Bowater Incorporated
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED June 30, 2007 |
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
FOR THE TRANSITION PERIOD FROM TO |
COMMISSION FILE NUMBER: 1-1872
BOWATER INCORPORATED
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
62-0721803 |
|
|
|
(State of Incorporation)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
55 East Camperdown Way, P.O. Box 1028, Greenville, SC 29602
(Address of principal executive offices)(Zip Code)
(864) 271-7733
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to the filing requirements for at least the past 90 days.
Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer,
or a non-accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Large Accelerated Filer þ Accelerated Filer o Non-accelerated Filer o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act).
Yes o No þ
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of common stock, as of
August 1, 2007.
|
|
|
Class |
|
Outstanding at August 1, 2007 |
|
|
|
Common Stock, $1.00 Par Value
|
|
56,250,480 Shares |
BOWATER INCORPORATED
INDEX
2
BOWATER INCORPORATED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Unaudited, in millions of US dollars except share and per-share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
|
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
Sales |
|
$ |
798.6 |
|
|
$ |
899.4 |
|
|
$ |
1,570.2 |
|
|
$ |
1,792.6 |
|
Costs and expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales, excluding depreciation, amortization and cost of
timber harvested |
|
|
639.5 |
|
|
|
697.7 |
|
|
|
1,240.0 |
|
|
|
1,377.9 |
|
Depreciation, amortization and cost of timber harvested |
|
|
79.7 |
|
|
|
81.2 |
|
|
|
159.6 |
|
|
|
162.3 |
|
Distribution costs |
|
|
82.8 |
|
|
|
83.5 |
|
|
|
158.1 |
|
|
|
166.4 |
|
Selling and administrative expense |
|
|
46.3 |
|
|
|
41.3 |
|
|
|
95.0 |
|
|
|
79.3 |
|
Net gain on disposition of assets |
|
|
(64.6 |
) |
|
|
(71.7 |
) |
|
|
(122.5 |
) |
|
|
(100.5 |
) |
|
Operating income |
|
|
14.9 |
|
|
|
67.4 |
|
|
|
40.0 |
|
|
|
107.2 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(47.3 |
) |
|
|
(49.3 |
) |
|
|
(94.6 |
) |
|
|
(98.7 |
) |
Other (expense) income, net |
|
|
(14.3 |
) |
|
|
(1.7 |
) |
|
|
(18.7 |
) |
|
|
4.8 |
|
|
(Loss) income before income taxes, minority interests, and
cumulative effect of accounting change |
|
|
(46.7 |
) |
|
|
16.4 |
|
|
|
(73.3 |
) |
|
|
13.3 |
|
|
Income tax provision |
|
|
(17.9 |
) |
|
|
(26.3 |
) |
|
|
(19.6 |
) |
|
|
(39.4 |
) |
Minority interests, net of tax |
|
|
2.0 |
|
|
|
(0.7 |
) |
|
|
(5.1 |
) |
|
|
(0.7 |
) |
|
Loss before cumulative effect of accounting change |
|
|
(62.6 |
) |
|
|
(10.6 |
) |
|
|
(98.0 |
) |
|
|
(26.8 |
) |
|
Cumulative effect of accounting change, net of tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2.6 |
) |
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
(62.6 |
) |
|
$ |
(10.6 |
) |
|
$ |
(98.0 |
) |
|
$ |
(29.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic loss per common share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before cumulative effect of accounting change |
|
$ |
(1.09 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.18 |
) |
|
$ |
(1.71 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.46 |
) |
Cumulative effect of accounting change, net of tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.05 |
) |
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
(1.09 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.18 |
) |
|
$ |
(1.71 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.51 |
) |
|
Diluted loss per common share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before cumulative effect of accounting change |
|
$ |
(1.09 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.18 |
) |
|
$ |
(1.71 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.46 |
) |
Cumulative effect of accounting change, net of tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.05 |
) |
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
(1.09 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.18 |
) |
|
$ |
(1.71 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.51 |
) |
|
Average number of shares outstanding (in millions): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted |
|
|
57.4 |
|
|
|
57.4 |
|
|
|
57.4 |
|
|
|
57.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends declared per common share |
|
$ |
0.20 |
|
|
$ |
0.20 |
|
|
$ |
0.40 |
|
|
$ |
0.40 |
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
3
BOWATER INCORPORATED
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Unaudited, in millions of US dollars except share and per-share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
89.4 |
|
|
$ |
98.9 |
|
Accounts receivable, net |
|
|
426.6 |
|
|
|
444.5 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
383.4 |
|
|
|
349.8 |
|
Timberlands held for sale |
|
|
4.2 |
|
|
|
18.7 |
|
Other current assets |
|
|
67.8 |
|
|
|
47.1 |
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
971.4 |
|
|
|
959.0 |
|
|
Timber and timberlands |
|
|
58.3 |
|
|
|
60.8 |
|
Fixed assets, net |
|
|
2,782.0 |
|
|
|
2,877.9 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
590.7 |
|
|
|
590.2 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
145.3 |
|
|
|
158.0 |
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
4,547.7 |
|
|
$ |
4,645.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and shareholders equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current installments of long-term debt |
|
$ |
15.8 |
|
|
$ |
14.9 |
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities |
|
|
418.4 |
|
|
|
431.2 |
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
434.2 |
|
|
|
446.1 |
|
|
Long-term debt, net of current installments |
|
|
2,243.0 |
|
|
|
2,251.6 |
|
Pension and other postretirement benefits obligations |
|
|
648.9 |
|
|
|
651.1 |
|
Other long-term liabilities |
|
|
92.8 |
|
|
|
92.5 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
335.6 |
|
|
|
313.0 |
|
Minority interests in subsidiaries |
|
|
74.8 |
|
|
|
59.0 |
|
Commitments and contingencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $1 par value. Authorized 100,000,000 shares; issued
67,847,110 and 67,585,104 shares at June 30, 2007 and December 31,
2006, respectively |
|
|
67.8 |
|
|
|
67.6 |
|
Exchangeable shares, no par value. Unlimited shares authorized; 1,202,154
and 1,423,830 shares outstanding at June 30, 2007 and December 31,
2006, respectively |
|
|
56.8 |
|
|
|
67.6 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
1,648.0 |
|
|
|
1,630.1 |
|
Retained deficit |
|
|
(195.1 |
) |
|
|
(76.0 |
) |
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
|
|
(373.4 |
) |
|
|
(371.0 |
) |
Treasury stock at cost, 11,598,105 and 11,600,717 shares at June 30,
2007 and December 31, 2006, respectively |
|
|
(485.7 |
) |
|
|
(485.7 |
) |
|
Total shareholders equity |
|
|
718.4 |
|
|
|
832.6 |
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders equity |
|
$ |
4,547.7 |
|
|
$ |
4,645.9 |
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
4
BOWATER INCORPORATED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
(Unaudited, in
millions of US dollars except share and per-share amounts)
For the six months ended June 30, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
Common |
|
|
Exchangeable |
|
|
Paid In |
|
|
Retained |
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
Treasury |
|
|
Shareholders |
|
|
|
Stock |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Capital |
|
|
Deficit |
|
|
Loss |
|
|
Stock |
|
|
Equity |
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2006 |
|
$ |
67.6 |
|
|
$ |
67.6 |
|
|
$ |
1,630.1 |
|
|
$ |
(76.0 |
) |
|
$ |
(371.0 |
) |
|
$ |
(485.7 |
) |
|
$ |
832.6 |
|
|
Cumulative adjustment to retained deficit for the
adoption of FIN 48 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.3 |
|
|
Dividends on common stock ($0.40 per share) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(23.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(23.4 |
) |
|
Retraction of exchangeable shares (221,676 shares issued
and exchangeable shares retracted) |
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
(10.8 |
) |
|
|
10.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share-based compensation costs for equity awards |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.0 |
|
|
Restricted stock units vested (40,330 shares, net of shares
forfeited for employee withholding taxes) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.7 |
) |
|
Treasury stock used for dividend reinvestment plans and
to pay employee and director benefits (2,612 shares) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive loss: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(98.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(98.0 |
) |
Change in unrealized prior service costs, net of tax of $1.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.4 |
) |
Change in actuarial gains and losses, net of tax of $4.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16.8 |
|
Foreign currency translation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(18.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(18.6 |
) |
Change in unrealized gain on hedged transactions, net
of tax of $0.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(100.4 |
) |
|
Balance at June 30, 2007 |
|
$ |
67.8 |
|
|
$ |
56.8 |
|
|
$ |
1,648.0 |
|
|
$ |
(195.1 |
) |
|
$ |
(373.4 |
) |
|
$ |
(485.7 |
) |
|
$ |
718.4 |
|
|
For the six months ended June 30, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
Common |
|
|
Exchangeable |
|
|
Paid In |
|
|
Retained |
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
Treasury |
|
|
Shareholders |
|
|
|
Stock |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Capital |
|
|
Earnings |
|
|
Loss |
|
|
Stock |
|
|
Equity |
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2005 |
|
$ |
67.5 |
|
|
$ |
68.1 |
|
|
$ |
1,621.6 |
|
|
$ |
100.1 |
|
|
$ |
(156.0 |
) |
|
$ |
(485.8 |
) |
|
$ |
1,215.5 |
|
|
Cumulative adjustment to retained earnings for adoption
of SAB 108 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.6 |
|
|
Dividends on common stock ($0.40 per share) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(23.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(23.0 |
) |
|
Share-based compensation costs for equity awards |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
Comprehensive loss: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(29.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(29.4 |
) |
Minimum pension liability |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4.7 |
) |
Foreign currency translation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.8 |
|
Change in unrealized gain on hedged transactions, net
of tax of $9.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(45.7 |
) |
|
Balance at June 30, 2006 |
|
$ |
67.5 |
|
|
$ |
68.1 |
|
|
$ |
1,623.7 |
|
|
$ |
56.3 |
|
|
$ |
(172.3 |
) |
|
$ |
(485.8 |
) |
|
$ |
1,157.5 |
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
5
BOWATER INCORPORATED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited, in millions of US dollars)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
Cash flows from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
(98.0 |
) |
|
$ |
(29.4 |
) |
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash (used for)
provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative effect of accounting change, net of tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.6 |
|
Share-based compensation |
|
|
8.3 |
|
|
|
(0.8 |
) |
Depreciation, amortization and cost of timber harvested |
|
|
159.6 |
|
|
|
162.3 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
24.4 |
|
|
|
28.5 |
|
Minority interests, net of tax |
|
|
5.1 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
Net pension (contributions) benefit costs |
|
|
(11.1 |
) |
|
|
(11.3 |
) |
Net gain on disposition of assets |
|
|
(122.5 |
) |
|
|
(100.5 |
) |
Changes in working capital: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable, net |
|
|
17.9 |
|
|
|
(17.0 |
) |
Inventories |
|
|
(33.6 |
) |
|
|
8.7 |
|
Income taxes receivable and payable |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
(2.0 |
) |
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities |
|
|
(15.0 |
) |
|
|
(11.1 |
) |
Other, net |
|
|
9.0 |
|
|
|
11.8 |
|
|
Net cash (used for) provided by operating activities |
|
|
(55.8 |
) |
|
|
42.5 |
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash invested in fixed assets, timber and timberlands |
|
|
(51.1 |
) |
|
|
(90.6 |
) |
Dispositions of assets, including timber and timberlands |
|
|
147.4 |
|
|
|
238.1 |
|
Direct acquisition costs related to the proposed merger
with Abitibi-Consolidated Inc. |
|
|
(12.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by investing activities |
|
|
83.9 |
|
|
|
147.5 |
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash dividends |
|
|
(22.9 |
) |
|
|
(22.9 |
) |
Short-term financing |
|
|
8.0 |
|
|
|
289.9 |
|
Short-term financing repayments |
|
|
(8.0 |
) |
|
|
(351.5 |
) |
Payments of long-term debt |
|
|
(14.7 |
) |
|
|
(22.0 |
) |
|
Net cash used for financing activities |
|
|
(37.6 |
) |
|
|
(106.5 |
) |
|
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(9.5 |
) |
|
|
83.5 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning of period |
|
|
98.9 |
|
|
|
30.1 |
|
|
End of period |
|
$ |
89.4 |
|
|
$ |
113.6 |
|
|
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid during the year for: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest, including capitalized interest of $0.2 and $2.8 |
|
$ |
96.0 |
|
|
$ |
104.9 |
|
Income taxes |
|
$ |
1.0 |
|
|
$ |
7.2 |
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
6
BOWATER INCORPORATED
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements Unaudited
1. |
|
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies |
|
|
|
Basis of Presentation |
|
|
|
The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Bowater Incorporated
and subsidiaries (Bowater, also referred to as we or our). The consolidated balance sheet
as of June 30, 2007, and the related statements of operations, stockholders equity and cash
flows for the periods ended June 30, 2007 and 2006 are unaudited. In our opinion, all
adjustments (consisting of normal recurring adjustments) necessary for fair presentation of the
interim financial statements have been made. The results of the interim period ended June 30,
2007 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year. These
financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements
and related notes and critical accounting estimates included in our most recent Annual Report
on Form 10-K. Certain prior-year amounts in the financial statements and the notes have been
reclassified to conform to the 2007 presentation. The reclassifications had no effect on total
shareholders equity or net loss. |
|
|
|
On January 1, 2007, we adopted FASB Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in
Income Taxes-An Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109 (FIN 48). FIN 48 clarifies the
accounting for the uncertainty in income taxes recognized by prescribing the threshold a tax
position is required to meet before being recognized in the financial statements. As a result
of the adoption, we recorded a $2.3 million credit to our opening retained deficit balance in
2007. The credit represents the cumulative effect of adoption on prior periods. For additional
information regarding this adjustment, refer to Note 8, Income Taxes. |
|
|
|
In December 2006, we adopted the provisions of Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 108, Considering
the Effects of Prior Year Misstatements when Quantifying Misstatements in Current Year
Financial Statements (SAB 108). We elected, as allowed under SAB 108, to reflect the effect
of initially applying this guidance by adjusting the carrying amount of the impacted
liabilities as of the beginning of 2006 and recording an offsetting adjustment to the opening
balance of our retained earnings in 2006. We recorded a cumulative adjustment to increase our
retained earnings by $8.6 million for the adoption of SAB 108. |
|
2. |
|
Inventories |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
December 31, |
(Unaudited, in millions) |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
At lower of cost or market: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Raw materials |
|
$ |
66.0 |
|
|
$ |
87.7 |
|
Work in process |
|
|
21.1 |
|
|
|
20.1 |
|
Finished goods |
|
|
172.9 |
|
|
|
123.0 |
|
Mill stores and other supplies |
|
|
136.8 |
|
|
|
132.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
396.8 |
|
|
|
362.8 |
|
Excess of current cost over LIFO inventory value |
|
|
(13.4 |
) |
|
|
(13.0 |
) |
|
|
|
$ |
383.4 |
|
|
$ |
349.8 |
|
|
7
BOWATER INCORPORATED
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements Unaudited
3. |
|
Other (Expense) Income, Net |
|
|
|
Other (expense) income, net in the Consolidated Statements of Operations includes the
following: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
(Unaudited, in millions) |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
Foreign exchange losses |
|
$ |
(16.5 |
) |
|
$ |
(4.8 |
) |
|
$ |
(19.6 |
) |
|
$ |
(3.0 |
) |
(Losses) earnings from equity method investments |
|
|
(0.9 |
) |
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
|
(2.7 |
) |
|
|
4.2 |
|
Interest income |
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
3.5 |
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
Miscellaneous income, net |
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
(14.3 |
) |
|
$ |
(1.7 |
) |
|
$ |
(18.7 |
) |
|
$ |
4.8 |
|
|
4. |
|
Timberlands Held for Sale |
|
|
|
We are currently marketing for sale approximately 16,000 acres of timberlands in the United
States and Canada. The sale of these timberlands is expected to be completed in 2007.
