UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION
Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
☑ Filed by the registrant | ☐ Filed by a party other than the registrant |
Check the appropriate box:
| ||||
☐
|
Preliminary Proxy Statement
| |||
☐
|
CONFIDENTIAL, FOR USE OF THE COMMISSION ONLY (AS PERMITTED BY RULE 14A-6(E)(2))
| |||
☑
|
Definitive Proxy Statement
| |||
☐
|
Definitive Additional Materials
| |||
☐
|
Soliciting Material Pursuant to Section 240.14a-12
|
AMGEN INC.
(Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)
Payment of filing fee (check the appropriate box):
| ||||
☑
|
No fee required.
| |||
☐
|
Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11
| |||
(1)
|
Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:
| |||
(2)
|
Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:
| |||
(3)
|
Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):
| |||
(4)
|
Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:
| |||
(5)
|
Total fee paid:
| |||
☐
|
Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.
| |||
☐ |
Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.
| |||
(1)
|
Amount Previously Paid:
| |||
(2)
|
Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:
| |||
(3)
|
Filing Party:
| |||
(4)
|
Date Filed: |
Robert A. Bradway Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and President | ||
|
||
Amgen Inc. One Amgen Center Drive Thousand Oaks, CA 91320-1799 |
April 8, 2019
Dear Fellow Stockholder:
You are invited to attend the 2019 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, or Annual Meeting, of Amgen Inc. to be held on Tuesday, May 21, 2019, at 11:00 A.M., local time, at the Four Seasons Hotel Westlake Village, Two Dole Drive, Westlake Village, California 91362.
Our Mission and Strategy: We seek to develop innovative medicines that address important unmet medical needs in the fight against serious illness. This objective is the central underpinning of our strategy which includes an integrated set of activities to strengthen our competitive position in our industry. In addition to our significant commitment to innovative research and development and the commercialization of the medicines we make, we are developing branded biosimilars which utilize our industry-leading biologics manufacturing skills. We are doing this while investing for long-term growth, deploying next-generation biomanufacturing facilities, expanding our global geographic reach, improving drug delivery systems, and building on our recent transformation successes to more efficiently bring our discoveries out of the lab and to patients worldwide. While investing in all these activities, we have simultaneously maintained a disciplined approach to capital allocation through which we invest in our future while also returning capital to stockholders. The consistent, strong execution of our strategy results in solving complex problems in biotechnology that benefit patients, building a long-lasting business, and generating long-term stockholder value.
Execution on Our Strategy in 2018: We launched several medicines, including Aimovig®*, the first calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) inhibitor approved for the preventive treatment of migraine in adults, Parsabiv®, for secondary hyperparathyroidism, and our first two biosimilars, KANJINTI (biosimilar trastuzumab (Herceptin®)) and AMGEVITA (biosimilar adalimumab (HUMIRA®)), in Europe. Recognizing the urgent need presented by cardiovascular disease, we also took significant actions in 2018 to address affordability challenges for patients who would benefit from Repatha® (our medicine to dramatically reduce low-density lipoprotein (bad) cholesterol), making it available in the U.S. at a 60% reduction from the medicines original list price. We advanced our early oncology pipeline. We also broke ground on our new next-generation biomanufacturing plant in Rhode Island in 2018. This new plant will be the first of its kind in the U.S. and will use our proven next-generation biomanufacturing capabilities to reliably supply medicines and meet the need of every patient, every time. In the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section of this proxy, we further discuss our progress against our strategic priorities in 2018.
Our Transformation: 2018 was the capstone year for a set of ambitious non-GAAP financial commitments we made to our stockholders five years ago, including earnings per share growth, operating margin improvement, and return of capital. As we previously reported, we met and exceeded these targets. The larger goal of our transformation, however, was to enhance our ability to compete. And here too, weve made great progress. Over the past five years, we launched nine new products, including in two new therapeutic areas, expanded our global presence to approximately 100 countries, generated our largest ever number of innovative and first-in-class molecules in our pipeline, reduced our development cycle time by an average of approximately 36 months, expanded our industry-leading human genetics capabilities, established a biosimilars business, and deployed a first of its kind, highly-efficient, next-generation biologics manufacturing capability. While our transformation is not complete, were in a much better position than ever before to serve patients and to deliver long-term growth.
Stockholder Engagement: We are also guided by the perspectives of our stockholders as expressed through direct engagement with us throughout the year and at our Annual Meeting. Since our 2018 annual meeting of stockholders, in addition to outreach by our executives and Investor Relations department to our investors owning approximately 58% of our outstanding shares, we have engaged in governance-focused outreach activities and discussions with the governance teams for stockholders comprising approximately 53% of our outstanding shares. Topics discussed included our business and financial performance, our environmental, sustainability, and governance programs, executive compensation (including its direct link to our business strategy), and product pricing. Feedback received during these meetings is shared with the full Board of Directors and informs Board decisions. We are eager to continue this valuable dialogue with our investors in the coming year.
I look forward to sharing more about our Company at the Annual Meeting. In addition to the business to be transacted and described in the accompanying Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders, I will discuss recent developments during the past year, the substantial progress we made on our strategic priorities for 2018, and respond to comments and questions.
On behalf of the Board of Directors, I thank you for your participation and investment in Amgen. We look forward to seeing you on May 21. As a final note, and also on behalf of the Board of Directors, I would like to thank Frank Herringer, who is not standing for re-election, for his years of wise counsel and guidance for Amgen.
Sincerely,
Robert A. Bradway
Chairman of the Board,
Chief Executive Officer and President
*Jointly | developed in collaboration with Novartis AG. |
Amgen Inc. One Amgen Center Drive Thousand Oaks, California 91320-1799 |
Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders
To be Held on May 21, 2019
To the Stockholders of Amgen Inc.:
Date and Time: |
Tuesday, May 21, 2019, at 11:00 A.M., local time | |||
Location: |
Four Seasons Hotel Westlake Village, Two Dole Drive, Westlake Village, California 91362 | |||
Record Date: |
March 22, 2019. Amgen stockholders of record at the close of business on the record date are entitled to receive notice of, and vote at, the 2019 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, or Annual Meeting, and any continuation, postponement, or adjournment thereof. | |||
Mail Date: |
We intend to mail the Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials, or the proxy statement and proxy card, as applicable, on or about April 8, 2019, to our stockholders of record on the record date. | |||
Items of Business: | ||||
1. |
To elect 12 directors to the Board of Directors of Amgen for a term of office expiring at the 2020 annual meeting of stockholders. The nominees for election to the Board of Directors are Dr. Wanda M. Austin, Mr. Robert A. Bradway, Dr. Brian J. Druker, Mr. Robert A. Eckert, Mr. Greg C. Garland, Mr. Fred Hassan, Dr. Rebecca M. Henderson, Mr. Charles M. Holley, Jr., Dr. Tyler Jacks, Ms. Ellen J. Kullman, Dr. Ronald D. Sugar, and Dr. R. Sanders Williams; | |||
2. |
To hold an advisory vote to approve our executive compensation; | |||
3. |
To ratify the selection of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accountants for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2019; and | |||
4. |
To transact such other business as may properly come before the Annual Meeting or any continuation, postponement, or adjournment thereof. | |||
Attendance: If you plan to attend the Annual Meeting, you will need an admittance ticket and proof of ownership of our Common Stock as of the close of business on March 22, 2019. Please read INFORMATION CONCERNING VOTING AND SOLICITATIONAttendance at the Annual Meeting in the accompanying proxy statement. |
Voting: Your vote is important, regardless of the number of shares that you own. Whether or not you plan to attend the Annual Meeting in person, it is important that your shares be represented and voted. Please read the Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders and proxy statement with care and follow the voting instructions to ensure that your shares are represented. By submitting your proxy promptly, you will save the Company the expense of further proxy solicitation. We encourage you to submit your proxy as soon as possible by Internet, by telephone, or by signing, dating, and returning all proxy cards or instruction forms provided to you.
By Order of the Board of Directors
Jonathan P. Graham
Secretary
Thousand Oaks, California
April 8, 2019
|
Proxy Statement Summary
|
|
This summary contains highlights about our Company and the upcoming 2019 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, or Annual Meeting. This summary does not contain all of the information that you should consider in advance of the meeting and we encourage you to read the entire proxy statement before voting.
2019 Annual Meeting of Stockholders
Date and Time: |
Tuesday, May 21, 2019, at 11:00 A.M., local time | |
Location: |
Four Seasons Hotel Westlake Village, Two Dole Drive, Westlake Village, California 91362 | |
Record Date: |
March 22, 2019 | |
Mail Date: |
We intend to mail the Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials, or the proxy statement and proxy card, as applicable, on or about April 8, 2019, to our stockholders. |
Voting Matters and Board Recommendations
Matter
|
Our Board Vote Recommendation
| |||
Item 1:
|
Election of 12 Nominees to the Board of Directors (page 6)
|
FOR each Director Nominee
| ||
Item 2:
|
Advisory Vote to Approve Our Executive Compensation (page 28)
|
FOR
| ||
Item 3:
|
Ratification of Selection of Independent Registered Public Accountants (page 91)
|
FOR
|
How to Vote
|
By Internet: You may submit a proxy over the Internet by following the instructions on the website referred to in the Notice, proxy card, or voting instruction form mailed to you. You will need the control number that appears on your Notice, proxy card, or voting instruction form. | |
|
By Telephone: You may submit a proxy by telephone by following the instructions on the website referred to in the Notice, proxy card, or voting instruction form mailed to you. You will need the control number that appears on your Notice, proxy card, or voting instruction form. | |
|
By Mail: If you received a full paper set of materials, date and sign your proxy card or voting instruction form and mail it in the enclosed, postage-paid envelope. If you received a Notice, you may request a proxy card by following the instructions on your Notice. You do not need to mail the proxy card if you are voting by Internet or telephone. | |
|
In Person: If you plan to attend the Annual Meeting, you will need an admittance ticket and proof of ownership of our Common Stock as of the close of business on March 22, 2019. If you plan to attend the Annual Meeting and wish to vote in person, you may request a ballot at the Annual Meeting. Please note that if your shares are held of record by a broker, bank, trust, or other nominee, and you decide to attend and vote at the Annual Meeting, your vote in person at the Annual Meeting will not be effective unless you present a legal proxy, issued in your name from the record holder (your broker, bank, trust, or other nominee). Please read INFORMATION CONCERNING VOTING AND SOLICITATIONAttendance at the Annual Meeting. Even if you intend to attend the Annual Meeting, we encourage you to submit your proxy in advance of the Annual Meeting. |
ï 2019 Proxy Statement 1
|
Proxy Statement Summary
|
|
Item 1: Election of 12 Nominees to the Board of Directors (Page 6)
Nominee |
Independent | Age | |
Director Since |
|
Audit |
|
Governance and Nominating |
|
Executive |
|
Compensation and Management Development |
|
|
Equity Award |
|
|
Corporate Responsibility and Compliance |
| |||||||||||||||||||
Wanda M. Austin
|
|
✓
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
M
|
|
|
M
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
Robert A. Bradway
|
|
56
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
C
|
|
|
M
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brian J. Druker
|
|
✓
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
2018
|
|
|
M
|
|
|
M
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
Robert A. Eckert
|
|
✓
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
M
|
|
|
M
|
|
|
C
|
|
|
C
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Greg C. Garland
|
|
✓
|
|
|
61
|
|
|
2013
|
|
|
C
|
|
|
M
|
|
|
M
|
|
|
M
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Fred Hassan
|
|
✓
|
|
|
73
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
M
|
|
|
M
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Rebecca M. Henderson
|
|
✓
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
M
|
|
|
M
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
Charles M. Holley, Jr.
|
|
✓
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
C
|
|
|
M
|
|
|
M
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||
Tyler Jacks
|
|
✓
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
M
|
|
|
M
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Ellen J. Kullman
|
|
✓
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
M
|
|
|
M
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Ronald D. Sugar
|
|
✓
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
M
|
|
|
M
|
|
|
C
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||
R. Sanders Williams
|
|
✓
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
M
|
|
|
M
|
|
C | indicates Chair of the committee. |
M | indicates member of the committee. |
Corporate Governance Highlights and Best Practices
* | For our director nominees. |
2 ï 2019 Proxy Statement
|
Proxy Statement Summary
|
|
We Have Implemented Governance Best Practices
We continuously monitor developments and best practices in corporate governance and consider stockholder feedback when enhancing our governance structures. Below are highlights of our key governance practices:
Effective Board Leadership and Independent Oversight |
✓ Highly Independent Board 11 of our 12 director nominees (page 21)
✓ Strong Refreshment Practices With 5 New Directors Since 2015 Average Board tenure of approximately 5 years for our director nominees (pages 7 and 14)
✓ Annual Anonymous Board and Committee Evaluation Process (pages 14 and 20-21)
✓ All Directors Meet Our Board of Directors Guidelines for Director Qualifications and Evaluations (Appendix A)
✓ Robust Lead Independent Director Role (page 15)
✓ Corporate Responsibility and Compliance Committee (page 23)
✓ Enterprise Risk Management Program and Annual Detailed Compensation Risk Analysis overseen by Board and Compensation and Management Development Committee, respectively (pages 16-17 and 26-27)
|
|||
Focus on Stockholder Rights |
✓ Proxy Access (pages 15 and 99) up to 20 eligible stockholders that own 3% of shares for 3 years who meet the requirements set forth in our Bylaws can nominate director nominees constituting up to the greater of 20% of the total directors or two nominees
✓ Majority Voting Standard for Director Elections (pages 14 and 97)
✓ Stockholders* May Act By Written Consent (page 15)
✓ Stockholders* Have a Right to Call Special Meetings (15% threshold requirement) (page 15)
✓ No Supermajority Vote Provisions in Certificate of Incorporation or Bylaws (page 15)
✓ No Poison Pill (page 15)
|
|||
History of Transparency and Accountability |
✓ Significant Stock Ownership Requirements for Officers and Directors (pages 62 and 84)
✓ Regular Engagement With Stockholders to Seek Feedback (page 41)
✓ We Continue to Seek Mechanisms to Lower the Cost Burden on Society of Serious Diseases
✓ We Have Demonstrated our Commitment to Environmentally Responsible Operations, Improving Patient Access to Medicines, Science Education, and our Community (page 24)
|
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR EACH OF THE 12 NAMED NOMINEES.
|
||||
|
* | Who meet the requirements set forth in our Amended and Restated Bylaws. |
ï 2019 Proxy Statement 3
|
Proxy Statement Summary
|
|
Item 2: Advisory Vote to Approve Our Executive
Compensation (Page 28)
2018 Total Target Direct Compensation Mix
| A significant majority of each Named Executive Officers, or NEOs, compensation is at-risk and dependent on our performance and execution of our strategic priorities. |
| We use median values as the reference point for each element of compensation at all levels, including our NEOs. We consider performance, job scope, and contribution in our final pay decisions. |
| Our compensation program is directly linked to our performance and strategy. Each year, our Compensation and Management Development Committee approves Company performance goals under our annual cash incentive programs that are designed to focus our staff on delivering financial and operational objectives to drive annual performance, advance strategic priorities, and position us for longer-term success. |
| 80% of our annual long-term incentive, or LTI, equity award grants are performance-based, aligning compensation with long-term value creation for our stockholders. Three-year performance units comprise 50% of our LTI equity award grants for the 2016-2018 performance period and the goal design and all measurement targets are established at the beginning of the three-year performance period. Our 2016-2018 performance units were earned for a performance period ending December 31, 2018, based on the Companys performance on three equally weighted annual non-Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, or non-GAAP, operating measures of earnings per share, or EPS, growth, operating margin, and operating expense as measured against the pre-established targets for each of the three years. |
* | Mr. Gordon and Dr. Reese are not included in the pie chart because they commenced their roles as executive officers of our Company on September 3, 2018, and July 26, 2018, respectively. |
4 ï 2019 Proxy Statement
|
Proxy Statement Summary
|
|
2018 Performance Against Pre-Established Goals and Measures
2018 Annual Cash Incentive Program
|
2016-2018 Long-Term Incentive Performance Award Payout
| |||||||
Goal
|
Weighting
|
% of Target Earned
|
||||||
Financial Performance
| ||||||||
Revenues
|
|
30%
|
|
224.7%
| ||||
Non-GAAP Net Income(1)
|
|
30%
|
|
186.5%
| ||||
Progress Innovative Pipeline
| ||||||||
Advance Early Pipeline
|
|
5%
|
|
113.9%
| ||||
Execute Key Clinical Studies and Regulatory Filings
|
|
20%
|
|
120.8%
| ||||
Deliver Annual Priorities
| ||||||||
Execute Critical Launches and Long-Term Commercial Objectives
|
|
10%
|
|
71.3%
| ||||
Achieve Transformation Objectives
|
|
5%
|
|
124.2%
| ||||
Final Score
|
|
Achieved 166.6%
|
(1) | Non-GAAP net income for purposes of the 2018 Company performance goals of our annual cash incentive award program is reported and reconciled in Appendix B. |
(2) | The operating measures of the 2016-2018 performance units were based on non-GAAP financial results for 2016, 2017, and 2018 as reported and reconciled in Appendix B, except that operating measures were further adjusted for the impacts of Hurricane Maria as prescribed by the terms of the 2016-2018 performance goals document. For this purpose, operating expense was reduced by $147 million ($0.16 in EPS) for 2017 and increased by $21 million ($0.03 in EPS) for 2018. |
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR THE APPROVAL OF THE ADVISORY RESOLUTION INDICATING THE APPROVAL OF THE COMPENSATION OF THE COMPANYS NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS.
|
Item 3: Ratification of Selection of Independent Registered Public Accountants (Page 91)
| The Audit Committee of the Board has selected Ernst & Young LLP, or Ernst & Young, as our independent registered public accountants for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2019. |
| Ernst & Young has served as our independent registered public accounting firm since the Companys inception in 1980. |
| Each year, the Audit Committee evaluates the qualifications and performance of the Companys independent registered public accountants and determines whether to re-engage the current independent registered public accountants. |
| Based on this evaluation, the Audit Committee believes that the continued retention of Ernst & Young is in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders. |
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR RATIFICATION OF OUR INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS.
|
ï 2019 Proxy Statement 5
|
Item 1 Election of Directors
|
|
Election of Directors
Nominees to the Board
Nominee |
Independent | Age | |
Director Since |
|
Audit |
|
Governance and Nominating |
|
Executive |
|
Compensation and Management Development |
|
|
Equity Award |
|
|
Corporate Responsibility and Compliance |
| |||||||||||||||||||
Wanda M. Austin
|
|
✓
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
M
|
|
|
M
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
Robert A. Bradway
|
|
56
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
C
|
|
|
M
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brian J. Druker
|
|
✓
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
2018
|
|
|
M
|
|
|
M
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
Robert A. Eckert
|
|
✓
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
M
|
|
|
M
|
|
|
C
|
|
|
C
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Greg C. Garland
|
|
✓
|
|
|
61
|
|
|
2013
|
|
|
C
|
|
|
M
|
|
|
M
|
|
|
M
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Fred Hassan
|
|
✓
|
|
|
73
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
M
|
|
|
M
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Rebecca M. Henderson
|
|
✓
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
M
|
|
|
M
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
Charles M. Holley, Jr.
|
|
✓
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
C
|
|
|
M
|
|
|
M
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||
Tyler Jacks
|
|
✓
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
M
|
|
|
M
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Ellen J. Kullman
|
|
✓
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
M
|
|
|
M
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Ronald D. Sugar
|
|
✓
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
M
|
|
|
M
|
|
|
C
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||
R. Sanders Williams
|
|
✓
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
M
|
|
|
M
|
|
C | indicates Chair of the committee. |
M | indicates member of the committee. |
6 ï 2019 Proxy Statement
|
Item 1 Election of Directors
|
|
Summary of Director Nominee Core Experiences and Skills
Our Board possesses a deep and broad set of skills and experiences that facilitate strong oversight and strategic direction for a leading global innovator in biotechnology. The following chart summarizes the competencies of each director nominee to be represented on our Board. The details of each directors competencies are included in each directors profile.
Experience / Skills Austin Bradway Druker Eckert Garland Hassan Henderson Holley Jacks Kullman Sugar Williams Healthcare Industry, Providers and Payers Science/Technology Public Company CEO/COO/CFO Regulatory Compliance Financial/Accounting Government/Public Policy International
The lack of a ✓ for a particular item does not mean that the director does not possess that qualification, characteristic, skill, or experience. Each of our Board members have experience and/or skills in the enumerated areas, however, the ✓ is designed to indicate that a director has particular strength in that area.
ï 2019 Proxy Statement 7
|
Item 1 Election of Directors
|
|
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR EACH OF THE NAMED NOMINEES. PROXIES WILL BE VOTED FOR THE ELECTION OF THE NOMINEES UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED.
Set forth below is biographical information for each nominee and a summary of the specific qualifications, attributes, skills, and experiences which led our Board to conclude that each nominee should serve on the Board at this time. All of our directors meet the qualifications and skills of our Amgen Inc. Board of Directors Guidelines for Director Qualifications and Evaluations included in this proxy statement as Appendix A. There are no family relationships among any of our directors or among any of our directors and our executive officers.
Wanda M. Austin
Director since: 2017
Age: 64
Committees: Audit Corporate Responsibility and Compliance Other Public Company Boards: Chevron Corporation
|
Wanda M. Austin has served as a director of the Company since 2017. Dr. Austin was appointed Interim President of the University of Southern California in August 2018. She is the retired President and Chief Executive Officer of The Aerospace Corporation, a leading architect of the United States national security space programs, where she served from 2008 until her retirement in 2016. From 2004 to 2007, Dr. Austin was Senior Vice President, National Systems Group of The Aerospace Corporation. Dr. Austin joined The Aerospace Corporation in 1979 and served in various positions from 1979 until 2004.
Dr. Austin has served as an Adjunct Research Professor at the University of Southern Californias Viterbi School of Engineering since 2007. She is the co-founder of MakingSpace, Inc., where she serves as a motivational speaker on STEM education. Dr. Austin has been a director of Chevron Corporation, a petroleum, exploration, production and refining company, since 2016, serving on its Board Nominating and Governance Committee and chairing its Public Policy Committee. Dr. Austin is a trustee of the University of Southern California and previously served on the boards of directors of the National Geographic Society and the Space Foundation. Dr. Austin received an undergraduate degree from Franklin & Marshall College, a masters degree from the University of Pittsburgh, and a doctorate from the University of Southern California. She is a member of the National Academy of Engineering.
Qualifications
The Board concluded that Dr. Austin should serve on the Board based on her leadership and management experience as a chief executive officer, her extensive background in science, technology, and government affairs in a highly regulated industry, and her public board experience. |
Robert A. Bradway
Director since: 2011
Age: 56
Committees: Equity Award Executive (Chair)
Other Public Company Boards: The Boeing Company
|
Robert A. Bradway has served as our director since 2011 and Chairman of the Board since 2013. Mr. Bradway has been our President since 2010 and Chief Executive Officer since 2012. From 2010 to 2012, Mr. Bradway served as our Chief Operating Officer. Mr. Bradway joined Amgen in 2006 as Vice President, Operations Strategy and served as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer from 2007 to 2010. Prior to joining Amgen, he was a Managing Director at Morgan Stanley in London where, beginning in 2001, he had responsibility for the firms banking department and corporate finance activities in Europe.
Mr. Bradway has been a director of The Boeing Company, an aerospace company and manufacturer of commercial airplanes, defense, space and securities systems, since 2016, serving on its Audit and Finance Committees. From 2011 to May 2017, Mr. Bradway was a director of Norfolk Southern Corporation, a transportation company. He has served on the board of trustees of the University of Southern California since 2014 and on the advisory board of the Leonard D. Schaeffer Center for Health Policy and Economics at that university since 2012. Mr. Bradway holds a bachelors degree in biology from Amherst College and a masters degree in business administration from Harvard Business School.
Qualifications
The Board concluded that Mr. Bradway should serve on the Board based on his thorough knowledge of all aspects of our business, combined with his leadership and management skills having previously served as our President and Chief Operating Officer and as our Chief Financial Officer. |
8 ï 2019 Proxy Statement
|
Item 1 Election of Directors
|
|
Brian J. Druker
Director since: 2018
Age: 63
Committees: Audit Corporate Responsibility and Compliance
|
Brian J. Druker has served as a director of the Company since May 2018. Dr. Druker joined Oregon Health & Science University, or OHSU, in 1993 and is currently a physician-scientist and professor of medicine. Dr. Druker has served as the director of the OHSU Knight Cancer Institute since 2007, associate dean for oncology of the OHSU School of Medicine since 2010, and the JELD-WEN chair of leukemia research at OHSU since 2001. He has been an investigator with the Howard Hughes Medical Institute, a nonprofit medical research organization, since 2002.
