EMC-2013.9.30-10Q
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
(Mark One)
|
| |
x | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2013
OR
|
| |
o | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission File Number 1-9853
EMC CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
| | |
Massachusetts | | 04-2680009 |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) | | (I.R.S. Employer Identification Number) |
| |
176 South Street Hopkinton, Massachusetts (Address of principal executive offices) | | 01748 (Zip Code) |
(508) 435-1000
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
|
| | |
Large accelerated filer x | | Accelerated filer o |
Non-accelerated filer o (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) | | Smaller reporting company o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No x
The number of shares of common stock, par value $.01 per share, of the registrant outstanding as of September 30, 2013 was 2,057,846,730.
EMC CORPORATION
|
|
FACTORS THAT MAY AFFECT FUTURE RESULTS This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements, within the meaning of the Federal securities laws, about our business and prospects. The forward-looking statements do not include the potential impact of any mergers, acquisitions, divestitures, securities offerings or business combinations that may be announced or closed after the date hereof. Any statements contained herein that are not statements of historical fact may be deemed to be forward-looking statements. Without limiting the foregoing, the words “believes,” “plans,” “intends,” “expects,” “goals” and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements, although not all forward-looking statements contain these words. Our future results may differ materially from our past results and from those projected in the forward-looking statements due to various uncertainties and risks, including those described in Item 1A of Part II (Risk Factors). The forward-looking statements speak only as of the date of this Quarterly Report and undue reliance should not be placed on these statements. We disclaim any obligation to update any forward-looking statements contained herein after the date of this Quarterly Report. |
PART I
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
EMC CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(in millions, except per share amounts) |
| | | | | | | |
| September 30, 2013 | | December 31, 2012 |
| (unaudited) | | |
ASSETS | | | |
Current assets: | | | |
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 7,155 |
| | $ | 4,714 |
|
Short-term investments | 3,442 |
| | 1,422 |
|
Accounts and notes receivable, less allowance for doubtful accounts of $63 and $68 | 2,934 |
| | 3,433 |
|
Inventories | 1,375 |
| | 1,201 |
|
Deferred income taxes | 986 |
| | 942 |
|
Other current assets | 555 |
| | 465 |
|
Total current assets | 16,447 |
| | 12,177 |
|
Long-term investments | 6,869 |
| | 5,260 |
|
Property, plant and equipment, net | 3,373 |
| | 3,145 |
|
Intangible assets, net | 1,831 |
| | 2,035 |
|
Goodwill | 14,306 |
| | 13,840 |
|
Other assets, net | 1,776 |
| | 1,612 |
|
Total assets | $ | 44,602 |
| | $ | 38,069 |
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY | | | |
Current liabilities: | | | |
Accounts payable | $ | 1,108 |
| | $ | 1,041 |
|
Accrued expenses | 2,699 |
| | 2,522 |
|
Income taxes payable | 201 |
| | 514 |
|
Convertible debt (See Note 4) | 1,658 |
| | 1,652 |
|
Deferred revenue | 5,093 |
| | 4,575 |
|
Total current liabilities | 10,759 |
| | 10,304 |
|
Income taxes payable | 310 |
| | 293 |
|
Deferred revenue | 3,416 |
| | 2,976 |
|
Deferred income taxes | 505 |
| | 575 |
|
Long-term debt (See Note 4) | 5,493 |
| | — |
|
Other liabilities | 365 |
| | 339 |
|
Total liabilities | 20,848 |
| | 14,487 |
|
Convertible debt (See Note 4) | 9 |
| | 58 |
|
Commitments and contingencies (See Note 14) |
|
| |
|
|
Shareholders’ equity: | | | |
Preferred stock, par value $0.01; authorized 25 shares; none outstanding | — |
| | — |
|
Common stock, par value $0.01; authorized 6,000 shares; issued and outstanding 2,058 and 2,107 shares | 21 |
| | 21 |
|
Additional paid-in capital | 2,289 |
| | 3,691 |
|
Retained earnings | 20,298 |
| | 18,853 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net | (291 | ) | | (208 | ) |
Total EMC Corporation’s shareholders’ equity | 22,317 |
| | 22,357 |
|
Non-controlling interests | 1,428 |
| | 1,167 |
|
Total shareholders’ equity | 23,745 |
| | 23,524 |
|
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity | $ | 44,602 |
| | $ | 38,069 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.
EMC CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED INCOME STATEMENTS
(in millions, except per share amounts)
(unaudited)
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| For the Three Months Ended | | For the Nine Months Ended |
| September 30, 2013 | | September 30, 2012 | | September 30, 2013 | | September 30, 2012 |
Revenues: | | | | | | | |
Product sales | $ | 3,165 |
| | $ | 3,084 |
| | $ | 9,535 |
| | $ | 9,332 |
|
Services | 2,374 |
| | 2,194 |
| | 7,005 |
| | 6,352 |
|
| 5,539 |
| | 5,278 |
| | 16,540 |
| | 15,684 |
|
Costs and expenses: | | | | | | | |
Cost of product sales | 1,324 |
| | 1,292 |
| | 4,020 |
| | 3,849 |
|
Cost of services | 773 |
| | 698 |
| | 2,271 |
| | 2,087 |
|
Research and development | 686 |
| | 653 |
| | 2,056 |
| | 1,896 |
|
Selling, general and administrative | 1,809 |
| | 1,709 |
| | 5,308 |
| | 5,076 |
|
Restructuring and acquisition-related charges | 40 |
| | 27 |
| | 195 |
| | 81 |
|
Operating income | 907 |
| | 899 |
| | 2,690 |
| | 2,695 |
|
Non-operating income (expense): | | | | | | | |
Investment income | 26 |
| | 29 |
| | 93 |
| | 85 |
|
Interest expense | (58 | ) | | (21 | ) | | (109 | ) | | (58 | ) |
Other expense, net | (55 | ) | | (63 | ) | | (197 | ) | | (158 | ) |
Total non-operating income (expense) | (87 | ) | | (55 | ) | | (213 | ) | | (131 | ) |
Income before provision for income taxes | 820 |
| | 844 |
| | 2,477 |
| | 2,564 |
|
Income tax provision | 181 |
| | 185 |
| | 474 |
| | 590 |
|
Net income | 639 |
| | 659 |
| | 2,003 |
| | 1,974 |
|
Less: Net income attributable to the non-controlling interest in VMware, Inc. | (53 | ) | | (33 | ) | | (136 | ) | | (111 | ) |
Net income attributable to EMC Corporation | $ | 586 |
| | $ | 626 |
| | $ | 1,867 |
| | $ | 1,863 |
|
| | | | | | | |
Net income per weighted average share, basic attributable to EMC Corporation common shareholders | $ | 0.28 |
| | $ | 0.30 |
| | $ | 0.89 |
| | $ | 0.89 |
|
Net income per weighted average share, diluted attributable to EMC Corporation common shareholders | $ | 0.27 |
| | $ | 0.28 |
| | $ | 0.86 |
| | $ | 0.84 |
|
| | | | | | | |
Weighted average shares, basic | 2,069 |
| | 2,104 |
| | 2,088 |
| | 2,090 |
|
Weighted average shares, diluted | 2,165 |
| | 2,210 |
| | 2,176 |
| | 2,207 |
|
| | | | | | | |
Cash dividends declared per common share | $ | 0.10 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 0.20 |
| | $ | — |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.
EMC CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(in millions)
(unaudited)
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| For the Three Months Ended | | For the Nine Months Ended |
| September 30, 2013 | | September 30, 2012 | | September 30, 2013 | | September 30, 2012 |
Net income | $ | 639 |
| | $ | 659 |
| | $ | 2,003 |
| | $ | 1,974 |
|
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of taxes (benefits): | | | | | | | |
Foreign currency translation adjustments | 12 |
| | 16 |
| | (44 | ) | | 8 |
|
Changes in market value of investments: | | | | | | | |
Changes in unrealized gains (losses), net of taxes (benefits) of $0, $25, $(16) and $53 | (1 | ) | | 44 |
| | (30 | ) | | 86 |
|
Reclassification adjustment for net losses (gains) realized in net income, net of benefits (taxes) of $0, $(2), $(4) and $(4) | 1 |
| | (3 | ) | | (7 | ) | | (2 | ) |
Net change in market value of investments | — |
| | 41 |
| | (37 | ) | | 84 |
|
Changes in market value of derivatives: | | | | | | | |
Changes in market value of derivatives, net of taxes (benefits) of $(1), $(6), $2 and $(20) | (1 | ) | | (14 | ) | | 6 |
| | (38 | ) |
Reclassification adjustment for net losses (gains) included in net income, net of benefits (taxes) of $0, $1, $(2) and $15 | (1 | ) | | 7 |
| | (9 | ) | | 27 |
|
Net change in the market value of derivatives | (2 | ) | | (7 | ) | | (3 | ) | | (11 | ) |
Other comprehensive income (loss) | 10 |
| | 50 |
| | (84 | ) | | 81 |
|
Comprehensive income | 649 |
| | 709 |
| | 1,919 |
| | 2,055 |
|
Less: Net income attributable to the non-controlling interest in VMware, Inc. | (53 | ) | | (33 | ) | | (136 | ) | | (111 | ) |
Less: Other comprehensive income attributable to the non-controlling interest in VMware, Inc. | (1 | ) | | — |
| | 1 |
| | (1 | ) |
Comprehensive income attributable to EMC Corporation | $ | 595 |
| | $ | 676 |
| | $ | 1,784 |
| | $ | 1,943 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.
EMC CORPORATION CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (in millions) (unaudited) |
| | | | | | | |
| For the Nine Months Ended |
| September 30, 2013 | | September 30, 2012 |
Cash flows from operating activities: | | | |
Cash received from customers | $ | 18,065 |
| | $ | 16,557 |
|
Cash paid to suppliers and employees | (12,740 | ) | | (11,951 | ) |
Dividends and interest received | 118 |
| | 65 |
|
Interest paid | (19 | ) | | (17 | ) |
Income taxes paid | (691 | ) | | (291 | ) |
Net cash provided by operating activities | 4,733 |
| | 4,363 |
|
Cash flows from investing activities: | | | |
Additions to property, plant and equipment | (673 | ) | | (523 | ) |
Capitalized software development costs | (342 | ) | | (316 | ) |
Purchases of short- and long-term available-for-sale securities | (8,630 | ) | | (5,012 | ) |
Sales of short- and long-term available-for-sale securities | 3,540 |
| | 4,154 |
|
Maturities of short- and long-term available-for-sale securities | 1,386 |
| | 844 |
|
Business acquisitions, net of cash acquired | (616 | ) | | (1,878 | ) |
Purchases of strategic and other related investments | (109 | ) | | (62 | ) |
Sales of strategic and other related investments | 10 |
| | 79 |
|
Joint venture funding | (268 | ) | | (218 | ) |
Proceeds from divestiture of businesses | 38 |
| | — |
|
Net cash used in investing activities | (5,664 | ) | | (2,932 | ) |
Cash flows from financing activities: | | | |
Proceeds from the issuance of EMC’s common stock | 302 |
| | 388 |
|
Proceeds from the issuance of VMware’s common stock | 185 |
| | 214 |
|
EMC repurchase of EMC’s common stock | (1,965 | ) | | (380 | ) |
EMC purchase of VMware’s common stock | (160 | ) | | (132 | ) |
VMware repurchase of VMware’s common stock | (392 | ) | | (307 | ) |
Excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation | 102 |
| | 212 |
|
Payment of long-term and short-term obligations | (14 | ) | | (1,714 | ) |
Proceeds from the issuance of long-term and short-term obligations | 5,460 |
| | 4 |
|
Interest rate contract settlement | — |
| | (70 | ) |
Dividend payment | (209 | ) | | — |
|
Third party contribution to Pivotal | 105 |
| | — |
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities | 3,414 |
| | (1,785 | ) |
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents | (42 | ) | | (18 | ) |
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents | 2,441 |
| | (372 | ) |
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period | 4,714 |
| | 4,492 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period | $ | 7,155 |
| | $ | 4,120 |
|
Reconciliation of net income to net cash provided by operating activities: | | | |
Net income | $ | 2,003 |
| | $ | 1,974 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: | | | |
Depreciation and amortization | 1,215 |
| | 1,128 |
|
Non-cash interest expense on debt | 82 |
| | 34 |
|
Non-cash restructuring and other special charges | 10 |
| | 9 |
|
Stock-based compensation expense | 700 |
| | 659 |
|
Provision for (recovery of) doubtful accounts | (2 | ) | | 21 |
|
Deferred income taxes, net | (31 | ) | | (73 | ) |
Excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation | (102 | ) | | (212 | ) |
Other, net | 23 |
| | (20 | ) |
Changes in assets and liabilities, net of acquisitions: | | | |
Accounts and notes receivable | 521 |
| | (207 | ) |
Inventories | (382 | ) | | (337 | ) |
Other assets | 122 |
| | 63 |
|
Accounts payable | 45 |
| | 119 |
|
Accrued expenses | (321 | ) | | (226 | ) |
Income taxes payable | (176 | ) | | 372 |
|
Deferred revenue | 1,006 |
| | 1,059 |
|
Other liabilities | 20 |
| | — |
|
Net cash provided by operating activities | $ | 4,733 |
| | $ | 4,363 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.
EMC CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
(in millions)
(unaudited)
For the nine months ended September 30, 2013:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Common Stock | | Additional Paid-in Capital | | Retained Earnings | | Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss | | Non-controlling Interests | | Shareholders’ Equity |
Shares | | Par Value | | | | | |
Balance, January 1, 2013 | 2,107 |
| | $ | 21 |
| | $ | 3,691 |
| | $ | 18,853 |
| | $ | (208 | ) | | $ | 1,167 |
| | $ | 23,524 |
|
Stock issued through stock option and stock purchase plans | 21 |
| | — |
| | 302 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 302 |
|
Tax benefit from stock options exercised | — |
| | — |
| | 115 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 115 |
|
Restricted stock grants, cancellations and withholdings, net | 10 |
| | — |
| | (115 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (115 | ) |
Repurchase of common stock | (80 | ) | | — |
| | (2,000 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (2,000 | ) |
EMC purchase of VMware stock | — |
| | — |
| | (124 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | (26 | ) | | (150 | ) |
Stock options issued in business acquisitions | — |
| | — |
| | 1 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 1 |
|
Stock-based compensation | — |
| | — |
| | 706 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 706 |
|
Cash dividends declared | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (422 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | (422 | ) |
Impact from equity transactions of non-controlling interests | — |
| | — |
| | (336 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | 152 |
| | (184 | ) |
Change in market value of investments | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (36 | ) | | (1 | ) | | (37 | ) |
Change in market value of derivatives | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (3 | ) | | — |
| | (3 | ) |
Translation adjustment | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (44 | ) | | — |
| | (44 | ) |
Reclassification of convertible debt (to)/from mezzanine (Note 4) | — |
| | — |
| | 49 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 49 |
|
Net income | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 1,867 |
| | — |
| | 136 |
| | 2,003 |
|
Balance, September 30, 2013 | 2,058 |
| | $ | 21 |
| | $ | 2,289 |
| | $ | 20,298 |
| | $ | (291 | ) | | $ | 1,428 |
| | $ | 23,745 |
|
For the nine months ended September 30, 2012:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Common Stock | | Additional Paid-in Capital | | Retained Earnings | | Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss | | Non-controlling Interests | | Shareholders’ Equity |
Shares | | Par Value | | | | | |
Balance, January 1, 2012 | 2,050 |
| | $ | 21 |
| | $ | 3,405 |
| | $ | 16,121 |
| | $ | (235 | ) | | $ | 968 |
| | $ | 20,280 |
|
Stock issued through stock option and stock purchase plans | 30 |
| | — |
| | 388 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 388 |
|
Tax benefit from stock options exercised | — |
| | — |
| | 257 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 257 |
|
Restricted stock grants, cancellations and withholdings, net | 10 |
| | — |
| | (120 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (120 | ) |
Repurchase of common stock | (15 | ) | | — |
| | (410 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (410 | ) |
EMC purchase of VMware stock | — |
| | — |
| | (114 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | (18 | ) | | (132 | ) |
Stock options issued in business acquisitions | — |
| | — |
| | 18 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 18 |
|
Stock-based compensation | — |
| | — |
| | 661 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 661 |
|
Impact from equity transactions of VMware, Inc. | — |
| | — |
| | (275 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | 89 |
| | (186 | ) |
Change in market value of investments | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 83 |
| | 1 |
| | 84 |
|
Change in market value of derivatives | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (11 | ) | | — |
| | (11 | ) |
Translation adjustment | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 8 |
| | — |
| | 8 |
|
Convertible debt conversions and warrant settlement | 32 |
| | (1 | ) | | (1 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (2 | ) |
Reclassification of convertible debt (to)/from mezzanine (Note 4) | — |
| | — |
| | 46 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 46 |
|
Net income | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 1,863 |
| | — |
| | 111 |
| | 1,974 |
|
Balance, September 30, 2012 | 2,107 |
| | $ | 20 |
| | $ | 3,855 |
| | $ | 17,984 |
| | $ | (155 | ) | | $ | 1,151 |
| | $ | 22,855 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.
EMC CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1. Basis of Presentation
Company
EMC Corporation (“EMC”) and its subsidiaries develop, deliver and support the Information Technology (“IT”) industry’s broadest range of information infrastructure and virtual infrastructure technologies, solutions and services.
EMC’s Information Infrastructure business provides a foundation for organizations to store, manage, protect, analyze and secure their vast and ever-increasing quantities of information, improve business agility, lower cost of ownership and enhance their competitive advantage within traditional data centers, virtual data centers and cloud-based IT infrastructures. EMC’s Information Infrastructure business comprises three segments – Information Storage, RSA Information Security and Information Intelligence Group.
EMC's GoPivotal, Inc. ("Pivotal") business was formed in the second quarter of 2013. Pivotal unites strategic technology, people and programs from EMC and VMware, Inc. ("VMware"), including Greenplum, Cloud Foundry, Spring, Cetas, Pivotal Labs, GemFire and other products from the VMware vFabric Suite. Pivotal is building a new platform comprising next-generation data fabrics, application fabrics and a cloud independent platform-as-a-service ("PaaS").
EMC’s VMware Virtual Infrastructure business, which is represented by EMC’s majority equity stake in VMware, is the leader in virtualization infrastructure solutions utilized by organizations to help them transform the way they build, deliver and consume IT resources. VMware’s virtualization infrastructure solutions, which include a suite of products designed to deliver a software-defined data center, run on industry-standard desktop computers and servers and support a wide range of operating system and application environments, as well as networking and storage infrastructures.
General
The accompanying interim consolidated financial statements are unaudited and have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) for interim financial information. These consolidated financial statements include the accounts of EMC, its wholly owned subsidiaries, as well as Pivotal and VMware, companies majority-owned by EMC. All intercompany transactions have been eliminated.
Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in our annual consolidated financial statements have been condensed or omitted. Accordingly, these interim consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2012 which are contained in our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 27, 2013.
The results of operations for the interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the results of operations to be expected for any future period or the entire fiscal year. The interim consolidated financial statements, in the opinion of management, reflect all adjustments necessary to fairly state the results as of and for the three- and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2013 and 2012.
Net Income Per Share
Basic net income per weighted average share has been computed using the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period. Diluted net income per weighted average share is computed using the weighted average number of common and dilutive common equivalent shares outstanding during the period. Common equivalent shares consist of stock options, restricted stock and restricted stock units, our $1.725 billion 1.75% convertible senior notes due 2013 ("2013 Notes") and associated warrants. Additionally, for purposes of calculating diluted net income per weighted average share, net income is adjusted for the difference between VMware’s reported diluted and basic net income per weighted average share, if any, multiplied by the number of shares of VMware held by EMC.
Reclassifications
Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform with the current year's presentation. During the second quarter of 2013, EMC and VMware combined certain operations to form Pivotal, with a cash investment from General Electric Company ("GE"). Pivotal is considered a separate reportable segment. We recast the segment disclosures for the prior financial reporting periods to separately present the operations of the Pivotal segment. None of the segment reclassifications impact EMC's previously reported consolidated financial statements. See Note 15 for further discussion of the segment reclassifications.
EMC CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In July 2013, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued new accounting guidance on the presentation of unrecognized tax benefits. This new guidance requires an entity to present an unrecognized tax benefit, or a portion of an unrecognized tax benefit, as a reduction to a deferred tax asset when a net operating loss carryforward, a similar tax loss or a tax credit carryforward exists, with limited exceptions. This new guidance is effective for the periods beginning after December 15, 2013, and should be applied prospectively with retroactive application permitted. We are currently evaluating the impact of the new guidance, and do not expect it to have a material impact on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
In March 2013, the FASB issued guidance that requires a parent company to release any related cumulative translation adjustment into net income only if the sale or transfer results in the complete or substantially complete liquidation of the foreign entity in which the subsidiary or group of assets had resided. This new guidance is effective beginning after December 15, 2013. We do not anticipate that the adoption of this new guidance will have a material impact on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
2. Non-controlling Interests
The non-controlling interests’ share of equity in VMware is reflected as non-controlling interests in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets and was $1,323 million and $1,167 million as of September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively. At September 30, 2013, EMC held approximately 97% of the combined voting power of VMware’s outstanding common stock and approximately 80% of the economic interest in VMware.
The effect of changes in our ownership interest in VMware on our equity was as follows (table in millions):
|
| | | | | | | |
| For the Nine Months Ended |
| September 30, 2013 | | September 30, 2012 |
Net income attributable to EMC Corporation | $ | 1,867 |
| | $ | 1,863 |
|
Transfers (to) from the non-controlling interest in VMware, Inc.: | | | |
Increase in EMC Corporation’s additional paid-in-capital for VMware’s equity issuances | 90 |
| | 117 |
|
Decrease in EMC Corporation’s additional paid-in-capital for VMware’s other equity activity | (426 | ) | | (392 | ) |
Net transfers (to) from non-controlling interest | (336 | ) | | (275 | ) |
Change from net income attributable to EMC Corporation and transfers from the non-controlling interest in VMware, Inc. | $ | 1,531 |
| | $ | 1,588 |
|
The non-controlling interests' share of equity in Pivotal is reflected as a component of the non-controlling interests in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets as $105 million and $0 million at September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively. At September 30, 2013, EMC consolidated held approximately 84% of the economic interest in Pivotal. GE's interest in Pivotal is in the form of a preferred equity instrument. Consequently, there is no net income attributable to non-controlling interest related to Pivotal on the consolidated income statements. Additionally, due to the terms of the preferred instrument, GE's non-controlling interest on the consolidated balance sheets is generally not impacted by Pivotal's equity related activity. The preferred equity instrument is convertible into common shares at GE’s election at any time.