Timberlands held for sale are carried on our Consolidated Balance Sheets at cost as we expect
the proceeds of the timberland sales to exceed the individual carrying values of the
timberlands sold. Deferred income taxes include $1.0 million and $4.8 million at June 30, 2007
and December 31, 2006, respectively, of deferred tax assets associated with these timberlands
held for sale. |
|
|
|
During the three months ended June 30, 2007, we sold approximately 55,600 acres of timberlands
and other assets for proceeds of $82.8 million. During the six months ended June 30, 2007, we
sold approximately 107,800 acres of timberlands and other assets for proceeds of $147.4 million |
|
|
|
During the three months ended June 30, 2006, we sold approximately 472,000 acres of
timberlands, our Baker Brook sawmill and other assets for proceeds of $201.3 million. During
the six months ended June 30, 2006, we sold approximately 496,800 acres of timberlands, our
Dégelis and Baker Brook sawmills and other assets for proceeds of approximately $238.1 million. |
|
5. |
|
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss |
|
|
|
The components of Accumulated other comprehensive loss in the Consolidated Balance Sheets are
as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
December 31, |
(Unaudited, in millions) |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
|
Unrealized prior service costs (1) |
|
$ |
(24.6 |
) |
|
$ |
(23.2 |
) |
Unrealized actuarial gains and losses (2) |
|
|
(342.1 |
) |
|
|
(358.9 |
) |
Unrealized transition obligation (3) |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
Foreign currency translation (4) |
|
|
(6.6 |
) |
|
|
12.0 |
|
Unrealized gain on hedging transactions (5) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.8 |
) |
|
|
|
$ |
(373.4 |
) |
|
$ |
(371.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Net of deferred tax benefit of $3.3 million and $1.5 million, respectively. Net of minority
interest of $2.3 million and $2.4 million, respectively. |
|
(2) |
|
Net of deferred tax benefit of $104.8
million and $109.6 million, respectively. Net of minority interest of $4.8 million and $5.2
million, respectively. |
|
(3) |
|
Net of deferred tax benefit of $0.1 million and $0.1 million,
respectively. |
|
(4) |
|
No tax effect is recorded for foreign currency translation since the foreign net
assets translated are deemed indefinitely invested. |
8
BOWATER INCORPORATED
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements Unaudited
|
|
|
|
(5) |
|
Net of a deferred tax benefit of $0.5 million for 2006. |
6. |
|
Loss Per Share |
|
|
|
The information required to compute net loss per basic and diluted share is as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
(Unaudited, in millions) |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
Basic weighted-average number of common shares
outstanding |
|
|
57.4 |
|
|
|
57.4 |
|
|
|
57.4 |
|
|
|
57.4 |
|
Effect of potentially dilutive securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted stock units |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted weighted-average number of common shares
outstanding |
|
|
57.4 |
|
|
|
57.4 |
|
|
|
57.4 |
|
|
|
57.4 |
|
|
|
|
No adjustments to net loss are necessary to compute net loss per basic and diluted share. The
dilutive effect of potentially dilutive securities is calculated using the treasury stock
method. Options to purchase 4.8 million shares for both the three and six months ended June 30,
2007, and 5.1 million shares for both the three and six months ended June 30, 2006, were
excluded from the calculation of diluted loss per share as the impact would have been
anti-dilutive. In addition, 1.0 million restricted stock units for both the three and six
months ended June 30, 2007, and 0.8 million restricted stock units for both the three and six
months ended June 30, 2006 were excluded from the calculation of diluted loss per share for the
same reason. |
|
7. |
|
Pension and Postretirement Expense |
|
|
|
The components of net periodic benefit costs relating to our pension and other postretirement
(OPEB) plans are as follows for the three and six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006: |
|
|
|
Pension Plans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
(Unaudited, in millions) |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
|
Components of net periodic benefit cost: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service cost |
|
$ |
9.2 |
|
|
$ |
11.0 |
|
|
$ |
18.3 |
|
|
$ |
21.9 |
|
Interest cost |
|
|
31.6 |
|
|
|
30.0 |
|
|
|
61.9 |
|
|
|
59.2 |
|
Expected return on plan assets |
|
|
(33.4 |
) |
|
|
(30.6 |
) |
|
|
(65.5 |
) |
|
|
(60.2 |
) |
Amortization of prior service cost |
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
1.4 |
|
|
|
2.3 |
|
|
|
2.8 |
|
Amortization of net actuarial loss |
|
|
7.0 |
|
|
|
8.8 |
|
|
|
13.8 |
|
|
|
17.7 |
|
Special termination benefits |
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
Curtailment and settlement losses |
|
|
2.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.4 |
|
|
|
4.6 |
|
|
Net periodic benefit cost |
|
$ |
22.5 |
|
|
$ |
20.6 |
|
|
$ |
42.2 |
|
|
$ |
46.0 |
|
|
9
BOWATER INCORPORATED
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements Unaudited
OPEB Plans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
(Unaudited, in millions) |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Components of net periodic benefit cost: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service cost |
|
$ |
0.5 |
|
|
$ |
1.0 |
|
|
$ |
1.0 |
|
|
$ |
2.0 |
|
Interest cost |
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
6.2 |
|
|
|
8.0 |
|
Amortization of prior service credit |
|
|
(2.8 |
) |
|
|
(1.5 |
) |
|
|
(5.6 |
) |
|
|
(3.0 |
) |
Amortization of net actuarial loss |
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
|
2.0 |
|
|
|
3.2 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
Curtailment and settlement gains |
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3.5 |
) |
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
Net periodic benefit cost |
|
$ |
2.1 |
|
|
$ |
5.5 |
|
|
$ |
1.3 |
|
|
$ |
10.8 |
|
|
|
|
Since the measurement date of our pension and OPEB plans is 90 days prior to the start of our year,
curtailment gains and losses that arise during the year are recorded on a 90-day lag. |
|
|
|
In December 2006, January 2007 and March 2007, certain employees received lump-sum payouts from two
of our retirement pension plans. Accordingly, settlement losses of $1.1 million and $5.6 million
were included in the net periodic benefit cost of our pension plans during the three and six months
ended June 30, 2007, respectively. |
|
|
|
In February 2007, union members at our Thunder Bay, Ontario facility ratified a new labor
agreement. As a result of a mill-wide restructuring of this facility, 157 jobs are being
eliminated. A curtailment loss of approximately $1.8 million and the cost of special termination
benefits of $4.0 million were included in the net periodic benefit cost of our pension plans during
the three and six months ended June 30, 2007, and a curtailment gain of $0.3 million was included
in the net periodic benefit cost of our OPEB plans during the three and six months ended June 30,
2007 as a result of the employee reduction. This event will also result in a settlement loss at the
time the benefits are paid. |
|
|
|
In October 2006, Bowater approved changes to its other postretirement plan for its U.S. salaried
employees. Benefits for employees were either eliminated or reduced depending on whether the
employee met certain age and years of service criteria. A curtailment gain of $3.2 million was
included in the net periodic benefit cost of our OPEB plans during the six months ended June 30,
2007. |
|
|
|
The curtailment loss of $4.6 million and curtailment gain of $0.2 million included in net periodic
benefit cost for our pension and OPEB plans, respectively, during the six months ended June 30,
2006 is due to the reduction of employees at our Thunder Bay A kraft pulp mill. |
|
|
|
In May 2007, union members at our Gatineau, Quebec facility ratified a new labor agreement. As a
result of a mill-wide restructuring of this facility, 143 jobs are being eliminated. A curtailment
loss of approximately $1.7 million will be recorded in the third quarter of 2007 as a result of the
employee reduction. |
10
BOWATER INCORPORATED
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements Unaudited
8. |
|
Income Taxes |
|
|
|
The income tax provision attributable to loss before income taxes, minority interests and
cumulative effect of accounting change differs from the amounts computed by applying the United
States federal statutory income tax rate of 35% as a result of the following: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
(Unaudited, in millions) |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
(Loss) income before income taxes, minority
interests and cumulative effect of accounting
change |
|
$ |
(46.7 |
) |
|
$ |
16.4 |
|
|
$ |
(73.3 |
) |
|
$ |
13.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expected income tax benefit (provision) |
|
|
16.4 |
|
|
|
(5.8 |
) |
|
|
25.7 |
|
|
|
(4.7 |
) |
Increase (decrease) in income taxes resulting
from: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Valuation allowance (1) |
|
|
(24.3 |
) |
|
|
(42.1 |
) |
|
|
(37.3 |
) |
|
|
(55.6 |
) |
Foreign exchange |
|
|
(16.5 |
) |
|
|
(10.2 |
) |
|
|
(17.3 |
) |
|
|
(12.6 |
) |
State income taxes, net of federal income
tax benefit |
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
|
|
(1.1 |
) |
|
|
(0.4 |
) |
|
|
(1.9 |
) |
Foreign taxes (2) |
|
|
6.9 |
|
|
|
29.4 |
|
|
|
11.3 |
|
|
|
30.4 |
|
Other, net |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
3.5 |
|
|
|
(1.6 |
) |
|
|
5.0 |
|
|
Income tax provision |
|
$ |
(17.9 |
) |
|
$ |
(26.3 |
) |
|
$ |
(19.6 |
) |
|
$ |
(39.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Income tax benefits generated on our Canadian operating losses were entirely offset by tax
charges to increase our valuation allowance related to these tax benefits. |
|
(2) |
|
Foreign taxes benefited by $4.4 million in the six months ended June 30, 2007 and $15.2
million in the three and six months ended June 30, 2006 due to capital gains treatment of
certain asset sales. |
|
|
We adopted the provisions of FIN 48 on January 1, 2007. As a result of the implementation of
FIN 48, we decreased our liability for unrecognized tax benefits by $2.3 million, which was
accounted for as a decrease to our January 1, 2007 retained deficit balance. Our liability for
unrecognized tax benefits as of January 1, 2007 is $28.3 million, which includes interest of
$0.6 million. We recognize interest and penalties accrued related to unrecognized tax benefits
as components of income tax expense. The total amount of unrecognized tax benefits that, if
recognized, would affect the effective tax rate is $23.1 million, which includes $0.6 million
of interest. If recognized, these items would impact the Consolidated Statements of Operations
and our effective tax rate. We anticipate that the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits
will decrease by approximately $7.0 million to $8.5 million during the next twelve months due
to certain U.S. statutes of limitations closing, primarily in the third quarter of 2007. The
approximately $7.0 million to $8.5 million of unrecognized tax benefits is attributable to
various U.S. income tax issues. We remain subject to income tax examination in Canada for tax
years 2002-2006, in Korea for tax years 2005-2006 and in the U.S. for tax years 2003-2006. |
|
9. |
|
Financial Instruments |
|
|
|
Bowater utilizes certain derivative instruments to enhance its ability to manage risk relating
to cash flow exposure. Derivative instruments are entered into for periods consistent with
related underlying cash flow exposures and do not constitute positions independent of those
exposures. We do not enter into contracts for speculative purposes; however, we do from time to time enter into commodity
and currency option contracts that are not accounted for as accounting hedges. Counterparty
risk is limited to institutions with long-term debt ratings of A or better for North American
financial institutions or ratings of AA or better for international institutions. |
11
BOWATER INCORPORATED
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements Unaudited
|
|
For derivatives that qualify for hedge accounting (currently only the Canadian dollar forward
contracts), we designate the derivative as a cash flow hedge at the inception of the hedge. We
formally document all relationships between the hedging instruments and the hedged items, as well
as our risk-management objectives and strategies for undertaking the various hedge transactions. We
link all hedges that are designated as cash flow hedges to forecasted transactions. Under the terms
of our risk management policy, we may enter into derivative contracts to hedge forecasted
transactions for a period not to exceed two years. We also assess, both at the inception of the
hedge and on an on-going basis, whether the derivatives that are used in hedging transactions are
highly effective in offsetting changes in cash flows of the hedged items. If it is determined that
a derivative is no longer highly effective as a hedge, we discontinue hedge accounting
prospectively. |
|
|
|
Canadian Dollar Forward Contracts |
|
|
|
We pay a significant portion of the operating expenses of our Canadian mill sites in Canadian
dollars. To reduce our exposure to U.S. and Canadian dollar exchange rate fluctuations, we
periodically enter into and designate Canadian dollar forward contracts to hedge certain of the
forecasted Canadian dollar cash outflows at our Canadian mill operations, which we believe are
likely to occur. There were no hedging contracts outstanding at June 30, 2007. Hedge
ineffectiveness associated with our Canadian dollar forward contracts was not material for the
periods presented in our Consolidated Financial Statements. |
|
|
|
British Pound Sterling Forward Contracts |
|
|
|
We have entered into sales agreements denominated in British pound sterling. Beginning in the first
quarter of 2007, we entered into currency forward contracts to partially limit our exposure to
British pound sterling-U.S. dollar exchange rate fluctuations. These currency forward contracts,
which do not currently meet the requirements for hedge accounting treatment, have been recorded at
fair value in the Consolidated Statement of Operations. As a result, approximately $0.8 million and
$0.7 million of pre-tax losses were recognized for the three and six months ended June 30, 2007,
respectively, for contracts that we entered into to economically hedge forecasted transactions
expected to occur through December 31, 2007. |
|
|
|
Natural Gas Swap Agreements |
|
|
|
Beginning in the third quarter of 2006, we entered into natural gas swap agreements under our