Dr. Druker has served on the scientific advisory boards of Aptose Biosciences Inc., a biotechnology company, since 2013, and Grail, Inc., a biotechnology company, since 2016. In 2011, he founded Blueprint Medicines Corporation, a biopharmaceutical company, and remains as a scientific advisor to this company. In 2006, he founded MolecularMD, a privately-held molecular diagnostics company.
Dr. Druker has received numerous awards, including the Lasker-DeBakey Clinical Research Award in 2009, the Japan Prize in Healthcare and Medical Technology in 2012, the Albany Medical Center Prize in 2013 (for influential work in the development of STI571 (Gleevec®) for the treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia), and the Tang Prize in Biopharmaceutical Science in 2018. He was elected to the National Academy of Sciences in 2012 as well as the National Academy of Medicine in 2007. Dr. Druker received both an undergraduate degree and his doctorate from the University of California, San Diego. |
Qualifications
The Board concluded that Dr. Druker should serve on the Board based on his extensive scientific research and expertise leading an important academic institution, conducting highly significant research in the area of oncology, and directly managing the care of cancer patients.
Robert A. Eckert
Lead Independent Director
Director since: 2012
Age: 64
Committees: Compensation and Management Development (Chair) Equity Award (Chair) Executive Governance and Nominating
Other Public Company Boards: Levi Strauss & Co. McDonalds Corporation
|
Robert A. Eckert is our lead independent director. Mr. Eckert has been an Operating Partner at Friedman Fleischer & Lowe, a private equity firm, since 2014. Mr. Eckert was the Chief Executive Officer of Mattel, Inc., a toy design, manufacture and marketing company, having held this position from 2000 through 2011, and its Chairman of the Board from 2000 through 2012. He was President and Chief Executive Officer of Kraft Foods Inc., a consumer packaged food and beverage company, from 1997 to 2000, Group Vice President from 1995 to 1997, President of the Oscar Mayer Foods Division from 1993 to 1995 and held various other senior executive and other positions from 1977 to 1992.
Mr. Eckert has been a director of McDonalds Corporation, a company which franchises and operates McDonalds restaurants in the global restaurant industry, since 2003, serving as the Chair of the Public Policy and Strategy Committee and a member of the Executive and Governance Committees. Mr. Eckert also has served as a director of Levi Strauss & Co., a jeans and casual wear manufacturer, since 2010, serving as Chair of the Compensation Committee and a member of the Nominating, Governance and Corporate Citizenship Committee. Levi Strauss & Co. was a privately-held company until March 2019 when it became publicly traded. Mr. Eckert was a director of Smart & Final Stores, Inc., a warehouse store, from 2013 until 2014 prior to it becoming a publicly-traded company. He was appointed director of Eyemart Express Holdings LLC, a privately-held eyewear retailer and portfolio company of Friedman Fleischer & Lowe, in 2015. Mr. Eckert is on the Global Advisory Board of the Kellogg School of Management at Northwestern University and serves on the Eller College National Board of Advisors at the University of Arizona. Mr. Eckert received an undergraduate degree from the University of Arizona and a masters degree in business administration from the Kellogg School of Management at Northwestern University.
Qualifications
The Board concluded that Mr. Eckert should serve on our Board because of Mr. Eckerts long-tenured experience as a chief executive officer of large public companies, his broad international experience in marketing and business development, and his valuable leadership experience.
|
ï 2019 Proxy Statement 9
|
Item 1 Election of Directors
|
|
Greg C. Garland
Director since: 2013
Age: 61
Committees: Compensation and Management Development Equity Award Executive Governance and Nominating (Chair)
Other Public Company Boards: Phillips 66(1)
|
Greg C. Garland is the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Phillips 66, an energy manufacturing and logistics company with midstream, chemical, refining and marketing and specialties businesses created through the repositioning of ConocoPhillips, having held this position since 2012. Mr. Garland chairs the Executive Committee of Phillips 66.(1) Prior to Phillips 66, Mr. Garland served as Senior Vice President, Exploration and Production, Americas of ConocoPhillips from 2010 to 2012. He was President and Chief Executive Officer of Chevron Phillips Chemical Company (now a joint venture between Phillips 66 and Chevron) from 2008 to 2010 and Senior Vice President, Planning and Specialty Chemicals from 2000 to 2008. Mr. Garland served in various positions at Phillips Petroleum Company from 1980 to 2000. Mr. Garland is a member of the Engineering Advisory Council for Texas A&M University. Mr. Garland received an undergraduate degree from Texas A&M University.
Qualifications
The Board concluded that Mr. Garland should serve on our Board because of Mr. Garlands experience as a chief executive officer and his over 30 years of international experience in a highly regulated industry.
|
(1) | Mr. Garland also serves as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Phillips 66 Partners LP, a master limited partnership and wholly-owned subsidiary of Phillips 66 without any employees. |
Fred Hassan
Director since: 2015
Age: 73
Committees: Audit Compensation and Management Development
Other Public Company Boards: Intrexon Corporation
Audit Committee financial expert |
Fred Hassan is Director at Warburg Pincus LLC, a global private equity investment institution, since 2018. Mr. Hassan was Special Limited Partner at Warburg Pincus LLC from 2017 to 2018 and Partner and Managing Director from 2011 to 2017 and, prior to that, served as Senior Advisor from 2009 to 2010. Mr. Hassan was Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of Schering-Plough Corporation from 2003 to 2009. Prior to this, Mr. Hassan was Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of Pharmacia Corporation, from 2001 to 2003. Before assuming these roles, he had served as President and Chief Executive Officer of Pharmacia Corporation from its creation in 2000 as a result of the merger of Pharmacia & Upjohn, Inc. with Monsanto Company. He was President and Chief Executive Officer of Pharmacia & Upjohn, Inc. beginning in 1997. Mr. Hassan previously held senior positions with Wyeth (formerly known as American Home Products), including that of Executive Vice President with responsibility for its pharmaceutical and medical products businesses, and served as a member of the board from 1995 to 1997. Prior to that, Mr. Hassan held various roles at Sandoz Pharmaceuticals and headed its U.S. pharmaceuticals businesses.
Mr. Hassan has been a director of Intrexon Corporation, a synthetic biology company, since 2016, serving on its Compensation Committee. Mr. Hassan was a director of Time Warner Inc., a media company, from 2009 until its acquisition by AT&T Inc., a provider of communications and digital entertainment services, in 2018. Mr. Hassan was a director of Avon Products, Inc., a manufacturer and marketer of beauty and related products, from 1999 until 2013 and served on its Compensation and Management Development, Nominating and Corporate Governance and Audit Committees, as lead independent director from 2009 to 2012, and Chairman of the Board between January and April 2013. Mr. Hassan was Chairman of the Board of Bausch & Lomb, from 2010 until its acquisition by Valeant Pharmaceuticals International, Inc., a pharmaceutical company, in 2013. Mr. Hassan served on the board of directors and Compensation and Audit Committees of Valeant Pharmaceuticals International, Inc. from 2013 to 2014. Mr. Hassan received an undergraduate degree from Imperial College of Science and Technology, University of London and a master's degree in business administration from Harvard Business School. |
Qualifications
The Board concluded that Mr. Hassan should serve on the Board based on his global experience as a public company chief executive officer, his particular knowledge and experience in the healthcare and pharmaceutical industries, including overseeing businesses with significant research and development operations, his diversified financial and business expertise, as well as prior public company board experience. Given his financial and leadership experience, Mr. Hassan has been determined to be an Audit Committee financial expert by our Board.
10 ï 2019 Proxy Statement
|
Item 1 Election of Directors
|
|
Rebecca M. Henderson
Director since: 2009
Age: 58
Committees: Audit Corporate Responsibility and Compliance Other Public Company Boards: IDEXX Laboratories, Inc.
|
Rebecca M. Henderson has been the John and Natty McArthur University Professor at Harvard University since 2011. From 2009 to 2011, Dr. Henderson served as the Senator John Heinz Professor of Environmental Management at Harvard Business School. Prior to this, she was a professor of management at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, or MIT, for 21 years, having been the Eastman Kodak LFM Professor of Management since 1999. Since 1995, she has also been a Research Associate at the National Bureau of Economic Research. She specializes in technology strategy and the broader strategic problems faced by companies in high technology industries.
Dr. Henderson has been a director of IDEXX Laboratories, Inc., a company which provides diagnostic and information technology-based products and services for veterinary, food and water applications, since 2003, chairing its Finance Committee and serving on its Compensation Committee. Dr. Henderson has also served as a director of the Ember Corporation, a privately-held semiconductor chip manufacturer, and on its Compensation Committee, from 2001 to 2009. She has further been a director of Linbeck Construction Corporation, a privately-held facility solutions company, from 2000 until 2004. Dr. Henderson has published articles, papers and reviews in a range of scholarly journals. Dr. Henderson received an undergraduate degree from MIT and a doctorate from Harvard University.
Qualifications
The Board concluded that Dr. Henderson should serve on the Board because Dr. Hendersons study of the complex strategy issues faced by high technology companies provides valuable insight into the Companys strategic and technology issues. |
Charles M. Holley, Jr.
Director since: 2017
Age: 62
Committees: Audit (Chair) Corporate Responsibility and Compliance Executive
Audit Committee financial expert
|
Charles M. Holley, Jr. is the former Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer for Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., or Walmart, where he served from 2010 to 2015 and as Executive Vice President between January 1, 2016 and January 31, 2016. Prior to this, Mr. Holley served as Executive Vice President, Finance and Treasurer of Walmart from 2007 to 2010. From 2005 to 2006, he served as Senior Vice President. Prior to that, Mr. Holley was Senior Vice President and Controller from 2003 to 2005. Mr. Holley served various roles in Wal-Mart International from 1994 through 2002. Prior to this, Mr. Holley served in various roles at Tandy Corporation. He spent more than ten years with Ernst & Young LLP. Mr. Holley is an Independent Senior Advisor, U.S. CFO Program, at Deloitte LLP, a privately-held provider of audit, consulting, tax, and advisory services, since 2016.
Mr. Holley serves on the Advisory Council for the McCombs School of Business at the University of Texas at Austin and the University of Texas Presidents Development Board.
Qualifications
The Board concluded that Mr. Holley should serve on the Board based on his experience as a chief financial officer of a global public company, his financial acumen, and his management and leadership skills. Given his financial and leadership experience, Mr. Holley has been determined to be an Audit Committee financial expert by our Board. |
ï 2019 Proxy Statement 11
|
Item 1 Election of Directors
|
|
Tyler Jacks
Director since: 2012
Age: 58
Committees: Audit Compensation and Management Development
Other Public Company Boards: Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.
|
Tyler Jacks joined the faculty of Massachusetts Institute of Technology, or MIT, in 1992 and is currently the David H. Koch Professor of Biology and director of the David H. Koch Institute for Integrative Cancer Research, which brings together biologists and engineers to improve detection, diagnosis and treatment of cancer, a position he has held since 2007. Dr. Jacks has been an investigator with the Howard Hughes Medical Institute, a nonprofit medical research organization, since 1994.
Dr. Jacks has been a director of Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc., a life sciences supply company, since 2009, serving on its Strategy and Finance Committee and scientific advisory board and chairing its Science and Technology Committee. In 2006, he co-founded T2 Biosystems, Inc., a biotechnology company, and served on its scientific advisory board until 2013. Dr. Jacks has served on the scientific advisory board of SQZ Biotech, a privately-held biotechnology company, since 2015. Dr. Jacks served on the scientific advisory board of Aveo Pharmaceuticals Inc., a biopharmaceutical company, from 2001 until 2013. In 2015, Dr. Jacks founded Dragonfly Therapeutics, Inc., a privately-held biopharmaceutical company, and serves as Chair of its scientific advisory board. He was appointed to the National Cancer Advisory Board, which advises and assists the Director of the National Cancer Institute with respect to the National Cancer Program, in 2011 and served as Chair until 2016. In 2016, Dr. Jacks was named to a blue ribbon panel of scientists and advisors established as a working group of the National Cancer Advisory Board and served as co-Chair advising the Cancer MoonshotSM Task Force. Dr. Jacks was a director of MITs Center for Cancer Research from 2001 to 2007 and received numerous awards including the Paul Marks Prize for Cancer Research and the American Association for Cancer Research Award for Outstanding Achievement. He was elected to the National Academy of Sciences as well as the National Academy of Medicine in 2009 and received the MIT Killian Faculty Achievement Award in 2015. Dr. Jacks received an undergraduate degree from Harvard University and his doctorate from the University of California, San Francisco. |
Qualifications
The Board concluded that Dr. Jacks should serve on the Board based on his extensive scientific expertise relevant to our industry, including his broad experience as a cancer researcher, pioneering uses of technology to study cancer-associated genes, and service on several scientific advisory boards and membership in the National Cancer Advisory Board.
Ellen J. Kullman
Director since: 2016
Age: 63
Committees: Audit Governance and Nominating
Other Public Company Boards: Dell Technologies Inc. Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. United Technologies Corporation
Audit Committee financial expert
|
Ellen J. Kullman is the former President, Chair and Chief Executive Officer of E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Company, or DuPont, a science and technology-based company, where she served from 2009 to 2015. Prior to this, Ms. Kullman served as President of DuPont from 2008 to 2009. From 2006 through 2008, she served as Executive Vice President of DuPont. Prior to that, Ms. Kullman was Group Vice President, DuPont Safety and Protection. Ms. Kullman has been a director of United Technologies Corporation, a technology products and services company, since 2011, and lead director since 2018, serving on its Compensation, Finance and Executive Committees. Ms. Kullman has been a director of Goldman Sachs Group, Inc., an investment banking firm, since 2016, serving on its Compensation, Corporate Governance and Nominating, and Risk Committees. Ms. Kullman has been a director of Dell Technologies Inc., a technology company, since 2016, serving on its Audit and Capital Stock Committees. Dell Technologies was a privately-held company until December 2018 when it became publicly traded. Ms. Kullman served as a director of General Motors, from 2004 to 2008, serving on its Audit Committee.
Ms. Kullman has also served as a director of Carbon3D, Inc., a privately-held 3D printing company, since 2016. Ms. Kullman has served on the Board of Trustees of Northwestern University since 2016 and on the Board of Overseers of Tufts University School of Engineering since 2006. She served as Chair of the US-China Business Council from 2013 to 2015. In 2016, Ms. Kullman joined the Temasek Americas Advisory Panel of Temasek Holdings (Private) Limited, a privately-held investment company based in Singapore. Ms. Kullman received a bachelor of science in mechanical engineering degree from Tufts University and a masters degree from the Kellogg School of Management at Northwestern University. |
Qualifications
The Board concluded that Ms. Kullman should serve on the Board based on her lengthy global experience as a public company chief executive officer and board chair, her management and leadership skills, and her experience with scientific operations, all of which provide valuable insight into the operations of our Company. Given her leadership and financial experience, Ms. Kullman has been determined to be an Audit Committee financial expert by our Board.
12 ï 2019 Proxy Statement
|
Item 1 Election of Directors
|
|
Ronald D. Sugar
Director since: 2010
Age: 70
Committees: Corporate Responsibility and Compliance (Chair) Executive Governance and Nominating
Other Public Company Boards: Air Lease Corporation Apple Inc. Chevron Corporation
|
Ronald D. Sugar is the retired Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of Northrop Grumman Corporation, a global aerospace and defense company, having held these posts from 2003 through 2009.
Dr. Sugar has been a director of Chevron Corporation, a petroleum, exploration, production and refining company, since 2005, serving as the lead director and on the Management Compensation Committee and chairing the Board Nominating and Governance Committee. Dr. Sugar has been a director of Apple Inc., a manufacturer and seller of, among other things, personal computers, mobile communication and media devices, since 2010, chairing the Audit and Finance Committee. Dr. Sugar has been a director of Air Lease Corporation, an aircraft leasing company, since 2010, chairing the Compensation Committee and serving on the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. Since 2010, he has been a senior advisor to Ares Management LLC, a privately-held asset manager and registered investment advisor. In 2014, Dr. Sugar joined the Temasek Americas Advisory Panel of Temasek Holdings (Private) Limited, a privately-held investment company based in Singapore. Dr. Sugar is a member of the National Academy of Engineering, trustee of the University of Southern California, member of the UCLA Anderson School of Management Board of Visitors, and director of the Los Angeles Philharmonic Association.
Qualifications
The Board concluded that Dr. Sugar should serve on our Board because of Dr. Sugars board and senior executive-level expertise, including his experience as chief executive officer and board chair of a large, highly regulated, public company and his insight in the areas of operations, government affairs, science, technology and finance. |
R. Sanders Williams
Director since: 2014
Age: 70
Committees: Corporate Responsibility and Compliance Governance and Nominating
Other Public Company Boards: Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings
|
R. Sanders Williams is the President Emeritus of Gladstone Institutes, a non-profit biomedical research enterprise, having served in this position since 2018, and was the Chief Executive Officer of Gladstone Foundation, a not-for-profit organization supporting the Gladstone Institutes during 2018. Dr. Williams has been a Professor of Medicine at the University of California, San Francisco since 2010, and Professor of Medicine at Duke University since 2018. Dr. Williams was both President of Gladstone Institutes and its Robert W. and Linda L. Mahley Distinguished Professor of Medicine, from 2010 to 2017. Prior to this, Dr. Williams served as Senior Vice Chancellor of the Duke University School of Medicine from 2008 to 2010 and Dean of the Duke University School of Medicine from 2001 to 2008. He was the founding Dean of the Duke-NUS Graduate Medical School, Singapore, from 2003 to 2008 and served on its Governing Board from 2003 to 2010. From 1990 to 2001, Dr. Williams was Chief of Cardiology and Director of the Ryburn Center for Molecular Cardiology at the University of Texas, Southwestern Medical Center.
Dr. Williams has been a director of the Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings, a diagnostic technologies company, since 2007, serving on the Audit Committee and chairing the Quality and Compliance Committee. Dr. Williams was a director of Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, a pharmaceutical company, from 2006 until 2013. Dr. Williams has served on the board of directors of the Gladstone Foundation, a non-profit institution that is distinct from Gladstone Institutes, since 2012 and on the board of directors of Exploratorium, a non-profit science museum and learning center located in San Francisco, from 2011 to 2018. Dr. Williams was elected to the National Academy of Medicine in 2002. Dr. Williams received his undergraduate degree from Princeton University and his doctorate from Duke University. |
Qualifications
The Board concluded that Dr. Williams should serve on the Board because of his broad medical and scientific background, including his leadership roles in domestic and academic science settings, his deep experience in cardiology, oversight of governance of multi-hospital healthcare provider systems, leadership and development of international medical programs in Asia, and prior industry board experience.
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR EACH OF THE ABOVE 12 NAMED NOMINEES.
ï 2019 Proxy Statement 13
|
Corporate Governance
|
|
The Board has the ultimate oversight responsibility for the risk management process. The Board discusses enterprise risks with our senior management on a regular basis, including as a part of its annual strategic planning process, annual budget review and approval, capital plan review and approval, and through reviews of compliance issues in the applicable committees of our Board, as appropriate. At each regular meeting, or more frequently as needed, the Board receives and considers reports from each of the committees set forth below, which reports may provide additional detail on risk management issues and managements response. Important categories of risk are assigned to appropriate Board committees that report back to the full Board:
Committee
|
Primary Risk Oversight Responsibility
|
|||
Governance and Nominating |
Oversees the assessment of each member of the Boards independence, as well as the effectiveness of our Corporate Governance Principles and Board of Directors Code of Conduct. Also oversees Board and committee evaluations and Board succession.
|
|||
Audit |
Oversees financial risk, such as capital risk, tax risk, financial compliance risk and internal controls over financial reporting, and oversees internal audit and independent registered public accountants.
|
|||
Compensation and Management Development |
Evaluates whether the right management talent is in place and oversees succession planning. Also oversees our compensation policies and practices and incentive program administration and design, including whether such policies, practices, and incentive programs balance risk-taking and rewards in an appropriate manner as discussed further below, align with stockholders interests, and are consistent with emerging best practices.
|
|||
Corporate Responsibility and Compliance |
Oversees non-financial compliance risk, such as regulatory risks associated with the requirements of the Federal health care program, Food and Drug Administration, and risks associated with pricing and access, information security, including cybersecurity, and our reputation. Also oversees staff member compliance with the Code of Conduct.
|
ï 2019 Proxy Statement 17
|
Corporate Governance
|
|
Process for Selecting Directors, Director Qualifications, and Board Diversity
ï 2019 Proxy Statement 19
|
Corporate Governance
|
|
Continuous Board Refreshment
The Board, led by the Governance Committee, has an ongoing process for identifying, evaluating and selecting directors.
Independent Search Firms Stockholders Independent Directors Candidate Pool Sourced, Maintained, and Updated Consider Guidelines for Director Qualifications and Evaluations (Appendix A) Consider skills matrix Consider diversity Review independence and potential conflicts Meet candidates Select Directors 5 new directors since 2015 Recommend Candidates to the Board Review by full Board
Regular Board and Committee Evaluations
Our Governance Committee leads an annual evaluation process of the Board and its committees. The Board and the Audit, Compensation, Compliance, and Governance Committees each complete an annual assessment focusing on their roles, effectiveness, and fulfillment of fiduciary duties.
1. Commence Annual Anonymous Evaluations Formal annual anonymous evaluations of the full Board as well as the Audit, Compensation, and Governance Committees are compiled and distributed Overseen by the Governance Committee 2. Evaluation and Assessment Directors provide feedback regarding Board and applicable committee: Composition and structure Role and effectiveness Fulfillment of fiduciary duties Meetings and materials Interaction with management 3. Review The lead independent director speaks with each member of the Board for one-on-one discussions Each committee and the full Board conduct separate discussions in executive session 4. Incorporation of Feedback Follow-up items are addressed at subsequent Board and committee meetings
20 ï 2019 Proxy Statement
|
Corporate Governance
|
|
Governance Committee Processes and Procedures for Considering and Determining Director Compensation
Current Members: Charles M. Holley, Jr.* (Chair) Wanda M. Austin Brian J. Druker (since May 2018) Fred Hassan* Rebecca M. Henderson Frank C. Herringer* Tyler Jacks Ellen J. Kullman*
*Audit Committee financial expert
Others Who Served in 2018: François de Carbonnel (until retirement at 2018 Annual Meeting)
Number of Meetings Held in 2018: 10
Each member has been determined by the Board to be independent under The NASDAQ Stock Market listing standards and the requirements of the SEC, including the requirements regarding financial literacy and sophistication.
|
Description and Key Responsibilities:
Oversees our accounting and financial reporting process and the audits of the financial statements, as required by NASDAQ.
Assists the Board in fulfilling its fiduciary responsibilities with respect to the oversight of our financial accounting and reporting, the underlying internal controls and procedures over financial reporting, and the audits of the financial statements.
Has sole authority for the appointment, compensation, retention, and oversight of the work of the independent registered public accountants.
Reviews and discusses, prior to filing or issuance, with management and the independent registered public accountants (when appropriate) our audited consolidated financial statements to be included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K and earnings press releases.
Approves all related party transactions, as required by NASDAQ.
| |||||||
Oversight of the Independent Registered Public Accountants The Audit Committee: Auditor Selection. Evaluates the qualifications and performance of our independent registered public accountants each year and determines whether to re-engage the current independent registered public accountants. Audit Partner Selection. Directly involved in the selection of the lead engagement partner through an interview process. Audit Firm Evaluation. Considers the quality and efficiency of the services provided, the independent registered public accountants technical expertise and knowledge of our operations and industry. Audit Services. Pre-approves services.
|
||||||||
22 ï 2019 Proxy Statement
|
Corporate Governance
|
|
ï 2019 Proxy Statement 23
|
Corporate Governance
|
|
Compensation Committee Processes and Procedures for Considering and Determining Executive Compensation in 2018
ï 2019 Proxy Statement 25
|
Item 2 Advisory Vote to Approve Our Executive Compensation
|
|
2018 Executive Compensation Was Aligned With Our Strategy and Performance
As discussed more fully in our Compensation Discussion and Analysis starting on page 33, a significant majority of each NEOs compensation is at-risk and dependent on our performance and execution of our strategic priorities.
