UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

[X]	QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the Quarterly Period Ended June 30, 2017

OR

[  ]	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from ________ to __________

Commission file number 000-54957

OWENS REALTY MORTGAGE, INC.

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)

 (Former Name, Former Address and Former Fiscal Year, if Changed Since Last Report)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes [X] No [  ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes [X] No [  ]

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of "large accelerated filer", "accelerated filer" and "smaller reporting company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check One):

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).

Yes [   ] No [X]

TABLE OF CONTENTS

		Page
Item 1.	Financial Statements
	Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited):
	Consolidated Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016	4
	Consolidated Statements of Income for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016	5
	Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity for the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016	6
	Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016	7
	Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements	9
Item 2.	Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	35
Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk	53
Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	55
PART II – OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1.	Legal Proceedings	55
Item 1A.	Risk Factors	56
Item 5.	Other Information	56
Item 6.	Exhibits	56

 

OWENS REALTY MORTGAGE, INC.

Consolidated Balance Sheets

 (UNAUDITED)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

OWENS REALTY MORTGAGE, INC.

Consolidated Statements of Income

 (UNAUDITED)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

OWENS REALTY MORTGAGE, INC.

Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity

Six Months Ended June 30, 2017 and 2016

(UNAUDITED)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

OWENS REALTY MORTGAGE, INC.

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

 (UNAUDITED)

 

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

 

Owens Realty Mortgage, Inc. (the "Company") was incorporated on August 9, 2012, under the laws of the State of Maryland. The Company is authorized to issue 50,000,000 shares of its $0.01 par value common stock ("Common Stock"). In addition, the Company is authorized to issue 5,000,000 shares of preferred stock at $0.01 par value per share. The Company was created to effect the merger (the "Merger") of Owens Mortgage Investment Fund, a California Limited Partnership ("OMIF") with and into the Company as described in the Registration Statement on Form S-4, as amended, of the Company, declared effective on February 12, 2013 (File No. 333-184392).  The Merger was part of a plan to reorganize the business operations of OMIF so that it could elect to qualify as a real estate investment trust for Federal income tax purposes. The Merger was approved by OMIF limited partners on April 16, 2013 and was completed on May 20, 2013.

The Company has elected to be taxed as a real estate investment trust ("REIT") under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code"), commencing with the Company's taxable year ended December 31, 2012. As a REIT, the Company is permitted to deduct distributions made to its stockholders, allowing its operating income represented by such distributions to avoid taxation at the entity level and to be taxed generally only at the stockholder level. The Company currently intends to distribute substantially all of its REIT taxable income, excluding net capital gains. As a REIT, however, the Company is subject to separate, corporate-level tax, including potential 100% penalty taxes under various circumstances, as well as certain state and local taxes. In addition, the Company's taxable REIT subsidiaries are subject to full corporate income tax. Furthermore, the Company's ability to continue to qualify as a REIT will depend upon its continuing satisfaction of various requirements, such as those related to the diversity of its stock ownership, the nature of its assets, the sources of its income and the distributions to its stockholders, including a requirement that the Company distribute to its stockholders at least 90% of its REIT taxable income on an annual basis (determined without regard to the dividends paid deduction and by excluding net capital gain).

In the opinion of the management of the Company, the accompanying unaudited financial statements contain all adjustments, consisting of normal, recurring adjustments, necessary to present fairly the financial information included therein. Certain information and footnote disclosures presented in the annual consolidated financial statements are not included in these interim financial statements.  These consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements included in the Form 10-K of ORM for the year ended December 31, 2016 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") on March 15, 2017. The results of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 are not necessarily indicative of the operating results to be expected for the full year ending December 31, 2017. The Company evaluates subsequent events up to the date it files its Form 10-Q with the SEC. 

Basis of Presentation

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly-owned taxable REIT subsidiaries ("TRSs") and its majority- and wholly-owned limited liability companies. The Company is in the business of providing mortgage lending services and manages its business as one operating segment. Due to foreclosure activity, the Company also owns and manages real estate assets.

Certain reclassifications, not affecting previously reported net income or total stockholders' equity, have been made to the previously issued consolidated financial statements to conform to the current period presentation.

 

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. Such estimates are inherently imprecise and actual results could differ significantly from such estimates.

In January 2017, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") 2017-01, "Business Combinations (Topic 805) – Clarifying the Definition of a Business", or ASU 2017-01. The amendments in ASU 2017-01 clarify the definition of a business by more clearly outlining the requirements for an integrated set of assets and activities to be considered a business and by establishing a practical framework to determine when the integrated set of assets and activities is a business. This standard is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, with early adoption permitted for transactions not yet reflected in the financial statements. The Company does not believe that adoption of ASU 2017-01 will have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.

In November 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-18, "Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230) – Restricted Cash", or ASU 2016-18. The amendments in ASU 2016-18 require that a statement of cash flows explain the change during the period in the total of cash, cash equivalents and amounts generally described as restricted cash and cash equivalents together when reconciling the beginning and end of period total amounts shown on the statement of cash flows. This standard is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, with early adoption permitted and requires adoption on a retrospective basis to each period presented. The adoption of ASU 2016-18 will result in the Company including its restricted cash with cash and cash equivalents when reconciling the beginning and ending amounts shown on its consolidated statement of cash flows.

In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-15, "Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230) – Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments", or ASU 2016-15. The amendments in ASU 2016-15 reflect eight targeted changes to how cash receipts and cash payments are presented and classified in the statement of cash flows. This standard is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, with early adoption permitted and requires adoption on a retrospective basis to each period presented, unless it is impracticable to apply, in which case, the amendment is required to be applied prospectively as of the earliest date practicable. Presently, the Company believes that the only impact from the adoption of ASU 2016-15 will be that distributions it receives from its equity method investment will be reported in cash flows from operating activities rather than investing activities on its consolidated statement of cash flows.

