Edgar Filing: EAGLE FINANCIAL SERVICES INC

Large accelerated filer

Accelerated filer

Non-accelerated filer

(Do not check if a smaller reporting company.)

Smaller reporting company

EFSI-2014.09.30-10Q

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)



ý	QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2014



¨	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from to

Commission File Number: 0-20146

EAGLE FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)



Virginia		54-1601306
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

2 East Main Street P.O. Box 391 Berryville, Virginia		22611
(Address of principal executive offices)		(Zip Code)

(540) 955-2510

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ý No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Date File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (232.405 of this Chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes ý No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No ý

The number of shares of the registrant’s Common Stock ($2.50 par value) outstanding as of October 31, 2014 was 3,454,336.

TABLE OF CONTENTS




PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1.	Financial Statements:
	Consolidated Balance Sheets at September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013	1
	Consolidated Statements of Income for the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2014 and 2013	2
	Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2014 and 2013	3
	Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity for the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2014 and 2013	4
	Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2014 and 2013	5
	Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements	7
Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	31
Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk	43
Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	43

PART II - OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.	Legal Proceedings	43
Item 1A.	Risk Factors	43
Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	43
Item 3.	Defaults Upon Senior Securities	44
Item 4.	Mine Safety Disclosures	44
Item 5.	Other Information	44
Item 6.	Exhibits	45

PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements

EAGLE FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Consolidated Balance Sheets

(dollars in thousands, except share amounts)



	September 30, 2014			December 31, 2013
	(Unaudited)
Assets
Cash and due from banks	$	7,885		$	9,295
Interest-bearing deposits with other institutions	7,453			4,948
Total cash and cash equivalents	15,338			14,243
Securities available for sale, at fair value	99,022			102,598
Restricted investments	2,358			2,192
Loans	465,068			444,273
Allowance for loan losses	(5,587		)	(5,488		)
Net Loans	459,481			438,785
Bank premises and equipment, net	18,529			17,214
Other real estate owned, net of allowance	1,644			1,646
Other assets	9,844			9,766
Total assets	$	606,216		$	586,444
Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity
Liabilities
Deposits:
Noninterest bearing demand deposits	$	151,961		$	147,698
Savings and interest bearing demand deposits	248,736			240,749
Time deposits	94,439			99,140
Total deposits	$	495,136		$	487,587
Federal Home Loan Bank advances	30,000			22,250
Trust preferred capital notes	7,217			7,217
Other liabilities	2,602			2,984
Total liabilities	$	534,955		$	520,038
Shareholders’ Equity
Preferred stock, $10 par value; 500,000 shares authorized and unissued	$	—		$	—
Common stock, $2.50 par value; authorized 10,000,000 shares; issued and outstanding 2014, 3,454,336 including 19,151 unvested restricted stock; issued and outstanding 2013, 3,409,831 including 21,050 unvested restricted stock	8,588			8,482
Surplus	12,312			11,537
Retained earnings	48,834			46,082
Accumulated other comprehensive income	1,527			305
Total shareholders’ equity	$	71,261		$	66,406
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity	$	606,216		$	586,444

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

EAGLE FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.

Consolidated Statements of Income (Unaudited)

(dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)



	Three Months Ended				Nine Months Ended
	September 30,				September 30,
	2014		2013		2014			2013
Interest and Dividend Income
Interest and fees on loans	$	5,397	$	5,446	$	16,317		$	16,120
Interest and dividends on securities available for sale:
Taxable interest income	458		500		1,447			1,565
Interest income exempt from federal income taxes	270		307		834			945
Dividends	126		38		197			147
Interest on deposits in banks	2		3		4			18
Total interest and dividend income	$	6,253	$	6,294	$	18,799		$	18,795
Interest Expense
Interest on deposits	241		269		730			883
Interest on federal funds purchased and securities sold under agreements to repurchase	—		2		20			31
Interest on Federal Home Loan Bank advances	159		276		476			819
Interest on trust preferred capital notes	33		34		98			101
Interest on interest rate swap	47		46		139			136
Total interest expense	$	480	$	627	$	1,463		$	1,970
Net interest income	$	5,773	$	5,667	$	17,336		$	16,825
Provision For Loan Losses	—		—		—			767
Net interest income after provision for loan losses	$	5,773	$	5,667	$	17,336		$	16,058
Noninterest Income
Income from fiduciary activities	$	212	$	296	$	873		$	929
Service charges on deposit accounts	332		377		984			1,086
Other service charges and fees	827		874		2,307			3,117
Gain on sale of securities	87		—		93			400
Other operating income	15		34		127			450
Total noninterest income	$	1,473	$	1,581	$	4,384		$	5,982
Noninterest Expenses
Salaries and employee benefits	$	3,017	$	2,926	$	8,768		$	8,477
Occupancy expenses	319		336		963			936
Equipment expenses	197		151		546			497
Advertising and marketing expenses	159		150		417			421
Stationery and supplies	74		57		238			203
ATM network fees	174		157		532			457
Other real estate owned expense	4		2		14			30
Loss (gain) on the sale of other real estate owned	14		111		(3		)	58
FDIC assessment	94		92		261			285
Computer software expense	252		185		664			504
Bank franchise tax	123		103		342			305
Professional fees	290		265		761			790
Other operating expenses	616		637		1,639			1,744
Total noninterest expenses	$	5,333	$	5,172	$	15,142		$	14,707
Income before income taxes	$	1,913	$	2,076	$	6,578		$	7,333
Income Tax Expense	528		571		1,872			2,024
Net income	$	1,385	$	1,505	$	4,706		$	5,309
Earnings Per Share
Net income per common share, basic	$	0.40	$	0.44	$	1.37		$	1.57
Net income per common share, diluted	$	0.40	$	0.44	$	1.37		$	1.56

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

EAGLE FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss)

(Unaudited)

(dollars in thousands)



	Three Months Ended						Nine Months Ended
	September 30,						September 30,
	2014			2013			2014		2013
Net income	$	1,385		$	1,505		$	4,706	$	5,309
Other comprehensive (loss) income:
Unrealized (loss) gain on available for sale securities, net of deferred income taxes (benefit) of $(39) and ($120) for the three months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively and $588 and ($1,412) for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively	(76		)	(235		)	1,143		(2,743		)
Change in fair value of interest rate swap, net of deferred income taxes of $22 and $0 for the three months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively and $41 and $56 for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively	41			1			79		109
Total other comprehensive (loss) income	(35		)	(234		)	1,222		(2,634		)
Total comprehensive income	$	1,350		$	1,271		$	5,928	$	2,675

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

EAGLE FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.

Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity (Unaudited)



	Common Stock		Surplus			Retained Earnings			Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income			Total
Balance, December 31, 2012	$	8,340	$	10,424		$	41,494		$	3,448		$	63,706
Net income						5,309						5,309
Other comprehensive (loss)									(2,634		)	(2,634		)
Restricted stock awards, stock incentive plan (9,699 shares)	24		(24		)							—
Income tax benefit on vesting of restricted stock			18									18
Stock options exercised (3,872 shares)	10		59									69
Stock-based compensation expense			218									218
Issuance of common stock, dividend investment plan (22,346 shares)	56		438									494
Issuance of common stock, employee benefit plan (7,721 shares)	19		142									161
Dividends declared ($0.57 per share)						(1,924		)				(1,924		)
Balance, September 30, 2013	$	8,449	$	11,275		$	44,879		$	814		$	65,417

Balance, December 31, 2013	$	8,482	$	11,537		$	46,082		$	305		66,406
Net income						4,706						4,706
Other comprehensive income									1,222			1,222
Restricted stock awards, stock incentive plan (10,009 shares)	25		(25		)							—
Income tax benefit on vesting of restricted stock			11									11
Stock options exercised (927 shares)	2		(2		)							—
Stock-based compensation expense			173									173
Issuance of common stock, dividend investment plan (23,473 shares)	59		456									515
Issuance of common stock, employee benefit plan (7,995 shares)	20		162									182
Dividends declared ($0.57 per share)						(1,954		)				(1,954		)
Balance, September 30, 2014	$	8,588	$	12,312		$	48,834		$	1,527		$	71,261

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

EAGLE FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited)

(dollars in thousands)



	Nine Months Ended
	September 30,
	2014			2013
Cash Flows from Operating Activities
Net income	$	4,706		$	5,309
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation	587			593
Amortization of intangible and other assets	117			113
Provision for loan losses	—			767
(Gain) loss on the sale of other real estate owned	(3		)	58
Loss on the sale and disposal of assets	5			2
(Gain) on the sale of securities	(93		)	(400		)
Accrual of restricted stock awards	173			218
Premium amortization on securities, net	88			108
Deferred tax benefit	—			876
Changes in assets and liabilities:
(Increase) in other assets	(812		)	(1,900		)
(Decrease) increase in other liabilities	(262		)	1,256
Net cash provided by operating activities	$	4,506		$	7,000
Cash Flows from Investing Activities
Proceeds from maturities and principal payments of securities available for sale	$	9,264		$	16,751
Proceeds from the sale of securities available for sale	1,129			2,756
Purchases of securities available for sale	(5,081		)	(22,727		)
Proceeds from the sale of restricted investments	284			136
Purchases of restricted investments	(450		)	—
Purchases of bank premises and equipment	(2,272		)	(1,290		)
Proceeds from the sale of other real estate owned	685			726
Proceeds from the sale of repossessed assets	26			11
Net (increase) in loans	(21,039		)	(20,593		)
Net cash (used in) investing activities	$	(17,454	)	$	(24,230	)
Cash Flows from Financing Activities
Net increase in demand deposits, money market and savings accounts	$	12,250		$	7,617
Net (decrease) in certificates of deposit	(4,700		)	(10,191		)
Net (decrease) in federal funds purchased and securities sold under agreements to repurchase	—			(10,000		)
Net increase in Federal Home Loan Bank advances	7,750			—
Issuance of common stock, employee benefit plan	182			161
Stock options exercised	—			69
Cash dividends paid	(1,439		)	(1,430		)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities	$	14,043		$	(13,774	)

EAGLE FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited)

(continued)



	Nine Months Ended
	September 30,
	2014		2013
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents	$	1,095	$	(31,004	)
Cash and Cash Equivalents
Beginning	14,243		48,690
Ending	$	15,338	$	17,686
Supplemental Disclosures of Cash Flow Information
Cash payments for:
Interest	$	1,474	$	2,055
Income taxes	$	1,985	$	2,097
Supplemental Schedule of Noncash Investing and Financing Activities:
Unrealized gain (loss) on securities available for sale	$	1,731	$	(4,155	)
Change in fair value of interest rate swap	$	120	$	165
Other real estate acquired in settlement of loans	$	680	$	—
Issuance of common stock, dividend investment plan	$	515	$	494

EAGLE FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

September 30, 2014

NOTE 1. General

The accompanying unaudited financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

In the opinion of management, the accompanying financial statements contain all adjustments (consisting of only normal recurring accruals) necessary to present fairly the financial position at September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, the results of operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, and cash flows for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013. The results of operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year. These financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013 (the “2013 Form 10-K”).

The Company owns 100% of Bank of Clarke County (the “Bank”) and Eagle Financial Statutory Trust II. The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions between the Company and the Bank have been eliminated. The subordinated debt of Eagle Financial Statutory Trust II is reflected as a liability of the Company.

Certain amounts in the consolidated financial statements have been reclassified to conform to current year presentations.

NOTE 2. Stock-Based Compensation Plan

During 2014, the Company’s shareholders approved a stock incentive plan which allows key employees and directors to increase their personal financial interest in the Company. This plan permits the issuance of incentive stock options and non-qualified stock options and the award of stock appreciation rights, common stock, restricted stock, and phantom stock. The plan authorizes the issuance of up to 500,000 shares of common stock.

The Company periodically grants Restricted Stock to its directors and executive officers. Restricted Stock provides grantees with rights to shares of common stock upon completion of a service period or achievement of Company performance measures. During the restriction period, all shares are considered outstanding and dividends are paid to the grantee. In general, outside directors are periodically granted restricted shares which vest over a period of less than 9 months. Beginning during 2006, executive officers were granted restricted shares which vest over a 3 year service period and restricted shares which vest based on meeting annual performance measures. The Company recognizes compensation expense over the restricted period.

The following table presents Restricted Stock activity for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013:



	Nine Months Ended
	September 30,
	2014				2013
	Shares		Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value		Shares		Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value
Nonvested, beginning of period	17,050		$	19.92	16,500		$	16.53
Granted	14,900		23.50		14,900		22.06
Vested	(10,009	)	19.65		(9,699	)	16.47
Forfeited	(2,790	)	22.11		(651	)	16.75
Nonvested, end of period	19,151		$	22.53	21,050		$	20.46

NOTE 3. Earnings Per Common Share

Basic earnings per share represents income available to common shareholders divided by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per share reflects additional common shares that would have been outstanding if dilutive potential common shares had been issued, as well as any adjustment to income that would result from the assumed issuance. The number of potential common shares is determined using the treasury method and relates to outstanding stock options and unvested restricted stock grants.

The following table shows the weighted average number of shares used in computing earnings per share for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013 and the effect on the weighted average number of shares of dilutive potential common stock. Potential dilutive common stock had no effect on income available to common shareholders.