natural gas hedging program for the purpose of reducing the risk inherent in fluctuating natural
gas prices. Our hedged natural gas costs are billed to us based on a publicly traded index plus a
fixed amount. The natural gas swap agreements allow us to minimize the effect of fluctuations in
those indices by contractually exchanging the publicly traded index upon which we are billed for a
fixed index of natural gas cost. The swap agreements, which do not currently meet the requirements
for hedge accounting treatment, have been recorded at fair value in the Consolidated Statement of
Operations. As a result, approximately $1.1 million of pre-tax losses and $0.1 million of pre-tax
gains were recognized for the three and six months ended June 30, 2007, respectively, for contracts
that we entered into in 2006 and 2007 to economically hedge forecasted transactions expected to
occur through July 2008. |
12
BOWATER INCORPORATED
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements Unaudited
|
|
Information regarding our outstanding British pound sterling and natural gas swap contracts
notional amount, fair market value, and range of exchange rates or natural gas price index prices
is summarized in the table below. The notional amount of these contracts represents the amount of
foreign currencies or natural gas to be purchased or sold at maturity and does not represent our
exposure on these contracts. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Range Of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
US$/CDN$ and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
US$/GBP |
|
|
Notional |
|
|
|
|
|
Exchange Rates |
(Unaudited, in millions of U.S. dollars |
|
Amount of |
|
Asset /(Liability) |
|
and Natural Gas |
except rates and prices) |
|
Derivatives |
|
Fair Market Value |
|
Index Prices |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of June 30, 2007: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign Currency Exchange Agreements: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
British pound sterling |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Due in 2007 |
|
$ |
40.3 |
|
|
$ |
(0.5 |
) |
|
$ |
1.9553 1.9992 |
|
Natural Gas Swap Agreements: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Due in 2007 |
|
$ |
6.1 |
|
|
$ |
(0.5 |
) |
|
$ |
6.15 9.53 |
|
Due in 2008 |
|
$ |
1.4 |
|
|
$ |
0.1 |
|
|
$ |
6.99 9.87 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2006: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign Currency Exchange Agreements: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canadian dollar |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Due in 2007 |
|
$ |
76.0 |
|
|
$ |
(0.4 |
) |
|
$ |
.8592 .8801 |
|
Natural Gas Swap Agreements: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Due in 2007 |
|
$ |
9.0 |
|
|
$ |
(1.1 |
) |
|
$ |
5.87 8.98 |
|
|
|
|
The counterparties to our derivative financial instruments are substantial and creditworthy
multi-national financial institutions. The risk of counterparty nonperformance is considered to be
remote, and no individual financial institution holds more than 34% of our derivative financial
instruments. |
|
|
|
The components of the cash flow hedges included in Accumulated other comprehensive loss are as
follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
(Unaudited, in millions) |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Gains) losses reclassified to earnings on matured cash flow hedges |
|
$ |
(0.2 |
) |
|
$ |
(11.6 |
) |
|
$ |
1.1 |
|
|
$ |
(29.2 |
) |
Unrealized gains for change in value on
outstanding cash flow hedges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.6 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
4.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
(8.0 |
) |
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
|
(24.8 |
) |
Income tax benefit |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
3.0 |
|
|
|
(0.5 |
) |
|
|
9.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (increase) decrease in Accumulated other
comprehensive loss |
|
$ |
(0.1 |
) |
|
$ |
(5.0 |
) |
|
$ |
0.8 |
|
|
$ |
(15.4 |
) |
|
10. |
|
Commitments and Contingencies |
|
|
|
Bowater is involved in various legal proceedings relating to contracts, commercial disputes,
taxes, environmental issues, employment and workers compensation claims and other matters. We
periodically review the status of |
13
BOWATER INCORPORATED
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements Unaudited
|
|
these proceedings with both inside and outside counsel. We believe that the ultimate
disposition of these matters will not have a material adverse effect on our financial
condition, but it could have a material adverse effect on the results of operations in a given
quarter or the year. |
|
|
|
On September 30, 2005, the Ministry of Justice of the Province of Quebec (MOJ) cited one of our
subsidiaries, Bowater Canadian Forest Products, Inc. (BCFPI), in connection with effluent water
quality of the Dolbeau mill. BCFPI settled this citation on March 29, 2007, by agreeing to pay
a fine and costs totaling CDN$158,000. The Dolbeau mill has taken steps to improve its effluent
quality and has experienced only two other exceedences since January 1, 2005. |
|
|
|
On June 18, 2007, The Levin Group, L.P. filed a complaint against Bowater in the Supreme Court
of New York, New York County, asserting claims for breach of contract and related claims
relating to certain advisory services purported to have been provided by the plaintiff in
connection with the combination (See Note 14). The complaint seeks damages of no less than $70
million, related costs and such other relief as the court deems just and proper. The management
of Bowater believes this claim is entirely without merit and intends to contest this matter. |
|
|
|
There have been no material developments to those legal proceedings described in our Annual
Report on Form 10-K filed on March 13, 2007. |
|
11. |
|
Share-Based Compensation |
|
|
|
We maintain incentive stock plans that provide for grants of stock options, equity
participation rights (EPRs) and restricted stock units to our directors, officers and key
employees. These plans are described more fully in our 2006 Annual Report on Form 10-K. |
|
|
|
Effective January 1, 2006, we adopted the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS No. 123R,
Share-based Payments and related interpretations (SFAS 123R). The adoption of SFAS 123R
resulted in a charge for the cumulative effect of accounting change of $2.6 million, net of
tax, (or $0.05 per share) that we recorded in the first quarter of 2006. |
|
|
|
The following table details the share-based compensation expense (excluding the cumulative
effect of accounting change) recorded in the Consolidated Statements of Operations by award: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
(Unaudited, in millions) |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
Stock options |
|
$ |
0.3 |
|
|
$ |
0.2 |
|
|
$ |
0.6 |
|
|
$ |
0.2 |
|
Restricted stock units |
|
|
3.2 |
|
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
|
7.4 |
|
|
|
1.9 |
|
EPRs |
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
(2.0 |
) |
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
(2.9 |
) |
|
Stock-based compensation expense (income) |
|
$ |
3.7 |
|
|
$ |
0.1 |
|
|
$ |
8.3 |
|
|
$ |
(0.8 |
) |
|
|
|
The following table details the tax (benefit) provision by award: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
(Unaudited, in millions) |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
Stock options |
|
$ |
(0.1 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.1 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.3 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.1 |
) |
Restricted stock units |
|
|
(0.9 |
) |
|
|
(0.4 |
) |
|
|
(2.0 |
) |
|
|
(0.4 |
) |
EPRs |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
Tax (benefit) provision |
|
$ |
(1.1 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(2.4 |
) |
|
$ |
0.2 |
|
|
14
BOWATER INCORPORATED
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements Unaudited
|
|
On January 30, 2007, we granted 72,146 stock options. The awards cliff vest after three years and
allow for accelerated vesting upon a grantees retirement. We have recognized compensation expense
based on the requisite service period, which is less than three years for certain employees who are
eligible for retirement as of the date of the grant or become eligible for retirement during the
vesting period. We issued 350,630 stock options in May 2006, which either cliff vest after 32
months (100,630 shares) or vest ratably over 36 months (250,000 shares). |
|
|
|
A summary of option activity under our stock plans as of and for the six months ended June 30, 2007
is presented below: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
Average |
|
Aggregate |
|
|
Number Of |
|
Average |
|
Remaining |
|
Intrinsic |
|
|
Options |
|
Exercise |
|
Contractual |
|
Value |
(Unaudited) |
|
(000s) |
|
Price |
|
Life (years) |
|
($000) |
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2006 |
|
|
4,982 |
|
|
$ |
43.45 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted during the period |
|
|
72 |
|
|
|
27.87 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised during the period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canceled during the period |
|
|
(249 |
) |
|
|
42.77 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at June 30, 2007 |
|
|
4,805 |
|
|
$ |
43.25 |
|
|
|
4.7 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
Exercisable at June 30, 2007 |
|
|
4,511 |
|
|
$ |
44.28 |
|
|
|
4.4 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
In accordance with SFAS 123R, we estimated the fair value of each stock option granted during the
six months ended June 30, 2007 on the date of grant using a Black-Scholes option-pricing formula,
applying weighted-average assumptions which are consistent with the assumptions described in Note
21 Share-Based Compensation included in our most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K, and amortize
that value to expense over the options requisite service period using the straight-line
attribution approach. The weighted-average fair value of options granted during the six months
ended June 30, 2007 was $9.08. |
|
|
|
During the three and six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, all vested options had a strike price
greater than the closing price of our common stock (i.e., were out-of-the-money), and there were
no stock option exercises during those periods. |
|
|
|
As of June 30, 2007, there was $1.9 million of unrecognized compensation cost related to stock
option awards granted under our stock plans. The unrecognized cost is expected to be recognized
over a weighted-average period of 1.9 years. |
|
|
|
Restricted Stock Units |
|
|
|
On January 30, 2007, we granted 327,945 restricted stock units (RSUs), all of which are
service-based awards. The awards cliff vest after three years and allow for accelerated vesting
upon a grantees retirement. We have recognized compensation expense based on the requisite service
period, which is less than three years for certain employees who are eligible for retirement as of
the date of the grant or will become eligible for retirement during the vesting period. |
|
|
|
On February 7, 2007, we granted 36,101 RSUs, all of which are performance-based awards. These
awards vest upon closing of the merger of Bowater and Abitibi-Consolidated Inc. (Abitibi), or
upon cancellation of the merger if the cancellation is due to a failure to receive regulatory
approval or Abitibis acts or failures to act. Accounting guidance dictates that, for purposes of
recognizing compensation expense for this type of award, the business combination is not considered
probable until the date the merger is consummated. As vesting of these awards is predicated upon
close of the merger or other events related to
the business combination, no compensation expense will be recorded for these awards until
consummation of the merger. In the event of the consummation of the merger, $1.0 million of
compensation expense will be immediately recognized. These awards are included in our outstanding
RSUs at the end of the period. |
15
BOWATER INCORPORATED
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements Unaudited
|
|
On March 23, 2007, we granted 54,200 RSUs, all of which are performance-based awards. The vesting
of these awards is contingent upon the realization of certain synergies within two years of
consummation of the AbitbiBowater merger. The key terms and conditions of these RSUs have not been
finalized; therefore a grant date for FAS 123R purposes has not occurred. As such, no compensation
expense was recorded during the three and six months ended June 30, 2007, nor were these awards
included in our outstanding RSUs at the end of the period. |
|
|
|
On May 10, 2006, we issued four separate grants of restricted stock units totaling 775,529 shares,
of which 43,530 shares are performance-based awards. The performance-based awards cliff vest after
32 months. The remaining shares, which are service-based awards, cliff vest after 32 months
(178,342 shares), 20 months (503,657 shares) or 12 months (50,000 shares). |
|
|
|
A summary of the status of our restricted stock units as of and for the six months ended June 30,
2007, is presented below: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number |
|
Weighted Average |
|
|
Of Units |
|
Fair Value at |
(Unaudited) |
|
(000s) |
|
Grant Date |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2006 |
|
|
665 |
|
|
$ |
26.11 |
|
Granted during the period |
|
|
364 |
|
|
|
27.85 |
|
Vested during the period |
|
|
(54 |
) |
|
|
26.35 |
|
Forfeited during the period |
|
|
(14 |
) |
|
|
26.64 |
|
|
Outstanding at June 30, 2007 |
|
|
961 |
|
|
$ |
26.75 |
|
|
|
|
As of June 30, 2007, there was $11.4 million of unrecognized compensation cost related to
restricted stock units granted under our stock plans, excluding those granted on February 7, 2007
(discussed above). This unrecognized cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average
period of 1.2 years. The total fair value of restricted stock units vested during the first six
months of 2007 was $1.2 million. |
|
|
|
Equity Participation Rights |
|
|
|
EPRs confer the right to receive cash based on the appreciation of Bowaters common stock price,
but no right to acquire stock ownership. The rights have a vesting period of two years and, unless
terminated earlier in accordance with their terms, expire 10 years after the grant date. The base
price is the fair market value of our common stock on the day of grant. The rights may be redeemed
only for cash, and the amount paid to the employee at the time of exercise is the difference
between the base price and the average high/low of our common stock on the day of settlement. There
have been no grants of EPRs since January 2003. |
|
|
|
The EPR awards are classified as liability awards under SFAS 123R since the EPRs are cash settled.