In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-13, "Financial Instruments – Credit Losses (Topic 326) – Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments", or ASU 2016-13. The amendments in ASU 2016-13 eliminate the probable and incurred credit loss recognition threshold in current GAAP and, instead, reflect an entity's current estimate of all expected credit losses. The amendments in ASU 2016-13 broaden the information that an entity must consider in developing its expected credit loss estimate for assets measured either collectively or individually. The use of forecasted information incorporates more timely information in the estimate of expected credit loss. This standard is effective for interim and annual reporting beginning after December 15, 2019, with early adoption permitted for interim and annual reporting beginning after December 15, 2018. The Company is currently evaluating the impact that ASU 2016-13 may have on its consolidated financial statements.

In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09, "Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606)," or ASU 2014-09. ASU 2014-09 broadly amends the accounting guidance for revenue recognition. ASU 2014-09's effective date was deferred one year by ASU 2015-14, and it is now effective for the first interim or annual period beginning after December 15, 2017, and is to be applied retrospectively to all periods presented or retrospectively with the cumulative effect recognized at the date of the initial application. Early adoption is not permitted. The Company expects that the majority of its revenue will not be impacted by the adoption of this accounting standard since the standard will not change its accounting policy for the recognition of interest income. The Company does not anticipate its revenue from real estate properties and related disclosures will be significantly impacted by this standard, however management is still evaluating the standard's impact as it relates to rental income and gain on sale of real estate when such sale is financed by the Company.

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, "Leases (Topic 842)" or ASU 2016-02.  ASU 2016-02 amends existing guidance related to leases, primarily by requiring the recognition of lease assets and lease liabilities by lessees for those leases classified as operating leases under the current accounting guidance. This standard is effective for interim and annual reporting beginning after December 15, 2018, with early adoption permitted.  The Company does not believe that adoption of ASU 2016-02 will have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.

In January 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-01, "Financial Instruments- Overall (Subtopic 825-10) – Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities", or ASU 2016-1.  ASU 2016-01 enhances the reporting model for financial instruments to provide users of financial statements with more decision-useful information. This Update contains several provisions, including but not limited to 1) requiring equity investments, with certain exceptions, to be measured at fair value with changes in fair value recognized in net income; 2) simplifying the impairment assessment of equity investments without readily determinable fair values by requiring a qualitative assessment to identify impairment; 3) eliminating the requirement to disclose the method(s) and significant assumptions used to estimate fair value; and 4) requiring separate presentation of financial assets and liabilities by measurement category and form of financial asset on the balance sheet or the accompanying notes to the financial statements. ASU 2016-1 also changes certain financial statement disclosure requirements, including requiring disclosures of the fair value of financial instruments be made on the basis of exit price. ASU 2016-1 is effective for public entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those fiscal years.  Management does not expect adoption of this accounting standard will have a significant impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements, however management expects the requirement to use an exit price methodology could impact the disclosures the Company makes related to fair value of its financial instruments.  Disclosure of the fair value of loans is likely to be impacted the most by this change.

Significant Accounting Policies

Loans are generally stated at the principal amount outstanding. Advances under the terms of a loan to pay property taxes, insurance, legal and other costs are generally capitalized and reported as interest and other receivables. The Company's portfolio consists primarily of real estate loans generally collateralized by first, second and third deeds of trust.  Interest income on loans is accrued by the simple interest method. A loan is generally placed on nonaccrual status when the loan becomes greater than ninety days delinquent in monthly payments and/or full payment of principal and interest is not expected. When a loan is classified as nonaccrual, interest accruals discontinue and all past due interest is included in the recorded investment in the impaired loan that is measured as described below. Interest accruals are resumed on such loans only when they are brought fully current with respect to interest and principal and when, in the judgment of management, the loans are estimated to be fully collectible as to both principal and interest. Cash receipts on nonaccrual loans are used to reduce any outstanding accrued interest, and then are recorded as interest income, except when such payments are specifically designated as principal reduction or when management does not believe the Company's investment in the loan is fully recoverable. The Company does not incur origination costs and does not earn or collect origination fees from borrowers as OFG is entitled to all such fees (see Note 9).

Loans and the related accrued interest and advances are analyzed by management on a periodic basis for ultimate recovery. The allowance for loan losses is management's estimate of probable credit losses inherent in the Company's loan portfolio that have been incurred as of the balance sheet date.  The allowance is established through a provision for loan losses which is charged to expense.  Additions to the allowance are expected to maintain the adequacy of the total allowance after credit losses and loan growth.  Credit exposures determined to be uncollectible are charged against the allowance.  Cash received on previously charged off amounts is recorded as a recovery to the allowance.  The overall allowance consists of two primary components: specific reserves related to impaired loans that are individually evaluated for impairment and general reserves for inherent losses related to loans that are not considered impaired and are collectively evaluated for impairment.

Regardless of a loan type, a loan is considered impaired when, based on current information and events, management believes it is probable that the Company will be unable to collect all amounts due, including principal and interest, according to the contractual terms of the original agreement.  All loans determined to be impaired are individually evaluated for impairment.  When a loan is considered impaired, management estimates impairment based on the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan's effective interest rate, except that as a practical expedient, management may measure impairment based on a loan's observable market price, or the fair value of the collateral if the loan is collateral dependent.  A loan is collateral dependent if the repayment of the loan is expected to be provided solely by the underlying collateral. These valuations are generally updated during the fourth quarter but may be updated during interim periods if deemed appropriate by management.

A restructuring of a debt constitutes a troubled debt restructuring ("TDR") if the Company for economic or legal reasons related to the debtor's financial difficulties grants a concession to the debtor that it would not otherwise consider.  Restructured loans typically present an elevated level of credit risk as the borrowers are not able to perform according to the original contractual terms.  Loans that are reported as TDR's are considered impaired and measured for impairment as described above.

The determination of the general reserve for loans that are not considered impaired and are collectively evaluated for impairment is based on estimates made by management, to include, but not limited to, consideration of historical losses by portfolio segment, internal asset classifications, and qualitative factors to include economic trends in the Company's service areas, industry experience and trends, geographic concentrations, estimated collateral values, the Company's underwriting policies, the character of the loan portfolio, and probable losses inherent in the portfolio taken as a whole.

The Company maintains a separate allowance for each portfolio segment (loan type).  These portfolio segments include commercial real estate, residential real estate and land loans.   The allowance for loan losses attributable to each portfolio segment, which includes both impaired loans that are individually evaluated for impairment and loans that are not considered impaired and are collectively evaluated for impairment, is combined to determine the Company's overall allowance, which is included on the consolidated balance sheet. The reserve for loans that are not considered impaired consists of reserve factors that are based on management's assessment of the following for each portfolio segment: (1) inherent credit risk, (2) historical losses, and (3) other qualitative factors.  These reserve factors are inherently subjective and are driven by the repayment risk associated with each portfolio segment described below.

Land Loans – These loans generally possess a higher inherent risk of loss than other real estate portfolio segments.  A major risk arises from the necessity to complete the projects within the specified costs and time lines. Trends in the construction industry significantly impact the credit quality of these loans as demand drives construction activity. In addition, trends in real estate values significantly impact the credit quality of these loans, as property values generally determine the economic viability of construction projects.

Commercial and Residential Real Estate Loans –Adverse economic developments or an overbuilt market impact commercial and residential real estate projects and may result in troubled loans.  Trends in vacancy rates of properties impact the credit quality of these loans.  High vacancy rates reduce operating revenues and the ability for properties to produce sufficient cash flow to service debt obligations.

Management monitors the credit quality of the Company's loan portfolio on an ongoing basis using certain credit quality indicators including a loan's delinquency status and internal asset classification. A loan is considered classified when it meets the definition of impaired as described above.

The following tables show the changes in the allowance for loan losses by portfolio segment for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016 and the allocation of the allowance for loan losses and loans as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 by portfolio segment and by impairment methodology:

 

 

 

The following tables show an aging analysis of the loan portfolio by the time monthly payments are past due as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016. All of the loans that were 90 or more days past due as listed below were on non-accrual status as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016.

The above table as of June 30, 2017 includes one past maturity loan in the Current Loan category of approximately $267,000 (Residential loan). This loan was current in making monthly interest payments as of June 30, 2017 and was paid off in full in July 2017.

The above table as of December 31, 2016 includes seven past maturity loans in the Current Loan category of approximately $8,686,000 ($3,675,000 Commercial of which $2,500,000 was less than 30 days and $1,175,000 was 30-59 days past maturity and $5,011,000 Residential all of which was greater than 90 days past maturity). These loans were current in making monthly interest payments and in the process of being extended, paid off or refinanced.

The following tables show information related to impaired loans as of and for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017:

The following tables show information related to impaired loans as of December 31, 2016 and for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016:

The recorded investment balances presented in the above tables include amounts advanced in addition to principal on impaired loans (such as property taxes, insurance and legal charges) that are reimbursable by borrowers and are included in interest and other receivables in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. Interest income recognized on a cash basis for impaired loans approximates the interest income recognized as reflected in the tables above. The average recorded investment and interest income recognized on impaired loans with no related allowance recorded presented in the above tables are disclosed as such, even if these impaired loans may have had an allowance recorded at some point during the year. In addition, the calculations of average recorded investment and interest income recognized in the above tables include loans that had been outstanding for some period of time during the year, but for which there was no recorded investment at the end of the year.

Troubled Debt Restructurings

The Company has allocated approximately $445,000 and $733,000 of specific reserves on loans totaling approximately $3,324,000 and $5,374,000 (recorded investments before allowance for loan losses) to borrowers whose loan terms had been modified in troubled debt restructurings as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively.  The Company has not committed to lend additional amounts to any of these borrowers.

No loans were modified as troubled debt restructurings during the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, nor were there loans modified as troubled debt restructurings within the previous twelve months for which there was a payment default during the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016.

During 2008, the Company entered into an operating agreement (the "Operating Agreement") of 1850 De La Cruz LLC, a California limited liability company ("1850"), with Nanook Ventures LLC ("Nanook"), an unrelated party.  The purpose of the joint venture is to own and operate certain industrial land and buildings located in Santa Clara, California. At the time of closing in July 2008, the two properties were separately contributed to two new limited liability companies, Nanook Ventures One LLC and Nanook Ventures Two LLC that are wholly owned by 1850. The Company and Nanook are the Members of 1850 and NV Manager, LLC is the manager.

The Company received distributions from 1850 of $90,000 during the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 and $87,000 during the three and six months ended June 30, 2016. The net income to the Company from its investment in 1850 De La Cruz was approximately $46,000 and $45,000 during the three months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively, and $90,000 and $87,000 during the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

Real estate properties held for sale as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 consisted of properties acquired through foreclosure classified by property type as follows:

Transfers

During the three months ended June 30, 2017, the Company transferred two properties with book values totaling approximately $382,000 (both Land) from "Held for Investment" to "Held for Sale" as the properties were listed for sale and sales are expected within a one year period. During the six months ended June 30, 2017, the Company transferred three properties with book values totaling approximately $1,844,000 (two Land and one Marina) from "Held for Investment" to "Held for Sale" as the properties were listed for sale and sales are expected within a one year period. Losses were not recorded as a result of the transfers.

During the three months ended June 30, 2016, the Company transferred three properties with book values totaling approximately $5,869,000 (one Land, one Office unit and one Golf course) from "Held for Investment" to "Held for Sale" as the properties were listed for sale and sales were expected within a one year period. During the six months ended June 30, 2016, the Company transferred four properties with book values totaling approximately $10,052,000 (one Land, one Office unit, one Golf course and one Condominium) from "Held for Investment" to "Held for Sale" as the properties were listed for sale and sales were expected within a one year period. Losses were not recorded as a result of the transfers.

Impairment Losses

During the three and six months ended June 30, 2017, the Company recorded an impairment loss of approximately $282,000 on the marina property located in Bethel Island, California due to an agreement signed by the Company to sell the property at a price that was lower than the book value of the property.

During the three and six months ended June 30, 2016, the Company recorded an impairment loss of approximately $2,110,000 on the unimproved residential and commercial land located in Gypsum, Colorado due to a reduction in the fair market value estimated by management and a decrease in the listing price of the property.

Sales

During the three months ended June 30, 2017, the Company sold commercial and residential land under development and six condominium units located in South Lake Tahoe, California for aggregate net sales proceeds of approximately $51,206,000, resulting in total gain on sale of real estate of approximately $13,878,000.

During the six months ended June 30, 2017, the Company also sold one parcel of land and one office property for aggregate net sales proceeds of approximately $872,000, resulting in an insignificant loss.

During the six months ended June 30, 2016, the Company sold one industrial property and one office building in an office complex for aggregate net sales proceeds of approximately $6,479,000, resulting in total gain on sale of real estate of approximately $4,839,000.

Foreclosure Activity

There were no foreclosures during the three and six months ended June 30, 2017.

During the three months ended June 30, 2016, the Company foreclosed on one loan secured by an office property located in Oakdale, California with a principal balance of approximately $1,079,000 and obtained the property via the trustee's sale. In addition, accrued interest and advances made on the loan (for items such as legal fees and delinquent property taxes) in the total amount of approximately $70,000 were capitalized to the basis of the property. It was determined that the fair value of the property was lower than the Company's investment in the loan and a specific loan allowance was previously established of approximately $495,000. This amount was then recorded as a charge-off against the allowance for loan losses at the time of foreclosure, after a reduction of the previously established allowance in the amount of approximately $48,000 as a result of an updated appraisal obtained (net charge-off of $448,000). The property, along with a unit in the building purchased by the Company in 2015, was contributed into a new taxable REIT subsidiary, East G, LLC, in June 2016. The property was sold during the six months ended June 30, 2017 and the LLC was dissolved.

Real estate held for investment as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 consisted of properties acquired through foreclosure classified by property type as follows:

The balances of land and the major classes of depreciable property for real estate held for investment as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 are as follows:

It is the Company's intent to sell its real estate properties held for investment, but expected sales of these properties are not probable to occur within the next year.

Depreciation expense was approximately $289,000 and $291,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively, and $584,000 and $619,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

Certain of the Company's real estate properties held for sale and investment are leased to tenants under noncancellable leases with remaining terms ranging from one to seven years. Certain of the leases require the tenant to pay all or some operating expenses of the properties. The future minimum rental income from noncancellable operating leases due within the five years subsequent to June 30, 2017 and thereafter is as follows:

 

The Company borrows funds under the revolving California Bank & Trust ("CB&T") Line of Credit and, until its termination in September 2016, a line of credit that was in place with Opus Bank ("Opus"). As of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, the outstanding balances and total commitments under the CB&T Line of Credit consisted of the following:

 

CB&T Line of Credit

In February 2014, the Company entered into a Credit Agreement and Advance Formula Agreement and related agreements with CB&T as the lender (the "CB&T Credit Facility").The agreements were amended and restated in April 2015, March 2016 and June 2017 to add First Bank and Umpqua Bank as additional lenders and to increase the maximum borrowings available (total commitment) under the facility to the lesser of a $75,000,000 maximum or the amount determined pursuant to a borrowing base calculation described in the Advance Formula Agreement (the "Total Current Commitment").  Borrowings under the CB&T Credit Facility mature on March 1, 2018.

Such borrowings bear interest payable monthly at the prime rate of interest established by CB&T from time-to-time plus one quarter percent (.25%) per annum (4.5% at June 30, 2017). Upon a default such interest rate increases by 2.00%. The original CB&T Credit Facility required the payment of an origination fee of $100,000 and other issuance costs totaling $177,000 that were capitalized to deferred financing costs and were being amortized to interest expense using the straight-line method through the maturity date of the CB&T Credit Facility (fully amortized as of June 30, 2017). The First Amendment required the payment of an origination fee and other costs totaling $255,000 that were capitalized to deferred financing costs and is being amortized to interest expense using the straight-line method through the new maturity date. The Company is also subject to certain ongoing administrative fees and expenses. Interest expense on the CB&T Credit Facility was approximately $71,000 and $304,000 during the three months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively (including $40,000 and $32,000, respectively, in amortization of deferred financing costs) and $231,000 and $493,000 during the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively (including $77,000 and $66,000, respectively, in deferred financing costs).

Borrowings are secured by certain assets of the Company. These collateral assets will include the grant to the lenders of first-priority deeds of trust on certain real property assets and trust deeds of the Company to be identified by the parties from time-to-time and all personal property of the Company, which collateral includes the assets described in the Security Agreement and in other customary collateral agreements that will be entered into by the parties from time-to-time. As of June 30, 2017, the carrying amount and classification of loans securing the CB&T Credit Facility were as follows:

The CB&T Credit Facility agreements contain financial covenants which are customary for a loan of this type. Management is not aware of any breach of these covenants as of June 30, 2017.

Opus Bank Line of Credit

In April 2014, the Company entered into a Secured Revolving Credit Loan Agreement (the "Opus Credit Agreement") and related agreements with Opus as the lender (the "Opus Credit Facility").  The Company repaid the Opus Credit Facility in full during 2016 and the facility has terminated.

The Opus Credit Facility required the payment of an origination fee of $100,000 and other issuance costs totaling $231,000 that were capitalized as deferred financing costs and were being amortized to interest expense using the straight-line method through the maturity date of the Opus Credit Facility. The Company was also subject to certain ongoing administrative fees and expenses. Interest expense on the Opus Credit Facility was approximately $124,000 during the three months ended June 30, 2016 (including $19,000 in amortization of deferred financing costs) and $233,000 during the six months ended June 30, 2016 (including $38,000 in amortization of deferred financing costs).

The Company had the following notes and loans payable outstanding as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016:

The following table shows maturities by year on these notes and loans payable as of June 30, 2017:

Tahoe Stateline Venture, LLC Loan Payable

In December 2014, Tahoe Stateline Ventures, LLC ("TSV") entered into a Credit Agreement (the "Credit Agreement") and related documents with RaboBank, N.A. as the lender ("Lender") providing TSV with a loan (the "TSV Loan") of up to $14,500,000. TSV borrowed $10,445,000 at the first closing under the TSV Loan and an additional $3,830,000 was borrowed in September 2015.

The maturity date of the TSV Loan is January 1, 2021 (the "Maturity Date"). All outstanding borrowings under the TSV Loan documents bear interest initially at a rate of 3.47% per annum (the "Long Term Adjustable Rate"), provided that on January 1, 2018 the Long Term Adjustable Rate will be reset to Lender's then current market rate for three year fixed rate loans from comparable commercial real estate secured transactions, as determined by Lender in its sole discretion. Upon a default under the TSV Loan documents, the interest rate on the outstanding principal balance increases by an additional five percent (5.00%) per annum and the rate on any other outstanding obligations thereunder increases to ten percent (10.00%) per annum. Prepayments under the TSV Loan documents are subject to certain prepayment fees; provided that during the 90 day period immediately prior to January 1, 2018, and the 90 day period immediately prior to the Maturity Date, TSV may prepay the entire unpaid balance of the Loan in full, without any prepayment fee or penalty.

During the term of the TSV Loan, TSV will make equal combined payments of principal and accrued interest on the first day of each month in an amount calculated to fully amortize the original principal amount over a period of 300 months, subject to certain adjustments and the balance of the TSV Loan is due on the Maturity Date.

The Credit Agreement required the payment of a closing fee of $108,750 and certain administrative fees totaling approximately $218,000. The majority of these costs were paid out of proceeds from the loan and capitalized to deferred financing costs and are being amortized to interest expense using the effective interest method through the Maturity Date. During the three months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, approximately $126,000 and $129,000, respectively, of interest expense was incurred (including approximately $9,000 and $9,000, respectively, of deferred financing costs amortized to interest expense). During the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, approximately $253,000 and $259,000, respectively, of interest expense was incurred (including approximately $18,000 and $18,000, respectively, of deferred financing costs amortized to interest expense).

The TSV Loan documents contain financial covenants which are customary for loans of this type. Management is not aware of any breach of these covenants as of June 30, 2017.

Zalanta Construction Loan Payable

In August 2016, Zalanta Resort at the Village, LLC ("ZRV") and Zalanta Resort at the Village - Phase II, LLC ("ZRV II" and, together with ZRV, the "Borrowers") entered into a Construction Loan Agreement (the "Loan Agreement") and related documents with Western Alliance Bank as the lender ("Lender") providing the Borrowers with a loan (the "ZRV Loan") of up to $31,000,000, subject to the terms and conditions of the ZRV Loan documents, for the purpose of financing the construction of a new mixed-use retail and residential condominium building (the "Project") on land (the "Premises") owned by ZRV in South Lake Tahoe.

Borrowings under the ZRV Loan documents are only for payment or reimbursement of approved Project costs and such borrowings are subject to customary conditions for loans of this type.  The borrowings under the ZRV Loan may not exceed the lesser of (i) 60% of the value of the Project, determined on an "as is" basis; or (ii) 65% of the Borrowers' total costs of the Project, to be calculated in accordance with the Loan Agreement. All outstanding borrowings under the ZRV Loan will bear interest at the Wall Street Journal Prime Rate plus 1.50% (calculated on a floating daily basis) (the "Note Rate"), but in no event will the Note Rate be lower than the floor rate of five percent (5.0%) per annum. The Note Rate as of June 30, 2017 was 5.75%.  Upon a default under the Loan Agreement, the Note Rate increases by an additional five percent (5.0%) per annum.

Interest only payments are payable monthly from an established interest reserve. In addition, commencing with the quarter ended June 30, 2017 and continuing on the last day of each calendar quarter thereafter during the term of the ZRV Loan, Borrowers are required to make a quarterly repayment of $6 million of principal (the "Curtailment Requirement"). The balance of the ZRV Loan is due on August 3, 2018.

Borrowings are secured by: (i) a first mortgage lien on the Premises and certain additional property (the "Additional Premises") held by ZRV II and all improvements, amenities and appurtenances to the Premises and the Additional Premises, (ii) an assignment of all personal property, sales contracts, rents, leases, and ground leases associated with the Premises, and (iii) all design, development, service, management, leasing and construction contracts associated with the Premises.  In addition, ZRV has established a deposit account with Lender of $3,000,000 to be held as additional collateral for the ZRV Loan.

The ZRV Loan documents contain provisions that allow for the sale of individual condominiums in the Project during the term of the ZRV Loan and the removal of those units from the collateral base, in exchange for payment of proceeds of the sales to Lender.  Any such payment of sales proceeds to Lender will be applied to reduce the principal balance of the ZRV Loan and will reduce the quarterly Curtailment Requirement. Principal payments totaling approximately $8,779,000 were made during the quarter ended June 30, 2017 from the sale of six condominium units during the quarter.

The Loan Agreement required the payment of an origination fee of $310,000 and other issuance costs totaling approximately $400,000. The majority of these costs were paid out of the loan proceeds and capitalized to deferred financing costs and are being amortized to the Project using the straight-line method through the maturity date. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2017, approximately $26,000 and $76,000, respectively, of deferred financing costs was amortized to the Project. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2017, approximately $183,000 and $472,000, respectively, of interest was incurred which was capitalized to the Project. During the three months ended June 30, 2017, approximately $165,000 of interest was expensed (including approximately $24,000 of deferred financing costs amortized to interest expense).

The ZRV Loan documents contain financial covenants which are customary for loans of this type. Management is not aware of any breach of these covenants as of June 30, 2017.

In consideration of the management services rendered to the Company pursuant to the management agreement between the Company and OFG (the "Management Agreement"), OFG is entitled to receive from the Company a management fee payable monthly, subject to a maximum of 2.75% per annum of the average unpaid balance of the Company's loans (the "Existing Management Fee').

All of the Company's loans are serviced by OFG, in consideration for which OFG receives a monthly fee, which, when added to all other fees paid in connection with the servicing of a particular loan, does not exceed the lesser of the customary, competitive fee paid in the community where the loan is placed for the provision of such mortgage services on that type of loan, or up to 0.25% per annum of the unpaid principal balance of the loans.

OFG, at its sole discretion may, on a monthly basis, adjust the Existing Management Fee and servicing fees as long as they do not exceed the allowable limits calculated on an annual basis. Even though the fees for a month may exceed ¹/₁₂ of the maximum limits, at the end of the calendar year the sum of the fees collected for each of the 12 months must be equal to or less than the stated limits. Management fees amounted to approximately $1,007,000 and $825,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively, and $1,954,000 and $1,591,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively, and are included in the accompanying consolidated statements of income. Servicing fees amounted to approximately $92,000 and $75,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively, and $178,000 and $145,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively, and are included in the accompanying consolidated statements of income. As of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, the Company owed management and servicing fees to OFG in the amount of approximately $399,000 and $324,000, respectively.

During the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016 and the year ended December 31, 2016, OFG elected to take the maximum compensation that it is able to take pursuant to the Company's charter.  As further described below in "Note 14 – Subsequent Events – Adjustment of the Management Fee", however, the Board and the Manager have agreed to adjust the management fee payable for the interim period commencing July 1, 2017 and ending on the final day of the month in which the Company's next stockholders' meeting is held to a fee based on a percentage of the Company's stockholders' equity. As further described in Note 14, there will be no change to the servicing fees or reimbursements payable by the Company to the Manager, and the Manager would also continue to receive the fees paid by our borrowers to the Manager.

Pursuant to the charter, OFG receives all late payment charges from borrowers on loans owned by the Company. The amounts paid to or collected by OFG for such charges totaled approximately $8,000 and $4,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively, and $22,000 and $6,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively. In addition, the Company remits other miscellaneous fees to OFG, which are collected from loan payments, loan payoffs or advances from loan principal (i.e. funding, demand and partial release fees). The amounts paid to or collected by OFG for such fees totaled approximately $6,000 and $4,000, respectively, during the three months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016 and $10,000 and $9,000, respectively, during the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

OFG originates all loans the Company invests in and receives loan origination and extension fees from borrowers. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2017, OFG earned approximately $823,000 and $1,351,000, respectively, on loans originated or extended of approximately $36,356,000 and $63,011,000, respectively. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2016, OFG earned approximately $535,000 and $1,253,000, respectively, on loans originated or extended of approximately $19,015,000 and $54,165,000, respectively.

OFG is reimbursed by the Company for the actual cost of goods, services and materials used for or by the Company and paid by OFG and the salary and related salary expense of OFG's non-management and non-supervisory personnel performing services for the Company which could be performed by independent parties (subject to certain limitations in the Management Agreement). The amounts reimbursed to OFG by the Company for such services were $97,000 and $106,000 during the three months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively, and $190,000 and $219,000 during the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively. As of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, there was $30,000 and $36,000 payable to OFG for such services. The Company also reimbursed certain of OFG's officers for allowed expenses in the total amount of approximately $1,000 and $0 during the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

The Company paid Investor's Yield, Inc. (a wholly owned subsidiary of OFG) approximately $0 and $3,000 during the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively, in fees primarily related to certain foreclosure proceedings on Company loans.

Dividends

On March 16, 2017, the board of directors declared a $0.08 per share dividend on the Company's shares of Common Stock to holders of record as of March 31, 2017. The dividend was paid on April 13, 2017 and totaled $819,798.

On June 13, 2017, the board of directors declared a $0.10 per share dividend on the Company's shares of Common Stock to holders of record as of June 30, 2017. The dividend was paid on July 13, 2017 and totaled $1,024,748.

Stock Repurchase Program

On December 11, 2015, the Board of Directors authorized a Rule 10b5-1 stock repurchase plan (the "2016 Repurchase Plan") under which the Company could purchase up to $7.5 million of its Common Stock. Under the 2016 Repurchase Plan, repurchases were to be funded from available working capital, and the repurchased shares were to return to the status of authorized but unissued shares of Common Stock. The 2016 Repurchase Plan provided for stock repurchases to commence on April 1, 2016 and was subject to certain price, volume and timing constraints specified in the brokerage agreement. No shares were repurchased under the 2016 Repurchase Plan and it expired on March 31, 2017.

On June 9, 2017, the Board of Directors authorized a new Rule 10b5-1 stock repurchase plan (the "2017 Repurchase Plan") under which the Company may purchase up to $10 million of its Common Stock. Under the 2017 Repurchase Plan, repurchases will be funded from available working capital, and the repurchased shares will return to the status of authorized but unissued shares of Common Stock. The 2017 Repurchase Plan provides for stock repurchases to commence on July 13, 2017 and is subject to certain price, volume and timing constraints specified in the brokerage agreement. There is no guarantee as to the exact number of shares that will be repurchased by the Company. The 2017 Repurchase Plan is set to expire on January 15, 2018, although the Company may terminate the Repurchase Plan at any time. As of August 4, 2017, the Company had repurchased 44,253 shares of its Common Stock under the 2017 Repurchase Plan for a total cost of approximately $762,000 (including commissions) and an average cost of $17.21 per share.

In accordance with the charter, the Company is required to maintain cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities as contingency reserves in an aggregate amount of 1‑1/2% of Capital as defined in the charter. Although the Manager believes the contingency reserves are adequate, it could become necessary for the Company to sell or otherwise liquidate certain of its investments or other assets to cover such contingencies on terms which might not be favorable to the Company, which could lead to unanticipated losses upon sale of such assets.

The contingency reserves required per the charter as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 were approximately $3,777,000 and $3,738,000, respectively, and are reported as part of restricted cash in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. The $6,500,000 required to be held in non-interest bearing accounts as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 pursuant to certain of the Company's credit agreements satisfied this contingency reserve requirement.

The Company discloses fair value of its financial and nonfinancial assets and liabilities pursuant to ASC 820 – Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures.  ASC 820 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosures about fair value measurements.

Fair value is defined in ASC 820 as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. ASC 820 also establishes a fair value hierarchy which requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. The standard describes three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value:

liabilities; quoted prices in active markets that are not active; or other inputs that are

observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full

term of the assets or liabilities

Company's own data or assumptions.

Level 3 inputs include unobservable inputs that are used when there is little, if any, market activity for the asset or liability measured at fair value. In certain cases, the inputs used to measure fair value fall into different levels of the fair value hierarchy. In such cases, the level in which the fair value measurement in its entirety falls is determined based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement. Management's assessment of the significance of a particular input requires judgment and considers factors specific to the asset or liability being measured.

Management monitors the availability of observable market data to assess the appropriate classification of financial instruments within the fair value hierarchy. Changes in economic conditions or model-based valuation techniques may require the transfer of financial instruments from one fair value level to another.  In such instances, the transfer is reported at the beginning of the reporting period.

Management evaluates the significance of transfers between levels based upon the nature of the financial instrument and size of the transfer relative to total assets, total liabilities or total earnings.

The following is a description of the Company's valuation methodologies used to measure and disclose the fair values of its financial and nonfinancial assets and liabilities on a nonrecurring basis. There were no assets or liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis.

The Company does not record loans at fair value on a recurring basis. However, from time to time, a loan may be considered impaired and a specific allowance for loan losses is established.  A loan is considered impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable that the Company will be unable to collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the loan. Once a loan is identified as impaired, management measures impairment in accordance with ASC 310-10-35.  The fair value of impaired loans is estimated by either an observable market price (if available) or the fair value of the underlying collateral, if collateral dependent.  The fair value of the loan's collateral is determined by third party appraisals (by licensed appraisers), broker price opinions, comparable property sales or other indications of value. Those impaired loans not requiring an allowance represent loans for which the fair value of the collateral exceed the recorded investments in such loans. At June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, all impaired loans were evaluated based on the fair value of the collateral by obtaining third party appraisals that valued the collateral primarily by utilizing an income or market approach or some combination of the two.  In accordance with ASC 820, impaired loans where an allowance is established based on the fair value of collateral require classification in the fair value hierarchy.  Because appraisals used by management generally include significant unobservable inputs and market data, the Company records the impaired loan as nonrecurring Level 3. Unobservable market data included in appraisals often includes adjustments to comparable property sales for such items as location, size and quality to estimate fair values using a sales comparison approach.  Unobservable market data also includes cash flow assumptions and capitalization rates used to estimate fair values under an income approach.

Real estate held for sale and investment includes properties acquired through foreclosure of the related loans. When property is acquired, any excess of the Company's recorded investment in the loan and accrued interest income over the estimated fair market value of the property, net of estimated selling costs, is charged against the allowance for loan losses. Subsequently, real estate properties held for sale are carried at the lower of carrying value or fair value less costs to sell. The Company periodically compares the carrying value of real estate held for investment to expected future cash flows as determined by internally or third party generated valuations (including third party appraisals that primarily utilize an income or market approach or some combination of the two) for the purpose of assessing the recoverability of the recorded amounts. If the carrying value exceeds future undiscounted cash flows, the assets are reduced to fair value. The fair value of real estate held for sale and investment is estimated using appraisals in a manner similar to that of collateral dependent impaired loans described above which generally results in a Level 2 or Level 3 classification in the fair value hierarchy.

The following table presents information about the Company's assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016:

The reversal of loan losses based on the fair value of loan collateral less estimated selling costs for the impaired loans above totaled approximately $0 and $48,000 during the three months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively, and $0 and $38,000 during the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively. Impairment losses were recorded on real estate properties in the amount of approximately $282,000 and $2,110,000 during the three months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively, and $282,000 and $2,110,000 during the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

There were no liabilities measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis at June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, there were no transfers into or out of Levels 1 and 2.

The following table presents quantitative information about Level 3 fair value measurements for assets measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis at June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016:

At June 30, 2017:

At December 31, 2016:

Where only one percentage is presented in the above table there was only one unobservable input of that type for one loan or property. Adjustments to comparable sales included items such as market conditions, location, size, condition, access/frontage and intended use. A weighted average of an unobservable input is presented in the table above only to the extent there were multiple impaired loans or real estate properties measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis.

The approximate carrying amounts and estimated fair values of financial instruments at June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 are as follows:

The following methods and assumptions were used by the Company in estimating the fair value of each class of financial instruments:

Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash: The carrying value of cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash approximates the fair value because of the liquidity and/or relatively short maturity of these instruments and are classified as Level 1.

Loans, net: Except as it relates to impaired loans measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis discussed previously, the fair value of loans is estimated using discounted cash flow methodology, using discount rates, which, in the opinion of management, best reflect current market interest rates that would be offered for loans with similar characteristics and credit quality but are often unobservable resulting in a Level 3 classification. Accrued interest and advances receivable relate to loans and are thus classified as Level 3.

 

Investment in limited liability company: The fair value of the Company's investment in limited liability company is estimated based on an appraisal obtained and is classified as Level 3 because the appraisal itself and/or adjustments thereto include unobservable data similar to the unobservable data discussed in the disclosures related to assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis.

Line of credit payable: The fair values of the Company's line of credit is estimated based upon a discounted cash flow model using comparable market indicators of current pricing for the same or similar issue or on the current rate offered to the Company for debt of the same remaining maturity and is generally observable resulting in a Level 2 classification. Accrued interest payable associated with the lines of credit is also classified as Level 2.

Notes and loans payable: The fair values of the Company's notes and loans payable and related accrued interest payable are estimated based upon a discounted cash flow model using comparable market indicators of current pricing for the same or similar issues or on the current rates offered to the Company for debt of the same remaining maturities resulting in either a Level 2 or Level 3 classification. Generally, Level 2 inputs are used for notes and loans payable with maturities of one year or less or that have been entered into in relatively close proximity to the balance sheet date and Level 3 inputs are used for other notes and loans payable. Accrued interest payable associated with the notes and loans payable is also classified as either Level 2 or Level 3.

The Company has entered into various contracts for design, architectural, engineering, foundation work and construction for the development of the land owned by ZRV. The aggregate amount of these contracts totaled approximately $34,285,000 of which approximately $34,042,000 had been incurred as of June 30, 2017 in addition to other capitalized costs related to the construction project of $5,395,000 (total of $39,437,000). Management expects that all costs for this project will be paid from advances from the construction loan, advances from the CB&T Credit Facility and/or cash reserves. It is possible that additional change orders will be submitted and construction costs may be higher than expected.

As of June 30, 2017, the Company has commitments to advance additional funds to borrowers of construction, rehabilitation and other loans in the total amount of approximately $33,636,000 (including approximately $4,720,000 in interest reserves).

The Company is involved in various legal actions arising in the normal course of business.  In the opinion of management, such matters will not have a material effect upon the financial position of the Company.

At a meeting of the Board of Directors held on August 7, 2017, the Company's Board of Directors and the Manager agreed to adjust the management fee to be paid (in cash) monthly in arrears to the Manager for the interim period commencing the month of July 2017 and ending on the final day of the month in which the next Company stockholders' meeting is held (the "Adjustment Period").  During each month in the Adjustment Period, the Existing Management Fee to be paid monthly would be reduced (but not increased) to the amount of the "Interim Management Fee" calculated as follows:

1.	The "Interim Management Fee" is equal to (i) one-twelfth (1/12) multiplied by (ii) 1.50% of the "Opening Stockholders' Equity Balance" (defined below), with such Opening Stockholders' Equity Balance to be adjusted by the Manager in the following manner:

(A) at the end of a calendar month to reflect any changes that result from any of the events specified in clause (A) in the definition of "Stockholders' Equity" (defined below) during such calendar month from the Opening Stockholders' Equity Balance; and

(B) at the end of a calendar quarter to reflect any changes that result from the components specified in clauses (B), (C) or (D) in the definition of "Stockholders' Equity" for such calendar quarter from the Opening Stockholders' Equity Balance.

Since the Management Fee is to be paid monthly during the Adjustment Period, and the components of Stockholders' Equity specified in clauses (B), (C) and (D) in the definition of "Stockholders' Equity" will not be known until the end of the quarter in question, the Manager shall use the prior quarter's value as an estimate for each monthly payment and will effect a reconciliation at the end of the quarter, so that the actual aggregate Management Fee paid for each quarter will be based on the values of the components specified in clauses (B), (C) and (D) in the definition of "Stockholders' Equity" at the end of that particular quarter as if the components specified in clauses (B), (C) and (D) were known at each month end.

2.	As used in the calculation of the Interim Management Fee, "Stockholders' Equity" means:

(A) the sum of the net proceeds from any issuances of the Company's equity securities since inception (including the book value of the Company's Common Stock and Additional Paid-in Capital at inception of the Company) less any amount that the Company pays for repurchases of its equity securities (determined as of the most recent month end), plus

(B) the Company's consolidated retained earnings at the end of the most recently completed calendar quarter (without taking into account any non-cash equity compensation expense incurred in current or prior periods), less

(C)  any unrealized gains, losses or other items that do not affect realized net income as of the most recently completed calendar quarter as adjusted to exclude

(D) one-time events pursuant to changes in GAAP and certain other non-cash charges after discussions between the Manager and the Company's  Independent Directors and after approval by a majority of the Company's  Independent Directors.

3.

As used in the calculation of the Interim Management Fee, "Opening Stockholders' Equity Balance" means Stockholders' Equity at the end of the most recently completed calendar quarter. "Independent Directors" means the members of the Company's Board of Directors who are not officers, employees or directors of the Manager or any person directly or indirectly controlling or controlled by the Manager, and who are otherwise "independent" in accordance with the applicable rules of the NYSE MKT.

4.

The Manager shall compute each installment of the Interim Management Fee reasonably promptly at the end of each calendar month during the Adjustment Period.  A copy of the computations, including a comparison of the Interim Management Fee to the Existing Management Fee, made by the Manager to calculate such installment shall thereafter promptly be delivered to the Board of Directors.

5.	There will be no change to the loan servicing fees or expense reimbursements payable by us to the Manager, and the Manager would also continue to receive the fees paid by our borrowers to the Manager.

Forward Looking Statements

Overview and Background

We are a specialty finance company that focuses on the origination, investment and management of commercial real estate mortgage loans.  We provide customized, short-term capital to small and middle-market investors and developers who require speed and flexibility. We are organized and conduct our operations to qualify as a real estate investment trust, or REIT, for U.S. federal income tax purposes. We are externally managed and advised by Owens Financial Group, Inc. ("OFG" or the "Manager"), a specialized commercial real estate management company that has originated, serviced and managed alternative commercial real estate investments since 1951.

The Company is a Maryland corporation formed to reorganize the business of its predecessor, OMIF, into a publicly traded REIT. OMIF was a California Limited Partnership registered with the SEC that was formed in 1983 for the purposes of funding and servicing short-term commercial real estate loans. Beginning in 2009, OMIF experienced liquidity issues as its borrowers were unable to access credit sources to pay off its loans.  OMIF eventually foreclosed on a substantial portion of its loan portfolio, repositioning many of the properties for investment or eventual sale.  OMIF also experienced a significant increase in capital withdrawal requests that it was unable to honor due to insufficient cash, net of reserves and restrictions under the terms of its bank line of credit. In addition, OMIF was restricted by provisions within the partnership agreement from making additional investments in mortgage loans while qualified redemption requests remained pending and unpaid. In addition to increasing investor liquidity through public listing of its stock, the Company was created to provide the opportunity for resuming mortgage lending activities, with the goal of increasing income to stockholders.

On May 20, 2013, OMIF merged with and into the Company with the Company as the surviving entity, succeeding to and continuing the operations of OMIF. The Company now, by virtue of the Merger, directly or indirectly owns all of the assets and business formerly owned by OMIF. The Company is a deemed successor issuer to OMIF pursuant to Rule 12g-3(a) under the Exchange Act, and on July 1, 2013, the Company's Common Stock was listed on the NYSE MKT exchange. For accounting purposes, the Merger was treated as a transfer of assets and exchange of shares between entities under common control. The accounting basis used to initially record the assets and liabilities in the Company was the carryover basis of OMIF.

Our primary sources of revenue are interest income earned on our loan portfolio and revenues we generate from our operating real estate assets. We have resumed originating loans and believe the Company is well positioned to capitalize on lending opportunities as the economy continues to recover. However, there can be no assurances that we will be able to identify and make loans to suitable commercial real estate borrowers or have adequate capital and liquidity to fund such loans.

Our operating results are affected primarily by:

·	the level of foreclosures and related loan and real estate losses experienced;

·	the income or losses from foreclosed properties prior to the time of disposal;