	Three Months Ended		Nine Months Ended
	September 30,		September 30,
	2014	2013	2014	2013
Average number of common shares outstanding	3,451,041	3,393,519	3,431,356	3,380,149
Effect of dilutive common stock	9,145	12,685	8,121	11,158
Average number of common shares outstanding used to calculate diluted earnings per share	3,460,186	3,406,204	3,439,477	3,391,307

NOTE 4. Securities

Amortized costs and fair values of securities available for sale at September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013 were as follows:



	Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized (Losses)			Fair Value
	September 30, 2014
	(in thousands)
Obligations of U.S. government corporations and agencies	$	36,912	$	517	$	(657	)	$	36,772
Mortgage-backed securities	12,802		480		(22		)	13,260
Obligations of states and political subdivisions	39,465		1,435		(90		)	40,810
Corporate securities	6,237		782		—			7,019
Equity securities	1,044		117		—			1,161
	$	96,460	$	3,331	$	(769	)	$	99,022
	December 31, 2013
	(in thousands)
Obligations of U.S. government corporations and agencies	$	35,890	$	439	$	(1,585	)	$	34,744
Mortgage-backed securities	14,896		422		(121		)	15,197
Obligations of states and political subdivisions	42,442		969		(295		)	43,116
Corporate securities	7,495		928		—			8,423
Equity securities	1,044		74		—			1,118
	$	101,767	$	2,832	$	(2,001	)	$	102,598

During the nine months ended September 30, 2014, the Company sold $1.1 million in available for sale securities for a net gain of $93 thousand. During the nine months ended September 30, 2013, the Company sold $2.8 million in available for sale securities for a net gain of $400 thousand.

The fair value and gross unrealized losses for securities available for sale, totaled by the length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous gross unrealized loss position, at September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013 were as follows:



	Less than 12 months				12 months or more				Total
	Fair Value		Gross Unrealized Losses		Fair Value		Gross Unrealized Losses		Fair Value		Gross Unrealized Losses
	September 30, 2014
	(in thousands)
Obligations of U.S. government corporations and agencies	$	3,982	$	22	$	22,253	$	635	$	26,235	$	657
Mortgage-backed securities	—		—		1,521		22		1,521		22
Obligations of states and political subdivisions	249		1		3,438		89		3,687		90
Corporate securities	—		—		—		—		—		—
Equity securities	—		—		—		—		—		—
	$	4,231	$	23	$	27,212	$	746	$	31,443	$	769
	December 31, 2013
	(in thousands)
Obligations of U.S. government corporations and agencies	$	23,235	$	1,551	$	1,967	$	34	$	25,202	$	1,585
Mortgage-backed securities	2,828		121		—		—		2,828		121
Obligations of states and political subdivisions	8,439		252		466		43		8,905		295
Corporate securities	—		—		—		—		—		—
Equity securities	—		—		—		—		—		—
	$	34,502	$	1,924	$	2,433	$	77	$	36,935	$	2,001

Gross unrealized losses on available for sale securities included thirty-seven (37) and fifty-one (51) debt securities at September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively. The Company evaluates securities for other-than-temporary impairment on at least a quarterly basis, and more frequently when economic or market concerns warrant such evaluation. The Company’s mortgage-backed securities are issued by U.S. government agencies, which guarantee payments to investors regardless of the status of the underlying mortgages. Consideration is given to the length of time and the amount of an unrealized loss, the financial condition of the issuer, and the intent and ability of the Company to retain its investment in the issuer long enough to allow for an anticipated recovery in fair value. The fair value of a security reflects its liquidity as compared to similar instruments, current market rates on similar instruments, and the creditworthiness of the issuer. Absent any change in the liquidity of a security or the creditworthiness of the issuer, prices will decline as market rates rise and vice-versa. The primary cause of the unrealized losses at September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013 was changes in market interest rates. Since the losses can be primarily attributed to changes in market interest rates and not expected cash flows or an issuer’s financial condition, the unrealized losses are deemed to be temporary. The continuing economic downturn involving housing, liquidity and credit were also a contributing factor to the unrealized losses on these securities at September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013. The Company monitors the financial condition of these issuers continuously and will record other-than-temporary impairment if the recovery of value is unlikely.

The Company’s securities are exposed to various risks, such as interest rate, market, currency and credit risks. Due to the level of risk associated with certain securities and the level of uncertainty related to changes in the value of securities, it is at least reasonably possible that changes in risks in the near term would materially affect securities reported in the financial statements. In addition, recent economic uncertainty and market events have led to unprecedented volatility in currency, commodity, credit and equity markets culminating in failures of some banking and financial services firms and government intervention to solidify others. These events underscore the level of investment risk associated with the current economic environment, and accordingly the level of risk in the Company’s securities.

Securities having a carrying value of $3.6 million at September 30, 2014 were pledged to secure securities sold under agreements to repurchase and other purposes required by law.

The composition of restricted investments at September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013 was as follows:



	September 30, 2014		December 31, 2013
	(in thousands)
Federal Reserve Bank Stock	$	344	$	344
Federal Home Loan Bank Stock	1,874		1,708
Community Bankers’ Bank Stock	140		140
	$	2,358	$	2,192

NOTE 5. Allowance for Loan Losses

Changes in the allowance for loan losses for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013 and the year ended December 31, 2013 were as follows:



	Nine Months Ended			Year Ended			Nine Months Ended
	September 30,			December 31,			September 30,
	2014			2013			2013
				(in thousands)
Balance, beginning	$	5,488		$	6,577		$	6,577
Provision charged to operating expense	—			—			767
Recoveries added to the allowance	614			233			204
Loan losses charged to the allowance	(515		)	(1,322		)	(830		)
Balance, ending	$	5,587		$	5,488		$	6,718

Nonaccrual and past due loans by class at September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013 were as follows:



	September 30, 2014
	(in thousands)
	30 - 59 Days Past Due		60 - 89 Days Past Due		90 or More Days Past Due		Total Past Due		Current		Total Loans		90 or More Days Past Due Still Accruing		Nonaccrual Loans
Commercial - Non Real Estate:
Commercial & Industrial	$	43	$	1,053	$	100	$	1,196	$	28,512	$	29,708	$	—	$	1,736
Commercial Real Estate:
Owner Occupied	3,276		739		608		4,623		95,127		99,750		—		2,485
Non-owner occupied	631		—		813		1,444		57,290		58,734		—		1,243
Construction and Farmland:
Residential	—		—		—		—		5,837		5,837		—		—
Commercial	424		16		80		520		32,256		32,776		16		462
Consumer:
Installment	60		2		—		62		13,234		13,296		—		—
Residential:
Equity Lines	63		121		179		363		30,570		30,933		—		329
Single family	1,526		348		345		2,219		186,463		188,682				2,373
Multifamily	—		—		—		—		3,050		3,050		—		—
All Other Loans	—		—		—		—		2,302		2,302		—		—
Total	$	6,023	$	2,279	$	2,125	$	10,427	$	454,641	$	465,068	$	16	$	8,628



	December 31, 2013
	(in thousands)
	30 - 59 Days Past Due		60 - 89 Days Past Due		90 or More Days Past Due		Total Past Due		Current		Total Loans		90 or More Past Due Still Accruing		Nonaccrual Loans
Commercial - Non Real Estate:
Commercial & Industrial	$	143	$	—	$	1,162	$	1,305	$	19,560	$	20,865	$	—	$	1,288
Commercial Real Estate:
Owner Occupied	364		—		1,270		1,634		90,811		92,445		—		1,269
Non-owner occupied	99		185		—		284		55,437		55,721		—		185
Construction and Farmland:
Residential	—		—		—		—		7,860		7,860		—		—
Commercial	—		—		—		—		29,073		29,073		—		157
Consumer:
Installment	95		9		11		115		13,670		13,785		11		6
Residential:
Equity Lines	202		25		—		227		31,997		32,224		—		179
Single family	1,995		180		693		2,868		183,541		186,409		—		1,328
Multifamily	—		—		—		—		2,850		2,850		—		—
All Other Loans	—		—		—		—		3,041		3,041		—		—
Total	$	2,898	$	399	$	3,136	$	6,433	$	437,840	$	444,273	$	11	$	4,412

Allowance for loan losses by segment at September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013 were as follows:



	As of and for the Nine Months Ended
	September 30, 2014
	(in thousands)
	Construction and Farmland			Residential Real Estate			Commercial Real Estate			Commercial		Consumer			All Other Loans			Unallocated		Total
Allowance for credit losses:
Beginning Balance	$	1,032		$	2,225		$	1,337		$	555	$	102		$	82		$	155	$	5,488
Charge-Offs	—			(435		)	—			—		(65		)	(15		)	—		(515		)
Recoveries	4			9			379			148		71			3			—		614
Provision	(143		)	76			(312		)	200		(2		)	(27		)	208		—
Ending balance	$	893		$	1,875		$	1,404		$	903	$	106		$	43		$	363	$	5,587
Ending balance: Individually evaluated for impairment	$	63		$	243		$	280		$	414	$	—		$	—		$	—	$	1,000
Ending balance: collectively evaluated for impairment	$	830		$	1,632		$	1,124		$	489	$	106		$	43		$	363	$	4,587
Financing receivables:
Ending balance	$	38,613		$	222,665		$	158,484		$	29,708	$	13,296		$	2,302		$	—	$	465,068
Ending balance individually evaluated for impairment	$	2,828		$	3,648		$	4,417		$	1,736	$	—		$	—		$	—	$	12,629
Ending balance collectively evaluated for impairment	$	35,785		$	219,017		$	154,067		$	27,972	$	13,296		$	2,302		$	—	$	452,439



	As of and for the Twelve Months Ended
	December 31, 2013
	(in thousands)
	Construction and Farmland			Residential Real Estate			Commercial Real Estate			Commercial			Consumer			All Other Loans			Unallocated			Total
Allowance for credit losses:
Beginning Balance	$	1,280		$	2,820		$	1,182		$	880		$	107		$	122		$	186		$	6,577
Charge-Offs	(20		)	(507		)	(289		)	(403		)	(85		)	(18		)	—			(1,322		)
Recoveries	5			109			7			47			54			11			—			233
Provision	(233		)	(197		)	437			31			26			(33		)	(31		)	—
Ending balance	$	1,032		$	2,225		$	1,337		$	555		$	102		$	82		$	155		$	5,488
Ending balance: Individually evaluated for impairment	$	218		$	627		$	299		$	334		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	1,478
Ending balance: collectively evaluated for impairment	$	814		$	1,598		$	1,038		$	221		$	102		$	82		$	155		$	4,010
Financing receivables:
Ending balance	$	36,933		$	221,483		$	148,166		$	20,865		$	13,785		$	3,041		$	—		$	444,273
Ending balance individually evaluated for impairment	$	2,674		$	4,922		$	4,750		$	1,347		$	—		$	6		$	—		$	13,699
Ending balance collectively evaluated for impairment	$	34,259		$	216,561		$	143,416		$	19,518		$	13,785		$	3,035		$	—		$	430,574

Impaired loans by class at September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013 were as follows:



	As of
	September 30, 2014
	(in thousands)
	Unpaid Principal Balance		Recorded Investment		Related Allowance		Average Recorded Investment		Interest Income Recognized
With no related allowance:
Commercial - Non Real Estate:
Commercial & Industrial	$	480	$	481	$	—	$	520	$	6
Commercial Real Estate:
Owner Occupied	2,237		2,237		—		2,558		31
Non-owner occupied	858		859		—		1,083		31
Construction and Farmland:
Residential	—		—		—		—		—
Commercial	2,472		2,483		—		2,505		74
Residential:
Equity lines	140		140		—		312		1
Single family	2,701		2,702		—		4,320		82
Multifamily	—		—		—		—		—
Other Loans	—		—		—		—		—
	$	8,888	$	8,902	$	—	$	11,298	$	225
With an allowance recorded:
Commercial - Non Real Estate:
Commercial & Industrial	$	1,256	$	1,256	$	414	$	1,550	$	3
Commercial Real Estate:
Owner Occupied	461		461		34		462		11
Non-owner occupied	861		861		246		880		9
Construction and Farmland:
Residential	—		—		—		—		—
Commercial	356		356		63		395		3
Residential:
Equity lines	189		189		113		338		2
Single family	618		620		130		630		18
Multifamily	—		—		—		—		—
Other Loans	—		—		—		—		—
	$	3,741	$	3,743	$	1,000	$	4,255	$	46
Total:
Commercial	$	1,736	$	1,737	$	414	$	2,070	$	9
Commercial Real Estate	4,417		4,418		280		4,983		82
Construction and Farmland	2,828		2,839		63		2,900		77
Residential	3,648		3,651		243		5,600		103
Other	—		—		—		—		—
Total	$	12,629	$	12,645	$	1,000	$	15,553	$	271

The average recorded investment of impaired loans for the three months ended September 30, 2014 was $15.3 million. The interest income recognized on impaired loans for the three months ended September 30, 2014 was $83 thousand.