In accordance with SFAS 123R, liability awards are remeasured at fair value at each reporting
period and the income or expense included in the consolidated statement of operations. As of June
30, 2007, the fair value of our EPRs liability is $0.9 million. The assumptions used to value the
liability are consistent with those used in the past. There have been no significant changes to the
number of EPRs outstanding or exercisable since December 31, 2006. Refer to our most recent Annual
Report on Form 10-K for additional details. |
16
BOWATER INCORPORATED
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements Unaudited
12. |
|
Off-Balance Sheet Debt Guarantees |
|
|
|
In connection with Bowaters 1999 land sale and note monetization, we guarantee 25% of the
outstanding investor notes principal balance of Timber Note Holdings LLC, one of our Qualified
Special Purpose Entities (QSPEs). Bowater guarantees approximately $6.9 million of the investor
notes principal balance at June 30, 2007. This guarantee is proportionately reduced by annual
principal repayments on the investor notes (annual minimum repayments of $2.0 million) through
2008. The remaining investor notes principal amount is to be repaid in 2009. Timber Note
Holdings LLC has assets of approximately $29.9 million and obligations of approximately $26.3
million, which include the investor notes. Bowater would be required to perform on the
guarantee if the QSPE were to default on the investor notes or if there were a default on the
notes receivable, neither of which has ever occurred. |
|
13. |
|
Segment Information |
|
|
|
During the third quarter of 2006, we announced that we were realigning our organizational
structure to move from a divisional organization to a functional organization that supports and
focuses on our multi-product line manufacturing and sales across our mill base. As a result of
this organizational realignment, we now manage our business based on the products that we
manufacture and sell to external customers and, therefore, our reportable segments changed. Our
new reportable segments are coated papers, specialty papers, newsprint, market pulp, and
lumber. Prior year information has been recast to the current year presentation of our
reportable segments. |
|
|
|
None of the income or loss items following Operating income in our Consolidated Statements of
Operations are allocated to our segments, since those items are reviewed separately by
Bowaters management. For the same reason, impairments, employee termination costs, gains on
dispositions of assets and other discretionary charges or credits are not allocated to the
segments. Share-based compensation expense is, however, allocated to our segments. We also
allocated depreciation expense to our segments, although the related fixed assets are not
allocated to segment assets. |
|
|
|
The following tables summarize information about segment profit and loss for the three and six
months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Coated |
|
Specialty |
|
|
|
|
|
Market |
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate |
|
Consolidated |
(Unaudited, in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
Papers |
|
Papers |
|
Newsprint |
|
Pulp |
|
Lumber |
|
and Other |
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Second quarter |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
$ |
129.5 |
|
|
$ |
151.3 |
|
|
$ |
313.0 |
|
|
$ |
137.7 |
|
|
$ |
64.1 |
|
|
$ |
3.0 |
|
|
$ |
798.6 |
|
|
Second quarter |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
156.2 |
|
|
|
141.8 |
|
|
|
367.3 |
|
|
|
136.7 |
|
|
|
94.0 |
|
|
|
3.4 |
|
|
|
899.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year to date |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
258.0 |
|
|
|
292.5 |
|
|
|
615.9 |
|
|
|
270.8 |
|
|
|
126.9 |
|
|
|
6.1 |
|
|
|
1,570.2 |
|
|
Year to date |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
309.1 |
|
|
|
272.7 |
|
|
|
740.8 |
|
|
|
266.1 |
|
|
|
190.5 |
|
|
|
13.4 |
|
|
|
1,792.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss) (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Second quarter |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
$ |
4.6 |
|
|
$ |
(9.8 |
) |
|
$ |
(10.7 |
) |
|
$ |
17.3 |
|
|
$ |
(7.0 |
) |
|
$ |
20.5 |
|
|
$ |
14.9 |
|
|
Second quarter |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
23.0 |
|
|
|
(17.2 |
) |
|
|
18.4 |
|
|
|
(1.6 |
) |
|
|
(4.8 |
) |
|
|
49.6 |
|
|
|
67.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year to date |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
13.2 |
|
|
|
(18.5 |
) |
|
|
(14.8 |
) |
|
|
36.0 |
|
|
|
(20.6 |
) |
|
|
44.7 |
|
|
|
40.0 |
|
|
Year to date |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
44.7 |
|
|
|
(25.4 |
) |
|
|
36.2 |
|
|
|
(1.3 |
) |
|
|
(3.5 |
) |
|
|
56.5 |
|
|
|
107.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Corporate and other operating loss includes net gains from dispositions of assets of $64.6
million and $71.7 million for the three months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively, and
$122.5 million and $100.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively. |
17
BOWATER INCORPORATED
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements Unaudited
14. |
|
Combination with Abitibi-Consolidated Inc. |
|
|
|
In January 2007, Bowater and Abitibi announced a definitive agreement to combine in an
all-stock merger of equals (the combined company which has been formed in connection with the
combination is referred to herein as AbitibiBowater). In July 2007, we received final
regulatory approval from the Canadian government, and the shareholders of both Abitibi and
Bowater approved the combination. We are still awaiting approval from the antitrust division of
the U.S. Department of Justice. In connection with the review and approval of the transaction
by the Canadian government, AbitibiBowater agreed, among other things, for a period of three
years after closing, to maintain its headquarters in Montreal, Canada; to maintain at least
five Canadians on its Board of Directors; and to apply for listing of its common stock on the
Toronto Stock Exchange (TSX). The combination is expected to be completed in the third quarter
of 2007, subject to obtaining regulatory approval from the U.S. government and other customary
closing conditions. Abitibi and Bowater will continue to operate separately until the
transaction closes. In connection with this announced combination, we have approved a retention
and severance program for approximately 320 Bowater employees who may be impacted by the
pending combination with Abitibi. This program provides a retention bonus for employees who
remain with Bowater through the closing of the combination or its cancellation for any reason
and an additional retention bonus for employees who remain with Bowater for a transition period
following closing of the combination. The costs associated with these programs are expensed as
incurred. Also in connection with the combination, we have incurred $18.0 million in direct
acquisition costs as of June 30, 2007. These costs have been capitalized in our Consolidated
Balance Sheet based upon the assumption that Bowater is the acquirer in this combination
for accounting purposes. |
|
15. |
|
Subsequent Event |
|
|
|
In order for us to maintain compliance with our U.S. and Canadian credit facilities subsequent
to the consummation of the proposed combination with Abitibi, it was necessary to amend those
facilities. The amendment was approved by our banks in July 2007 and will be entered into upon
consummation of the combination. The amendment permits a structure that allows AbitibiBowater,
which will become the parent corporation of Bowater upon consummation
of the merger, to become a
party to the credit facilities. All existing debt structures are expected to remain intact upon
consummation of the merger; however, restrictions on the amount of cash that can be transferred
from Bowater to AbitibiBowater are expected. |
18
BOWATER INCORPORATED
|
|
|
Item 2. |
|
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
Cautionary Statements Regarding Forward-Looking Information and Use of Third Party Data
Statements contained in this Form 10-Q that do not constitute historical financial results or other
factual information are forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities
Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements include, for example, statements about
our business outlook, assessment of market conditions, strategies, future plans, future sales and
shipments, prices for our major products, inventory levels, cost reduction measures, manufacturing
performance, product mix, capital spending and tax and exchange rates. Forward looking statements
also include statements concerning our pending combination with Abitibi-Consolidated Inc.,
including statements about the expected timing of such transaction, conditions to closing and
anticipated post-closing operations and results. These forward-looking statements are not
guarantees of future performance. These statements are based on managements expectations that
involve a number of business risks and uncertainties, any of which could cause actual results to
differ materially from those expressed in or implied by the forward-looking statements. In addition
to specific factors described in connection with any particular forward-looking statement, factors
that could cause actual results to differ materially include, but are not limited to, those
described under the caption Risk Factors from time to time, in Bowaters filings with the
Securities and Exchange Commission. In addition, other risks could adversely affect us, as it is
not possible for us to predict or assess all risks. We disclaim any obligation to publicly update
or revise any forward-looking statements even if our situation changes in the future.
Information about industry or general economic conditions contained in this report is derived from
third party sources (i.e., the Pulp and Paper Products Council; RISI, Inc.; and certain trade
publications) that Bowater believes are widely accepted and accurate; however, Bowater has not
independently verified this information and cannot provide assurances of its accuracy.
Accounting Policies and Estimates
The following discussion and analysis provides information that we believe is useful in
understanding our operating results, cash flows and financial condition and should be read in
conjunction with our unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements included in this quarterly report.
Our significant accounting policies are described in Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial
Statements in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006. Bowaters
critical accounting estimates are described under the caption Critical Accounting Estimates in
Item 7 of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006.
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles
requires us to make estimates, assumptions and judgments and rely on projections of future results
of operations and cash flows. We base our estimates and assumptions on historical data and other
assumptions that we believe are reasonable under the circumstances. These estimates and assumptions
affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and
liabilities in our financial statements. In addition, they affect the reported amounts of revenues
and expenses during the reporting period.
Our judgments are based on our assessment as to the effect certain estimates, assumptions of future
trends or events may have on the financial condition and results of operations reported in our
Consolidated Financial Statements. It is important that the reader of our financial statements
understand that actual results could differ materially from these estimates, assumptions,
projections and judgments.
Overview of Financial Performance
We manage our business based on the products that we manufacture and sell to external customers.
Our primary product lines includecoated papers, specialty papers, newsprint, market pulp, and
lumber.
Our net loss for the second quarter of 2007 was $62.6 million, or $1.09 per diluted share, as
compared to a net loss of $10.6 million, or $0.18 per diluted share, for the same period in 2006.
19
BOWATER INCORPORATED
Our sales in the second quarter of 2007 were $798.6 million, a decrease of $100.8 million from the
second quarter of 2006 sales of $899.4 million. Average transaction prices decreased for all of our
major products except market pulp, and shipments decreased for all of our major products except
specialty papers. The increase in the shipments of specialty papers was due primarily to the
conversion of a newsprint machine at our Calhoun facility in July 2006 to produce a lightly coated
freesheet hybrid product. Shipments of newsprint were significantly lower in the second quarter of
2007 compared to the second quarter of 2006 due to the continued decline of North American
newsprint consumption and the above mentioned shift to specialty paper production. We have
increased our exports of newsprint into areas where market conditions are stronger, but those
export sales only partially offset the effects of the North American declines. As such, we continue
to curtail paper production at several facilities. The production of paper was curtailed at our
Thunder Bay, Ontario facility from September 2006 through the end of May 2007. We also indefinitely
idled paper machine no. 3 at our Gatineau, Quebec facility beginning in March 2007 and indefinitely
idled paper machine no. 2 at our Dolbeau, Quebec facility beginning in late May 2007 in response to
the decreased North American demand for newsprint and higher costs to operate our Canadian mills,
primarily due to the stronger Canadian dollar. Shipments of market pulp decreased in the second
quarter of 2007 compared to the same time period in 2006 primarily due to the permanent closure of
our Thunder Bay A kraft pulp mill in May 2006 and increased internal consumption of pulp.
However, the increase in the average transaction price for market pulp more than offset the
negative effect of reduced shipments. Shipments of lumber were lower in the second quarter of 2007
as compared to the second quarter of 2006 primarily due to weak demand in the U.S. housing market
and the impact of quotas imposed by the Softwood Lumber Agreement in January 2007.
Our costs decreased $58.2 million during the second quarter of 2007 as compared to the same time
period in 2006. This reduction in costs was primarily due to lower volumes and lower maintenance
and labor costs. These lower costs were partially offset by reduced benefits from our Canadian
dollar hedging program and a stronger Canadian dollar (which increased from an average rate of
US$0.8903 to US$0.9099). When combined, these offsets increased our costs by $19.7 million compared
to the same time period in 2006. Higher wood costs, particularly recycled fiber costs increased our
costs by $6.5 million compared to the same time period in 2006. Despite the significant increase in
recycled fiber costs and the stronger Canadian dollar, our operating costs per ton have remained
flat across all our paper grades when compared to the first quarter of 2007. We believe the
decrease in our operating costs per ton, net of recycled fiber costs and the impact of the stronger
Canadian dollar, is a result of our commitment to our operational improvement program and the
progress we have made in reducing our controllable costs. Specifically, our Thunder Bay mill from
December 2006 through June 2007 has lowered its costs to produce paper by approximately $150 per
metric ton and its costs to produce pulp by approximately $25 per metric ton. We expect the full
impact of the restart of one of Thunder Bays paper machine and these cost improvements to be
reflected in the third quarter. Additional information regarding the changes in our manufacturing
and other costs is included below in the section Consolidated Results of Operations. In addition,
we recorded a net gain on the disposition of assets of $64.6 million in the second quarter of 2007,
primarily associated with our ongoing land sales program.
Business Strategy and Outlook
Our focus is on improving our product mix and reducing our operating costs per ton. North American
newsprint demand declined significantly during the first six months
of 2007, and there is no clear
indication as to the level at which demand will stabilize. As a result of the changes in customer
demand, we indefinitely idled paper machine no. 3 at our Gatineau, Quebec facility and curtailed
production at various other facilities in March 2007. We reduced production of newsprint by
approximately 119,000 metric tons in the first six months of 2007,
including approximately 10,000
metric tons as a result of a major rebuild of a paper machine at our Calhoun mill. In addition, we
indefinitely idled paper machine no. 2 at our Dolbeau, Quebec facility in late May 2007. We will
continue to evaluate our production options and focus on increasing production of our more
profitable product lines from our lower cost sites. For example, we converted a newsprint machine
to produce specialties at our Calhoun facility in July 2006, and we plan to increase production of
specialty papers at our Thunder Bay facility in the third quarter of 2007.
We expect to spend approximately $100 million on capital projects during the remaining six months
of 2007 compared to depreciation of approximately $160 million. Spending in 2007 is expected to be
$50 million lower than in 2006. This reduction in capital spending reflects our disciplined
approach to limit capital expenditures to those that are expected to achieve the highest return on
our assets.
20
BOWATER INCORPORATED
On January 29, 2007, we announced that we had entered into an agreement to combine with
Abitibi-Consolidated Inc. (Abitibi) in a merger of equals. In July 2007, we received final
regulatory approval from the Canadian government, and the shareholders of both Abitibi and Bowater
approved the combination. We are still awaiting approval from the antitrust division of the U.S.
