor, and Fortis Advisors LLC, as the representative for Attributors security holders (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the Commission on December 4, 2012 (File No. 001-34108)) | |
3.1 | Articles of Incorporation of Digimarc Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the Commission on May 4, 2010 (File No. 001-34108)) | |
3.2 | Bylaws of Digimarc Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the Commission on May 4, 2010 (File No. 001-34108)) | |
4.1 | Specimen common stock certificate of Digimarc Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed with the Commission on February 27, 2009 (File No. 001-34108)) | |
4.2 | Rights Agreement, dated July 31, 2008, between Digimarc Corporation and Computershare Trust Company, N.A. as Rights Agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed with the Commission on February 27, 2009 (File No. 001-34108)) | |
4.3 | Form of Certificate of Designation of Series R Preferred Stock (attached as an exhibit to the Rights Agreement filed as Exhibit 4.2 hereto) |
E-1
Exhibit |
Exhibit Description | |
4.4 | Form of Rights Certificate (attached as an exhibit to the Rights Agreement filed as Exhibit 4.2 hereto) | |
10.1 | License Agreement between DMRC Corporation and L-1 Identity Solutions Operating Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Amendment No. 4 to the Companys Registration Statement on Form 10, filed with the Commission on October 2, 2008 (File No. 001-34108))(1) | |
10.2 | Counterfeit Deterrence System Development and License Agreement, dated as of December 6, 2012, between Digimarc Corporation and the Bank for International Settlements (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Companys amended Annual Report on Form 10-K/A, filed with the Commission on August 7, 2013 (File No. 001-34108))(4) | |
*10.3 | Form of Indemnification Agreement between DMRC Corporation and each of its executive officers and directors (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to Amendment No. 2 to the Companys Registration Statement on Form 10, filed with the Commission on August 13, 2008 (File No. 001-34108)) | |
*10.4 | Employment Agreement, effective as of November 1, 2011, between Digimarc Corporation and Bruce Davis (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the Commission on November 7, 2011 (File No. 001-34108)) | |
*10.5 | Digimarc Corporation 2008 Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 to the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, filed with the Commission on November 24, 2008 (File No. 001-34108)) | |
*10.6 | Form of Notice of Stock Option Award and Stock Option Award Agreement under the Digimarc Corporation 2008 Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8 to the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, filed with the Commission on November 24, 2008 (File No. 001-34108)) | |
*10.7 | Equity Compensation Program for Nonemployee Directors under the Digimarc Corporation 2008 Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9 to the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, filed with the Commission on November 24, 2008 (File No. 001-34108)) | |
*10.8 | Form of Indemnification Agreement between Digimarc Corporation and each of its executive officers and directors (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Digimarc Corporations Annual Report on Form 10-K, as filed by Digimarc Corporation with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 13, 2006 (File No. 000-28317)) | |
*10.9 | Form of Change of Control Retention Agreement entered into by and between Digimarc Corporation and each of Messrs. McConnell, Chamness, Knudson, Meyer and Beck (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9 to the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed with the Commission on February 22, 2013 (File No. 001-34108)) | |
10.10 | Patent License Agreement, dated as of June 11, 2009 between Digimarc Corporation and The Nielsen Company (US), LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, filed with the Commission on July 31, 2009 (File No. 001-34108))(2) | |
10.11 | Limited Liability Company I Agreement, dated June 11, 2009 between Digimarc Corporation and The Nielsen Company (US), LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, filed with the Commission on July 31, 2009 (File No. 001-34108))(2) | |
10.12 | Limited Liability Company II Agreement, dated June 11, 2009 between Digimarc Corporation and The Nielsen Company (US), LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, filed with the Commission on July 31, 2009 (File No. 001-34108))(2) |
E-2
Exhibit |
Exhibit Description | |
10.13 | Lease Agreement, dated March 22, 2004, between Digimarc Corporation and PS Business Parks, L.P., as amended on May 13, 2010 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, filed with the Commission on July 30, 2010 (File No. 001-34108)) | |
10.14 | Patent License Agreement, effective as of October 5, 2010, between Digimarc Corporation and IV Digital Multimedia Inventions, LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.12 to the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed with the Commission on March 3, 2011 (File No. 001-34108))(3) | |
10.15 | Grant-Back License Agreement, dated October 5, 2010, between Digimarc Corporation and IV Digital Multimedia Inventions, LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.13 to the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed with the Commission on March 3, 2011 (File No. 001-34108))(3) | |
10.16 | Patent Rights Agreement, dated October 5, 2010, between Digimarc Corporation and IV Digital Multimedia Inventions, LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.14 to the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed with the Commission on March 3, 2011 (File No. 001-34108)) | |
10.17 | Work Agreement, dated October 5, 2010, by and among Digimarc Corporation, Invention Law Group, P.C. and IV Digital Multimedia Inventions, LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.15 to the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed with the Commission on March 3, 2011 (File No. 001-34108))(3) | |
21.1 | List of Subsidiaries | |
23.1 | Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm | |
31.1 | Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Executive Officer | |
31.2 | Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Financial Officer | |
32.1 | Section 1350 Certification of Chief Executive Officer | |
32.2 | Section 1350 Certification of Chief Financial Officer | |
101.INS | XBRL Instance Document | |
101.SCH | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document | |
101.CAL | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document | |
101.DEF | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document | |
101.LAB | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document | |
101.PRE | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document |
* | Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement. |
| Schedules and certain exhibits to this agreement have been omitted pursuant to Item 601(b)(2) of Regulation S-K. Digimarc hereby undertakes to furnish to the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Commission) copies of the omitted schedules and exhibits upon request by the Commission. |
(1) | Confidential treatment has been granted for certain portions omitted from this exhibit pursuant to an order granted by the Commission on October 21, 2008, under Rule 24b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Confidential portions of this exhibit have been separately filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. |
(2) | Confidential treatment has been granted for certain portions omitted from this exhibit pursuant to an order granted by the Commission on September 10, 2009, under Rule 24b-2 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Confidential portions of this exhibit have been separately filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. |
E-3
(3) | Confidential treatment has been granted for certain portions omitted from this exhibit pursuant to an order granted by the Commission on March 17, 2011, under Rule 24b-2 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Confidential portions of this exhibit have been separately filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. |
(4) | Confidential treatment has been granted for certain portions omitted from this exhibit pursuant to an order granted by the Commission on September 3, 2013, under Rule 24b-2 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Confidential portions of this exhibit have been separately filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. |
E-4