3. Business Combinations, Intangibles and Goodwill
During the nine months ended September 30, 2013, EMC acquired five companies. We acquired substantially all of the outstanding capital stock of Adaptivity, Inc., a provider of software solutions that automate and accelerate enterprise IT migration to the Cloud and ScaleIO, a provider of server-side storage software. These acquisitions complement and expand our Information Storage segment. A member of our board of directors is an investor in a limited partnership which held an equity interest in ScaleIO. The director did not participate in any votes of the board of directors or any committee thereof approving the acquisition, and the terms of the acquisition were negotiated at arms' length.
We also acquired all of the outstanding capital stock of Sitrof Technologies, a document management consultancy provider which complements and expands our Information Intelligence Group segment. We acquired Aveksa, Inc., a provider of Cloud-based identity and access management solutions and PassBan Corporation, a developer of mobile and Cloud-based multi-factor authentication technology. These acquisitions complement and expand our RSA Information Security segment.
EMC CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
Additionally, during the nine months ended September 30, 2013, VMware acquired Virsto Software, a provider of software that optimizes storage performance and utilization in virtual environments.
The aggregate consideration for these six acquisitions was $616 million, net of cash acquired. The consideration paid was allocated to the fair value of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on estimated fair values as of the respective acquisition dates. The aggregate allocation to goodwill, intangibles and net liabilities was approximately $490 million, $137 million and $11 million, respectively. The intangible assets are being amortized based upon the pattern in which the economic benefits of the intangible assets are being utilized. The results of these acquisitions have been included in the consolidated financial statements from the date of purchase. Pro forma results of operations have not been presented as the results of the acquired companies were not material to our consolidated results of operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 or 2012.
Intangible Assets
Intangible assets, excluding goodwill, as of September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012 consist of (tables in millions):
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| September 30, 2013 |
| Gross Carrying Amount | | Accumulated Amortization | | Net Book Value |
Purchased technology | $ | 2,327 |
| | $ | (1,373 | ) | | $ | 954 |
|
Patents | 225 |
| | (98 | ) | | 127 |
|
Software licenses | 100 |
| | (90 | ) | | 10 |
|
Trademarks and tradenames | 171 |
| | (114 | ) | | 57 |
|
Customer relationships and customer lists | 1,370 |
| | (822 | ) | | 548 |
|
Leasehold interest | 145 |
| | (10 | ) | | 135 |
|
Other | 27 |
| | (27 | ) | | — |
|
Total intangible assets, excluding goodwill | $ | 4,365 |
| | $ | (2,534 | ) | | $ | 1,831 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| December 31, 2012 |
| Gross Carrying Amount | | Accumulated Amortization | | Net Book Value |
Purchased technology | $ | 2,233 |
| | $ | (1,207 | ) | | $ | 1,026 |
|
Patents | 225 |
| | (87 | ) | | 138 |
|
Software licenses | 96 |
| | (88 | ) | | 8 |
|
Trademarks and tradenames | 173 |
| | (102 | ) | | 71 |
|
Customer relationships and customer lists | 1,378 |
| | (724 | ) | | 654 |
|
Leasehold interest | 145 |
| | (7 | ) | | 138 |
|
Other | 26 |
| | (26 | ) | | — |
|
Total intangible assets, excluding goodwill | $ | 4,276 |
| | $ | (2,241 | ) | | $ | 2,035 |
|
Goodwill
Changes in the carrying amount of goodwill, net, on a consolidated basis and by segment, for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and the year ended December 31, 2012 consist of (tables in millions):
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Nine Months Ended September 30, 2013 |
| Information Storage | | Information Intelligence Group | | RSA Information Security | | Pivotal | | VMware Virtual Infrastructure | | Total |
Balance, beginning of the period | $ | 7,442 |
| | $ | 1,484 |
| | $ | 2,022 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 2,892 |
| | $ | 13,840 |
|
Goodwill resulting from acquisitions | 146 |
| | 1 |
| | 181 |
| | — |
| | 162 |
| | 490 |
|
Finalization of purchase price allocations and other, net | (1 | ) | | 2 |
| | (1 | ) | | — |
| | (24 | ) | | (24 | ) |
Goodwill transferred in formation of Pivotal | (112 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | 140 |
| | (28 | ) | | — |
|
Balance, end of the period | $ | 7,475 |
| | $ | 1,487 |
| | $ | 2,202 |
| | $ | 140 |
| | $ | 3,002 |
| | $ | 14,306 |
|
EMC CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Year Ended December 31, 2012 |
| Information Storage | | Information Intelligence Group | | RSA Information Security | | Pivotal | | VMware Virtual Infrastructure | | Total |
Balance, beginning of the year | $ | 7,034 |
| | $ | 1,469 |
| | $ | 1,849 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 1,803 |
| | $ | 12,155 |
|
Goodwill resulting from acquisitions | 438 |
| | 15 |
| | 179 |
| | — |
| | 1,092 |
| | 1,724 |
|
Finalization of purchase price allocations | (1 | ) | | — |
| | (6 | ) | | — |
| | (3 | ) | | (10 | ) |
Goodwill de-recognized in divestiture of business | (29 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (29 | ) |
Balance, end of the year | $ | 7,442 |
| | $ | 1,484 |
| | $ | 2,022 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 2,892 |
| | $ | 13,840 |
|
During the second quarter of 2013, EMC and VMware formed Pivotal, with an investment from GE. As Pivotal is considered a separate reportable segment, the transfer of goodwill from the Information Storage and VMware Virtual Infrastructure segments to the newly formed Pivotal segment is shown in the current period rollforward. The amount of transferred goodwill was determined using the relative fair value method. See Note 15 for further discussion of the segment reclassifications.
4. Debt
Long-Term Debt
In June 2013, we issued $5.5 billion aggregate principal amount of senior notes (collectively, the "Notes"). The Notes pay a fixed rate of interest semi-annually in arrears with the first interest payment commencing on December 1, 2013. The proceeds from the Notes will be used to satisfy cash payment obligations at the maturity, or upon the conversion, of the outstanding 2013 Notes as well as for general corporate purposes including stock repurchases, dividend payments, working capital needs and other business opportunities. The Notes of each series are senior, unsecured obligations of EMC and are not convertible or exchangeable. Unless previously purchased and canceled, we will repay the Notes of each series at 100% of the principal amount, together with accrued and unpaid interest thereon, at maturity. However, EMC has the right to redeem any or all of the Notes at specified redemption prices. As of September 30, 2013, we were in compliance with all debt covenants, which are customary in nature.
Our long-term debt as of September 30, 2013 was as follows (dollars in millions):
|
| | | | | | | |
Senior Notes | | Issued at Discount to Par | | Carrying Value |
$2.5 billion 1.875% Notes due 2018 | | 99.943 | % | | $ | 2,499 |
|
$2.0 billion 2.650% Notes due 2020 | | 99.760 | % | | $ | 1,995 |
|
$1.0 billion 3.375% Notes due 2023 | | 99.925 | % | | $ | 999 |
|
| | | | $ | 5,493 |
|
The unamortized discount on the Notes consists of $7 million, which will be fully amortized by June 1, 2023. The effective interest rate on the Notes was 2.5% for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013.
Convertible Debt
In November 2006, we issued our $1.725 billion 1.75% convertible senior notes due 2011 (the “2011 Notes”) and our 2013 Notes for total gross proceeds of $3.5 billion. The 2013 Notes are senior unsecured obligations and rank equally with all other existing and future senior unsecured debt.
The 2011 Notes matured and a majority of the noteholders exercised their right to convert the outstanding 2011 Notes at the end of 2011. Pursuant to the settlement terms, the majority of the converted 2011 Notes were not settled until January 9, 2012. At that time, we paid the noteholders $1.7 billion in cash for the outstanding principal and 30 million shares for the $661 million in excess of the conversion value over the principal amount, as prescribed by the terms of the 2011 Notes.
At September 30, 2013, the 2013 Notes were fully convertible until maturity. Accordingly, since the terms of the 2013 Notes require the principal to be settled in cash, we reclassified to the mezzanine from shareholders’ equity the portion of the 2013 Notes
EMC CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
attributable to the conversion feature which had not yet been accreted to its face value, and the 2013 Notes are classified as a current liability. Approximately $58 million of the 2013 Notes have been converted as of September 30, 2013.
Upon conversion, we will pay cash up to the principal amount of the debt converted. With respect to any conversion value in excess of the principal amount of the 2013 Notes converted, we have the option to settle the excess with cash, shares of our common stock, or a combination of cash and shares of our common stock based on a daily conversion value, determined in accordance with the indenture, calculated on a proportionate basis for each day of the relevant 20-day observation period. The initial conversion rate for the 2013 Notes will be 62.1978 shares of our common stock per one thousand dollars of principal amount of 2013 Notes, which represents a 27.5% conversion premium from the date the 2013 Notes were issued and is equivalent to a conversion price of approximately $16.08 per share of our common stock. The conversion price is subject to adjustment in some events as set forth in the indenture. In addition, if a “fundamental change” (as defined in the indenture) occurs prior to the maturity date, we will in some cases increase the conversion rate for a holder of 2013 Notes that elects to convert its 2013 Notes in connection with such fundamental change.
The carrying amount of the 2013 Notes reported in the consolidated balance sheets as of September 30, 2013 was $1,658 million and the fair value was $2,676 million. The carrying amount of the equity component of the 2013 Notes was $316 million at September 30, 2013. As of September 30, 2013, the unamortized discount on the 2013 Notes consists of $9 million, which will be fully amortized by December 1, 2013.
The 2013 Notes pay interest in cash at a rate of 1.75% semi-annually in arrears on December 1 and June 1 of each year. The effective interest rate on the 2011 Notes and 2013 Notes was 5.6% for both the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012.
The following tables represent the key components of our interest expense on convertible debt (tables in millions):
|
| | | | | | | |
| For the Three Months Ended |
| September 30, 2013 | | September 30, 2012 |
Contractual interest expense on the coupon | $ | 7 |
| | $ | 8 |
|
Amortization of the discount component recognized as interest expense | 17 |
| | 15 |
|
Total interest expense on the convertible debt | $ | 24 |
| | $ | 23 |
|
|
| | | | | | | |
| For the Nine Months Ended |
| September 30, 2013 | | September 30, 2012 |
Contractual interest expense on the coupon | $ | 22 |
| | $ | 22 |
|
Amortization of the discount component recognized as interest expense | 49 |
| | 45 |
|
Total interest expense on the convertible debt | $ | 71 |
| | $ | 67 |
|
In connection with the issuance of the 2011 Notes and 2013 Notes, we entered into separate convertible note hedge transactions with respect to our common stock (the “Purchased Options”). The Purchased Options allow us to receive shares of our common stock and/or cash related to the excess conversion value that we would pay to the holders of the 2011 Notes and 2013 Notes upon conversion. The Purchased Options will cover, subject to customary anti-dilution adjustments, approximately 215 million shares of our common stock. We paid an aggregate amount of $669 million of the proceeds from the sale of the 2011 Notes and 2013 Notes for the Purchased Options that was recorded as additional paid-in-capital in shareholders’ equity. In the fourth quarter of 2011, we exercised 108 million of the Purchased Options in conjunction with the planned settlements of the 2011 Notes, and we received 30 million shares of net settlement on January 9, 2012, representing the excess conversion value of the options. The remaining 108 million of the Purchased Options expire on December 1, 2013.
We also entered into separate transactions in which we sold warrants to acquire, subject to customary anti-dilution adjustments, approximately 215 million shares of our common stock at an exercise price of approximately $19.55 per share of our common stock. We received aggregate proceeds of $391 million from the sale of the associated warrants. Upon exercise, the value of the warrants is required to be settled in shares. Half of the associated warrants were exercised between February 15, 2012 and March 14, 2012 and the remaining half of the associated warrants have expiration dates between February 18, 2014 and March 18, 2014. During the first quarter of 2012, the exercised warrants were settled with 32 million shares of our common stock.
EMC CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
The Purchased Options and associated warrants will generally have the effect of increasing the conversion price of the 2013 Notes to approximately $19.55 per share of our common stock, representing an approximate 55% conversion premium based on the closing price of $12.61 per share of our common stock on November 13, 2006, which was the issuance date of the 2013 Notes.
Interest Rate Swap Contracts
In 2010, EMC entered into interest rate swap contracts with an aggregate notional amount of approximately $900 million. These swaps were designated as cash flow hedges of the semi-annual interest payments of the forecasted issuance of ten year debt in 2011 when our 2011 Notes were scheduled to become due. As such, the unrealized loss on these hedges was recognized in other comprehensive loss. In November 2011, we settled the swaps and replaced them with new interest rate swap contracts for the forecasted issuance of debt in 2012. In April 2012, we settled the swaps and replaced them with new interest rate swap contracts for the forecasted issuance of debt in 2012. Each of these new swaps was deemed as an effective hedge as the notional amounts and other terms matched the underlying hedged item. Losses on the interest rate swap contracts at the time of settlement of $141 million in November 2011 and $23 million in April 2012 were deferred as they were expected to be realized over the life of the new debt issued under the related interest rate swap contracts and recognized as a component of interest expense in the consolidated income statements.
In June 2012, management changed its forecast date for the issuance of debt from December 31, 2012 to the first quarter of 2014. Consequently, hedge accounting effectively ceased as the terms of the swaps no longer matched the terms of the underlying hedged item resulting in changes in the fair value of the swaps being recorded in the consolidated income statement. The swaps were subsequently re-designated as cash flow hedges and achieved hedge accounting. The change in the forecasted timeframe for the issuance of debt resulted in certain previously-anticipated hedge interest payments no longer being expected to occur within the window covered by the hedge designation. As a result, $40 million of accumulated realized losses in other comprehensive income related to these previously-anticipated interest payments were reclassified from other comprehensive income and recognized in the 2012 consolidated income statements.
In July 2012, we settled the interest rate swap contracts and did not replace them. Losses on the interest rate swap contracts at the time of settlement of $46 million were deferred as they are expected to be realized over the life of the new debt issued under the related interest rate swap contracts and recognized as a component of interest expense in the consolidated income statements.
At September 30, 2013, we had $177 million of accumulated realized losses related to the settled swaps in accumulated other comprehensive income which will be realized during the life of our ten year Notes. These losses will be reclassified from other comprehensive income and recognized on a straight-line basis in the consolidated income statements as interest expense beginning in the third quarter of 2014.
5. Fair Value of Financial Assets and Liabilities
Our fixed income and equity investments are classified as available for sale and recorded at their fair market values. We determine fair value using the following hierarchy:
| |
• | Level 1 – Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. |
| |
• | Level 2 – Inputs other than Level 1 that are observable, either directly or indirectly, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities. |
| |
• | Level 3 – Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities. |
Most of our fixed income securities are classified as Level 2, with the exception of some of our U.S. government and agency obligations and our investments in publicly traded equity securities, which are classified as Level 1, and all of our auction rate securities, which are classified as Level 3. In addition, our strategic investments held at cost are classified as Level 3. At September 30, 2013, the vast majority of our Level 2 securities were priced by pricing vendors. These pricing vendors utilize the most recent observable market information in pricing these securities or, if specific prices are not available for these securities, use other observable inputs like market transactions involving identical or comparable securities. In the event observable inputs are not available, we assess other factors to determine the security’s market value, including broker quotes or model valuations. Each month, we perform independent price verifications of all of our fixed income holdings. In the event a price fails a pre-established tolerance check, it is researched so that we can assess the cause of the variance to determine what we believe is the appropriate fair market value.
EMC CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
In general, investments with remaining effective maturities of 12 months or less from the balance sheet date are classified as short-term investments. Investments with remaining effective maturities of more than 12 months from the balance sheet date are classified as long-term investments. Our publicly traded equity securities are classified as long-term investments and our strategic investments held at cost are classified as other assets. As a result of the lack of liquidity for auction rate securities, we have classified these as long-term investments as of September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012. At September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, all of our short- and long-term investments, excluding auction rate securities, were recognized at fair value, which was determined based upon observable inputs from our pricing vendors for identical or similar assets. At September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, auction rate securities were valued using a discounted cash flow model.
The following tables summarize the composition of our short- and long-term investments at September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012 (tables in millions):
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| September 30, 2013 |
| Amortized Cost | | Unrealized Gains | | Unrealized (Losses) | | Aggregate Fair Value |
U.S. government and agency obligations | $ | 4,505 |
| | $ | 6 |
| | $ | (3 | ) | | $ | 4,508 |
|
U.S. corporate debt securities | 2,106 |
| | 6 |
| | (3 | ) | | 2,109 |
|
High yield corporate debt securities | 526 |
| | 17 |
| | (7 | ) | | 536 |
|
Asset-backed securities | 5 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 5 |
|
Municipal obligations | 939 |
| | 3 |
| | (1 | ) | | 941 |
|
Auction rate securities | 72 |
| | — |
| | (5 | ) | | 67 |
|
Foreign debt securities | 2,037 |
| | 5 |
| | (3 | ) | | 2,039 |
|
Total fixed income securities | 10,190 |
| | 37 |
| | (22 | ) | | 10,205 |
|
Publicly traded equity securities | 78 |
| | 28 |
| | — |
| | 106 |
|
Total | $ | 10,268 |
| | $ | 65 |
| | $ | (22 | ) | | $ | 10,311 |
|
We held approximately $2.0 billion in foreign debt securities at September 30, 2013. These securities have an average credit rating of A+, and approximately 4% of these securities are deemed sovereign debt with an average credit rating of AA+. None of the securities deemed sovereign debt are from Greece, Italy, Ireland, Portugal, Spain or Cyprus.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| December 31, 2012 |
| Amortized Cost | | Unrealized Gains | | Unrealized (Losses) | | Aggregate Fair Value |
U.S. government and agency obligations | $ | 2,191 |
| | $ | 10 |
| | $ | (1 | ) | | $ | 2,200 |
|
U.S. corporate debt securities | 1,480 |
| | 10 |
| | — |
| | 1,490 |
|
High yield corporate debt securities | 486 |
| | 34 |
| | (1 | ) | | 519 |
|
Asset-backed securities | 2 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 2 |
|
Municipal obligations | 1,032 |
| | 3 |
| | — |
| | 1,035 |
|
Auction rate securities | 74 |
| | — |
| | (4 | ) | | 70 |
|
Foreign debt securities | 1,270 |
| | 9 |
| | — |
| | 1,279 |
|
Total fixed income securities | 6,535 |
| | 66 |
| | (6 | ) | | 6,595 |
|
Publicly traded equity securities | 47 |
| | 41 |
| | (1 | ) | | 87 |
|
Total | $ | 6,582 |
| | $ | 107 |
| | $ | (7 | ) | | $ | 6,682 |
|
EMC CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
The following tables represent our fair value hierarchy for our financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value as of September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012 (tables in millions):
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| September 30, 2013 |
| Level 1 | | Level 2 | | Level 3 | | Total |
Cash | $ | 1,611 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 1,611 |
|
Cash equivalents | 4,942 |
| | 602 |
| | — |
| | 5,544 |
|
U.S. government and agency obligations | 2,201 |
| | 2,307 |
| | — |
| | 4,508 |
|
U.S. corporate debt securities | — |
| | 2,109 |
| | — |
| | 2,109 |
|
High yield corporate debt securities | — |
| | 536 |
| | — |
| | 536 |
|
Asset-backed securities | — |
| | 5 |
| | — |
| | 5 |
|
Municipal obligations | — |
| | 941 |
| | — |
| | 941 |
|
Auction rate securities | — |
| | — |
| | 67 |
| | 67 |
|
Foreign debt securities | — |
| | 2,039 |
| | — |
| | 2,039 |
|
Publicly traded equity securities | 106 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 106 |
|
Total cash and investments | $ | 8,860 |
| | $ | 8,539 |
| | $ | 67 |
| | $ | 17,466 |
|
Other items: | | | | | | | |
Strategic investments held at cost | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 378 |
| | $ | 378 |
|
Investment in joint venture | — |
| | — |
| | 34 |
| | 34 |
|
Convertible debt carried at discounted cost | — |
| | (2,676 | ) | | — |
| | (2,676 | ) |
Long-term debt carried at discounted cost | — |
| | (5,449 | ) | | — |
| | (5,449 | ) |
Foreign exchange derivative assets | — |
| | 41 |
| | — |
| | 41 |
|
Foreign exchange derivative liabilities | — |
| | (27 | ) | | — |
| | (27 | ) |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| December 31, 2012 |
| Level 1 | | Level 2 | | Level 3 | | Total |
Cash | $ | 1,454 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 1,454 |
|
Cash equivalents | 2,898 |
| | 362 |
| | — |
| | 3,260 |
|
U.S. government and agency obligations | 1,327 |
| | 873 |
| | — |
| | 2,200 |
|
U.S. corporate debt securities | — |
| | 1,490 |
| | — |
| | 1,490 |
|
High yield corporate debt securities | — |
| | 519 |
| | — |
| | 519 |
|
Asset-backed securities | — |
| | 2 |
| | — |
| | 2 |
|
Municipal obligations | — |
| | 1,035 |
| | — |
| | 1,035 |
|
Auction rate securities | — |
| | — |
| | 70 |
| | 70 |
|
Foreign debt securities | — |
| | 1,279 |
| | — |
| | 1,279 |
|
Publicly traded equity securities | 87 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 87 |
|
Total cash and investments | $ | 5,766 |
| | $ | 5,560 |
| | $ | 70 |
| | $ | 11,396 |
|
Other items: | | | | | | | |
Strategic investments held at cost | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 364 |
| | $ | 364 |
|
Investment in joint venture | — |
| | — |
| | 33 |
| | 33 |
|
Convertible debt carried at discounted cost | — |
| | (2,666 | ) | | — |
| | (2,666 | ) |
Foreign exchange derivative assets | — |
| | 30 |
| | — |
| | 30 |
|
Foreign exchange derivative liabilities | — |
| | (35 | ) | | — |
| | (35 | ) |
Commodity derivative liabilities | — |
| | (1 | ) | | — |
| | (1 | ) |
Our auction rate securities are predominantly rated investment grade and are primarily collateralized by student loans. The underlying loans of all but two of our auction rate securities, with a market value of $16 million, have partial guarantees by the U.S. government as part of the Federal Family Education Loan Program (“FFELP”) through the U.S. Department of Education. FFELP guarantees at least 95% of the loans which collateralize the auction rate securities. We believe the quality of the collateral underlying most of our auction rate securities will enable us to recover our principal balance.