Department of Justice. In connection with the review and approval of the transaction by the
Canadian government, the newly formed jointly combined company, AbitibiBowater Inc., agreed, among
other things, for a period of three years after closing, to maintain its headquarters in Montreal,
Canada; to maintain at least five Canadians on its Board of Directors; and to apply for listing of
its common stock on the Toronto Stock Exchange (TSX). The combination, when completed, will have a
material impact on our results of operations, financial condition and liquidity going forward.
Management believes that, as a result of the merger and the synergies, the combined company will be
operationally and financially stronger and better able to meet changing customer needs while
competing more effectively in the global marketplace. We expect that the combination will generate
approximately $250 million of annual cost synergies from improved efficiencies in such areas as
production, selling, administrative, distribution and procurement costs. We continue to expect to
complete the combination in the third quarter of 2007, subject to obtaining regulatory approval
from the U.S. government and other customary closing conditions. In connection with the
combination, we have approved a retention and severance program for approximately 320 Bowater
employees who may be impacted by the combination. This program provides a retention bonus for
employees who remain with Bowater through the closing of the combination or its cancellation and an
additional retention bonus for employees who remain with Bowater for a transition period following
closing of the combination.
Business and Financial Review
Consolidated Results of Operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
(In millions) |
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
Sales |
|
$ |
798.6 |
|
|
$ |
899.4 |
|
|
$ |
(100.8 |
) |
|
$ |
1,570.2 |
|
|
$ |
1,792.6 |
|
|
$ |
(222.4 |
) |
Operating income |
|
|
14.9 |
|
|
|
67.4 |
|
|
|
(52.5 |
) |
|
|
40.0 |
|
|
|
107.2 |
|
|
|
(67.2 |
) |
|
Significant items that improved (lowered) operating income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product pricing |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(32.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(45.5 |
) |
Shipment volume |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(68.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(176.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in total sales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(100.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(222.4 |
) |
Manufacturing costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
71.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
155.4 |
|
Employee termination costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in total manufacturing costs and depreciation,
amortization, and cost of timber harvested |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
59.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
140.6 |
|
Distribution costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.3 |
|
Selling and administrative expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15.7 |
) |
Gain on disposition of assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(52.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(67.2 |
) |
|
Three months ended June 30, 2007 versus June 30, 2006
Sales decreased in the second quarter of 2007 as compared to the second quarter of 2006 due
primarily to lower transaction prices for coated papers, specialty papers, newsprint and lumber and
decreased shipments of coated papers, newsprint, market pulp and lumber, partially offset by higher transaction prices
for market pulp and higher shipments of specialty papers as further noted in the Segment Results
of Operations section.
21
BOWATER INCORPORATED
Operating income decreased in the second quarter of 2007 as compared to the second quarter of 2006.
The above table analyzes the major items that decreased operating income. A brief explanation of
these major items follows:
Product pricing for our coated papers, specialty papers, newsprint, and lumber product groups
was lower in the second quarter of 2007 as compared to the second quarter of 2006. Please refer
to the discussion of Segment Results of Operations for a more detailed analysis of product
pricing.
Shipment volume for our coated papers, newsprint, market pulp and lumber product groups was
lower in the second quarter of 2007 as compared to the second quarter of 2006. Please refer to
the discussion of Segment Results of Operations for a more detailed analysis of shipments.
Manufacturing costs were lower in the second quarter of 2007 as compared to the second quarter
of 2006 resulting primarily from lower volumes ($48.6 million), lower maintenance ($20.0
million), lower labor costs
($9.2 million) and lower depreciation ($1.7 million), partially offset by reduced benefits from
our Canadian dollar hedging program ($11.4 million), a stronger Canadian dollar ($8.3 million)
and higher wood costs ($6.5 million).
Employee termination costs were higher in the second quarter of 2007 due to severance and
pension and other postretirement related charges that exceeded amounts recorded in the second
quarter of 2006. Please refer to the discussion of Corporate and Other for a more detailed
analysis of employee termination costs.
Selling and administrative expenses were higher in the second quarter of 2007 as compared to
the same period of 2006, primarily as a result of higher share-based compensation costs and
higher merger-related costs. Please refer to the discussion of Corporate and Other for a more
detailed analysis of these costs.
Gain on disposition of assets relates primarily to land sales. The decrease is due to lower net
gains on land sold in the second quarter of 2007 compared to the same period of 2006.
Six months ended June 30, 2007 versus June 30, 2006
Sales decreased in the first six months of 2007 as compared to the same period of 2006 due
primarily to lower transaction prices for coated papers, specialty papers, newsprint and lumber and
decreased shipments of coated papers, newsprint, market pulp and lumber, partially offset by higher
transaction prices for market pulp and higher shipments of specialty papers as further noted in the
Segment Results of Operations section.
Operating income decreased in the first six months of 2007 as compared to the same period of 2006.
The above table analyzes the major items that decreased operating income. A brief explanation of
these major items follows:
Product pricing for our coated papers, specialty papers, newsprint, and lumber product groups
was lower in the first six months of 2007 as compared to the same period of 2006. Please refer
to the discussion of Segment Results of Operations for a more detailed analysis of product
pricing.
Shipment volume for our coated papers, newsprint, market pulp and lumber product groups was
lower in the first six months of 2007 as compared to the same period of 2006. Please refer to
the discussion of Segment Results of Operations for a more detailed analysis of shipments.
22
BOWATER INCORPORATED
Manufacturing costs were lower in the first six months of 2007 as compared to the same period
of 2006 resulting primarily from lower volumes ($109.2 million), lower maintenance ($26.9
million), lower labor costs ($21.7 million), lower energy costs ($4.0 million) and lower depreciation ($2.9 million),
partially offset by reduced benefits from our Canadian dollar hedging program ($30.2 million),
higher wood costs ($9.0 million), a stronger Canadian dollar ($3.4 million), and higher
chemical costs ($1.3 million).
Employee termination costs were higher in the first six months of 2007 due to severance and
pension and postretirement related charges that exceeded amounts recorded in the same period of
2006. Please refer to the discussion of Corporate and Other for a more detailed analysis of
employee termination costs.
Distribution costs were lower in the first six months of 2007 as compared to the same period of
2006, primarily as a result of the reduced shipments of product and reduced lumber duties.
Selling and administrative expenses were higher in the first six months of 2007 as compared to
the same period of 2006, primarily as a result of higher share-based compensation costs and
higher merger-related costs. Please refer to the discussion of Corporate and Other for a more
detailed analysis of these costs.
Gain on disposition of assets relates primarily to land sales. The increase is due to higher
net gains on land sold in the first six months of 2007 compared to the same period of 2006.
Segment Results of Operations
During the third quarter of 2006, we announced that we had realigned our organizational structure
to move from a divisional organization to a functional organization that supports and focuses on
our multi-line manufacturing and sales across our mill base. As a result of this organizational
realignment, our reportable segments were changed to reflect how we internally manage our business.
This Managements Discussion and Analysis reflects our new reportable segments which are coated
papers, specialty papers, newsprint, market pulp, and lumber. Prior year information has been
recast to the current year presentation.
In general, our products are globally traded commodities. Pricing and the level of shipments of
these products will continue to be influenced by the balance between supply and demand as affected
by global economic conditions, changes in consumption and capacity, the level of customer and
producer inventories and fluctuations in currency exchange rates.
23
BOWATER INCORPORATED
Coated Papers
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
Average price (per short ton) |
|
$ |
690 |
|
|
$ |
774 |
|
|
$ |
(84 |
) |
|
$ |
700 |
|
|
$ |
785 |
|
|
$ |
(85 |
) |
Shipments (thousands of short tons) |
|
|
187.5 |
|
|
|
201.8 |
|
|
|
(14.3 |
) |
|
|
368.6 |
|
|
|
394.2 |
|
|
|
(25.6 |
) |
Downtime (thousands of short tons) |
|
|
13.7 |
|
|
|
19.2 |
|
|
|
(5.5 |
) |
|
|
23.8 |
|
|
|
36.0 |
|
|
|
(12.2 |
) |
Inventory at end of period (thousands of short tons) |
|
|
46.7 |
|
|
|
50.0 |
|
|
|
(3.3 |
) |
|
|
46.7 |
|
|
|
50.0 |
|
|
|
(3.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales |
|
$ |
129.5 |
|
|
$ |
156.2 |
|
|
$ |
(26.7 |
) |
|
$ |
258.0 |
|
|
$ |
309.1 |
|
|
$ |
(51.1 |
) |
Segment income |
|
|
4.6 |
|
|
|
23.0 |
|
|
|
(18.4 |
) |
|
|
13.2 |
|
|
|
44.7 |
|
|
|
(31.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Significant items that improved
(lowered) segment income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product pricing |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(15.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(29.9 |
) |
Shipment volume |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(21.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in total sales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(26.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(51.1 |
) |
Manufacturing costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18.0 |
|
Distribution costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling and administrative expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(18.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(31.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24
BOWATER INCORPORATED
Three months ended June 30, 2007 versus June 30, 2006
Sales of coated papers decreased in the second quarter of 2007 as compared to the second quarter of
2006 primarily as a result of decreased product pricing and lower shipments. Our average
transaction price decreased 10.9% and our coated mechanical papers shipments decreased 7.1% in the
second quarter of 2007 as compared to the second quarter of 2006. The postal rate increase in May
2007 had a negative impact on demand for our coated mechanical grades. Demand is expected to
continue to be negatively impacted by the postal rate increase. The affect of the postal rate
increase aside, we are seeing improvement in the supply-demand balance for coated mechanical papers
primarily due to capacity closures by some of our North American competitors, and reduced offshore
imports. Specifically, imports from Europe were down in June as a result of the strong Euro and
recent capacity closures overseas. We are expecting a further reduction in imports from Asia as a
result of the U.S. Department of Commerces levy of duties on Asian imports of coated mechanical
papers. We have announced a $60 per short ton price increase for our coated mechanical papers
effective July 1, 2007.
Segment income decreased in the second quarter of 2007 as compared to the second quarter of 2006
primarily as a result of lower sales, as noted above. The lower sales were partially offset by
lower manufacturing costs, primarily from lower volumes ($7.3 million).
Our inventories declined slightly in the second quarter, as printers begin to restock in
preparation for the typically strong third quarter.
Coated Papers Third Party Data: U.S. consumer magazine advertising pages decreased 1.2% in the six
months ended June 30, 2007 compared to the same period of 2006. North American demand for coated
mechanical papers increased 1.3 % in the six months ended June 30, 2007 compared to the same period
in 2006.
Six months ended June 30, 2007 versus June 30, 2006
Sales of coated papers decreased in the first six months of 2007 as compared to the first six
months of 2006 primarily as a result of decreased product pricing and lower shipments. Our average
transaction price decreased 10.8% and our coated mechanical papers shipments decreased 6.5% in the
first six months of 2007 as compared to the first six months of 2006.
Segment income decreased in the first six months of 2007 as compared to the first six months of
2006 primarily as a result of lower sales, as noted above. The lower sales were partially offset by
lower manufacturing costs including the impact of lower volumes ($13.7 million), lower depreciation
($2.2 million), and lower maintenance costs ($1.7 million).
25
BOWATER INCORPORATED
Specialty Papers
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
Average price (per short ton) |
|
$ |
653 |
|
|
$ |
666 |
|
|
$ |
(13 |
) |
|
$ |
653 |
|
|
$ |
661 |
|
|
$ |
(8 |
) |
Shipments (thousands of short tons) |
|
|
231.9 |
|
|
|
212.8 |
|
|
|
19.1 |
|
|
|
448.2 |
|
|
|
412.6 |
|
|
|
35.6 |
|
Downtime (thousands of short tons) |
|
|
8.6 |
|
|
|
1.4 |
|
|
|
7.2 |
|
|
|
14.4 |
|
|
|
1.4 |
|
|
|
13.0 |
|
Inventory at end of period (thousands of short tons) |
|
|
70.4 |
|
|
|
38.2 |
|
|
|
32.2 |
|
|
|
70.4 |
|
|
|
38.2 |
|
|
|
32.2 |
|
|
(In millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales |
|
$ |
151.3 |
|
|
$ |
141.8 |
|
|
$ |
9.5 |
|
|
$ |
292.5 |
|
|
$ |
272.7 |
|
|
$ |
19.8 |
|
Segment loss |
|
|
(9.8 |
) |
|
|
(17.2 |
) |
|
|
7.4 |
|
|
|
(18.5 |
) |
|
|
(25.4 |
) |
|
|
6.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Significant items that improved (lowered) segment loss: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product pricing |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(4.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(5.1 |
) |
Shipment volume |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in total sales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19.8 |
|
Manufacturing costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10.4 |
) |
Distribution costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3.7 |
) |
Selling and administrative expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
7.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
6.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended June 30, 2007 versus June 30, 2006
Sales increased in the second quarter of 2007 as compared to the second quarter of 2006 primarily
as a result of a 9.0% increase in shipments of specialty papers which was partially offset by a
slight decrease in product pricing. The increase in shipments was due to our increased production
as a result of shifting machine capacity from newsprint to specialty papers. We completed the
conversion of a newsprint machine to specialty production at our Calhoun mill in July 2006. In May
2007, our Thunder Bay facility restarted paper machine No. 4, which had been idled since September
2006. Coinciding with the restart of Thunder Bays paper machine, we indefinitely idled a specialty
producing machine at our Dolbeau facility. We plan to shift Dolbeaus specialty papers production
to our Thunder Bay facility in the third quarter of 2007. Our Thunder Bay facility has two machines
that can alternate between the production of newsprint and specialty papers. With the restructuring
that has taken place at our Thunder Bay facility, we have been able to make the site significantly
more competitive by lowering its cost to produce paper from
December 2006 through June 2007 by
approximately $150 per metric ton. We believe the quality assets and unique multiple fiber furnishes
available at our Thunder Bay mill provide us with the opportunity to produce a variety of higher
value-added specialty grades on these machines. We expect the full impact of the restart of Thunder
Bays paper machine and these cost improvements to be reflected in the third quarter.