LTI Equity Award Allocation | 2018 Total Target Direct Compensation Mix | |
|
2018 Performance Against Pre-Established Goals and Measures
2018 Annual Cash Incentive Program
|
2016-2018 Long-Term Incentive Performance Program
| |||||||
Goal
|
Weighting
|
% of Target Earned
|
||||||
Financial Performance
| ||||||||
Revenues
|
|
30%
|
|
224.7%
| ||||
Non-GAAP Net Income(1)
|
|
30%
|
|
186.5%
| ||||
Progress Innovative Pipeline
| ||||||||
Advance Early Pipeline
|
|
5%
|
|
113.9%
| ||||
Execute Key Clinical Studies and Regulatory Filings
|
|
20%
|
|
120.8%
| ||||
Deliver Annual Priorities
| ||||||||
Execute Critical Launches and Long-Term Commercial Objectives
|
|
10%
|
|
71.3%
| ||||
Achieve Transformation Objectives
|
|
5%
|
|
124.2%
| ||||
Final Score
|
|
Achieved 166.6%
|
* | Mr. Gordon and Dr. Reese are not included in the pie chart because they commenced their roles as executive officers of our Company on September 3, 2018, and July 26, 2018, respectively. |
(1) | Non-Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, or non-GAAP, net income for purposes of the 2018 Company performance goals of our annual cash incentive award program is reported and reconciled in Appendix B. |
(2) | The operating measures of the 2016-2018 performance units were based on non-GAAP financial results for 2016, 2017, and 2018 as reported and reconciled in Appendix B, except that operating measures were further adjusted for the impacts of Hurricane Maria as prescribed by the terms of the 2016-2018 performance goals document. For this purpose, operating expense was reduced by $147 million ($0.16 in EPS) for 2017 and increased by $21 million ($0.03 in EPS) for 2018. |
ï 2019 Proxy Statement 29
|
Item 2 Advisory Vote to Approve Our Executive Compensation
|
|
2018 Alignment of Pay with Performance
Our strategy includes a series of integrated activities to strengthen our long-term competitive position in the industry. Key 2018 activities that align our NEO pay with performance and support the execution of our strategic priorities are summarized below.
We delivered strong financial performance.
| Revenues were $23.7 billion in 2018, an increase of 4% from 2017, driven primarily by product sales growth. |
| Our non-GAAP net income(1) grew 4% to $9.6 billion in 2018. |
| We realized benefits from ongoing transformation initiatives along with increased investment in both research and development and our launch products. |
| We delivered a one-year total shareholder return of 15% and a five-year return of 93%, outperforming our peer group and the Standard & Poors 500 Index over both time periods. |
Total Shareholder Return
| Our quarterly 2018 dividend of $1.32 per share represented a 15 percent increase from the quarterly dividend for 2017. |
| During 2018, we repurchased $17.9 billion of our Common Stock and paid dividends totaling $3.5 billion, resulting in our returning a total of $21.4 billion of capital to our stockholders through stock repurchases and dividends. |
We progressed our pipeline.
We develop innovative and biosimilar medicines that address unmet medical needs to treat serious illnesses. In 2018, we launched two innovative products, two biosimilars, and generated a significant number of innovative and first-in-class molecules in our portfolio.
We launched four medicines in 2018.
v | Innovative Medicines Launched. We launched two important innovative products in 2018 in the U.S. in two different therapeutic areas: |
|
Aimovig® (migraine), the first calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) inhibitor approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for the preventive treatment of migraine in adults. Migraine is a debilitating condition that continues to have a significant lasting impact on the lives of patients and society at large. In 2018, we served more than 150,000 patients with Aimovig. |
(1) | Non-GAAP net income for purposes of the 2018 Company performance goals of our annual cash incentive award program is reported and reconciled in Appendix B. |
30 ï 2019 Proxy Statement
|
Item 2 Advisory Vote to Approve Our Executive Compensation
|
|
|
Parsabiv® (nephrology), our medicine for secondary hyperparathyroidism. Parsabiv, which is administered along with dialysis, delivers clinical benefits to patients by putting control in the hands of the health care provider. |
v | Biosimilars Launched. We also launched two important biosimilars outside the U.S. in 2018: |
| KANJINTI (biosimilar trastuzumab (Herceptin®)) launched in Europe for the treatment of HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer, HER2-positive early breast cancer, and HER2-positive metastatic adenocarcinoma of the stomach or gastroesophageal junction. |
| AMGEVITA (biosimilar adalimumab (HUMIRA®)) launched in Europe for the treatment of inflammatory diseases, including moderate-to-severe rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, severe active ankylosing spondylitis, moderate-to-severe chronic plaque psoriasis, moderate-to-severe Crohns disease, and moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis. |
We advanced our early pipeline with approximately 20 unique oncology assets in development.
| We initiated 10 first-in-human studies, including for small-cell lung cancer, obesity, glioblastoma, relapsed/refractory diffuse large b-cell lymphoma, mantle cell lymphoma and follicular lymphoma, multiple myeloma, acute myeloid leukemia, non-hodgkins lymphoma, and cardiovascular disease. |
| In the oncology pipeline, we are advancing approximately 20 early-stage product candidates in therapeutic indications ranging from solid tumors (including small-cell lung cancer) and hematological malignancies (including multiple myeloma and acute myeloid leukemia). We have designed these development programs to rapidly establish proof-of-concepts and generate data to support our move into the pivotal phase so that we may get these innovative therapies to patients as quickly as possible. |
We executed key clinical studies and regulatory filings.
v | Innovative Portfolio Developments. We executed key clinical studies and regulatory filings for KYPROLIS®, XGEVA®, BLINCYTO®, and Nplate® in oncology, for Repatha® in cardiovascular disease, for tezepelumab(1) in inflammatory disease, and for Prolia® and EVENITY(2)* in bone health. |
v | Biosimilar Portfolio Developments. In our biosimilars portfolio, MVASI(3) (biosimilar bevacizumab (Avastin®)) was approved in Europe, we submitted applications in the U.S. and Europe for ABP 710 (biosimilar infliximab (REMICADE®)), and ABP 798(3) (biosimilar rituximab (RITUXAN®)) met its primary endpoint in our Phase 1/Phase 3 study. |
We delivered on our annual priorities to execute critical launches and long-term commercial objectives.
Revenue growth (4%) benefited from double-digit, volume-driven sales growth from a number of our innovative medicines that address unmet medical needs to treat serious illnesses, including Repatha in cardiovascular disease, Prolia in osteoporosis, and KYPROLIS in cancer.
We realized our 2014-2018 commitments to investors and our transformation objectives.
2018 was the capstone year for a set of ambitious non-GAAP financial commitments we made to our stockholders five years ago, including earnings per share growth, operating margin improvement, and return of capital that we met and exceeded through significant transformation and process improvement efforts. The benefits of our transformation continues in the productivity capabilities we have embedded into our business to reallocate resources to our pipeline and growth opportunities, putting us in a better position to serve patients and deliver long-term growth.
We invested for long-term growth while returning substantial capital to our stockholders.
| In 2018, we invested $3.7 billion in research and development and $738 million in capital expenditures. |
| Between 2011 and 2018, we have increased our global presence to approximately 100 countries from 50. |
| Next-generation biomanufacturing plants require a smaller manufacturing footprint and offer greater environmental benefits, including reduced consumption of water and energy and lower levels of carbon emissions. In 2018, we successfully operated our next-generation manufacturing facility in Singapore and broke ground on a next-generation biomanufacturing plant in Rhode Island. This new plant will be the first of its kind in the U.S. and will use our proven next-generation biomanufacturing capabilities to manufacture our products while maintaining a reliable, high-quality, compliant supply of medicines to continue our commitment to meet the need of every patient every time. |
(1) | Jointly developed in collaboration with AstraZeneca plc. |
(2) | Jointly developed in collaboration with UCB. *Trade name provisionally approved in U.S. |
(3) | Jointly developed in collaboration with Allergan plc. |
ï 2019 Proxy Statement 31
|
Item 2 Advisory Vote to Approve Our Executive Compensation
|
|
Positive 2018 Say on Pay Vote Outcome and Engagement With Our Stockholders
Board Recommends a Vote FOR Our Executive Compensation
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR THE ADVISORY RESOLUTION TO APPROVE THE COMPENSATION OF THE COMPANYS NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS.
32 ï 2019 Proxy Statement
|
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
|
|
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
Table of Contents
ï 2019 Proxy Statement 33
|
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
|
|
This Compensation Discussion and Analysis describes our compensation strategy, philosophy, policies, programs, and practices, or compensation program, for our Named Executive Officers, or NEOs, and the positions they held in 2018 below.
Name | Title | |
Robert A. Bradway |
Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and President | |
Anthony C. Hooper |
Former Executive Vice President, Global Commercial Operations (through September 3, 2018) | |
Murdo Gordon |
Executive Vice President, Global Commercial Operations | |
Sean E. Harper |
Former Executive Vice President, Research and Development (through July 26, 2018) | |
David W. Meline |
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer | |
David M. Reese |
Executive Vice President, Research and Development | |
Jonathan P. Graham |
Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary |
Planned Succession Executive Officer Changes in 2018
34 ï 2019 Proxy Statement
|
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
|
|
Our strategy includes a series of integrated activities to strengthen our long-term competitive position in the industry. Select 2018 activities that support the execution of our strategic priorities and align our NEO pay with performance are summarized below and discussed further in the following pages.
Our Strategic Priorities
Select 2018 Activities | Description | |||||||||||
Innovative Medicines |
Launched: Aimovig®(1) (migraine) Parsabiv® (nephrology) Progressed pipeline: 10 investigational 10 first-in-human studies
|
Our research and development strategy is aimed at advancing differentiated, best-in-class or first-in-class molecules that deliver large effect sizes against serious illnesses. Our focus on developing innovative, breakaway medicines to address important unmet needs guides how we allocate resources across internal and external program possibilities. This results in a productive balance of internal development and external programs and collaborations reflected in our current product portfolio and pipeline.
|
||||||||||
Branded Biosimilars |
Launched: KANJINTI AMGEVITA 3 biosimilars in Phase 3 |
We believe our deep experience in biologics development and unparalleled capabilities in biotechnology manufacturing make the emerging biosimilars market attractive and position us for leadership. |
||||||||||
Transforming Amgen for the Future |
Met and exceeded 2014-2018 Embedded productivity |
We have improved our business and operating model through significant transformation and process improvement efforts. We have driven research and development efficiency through productivity initiatives. Among these programs, we reduced our development cycle time by an average of approximately 36 months, reduced the time it takes to bring new medicines to market, reengineered internal processes to make them more efficient, and explored new technologies with the potential to further enhance the value we deliver to patients. Further, the benefits of our transformation continue in the productivity capabilities we have embedded in our business to reallocate resources to our pipeline and growth opportunities.
|
||||||||||
Capital Allocation and Investing for Long-Term Growth |
$17.9B in stock repurchases $3.5B of dividends 15% per share dividend |
We recognize that stockholders who support investment in developing innovative medicines require an appropriate return on the capital they commit to Amgen. In 2018, we returned $21.4 billion in capital to our stockholders, consisting of $17.9 billion in stock repurchases and $3.5 billion of dividends. |
||||||||||
Global Geographic Reach |
Presence in ~100 countries |
We are leveraging our global presence to deliver the potential of our products to patients globally. Amgen medicines are now available to patients in approximately 100 countries worldwide.
|
||||||||||
Next-Generation Biomanufacturing | Broke ground on
U.S. |
Next-generation biomanufacturing plants, such as our Singapore facility licensed in 2017, require a smaller manufacturing footprint and offer greater environmental benefits, including reduced consumption of water and energy and lower levels of carbon emissions. Our new plant being built in Rhode Island will be the first of its kind in the U.S. and will use these proven next-generation biomanufacturing capabilities. |
||||||||||
Improved Drug Delivery Systems | Invested in delivery devices to enhance patient experience, including our SureClick® autoinjector
|
Biologic medicines are, for the most part, injected subcutaneously or administered intravenously. Innovations that make the delivery of our medicines easier and less costly are good for patients and have positive economic benefits to the healthcare system. They also offer important opportunities for differentiation and contribute to our life cycle management strategies for our mature brands.
|
(1) | Jointly developed in collaboration with Novartis AG. |
ï 2019 Proxy Statement 35
|
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
|
|
Aligning Pay With Performance and Execution of Our Strategic Priorities
(1) | Non-Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, or non-GAAP, net income for purposes of the 2018 Company performance goals of our annual cash incentive award program is reported and reconciled in Appendix B. |
36 ï 2019 Proxy Statement
|
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
|
|
(1) | U.S. Food and Drug Administration. |
(2) | RandomizEd, OpeN Label, Phase 3 Study of Carfilzomib Plus DExamethAsone Vs Bortezomib Plus DexamethasOne in Patients with Relapsed Multiple Myeloma. |
(3) | CArfilzomib, Lenaldidomide, and DexamethaSone versus Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone for the treatment of PatIents with Relapsed Multiple MyEloma. |
(4) | New Drug Application. |
(5) | Developed in Japan by Amgen Astellas BioPharma K.K., our joint venture with Astellas Pharma Inc. |
(6) | Biologics License Application. |
ï 2019 Proxy Statement 37
|
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
|
|
(1) | Jointly developed in collaboration with AstraZeneca plc. |
(2) | Jointly developed in collaboration with UCB. Developed in Japan by Amgen Astellas BioPharma K.K., our joint venture with Astellas Pharma Inc. *Trade name provisionally approved in U.S. |
(3) | European Medicines Agency. |
(4) | Jointly developed in collaboration with Allergan plc. |
38 ï 2019 Proxy Statement
|
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
|
|
(1) | Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use of the European Medicines Agency. |
ï 2019 Proxy Statement 39
|
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
|
|
Final 2016-2018 Performance Period Calculation 2016-2018 Non-GAAP(1) Operating Measures EPS Growth (1/3rd) Operating Margin (1/3rd) Operating Expense (1/3rd) 115.4% 2016-2018 Amgen Relative TSR Performance 30.3% Final Payout 145.7%
(1) | The operating measures of the 2016-2018 performance units were based on Non-GAAP financial results for 2016, 2017, and 2018 as reported and reconciled in Appendix B, except that operating measures were further adjusted for the impacts of Hurricane Maria as prescribed by the terms of the 2016-2018 performance goals document. For this purpose, operating expense was reduced by $147 million ($0.16 in EPS) for 2017 and increased by $21 million ($0.03 in EPS) for 2018. |
40 ï 2019 Proxy Statement
|
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
|
|
Our 2018 Compensation Program Highlights and Objectives
Total Target Direct Compensation Focuses on At Risk Compensation (90% for our Chief Executive Officer, or CEO, and 83% for our other NEOs) |
2018 Total Target Direct Compensation Mix 76% 14% 10% 90% At Risk CEO 90% pay at risk 75% performance based 17% 17% 66% 83% At Risk other NEOs* 83% pay at risk 69% performance based Purpose LTI Equity Awards Provide a direct link to the creation of stockholder value and execution on our strategy Align NEO's interests with stockholders Foster long-term focus and retention Annual Cash Incentives Measure NEO's performance against pre-established Company performance goals Align all staff members around the same Company performance goals as all such annual cash incentive awards are based on these goals Motivate NEOs to meet or exceed our Company performance goals to drive annual performance and position us for longer-term success via our strategy Base Salary Provides a degree of financial certainty that helps us retain talent Recognizes competitive market conditions and/or rewards individual performance through periodic increases LTI Equity Award Allocation: 80% Performance Based 50% Performance Units 30% Stock Options 20% Restricted Stock Units All preceding pie charts are calculated using (i) the "Salary" column from the "Summary Compensation Table" in our Executive Compensation Tables (ii) the target annual cash incentive cash incentive award in the "Estimated Possible Payouts Under Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards - Target" column in the table in footnote 3 to the "Grants of Plan-Based Awards" table in our Executive Compensation Tables and (iii) the grant date fair value of annual grants of performance units, restricted stock units, or RSUs and stock options in the "Grant Date Fair Value of Stock and Option Awards" column of the "Grants of Plan-Based Awards" table in our Executive Compensation Tables.
* | Mr. Gordon and Dr. Reese are not included in the pie chart because they commenced their roles as executive officers of our Company on September 3, 2018, and July 26, 2018, respectively. |
42 ï 2019 Proxy Statement
|
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
|
|
LTI Equity Awards (At Risk)
| Performance Units (50%). Performance units are rights to earn shares of our Common Stock based on pre-established performance goals achieved over a performance period of generally three years. The Compensation Committee establishes the performance award goal design at the beginning of each three-year period of the performance award program. The number of performance units earned is determined by our performance as measured against the pre-established performance goals at the end of the performance period. There is no guarantee of any value realized from the grants as they are earned only if specific long-term performance goals are achieved. |
| Stock Options (30%). Aligned with stockholder interests as they only have value if the Companys stock price increases after grant. |
| Restricted Stock Units (20%). Designed to encourage retention and long-term value creation. |
| Stock options and RSUs generally vest over four years in three approximately equal installments on the second, third, and fourth anniversaries of the grant date. The delay in the commencement of vesting further emphasizes the long-term performance focus of our LTI equity award program and enhances retention. |
Performance Units Earned for the 2016-2018 Performance Period
The performance units for the 2016-2018 performance period were earned based on the Companys performance on three pre-established equally weighted annual non-GAAP operating measures(1) (EPS growth, operating margin, and operating expense) as measured against the pre-established targets for each of the three years. At the end of this performance period, the operating measures were averaged resulting in the total operating measures score of 115.4%. This score was then modified based on our three-year TSR performance of +30.3% (at the 65.2% percentile relative to the TSRs of the companies in the S&P 500 for this performance period)(2). These calculations resulted in a payout of 145.7% of target performance units granted.
|
Annual Cash Incentive Awards (At Risk and Designed to Drive Execution of Our Strategic Priorities)
Our Compensation Committee annually approves Company performance goals that are designed to focus our staff on delivering on our financial performance and operational objectives and to support our strategic priorities to drive annual performance and position us to execute on our strategy in the near- and longer-term. Our Executive Incentive Plan, or EIP, establishes a maximum award possible for each participant and annual cash incentive awards are made to our NEOs using the Compensation Committees negative discretion under the EIP generally based on the Companys performance against the pre-established Company performance goals. |
Our annual cash incentive awards are earned based on achieving financial performance, operational objectives that drive near- and long-term growth, stockholder value, and support our strategy. In 2018, we established annual Company performance goals that also serve to support our longer-term strategy. These performance goals are composed of revenues (30%), non-GAAP net income(3) (30%), and a number of operational measures supporting Progress Innovative Pipeline (25%) (composed of Advance Early Pipeline (5%) and Execute Key Clinical Studies and Regulatory Filings (20%)) and Deliver Annual Priorities (15%) (composed of Execute Critical Launches and Long-Term Commercial Objectives (10%) and Achieve Transformation Objectives (5%)). Based on our overall performance in 2018 compared to these pre-established Company performance goals, we paid annual cash incentive awards at 166.6% of target bonus opportunity.
|
Base Salaries (the smallest component of compensation for our NEOs)
| Based on data provided to the Compensation Committee, including recommendations of Frederic W. Cook & Co., or FW Cook, the Compensation Committees independent consultant, the Compensation Committee provided no base salary increases to its NEOs in 2018 consistent with our market positioning and reflective of our continued exercise of financial discipline. |
(1) | The operating measures of the 2016-2018 performance units were based on non-GAAP financial results for 2016, 2017, and 2018 as reported and reconciled in Appendix B, except that operating measures were further adjusted for the impacts of Hurricane Maria as prescribed by the terms of the 2016-2018 performance goals document. For this purpose, operating expense was reduced by $147 million ($0.16 in EPS) for 2017 and increased by $21 million ($0.03 in EPS) for 2018. |
(2) | Based on our average daily closing price of a share of our Common Stock for the first 20 trading days beginning on the grant date (May 3, 2016) and last 20 trading days of the performance period. |
(3) | Non-GAAP net income for purposes of the 2018 Company performance goals of our annual cash incentive award program is reported and reconciled in Appendix B. |
ï 2019 Proxy Statement 43
|
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
|
|
How Compensation Decisions Are Made For Our Named Executive Officers
Roles and Responsibilities
Compensation Committee Composed solely of independent directors and reports to the Board
|
Evaluates the performance of our CEO within the context of the financial and operational performance of the Company.
Determines and approves compensation packages for our CEO, other NEOs, Executive Vice Presidents, Senior Vice Presidents, and Section 16 officers (collectively, Senior Management).
Reviews and approves all compensation programs in which our NEOs participate.
Oversees the development and effective succession planning of our CEO and other members of Senior Management annually.
Exercises the sole authority to select, retain, replace, and/or obtain advice from compensation consultants, legal counsel, and other outside advisors and assesses the independence of each such advisor, taking into consideration the factors set forth in the Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC, rules and The NASDAQ Stock Market listing standards.
Oversees the Boards relationship with and response to stockholders on executive compensation matters and the Compensation Discussion and Analysis.
|
Consultant to the Compensation Committee Frederic W. Cook & Co., Inc., Independent consultant retained directly by the Compensation Committee
|
Regularly attends Compensation Committee meetings, including meeting in executive session with the Compensation Committee.
Provides advice and studies on the appropriateness and competitiveness of our compensation program relative to market practice for our NEO compensation.
Provides advice and studies on our equity programs.
Provides advice on the selection of our peer group.
Consults on executive compensation trends and developments.
Consults and makes recommendations, when requested, on various compensation matters and compensation program designs and practices to support our business strategy and objectives.
Coordinates and reviews the appropriateness of market data compiled by management.
Works with management to assess the potential risks arising from our compensation policies and practices.
|
CEO Assisted by the Senior Vice President, Human Resources and other Company staff members |
Conducts performance reviews of the other NEOs and makes recommendations to the Compensation Committee with respect to compensation of Senior Management other than himself.
Provides recommendations on the development of and succession planning for the members of Senior Management other than himself.
|
ï 2019 Proxy Statement 45
|
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
|
|
46 ï 2019 Proxy Statement
|
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
|
|
How We Establish Our Peer Group
2018 Peer Group Companies Biotechnology and pharmaceutical companies with which we compete for executive talent. | ||||
Objective Criteria Considered
|
2018 Peer Group (Companies in blue also list Amgen as a peer)
| |||
GICS codes of biotechnology (352010) and pharmaceuticals (352020);
12-month average market capitalization between 0.25 and 4.0x that of Amgens average market capitalization for the same period(1);
Trailing four-quarter revenues between 0.25 and 4.0x that of Amgens revenues(1);
Non-U.S. peers limited to those commonly identified as a peer of peers;
Competitors for executive talent;
Companies of comparable scope and complexity;
Competitors for equity investor capital;
Companies that identify us as their direct peer; and
Companies with similar pay practices. |
AbbVie Inc.
Allergan plc
AstraZeneca plc
Biogen Inc.
Bristol-Myers Squibb Company
Celgene Corporation
Eli Lilly and Company
Gilead Sciences, Inc.
GlaxoSmithKline plc
Johnson & Johnson
Merck & Co., Inc.
Novartis AG
Pfizer Inc.
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Roche Holding AG
Sanofi S.A. |
(1) | For purposes of the 2018 peer group analyses: |
Market Capitalization(a) | 2017 Revenues(b) | |||||
Amgen |
$127 billion |
|
$23 billion |
| ||
Relative Peer Group Position |
3rd Quartile (above median) |
|
2nd Quartile |
|
(a) | Represents the 12-month average market capitalization as of May 31, 2018. |
(b) | Represents revenues for the trailing four quarters ended March 31, 2018. Revenues for GlaxoSmithKline plc, Roche Holding AG, and Sanofi S.A. were converted into U.S. dollars using Standard & Poors Capital IQ. |
The Market Median is determined for our CEO and our other NEOs based on the prior years compensation and is reviewed by the Compensation Committee to inform compensation decisions made in March of each year as follows:
Market Median
|
| |||||
CEO (compiled by FW Cook)
|
Other NEOs
|
|||||
50th percentile of each compensation element paid to CEOs in our peer group in the previous year from proxy statements. |
Average of the 50th percentile of each compensation element of our peer group from the PHRA Survey and proxy statements in the previous year (with base pay data aged forward to the current year).
|
ï 2019 Proxy Statement 47
|
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
|
|
Value of 2018 Long-Term Incentive Equity Awards
Based on a review of Company and executive performance and market data, the Compensation Committee determined to grant the following LTI equity award grant values to our CEO and the other NEOs in March 2018, with an effective grant date of April 27, 2018, the third business day after the announcement of our first quarter 2018 earnings results (with the exception of Mr. Gordon who joined the Company in September 2018). (For more information regarding the determination of the Market Median, see How Compensation Decisions Are Made For Our Named Executive OfficersPeer Group Data Sources previously discussed.)
Named Executive Officer |
Performance Units(1) ($) |
Stock Options ($) |
Restricted Stock Units ($) |
Total Equity Value Granted ($) |
2017 Market Median ($) |
Difference vs. Market Median Over/ (Under) (%) |
||||||||||||||||||
Robert A. Bradway |
6,250,000 | 3,750,000 | 2,500,000 | 12,500,000 | 11,000,000 | 13.6 | ||||||||||||||||||
Anthony C. Hooper |
2,000,000 | 1,200,000 | 800,000 | 4,000,000 | 3,993,938 | 0.2 | ||||||||||||||||||
Murdo Gordon(2) |
n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | ||||||||||||||||||
Sean E. Harper |
2,000,000 | 1,200,000 | 800,000 | 4,000,000 | 3,740,699 | 6.9 | ||||||||||||||||||
David W. Meline |
2,000,000 | 1,200,000 | 800,000 | 4,000,000 | 3,555,907 | 12.5 | ||||||||||||||||||
David M. Reese(3) |
450,000 | 270,000 | 180,000 | 900,000 | n/a | n/a | ||||||||||||||||||
Jonathan P. Graham |
1,400,000 | 840,000 | 560,000 | 2,800,000 | 2,583,298 | 8.4 |
(1) | The 2018-2020 performance period runs from January 1, 2018 through December 31, 2020. |
(2) | Mr. Gordon commenced employment with the Company effective September 3, 2018. For a description of the new-hire LTI equity awards granted to Mr. Gordon in connection with the commencement of his employment, see the subsection Initial Hire and Promotion Equity Awards below. |
(3) | Dr. Reese was appointed as Executive Vice President, Research and Development, effective July 26, 2018. Prior to that date, and at the time that the 2018 annual LTI equity awards were granted, Dr. Reese served as Senior Vice President, Translational Sciences and Oncology and the grant amounts reflect his level as a Senior Vice President. A Market Median was not available for this position. The table excludes the promotional RSU award with a cash value of $2,400,000 granted on November 2, 2018. See the subsection Initial Hire and Promotion Equity Awards below for more details. |
ï 2019 Proxy Statement 49
|
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
|
|
(1) | The operating measures for the 2016-2018 performance units were based on non-GAAP financial results for 2016, 2017, and 2018 as reported and reconciled in Appendix B, except that operating measures were further adjusted for the impacts of Hurricane Maria as prescribed by the terms of the 2016-2018 performance goals document. For this purpose, operating expense was reduced by $147 million ($0.16 in EPS) for 2017 and increased by $21 million ($0.03 in EPS) for 2018. |
50 ï 2019 Proxy Statement
|
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
|
|
2016-2018 Performance Period Goal Design and Award Calculation
All operating measures were established in early 2016 at the
beginning of the three-year performance period
2018 Operating Measures and Performance
Non-GAAP(1) Operating Measures |
Minimum (50%) |
Target (100%) |
Intermediate (125%) |
Maximum (150%) |
2018 Performance | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
EPS Growth ($) |
142.9% ($14.37) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
£$11.15 |
$12.25 |
$13.80 |
³$14.60 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Operating Margin (%) |
106.6% (52.5%) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
£48% |
52% |
54% |
³58% |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Operating Expense (in billions) |
50.0% ($11.91B) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
³$11.5B |
$10.9B |
|
£$10.3B |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
99.8%
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Final 2016-2018 Performance Period Calculation 2016-2018 Non-GAAP(1) Operating Measures EPS Growth (1/3rd) Operating Margin (1/3rd) Operating Expense (1/3rd) 115.4% 2016-2018 Amgen Relative TSR Performance 30.3% Final Payout 145.7%
(1) | The operating measures of the 2016-2018 performance goals were based on non-GAAP financial results for 2016, 2017, and 2018 as reported and reconciled in Appendix B, except that operating measures were further adjusted for the impacts of Hurricane Maria as prescribed by the terms of the 2016-2018 performance goals document. For this purpose, operating expense was reduced by $147 million ($0.16 in EPS) for 2017 and increased by $21 million ($0.03 in EPS) for 2018. |
(2) | Our targets for our 2016 and 2017 performance under the 2016-2018 performance goals were disclosed in our 2018 proxy statement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 11, 2018. |
ï 2019 Proxy Statement 51
|
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
|
|
Performance Units Earned for 2016-2018 Performance Period
Our actual performance of 145.7% for the 2016-2018 performance period resulted in the following number of shares of Common Stock being earned under our performance award program for this performance period. Each earned performance unit converted to one share of Common Stock upon the payout date of March 22, 2019.
Named Executive Officer |
Performance Units Value Granted (Target) ($) |
Number of Performance Units Granted (#) |
Number of Shares of our Common (#) |
|||||||||
Robert A. Bradway |
5,500,000 | 32,246 | 50,962 | |||||||||
Anthony C. Hooper |
2,000,000 | 11,726 | 18,532 | |||||||||
Murdo Gordon(2) |
n/a | n/a | n/a | |||||||||
Sean E. Harper |
1,750,000 | 10,260 | 16,215 | |||||||||
David W. Meline |
1,750,000 | 10,260 | 16,215 | |||||||||
David M. Reese |
400,000 | 2,345 | 3,706 | |||||||||
Jonathan P. Graham | 1,150,000 | 6,742 | 10,655 |
(1) | Includes dividend equivalents earned on these amounts rounded down to the nearest whole number of shares (excluding fractional shares paid in cash). |
(2) | Mr. Gordon commenced employment with the Company after the participants for the 2016-2018 performance period had been determined and, as such, he did not receive any performance units for the 2016-2018 performance period. For a description of the new-hire LTI equity awards granted to Mr. Gordon in connection with the commencement of his employment, see the subsection Initial Hire and Promotion Equity Awards above. |
52 ï 2019 Proxy Statement
|
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
|
|
2017-2019 Performance Period Goal Design and Award Calculation
All operating measures were established in early 2017 at the
beginning of the three-year performance period
2018 Operating Measures and Performance
Non-GAAP(1) Operating Measures |
Minimum (50%) |
Target (100%) |
Intermediate (125%) |
Maximum (150%) |
2018 Performance | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
EPS Growth ($) |
142.9% ($14.37) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
£$11.15 |
$12.25 |
$13.80 |
³$14.60 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Operating Margin (%) |
106.6% (52.5%) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
£48% |
52% |
54% |
³58% |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Operating Expense (in billions) |
50.0% ($11.91B) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
³$11.5B |
$10.9B |
|
£$10.3B |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
99.8% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Final 2017-2019 Performance Period Calculation 2017-2019 Non-GAAP(1) Operating Measures EPS Growth (1/3rd) Operating Margin (1/3rd) Operating Expense ROIC (1/3rd) 2017-2019 Amgen Relative TSR Performance Final Payout Multiplier (0-200% of target)
(1) | The operating measures of the 2017-2019 performance goals were based on non-GAAP financial results for 2017 and 2018 as reported and reconciled in Appendix B, except that operating measures were further adjusted for the impacts of Hurricane Maria as prescribed by the terms of the 2017-2019 performance goals document. For this purpose, operating expense was reduced by $147 million ($0.16 in EPS) for 2017 and increased by $21 million ($0.03 in EPS) for 2018. |
(2) | Our targets for our 2017 performance were disclosed under the 2017-2019 performance goals in our 2018 proxy statement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 11, 2018. |
(3) | 2019 targets are pre-established and to be disclosed. Such 2019 targets are not being disclosed at this time as they are competitively sensitive. |
ï 2019 Proxy Statement 53
|
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
|
|
54 ï 2019 Proxy Statement
|
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
|
|
2018-2020 Performance Period Goal Design and Award Calculation
All operating measures were established in early 2018 at the
beginning of the three-year performance period
2018 Operating Measures and Performance
Non-GAAP(1) Operating Measures |
Minimum (30%) |
Low (65%) |
Target (100%) |
High (135%) |
Maximum (170%) |
2018 Performance | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
EPS Growth ($) |
132.7% ($14.40) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
£$10.60 |
$11.40
|
$12.95 |
$14.50 |
³$15.30 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Operating Margin (%) |
105.4% (52.6%) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
£46% |
48%
|
52% |
56% |
³58% |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Operating Expense (in billions) |
30.0% ($11.89B) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
³$11.8B |
|
$11.2B |
|
£$10.6B |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
89.4%
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Final 2018-2020 Performance Period Calculation 2018-2020 Non-GAAP(1) Operating Measures 2018 2019 and 2020 EPS Growth EPS Growth Operating Margin ROIC Operating Expense 2018-2020 Amgen Relative TSR Performance
(1) | The 2018 non-GAAP operating measures (EPS growth, operating margin, and operating expense) with respect to the 2018-2020 performance period are as reported and reconciled in Appendix B. |
(2) | 2019 and 2020 targets are pre-established and to be disclosed. Such 2019 and 2020 targets are not being disclosed at this time as they are competitively sensitive. |
ï 2019 Proxy Statement 55
|
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
|
|
56 ï 2019 Proxy Statement
|
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
|
|
(1) | Non-GAAP net income for purposes of the EIP is as reported and reconciled in Appendix B. |
(2) | Non-GAAP net income for purposes of the 2018 Company performance goals of our annual cash incentive award program is reported and reconciled in Appendix B. |
ï 2019 Proxy Statement 57
|
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
|
|
2018 Company Performance Goals and Results
The table below illustrates the goals established, the weighting of each goal, and our actual performance for 2018. No amounts can be earned for below-threshold performance for our financial metrics.
Deliver Results (60% weighting) |
|
|
Weighted Score Achieved 123.4% |
| ||||||||||||||||
Financial Goals (60%) ($ In Millions) |
|
Weighting |
|
|
Threshold |
|
|
Target |
|
|
Maximum |
|
|
Achieved |
| |||||
Revenues |
|
30% |
|
|
$20,580 |
|
$ |
21,990 |
|
|
$23,750 |
|
|
$23,747 224.7% |
| |||||
Non-GAAP Net Income(1) |
30% | $7,815 | $8,685 | $9,725 | |
$9,573 186.5% |
|
Progress Innovative Pipeline (25% weighting) |
Weighted Score Achieved 29.9% |
|||||||||
Goals |
Weighting |
Results |
Achieved |
|||||||
Advance Early Pipeline |
|
5% |
|
We generated a total of eight product teams (formed when a molecule has been judged to have the potential to be safe and effective in humans). |
|
113.9% |
| |||
We advanced two programs through the early-to-late stage portal. |
||||||||||
We initiated 10 first-in-human studies, including for small-cell lung cancer, obesity, glioblastoma, relapsed/refractory diffuse large b-cell lymphoma, mantle cell lymphoma and follicular lymphoma, multiple myeloma, acute myeloid leukemia, non-hodgkins lymphoma, and cardiovascular disease. |
||||||||||
We established access to a new large population for genetic analysis and initiated genotyping and sequencing. |
||||||||||
Execute Key Clinical Studies and Regulatory Filings |
20% | We achieved selected clinical activity milestones for KYPROLIS, BLINCYTO, Nplate, IMLYGIC, and ABP 710 (biosimilar infliximab (REMICADE®)). |
120.8% | |||||||
We completed regulatory filings for Aimovig, XGEVA (skeletal related events in multiple myeloma), Repatha, BLINCYTO, EVENITY (U.S. submission), and KYPROLIS. |
||||||||||
Deliver Annual Priorities (15% weighting) |
Weighted Score Achieved 13.3% |
|||||||||
Goals |
Weighting |
Results |
Achieved |
|||||||
Execute Critical Launches and Long-Term Commercial Objectives |
|
10% |
|
We set aspirational internal goals to focus our entire Company on delivering on the promise of three important medicines, Prolia, KYPROLIS, and Repatha. While all three products delivered double-digit, volume-driven growth, we did not meet all of our aspirational goals. |
|
71.3% |
| |||
Achieve Transformation Objectives |
5% | We established six transformation initiatives with specific savings targets established for each activity across corporate functions and operations to drive additional savings across the Company, advance internal productivity, and further our full potential initiatives. For this program, we realized approximately $368 million in gross savings that we reinvested in the business including product launches and research and development activities(2).
|
124.2% |
2018 Company Performance Goals Final Score
|
|
Achieved 166.6%
|
|
(1) | Non-GAAP net income for purposes of the 2018 Company performance goals of our annual cash incentive award program is reported and reconciled in Appendix B. |
(2) | Net operating expense savings in the same period were not significant. |
58 ï 2019 Proxy Statement
|
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
|
|
2018 Annual Cash Incentive Awards
As shown in the table above, our performance against the 2018 Company performance goals yielded a composite final score of 166.6% and the Compensation Committee awarded actual annual cash incentive awards under the EIP to our NEOs based on this composite final score. No further discretion was employed.
Named Executive Officer | Target Opportunity (% of Base Salary) |
Target 2018 Award($) | Actual 2018 Award($)(1) | |||||||||
Robert A. Bradway |
|
150 |
|
|
2,340,000 |
|
|
3,898,000 |
| |||
Anthony C. Hooper |
|
100 |
|
|
1,053,000 |
|
|
1,754,000 |
| |||
Murdo Gordon(2) |
|
100 |
|
|
307,692 |
|
|
513,000 |
| |||
Sean E. Harper |
|
100 |
|
|
974,000 |
|
|
1,623,000 |
||||
David W. Meline |
|
100 |
|
|
974,000 |
|
|
1,623,000 |
||||
David M. Reese |
|
80 |
(3) |
|
548,154 |
|
|
913,000 |
||||
Jonathan P. Graham |
|
90 |
|
|
841,500 |
|
|
1,402,000 |
|
(1) | Calculated in accordance with the 2018 Company performance goals composite final score based on actual 2018 earnings. |
(2) | Mr. Gordons award was pro-rated for the number of days he was employed in 2018. |
(3) | Dr. Reeses target annual cash incentive award opportunity was increased from 65% to 100% of base salary in connection with his promotion to Executive Vice President, Research and Development, effective as of July 26, 2018. The target opportunity is a pro-rated bonus target based on the number of days at each target level before and after the effective date of his promotion. |
ï 2019 Proxy Statement 59
|
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
|
|
2018 Base Salary Market Position
The 2018 base salaries as in effect at the end of 2018 and the Market Median position as reviewed by the Compensation Committee in March 2018 are shown in the table below:
Named Executive Officer |
2017 Base Salary ($) |
Increase (%) |
2018 Base Salary ($) |
2017 Market Median ($) |
Difference vs. Market Median Over/(Under) (%) |
|||||||||||||||
Robert A. Bradway |
|
1,560,000 |
|
|
0 |
|
|
1,560,000 |
|
|
1,513,000 |
|
|
3.1 |
| |||||
Anthony C. Hooper |
|
1,053,000 |
|
|
0 |
|
|
1,053,000 |
|
|
1,030,952 |
|
|
2.1 |
| |||||
Murdo Gordon(1) |
|
n/a |
|
|
n/a |
|
|
n/a |
|
|
n/a |
|
|
n/a |
| |||||
Sean E. Harper |
|
974,000 |
|
|
0 |
|
|
974,000 |
|
|
1,025,975 |
|
|
(5.1 |
) | |||||
David W. Meline |
|
974,000 |
|
|
0 |
|
|
974,000 |
|
|
1,018,030 |
|
|
(4.3 |
) | |||||
David M. Reese(2) |
|
500,000 |
|
|
0 |
|
|
500,000 |
|
|
n/a |
|
|
n/a |
| |||||
Jonathan P. Graham |
|
935,000 |
|
|
0 |
|
|
935,000 |
|
|
931,759 |
|
|
0.3 |
|
(1) | Mr. Gordon commenced employment with us in September 2018. His base salary was set at $1,000,000 based on the Market Median for his position and for internal consistency. For further description of the base salary provided to Mr. Gordon in connection with the commencement of his employment, see the subsection Offer LetterMr. Gordon below. |
(2) | At the time that the base salaries were determined in March 2018, Dr. Reese served as Senior Vice President, Translational Sciences and Oncology and a Market Median was not available. His base salary for 2018 was initially set at $500,000, reflecting his base salary for 2017. Dr. Reese was promoted to Executive Vice President, Research and Development, effective July 26, 2018, and the Compensation Committee increased Dr. Reeses base salary by approximately 90% to $950,000 to reflect his new responsibilities and to bring him closer to the Market Median for his new position. |
60 ï 2019 Proxy Statement
|
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
|
|
Total Target Annual Cash Compensation
Total target annual cash compensation reviewed by the Compensation Committee in March 2018 prior to the compensation changes being made are shown in the table below:
Named Executive Officer |
2017 Amgen Target Total Annual Cash ($) |
2017 Market Median ($) |
Difference vs. Market Median Over/(Under) (%) |
|||||||||
Robert A. Bradway |
|
3,900,000 |
|
|
3,959,000 |
|
|
(1.5 |
) | |||
Anthony C. Hooper |
|
2,106,000 |
|
|
2,073,699 |
|
|
1.6 |
| |||
Murdo Gordon(1) |
|
n/a |
|
|
n/a |
|
|
n/a |
| |||
Sean E. Harper |
|
1,948,000 |
|
|
2,116,330 |
|
|
(8.0 |
) | |||
David W. Meline |
|
1,948,000 |
|
|
2,063,871 |
|
|
(5.6 |
) | |||
David M. Reese(2) |
|
825,000 |
|
|
n/a |
|
|
n/a |
| |||
Jonathan P. Graham |
|
1,776,500 |
|
|
1,690,870 |
|
|
5.1 |
|
(1) | Mr. Gordon commenced employment with the Company after the March 2018 compensation decisions were made. For a description of total target annual cash compensation provided to Mr. Gordon in connection with the commencement of his employment, see the subsection Offer LetterMr. Gordon below. |
(2) | Dr. Reese was appointed as Executive Vice President, Research and Development, effective July 26, 2018. Prior to that date, and at the time that the 2018 compensation decisions were determined, Dr. Reese served as Senior Vice President, Translational Sciences and Oncology and a Market Median was not available for that role. |
Compensation Policies and Practices
Recoupment Provisions
ï 2019 Proxy Statement 61
|
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
|
|
Clawback Policy
Stock Ownership Guidelines Requirements
The stock ownership guidelines for 2018 were:
Position | Stock Ownership Requirement | Compliance | ||
Chief Executive Officer(1) |
6x base salary |
✓ | ||
Executive Vice President |
3x base salary |
✓ | ||
Senior Vice President |
2x base salary |
✓ | ||
Vice President |
1x base salary |
✓ |
(1) | Mr. Bradway exceeded his ownership requirement and holds approximately 50 times his base salary, or eight times his stock ownership requirement as of November 9, 2018, the effective date of certifications. |
62 ï 2019 Proxy Statement
|
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
|
|
64 ï 2019 Proxy Statement
|
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
|
|
66 ï 2019 Proxy Statement
|
Executive Compensation Tables
|
|
Summary Compensation Table
The following table sets forth summary information concerning the compensation awarded to, paid to, or earned by each of our Named Executive Officers, or NEOs.
Name and Principal Position | Year |
Salary ($)(1) |
Bonus ($) |
Stock Awards ($)(2) |
Option Awards ($)(3) |
Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation ($)(4) |
All Other Compensation ($)(5) |
Total ($) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Performance Units and Restricted Stock Units |
Stock Options |
EIP/GMIP | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Robert A. Bradway Chief Executive Officer and President
|
|
2018 2017 2016 |
|
|
1,566,000 1,555,962 1,531,731 |
|
|
0 0 0 |
|
|
8,749,818 8,399,812 7,699,723 |
|
|
3,749,994 3,599,974 3,299,994 |
|
|
3,898,000 2,683,000 3,650,000 |
|
|
591,454 661,041 668,553 |
|
|
18,555,266 16,899,789 16,850,001 |
| ||||||||
Anthony C. Hooper Former Executive Vice President, Global Commercial Operations
|
|
2018 2017 2016 |
|
|
1,057,050 1,050,173 1,031,788 |
|
|
0 0 0 |
|
|
2,799,925 2,799,937 2,799,874 |
|
|
1,199,995 1,199,973 1,199,995 |
|
|
1,754,000 1,207,000 1,639,000 |
|
|
254,489 295,467 294,528 |
|
|
7,065,459 6,552,550 6,965,185 |
| ||||||||
Murdo Gordon(6) Executive Vice President, Global Commercial Operations
|
|
2018 |
|
|
330,769 |
|
|
2,000,000 |
|
|
9,899,861 |
|
|
0 |
|
|
513,000 |
|
|
1,336,604 |
|
|
14,080,234 |
| ||||||||
Sean E. Harper Former Executive Vice President, Research and Development
|
|
2018 2017 2016 |
|
|
977,746 970,769 946,246 |
|
|
0 0 0 |
|
|
2,799,925 2,589,867 2,449,925 |
|
|
1,199,995 1,110,000 1,049,986 |
|
|
1,623,000 1,116,000 1,502,000 |
|
|
234,212 269,731 264,885 |
|
|
6,834,878 6,056,367 6,213,042 |
| ||||||||
David W. Meline Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|
|
2018 2017 2016 |
|
|
977,746 970,769 946,733 |
|
|
0 0 0 |
|
|
2,799,925 2,449,878 2,449,925 |
|
|
1,199,995 1,049,990 1,049,986 |
|
|
1,623,000 1,116,000 1,503,000 |
|
|
260,102 271,651 268,821 |
|
|
6,860,768 5,858,288 6,218,465 |
| ||||||||
David M. Reese(7) Executive Vice President, Research and Development
|
|
2018 |
|
|
697,500 |
|
|
300,000 |
|
|
3,029,787 |
|
|
269,966 |
|
|
913,000 |
|
|
129,019 |
|
|
5,339,272 |
| ||||||||
Jonathan P. Graham(8) Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary
|
|
2018 2017 2016 |
|
|
938,596 932,577 916,789 |
|
|
0 0 1,000,000 |
|
|
1,959,878 1,749,939 1,609,898 |
|
|
839,983 749,997 689,990 |
|
|
1,402,000 858,000 1,165,000 |
|
|
204,901 231,695 1,038,668 |
|
|
5,345,358 4,522,208 6,420,345 |
|
(1) | Reflects base salary earned in each bi-weekly pay period (or portion thereof) during each fiscal year before pre-tax contributions and, therefore, includes compensation deferred under our qualified deferred compensation plan and nonqualified deferred compensation plan, or NDCP. Under payroll practices for salaried staff members of our U.S. entities, including our NEOs, base salary earned in a pay period is computed by dividing the annual base salary then in effect by 26, which is the number of full bi-weekly pay periods in a year. |
(2) | For 2018, reflects the grant date fair values of performance units for the 2018-2020 performance period and restricted stock units, or RSUs, granted during 2018 determined in accordance with Accounting Standards Codification, or ASC, Topic 718 (see footnotes 7, 8, and 10 to the Grants of Plan-Based Awards table for information on how these amounts were determined). |
The number of units to be earned for the performance units granted during 2018 is based on the average of our performance against annual operating performance measures established at the commencement of the three year performance period, with the payout on such measures modified up or down by our total shareholder return, or TSR, relative to the TSRs of the companies in the Standard & Poors 500 Index, or S&P 500, all computed over the performance period. These operating performance |
ï 2019 Proxy Statement 67
|
Executive Compensation Tables
|
|
measures are performance conditions, as defined under ASC 718. The values shown in this table and the Grants of Plan-Based Awards table are based on probable outcomes of these performance conditions. The table below shows the grant date fair values of these performance unit awards: (1) if the maximum is achieved with regard to all of the operating performance measures which would result in an earnout of 170% based on the operating performance measures with the TSR market condition at target, with no increase or decrease based on the market condition; and (2) if the maximum is achieved with regard to all of the operating performance measures and maximum performance occurs under the TSR market condition which results in an additional 30% earnout, for total earned payout of 200% of performance units granted. |
Fair Value of Performance Units for the 2018-2020 Performance Period | ||||||||
Name | Based on the Maximum Performance Regarding the 2018-2020 Operating Performance Measures |
Based on the Maximum Performance Regarding the Operating Performance Measures and Maximum Payout for the TSR Modifier |
||||||
Robert A. Bradway |
|
$10,624,727 |
|
|
$12,499,879 |
| ||
Anthony C. Hooper |
|
$3,399,739 |
|
|
$3,999,871 |
| ||
Murdo Gordon |
|
$5,949,902 |
|
|
$6,999,955 |
| ||
Sean E. Harper |
|
$3,399,739 |
|
|
$3,999,871 |
| ||
David W. Meline |
|
$3,399,739 |
|
|
$3,999,871 |
| ||
David M. Reese |
|
$764,748 |
|
|
$899,725 |
| ||
Jonathan P. Graham |
|
$2,379,949 |
|
|
$2,799,985 |
|
(3) | For 2018, reflects the grant date fair values of non-qualified stock options granted during 2018 determined in accordance with ASC 718 (see footnote 9 to the Grants of Plan-Based Awards table for information on how these amounts were determined). |
(4) | Reflects amounts that were earned under our Executive Incentive Plan, or EIP, for 2018 performance which were determined and paid in March 2019. For a description of our EIP, see Elements of Compensation and Specific Compensation DecisionsAnnual Cash Incentive Awards in our Compensation Discussion and Analysis. |
(5) | See the subsection All Other CompensationPerquisites and Other Compensation immediately following these footnotes. |
(6) | Mr. Gordon was hired to serve as Executive Vice President, Global Commercial Operations effective September 3, 2018. This table reflects his compensation earned beginning on that date. The amount shown for Mr. Gordon in the bonus column is a sign-on bonus to replace the value of Mr. Gordons 2018 bonus with his previous employer which was forfeited upon him leaving his position and to induce Mr. Gordon to accept our offer of employment. |
(7) | Dr. Reese was promoted to Executive Vice President, Research and Development on July 26, 2018, and this is the first year he is a NEO. Compensation shown reflects his compensation for the full year, and the amount shown in the bonus column was paid to him in connection with his promotion. |
(8) | The amount shown in the bonus column for 2016 is the second of two installments due to Mr. Graham as a sign-on bonus to replace the pro-rata value of Mr. Grahams 2015 bonus at his previous employer, which was forfeited upon his leaving, and to induce Mr. Graham to accept our offer of employment. |
All Other CompensationPerquisites and Other Compensation
Perquisites. The amounts reported reflect the aggregate incremental cost of perquisites and other personal benefits provided to our NEOs and are included in the All Other Compensation column of the Summary Compensation Table. The following table sets forth the perquisites provided to our NEOs in 2018.
Personal Use of Company Aircraft(1) |
Personal Use of Company Car and Driver(2) |
Personal Financial Planning Services |
Moving and
Relocation Expenses(3) |
Other(4) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Name |
Aggregate Incremental Cost($) |
Aggregate Incremental Cost($) |
Aggregate Incremental Cost($) |
Aggregate Incremental Cost($) |
Tax Gross- Up($) |
Aggregate Incremental Cost($) |
Total($) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Robert A. Bradway |
|
88,884 |
|
|
4,091 |
|
|
15,000 |
|
|
0 |
|
|
0 |
|
|
59,179 |
|
|
167,154 |
| |||||||
Anthony C. Hooper |
|
0 |
|
|
805 |
|
|
15,000 |
|
|
0 |
|
|
0 |
|
|
12,684 |
|
|
28,489 |
| |||||||
Murdo Gordon |
|
0 |
|
|
0 |
|
|
3,904 |
|
|
213,287 |
|
|
94,381 |
|
|
1,955 |
|
|
313,527 |
| |||||||
Sean E. Harper |
|
0 |
|
|
0 |
|
|
15,000 |
|
|
0 |
|
|
0 |
|
|
10,212 |
|
|
25,212 |
| |||||||
David W. Meline |
|
24,237 |
|
|
1,365 |
|
|
15,000 |
|
|
0 |
|
|
0 |
|
|
10,500 |
|
|
51,102 |
| |||||||
David M. Reese |
|
0 |
|
|
0 |
|
|
15,000 |
|
|
0 |
|
|
0 |
|
|
10,500 |
|
|
25,500 |
| |||||||
Jonathan P. Graham |
|
0 |
|
|
79 |
|
|
15,000 |
|
|
0 |
|
|
0 |
|
|
10,522 |
|
|
25,601 |
|
(1) | The aggregate incremental cost of use of our aircraft for personal travel by our NEOs is allocated entirely to the highest ranking NEO present on the flight (except for on-board catering costs which are allocated to each NEO present). If each NEO present on the flight is the same level, the aggregate incremental costs of use of our aircraft for personal travel is allocated to each NEO present. The aggregate incremental cost for personal use of our aircraft is calculated based on our variable operating costs, |
68 ï 2019 Proxy Statement
|
Executive Compensation Tables
|
|
which include crew travel expenses, on-board catering, landing fees, trip-related hangar/parking costs, fuel, trip-related maintenance, and other smaller variable costs. In determining the incremental cost relating to fuel and trip-related maintenance, we applied an estimate derived from our average costs. We believe that the use of this methodology for 2018 is a reasonably accurate method for calculating fuel and trip-related maintenance costs. Because our aircraft are used primarily for business travel, we do not include the fixed costs that do not change based on usage, such as pilots salaries, our aircraft purchase costs, and the cost of maintenance not related to trips. |
(2) | The aggregate incremental cost for personal use of the car and driver provided by us is determined as the sum of the cost of fuel, driver overtime costs allocable to personal usage, and maintenance costs for the total number of personal miles driven. Personal miles include travel to and from work from home. As the cars are used primarily for business travel, fixed costs that would be incurred by us to operate the company cars for business use such as car lease costs and driver salaries are not included. |
(3) | Mr. Gordon agreed to relocate from New Jersey to Thousand Oaks, California to serve as Executive Vice President, Global Commercial Operations in September 2018. The incremental cost of certain relocation benefits that were provided to Mr. Gordon in 2018 in connection with his relocation in accordance with our relocation policies, include: |
(a) | $93,488 for costs to sell his previous residence and purchase his new residence; |
(b) | $34,610 for costs to relocate household goods; |
(c) | $63,855 for costs for temporary housing; |
(d) | $21,334 for reimbursed relocation-related travel expenses and miscellaneous other relocation expenses; and |
(e) | $94,381 for tax gross-up payments on moving and relocation benefits provided. |
(4) (a) | Other expenses for Mr. Bradway reflect our payment of the required filing fee of $45,000 incurred by Mr. Bradway under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976, or HSR Act, as approved by the Compensation and Management Development Committee, or Compensation Committee. During 2018, Mr. Bradway submitted filings under the HSR Act based on his then-current and anticipated future holdings of Amgen Common Stock approaching the reporting threshold under the HSR Act. The Compensation Committee reviewed the legal requirements under the HSR Act. Based on this review, the Compensation Committee approved that the payment of the HSR Act filing fee be made by the Company on Mr. Bradways behalf because the stock giving rise to the reporting requirements was granted as part of Mr. Bradways compensation for services to the Company and such requirements were triggered because of Mr. Bradways election to continue to hold such stock. Mr. Bradway was responsible for any taxes due as a result of the Company paying the HSR Act filing fee and was not provided a tax gross-up payment. |
(b) | Other expenses also include Company contributions to non-profit charities designated by the executive in the amount of $9,984 for Messrs. Bradway and Hooper and $10,000 for Drs. Harper and Reese and Messrs. Meline and Graham. |
(c) | Other expenses also include executive physicals, gifts, personal expenses on business travel, and expenses related to guests accompanying the NEOs on business travel. |
Other Compensation. The following table sets forth compensation for our NEOs in 2018 incurred in connection with our 401(k) Retirement and Savings Plan, or 401(k) Plan, our NDCP, and our Supplemental Retirement Plan, or SRP. These amounts, along with the perquisites and other compensation discussed above, are included in the All Other Compensation column of the Summary Compensation Table. See Nonqualified Deferred Compensation below for a description of these plans.
Name |
Company Contributions to 401(k) Retirement and Savings Plan($) |
Company Credits to Non-Qualified |
Company Credits to Supplemental Retirement Plan($) |
Total($) | ||||||||||||
Robert A. Bradway |
|
27,500 |
|
|
0 |
|
|
396,800 |
|
|
424,300 |
| ||||
Anthony C. Hooper |
|
27,500 |
|
|
0 |
|
|
198,500 |
|
|
226,000 |
| ||||
Murdo Gordon |
|
19,808 |
|
|
1,000,000 |
|
|
3,269 |
|
|
1,023,077 |
| ||||
Sean E. Harper |
|
27,500 |
|
|
0 |
|
|
181,500 |
|
|
209,000 |
| ||||
David W. Meline |
|
27,500 |
|
|
0 |
|
|
181,500 |
|
|
209,000 |
| ||||
David M. Reese |
|
27,500 |
|
|
0 |
|
|
76,019 |
|
|
103,519 |
| ||||
Jonathan P. Graham |
|
27,500 |
|
|
0 |
|
|
151,800 |
|
|
179,300 |
|
ï 2019 Proxy Statement 69
|
Executive Compensation Tables
|
|
Grants of Plan-Based Awards
The following table sets forth summary information regarding all grants of plan-based awards made to our NEOs for the year ended December 31, 2018. All of our equity based awards were granted under the Amgen Inc. 2009 Equity Incentive Plan, as amended.
Estimated Future Payouts |
Estimated Future |
All
Other |
All
Other (#)(6) |
Exercise ($/Sh) |
Grant Date |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Name |
Grant Date |
Approval Date(1) |
Threshold | Target | Maximum | Threshold | Target | Maximum | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
EIP/GMIP | Performance Units | RSUs | Stock Options | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Robert A. Bradway |
3/7/18 | 3/7/18 | (3) | (3) | 11,966,250 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
4/27/18 | 3/7/18 | (4) | 33,107 | 66,214 | 6,249,939 | (7) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
4/27/18 | 3/7/18 | 14,087 | 2,499,879 | (8) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
4/27/18
|
|
|
3/7/18
|
|
|
108,444
|
|
|
177.46
|
|
3,749,994 | (9) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Anthony C. Hooper |
3/7/18 | 3/7/18 | (3) | (3) | 7,179,750 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
4/27/18 | 3/7/18 | (4) | 10,594 | 21,188 | 1,999,935 | (7) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
4/27/18 | 3/7/18 | 4,508 | 799,990 | (8) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
4/27/18
|
|
|
3/7/18
|
|
|
34,702
|
|
|
177.46
|
|
1,199,995 | (9) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Murdo Gordon |
9/3/18 | (2) | 9/3/18 | (2) | (3) | 307,692 | (2) | 692,307 | (2) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
11/2/18 | 7/20/18 | (4) | 17,699 | 35,398 | 3,499,977 | (10) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
11/2/18
|
|
|
7/20/18
|
|
|
34,213
|
|
6,399,884 | (8) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sean E. Harper |
3/7/18 | 3/7/18 | (3) | (3) | 7,179,750 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
4/27/18 | 3/7/18 | (4) | 10,594 | 21,188 | 1,999,935 | (7) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
4/27/18 | 3/7/18 | 4,508 | 799,990 | (8) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
4/27/18
|
|
|
3/7/18
|
|
|
34,702
|
|
|
177.46
|
|
1,199,995 | (9) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
David W. Meline |
3/7/18 | 3/7/18 | (3) | (3) | 7,179,750 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
4/27/18 | 3/7/18 | (4) | 10,594 | 21,188 | 1,999,935 | (7) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
4/27/18 | 3/7/18 | 4,508 | 799,990 | (8) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
4/27/18
|
|
|
3/7/18
|
|
|
34,702
|
|
|
177.46
|
|
1,199,995 | (9) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
David M. Reese |
3/7/18 | 3/7/18 | (3) | (3) | 4,786,500 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
4/27/18 | 3/7/18 | (4) | 2,383 | 4,766 | 449,863 | (7) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
11/2/18 | 5/21/18 | 12,830 | 2,399,980 | (8) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
4/27/18 | 3/7/18 | 1,014 | 179,944 | (8) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
4/27/18
|
|
|
3/7/18
|
|
|
7,807
|
|
|
177.46
|
|
269,966 | (9) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Jonathan P. Graham |
3/7/18 | 3/7/18 | (3) | (3) | 4,786,500 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
4/27/18 | 3/7/18 | (4) | 7,416 | 14,832 | 1,399,992 | (7) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
4/27/18 | 3/7/18 | 3,155 | 559,886 | (8) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
4/27/18
|
|
|
3/7/18
|
|
|
24,291
|
|
|
177.46
|
|
839,983 | (9) |
(1) | Reflects the date on which the grants were approved by the Compensation Committee. |
(2) | Because Mr. Gordon commenced employment with us in September 2018, he received a pro-rata 2018 award under the Global Management Incentive Plan, or GMIP, as he was not an employee when participants in the EIP were determined. Amounts shown represent his target and maximum opportunity under the GMIP after pro-rating based on his hire date. |
(3) | Represents awards to our NEOs made under our EIP (except for Mr. Gordon) whose award was made under our GMIP since Mr. Gordon commenced employment on September 3, 2018, and was not eligible to participate in the EIP. For our EIP participants, the maximum amounts shown in the table above reflect the largest possible payments under our EIP for the 2018 performance period, based on non-Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, or non-GAAP, net income, as defined for the EIP and reported and reconciled in Appendix B. There are no thresholds or targets under the EIP. The EIP provides that the Compensation Committee may use negative discretion to award any amount that does not exceed the maximum. Consistent with its practice since the EIP was approved by our stockholders, the Compensation Committee employed the pre-established Company performance goals under our GMIP, as illustrated in the table below, in determining the actual amounts awarded under the EIP in 2018. |
Our 2018 Company performance goals were financial and operating performance goals weighted as follows: (1) Deliver Results (60%)30% Revenues and 30% Non-GAAP Net Income (as reported and reconciled in Appendix B); (2) Progress Innovative Pipeline (25%); and (3) Deliver Annual Priorities (15%). There are no payouts for below-threshold performance on any of our Company performance goals. Threshold performance on our Progress Innovative Pipeline goals results in 50% earned for those metrics. Certain measurements of performance for the non-financial metrics are more subjective in nature and could result in a very small payout percentage (less than 1% of an annual cash incentive award) and, as such, no threshold amounts are shown in the table. The 2018 Company performance goals derived target and maximum payout levels, which are based on a multiple of salary, are shown in the table below. Maximum performance under all of the performance metrics results in 225% of target being earned. The actual amounts awarded under our Company performance goals are based on achievement of 166.6% performance against target and |
70 ï 2019 Proxy Statement
|
Executive Compensation Tables
|
|
are reported as Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation in our Summary Compensation Table and are shown in the table below. For a description of our pre-established Company performance goals and the use of the GMIP in the Compensation Committees exercise of negative discretion see Elements of Compensation and Specific Compensation DecisionsAnnual Cash Incentive Awards in our Compensation Discussion and Analysis. |
Estimated Possible Payouts Under Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards($) |
Non-Equity Compensation($) |
|||||||||||||||||
Name | Threshold | Target | Maximum | Actual | ||||||||||||||
Robert A. Bradway |
|
|
|
|
2,340,000 |
|
|
5,265,000 |
|
|
3,898,000 |
| ||||||
Anthony C. Hooper |
|
|
|
|
1,053,000 |
|
|
2,369,250 |
|
|
1,754,000 |
| ||||||
Murdo Gordon |
|
|
|
|
307,692 |
|
|
692,307 |
|
|
513,000 |
| ||||||
Sean E. Harper |
|
|
|
|
974,000 |
|
|
2,191,500 |
|
|
1,623,000 |
| ||||||
David W. Meline |
|
|
|
|
974,000 |
|
|
2,191,500 |
|
|
1,623,000 |
| ||||||
David M. Reese |
|
|
|
|
548,154 |
|
|
1,233,347 |
|
|
913,000 |
| ||||||
Jonathan P. Graham |
|
|
|
|
841,500 |
|
|
1,893,375 |
|
|
1,402,000 |
|
(4) | Reflects estimated payouts regarding performance units granted during 2018 for the 2018-2020 performance period for NEOs. The number of units granted (which equals the target number of units of the award) will be multiplied by a payout percentage, which can range from 0% to 200%, to determine the number of units earned by the participant at the end of the performance period. Shares of our Common Stock will be issued on a one-for-one basis for each performance unit earned. |
For all the NEOs other than Mr. Gordon, the payout percentage for the 2018-2020 performance period is earned based on three operating measures, with the total of such operating measures ranging from 30% to 170%, which is then modified up or down by up to 30 percentage points based on our relative TSR performance ranking. The operating measures are: (1) annual non-GAAP earnings per share for 2018, 2019, and 2020; (2) annual non-GAAP operating expense for 2018; (3) annual non-GAAP operating margin for 2018; and (4) annual non-GAAP return on invested capital, or ROIC, for 2019 and 2020. Each of the operating measures are measured against pre-established goals for every year in the 2018-2020 performance period, which runs from January 1, 2018 through December 31, 2020. All goals are set at the commencement of the three-year performance period. Each applicable operating measure is weighted equally (one-third per measure for 2018 and one-half per measure for 2019 and 2020) to determine the total operating measures percentage for that year. At the end of the performance period, the final annual operating performance percentages for each of the three years are averaged to determine the score for the three-year performance period. The TSR modifier is based on how the TSR of our Common Stock ranks relative to the TSRs of the companies that are listed in the S&P 500, as defined (the Reference Group), over the period from the date of grant through the end of the performance period. If the rank of the TSR of our Common Stock equals or exceeds the 75th percentile or equals or is less than the 25th percentile, the TSR modifier increases or decreases the payout by 30 percentage points, respectively. If the TSR of our Common Stock is at the 50th percentile, the TSR modifier is zero. Linear interpolation is used to determine the TSR modifier if the rank of the TSR of our Common Stock falls between these percentiles. If our absolute TSR over the performance period is less than 0, then the modifier cannot be greater than 0. With respect to the performance units granted to Mr. Gordon, the payout percentage for the 2018-2020 performance period is computed in a similar manner as the performance unit grants to the other NEOs, except that no operating measures for 2018 are used as Mr. Gordon commenced employment with the Company late in 2018 and therefore could not significantly impact 2018 operating results. Accordingly, the payout percentage for Mr. Gordons performance units is earned based only on the two operating measures in effect for the 2019 and 2020 years under our 2018-2020 performance period: (1) annual non-GAAP earnings per share; and (2) annual non-GAAP ROIC. In addition, the relative TSR for Mr. Gordons 2018-2020 performance units is computed over the period from Mr. Gordons grant date of November 2, 2018 (instead of April 27, 2018) to December 31, 2020. |
All performance units accrue dividend equivalents deemed reinvested in shares and that are payable in shares only to the extent and when the underlying performance units are earned. For more information, see Elements of Compensation and Specific Compensation DecisionsLong-Term Incentive Equity Awards in our Compensation Discussion and Analysis. All 2018 non-GAAP operating measures with respect to the 2018-2020 performance period discussed above are reported and reconciled in Appendix B. |
(5) | Reflects the RSUs granted during 2018, including the annual grant of RSUs to our NEOs, RSUs granted to Mr. Gordon in connection with the commencement of his employment with the Company, and RSUs granted to Dr. Reese for his promotion to Executive Vice President, Research and Development. RSUs accrue dividend equivalents that are deemed reinvested in shares and payable only to the extent and when the underlying RSUs vest and are issued to the recipient. |
(6) | Reflects the 2018 annual grant of non-qualified stock options to our NEOs. Mr. Gordon commenced employment with the Company after the 2018 annual grant and did not receive non-qualified stock options. |
(7) | Reflects the grant date fair values of performance units granted to our NEOs, other than Mr. Gordon, for the 2018-2020 performance period determined in accordance with ASC 718, based on the number of performance units granted multiplied by: (i) 100% which is the operating measures percentage earnout based on the probable outcomes of financial performance measures over the three-year performance period as of the grant date; and (ii) the grant date fair value per unit of $188.78, which reflects the impact of the TSR modifier of $11.32 per share, which is a market condition. The grant date fair value per unit was calculated using a payout simulation model with the following key assumptions: risk-free interest rate of 2.6%; volatility of the price of our Common Stock of 23.9%; the closing price of our Common Stock on the grant date of $177.46 per share; volatilities of the prices of the stocks of the Reference Group; and the correlations of returns of our Common Stock and the stocks of the Reference Group to simulate TSRs and their resulting impact on the payout percentages based on the contractual terms of the performance units. |
(8) | Reflects the grant date fair values of RSUs granted during 2018 determined in accordance with ASC 718 based on the number of RSUs granted multiplied by the grant date fair values per unit of $177.46 and $187.06 on April 27 and November 2, respectively. Because these RSUs accrue dividend equivalents during the vesting period, the grant date fair value per unit equals the closing price of our Common Stock on the grant date. |
(9) | Reflects the grant date fair values of stock options granted during 2018 determined in accordance with ASC 718 based on the number of options granted multiplied by the grant date fair value per option of $34.58. The grant date fair value of an option was determined using a Black-Scholes option valuation model with the following key assumptions: risk-free interest rate of 2.8%; expected life of 5.8 years; expected volatility of the price of our Common Stock of 24.6%; expected dividend yield of 2.9%; and the exercise price of $177.46. |
(10) | Reflects the grant date fair value of performance units granted to Mr. Gordon for the 2018-2020 performance period determined in accordance with ASC 718, based on the number of performance units granted multiplied by: (i) 100% which is the operating measures percentage earnout based on the probable outcomes of financial |
ï 2019 Proxy Statement 71
|
Executive Compensation Tables
|
|
performance measures over the three-year performance period as of the grant date; and (ii) the grant date fair value per unit of $197.75, which reflects the impact of the TSR modifier of $10.69 per share, which is a market condition. The grant date fair value per unit was calculated using a payout simulation model with the following key assumptions: risk-free interest rate of 2.9%; volatility of the price of our Common Stock of 21.6%; the closing price of our Common Stock on the grant date of $187.06 per share; volatilities of the prices of the stocks of the Reference Group; and the correlations of returns of our Common Stock and the stocks of the Reference Group to simulate TSRs and their resulting impact on the payout percentages based on the contractual terms of the performance units. |
Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year End
The following table sets forth summary information regarding the outstanding equity awards at December 31, 2018 granted to each of our NEOs.
Option Awards | Stock Awards | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Name |
Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options Exercisable (#) |
Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options Unexercisable (#) |
Option Exercise Price ($/Option) |
Option Expiration Date(1) |
Number of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested (#)(2) |
Market Value of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested ($)(3) |
Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested (#) |
Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Market or Payout Value of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested ($)(3) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock Options(1)
|
Restricted Stock Units and Dividend Equivalents
|
Performance Units and Dividend Equivalents
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Robert A. Bradway |
|
0 |
|
|
108,444 |
|
|
177.46 |
|
|
4/27/28 |
|
|
45,042 |
|
|
8,768,326 |
|
||||||||||||||
0 | 130,718 | 162.60 | 5/1/27 | 67,599 | (4) | 13,159,497 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
39,528 | 80,254 | 156.35 | 5/3/26 | 70,361 | (5) | 13,697,176 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
73,500 | 0 | 54.69 | 4/25/21 | 50,557 | (6) | 9,841,931 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
127,000 | 0 | 58.43 | 4/26/20 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Anthony C. Hooper |
0 | 34,702 | 177.46 | 4/27/28 | 15,178 | 2,954,701 | 21,631 | (4) | 4,210,907 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
0 | 43,572 | 162.60 | 5/1/27 | 23,453 | (5) | 4,565,596 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
14,373 | 29,184 | 156.35 | 5/3/26 | 18,384 | (6) | 3,578,813 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Murdo Gordon |
0 | 0 | 34,448 | 6,705,992 | 35,642 | (4) | 6,938,428 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sean E. Harper |
0 | 34,702 | 177.46 | 1/4/24 | 14,084 | 2,741,732 | 21,631 | (4) | 4,210,907 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
0 | 40,305 | 162.60 | 1/4/24 | 21,693 | (5) | 4,222,976 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
12,576 | 25,536 | 156.35 | 1/4/24 | 16,086 | (6) | 3,131,462 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
David W. Meline |
0 | 34,702 | 177.46 | 4/27/28 | 13,826 | 2,691,507 | 21,631 | (4) | 4,210,907 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
0 | 38,126 | 162.60 | 5/1/27 | 20,521 | (5) | 3,994,823 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
12,576 | 25,536 | 156.35 | 5/3/26 | 16,086 | (6) | 3,131,462 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
David M. Reese |
0 | 7,807 | 177.46 | 4/27/28 | 21,229 | 4,132,649 | 4,865 | (4) | 947,070 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
0 | 8,714 | 162.60 | 5/1/27 | 4,690 | (5) | 913,002 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2,874 | 5,837 | 156.35 | 5/3/26 | 3,676 | (6) | 715,607 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2,300 | 0 | 54.69 | 4/25/21 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1,480 | 0 | 58.43 | 4/26/20 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Jonathan P. Graham |
0 | 24,291 | 177.46 | 4/27/28 | 22,029 | 4,288,385 | 15,142 | (4) | 2,947,693 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
0 | 27,233 | 162.60 | 5/1/27 | 14,658 | (5) | 2,853,473 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
8,264 | 16,781 | 156.35 | 5/3/26 | 10,570 | (6) | 2,057,662 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(1) | In general, stock options expire on the tenth anniversary of their grant date. If a retirement-eligible staff member retires, their stock options continue to vest and expire on the earlier of: (i) the fifth anniversary of their retirement date; or (ii) the end of the grant term. No stock options were granted to NEOs during 2012 through 2015. |
72 ï 2019 Proxy Statement
|
Executive Compensation Tables
|
|
(2) | The following table shows the vesting of RSUs and related accrued dividend equivalents (rounded down to the nearest whole number of units) outstanding as of December 31, 2018. RSUs accrue dividends that are deemed reinvested in shares and payable only when and to the extent the underlying RSUs vest and are issued to the participant. |
Granted on | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Name |
November 2, 2017(a) |
April 27 2018(b) |
May 1, 2017(b) |
May 3, 2016(c) |
August 4, 2015(d) |
January 30, 2015(e) |
||||||||||||||||||
Robert A. Bradway |
|
0 |
|
|
14,381 |
|
|
15,480 |
|
|
10,144 |
|
|
0 |
|
|
5,037 |
| ||||||
Anthony C. Hooper |
|
0 |
|
|
4,602 |
|
|
5,160 |
|
|
3,688 |
|
|
0 |
|
|
1,728 |
| ||||||
Murdo Gordon |
|
34,448 |
|
|
0 |
|
|
0 |
|
|
0 |
|
|
0 |
|
|
0 |
| ||||||
Sean E. Harper |
|
0 |
|
|
4,602 |
|
|
4,773 |
|
|
3,228 |
|
|
0 |
|
|
1,481 |
| ||||||
David W. Meline |
|
0 |
|
|
4,602 |
|
|
4,515 |
|
|
3,228 |
|
|
0 |
|
|
1,481 |
| ||||||
David M. Reese |
|
12,918 |
|
|
1,035 |
|
|
6,192 |
|
|
738 |
|
|
0 |
|
|
346 |
| ||||||
Jonathan P. Graham |
|
0 |
|
|
3,221 |
|
|
3,225 |
|
|
2,121 |
|
|
13,462 |
|
|
0 |
|
(a) | With respect to Mr. Gordon, RSUs are scheduled to vest at a rate of approximately 35%, 35%, and 30% on the first, second, and third anniversary of the grant date, respectively. With respect to Dr. Reese, RSUs are scheduled to vest at a rate of approximately 33%, 33%, and 34% on the second, third, and fourth anniversaries of the grant date, respectively. |
(b) | Scheduled to vest at a rate of approximately 33%, 33%, and 34% on the second, third, and fourth anniversaries of the grant date, respectively. |
(c) | Scheduled to vest in approximately equal installments on each of the third and fourth anniversaries of the grant date. |
(d) | Scheduled to vest on the fourth anniversary of the grant date. |
(e) | All units vested on January 30, 2019. |
(3) | The market values of RSUs and performance units (and related dividend equivalents) were calculated by multiplying the number of RSUs outstanding or the number of performance units as determined in accordance with Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC, rules and footnotes 4 through 6 below, as applicable, by the closing price of our Common Stock on December 31, 2018 ($194.67). |
(4) | Reflects the sum of the number of performance units granted for the 20182020 performance period (January 1, 2018 to December 31, 2020) and the related dividend equivalents accrued through December 31, 2018, multiplied by the maximum payout percentage of 200%. As required by SEC rules, the maximum payout percentage is disclosed in the table since the estimated payout percentage as of December 31, 2018, based on the sum of: (1) the estimated outcomes of our operating measures to be achieved; and (2) the TSR modifier based on our TSR percentile rank relative to the TSRs of the companies in the Reference Group for the period from the April 27, 2018 grant date (the November 2, 2018 grant date with respect to Mr. Gordon) to December 31, 2018, exceeds the target payout of 100% of the performance units granted. The number of dividend equivalents multiplied by the 200% payout percentage (rounded down to the nearest whole number of units) included in the table above are as follows: 1,385 units for Mr. Bradway; 443 units for Messrs. Hooper and Meline and Dr. Harper; 244 units for Mr. Gordon; 99 units for Dr. Reese; and 310 units for Mr. Graham. Dividend equivalents are only paid when and to the extent the underlying performance units are earned. |
(5) | Reflects the sum of the number of performance units granted for the 20172019 performance period (January 1, 2017 to December 31, 2019) and the related dividend equivalents accrued through December 31, 2018, multiplied by the maximum payout percentage of 200%. As required by SEC rules, the maximum payout percentage is disclosed in the table since the estimated payout percentage as of December 31, 2018, based on the sum of: (1) the estimated outcomes of our operating measures to be achieved; and (2) the TSR modifier based on our TSR percentile rank relative to the TSRs of the companies in the Reference Group for the period from the May 1, 2017 grant date to December 31, 2018, is greater than the target payout of 100% of the performance units granted. The number of dividend equivalents multiplied by the 200% payout percentage (rounded down to the nearest whole number of units) included in the table above are as follows: 3,275 units for Mr. Bradway; 1,091 units for Mr. Hooper; 1,009 units for Dr. Harper; 955 units for Mr. Meline; 218 units for Dr. Reese; and 682 units for Mr. Graham. Dividend equivalents are only paid when and to the extent the underlying performance units are earned. |
(6) | Reflects the number of performance units granted for the 2016-2018 performance period (January 1, 2016 to December 31, 2018) and related dividend equivalents accrued through December 31, 2018, multiplied by the payout percentage of 145.7%, which is the relative TSR percentage multiplier based on our TSR percentile rank relative to the TSRs of the companies in the Reference Group for the period from the May 3, 2016 grant date to December 31, 2018. The number of dividend equivalents multiplied by the 145.7% payout percentage noted above (rounded down to the nearest whole number of units) included in the table above are as follows: 3,575 units for Mr. Bradway; 1,300 units for Mr. Hooper; and 1,137 units for Dr. Harper and Mr. Meline; 259 units for Dr. Reese; and 747 units for Mr. Graham. Since these performance units were paid in 2019, they will be reflected in the Option Exercise and Stock Vested table in next years proxy statement. |
The estimated payouts of the performance units described above are disclosed in the limited context of our executive compensation program and should not be understood to be statements of our expectations of our stock price or estimates of results or other guidance. We specifically caution investors not to apply these statements to other contexts.
ï 2019 Proxy Statement 73
|
Executive Compensation Tables
|
|
Option Exercises and Stock Vested
The following table summarizes the exercise of options, the vesting of RSUs, and the payment of performance units earned for the 2015-2017 performance period (and related dividend equivalents, as applicable) for each of our NEOs during the year ended December 31, 2018. The RSUs and performance units vested and converted to one share of our Common Stock for each vested RSU and performance unit. The 2015-2017 performance units had a performance period from January 30, 2015 through January 30, 2018 and became payable as shares upon certification by our Compensation Committee in March 2018.
Option Awards | Stock Awards | |||||||||||||||
Name |
Number of Securities Acquired on Exercise (#) |
Value Realized on Exercise ($)(1) |
Number of Shares Acquired on Vesting (#) |
Value Realized on Vesting ($)(2) |
||||||||||||
Robert A. Bradway |
|
0 |
|
|
0 |
|
|
67,046 |
|
|
11,963,052 |
| ||||
Anthony C. Hooper |
|
0 |
|
|
0 |
|
|
23,050 |
|
|
4,111,504 |
| ||||
Murdo Gordon |
|
0 |
|
|
0 |
|
|
0 |
|
|
0 |
| ||||
Sean E. Harper |
|
37,000 |
|
|
5,305,445 |
|
|
20,055 |
|
|
3,580,745 |
| ||||
David W. Meline |
|
0 |
|
|
0 |
|
|
33,065 |
|
|
6,147,655 |
| ||||
David M. Reese |
|
1,260 |
|
|
164,304 |
|
|
4,550 |
|
|
804,845 |
| ||||
Jonathan P. Graham |
|
0 |
|
|
0 |
|
|
14,302 |
|
|
2,802,780 |
|
(1) | The value shown is based on the stock options exercised multiplied by the difference between the price at which they were valued on the date of exercise and stock option exercise price. |
(2) | The value shown is the closing price of a share of our Common Stock on the business days immediately prior to the vesting dates of RSUs and to the payment date for the performance units, as applicable, multiplied by the number of units vested/paid, including cash received in lieu of fractional dividend equivalents. |
Nonqualified Deferred Compensation
The following table sets forth summary information regarding aggregate contributions to and account balances under our SRP and NDCP for, and as of, the year ended December 31, 2018. There were no withdrawals by any of the NEOs in 2018.
Name |
2018 Employee Contributions ($)(1) |
2018 Company Contributions ($)(2) |
2018 Earnings (Losses) ($)(3) |
Balance as of 12/31/18 |
||||||||||||
Robert A. Bradway |
|
402,450 |
|
|
396,800 |
|
|
(330,808 |
) |
|
12,901,937 |
| ||||
Anthony C. Hooper |
|
201,250 |
|
|
198,500 |
|
|
(75,640 |
) |
|
2,145,669 |
| ||||
Murdo Gordon |
|
0 |
|
1,003,269 | (2) | (63,041 | ) | 940,228 | ||||||||
Sean E. Harper |
|
0 |
|
|
181,500 |
|
|
(204,789 |
) |
|
3,254,878 |
| ||||
David W. Meline |
|
111,600 |
|
|
181,500 |
|
|
(237,215 |
) |
|
5,742,903 |
| ||||
David M. Reese |
|
0 |
|
|
76,019 |
|
|
(42,074 |
) |
|
842,508 |
| ||||
Jonathan P. Graham |
|
89,904 |
|
|
151,800 |
|
|
(155,770 |
) |
|
2,887,036 |
|
(1) | Reflects the portions of the annual cash incentive awards deferred and contributed to the NDCP in the amount of $402,450, $100,000, and $111,600 by Messrs. Bradway, Hooper, and Meline, respectively, that were included in the Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation column of the Summary Compensation Table in 2017, the year they were earned. Also reflects a portion of salaries deferred and contributed to the NDCP in the amount of $101,250 and $89,904 by Messrs. Hooper and Graham, respectively, that were included in the Salary column of the Summary Compensation Table in 2018, the year they were earned. |
(2) | Reflects credits to the SRP. To compensate for Mr. Gordons forfeiture of certain pension benefits at his previous employer, Mr. Gordon was provided with a $1,000,000 Company contribution to his NDCP in connection with his initial hiring. The SRP vests on the third anniversary of Mr. Gordons hire date. The NDCP vests in approximately equal installments of 33% on the first and second anniversaries and 34% on the third anniversary of his hire date, subject to continued employment with us through such dates, and which are included in the All Other Compensation column of the Summary Compensation Table. |
(3) | Reflects earnings (losses) in the NDCP and SRP for 2018. |
(4) | Reflects balances in the NDCP and SRP on December 31, 2018. All amounts are vested, except amounts with respect to: $936,942, $869,657, and $916,262 for Mr. Gordon, Mr. Meline, and Mr. Graham, respectively, related to Company contributions in their NDCP accounts and related earnings and losses and $3,286 for Mr. Gordon related to Company contributions and related gains and losses to his SRP account. These balances include the following aggregate amounts that are reported as compensation in this proxy statement in the Summary Compensation Table in 2018, 2017, and 2016: $1,802,927 for Mr. Bradway; $1,043,211 for Mr. Hooper; $1,003,269 for Mr. Gordon; $617,008 for Dr. Harper; $1,063,809 for Mr. Meline; $76,019 for Dr. Reese; and $547,112 for Mr. Graham. |
74 ï 2019 Proxy Statement
|
Executive Compensation Tables
|
|
General Provisions of the Supplemental Retirement Plan and Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plan
Retirement and Savings Plan and Supplemental Retirement Plan
Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plan
ï 2019 Proxy Statement 75
|
Executive Compensation Tables
|
|
Investment Options Under the Supplemental Retirement Plan and Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plan
Name of Investment Option |
Rate of Return for 2018 |
Name of Investment Option |
Rate of Return for 2018 |
|||||||
Amgen Target Retirement Portfolio Income |
|
(3.11)% |
|
Large Cap Value |
|
(6.58)% |
| |||
Amgen Target Retirement Portfolio 2020 |
|
(3.50)% |
|
Large Cap Index |
|
(4.42)% |
| |||
Amgen Target Retirement Portfolio 2030 |
|
(4.73)% |
|
Large Cap Growth |
|
1.51% |
| |||
Amgen Target Retirement Portfolio 2040 |
|
(6.88)% |
|
Small-Mid Cap Value |
|
(18.60)% |
| |||
Amgen Target Retirement Portfolio 2050 |
|
(7.97)% |
|
Small-Mid Cap Index |
|
(9.53)% |
| |||
Amgen Target Retirement Portfolio 2060 |
|
(12.11)% |
* |
Small-Mid Cap Growth |
|
0.16% |
| |||
Capital Preservation |
|
2.19% |
|
International Value |
|
(12.96)% |
| |||
Fixed Income Index |
|
0.00% |
|
International Index |
|
(13.82)% |
| |||
Fixed Income |
|
0.38% |
|
International Growth |
|
(10.79)% |
| |||
High Yield |
|
(1.92)% |
|
Emerging Markets |
|
(10.23)% |
| |||
Inflation-Protection |
|
(1.32)% |
|
REIT Index |
|
(5.83)% |
|
* | Inception to date. |
76 ï 2019 Proxy Statement
|
Executive Compensation Tables
|
|
Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change of Control
Change of Control Severance Plan
ï 2019 Proxy Statement 77
|
Executive Compensation Tables
|
|
78 ï 2019 Proxy Statement
|
Executive Compensation Tables
|
|
ï 2019 Proxy Statement 79
|
Executive Compensation Tables
|
|
Estimated Payments to Robert A. Bradway
Triggering Event | ||||||||||||||||
Estimated Potential Payment or Benefit | Change in Control($) |
Change in Control and Termination($) |
Retirement($) | Death or Disability($) |
||||||||||||
Lump sum cash severance payment |
0 | 7,800,000 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||
Intrinsic value of accelerated unvested stock options |
0 | 9,133,781 | 9,133,781 | 9,133,781 | ||||||||||||
Intrinsic value of accelerated unvested RSUs |
0 | 8,768,326 | 8,768,326 | 8,768,326 | ||||||||||||
Value of 2018-2020 performance units |
8,553,605 | (1) | 8,553,605 | (1) | 8,546,986 | (2) | 8,546,986 | (2) | ||||||||
Value of 2017-2019 performance units |
10,834,359 | (1) | 10,834,359 | (1) | 10,567,272 | (2) | 10,567,272 | (2) | ||||||||
Continuing health care benefits for 18 months(3) |
0 | 36,923 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||
Continuing retirement plan contributions for two years(4) |
0 | 785,000 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||
Total |
19,387,964 | 45,911,994 | 37,016,365 | 37,016,365 | ||||||||||||
Estimated Payments to Anthony C. Hooper
Triggering Event | ||||||||||||
Estimated Potential Payment or Benefit |
Change in Control($) |
Change in Control and Termination($) |
Death or Disability($) |
|||||||||
Lump sum cash severance payment |
0 | 4,212,000 | 0 | |||||||||
Intrinsic value of accelerated unvested stock options |
0 | 3,112,906 | 3,112,906 | |||||||||
Intrinsic value of accelerated unvested RSUs |
0 | 2,954,701 | 2,954,701 | |||||||||
Value of 2018-2020 performance units |
2,737,060 | (1) | 2,737,060 | (1) | 2,734,919 | (2) | ||||||
Value of 2017-2019 performance units |
3,611,323 | (1) | 3,611,323 | (1) | 3,522,359 | (2) | ||||||
Continuing health care benefits for 18 months(3) |
0 | 25,024 | 0 | |||||||||
Continuing retirement plan contributions for two years(4) |
0 | 426,200 | 0 | |||||||||
Total |
6,348,383 | 17,079,214 | 12,324,885 | |||||||||
Estimated Payments to Murdo Gordon
Triggering Event | ||||||||||||||||
Estimated Potential Payment or Benefit |
Change in Control($) |
Change in Control and Termination($) |
Termination Without Cause($)(7) |
Death or Disability($) |
||||||||||||
Lump sum cash severance payment |
0 | 4,000,000 | 4,000,000 | 0 | ||||||||||||
Intrinsic value of accelerated unvested RSUs |
0 | 6,705,992 | 0 | 1,676,366 | (9) | |||||||||||
Value of 2018-2020 performance units |
3,500,000 | (1) | 3,500,000 | (1) | 0 | 912,418 | (2) | |||||||||
Continuing health care benefits for 18 months(3) |
0 | 36,923 | 36,923 | 0 | ||||||||||||
Continuing retirement plan contributions for two years(4) |
0 | 405,000 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||
Acceleration of unvested balance of SRP account |
0 | 3,286 | 0 | 3,286 | ||||||||||||
Acceleration of unvested balance of DCP account |
936,942 | 936,942 | 936,942 | 936,942 | ||||||||||||
Total |
4,436,942 | 15,588,143 | 4,973,865 | 3,529,012 | ||||||||||||
80 ï 2019 Proxy Statement
|
Executive Compensation Tables
|
|
Estimated Payments to Sean E. Harper(10)
Triggering Event |
||||
Estimated Potential Payment or Benefit | Retirement($) | |||
Intrinsic value of accelerated unvested stock options |
|
2,945,760 |
| |
Intrinsic value of accelerated unvested RSUs |
|
2,752,578 |
| |
Value of 2018-2020 performance units |
|
2,745,737 |
| |
Value of 2017-2019 performance units |
|
3,270,884 |
| |
Total |
|
11,714,959 |
|
Estimated Payments to David W. Meline
Triggering Event | ||||||||||||
Estimated Potential Payment or Benefit |
Change in Control($) |
Change in Control and Termination($) |
Death or Disability($) |
|||||||||
Lump sum cash severance payment |
|
0 |
|
|
3,896,000 |
|
|
0 |
| |||
Intrinsic value of accelerated unvested stock options |
|
0 |
|
|
2,798,462 |
|
|
2,798,462 |
| |||
Intrinsic value of accelerated unvested RSUs |
|
0 |
|
|
2,691,507 |
|
|
2,691,507 |
| |||
Value of 2018-2020 performance units |
|
2,737,060 |
(1) |
|
2,737,060 |
(1) |
|
2,734,919 |
(2) | |||
Value of 2017-2019 performance units |
|
3,159,883 |
(1) |
|
3,159,883 |
(1) |
|
3,082,015 |
(2) | |||
Continuing health care benefits for 18 months(3) |
|
0 |
|
|
36,923 |
|
|
0 |
| |||
Continuing retirement plan contributions for two years(4) |
|
0 |
|
|
394,600 |
|
|
0 |
| |||
Acceleration of unvested balance of DCP account |
|
835,142 |
(5) |
|
835,142 |
(5) |
|
0 |
| |||
Total |
|
6,732,085 |
|
|
16,549,577 |
|
|
11,306,903 |
|
Estimated Payments to David M. Reese
Triggering Event | ||||||||||||||||
Estimated Potential Payment or Benefit |
Change in Control($) |
Change in Control and Termination($) |
Retirement($) | Death or Disability($) |
||||||||||||
Lump sum cash severance payment |
|
0 |
|
|
2,880,400 |
(6) |
|
0 |
|
|
0 |
| ||||
Intrinsic value of accelerated unvested stock options |
|
0 |
|
|
637,490 |
|
|
637,490 |
|
|
637,490 |
| ||||
Intrinsic value of accelerated unvested RSUs |
|
0 |
|
|
4,132,649 |
|
|
613,573 |
(8) |
|
4,132,649 |
| ||||
Value of 2018-2020 performance units |
|
615,547 |
(1) |
|
615,547 |
(1) |
|
615,157 |
(2) |
|
615,157 |
(2) | ||||
Value of 2017-2019 performance units |
|
722,226 |
(1) |
|
722,226 |
(1) |
|
704,316 |
(2) |
|
704,316 |
(2) | ||||
Continuing health care benefits for 18 months(3) |
|
0 |
|
|
36,923 |
|
|
0 |
|
|
0 |
| ||||
Continuing retirement plan contributions for two years(4) |
|
0 |
|
|
347,000 |
|
|
0 |
|
|
0 |
| ||||
Total |
|
1,337,773 |
|
|
9,372,235 |
|
|
2,570,536 |
|
|
6,089,612 |
|
ï 2019 Proxy Statement 81
|
Executive Compensation Tables
|
|
Estimated Payments to Jonathan P. Graham
Triggering Event | ||||||||||||
Estimated Potential Payment or Benefit |
Change in Control($) |
Change in Control and Termination($) |
Death or Disability($) |
|||||||||
Lump sum cash severance payment |
|
0 |
|
|
3,553,000 |
|
|
0 |
| |||
Intrinsic value of accelerated unvested stock options |
|
0 |
|
|
1,934,458 |
|
|
1,934,458 |
| |||
Intrinsic value of accelerated unvested RSUs |
|
0 |
|
|
4,288,385 |
|
|
4,288,385 |
| |||
Value of 2018-2020 performance units |
|
1,915,942 |
(1) |
|
1,915,942 |
(1) |
|
1,914,385 |
(2) | |||
Value of 2017-2019 performance units |
|
2,257,004 |
(1) |
|
2,257,004 |
(1) |
|
2,201,328 |
(2) | |||
Continuing health care benefits for 18 months(3) |
|
0 |
|
|
36,923 |
|
|
0 |
| |||
Continuing retirement plan contributions for two years(4) |
|
0 |
|
|
360,300 |
|
|
0 |
| |||
Acceleration of unvested balance of DCP account |
|
916,262 |
|
|
916,262 |
|
|
916,262 |
| |||
Total |
|
5,089,208 |
|
|
15,262,274 |
|
|
11,254,818 |
|
(1) | In the event of a change of control occurring after the first six months of the 2018-2020 performance period, other than for performance units granted to Mr. Gordon, the number of performance units that would have been earned is the sum of the number of performance units granted and related dividend equivalents accrued through December 31, 2018, multiplied by a payout percentage of 130%, which employs the plan dictated target level of performance for the operating performance measures of 100% modified up by 30 percentage points by the TSR modifier which is based on our TSR percentile rank relative to the TSRs of the companies in the Reference Group for the period from the April 27, 2018 grant date through September 30, 2018, the last business day of the last fiscal quarter before the change in control. With respect to Mr. Gordons grant of performance units for the 2018-2020 performance period, in the event of a change in control that occurs during 2018, he is entitled to the grant value of the award of $3,500,000. |
In the event of a change of control occurring during the second year of the 2017-2019 performance period, the number of performance units that would have been earned is the sum of the number of performance units granted and related dividend equivalents accrued through December 31, 2018, multiplied by a payout percentage of 158.2%, which is the percentage based on the estimated outcomes of our operating performance measures achieved during the first year of the performance period of 118.4% increased by the TSR modifier by 39.8 percentage points based on our TSR percentile rank relative to the TSRs of the companies in the Reference Group for the period from the May 1, 2017 grant date to September 30, 2018, the last business day of the last fiscal quarter before the change in control. |
Our TSRs for purposes of determining the payout percentages of these awards would be based on the higher of: (i) the average closing price of our Common Stock for the last 20 trading days of the shortened performance period ended on September 30, 2018; and (ii) the value of consideration the acquirer paid for a share of our Common Stock in the change of control. For purposes of the payout values shown in the tables, the TSRs for our Common Stock were based on the respective actual TSRs over the respective averaging periods ending September 30, 2018 the last business day of the last fiscal quarter before the change in control. The resulting number of units that would have been so earned was multiplied by $194.67, the closing price of our Common Stock on December 31, 2018. |
For information on the actual number of units to be earned for these performance unit grants, see Elements of Compensation and Specific Compensation DecisionsLong-Term Incentive Equity Awards in our Compensation Discussion and Analysis. |
(2) | In the event death or disability occurs, the participant is entitled to the number of performance units that would have been earned by the NEO if he had remained employed for the entire performance period. For purposes of the payout values shown in the tables, the number of units that would have been earned was multiplied by $194.67, the closing price of our Common Stock on December 31, 2018. |
For the 2018-2020 performance period for NEOs other than Mr. Gordon, the number of performance units that would have been earned is the sum of the number of performance units granted and related dividend equivalents accrued through December 31, 2018, multiplied by the payout percentage of 129.9%. The payout percentage is based on the estimated outcomes as of December 31, 2018, of our operating performance measures to be achieved during the performance period of 99.9%, which was increased by the TSR modifier by 30 percentage points based on our TSR percentile rank relative to the TSRs of the companies in the Reference Group for the period from the April 27, 2018 grant date to December 31, 2018. With respect to Mr. Gordons grant of performance units for 2018-2020 performance period, the number of performance units that would have been earned is the sum of the number of performance units granted and related dividend equivalents accrued through December 31, 2018, multiplied by the payout percentage of 105.2%. The payout percentage is based on estimated outcomes as of December 31, 2018, of our operating measures to be achieved during the performance period of 105.2% with no adjustment by the TSR modifier as our TSR for the period from the November 2, 2018 grant date to December 31, 2018 was negative, even though it exceeded the 75th percentile rank relative to the TSRs of the companies in the Reference Group during this period. Also, since the termination events were assumed to occur in the year the award is granted, and Mr. Gordon commenced employment with the company in 2018, the amount in the table above reflects a pro-rata reduction of the performance units to be paid out based on the number of complete months of service provided by Mr. Gordon in 2018. |
For the 2017-2019 performance period, the number of performance units that would have been earned is the sum of the number of performance units granted and related dividend equivalents accrued through December 31, 2018, multiplied by the payout percentage of 154.3%. The payout percentage is based on the estimated outcomes as of December 31, 2018, of our operating performance measures to be achieved during the performance period of 104.3%, which was increased by the TSR modifier by 50 percentage points based on our TSR percentile rank relative to the TSRs of the companies in the Reference Group for the period from the May 1, 2017 grant date to December 31, 2018. |
In the event of actual death or disability, payout of shares in satisfaction of amounts earned for grants for the 2018-2020 and 2017-2019 performance periods would not occur until after the end of the performance periods. For more information, see Elements of Compensation and Specific Compensation DecisionsLong-Term Incentive Equity Awards in our Compensation Discussion and Analysis. |
As Mr. Bradway and Dr. Reese were retirement-eligible as of December 31, 2018, the retirement payout amounts for performance units for the 2018-2020 and 2017-2019 performance periods were calculated in the same manner as the respective death and disability amounts. |
82 ï 2019 Proxy Statement
|
Executive Compensation Tables
|
|
(3) | Reflects the estimated cost of medical, dental, and vision insurance coverage based on rates charged to our staff members for post-employment coverage provided in accordance with COBRA for the first 18 months following termination adjusted for the last six months of this period by an 8% inflation factor for medical coverage and a 6% inflation factor for dental coverage. |
(4) | Reflects the value of retirement plan contributions for two years calculated as two times the sum of: (i) $2,500; and (ii) the product of: (a) 10%; and (b) the sum of the NEOs annual base salary as of December 31, 2018, and the NEOs targeted annual cash incentive award for 2018 (which equals the NEOs annual base salary as of December 31, 2018, multiplied by the NEOs target annual cash incentive award percentage). |
(5) | Reflects a reduction of $34,515 from Mr. Melines unvested balance in the NDCP that would otherwise become immediately vested in the event of a change in control to avoid excise tax he would be liable for if all benefits pursuant to the Change of Control Severance Plan were provided to Mr. Meline. For purposes of determining whether a reduction in the amount in the NDCP subject to accelerated vesting should be made, we applied the highest applicable federal and state income tax rates to the benefits subject to income taxes that would be provided to Mr. Meline pursuant to the Change of Control Severance Plan in the table above. |
(6) | Reflects the cash severance payment pursuant to our Change of Control Severance Plan described above. The payment to Dr. Reese was reduced by $539,600 from the amount otherwise due to him to avoid excise tax he would be liable for if all benefits pursuant to the Change of Control Severance Plan were paid to Dr. Reese. For purposes of determining whether the cash severance payment reduction should be made, we applied the highest applicable federal and state income tax rates to the benefits subject to income taxes that would be payable to Dr. Reese pursuant to the Change of Control Severance Plan in the table above. |
(7) | Reflects amounts that would be paid to Mr. Gordon pursuant to his offer letter in the event Mr. Gordon was terminated without cause, including two years of annual salary and annual target incentive bonus, as defined, and the cost of providing continuing medical and dental insurance coverage for 18 months in accordance with COBRA calculated in the same manner as described in footnote 3 above. The terms of Mr. Gordons offer letter relating to these benefits expire at the end of the third year of his employment on September 3, 2021. |
(8) | Excludes the value of unvested RSUs (including related accrued dividend equivalents rounded down to the nearest whole number of units) granted to Dr. Reese on May 1, 2017 and November 2, 2018, totaling 18,078 units which do not provide for continued vesting after retirement. |
(9) | In accordance with the terms of our award agreements, the termination events in the year an award is granted reflects a pro-rata reduction of the RSUs (including related accrued dividend equivalents rounded down to the nearest whole number of units) granted to Mr. Gordon in connection with the commencement of his employment in 2018 based on the number of complete months of service provided by Mr. Gordon during 2018. |
(10) | Dr. Harper retired from the Company on January 4, 2019, when the closing price of our stock was $195.44. Since Dr. Harper became retirement-eligible prior to his retirement, his unvested stock options, RSUs and performance units will continue to vest on their original schedules subsequent to his termination. For presentation purposes in the table above, these awards are valued as if they were fully vested on January 4, 2019. The payout of shares in satisfaction of amounts earned for grants for the 2018-2020 and 2017-2019 performance periods will not occur until after the end of the performance periods. |
ï 2019 Proxy Statement 83
|
Director Compensation
|
|
Director Compensation Table
The following table shows compensation of the non-employee members of our Board for 2018. Robert A. Bradway, our Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and President is not included in the table as he is an employee and thus receives no compensation for his service as a director.
Non-Employee Director
|
Fees Earned or
|
Stock Awards($)(5)(6)
|
All Other Compensation($)(7)
|
Total($)
|
||||||||||||
Wanda M. Austin
|
|
124,000
|
|
|
216,602
|
|
|
22,401
|
|
|
363,003
|
| ||||
David Baltimore(1)
|
|
58,000
|
|
|
199,997
|
|
|
34,009
|
|
|
292,006
|
| ||||
François de Carbonnel(1)
|
|
59,000
|
|
|
199,997
|
|
|
26,873
|
|
|
285,870
|
| ||||
Brian J. Druker(1)
|
|
84,667
|
|
|
133,261
|
|
|
12,959
|
|
|
230,887
|
| ||||
Robert A. Eckert
|
|
179,000
|
|
|
199,997
|
|
|
20,762
|
|
|
399,759
|
| ||||
Greg C. Garland
|
|
144,000
|
|
|
199,997
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
|
363,997
|
| ||||
Fred Hassan
|
|
126,000
|
|
|
199,997
|
|
|
21,472
|
|
|
347,469
|
| ||||
Rebecca M. Henderson
|
|
124,000
|
|
|
199,997
|
|
|
30,478
|
|
|
354,475
|
| ||||
Frank C. Herringer(2)
|
|
122,000
|
|
|
199,997
|
|
|
84,657
|
|
|
406,654
|
| ||||
Charles M. Holley, Jr.(3)
|
|
73,000
|
|
|
272,639
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
355,639
|
| ||||
Tyler Jacks
|
|
126,000
|
|
|
199,997
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
|
345,997
|
| ||||
Ellen J. Kullman(3)
|
|
0
|
|
|
323,605
|
|
|
20,225
|
|
|
343,830
|
| ||||
Ronald D. Sugar
|
|
138,000
|
|
|
199,997
|
|
|
608
|
|
|
338,605
|
| ||||
R. Sanders Williams
|
|
118,000
|
|
|
199,997
|
|
|
20,224
|
|
|
338,221
|
|
(1) | Dr. Baltimore and Mr. de Carbonnel retired from our Board in May 2018 and Dr. Druker was elected to our Board effective May 22, 2018. Accordingly, fees earned by each director in 2018 consist of a pro-rata amount of the annual retainer fee (pro-rated on a monthly basis) and fees for committee meetings attended in 2018. |
(2) | All cash fees for Mr. Herringer were deferred under our NDCP. |
(3) | Mr. Holley and Ms. Kullman elected to receive 50% and 100%, respectively, of their annual retainer and committee meeting fees in the form of deferred RSUs. |
(4) | Reflects all fees earned by members of our Board for participation in regular, telephonic, and special meetings of Board committees and annual retainers, as applicable. |
(5) | Reflects the grant date fair values of RSUs determined in accordance with Accounting Standards Codification Topic 718 consisting of 1,127 RSUs granted on April 27, 2018, to each director named above, except Dr. Druker who was not yet a member of our Board. Dr. Druker was granted 678 RSUs on July 31, 2018, based on a pro-rata value consistent with his length of service on the Board during 2018. The grant date fair values of all of these awards are based on the closing prices of our Common Stock on the grant dates of $177.46 and $196.55 on April 27, 2018, and July 31, 2018, respectively, multiplied by the number of RSUs granted. Such grants occur on the third business day after release of our annual or quarterly earnings, as applicable. Directors that elect to defer receipt of the shares accrue dividend equivalents on the vested RSUs during the deferral period. All of the RSUs granted to directors were fully vested upon grant. |
In addition to the grants discussed above, Mr. Holley and Ms. Kullman were granted RSUs in lieu of cash fees for 50% and 100%, respectively, of their annual retainer and committee meeting fees as follows:
Granted on
|
||||||||||||||||
Non-Employee Director
|
April 27, 2018
|
July 31, 2018
|
November 2, 2018
|
February 1, 2019
|
||||||||||||
Charles M. Holley, Jr.
|
|
101
|
|
|
89
|
|
|
93
|
|
|
106
|
| ||||
Ellen J. Kullman
|
|
174
|
|
|
152
|
|
|
149
|
|
|
187
|
|
The grant date fair values per unit for these awards were $177.46, $196.55, $187.06, and $187.07 for April 27, 2018, July 31, 2018, November 2, 2018, and February 1, 2019, respectively. In addition to the stock awards discussed above, Dr. Austin, who was appointed to our Board in December 2017, was granted 94 RSUs on February 6, 2018, the third business day after release of our annual earnings for 2017, with a grant date fair value per unit of $176.65 and aggregate fair value of $16,605, representing her pro-rated 2017 equity award consistent with her length of service on the Board during 2017.
ï 2019 Proxy Statement 85
|
Director Compensation
|
|
(6) | The table below shows the aggregate numbers of stock awards and stock option awards outstanding for each non-employee director as of December 31, 2018. Stock awards consist of vested RSUs for which receipt of the underlying shares of our Common Stock has been deferred (vested/deferred RSUs) and dividends on vested/deferred RSUs deemed automatically reinvested to acquire additional vested/deferred RSUs (rounded down to the nearest whole number of units). Directors may elect to defer issuance of shares until a later date, which would result in a deferral of taxable income to the director until the stock issuance date. Upon the passage of any applicable deferral period, the vested/deferred RSUs are paid in shares of our Common Stock on a one-for-one basis. Option awards consist of fully exercisable stock options. |
Non-Employee Director
|
Aggregate Stock Awards Outstanding as of December 31, 2018(a)
|
Aggregate Option Awards Outstanding as of December 31, 2018(b)
|
||||||
Restricted Stock Units and Dividend Equivalents
|
Stock Options
|
|||||||
Wanda M. Austin
|
|
0
|
|
|
0
|
| ||
David Baltimore
|
|
0
|
|
|
15,000
|
| ||
François de Carbonnel
|
|
2,338
|
|
|
0
|
| ||
Brian J. Druker
|
|
687
|
|
|
0
|
| ||
Robert A. Eckert
|
|
9,242
|
|
|
20,000
|
| ||
Greg C. Garland
|
|
0
|
|
|
0
|
| ||
Fred Hassan
|
|
0
|
|
|
0
|
| ||
Rebecca M. Henderson
|
|
12,235
|
|
|
5,000
|
| ||
Frank C. Herringer
|
|
23,636
|
|
|
15,000
|
| ||
Charles M. Holley, Jr.
|
|
1,437
|
|
|
0
|
| ||
Tyler Jacks
|
|
7,137
|
|
|
0
|
| ||
Ellen J. Kullman
|
|
2,922
|
|
|
0
|
| ||
Ronald D. Sugar
|
|
12,988
|
|
|
30,000
|
| ||
R. Sanders Williams
|
|
0
|
|
|
0
|
|
(a) | Restricted stock units and related dividend equivalents are all vested, but receipt has been deferred. |
(b) | All options are vested. |
86 ï 2019 Proxy Statement
|
Director Compensation
|
|
(7) | The table below provides a summary of amounts paid by the Company for perquisites and other special benefits. |
Non-Employee Director
|
Matching of Charitable Contributions ($)(a)
|
Personal Use
of Company Aircraft(b)
|
Reimbursement of Expenses
in
|
Other(d)
|
Dividends Accrued on Vested/ Deferred RSUs($)(e)
|
Total($)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Aggregate Incremental Amounts($)
|
Tax Gross- Up($)
|
Aggregate Incremental Amounts($)
|
Tax Gross- Up($)
|
Aggregate Incremental Amounts($)
|
Tax Gross- Up($)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Wanda M. Austin
|
|
22,000
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
286
|
|
|
115
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
22,401
|
| |||||||||
David Baltimore
|
|
20,000
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
346
|
|
|
139
|
|
|
9,716
|
|
|
3,808
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
34,009
|
| |||||||||
François de Carbonnel
|
|
0
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
869
|
|
|
585
|
|
|
9,611
|
|
|
3,671
|
|
|
12,137
|
|
|
26,873
|
| |||||||||
Brian J. Druker
|
|
12,500
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
459
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
12,959
|
| |||||||||
Robert A. Eckert
|
|
20,000
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
762
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
20,762
|
| |||||||||
Greg C. Garland
|
|
20,000
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
20,000
|
| |||||||||
Fred Hassan
|
|
20,000
|
|
|
316
|
|
|
891
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
207
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
21,472
|
| |||||||||
Rebecca M. Henderson
|
|
20,000
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
10,478
|
|
|
30,478
|
| |||||||||
Frank C. Herringer
|
|
30,000
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
54,657
|
|
|
84,657
|
| |||||||||
Charles M. Holley, Jr.
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
10,000
|
| |||||||||
Tyler Jacks
|
|
20,000
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
20,000
|
| |||||||||
Ellen J. Kullman
|
|
20,000
|
|
|
206
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
20,225
|
| |||||||||
Ronald D. Sugar
|
|
0
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
434
|
|
|
174
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
608
|
| |||||||||
R. Sanders Williams
|
|
20,000
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
160
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
20,224
|
|
(a) | These are charitable contributions of The Amgen Foundation, Inc. that matched the directors charitable contributions made in 2018, including contribution to disaster relief organizations of $2,000 by Dr. Austin and $10,000 by Mr. Herringer. |
(b) | Where we have guests accompany directors on our aircraft or where the director, for non-business purposes, accompanies executives using our aircraft for business purposes, we typically incur de minimis incremental cost for transporting that person, but we are required to impute income to the director for his or her income tax purposes. We reimburse the director for the additional income taxes imposed on the director in these circumstances. The aggregate incremental cost of use of our aircraft is calculated based on our variable operating costs, which include crew travel expenses, on-board catering, landing fees, trip-related hangar/parking costs, fuel, maintenance, and other smaller variable costs. In determining the incremental cost relating to fuel and trip-related maintenance, we applied an estimate derived from our average costs. We believe that the use of this methodology is a reasonably accurate method for calculating fuel and trip-related maintenance costs. Because our aircraft are used primarily for business travel, we do not include the fixed costs that do not change based on usage, such as pilots salaries, our aircraft purchase costs, and the cost of maintenance not related to trips. |
(c) | These amounts reflect the incremental costs of personal expenses incurred while on business travel and related imputed income to the director for his or her income tax purposes. We reimburse the director for the additional income taxes imposed on the director in these circumstances. Where we have guests accompanying directors for business purposes, we may incur incremental costs for the guest and may be required to impute income to the director for his or her income tax purposes. We reimburse the director for the additional income taxes imposed on the director in these circumstances. |
(d) | Amounts for Dr. Baltimore and Mr. de Carbonnel reflect costs and related tax gross-up for gifts given to them related to retirement from our Board. Amounts for Mr. Hassan and Dr. Williams reflect costs and related tax gross-ups for personal expenses while on business travel. |
(e) | Amounts reflect dividends accrued on vested/deferred RSUs granted prior to 2011 as the impact of dividends was not considered in determining the grant date fair values of these awards for purposes of reporting compensation in the Stock Awards column in the Director Compensation Table in the Companys proxy statements in prior years. |
ï 2019 Proxy Statement 87
|
Security Ownership of Directors and Executive Officers
|
|
Security Ownership of Directors and Executive Officers
The following table sets forth certain information regarding the beneficial ownership of our Common Stock as of March 22, 2019 by: (i) each current director and nominee; (ii) our Named Executive Officers, or NEOs (as specified on page 34); and (iii) all of our current directors and executive officers as a group. There were 615,949,381 shares of our Common Stock outstanding as of March 22, 2019. None of our directors, nominees, NEOs, or executive officers, individually or as a group, beneficially owns greater than 1% of our outstanding shares of Common Stock.
Amgen Inc.
|
||||||||||||
Beneficial Owner
|
Total Common Stock Beneficially Owned
|
Shares Acquirable Within 60 Days
|
Percent of Total
|
|||||||||
Non-Employee Directors and Nominees
|
||||||||||||
Wanda M. Austin
|
|
1,221
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
*
|
| |||
Brian J. Druker
|
|
0
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
*
|
| |||
Robert A. Eckert
|
|
20,435
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
|
*
|
| |||
Greg C. Garland
|
|
7,051
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
*
|
| |||
Fred Hassan
|
|
7,218
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
*
|
| |||
Rebecca M. Henderson
|
|
8,150
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
|
*
|
| |||
Frank C. Herringer(3)
|
|
42,722
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
|
*
|
| |||
Charles M. Holley, Jr.(4)
|
|
1,260
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
*
|
| |||
Tyler Jacks
|
|
1,890
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
*
|
| |||
Ellen J. Kullman
|
|
410
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
*
|
| |||
Ronald D. Sugar
|
|
26,000
|
|
|
26,000
|
|
|
*
|
| |||
R. Sanders Williams
|
|
5,136
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
*
|
| |||
|
||||||||||||
Named Executive Officers
|
||||||||||||
Robert A. Bradway
|
|
748,691
|
|
|
332,876
|
|
|
*
|
| |||
Anthony C. Hooper
|
|
257,406
|
|
|
46,670
|
|
|
*
|
| |||
Murdo Gordon
|
|
0
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
*
|
| |||
Sean E. Harper
|
|
80,428
|
|
|
29,065
|
|
|
*
|
| |||
David W. Meline
|
|
83,326
|
|
|
40,837
|
|
|
*
|
| |||
David M. Reese
|
|
26,528
|
|
|
14,827
|
|
|
*
|
| |||
Jonathan P. Graham
|
|
52,533
|
|
|
27,638
|
|
|
*
|
| |||
All current directors, NEOs and executive officers as a group (23 individuals)(5)
|
|
1,511,565
|
|
|
600,394
|
|
|
*
|
|
* | Less than 1%. |
(1) | Information in this table is based on our records and information provided by directors, NEOs, executive officers, and in public filings. Unless otherwise indicated in the footnotes and subject to community property laws, where applicable, each of the directors and nominees, NEOs, and executive officers has sole voting and/or investment power with respect to such shares, including shares held in trust. |
88 ï 2019 Proxy Statement
|
Security Ownership of Directors and Executive Officers
|
|
(2) | Includes shares which the individuals shown have the right to acquire (a) upon vesting of restricted stock units, or RSUs, and related dividend equivalents (excluding fractional shares), where the shares are issuable as of March 22, 2019, or within 60 days thereafter, and (b) upon exercise of stock options that are vested as of March 22, 2019, or within 60 days thereafter, as set forth in the table below. Such shares are deemed to be outstanding in calculating the percentage ownership of such individual (and the group), but are not deemed to be outstanding as to any other person. Excludes vested RSUs, and related dividend equivalents, for which receipt has been deferred by certain of the non-employee directors to a date later than 60 days after March 22, 2019. Dividend equivalents credited on RSUs are deemed reinvested and are paid out with the vested RSUs in shares of our Common Stock. |
Name
|
RSUs and Dividend Equivalents Included
|
Stock Options Included
|
RSUs and Dividend Equivalents Excluded Because of Deferrals
|
|||||||||
Wanda M. Austin
|
|
0
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
0
|
| |||
Brian J. Druker
|
|
0
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
692
|
| |||
Robert A. Eckert
|
|
0
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
|
9,316
|
| |||
Greg C. Garland
|
|
0
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
0
|
| |||
Fred Hassan
|
|
0
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
0
|
| |||
Rebecca M. Henderson
|
|
0
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
|
12,333
|
| |||
Frank C. Herringer
|
|
0
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
|
23,825
|
| |||
Charles M. Holley, Jr.
|
|
0
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
1,555
|
| |||
Tyler Jacks
|
|
0
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
7,195
|
| |||
Ellen J. Kullman
|
|
0
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
3,134
|
| |||
Ronald D. Sugar
|
|
0
|
|
|
26,000
|
|
|
13,092
|
| |||
R. Sanders Williams
|
|
0
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
0
|
| |||
Robert A. Bradway
|
|
10,184
|
|
|
322,692
|
|
|
0
|
| |||
Anthony C. Hooper
|
|
3,545
|
|
|
43,125
|
|
|
0
|
| |||
Murdo Gordon
|
|
0
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
0
|
| |||
Sean E. Harper
|
|
3,188
|
|
|
25,877
|
|
|
0
|
| |||
David W. Meline
|
|
3,103
|
|
|
37,734
|
|
|
0
|
| |||
David M. Reese
|
|
2,423
|
|
|
12,404
|
|
|
0
|
| |||
Jonathan P. Graham
|
|
2,123
|
|
|
25,515
|
|
|
0
|
|
(3) | Includes 17,152 shares held by family trusts. |
(4) | Shares held through the Holley Family Trust. |
(5) | Includes 140,890 shares (excluding fractional shares) held by the four executive officers who are not NEOs and who have a right to acquire such shares upon the vesting of RSUs that have not been deferred to a date later than 60 days after March 22, 2019, or upon exercise of vested stock options as of March 22, 2019, or within 60 days thereafter. All current directors, NEOs, and executive officers as a group have the right to acquire a total of 28,234 shares upon vesting of RSUs, and related dividend equivalents, where the shares are issuable as of March 22, 2019, or within 60 days thereafter and 572,160 shares upon exercise of stock options that are vested as of March 22, 2019, or within 60 days thereafter. |
ï 2019 Proxy Statement 89
|
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners
|
|
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners
The following table shows the number of shares of our Common Stock owned by each person or entity known to the Company to be the beneficial owners of more than 5% of our Common Stock as of March 22, 2019, based on a review of publicly available statements of beneficial ownership filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC, on Schedules 13D and 13G through March 22, 2019.
Common Stock
|
||||||||
Name and Address of Beneficial Owner
|
Number of Shares
|
Percent of Total(1)
|
||||||
The Vanguard Group(2) 100 Vanguard Blvd. Malvern, PA 19355
|
|
49,919,229
|
|
|
8.1%
|
| ||
BlackRock, Inc.(3) 55 East 52nd Street New York, NY 10055
|
|
46,127,396
|
|
|
7.5%
|
| ||
Capital Research Global Investors(4) 333 South Hope Street Los Angeles, CA 90071
|
|
35,144,975
|
|
|
5.7%
|
| ||
FMR LLC(5) 245 Summer Street Boston, MA 02210
|
|
33,118,396
|
|
|
5.4%
|
|
(1) | The Percent of Total reported in this column has been calculated based upon the numbers of shares of Common Stock outstanding as of March 22, 2019, and may differ from the Percent of Class reported in statements of beneficial ownership filed with the SEC. |
(2) | The amounts shown and the following information was provided by The Vanguard Group pursuant to a Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on February 11, 2019. The Vanguard Group reports that it has sole voting power over 788,654 of these shares and sole dispositive power over 49,000,381 shares. |
(3) | The amounts shown and the following information was provided by BlackRock, Inc. pursuant to a Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on February 11, 2019. BlackRock, Inc. reports that it has sole voting power over 40,088,491 of these shares and sole dispositive power over 46,127,396 shares. |
(4) | The amounts shown and the following information was provided by Capital Research Global Investors pursuant to a Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on February 14, 2019. Capital Research Global Investors reports that it has sole voting and dispositive power over all 35,144,975 shares. |
(5) | The amounts shown and the following information was provided by FMR LLC pursuant to a Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on February 13, 2019. FMR LLC reports that it has sole voting power over 4,050,724 of these shares and sole dispositive power over 33,118,396 shares. |
90 ï 2019 Proxy Statement
|
Audit Matters
|
|
Audit Committee Report
Audit Committee of the Board of Directors
Charles M. Holley, Jr., Chairman
Wanda M. Austin
Brian J. Druker
Fred Hassan
Rebecca M. Henderson
Frank C. Herringer
Tyler Jacks
Ellen J. Kullman
Independent Registered Public Accountants
The following table presents fees for professional services provided or to be provided by Ernst & Young for audits of the years ended December 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017, and fees for other services rendered by Ernst & Young during these periods.
2018
|
2017
|
|||||||
Audit
|
$
|
7,876,000
|
|
$
|
8,332,000
|
| ||
Audit-Related
|
|
752,000
|
|
|
290,000
|
| ||
Tax
|
|
0
|
|
|
0
|
| ||
All Other Fees
|
|
0
|
|
|
0
|
| ||
Total Fees
|
$
|
8,628,000
|
|
$
|
8,622,000
|
|
92 ï 2019 Proxy Statement
|
Information Concerning Voting and Solicitation
|
|
(1) | Stockholders who submit a proxy through the Internet or telephone should be aware that they may incur costs to access the Internet or telephone, such as usage charges from telephone companies or Internet service providers and that these costs must be borne by the stockholder. |
96 ï 2019 Proxy Statement
|
Information Concerning Voting and Solicitation
|
|
ï 2019 Proxy Statement 97
|
Information Concerning Voting and Solicitation
|
|
98 ï 2019 Proxy Statement
|
Other Matters
|
|
Householding of Proxy Materials
No Incorporation by Reference
Disclaimer
Forward-Looking Statements
100 ï 2019 Proxy Statement
|
Other Matters
|
|
Other Matters
The Board knows of no matters other than those listed in the attached Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders that are likely to be brought before the Annual Meeting. However, if any other matter properly comes before the Annual Meeting, the persons named on the enclosed proxy card will vote the proxy in accordance with their best judgment on such matter.
By Order of the Board of Directors
Jonathan P. Graham
Secretary
April 8, 2019
ï 2019 Proxy Statement 101
|
Appendix A
|
|
Amgen Inc. Board of Directors
Guidelines for Director Qualifications and Evaluations
These guidelines set forth (1) the minimum qualifications that the Governance and Nominating Committee of the Board of Directors (the Committee) of Amgen Inc. (Amgen) believes are important for directors to possess, and (2) a description of the Committees process for identifying and evaluating nominees for director, including nominees recommended by stockholders. These guidelines are only guidelines and may be waived and/or changed by the Committee and/or the Board of Directors as appropriate.
1. Candidate Qualifications
In seeking individuals to join the Board of Directors or to fill director vacancies on the Board of Directors, the Committee considers the following to be minimum qualifications that a candidate must possess:
| Demonstrated breadth and depth of management and leadership experience, preferably in a senior leadership role in a large or recognized organization; |
| Financial and/or business acumen or relevant industry or scientific experience; |
| Integrity and high ethical standards; |
| Sufficient time to devote to Amgens business as a member of the Board; |
| Ability to oversee, as a director, Amgens business and affairs for the benefit of Amgens stockholders; |
| Ability to comply with the Boards Code of Conduct; and |
| Demonstrated ability to think independently and work collaboratively. |
In addition, the Committee may consider the following where necessary and appropriate:
| A candidates independence, as defined by The NASDAQ Stock Market, Inc.; |
| A candidates ability to satisfy the composition requirements for the Audit Committee and the Compensation and Management Development Committee; |
| Maintaining a Board that reflects diversity; and |
| The Boards overall size, structure and composition. |
2. Candidate Identification and Evaluation Process
(a) For purposes of identifying nominees for the Board of Directors, the Committee relies on professional and personal contacts of the Committee, other members of the Board of Directors and senior management, as well as candidates recommended by independent search firms retained by the Committee from time to time. The Committee also will consider candidates recommended by stockholders. Any director nominations submitted by stockholders will be evaluated in the same manner that nominees suggested by Board members, management or other parties are evaluated.
(b) In evaluating potential candidates, the Committee will determine whether the candidate is qualified for service on the Board of Directors by evaluating the candidate under the guidelines set forth above and by determining if any individual candidate suits the Committees and the Board of Directors overall objectives at the time the candidate is being evaluated.
ï 2019 Proxy Statement A-1
|
Appendix B
|
|
Reconciliations of GAAP to Non-GAAP Measures
Amgen Inc.
GAAP to Non-GAAP Reconciliations
(Dollars in millions)
(Unaudited)
Years ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
2018 | 2017 | 2016 | ||||||||||
GAAP cost of sales |
$ | 4,101 | $ | 4,069 | $ | 4,162 | ||||||
Adjustments to cost of sales: |
||||||||||||
Acquisition-related expenses (a) |
(1,099) | (1,126) | (1,248) | |||||||||
Certain net charges pursuant to our restructuring initiative |
(1) | | (1) | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Total adjustments to cost of sales |
(1,100) | (1,126) | (1,249) | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Non-GAAP cost of sales |
$ | 3,001 | $ | 2,943 | $ | 2,913 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
GAAP cost of sales as a percentage of product sales |
18.2% | 18.7% | 19.0% | |||||||||
Acquisition-related expenses (a) |
-4.9 | -5.2 | -5.7 | |||||||||
Certain net charges pursuant to our restructuring initiative |
0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Non-GAAP cost of sales as a percentage of product sales |
13.3% | 13.5% | 13.3% | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
GAAP research and development expenses |
$ | 3,737 | $ | 3,562 | $ | 3,840 | ||||||
Adjustments to research and development expenses: |
||||||||||||
Acquisition-related expenses (a) |
(78) | (77) | (78) | |||||||||
Certain net charges pursuant to our restructuring initiative |
(2) | (3) | (7) | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Total adjustments to research and development expenses |
(80) | (80) | (85) | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Non-GAAP research and development expenses |
$ | 3,657 | $ | 3,482 | $ | 3,755 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
GAAP research and development expenses as a percentage of product sales |
16.6% | 16.3% | 17.5% | |||||||||
Acquisition-related expenses (a) |
-0.4 | -0.3 | -0.3 | |||||||||
Certain net charges pursuant to our restructuring initiative |
0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Non-GAAP research and development expenses as a percentage of product sales |
16.2% | 16.0% | 17.2% | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
GAAP selling, general and administrative expenses |
$ | 5,332 | $ | 4,870 | $ | 5,062 | ||||||
Adjustments to selling, general and administrative expenses: |
||||||||||||
Acquisition-related expenses (a) |
(84) | (99) | (180) | |||||||||
Certain net charges pursuant to our restructuring initiative |
(16) | (2) | (5) | |||||||||
Other |
| (3) | | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Total adjustments to selling, general and administrative expenses |
(100) | (104) | (185) | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Non-GAAP selling, general and administrative expenses |
$ | 5,232 | $ | 4,766 | $ | 4,877 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
GAAP selling, general and administrative expenses as a percentage of product sales |
23.7% | 22.3% | 23.1% | |||||||||
Acquisition-related expenses (a) |
-0.4 | -0.4 | -0.8 | |||||||||
Certain net charges pursuant to our restructuring initiative |
-0.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | |||||||||
Other |
0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Non-GAAP selling, general and administrative expenses as a percentage of product sales |
23.2% | 21.9% | 22.3% | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
B-1 ï 2019 Proxy Statement
|
Appendix B
|
|
Years ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
2018 | 2017 | 2016 | ||||||||||
GAAP operating expenses |
$ | 13,484 | $ | 12,876 | $ | 13,197 | ||||||
Adjustments to operating expenses: |
||||||||||||
Adjustments to cost of sales |
(1,100) | (1,126) | (1,249) | |||||||||
Adjustments to research and development expenses |
(80) | (80) | (85) | |||||||||
Adjustments to selling, general and administrative expenses |
(100) | (104) | (185) | |||||||||
Certain net charges pursuant to our restructuring initiative (b) |
7 | (83) | (24) | |||||||||
Certain other expenses |
(25) | | | |||||||||
Acquisition-related adjustments (c) |
(296) | (292) | (4) | |||||||||
Expense related to legal proceedings |
| | (105) | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Total adjustments to operating expenses |
(1,594) | (1,685) | (1,652) | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Non-GAAP operating expenses |
$ | 11,890 | $ | 11,191 | $ | 11,545 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
GAAP operating income |
$ | 10,263 | $ | 9,973 | $ | 9,794 | ||||||
Adjustments to operating expenses |
1,594 | 1,685 | 1,652 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Non-GAAP operating income |
$ | 11,857 | $ | 11,658 | $ | 11,446 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
GAAP operating income as a percentage of product sales |
45.5% | 45.8% | 44.7% | |||||||||
Adjustments to cost of sales |
4.9 | 5.2 | 5.7 | |||||||||
Adjustments to research and development expenses |
0.4 | 0.3 | 0.3 | |||||||||
Adjustments to selling, general and administrative expenses |
0.5 | 0.4 | 0.8 | |||||||||
Certain net charges pursuant to our restructuring initiative (b) |
0.0 | 0.4 | 0.2 | |||||||||
Certain other expenses |
0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | |||||||||
Acquisition-related adjustments (c) |
1.3 | 1.4 | 0.0 | |||||||||
Expense related to legal proceedings |
0.0 | 0.0 | 0.6 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Non-GAAP operating income as a percentage of product sales |
52.6% | 53.5% | 52.3% | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
GAAP interest and other income, net |
$ | 674 | $ | 928 | $ | 629 | ||||||
Adjustments to other income (d) |
(68) | | | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Non-GAAP interest and other income, net |
$ | 606 | $ | 928 | $ | 629 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
GAAP income before income taxes |
$ | 9,545 | $ | 9,597 | $ | 9,163 | ||||||
Adjustments to operating expenses |
1,594 | 1,685 | 1,652 | |||||||||
Adjustments to other income (d) |
(68) | | | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Non-GAAP income before income taxes |
$ | 11,071 | $ | 11,282 | $ | 10,815 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
GAAP provision for income taxes |
$ | 1,151 | $ | 7,618 | $ | 1,441 | ||||||
Adjustments to provision for income taxes: |
||||||||||||
Income tax effect of the above adjustments (e) |
362 | 538 | 525 | |||||||||
Other income tax adjustments (f) |
(15) | (6,120) | 64 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Total adjustments to provision for income taxes |
347 | (5,582) | 589 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Non-GAAP provision for income taxes |
$ | 1,498 | $ | 2,036 | $ | 2,030 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
GAAP tax as a percentage of income before taxes |
12.1% | 79.4% | 15.7% | |||||||||
Adjustments to provision for income taxes: |
||||||||||||
Income tax effect of the above adjustments (e) |
1.6 | -7.1 | 2.5 | |||||||||
Other income tax adjustments (f) |
-0.2 | -54.3 | 0.6 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Total adjustments to provision for income taxes |
1.4 | -61.4 | 3.1 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Non-GAAP tax as a percentage of income before taxes |
13.5% | 18.0% | 18.8% | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
GAAP net income |
$ | 8,394 | $ | 1,979 | $ | 7,722 | ||||||
Adjustments to net income: |
||||||||||||
Adjustments to income before income taxes, net of the income tax effect |
1,164 | 1,147 | 1,127 | |||||||||
Other income tax adjustments (f) |
15 | 6,120 | (64) | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Total adjustments to net income |
1,179 | 7,267 | 1,063 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Non-GAAP net income |
$ | 9,573 | $ | 9,246 | $ | 8,785 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
ï 2019 Proxy Statement B-2
|
Appendix B
|
|
Amgen Inc.
GAAP to Non-GAAP Reconciliations
(In millions, except per-share data)
(Unaudited)
The following table presents the computations for GAAP and non-GAAP diluted earnings per share.
Years ended December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
2018 | 2017 | 2016 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
GAAP | Non-GAAP | GAAP | Non-GAAP | GAAP | Non-GAAP | |||||||||||||||||||
Net income |
$ | 8,394 | $ | 9,573 | $ | 1,979 | $ | 9,246 | $ | 7,722 | $ | 8,785 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Shares |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Weight-average shares for basic EPS |
661 | 661 | 731 | 731 | 748 | 748 | ||||||||||||||||||
Effect of dilutive securities |
4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 6 | 6 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Weighted-average shares for diluted EPS |
665 | 665 | 735 | 735 | 754 | 754 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Diluted earnings per share |
$ | 12.62 | $ | 14.40 | $ | 2.69 | $ | 12.58 | $ | 10.24 | $ | 11.65 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) | The adjustments related primarily to noncash amortization of intangible assets acquired in business combinations. |
(b) | For the year ended December 31, 2017, the adjustment related primarily to severance expenses associated with our restructuring initiative. For the year ended December 31, 2016, the adjustment related primarily to asset-related charges associated with our site closures. |
(c) | For the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, the adjustments related primarily to impairments of intangible assets acquired in business combinations. |
(d) | For the year ended December 31, 2018, the adjustment related to the net gain associated with the Kirin-Amgen share acquisition. |
(e) | The tax effect of the adjustments between our GAAP and non-GAAP results takes into account the tax treatment and related tax rate(s) that apply to each adjustment in the applicable tax jurisdiction(s). Generally, this results in a tax impact at the U.S. marginal tax rate for certain adjustments, including the majority of amortization of intangible assets, whereas the tax impact of other adjustments, including restructuring expense, depends on whether the amounts are deductible in the respective tax jurisdictions and the applicable tax rate(s) in those jurisdictions. Due to these factors, the effective tax rates for the adjustments to our GAAP income before income taxes, for the year ended December 31, 2018, was 23.7% compared with 31.9% and 31.8% for 2017 and 2016, respectively. |
(f) | For the year ended December 31, 2017, the adjustment related primarily to the impact of U.S. Corporate tax reform, including the repatriation tax on accumulated foreign earnings and the remeasurement of certain net deferred and other tax liabilities. |
B-3 ï 2019 Proxy Statement
|
||
Amgen Inc. One Amgen Center Drive Thousand Oaks, CA 91320-1799 |
Printed on recycled paper | ©2019 Amgen Inc. All Rights Reserved |
SAMPLE |
|
NO POSTAGE NECESSARY IF MAILED IN THE UNITED STATES |
||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
BUSINESS REPLY MAIL FIRST-CLASS MAIL PERMIT NO. 67 THOUSAND OAKS CA |
||||||||||||
POSTAGE WILL BE PAID BY ADDRESSEE | ||||||||||||
ANNUAL MEETING AMGEN |
||||||||||||
PO BOX 2605 |
||||||||||||
SEAL BEACH CA 90740-9906 |
SAMPLE
Only Amgen Inc. stockholders with admittance tickets will be admitted to the 2019 Annual Meeting of Stockholders. Each stockholder is entitled to one admittance ticket. If you come to the meeting and do not have an admittance ticket, you will be admitted only upon presentation of proper identification and evidence of stock ownership as of March 22, 2019. Ensuring the 2019 Annual Meeting of Stockholders is safe and productive is our top priority. As such, failure to follow these admission procedures may result in being denied admission. Because seating in the main meeting room is limited, and in order to be able to address security concerns, we reserve the right to direct attendees to view the meeting in an overflow room.
☐ | Please send me an admittance ticket for the Amgen Inc. 2019 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on Tuesday, May 21, 2019, at 11:00 A.M., local time, in Westlake Village, California. |
| ||||||||
Name |
(Please print) | |||||||
| ||||||||
Address | ||||||||
|
( ) | |||||||
| ||||||||
City | State | Zip | Telephone No. (Please provide) |
YOU DO NOT NEED TO RETURN THIS CARD IF YOU DO NOT PLAN TO ATTEND
THE 2019 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS.
SAMPLE
ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS OF AMGEN INC. May 21, 2019 GO GREEN e-Consent makes it easy to go paperless. With e-Consent, you can quickly access your proxy material, statements and other eligible documents online, while reducing costs, clutter and paper waste. Enroll today via www.astfinancial.com to enjoy online access. IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING THE AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIALS FOR THE STOCKHOLDER MEETING TO BE HELD ON MAY 21, 2019: The Notice of 2019 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, Proxy Statement, Form Proxy Card and 2018 Annual Report are available at http://www.astproxyportal.com/ast/Amgen If you wish to attend the Annual Meeting, please visit [address has been provided to stockholders directly]. Please sign, date and mail your proxy card in the envelope provided as soon as possible. Please detach along perforated line and mail in the envelope provided. PLEASE SIGN, DATE AND RETURN PROMPTLY IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE. PLEASE MARK YOUR VOTE IN BLUE OR BLACK INK AS SHOWN HERE x The Board of Directors recommends you vote FOR each listed nominee in item #1. 1. To elect twelve directors to the Board of Directors of Amgen Inc. for a term of office expiring at the 2020 annual meeting of stockholders. The nominees for election to the Board of Directors are: FOR AGAINST ABSTAIN Dr. Wanda M. Austin Mr. Robert A. Bradway Dr. Brian J. Druker Mr. Robert A. Eckert Mr. Greg C. Garland Mr. Fred Hassan Dr. Rebecca M. Henderson Mr. Charles M. Holley, Jr. Dr. Tyler Jacks Ms. Ellen J. Kullman Dr. Ronald D. Sugar Dr. R. Sanders Williams The Board of Directors recommends you vote FOR each of items #2 and #3. 2. Advisory vote to approve our executive compensation. 3. To ratify the selection of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accountants for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2019. NOTE: Such other business as may properly come before the meeting or any continuation , postponement, or adjournment thereof. To change the address on your account, please check the box at right and indicate your new address in the address space above. Please note that changes to the registered name(s) on the account may not be submitted via this method. Signature of Stockholder Date: Signature of Stockholder Date: Note: Please sign exactly as your name or names appear on this Proxy Card. When shares are held jointly, each holder should sign. When signing as executor, administrator, attorney-in-fact, trustee or guardian, please give full title as such. If the signer is a corporation, please sign full corporate name by duly authorized officer, giving full title as such. If signer is a partnership, please sign in partnership name by authorized person.
SAMPLE
This Proxy Card will be voted as specified or, if no choice is specified, will be voted FOR the election of the named director nominees, FOR the advisory vote to approve our executive compensation, and FOR ratification of the selection of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accountant. As of the date hereof, the undersigned hereby acknowledges receipt of the 2019 Proxy Statement and accompanying Notice of 2019 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on May 21, 2019, Form Proxy Card and the 2018 Annual Report. In their discretion, the Proxy Holders (as defined below) are authorized to vote upon such other matters as may properly come before the 2019 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and at any continuation, postponement, or adjournment thereof. The Board of Directors, at present, knows of no other business to be presented at the 2019 Annual Meeting of Stockholders. By signing this proxy you revoke all prior proxies. This proxy will be governed by the laws of the State of Delaware and federal securities laws. AMGEN INC. ONE AMGEN CENTER DRIVE, THOUSAND OAKS, CA 91320-1799 PROXY SOLICITED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS FOR THE 2019 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS TO BE HELD ON MAY 21, 2019 Robert A. Bradway, David W. Meline and Jonathan P. Graham (the Proxy Holders), or any of them, each with the power of substitution, hereby are authorized to represent the undersigned, with all powers which the undersigned would possess if personally present, to vote the shares of Amgen Inc. Common Stock of the undersigned at the 2019 Annual Meeting of Stockholders of Amgen Inc., to be held on Tuesday, May 21, 2019, at 11:00 A.M., local time, at the Four Seasons Hotel Westlake Village, Two Dole Drive, Westlake Village, CA 91362, and at any continuation, postponement, or adjournment of that meeting, upon and in respect of the following matters and in accordance with the following instructions, with discretionary authority as to any and all other business that may properly come before the meeting. You are encouraged to specify your choices by marking the appropriate boxes, SEE REVERSE SIDE, but you need not mark any boxes if you wish to vote in accordance with the Board of Directors recommendations. PLEASE MARK, SIGN, DATE, AND RETURN PROMPTLY USING THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE. (Continued and to be signed on the reverse side) 1-1 14475
SAMPLE
ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS OF AMGEN INC. May 21, 2019 PROXY VOTING INSTRUCTIONS INTERNET - Access www.voteproxy.com and follow the on-screen instructions or scan the QR code with your smartphone. Have your proxy card available when you access the web page. TELEPHONE - Call toll-free 1-800-PROXIES (1-800-776-9437) in the United States or 1-718-921-8500 from foreign countries from any touch-tone telephone and follow the instructions. Have your proxy card available when you call. Vote online/phone until 11:59 PM ET the day before the meeting. MAIL - Sign, date, and mail your proxy card in the envelope provided as soon as possible. IN PERSON- You may vote your shares in person by attending the Annual Meeting. GO GREEN - e-Consent makes it easy to go paperless. With e-Consent, you can quickly access your proxy material, statements and other eligible documents online, while reducing costs, clutter and paper waste. Enroll today via www.astfinancial.com to enjoy online access. If you wish to attend the Annual Meeting, please visit [address has been provided to stockholders directly]. COMPANY NUMBER ACCOUNT NUMBER IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING THE AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIALS FOR THE STOCKHOLDER MEETING TO BE HELD ON MAY 21, 2019: The Notice of 2019 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, Proxy Statement, Form Proxy Card and 2018 Annual Report are available at http://www.astproxyportal.com/ast/Amgen Please detach along perforated line and mail in the envelope provided IF you are not voting by telephone or the Internet. PLEASE SIGN, DATE AND RETURN PROMPTLY IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE. PLEASE MARK YOUR VOTE IN BLUE OR BLACK INK AS SHOWN HERE x The Board of Directors recommends you vote FOR each listed nominee in item #1. 1. To elect twelve directors to the Board of Directors of Amgen Inc. for a term of office expiring at the 2020 annual meeting of stockholders. The nominees for election to the Board of Directors are: FOR AGAINST ABSTAIN Dr. Wanda M. Austin Mr. Robert A. Bradway Dr. Brian J. Druker Mr. Robert A. Eckert Mr. Greg C. Garland Mr. Fred Hassan Dr. Rebecca M. Henderson Mr. Charles M. Holley, Jr. Dr. Tyler Jacks Ms. Ellen J. Kullman Dr. Ronald D. Sugar Dr. R. Sanders Williams The Board of Directors recommends you vote FOR each of items #2 and #3. 2. Advisory vote to approve our executive compensation. 3. To ratify the selection of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accountants for the fiscal Year ending December 31, 2019. NOTE: Such other business as may properly come before the meeting or any continuation, postponement, or adjournment thereof. To change the address on your account, please check the box at right and indicate your new address in the address space above. Please note that changes to the registered name(s) on the account may not be submitted via this method. Signature of Stockholder Date: Signature of Stockholder Date: Note: Please sign exactly as your name or names appear on this Proxy Card. When shares are held jointly, each holder should sign. When signing as executor, administrator, attorney-in-fact, trustee or guardian, please give full title as such. If the signer is a corporation, please sign full corporate name by duly authorized officer, giving full title as such. If signer is a partnership, please sign in partnership name by authorized person.
SAMPLE
This Proxy Card will be voted as specified or, if no choice is specified, will be voted FOR the election of the named director nominees, FOR the advisory vote to approve our executive compensation, and FOR ratification of the selection of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accountant. As of the date hereof, the undersigned hereby acknowledges receipt of the 2019 Proxy Statement and accompanying Notice of 2019 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on May 21, 2019, Form Proxy Card and the 2018 Annual Report. In their discretion, the Proxy Holders (as defined below) are authorized to vote upon such other matters as may properly come before the 2019 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and at any continuation, postponement, or adjournment thereof. The Board of Directors, at present, knows of no other business to be presented at the 2019 Annual Meeting of Stockholders. By signing this proxy you revoke all prior proxies. This proxy will be governed by the laws of the State of Delaware and federal securities laws. AMGEN INC. ONE AMGEN CENTER DRIVE, THOUSAND OAKS, CA 91320-1799 PROXY SOLICITED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS FOR THE 2019 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS TO BE HELD ON MAY 21, 2019 Robert A. Bradway, David W. Meline and Jonathan P. Graham (the Proxy Holders), or any of them, each with the power of substitution, hereby are authorized to represent the undersigned, with all powers which the undersigned would possess if personally present, to vote the shares of Amgen Inc. Common Stock of the undersigned at the 2019 Annual Meeting of Stockholders of Amgen Inc., to be held on Tuesday, May 21, 2019, at 11:00 A.M., local time, at the Four Seasons Hotel Westlake Village, Two Dole Drive, Westlake Village, CA 91362, and at any continuation, postponement, or adjournment of that meeting, upon and in respect of the following matters and in accordance with the following instructions, with discretionary authority as to any and all other business that may properly come before the meeting. You are encouraged to specify your choices by marking the appropriate boxes, SEE REVERSE SIDE, but you need not mark any boxes if you wish to vote in accordance with the Board of Directors recommendations. PLEASE MARK, SIGN, DATE, AND RETURN PROMPTLY USING THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE. (Continued and to be signed on the reverse side) 1-1 14475