EMC CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
To determine the estimated fair value of our investment in auction rate securities, we used a discounted cash flow model using a five year time horizon. As of September 30, 2013, the coupon rates used ranged from 0% to 4% and the discount rate was 1%, which rate represents the rate at which similar FFELP backed securities with a five year time horizon outside of the auction rate securities market were trading at September 30, 2013. The assumptions used in preparing the discounted cash flow model include an incremental discount rate for the lack of liquidity in the market (“liquidity discount margin”) for an estimated period of time. The discount rate we selected was based on AA-rated banks as the majority of our portfolio is invested in student loans where EMC acts as a financier to these lenders. The liquidity discount margin represents an estimate of the additional return an investor would require for the lack of liquidity of these securities over an estimated five year holding period. The rate used for the discount margin was 1% at September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012 due to the narrowing of credit spreads on AA-rated banks during 2012 and into 2013.
The following table provides a summary of changes in fair value of our Level 3 auction rate securities for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012 (table in millions):
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| For the Three Months Ended | | For the Nine Months Ended |
| September 30, 2013 | | September 30, 2012 | | September 30, 2013 | | September 30, 2012 |
Balance, beginning of the period | $ | 68 |
| | $ | 74 |
| | $ | 70 |
| | $ | 75 |
|
Calls at par value | — |
| | — |
| | (1 | ) | | — |
|
Other-than-temporary impairment loss | — |
| | — |
| | (1 | ) | | (2 | ) |
(Increase) decrease in previously recognized unrealized losses included in other comprehensive income | (1 | ) | | 1 |
| | (1 | ) | | 2 |
|
Balance, end of the period | $ | 67 |
| | $ | 75 |
| | $ | 67 |
| | $ | 75 |
|
Significant changes in the unobservable inputs discussed above could result in a significantly lower or higher fair value measurement. Generally, an increase in the discount rate, liquidity discount margin or coupon rate results in a decrease in our fair value measurement and a decrease in the discount rate, liquidity discount margin or coupon rate results in an increase in our fair value measurement.
In the fourth quarter of 2012, EMC and Lenovo formed a joint venture, LenovoEMC Limited, to provide NAS systems to small- and medium-sized businesses and distributed enterprise sites. EMC has a 49% ownership percentage of the joint venture. We account for our LenovoEMC joint venture using the fair value method of accounting. To determine the estimated fair value of our investment, we use a discounted cash flow model using a three year time horizon. The discount rate used was 6%, which represents the incremental borrowing rate for a market participant. The assumptions used in preparing the discounted cash flow model include an analysis of estimated Lenovo NAS revenue against a prescribed target as well as consideration of the purchase price put and call features included in the joint venture agreement. The put and call features create a floor and a cap on the fair value of the investment. As such, there is a limit to the impact on the fair value that would result from significant changes in the unobservable inputs.
The following table provides a summary of changes in fair value of our LenovoEMC joint venture for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 (table in millions):
|
| | | | | | | |
| September 30, 2013 |
| Three Months Ended | | Nine Months Ended |
Balance, beginning of the period | $ | 34 |
| | $ | 33 |
|
Realized gain included in other income (expense) | — |
| | 1 |
|
Balance, end of period | $ | 34 |
| | $ | 34 |
|
The carrying value of the strategic investments held at cost were accounted for under the cost method. As part of our impairment review, we perform a fair value calculation of our strategic investments held at cost on a quarterly basis using the most currently available information. To determine the estimated fair value of private strategic investments held at cost, we use a combination of several valuation techniques including discounted cash flow models, acquisition comparables and trading comparables. In addition, we evaluate the impact of pre- and post-money valuations of recent financing events and the impact of those on our fully diluted ownership percentages, and we consider any available information regarding the issuer’s historical and forecasted performance as well as market comparables and conditions. The fair value of these investments is considered in our review for impairment if any events and changes in circumstances occur that might have a significant adverse effect on their value.
EMC CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
Investment Losses
Unrealized losses on investments at September 30, 2013 by investment category and length of time the investment has been in a continuous unrealized loss position are as follows (table in millions):
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Less Than 12 Months | | 12 Months or Greater | | Total |
| Fair Value | | Gross Unrealized Losses | | Fair Value | | Gross Unrealized Losses | | Fair Value | | Gross Unrealized Losses |
U.S. government and agency obligations | $ | 787 |
| | $ | (3 | ) | | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 787 |
| | $ | (3 | ) |
U.S. corporate debt securities | 823 |
| | (3 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | 823 |
| | (3 | ) |
High yield corporate debt securities | 190 |
| | (7 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | 190 |
| | (7 | ) |
Municipal obligations | 139 |
| | (1 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | 139 |
| | (1 | ) |
Auction rate securities | — |
| | — |
| | 67 |
| | (5 | ) | | 67 |
| | (5 | ) |
Foreign debt securities | 805 |
| | (3 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | 805 |
| | (3 | ) |
Total | $ | 2,744 |
| | $ | (17 | ) | | $ | 67 |
| | $ | (5 | ) | | $ | 2,811 |
| | $ | (22 | ) |
For all of our securities for which the amortized cost basis was greater than the fair value at September 30, 2013, we have concluded that currently we neither plan to sell the security nor is it more likely than not that we would be required to sell the security before its anticipated recovery. In making the determination as to whether the unrealized loss is other-than-temporary, we considered the length of time and extent the investment has been in an unrealized loss position, the financial condition and near-term prospects of the issuers, the issuers’ credit rating, third party guarantees and the time to maturity.
Contractual Maturities
The contractual maturities of fixed income securities held at September 30, 2013 are as follows (table in millions):
|
| | | | | | | |
| September 30, 2013 |
| Amortized Cost Basis | | Aggregate Fair Value |
Due within one year | $ | 3,439 |
| | $ | 3,442 |
|
Due after 1 year through 5 years | 5,707 |
| | 5,718 |
|
Due after 5 years through 10 years | 539 |
| | 546 |
|
Due after 10 years | 505 |
| | 499 |
|
Total | $ | 10,190 |
| | $ | 10,205 |
|
6. Inventories
Inventories consist of (table in millions):
|
| | | | | | | |
| September 30, 2013 | | December 31, 2012 |
Work-in-process | $ | 691 |
| | $ | 606 |
|
Finished goods | 684 |
| | 595 |
|
| $ | 1,375 |
| | $ | 1,201 |
|
7. Accounts and Notes Receivable and Allowance for Credit Losses
Accounts and notes receivable are recorded at cost. The portion of our notes receivable due in one year or less are included in accounts and notes receivable and the long-term portion is included in other assets, net on the consolidated balance sheets. Lease receivables arise from sales-type leases of products. We typically sell, without recourse, the contractual right to the lease payment stream and assets under lease to third parties. For certain customers, we retain the lease.
EMC CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
The contractual amounts due under the leases we retained as of September 30, 2013 were as follows (table in millions):
|
| | | |
Year | Contractual Amounts Due Under Leases |
Due within one year | $ | 123 |
|
Due within two years | 81 |
|
Due within three years | 70 |
|
Thereafter | 2 |
|
Total | 276 |
|
Less amounts representing interest | (5 | ) |
Present value | 271 |
|
Current portion (included in accounts and notes receivable) | 130 |
|
Long-term portion (included in other assets, net) | $ | 141 |
|
Subsequent to September 30, 2013, we sold $56 million of these notes to third parties without recourse.
We maintain an allowance for credit losses on our accounts and notes receivable. The allowance is based on the credit worthiness of our customers, including an assessment of the customer’s financial position, operating performance and their ability to meet their contractual obligation. We assess the credit scores for our customers each quarter. In addition, we consider our historical experience, the age of the receivable and current market and economic conditions. Uncollectible amounts are charged against the allowance account.
In the event we determine that a lease may not be paid, we include in our allowance an amount for the outstanding balance related to the lease receivable. As of September 30, 2013, amounts from lease receivables past due for more than 90 days were not significant.
The following table presents the activity of our allowance for credit losses related to lease receivables for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012 (table in millions):
|
| | | | | | | |
| For the Nine Months Ended |
| September 30, 2013 | | September 30, 2012 |
Balance, beginning of the period | $ | 17 |
| | $ | 24 |
|
Recoveries | (12 | ) | | (16 | ) |
Provisions | 3 |
| | 9 |
|
Balance, end of the period | $ | 8 |
| | $ | 17 |
|
Gross lease receivables totaled $276 million and $329 million as of September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively, before the allowance. The components of these balances were individually evaluated for impairment and included in our allowance determination as necessary.
8. Property, Plant and Equipment
Property, plant and equipment consist of (table in millions):
|
| | | | | | | |
| September 30, 2013 | | December 31, 2012 |
Furniture and fixtures | $ | 215 |
| | $ | 197 |
|
Equipment and software | 5,804 |
| | 5,345 |
|
Buildings and improvements | 1,991 |
| | 1,873 |
|
Land | 121 |
| | 121 |
|
Building construction in progress | 286 |
| | 197 |
|
| 8,417 |
| | 7,733 |
|
Accumulated depreciation | (5,044 | ) | | (4,588 | ) |
| $ | 3,373 |
| | $ | 3,145 |
|
EMC CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
Building construction in progress at September 30, 2013 includes $74 million for facilities not yet placed in service that we are holding for future use.
9. Joint Ventures
We make investments in joint ventures. For each joint venture investment, we consider the facts and circumstances in order to determine whether it qualifies for cost accounting, equity accounting, fair value method accounting or whether it should be consolidated.
In 2009, Cisco and EMC formed VCE Company LLC (“VCE”), with investments from VMware and Intel. VCE, through Vblock infrastructure platforms, delivers an integrated IT offering that combines network, computing, storage, management, security and virtualization technologies for converged infrastructures and cloud based computing models. As of September 30, 2013, we have contributed $976 million in funding and $16 million in stock-based compensation to VCE since inception and own approximately 58% of VCE’s outstanding equity.
We consider VCE a variable interest entity. Authoritative guidance related to variable interest entities states that the primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity must have both of the following characteristics: (a) the power to direct the activities of a variable interest entity that most significantly will impact the entity’s economic performance; and (b) the obligation to absorb losses that could be potentially significant to the variable interest entity or the right to receive benefits from the entity that could potentially be significant to the variable interest entity. Since the power to direct the activities of VCE which most significantly impact its economic performance are determined by its board of directors, which is comprised of equal representation of EMC and Cisco, and all significant decisions require the approval of the minority shareholders, we have determined we are not the primary beneficiary, and as such we account for the investment under the equity method.
Our portion of VCE’s gains and losses is recognized in other expense, net, in the consolidated income statements. Our consolidated share of VCE’s losses, based upon our portion of the overall funding, was approximately 63% for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012. As of September 30, 2013, we have recorded net accumulated losses from VCE of $713 million since inception, of which $75 million and $215 million were recorded in the three and nine months ending September 30, 2013, respectively, and $62 million and $177 million were recorded in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012, respectively.
We recognized $131 million and $307 million in revenue from sales of product and services to VCE during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013, respectively, and $65 million and $211 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012, respectively. We perform certain administrative services, pursuant to an administrative services agreement, on behalf of VCE and we pay certain operating expenses on behalf of VCE. Accordingly, we had a receivable from VCE related to the administrative services agreement of $47 million and $44 million as of September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively, included in other current assets in the consolidated balance sheets.
10. Accrued Expenses
Accrued expenses consist of (table in millions):
|
| | | | | | | |
| September 30, 2013 | | December 31, 2012 |
Salaries and benefits | $ | 961 |
| | $ | 1,018 |
|
Product warranties | 285 |
| | 278 |
|
Dividends payable (see Note 12) | 208 |
| | — |
|
Partner rebates | 174 |
| | 187 |
|
Restructuring, current (See Note 13) | 87 |
| | 76 |
|
Derivatives | 38 |
| | 40 |
|
Other | 946 |
| | 923 |
|
| $ | 2,699 |
| | $ | 2,522 |
|
Product Warranties
Systems sales include a standard product warranty. At the time of the sale, we accrue for systems’ warranty costs. The initial systems’ warranty accrual is based upon our historical experience, expected future costs and specific identification of systems’
EMC CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
requirements. Upon sale or expiration of the initial warranty, we may sell additional maintenance contracts to our customers. Revenue from these additional maintenance contracts is included in deferred revenue and recognized ratably over the service period. The following represents the activity in our warranty accrual for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012 (table in millions):
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| For the Three Months Ended | | For the Nine Months Ended |
| September 30, 2013 | | September 30, 2012 | | September 30, 2013 | | September 30, 2012 |
Balance, beginning of the period | $ | 291 |
| | $ | 262 |
| | $ | 278 |
| | $ | 255 |
|
Provision | 39 |
| | 41 |
| | 135 |
| | 129 |
|
Amounts charged to the accrual | (45 | ) | | (38 | ) | | (128 | ) | | (119 | ) |
Balance, end of the period | $ | 285 |
| | $ | 265 |
| | $ | 285 |
| | $ | 265 |
|
The provision includes amounts accrued for systems at the time of shipment, adjustments for changes in estimated costs for warranties on systems shipped in the period and changes in estimated costs for warranties on systems shipped in prior periods. It is not practicable to determine the amounts applicable to each of the components.
11. Income Taxes
Our effective income tax rates were 22.1% and 19.1% for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013, respectively. Our effective income tax rates were 22.0% and 23.0% for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012, respectively. Our effective income tax rate is based upon estimated income before provision for income taxes for the year, composition of the income in different countries, and adjustments, if any, in the applicable quarterly periods for potential tax consequences, benefits and/or resolutions of tax audits or other tax contingencies. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013, the effective income tax rate varied from the statutory income tax rate principally as a result of the mix of income attributable to foreign versus domestic jurisdictions, state taxes and the federal tax credit for increasing research activities. Our aggregate income tax rate in foreign jurisdictions is lower than our income tax rate in the United States; substantially all of our income before provision for income taxes from foreign operations has been earned by our Irish subsidiaries. We do not believe that any recent or currently expected developments in non-U.S. tax jurisdictions are reasonably likely to have a material impact on our effective income rate. On January 2, 2013, the American Taxpayer Relief Act of 2012 was signed into law. Some of the provisions were retroactive to January 1, 2012 including an extension of the U.S. federal tax credit for increasing research activities through December 31, 2013. Because the extension was enacted after December 31, 2012, our income tax provision for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 included the federal tax credit for increasing research activities for the full year 2012 as well as the nine months ended September 30, 2013, which reduced our effective tax rate for the nine month period. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012, the effective income tax rate varied from the statutory income tax rate principally as a result of the mix of income attributable to foreign versus domestic jurisdictions.
Our effective income tax rate decreased in the nine months ended September 30, 2013 from the nine months ended September 30, 2012 due primarily to the retroactive renewal of the U.S. federal tax credit for increasing research activities on January 2, 2013 as discussed above. The U.S. federal tax credit for increasing research activities reduced our effective income tax rate by approximately 4.4% for the nine months ended September 30, 2013. There were also differences in the mix of income attributable to foreign versus domestic jurisdictions, state taxes, change in tax contingency reserves and discrete items, the net impact of which is immaterial. Our effective income tax rate for the three months ended September 30, 2013 is consistent with our effective income tax rate for the three months ended September 30, 2012 as a 3.0% favorable impact of U.S. federal tax credit for increasing research activities on our effective income tax rate is offset by a lower estimated Section 199 deduction and other differences between the two three-month periods.
We are routinely under audit by the Internal Revenue Service (the “IRS”). We have concluded all U.S. federal income tax matters for years through 2008. The IRS commenced a federal income tax audit for the tax years 2009 and 2010 in the third quarter of 2012. The current federal income tax audit is still in the early stage for information gathering and it is not expected to be completed until 2015. We also have income tax audits in process in numerous state, local and international jurisdictions. In our international jurisdictions that comprise a significant portion of our operations, the years that may be examined vary, with the earliest year being 2003. Based on the timing and outcome of examinations of EMC, the result of the expiration of statutes of limitations for specific jurisdictions or the timing and result of ruling requests from taxing authorities, it is reasonably possible that the related unrecognized tax benefits could change from those recorded in our statement of financial position. We anticipate that several of these audits may be finalized within the next twelve months. While we expect the amount of unrecognized tax
EMC CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
benefits to change in the next twelve months, we do not expect the change to have a significant impact on our results of operations or financial position.
12. Shareholders’ Equity
The reconciliation from basic to diluted earnings per share for both the numerators and denominators is as follows (table in millions): |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| For the Three Months Ended | | For the Nine Months Ended |
| September 30, 2013 | | September 30, 2012 | | September 30, 2013 | | September 30, 2012 |
Numerator: | | | | | | | |
Net income attributable to EMC Corporation | $ | 586 |
| | $ | 626 |
| | $ | 1,867 |
| | $ | 1,863 |
|
Incremental dilution from VMware | (2 | ) | | (2 | ) | | (5 | ) | | (7 | ) |
Net income – dilution attributable to EMC Corporation | $ | 584 |
| | $ | 624 |
| | $ | 1,862 |
| | $ | 1,856 |
|
Denominator: | | | | | | | |
Weighted average shares, basic | 2,069 |
| | 2,104 |
| | 2,088 |
| | 2,090 |
|
Weighted common stock equivalents | 29 |
| | 38 |
| | 29 |
| | 42 |
|
Assumed conversion of the 2013 Notes and associated warrants | 67 |
| | 68 |
| | 59 |
| | 75 |
|
Weighted average shares, diluted | 2,165 |
| | 2,210 |
| | 2,176 |
| | 2,207 |
|
Due to the cash settlement feature of the principal amount of the 2013 Notes, we only include the impact of the premium feature in our diluted earnings per share calculation when the 2013 Notes are convertible due to maturity or when the average stock price exceeds the conversion price of the 2013 Notes.
Concurrent with the issuance of the 2011 Notes and 2013 Notes, we also entered into separate transactions in which we sold warrants to acquire, subject to customary anti-dilution adjustments, approximately 215 million shares of our common stock at an exercise price of approximately $19.55 per share of our common stock. Half of the associated warrants were exercised during the first quarter of 2012. We include the impact of the remaining outstanding sold warrants in our diluted earnings per share calculation when the average stock price exceeds the exercise price.
Restricted stock awards, restricted stock units and options to acquire shares of our common stock in the amount of 1 million and 3 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013, respectively, and 5 million and 4 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012, respectively, were excluded from the calculation of diluted earnings per share because they were antidilutive. The incremental dilution from VMware represents the impact of VMware’s dilutive securities on EMC’s consolidated diluted net income per share and is calculated by multiplying the difference between VMware’s basic and diluted earnings per share by the number of VMware shares owned by EMC.
Repurchase of Common Stock
We utilize both authorized and unissued shares (including repurchased shares) for all issuances under our equity plans. Our Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of 250 million shares of our common stock in April 2008 and an additional 250 million shares of our common stock in February 2013. For the nine months ended September 30, 2013, we spent $2.0 billion to repurchase 80 million shares of our common stock. Of the 500 million shares authorized for repurchase, we have repurchased 303 million shares at a total cost of $6.4 billion, leaving a remaining balance of 197 million shares authorized for future repurchases. We plan to spend up to $3.5 billion by the end of the second quarter of 2014 and up to $6.0 billion by the end of 2015 on common stock repurchases.
Cash Dividend on Common Stock
In May 2013 and August 2013, our Board of Directors declared quarterly cash dividends of $0.10 per share of common stock. During the third quarter of 2013, EMC paid a cash dividend of $209 million. On October 23, 2013, EMC paid a cash dividend of $206 million to shareholders of record as of the close of business on October 1, 2013.
EMC CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Changes in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), which is presented net of tax, consist of the following (table in millions):
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Foreign Currency Translation Adjustments | | Unrealized Net Gains on Investments | | Unrealized Net Losses on Derivatives | | Recognition of Actuarial Net Loss from Pension and Other Postretirement Plans | | Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income Attributable to the Non-controlling Interest in VMware, Inc. | | Total |
Balance as of December, 31 2012(a) | $ | (9 | ) | | $ | 64 |
| | $ | (109 | ) | | $ | (153 | ) | | $ | (1 | ) | | $ | (208 | ) |
Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications | (44 | ) | | (30 | ) | | 6 |
| | — |
| | 1 |
| | (67 | ) |
Net losses (gains) reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income | — |
| | (7 | ) | | (9 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | (16 | ) |
Net current period other comprehensive income (loss) | (44 | ) | | (37 | ) | | (3 | ) | | — |
| | 1 |
| | (83 | ) |
Balance as of September 30, 2013(b) | $ | (53 | ) | | $ | 27 |
| | $ | (112 | ) | | $ | (153 | ) | | $ | — |
| | $ | (291 | ) |
__________________
| |
(a) | Net of taxes (benefits) of $37 million for unrealized net gains on investments, $(67) million for unrealized net losses on derivatives and $(87) million for actuarial net loss on pension plans. |
| |
(b) | Net of taxes (benefits) of $17 million for unrealized net gains on investments, $(67) million for unrealized net losses on derivatives and $(87) million for actuarial net loss on pension plans. |
The amounts reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 are as follows (tables in millions):
|
| | | | | | |
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income Components | | Amount Reclassified from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income | | Impacted Line Item on Consolidated Income Statements |
For the Three Months Ended September 30, 2013: | | | | |
| | | | |
Net gain on investments: | | $ | (1 | ) | | Investment income |
| | — |
| | Provision for income tax |
Net of tax | | $ | (1 | ) | | |
| | | | |
Net gain on derivatives: | | | | |
Foreign exchange contracts | | $ | (3 | ) | | Product sales revenue |
Foreign exchange contracts | | 4 |
| | Cost of product sales |
Total net gain on derivatives before tax | | 1 |
| | |
| | — |
| | Provision for income tax |
Net of tax | | $ | 1 |
| | |
EMC CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
|
| | | | | | |
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income Components | | Amount Reclassified from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income | | Impacted Line Item on Consolidated Income Statements |
For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2013: | | | | |
| | | | |
Net gain on investments: | | $ | 11 |
| | Investment income |
| | (4 | ) | | Provision for income tax |
Net of tax | | $ | 7 |
| | |
| | | | |
Net gain on derivatives: | | | | |
Foreign exchange contracts | | $ | 13 |
| | Product sales revenue |
Foreign exchange contracts | | (2 | ) | | Cost of product sales |
Total net gain on derivatives before tax | | 11 |
| | |
| | (2 | ) | | Provision for income tax |
Net of tax | | $ | 9 |
| | |
13. Restructuring and Acquisition-Related Charges
For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013, we incurred restructuring and acquisition-related charges of $40 million and $195 million, respectively. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012, we incurred restructuring and acquisition-related charges of $27 million and $81 million, respectively. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013, EMC incurred $30 million and $116 million, respectively, of restructuring charges, primarily related to our current year restructuring programs and $4 million and $8 million, respectively, of charges in connection with acquisitions for financial advisory, legal and accounting services. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013, VMware incurred $1 million and $54 million, respectively, of restructuring charges related to workforce reductions as part of its current year restructuring program and $1 million and $3 million, respectively, of charges in connection with acquisitions for financial advisory, legal and accounting services. In addition, VMware incurred $4 million and $14 million of impairment charges related to its business realignment for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013, respectively. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012, we incurred $22 million and $71 million, respectively, of restructuring charges, primarily related to our 2012 restructuring programs and $5 million and $10 million, respectively, of costs in connection with acquisitions for financial advisory, legal and accounting services.