Segment loss decreased in the second quarter of 2007 as compared to the second quarter of 2006
primarily as a result of the increased sales discussed above, partially offset by higher
manufacturing and distribution costs. The higher manufacturing costs consisted of higher volumes
($8.7 million), reduced benefits from our Canadian dollar hedging program ($2.5 million) and a
stronger Canadian dollar ($1.7 million), partially offset by lower maintenance ($5.8 million) and
lower labor costs ($4.8 million).
26
BOWATER INCORPORATED
Inventory levels were higher at June 30, 2007 as compared to June 30, 2006 due to increased
capacity and a weaker market in the first half of 2007 as compared to the first half of 2006.
Specialty Papers Third Party Data: North American demand for supercalendered high gloss papers was
up 4.2%; for lightweight or directory grades was up 3.5%; and for standard uncoated mechanical
papers was down 8.0% for the six months ended June 30, 2007 compared to the same period in 2006.
Six months ended June 30, 2007 versus June 30, 2006
Sales increased in the first six months of 2007 as compared to the first six months of 2006 as a
result of the 8.6% increase in shipments of specialty papers, which were partially offset by a
slight decrease in product pricing. We continue to shift machine capacity from newsprint to
specialty papers including a machine conversion at our Calhoun mill in July of 2006 and increased
production of specialty papers planned at our Thunder Bay mill, which produces both newsprint and
specialty papers, beginning in the third quarter of 2007.
Segment loss decreased in the first six months of 2007 as compared to the first six months of 2006
primarily as a result of increased sales discussed above, which were partially offset by higher
manufacturing costs and higher distribution costs. The higher manufacturing costs were a result of
higher volumes ($12.5 million), reduced benefits from our Canadian dollar hedging program ($6.6
million), higher wood costs ($3.1 million), and higher depreciation
($4.4 million), partially offset by lower energy ($5.3 million) maintenance ($5.2 million), and
labor costs ($4.4 million).
Newsprint
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
Average price (per metric ton) |
|
$ |
605 |
|
|
$ |
640 |
|
|
$ |
(35 |
) |
|
$ |
612 |
|
|
$ |
631 |
|
|
$ |
(19 |
) |
Shipments (thousands of metric tons) |
|
|
517.3 |
|
|
|
574.0 |
|
|
|
(56.7 |
) |
|
|
1,007.2 |
|
|
|
1,174.4 |
|
|
|
(167.2 |
) |
Downtime (thousands of metric tons) |
|
|
56.5 |
|
|
|
64.2 |
|
|
|
(7.7 |
) |
|
|
119.5 |
|
|
|
106.3 |
|
|
|
13.2 |
|
Inventory at end of period (thousands of metric tons) |
|
|
102.2 |
|
|
|
63.7 |
|
|
|
38.5 |
|
|
|
102.2 |
|
|
|
63.7 |
|
|
|
38.5 |
|
|
(In millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales |
|
$ |
313.0 |
|
|
$ |
367.3 |
|
|
$ |
(54.3 |
) |
|
$ |
615.9 |
|
|
$ |
740.8 |
|
|
$ |
(124.9 |
) |
Segment (loss) income |
|
|
(10.7 |
) |
|
|
18.4 |
|
|
|
(29.1 |
) |
|
|
(14.8 |
) |
|
|
36.2 |
|
|
|
(51.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Significant items that improved (lowered)
segment (loss) income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product pricing |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(17.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(18.8 |
) |
Shipment volume |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(36.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(106.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in total sales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(54.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(124.9 |
) |
Manufacturing costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
69.1 |
|
Distribution costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.3 |
|
Selling and administrative expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(29.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(51.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27
BOWATER INCORPORATED
Three months ended June 30, 2007 versus June 30, 2006
Sales decreased in the second quarter of 2007 as compared to the second quarter of 2006 primarily
as a result of a 5.5% decrease in product pricing and lower shipments of newsprint. Newsprint
shipments were 9.9% lower in the second quarter of 2007 when compared to the second quarter of 2006
as we continue to match production to our orders and continue the shift of machine capacity from
newsprint to specialties. While North American consumption remains in decline, global newsprint
demand has increased. We continue to take advantage of the stronger global markets by shipping more
newsprint out of North America and into areas where market conditions are stronger. Additionally,
we continued to curtail production at our Gatineau and other facilities during the quarter due to
the overall weak demand of newsprint. In the second quarter of 2007, we had total downtime of
56,500 metric tons, including 2,500 metric tons of maintenance downtime. We have informed our North
American customers of a $25 per ton price increase, effective September 1, 2007.
Segment income decreased to a segment loss in the second quarter of 2007 as compared to the second
quarter of 2006 primarily as a result of lower sales noted above and slightly higher distribution
costs, partially offset by lower manufacturing costs. Manufacturing costs were lower as a result of
lower volumes ($23.0 million), lower maintenance ($9.1 million) and lower labor costs ($7.9
million), partially offset by higher wood costs, particularly increased recycled fiber costs ($12.0
million), reduced benefits from our Canadian dollar hedging program ($4.6 million), and a stronger
Canadian dollar ($4.4 million).
Inventory levels increased 60.4% at June 30, 2007 as compared to June 30, 2006 due to an increase
in export warehouse inventory levels.
Newsprint Third Party Data: For the six months ended June 30, 2007, total U.S. demand and
consumption of newsprint decreased 11.2% and 11.1%, respectively, as compared to the same period
last year. North American net exports of newsprint were 12.6% higher than 2006 levels. Total
inventories (North American mills and users) at June 30, 2007 were 1.3 million metric tons, or
3.6%, higher than June 30, 2006. At June 30, 2007 and 2006, the days of supply at the U.S. daily
newspapers was 45 days and 44 days, respectively. The North American operating rate was 94% for the
six months ended June 30, 2007. Newspaper advertising linage declined 7.4% when compared to the
first six months of 2006.
Six months ended June 30, 2007 versus June 30, 2006
Sales decreased in the first six months of 2007 as compared to the first six months of 2006
primarily as a result of lower product pricing and lower shipments of newsprint. Newsprint
shipments were 14.2% lower in the first six months of 2007 when compared to the first six months of
2006 as we continue to match production to our orders and continue the shift of machine capacity
from newsprint to specialties. Additionally, we temporarily curtailed production at our Gatineau
and other facilities in the first six months of 2007 due to weak demand of newsprint. In the first
six months of 2007, we had total downtime of 119,000 metric tons, including 13,000 metric tons of
maintenance downtime primarily related to a major machine rebuild at one of our sites. We will
continue to match production to our orders.
Segment income decreased to a segment loss in the first six months of 2007 as compared to the first
six months of 2006 primarily as a result of lower sales noted above, partially offset by lower
manufacturing and distribution costs. Manufacturing costs were lower as a result of lower volumes
($62.7 million), lower maintenance ($13.7 million), lower labor costs ($14.1 million) and lower
depreciation expense ($4.6 million), partially offset by higher wood costs, particularly increased
recycled fiber costs ($19.5 million), reduced benefits from our Canadian dollar hedging program
($12.1 million) and a stronger Canadian dollar ($2.6 million).
28
BOWATER INCORPORATED
Market Pulp
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
Average price (per metric ton) |
|
$ |
648 |
|
|
$ |
564 |
|
|
$ |
84 |
|
|
$ |
638 |
|
|
$ |
544 |
|
|
$ |
94 |
|
Shipments (thousands of metric tons) |
|
|
212.5 |
|
|
|
242.3 |
|
|
|
(29.8 |
) |
|
|
424.2 |
|
|
|
489.7 |
|
|
|
(65.5 |
) |
Downtime (thousands of metric tons) |
|
|
16.6 |
|
|
|
14.6 |
|
|
|
2.0 |
|
|
|
23.1 |
|
|
|
18.7 |
|
|
|
4.4 |
|
Inventory at end of period (thousands of metric tons) |
|
|
58.7 |
|
|
|
70.5 |
|
|
|
(11.8 |
) |
|
|
58.7 |
|
|
|
70.5 |
|
|
|
(11.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales |
|
$ |
137.7 |
|
|
$ |
136.7 |
|
|
$ |
1.0 |
|
|
$ |
270.8 |
|
|
$ |
266.1 |
|
|
$ |
4.7 |
|
Segment income (loss) |
|
|
17.3 |
|
|
|
(1.6 |
) |
|
|
18.9 |
|
|
|
36.0 |
|
|
|
(1.3 |
) |
|
|
37.3 |
|
|
Significant items that improved (lowered) segment
income (loss): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product pricing |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
17.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
38.6 |
|
Shipment volume |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(16.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(33.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in total sales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.7 |
|
Manufacturing costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34.1 |
|
Distribution costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.1 |
) |
Selling and administrative expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
18.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
37.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended June 30, 2007 versus June 30, 2006
Sales of market pulp increased slightly in the second quarter of 2007 as compared to the same
period in 2006 as a result of higher product pricing, which was almost completely offset by lower
shipments. Our average price for market pulp was 14.9% higher in the second quarter of 2007
compared to the second quarter of 2006. The increase in demand is from both North America and
offshore markets, particularly China. We implemented price increases of $20 per metric ton for
softwood and $30 per metric ton for fluff pulp, effective
July 1, 2007. We also implemented a price increase of $20 per
metric ton for hardwood grades effective August 1, 2007. Our shipments decreased
12.3% and our inventories decreased 16.7% compared to 2006, due to reduced production from our
Thunder Bay facility as a result of the permanent shut of our A kraft pulp mill in May 2006. Mill
inventories remain at low levels, particularly in softwood products, and consumer inventories are
at near record lows as well. Currently, softwood grades have better market supply/demand dynamics
than hardwood grades, but with the tight softwood grade market, demand for the hardwood grades is
growing.
Segment income increased in the second quarter of 2007 from a segment loss for the same period in
2006, primarily as a result of lower manufacturing costs. The lower manufacturing costs consisted
of lower volumes ($17.1 million) and lower labor costs ($2.2 million), partially offset by reduced benefits
from our Canadian dollar hedging program ($2.7 million) and a stronger Canadian dollar ($1.0
million).
Market Pulp Third Party Data: World demand for market pulp increased 2% in the six months ended
June 30, 2007 compared to the same period last year. World producers shipped at 94% of capacity
during the six months ended June 30, 2007 compared to 97% during the same period in 2006.
29
BOWATER INCORPORATED
Six months ended June 30, 2007 versus June 30, 2006
Sales of market pulp increased in the first six months of 2007 as compared to the same period in
2006 as a result of higher product pricing, which was partially offset by lower shipments. Our
average price for market pulp was 17.3% higher in the first six months of 2007 compared to first
six months of 2006. The increase in demand is from both North America and offshore markets,
particularly China. Our shipments decreased 13.4% and our inventories decreased 16.7% compared to
2006, due to reduced production from our Thunder Bay facility as a result of the permanent shut of
our A kraft pulp mill in May 2006. Mill inventories remain at low levels, particularly in
softwood grades, and consumer inventories are at near record lows as well.
Segment income increased in the first six months of 2007 from a segment loss for the same period in
2006 primarily as a result of the change in total sales, as noted above, and lower manufacturing
costs. The lower manufacturing costs consisted of lower volumes ($25.6 million), lower labor ($5.7
million), maintenance ($4.4 million), wood ($4.3 million), and energy costs ($2.3 million),
partially offset by reduced benefits from our Canadian dollar hedging program ($7.2 million) and a
stronger Canadian dollar ($0.3 million).
Lumber
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
Average price (per mbf) |
|
$ |
283 |
|
|
$ |
334 |
|
|
$ |
(51 |
) |
|
$ |
278 |
|
|
$ |
343 |
|
|
$ |
(65 |
) |
Shipments (millions of mbf) |
|
|
226.7 |
|
|
|
281.1 |
|
|
|
(54.4 |
) |
|
|
456.5 |
|
|
|
556.1 |
|
|
|
(99.6 |
) |
Downtime (millions of mbf) |
|
|
43.6 |
|
|
|
54.0 |
|
|
|
(10.4 |
) |
|
|
68.6 |
|
|
|
111.9 |
|
|
|
(43.3 |
) |
Inventory at end of period (millions of mbf) |
|
|
49.0 |
|
|
|
48.9 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
49.0 |
|
|
|
48.9 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales |
|
$ |
64.1 |
|
|
$ |
94.0 |
|
|
$ |
(29.9 |
) |
|
$ |
126.9 |
|
|
$ |
190.5 |
|
|
$ |
(63.6 |
) |
Segment loss |
|
|
(7.0 |
) |
|
|
(4.8 |
) |
|
|
(2.2 |
) |
|
|
(20.6 |
) |
|
|
(3.5 |
) |
|
|
(17.1 |
) |
|
Significant items that improved (lowered)
segment loss: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product pricing |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(12.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(30.8 |
) |
Shipment volume |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(17.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(32.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in total sales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(29.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(63.6 |
) |
Manufacturing costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34.4 |
|
Distribution costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.1 |
|
Selling and administrative expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(2.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(17.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended June 30, 2007 versus June 30, 2006
Sales decreased in the second quarter of 2007 as compared to the same period in 2006 as a result of
a 15.3% lumber price decrease primarily due to a weaker U.S. housing market. Our lumber shipments
decreased 19.4% in the second quarter of 2007 as compared to the same period in 2006 mainly as a
result of sawmills that were sold in the second quarter of 2006 and the restrictions imposed by
quotas under the Softwood Lumber Agreement between the U.S. and Canada beginning in January 2007.
Segment loss increased slightly in the second quarter of 2007 as compared to the same period in
2006 as a result of the lower sales discussed above, partially offset by lower manufacturing and
distribution costs. The decrease in manufacturing costs consisted of lower volumes ($10.3 million),
lower wood ($5.3 million) and labor costs ($2.9 million), partially offset by reduced benefits from
our Canadian dollar hedging program ($1.6 million) and a stronger
30
BOWATER INCORPORATED
Canadian dollar ($1.2 million). The lower distribution costs are primarily due to lower shipments
and a reduction in lumber duties paid to the U.S. Department of Commerce in the second quarter of
2007 as a result of the agreement that was implemented in January 2007 regarding Canadian softwood
lumber exports to the U.S.