	As of
	December 31, 2013
	(in thousands)
	Unpaid Principal Balance		Recorded Investment		Related Allowance		Average Recorded Investment		Interest Income Recognized
With no related allowance:
Commercial - Non Real Estate:
Commercial & Industrial	$	126	$	145	$	—	$	329	$	8
Commercial Real Estate:
Owner Occupied	2,246		2,273		—		2,512		118
Non-owner occupied	1,396		1,398		—		1,498		91
Construction and Farmland:
Residential	—		—		—		—		—
Commercial	2,392		2,401		—		2,420		97
Residential:
Equity lines	289		290		—		460		16
Single family	3,060		3,100		—		3,531		146
Multifamily	—		—		—		—		—
Other Loans	6		6		—		7		1
	$	9,515	$	9,613	$	—	$	10,757	$	477
With an allowance recorded:
Commercial - Non Real Estate:
Commercial & Industrial	$	1,221	$	1,221	$	334	$	1,271	$	59
Commercial Real Estate:
Owner Occupied	—		—		—		—		—
Non-owner occupied	1,108		1,111		299		1,126		49
Construction and Farmland:
Residential	—		—		—		—		—
Commercial	282		283		218		308		18
Residential:
Equity lines	74		74		74		217		7
Single family	1,499		1,508		553		1,530		71
Multifamily	—		—		—		—		—
Other Loans	—		—		—		—		—
	$	4,184	$	4,197	$	1,478	$	4,452	$	204
Total:
Commercial	$	1,347	$	1,366	$	334	$	1,600	$	67
Commercial Real Estate	4,750		4,782		299		5,136		258
Construction and Farmland	2,674		2,684		218		2,728		115
Residential	4,922		4,972		627		5,738		240
Other	6		6		—		7		1
Total	$	13,699	$	13,810	$	1,478	$	15,209	$	681

The Company uses a rating system for evaluating the risks associated with non-consumer loans. Consumer loans are not evaluated for risk unless the characteristics of the loan fall within classified categories. Descriptions of these ratings are as follows:




Pass	Pass loans exhibit acceptable operating trends, balance sheet trends, and liquidity. Sufficient cash flow exists to service the loan. All obligations have been paid by the borrower in an as agreed manner.

Watch	Watch loans exhibit income volatility, negative operating trends, and a highly leveraged balance sheet. A higher level of supervision is required for these loans as the potential for a negative event could impact the borrower’s ability to repay the loan.

Special mention	Special mention loans exhibit a potential weakness, which if left uncorrected, may negatively affect the borrower’s ability to repay its debt obligation. The risk of default is not imminent and the borrower still demonstrates sufficient cash flow to support the loan.

Substandard	Substandard loans exhibit well defined weaknesses and have a potential of default. The borrowers exhibit adverse financial trends but still have the ability to service debt obligations.

Doubtful	Doubtful loans exhibit all of the characteristics inherent in substandard loans but the weaknesses make collection or full liquidation highly questionable.

Loss	Loss loans are considered uncollectible and of such little value that its continuance as a bankable asset is not warranted.

Credit quality information by class at September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013 was as follows:



	As of
	September 30, 2014
	(in thousands)
INTERNAL RISK RATING GRADES	Pass		Watch		Special Mention		Substandard		Doubtful		Loss		Total
Commercial - Non Real Estate:
Commercial & Industrial	$	25,375	$	2,284	$	22	$	772	$	1,255	$	—	$	29,708
Commercial Real Estate:
Owner Occupied	76,373		17,682		834		3,678		1,183		—		99,750
Non-owner occupied	39,631		12,895		2,911		3,248		49		—		58,734
Construction and Farmland:
Residential	5,715		122		—		—		—		—		5,837
Commercial	26,037		3,501		871		2,287		80		—		32,776
Residential:
Equity Lines	29,426		1,207		—		150		150		—		30,933
Single family	162,760		15,314		5,702		4,330		576		—		188,682
Multifamily	2,166		884		—		—		—		—		3,050
All other loans	2,302		—		—		—		—		—		2,302
Total	$	369,785	$	53,889	$	10,340	$	14,465	$	3,293	$	—	$	451,772



	Performing		Nonperforming
Consumer Credit Exposure by Payment Activity	$	13,234	$	62



	As of
	December 31, 2013
	(in thousands)
INTERNAL RISK RATING GRADES	Pass		Watch		Special Mention		Substandard		Doubtful		Loss		Total
Commercial - Non Real Estate:
Commercial & Industrial	$	16,565	$	2,820	$	86	$	106	$	1,288	$	—	$	20,865
Commercial Real Estate:
Owner Occupied	73,998		12,036		3,322		1,820		1,269		—		92,445
Non-owner occupied	31,484		14,922		5,557		3,758		—		—		55,721
Construction and Farm land:
Residential	7,738		122		—		—		—		—		7,860
Commercial	24,252		1,353		1,196		2,186		86		—		29,073
Residential:
Equity Lines	30,458		708		415		480		163		—		32,224
Single family	157,273		11,505		11,046		5,775		810		—		186,409
Multifamily	1,946		904		—		—		—		—		2,850
All other loans	3,041		—		—		—		—		—		3,041
Total	$	346,755	$	44,370	$	21,622	$	14,125	$	3,616	$	—	$	430,488



	Performing		Nonperforming
Consumer Credit Exposure by Payment Activity	$	13,670	$	115

NOTE 6. Troubled Debt Restructurings

All loans deemed a troubled debt restructuring, or “TDR”, are considered impaired, and are evaluated for collateral and cash-flow sufficiency. A loan is considered a TDR when the Company, for economic or legal reasons related to a borrower’s financial difficulties, grants a concession to the borrower that the Company would not otherwise consider. All of the following factors are indicators that the Bank has granted a concession (one or multiple items may be present):


•	The borrower receives a reduction of the stated interest rate to a rate less than the institution is willing to accept at the time of the restructure for a new loan with comparable risk.


•	The borrower receives an extension of the maturity date or dates at a stated interest rate lower than the current market interest rate for new debt with similar risk characteristics.


•	The borrower receives a reduction of the face amount or maturity amount of the debt as stated in the instrument or other agreement.


•	The borrower receives a deferral of required payments (principal and/or interest).


•	The borrower receives a reduction of the accrued interest.

There were seventeen (17) troubled debt restructured loans totaling $5.5 million at September 30, 2014. At December 31, 2013, there were twenty (20) troubled debt restructured loans totaling $6.4 million. Eight loans, totaling $1.5 million, were in nonaccrual status at September 30, 2014. Five loans, totaling $1.0 million, were in nonaccrual status at December 31, 2013. There were no outstanding commitments to lend additional amounts to troubled debt restructured borrowers at September 30, 2014.

The following tables and narrative set forth information on the Company’s troubled debt restructurings by class of financing receivable occurring during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014 and September 30, 2013:



		Three Months Ended
		September 30, 2014
		(in thousands)
	Number of Contracts	Pre-Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment		Post-Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment
Commercial - Non Real Estate:
Commercial & Industrial	1	$	289	$	289
Residential:
Equity	1	69		69
Single family	1	652		350
	3	$	1,010	$	708

		Three Months Ended
		September 30, 2013
		(in thousands)
	Number of Contracts	Pre-Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment		Post-Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment
Commercial Real Estate:
Owner Occupied	1	$	514	$	368
Construction and Farmland:
Commercial	1	87		87
Residential:
Single family	5	1,197		1,197
	7	$	1,798	$	1,652

		Nine Months Ended
		September 30, 2014
		(in thousands)
	Number of Contracts	Pre-Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment		Post-Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment
Commercial - Non Real Estate:
Commercial & Industrial	1	$	289	$	289
Residential:
Equity	1	69		69
Single family	1	652		350
Total	3	$	1,010	$	708

		Nine Months Ended
		September 30, 2013
		(in thousands)
	Number of Contracts	Pre-Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment		Post-Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment
Commercial Real Estate:
Owner Occupied	1	$	514	$	368
Construction and Farmland:
Commercial	1	87		87
Residential:
Equity	1	184		184
Single family	5	1,197		1,197
Total	8	$	1,982	$	1,836

During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014, the Company restructured three loans by granting concessions to borrowers experiencing financial difficulties. One commercial and industrial loan and one residential single family loan was modified by reducing the monthly payments. One residential equity loan was modified by changing payments to interest only for a period of time.

During the three months ended September 30, 2013, the Company restructured seven loans by granting concessions to borrowers experiencing financial difficulties. One owner occupied commercial real estate loan was modified by restructuring the loan and granting a lower interest rate. One commercial construction and farmland loan was modified by granting a lower interest rate. Four single family residential loans were modified by changing the amortization period and granting a lower interest rate. One single family residential loan was modified by changing the amortization period. During the nine months ended September 30, 2013, the Company restructured eight loans by granting concessions to borrowers experiencing financial difficulties. In addition to those restructured during the third quarter, one residential loan was modified by changing payments to interest-only in order to reduce the monthly payment for a period of time.

Loans by class of financing receivable modified as TDRs within the previous 12 months and for which there was a payment default during the stated periods were:



	Three Months Ended
	September 30, 2014
	(in thousands)
	Number of Contracts	Recorded Investment
Construction and Farmland:
Commercial	2	$	1,608
Total	2	$	1,608

	Three Months Ended
	September 30, 2013
	(in thousands)
	Number of Contracts	Recorded Investment
Commercial Real Estate:
Owner occupied	2	$	495
Non-owner occupied	1	557
Residential:
Single Family	4	946
Total	7	$	1,998


	Nine Months Ended
	September 30, 2014
	(in thousands)
	Number of Contracts	Recorded Investment
Construction and Farmland:
Commercial	2	$	1,608
Total	2	$	1,608

	Nine Months Ended
	September 30, 2013
	(in thousands)
	Number of Contracts	Recorded Investment
Commercial Real Estate:
Owner occupied	3	$	654
Non-owner occupied	1	557
Residential:
Single family	4	946
Total	8	$	2,157

A loan is considered to be in payment default once it is 30 days contractually past due under the modified terms.

NOTE 7. Deposits

The composition of deposits at September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013 was as follows:



	September 30, 2014		December 31, 2013
	(in thousands)
Noninterest bearing demand deposits	$	151,961	$	147,698
Savings and interest bearing demand deposits:
NOW accounts	$	79,895	$	85,459
Money market accounts	99,057		92,125
Regular savings accounts	69,784		63,165
	$	248,736	$	240,749
Time deposits:
Balances of less than $100,000	$	60,084	$	63,221
Balances of $100,000 and more	34,355		35,919
	$	94,439	$	99,140
	$	495,136	$	487,587

NOTE 8. Postretirement Benefit Plans

The Company provides certain health care and life insurance benefits for nine retired employees who have met certain eligibility requirements. All other employees retiring after reaching age 65 and having at least 15 years of service with the Company will be allowed to stay on the Company’s group life and health insurance policies, but will be required to pay premiums. The Company’s share of the estimated costs that will be paid after retirement is generally being accrued by charges to expense over the employees’ active service periods to the dates they are fully eligible for benefits.

Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“GAAP”) requires the Company to recognize the funded status (i.e. the difference between the fair value of plan assets and the projected benefit obligations) of its postretirement benefit plans in the consolidated balance sheet, with a corresponding adjustment to accumulated other comprehensive income, net of taxes.

Net periodic benefit costs of the postretirement plan were $(1) thousand for the three months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013. Net periodic benefit costs of the postretirement benefit plan for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013 were $(3) thousand.

NOTE 9. Trust Preferred Capital Notes

In September 2007, Eagle Financial Statutory Trust II (the “Trust II”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, was formed for the purpose of issuing redeemable capital securities. On September 20, 2007, Trust II issued $7.0 million of trust preferred securities and $217 thousand in common equity. The principal asset of Trust II is $7.2 million of the Company’s junior subordinated debt securities with the same maturity and interest rate structures as the capital securities. The securities have a LIBOR-indexed floating rate of interest and the interest rate at September 30, 2014 was 1.85%. The securities have a mandatory redemption date of September 1, 2037, and were subject to varying call provisions beginning September 1, 2012.

The trust preferred securities are included in Tier 1 capital for regulatory capital adequacy purposes as long as their amount does not exceed 25% of Tier 1 capital, including total trust preferred securities. The portion of the trust preferred securities not considered as Tier 1 capital, if any, may be included in Tier 2 capital. At September 30, 2014, the total amount ($7.0 million) of trust preferred securities issued by Trust II is included in the Company’s Tier 1 capital.

The obligations of the Company with respect to the issuance of the capital securities constitute a full and unconditional guarantee by the Company of the Trust’s obligations with respect to the capital securities.

Subject to certain exceptions and limitations, the Company may elect from time to time to defer interest payments on the junior subordinated debt securities, which would result in a deferral of distribution payments on the related capital securities.

NOTE 10. Fair Value Measurements

GAAP requires the Company to record fair value adjustments to certain assets and liabilities and to determine fair value disclosures. The fair value of certain assets and liabilities is an exit price, representing the amount that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants.

“Fair Value Measurements” defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value, establishes a three-level valuation hierarchy for disclosure of fair value measurement and enhances disclosure requirements for fair value measurements. The valuation hierarchy is based upon the transparency of inputs to the valuation of an asset or liability as of the measurement date. The three levels are defined as follows:



•	Level 1	Inputs to the valuation methodology are quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in active markets.

•	Level 2	Inputs to the valuation methodology include quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, and inputs that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the financial instrument.

•	Level 3	Inputs to the valuation methodology are unobservable and significant to the fair value measurement.

The following sections provide a description of the valuation methodologies used for instruments measured at fair value, as well as the general classification of such instruments pursuant to the valuation hierarchy:

Securities Available for Sale: Where quoted prices are available in an active market, securities are classified within Level 1 of the valuation hierarchy. Level 1 securities would include highly liquid government bonds, mortgage products and exchange traded equities. If quoted market prices are not available, then fair values are estimated by using pricing models, quoted prices of securities with similar characteristics, or discounted cash flow. Level 2 securities would include U.S. agency securities, mortgage-backed agency securities, obligations of states and political subdivisions and certain corporate, asset backed and other securities. In certain cases where there is limited activity or less transparency around inputs to the valuation, securities are classified within Level 3 of the valuation hierarchy.

Interest Rate Swap: The fair value is estimated by a third party using inputs that are observable or that can be corroborated by observable market data, and therefore, are classified within Level 2 of the valuation hierarchy.

The following table presents balances of financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis at September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013:



			Fair Value Measurements at
			September 30, 2014
			Using
	Balance as of		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets		Significant Other Observable Inputs		Significant Unobservable Inputs
	September 30, 2014		(Level 1)		(Level 2)		(Level 3)
	(in thousands)
Assets:
Securities available for sale
Obligations of U.S. government corporations and agencies	$	36,772	$	—	$	36,772	$	—
Mortgage-backed securities	13,260		—		13,260		—
Obligations of states and political subdivisions	40,810		—		40,810		—
Corporate securities	7,019		—		7,019		—
Equity securities:
Bank preferred stock	1,161		1,161		—		—
Total assets at fair value	$	99,022	$	1,161	$	97,861	$	—
Liabilities:
Interest rate swap	314		—		314		—
Total liabilities at fair value	$	314	$	—	$	314	$	—

			Fair Value Measurements at
			December 31, 2013
			Using
	Balance as of		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets		Significant Other Observable Inputs		Significant Unobservable Inputs
	December 31, 2013		(Level 1)		(Level 2)		(Level 3)
	(in thousands)
Assets:
Securities available for sale
Obligations of U.S. government corporations and agencies	$	34,744	$	—	$	34,744	$	—
Mortgage-backed securities	15,197		—		15,197		—
Obligations of states and political subdivisions	43,116		—		43,116		—
Corporate securities	8,423		—		8,423		—
Equity securities:
Bank preferred stock	1,118		1,118		—		—
Total assets at fair value	$	102,598	$	1,118	$	101,480	$	—
Liabilities:
Interest rate swap	434		—		434		—
Total liabilities at fair value	$	434	$	—	$	434	$	—

Certain financial assets are measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis in accordance with GAAP. Adjustments to the fair value of these assets usually result from the application of lower of cost or market accounting or write downs of individual assets.

The following describes the valuation techniques used by the Company to measure certain financial and nonfinancial assets recorded at fair value on a nonrecurring basis in the financial statements:

Impaired Loans: Loans are designated as impaired when, in the judgment of management based on current information and events, it is probable that all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement will not be collected. The measurement of loss associated with impaired loans can be based on either the observable market price of the loan or the fair value of the collateral securing the loans. Collateral may be in the form of real estate or business assets including equipment, inventory, and accounts receivable. The vast majority of the collateral is real estate. Level 2 impaired loan value is determined by utilizing an income or market valuation approach based on an appraisal conducted by an independent, licensed appraiser outside of the Company using observable market data. The value of business equipment is based upon an outside appraisal if deemed significant, or the net book value on the applicable business’ financial statements if not considered significant using observable market data. Level 3 impaired loan values are determined using inventory and accounts receivable collateral and are based on financial statement balances or aging reports. If the collateral is a house or building in the process of construction or if an appraisal of the real estate property is over two years old or has been discounted based on management’s historical knowledge, changes in market conditions from the time of valuation, and/or management’s expertise and knowledge of the client and client’s business, then the fair value is considered Level 3. Impaired loans allocated to the Allowance for Loan Losses are measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis. Any fair value adjustments are recorded in the period incurred as provision for loan losses on the Consolidated Statements of Income.

Other Real Estate Owned: Assets acquired through, or in lieu of, loan foreclosure are held for sale and are initially recorded at the lesser of the fair value of the property, less estimated selling costs or the loan balance outstanding at the date of foreclosure. Any write-downs based on the asset’s fair value at the date of acquisition are charged to the allowance for loan losses. If there is a contract for the sale of a property, and management reasonably believes the contract will be executed, fair value is based on the sale price in that contract (Level 1). Lacking such a contract, the value of real estate collateral is determined utilizing an income or market valuation approach based on an appraisal conducted by an independent, licensed appraiser outside of the Company using observable market data (Level 2). However, if the collateral is a house or building in the process of construction or if an appraisal of the real estate property is over two years old, then the fair value is considered Level 3. After foreclosure, valuations are periodically performed by management and property held for sale is carried at the lower of the new cost basis or fair value less cost to sell. Any subsequent valuation adjustments are applied to earnings in the consolidated statements of income. Impairment losses on property to be held and used are measured as the amount by which the carrying amount of a property exceeds its fair value. Costs of significant property improvements are capitalized, whereas costs relating to holding property are expensed. The portion of interest costs relating to development of real estate is capitalized. Valuations are periodically performed by management, and any subsequent write-downs are recorded as a charge to operations, if necessary, to reduce the carrying value of a property to the lower of its cost or fair value less cost to sell. We believe that the fair value component in its valuation follows the provisions of GAAP.

The following table displays quantitative information about Level 3 Fair Value Measurements for certain financial assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis at September 30, 2014 (dollars in thousands):



	Quantitative information about Level 3 Fair Value Measurements for
	September 30, 2014
	Valuation Technique(s)	Unobservable Input	Range	Weighted Average
Assets:
Impaired loans	Discounted appraised value	Selling cost	12% - 60%	14%
Other real estate owned	Discounted appraised value	Selling cost	5% - 10%	8%

The following table summarizes the Company’s financial and nonfinancial assets that were measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis at September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013:



			Carrying value at
			September 30, 2014
	Balance as of		Identical Assets		Observable Inputs		Unobservable Inputs
	September 30, 2014		(Level 1)		(Level 2)		(Level 3)
	(in thousands)
Financial Assets:
Impaired loans	$	2,741	$	—	$	435	$	2,306
Nonfinancial Assets:
Other real estate owned	1,644		638		668		338
			Carrying value at
			December 31, 2013
	Balance as of		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets		Significant Other Observable Inputs		Significant Unobservable Inputs
	December 31, 2013		(Level 1)		(Level 2)		(Level 3)
	(in thousands)
Financial Assets:
Impaired loans	$	2,706	$	—	$	1,299	$	1,407
Nonfinancial Assets:
Other real estate owned	1,646		638		1,008		—

The changes in Level 3 financial assets measured at estimated fair value on a nonrecurring basis during the period ended September 30, 2014 were as follows:



	Fair Value Measurements at
	September 30, 2014
	Impaired Loans			Other Real Estate Owned
	(in thousands)
Balance - January 1, 2014	$	1,407		$	—
Sales proceeds	—			—
Valuation allowance	—			—
(Loss) on disposition	—			—
Transfers into Level 3	1,740			488
Transfers out of Level 3	(841		)	(150		)
Total assets at fair value	$	2,306		$	338

GAAP defines the fair value of a financial instrument as the amount at which the instrument could be exchanged in a current transaction between willing parties, other than through a forced or liquidation sale for purposes of this disclosure. Fair value is best determined based upon quoted market prices. However, in many instances, there are no quoted market prices for the Company’s various financial instruments. In cases where quoted market prices are not available, fair values are based on estimates using present value or other valuation techniques. Those techniques are significantly affected by the assumptions used, including the discount rate and estimates of future cash flows. Accordingly, the fair value estimates may not be realized in an immediate settlement of the instrument. The following methods and assumptions were used to estimate the fair value of the Company’s financial instruments:

Cash and short-term investments/accrued interest: The fair value was equal to the carrying amount.

Securities: The fair value, excluding restricted securities, was based on quoted market prices. The fair value of restricted securities approximated the carrying amount based on the redemption provisions of the issuers.

Loans: The fair value of variable rate loans, which reprice frequently and with no significant change in credit risk, was equal to the carrying amount. The fair value of all other loans was determined using discounted cash flow analysis. The discount rate was equal to the current interest rate on similar products.

Deposits and borrowings: The fair value of demand deposits, savings accounts, and certain money market deposits was equal to the carrying amount. The fair value of all other deposits and borrowings was determined using discounted cash flow analysis. The discount rate was equal to the current interest rate on similar products.

Off-balance-sheet financial instruments: The fair value of commitments to extend credit was estimated using the fees currently charged to enter similar agreements, taking into account the remaining terms of the agreements and the credit worthiness of the counterparties. The fair value of fixed rate loan commitments also considered the difference between current interest rates and the committed interest rates. The fair value of standby letters of credit was estimated using the fees currently charged for similar agreements or on the estimated cost to terminate or otherwise settle the obligations with the counterparties.

The carrying value and fair value of the Company’s financial instruments at September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013 were as follows:



	Fair Value Measurements at
	September 30, 2014
	Using
	Carrying Value as of		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets		Significant Other Observable Inputs		Significant Unobservable Inputs		Fair Value as of
	September 30, 2014		(Level 1)		(Level 2)		(Level 3)		September 30, 2014
	(in thousands)
Financial Assets:
Cash and short-term investments	$	15,338	$	15,338	$	—	$	—	$	15,338
Securities	99,022		1,161		97,861		—		99,022
Restricted Investments	2,358		—		2,358		—		2,358
Loans, net	459,481		—		463,470		2,306		465,776
Accrued interest receivable	1,850		—		1,850		—		1,850

Financial Liabilities:
Deposits	$	495,136	$	—	$	495,235	$	—	$	495,235
Federal Home Loan Bank advances	30,000		—		30,249		—		30,249
Trust preferred capital notes	7,217		—		7,217		—		7,217
Accrued interest payable	155		—		155		—		155
Interest rate swap contract	314		—		314		—		314



	Fair Value Measurements at
	December 31, 2013
	Using
	Carrying Value as of		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets		Significant Other Observable Inputs		Significant Unobservable Inputs		Fair Value as of
	December 31, 2013		(Level 1)		(Level 2)		(Level 3)		December 31, 2013
	(in thousands)
Financial assets:
Cash and short-term investments	$	14,243	$	14,243	$	—	$	—	$	14,243
Securities	102,598		1,118		101,480		—		102,598
Restricted Investments	2,192		—		2,192		—		2,192
Loans, net	438,785		—		446,329		1,407		447,736
Accrued interest receivable	1,797		—		1,797		—		1,797

Financial liabilities:
Deposits	$	487,587	$	—	$	488,074	$	—	$	488,074
Federal Home Loan Bank advances	22,250		—		22,214		—		22,214
Trust preferred capital notes	7,217		—		7,217		—		7,217
Accrued interest payable	165		—		165		—		165
Interest rate swap contract	434		—		434		—		434

The Company assumes interest rate risk (the risk that general interest rate levels will change) during its normal operations. As a result, the fair value of the Company’s financial instruments will change when interest rate levels change and that change may be either favorable or unfavorable to the Company. Management attempts to match maturities of assets and liabilities in order to minimize interest rate risk. However, borrowers with fixed rate obligations are less likely to prepay their principal balance in a rising rate environment and more likely to do so in a falling rate environment. Conversely, depositors who are receiving fixed rate interest payments are more likely to withdraw funds before maturity in a rising rate environment and less likely to do so in a falling rate environment. Management monitors rates and maturities of assets and liabilities and attempts to minimize interest rate risk by adjusting the terms of new loans and deposits and by investing in securities with terms that mitigate the Company’s overall interest rate risk.

NOTE 11. Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities

Interest Rate Swaps

The Company uses interest rate swaps to reduce interest rate risk and to manage interest expense. By entering into these agreements, the Company converts floating rate debt into fixed rate debt, or alternatively, converts fixed rate debt into floating rate debt. Interest differentials paid or received under the swap agreements are reflected as adjustments to interest expense. These interest rate swap agreements are derivative instruments that qualify for hedge accounting as discussed in Note 1. The notional amounts of the interest rate swaps are not exchanged and do not represent exposure to credit loss. In the event of default by a counterparty, the risk in these transactions is the cost of replacing the agreements at current market rates.

On December 4, 2008, the Company entered into an interest rate swap agreement related to the outstanding trust preferred capital notes. The swap agreement became effective on December 1, 2008. The notional amount of the interest rate swap was $7.0 million and has an expiration date of December 1, 2016. Under the terms of the agreement, the Company pays interest quarterly at a fixed rate of 2.85% and receives interest quarterly at a variable rate of three month LIBOR. The variable rate resets on each interest payment date.

The following table summarizes the fair value of derivative instruments at September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013:



	September 30, 2014			December 31, 2013
	Balance Sheet Location	Fair Value		Balance Sheet Location	Fair Value
	(dollars in thousands)
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments under GAAP
Interest rate swap contracts	Other Liabilities	$	314	Other Liabilities	$	434

The following tables present the effect of the derivative instrument on the Consolidated Balance Sheet at September 30, 2014 and 2013 and the Consolidated Statements of Income for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013:



	Three Months Ended
	September 30,
Derivatives in GAAP Cash Flow Hedging Relationships	Amount of Gain (Loss) Recognized in OCI on Derivative (Effective Portion)				Location of Gain (Loss) Recognized in Income (Ineffective Portion)	Amount of Gain (Loss) Recognized in Income (Ineffective Portion)
Derivatives in GAAP Cash Flow Hedging Relationships	2014		2013			2014		2013
	(dollars in thousands)					(dollars in thousands)
Interest rate swap contracts, net of tax	$	41	$	1	Not applicable	$	—	$	—

	Nine Months Ended
	September 30,
Derivatives in GAAP Cash Flow Hedging Relationships	Amount of Gain (Loss) Recognized in OCI on Derivative (Effective Portion)				Location of Gain (Loss) Recognized in Income (Ineffective Portion)	Amount of Gain (Loss) Recognized in Income (Ineffective Portion)
Derivatives in GAAP Cash Flow Hedging Relationships	2014		2013			2014		2013
	(dollars in thousands)					(dollars in thousands)
Interest rate swap contracts, net of tax	$	79	$	109	Not applicable	$	—	$	—

NOTE 12. Change in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income

Accumulated other comprehensive income includes unrealized gains and losses on available for sale securities, change in fair value of interest rate swaps and changes in benefit obligations and plan assets for the post retirement benefit plan. Changes to other comprehensive income are presented net of tax effect as a component of equity. Reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income are recorded in the Consolidated Statements of Income either as a gain or loss.

Changes to accumulated other comprehensive income by components are shown in the following tables for the periods indicated:




	Three Months Ended
	September 30,
	2014											2013
	Unrealized Gains and Losses on Available for Sale Securities			Change in Fair Value of Interest Rate Swap			Change in Benefit Obligations and Plan Assets for the Post Retirement Benefit Plan		Total			Unrealized Gains and Losses on Available for Sale Securities			Change in Fair Value of Interest Rate Swap			Change in Benefit Obligations and Plan Assets for the Post Retirement Benefit Plan		Total
	(dollars in thousands)
July 1	$	1,766		$	(248	)	$	44	$	1,562		$	1,316		$	(311	)	$	43	$	1,048
Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications	(28		)	63			—		35			(355		)	1			—		(354		)
Reclassifications from other comprehensive income (loss)	(87		)	—			—		(87		)	—			—			—		—
Tax effect of current period changes	39			(22		)	—		17			120			—			—		120
Current period changes net of taxes	(76		)	41			—		(35		)	(235		)	1			—		(234		)
September 30	$	1,690		$	(207	)	$	44	$	1,527		$	1,081		$	(310	)	$	43	$	814



	Nine Months Ended
	September 30,
	2014											2013
	Unrealized Gains and Losses on Available for Sale Securities			Change in Fair Value of Interest Rate Swap			Change in Benefit Obligations and Plan Assets for the Post Retirement Benefit Plan		Total			Unrealized Gains and Losses on Available for Sale Securities			Change in Fair Value of Interest Rate Swap			Change in Benefit Obligations and Plan Assets for the Post Retirement Benefit Plan		Total
	(dollars in thousands)
January 1	$	547		$	(286	)	$	44	$	305		$	3,824		$	(419	)	$	43	$	3,448
Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications	1,824			120			—		1,944			(3,755		)	165			—		(3,590		)
Reclassifications from other comprehensive income (loss)	(93		)	—			—		(93		)	(400		)	—			—		(400		)
Tax effect of current period changes	(588		)	(41		)	—		(629		)	1,412			(56		)	—		1,356
Current period changes net of taxes	1,143			79			—		1,222			(2,743		)	109			—		(2,634		)
September 30	$	1,690		$	(207	)	$	44	$	1,527		$	1,081		$	(310	)	$	43	$	814

For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014, $87 thousand and $93 thousand, respectively, was reclassified out of comprehensive income and appeared as Gain on Sale of Securities in the Consolidated Statements of Income. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013, zero and $400 thousand, respectively, was reclassified out of comprehensive income and appeared as Gain on Sale of Securities in the Consolidated Statements of Income.

NOTE 13. Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In January 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-01, “Investments-Equity Method and Joint Ventures (Topic 323): Accounting for Investments in Qualified Affordable Housing Projects (a consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force).” The amendments in this ASU permit reporting entities to make an accounting policy election to account for their investments in qualified affordable housing projects using the proportional amortization method if certain conditions are met. Under the proportional amortization method, an entity amortizes the initial cost of the investment in proportion to the tax credits and other tax benefits received and recognizes the net investment performance in the income statement as a component of income tax expense (benefit). The amendments in this ASU should be applied retrospectively to all periods presented. A reporting entity that uses the effective yield method to account for its investments in qualified affordable housing projects before the date of adoption may continue to apply the effective yield method for those preexisting investments. The amendments in this ASU are effective for public business entities for annual periods and interim reporting periods within those annual periods, beginning after December 15, 2014. Early adoption is permitted. The Company is currently assessing the impact that ASU 2014-01 will have on its consolidated financial statements.

In January 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-04, “Receivables-Troubled Debt Restructurings by Creditors (Subtopic 310-40): Reclassification of Residential Real Estate Collateralized Consumer Mortgage Loans upon Foreclosure (a consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force).” The amendments in this ASU clarify that an in substance repossession or foreclosure occurs, and a creditor is considered to have received physical possession of residential real estate property collateralizing a consumer mortgage loan, upon either (1) the creditor obtaining legal title to the residential real estate property upon completion of a foreclosure or (2) the borrower conveying all interest in the residential real estate property to the creditor to satisfy that loan through completion of a deed in lieu of foreclosure or through a similar legal agreement. Additionally, the amendments require interim and annual disclosure of both (1) the amount of foreclosed residential real estate property held by the creditor and (2) the recorded investment in consumer mortgage loans collateralized by residential real estate property that are in the process of foreclosure according to local requirements of the applicable jurisdiction. The amendments in this ASU are effective for public business entities for annual periods, and interim periods within those annual periods, beginning after December 15, 2014. The Company is currently assessing the impact that ASU 2014-04 will have on its consolidated financial statements.

In April 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-08, “Presentation of Financial Statements (Topic 205) and Property, Plant, and Equipment (Topic 360): Reporting Discontinued Operations and Disclosures of Disposals of Components of an Entity.” The amendments in this ASU change the criteria for reporting discontinued operations while enhancing disclosures in this area. Under the new guidance, only disposals representing a strategic shift in operations should be presented as discontinued operations. Those strategic shifts should have a major effect on the organization’s operations and financial results and include disposals of a major geographic area, a major line of business, or a major equity method investment. The new guidance requires expanded disclosures about discontinued operations that will provide financial statement users with more information about the assets, liabilities, income, and expenses of discontinued operations. Additionally, the new guidance requires disclosure of the pre-tax income attributable to a disposal of a significant part of an organization that does not qualify for discontinued operations reporting. The amendments in the ASU are effective for public business entities for annual periods, and interim periods within those annual periods, beginning after December 15, 2014. Early adoption is permitted. The Company does not expect the adoption of ASU 2014-08 to have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.

In June 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers: Topic 606”. This ASU applies to any entity using U.S. GAAP that either enters into contracts with customers to transfer goods or services or enters into contracts for the transfer of nonfinancial assets unless those contracts are within the scope of other standards. The guidance supersedes the revenue recognition requirements in Topic 605, “Revenue Recognition”, most industry-specific guidance, and some cost guidance included in Subtopic 605-35, “Revenue Recognition-Construction-Type and Production-Type Contracts”. The core principle of the guidance is that an entity should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. To be in alignment with the core principle, an entity must apply a five step process including: identification of the contract(s) with a customer, identification of performance obligations in the contract(s), determination of the transaction price, allocation of the transaction price to the performance obligations, and recognition of revenue when (or as) the entity satisfies a performance obligation. Additionally, the existing requirements for the recognition of a gain or loss on the transfer of nonfinancial assets that are not in a contract with a customer have also been amended to be consistent with the guidance on recognition and measurement. The amendments in this ASU are effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim periods within that reporting period. Early adoption is not permitted. The Company is currently assessing the impact that ASU 2014-09 will have on its consolidated financial statements.

In June 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-10, “Development Stage Entities (Topic 915): Elimination of Certain Financial Reporting Requirements, Including an Amendment to Variable Interest Entities Guidance in Topic 810, Consolidation”. The amendments in this ASU remove all incremental financial reporting requirements from U.S. GAAP for development stage entities, including the removal of Topic 915, “Development Stage Entities”, from the FASB Accounting Standards Codification. In addition, this ASU adds an example disclosure and removes an exception provided to development stage entities in Topic 810, “Consolidation”, for determining whether an entity is a variable interest entity. The presentation and disclosure requirements in Topic 915 will no longer be required for the first annual period beginning after December 15, 2014. The revised consolidation standards are effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2015. Early adoption is permitted. The Company does not expect the adoption of ASU 2014-10 to have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.

In June 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-11, “Transfers and Servicing (Topic 860): Repurchase-to-Maturity Transactions, Repurchase Financings, and Disclosures”. This ASU aligns the accounting for repurchase-to-maturity transactions and repurchase agreements executed as a repurchase financing with the accounting for other typical repurchase agreements. The new guidance eliminates sale accounting for repurchase-to-maturity transactions and supersedes the guidance under which a transfer of a financial asset and a contemporaneous repurchase financing could be accounted for on a combined basis as a forward agreement. The amendments in the ASU also require a new disclosure for transactions economically similar to repurchase agreements in which the transferor retains substantially all of the exposure to the economic return on the transferred financial assets throughout the term of the transaction. Additional disclosures will be required for the nature of collateral pledged in repurchase agreements and similar transactions accounted for as secured borrowings. The amendments in this ASU are effective for the first interim or annual period beginning after December 15, 2014; however, the disclosure for transactions accounted for as secured borrowings is required to be presented for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2014, and interim periods beginning after March 15, 2015. Early adoption is not permitted. The Company is currently assessing the impact that ASU 2014-11 will have on its consolidated financial statements.

In June 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-12, “Compensation - Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Accounting for Share-Based Payments When the Terms of an Award Provide That a Performance Target Could Be Achieved after the Requisite Service Period”. The new guidance applies to reporting entities that grant employees share-based payments in which the terms of the award allow a performance target to be achieved after the requisite service period. The amendments in the ASU require that a performance target that affects vesting and that could be achieved after the requisite service period be treated as a performance condition. Existing guidance in “Compensation - Stock Compensation (Topic 718)”, should be applied to account for these types of awards. The amendments in this ASU are effective for annual periods and interim periods within those annual periods beginning after December 15, 2015. Early adoption is permitted and reporting entities may choose to apply the amendments in the ASU either on a prospective or retrospective basis. The Company is currently assessing the impact that ASU 2014-12 will have on its consolidated financial statements.

In August 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-15, “Presentation of Financial Statements - Going Concern (Subtopic 205-40): Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entity’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern”. This update is intended to provide guidance about management’s responsibility to evaluate whether there is substantial doubt about an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern and to provide related footnote disclosures. Management is required under the new guidance to evaluate whether there are conditions or events, considered in the aggregate, that raise substantial doubt about the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern within one year after the date the financial statements are issued when preparing financial statements for each interim and annual reporting period. If conditions or events are identified, the ASU specifies the process that must be followed by management and also clarifies the timing and content of going concern footnote disclosures in order to reduce diversity in practice. The amendments in this ASU are effective for annual periods and interim periods within those annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016. Early adoption is permitted. The Company does not expect the adoption of ASU 2014-15 to have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.

NOTE 14. Subsequent Events

The Company has evaluated events and transactions subsequent to September 30, 2014 through the date these financial statements were issued. Based on definitions and requirements of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles for “Subsequent Events”, the Company has not identified any events that would require adjustments to, or disclosure in the financial statements.

NOTE 15. Branch Activity

On February 25, 2014, the Company entered into a $1.8 million contract to purchase land to build its twelfth retail branch, located in Loudoun County, Virginia. The land was purchased for the $1.8 million contract price on August 27, 2014. On September 10, 2014, the Company entered into a $1.3 million contract to build its twelfth retail branch, located in Ashburn, Virginia. The branch is expected to be completed during Spring 2015.

The full service branch located at 3360 Valley Pike in Winchester, Virginia was closed to business on June 27, 2014.

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The purpose of this discussion is to focus on the important factors affecting the Company’s financial condition, results of operations, liquidity and capital resources. This discussion should be read in conjunction with the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements and the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements presented in Part I, Item 1, Financial Statements, of this Form 10-Q and Item 8, Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, of the 2013 Form 10-K.

GENERAL

Eagle Financial Services, Inc. is a bank holding company which owns 100% of the stock of Bank of Clarke County (the “Bank” and collectively with Eagle Financial Services, Inc., the “Company”). Accordingly, the results of operations for the Company are dependent upon the operations of the Bank. The Bank conducts commercial banking business which consists of attracting deposits from the general public and investing those funds in commercial, consumer and real estate loans and corporate, municipal and U.S. government agency securities. The Bank’s deposits are insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation to the extent permitted by law. At September 30, 2014, the Company had total assets of $606.2 million, net loans of $459.5 million, total deposits of $495.1 million, and shareholders’ equity of $71.3 million. The Company’s net income was $4.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2014.

MANAGEMENT’S STRATEGY

The Company strives to be an outstanding financial institution in its market by building solid sustainable relationships with: (1) its customers, by providing highly personalized customer service, a network of conveniently placed branches and ATMs, a competitive variety of products/services and courteous, professional employees, (2) its employees, by providing generous benefits, a positive work environment, advancement opportunities and incentives to exceed expectations, (3) its communities, by participating in local concerns, providing monetary support, supporting employee volunteerism and providing employment opportunities, and (4) its shareholders, by providing sound profits and returns, sustainable growth, regular dividends and committing to its local, independent status.

OPERATING STRATEGY

The Bank is a locally owned and managed financial institution. This allows the Bank to be flexible and responsive in the products and services it offers. The Bank grows primarily by lending funds to local residents and businesses at a competitive price that reflects the inherent risk of lending. The Bank attempts to fund these loans through deposits gathered from local residents and businesses. The Bank prices its deposits by comparing alternative sources of funds and selecting the lowest cost available. When deposits are not adequate to fund asset growth, the Bank relies on borrowings, both short and long term. The Bank’s primary source of borrowed funds is the Federal Home Loan Bank of Atlanta which offers numerous terms and rate structures to the Bank.

As interest rates change, the Bank attempts to maintain its net interest margin. This is accomplished by changing the price, terms, and mix of its financial assets and liabilities. The Bank also earns fees on services provided through its trust department, sales of investments through Eagle Investment Services, mortgage originations and deposit operations. The Bank also incurs noninterest expenses such as compensating employees, maintaining and acquiring fixed assets, and purchasing goods and services necessary to support its daily operations.

The Bank has a marketing department which seeks to develop new business. This is accomplished through an ongoing calling program whereby account officers visit with existing and potential customers to discuss the products and services offered. The Bank also utilizes traditional advertising such as television commercials, radio ads, newspaper ads, and billboards.

LENDING POLICIES

Administration and supervision over the lending process is provided by the Bank’s Credit Administration Department. The principal risk associated with the Bank’s loan portfolio is the creditworthiness of its borrowers. In an effort to manage this risk, the Bank’s policy gives loan amount approval limits to individual loan officers based on their position and level of experience. Credit risk is increased or decreased, depending on the type of loan and prevailing economic conditions. In consideration of the different types of loans in the portfolio, the risk associated with real estate mortgage loans, commercial loans and consumer loans varies based on employment levels, consumer confidence, fluctuations in the value of real estate and other conditions that affect the ability of borrowers to repay debt.

The Company has written policies and procedures to help manage credit risk. The Company utilizes a loan review process that includes formulation of portfolio management strategy, guidelines for underwriting standards and risk assessment, procedures for ongoing identification and management of credit deterioration, and regular portfolio reviews to establish loss exposure and to ascertain compliance with the Company’s policies.

The Bank uses a tiered approach to approve credit requests consisting of individual lending authorities, a senior management loan committee, and a director loan committee. Lending limits for individuals and the Senior Loan Committee are set by the Board of Directors and are determined by loan purpose, collateral type, and internal risk rating of the borrower. The highest individual authority (Category I) is assigned to the Bank’s President / Chief Executive Officer, Senior Loan Officer and Senior Credit Officer (approval authority only). Two officers in Category I may combine their authority to approve loan requests to borrowers with credit exposure up to $1.0 million on a secured basis and $500 thousand unsecured. Officers in Category II, III, IV, V, VI and VII have lesser authorities and with approval of a Category I officer may extend loans to borrowers with exposure of $500 thousand on a secured basis and $250 thousand unsecured. Loan exposures up to $1.0 million may be approved with the concurrence of two, Category I officers. Loans to borrowers with total credit exposures between $1.0 million and $3.0 million are approved by the Senior Loan Committee consisting of the President, Chief Operating Officer, Senior Loan Officer, Senior Credit Officer, and Chief Financial Officer. Approval of the Senior Loan Committee is required prior to being referred to the Director Loan Committee for approval. Loans exceeding $3 million and up to the Bank’s legal lending limit can be approved by the Director Loan Committee consisting of four directors (three directors constituting a forum). The Director’s Loan Committee also reviews and approves changes to the Bank’s Loan Policy as presented by management.

The following sections discuss the major loan categories within the total loan portfolio:

One-to-Four-Family Residential Real Estate Lending

Residential lending activity may be generated by the Bank’s loan officer solicitations, referrals by real estate professionals, and existing or new bank customers. Loan applications are taken by a Bank loan officer. As part of the application process, information is gathered concerning income, employment and credit history of the applicant. The valuation of residential collateral is provided by independent fee appraisers who have been approved by the Bank’s Directors Loan Committee. In connection with residential real estate loans, the Bank requires title insurance, hazard insurance and, if applicable, flood insurance. In addition to traditional residential mortgage loans secured by a first or junior lien on the property, the Bank offers home equity lines of credit.

Commercial Real Estate Lending

Commercial real estate loans are secured by various types of commercial real estate in the Bank’s market area, including multi-family residential buildings, commercial buildings and offices, small shopping centers and churches. Commercial real estate loan originations are obtained through broker referrals, direct solicitation of developers and continued business from customers. In its underwriting of commercial real estate, the Bank’s loan to original appraised value ratio is generally 80% or less. Commercial real estate lending entails significant additional risk as compared with residential mortgage lending. Commercial real estate loans typically involve larger loan balances concentrated with single borrowers or groups of related borrowers. Additionally, the repayment of loans secured by income producing properties is typically dependent on the successful operation of a business or a real estate project and thus may be subject, to a greater extent, to adverse conditions in the real estate market or the economy, in general. The Bank’s commercial real estate loan underwriting criteria require an examination of debt service coverage ratios, the borrower’s creditworthiness, prior credit history and reputation, and the Bank typically requires personal guarantees or endorsements of the borrowers’ principal owners.

Construction and Land Development Lending

The Bank makes local construction loans, primarily residential, and land acquisition and development loans. The construction loans are secured by residential houses under construction and the underlying land for which the loan was obtained. The average life of most construction loans is less than one year and the Bank offers both fixed and variable rate interest structures. The interest rate structure offered to customers depends on the total amount of these loans outstanding and the impact of the interest rate structure on the Bank’s overall interest rate risk. There are two characteristics of construction lending which impact its overall risk as compared to residential mortgage lending. First, there is more concentration risk due to the extension of a large loan balance through several lines of credit to a single developer or contractor. Second, there is more collateral risk due to the fact that loan funds are provided to the borrower based upon the estimated value of the collateral after completion. This could cause an inaccurate estimate of the amount needed to complete construction or an excessive loan-to-value ratio. To mitigate the risks associated with construction lending, the Bank generally limits loan amounts to 80% of the estimated appraised value of the finished home. The Bank also obtains a first lien on the property as security for its construction loans and typically requires personal guarantees from the borrower’s principal owners. Finally, the Bank performs inspections of the construction projects to ensure that the percentage of construction completed correlates with the amount of draws on the construction line of credit.

Commercial and Industrial Lending

Commercial business loans generally have more risk than residential mortgage loans, but have higher yields. To manage these risks, the Bank generally obtains appropriate collateral and personal guarantees from the borrower’s principal owners and monitors the financial condition of its business borrowers. Residential mortgage loans generally are made on the basis of the borrower’s ability to make repayment from employment and other income and are secured by real estate whose value tends to be readily ascertainable. In contrast, commercial business loans typically are made on the basis of the borrower’s ability to make repayment from cash flow from its business and are secured by business assets, such as commercial real estate, accounts receivable, equipment and inventory. As a result, the availability of funds for the repayment of commercial business loans is substantially dependent on the success of the business itself. Furthermore, the collateral for commercial business loans may depreciate over time and generally cannot be appraised with as much precision as residential real estate.

Consumer Lending

The Bank offers various secured and unsecured consumer loans, which include personal installment loans, personal lines of credit, automobile loans, and credit card loans. The Bank originates its consumer loans within its geographic market area and these loans are generally made to customers with whom the Bank has an existing relationship. Consumer loans generally entail greater risk than residential mortgage loans, particularly in the case of consumer loans which are unsecured or secured by rapidly depreciable assets such as automobiles. In such cases, any repossessed collateral on a defaulted consumer loan may not provide an adequate source of repayment of the outstanding loan balance as a result of the greater likelihood of damage, loss or depreciation. Consumer loan collections are dependent on the borrower’s continuing financial stability, and thus are more likely to be adversely affected by job loss, divorce, illness or personal bankruptcy. Furthermore, the application of various federal and state laws, including federal and state bankruptcy and insolvency laws, may limit the amount which can be recovered on such loans.

The underwriting standards employed by the Bank for consumer loans include a determination of the applicant’s payment history on other debts and an assessment of ability to meet existing obligations and payments on the proposed loan. The stability of the applicant’s monthly income may be determined by verification of gross monthly income from primary employment, and from any verifiable secondary income. Although creditworthiness of the applicant is the primary consideration, the underwriting process also includes an analysis of the value of the security in relation to the proposed loan amount.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES

The financial statements of the Company are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP). The financial information contained within these statements is, to a significant extent, based on measurements of the financial effects of transactions and events that have already occurred. A variety of factors could affect the ultimate value that is obtained when earning income, recognizing an expense, recovering an asset or relieving a liability. The Company uses historical loss factors as one element in determining the inherent loss that may be present in the loan portfolio. Actual losses could differ significantly from the historical factors that are used. In addition, GAAP itself may change from one previously acceptable method to another method. Although the economics of the transactions would be the same, the timing of events that would impact the transactions could change.

The allowance for loan losses is an estimate of the losses that may be sustained in the Company’s loan portfolio. As required by GAAP, the allowance for loan losses is accrued when their occurrence is probable and they can be estimated, including impairment losses based on the differences between the loan balance and the value of its collateral, the present value of future cash flows, or the price established in the secondary market. The Company’s allowance for loan losses has three basic components: the general allowance, the specific allowance and the unallocated allowance. Each of these components is determined based upon estimates that can and do change when actual events occur. The general allowance uses historical experience and other qualitative factors to estimate future losses and, as a result, the estimated amount of losses can differ significantly from the actual amount of losses which would be incurred in the future. However, the potential for significant differences is mitigated by continuously updating the loss history of the Company. The specific allowance is based upon the evaluation of specific loans on which a loss may be realized. Factors such as past due history, ability to pay, and collateral value are used to identify those loans on which a loss may be realized. Each of these loans is then evaluated to determine how much loss is estimated to be realized on its disposition. The sum of the estimated losses on the individual loans becomes the Company’s specific allowance. This process is inherently subjective and actual losses may be greater than or less than the estimated specific allowance. The unallocated allowance reflects the margin of imprecision inherent in the underlying assumptions used in the methodologies for estimating general and specific losses in the portfolio. As specific loans are identified or losses are experienced on these loans, they will be reflected within the general or specific allowances. Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements presented in Item 8, Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, of the 2013 Form 10-K, provides additional information related to the allowance for loan losses.

FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS

The Company makes forward looking statements in this report that are subject to risks and uncertainties. These forward looking statements include statements regarding our profitability, liquidity, allowance for loan losses, interest rate sensitivity, market risk, growth strategy, and financial and other goals. The words “believes,” “expects,” “may,” “will,” “should,” “projects,” “contemplates,” “anticipates,” “forecasts,” “intends,” or other similar words or terms are intended to identify forward looking statements. These forward looking statements are subject to significant uncertainties because they are based upon or are affected by factors including:


•	the ability to successfully manage growth or implement growth strategies if the Bank is unable to identify attractive markets, locations or opportunities to expand in the future;


•	competition with other banks and financial institutions, and companies outside of the banking industry, including those companies that have substantially greater access to capital and other resources;


•	the successful management of interest rate risk;


•	risks inherent in making loans such as repayment risks and fluctuating collateral values;


•	changes in general economic and business conditions in the market area;


•	reliance on the management team, including the ability to attract and retain key personnel;


•	changes in interest rates and interest rate policies;


•	maintaining capital levels adequate to support growth;


•	maintaining cost controls and asset qualities as new branches are opened or acquired;


•	demand, development and acceptance of new products and services;


•	problems with technology utilized by the Bank;


•	changing trends in customer profiles and behavior;


•	changes in banking and other laws and regulations; and


•	other factors described in Item 1A., “Risk Factors,” in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013.

Because of these uncertainties, actual future results may be materially different from the results indicated by these forward looking statements. In addition, past results of operations do not necessarily indicate future results.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Net Income

Net income for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 was $4.7 million, a decrease of $603 thousand or 11.36% as compared to net income for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 of $5.3 million. Basic earnings per share were $1.37 and $1.57 for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively. Diluted earnings per share were $1.37 and $1.56 for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively. Net income during the third quarter of 2014 and the third quarter of 2013 was $1.4 million and $1.5 million, respectively, a decrease of $120 thousand or 7.97%. Earnings per share, basic and diluted were $0.40 and $0.44 for the third quarter of 2014 and 2013, respectively.

Return on average assets (ROA) measures how efficiently the Company uses its assets to produce net income. Some issues reflected within this efficiency include the Company’s asset mix, funding sources, pricing, fee generation, and cost control. The ROA of the Company, on an annualized basis, for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013 was 1.06% and 1.23%, respectively.

Return on average equity (ROE) measures the utilization of shareholders’ equity in generating net income. This measurement is affected by the same factors as ROA with consideration to how much of the Company’s assets are funded by shareholders. The ROE of the Company, on an annualized basis, for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013 was 9.12% and 11.01%, respectively.

Net Interest Income

Net interest income is our primary source of revenue, representing the difference between interest and fees earned on interest-earning assets and the interest paid on deposits and other interest-bearing liabilities. The level of net interest income is impacted primarily by variations in the volume and mix of these assets and liabilities, as well as changes in interest rates. Net interest income was $17.3 million and $16.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively, which represents an increase of $511 thousand or 3.04%. Net interest income was $5.8 million and $5.7 million for the three months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively, which represents an increase of $106 thousand or 1.87%. Average interest earning assets increased $21.9 million from the three months ended September 30, 2013 to the three months ended September 30, 2014 while the average yield decreased 22 basis points over that same period.

Total interest income was $18.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013. Total interest income was $6.3 million for the third quarter of 2014 and 2013. Total interest expense was $1.5 million and $2.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively, which represents a decrease of $507 thousand or 25.74%. Total interest expense was $480 thousand and $627 thousand for the third quarter of 2014 and 2013, respectively, which represents a decrease of $147 thousand or 23.44%. This decrease is largely attributable to the prepayment of a $10.0 million FHLB advance with an interest rate of 4.07% during the fourth quarter of 2013. Average interest bearing liabilities increased $6.9 million from the three months ended September 30, 2013 to the three months ended September 30, 2014 while the rate on interest bearing liabilities decreased 16 basis points over the same period.

The net interest margin was 4.26% and 4.27% for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively. The net interest margin was 4.18% and 4.28% for the third quarter of 2014 and 2013, respectively. The net interest margin is calculated by dividing tax-equivalent net interest income by total average earnings assets. Tax-equivalent net interest income is calculated by adding the tax benefit on certain securities and loans, whose interest is tax-exempt, to total interest income then subtracting total interest expense. The tax rate used to calculate the tax benefit was 34% for 2014 and 2013. The following table reconciles tax-equivalent net interest income, which is not a measurement under accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP), to net interest income.

Net interest income and net interest margin may experience some additional decline as higher yielding assets are repriced or replaced at lower current market rates. This decline will likely occur more rapidly than the decline in cost of funds due to the low level of interest rates currently being paid on interest bearing liabilities.



	Three Months Ended				Nine Months Ended
	September 30,				September 30,
	2014		2013		2014		2013
	(in thousands)				(in thousands)
GAAP Financial Measurements:
Interest Income - Loans	$	5,397	$	5,446	$	16,317	$	16,120
Interest Income - Securities and Other Interest-Earnings Assets	856		848		2,482		2,675
Interest Expense - Deposits	241		269		730		883
Interest Expense - Other Borrowings	239		358		733		1,087
Total Net Interest Income	$	5,773	$	5,667	$	17,336	$	16,825
Non-GAAP Financial Measurements:
Add: Tax Benefit on Tax-Exempt Interest Income - Loans	$	32	$	22	$	74	$	70
Add: Tax Benefit on Tax-Exempt Interest Income - Securities	139		158		430		487
Total Tax Benefit on Tax-Exempt Interest Income	$	171	$	180	$	504	$	557
Tax-Equivalent Net Interest Income	$	5,944	$	5,847	$	17,840	$	17,382

The tax-equivalent yield on earning assets decreased 14 basis points from 4.75% for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 to 4.61% for the same period in 2014. During that same time, the tax-equivalent yield on securities decreased 6 basis points from 3.80% to 3.74%. The tax equivalent yield on loans decreased 30 basis points from 5.08% for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 to 4.78% for the same time period in 2014. The average rate on interest bearing liabilities decreased 18 basis points from 0.70% for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 to 0.52% for the same time period in 2014. The average rate on interest bearing deposits decreased 6 basis points from 0.35% to 0.29% during that same time. The Company’s management of interest rates on deposits contributed to the decrease in costs. In general, deposit pricing is done in response to monetary policy actions and yield curve changes. Also, local competition for funds affects the cost of time deposits, which are primarily comprised of certificates of deposit. The Company prefers to rely more heavily on non-maturity deposits, which include NOW accounts, money market accounts, and savings accounts. Changes in the average rate on interest-bearing liabilities can also be affected by the pricing on other sources of funds, namely borrowings. The Company utilizes overnight borrowings in the form of federal funds purchased, retail repurchase agreements and wholesale repurchase agreements. The average rate on these borrowings decreased 184 basis points from 2.91% to 1.07% for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2014, respectively. The cost of federal funds purchased is affected by the Federal Reserve’s changes in the federal funds target rate which remained at 0.25% during the third quarter of 2014. The rate on wholesale repurchase agreements was fixed at 3.54%, but matured on January 30, 2013 resulting in the significant decrease in yield. The Company has not borrowed funds through retail repurchase agreements since June 2011. The Company also borrows from the FHLB in the form of short and long term advances. The average rate on FHLB advances decreased 110 basis points from 3.40% to 2.30% for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2014. A $10.0 million FHLB advance with an interest rate of 4.07% was paid off in December 2013 resulting in a decrease of average rate. FHLB advances outstanding have increased by $7.8 million during 2014. However, the average balance of FHLB advances outstanding for the same period has decreased $4.6 million. There were no significant changes in asset mix during the nine months ended September 30, 2014.

As of July 1, 2014, the Company began deferring loan origination fees and related direct loan origination costs in accordance with ASC 310-20. This has a direct impact on the net interest margin and more specifically, the loan yield.

Provision for Loan Losses

The provision for loan losses is based upon management’s estimate of the amount required to maintain an adequate allowance for loan losses as discussed within the Critical Accounting Policies section above. The allowance represents an amount that, in management’s judgment, will be adequate to absorb any losses on existing loans that may become uncollectible. Management’s judgment in determining the level of the allowance is based on evaluations of the collectability of loans while taking into consideration such factors as trends in delinquencies and charge-offs, changes in the nature and volume of the loan portfolio, current economic conditions that may affect a borrower’s ability to repay and the value of collateral, overall portfolio quality and review of specific potential losses. This evaluation is inherently subjective because it requires estimates that are susceptible to significant revision as more information becomes available. The amount of provision for loan losses is affected by several factors including the growth rate of loans, net charge-offs, and the estimated amount of potential losses within the loan portfolio. The provision for loan losses was zero and $767 thousand for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively. The decrease in provision for loan losses is mainly reflective of two large recoveries recorded during the second quarter of 2014 combined with a low level of charge-offs. While the general reserve increased due to additional past due and nonaccrual loans identified during the third quarter, the specific reserve decreased based on updated appraisal values for impaired loans, therefore requiring no provision for the nine months ended September 30, 2014.

Noninterest Income

Total noninterest income for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013 was $4.4 million and $6.0 million, respectively, which represents a decrease of $1.6 million or 26.71%. Total noninterest income for the third quarter of 2014 and 2013 was $1.5 million and $1.6 million, respectively, which represents a decrease of $108 thousand or 6.83%. Management reviews the activities which generate noninterest income on an ongoing basis.

The following table provides the components of noninterest income for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, which are included within the respective Consolidated Statements of Income headings. Variances that the Company believes require explanation are discussed below the table.



	Three Months Ended									Nine Months Ended
	September 30,									September 30,
(dollars in thousands)	2014		2013		$ Change			% Change		2014		2013		$ Change			% Change
Income from fiduciary activities	$	212	$	296	$	(84	)	(28	)%	$	873	$	929	$	(56	)	(6	)%
Service charges on deposit accounts	332		377		(45		)	(12	)%	984		1,086		(102		)	(9	)%
Other service charges and fees	827		874		(47		)	(5	)%	2,307		3,117		(810		)	(26	)%
Gain on sale of securities	87		—		87			NM		93		400		(307		)	NM
Other operating income	15		34		(19		)	(56	)%	127		450		(323		)	(72	)%
Total noninterest income	$	1,473	$	1,581	$	(108	)	(7	)%	$	4,384	$	5,982	$	(1,598	)	(27	)%

NM - Not Meaningful

Income from fiduciary activities, generated by trust services offered through Eagle Investment Group, decreased $84 thousand or 28.38% from $296 thousand during the three months ended September 30, 2013 to $212 thousand during the three months ended September 30, 2014. The amount of income from fiduciary activities is determined by the number of active accounts and total assets under management. Also, income can fluctuate due to the number of estates settled within any period.

Service charges on deposit accounts decreased $45 thousand or 11.94% from $377 thousand during the three months ended September 30, 2014 to $332 thousand during the three months ended September 30, 2014. They decreased $102 thousand or 9.39% from $1.1 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2013 to $984 thousand during the nine months ended September 30, 2014. Service charges on deposit accounts are derived from the volume of demand and savings accounts generated through the Bank’s branch network. Although the Bank continues to see an increase in these account types, recent regulatory changes on the charging of fees on certain transactions have adversely impacted fee income.

Other service charges and fees decreased $810 thousand or 25.99% from $3.1 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2013 to $2.3 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2014. The amount of other service charges and fees is comprised primarily of commissions from the sale of non-deposit investment products, fees received from the Bank’s credit card program, fees generated from the Bank’s ATM/debit card programs, and fees generated from the origination of mortgage loans for the secondary market. The majority of this decrease is due to the sale of the merchant card portfolio which occurred in June 2013, resulting in gross proceeds of $450 thousand. This decrease can also be attributed to reduced activity in the origination of mortgage loans for the secondary market.

Other operating income decreased $323 thousand or 71.78% from $450 thousand to $127 thousand during the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2014, respectively. This decrease was mainly due to the accrual of life insurance benefits in the amount of $250 thousand during the second quarter of 2013. In addition, the Company received approximately $20 thousand in insurance proceeds during the second quarter of 2013 related to a power surge that damaged a significant amount of computer hardware in the main branch.

Noninterest Expenses

Total noninterest expenses increased $435 thousand or 2.96% from $14.7 million to $15.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2014. Total noninterest expenses increased $161 thousand or 3.11% for the three months ended September 30, 2013 and 2014. The efficiency ratio of the Company was 67.51% and 64.70% for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013. The efficiency ratio is not a measurement under accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. It is calculated by dividing noninterest expense by the sum of tax equivalent net interest income and noninterest income excluding gains and losses on the investment portfolio. The tax rate utilized is 34%.

The following table presents the components of noninterest expense for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, which are included within the respective Consolidated Statements of Income headings. Variances that the Company believes require explanation are discussed below the table.



	Three Months Ended									Nine Months Ended
	September 30,									September 30,
(dollars in thousands)	2014		2013		$ Change			% Change		2014			2013		$ Change			% Change
Salaries and employee benefits	$	3,017	$	2,926	$	91		3	%	$	8,768		$	8,477	$	291		3	%
Occupancy expenses	319		336		(17		)	(5	)%	963			936		27			3	%
Equipment expenses	197		151		46			30	%	546			497		49			10	%
Advertising and marketing expenses	159		150		9			6	%	417			421		(4		)	(1	)%
Stationary and supplies	74		57		17			30	%	238			203		35			17	%
ATM network fees	174		157		17			11	%	532			457		75			16	%
Other real estate owned expense	4		2		2			100	%	14			30		(16		)	(53	)%
(Gain) loss on the sale of other real estate owned	14		111		(97		)	NM		(3		)	58		(61		)	NM
FDIC assessment	94		92		2			2	%	261			285		(24		)	(8	)%
Computer software expense	252		185		67			36	%	664			504		160			32	%
Bank franchise tax	123		103		20			19	%	342			305		37			12	%
Professional fees	290		265		25			9	%	761			790		(29		)	(4	)%
Other operating expenses	616		637		(21		)	(3	)%	1,639			1,744		(105		)	(6	)%
Total noninterest expenses	$	5,333	$	5,172	$	161		3	%	$	15,142		$	14,707	$	435		3	%

NM - Not Meaningful

Equipment expenses increased $46 thousand or 30.46% from $151 thousand to $197 thousand during the three months ended September 30, 2013 and 2014, respectively. Equipment expenses increased $49 thousand or 9.86% from $497 thousand to $546 thousand during the three months ended September 30, 2013 and 2014, respectively. The increase in expense results from higher levels of equipment costs related to investments in updating the Company's delivery channels and support systems.

ATM network fees increased $75 thousand or 16.41% from $457 thousand to $532 thousand during the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2014, respectively. ATM network fees fluctuate based on the usage of ATM and debit cards.

Computer software expenses increased $67 thousand or 36.22% from $185 thousand to $252 thousand during the three months ended September 30, 2013 and 2014, respectively. Computer software expenses increased $160 thousand or 31.75% from $504 thousand to $664 thousand during the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2014, respectively. The increase in expense results from higher levels of software costs related to investments in updating the Company's delivery channels and support systems.

As discussed in Note 15 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, a full service branch location in Winchester was closed in June 2014. Until this property is sold, noninterest expenses are not expected to be impacted. All branch employees were relocated within the Company and occupancy expenses continue to be incurred in order to maintain the property. In addition, the Company has entered into a contract to purchase land for a new branch location in Loudoun County. This branch is not expected to open until 2015 and should not have any impact on noninterest expenses for the year ending December 31, 2014.

Income Taxes

Income tax expense was $1.9 million and $2.0 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively. These amounts correspond to an effective tax rate of 28.46% and 27.61% for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively. The difference between the effective tax rate and statutory income tax rate can be primarily attributed to tax-exempt interest earned on certain securities and loans.

FINANCIAL CONDITION

Securities

Total securities were $99.0 million at September 30, 2014, compared to $102.6 million at December 31, 2013. This represents a decrease of $3.6 million or 3.49%. The Company purchased $5.1 million in securities during the nine months ended September 30, 2014. The Company had total maturities and principal repayments of $9.3 million. There were $1.1 million in sales during the nine months ended September 30, 2014. The Company did not have any securities from a single issuer, other than U.S. government agencies, whose amount exceeded 10% of shareholders’ equity at September 30, 2014. Note 4 to the Consolidated Financial Statements provides additional details about the Company’s securities portfolio at September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013. The Company had an unrealized gain on available for sale securities of $2.6 million at September 30, 2014 as compared to an unrealized gain of $831 thousand at December 31, 2013. Unrealized gains or losses on available for sale securities are reported within shareholders’ equity, net of the related deferred tax effect, as accumulated other comprehensive income.

Loan Portfolio

The Company’s primary use of funds is supporting lending activities from which it derives the greatest amount of interest income. Gross loans were $465.1 million and $444.3 million at September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively. This represents an increase of $20.8 million or 4.68% during the nine months ended September 30, 2014. The ratio of loans to deposits increased during the nine months ended September 30, 2014 from 91.12% at December 31, 2013 to 93.93% at September 30, 2014.

The loan portfolio consists primarily of loans for owner-occupied single family dwellings, loans to acquire consumer products such as automobiles, and loans to small farms and businesses. Note 5 to the Consolidated Financial Statements provides the composition of the loan portfolio at September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013.

Loans secured by real estate were $419.8 million or 90.26% and $406.6 million or 91.52% of total loans at September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively. This represents an increase of $13.2 million or 3.24% during the nine months ended September 30, 2014. Consumer installment loans were $13.3 million or 2.86% and $13.8 million or 3.10% of total loans at September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively. This represents a decrease of $489 thousand or 3.55% during the nine months ended September 30, 2014. Commercial and industrial loans were $29.7 million or 6.39% and $20.9 million or 4.70% of total loans at September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively. This represents an increase of $8.8 million or 42.38% for the nine months ended September 30, 2014.

Allowance for Loan Losses

The purpose of, and the methods for, measuring the allowance for loan losses are discussed in the Critical Accounting Policies section above. Note 5 to the Consolidated Financial Statements shows the activity within the allowance for loan losses during the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013 and the year ended December 31, 2013. Charged-off loans were $515 thousand and $830 thousand for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively. Recoveries were $614 thousand and $204 thousand for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively. This resulted in net recoveries of $99 thousand and net charge-offs of $626 thousand for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively. The allowance for loan losses as a percentage of loans was 1.20% at September 30, 2014 and 1.24% at December 31, 2013. The allowance for loan losses was 54.31% of nonperforming assets at September 30, 2014 and 90.43% of nonperforming assets at December 31, 2013. Nonperforming assets increased by $4.2 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2014 due mainly to increases in nonaccrual loans. Despite this increase, management believes that the allowance for loan losses is currently adequate to absorb potential future losses inherent in the loan portfolio. Given the uncertainty in the economic environment, there is a potential for increases in past due loans, nonperforming loans and other real estate owned. However, the Company believes that the allowance for loan losses will be maintained at a level adequate to mitigate any negative impact resulting from such increases.

Nonperforming Assets and Other Assets

Nonperforming assets consist of nonaccrual loans, repossessed assets, other real estate owned (foreclosed properties), and loans past due 90 days or more and still accruing. Nonaccrual loans were $8.6 million and $4.4 million at September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively. Other real estate owned and repossessed assets were $1.6 million at September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013. The Company held five other real estate assets with an average balance of $329 thousand at September 30, 2014. At December 31, 2013, the company held five other real estate assets with an average balance of $329 thousand. The percentage of nonperforming assets to loans and other real estate owned was 2.20% at September 30, 2014 and 1.36% at December 31, 2013. There were $16 thousand in loans past due 90 days or more and still accruing interest at September 30, 2014. Total loans past due 90 days or more and still accruing interest were $11 thousand at December 31, 2013. Loans past due 30 days or more increased $4.0 million between December 31, 2013 and September 30, 2014. The majority of this increase was due to a few large balance loans and is not necessarily indicative of future trends in nonperforming assets.

During the nine months ended September 30, 2014, the Bank placed twenty-six loans totaling $5.0 million on nonaccrual status. All but two of these loans were secured by real estate. Management evaluates the financial condition of these borrowers and the value of any collateral on these loans. The results of these evaluations are used to estimate the amount of losses which may be realized on the disposition of these nonaccrual loans.

Loans are placed on nonaccrual status when collection of principal and interest is doubtful, generally when a loan becomes 90 days past due. There are three negative implications for earnings when a loan is placed on non-accrual status. First, all interest accrued but unpaid at the date that the loan is placed on non-accrual status is either deducted from interest income or written off as a loss. Second, accruals of interest are discontinued until it becomes certain that both principal and interest can be repaid. Finally, there may be actual losses that require additional provisions for loan losses to be charged against earnings.

For real estate loans, upon foreclosure, the balance of the loan is transferred to “Other Real Estate Owned” (“OREO”) and carried at the lower of the outstanding loan balance or the fair market value of the property based on current appraisals and other current market trends, less estimated selling costs. If a write down of the OREO property is necessary at the time of foreclosure, the amount is charged-off to the allowance for loan losses. A review of the recorded property value is performed in conjunction with normal loan reviews, and if market conditions indicate that the recorded value exceeds the fair market value, additional write downs of the property value are charged directly to operations.

In addition, the Company may, under certain circumstances, restructure loans in troubled debt restructurings as a concession to a borrower when the borrower is experiencing financial distress. Formal, standardized loan restructuring programs are not utilized by the Company. Each loan considered for restructuring is evaluated based on customer circumstances and may include modifications to one or more loan provisions. Such restructured loans are included in impaired loans. However, restructured loans are not necessarily considered nonperforming assets. At September 30, 2014, the Company had $5.5 million in restructured loans with specific allowances totaling $236 thousand. At December 31, 2013 , the Company had $6.4 million in restructured loans with specific allowances totaling $203 thousand. At September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, total restructured loans performing under the restructured terms and accruing interest were $4.0 million and $5.4 million, respectively. Eight loans, totaling $1.5 million, were in nonaccrual status at September 30, 2014. Five loans, totaling $1.0 million, were in nonaccrual status at December 31, 2013.

Deposits

Total deposits were $495.1 million and $487.6 million at September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively. This represents an increase of $7.5 million or 1.55% during the nine months ended September 30, 2014. Note 7 to the Consolidated Financial Statements provides the composition of total deposits at September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013.

Noninterest-bearing demand deposits which are comprised of checking accounts, increased $4.3 million or 2.89% from $147.7 million at December 31, 2013 to $152.0 million at September 30, 2014. Savings and interest-bearing demand deposits, which include NOW accounts, money market accounts and regular savings accounts increased $8.0 million or 3.32% from $240.7 million at December 31, 2013 to $248.7 million at September 30, 2014. Time deposits decreased $4.7 million or 4.74% from $99.1 million at December 31, 2013 to $94.4 million at September 30, 2014. This is comprised of a decrease in time deposits of $100,000 and more of $1.6 million or 4.35% and a decrease in time deposits of less than $100,000 of $3.1 million or 4.96%. Certificates of deposit also included $11.8 million and $12.0 million in brokered certificates of deposit at September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively.

CAPITAL RESOURCES

The Company continues to be a well capitalized financial institution. Total shareholders’ equity at September 30, 2014 was $71.3 million, reflecting a percentage of total assets of 11.76%, as compared to $66.4 million and 11.32% at December 31, 2013. During the first half of 2013 and 2014, the Company declared dividends of $0.57 per share. Total dividends paid during the year ended December 31, 2013 were $0.76 per share. The Company has a Dividend Investment Plan that reinvests the dividends of the shareholder in Company stock.

Federal regulatory risk-based capital guidelines require percentages to be applied to various assets, including off-balance sheet assets, based on their perceived risk in order to calculate risk-weighted assets. Tier 1 capital consists of total shareholders’ equity plus qualifying trust preferred securities outstanding less net unrealized gains and losses on available for sale securities, goodwill and other intangible assets. Total capital is comprised of Tier 1 capital plus the allowable portion of the allowance for loan losses and any excess trust preferred securities that do not qualify as Tier 1 capital. The $7.0 million in trust preferred securities, issued by the Company during 2007, qualifies as Tier 1 capital because this amount does not exceed 25% of total capital, including the trust preferred securities. For capital adequacy purposes, financial institutions must maintain a Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of at least 4%, a total risk-based capital ratio of at least 8% and a minimum Tier 1 leverage ratio of 4%. The Company’s policy requires a Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of at least 8%, a total risk-based capital ratio of at least 10% and a minimum Tier 1 leverage ratio of 5%. The Company’s Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio was 17.29% at September 30, 2014 as compared to 17.17% at December 31, 2013. The Company’s total risk-based capital ratio was 18.54% at September 30, 2014 as compared to 18.42% at December 31, 2013. The Company’s Tier 1 capital to average total assets ratio was 12.80% at September 30, 2014 as compared to 12.48% at December 31, 2013. The Company monitors these ratios on a quarterly basis and has several strategies, including without limitation the issuance of common stock, to ensure that these ratios remain above regulatory minimums.

The Company’s Tier 1 capital and total capital include $7.0 million of trust preferred securities. Under the changes to the regulatory capital framework that were approved on July 9, 2013 by the federal banking agencies (Basel III Final Rule), the Company's trust preferred securities will continue to be included in Tier 1 capital and total capital until they mature, pursuant to a "grandfathering" provision that exempts the Company's securities from the more stringent regulatory capital treatment contained in the Basel III Final Rule for trust preferred securities. In addition to "grandfathering" certain previously outstanding trust preferred securities for community banks, the Basel III Final Rule introduces a new Common Equity Tier 1 capital measure, increases the applicable minimum regulatory capital levels and certain prompt corrective action capital levels, and establishes a capital conservation buffer and new risk weights for certain types of assets. The Basel III Final Rule is effective for community banks on January 1, 2015 and has a transition period applicable to certain regulatory capital changes until January 1, 2019. The Company is currently assessing the impact that the Basel III Final Rule will have on its capital ratios.

LIQUIDITY

Liquidity management involves meeting the present and future financial obligations of the Company with the sale or maturity of assets or with the occurrence of additional liabilities. Liquidity needs are met with cash on hand, deposits in banks, federal funds sold, securities classified as available for sale and loans maturing within one year. At September 30, 2014, liquid assets totaled $199.5 million as compared to $201.8 million at December 31, 2013. These amounts represent 37.28% and 38.80% of total liabilities at September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively. The Company minimizes liquidity demand by utilizing core deposits to fund asset growth. Securities provide a constant source of liquidity through paydowns and maturities. Also, the Company maintains short-term borrowing arrangements, namely federal funds lines of credit, with larger financial institutions as an additional source of liquidity. Finally, the Bank’s membership with the Federal Home Loan Bank of Atlanta provides a source of borrowings with numerous rate and term structures. The Company’s senior management monitors the liquidity position regularly and attempts to maintain a position which utilizes available funds most efficiently.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

There have been no material changes in Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk as reported in the 2013 Form 10-K.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

Disclosure Controls and Procedures

The Company, under the supervision and with the participation of management, including the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of its disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. Based on that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of September 30, 2014 to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in reports that it files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in Securities and Exchange Commission rules and forms and that such information is accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Internal Control over Financial Reporting

Management is also responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over the Company’s financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended). The Company is currently using the 1992 COSO Framework.

There were no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting during the Company’s quarter ended September 30, 2014 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

PART II - OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

There are no material pending legal proceedings to which the Company is a party or of which the property of the Company is subject.

Item 1A. Risk Factors

There were no material changes to the Company’s risk factors as disclosed in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013.

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

None.

Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities

None.

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures

None.

Item 5. Other Information

None.

Item 6. Exhibits

The following exhibits are filed with this Form 10-Q and this list includes the exhibit index:



Exhibit No.			Description

31.1			Certification by Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

31.2			Certification by Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32.1			Certification by Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

101			The following materials from the Eagle Financial Service, Inc. Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2014 formatted in Extensible Business Reporting Language (XBRL): (i) Consolidated Balance Sheets, (ii) Consolidated Statements of Income, (iii) Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (iv) Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders' Equity, (v) Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows and (vi) notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized, this 12th day of November, 2014.

Eagle Financial Services, Inc.




By:		/S/ JOHN R. MILLESON
		John R. Milleson President and Chief Executive Officer

By:		/S/ KATHLEEN J. CHAPPELL
		Kathleen J. Chappell Vice President, Chief Financial Officer

EXHIBIT INDEX




Exhibit No.			Description

31.1			Certification by Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

31.2			Certification by Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32.1			Certification by Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

101			The following materials from the Eagle Financial Service, Inc. Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2014 formatted in Extensible Business Reporting Language (XBRL): (i) Consolidated Balance Sheets, (ii) Consolidated Statements of Income, (iii) Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (iv) Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders' Equity, (v) Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows and (vi) notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.