In the first and third quarters of 2013, EMC implemented restructuring programs to create further operational efficiencies which will result in workforce reductions of approximately 1,000 and 525 positions, respectively. The actions will impact positions around the globe covering our Information Storage, RSA Information Security and Information Intelligence Group segments. All of these actions are expected to be completed within a year of the start of each program.
In the first quarter of 2013, VMware approved and initiated a business realignment plan to streamline its operations. The plan included the elimination of approximately 725 positions across all major functional groups and geographies. Substantially all of the cash-related expenses incurred in connection with the business realignment plan have been paid as of September 30, 2013 and the remaining cash payments are expected to be fully paid out by the end of 2013.
During 2012, we implemented separate restructuring programs to create further operational efficiencies which resulted in a workforce reduction of 1,163 positions, of which 298, 279 and 292 positions were identified in the first, second and third quarters of 2012, respectively. The actions impacted positions around the globe covering our Information Storage, RSA Information Security and Information Intelligence Group segments. All of these actions are expected to be completed by the end of 2013.
For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013, we recognized $2 million and $14 million, respectively, of lease termination costs for facilities vacated in the period in accordance with our plan as part of all of our restructuring programs and for costs associated with terminating other contractual obligations. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012, we recognized $7 million and $15 million, respectively, of lease termination costs for facilities vacated in the period in accordance with our plan as part of all of our restructuring programs. These costs are expected to be utilized by the end of 2015.
EMC CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
The activity for the restructuring programs is presented below (tables in millions):
Three Months Ended September 30, 2013:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
2013 EMC Programs | | | | | | | |
Category | Balance as of June 30, 2013 | | 2013 Charges | | Utilization | | Balance as of September 30, 2013 |
Workforce reductions | $ | 45 |
| | $ | 28 |
| | $ | (21 | ) | | $ | 52 |
|
Consolidation of excess facilities and other contractual obligations | 2 |
| | 1 |
| | (1 | ) | | 2 |
|
Total | $ | 47 |
| | $ | 29 |
| | $ | (22 | ) | | $ | 54 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
2013 VMware Programs | | | | | | | |
Category | Balance as of June 30, 2013 | | 2013 Charges | | Utilization | | Balance as of September 30, 2013 |
Workforce reductions | $ | 2 |
| | $ | 1 |
| | $ | (2 | ) | | $ | 1 |
|
Consolidation of excess facilities and other contractual obligations | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
Total | $ | 2 |
| | $ | 1 |
| | $ | (2 | ) | | $ | 1 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Other EMC Programs | | | | | | | |
Category | Balance as of June 30, 2013 | | Adjustments to the Provision | | Utilization | | Balance as of September 30, 2013 |
Workforce reductions | $ | 29 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | (6 | ) | | $ | 23 |
|
Consolidation of excess facilities and other contractual obligations | 27 |
| | 1 |
| | (3 | ) | | 25 |
|
Total | $ | 56 |
| | $ | 1 |
| | $ | (9 | ) | | $ | 48 |
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2013:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
2013 EMC Programs | | | | | | | |
Category | Balance as of December 31, 2012 | | 2013 Charges | | Utilization | | Balance as of September 30, 2013 |
Workforce reductions | $ | — |
| | $ | 110 |
| | $ | (58 | ) | | $ | 52 |
|
Consolidation of excess facilities and other contractual obligations | — |
| | 4 |
| | (2 | ) | | 2 |
|
Total | $ | — |
| | $ | 114 |
| | $ | (60 | ) | | $ | 54 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
2013 VMware Programs | | | | | | | |
Category | Balance as of December 31, 2012 | | 2013 Charges | | Utilization | | Balance as of September 30, 2013 |
Workforce reductions | $ | — |
| | $ | 54 |
| | $ | (53 | ) | | $ | 1 |
|
Consolidation of excess facilities and other contractual obligations | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
Total | $ | — |
| | $ | 54 |
| | $ | (53 | ) | | $ | 1 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Other EMC Programs | | | | | | | |
Category | Balance as of December 31, 2012 | | Adjustments to the Provision | | Utilization | | Balance as of September 30, 2013 |
Workforce reductions | $ | 63 |
| | $ | (8 | ) | | $ | (32 | ) | | $ | 23 |
|
Consolidation of excess facilities and other contractual obligations | 28 |
| | 10 |
| | (13 | ) | | 25 |
|
Total | $ | 91 |
| | $ | 2 |
| | $ | (45 | ) | | $ | 48 |
|
EMC CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
Three Months Ended September 30, 2012:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
2012 EMC Programs | | | | | | | |
Category | Balance as of June 30, 2012 | | 2012 Charges | | Utilization | | Balance as of September 30, 2012 |
Workforce reductions | $ | 34 |
| | $ | 17 |
| | $ | (11 | ) | | $ | 40 |
|
Consolidation of excess facilities and other contractual obligations | 3 |
| | 8 |
| | (3 | ) | | 8 |
|
Total | $ | 37 |
| | $ | 25 |
| | $ | (14 | ) | | $ | 48 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Other EMC Programs | | | | | | | |
Category | Balance as of June 30, 2012 | | Adjustments to the Provision | | Utilization | | Balance as of September 30, 2012 |
Workforce reductions | $ | 20 |
| | $ | (1 | ) | | $ | (4 | ) | | $ | 15 |
|
Consolidation of excess facilities and other contractual obligations | 25 |
| | (2 | ) | | (2 | ) | | 21 |
|
Total | $ | 45 |
| | $ | (3 | ) | | $ | (6 | ) | | $ | 36 |
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2012:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
2012 EMC Programs | | | | | | | |
Category | Balance as of December 31, 2011 | | 2012 Charges | | Utilization | | Balance as of September 30, 2012 |
Workforce reductions | $ | — |
| | $ | 63 |
| | $ | (23 | ) | | $ | 40 |
|
Consolidation of excess facilities and other contractual obligations | — |
| | 14 |
| | (6 | ) | | 8 |
|
Total | $ | — |
| | $ | 77 |
| | $ | (29 | ) | | $ | 48 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Other EMC Programs | | | | | | | |
Category | Balance as of December 31, 2011 | | Adjustments to the Provision | | Utilization | | Balance as of September 30, 2012 |
Workforce reductions | $ | 50 |
| | $ | (7 | ) | | $ | (28 | ) | | $ | 15 |
|
Consolidation of excess facilities and other contractual obligations | 30 |
| | 1 |
| | (10 | ) | | 21 |
|
Total | $ | 80 |
| | $ | (6 | ) | | $ | (38 | ) | | $ | 36 |
|
In connection with VMware's business realignment plan, in the three months ended September 30, 2013, VMware sold certain assets relating to a previous acquisition, Zimbra, in exchange for cash and equity resulting in a pre-tax gain of $12 million. During the nine months ended September 30, 2013, VMware recognized cumulative pre-tax gains of $44 million relating to the disposition of certain lines of business that were no longer aligned with VMware's core business priorities, including Zimbra. The gains recognized in connection with these dispositions were recorded to other expense, net on the consolidated income statements for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013.
EMC CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
14. Commitments and Contingencies
Litigation
We are involved in a variety of claims, demands, suits, investigations and proceedings that arise from time to time relating to matters incidental to the ordinary course of our business, including actions with respect to contracts, intellectual property, product liability, employment, benefits and securities matters. As required by authoritative guidance, we have estimated the amount of probable losses that may result from all currently pending matters, and such amounts are reflected in our consolidated financial statements. These recorded amounts are not material to our consolidated financial position or results of operations and no additional material losses related to these pending matters are reasonably possible. While it is not possible to predict the outcome of these matters with certainty, we do not expect the results of any of these actions to have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations or financial condition. Because litigation is inherently unpredictable, however, the actual amounts of loss may prove to be larger or smaller than the amounts reflected in our consolidated financial statements, and we could incur judgments or enter into settlements of claims that could adversely affect our operating results or cash flows in a particular period.
15. Segment Information
In the second quarter of 2013, we began managing the Company as three federated businesses: EMC Information Infrastructure, Pivotal and VMware Virtual Infrastructure. EMC Information Infrastructure operates in three segments: Information Storage, Information Intelligence Group and RSA Information Security while Pivotal and VMware Virtual Infrastructure each operate as single segments.
On April 1, 2013, EMC and VMware formed Pivotal to build a new platform comprising next-generation data fabrics, application fabrics and a cloud-independent PaaS. EMC contributed substantially all assets and liabilities, including intellectual property and employees, related to its Greenplum and Pivotal Labs businesses. VMware contributed substantially all assets and liabilities, including intellectual property and employees, related to certain of its Cloud Application Platform products and services, including Cloud Foundry, Spring, Cetas, GemFire and other products from the VMware vFabric Suite. These contributions were recorded at the April 1, 2013 carrying value as this was a transaction with entities under common control.
On May 8, 2013, General Electric Company ("GE") purchased 10% of Pivotal's outstanding equity for approximately $105 million. At September 30, 2013, EMC consolidated held approximately 84% of the economic interest in Pivotal. GE's interest in Pivotal is in the form of a preferred equity instrument. Consequently, there is no net income attributable to non-controlling interest related to Pivotal on the consolidated income statements.
Beginning in the second quarter of 2013, EMC began presenting Pivotal as a separate reportable segment. We recast the segment disclosures for the prior financial reporting periods to separately present the operations of the Pivotal segment which has resulted in the transfer of revenue, gross profit, operating expenses and operating income from the Information Storage and VMware Virtual Infrastructure segments to Pivotal. These changes had no impact on the previously reported financial results for the Information Intelligence Group or RSA Information Security segments. In addition, none of these changes impacted our previously reported consolidated financial statements.
Our management measures are designed to assess performance of these reporting segments excluding certain items. As a result, the corporate reconciling items are used to capture the items excluded from the segment operating performance measures, including stock-based compensation expense and acquisition-related intangible asset amortization expense. Additionally, in certain instances, infrequently occurring gains or losses are also excluded from the measures used by management in assessing segment performance. Research and development expenses, selling, general and administrative expenses and restructuring and acquisition-related charges associated with the EMC Information Infrastructure business are not allocated to the segments within the EMC Information Infrastructure business, as they are managed centrally at the EMC Information Infrastructure business level. EMC Information Infrastructure and Pivotal have not been allocated non-operating income (expense), net and income tax expense as these costs are managed centrally at the EMC Corporate level. Accordingly, for the three segments within the EMC Information Infrastructure business, gross profit is the segment operating performance measure, while for Pivotal, operating income is the operating performance measure. The VMware Virtual Infrastructure amounts represent the revenues and expenses of VMware as reflected within EMC’s consolidated financial statements.
EMC CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
Our segment information for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012 is as follows (tables in millions, except percentages):
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| EMC Information Infrastructure | | | | | | |
| Information Storage | | Information Intelligence Group | | RSA Information Security | | EMC Information Infrastructure | | Pivotal | | EMC Information Infrastructure plus Pivotal |
Three Months Ended: | | | | | | | | | | | |
September 30, 2013 | | | | | | | | | | | |
Revenues: | | | | | | | | | | | |
Product revenues | $ | 2,415 |
| | $ | 32 |
| | $ | 120 |
| | $ | 2,567 |
| | $ | 35 |
| | $ | 2,602 |
|
Services revenues | 1,358 |
| | 117 |
| | 132 |
| | 1,607 |
| | 45 |
| | 1,652 |
|
Total consolidated revenues | 3,773 |
| | 149 |
| | 252 |
| | 4,174 |
| | 80 |
| | 4,254 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Gross profit | $ | 2,101 |
| | $ | 94 |
| | $ | 170 |
| | $ | 2,365 |
| | $ | 34 |
| | $ | 2,399 |
|
Gross profit percentage | 55.7 | % | | 63.3 | % | | 67.6 | % | | 56.6 | % | | 42.6 | % | | 56.4 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Research and development | | | | | | | 354 |
| | 32 |
| | 386 |
|
Selling, general and administrative | | | | | | | 1,114 |
| | 43 |
| | 1,157 |
|
Restructuring and acquisition-related charges | | | | | | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
Total costs and expenses | | | | | | | 1,468 |
| | 75 |
| | 1,543 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Operating income | | | | | | | $ | 897 |
| | $ | (41 | ) | | $ | 856 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| EMC Information Infrastructure plus Pivotal | | VMware Virtual Infrastructure within EMC | | Corp Reconciling Items | | Consolidated |
Three Months Ended | | | | | | | |
September 30, 2013 | | | | | | | |
Revenues: | | | | | | | |
Product revenues | $ | 2,602 |
| | $ | 563 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 3,165 |
|
Services revenues | 1,652 |
| | 722 |
| | — |
| | 2,374 |
|
Total consolidated revenues | 4,254 |
| | 1,285 |
| | — |
| | 5,539 |
|
| | | | | | |
|
Gross profit | $ | 2,399 |
| | $ | 1,141 |
| | $ | (98 | ) | | $ | 3,442 |
|
Gross profit percentage | 56.4 | % | | 88.8 | % | | — |
| | 62.1 | % |
| | | | | | | |
Research and development | 386 |
| | 208 |
| | 92 |
| | 686 |
|
Selling, general and administrative | 1,157 |
| | 493 |
| | 159 |
| | 1,809 |
|
Restructuring and acquisition-related charges | — |
| | — |
| | 40 |
| | 40 |
|
Total costs and expenses | 1,543 |
| | 701 |
| | 291 |
| | 2,535 |
|
| | | | | | | |
Operating income | 856 |
| | 440 |
| | (389 | ) | | 907 |
|
| | | | | | | |
Non-operating income (expense), net | (106 | ) | | 7 |
| | 12 |
| | (87 | ) |
Income tax provision | 193 |
| | 70 |
| | (82 | ) | | 181 |
|
Net income | 557 |
| | 377 |
| | (295 | ) | | 639 |
|
Net income attributable to the non-controlling interest in VMware, Inc. | — |
| | (74 | ) | | 21 |
| | (53 | ) |
Net income attributable to EMC Corporation | $ | 557 |
| | $ | 303 |
| | $ | (274 | ) | | $ | 586 |
|
EMC CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| EMC Information Infrastructure | | | | | | |
| Information Storage | | Information Intelligence Group | | RSA Information Security | | EMC Information Infrastructure | | Pivotal | | EMC Information Infrastructure plus Pivotal |
Three Months Ended: | | | | | | | | | | | |
September 30, 2012 | | | | | | | | | | | |
Revenues: | | | | | | | | | | | |
Product revenues | $ | 2,420 |
| | $ | 50 |
| | $ | 106 |
| | $ | 2,576 |
| | $ | 23 |
| | $ | 2,599 |
|
Services revenues | 1,306 |
| | 108 |
| | 121 |
| | 1,535 |
| | 43 |
| | 1,578 |
|
Total consolidated revenues | 3,726 |
| | 158 |
| | 227 |
| | 4,111 |
| | 66 |
| | 4,177 |
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | |
Gross profit | $ | 2,119 |
| | $ | 108 |
| | $ | 146 |
| | $ | 2,373 |
| | $ | 37 |
| | $ | 2,410 |
|
Gross profit percentage | 56.9 | % | | 68.1 | % | | 64.2 | % | | 57.7 | % | | 55.6 | % | | 57.7 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Research and development | | | | | | | 356 |
| | 31 |
| | 387 |
|
Selling, general and administrative | | | | | | | 1,079 |
| | 38 |
| | 1,117 |
|
Restructuring and acquisition-related charges | | | | | | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
Total costs and expenses | | | | | | | 1,435 |
| | 69 |
| | 1,504 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Operating income | | | | | | | $ | 938 |
| | $ | (32 | ) | | $ | 906 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| EMC Information Infrastructure plus Pivotal | | VMware Virtual Infrastructure within EMC | | Corp Reconciling Items | | Consolidated |
Three Months Ended | | | | | | | |
September 30, 2012 | | | | | | | |
Revenues: | | | | | | | |
Product revenues | $ | 2,599 |
| | $ | 485 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 3,084 |
|
Services revenues | 1,578 |
| | 616 |
| | — |
| | 2,194 |
|
Total consolidated revenues | 4,177 |
| | 1,101 |
| | — |
| | 5,278 |
|
| | | | | | | |
Gross profit | $ | 2,410 |
| | $ | 975 |
| | $ | (97 | ) | | $ | 3,288 |
|
Gross profit percentage | 57.7 | % | | 88.6 | % | | — |
| | 62.3 | % |
| | | | | | | |
Research and development | 387 |
| | 178 |
| | 88 |
| | 653 |
|
Selling, general and administrative | 1,117 |
| | 421 |
| | 171 |
| | 1,709 |
|
Restructuring and acquisition-related charges | — |
| | — |
| | 27 |
| | 27 |
|
Total costs and expenses | 1,504 |
| | 599 |
| | 286 |
| | 2,389 |
|
| | | | | | | |
Operating income | 906 |
| | 376 |
| | (383 | ) | | 899 |
|
| | | | | | | |
Non-operating income (expense), net | (63 | ) | | 9 |
| | (1 | ) | | (55 | ) |
Income tax provision | 202 |
| | 87 |
| | (104 | ) | | 185 |
|
Net income | 641 |
| | 298 |
| | (280 | ) | | 659 |
|
Net income attributable to the non-controlling interest in VMware, Inc. | — |
| | (58 | ) | | 25 |
| | (33 | ) |
Net income attributable to EMC Corporation | $ | 641 |
| | $ | 240 |
| | $ | (255 | ) | | $ | 626 |
|
EMC CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| EMC Information Infrastructure | | | | | | |
| Information Storage | | Information Intelligence Group | | RSA Information Security | | EMC Information Infrastructure | | Pivotal | | EMC Information Infrastructure plus Pivotal |
Nine Months Ended: | | | | | | | | | | | |
September 30, 2013 | | | | | | | | | | | |
Revenues: | | | | | | | | | | | |
Product revenues | $ | 7,444 |
| | $ | 115 |
| | $ | 317 |
| | $ | 7,876 |
| | $ | 82 |
| | $ | 7,958 |
|
Services revenues | 4,019 |
| | 343 |
| | 395 |
| | 4,757 |
| | 136 |
| | 4,893 |
|
Total consolidated revenues | 11,463 |
| | 458 |
| | 712 |
| | 12,633 |
| | 218 |
| | 12,851 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Gross profit | $ | 6,408 |
| | $ | 290 |
| | $ | 471 |
| | $ | 7,169 |
| | $ | 86 |
| | $ | 7,255 |
|
Gross profit percentage | 55.9 | % | | 63.3 | % | | 66.1 | % | | 56.7 | % | | 39.5 | % | | 56.5 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Research and development | | | | | | | 1,094 |
| | 87 |
| | 1,181 |
|
Selling, general and administrative | | | | | | | 3,305 |
| | 119 |
| | 3,424 |
|
Restructuring and acquisition-related charges | | | | | | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
Total costs and expenses | | | | | | | 4,399 |
| | 206 |
| | 4,605 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Operating income | | | | | | | $ | 2,770 |
| | $ | (120 | ) | | $ | 2,650 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| EMC Information Infrastructure plus Pivotal | | VMware Virtual Infrastructure within EMC | | Corp Reconciling Items | | Consolidated |
Nine Months Ended | | | | | | | |
September 30, 2013 | | | | | | | |
Revenues: | | | | | | | |
Product revenues | $ | 7,958 |
| | $ | 1,577 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 9,535 |
|
Services revenues | 4,893 |
| | 2,112 |
| | — |
| | 7,005 |
|
Total consolidated revenues | 12,851 |
| | 3,689 |
| | — |
| | 16,540 |
|
| | | | | | | |
Gross profit | $ | 7,255 |
| | $ | 3,292 |
| | $ | (298 | ) | | $ | 10,249 |
|
Gross profit percentage | 56.5 | % | | 89.2 | % | | — |
| | 62.0 | % |
| | | | | | | |
Research and development | 1,181 |
| | 606 |
| | 269 |
| | 2,056 |
|
Selling, general and administrative | 3,424 |
| | 1,432 |
| | 452 |
| | 5,308 |
|
Restructuring and acquisition-related charges | — |
| | — |
| | 195 |
| | 195 |
|
Total costs and expenses | 4,605 |
| | 2,038 |
| | 916 |
| | 7,559 |
|
| | | | | | | |
Operating income | 2,650 |
| | 1,254 |
| | (1,214 | ) | | 2,690 |
|
| | | | | | | |
Non-operating income (expense), net | (256 | ) | | 14 |
| | 29 |
| | (213 | ) |
Income tax provision | 595 |
| | 247 |
| | (368 | ) | | 474 |
|
Net income | 1,799 |
| | 1,021 |
| | (817 | ) | | 2,003 |
|
Net income attributable to the non-controlling interest in VMware, Inc. | — |
| | (202 | ) | | 66 |
| | (136 | ) |
Net income attributable to EMC Corporation | $ | 1,799 |
| | $ | 819 |
| | $ | (751 | ) | | $ | 1,867 |
|
EMC CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| EMC Information Infrastructure | | | | | | |
| Information Storage | | Information Intelligence Group | | RSA Information Security | | EMC Information Infrastructure | | Pivotal | | EMC Information Infrastructure plus Pivotal |
Nine Months Ended: | | | | | | | | | | | |
September 30, 2012 | | | | | | | | | | | |
Revenues: | | | | | | | | | | | |
Product revenues | $ | 7,358 |
| | $ | 131 |
| | $ | 306 |
| | $ | 7,795 |
| | $ | 67 |
| | $ | 7,862 |
|
Services revenues | 3,819 |
| | 325 |
| | 348 |
| | 4,492 |
| | 106 |
| | 4,598 |
|
Total consolidated revenues | 11,177 |
| | 456 |
| | 654 |
| | 12,287 |
| | 173 |
| | 12,460 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Gross profit | $ | 6,330 |
| | $ | 299 |
| | $ | 458 |
| | $ | 7,087 |
| | $ | 89 |
| | $ | 7,176 |
|
Gross profit percentage | 56.6 | % | | 65.6 | % | | 70.0 | % | | 57.7 | % | | 51.8 | % | | 57.6 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Research and development | | | | | | | 1,046 |
| | 92 |
| | 1,138 |
|
Selling, general and administrative | | | | | | | 3,272 |
| | 112 |
| | 3,384 |
|
Restructuring and acquisition-related charges | | | | | | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
Total costs and expenses | | | | | | | 4,318 |
| | 204 |
| | 4,522 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Operating income | | | | | | | $ | 2,769 |
| | $ | (115 | ) | | $ | 2,654 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| EMC Information Infrastructure plus Pivotal | | VMware Virtual Infrastructure within EMC | | Corp Reconciling Items | | Consolidated |
Nine Months Ended | | | | | | | |
September 30, 2012 | | | | | | | |
Revenues: | | | | | | | |
Product revenues | $ | 7,862 |
| | $ | 1,470 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 9,332 |
|
Services revenues | 4,598 |
| | 1,754 |
| | — |
| | 6,352 |
|
Total consolidated revenues | 12,460 |
| | 3,224 |
| | — |
| | 15,684 |
|
| | | | | | | |
Gross profit | $ | 7,176 |
| | $ | 2,857 |
| | $ | (285 | ) | | $ | 9,748 |
|
Gross profit percentage | 57.6 | % | | 88.6 | % | | — |
| | 62.2 | % |
| | | | | | | |
Research and development | 1,138 |
| | 517 |
| | 241 |
| | 1,896 |
|
Selling, general and administrative | 3,384 |
| | 1,230 |
| | 462 |
| | 5,076 |
|
Restructuring and acquisition-related charges | — |
| | — |
| | 81 |
| | 81 |
|
Total costs and expenses | 4,522 |
| | 1,747 |
| | 784 |
| | 7,053 |
|
| | | | | | | |
Operating income | 2,654 |
| | 1,110 |
| | (1,069 | ) | | 2,695 |
|
| | | | | | | |
Non-operating income (expense), net | (140 | ) | | 20 |
| | (11 | ) | | (131 | ) |
Income tax provision | 676 |
| | 204 |
| | (290 | ) | | 590 |
|
Net income | 1,838 |
| | 926 |
| | (790 | ) | | 1,974 |
|
Net income attributable to the non-controlling interest in VMware, Inc. | — |
| | (180 | ) | | 69 |
| | (111 | ) |
Net income attributable to EMC Corporation | $ | 1,838 |
| | $ | 746 |
| | $ | (721 | ) | | $ | 1,863 |
|
EMC CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)
Our revenues are attributed to the geographic areas according to the location of the customers. Revenues by geographic area are included in the following table (table in millions):
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| For the Three Months Ended | | For the Nine Months Ended |
| September 30, 2013 | | September 30, 2012 | | September 30, 2013 | | September 30, 2012 |
United States | $ | 2,956 |
| | $ | 2,886 |
| | $ | 8,752 |
| | $ | 8,376 |
|
Europe, Middle East and Africa | 1,455 |
| | 1,352 |
| | 4,418 |
| | 4,216 |
|
Asia Pacific and Japan | 789 |
| | 733 |
| | 2,361 |
| | 2,193 |
|
Latin America, Mexico and Canada | 339 |
| | 307 |
| | 1,009 |
| | 899 |
|
Total | $ | 5,539 |
| | $ | 5,278 |
| | $ | 16,540 |
| | $ | 15,684 |
|
No country other than the United States accounted for 10% or more of revenues during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 or 2012.
Long-lived assets, excluding financial instruments, deferred tax assets, goodwill and intangible assets, in the United States were $4,313 million at September 30, 2013 and $3,994 million at December 31, 2012. Internationally, long-lived assets, excluding financial instruments, deferred tax assets, goodwill and intangible assets, were $836 million at September 30, 2013 and $698 million at December 31, 2012. No country other than the United States accounted for 10% or more of total long-lived assets, excluding financial instruments and deferred tax assets, at September 30, 2013 or December 31, 2012.
| |
Item 2. | MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS |
|
| | | | |
This Management’s Discussion and Analysis (“MD&A”) of Financial Condition and Results of Operations should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and notes thereto which appear elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. The following discussion contains forward-looking statements and should also be read in conjunction with the risk factors set forth in Item 1A of Part II. The forward-looking statements do not include the potential impact of any mergers, acquisitions, divestitures, securities offerings or business combinations that may be announced or closed after the date hereof. |
Certain tables may not add or recalculate due to rounding.
INTRODUCTION
In the second quarter of 2013, we began managing the Company as three federated businesses: EMC Information Infrastructure, Pivotal and VMware Virtual Infrastructure. This approach allows each of the three businesses to individually build products, go-to-market capabilities and ecosystems that they need to succeed in their respective markets while sharing the same ultimate goal of helping customers leverage Cloud Computing, Big Data and Trusted Information Technology (“IT”) to maximize control, efficiency and choice. By dividing our strategy and executional focus across these three businesses, we can focus on each of their respective missions and offer customers horizontal solutions and more choices than they get from our competitors. We believe this strategy provides us with the opportunity to take advantage of the solid growth opportunity of EMC Information Infrastructure and the faster growth opportunities of VMware Virtual Infrastructure and Pivotal.
Cloud Computing leverages an on-demand, self-managed, virtualized infrastructure to deliver IT as a Service in a more efficient, flexible and cost-effective manner. With the rise of trends towards mobile, social and Big Data, customers are finding greater efficiency through the available choice from cloud infrastructures where the private, public or hybrid cloud turns IT into a service that can be utilized on-demand. Accordingly, customers are increasingly recognizing that their ability to compete is tied to the efficiency, flexibility and agility of their IT operations and that transitioning to a cloud-based architecture will be a key component to their success. We believe our offerings are well-suited to capitalize on this trend as it unfolds over the next several years.
Big Data, which is a primary contributor to the pace of overall data growth, refers to the large repositories of corporate and external data, including unstructured information created by new applications (e.g. medical, entertainment, energy, telemetry and geophysical), social media and other web repositories. It is triggering new approaches for our customers to derive business insight and create new opportunities to expand revenues.
The successful transition to a model that leverages Cloud Computing and Big Data is dependent upon both the right infrastructure and the ability to build Trust into that infrastructure. Businesses require IT resources that can scale on demand, handle a variety of workloads and be trusted at all times. Accordingly, the ability for customers to have and offer Trusted IT is a valuable competitive advantage.
We believe we are well-positioned in these markets to continue assisting our customers in storing, managing and unlocking the value contained within their information and to enable them to leverage our data-centric approach to security to take full advantage of Cloud Computing and Big Data.
EMC Information Infrastructure
Our EMC Information Infrastructure business consists of three segments: Information Storage, Information Intelligence and RSA Information Security. The objective for our EMC Information Infrastructure business is to simultaneously increase our market share though our strong and ever expanding portfolio of offerings while investing in the business. In the third quarter ended September 30, 2013, we continued to innovate and invest in expanding our total addressable market through increased internal research and development (“R&D”). Our investment in new technologies and solutions is reflected in our products successfully launched during the third quarter of 2013, as well as our roadmap for the fourth quarter, with numerous innovations, refreshes and brand-new products as well as business acquisitions. We have developed a product portfolio with customers' current and future needs in mind which will continue to evolve as the largest transformation in IT history is creating enormous opportunities in Cloud Computing, Big Data and Trust.
Our go to market model, where we continue to leverage our direct sales force and services organization, as well as our channel and services partners and service providers, positions us well to help enable customers to transition to Cloud Computing and benefit
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS - (Continued)
from Big Data in the most advantageous manner for their businesses. As IT headcount grows at a fraction of the pace of data and the demands from the data center escalate, customers continue to look for simple and scalable ways to build out their IT-as-a-service function. We offer three alternatives to help our customers transition to cloud architectures and leverage Big Data to meet these needs: our best of breed infrastructure components, proven infrastructure through VSPEX and converged infrastructure with Vblock from VCE Company LLC, our joint venture with Cisco, and other investors VMware and Intel, which continues to gather momentum in one of the fastest growing areas in IT. Our service provider program continues to be an important part of our strategy to lead our customers to the public cloud.
Pivotal
In April 2013, we, along with VMware and an investment from General Electric Company (“GE”), officially formed Pivotal, which is focused on building a platform comprising the next generation of data fabrics, application fabrics and a cloud independent platform-as-a-service ("PaaS") to support Cloud Computing and Big and Fast Data Applications. The first version of this platform, Pivotal One, will be launched before the end of the year. Additionally, Pivotal is actively engaging with other industry players with the intention of working together to expand the ecosystem. We expect 2013 to be a transition year for Pivotal, and we believe we are positioning the business for rapid growth in the future.
VMware Virtual Infrastructure
VMware's financial focus is on long-term revenue growth to enable it to fund its expansion of industry segment share and to evolve its virtualization-based products for data centers, end-user devices and Cloud Computing through a combination of internal development and acquisitions. VMware expects to grow its business by building long-term relationships with its customers which includes selling its solutions through enterprise license agreements (“ELAs”) as well as through additional transactional business. Additionally, VMware has made, and expects to continue to consider, strategic business acquisitions in the future.
In January 2013, VMware announced a realignment of its strategy to refocus its resources and investments in support of three growth priorities which include the software-defined data center ("SDDC"), the hybrid cloud and end-user computing. SDDC includes development and delivery of innovations in networking, security, storage and management as it continues to roll out and enhance the features of its vCloud Suite. For the hybrid cloud, VMware has introduced a public cloud infrastructure as a service offering designed to be completely interoperable with its customers' VMware virtualized infrastructure. For end-user computing, VMware has solutions designed to enable a user-centric approach to personal computing.
On a consolidated basis, our vision, strategy, market leading assets within our portfolio which continues to be expanded with our recent and upcoming product launches, as well as our continued steady execution positions us to continue to anticipate and capitalize on the mega trends of Cloud Computing, Big Data and Trust in 2013 and beyond. As a result, we believe our federated businesses will continue to grow faster than the markets we serve in 2013, while simultaneously investing in the business and growing earnings per share.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Revenues
The following tables present total revenue by our segments (in millions):
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| For the Three Months Ended | | |
| September 30, 2013 | | September 30, 2012 | | $ Change | | % Change |
Information Storage | $ | 3,773 |
| | $ | 3,726 |
| | $ | 47 |
| | 1 | % |
Information Intelligence Group | 149 |
| | 158 |
| | (9 | ) | | (6 | )% |
RSA Information Security | 252 |
| | 227 |
| | 25 |
| | 11 | % |
Pivotal | 80 |
| | 66 |
| | 14 |
| | 21 | % |
VMware Virtual Infrastructure | 1,285 |
| | 1,101 |
| | 184 |
| | 17 | % |
Total revenues | $ | 5,539 |
| | $ | 5,278 |
| | $ | 261 |
| | 5 | % |
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS - (Continued)
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| For the Nine Months Ended | | |
| September 30, 2013 | | September 30, 2012 | | $ Change | | % Change |
Information Storage | $ | 11,463 |
| | $ | 11,177 |
| | $ | 286 |
| | 3 | % |
Information Intelligence Group | 458 |
| | 456 |
| | 2 |
| | — | % |
RSA Information Security | 712 |
| | 654 |
| | 58 |
| | 9 | % |
Pivotal | 218 |
| | 173 |
| | 45 |
| | 27 | % |
VMware Virtual Infrastructure | 3,689 |
| | 3,224 |
| | 465 |
| | 14 | % |
Total revenues | $ | 16,540 |
| | $ | 15,684 |
| | $ | 856 |
| | 5 | % |
Consolidated product revenues increased 3% and 2% to $3,165 million and $9,535 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013, respectively. Although our revenues were negatively impacted by general economic and business conditions, including recent reductions in global IT spending and US federal government spending and higher than expected un-shipped orders during the three months ended September 30, 2013, we experienced growth in both the three- and nine-month periods. The growth was driven by the continued demand for our portfolio of offerings to address the storage, data analysis and virtualization needs for continued information growth, particularly as customers continue to build out their own data centers to develop and support their private or public cloud infrastructures and analyze and protect the data within their data centers.
The Information Storage segment’s product revenues were flat at $2,415 million for the three months ended September 30, 2013 and increased 1% to $7,444 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2013. Revenue from the High-end Storage business, which primarily includes revenues from EMC Symmetrix, decreased 8% and increased 2% for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013, respectively. The decrease in the three month period is largely due to over a 40% decrease in storage product revenue from the US federal government resulting primarily from an unexpected re-prioritization of year-end budgets ahead of the US federal government shutdown. The increase in the nine month period is largely due to increased demand from existing and new customers for storage solutions with high performance, consolidation and automation in demanding virtual data center environments, many of which are evolving into private clouds or are powering public clouds. Revenue from the Unified and Backup Recovery business improved despite a large volume of higher margin product orders which came in too late in the quarter to ship. Our Unified Storage business benefited from the very successful global launch in September of our next-generation VNX. Our Backup Recovery purpose-built appliance businesses continued to grow and gain market share, driven by a refresh of our mid-tier Data Domain products. Revenue from the Emerging Storage business, which primarily includes product and maintenance revenues from EMC Isilon, EMC Atmos, EMC VPLEX, EMC RecoverPoint, ASD Suites and EMC Xtrem families, increased 66% and 44% for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013, respectively. EMC Isilon, with its scale-out file offering, added a record number of new customers in the third quarter and continues to deliver strong revenue growth in its traditional areas of strength as it expands its presence in enterprise environments. The EMC Atmos object-based cloud storage solution contributed to the growth as it is increasingly used by large web-scale providers and developers. VPLEX continued to grow at well over 50% for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013.
The Pivotal segment’s product revenues increased 54% and 24% to $35 million and $82 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013, respectively. Pivotal has made good progress since its formal launch on April 1st with its existing products such as Greenplum and GemFire continuing to have significant design wins. The Pivotal team is building a new application development platform, Pivotal One, comprising next-generation data fabrics, application fabrics and a cloud-independent PaaS, which is on track for availability before year end.
The VMware Virtual Infrastructure segment’s product revenues increased 16% and 7% to $563 million and $1,577 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013, respectively. VMware’s license revenues increased primarily due to demand for product offerings including vCloud and vSphere with operations management and automation as customers' needs related to developing the software-defined data center, hybrid cloud and end-user computing continue. During the three months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, ELAs comprised 33% and 24%, respectively, and ELAs comprised 33% and 25%, respectively, of total sales during the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012.
The RSA Information Security segment’s product revenues increased 13% and 4% to $120 million and $317 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013, respectively. Product revenues increased during the three- and nine-month periods for both our Identity and Protection businesses with SecurID returning to growth in the third quarter of 2013 and our Security Management and Compliance business where growth accelerated for Archer and our Security Analytics suite.
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS - (Continued)
The Information Intelligence Group segment’s product revenues decreased 35% and 13% to $32 million and $115 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013, respectively. The decrease in product revenues during the three months ended September 30, 2013 was primarily due to delayed purchases due to customers' tight budgets. This business continues to make progress as it transitions to more cloud friendly offerings and vertical based solutions. In addition, we continued to see good growth from our new initiatives such as Syncplicity.
Consolidated services revenues increased 8% and 10% to $2,374 million and $7,005 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013, respectively. The consolidated services revenues increase was primarily driven by the Information Storage and VMware Virtual Infrastructure segments’ services revenues resulting from increased demand for maintenance-related services and professional services as we continue to provide expertise to customers on effective ways to enable Cloud Computing and to leverage their Big Data assets.
The Information Storage segment’s services revenues increased 4% and 5% to $1,358 million and $4,019 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013, respectively. The increase in services revenue for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 was primarily attributable to higher demand for maintenance-related services associated with a larger installed base as well as increased professional services.
The Pivotal segment’s services revenues increased 4% and 28% to $45 million and $136 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013, respectively. The increase in services revenues was primarily attributable to higher demand for maintenance-related services associated with the growing installed base.
The VMware Virtual Infrastructure segment’s services revenues increased 17% and 20% to $722 million and $2,112 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013, respectively. The increase in services revenues was primarily attributable to growth in VMware’s software maintenance revenues which benefited from strong renewals, multi-year software maintenance contracts sold in previous periods and additional maintenance contracts sold in conjunction with new software license sales. Additionally, VMware experienced increased demand in their professional services, driven by the growth in their license sales and installed base.
The RSA Information Security segment’s services revenues increased 10% and 13% to $132 million and $395 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013, respectively. Services revenues increased due to an increase in professional services and maintenance revenues resulting from continued demand for support from our installed base. The Information Intelligence Group segment’s services revenues increased 8% and 5% to $117 million and $343 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013, respectively. The increase in services revenues was due to increased customer demand for the new initiatives and strategic services.
Consolidated revenues by geography were as follows (in millions):
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | For the Three Months Ended | | |
| | September 30, 2013 | | September 30, 2012 | | % Change |
|
| United States | $ | 2,956 |
| | $ | 2,886 |
| | 2 | % |
| Europe, Middle East and Africa | 1,455 |
| | 1,352 |
| | 8 | % |
| Asia Pacific and Japan | 789 |
| | 733 |
| | 8 | % |
| Latin America, Mexico and Canada | 339 |
| | 307 |
| | 10 | % |
| Total revenues | $ | 5,539 |
| | $ | 5,278 |
| | 5 | % |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | For the Nine Months Ended | | |
| | September 30, 2013 | | September 30, 2012 | | % Change |
|
| United States | $ | 8,752 |
| | $ | 8,376 |
| | 4 | % |
| Europe, Middle East and Africa | 4,418 |
| | 4,216 |
| | 5 | % |
| Asia Pacific and Japan | 2,361 |
| | 2,193 |
| | 8 | % |
| Latin America, Mexico and Canada | 1,009 |
| | 899 |
| | 12 | % |
| Total revenues | $ | 16,540 |
| | $ | 15,684 |
| | 5 | % |
Revenues increased for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 compared to the same periods in 2012 in all of our geographic markets.
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS - (Continued)
Changes in exchange rates negatively impacted revenue growth by 1% for both the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013. The impact of the change in rates was most significant in Japan and Brazil.
Costs and Expenses
The following tables present our costs and expenses, other income and net income attributable to EMC Corporation (in millions): |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | For the Three Months Ended | | |
| | September 30, 2013 | | September 30, 2012 | | $ Change | | % Change |
|
| Cost of revenue: | | | | | | | |
| Information Storage | $ | 1,672 |
| | $ | 1,607 |
| | $ | 65 |
| | 4 | % |
| Information Intelligence Group | 55 |
| | 50 |
| | 5 |
| | 9 | % |
| RSA Information Security | 82 |
| | 81 |
| | 1 |
| | — | % |
| Pivotal | 46 |
| | 29 |
| | 17 |
| | 57 | % |
| VMware Virtual Infrastructure | 144 |
| | 126 |
| | 18 |
| | 14 | % |
| Corporate reconciling items | 98 |
| | 97 |
| | 1 |
| | — | % |
| Total cost of revenue | 2,097 |
| | 1,990 |
| | 107 |
| | 5 | % |
| Gross margins: | | | | | | | |
| Information Storage | 2,101 |
| | 2,119 |
| | (18 | ) | | (1 | )% |
| Information Intelligence Group | 94 |
| | 108 |
| | (14 | ) | | (12 | )% |
| RSA Information Security | 170 |
| | 146 |
| | 24 |
| | 17 | % |
| Pivotal | 34 |
| | 37 |
| | (3 | ) | | (7 | )% |
| VMware Virtual Infrastructure | 1,141 |
| | 975 |
| | 166 |
| | 17 | % |
| Corporate reconciling items | (98 | ) | | (97 | ) | | (1 | ) | | — | % |
| Total gross margin | 3,442 |
| | 3,288 |
| | 154 |
| | 5 | % |
| Operating expenses: | | | | | | | |
| Research and development(1) | 686 |
| | 653 |
| | 33 |
| | 5 | % |
| Selling, general and administrative(2) | 1,809 |
| | 1,709 |
| | 100 |
| | 6 | % |
| Restructuring and acquisition-related charges | 40 |
| | 27 |
| | 13 |
| | 48 | % |
| Total operating expenses | 2,535 |
| | 2,389 |
| | 146 |
| | 6 | % |
| Operating income | 907 |
| | 899 |
| | 8 |
| | 1 | % |
| Investment income, interest expense and other expenses, net | (87 | ) | | (55 | ) | | (32 | ) | | 59 | % |
| Income before income taxes | 820 |
| | 844 |
| | (24 | ) | | (3 | )% |
| Income tax provision | 181 |
| | 185 |
| | (4 | ) | | (2 | )% |
| Net income | 639 |
| | 659 |
| | (20 | ) | | (3 | )% |
| Less: Net income attributable to the non-controlling interest in VMware, Inc. | (53 | ) | | (33 | ) | | (20 | ) | | 63 | % |
| Net income attributable to EMC Corporation | $ | 586 |
| | $ | 626 |
| | $ | (40 | ) | | (7 | )% |
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS - (Continued)
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | For the Nine Months Ended | | |
| | September 30, 2013 | | September 30, 2012 | | $ Change | | % Change |
|
| Cost of revenue: | | | | | | | |
| Information Storage | $ | 5,055 |
| | $ | 4,847 |
| | $ | 208 |
| | 4 | % |
| Information Intelligence Group | 168 |
| | 157 |
| | 11 |
| | 7 | % |
| RSA Information Security | 241 |
| | 196 |
| | 45 |
| | 23 | % |
| Pivotal | 132 |
| | 84 |
| | 48 |
| | 59 | % |
| VMware Virtual Infrastructure | 397 |
| | 367 |
| | 30 |
| | 8 | % |
| Corporate reconciling items | 298 |
| | 285 |
| | 13 |
| | (4 | )% |
| Total cost of revenue | 6,291 |
| | 5,936 |
| | 355 |
| | 6 | % |
| Gross margins: | | | | | | | |
| Information Storage | 6,408 |
| | 6,330 |
| | 78 |
| | 1 | % |
| Information Intelligence Group | 290 |
| | 299 |
| | (9 | ) | | (3 | )% |
| RSA Information Security | 471 |
| | 458 |
| | 13 |
| | 3 | % |
| Pivotal | 86 |
| | 89 |
| | (3 | ) | | (4 | )% |
| VMware Virtual Infrastructure | 3,292 |
| | 2,857 |
| | 435 |
| | 15 | % |
| Corporate reconciling items | (298 | ) | | (285 | ) | | (13 | ) | | 4 | % |
| Total gross margin | 10,249 |
| | 9,748 |
| | 501 |
| | 5 | % |
| Operating expenses: | | | | | | | |
| Research and development(3) | 2,056 |
| | 1,896 |
| | 160 |
| | 8 | % |
| Selling, general and administrative(4) | 5,308 |
| | 5,076 |
| | 232 |
| | 5 | % |
| Restructuring and acquisition-related charges | 195 |
| | 81 |
| | 114 |
| | 142 | % |
| Total operating expenses | 7,559 |
| | 7,053 |
| | 506 |
| | 7 | % |
| Operating income | 2,690 |
| | 2,695 |
| | (5 | ) | | — | % |
| Investment income, interest expense and other expenses, net | (213 | ) | | (131 | ) | | (82 | ) | | 63 | % |
| Income before income taxes | 2,477 |
| | 2,564 |
| | (87 | ) | | (3 | )% |
| Income tax provision | 474 |
| | 590 |
| | (116 | ) | | (20 | )% |
| Net income | 2,003 |
| | 1,974 |
| | 29 |
| | 2 | % |
| Less: Net income attributable to the non-controlling interest in VMware, Inc. | (136 | ) | | (111 | ) | | (25 | ) | | 22 | % |
| Net income attributable to EMC Corporation | $ | 1,867 |
| | $ | 1,863 |
| | $ | 4 |
| | — | % |
___________
| |
(1) | Amount includes corporate reconciling items of $92 million and $88 million for the three months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. |
| |
(2) | Amount includes corporate reconciling items of $159 million and $171 million for the three months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. |
| |
(3) | Amount includes corporate reconciling items of $269 million and $241 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. |
| |
(4) | Amount includes corporate reconciling items of $452 million and $462 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. |
Gross Margins
Overall our gross margin percentages were 62.1% and 62.3% for the three months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. The slight decrease in the gross margin percentage in the third quarter of 2013 compared to 2012 was attributable to the Information Storage segment, which decreased overall gross margins by 91 basis points, the Pivotal segment, which decreased overall gross margins by 21 basis points and the Information Intelligence Group segment, which decreased overall gross margins by 14 basis points. These decreases were partially offset by the RSA Information Security segment, which increased overall gross margins by 17 basis points and the VMware Virtual Infrastructure, which increased overall gross margins by 96 basis points. In addition, the increase in corporate reconciling items, consisting of stock-based compensation, acquisition-related intangible asset
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS - (Continued)
amortization and amortization of VMware’s capitalized software from prior periods decreased the consolidated gross margin percentage by 1 basis point.
Overall gross margin percentages were 62.0% and 62.2% for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. The slight decrease in the gross margin percentage in the first three quarters of 2013 compared to 2012 was attributable to the Information Storage segment, which decreased overall gross margins by 61 basis points, the Pivotal segment, which decreased overall gross margins by 20 basis points, the RSA Information Security segment, which decreased overall gross margins by 14 basis points and the Information Intelligence Group segment, which decreased overall gross margins by 6 basis points. These decreases were partially offset by the VMware Virtual Infrastructure segment, which increased overall gross margins by 91 basis points. In addition, the increase in corporate reconciling items, consisting of stock-based compensation, acquisition-related intangible asset amortization and amortization of VMware’s capitalized software from prior periods decreased the consolidated gross margin percentage by 8 basis points.
For segment reporting purposes, stock-based compensation, acquisition-related intangible asset amortization and amortization of VMware’s capitalized software from prior periods are recognized as corporate expenses and are not allocated among our various operating segments. The increase of $1 million in the corporate reconciling items within cost of goods sold for the three months ended September 30, 2013 compared to the same period in 2012 was attributable to a $7 million increase in acquisition-related intangible asset amortization expense, partially offset by a $5 million decrease in amortization of VMware’s capitalized software from prior periods and a $1 million decrease in stock-based compensation expense. The increase of $13 million in corporate reconciling items for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 compared to the same period in 2012 was attributable to a $32 million increase in acquisition-related intangible asset amortization expense, partially offset by a $3 million decrease in stock-based compensation expense and a $16 million decrease in amortization of VMware’s capitalized software from prior periods.
The gross margin percentages for the Information Storage segment were 55.7% and 56.9% for the three months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively, and were 55.9% and 56.6% for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. The decrease in gross margin percentage for the three months ended September 30, 2013 compared to the same period in 2012 was primarily attributable to a decrease in high-end storage product revenue driven by more than a 40% decrease in revenue from the US federal government and a large volume of higher margin product orders which came in too late in the quarter to ship. The decrease in gross margin percentage for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 compared to the same period in 2012 was due to a large volume of higher margin product orders which came in too late in the quarter to ship at the end of the third quarter of 2013 as well as reduced service margins in the second and third quarters of 2013 driven by a build up in consulting capabilities and higher customer service field activity.
The gross margin percentages for the Pivotal segment were 42.6% and 55.6% for the three months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively, and were 39.5% and 51.8% for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. The decrease in gross margin percentage for both the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 compared to the same periods in 2012 was due to a decrease in product margins resulting from an increase in the mix of appliance sales relative to software sales as well as a decrease in service margins as we build out the service capabilities of this new business.
The gross margin percentages for the VMware Virtual Infrastructure segment were 88.8% and 88.6% for the three months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively, and were 89.2% and 88.6% for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. The increase in gross margin percentage for both the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 compared to the same periods in 2012 was primarily attributable to improvements in product margins due to a decrease of IT development costs and a decrease in royalty and licensing costs for technology licensed from third-party providers that is used in its products.
The gross margin percentages for the RSA Information Security segment were 67.6% and 64.2% for the three months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively, and were 66.1% and 70.0% for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. The increase in gross margin percentage for the three months ended September 30, 2013 compared to the same period in 2012 was due to an increase in product margins resulting from an increase in sales of higher margin products as well as an increase in services margins. The decrease in gross margin percentage for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 compared to the same period in 2012 was primarily due to an atypically higher gross margin in 2012 due to the release of the residual reserve related to the one-time impact of RSA remediation associated with working with customers to implement remediation programs which occurred in the three months ended June 30, 2012.
The gross margin percentages for the Information Intelligence Group segment were 63.3% and 68.1% for three months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively, and were 63.3% and 65.6% for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. The decrease in gross margin percentage for both the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 compared to the same periods in 2012 was attributable to a decline in license revenue.
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS - (Continued)
Research and Development
As a percentage of revenues, R&D expenses were 12% for both the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012. R&D expenses increased $33 million and $160 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013, respectively, compared to the same periods in 2012 primarily due to an increase in personnel-related costs, which are expenses driven by incremental headcount from strategic hiring and business acquisitions and infrastructure costs. For the three months ended September 30, 2013, personnel-related costs increased by $29 million, depreciation expense increased by $8 million, infrastructure expenses increased by $5 million and business development costs increased by $4 million. For the nine months ended September 30, 2013, personnel-related costs increased by $147 million, depreciation expense increased by $22 million and infrastructure costs increased $17 million, partially offset by a decrease in materials costs of $6 million. Partially offsetting these increases were higher capitalization of software development costs of $14 million and $28 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013, respectively, which decrease R&D expenses.
Corporate reconciling items within R&D, which consist of stock-based compensation and intangible asset amortization, increased $4 million and $28 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013, respectively, when compared to the same periods in 2012. Stock-based compensation expense increased $5 million and $30 million, respectively, partially offset by a decrease in intangible asset amortization of $1 million and $2 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013, respectively.
R&D expenses within EMC’s Information Infrastructure business, as a percentage of EMC’s Information Infrastructure business revenues, were 9% for both the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012. R&D expenses decreased $2 million and increased $48 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013, respectively, primarily due to changes in personnel-related costs, which are expenses driven by incremental headcount from strategic hiring and business acquisitions, depreciation expense and facility costs. For the three months ended September 30, 2013, personnel-related costs increased by $11 million, depreciation expense increased by $5 million and business development costs increased by $3 million. For the nine months ended September 30, 2013, personnel-related costs increased by $53 million, depreciation expense increased by $16 million and infrastructure costs increased by $11 million. Somewhat offsetting these increased costs was an increase in capitalization of software development costs of $19 million and $33 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013, respectively. The increase in capitalized software development costs is primarily due to the timing of products reaching technological feasibility.
R&D expenses within the Pivotal business, as a percentage of Pivotal's revenues, were 40% and 47% for the three months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively, and were 40% and 53% for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. R&D expenses increased $1 million and decreased $5 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013, respectively, primarily due to fluctuations in personnel-related costs as the business continues to transition to its new strategic focus.
R&D expenses within the VMware Virtual Infrastructure business, as a percentage of VMware’s revenues, were 16% for both the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012. R&D expenses increased $30 million and $89 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013, respectively, compared to the same periods in 2012 largely due to increases in personnel-related costs of $26 million and $76 million, respectively, driven by incremental headcount from strategic hiring as well as increases in depreciation costs of $2 million and $6 million, respectively, as well as increases in infrastructure costs of $2 million and $7 million, respectively.
Selling, General and Administrative
As a percentage of revenues, selling, general and administrative (“SG&A”) expenses were 33% and 32% for the three months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively, and were 32% for both the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012. SG&A expenses increased by $100 million and $232 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013, respectively, compared to the same periods in 2012 primarily due to increases in personnel-related costs, which are expenses driven by incremental headcount from strategic hiring and business acquisitions including variable compensation bonuses and increases in travel, business development and infrastructure expense. For the three months ended September 30, 2013, personnel-related costs increased by $73 million, business development expense increased by $15 million, travel increased by $8 million and infrastructure costs increased by $4 million. For the nine months ended September 30, 2013, personnel-related costs increased by $197 million, business development expense increased by $18 million and infrastructure expense increased by $7 million.
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS - (Continued)
Corporate reconciling items within SG&A, which consist of stock-based compensation and intangible asset amortization, decreased $12 million and increased $10 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013, respectively, when compared to the same periods in 2012. Intangible asset amortization decreased $2 million and $6 million and stock-based compensation expense decreased $10 million and $4 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013, respectively.
SG&A expenses within EMC’s Information Infrastructure business, as a percentage of EMC’s Information Infrastructure business revenues, were 27% and 26% for the three months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively, and were 26% and 27% for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. SG&A expenses increased $34 million for both the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 when compared to the same periods in 2012 primarily due to increases in personnel-related costs, which are expenses driven by incremental headcount from strategic hiring and business acquisitions and increases in business development, depreciation, infrastructure and travel expense. Personnel-related costs increased by $18 million and $19 million, business development costs increased by $2 million and $7 million, depreciation expense increased by $1 million and $7 million, infrastructure costs increased by $6 million and $5 million and travel expense increased by $7 million and $2 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013, respectively.
SG&A expenses within the Pivotal business, as a percentage of Pivotal's revenues, were 54% and 57% for the three months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively, and were 54% and 65% for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. SG&A expenses increased $5 million and $7 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013, respectively, when compared to the same periods in 2012 primarily due to fluctuations in personnel-related costs as the business continues to transition to its new strategic focus.
SG&A expenses within the VMware Virtual Infrastructure business, as a percentage of VMware’s revenues, were 38% for both the three months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, and were 39% and 38% for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. SG&A expenses increased $72 million and $202 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013, respectively, when compared to the same periods in 2012 primarily due to growth in personnel-related expenses of $41 million and $126 million in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013, respectively, driven by incremental headcount. In addition, there were increases in commissions of $20 million and $65 million and increases to business development of $12 million and $8 million during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013, respectively.
Restructuring and Acquisition-Related Charges
For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013, we incurred restructuring and acquisition-related charges of $40 million and $195 million, respectively. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012, we incurred restructuring and acquisition-related charges of $27 million and $81 million, respectively. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013, EMC incurred $30 million and $116 million, respectively, of restructuring charges, primarily related to our current year restructuring programs and $4 million and $8 million, respectively, of charges in connection with acquisitions for financial advisory, legal and accounting services. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013, VMware incurred $1 million and $54 million, respectively, of restructuring charges related to workforce reductions as part of its current year restructuring program and $1 million and $3 million, respectively, of charges in connection with acquisitions for financial advisory, legal and accounting services. In addition, VMware incurred $4 million and $14 million of impairment charges related to its business realignment for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013, respectively. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012, we incurred $22 million and $71 million, respectively, of restructuring charges, primarily related to our 2012 restructuring programs and $5 million and $10 million, respectively, of costs in connection with acquisitions for financial advisory, legal and accounting services.
In the first and third quarters of 2013, EMC implemented restructuring programs to create further operational efficiencies which will result in workforce reductions of approximately 1,000 and 525 positions, respectively. The actions will impact positions around the globe covering our Information Storage, RSA Information Security and Information Intelligence Group segments. All of these actions are expected to be completed within a year of the start of each program.
In the first quarter of 2013, VMware approved and initiated a business realignment plan to streamline its operations. The plan included the elimination of approximately 725 positions across all major functional groups and geographies. Substantially all of the cash-related expenses incurred in connection with the business realignment plan have been paid as of September 30, 2013 and the remaining cash payments are expected to be fully paid out by the end of 2013.
During 2012, we implemented separate restructuring programs to create further operational efficiencies which resulted in a workforce reduction of 1,163 positions, of which 298, 279 and 292 positions were identified in the first, second and third quarters
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS - (Continued)
of 2012, respectively. The actions impacted positions around the globe covering our Information Storage, RSA Information Security and Information Intelligence Group segments. All of these actions are expected to be completed by the end of 2013.
For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013, we recognized $2 million and $14 million, respectively, of lease termination costs for facilities vacated in the period in accordance with our plan as part of all of our restructuring programs and for costs associated with terminating other contractual obligations. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012, we recognized $7 million and $15 million, respectively, of lease termination costs for facilities vacated in the period in accordance with our plan as part of all of our restructuring programs. These costs are expected to be utilized by the end of 2015.
Investment Income
Investment income was $26 million and $29 million for the three months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively, and was $93 million and $85 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. Investment income decreased for the three months ended September 30, 2013 when compared to the same period in 2012 primarily due to a decrease in net realized gains. For the three months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, net realized losses were $1 million and net realized gains were $5 million, respectively, and interest income was $27 million and $25 million, respectively. For the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, net realized gains were $11 million and $6 million, respectively, and interest income was $79 million and $77 million, respectively. Investment income increased for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 when compared to the same period in 2012 primarily due an increase in net realized gains during the first and second quarters of 2013.
Interest Expense
Interest expense was $58 million and $21 million for the three months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively, and was $109 million and $58 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. Interest expense consists primarily of interest on the 2013 Notes and the Notes. Interest expense on the Notes was $35 million and $45 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013, respectively. Also included in interest expense are non-cash interest charges related to amortization of the debt discount attributable to the conversion feature of $17 million and $15 million for the three months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively, and $49 million and $46 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively, as we are accreting the 2013 Notes to their stated values over their term. Also included in interest expense is the amortization of the debt discount and debt issuance fees attributable to the Notes. See Note 4 to the consolidated financial statements.
Other Expense, Net
Other expense, net was $55 million and $63 million for the three months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively, and was $197 million and $158 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. Other expense, net primarily consists of our consolidated share of the losses from our converged infrastructure joint venture, VCE Company LLC, of $75 million and $62 million for the three months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively, and $215 million and $177 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively, and foreign currency exchange losses. In addition, during the nine months ended September 30, 2012, we incurred losses on interest rate swaps of $40 million and $71 million in net gains from the sale of strategic investments held at cost which includes a gain on our strategic investment in XtremIO of $32 million. During the nine months ended September 30, 2013, VMware recorded net gains on the divestiture of businesses and investments of $31 million.
The VCE joint venture is accounted for under the equity method and our consolidated share of VCE's losses is based upon our portion of the overall funding, which was approximately 63% at September 30, 2013, and represents our share of the net losses of the joint venture net of equity accounting adjustments. The losses recognized from the joint venture exclude our consolidated revenues and gross margins from sales of products and services to VCE, and any additional related selling expenses. See Note 9 to the consolidated financial statements.
Provision for Income Taxes
Our effective income tax rates were 22.1% and 19.1% for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013, respectively. Our effective income tax rates were 22.0% and 23.0% for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012, respectively. Our effective income tax rate is based upon estimated income before provision for income taxes for the year, composition of the income in different countries, and adjustments, if any, in the applicable quarterly periods for potential tax consequences, benefits and/or resolutions of tax audits or other tax contingencies. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013, the effective income tax rate varied from the statutory income tax rate principally as a result of the mix of income attributable to foreign versus domestic jurisdictions, state taxes and the federal tax credit for increasing research activities. Our aggregate income tax rate in foreign jurisdictions is lower than our income tax rate in the United States; substantially all of our income before provision for income taxes from foreign operations has been earned by our Irish subsidiaries. We do not believe that any recent or currently expected
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS - (Continued)
developments in non-U.S. tax jurisdictions are reasonably likely to have a material impact on our effective income rate. On January 2, 2013, the American Taxpayer Relief Act of 2012 was signed into law. Some of the provisions were retroactive to January 1, 2012 including an extension of the U.S. federal tax credit for increasing research activities through December 31, 2013. Because the extension was enacted after December 31, 2012, our income tax provision for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 included the federal tax credit for increasing research activities for the full year 2012 as well as the nine months ended September 30, 2013, which reduced our effective tax rate for the nine month period. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012, the effective income tax rate varied from the statutory income tax rate principally as a result of the mix of income attributable to foreign versus domestic jurisdictions.
Our effective income tax rate decreased in the nine months ended September 30, 2013 from the nine months ended September 30, 2012 due primarily to the retroactive renewal of the U.S. federal tax credit for increasing research activities on January 2, 2013 as discussed above. The U.S. federal tax credit for increasing research activities reduced our effective income tax rate by approximately 4.4% for the nine months ended September 30, 2013. There were also differences in the mix of income attributable to foreign versus domestic jurisdictions, state taxes, change in tax contingency reserves and discrete items, the net impact of which is immaterial. Our effective income tax rate for the three months ended September 30, 2013 is consistent with our effective income tax rate for the three months ended September 30, 2012 as a 3.0% favorable impact of U.S. federal tax credit for increasing research activities on our effective income tax rate is offset by a lower estimated Section 199 deduction and other differences between the two three-month periods.
We are routinely under audit by the Internal Revenue Service (the “IRS”). We have concluded all U.S. federal income tax matters for years through 2008. The IRS commenced a federal income tax audit for the tax years 2009 and 2010 in the third quarter of 2012. The current federal income tax audit is still in the early stage for information gathering and it is not expected to be completed until 2015. We also have income tax audits in process in numerous state, local and international jurisdictions. In our international jurisdictions that comprise a significant portion of our operations, the years that may be examined vary, with the earliest year being 2003. Based on the timing and outcome of examinations of EMC, the result of the expiration of statutes of limitations for specific jurisdictions or the timing and result of ruling requests from taxing authorities, it is reasonably possible that the related unrecognized tax benefits could change from those recorded in our statement of financial position. We anticipate that several of these audits may be finalized within the next twelve months. While we expect the amount of unrecognized tax benefits to change in the next twelve months, we do not expect the change to have a significant impact on our results of operations or financial position.
Our effective income tax rate for the remainder of 2013 may be affected by such factors as changes in tax laws, regulations or income tax rates, changing interpretation of existing laws or regulations, the impact of accounting for stock-based compensation, the impact of accounting for business combinations, changes in our international organization, and changes in overall levels of income before provision for income taxes. Our effective income tax rate may also be adversely affected by earnings being lower than anticipated in countries where we have lower statutory income tax rates and higher than anticipated in countries where we have higher statutory income tax rates.
Non-controlling Interest in VMware, Inc.
The net income attributable to the non-controlling interest in VMware was $53 million and $33 million for the three months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively, and was $136 million and $111 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. The increase in both the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 compared to the same periods in 2012 was due to increases in VMware’s net income. VMware’s net income was $261 million and $157 million for the three months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively, and was $679 million and $540 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. The weighted average non-controlling interest in VMware was approximately 20% and 21% for the three months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively, and was 20% and 21% for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. EMC has a stock purchase program of VMware’s Class A common stock to maintain an approximately 80% majority ownership in VMware over the long term. During the nine months ended September 30, 2013, EMC purchased approximately 2 million VMware shares for approximately $150 million.
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS - (Continued)
Financial Condition
Cash provided by operating activities was $4,733 million and $4,363 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. Cash received from customers was $18,065 million and $16,557 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. The increase in cash received from customers was attributable to an increase in sales volume and strong customer collections. Cash paid to suppliers and employees was $12,740 million and $11,951 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. The increase was primarily attributable to a general growth in the business to support the increased revenue base. For the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, we paid $691 million and $291 million, respectively, in income taxes. These payments are comprised of estimated taxes for the current year, extension payments for the prior year and refunds or payments associated with income tax filings and tax audits. The higher payments in the nine months ended September 30, 2013 compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2012 were primarily driven by higher pretax income and lower stock-based compensation and tax depreciation deductions in 2012 compared to 2011.
Cash used in investing activities was $5,664 million and $2,932 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. Cash used for business acquisitions, strategic and other investments was $715 million and $1,861 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. This activity varies from period to period based upon the number and size of acquisitions in a given period. In the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, we also provided funding of $268 million and $218 million, respectively, to our joint venture VCE. During the nine months ended September 30, 2013, VMware received $38 million from dispositions of certain lines of business. Capital additions were $673 million and $523 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. Capitalized software development costs were $342 million and $316 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. Net purchases of investments were $3,704 million and $14 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. This activity varies from period to period based upon our cash collections, cash requirements and maturity dates of our investments as well as cash available after the issuance and payment of debt.
Cash provided by financing activities was $3,414 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and cash used in financing activities was $1,785 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2012. We received $5,460 million in proceeds through the issuance of long-term notes in the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and we spent $1,714 million for repayment of our long- and short-term obligations including convertible debt in the nine months ended September 30, 2012. We spent $1,965 million and $380 million to repurchase 80 million and 15 million shares of our common stock for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. We also spent $160 million and $132 million to purchase 2 million shares of VMware’s common stock in both the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. Additionally, in the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, VMware spent $392 million and $307 million to repurchase 5 million and 3 million shares, respectively, of its common stock. We generated $487 million and $602 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively, from the issuance of common stock. We generated $102 million and $212 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively, of excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation. During the nine months ended September 30, 2012, we used $70 million on the settlement of interest rate swap contracts. Additionally, during the nine months ended September 30, 2013, Pivotal received a $105 million capital contribution from GE and EMC paid a dividend of $209 million to shareholders.
In August 2013, EMC declared a quarterly cash dividend of $0.10 per share of common stock. On October 23, 2013, EMC paid a cash dividend of $206 million to shareholders of record as of the close of business on October 1, 2013.
We expect to continue to generate positive cash flows from operations for the remainder of 2013 and to use cash generated from operations as our primary source of liquidity. We believe that existing cash and cash equivalents, together with any cash generated from operations, will be sufficient to meet normal operating requirements for the next twelve months.
In June 2013, we issued $5.5 billion aggregate principal amount of senior notes (collectively, the "Notes"). The Notes pay a fixed rate of interest semi-annually in arrears with the first interest payment commencing on December 1, 2013. The proceeds from the Notes will be used to satisfy cash payment obligations at the maturity, or upon the conversion, of the outstanding 2013 Notes as well as for general corporate purposes including stock repurchases, working capital needs and other business opportunities. The Notes of each series are senior, unsecured obligations of EMC and are not convertible or exchangeable. Unless previously purchased and canceled, we will repay the Notes of each series at 100% of the principal amount, together with accrued and unpaid interest thereon, at maturity. However, EMC has the right to redeem any or all of the Notes at specified redemption prices. As of September 30, 2013, we were in compliance with all debt covenants which are customary in nature.
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS - (Continued)
The 2011 Notes matured and a majority of the noteholders exercised their right to convert the outstanding 2011 Notes at the end of 2011. Pursuant to the settlement terms, the majority of the converted 2011 Notes were not settled until January 9, 2012. At that time, we paid the noteholders $1,700 million in cash for the outstanding principal and 30 million shares for the $661 million excess of the conversion value over the principal amount, as prescribed by the terms of the 2011 Notes.
The remaining $1,667 million of the 2013 Notes is due in November 2013. At September 30, 2013, the 2013 Notes are fully convertible until maturity. Accordingly, since the terms of the 2013 Notes require the principal to be settled in cash, we reclassified to the mezzanine from shareholders’ equity the portion of the 2013 Notes attributable to the conversion feature which had not yet been accreted to its face value, and the 2013 Notes are classified as a current liability. Approximately $58 million of the 2013 Notes have been converted as of September 30, 2013.
Based upon the closing price of our common stock for the prescribed measurement period during the three months ended September 30, 2013, the contingent conversion thresholds on the 2013 Notes were exceeded. As a result, the 2013 Notes are convertible at the option of the holder through September 1, 2013, at which time they are fully convertible until maturity. Upon conversion, we are obligated to pay cash up to the principal amount of the debt converted. We have the option to settle any conversion value in excess of the principal amount with cash, shares of our common stock, or a combination thereof.
In connection with the issuance of the 2011 Notes and 2013 Notes, we entered into separate convertible note hedge transactions with respect to our common stock (the “Purchased Options”). The Purchased Options allow us to receive shares of our common stock and/or cash related to the excess conversion value that we would pay to the holders of the 2011 Notes and 2013 Notes upon conversion. The Purchased Options will cover, subject to customary anti-dilution adjustments, approximately 215 million shares of our common stock. We paid an aggregate amount of $669 million of the proceeds from the sale of the 2011 Notes and 2013 Notes for the Purchased Options that was recorded as additional paid-in-capital in shareholders’ equity. In the fourth quarter of 2011, we exercised 108 million of the Purchased Options in conjunction with the planned settlements of the 2011 Notes, and we received 30 million shares of net settlement on January 9, 2012, representing the excess conversion value of the options. The remaining 108 million of the Purchased Options expire on December 1, 2013.
We also entered into separate transactions in which we sold warrants to acquire, subject to customary anti-dilution adjustments, approximately 215 million shares of our common stock at an exercise price of approximately $19.55 per share of our common stock. We received aggregate proceeds of $391 million from the sale of the associated warrants. Upon exercise, the value of the warrants is required to be settled in shares. Half of the associated warrants were exercised between February 15, 2012 and March 14, 2012 and the remaining half of the associated warrants have expiration dates between February 18, 2014 and March 18, 2014. During the first quarter of 2012, the exercised warrants were settled with 32.3 million shares of our common stock.
At September 30, 2013, our total cash, cash equivalents, and short-term and long-term investments were $17,466 million. This balance includes approximately $5,837 million held by VMware, of which $3,918 million is held overseas, and $3,603 million held by EMC in overseas entities. If these overseas funds are needed for our operations in the U.S., we would be required to accrue and pay U.S. taxes to repatriate these funds. However, our intent is to permanently reinvest these funds outside of the U.S. and our current plans do not demonstrate a need to repatriate them to fund our U.S. operations.
Use of Non-GAAP Financial Measures and Reconciliations to GAAP Results
The financial statements are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”). EMC used certain non-GAAP financial measures in the three months ended September 30, 2013 which exclude stock-based compensation, amortization of intangible assets, restructuring and acquisition-related charges, the amortization of VMware’s capitalized software from prior periods and infrequently occurring gains, losses and charges to measure its gross margin, operating margin, non-operating income (expense), net income and diluted earnings per share for purposes of managing our business. EMC also assesses its financial performance by measuring its free cash flow which is also a non-GAAP financial measure. Free cash flow is defined as net cash provided by operating activities, less additions to capital expenditures and capitalized software development costs. These non-GAAP financial measures should be considered in addition to, not as a substitute for, measures of EMC’s financial performance or liquidity prepared in accordance with GAAP. EMC’s non-GAAP financial measures may be defined differently from time to time and may be defined differently than similar terms used by other companies, and accordingly, care should be exercised in understanding how EMC defines its non-GAAP financial measures.
EMC’s management uses the non-GAAP financial measures to gain an understanding of EMC’s comparative operating performance (when comparing such results with previous periods or forecasts) and future prospects and excludes these items from its internal financial statements for purposes of its internal budgets and each reporting segment’s financial goals. These non-GAAP financial measures are used by EMC’s management in their financial and operating decision-making because management believes
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS - (Continued)
they reflect EMC’s ongoing business in a manner that allows meaningful period-to-period comparisons. EMC’s management believes that these non-GAAP financial measures provide useful information to investors and others (a) in understanding and evaluating EMC’s current operating performance and future prospects in the same manner as management does, if they so choose, and (b) in comparing in a consistent manner EMC’s current financial results with EMC’s past financial results.
Our non-GAAP operating results for the three months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012 were as follows (in millions):
|
| | | | | | | |
| For the Three Months Ended |
| September 30, 2013 | | September 30, 2012 |
Gross margin | $ | 3,540 |
| | $ | 3,385 |
|
Gross margin percentage | 63.9 | % | | 64.1 | % |
Operating income | 1,296 |
| | 1,282 |
|
Operating margin percentage | 23.4 | % | | 24.3 | % |
Income tax provision | 263 |
| | 289 |
|
Net income attributable to EMC | 860 |
| | 881 |
|
Diluted earnings per share attributable to EMC | $ | 0.40 |
| | $ | 0.40 |
|
The slight decrease in non-GAAP gross margin percentage was attributable to reduced Information Storage product margins primarily attributable to a decrease in high-end storage product revenue driven by more than a 40% decrease in revenue from the US federal government during the three months ended September 30, 2013 and a large volume of higher margin product orders which came in too late in the quarter to ship. The decrease in the non-GAAP operating margin percentage was attributable to fixed operating expenses growing at a faster rate than revenue due to the unexpected revenue shortfall as discussed above.
The reconciliation of the above financial measures from GAAP to non-GAAP is as follows (in millions):
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| For the Three Months Ended September 30, 2013 |
| GAAP | | Stock-based compensation | | Intangible asset amortization | | Restructuring and acquisition- related charges | | Amortization of VMware's capitalized software from prior periods | | Special tax items | | Net gain on disposition of certain lines of business and other | | Non-GAAP |
Gross margin | $ | 3,442 |
| | $ | 32 |
| | $ | 58 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 8 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 3,540 |
|
Operating income | 907 |
| | 244 |
| | 97 |
| | 40 |
| | 8 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 1,296 |
|
Income tax provision | 181 |
| | 64 |
| | 27 |
| | 10 |
| | 2 |
| | (23 | ) | | 2 |
| | 263 |
|
Net income attributable to EMC | 586 |
| | 163 |
| | 66 |
| | 29 |
| | 4 |
| | 23 |
| | (11 | ) | | 860 |
|
Diluted earnings per share attributable to EMC | $ | 0.27 |
| | $ | 0.08 |
| | $ | 0.03 |
| | $ | 0.01 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 0.01 |
| | $ | (0.01 | ) | | $ | 0.40 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| For the Three Months Ended September 30, 2012 |
| GAAP | | Stock-based compensation | | Intangible asset amortization | | Restructuring and acquisition- related charges | | Amortization of VMware's capitalized software from prior periods | | Non-GAAP |
Gross margin | $ | 3,288 |
| | $ | 33 |
| | $ | 51 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 13 |
| | $ | 3,385 |
|
Operating income | 899 |
| | 250 |
| | 93 |
| | 27 |
| | 13 |
| | 1,282 |
|
Income tax provision | 185 |
| | 67 |
| | 30 |
| | 3 |
| | 4 |
| | 289 |
|
Net income attributable to EMC | 626 |
| | 164 |
| | 60 |
| | 24 |
| | 7 |
| | 881 |
|
Diluted earnings per share attributable to EMC | $ | 0.28 |
| | $ | 0.07 |
| | $ | 0.03 |
| | $ | 0.01 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 0.40 |
|
We also monitor our ability to generate free cash flow in relationship to our non-GAAP net income attributable to EMC over comparable periods. For the nine months ended September 30, 2013, our free cash flow was $3,718 million, an increase of 6% compared to the free cash flow generated for the nine months ended September 30, 2012. The free cash flow for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 exceeded our same period non-GAAP net income attributable to EMC by $1,101 million. EMC uses free cash flow, among other measures, to evaluate the ability of its operations to generate cash that is available for purposes other than capital expenditures and capitalized software development costs. Management believes that information regarding free cash
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS - (Continued)
flow provides investors with an important perspective on the cash available to make strategic acquisitions and investments, repurchase shares, pay dividends, service debt and fund ongoing operations. As free cash flow is not a measure of liquidity calculated in accordance with GAAP, free cash flow should be considered in addition to, but not as a substitute for, the analysis provided in the statements of cash flows.
The reconciliation of the above free cash flow from GAAP to non-GAAP is as follows (in millions):
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| For the Three Months Ended | | For the Nine Months Ended |
| September 30, 2013 | | September 30, 2012 | | September 30, 2013 | | September 30, 2012 |
Cash Flow from Operations | $ | 1,793 |
| | $ | 1,438 |
| | $ | 4,733 |
| | $ | 4,363 |
|
Capital Expenditures | (236 | ) | | (191 | ) | | (673 | ) | | (523 | ) |
Capitalized Software Development Costs | (123 | ) | | (109 | ) | | (342 | ) | | (316 | ) |
Free Cash Flow | $ | 1,434 |
| | $ | 1,138 |
| | $ | 3,718 |
| | $ | 3,524 |
|
Free cash flow represents a non-GAAP measure related to operating cash flows. In contrast, our GAAP measure of cash flow consists of three components. These are cash flows provided by operating activities of $4,733 million and $4,363 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively, cash used in investing activities of $5,664 million and $2,932 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively, and net cash provided by and (used in) financing activities of $3,414 million and $(1,785) million for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively.
All of the foregoing non-GAAP financial measures have limitations. Specifically, the non-GAAP financial measures that exclude the items noted above do not include all items of income and expense that affect EMC’s operations or cash flows. Further, these non-GAAP financial measures are not prepared in accordance with GAAP, may not be comparable to non-GAAP financial measures used by other companies and do not reflect any benefit that such items may confer on EMC. Management compensates for these limitations by also considering EMC’s financial results as determined in accordance with GAAP.
Item 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
For quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk affecting us, see Item 7A “Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on February 27, 2013. Our exposure to market risks has not changed materially from that set forth in our Annual Report.
Item 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures. Our management, with the participation of our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”)), as of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. Based on such evaluation, our principal executive officer and principal financial officer have concluded that as of such date, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. There was no change in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) that occurred during the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
PART II
OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
We are involved in a variety of claims, demands, suits, investigations and proceedings that arise from time to time relating to matters incidental to the ordinary course of our business, including actions with respect to contracts, intellectual property, product liability, employment, benefits and securities matters. As required by authoritative guidance, we have estimated the amount of probable losses that may result from all currently pending matters, and such amounts are reflected in our consolidated financial statements. These recorded amounts are not material to our consolidated financial position or results of operations and no additional material losses related to these pending matters are reasonably possible. While it is not possible to predict the outcome of these matters with certainty, we do not expect the results of any of these actions to have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations or financial condition. Because litigation is inherently unpredictable, however, the actual amounts of loss may prove to be larger or smaller than the amounts reflected in our consolidated financial statements, and we could incur judgments or enter into settlements of claims that could adversely affect our operating results or cash flows in a particular period.
Item 1A. RISK FACTORS
The risk factors that appear below could materially affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. This description includes any material changes to and supersedes the description of the risk factors associated with our business previously disclosed in Item 1A of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012. The risks and uncertainties described below are not the only risks and uncertainties facing us. Our business is also subject to general risks and uncertainties that affect many other companies.
Our business could be materially adversely affected as a result of general economic and market conditions.
We are subject to the effects of general global economic and market conditions that are beyond our control. If these conditions remain challenging or deteriorate, our business, results of operations or financial condition could be materially adversely affected. Possible consequences from macroeconomic global challenges such as the debt crisis in certain countries in the European Union or slowing economies in parts of Asia, or the impact of continuing uncertainty associated with the budget “sequestration” in the United States government on our business, including insolvency of key suppliers resulting in product delays, inability of customers to obtain credit to finance purchases of our products, customer insolvencies, increased risk that customers may delay payments, fail to pay or default on credit extended to them, and counterparty failures negatively impacting our treasury operations, could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations or financial condition.
Our business could be materially adversely affected as a result of a lessening demand in the information technology market.
Our revenue and profitability depend on the overall demand for our products and services. Delays or reductions in IT spending could materially adversely affect demand for our products and services which could result in decreased revenues or earnings.
Our customers operate in a variety of sectors and across many geographies. Any adverse effects to such markets could materially adversely affect demand for our products and services which could result in decreased revenues or earnings.
Competitive pricing, sales volume, mix and component costs could materially adversely affect our revenues, gross margins and earnings.
Our gross margins are impacted by a variety of factors, including competitive pricing, component and product design costs as well as the volume and relative mixture of product and services revenues. Increased component costs, increased pricing pressures, the relative and varying rates of increases or decreases in component costs and product price, changes in product and services revenue mixture or decreased volume could have a material adverse effect on our revenues, gross margins or earnings.
The costs of third-party components comprise a significant portion of our product costs. While we generally have been able to manage our component and product design costs, we may have difficulty managing such costs if supplies of certain components become limited or component prices increase. Any such limitation could result in an increase in our component costs. An increase in component or design costs relative to our product prices could have a material adverse effect on our gross margins and earnings. Moreover, certain competitors may have advantages due to vertical integration of their supply chain, which may include disk drives, microprocessors, memory components and servers.
The markets in which we do business are highly competitive, and we may encounter aggressive price competition for all of our products and services from numerous companies globally. There also has been and may continue to be a willingness on the part of certain competitors to reduce prices or provide information infrastructure and virtual infrastructure products or services, together with other IT products or services, at minimal or no additional cost in order to preserve or gain market share. Such price competition may result in pressure on our product and service prices, and reductions in product and service prices may have a material adverse effect on our revenues, gross margins and earnings.
If our suppliers are not able to meet our requirements, we could have decreased revenues and earnings.
We purchase or license many sophisticated components and products from one or a limited number of qualified suppliers, including some of our competitors. These components and products include flash drives, disk drives, high density memory components, power supplies and software developed and maintained by third parties. We have experienced delivery delays from time to time because of high industry demand or the inability of some vendors to consistently meet our quality or delivery requirements. Natural disasters have also in the past and may continue to impact our ability to procure certain components in a timely fashion. Current or future social and environmental regulations or critical issues, such as those relating to the sourcing of conflict minerals from the Democratic Republic of the Congo or the need to eliminate environmentally sensitive materials from our products, could restrict the supply of resources used in production or increase our costs. If any of our suppliers were to cancel or materially change contracts or commitments with us or fail to meet the quality or delivery requirements needed to satisfy customer orders for our products, we could lose time-sensitive customer orders, be unable to develop or sell certain products cost-effectively or on a timely basis, if at all, and have significantly decreased quarterly revenues and earnings, which would have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition. Additionally, we periodically transition our product line to incorporate new technologies. The importance of transitioning our customers smoothly to new technologies, along with our historically uneven pattern of quarterly sales, intensifies the risk that the failure of a supplier to meet our quality or delivery requirements will have a material adverse impact on our revenues and earnings. An economic crisis may also negatively affect our suppliers’ solvency, which could, in turn, result in product delays or otherwise materially adversely affect our business, results of operations or financial condition.
Our financial performance is impacted by the financial performance of VMware.
Because we consolidate VMware’s financial results in our results of operations, our financial performance will be impacted by the financial performance of VMware. VMware’s financial performance may be affected by a number of factors, including, but not limited to:
| |
• | general economic conditions in their domestic and international markets and the effect that these conditions have on VMware’s customers’ capital budgets and the availability of funding for software purchases; |
| |
• | fluctuations in demand, adoption rates, sales cycles and pricing levels for VMware’s products and services; |
| |
• | fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates; |
| |
• | changes in customers’ budgets for information technology purchases and in the timing of their purchasing decisions; |
| |
• | the timing of recognizing revenues in any given quarter, which, as a result of software revenue recognition policies, can be affected by a number of factors, including product announcements, beta programs and product promotions that can cause revenue recognition of certain orders to be deferred until future products to which customers are entitled become available; |
| |
• | the sale of VMware’s products and services in the timeframes anticipated, including the number and size of orders in each quarter; |
| |
• | VMware’s ability to develop, introduce and ship in a timely manner new products and services and enhancements that meet customer demand, certification requirements and technical requirements; |
| |
• | VMware's ability to compete effectively; |
| |
• | the introduction of new pricing and packaging models for VMware’s product offerings; |
| |
• | the timing of the announcement or release of upgrades or new products by VMware or by its competitors; |
| |
• | VMware’s ability to maintain scalable internal systems for reporting, order processing, license fulfillment, product delivery, purchasing, billing and general accounting, among other functions; |
| |
• | VMware’s ability to control costs, including its operating expenses; |
| |
• | changes to VMware’s effective tax rate; |
| |
• | the increasing scale of VMware’s business and its effect on VMware’s ability to maintain historical rates of growth; |
| |
• | VMware’s ability to attract and retain highly skilled employees, particularly those with relevant experience in software development and sales; |
| |
• | VMware’s ability to conform to emerging industry standards and to technological developments by its competitors and customers; |
| |
• | renewal rates and the amounts of the renewals for enterprise license agreements, or ELA’s, as original ELA terms expire; |
| |
• | the timing and amount of software development costs that may be capitalized beginning when technological feasibility has been established and ending when the product is available for general release; |
| |
• | unplanned events that could affect market perception of the quality or cost-effectiveness of VMware’s products and solutions; and |
| |
• | the recoverability of benefits from goodwill and acquired intangible assets, and the potential impairment of these assets. |
Our stock price is volatile and may be affected by the trading price of VMware Class A common stock.
Our stock price, like that of other technology companies, is subject to significant volatility because of factors such as:
| |
• | the announcement of acquisitions, new products, services or technological innovations by us or our competitors; |
| |
• | quarterly variations in our operating results; |
| |
• | changes in revenue or earnings estimates by the investment community; and |
| |
• | speculation in the press or investment community. |
The trading price of our common stock has been and likely will continue to be affected by various factors related to VMware, including:
| |
• | the trading price for VMware Class A common stock; |
| |
• | actions taken or statements made by us, VMware, or others concerning our relationship with VMware; and |
| |
• | factors impacting the performance of VMware, including those discussed in the prior risk factor. |
In addition, although we own a majority of VMware and consolidate their results, our stock price may not reflect our pro rata ownership interest of VMware.
We may be unable to keep pace with rapid industry, technological and market changes.
The markets in which we compete are characterized by rapid technological change, frequent new product introductions, evolving industry standards and changing needs of customers. There can be no assurance that our existing products will be properly positioned in the market or that we will be able to introduce new or enhanced products into the market on a timely basis, or at all. We spend a considerable amount of money on research and development and introduce new products from time to time. There can be no assurance that enhancements to existing products and solutions or new products and solutions will receive customer acceptance. As competition in the IT industry increases, it may become increasingly difficult for us to maintain a technological advantage and to leverage that advantage toward increased revenues and profits. In addition, there can be no assurance that our vision of enabling hybrid Cloud Computing, Big Data and Trust through infrastructure and application transformation will be accepted or validated in the marketplace.
Risks associated with the development and introduction of new products include delays in development and changes in data storage, networking virtualization, infrastructure management, information security and operating system technologies which could require us to modify existing products. Risks inherent in the transition to new products include:
| |
• | the difficulty in forecasting customer preferences or demand accurately; |
| |
• | the inability to expand production capacity to meet demand for new products; |
| |
• | the inability to successfully manage the interoperability and transition from older products; |
| |
• | the impact of customers’ demand for new products on the products being replaced, thereby causing a decline in sales of existing products and an excessive, obsolete supply of inventory; and |
| |
• | delays in initial shipments of new products. |
Further risks inherent in new product introductions include the uncertainty of price-performance relative to products of competitors, competitors’ responses to the introductions and the desire by customers to evaluate new products for extended periods of time. Our failure to introduce new or enhanced products on a timely basis, keep pace with rapid industry, technological or market changes or effectively manage the transitions to new products or new technologies could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations or financial condition.
The markets we serve are highly competitive, and we may be unable to compete effectively.
We compete with many companies in the markets we serve, certain of which offer a broad spectrum of IT products and services and others which offer specific information storage, protection, security, management, virtualization and intelligence products or services. Some of these companies (whether independently or by establishing alliances) may have substantially greater financial, marketing and technological resources, larger distribution capabilities, earlier access to customers and greater opportunity to address customers’ various IT requirements than us. In addition, as the IT industry consolidates, companies may improve their competitive position and ability to compete against us. We compete on the basis of our products’ features, performance and price as well as our services. Our failure to compete on any of these bases could affect demand for our products or services, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations or financial condition.
Companies may develop new technologies or products in advance of us or establish business models or technologies disruptive to us. Our business may be materially adversely affected by the announcement or introduction of new products, including hardware and software products and services by our competitors, and the implementation of effective marketing or sales strategies by our competitors. The material adverse effect to our business could include a decrease in demand for our products and services and an increase in the length of our sales cycle due to customers taking longer to compare products and services and to complete their purchases.
We may have difficulty managing operations.
Our future operating results will depend on our overall ability to manage operations, which includes, among other things:
| |
• | retaining and hiring, as required, the appropriate number of qualified employees; |
| |
• | managing, protecting and enhancing, as appropriate, our infrastructure, including but not limited to, our information systems (and such systems’ ability to protect confidential information residing on the systems) and internal controls; |
| |
• | accurately forecasting revenues; |
| |
• | training our sales force to sell effectively, given the breadth of our offerings; |
| |
• | successfully integrating new acquisitions; |
| |
• | managing inventory levels, including minimizing excess and obsolete inventory, while maintaining sufficient inventory to meet customer demands; |
| |
• | managing our manufacturing capacity, real estate facilities and other assets; |
| |
• | meeting our sustainability goals; and |
An unexpected decline in revenues without a corresponding and timely reduction in expenses or a failure to manage other aspects of our operations could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations or financial condition.
Our investment portfolio could experience a decline in market value which could adversely affect our financial results.
We held $10.3 billion in short- and long-term investments as of September 30, 2013. The investments are invested primarily in investment grade debt securities, and we limit the amount of investment with any one issuer. A further deterioration in the economy, including a tightening of credit markets, increased defaults by issuers, or significant volatility in interest rates, including the downgrade of U.S. government debt, could cause the investments to decline in value or could impact the liquidity of the portfolio. If market conditions deteriorate significantly, our results of operations or financial condition could be materially adversely affected.
Our business may suffer if we are unable to retain or attract key personnel.
Our business depends to a significant extent on the continued service of senior management and other key employees, the development of additional management personnel and the hiring of new qualified employees. There can be no assurance that we will be successful in retaining existing personnel or recruiting new personnel. The loss of one or more key or other employees, our inability to attract additional qualified employees or the delay in hiring key personnel could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations or financial condition.
Our quarterly revenues and earnings could be materially adversely affected by uneven sales patterns and changing purchasing behaviors.
Our quarterly sales have historically reflected an uneven pattern in which a disproportionate percentage of a quarter’s total sales occur in the last month and weeks and days of each quarter. This pattern makes prediction of revenues, earnings and working capital for each financial period especially difficult and uncertain and increases the risk of unanticipated variations in quarterly results and financial condition. We believe this uneven sales pattern is a result of many factors including:
| |
• | the relative dollar amount of our product and services offerings in relation to many of our customers’ budgets, resulting in long lead times for customers’ budgetary approval, which tends to be given late in a quarter; |
| |
• | the tendency of customers to wait until late in a quarter to commit to purchase in the hope of obtaining more favorable pricing from one or more competitors seeking their business; |
| |
• | the fourth-quarter influence of customers spending their remaining capital budget authorization prior to new budget constraints in the first nine months of the following year; and |
Our uneven sales pattern also makes it extremely difficult to predict near-term demand and adjust manufacturing capacity or our supply chain accordingly. If predicted demand is substantially greater than orders, there will be excess inventory. Alternatively, if orders substantially exceed predicted demand, the ability to assemble, test and ship orders received in the last weeks and days of each quarter may be limited, which could materially adversely affect quarterly revenues and earnings.
In addition, our revenues in any quarter are substantially dependent on orders booked and shipped in that quarter and our backlog at any particular time is not necessarily indicative of future sales levels. This is because:
| |
• | we assemble our products on the basis of our forecast of near-term demand and maintain inventory in advance of receipt of firm orders from customers; |
| |
• | we generally ship products shortly after receipt of the order; and |
| |
• | customers may generally reschedule or cancel orders with little or no penalty. |
Loss of infrastructure, due to factors such as an information systems failure, loss of public utilities, natural disasters or extreme weather conditions, could impact our ability to book orders or ship products in a timely manner. Delays in product shipping or an unexpected decline in revenues without a corresponding and timely slowdown in expenses, could intensify the impact of these factors on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
In addition, unanticipated changes in our customers’ purchasing behaviors such as customers taking longer to negotiate and complete their purchases or making smaller, incremental purchases based on their current needs, also make the prediction of revenues, earnings and working capital for each financial period difficult and uncertain and increase the risk of unanticipated variations in our quarterly results and financial condition.
Risks associated with our distribution channels may materially adversely affect our financial results.
In addition to our direct sales force, we have agreements in place with many distributors, systems integrators, resellers and original equipment manufacturers to market and sell our products and services. We derive a significant percentage of our revenues from such distribution channels. Our financial results could be materially adversely affected if our contracts with channel partners were terminated, if our relationship with channel partners were to deteriorate, if the financial condition of our channel partners were to weaken, if our channel partners were not able to timely and effectively implement their planned actions or if the level of demand for our channel partners’ products and services were to decrease. In addition, as our market opportunities change, we may
have an increased reliance on channel partners, which may negatively impact our gross margins. There can be no assurance that we will be successful in maintaining or expanding these channels. If we are not successful, we may lose sales opportunities, customers and market share. Furthermore, the partial reliance on channel partners may materially reduce the visibility to our management of potential customers and demand for products and services, thereby making it more difficult to accurately forecast such demand. In addition, there can be no assurance that our channel partners will not develop, market or sell products or services or acquire other companies that develop, market or sell products or services in competition with us in the future.
In addition, as we focus on new market opportunities and additional customers through our various distribution channels, including small-to-medium sized businesses, we may be required to provide different levels of service and support than we typically provided in the past. We may have difficulty managing directly or indirectly through our channels these different service and support requirements and may be required to incur substantial costs to provide such services which may adversely affect our business, results of operations or financial condition.
Due to the global nature of our business, political, economic or regulatory changes or other factors in a specific country or region could impair our international operations, future revenue or financial condition.
A substantial portion of our revenues is derived from sales outside the United States including, increasingly, in rapid growth markets such as Brazil, Russia, India and China. In addition, a substantial portion of our products is manufactured outside of the United States. Accordingly, our future results could be materially adversely affected by a variety of factors relating to our operations outside the United States, including, among others, the following:
| |
• | changes in foreign currency exchange rates; |
| |
• | changes in a specific country’s or region’s economic conditions; |
| |
• | political or social unrest; |
| |
• | import or export licensing requirements; |
| |
• | the overlap of different tax structures or changes in international tax laws; |
| |
• | changes in regulatory requirements; |
| |
• | difficulties in staffing and managing international operations; |
| |
• | stringent privacy policies in some foreign countries; |
| |
• | compliance with a variety of foreign laws and regulations; and |
| |
• | longer payment cycles in certain countries. |
Foreign operations, particularly in those countries with developing economies, are also subject to risks of violations of laws prohibiting improper payments and bribery, including the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and similar regulations in foreign jurisdictions. Although we implement policies and procedures designed to ensure compliance with these laws, our employees, contractors and agents may take actions in violation of our policies. Any such violations, even if prohibited by our policies, could subject us to civil or criminal penalties or otherwise have an adverse effect on our business and reputation.
In addition, we hold a significant portion of our cash and investments in our international subsidiaries. Potential regulations could impact our ability to transfer the cash and investments to the United States. Should we desire to repatriate cash, we may incur a significant tax obligation.
We operate a Venezuelan sales subsidiary in which the Bolivar is the functional currency. Our operations in Venezuela include U.S. dollar-denominated assets and liabilities which we re-measure to Bolivars. The re-measurement may result in transaction gains or losses. We have used the official exchange rate to remeasure these balances based upon the expected rate at which we believe the items will be settled. As a result of continued hyper-inflation in Venezuela, effective in 2010, we modified the functional currency to be the U.S. dollar. As a result of this change, Bolivar-denominated transactions will be subject to exchange gains and losses that may impact our earnings. While we do not believe this change will have a material impact on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows, these items could be adversely affected if there is a significant change in exchange rates.
Cybersecurity breaches could expose us to liability, damage our reputation, compromise our ability to conduct business, require us to incur significant costs or otherwise adversely affect our financial results.
We retain sensitive data, including intellectual property, proprietary business information and personally identifiable information, in our secure data centers and on our networks. We face a number of threats to our data centers and networks of unauthorized access, security breaches and other system disruptions. It is critical to our business strategy that our infrastructure remains secure and is perceived by customers and partners to be secure. Despite our security measures, our infrastructure may be vulnerable to attacks by hackers or other disruptive problems, such as the sophisticated cyber attack on our RSA division that we disclosed in March 2011. Any such security breach may compromise information stored on our networks and may result in significant data losses or theft of our, our customers’, our business partners’ or our employees’ intellectual property, proprietary business information or personally identifiable information. In addition, we have outsourced a number of our business functions to third party contractors, and any breach of their security systems could adversely affect us.
A cybersecurity breach could negatively affect our reputation as a trusted provider of information infrastructure by adversely affecting the market’s perception of the security or reliability of our products or services. In addition, a cyber attack could result in other negative consequences, including remediation costs, disruption of internal operations, increased cybersecurity protection costs, lost revenues or litigation.
Undetected problems in our products could directly impair our financial results.
If flaws in design, production, assembly or testing of our products (by us or our suppliers) were to occur, we could experience a rate of failure in our products that would result in substantial repair, replacement or service costs and potential damage to our reputation. Continued improvement in manufacturing capabilities, control of material and manufacturing quality and costs and product testing are critical factors in our future growth. There can be no assurance that our efforts to monitor, develop, modify and implement appropriate test and manufacturing processes for our products will be sufficient to permit us to avoid a rate of failure in our products that results in substantial delays in shipment, significant repair or replacement costs or potential damage to our reputation, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations or financial condition.
Our business could be materially adversely affected as a result of the risks associated with alliances.
We have alliances, such as our VCE joint venture, with leading information technology companies, some of whom may be our competitors in other areas, and we plan to continue our strategy of developing key alliances in order to expand our reach into markets. There can be no assurance that we will be successful in our ongoing strategic alliances or that we will be able to find further suitable business relationships as we develop new products and strategies. Any failure to continue or expand such relationships could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations or financial condition.
There can be no assurance that companies with which we have strategic alliances, certain of which have substantially greater financial, marketing or technological resources than us, will not develop or market products in competition with us in the future, discontinue their alliances with us or form alliances with our competitors.
Our business may suffer if we cannot protect our intellectual property.
We generally rely upon patent, copyright, trademark and trade secret laws and contract rights in the United States and in other countries to establish and maintain our proprietary rights in our technology and products. However, there can be no assurance that any of our proprietary rights will not be challenged, invalidated or circumvented. In addition, the laws of certain countries do not protect our proprietary rights to the same extent as do the laws of the United States. Therefore, there can be no assurance that we will be able to adequately protect our proprietary technology against unauthorized third-party copying or use, which could adversely affect our competitive position. Further, there can be no assurance that we will be able to obtain licenses to any technology that we may require to conduct our business or that, if obtainable, such technology can be licensed at a reasonable cost.
From time to time, we receive notices from third parties claiming infringement by our products of third-party patent or other intellectual property rights. Responding to any such claim, regardless of its merit, could be time-consuming, result in costly litigation, divert management’s attention and resources and cause us to incur significant expenses. In the event there is a temporary or permanent injunction entered prohibiting us from marketing or selling certain of our products or a successful claim of infringement against us requiring us to pay royalties to a third party, and we fail to develop or license a substitute technology, our business, results of operations or financial condition could be materially adversely affected.
In addition, although we believe we have adequate security measures, if our intellectual property or other sensitive data is misappropriated, we could suffer monetary and other losses and reputational harm, which could materially adversely affect our business, results of operations or financial condition. In the past, VMware has been made aware of public postings by hackers of portions of their source code.
We may become involved in litigation that may materially adversely affect us.
From time to time, we may become involved in various legal proceedings relating to matters incidental to the ordinary course of our business, including patent, commercial, product liability, employment, class action, whistleblower and other litigation and claims, and governmental and other regulatory investigations and proceedings. Such matters can be time-consuming, divert management’s attention and resources and cause us to incur significant expenses. Furthermore, because litigation is inherently unpredictable, there can be no assurance that the results of any of these actions will not have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations or financial condition.
Issues arising during the upgrade of our enterprise resource planning system could affect our operating results and ability to manage our business effectively.
We are in the process of upgrading our enterprise resource planning, or ERP, computer system to enhance operating efficiencies and provide more effective management of our business operations. While one phase of our upgrade was implemented in the third quarter of 2012, we still have further planned phases to our upgrade. The upgrade could cause substantial business interruption that could adversely impact our operating results. We are investing significant financial and personnel resources into this project. However, there is no assurance that the design will meet our current and future business needs or that it will operate as designed. We are heavily dependent on such computer systems, and any significant failure or delay in the system upgrade, if encountered, could cause a substantial interruption to our business and additional expense which could result in an adverse impact on our operating results, cash flows and financial condition.
We may have exposure to additional income tax liabilities.
As a multinational corporation, we are subject to income taxes in both the United States and various foreign jurisdictions. Due to economic and political conditions, tax rates in various jurisdictions may be subject to significant change, which might significantly affect our effective income tax rates in the future. Our domestic and international tax liabilities are subject to the allocation of revenues and expenses in different jurisdictions and the timing of recognizing revenues and expenses. Additionally, the amount of income taxes paid is subject to our interpretation of applicable tax laws in the jurisdictions in which we file and changes to tax laws. From time to time, we are subject to income tax audits. While we believe we have complied with all applicable income tax laws, there can be no assurance that a governing tax authority will not have a different interpretation of the law and assess us with additional taxes. Should we be assessed with additional taxes, there could be a material adverse effect on our results of operations or financial condition.
As part of the current Administration’s ongoing budget negotiations, President Obama and the House of Representatives and Senate Committees have called for a comprehensive tax reform, which might change certain U.S. tax rules for U.S. corporations doing business outside the United States. While the scope of future changes differs among various tax proposals and remains unclear, proposed changes might include limiting the ability of U.S. corporations to deduct certain expenses attributable to offshore earnings, modifying the foreign tax credit rules and taxing currently certain transfers of intangibles offshore. The enactment of some or all of these proposals could increase the Company's effective tax rate and adversely affect our profitability.
During 2010, the IRS announced and finalized Schedule UTP, Uncertain Tax Positions Statement. This schedule is an annual disclosure of certain federal UTPs, ranked in order of magnitude which includes "a concise description of the tax position, including a description of the relevant facts affecting the tax treatment of the position and information that reasonably can be expected to apprise the Service of the identity of the tax position." As a result of this disclosure, the amount of taxes we would have to pay in the future could increase.
Changes in regulations could materially adversely affect us.
Our business, results of operations or financial condition could be materially adversely affected if laws, regulations or standards relating to us or our products are newly implemented or changed. In addition, our compliance with existing regulations may have a material adverse impact on us. Under applicable federal securities laws, including the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, we are required to evaluate and determine the effectiveness of our internal control structure and procedures for financial reporting. Should
we or our independent auditors determine that we have material weaknesses in our internal controls, our results of operations or financial condition may be materially adversely affected or our stock price may decline. In March 2010, President Obama signed into law a comprehensive health care reform package. We cannot currently determine the impact that such legislation could have on our business, results of operations or financial condition.
Changes in generally accepted accounting principles may materially adversely affect us.
From time to time, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) promulgates new accounting principles that could have a material adverse impact on our results of operations or financial condition. The FASB is currently contemplating a number of new accounting pronouncements which, if approved, could materially change our reported results. Such changes could have a material adverse impact on our results of operations and financial position.
Our business could be materially adversely affected as a result of the risks associated with acquisitions, investments and joint ventures.
As part of our business strategy, we seek to acquire businesses that offer complementary products, services or technologies. These acquisitions are accompanied by the risks commonly encountered in an acquisition of a business, which may include, among other things:
| |
• | the effect of the acquisition on our financial and strategic position and reputation; |
| |
• | the failure of an acquired business to further our strategies; |
| |
• | the failure of the acquisition to result in expected benefits, which may include benefits relating to enhanced revenues, technology, human resources, cost savings, operating efficiencies and other synergies; |
| |
• | the difficulty and cost of integrating the acquired business, including costs and delays in implementing common systems and procedures and costs and delays caused by communication difficulties or geographic distances between the two companies’ sites; |
| |
• | the assumption of known or unknown liabilities of the acquired business, including litigation-related liability; |
| |
• | the potential impairment of acquired assets; |
| |
• | the lack of experience in new markets, products or technologies or the initial dependence on unfamiliar supply or distribution partners; |
| |
• | the diversion of our management’s attention from other business concerns; |
| |
• | the impairment of relationships with customers or suppliers of the acquired business or our customers or suppliers; |
| |
• | the recoverability of benefits from goodwill and intangible assets and the potential impairment of these assets; |
| |
• | the potential loss of key employees of the acquired company; and |
| |
• | the potential incompatibility of business cultures. |
These factors could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations or financial condition. To the extent that we issue shares of our common stock or other rights to purchase our common stock in connection with any future acquisition, existing shareholders may experience dilution. Additionally, regardless of the form of consideration issued, acquisitions could negatively impact our net income and our earnings per share.
In addition to the risks commonly encountered in the acquisition of a business as described above, we may also experience risks relating to the challenges and costs of closing a transaction or failing to close an announced transaction. Further, the risks described above may be exacerbated as a result of managing multiple acquisitions at the same time.
We also seek to invest in businesses that offer complementary products, services or technologies and to, from time to time, create new joint ventures or alliances. These investments and ventures are accompanied by risks similar to those encountered in an acquisition of a business.
Our pension plan assets are subject to market volatility.
We have a noncontributory defined benefit pension plan assumed as part of our Data General acquisition. The plan’s assets are invested in common stocks, bonds and cash. The expected long-term rate of return on the plan’s assets was 6.75%. This rate
represents the average of the expected long-term rates of return weighted by the plan’s assets as of December 31, 2012. We continue to gradually shift the asset allocation to lower the percentage of investment in equity securities and increase the percentage of investments in long-duration fixed-income securities. The effect of such change could result in a reduction in the long-term rate of return on plan assets and an increase in future pension expense. As of December 31, 2012, the ten-year historical rate of return on plan assets was 8.4%, and the inception to date return on plan assets was 9.9%. In 2012, we experienced a 13.7% gain on plan assets. Should we not achieve the expected rate of return on the plan’s assets or if the plan experiences a decline in the fair value of its assets, we may be required to contribute assets to the plan which could materially adversely affect our results of operations or financial condition.
Our business could be materially adversely affected by changes in regulations or standards regarding energy use of our products.
We continually seek ways to increase the energy efficiency of our products. Recent analyses have estimated the amount of global carbon emissions that are due to information technology products. As a result, governmental and non-governmental organizations have turned their attention to development of regulations and standards to drive technological improvements and reduce such amount of carbon emissions. There is a risk that the development of these standards will not fully address the complexity of the technology developed by the IT industry or will favor certain technological approaches. Depending on the regulations or standards that are ultimately adopted, compliance could materially adversely affect our business, results of operations or financial condition.
Our business could be materially adversely affected as a result of war, acts of terrorism, natural disasters or climate change.
Terrorist acts, acts of war, natural disasters, or the direct and indirect effects of climate change (such as sea level rise, increased storm severity, drought, flooding, wildfires, pandemics, and social unrest from resource depletion and rising food prices) may cause damage or disruption to our employees, facilities, customers, partners, suppliers, distributors and resellers, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations or financial condition. Such events may also cause damage or disruption to transportation and communication systems and to our ability to manage logistics in such an environment, including receipt of components and distribution of products.
Our failure to pay quarterly dividends to our shareholders could materially adversely affect our stock price.
Our ability to pay quarterly dividends will be subject to, among other things, our financial position and results of operations, available cash and cash flow, capital requirements, and other factors. Any reduction or discontinuation of quarterly dividends could cause our stock price to decline significantly.
Item 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES IN THE THIRD QUARTER OF 2013
(table in millions, except per share amounts)
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Period | Total Number of Shares Purchased(1) | | Average Price Paid per Share | | Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs | | Maximum Number (or Approximate Dollar Value) of Shares that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs |
July 1, 2013 – July 31, 2013 | 15 |
| | $ | 25.01 |
| | 15 |
| | 221 |
|
August 1, 2013 – August 31, 2013 | 14 |
| | 26.21 |
| | 12 |
| | 209 |
|
September 1, 2013 – September 30, 2013 | 12 |
| | 26.56 |
| | 12 |
| | 197 |
|
Total | 41 |
| (2) | $ | 25.87 |
| | 39 |
| | 197 |
|
__________________________
| |
(1) | Except as noted in note (2), all shares were purchased in open-market transactions pursuant to our previously announced authorizations by our Board of Directors in April 2008 to repurchase 250 million shares of our common stock and in February 2013 to repurchase an additional 250 million shares of our common stock. These repurchase authorizations do not have a fixed termination date. |
| |
(2) | Includes an aggregate of 2 million shares withheld from employees for the payment of taxes. |
Item 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES
None.
Item 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES
Not applicable.
Item 5. OTHER INFORMATION
None.
Item 6. EXHIBITS
See index to Exhibits on page 60 of this report.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
| | | |
Date: November 7, 2013 | | EMC CORPORATION |
|
| | By: | /s/ David I. Goulden |
| | | David I. Goulden |
| | | President and Chief Operating Officer |
| | | (Principal Financial Officer) |
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
| | |
3.1 | | Restated Articles of Organization of EMC Corporation. (1) |
3.2 | | Amended and Restated Bylaws of EMC Corporation. (1) |
4.1 | | Form of Stock Certificate. (2) |
4.2 | | Indenture with Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as trustee, dated as of November 17, 2006. (3) |
4.3 | | Registration Rights Agreement with Goldman, Sachs & Co., Lehman Brothers Inc. and Citigroup Global Markets Inc., dated as of November 17, 2006. (3) |
4.4 | | Underwriting Agreement, dated as of June 3, 2013, by and among the Company, Citigroup Global Markets Inc., J.P. Morgan Securities LLC and Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated, as representatives of the several underwriters named therein. (4) |
4.5 | | Indenture, dated as of June 6, 2013, by and between the Company and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Trustee. (4) |
10.1 | | Aveksa, Inc. 2005 Equity Incentive Plan. (filed herewith) |
10.2 | | ScaleIO, Inc. 2011 Stock Incentive Plan. (filed herewith) |
31.1 | | Certification of Principal Executive Officer required by Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. (filed herewith) |
31.2 | | Certification of Principal Financial Officer required by Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. (filed herewith) |
32.1 | | Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. (filed herewith) |
32.2 | | Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. (filed herewith) |
101.INS* | | XBRL Instance Document. (filed herewith) |
101.SCH* | | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema. (filed herewith) |
101.CAL* | | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase. (filed herewith) |
101.DEF* | | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase. (filed herewith) |
101.LAB* | | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase. (filed herewith) |
101.PRE* | | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase. (filed herewith) |
_________________
|
| |
* | Pursuant to Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, these interactive data files shall not be deemed to be “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise subject to liability under that section, and shall not be incorporated by reference into any registration statement or other document filed under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, except as expressly set forth by specific reference in such filing. |
| |
(1) | Incorporated by reference to EMC Corporation’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed May 3, 2013 (No. 1-9853). |
| |
(2) | Incorporated by reference to EMC Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed February 29, 2008 (No. 1-9853). |
| |
(3) | Incorporated by reference to EMC Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed November 17, 2006 (No. 1-9853). |
| |
(4) | Incorporated by reference to EMC Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed June 6, 2013 (No. 1-9853). |