Lumber Third Party Data: U.S. housing starts decreased 19.4% from June 2006 to June 2007.
Six months ended June 30, 2007 versus June 30, 2006
Sales decreased in the first six months of 2007 as compared to the same period in 2006 as a result
of a 19.0% lumber price decrease due primarily to a weaker U.S. housing market. Our lumber
shipments decreased 17.9% in the first six months of 2007 as compared to the same period in 2006
mainly as a result of sawmills that we sold in the first six months of 2006 and the restrictions
imposed by quotas under the Softwood Lumber Agreement.
Segment loss increased in the first six months of 2007 as compared to the same period in 2006 as a
result of lower sales discussed above, partially offset by lower manufacturing and distribution
costs. The decrease in manufacturing costs consisted of lower volumes ($18.0 million), lower wood
($10.1 million), labor ($3.3 million) and maintenance costs ($1.8 million), partially offset by
reduced benefits from our Canadian dollar hedging program ($4.2 million) and a stronger Canadian
dollar ($0.3 million). The lower distribution costs were primarily due to lower shipments and a
reduction in lumber duties paid in connection with the Softwood Lumber Agreement.
Corporate and Other
We exclude the gain on disposition of assets and employee termination costs from our internal
review of product line results. Also excluded from our product line review are corporate and other
items which include timber sales and general and administrative expenses. These items are analyzed
separately from our product line results. The following table is included in order to facilitate
the reconciliation of our product line sales and segment income (loss) to our total sales and
operating income in our Consolidated Statements of Operations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
(In millions) |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
Change |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
Change |
|
Corporate and Other: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales |
|
$ |
3.0 |
|
|
$ |
3.4 |
|
|
$ |
(0.4 |
) |
|
$ |
6.1 |
|
|
$ |
13.4 |
|
|
$ |
(7.3 |
) |
Operating (loss) income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net gain on disposition of assets |
|
$ |
64.6 |
|
|
$ |
71.7 |
|
|
$ |
(7.1 |
) |
|
$ |
122.5 |
|
|
$ |
100.5 |
|
|
$ |
22.0 |
|
Employee termination costs |
|
|
(12.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12.0 |
) |
|
|
(19.2 |
) |
|
|
(4.4 |
) |
|
|
(14.8 |
) |
Corporate and other |
|
|
(32.1 |
) |
|
|
(22.1 |
) |
|
|
(10.0 |
) |
|
|
(58.6 |
) |
|
|
(39.6 |
) |
|
|
(19.0 |
) |
|
Net gain on disposition of assets: During the three months and six months ended June 30, 2007,
Bowater recorded net pre-tax gains of $64.6 million and $122.5 million, respectively, related
primarily to the sale of timberlands. During the first six months of 2007, we completed the sale of
approximately 107,800 acres of timberlands and other assets for proceeds of $147.4 million. During
the three months and six months ended June 30, 2006, Bowater recorded net pre-tax gains of $71.7
million and $100.5 million, respectively, related primarily to the sale of timberlands. During the
first six months of 2006, we completed the sale of approximately 496,800 acres of timberlands in
the U.S. and Canada, two small Canadian sawmills and other non-core fixed assets for total proceeds
of $238.1 million.
31
BOWATER INCORPORATED
Employee termination costs: During the three months and six months ended June 30, 2007, we recorded
$12.0 million and $19.2 million, respectively, of employee termination costs, primarily as a result
of $6.6 million and $7.9 million, respectively, of pension
and postretirement-related charges associated with a mill-wide restructuring at our Thunder
Bay, Ontario facility, lump-sum payouts to certain employees and certain changes to our U.S. postretirement benefit plans. The balance of
the charge is related to severance for a number of employees during the first six months of 2007.
During the three months and six months ended June 30, 2006, we recorded $4.4 million of net
curtailment losses related to the termination of employees upon the permanent closure of our
Thunder Bay A kraft pulp mill.
Corporate and other: The decrease in sales for the three and six months ended June 30, 2007 as
compared to the same periods in the prior year is due to lower timber sales, as the land that was
producing the timberlands has been sold in our land sales program. The increase in operating loss
during the three and six months ended June 30, 2007 is primarily due to increased share-based
compensation expense ($3.6 million and $9.1 million, respectively) and merger related costs ($8.0
million and $10.3 million, respectively), incurred in connection with our planned combination with
Abitibi.
Interest Expense
The decrease in interest expense of $2.0 million and $4.1 million for the three and six months
ended June 30, 2007, respectively, is primarily attributable to lower average debt balances during
the 2007 periods.
Income Taxes
Our effective tax rate, which resulted in the recording of a tax provision on a pre-tax loss, was
(38.3)% for the second quarter of 2007 as compared to 160.4% for the second quarter of 2006 and was
(26.7)% for the first six months of 2007 as compared to 296.2% for the first six months of 2006. We
established a valuation allowance against our Canadian deferred tax assets in 2005. Our Canadian
operations have continued to experience operating losses since then. Consequently, income tax
benefits and tax credits of $24.3 million and $42.1 million for the second quarter of 2007 and
2006, respectively, and $37.3 million and $55.6 million for the first six months of 2007 and 2006,
respectively, which arose primarily from operating losses at certain Canadian operations, were
entirely offset by tax charges to increase our tax valuation allowance.
Our effective tax rate varies frequently and substantially from the weighted-average effect of both
domestic and foreign statutory tax rates primarily as a result of the tax treatment on foreign
currency gains and losses. We have a number of foreign subsidiaries whose unconsolidated foreign
currency gains and losses are taxed in Canada. Upon consolidation, such income and gains are
eliminated, but we are still liable for the Canadian taxes. Due to the variability and volatility
of foreign exchange rates, we are unable to estimate the impact of future changes in exchange rates
on our effective tax rate. Additionally, we will likely not be recording income tax benefits on
most of our 2007 operating losses generated in Canada, which would have the impact of increasing
our overall effective income tax rate in future periods. To the extent that our Canadian operations
become profitable, the impact of this valuation allowance would lessen or reverse and positively
impact our effective tax rate in those periods.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Our primary sources of liquidity and capital resources are generally cash provided from operations
and available borrowings under our credit facilities, which are discussed in more detail below. We
periodically review timberland holdings and sell timberlands. In the first six months of 2007, the
sale of timberlands and other assets, generating proceeds of $147.4 million, also provided a
significant source of liquidity. Since late 2005, we have generated approximately $520 million of
proceeds from such sales. We believe that cash from operations and access to our credit facilities
will be sufficient to provide for our anticipated requirements for working capital, contractual
obligations, capital expenditures and dividend payments on a stand-alone basis for the next twelve
months.
32
BOWATER INCORPORATED
Cash (Used for) Provided by Operations
During the first six months of 2007 and 2006, Bowater had a net loss of $98.0 million and $29.4
million, respectively. Cash used for operating activities totaled $55.8 million in the first six
months of 2007 compared to cash provided by operating activities of $42.5 million during the same
period of 2006. The decrease in cash provided by operations was primarily related to lower sales
for most of our products and higher costs to operate certain of our mills. As noted in the
discussion of our segment results of operations, transaction prices and shipments were lower for
the majority of our products. Newsprint and specialty paper production has been curtailed as a
result of the continued decline in newsprint demand and higher costs to operate our Canadian mills,
primarily due to the stronger Canadian dollar and higher energy costs.
Working capital negatively impacted our cash flows from operations in the first six months of 2007
primarily due to an increase in inventories for newsprint and specialty papers, which resulted
primarily from an increase in capacity and a weaker market for specialty papers and an increase in
export warehouse inventory related to our significant increase in exports of newsprint, as well as
a decrease in accounts payable and accrued liabilities due to the timing of payments. These working
capital changes were partially offset by a decrease in accounts receivable which was primarily due
to lower sales, net of an increase in accounts receivable resulting from an increase in export
sales, which tend to have extended terms.
Cash Provided by Investing Activities
Cash provided by investing activities totaled $83.9 million and $147.5 million for the first six
months of 2007 and 2006, respectively. The decrease in cash provided by investing activities during
the first six months of 2007 is due primarily to fewer land sales, partially offset by decreased
investment in our capital assets. Additionally, in connection with the combination with Abitibi, we
spent $12.4 million for direct acquisition costs during the first six months of 2007. Capital
expenditures include compliance, maintenance and return-based projects. We expect to spend
approximately $100 million on similar capital projects during the remaining six months of 2007.
Cash Used for Financing Activities
Cash used for financing activities totaled $37.6 million and $106.5 million for the first six
months of 2007 and 2006, respectively. Bowater paid cash dividends of $22.9 million and made net
payments of $14.7 million on its long-term debt during the first six months of 2007.
Short-term Financing
As of June 30, 2007, we had available borrowings under our credit facilities as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount |
|
Commitment |
|
Termination |
|
Interest |
Short-Term Bank Debt |
|
Commitment |
|
Outstanding |
|
Available (1) |
|
Date |
|
Rate (2) |
|
|
|
(in millions except for dates and interest rates)
|
U.S. Credit Agreement |
|
$ |
415.0 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
347.0 |
|
|
|
05/11 |
|
|
|
8.75 |
% |
|
Canadian Credit Agreement |
|
|
165.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
129.2 |
|
|
|
05/08 |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
|
$ |
580.0 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
476.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The commitment available under each of the revolving credit facilities is subject to collateral
requirements and covenant restrictions as described below and is reduced by outstanding letters of
credit of $68.0 million for the U.S. and $35.8 million for Canada. Commitment fees for unused
portions of the U.S. and Canadian facilities are 50 basis points and 25 basis points, respectively. |
|
(2) |
|
Borrowings under the revolving credit facilities incur interest based, at our option, on
specified market interest rates plus a margin. We had borrowings under our U.S. credit agreement
during the first six months of 2007. |
33
BOWATER INCORPORATED
|
|
|
|
|
These borrowings were fully repaid during the first six months of 2007. We had no outstanding
borrowings under our Canadian credit agreement during the first six months of 2007. |
Financial covenants under both our U.S. Credit Agreement and our Canadian Credit Agreement are
based upon our consolidated financial results and consist of the following two ratios:
|
i. |
|
a maximum ratio of senior secured indebtedness (including all advances and letters of credit
under the U.S. and Canadian facilities, and any other indebtedness secured by assets of
Bowater and its subsidiaries) to EBITDA (generally defined as net income, excluding
extraordinary, non-recurring or non-cash items and gains (or losses) on asset dispositions,
plus income taxes plus depreciation plus interest expense) of 1.25 to 1; and |
|
|
ii. |
|
a minimum ratio of EBITDA (defined as EBITDA, plus gains (or minus losses) from asset
dispositions) to interest expense of 2.00 to 1. |
We believe we are in compliance with all of our covenants and other requirements set forth in
our credit facilities.
In order for us to maintain compliance with our U.S. and Canadian credit facilities subsequent to
the consummation of the proposed combination with Abitibi, it was necessary to amend those
facilities. The amendment was approved by our banks in July 2007 and will be entered into upon
consummation of the combination. The amendment permits a structure that allows AbitibiBowater,
which would become the parent corporation of Bowater upon consummation of the merger, to become a
party to the credit facilities. All existing debt structures are expected to remain intact upon
consummation of the merger; however, restrictions on the amount of cash that can be transferred
from Bowater to AbitibiBowater are expected.
Employees
As of June 30, 2007, Bowater employed approximately 6,900 people, of whom approximately 4,700 were
represented by bargaining units. Our unionized employees in the U.S. are represented predominantly
by the United Steelworkers Union and in Canada predominantly by the Communications, Energy and
Paper Union. Labor agreements covering approximately 390 employees in the U.S. paper mills expire
in September 2007. A labor agreement covering approximately 150 employees at our Mokpo facility
expires in July 2007.
In July 2007, Bowater negotiated a new labor agreement covering approximately 100 employees at our
Saint-Félicien sawmill facility. The new agreement, which was approved by union members, expires in
May 2011.
In February 2007, the union members at our Thunder Bay, Ontario facility ratified an agreement that
is expected to result in approximately CDN$16.0 million in annual labor savings. This plan was one
of the cost reduction measures considered in making the decision to resume operation of a paper
machine at our Thunder Bay facility in May 2007. As a result of a mill-wide restructuring of this
facility, 157 jobs were eliminated. This reduction in jobs is partially offset by the recall of 40
previously laid-off employees as a result of the restart of one of the paper machines at this
facility in May 2007.
At our Gatineau, Quebec mill approximately 175 jobs will be eliminated in a mill-wide restructure
to improve the cost competitiveness of the mill. One of Gatineaus three paper machines is
temporarily idled due to a combination of elevated costs for recycled fiber and insufficient demand
for our newsprint product. In the event the idled machine is restarted, a portion of these
employees would be recalled back to work.
At our Dolbeau, Quebec mill approximately 130 jobs will be eliminated in a mill-wide restructure to
improve the cost competitiveness of the mill. One of Dolbeaus two paper machines is temporarily
idled due to a combination of elevated costs for recycled fiber and insufficient demand for our
book printing grades. In the event the idled machine is restarted, a portion of these employees are
expected to be recalled back to work.
Exchange Rate Fluctuation Effect on Earnings
34
BOWATER INCORPORATED
Canadian Dollar
Nearly half of our manufacturing costs and certain financial liabilities are denominated in
Canadian dollars. Sales are denominated in the currency of the country in which they occur.
Accordingly, changes in the Canadian-U.S. dollar exchange rate may significantly impact our
revenues and costs. The magnitude and direction of this impact primarily depends on our production
and sales volume, the proportion of our production and sales that occur in Canada, the proportion
of our tax and other financial liabilities denominated in Canadian dollars, our hedging levels, and
the magnitude, direction and duration of changes in the Canadian-U.S. dollar exchange rate.
Increases in the value of the Canadian dollar versus the U.S. dollar reduce our earnings, which are
reported in U.S. dollars. The impact of a one-cent increase in the Canadian dollar exchange rate on
our operating income is discussed below in Exchange Rate Hedging Programs Canadian Dollars
Forward Contracts.
British Pound Sterling
We have entered into sales agreements denominated in the British pound sterling, representing less
than 5% of our sales for the first six months 2007. Accordingly, changes in the British pound
sterling-U.S. dollar exchange rate impact the amount of revenues we recognize. The magnitude and
direction of the impact primarily depends on our sales volume under these sales agreements, our
hedging levels, and the magnitude, direction and duration of changes in the British pound
sterling-U.S. dollar exchange rate. Decreases in the value of the British pound sterling versus the
U.S. dollar reduce our sales, which are reported in U.S. dollars.
Exchange Rate Hedging Programs
Canadian Dollars Forward Contracts
We attempt to partially limit our exposure to Canadian-U.S. dollar exchange rate fluctuations
through hedging transactions. Under the exchange rates and operating conditions that existed at
June 30, 2007, for every one-cent increase in the Canadian-U.S. dollar exchange rate, our operating
income, before currency hedging, for the six months ended June 30, 2007 was reduced by
approximately $6.7 million. We expect exchange rate fluctuations to continue to impact costs and
revenues; however, we cannot predict the magnitude or direction of this effect for any quarter, and
there can be no assurance that the future effect will be similar to that set forth above. Based on
exchange rates and operating conditions projected for the remainder of 2007, we project that a
one-cent increase in the Canadian dollar exchange rate would reduce our operating income for the
year ended December 31, 2007, before currency hedging, by approximately $13.3 million.
At December 31, 2006, we had approximately $0.4 million of unrealized losses recorded on our
Canadian dollar hedging program. With the Canadian dollar strengthening to historically high
levels, we had been entering into short-term hedging contracts that extend out only a few months at
a time. As of June 30, 2007, all of our outstanding contracts had expired. We continue to assess
opportunities to enter into short-term hedging contracts. For a further description of our hedging
activities, see Note 9 to our Consolidated Financial Statements.
British Pound Sterling Forward Contracts
Beginning in the first quarter of 2007, we entered into currency forward contracts to partially
limit our exposure to British pound sterling-U.S. dollar exchange rate fluctuations. We expect
exchange rate fluctuations to continue to impact revenues; however, we cannot predict the magnitude
or direction of this effect for any quarter, and there can be no assurance that the future effect
will be similar to that set forth above. All of the existing contracts will mature on or before
December 2007. Based on exchange rates and sales volumes projected for the remainder of 2007, we
project that a one-cent increase in the British pound sterling exchange rate would reduce our sales
for the year ended December 31, 2007, before currency hedging, by approximately $0.3 million.
These contracts do not currently qualify for hedge accounting treatment and have been adjusted to
fair value through the Consolidated Statements of Operations. Approximately $0.8 million and $0.7
million of pre-tax losses were recognized for the three and six months ended June 30, 2007,
respectively, for contracts that we purchased to economically hedge forecasted sales expected to
occur in 2007. Hedging contracts outstanding at June 30, 2007 have
35
BOWATER INCORPORATED
been established to hedge forecasted transactions through the fourth quarter of 2007. As of June
30, 2007, the fair value of our outstanding British pound sterling forward contracts, which have a
notional value of $40.3 million, is a liability of $0.5 million. For a further description of our
hedging activities, see Note 9 to our Consolidated Financial Statements.
Commodity Hedging Program
Natural Gas Swap Agreements
Beginning in the third quarter of 2006, we entered into natural gas swap agreements under our
natural gas hedging program for the purpose of reducing the risk inherent in fluctuating natural
gas prices. Our hedged natural gas costs are billed to us based on a publicly traded index plus a
fixed amount. The natural gas swap agreements allow us to minimize the effect of fluctuations in
those indices by contractually exchanging the publicly traded index upon which we are billed for a
fixed index of natural gas cost. The swap agreements, which did not qualify for hedge accounting
treatment during the first six months of 2007, have been adjusted to fair value through the
Consolidated Statements of Operations. As a result, approximately $1.1 million of pre-tax losses
and $0.1 million of pre-tax gains were recognized for the three and six months ended June 30, 2007,
respectively, for contracts that we entered into to economically hedge forecasted transactions
expected to occur through July 2008. As of June 30, 2007, the fair value of our outstanding natural
gas swap agreements, which have a notional amount of $7.5 million, is a liability of $0.4 million.
For a further description of our hedging activities, see Note 9 to our Consolidated Financial
Statements.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
Fair Value Measurements
In September 2006, the FASB issued Statement No. 157, Fair Value Measurements (SFAS 157). SFAS
157 provides enhanced guidance for using fair value to measure assets and liabilities. SFAS 157
also responds to investors requests for expanded information about the extent to which companies
measure assets and liabilities at fair value, the information used to measure fair value, and the
effect of fair value measurements on earnings. SFAS 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework
for measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting principles, and expands disclosures about
fair value measurements. SFAS 157 applies to other accounting pronouncements that require or permit
fair value measurements and is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning
after November 15, 2007 and interim periods within those fiscal years. We are currently evaluating
the impact of this statement on our results of operations and financial position.
In February 2007, the FASB issued Statement No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets
and Financial Liabilities (SFAS 159) which permits entities to choose to measure many financial
instruments and certain other items at fair value. The fair value option established by SFAS 159
permits all companies to choose to measure eligible items at fair value at specified election
dates. Unrealized gains and losses on items for which the fair value option has been elected will
be reported in earnings at each subsequent reporting date. The decision to elect the fair value
option may be applied on an instrument by instrument basis, with a few exceptions, is irrevocable,
unless a new election date occurs, and is applied to entire instruments only, not to portions of
instruments. SFAS 159 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 1, 2007. We are
currently evaluating the impact of this statement on our results of operations and financial
position.
36
BOWATER INCORPORATED
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Foreign Exchange Risk
We have manufacturing operations in the United States, Canada and Korea and sales offices located
throughout the world. As a result, we are exposed to movements in foreign currency exchange rates
in countries outside the United States. Our most significant foreign currency exposure relates to
Canada. Approximately 40% of our pulp and paper production capacity and a significant portion of
our lumber production are in Canada, with manufacturing costs primarily denominated in Canadian
dollars. Also, certain other assets and liabilities are denominated in Canadian dollars and are
exposed to foreign currency movements. As a result, our earnings are affected by increases or
decreases in the value of the Canadian dollar. Increases in the value of the Canadian dollar versus
the United States dollar will tend to reduce reported earnings, and decreases in the value of the
Canadian dollar will tend to increase reported earnings. See the information set forth under Item
1A Risks Factors Currency fluctuations may adversely affect our results of operations and
financial condition and changes in foreign currency exchange rates can affect our competitive
position, selling prices and manufacturing costs in Part II of our Form 10-Q for the three months
ended March 31, 2007 and under section Exchange Rate Fluctuation Effect on Earnings in this Form
10-Q for further information on foreign exchange risks related to our sales and operating costs. To
reduce our exposure to differences in Canadian dollar and British pound sterling exchange rate
fluctuations, we periodically enter into and designate Canadian dollar forward contracts and
British pound sterling forward contracts to hedge certain of our forecasted Canadian dollar cash
outflows and British pound sterling cash inflows, respectively. We estimate the monthly forecasted
Canadian dollar outflows on a rolling 24-month basis. Depending on the level of the Canadian
dollar, we hedge the forecasted Canadian dollar outflows of manufacturing costs up to 90% in
each of the first twelve months and up to 80% in the following twelve months.
Due to the continued strengthening of the Canadian dollar, we are
currently not hedging beyond the next three months. At June 30, 2007, we had no Canadian dollar forward
contracts outstanding. We enter into British pound sterling forward contracts for an amount equal
to up to 75% of outstanding sales contracts with U.K. customers, depending on the level of the
British pound sterling. At June 30, 2007, we had entered into British pound sterling forward
contracts for a notional amount of $40.3 million, which represented 60% of our outstanding sales
contracts with U.K. customers. Information regarding the carrying value and fair market value of
the outstanding contracts is set forth in Note 9 to our Consolidated Financial Statements.
Interest Rate Risk
We are exposed to interest rate risk on our fixed-rate and variable-rate long-term debt and our
short-term variable-rate bank debt. Our objective is to manage the impact of interest rate changes
on earnings and cash flows and on the market value of our borrowings. We have a mix of fixed-rate
and variable-rate borrowings. At June 30, 2007, we had $1,990.9 million of fixed rate long-term
debt and $267.9 million of short and long-term variable rate debt. The fixed rate long-term debt is
exposed to fluctuations in fair value resulting from changes in market interest rates, but not
earnings or cash flows. Our variable rate short and long-term debt approximates fair value as it
bears interest rates that approximate market, but changes in interest rates do affect future
earnings and cash flows. Based on our outstanding short and long-term variable rate debt, a 100
basis-point increase in interest rates would have increased our interest expense in the first six
months of 2007 by approximately $1.4 million.
Commodity Price Risk
We purchase significant amounts of energy, chemicals, wood fiber and recovered paper to supply our
manufacturing facilities. These raw materials are market-priced commodities and, as such, are
subject to fluctuations in market prices. Increases in the prices of these commodities will tend to
reduce our reported earnings and decreases will tend to increase our reported earnings. From time
to time, we may enter into contracts aimed at securing a stable source of supply for commodities
such as timber, wood fiber, energy, chemicals and recovered paper. These contracts typically
require us to pay the market price at the time of purchase. Thus under these contracts we generally remain subject to market fluctuations in
commodity prices. In order to offset some of this inherent risk for energy, we have also entered
into natural gas swap arrangements. The natural gas swap agreements allow us to minimize the effect
of fluctuations
37
BOWATER INCORPORATED
in those indices by contractually exchanging the publicly traded index upon which we are billed for
a fixed index of natural gas cost.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures.
(a) |
|
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures: |
We have evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and
procedures as of June 30, 2007. Based on that evaluation, the Chairman, President and Chief
Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and
procedures are effective in recording, processing, summarizing, and timely reporting information
required to be disclosed in our reports to the Securities and Exchange Commission.
(b) |
|
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting: |
In connection with the evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, there were no
changes during the period covered by this report that have materially affected, or are reasonably
likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings.
(a) |
|
Bowater is involved in various legal proceedings relating to contracts, commercial disputes,
taxes, environmental issues, employment and workers compensation claims and other matters. We
periodically review the status of these proceedings with both inside and outside counsel. We
believe that the ultimate disposition of these matters will not have a material adverse effect on
our financial condition, but it could have a material adverse effect on the results of operations
in a given quarter or the year. |
|
(b) |
|
On September 30, 2005, the Ministry of Justice of the Province of Quebec (MOJ) cited one of our
subsidiaries, Bowater Canadian Forest Products, Inc. (BCFPI), in connection with effluent water
quality of the Dolbeau mill. BCFPI settled this citation on March 29, 2007, by agreeing to pay a
fine and costs totaling CDN $158,000 (approximately US $136,000). The Dolbeau mill has taken steps
to improve its effluent quality and has experienced only two other exceedences since January 1,
2005. |
|
(c) |
|
On June 18, 2007, The Levin Group, L.P. filed a complaint against Bowater in the Supreme Court
of New York, New York County, asserting claims for breach of contract and related claims relating
to certain advisory services purported to have been provided by the plaintiff in connection with
the combination. The complaint seeks damages of no less than $70 million, related costs and such
other relief as the court deems just and proper. The management of Bowater believes this claim is
entirely without merit and intends to contest this matter vigorously. |
|
(d) |
|
There have been no other material developments to the legal proceedings described in our Annual
Report on Form 10-K filed on March 1, 2007. |
38
BOWATER INCORPORATED
Item 6.
Exhibits.
Exhibits (numbered in accordance with Item 601 of Regulation S-K):
|
|
|
Exhibit No. |
|
Description |
|
|
|
4.1
|
|
First Amendment to the Credit
Agreement, dated July 20, 2007, by and among Bowater Canadian
Forest Products Inc., as Borrower; Bowater Incorporated, as U.S.
Borrower; Bowater Canadian Holdings Incorporated, as Parent Grantor;
several lenders and The Bank of Nova Scotia. |
4.2
|
|
First Amendment to Credit
Agreement, dated July 20, 2007, by and among Bowater Incorporated, several lenders
and Wachovia Bank, National Association. |
10.1
|
|
First Amendment dated May 11, 2007 to the Agreement between Bowater Incorporated and Arnold M.
Nemirow, dated May 10, 2006. |
12.1
|
|
Statement regarding Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges. |
31.1
|
|
Certification of CEO Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
31.2
|
|
Certification of CFO Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
32.1
|
|
Certification of CEO Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
32.2
|
|
Certification of CFO Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
39
BOWATER INCORPORATED
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused
this Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
BOWATER INCORPORATED
|
|
|
By |
/s/ William G. Harvey
|
|
|
|
William G. Harvey |
|
|
|
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
By |
/s/ Joseph B. Johnson
|
|
|
|
Joseph B. Johnson |
|
|
|
Vice President and Controller |
|
|
Dated: August 9, 2007
40
BOWATER INCORPORATED
INDEX
TO EXHIBITS
|
|
|
Exhibit No. |
|
Description |
4.1
|
|
First Amendment to the Credit
Agreement, dated July 20, 2007, by and among Bowater Canadian
Forest Products Inc., as Borrower; Bowater Incorporated, as U.S.
Borrower; Bowater Canadian Holdings Incorporated, as Parent Grantor;
several lenders and The Bank of Nova Scotia. |
4.2
|
|
First Amendment to Credit
Agreement, dated July 20, 2007, by and among Bowater Incorporated, several lenders
and Wachovia Bank, National Association. |
10.1
|
|
First Amendment dated May 11, 2007 to the Agreement between Bowater Incorporated and Arnold M.
Nemirow, dated May 10, 2006. |
12.1
|
|
Statement regarding Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges. |
31.1
|
|
Certification of CEO Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
31.2
|
|
Certification of CFO Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
32.1
|
|
Certification of CEO Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
32.2
|
|
Certification of CFO Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |