e424b3
Filed Pursuant to Rule 424(b)(3)
File
No. 333-167421
SUBSCRIPTION AND COMMUNITY
OFFERING PROSPECTUS
(Proposed Holding
Company for Northfield Bank)
Up to 35,650,000 Shares of Common Stock
(Subject to increase to up to 40,997,500 shares)
Northfield Bancorp, Inc., a newly formed Delaware corporation,
is offering up to 35,650,000 shares of common stock for
sale at $10.00 per share on a best efforts basis in connection
with the conversion of Northfield Bancorp, MHC from the mutual
holding company to the stock holding company form of
organization. The shares we are offering represent the ownership
interest in Northfield Bancorp, Inc., a federal corporation,
currently owned by Northfield Bancorp, MHC. In this prospectus,
we will refer to Northfield Bancorp, Inc., the Delaware
corporation, as Northfield-Delaware, and we will
refer to Northfield Bancorp, Inc., the federal corporation, as
Northfield-Federal. Northfield-Federals common
stock is currently traded on the Nasdaq Global Select Market
under the trading symbol NFBK. For a period of 20
trading days after the completion of the conversion and
offering, we expect the shares of Northfield-Delaware common
stock will trade on the Nasdaq Global Select Market under the
symbol NFBKD. Thereafter, our trading symbol will
revert to NFBK.
The shares of common stock are first being offered in a
subscription offering to eligible depositors and tax-qualified
employee benefit plans of Northfield Bank as described in this
prospectus. Eligible depositors and tax-qualified employee
benefit plans have priority rights to buy all of the shares
offered. Shares not purchased in the subscription offering will
simultaneously be offered for sale to the general public in a
community offering, with a preference given to residents of the
communities served by Northfield Bank and existing stockholders
of Northfield-Federal. We also may offer for sale shares of
common stock not purchased in the subscription or community
offerings in a syndicated community offering through a syndicate
of selected dealers.
We may sell up to 40,997,500 shares of common stock because
of demand for the shares of common stock or changes in market
conditions, without resoliciting purchasers. We must sell a
minimum of 26,350,000 shares in the offering in order to
complete the offering and the conversion.
In addition to the shares we are selling in the offering, the
remaining interest in Northfield-Federal currently held by the
public will be exchanged for shares of common stock of
Northfield-Delaware based on an exchange ratio that will result
in existing public stockholders of Northfield-Federal owning
approximately the same percentage of Northfield-Delaware common
stock as they owned in Northfield-Federal immediately prior to
the completion of the conversion. We will issue up to
27,341,810 shares of common stock in the exchange, which
may be increased to up to 31,443,082 shares if we sell
40,997,500 shares of common stock in the offering.
The minimum order is 25 shares. The offering is expected to
expire at 4:00 p.m., Eastern Time, on September 13,
2010. We may extend this expiration date without notice to you
until October 28, 2010. Once submitted, orders are
irrevocable unless the offering is terminated or is extended,
with Office of Thrift Supervision approval, beyond
October 28, 2010, or the number of shares of common stock
to be sold is increased to more than 40,997,500 shares or
decreased to less than 26,350,000 shares. If the offering
is extended past October 28, 2010, or if the number of
shares to be sold is increased to more than
40,997,500 shares or decreased to less than
26,350,000 shares, we will resolicit subscribers, and all
funds delivered to us to purchase shares of common stock will be
returned promptly with interest. Funds received in the
subscription and the community offerings will be held in a
segregated account at Northfield Bank and will earn interest at
0.25% per annum until completion of the offering.
Sandler ONeill & Partners, L.P. will assist us
in selling the shares on a best efforts basis in the
subscription and community offerings, and will serve as sole
book-running manager for any syndicated community offering.
Sandler ONeill & Partners, L.P. is not required
to purchase any shares of common stock that are being offered
for sale.
OFFERING
SUMMARY
Price: $10.00 per Share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted
|
|
|
Minimum
|
|
Midpoint
|
|
Maximum
|
|
Maximum
|
|
Number of shares
|
|
|
26,350,000
|
|
|
|
31,000,000
|
|
|
|
35,650,000
|
|
|
|
40,997,500
|
|
Gross offering proceeds
|
|
$
|
263,500,000
|
|
|
$
|
310,000,000
|
|
|
$
|
356,500,000
|
|
|
$
|
409,975,000
|
|
Estimated offering expenses, excluding selling agent commissions
|
|
$
|
1,681,500
|
|
|
$
|
1,681,500
|
|
|
$
|
1,681,500
|
|
|
$
|
1,681,500
|
|
Selling agent commissions (1)
|
|
$
|
7,790,700
|
|
|
$
|
9,167,100
|
|
|
$
|
10,543,500
|
|
|
$
|
12,126,360
|
|
Estimated net proceeds
|
|
$
|
254,027,800
|
|
|
$
|
299,151,400
|
|
|
$
|
344,275,000
|
|
|
$
|
396,167,140
|
|
Estimated net proceeds per share
|
|
$
|
9.64
|
|
|
$
|
9.65
|
|
|
$
|
9.66
|
|
|
$
|
9.66
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
The amounts shown assume that 50%
of the shares are sold in the subscription and community
offerings and the remaining 50% are sold in a syndicated
community offering. The amounts shown include fees and selling
commissions payable by us: (i) to Sandler
ONeill & Partners, L.P. in connection with the
subscription and community offerings equal to 1.0% of the
aggregate amount of common stock sold in the subscription and
community offerings (net of insider purchases and shares
purchased by our employee stock ownership plan), or
approximately $1.9 million at the adjusted maximum of the
offering range; and (ii) a management fee payable by us of
1.0% of the actual purchase price of each share of common stock
sold in the syndicated community offering, 80% of which will be
paid to Sandler ONeill & Partners, L.P. and 20%
of which will be paid to Keefe, Bruyette & Woods,
Inc., and a selling concession payable by us of 4.0% of the
actual purchase price of each share of common stock sold in the
syndicated community offering, which will be allocated to
dealers (including Sandler ONeill & Partners,
L.P. and Keefe, Bruyette & Woods, Inc.) in accordance
with the actual number of shares of common stock sold by such
dealers, or approximately $10.2 million at the adjusted
maximum of the offering. Sandler ONeill &
Partners, L.P. will not be separately reimbursed for expenses if
the offering is completed. See The Conversion and
Offering Plan of Distribution; Selling Agent
Compensation for information regarding compensation to be
received by Sandler ONeill & Partners, L.P.,
Keefe, Bruyette & Woods, Inc. and the other
broker-dealers that may participate in the syndicated community
offering and Pro Forma Data for the assumptions
regarding the number of shares that may be sold in the
subscription and community offerings and the syndicated
community offering used to determine the estimated offering
expenses. If all shares of common stock were sold in the
syndicated community offering, the maximum selling agent
commissions would be approximately $13.2 million,
$15.5 million, $17.8 million and $20.5 million at
the minimum, midpoint, maximum, and adjusted maximum levels of
the offering, respectively.
|
This investment involves a degree of risk, including the
possible loss of principal.
Please read Risk Factors beginning on
page 16.
These securities are not deposits or accounts and are not
insured or guaranteed by the Federal Deposit Insurance
Corporation or any other government agency. Neither the
Securities and Exchange Commission, the Office of Thrift
Supervision, nor any state securities regulator has approved or
disapproved of these securities or determined if this Prospectus
is accurate or complete. Any representation to the contrary is a
criminal offense.
For assistance, please contact the
Stock Information Center, toll-free, at
(877) 651-9234.
The date of this prospectus is
August 9, 2010.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page |
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
|
56 |
|
|
|
|
95 |
|
|
|
|
95 |
|
|
|
|
113 |
|
|
|
|
122 |
|
|
|
|
124 |
|
|
|
|
153 |
|
|
|
|
155 |
|
|
|
|
156 |
|
|
|
|
180 |
|
|
|
|
184 |
|
|
|
|
188 |
|
|
|
|
189 |
|
|
|
|
189 |
|
|
|
|
189 |
|
|
|
|
190 |
|
|
|
|
F-1 |
|
i
SUMMARY
The following summary explains the significant aspects of the conversion, the offering and the
exchange of existing shares of Northfield-Federal common stock for shares of Northfield-Delaware
common stock. It may not contain all of the information that is important to you. For additional
information before making an investment decision, you should read this entire document carefully,
including the consolidated financial statements and the notes to the consolidated financial
statements, and the section entitled Risk Factors.
The Companies
Northfield-Delaware
The shares being offered will be issued by Northfield-Delaware, a newly formed Delaware
corporation. Upon completion of the conversion, Northfield-Delaware will become the successor
corporation to Northfield-Federal and the parent holding company for Northfield Bank.
Northfield-Delawares executive offices are located at 581 Main Street, Suite 810, Woodbridge, New
Jersey 07095, and its telephone number at this address is (732) 499-7200.
Northfield Bank
Northfield Bank is a community bank that has served the banking needs of its customers since
1887. Northfield Bank conducts business primarily from its home office located in Staten Island,
New York, its operations center located in Woodbridge, New Jersey, its 17 additional branch offices
located in New York and New Jersey and its lending offices located in Brooklyn, New York and
Gwinnett County, Georgia. The branch offices are located in the New York counties of Richmond
(Staten Island) and Kings (Brooklyn) and the New Jersey counties of Union and Middlesex.
Northfield Banks principal business consists of taking deposits, primarily through its retail
banking offices, and investing those funds in loans and securities. Northfield Bank offers a
variety of deposit accounts with a range of interest rates and terms, and relies on its convenient
locations, customer service and competitive pricing and products to attract and retain deposits.
To a lesser extent, Northfield Bank uses borrowed funds and brokered deposits as additional sources
of funds. Northfield Banks principal lending activity is originating multifamily and commercial
real estate loans for retention in its portfolio, and also offering a variety of other types of
loans for individuals and small businesses. Northfield Banks investment securities portfolio is
comprised principally of mortgage-backed securities and corporate bonds. Northfield Bank is
subject to comprehensive regulation and examination by the Office of Thrift Supervision.
Northfield Banks website address is www.eNorthfield.com. Information on this website
is not and should not be considered a part of this prospectus.
Northfield-Federal and Northfield Bancorp, MHC
Northfield-Federal is a federally chartered corporation that currently is the parent holding
company of Northfield Bank. At March 31, 2010, Northfield-Federal had consolidated assets of $2.1
billion, deposits of $1.4 billion and stockholders equity of $396.3 million. At March 31, 2010,
Northfield-Federal had 43,722,522 shares of common stock outstanding, of which 19,080,838 shares,
or 43.6%, were owned by the public (including Northfield Bank Foundation) and will be exchanged for
shares of common stock of Northfield-Delaware as part of the conversion. The remaining 24,641,684
shares of common stock of Northfield-Federal are held by Northfield Bancorp, MHC, a federally
chartered mutual holding company. The shares of common stock being offered by Northfield-Delaware
represent Northfield Bancorp, MHCs ownership interest in Northfield-Federal. Upon completion of
the conversion and offering, Northfield Bancorp, MHCs shares will be cancelled and Northfield
Bancorp, MHC and Northfield-Federal will no longer exist.
1
Our Current Organizational Structure
We have been organized in mutual holding company form since 1995, and in the two-tiered mutual
holding company structure since 2002. In November 2007, Northfield-Federal sold 19,265,316 shares
of its common stock to the public, representing 43.0% of its then-outstanding shares, at $10.00 per
share. Northfield-Federal issued 24,641,684 shares to Northfield Bancorp, MHC, and 896,061 shares
to Northfield Bank Foundation, which was formed in connection with the initial stock offering.
Pursuant to the terms of Northfield Bancorp, MHCs plan of conversion and reorganization,
Northfield Bancorp, MHC is now converting from the mutual holding company corporate structure to
the stock holding company corporate structure. As part of the conversion, we are offering for sale
the majority ownership interest in Northfield-Federal that is currently held by Northfield Bancorp,
MHC. We are not contributing additional shares to the Northfield Bank Foundation in connection
with the conversion and offering. Upon completion of the conversion and offering, Northfield
Bancorp, MHC and Northfield-Federal will cease to exist, and we will complete the transition of our
organization from being partially owned by public stockholders to being fully owned by public
stockholders. Upon completion of the conversion, public stockholders of Northfield-Federal will
receive shares of common stock of Northfield-Delaware in exchange for their shares of
Northfield-Federal.
The following diagram shows our current organizational structure, reflecting ownership
percentages as of July 30, 2010:
2
After the conversion and offering are completed, we will be organized as a fully public
holding company, as follows:
Business Strategy
Our business strategies are to:
|
|
|
remain a community-oriented financial institution; |
|
|
|
|
continue to increase our lending; |
|
|
|
|
improve asset quality; |
|
|
|
|
expand through branching and acquisitions; and |
|
|
|
|
employ securities investment strategies to increase income. |
See Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
OperationsBusiness Strategy for a more complete discussion of our business strategy.
Reasons for the Conversion and Offering
Our primary reasons for converting to the fully public stock form of ownership and undertaking
the stock offering are to:
|
|
|
eliminate the uncertainties associated with the mutual holding company
structure under recently enacted financial reform legislation; |
|
|
|
|
increase our capital; |
|
|
|
|
transition us to a more familiar and flexible organizational structure; |
3
|
|
|
improve the liquidity of our shares of common stock; and |
|
|
|
|
support any future mergers and acquisitions. |
See The Conversion and Offering for a more complete discussion of our reasons for conducting
the conversion and offering.
Terms of the Offering
We are offering between 26,350,000 and 35,650,000 shares of common stock to eligible
depositors of Northfield Bank, to our tax-qualified employee benefit plans and, to the extent
shares remain available, to residents of the New Jersey Counties of Bergen, Essex, Hudson,
Hunterdon, Middlesex, Monmouth, Morris, Ocean, Passaic, Somerset, Sussex and Union, the New York
Counties of Bronx, Kings, Nassau, New York, Putnam, Queens, Richmond, Rockland, Suffolk and
Westchester, and Pike County, Pennsylvania. To the extent shares of common stock remain available,
we are also offering the shares to our existing public stockholders and to the general public in a
community offering and, if necessary, to the general public in a syndicated community offering.
The number of shares of common stock to be sold may be increased to up to 40,997,500 shares as a
result of demand for the shares of common stock in the offering or changes in market conditions.
Unless the number of shares of common stock to be offered is increased to more than 40,997,500
shares or decreased to fewer than 26,350,000 shares, or the offering is extended beyond October 28,
2010, subscribers will not have the opportunity to change or cancel their stock orders once
submitted. If the offering is extended past October 28, 2010, or if the number of shares to be
sold is increased to more than 40,997,500 shares or decreased to less than 26,350,000 shares, all
subscribers stock orders will be canceled, their withdrawal authorizations will be canceled and
funds delivered to us to purchase shares of common stock in the subscription and community
offerings will be returned promptly with interest at 0.25% per annum. We will then resolicit
subscribers, giving them an opportunity to place new orders for a period of time.
The purchase price of each share of common stock to be offered for sale in the offering is
$10.00. All investors will pay the same purchase price per share. Investors will not be charged a
commission to purchase shares of common stock in the offering. Sandler ONeill & Partners, L.P.,
our marketing agent in the offering, will use its best efforts to assist us in selling shares of
our common stock but is not obligated to purchase any shares of common stock in the offering.
How We Determined the Offering Range, the Exchange Ratio and the $10.00 Per Share Stock Price
The amount of common stock we are offering for sale and the exchange ratio for the exchange of
shares of Northfield-Delaware for shares of Northfield-Federal are based on an independent
appraisal of the estimated market value of Northfield-Delaware, assuming the conversion, exchange
and offering are completed. RP Financial, LC., our independent appraiser, has estimated that, as
of May 14, 2010, and updated as of July 16, 2010, this market value was $547.8 million. Based on
Office of Thrift Supervision regulations, this market value forms the midpoint of a valuation range
with a minimum of $465.6 million and a maximum of $629.9 million. Based on this valuation and the
valuation range, the 56.6% ownership interest of Northfield Bancorp, MHC in Northfield-Federal as
of July 30, 2010 being sold in the offering and the $10.00 per share price, the number of shares of
common stock being offered for sale by Northfield-Delaware will range from 26,350,000 shares to
35,650,000 shares. The $10.00 per share price was selected primarily because it is the price most
commonly used in mutual-to-stock conversions of financial institutions. The exchange ratio will
range from 1.0693 shares at the minimum of the offering range to 1.4467 shares at the maximum of
the offering range, and will preserve the existing percentage ownership of public stockholders of
Northfield-Federal (excluding any new shares purchased by them in the stock offering and their
receipt of cash in lieu of fractional shares). If demand for shares or market conditions warrant,
the appraisal can be increased by 15%, which would result in an appraised value of $724.4 million,
an offering of 40,997,500 shares of common stock, and an exchange ratio of 1.6637 shares.
4
The appraisal is based in part on Northfield-Federals financial condition and results of
operations, the pro forma effect of the additional capital raised by the sale of shares of common
stock in the offering, and an analysis of a peer group of ten publicly traded thrift holding
companies that RP Financial, LC. considers comparable to Northfield-Federal. The appraisal peer
group consists of the following companies. Asset size for all companies is as of March 31, 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ticker |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Company Name |
|
Symbol |
|
Exchange |
|
Headquarters |
|
Total Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions) |
Brookline Bancorp, Inc. |
|
BRKL |
|
Nasdaq |
|
Brookline, MA |
|
$ |
2,639 |
|
Danvers Bancorp, Inc. |
|
DNBK |
|
Nasdaq |
|
Danvers, MA |
|
$ |
2,455 |
|
ESB Financial Corp. |
|
ESBF |
|
Nasdaq |
|
Ellwood City, PA |
|
$ |
1,955 |
|
ESSA Bancorp, Inc. |
|
ESSA |
|
Nasdaq |
|
Stroudsburg, PA |
|
$ |
1,059 |
|
Flushing Financial Corp. |
|
FFIC |
|
Nasdaq |
|
Lake Success, NY |
|
$ |
4,183 |
|
NewAlliance Bancshares |
|
NAL |
|
NYSE |
|
New Haven, CT |
|
$ |
8,501 |
|
OceanFirst Financial Corp. |
|
OCFC |
|
Nasdaq |
|
Toms River, NJ |
|
$ |
2,199 |
|
Provident NY Bancorp, Inc. |
|
PBNY |
|
Nasdaq |
|
Montebello, NY |
|
$ |
2,936 |
|
United Financial Bancorp |
|
UBNK |
|
Nasdaq |
|
W. Springfield, MA |
|
$ |
1,513 |
|
Westfield Financial Inc. |
|
WFD |
|
Nasdaq |
|
Westfield, MA |
|
$ |
1,200 |
|
The following table presents a summary of selected pricing ratios for the peer group
companies based on earnings and other information as of and for the twelve months ended March 31,
2010, and stock prices as of July 16, 2010, as reflected in the updated appraisal report. The
summary pricing ratios for Northfield-Delaware (on a pro forma basis) are based on earnings and
other information as of and for the twelve months ended June 30, 2010 as reflected in the updated
appraisal. Compared to the average pricing of the peer group, our pro forma pricing ratios at the
midpoint of the offering range indicated a discount of 18.3% on a price-to-book value basis, a
discount of 28.7% on a price-to-tangible book value basis, and a premium of 53.8% on a
price-to-earnings basis.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Price-to-earnings |
|
Price-to-book |
|
Price-to-tangible |
|
|
multiple (1)(2) |
|
value ratio (2) |
|
book value ratio (2) |
Northfield-Delaware
(on a pro forma
basis, assuming
completion of the
conversion) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted Maximum |
|
|
51.38x |
|
|
|
94.88 |
% |
|
|
96.99 |
% |
Maximum |
|
|
44.83x |
|
|
|
88.03 |
% |
|
|
90.01 |
% |
Midpoint |
|
|
39.10x |
|
|
|
81.23 |
% |
|
|
83.19 |
% |
Minimum |
|
|
33.34x |
|
|
|
73.53 |
% |
|
|
75.47 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Valuation of peer
group companies, all
of which are fully
converted (on an
historical basis) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Averages |
|
|
25.42x |
|
|
|
99.38 |
% |
|
|
116.16 |
% |
Medians |
|
|
24.15x |
|
|
|
98.76 |
% |
|
|
120.36 |
% |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Price-to-earnings multiples calculated by RP Financial, LC. in the independent appraisal are
based on an estimate of core or recurring earnings. These ratios are different than those
presented in Pro Forma Data. |
|
(2) |
|
Pro forma pricing ratios for Northfield-Delaware are based on financial information through
June 30, 2010. These ratios are different than those presented in Pro Forma Data. |
The independent appraisal does not indicate trading market value. Do not assume or
expect that our valuation as indicated in the appraisal means that after the conversion and
offering the shares of our common stock will trade at or above the $10.00 per share purchase price.
Furthermore, the pricing ratios presented in the appraisal were utilized by RP Financial, LC. to
estimate our pro forma appraised value for regulatory purposes and not to compare the relative
value of shares of our common stock with the value of the capital stock of the peer group. The
value of the capital stock of a particular company may be affected by a number of factors such as
financial performance, asset size and market location.
5
For a more complete discussion of the amount of common stock we are offering for sale and the
independent appraisal, see The Conversion and OfferingStock Pricing and Number of Shares to be
Issued.
After-Market Stock Price Performance Provided by Independent Appraiser
The following table presents stock price performance information for all second-step
conversions completed between January 1, 2009 and July 16, 2010. None of these companies were
included in the group of 10 comparable public companies utilized in RP Financial, LC.s valuation
analysis.
Completed Second-Step Conversion Offerings
Closing Dates between January 1, 2009 and July 16, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage Price Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
From Initial Trading Date |
Company Name and |
|
Conversion |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Through July 16, |
Ticker Symbol |
|
Date |
|
Exchange |
|
One Day |
|
One Week |
|
One Month |
|
2010 |
Jacksonville Bancorp, Inc. (JXSB) |
|
7/15/10 |
|
Nasdaq |
|
|
6.5 |
% |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
5.0 |
% |
Colonial Fin. Services, Inc. (COBK) |
|
7/13/10 |
|
Nasdaq |
|
|
0.5 |
% |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
(1.6 |
)% |
Viewpoint Fin. Group (VPFG) |
|
7/7/10 |
|
Nasdaq |
|
|
(5.0 |
)% |
|
|
(4.5 |
)% |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
(5.0 |
)% |
Oneida Financial Corp. (ONFC) |
|
7/7/10 |
|
Nasdaq |
|
|
(6.3 |
)% |
|
|
(6.3 |
)% |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
(5.6 |
)% |
Fox Chase Bancorp, Inc. (FXCB) |
|
6/29/10 |
|
Nasdaq |
|
|
(4.1 |
)% |
|
|
(4.0 |
)% |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
(2.3 |
)% |
Oritani Financial Corp. (ORIT) |
|
6/24/10 |
|
Nasdaq |
|
|
3.1 |
% |
|
|
(1.4 |
)% |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
(1.9 |
)% |
Eagle Bancorp Montana, Inc. (EBMT) |
|
4/5/10 |
|
Nasdaq |
|
|
5.5 |
% |
|
|
6.5 |
% |
|
|
4.1 |
% |
|
|
(2.0 |
)% |
Ocean Shore Holding Co. (OSHC) |
|
12/21/09 |
|
Nasdaq |
|
|
7.5 |
% |
|
|
12.3 |
% |
|
|
13.1 |
% |
|
|
35.0 |
% |
Northwest Bancshares, Inc. (NWBI) |
|
12/18/09 |
|
Nasdaq |
|
|
13.5 |
% |
|
|
13.0 |
% |
|
|
14.0 |
% |
|
|
13.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.4 |
% |
|
|
2.1 |
% |
|
|
10.4 |
% |
|
|
3.9 |
% |
Median |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.1 |
% |
|
|
(1.4 |
)% |
|
|
13.1 |
% |
|
|
(1.9 |
)% |
Stock price performance is affected by many factors, including, but not limited to:
general market and economic conditions; the interest rate environment; the amount of proceeds a
company raises in its offering; and numerous factors relating to the specific company, including
the experience and ability of management, historical and anticipated operating results, the nature
and quality of the companys assets, and the companys market area. None of the companies listed
in the table above are exactly similar to Northfield-Delaware, the pricing ratios for their stock
offerings may have been different from the pricing ratios for Northfield-Delaware shares of common
stock and the market conditions in which these offerings were completed may have been different
from current market conditions. Furthermore, this table presents only short-term performance with
respect to companies that recently completed their second-step conversions and may not be
indicative of the longer-term stock price performance of these companies. The performance of these
stocks may not be indicative of how our stock will perform.
Our stock price may trade below $10.00 per share, as the stock prices of many second-step
conversions have decreased below the initial offering price. Before you make an investment
decision, we urge you to carefully read this prospectus, including, but not limited to, the section
entitled Risk Factors beginning on page 16.
The Exchange of Existing Shares of Northfield-Federal Common Stock
If you are currently a stockholder of Northfield-Federal, your shares will be canceled at the
completion of the conversion and will be exchanged for shares of common stock of
Northfield-Delaware. The number of shares of common stock you receive will be based on the
exchange ratio, which will depend upon our final appraised value. The following table shows how
the exchange ratio will adjust, based on the valuation of Northfield-Delaware and the number of
shares of common stock issued in the offering. The table also shows the number of shares of
Northfield-Delaware common stock a hypothetical owner of Northfield-Federal common stock would
receive in exchange for 100 shares of Northfield-Federal common stock owned at the completion of
the conversion, depending on the number of shares of common stock issued in the offering.
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equivalent |
|
Equivalent |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Shares |
|
|
|
|
|
Value of |
|
Pro Forma |
|
Shares to |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares of Northfield-Delaware |
|
of Common |
|
|
|
|
|
Shares |
|
Tangible |
|
be |
|
|
Shares to be Sold in |
|
to be Issued for Shares of |
|
Stock to be |
|
|
|
|
|
Based |
|
Book Value |
|
Received |
|
|
This Offering |
|
Northfield-Federal |
|
Issued in |
|
|
|
|
|
Upon |
|
Per |
|
for 100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent |
|
|
|
|
|
Percent |
|
Exchange and |
|
Exchange |
|
Offering |
|
Exchanged |
|
Existing |
|
|
Amount |
|
(1) |
|
Amount |
|
(1) |
|
Offering |
|
Ratio |
|
Price (2) |
|
Share (3) |
|
Shares |
Minimum |
|
|
26,350,000 |
|
|
|
56.6 |
% |
|
|
20,209,164 |
|
|
|
43.4 |
% |
|
|
46,559,164 |
|
|
|
1.0693 |
|
|
$ |
10.69 |
|
|
$ |
14.08 |
|
|
|
106 |
|
Midpoint |
|
|
31,000,000 |
|
|
|
56.6 |
|
|
|
23,775,487 |
|
|
|
43.4 |
|
|
|
54,775,487 |
|
|
|
1.2580 |
|
|
|
12.58 |
|
|
|
15.03 |
|
|
|
125 |
|
Maximum |
|
|
35,650,000 |
|
|
|
56.6 |
|
|
|
27,341,810 |
|
|
|
43.4 |
|
|
|
62,991,810 |
|
|
|
1.4467 |
|
|
|
14.47 |
|
|
|
15.99 |
|
|
|
144 |
|
Adjusted Maximum |
|
|
40,997,500 |
|
|
|
56.6 |
|
|
|
31,443,082 |
|
|
|
43.4 |
|
|
|
72,440,582 |
|
|
|
1.6637 |
|
|
|
16.64 |
|
|
|
17.07 |
|
|
|
166 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Ownership percentages reflect shares outstanding at July 30, 2010. |
|
(2) |
|
Represents the value of shares of Northfield-Delaware common stock to be received in the
conversion by a holder of one share of Northfield-Federal, pursuant to the exchange ratio,
based upon the $10.00 per share purchase price. |
|
(3) |
|
Represents the pro forma tangible book value per share at each level of the offering range
multiplied by the respective exchange ratio. |
If you own shares of Northfield-Federal common stock in a brokerage account in street
name, your shares will be exchanged automatically, and you do not need to take any action to
exchange your shares of common stock. If your shares are represented by physical
Northfield-Federal stock certificates, after the completion of the conversion and stock offering,
our exchange agent will mail to you a transmittal form with instructions to surrender your stock
certificates. New certificates of Northfield-Delaware common stock will be mailed to you within
five business days after the exchange agent receives properly executed transmittal forms and your
Northfield-Federal stock certificates. You should not submit a stock certificate until you receive
a transmittal form.
No fractional shares of Northfield-Delaware common stock will be issued to any public
stockholder of Northfield-Federal. For each fractional share that otherwise would be issued,
Northfield-Delaware will pay in cash an amount equal to the product obtained by multiplying the
fractional share interest to which the holder otherwise would be entitled by the $10.00 per share
offering price.
Outstanding options to purchase shares of Northfield-Federal common stock also will convert
into and become options to purchase shares of Northfield-Delaware common stock based upon the
exchange ratio. The aggregate exercise price, duration and vesting schedule of these options will
not be affected by the conversion. At March 31, 2010, there were 2,072,540 outstanding options to
purchase shares of Northfield-Federal common stock, 402,060 of which have vested. Such outstanding
options will be converted into options to purchase 2,216,167 shares of common stock at the minimum
of the offering range and 2,998,344 shares of common stock at the maximum of the offering range.
Because Office of Thrift Supervision regulations prohibit us from repurchasing our common stock
during the first year following the conversion unless compelling business reasons exist for such
repurchases, we may use authorized but unissued shares to fund option exercises that occur during
the first year following the conversion. If all existing options were exercised for authorized but
unissued shares of common stock following the conversion, stockholders would experience dilution of
approximately 4.54% at both the minimum and the maximum of the offering range.
How We Intend to Use the Proceeds From the Offering
We intend to invest at least 50% of the net proceeds from the stock offering in Northfield
Bank, loan funds to our employee stock ownership plan to fund its purchase of shares of common
stock in the stock offering and retain the remainder of the net proceeds from the offering.
Therefore, assuming we sell 31,000,000 shares of common stock in the stock offering, and we have
net proceeds of $299.2 million, we intend to invest $149.6 million in Northfield Bank, loan $12.4
million to our employee stock ownership plan to fund its purchase of shares of common stock and
retain the remaining $137.2 million of the net proceeds.
We may use the funds we retain to acquire other financial institutions, for investments, to
pay cash dividends, to repurchase shares of common stock and for other general corporate purposes.
Northfield Bank may
7
use the proceeds it receives from us to acquire other financial institutions, to expand its
branch network and to support increased lending (with an emphasis on multifamily and commercial
real estate lending) and other products and services. Northfield Bank currently intends to open
nine new branch offices by December 31, 2013, and has currently committed to establishing three new
branch offices in Brooklyn, New York and one branch office in Staten Island, New York.
Please see the section of this prospectus entitled How We Intend to Use the Proceeds from the
Offering for more information on the proposed use of the proceeds from the offering.
Persons Who May Order Shares of Common Stock in the Offering
We are offering the shares of common stock in a subscription offering in the following
descending order of priority:
|
(i) |
|
First, to depositors with accounts at Northfield Bank with aggregate balances
of at least $50 at the close of business on March 31, 2009. |
|
|
(ii) |
|
Second, to our tax-qualified employee benefit plans (including Northfield
Banks employee stock ownership plan and 401(k) plan), which will receive, without
payment therefor, nontransferable subscription rights to purchase in the aggregate up
to 10% of the shares of common stock sold in the offering. We expect our employee
stock ownership plan to purchase 4% of the shares of common stock sold in the stock
offering, although we reserve the right to have the employee stock ownership plan
purchase more than 4% of the shares sold in the offering to the extent necessary to
complete the offering at the minimum of the offering range. |
|
|
(iii) |
|
Third, to depositors with accounts at Northfield Bank with aggregate balances
of at least $50 at the close of business on June 30, 2010. |
|
|
(iv) |
|
Fourth, to depositors of Northfield Bank at the close of business on July 30,
2010. |
Shares of common stock not purchased in the subscription offering will be offered for sale to
the general public in a community offering, with a preference given first to natural persons
(including trusts of natural persons) residing in the New Jersey Counties of Bergen, Essex, Hudson,
Hunterdon, Middlesex, Monmouth, Morris, Ocean, Passaic, Somerset, Sussex and Union, the New York
Counties of Bronx, Kings, Nassau, New York, Putnam, Queens, Richmond, Rockland, Suffolk and
Westchester, and Pike County, Pennsylvania. To the extent shares of common stock remain available,
we are also offering the shares to Northfield-Federals public stockholders as of July 30, 2010.
The community offering is expected to begin concurrently with the subscription offering. We also
may offer for sale shares of common stock not purchased in the subscription offering or the
community offering through a syndicated community offering. Sandler ONeill & Partners, L.P. will
act as sole book-running manager and Keefe, Bruyette & Woods, Inc. will act as co-manager for the
syndicated community offering, which is also being conducted on a best efforts basis. We have the
right to accept or reject, in our sole discretion, orders received in the community offering or
syndicated community offering. Any determination to accept or reject stock orders in the community
offering and the syndicated community offering will be based on the facts and circumstances
available to management at the time of the determination.
If we receive orders for more shares than we are offering, we may not be able to fully or
partially fill your order. Shares will be allocated first to categories in the subscription
offering. A detailed description of the subscription offering, the community offering and the
syndicated community offering, as well as a discussion regarding allocation procedures, can be
found in the section of this prospectus entitled The Conversion and Offering.
Limits on How Much Common Stock You May Purchase
The minimum number of shares of common stock that may be purchased is 25.
8
Generally, no individual may purchase more than 300,000 shares ($3.0 million) of common stock.
If any of the following persons purchase shares of common stock, their purchases, in all
categories of the offering, when combined with your purchases, cannot exceed 300,000 shares ($3.0
million) of common stock:
|
|
|
your spouse or relatives of you or your spouse living in your house; |
|
|
|
|
most companies, trusts or other entities in which you are a trustee, have
a substantial beneficial interest or hold a senior position; or |
|
|
|
|
other persons who may be your associates or persons acting in concert with
you. |
Unless we determine otherwise, persons having the same address and persons exercising
subscription rights through qualifying deposit accounts registered to the same address will be
subject to the overall purchase limitation of 300,000 shares ($3.0 million).
In addition to the above purchase limitations, there is an ownership limitation for current
stockholders of Northfield-Federal other than our employee stock ownership plan. Shares of common
stock that you purchase in the offering individually and together with persons described above,
plus any shares you and they receive in exchange for existing shares of Northfield-Federal common
stock, may not exceed 5% of the total shares of common stock to be issued and outstanding after the
completion of the conversion. However, if, based on your current ownership level, you will own
more than 5% of the total shares of common stock to be issued and outstanding after the completion
of the conversion, you will not need to divest any of your shares.
Subject to Office of Thrift Supervision approval, we may increase or decrease the purchase and
ownership limitations at any time. See the detailed description of the purchase limitations in the
section of this prospectus headed The Conversion and OfferingAdditional Limitations on Common
Stock Purchases.
How You May Purchase Shares of Common Stock in the Subscription Offering and the Community Offering
In the subscription offering and community offering, you may pay for your shares only by:
|
(i) |
|
personal check, bank check or money order made payable directly to Northfield
Bancorp, Inc.; or |
|
|
(ii) |
|
authorizing us to withdraw available funds from the types of Northfield Bank
deposit accounts designated on the stock order form. |
Northfield Bank is not permitted to lend funds to anyone for the purpose of purchasing shares
of common stock in the offering. Additionally, you may not use a Northfield Bank line of credit
check or any type of third party check to pay for shares of common stock. Please do not submit
cash or wire transfers. You may not designate withdrawal from Northfield Banks accounts with
check-writing privileges; instead, please submit a check. You may not authorize direct withdrawal
from a Northfield Bank retirement account. See Using Individual Retirement Account Funds to
Purchase Shares of Common Stock.
You may subscribe for shares of common stock in the offering by delivering a signed and
completed original stock order form, together with full payment payable to Northfield Bancorp, Inc.
or authorization to withdraw funds from one or more of your Northfield Bank deposit accounts,
provided that the stock order form is received before 4:00 p.m., Eastern Time, on September 13,
2010, which is the end of the subscription offering period. You may submit your stock order form
and payment by mail using the stock order reply envelope provided, or by overnight delivery to our
Stock Information Center at the address noted on the Stock Order Form. You may hand-deliver stock
order forms to the Stock Information Center, which will be located at Northfield Banks Avenel
office, 1410 St. Georges Avenue, Second floor, Avenel, New Jersey. Hand-delivered stock order
forms will only be accepted at this location. We will not accept stock order forms at our other
branch offices. Please do not mail stock order forms to Northfield Banks offices.
9
Please see The Conversion and Offering Procedure for Purchasing SharesPayment for Shares
for a complete description of how to purchase shares in the stock offering.
Using Individual Retirement Account Funds to Purchase Shares of Common Stock
You may be able to subscribe for shares of common stock using funds in your individual
retirement account, or IRA. If you wish to use some or all of the funds in your Northfield Bank
individual retirement account, the applicable funds must be transferred to a self-directed account
maintained by an independent trustee, such as a brokerage firm, and the purchase must be made
through that account. If you do not have such an account, you will need to establish one before
placing your stock order. An annual administrative fee may be payable to the independent trustee.
Because individual circumstances differ and the processing of retirement fund orders takes
additional time, we recommend that you contact our Stock Information Center promptly, preferably at
least two weeks before the September 13, 2010 offering deadline, for assistance with purchases
using your individual retirement account or other retirement account that you may have at
Northfield Bank or elsewhere. Whether you may use such funds for the purchase of shares in the
stock offering may depend on timing constraints and, possibly, limitations imposed by the
institution where the funds are held.
See The Conversion and OfferingProcedure for Purchasing SharesPayment for Shares and
Using Individual Retirement Account Funds for a complete description of how to use IRA funds to
purchase shares in the stock offering.
Purchases by Officers and Directors
We expect our directors and executive officers, together with their associates, to subscribe
for 89,000 shares of common stock in the offering, representing 0.34% of shares to be sold at the
minimum of the offering range. The purchase price paid by them will be the same $10.00 per share
price paid by all other persons who purchase shares of common stock in the offering. Following the
conversion, our directors and executive officers, together with their associates, are expected to
beneficially own 1,603,032 shares of common stock, or 3.4% of our total outstanding shares of
common stock at the minimum of the offering range, which includes shares they currently own that
will be exchanged for new shares of Northfield-Delaware.
See Subscriptions by Directors and Executive Officers for more information on the proposed
purchases of shares of common stock by our directors and executive officers.
Deadline for Orders of Shares of Common Stock in the Subscription and Community Offering
The deadline for purchasing shares of common stock in the subscription and community offering
is 4:00 p.m., Eastern Time, on September 13, 2010, unless we extend this deadline. If you wish to
purchase shares of common stock, a properly completed and signed original stock order form,
together with full payment, must be received (not postmarked) by this time.
Although we will make reasonable attempts to provide this prospectus and offering materials to
holders of subscription rights, the subscription offering and all subscription rights will expire
at 4:00 p.m., Eastern Time, on September 13, 2010, whether or not we have been able to locate each
person entitled to subscription rights.
See The Conversion and Offering Procedure for Purchasing SharesExpiration Date for a
complete description of the deadline for purchasing shares in the stock offering.
You May Not Sell or Transfer Your Subscription Rights
Office of Thrift Supervision regulations prohibit you from transferring your subscription
rights. If you order shares of common stock in the subscription offering, you will be required to
state that you are purchasing the common stock for yourself and that you have no agreement or
understanding to sell or transfer your subscription rights. We intend to take legal action,
including reporting persons to federal agencies, against anyone who we
10
believe has sold or transferred his or her subscription rights. We will not accept your order
if we have reason to believe that you have sold or transferred your subscription rights. On the
order form, you may not add the names of others for joint stock registration who do not have
subscription rights or who qualify only in a lower subscription offering priority than you do. You
may add only those who were eligible to purchase shares of common stock in the subscription
offering at your date of eligibility. In addition, the stock order form requires that you list all
deposit accounts, giving all names on each account and the account number at the applicable
eligibility date. Failure to provide this information, or providing incomplete or incorrect
information, may result in a loss of part or all of your share allocation if there is an
oversubscription.
Delivery of Stock Certificates
Certificates representing shares of common stock sold in the subscription offering and
community offering will be mailed to the certificate registration address noted by purchasers on
the stock order form. Stock certificates will be sent to purchasers by first-class mail as soon as
practicable after the completion of the conversion and stock offering. We expect trading in the
stock to begin on the business day of or on the business day following the completion of the
conversion and stock offering. The conversion and stock offering are expected to be completed as
soon as practicable following satisfaction of the conditions described below in Conditions to
Completion of the Conversion. It is possible that until certificates for the common stock are
delivered to purchasers, purchasers might not be able to sell the shares of common stock that they
ordered, even though the common stock will have begun trading. Your ability to sell the shares of
common stock before receiving your stock certificate will depend on arrangements you may make with
a brokerage firm. If you are currently a stockholder of Northfield-Federal, see The Conversion
and OfferingExchange of Existing Stockholders Stock Certificates.
Conditions to Completion of the Conversion
We cannot complete the conversion and offering unless:
|
|
|
The plan of conversion and reorganization is approved by at least a
majority of votes eligible to be cast by members of Northfield Bancorp, MHC (depositors
of Northfield Bank) as of July 30, 2010; |
|
|
|
|
The plan of conversion and reorganization is approved by at least
two-thirds of the outstanding shares of common stock of Northfield-Federal as of July
30, 2010, including shares held by Northfield Bancorp, MHC; |
|
|
|
|
The plan of conversion and reorganization is approved by at least a
majority of the outstanding shares of common stock of Northfield-Federal as of July 30,
2010, excluding those shares held by Northfield Bancorp, MHC; |
|
|
|
|
We sell at least the minimum number of shares of common stock offered; and |
|
|
|
|
We receive the final approval of the Office of Thrift Supervision to
complete the conversion and offering. |
Northfield Bancorp, MHC intends to vote its shares in favor of the plan of conversion and
reorganization. At July 30, 2010, Northfield Bancorp, MHC owned 56.6% of the outstanding shares of
common stock of Northfield-Federal. The directors and executive officers of Northfield-Federal and
their affiliates owned 1,118,296 shares of Northfield-Federal (excluding exercisable options), or
2.6% of the outstanding shares of common stock and 5.9% of the outstanding shares of common stock
excluding shares owned by Northfield Bancorp, MHC. They intend to vote those shares in favor of the
plan of conversion and reorganization.
11
Steps We May Take if We Do Not Receive Orders for the Minimum Number of Shares
If we do not receive orders for at least 26,350,000 shares of common stock, we may take
several steps in order to issue the minimum number of shares of common stock in the offering range.
Specifically, we may:
|
(i) |
|
increase the purchase and ownership limitations; and/or |
|
|
(ii) |
|
seek regulatory approval to extend the offering beyond October 28, 2010, so
long as we resolicit subscriptions that we have previously received in the offering;
and/or |
|
|
(iii) |
|
increase the shares purchased by the employee stock ownership plan. |
If one or more purchase limitations are increased, subscribers in the subscription offering
who ordered the maximum amount will be, and, in our sole discretion, some other large purchasers
may be, given the opportunity to increase their subscriptions up to the then-applicable limit.
Possible Change in the Offering Range
RP Financial, LC. will update its appraisal before we complete the offering. If, as a result
of demand for the shares or changes in market conditions, RP Financial, LC. determines that our pro
forma market value has increased, we may sell up to 40,997,500 shares in the offering without
further notice to you. If our pro forma market value at that time is either below $465.6 million
or above $724.4 million, then, after consulting with the Office of Thrift Supervision, we may:
|
|
|
terminate the stock offering and promptly return all funds (with interest paid on
funds received in the subscription and community offerings); |
|
|
|
|
set a new offering range; or |
|
|
|
|
take such other actions as may be permitted by the Office of Thrift Supervision and
the Securities and Exchange Commission. |
If we set a new offering range, we will promptly return funds, with interest at 0.25% per
annum for funds received for purchases in the subscription and community offerings, and cancel any
authorization to withdraw funds from deposit accounts for the purchase of shares of common stock.
We will resolicit subscribers, allowing them to place a new stock order for a period of time.
Possible Termination of the Offering
We may terminate the offering at any time prior to the special meeting of members of
Northfield Bancorp, MHC that is being called to vote on the conversion, and at any time after
member approval with the approval of the Office of Thrift Supervision. If we terminate the
offering, we will promptly return your funds with interest at 0.25% per annum and we will cancel
deposit account withdrawal authorizations.
Benefits to Management and Potential Dilution to Stockholders Resulting from the Conversion
We expect our employee stock ownership plan, which is a tax-qualified retirement plan for the
benefit of all of our employees, to purchase up to 4% of the shares of common stock we sell in the
offering. These shares, when combined with shares owned by our existing employee stock ownership
plan, will be less than 8% of the shares outstanding following the conversion. If we receive
orders for more shares of common stock than the maximum of the offering range, the employee stock
ownership plan will have first priority to purchase shares over this maximum, up to a total of 4%
of the shares of common stock sold in the offering. This would reduce the number of shares
available for allocation to eligible account holders. For further information, see
ManagementExecutive CompensationEmployee Stock Ownership Plan and Trust.
12
Office of Thrift Supervision regulations permit us to implement one or more new stock-based
benefit plans no earlier than six months after completion of the conversion. Our current intention
is to implement one or more new stock-based incentive plans, but we have not determined whether we
would adopt the plans within 12 months following the completion of the conversion or more than 12
months following the completion of the conversion. Stockholder approval of these plans would be
required. If we implement stock-based benefit plans within 12 months following the completion of
the conversion, the stock-based benefit plans would reserve a number of shares (i) up to 4% of the
shares of common stock sold in the offering (reduced by amounts purchased in the stock offering by
our 401(k) plan using its purchase priority in the stock offering) for awards of restricted stock
to key employees and directors, at no cost to the recipients and (ii) up to 10% of the shares of
common stock sold in the offering for issuance pursuant to the exercise of stock options by key
employees and directors. The total number of shares available under the stock-based benefit plans
is subject to adjustment as may be required by Office of Thrift Supervision regulations or policy
to reflect shares of common stock or stock options previously granted by Northfield-Federal or
Northfield Bank. For stock-based benefit plans adopted within 12 months following the completion
of the conversion, current Office of Thrift Supervision policy would require that the total number
of shares of restricted stock and the total number of shares available for the exercise of stock
options not exceed 4% and 10%, respectively, of our total outstanding shares following the
conversion. If the stock-based benefit plan is adopted more than 12 months after the completion of
the conversion, it would not be subject to the percentage limitations set forth above. We have not
yet determined the number of shares that would be reserved for issuance under these plans. For a
description of our current stock-based benefit plan, see ManagementCompensation Discussion and
AnalysisEquity Awards.
The following table summarizes the number of shares of common stock and the aggregate dollar
value of grants that are available under one or more stock-based benefit plans if such plans
reserve a number of shares of common stock equal to not more than 4% and 10% of the shares sold in
the stock offering for restricted stock awards and stock options, respectively. The table shows
the dilution to stockholders if all such shares are issued from authorized but unissued shares,
instead of shares purchased in the open market. A portion of the stock grants shown in the table
below may be made to non-management employees or consultants. The table also sets forth the number
of shares of common stock to be acquired by the employee stock ownership plan for allocation to all
qualifying employees.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Shares to be Granted or Purchased |
|
|
Dilution |
|
|
Value of Grants (In |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As a |
|
|
Resulting |
|
|
Thousands (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At |
|
|
Percentage |
|
|
From |
|
|
|
|
|
|
At |
|
|
|
At |
|
|
Adjusted |
|
|
of Common |
|
|
Issuance of |
|
|
At |
|
|
Adjusted |
|
|
|
Minimum of |
|
|
Maximum |
|
|
Stock to be |
|
|
Shares for |
|
|
Minimum |
|
|
Maximum |
|
|
|
Offering |
|
|
of Offering |
|
|
Sold in the |
|
|
Stock-Based |
|
|
of Offering |
|
|
of Offering |
|
|
|
Range |
|
|
Range |
|
|
Offering |
|
|
Benefit Plans |
|
|
Range |
|
|
Range |
|
Employee stock ownership plan |
|
|
1,054,000 |
|
|
|
1,639,900 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
% |
|
|
N/A |
(2) |
|
$ |
10,540 |
|
|
$ |
16,399 |
|
Restricted stock awards |
|
|
1,054,000 |
|
|
|
1,639,900 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
2.21 |
% |
|
|
10,540 |
|
|
|
16,399 |
|
Stock options |
|
|
2,635,000 |
|
|
|
4,099,750 |
|
|
|
10.0 |
|
|
|
5.36 |
% |
|
|
9,829 |
|
|
|
15,292 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
4,743,000 |
|
|
|
7,379,550 |
|
|
|
18.0 |
% |
|
|
7.34 |
% |
|
$ |
30,909 |
|
|
$ |
48,090 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The actual value of restricted stock awards will be determined based on their fair value as
of the date grants are made. For purposes of this table, fair value for stock awards is
assumed to be the same as the offering price of $10.00 per share. The fair value of stock
options has been estimated at $3.73 per option using the Black-Scholes option pricing model,
adjusted for the exchange ratio, with the following assumptions: a grant-date share price and
option exercise price of $10.00; an expected option life of 6.5 years; a dividend yield of
1.4%; a risk-free rate of return of 3.10%; and a volatility rate of 38.29%. The actual value
of option grants will be determined by the grant-date fair value of the options, which will
depend on a number of factors, including the valuation assumptions used in the option pricing
model ultimately adopted. |
|
(2) |
|
No dilution is reflected for the employee stock ownership plan because such shares are
assumed to be purchased in the stock offering. |
We may fund our stock-based benefit plans through open market purchases, as opposed to
new issuances of stock; however, if any options previously granted under our existing 2008 Equity
Incentive Plan are exercised during the first year following completion of the offering, they will
be funded with newly issued shares as Office of Thrift Supervision regulations do not permit us to
repurchase our shares during the first year following the completion of the offering except to fund
the grants of restricted stock under our stock-based benefit plan or under extraordinary
circumstances. We have been advised by the staff of the Office of Thrift Supervision that the
exercise
13
of outstanding options and cancellation of treasury shares in the conversion will not
constitute an extraordinary circumstance for purposes of this test.
The following table presents information as of March 31, 2010 regarding our employee stock
ownership plan, our 2008 Equity Incentive Plan and our proposed stock-based benefit plan. The
table below assumes that 62,991,810 shares are outstanding after the offering, which includes the
sale of 35,650,000 shares in the offering at the maximum of the offering range and the issuance of
shares in exchange for shares of Northfield-Federal using an exchange ratio of 1.4467. It also
assumes that the value of the stock is $10.00 per share.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares Outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
Shares at Maximum |
|
|
Estimated Value of |
|
|
After the |
|
Existing and New Stock Benefit Plans |
|
Participants |
|
of Offering Range |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Conversion |
|
Employee Stock Ownership Plan: |
|
Employees |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares purchased in 2007 offering (1) |
|
|
|
|
2,540,809 |
(2) |
|
$ |
25,408,090 |
|
|
|
4.03 |
% |
Shares to be purchased in this offering |
|
|
|
|
1,426,000 |
|
|
|
14,260,000 |
|
|
|
2.26 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total employee stock ownership plan shares |
|
|
|
|
3,966,809 |
|
|
$ |
39,668,090 |
|
|
|
6.30 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted Stock Awards: |
|
Directors, Officers and Employees |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 Equity Incentive Plan (1) |
|
|
|
|
1,270,404 |
(3) |
|
$ |
12,704,040 |
(4) |
|
|
2.02 |
% |
New shares of restricted stock |
|
|
|
|
1,426,000 |
|
|
|
14,260,000 |
(4) |
|
|
2.26 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shares of restricted stock |
|
|
|
|
2,696,404 |
|
|
$ |
26,964,040 |
|
|
|
4.28 |
%(5) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock Options: |
|
Directors, Officers and Employees |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 Equity Incentive Plan (1) |
|
|
|
|
3,176,011 |
(6) |
|
$ |
11,846,521 |
|
|
|
5.04 |
% |
New stock options |
|
|
|
|
3,565,000 |
|
|
|
13,297,450 |
(7) |
|
|
5.66 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stock options |
|
|
|
|
6,741,011 |
|
|
$ |
25,143,971 |
|
|
|
10.70 |
%(5) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total of stock benefit plans |
|
|
|
|
13,404,224 |
|
|
$ |
91,776,101 |
|
|
|
21.28 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The number of shares indicated has been adjusted for the 1.4467 exchange ratio at the
maximum of the offering range. |
|
(2) |
|
As of March 31, 2010, 256,951 of these shares, or 177,612 shares prior to adjustment for the
exchange, have been allocated. |
|
(3) |
|
As of March 31, 2010, 1,200,110 of these shares, or 829,550 shares prior to adjustment for
the exchange, have been awarded, and 252,927 of these shares, or 174,830 shares prior to
adjustment for the exchange, have vested. |
|
(4) |
|
The value of restricted stock awards is determined based on their fair value as of the date
grants are made. For purposes of this table, the fair value of awards under the new
stock-based benefit plan is assumed to be the same as the offering price of $10.00 per share. |
|
(5) |
|
The number of shares of restricted stock and shares reserved for stock options set forth in
the table would exceed regulatory limits if a stock-based incentive plan were adopted within
one year of the completion of the conversion. Accordingly, the number of new shares of
restricted stock and shares reserved for stock options set forth in the table would have to be
reduced such that the aggregate amount of stock awards and shares reserved for stock options
would be 4% or less and 10% or less, respectively, of our outstanding shares, unless we obtain
a waiver from the Office of Thrift Supervision, or we implement the incentive plan more than
12 months after completion of the conversion. We have not determined whether we will
implement a new stock-based incentive plan earlier than 12 months after completion of the
conversion or more than 12 months after the completion of the conversion. |
|
(6) |
|
As of March 31, 2010, options to purchase 3,018,395 of these shares, or 2,086,400 shares
prior to adjustment for the exchange, have been awarded, and options to purchase 581,660 of
these shares, or 402,060 shares prior to adjustment for the exchange, have vested. |
|
(7) |
|
The weighted-average fair value of stock options to be granted has been estimated at $3.73
per option, adjusted for the exchange ratio, using the Black-Scholes option pricing model.
The fair value of stock options uses the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following
assumptions: exercise price, $10.00; trading price on date of grant, $10.00; dividend yield,
1.4%; expected life, 6.5 years; expected volatility, 38.29%; and risk-free rate of return,
3.10%. The actual value of option grants will be determined by the grant-date fair value of
the options, which will depend on a number of factors, including the valuation assumptions
used in the option pricing model ultimately adopted. |
Market for Common Stock
Existing publicly held shares of Northfield-Federals common stock are quoted on the Nasdaq
Global Select Market under the symbol NFBK. Upon completion of the conversion, the shares of
common stock of Northfield-Delaware will replace the existing shares. For a period of 20 trading
days after the completion of the conversion and offering, we expect our shares of common stock will
trade on the Nasdaq Global Select Market under the symbol NFBKD, and, thereafter, our trading
symbol will revert to NFBK. In order to list our stock on the Nasdaq Global Select Market, we
are required to have at least three broker-dealers who will make a market in
14
our common stock. As of March 31, 2010, Northfield-Federal had 22 registered market makers in
its common stock, including Sandler ONeill & Partners, L.P. Sandler ONeill & Partners, L.P. has
advised us that it intends to make a market in our common stock following the offering, but it is
under no obligation to do so.
Our Dividend Policy
Northfield-Federal currently pays a quarterly cash dividend of $0.05 per share, which equals
$0.20 per share on an annualized basis. After the conversion, we intend to continue to pay cash
dividends on a quarterly basis. We expect the quarterly dividends per share to be between $0.03
and $0.04 per share, depending on how many shares of common stock are sold in the offering. This
would approximately preserve the dividend amount that Northfield-Federal stockholders currently
receive, as adjusted to reflect the exchange ratio. The dividend rate and the continued payment of
dividends will depend on a number of factors, including our capital requirements, our financial
condition and results of operations, tax considerations, statutory and regulatory limitations, and
general economic conditions. No assurance can be given that we will continue to pay dividends or
that they will not be reduced or eliminated in the future.
For information regarding our historical dividend payments, see Selected Consolidated
Financial and Other Data of Northfield Bancorp, Inc. and Market for the Common Stock. For
information regarding our current and proposed dividend policy, see Our Dividend Policy.
Tax Consequences
Northfield Bancorp, MHC, Northfield-Federal, Northfield Bank and Northfield-Delaware have
received an opinion of counsel, Luse Gorman Pomerenk & Schick, P.C., regarding the material federal
income tax consequences of the conversion, and have received opinions of Crowe Horwath LLP
regarding the material New York and New Jersey state tax consequences of the conversion. As a
general matter, the conversion will not be a taxable transaction for purposes of federal or state
income taxes to Northfield Bancorp, MHC, Northfield-Federal (except for cash paid for fractional
shares), Northfield Bank, Northfield-Delaware, persons eligible to subscribe in the subscription
offering, or existing stockholders of Northfield-Federal. Existing stockholders of
Northfield-Federal who receive cash in lieu of fractional share interests in shares of
Northfield-Delaware will recognize a gain or loss equal to the difference between the cash received
and the tax basis of the fractional share.
How You Can Obtain Additional InformationStock Information Center
Our banking personnel may not, by law, assist with investment-related questions about the
offering. If you have any questions regarding the conversion or offering, please call our Stock
Information Center. The toll-free telephone number is (877) 651-9234. The Stock Information
Center is open Monday through Friday between 10:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m., Eastern Time. The Stock
Information Center will be closed on weekends and bank holidays.
15
RISK FACTORS
You should consider carefully the following risk factors in evaluating an investment in the
shares of common stock.
Risks Related to Our Business
We have been negatively affected by current market and economic conditions. A continuation or
worsening of these conditions could adversely affect our operations, financial condition and
earnings.
The severe economic recession of 2008 and 2009 and the weak economic recovery since then have
resulted in continued uncertainty in the financial markets and the expectation of weak general
economic conditions, including high levels of unemployment, continuing through 2010. The resulting
economic pressure on consumers and businesses has adversely affected our business, financial
condition and results of operations. The credit quality of loan and investment securities
portfolios has deteriorated at many financial institutions and the values of real estate collateral
supporting many commercial loans and home mortgages have declined and may continue to decline. Our
commercial and multifamily real estate loan customers have experienced increases in vacancy rates
and declines in rental rates for both multifamily and commercial properties. Financial companies
stock prices have been negatively affected, as has the ability of banks and bank holding companies
to raise capital or borrow in the debt markets. A continuation or worsening of these conditions
could result in reduced loan demand and further increases in loan delinquencies, loan losses, loan
loss provisions, costs associated with monitoring delinquent loans and disposing of foreclosed
property, and otherwise negatively affect our operations, financial condition and earnings.
Our concentration in multifamily loans, commercial real estate loans, and construction and land
loans, as well as our commercial business loans, could expose us to increased lending risks and
related loan losses.
Our current business strategy is to continue to emphasize multifamily loans and to a lesser
extent commercial real estate loans. At March 31, 2010, $559.3 million, or 75.9% of our total loan
portfolio, consisted of multifamily, commercial real estate, and construction and land loans. In
addition, at March 31, 2010, our largest industry concentration of commercial real estate loans was
hotels and motels, which totaled $29.4 million, or 8.8% of commercial real estate loans at that
date.
These types of loans generally expose a lender to greater risk of non-payment and loss than
one- to four-family residential mortgage loans because repayment of the loans often depends on the
successful operation of the properties and the income stream of the borrowers. Such loans
typically involve larger loan balances to single borrowers or groups of related borrowers compared
to one- to four-family residential mortgage loans. Also, many of our borrowers have more than one
of these types of loans outstanding. Consequently, an adverse development with respect to one loan
or one credit relationship can expose us to a significantly greater risk of loss compared to an
adverse development with respect to a one- to four-family residential real estate loan.
In addition, if loans that are collateralized by real estate become troubled and the value of
the real estate has been significantly impaired, then we may not be able to recover the full
contractual amount of principal and interest that we anticipated at the time we originated the
loan, which could cause us to increase our provision for loan losses and adversely affect our
operating results and financial condition. Also, the collateral underlying commercial business
loans may fluctuate in value. Some of our commercial business loans are collateralized by
equipment, inventory, accounts receivable or other business assets, and the liquidation of
collateral in the event of default is often an insufficient source of repayment because accounts
receivable may be uncollectible and inventories may be obsolete or of limited use.
Construction and land lending involves additional risks because of the inherent difficulty in
estimating a propertys value both before and at completion of the project. Construction costs may
exceed original estimates as a result of increased materials, labor or other costs. In addition,
because of current uncertainties in the residential and commercial real estate markets, property
values have become more difficult to determine than they have been
16
historically. The repayment of construction and land acquisition and development loans often
depends on the ability of the borrower to sell or lease the property. These loans also require
ongoing monitoring.
A significant portion of our loan portfolio is unseasoned.
Our loan portfolio has grown to $736.6 million at March 31, 2010, from $387.8 million at
December 31, 2005. It is difficult to assess the future performance of these recently originated
loans because of our relatively limited history in commercial real estate and multifamily lending.
In addition, we purchased $35.4 million of insurance premium finance loans during the quarter ended
December 31, 2009, and grew this portfolio to $40.0 million at March 31, 2010. These loans may
have delinquency or charge-off levels above our historical experience, which could adversely affect
our future performance.
If our allowance for loan losses is not sufficient to cover actual loan losses, our earnings could
decrease.
We make various assumptions and judgments about the collectability of our loan portfolio,
including the creditworthiness of our borrowers and the value of the real estate and other assets
serving as collateral for the repayment of many of our loans. In determining the amount of the
allowance for loan losses, we review our loans and our loss and delinquency experience, as well as
the experience of other similarly situated institutions, and we evaluate other factors including,
among other things, current economic conditions. If our assumptions are incorrect, our allowance
for loan losses may not be sufficient to cover losses inherent in our loan portfolio, which would
require additions to our allowance. Material additions to our allowance would materially decrease
our net income.
In addition, bank regulators periodically review our allowance for loan losses and, based on
information available to them at the time of their review, may require us to increase our allowance
for loan losses or recognize further loan charge-offs. An increase in our allowance for loan
losses or loan charge-offs as required by these regulatory authorities may have a material adverse
effect on our financial condition and results of operations.
Declines in real estate values could decrease our loan originations and increase delinquencies and
defaults.
Declines in real estate values in our market area could adversely affect our results of
operations. Like all financial institutions, we are subject to the effects of any economic
downturn. In particular, a significant decline in real estate values would likely lead to a
decrease in new multifamily, commercial real estate, and home equity lending and increased
delinquencies and defaults in our real estate loan portfolio. Declines in the average sale prices
of real estate in our primary market area could lead to higher loan losses.
Government responses to economic conditions may adversely affect our operations, financial
condition and earnings.
Newly enacted financial reform legislation will change the bank regulatory framework, create
an independent consumer protection bureau that will assume the consumer protection responsibilities
of the various federal banking agencies, and establish more stringent capital standards for banks
and bank holding companies. The legislation will also result in new regulations affecting the
lending, funding, trading and investment activities of banks and bank holding companies. Bank
regulatory agencies also have been responding aggressively to concerns and adverse trends
identified in examinations. Ongoing uncertainty and adverse developments in the financial services
industry and the domestic and international credit markets, and the effect of new legislation and
regulatory actions in response to these conditions, may adversely affect our operations by
restricting our business activities, including our ability to originate or sell loans, modify loan
terms, or foreclose on property securing loans. These measures are likely to increase our costs of
doing business and may have a significant adverse effect on our lending activities, financial
performance and operating flexibility. In addition, these risks could affect the performance and
value of our loan and investment securities portfolios, which also would negatively affect our
financial performance.
Furthermore, the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, in an attempt to help the
overall economy, has, among other things, kept interest rates low through its targeted federal
funds rate and the purchase of mortgage-backed securities. If the Federal Reserve Board increases
the federal funds rate, overall interest rates will
17
likely rise, which may negatively impact the housing markets and the U.S. economic recovery.
In addition, deflationary pressures, while possibly lowering our operating costs, could have a
significant negative effect on our borrowers, especially our business borrowers, and the values of
underlying collateral securing loans, which could negatively affect our financial performance.
Financial reform legislation recently enacted by Congress will, among other things, eliminate the
Office of Thrift Supervision, tighten capital standards, create a new Consumer Financial Protection
Bureau and result in new laws and regulations that are expected to increase our costs of
operations.
The President recently signed into law the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer
Protection Act (the Dodd-Frank Act) which will significantly change the current bank regulatory
structure and affect the lending, investment, trading and operating activities of financial
institutions and their holding companies. The Dodd-Frank Act will eliminate our current primary
federal regulator, the Office of Thrift Supervision, and require Northfield Bank to be regulated by
the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (the primary federal regulator for national banks).
The Dodd-Frank Act also authorizes the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System to
supervise and regulate all savings and loan holding companies like Northfield-Delaware, in addition
to bank holding companies which it currently regulates. As a result, the Federal Reserve Boards
current regulations applicable to bank holding companies, including holding company capital
requirements, will apply to savings and loan holding companies like Northfield-Delaware. These
capital requirements are substantially similar to the capital requirements currently applicable to
Northfield Bank, as described in Supervision and RegulationFederal Banking RegulationCapital
Requirements. The Dodd-Frank Act also requires the Federal Reserve Board to set minimum capital
levels for bank holding companies that are as stringent as those required for the insured
depository subsidiaries, and the components of Tier 1 capital would be restricted to capital
instruments that are currently considered to be Tier 1 capital for insured depository institutions.
Bank holding companies with assets of less than $500 million are exempt from these capital
requirements. Under the Dodd-Frank Act, the proceeds of trust preferred securities are excluded
from Tier 1 capital unless such securities were issued prior to May 19, 2010 by bank or savings and
loan holding companies with less than $15 billion of assets. The legislation also establishes a
floor for capital of insured depository institutions that cannot be lower than the standards in
effect today, and directs the federal banking regulators to implement new leverage and capital
requirements within 18 months that take into account off-balance sheet activities and other risks,
including risks relating to securitized products and derivatives.
The Dodd-Frank Act also creates a new Consumer Financial Protection Bureau with broad powers
to supervise and enforce consumer protection laws. The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau has
broad rule-making authority for a wide range of consumer protection laws that apply to all banks
and savings institutions such as Northfield Bank, including the authority to prohibit unfair,
deceptive or abusive acts and practices. The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau has examination
and enforcement authority over all banks and savings institutions with more than $10 billion in
assets. Banks and savings institutions with $10 billion or less in assets will be examined by
their applicable bank regulators. The new legislation also weakens the federal preemption
available for national banks and federal savings associations, and gives state attorneys general
the ability to enforce applicable federal consumer protection laws.
Also effective one year after the date of enactment is a provision of the Dodd-Frank Act that
eliminates the federal prohibitions on paying interest on demand deposits, thus allowing businesses
to have interest bearing checking accounts. Depending on competitive responses, this significant
change to existing law could have an adverse effect on our interest expense.
The legislation also broadens the base for Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation insurance
assessments. Assessments will now be based on the average consolidated total assets less tangible
equity capital of a financial institution. The Dodd-Frank Act also permanently increases the
maximum amount of deposit insurance for banks, savings institutions and credit unions to $250,000
per depositor, retroactive to January 1, 2009, and non-interest bearing transaction accounts have
unlimited deposit insurance through December 31, 2013. Lastly, the Dodd-Frank Act will increase
stockholder influence over boards of directors by requiring companies to give stockholders a
non-binding vote on executive compensation and so-called golden parachute payments, and by
authorizing the Securities and Exchange Commission to promulgate rules that would allow
stockholders to nominate their own
18
candidates using a companys proxy materials. The legislation also directs the Federal
Reserve Board to promulgate rules prohibiting excessive compensation paid to bank holding company
executives, regardless of whether the company is publicly traded.
It is difficult to predict at this time what effect the new legislation and implementing
regulations will have on community banks, including the lending and credit practices of such banks.
Moreover, many of the provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act will not take effect for at least a year,
and the legislation requires various federal agencies to promulgate numerous and extensive
implementing regulations over the next several years. Although the substance and scope of these
regulations cannot be determined at this time, it is expected that the legislation and implementing
regulations, particularly those relating to the new Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, will
increase our operating and compliance costs.
We are subject to extensive regulatory oversight.
We and our subsidiaries are subject to extensive regulation and supervision. Regulators have
intensified their focus on bank lending criteria and controls, and on the USA PATRIOT Acts
anti-money laundering and Bank Secrecy Act compliance requirements. There also is increased
scrutiny of our compliance practices generally and particularly with the rules enforced by the
Office of Foreign Assets Control. Our failure to comply with these and other regulatory
requirements could lead to, among other remedies, administrative enforcement actions and legal
proceedings. In addition, the Dodd-Frank Act and implementing regulations are likely to have a
significant effect on the financial services industry, which are likely to increase operating costs
and reduce profitability. Regulatory or legislative changes could make regulatory compliance more
difficult or expensive for us, and could cause us to change or limit some of our products and
services, or the way we operate our business.
Legislative or regulatory responses to perceived financial and market problems could impair our
rights against borrowers.
Current and future proposals made by members of Congress would reduce the amount distressed
borrowers are otherwise contractually obligated to pay under their mortgage loans, and may limit
the ability of lenders to foreclose on mortgage collateral. If proposals such as these, or other
proposals limiting Northfield Banks rights as a creditor, were to be implemented, we could
experience increased credit losses on our loans and mortgage-backed securities, or increased
expense in pursuing our remedies as a creditor.
Recent health care legislation could increase our expenses or require us to pass further costs on
to our employees, which could adversely affect our operations, financial condition and earnings.
Legislation enacted in 2010 requires companies to provide expanded health care coverage to
their employees, such as affordable coverage to part-time employees and coverage to dependent adult
children of employees. Companies will also be required to enroll new employees automatically into
one of their health plans. Compliance with these and other new requirements of the health care
legislation will increase our employee benefits expense, and may require us to pass these costs on
to our employees, which could give us a competitive disadvantage in hiring and retaining qualified
employees.
Changes in market interest rates could adversely affect our financial condition and results of
operations.
Our financial condition and results of operations are significantly affected by changes in
market interest rates. Our results of operations substantially depend on our net interest income,
which is the difference between the interest income we earn on our interest-earning assets and the
interest expense we pay on our interest-bearing liabilities. Our interest-bearing liabilities
generally reprice or mature more quickly than our interest-earning assets. If rates increase
rapidly, we may have to increase the rates we are willing to pay on our deposits and borrowed funds
more quickly than any changes in interest rates on our loans and investments, resulting in a
negative effect on interest spreads and net interest income. In addition, the effect of rising
rates could be compounded if deposit customers move funds from savings accounts to higher rate
certificate of deposit accounts. Conversely, should market interest rates fall below current
levels, our net interest margin could also be negatively affected if
19
competitive pressures keep us from further reducing rates on our deposits, while the yields on our
assets decrease more rapidly through loan prepayments and interest rate adjustments.
We also are subject to reinvestment risk associated with changes in interest rates. Changes
in interest rates may affect the average life of loans and mortgage-related securities. Decreases
in interest rates often result in increased prepayments of loans and mortgage-related securities,
as borrowers refinance their loans to reduce borrowings costs. Under these circumstances, we are
subject to reinvestment risk to the extent we are unable to reinvest the cash received from such
prepayments in loans or other investments that have interest rates that are comparable to the
interest rates on existing loans and securities. Additionally, increases in interest rates may
decrease loan demand and/or may make it more difficult for borrowers to repay adjustable rate
loans.
Changes in interest rates also affect the value of our interest earning assets and in
particular our securities portfolio. Generally, the value of securities fluctuates inversely with
changes in interest rates. At March 31, 2010, the fair value of our securities portfolio
(excluding Federal Home Loan Bank of New York stock) totaled $1.2 billion.
At March 31, 2010, our simulation model indicated that our net portfolio value (the net
present value of our interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities) would decrease by
9.6% if there was an instantaneous parallel 200 basis point increase in market interest rates. See
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of OperationsManagement
of Market Risk.
Strong competition within our market areas may limit our growth and profitability.
Competition in the banking and financial services industry is intense. In our market areas,
we compete with commercial banks, savings institutions, mortgage brokerage firms, credit unions,
finance companies, mutual funds, money market funds, insurance companies, and brokerage and
investment banking firms operating locally and elsewhere. Some of our competitors have greater
name recognition and market presence than we do and offer certain services that we do not or cannot
provide. This can give them an advantage in attracting business. In addition, larger competitors
may be able to price loans and deposits more aggressively than we do.
In addition, the recent crisis in the financial services industry has resulted in a number of
financial services companies, such as investment banks and automobile and real estate finance
companies, electing to become bank holding companies. These financial services companies
traditionally have generated funds from sources other than insured bank deposits. Many of the
alternative funding sources traditionally utilized by these companies are no longer available.
This has resulted in these companies relying more on insured bank deposits to fund their
operations, which has increased competition for deposits and may increase the related costs of such
deposits.
Our profitability depends on our continued ability to compete successfully in our market
areas. For additional information see Business of Northfield Bancorp, Inc. and Northfield
BankMarket Area and Competition.
The requirement to account for certain assets at estimated fair value, and a proposal to account
for additional financial assets and liabilities at estimated fair value, may adversely affect our
results of operations.
We report certain assets, including securities, at fair value, and a recent proposal would
require us to report most of our financial assets and liabilities at fair value. Generally, for
securities that are reported at fair value, we use quoted market prices or valuation models that
utilize observable market inputs to estimate fair value. Because we carry these assets on our
books at their estimated fair value, we may record losses even if the asset in question presents
minimal credit risk. Under current accounting requirements, elevated delinquencies, defaults, and
estimated losses from the disposition of collateral in our private-label mortgage-backed securities
portfolio may require us to recognize additional other-than-temporary impairments in future periods
with respect to our securities portfolio. The amount and timing of any impairment recognized will
depend on the severity and duration of the decline in the estimated fair value of the asset and our
estimate of the anticipated recovery period. Under proposed accounting requirements, we may be
required to record reductions in the fair value of nearly all of our financial
20
assets and liabilities (including loans) either through a charge to net income or through a
reduction to accumulated other comprehensive income. Accordingly, we could be required to record
losses on assets such as loans where we have no intention to sell the loan and expect the loan to
be repaid in full. This could result in a decrease in net income, a decrease in our stockholders
equity, or both.
We could record future losses on our securities portfolio.
During the year ended December 31, 2009, we recognized total other-than-temporary impairment
on our securities portfolio of $1.4 million, of which $176,000 was considered to be credit-related
and, therefore, in accordance with applicable accounting standards, recorded as a loss through a
reduction of non-interest income. A number of factors or combinations of factors could require us
to conclude in one or more future reporting periods that an unrealized loss that exists with
respect to our securities portfolio constitutes additional impairment that is other than temporary,
which could result in material losses to us. These factors include, but are not limited to, a
continued failure by an issuer to make scheduled interest payments, an increase in the severity of
the unrealized loss on a particular security, an increase in the continuous duration of the
unrealized loss without an improvement in value or changes in market conditions and/or industry or
issuer specific factors that would render us unable to forecast a full recovery in value. In
addition, the fair values of securities could decline if the overall economy and the financial
condition of some of the issuers continues to deteriorate and there remains limited liquidity for
these securities.
If our investment in the common stock of the Federal Home Loan Bank of New York is classified as
other-than-temporarily impaired or as permanently impaired, our earnings and stockholders equity
could decrease.
We own stock of the Federal Home Loan Bank of New York, which is part of the Federal Home Loan
Bank system. The Federal Home Loan Bank of New York common stock is held to qualify for membership
in the Federal Home Loan Bank of New York and to be eligible to borrow funds under the Federal Home
Loan Bank of New Yorks advance programs. The aggregate cost of our Federal Home Loan Bank of New
York common stock as of March 31, 2010, was $5.0 million based on its par value. There is no
market for Federal Home Loan Bank of New York common stock.
Although the Federal Home Loan Bank of New York is not reporting current operating
difficulties, recent published reports indicate that certain member banks of the Federal Home Loan
Bank System may be subject to accounting rules and asset quality risks that could result in
materially lower regulatory capital levels. In an extreme situation, it is possible that the
capital of the Federal Home Loan Bank System, including the Federal Home Loan Bank of New York,
could be substantially diminished. Consequently, there is a risk that our investment in Federal
Home Loan Bank of New York common stock could be deemed other-than-temporarily impaired at some
time in the future, and if this occurs, it would cause earnings and stockholders equity to
decrease by the impairment charge.
We hold intangible assets that could be classified as impaired in the future. If these assets are
considered to be either partially or fully impaired in the future, our earnings and the book values
of these assets would decrease.
We are required to test our goodwill and core deposit intangible assets for impairment on a
periodic basis. The impairment testing process considers a variety of factors, including the
current market price of our common shares. It is possible that future impairment testing could
result in a partial or full impairment of the value of our goodwill or core deposit intangible
assets, or both. If an impairment determination is made in a future reporting period, our earnings
and the book value of these intangible assets will be reduced by the amount of the impairment. If
an impairment loss is recorded, it will have little or no effect on the tangible book value of our
shares of common stock or our regulatory capital levels.
21
Northfield Bank is required to maintain a significant percentage of its total assets in residential
mortgage loans and investments secured by residential mortgage loans, which restricts our ability
to diversify our loan portfolio.
A federal savings bank or thrift differs from a commercial bank in that it is required to
maintain at least 65% of its total assets in qualified thrift investments, which generally
include loans and investments for the purchase, refinance, construction, improvement, or repair of
residential real estate, as well as home equity loans, education loans and small business loans.
To maintain our federal savings bank charter we have to be a qualified thrift lender or QTL in
nine out of each 12 immediately preceding months. Because of the QTL requirement, we are limited
in our ability to change our asset mix and increase the yield on our earning assets by growing our
commercial loan portfolio. However, a loan that does not exceed $2 million (including a group of
loans to one borrower) that is for commercial, corporate, business, or agricultural purposes is
included in our qualified thrift investments.
In addition, if we continue to grow our commercial loan portfolio and our single-family
residential mortgage loan portfolio decreases, it is possible that in order to maintain our QTL
status, we could be forced to buy mortgage-backed securities or other qualifying assets at times
when the terms of such investments may not be attractive. Alternatively, we may find it necessary
to pursue different structures, including converting Northfield Banks savings bank charter to a
commercial bank charter.
Any future Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation insurance premiums or special assessments will
adversely affect our earnings.
As part of its plan to restore the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporations insurance reserve
ratio to 1.15% of estimated insured deposits, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation imposed a
special assessment equal to five basis points of assets less Tier 1 capital as of June 30, 2009,
which was payable on September 30, 2009. In addition, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
increased its quarterly deposit insurance assessment rates and amended the method by which rates
are calculated. The Dodd-Frank Act also requires the reserve ratio of the Deposit Insurance Fund
to increase from 1.15% to 1.35% of insured deposits by September 30, 2020, although banks with
assets of less than $10 billion are exempt from any additional assessments to achieve the higher
reserve ratio.
On November 12, 2009, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation also approved a final rule
requiring insured depository institutions to prepay on December 30, 2009, their estimated quarterly
risk-based assessments for the fourth quarter of 2009, and for all of 2010, 2011, and 2012.
Estimated assessments for the fourth quarter of 2009 and for all 2010 are based upon the assessment
rate in effect on September 30, 2009, with three basis points added for the 2011 and 2012
assessment rates. In addition, a 5% annual growth rate in the assessment base is assumed. Prepaid
assessments are to be applied against the actual quarterly assessments until exhausted, and may not
be applied to any special assessments that may occur in the future. Any unused prepayments will be
returned to the institution on June 30, 2013. On December 30, 2009, we prepaid $5.7 million in
estimated assessment fees for the fourth quarter of 2009 through 2012. Actions the Federal Deposit
Insurance Corporation takes in the future could result in significantly higher deposit insurance
premiums, special assessments, or prepaid assessments, which could have a significant affect on our
earnings.
The Office of Thrift Supervision is currently conducting an examination to determine our compliance
with the Community Reinvestment Act. If we do not receive a rating of Satisfactory or better
with respect to compliance with the Community Reinvestment Act, our ability to implement our
business strategy could be hindered significantly.
The Office of Thrift Supervision is currently conducting a regularly scheduled examination to
determine our compliance with the Community Reinvestment Act. The Community Reinvestment Act and
related regulations of the Office of Thrift Supervision require savings banks, such as Northfield
Bank, to help meet the credit needs of their communities, including low- and moderate-income
neighborhoods. We have not received the results of the examination, and there is a possibility
that we may not receive a rating of Satisfactory or better. The Office of Thrift Supervision
considers, among other factors, a savings banks compliance with the Community Reinvestment
22
Act in reviewing corporate applications, such as applications to establish branches or conduct
mergers and acquisitions, and a rating below Satisfactory can result in the denial of such
applications. The failure to receive a rating of Satisfactory or better can also result in other
restrictions on a savings banks activities. This would last until such time as Northfield Bank
received a rating of Satisfactory or better with respect to the Community Reinvestment Act, and a
new review of our compliance may not occur for another two years. This could limit our ability to
implement our business strategy, particularly with respect to acquisitions and branching, and could
limit our ability to deploy the proceeds from the offering in our originally anticipated timeframe,
either of which could have an adverse effect on our earnings and our return on equity.
We may face risks with respect to future expansion.
We intend to increase the size of our operations through de novo branching, and may continue
to seek whole bank or branch acquisitions in the future. Growth strategies involve a number of
risks, including:
|
|
|
the potential inability to generate deposits or originate loans in amounts that
offset the costs of establishing new branch offices; |
|
|
|
|
the time and costs associated with identifying and evaluating potential acquisitions
and merger partners; |
|
|
|
|
time and costs associated with the integration and operation of acquired
institutions, and the inability to successfully integrate the operations of an acquired
institution, or to achieve financial results comparable to or better than our
historical experience; |
|
|
|
|
the incurrence of goodwill and possible impairment thereof associated with an
acquisition and the possible adverse short-term effects on our results of operations;
and |
|
|
|
|
the risk of loss of key employees and customers. |
Risks associated with system failures, interruptions, or breaches of security could negatively
affect our earnings.
Information technology systems are critical to our business. We use various technology
systems to manage our customer relationships, general ledger, securities, deposits, and loans.
Although we have established policies and procedures to prevent or limit the impact of system
failures, interruptions and security breaches, such events may still occur, or may not be
adequately addressed if they do occur. In addition, any compromise of our systems could deter
customers from using our products and services. Although we rely on security systems to provide
security and authentication necessary to effect the secure transmission of data, these precautions
may not protect our systems from compromises or breaches of security.
In addition, we outsource a majority of our data processing to certain third-party providers.
If these third-party providers encounter difficulties, or if we have difficulty communicating with
them, our ability to adequately process and account for transactions could be affected, and our
business operations could be adversely affected. Threats to information security also exist in the
processing of customer information through various other vendors and their personnel.
The occurrence of any system failures, interruption or breach of security could damage our
reputation and result in a loss of customers and business thereby subjecting us to additional
regulatory scrutiny, or could expose us to litigation and possible financial liability. Any of
these events could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of
operations.
23
Risks Related to the Offering
The future price of the shares of common stock may be less than the $10.00 purchase price per share
in the offering.
If you purchase shares of common stock in the offering, you may not be able to sell them later
at or above the $10.00 purchase price in the offering. In several cases, shares of common stock
issued by newly converted savings institutions or mutual holding companies have traded below the
initial offering price. The aggregate purchase price of the shares of common stock sold in the
offering will be based on an independent appraisal. The independent appraisal is not intended, and
should not be construed, as a recommendation of any kind as to the advisability of purchasing
shares of common stock. The independent appraisal is based on certain estimates, assumptions and
projections, all of which are subject to change from time to time. After the shares begin trading,
the trading price of our common stock will be determined by the marketplace, and may be influenced
by many factors, including prevailing interest rates, the overall performance of the economy,
investor perceptions of Northfield-Delaware and the outlook for the financial services industry in
general. Price fluctuations may be unrelated to the operating performance of particular companies.
Our failure to effectively deploy the net proceeds may have an adverse effect on our financial
performance and the value of our common stock.
We intend to invest between $127.0 million and $172.1 million of the net proceeds of the
offering (or $198.1 million at the adjusted maximum of the offering range) in Northfield Bank. We
may use the remaining net proceeds to invest in short-term investments, repurchase shares of common
stock, pay dividends or for other general corporate purposes. We also expect to use a portion of
the net proceeds we retain to fund a loan for the purchase of shares of common stock in the
offering by the employee stock ownership plan. Northfield Bank may use the net proceeds it
receives to fund new loans, expand its retail banking franchise by acquiring new branches or by
acquiring other financial institutions or other financial services companies, or for other general
corporate purposes. However, with the exception of the loan to the employee stock ownership plan,
we have not allocated specific amounts of the net proceeds for any of these purposes, and we will
have significant flexibility in determining the amount of the net proceeds we apply to different
uses and the timing of such applications. Also, certain of these uses, such as opening new branches
or acquiring other financial institutions, may require the approval of the Office of Thrift
Supervision. We have not established a timetable for reinvesting the net proceeds, and we cannot
predict how long we will require to reinvest the net proceeds.
Our return on equity will be low following the stock offering. This could negatively affect the
trading price of our shares of common stock.
Net income divided by average equity, known as return on equity, is a ratio many investors
use to compare the performance of a financial institution to its peers. Following the stock
offering, we expect our consolidated equity to be between $629.6 million at the minimum of the
offering range and $760.0 million at the adjusted maximum of the offering range. Based upon our
annualized income for the quarter ended March 31, 2010, and these pro forma equity levels, our
return on equity would be 2.21% and 1.85% at the minimum and adjusted maximum of the offering
range, respectively. We expect our return on equity to remain low until we are able to leverage the
additional capital we receive from the stock offering. Although we will be able to increase net
interest income using proceeds of the stock offering, our return on equity will be negatively
affected by added expenses associated with our employee stock ownership plan and the stock-based
benefit plan we intend to adopt. Until we can increase our net interest income and non-interest
income and leverage the capital raised in the stock offering, we expect our return on equity to
remain low, which may reduce the market price of our shares of common stock.
Our stock-based benefit plans would increase our expenses and reduce our income.
We intend to adopt one or more new stock-based benefit plans after the conversion, subject to
stockholder approval, which would increase our annual compensation and benefit expenses related to
the stock options and shares granted to participants under our stock-based benefit plan. The
actual amount of these new stock-related
24
compensation and benefit expenses will depend on the number of options and stock awards
actually granted under the plan, the fair market value of our stock or options on the date of
grant, the vesting period and other factors which we cannot predict at this time. In the event we
adopt the plan within 12 months following the conversion, under current Office of Thrift
Supervision policy the total shares of common stock reserved for issuance pursuant to awards of
restricted stock and grants of options under our existing and proposed stock-based benefit plans
would be limited to 4% and 10%, respectively, of the total shares of our common stock outstanding.
If we award restricted shares of common stock or grant options in excess of these amounts under
stock-based benefit plans adopted more than 12 months after the completion of the conversion, our
costs would increase further.
In addition, we would recognize expense for our employee stock ownership plan when shares are
committed to be released to participants accounts, and we would recognize expense for restricted
stock awards and stock options over the vesting period of awards made to recipients. The expense
in the first year following the offering for shares purchased in the offering has been estimated to
be approximately $547,000 ($328,000 after tax) at the adjusted maximum of the offering range as set
forth in the pro forma financial information under Pro Forma Data, assuming the $10.00 per share
purchase price as fair market value. Actual expenses, however, may be higher or lower, depending on
the price of our common stock. For further discussion of our proposed stock-based plans, see
ManagementBenefits to be Considered Following Completion of the Conversion.
The implementation of stock-based benefit plans may dilute your ownership interest. Historically,
stockholders have approved these stock-based benefit plans.
We intend to adopt one or more new stock-based benefit plans following the stock offering.
These plans may be funded either through open market purchases or from the issuance of authorized
but unissued shares of common stock. Our ability to repurchase shares of common stock to fund
these plans will be subject to many factors, including, but not limited to, applicable regulatory
restrictions on stock repurchases, the availability of stock in the market, the trading price of
the stock, our capital levels, alternative uses for our capital and our financial performance.
While our intention is to fund the new stock-based benefit plan through open market purchases,
stockholders would experience a 7.34% reduction in ownership interest at the adjusted maximum of
the offering range in the event newly issued shares of our common stock are used to fund stock
options and shares of restricted common stock in an amount equal to up to 10% and 4%, respectively,
of the shares sold in the offering. In the event we adopt the plan within 12 months following the
conversion, under current Office of Thrift Supervision policy the total shares of common stock
reserved for issuance pursuant to awards of restricted stock and grants of options under our
existing and proposed stock-based benefit plans would be limited to 4% and 10%, respectively, of
the total shares of our common stock outstanding. In the event we adopt the plan more than 12
months following the conversion, the plan would not be subject to these limitations.
Although the implementation of the stock-based benefit plan will be subject to stockholder
approval, historically, the overwhelming majority of stock-based benefit plans adopted by savings
institutions and their holding companies following mutual-to-stock conversions have been approved
by stockholders.
We have not determined when we will adopt one or more new stock-based benefit plans. Stock-based
benefit plans adopted more than 12 months following the completion of the conversion may exceed
regulatory restrictions on the size of stock-based benefit plans adopted within 12 months, which
would further increase our costs.
If we adopt stock-based benefit plans more than 12 months following the completion of the
conversion, then grants of shares of common stock or stock options under our existing and proposed
stock-based benefit plans may exceed 4% and 10%, respectively, of our total outstanding shares.
Stock-based benefit plans that provide for awards in excess of these amounts would increase our
costs beyond the amounts estimated in Our stock-based benefit plans would increase our expenses
and reduce our income. Stock-based benefit plans that provide for awards in excess of these
amounts could also result in dilution to stockholders in excess of that described in The
implementation of stock-based benefit plans may dilute your ownership interest. Historically,
stockholders have approved these stock-based benefit plans. Although the implementation of
stock-based benefit plans would be
25
subject to stockholder approval, the determination as to the timing of the implementation of
such plans will be at the discretion of our board of directors.
Various factors may make takeover attempts more difficult to achieve.
Our board of directors has no current intention to sell control of Northfield-Delaware.
Provisions of our certificate of incorporation and bylaws, federal regulations, Northfield Banks
charter, Delaware law, shares of restricted stock and stock options that we have granted or may
grant to employees and directors, stock ownership by our management and directors and employment
agreements that we have entered into with our executive officers, and various other factors may
make it more difficult for companies or persons to acquire control of Northfield-Delaware without
the consent of our board of directors. You may want a takeover attempt to succeed because, for
example, a potential acquiror could offer a premium over the then prevailing price of our common
stock. For additional information, see Restrictions on Acquisition of Northfield-Delaware,
ManagementEmployment Agreements, Potential Payments to Named Executive Officers and
Benefits to be Considered Following Completion of the Conversion.
There may be a decrease in stockholders rights for existing stockholders of Northfield-Federal.
As a result of the conversion, existing stockholders of Northfield-Federal will become
stockholders of Northfield-Delaware. In addition to the provisions discussed above that may
discourage takeover attempts that are favored by stockholders, some rights of stockholders of
Northfield-Delaware will be reduced compared to the rights stockholders currently have in
Northfield-Federal. The reduction in stockholder rights results from differences between the
federal and Delaware chartering documents and bylaws, and from distinctions between federal and
Delaware law. Many of the differences in stockholder rights under the certificate of incorporation
and bylaws of Northfield-Delaware are not mandated by Delaware law but have been chosen by
management as being in the best interests of Northfield-Delaware and its stockholders. The
certificate of incorporation and bylaws of Northfield-Delaware include the following provisions:
(i) greater lead time required for stockholders to submit proposals for new business or to nominate
directors; and (ii) approval by at least 80% of the outstanding shares of capital stock entitled to
vote generally is required to amend the bylaws and certain provisions of the certificate of
incorporation. See Comparison of Stockholders Rights For Existing Stockholders of Northfield
Bancorp, Inc. for a discussion of these differences.
You may not revoke your decision to purchase Northfield-Delaware common stock in the subscription
or community offerings after you send us your order.
Funds submitted or automatic withdrawals authorized in connection with a purchase of shares of
common stock in the subscription and community offerings will be held by us until the completion or
termination of the conversion and offering, including any extension of the expiration date.
Because completion of the conversion and offering will be subject to regulatory approvals and an
update of the independent appraisal prepared by RP Financial, LC., among other factors, there may
be one or more delays in the completion of the conversion and offering. Orders submitted in the
subscription and community offerings are irrevocable, and purchasers will have no access to their
funds unless the offering is terminated, or extended beyond October 28, 2010, or the number of
shares to be sold in the offering is increased to more than 40,997,500 shares or decreased to fewer
than 26,350,000 shares.
An active trading market for our common stock may not develop.
Northfield-Federals common stock is currently quoted on the Nasdaq Global Select Market.
Upon completion of the conversion, the common stock of Northfield-Delaware will replace the
existing shares. An active public trading market for Northfield-Delawares common stock may not
develop or be sustained after this stock offering. If an active trading market for our common
stock does not develop, you may not be able to sell all of your shares of common stock on short
notice, and the sale of a large number of shares at one time could depress the market price.
26
The distribution of subscription rights could have adverse income tax consequences.
If the subscription rights granted to certain depositors of Northfield Bank are deemed to have
an ascertainable value, receipt of such rights may be taxable in an amount equal to such value.
Whether subscription rights are considered to have ascertainable value is an inherently factual
determination. We have received an opinion of counsel, Luse Gorman Pomerenk & Schick, P.C., that
it is more likely than not that such rights have no value; however, such opinion is not binding on
the Internal Revenue Service.
27
SELECTED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL AND OTHER DATA
OF NORTHFIELD BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
The following tables set forth selected consolidated historical financial and other data of
Northfield-Federal and its subsidiaries for the years and at the dates indicated. The following is
only a summary and you should read it in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements of
Northfield-Federal and notes beginning on page F-1 of this prospectus. The information at December
31, 2009 and 2008, and for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007 is derived in part
from the audited consolidated financial statements that appear in this prospectus. The information
at December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005 and for the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005, is derived
in part from audited consolidated financial statements that do not appear in this prospectus. The
information at March 31, 2010 and for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, is unaudited
and reflects only normal recurring adjustments that are, in the opinion of management, necessary
for a fair presentation of the results for the interim periods presented. The results of
operations for the three months ended March 31, 2010, are not necessarily indicative of the results
to be achieved for all of 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At |
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
At December 31, |
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
|
(In thousands) |
Selected Financial Condition Data: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
2,097,803 |
|
|
$ |
2,002,274 |
|
|
$ |
1,757,761 |
|
|
$ |
1,386,918 |
|
|
$ |
1,294,747 |
|
|
$ |
1,408,562 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
50,811 |
|
|
|
42,544 |
|
|
|
50,128 |
|
|
|
25,088 |
|
|
|
60,624 |
|
|
|
38,368 |
|
Trading securities |
|
|
3,706 |
|
|
|
3,403 |
|
|
|
2,498 |
|
|
|
3,605 |
|
|
|
2,667 |
|
|
|
2,360 |
|
Securities available-for-sale, at
estimated market value |
|
|
1,216,195 |
|
|
|
1,131,803 |
|
|
|
957,585 |
|
|
|
802,417 |
|
|
|
713,098 |
|
|
|
863,064 |
|
Securities held-to-maturity |
|
|
6,220 |
|
|
|
6,740 |
|
|
|
14,479 |
|
|
|
19,686 |
|
|
|
26,169 |
|
|
|
34,841 |
|
Loans held-for-investment, net |
|
|
737,225 |
|
|
|
729,269 |
|
|
|
589,984 |
|
|
|
424,329 |
|
|
|
409,189 |
|
|
|
387,467 |
|
Allowance for loan losses |
|
|
(17,146 |
) |
|
|
(15,414 |
) |
|
|
(8,778 |
) |
|
|
(5,636 |
) |
|
|
(5,030 |
) |
|
|
(4,795 |
) |
Net loans held-for-investment |
|
|
720,079 |
|
|
|
713,855 |
|
|
|
581,206 |
|
|
|
418,693 |
|
|
|
404,159 |
|
|
|
382,672 |
|
Bank owned life insurance |
|
|
44,174 |
|
|
|
43,751 |
|
|
|
42,001 |
|
|
|
41,560 |
|
|
|
32,866 |
|
|
|
31,635 |
|
Federal Home Loan Bank of New
York stock, at cost |
|
|
5,026 |
|
|
|
6,421 |
|
|
|
9,410 |
|
|
|
6,702 |
|
|
|
7,186 |
|
|
|
11,529 |
|
Other real estate owned |
|
|
1,533 |
|
|
|
1,938 |
|
|
|
1,071 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits |
|
|
1,392,905 |
|
|
|
1,316,885 |
|
|
|
1,024,439 |
|
|
|
877,225 |
|
|
|
989,789 |
|
|
|
1,010,146 |
|
Borrowed funds |
|
|
293,060 |
|
|
|
279,424 |
|
|
|
332,084 |
|
|
|
124,420 |
|
|
|
128,534 |
|
|
|
233,629 |
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
1,701,517 |
|
|
|
1,610,734 |
|
|
|
1,371,183 |
|
|
|
1,019,578 |
|
|
|
1,130,753 |
|
|
|
1,256,803 |
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
396,286 |
|
|
|
391,540 |
|
|
|
386,578 |
|
|
|
367,340 |
|
|
|
163,994 |
|
|
|
151,759 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended March 31, |
|
|
For the Years Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands except per share amounts) |
|
Selected Operating Data: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income |
|
$ |
21,007 |
|
|
$ |
20,482 |
|
|
$ |
85,568 |
|
|
$ |
75,049 |
|
|
$ |
65,702 |
|
|
$ |
64,867 |
|
|
$ |
66,302 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
6,458 |
|
|
|
7,721 |
|
|
|
28,977 |
|
|
|
28,256 |
|
|
|
28,836 |
|
|
|
28,406 |
|
|
|
24,234 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income
before provision for
loan losses |
|
|
14,549 |
|
|
|
12,761 |
|
|
|
56,591 |
|
|
|
46,793 |
|
|
|
36,866 |
|
|
|
36,461 |
|
|
|
42,068 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
1,930 |
|
|
|
1,644 |
|
|
|
9,038 |
|
|
|
5,082 |
|
|
|
1,442 |
|
|
|
235 |
|
|
|
1,629 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income
after provision for
loan losses |
|
|
12,619 |
|
|
|
11,117 |
|
|
|
47,553 |
|
|
|
41,711 |
|
|
|
35,424 |
|
|
|
36,226 |
|
|
|
40,439 |
|
Non-interest income |
|
|
1,723 |
|
|
|
969 |
|
|
|
5,393 |
|
|
|
6,153 |
|
|
|
9,478 |
|
|
|
4,600 |
|
|
|
4,354 |
|
Non-interest expense |
|
|
9,121 |
|
|
|
7,782 |
|
|
|
34,254 |
|
|
|
24,852 |
|
|
|
35,950 |
|
|
|
23,818 |
|
|
|
21,258 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
5,221 |
|
|
|
4,304 |
|
|
|
18,692 |
|
|
|
23,012 |
|
|
|
8,952 |
|
|
|
17,008 |
|
|
|
23,535 |
|
Income tax expense (benefit) |
|
|
1,840 |
|
|
|
1,569 |
|
|
|
6,618 |
|
|
|
7,181 |
|
|
|
(1,555 |
) |
|
|
6,166 |
|
|
|
10,376 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
3,381 |
|
|
$ |
2,735 |
|
|
$ |
12,074 |
|
|
$ |
15,831 |
|
|
$ |
10,507 |
|
|
$ |
10,842 |
|
|
$ |
13,159 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per
common share, basic and
diluted (1) |
|
$ |
0.08 |
|
|
$ |
0.06 |
|
|
$ |
0.28 |
|
|
$ |
0.37 |
|
|
$ |
(0.03 |
) |
|
NA |
|
|
NA |
|
Weighted average basic
shares outstanding (1) |
|
|
41,509,173 |
|
|
|
43,089,331 |
|
|
|
42,405,774 |
|
|
|
43,133,856 |
|
|
|
43,076,586 |
|
|
NA |
|
|
NA |
|
Weighted average diluted
shares outstanding |
|
|
41,823,794 |
|
|
|
43,104,409 |
|
|
|
42,532,568 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NA |
|
|
NA |
|
(footnotes on following page)
28
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At or For the Three |
|
|
|
|
Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
At or For the Years Ended December 31, |
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
Selected Financial Ratios and Other Data: (2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Performance Ratios: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Return on average assets (3) |
|
|
0.67 |
% |
|
|
0.63 |
% |
|
|
0.64 |
% |
|
|
1.01 |
% |
|
|
0.78 |
% |
|
|
0.80 |
% |
|
|
0.88 |
% |
Return on average equity (3) |
|
|
3.48 |
% |
|
|
2.87 |
% |
|
|
3.09 |
% |
|
|
4.22 |
% |
|
|
5.27 |
% |
|
|
7.01 |
% |
|
|
8.63 |
% |
Interest rate spread (3)(4) |
|
|
2.68 |
% |
|
|
2.48 |
% |
|
|
2.66 |
% |
|
|
2.37 |
% |
|
|
2.34 |
% |
|
|
2.40 |
% |
|
|
2.67 |
% |
Net interest margin (3)(5) |
|
|
3.03 |
% |
|
|
3.07 |
% |
|
|
3.16 |
% |
|
|
3.13 |
% |
|
|
2.87 |
% |
|
|
2.81 |
% |
|
|
2.94 |
% |
Dividend payout ratio (8) |
|
|
22.83 |
% |
|
|
28.30 |
% |
|
|
24.54 |
% |
|
|
4.66 |
% |
|
|
|
% |
|
|
|
% |
|
|
|
% |
Efficiency ratio (3)(6) |
|
|
56.05 |
% |
|
|
56.68 |
% |
|
|
55.26 |
% |
|
|
46.94 |
% |
|
|
77.57 |
% |
|
|
58.01 |
% |
|
|
45.79 |
% |
Non-interest expense to average total assets (3) |
|
|
1.80 |
% |
|
|
1.78 |
% |
|
|
1.82 |
% |
|
|
1.58 |
% |
|
|
2.66 |
% |
|
|
1.77 |
% |
|
|
1.42 |
% |
Average interest-earning assets to average
interest-bearing liabilities |
|
|
126.45 |
% |
|
|
131.30 |
% |
|
|
130.44 |
% |
|
|
136.94 |
% |
|
|
123.33 |
% |
|
|
118.89 |
% |
|
|
115.69 |
% |
Average equity to average total assets |
|
|
19.21 |
% |
|
|
21.86 |
% |
|
|
20.82 |
% |
|
|
23.84 |
% |
|
|
14.73 |
% |
|
|
11.47 |
% |
|
|
10.21 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset Quality Ratios: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-performing assets to total assets |
|
|
2.46 |
% |
|
|
1.39 |
% |
|
|
2.19 |
% |
|
|
0.61 |
% |
|
|
0.71 |
% |
|
|
0.55 |
% |
|
|
0.15 |
% |
Non-performing loans to total loans |
|
|
6.79 |
% |
|
|
3.86 |
% |
|
|
5.73 |
% |
|
|
1.63 |
% |
|
|
2.32 |
% |
|
|
1.74 |
% |
|
|
0.53 |
% |
Allowance for loan losses to non-performing loans |
|
|
34.26 |
% |
|
|
40.78 |
% |
|
|
36.86 |
% |
|
|
91.07 |
% |
|
|
57.31 |
% |
|
|
70.70 |
% |
|
|
232.88 |
% |
Allowance for loan losses to total loans |
|
|
2.33 |
% |
|
|
1.57 |
% |
|
|
2.11 |
% |
|
|
1.49 |
% |
|
|
1.33 |
% |
|
|
1.23 |
% |
|
|
1.24 |
% |
Net charge-offs to average loans outstanding |
|
|
0.11 |
% |
|
|
0.40 |
% |
|
|
0.37 |
% |
|
|
0.38 |
% |
|
|
0.20 |
% |
|
|
|
% |
|
|
|
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital Ratios: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total capital to risk-weighted assets (7) |
|
|
28.59 |
% |
|
|
33.82 |
% |
|
|
28.52 |
% |
|
|
34.81 |
% |
|
|
38.07 |
% |
|
|
25.03 |
% |
|
|
23.72 |
% |
Tier I capital to risk-weighted assets (7) |
|
|
27.31 |
% |
|
|
32.61 |
% |
|
|
27.24 |
% |
|
|
33.68 |
% |
|
|
37.23 |
% |
|
|
24.25 |
% |
|
|
22.97 |
% |
Tier I capital to adjusted assets (for 2005 and
2006) and to average assets (for 2007 and
forward) (7) |
|
|
13.91 |
% |
|
|
15.85 |
% |
|
|
14.35 |
% |
|
|
15.98 |
% |
|
|
18.84 |
% |
|
|
12.38 |
% |
|
|
10.62 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Data: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of full service offices |
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
Full time equivalent employees |
|
|
221 |
|
|
|
193 |
|
|
|
223 |
|
|
|
203 |
|
|
|
192 |
|
|
|
208 |
|
|
|
201 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Net loss per share in 2007 is calculated for the period that the shares of common stock were
outstanding (November 8, 2007 through December 31, 2007). The net loss for this period was
$1.5 million. |
|
(2) |
|
Annualized where appropriate. |
|
(3) |
|
2008 performance ratios include a $2.5 million tax-exempt gain from the death of an officer
and $463,000 ($292,000, net of tax) in costs associated with our conversion to a new core
processing system that was completed in January 2009. 2007 performance ratios include the
after-tax effect of: a charge of $7.8 million due to the contribution to the Northfield Bank
Foundation; a gain of $2.4 million as a result of the sale of two branch locations, and
associated deposit relationships; net interest income of $810,000 (after tax) related to
short-term investment returns earned on subscription proceeds (net of interest paid during the
stock offering); and the reversal of state and local tax liabilities of approximately $4.5
million, net of federal taxes. 2006 performance ratios include the effect of a $931,000
(after tax) charge related to a supplemental retirement agreement entered into with our former
president. |
|
(4) |
|
The interest rate spread represents the difference between the weighted-average yield on
interest earning assets and the weighted-average cost of interest-bearing liabilities. |
|
(5) |
|
The net interest margin represents net interest income as a percent of average
interest-earning assets for the period. |
|
(6) |
|
The efficiency ratio represents non-interest expense divided by the sum of net interest
income and non-interest income. |
|
(7) |
|
Ratios for 2005 and 2006 were determined pursuant to Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
regulations. Beginning November 6, 2007, Northfield Bank became subject to the capital
requirements under Office of Thrift Supervision regulations. While the capital regulations of
these two agencies are substantially similar, they are not identical. |
|
(8) |
|
Dividend payout ratio is calculated as total dividends declared for the period (excluding
dividends waived by Northfield Bancorp, MHC) divided by net income for the period. The
following table sets forth total cash dividends paid per period, which is calculated by
multiplying the dividends declared per share by the number of shares outstanding as of the
applicable record date. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended |
|
|
For the Year Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Dividends paid to public stockholders |
|
$ |
772 |
|
|
$ |
774 |
|
|
$ |
2,963 |
|
|
$ |
738 |
|
Dividends paid to Northfield Bancorp, MHC |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total dividends paid |
|
$ |
772 |
|
|
$ |
774 |
|
|
$ |
2,963 |
|
|
$ |
738 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total dividends waived by Northfield Bancorp, MHC |
|
$ |
986 |
|
|
$ |
986 |
|
|
$ |
3,943 |
|
|
$ |
986 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total dividends paid and total dividends waived |
|
$ |
1,758 |
|
|
$ |
1,760 |
|
|
$ |
6,906 |
|
|
$ |
1,724 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29
RECENT DEVELOPMENTS
The following tables set forth selected consolidated historical financial and other data
of Northfield-Federal and its subsidiaries for the periods and at the dates indicated. The
following is only a summary and you should read it in conjunction with the consolidated financial
statements of Northfield-Federal and notes beginning on page F-1 of this prospectus. The
information at December 31, 2009 is derived in part from the audited consolidated financial
statements that appear in this prospectus. The information at June 30, 2010 and for the three and
six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, is unaudited and reflects only normal recurring
adjustments that are, in the opinion of management, necessary for a fair presentation of the
results for the interim periods presented. The results of operations for the three and six months
ended June 30, 2010 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be achieved for the year
ending December 31, 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At June 30, |
|
At December 31, |
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
|
(In thousands) |
Selected Financial Condition Data: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
2,208,165 |
|
|
$ |
2,002,274 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
28,862 |
|
|
|
42,544 |
|
Trading securities |
|
|
3,515 |
|
|
|
3,403 |
|
Securities available-for-sale, at
estimated market value |
|
|
1,301,727 |
|
|
|
1,131,803 |
|
Securities held-to-maturity |
|
|
5,830 |
|
|
|
6,740 |
|
Loans held-for-investment, net |
|
|
772,909 |
|
|
|
729,269 |
|
Allowance for loan losses |
|
|
(19,122 |
) |
|
|
(15,414 |
) |
Net loans held-for-investment |
|
|
753,787 |
|
|
|
713,855 |
|
Bank owned life insurance |
|
|
54,688 |
|
|
|
43,751 |
|
Federal Home Loan Bank of New
York stock, at cost |
|
|
8,119 |
|
|
|
6,421 |
|
Other real estate owned |
|
|
1,362 |
|
|
|
1,938 |
|
Deposits |
|
|
1,380,695 |
|
|
|
1,316,885 |
|
Borrowed funds |
|
|
356,333 |
|
|
|
279,424 |
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
1,808,426 |
|
|
|
1,610,734 |
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
399,739 |
|
|
|
391,540 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months |
|
|
For the Six Months |
|
|
|
Ended June 30, |
|
|
Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands except per share amounts) |
|
Selected Operating Data: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income |
|
$ |
22,032 |
|
|
$ |
21,013 |
|
|
$ |
43,039 |
|
|
$ |
41,495 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
6,115 |
|
|
|
7,176 |
|
|
|
12,573 |
|
|
|
14,897 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income
before provision for
loan losses |
|
|
15,917 |
|
|
|
13,837 |
|
|
|
30,466 |
|
|
|
26,598 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
2,798 |
|
|
|
3,099 |
|
|
|
4,728 |
|
|
|
4,743 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income
after provision for
loan losses |
|
|
13,119 |
|
|
|
10,738 |
|
|
|
25,738 |
|
|
|
21,855 |
|
Non-interest income |
|
|
1,866 |
|
|
|
1,524 |
|
|
|
3,589 |
|
|
|
2,493 |
|
Non-interest expense |
|
|
8,457 |
|
|
|
9,061 |
|
|
|
17,578 |
|
|
|
16,843 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
6,528 |
|
|
|
3,201 |
|
|
|
11,749 |
|
|
|
7,505 |
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
2,342 |
|
|
|
1,079 |
|
|
|
4,182 |
|
|
|
2,648 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
4,186 |
|
|
$ |
2,122 |
|
|
$ |
7,567 |
|
|
$ |
4,857 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per share,
basic and diluted |
|
$ |
0.10 |
|
|
$ |
0.05 |
|
|
$ |
0.18 |
|
|
$ |
0.11 |
|
Weighted average basic
shares outstanding |
|
|
41,417,662 |
|
|
|
42,625,593 |
|
|
|
41,462,961 |
|
|
|
42,856,503 |
|
Weighted average diluted
shares outstanding |
|
|
41,783,730 |
|
|
|
42,719,665 |
|
|
|
41,803,306 |
|
|
|
42,911,078 |
|
(footnotes on following page)
30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At or For the Three |
|
At or For the Six |
|
|
Months Ended |
|
Months Ended |
|
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
Selected Financial Ratios and Other Data: (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Performance Ratios: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Return on average assets |
|
|
0.80 |
% |
|
|
0.47 |
% |
|
|
0.74 |
% |
|
|
0.55 |
% |
Return on average equity |
|
|
4.23 |
% |
|
|
2.18 |
% |
|
|
3.86 |
% |
|
|
2.52 |
% |
Interest rate spread (2) |
|
|
2.91 |
% |
|
|
2.70 |
% |
|
|
2.80 |
% |
|
|
2.59 |
% |
Net interest margin (3) |
|
|
3.23 |
% |
|
|
3.23 |
% |
|
|
3.14 |
% |
|
|
3.15 |
% |
Dividend payout ratio (4) |
|
|
19.25 |
% |
|
|
35.53 |
% |
|
|
20.89 |
% |
|
|
31.46 |
% |
Efficiency ratio (5) |
|
|
47.56 |
% |
|
|
58.99 |
% |
|
|
51.62 |
% |
|
|
57.90 |
% |
Non-interest expense to average total assets |
|
|
1.62 |
% |
|
|
2.00 |
% |
|
|
1.71 |
% |
|
|
1.89 |
% |
Average interest-earning assets to average
interest-bearing liabilities |
|
|
125.70 |
% |
|
|
131.74 |
% |
|
|
125.97 |
% |
|
|
131.77 |
% |
Average equity to average total assets |
|
|
19.01 |
% |
|
|
21.55 |
% |
|
|
19.11 |
% |
|
|
21.70 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset Quality Ratios: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-performing assets to total assets |
|
|
2.39 |
% |
|
|
1.70 |
% |
|
|
2.39 |
% |
|
|
1.70 |
% |
Non-performing loans to total loans |
|
|
6.66 |
% |
|
|
4.71 |
% |
|
|
6.66 |
% |
|
|
4.71 |
% |
Allowance for loan losses to non-performing loans |
|
|
37.13 |
% |
|
|
38.95 |
% |
|
|
37.13 |
% |
|
|
38.95 |
% |
Allowance for loan losses to total loans |
|
|
2.47 |
% |
|
|
1.84 |
% |
|
|
2.47 |
% |
|
|
1.84 |
% |
Net charge-offs to average loans outstanding |
|
|
0.44 |
% |
|
|
0.54 |
% |
|
|
0.28 |
% |
|
|
0.47 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital Ratios: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total capital to risk-weighted assets |
|
|
27.70 |
% |
|
|
31.41 |
% |
|
|
27.70 |
% |
|
|
31.41 |
% |
Tier I capital to risk-weighted assets |
|
|
26.42 |
% |
|
|
30.10 |
% |
|
|
26.42 |
% |
|
|
30.10 |
% |
Tier I capital to adjusted assets |
|
|
13.48 |
% |
|
|
15.53 |
% |
|
|
13.48 |
% |
|
|
15.53 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Data: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of full service offices |
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
Full time equivalent employees |
|
|
231 |
|
|
|
212 |
|
|
|
231 |
|
|
|
212 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Annualized where appropriate. |
|
(2) |
|
The interest rate spread represents the difference between the weighted-average yield on
interest earning assets and the weighted-average cost of interest-bearing liabilities. |
|
(3) |
|
The net interest margin represents net interest income as a percent of average
interest-earning assets for the period. |
|
(4) |
|
Dividend payout ratio is calculated as total dividends declared for the period (excluding
dividends waived by Northfield Bancorp, MHC) divided by net income for the period. The
following table sets forth total cash dividends paid per period, which is calculated by
multiplying the dividends declared per share by the number of shares outstanding as of the
applicable record date. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended |
|
|
For the Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Dividends paid to public stockholders |
|
$ |
806 |
|
|
$ |
754 |
|
|
$ |
1,581 |
|
|
$ |
1,528 |
|
Dividends paid to Northfield Bancorp, MHC |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total dividends paid |
|
$ |
806 |
|
|
$ |
754 |
|
|
$ |
1,581 |
|
|
$ |
1,528 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total dividends waived by Northfield Bancorp, MHC |
|
$ |
1,232 |
|
|
$ |
986 |
|
|
$ |
2,218 |
|
|
$ |
1,971 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total dividends paid and total dividends waived |
|
$ |
2,038 |
|
|
$ |
1,740 |
|
|
$ |
3,799 |
|
|
$ |
3,499 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5) |
|
The efficiency ratio represents non-interest expense divided by the sum of net interest
income and non-interest income. |
Comparison of Financial Condition at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009
Total assets increased $205.9 million, or 10.3%, to $2.2 billion at June 30, 2010, from $2.0
billion at December 31, 2009. The increase was primarily attributable to increases in securities
of $169.1 million and loans held for investment, net, of $43.6 million. In addition, bank owned
life insurance increased $10.9 million, primarily resulting from the purchase of $10.0 million of
insurance policies during the quarter ended June 30, 2010, coupled with $937,000 of income earned
on bank owned life insurance for the six months ended June 30, 2010.
31
Cash and cash equivalents decreased $13.7 million, or 32.2%, to $28.9 million at June 30,
2010, from $42.5 million at December 31, 2009. We have been deploying funds into higher yielding
investments such as loans and securities with risk and return characteristics that we deem
acceptable.
Securities available-for-sale increased $169.9 million, or 15.0%, to $1.3 billion at June 30,
2010, from $1.1 billion at December 31, 2009. The increase was primarily attributable to purchases
of $491.8 million and an increase of $8.6 million in net unrealized gains, partially offset by
maturities and paydowns of $235.5 million and sales of $95.0 million.
Securities held-to-maturity decreased $910,000, or 13.5%, to $5.8 million at June 30, 2010,
from $6.7 million at December 31, 2009. The decrease was attributable to maturities and paydowns
during the six months ended June 30, 2010.
Our securities portfolio totaled $1.3 billion at June 30, 2010, as compared to $1.1 billion at
December 31, 2009, which represented an increase of $169.1 million, or 14.8%. At June 30, 2010,
$905.4 million of the portfolio consisted of residential mortgage-backed securities issued or
guaranteed by Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac or Ginnie Mae. We also held residential mortgage-backed
securities not guaranteed by Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac or Ginnie Mae, referred to as private label
securities. These private label securities had an amortized cost of $128.4 million and an
estimated fair value of $132.6 million at June 30, 2010. These private label securities portfolios
were in a net unrealized gain position of $4.1 million at June 30, 2010, consisting of gross
unrealized gains of $5.9 million and gross unrealized losses of $1.8 million.
Of the $132.6 million of private label securities, three securities with an estimated fair
value of $13.3 million (amortized cost of $14.9 million) are rated less than AAA at June 30, 2010.
Of the three securities, one had an estimated fair value of $2.5 million (amortized cost of $2.5
million) and was rated A+, another had an estimated fair value of $6.1 million (amortized cost of
$7.2 million) and was rated Caa2, and the remaining security had an estimated fair value of $4.8
million (amortized cost of $5.2 million) and was rated CCC (downgraded to a rating of CC subsequent
to June 30, 2010). The ratings of the securities detailed above represent the lowest rating for
each security received from the rating agencies of Moodys, Standard & Poors, and Fitch. We
continue to receive principal and interest payments in accordance with the contractual terms of
each of these securities. Management has evaluated, among other things, delinquency status,
location of collateral, estimated prepayment speeds, and the estimated default rates and loss
severity in liquidating the underlying collateral for each of these three securities. Since
management does not have the intent to sell the securities, and it is more likely than not that we
will not be required to sell the securities before their anticipated recovery, we believe that the
unrealized losses at June 30, 2010, were temporary, and as such, were recorded as a component of
accumulated other comprehensive income, net of tax.
Loans held for investment, net, totaled $772.9 million at June 30, 2010, as compared to $729.3
million at December 31, 2009. The increase was primarily in multifamily real estate loans, which
increased $33.0 million, or 18.5%, to $211.4 million at June 30, 2010, from $178.4 million at
December 31, 2009. Commercial real estate loans increased $11.5 million, or 3.5%, to $339.3
million, insurance premium loans increased $9.3 million, or 23.0%, to $49.7 million, and home
equity loans increased $4.5 million, or 17.2%, from $26.1 million at December 31, 2009. These
increases were partially offset by decreases in residential loans, land and construction loans, and
commercial and industrial loans.
Bank owned life insurance increased $10.9 million, or 25.0%, from December 31, 2009 to June
30, 2010. The increase resulted from the purchase of $10.0 million of insurance policies during
the quarter ended June 30, 2010, coupled with $937,000 of income earned on bank owned life
insurance for the six months ended June 30, 2010.
Federal Home Loan Bank of New York stock, at cost, increased $1.7 million, or 26.4%, from $6.4
million at December 31, 2009 to $8.1 million at June 30, 2010. This increase was attributable to
an increase in borrowings outstanding with the Federal Home Loan Bank of New York over the same
time period.
32
Other real estate owned decreased $576,000, or 29.7%, from $1.9 million at December 31, 2009,
to $1.4 million at June 30, 2010. This decrease was attributable to downward valuation adjustments
of $146,000 recorded against the carrying balances of the properties in the first quarter of 2010,
reflecting deterioration in estimated fair values, coupled with the sale of other real estate owned
properties. No valuation adjustments were recorded in the three months ended June 30, 2010.
Other assets decreased $2.7 million, or 17.7%, to $12.3 million at June 30, 2010, from $14.9
million at December 31, 2009. The decrease in other assets was attributable to a decrease in net
deferred tax assets, which resulted primarily from an increase in net unrealized gains on the
available for sale securities portfolio from December 31, 2009, to June 30, 2010.
Deposits increased $63.8 million, or 4.8%, to $1.4 billion at June 30, 2010, from $1.3 billion
at December 31, 2009. The increase in deposits for the six months ended June 30, 2010, was due in
part to an increase of $31.9 million in short-term certificates of deposit originated through the
CDARS® Network. We utilize this funding source as a cost effective alternative to other
short-term funding sources. In addition, savings and money market accounts and transaction
accounts, increased $41.2 million and $16.6 million, respectively, from December 31, 2009 to June
30, 2010. These increases were partially offset by a decrease of $25.9 million in certificates of
deposit (that we originated) over the same time period. We continue to focus on our marketing and
pricing of our products, which we believe promotes longer-term customer relationships.
Borrowings increased $76.9 million, or 27.5%, to $356.3 million at June 30, 2010, from $279.4
million at December 31, 2009. The increase in borrowings resulted primarily from our increasing
longer-term borrowings, taking advantage of, and locking in, low interest rates, which was
partially offset by maturities during the six months ended June 30, 2010.
Accrued expenses and other liabilities increased $56.2 million, to $69.8 million at June 30,
2010 from $13.7 million at December 31, 2009. The increase was primarily a result of $55.9 million
in due to securities brokers, which resulted from securities purchases occurring prior to June 30,
2010, and settling after the quarter end.
Total stockholders equity increased to $399.7 million at June 30, 2010, from $391.5 million
at December 31, 2009. The increase was primarily attributable to net income of $7.6 million for
the six months ended June 30, 2010, and an increase in accumulated other comprehensive income of
$5.3 million. A decrease in market interest rates increased the estimated fair value of our
securities available for sale. The increase in stockholders equity also was due to a $1.9 million
increase in additional paid-in capital primarily related to the recognition of compensation expense
associated with equity awards. These increases were partially offset by an increase of $5.2
million in treasury stock, and the payment of approximately $1.6 million in cash dividends for the
six months ended June 30, 2010. On June 4, 2010, in connection with our announcement that we
intend to convert to a fully public company, the Board of Directors terminated its previously
announced stock repurchase program. Since inception of the program, we have repurchased 2,083,934
shares of common stock at an average cost of $11.99 per share.
Comparison of Operating Results for the Quarters Ended June 30, 2010 and 2009
Net Income. Net income increased $2.1 million, or 97.3%, for the quarter ended June 30, 2010,
compared to the quarter ended June 30, 2009. Net interest income increased $2.1 million, or 15.0%,
non-interest income increased $342,000, or 22.4%, non-interest expense decreased $604,000, or 6.7%,
and the provision for loan losses decreased $301,000, or 9.7%, which was partially offset by an
increase of $1.3 million in income tax expense over the same time periods.
Interest Income. Interest income increased $1.0 million, or 4.9%, to $22.0 million for the
three months ended June 30, 2010, from $21.0 million for the three months ended June 30, 2009. The
increase in interest income was primarily the result of an increase in average interest-earning
assets of $255.4 million, or 14.8%. The increase in average interest-earning assets was primarily
attributable to an increase in average loans of $117.4 million, or 18.3%, an increase in securities
(other than mortgage-backed securities) of $188.1 million, partially offset by a decrease in
average mortgage-backed securities of $25.1 million, or 2.8%, and a decrease in average
interest-earning deposits of $23.4 million, or 25.6%. The effect of the increase in average
interest-earning assets was partially offset
33
by a decrease in the yield earned to 4.47% for the three months ended June 30, 2010, from
4.90% for the three months ended June 30, 2009. The rates earned on all asset categories, other
than loans, decreased due to the general decline in market interest rates for these asset types.
The rate earned on loans increased from 5.80% for the three months ended June 30, 2009, to 6.41%
for the three months ended June 30, 2010. The yield earned on loans was positively affected by
interest income recorded on non-accrual loans on a cash basis. The loan portfolio had a weighted
average coupon rate of approximately 6.16% at June 30, 2010.
Interest Expense. Interest expense decreased $1.1 million, or 14.8%, to $6.1 million for the
three months ended June 30, 2010, from $7.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2009. The
decrease was attributable to a decrease in interest expense on deposits of $1.2 million, or 26.3%,
partially offset by an increase in interest expense on borrowings of $143,000, or 5.5%. The
decrease in interest expense on deposits was attributable to a decrease in the cost of deposits of
74 basis points, or 40.7%, to 1.08% for the quarter ended June 30, 2010, from 1.82% for the quarter
ended June 30, 2009, reflecting lower market interest rates for short-term deposits. The decrease
in the cost of deposits was partially offset by an increase of $237.6 million, or 23.5%, in average
interest-bearing deposits outstanding between the two quarters. The increase in interest expense
on borrowings was primarily attributable to an increase of $28.3 million, or 9.7%, in average
borrowings outstanding for the three months ended June 30, 2010, compared to the three months ended
June 30, 2009, partially offset by a decrease in the cost of borrowings of 13 basis points, to
3.42%, from 3.55% for the three months ended June 30, 2009, reflecting lower market interest rates
for borrowed funds.
Net Interest Income. Net interest income increased $2.1 million, or 15.0%, due primarily to
average interest earning assets increasing $255.4 million, or 14.8%, as the net interest margin
remained flat at 3.23% for the quarter ended June 30, 2010 compared to the quarter ended June 30,
2009. The average yield earned on interest earning assets decreased 43 basis points, or 8.8%, to
4.47% for the quarter ended June 30, 2010, from 4.90% for the quarter ended June 30, 2009. This
change was offset by a 64 basis point decrease in the average rate paid on interest-bearing
liabilities over the comparable periods. The average yield earned on interest earning assets and
net interest margin were positively affected by interest income recorded on non-accrual loans on a
cash basis. The loan portfolio had a weighted average coupon rate of approximately 6.16% at June
30, 2010. The general decline in yields was due to the overall low interest rate environment. The
increase in average interest earning assets was due primarily to an increase in average loans
outstanding of $117.4 million, and other securities of $188.1 million, partially offset by
decreases in mortgage-backed securities and interest-earning assets in other financial
institutions. Other securities consist primarily of investment-grade corporate bonds and
government-sponsored enterprise bonds.
Provision for Loan Losses. The provision for loan losses was $2.8 million for the quarter
ended June 30, 2010, a decrease of $301,000, or 9.7%, from the $3.1 million provision recorded in
the quarter ended June 30, 2009. The decrease in the provision for loan losses in the current
quarter was due primarily to the change in the composition of our loan portfolio, partially offset
by increases in general loss factors. These increases in the general loss factors utilized in
managements estimate of credit losses inherent in the loan portfolio were a result of declines in
collateral values supporting our loans and further deterioration of our local economy. During the
quarter ended June 30, 2010, we continued our emphasis on originating multifamily real estate loans
which resulted in less growth in commercial real estate loans as compared to the quarter ended June
30, 2009. We believe that our commercial real estate loans generally have greater credit risk than
our multifamily real estate loans. Net charge-offs for the quarter ended June 30, 2010, were
$822,000, as compared to $853,000 for the quarter ended June 30, 2009. We charged off $469,000 of
commercial real estate loans and $333,000 of construction and land loans during the quarter ended
June 30, 2010.
Non-interest Income. Non-interest income increased $342,000, or 22.4%, to $1.9 million for
the quarter ended June 30, 2010, compared to $1.5 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2009,
primarily as a result of an increase of $236,000 in gain on securities transactions, net. We
recognized $530,000 in gains on securities transactions during the quarter ended June 30, 2010,
compared to $294,000 in gains on securities transactions during the quarter ended June 30, 2009.
Securities gains in the second quarter of 2010 included gross realized gains of $785,000 on the
sale of available-for-sale securities, partially offset by securities losses of $255,000 related to
our trading portfolio. We recognized $294,000 of securities gains related to our trading portfolio
during the quarter ended June 30, 2009. The trading portfolio is used to fund our deferred
compensation obligation to certain of our employees and directors. The participants in this plan,
at their election, defer a portion of their compensation. Gains
34
and losses on trading securities have no effect on net income since participants benefit from,
and bear the full risk of, changes in the market values of trading securities. Therefore, we
record an equal and offsetting amount in non-interest expense, reflecting the change in our
obligations under the plan. We do not expect to continue to recognize the level of gains on the
sale of available for sale securities that we recognized this quarter. We also recognized
approximately $197,000 of income on the sale of fixed assets during the quarter ended June 30,
2010.
Non-interest Expense. Non-interest expense decreased $604,000, or 6.7%, to $8.5 million for
the quarter ended June 30, 2010, from $9.1 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2009. This
decrease was primarily attributable to a decrease of $608,000 in Federal Deposit Insurance
Corporation insurance expense. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation insurance expense for the
quarter ended June 30, 2009 included $770,000 for a Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation special
assessment.
Income Tax Expense. We recorded income tax expense of $2.3 million and $1.1 million for the
quarters ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively. The effective tax rate for the quarter ended
June 30, 2010, was 35.9%, as compared to 33.7% for the quarter ended June 30, 2009. The increase
in the effective tax rate was the result of a higher level of taxable income in 2010 as compared to
2009.
Comparison of Operating Results for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2010 and 2009
Net Income. Net income increased $2.7 million, or 55.8%, for the six months ended June 30,
2010, as compared to the six months ended June 30, 2009, due primarily to an increase of $3.9
million in net interest income, and an increase of $1.1 million in non-interest income, partially
offset by an increase of $735,000 in non-interest expense and an increase of $1.5 million in income
tax expense over the same time period.
Interest Income. Interest income increased $1.5 million, or 3.7%, to $43.0 million for the
six months ended June 30, 2010, from $41.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009. The
increase in interest income was primarily the result of an increase in average interest-earning
assets of $256.9 million, or 15.1%. The increase in average interest-earning assets was primarily
attributable to an increase in average loans of $125.2 million, or 20.2%, an increase in securities
(other than mortgage-backed securities) of $191.3 million, partially offset by a decrease in
average mortgage-backed securities of $29.9 million, or 3.2%, and a decrease in average
interest-earning deposits of $28.0 million, or 29.5%. The effect of the increase in average
interest-earning assets was partially offset by a decrease in the yield earned to 4.43% for the six
months ended June 30, 2010, from 4.92% for the six months ended June 30, 2009. The rates earned on
all asset categories, other than loans and Federal Home Loan Bank of New York stock, decreased due
to the general decline in market interest rates for these asset types. The rate earned on loans
increased from 5.79% for the six months ended June 30, 2009, to 6.05% for the six months ended June
30, 2010, and the yield earned on Federal Home Loan Bank of New York stock increased to 5.08% from
4.72% over the comparable period.
Interest Expense. Interest expense decreased $2.3 million, or 15.6%, to $12.6 million for the
six months ended June 30, 2010, from $14.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009. The
decrease was attributable to a decrease in interest expense on deposits of $2.2 million, or 23.2%,
coupled with a decrease in interest expense on borrowings of $115,000, or 2.2%. The decrease in
interest expense on deposits was attributable to a decrease in the cost of deposits of 75 basis
points, or 38.7%, to 1.19% for the six months ended June 30, 2010, from 1.94% for the six months
ended June 30, 2009, reflecting lower market interest rates for short-term deposits. The decrease
in the cost of deposits was partially offset by an increase of $245.5 million, or 24.7%, in average
interest-bearing deposits outstanding over the comparable period. The decrease in interest expense
on borrowings was primarily attributable to a decrease of 28 basis points, or 7.7%, in the cost of
borrowings, partially offset by an increase of $17.9 million, or 6.0%, in average borrowings
outstanding for the six months ended June 30, 2010, compared to the six months ended June 30, 2009,
reflecting lower market interest rates for borrowed funds.
Net Interest Income. Net interest income increased $3.9 million, or 14.5% for the six months
ended June 30, 2010, due primarily to interest earning assets increasing $256.9 million, or 15.1%,
partially offset by a decrease in the net interest margin of one basis point, or 0.3%, over the
prior year comparable period. The net interest margin decreased for the six months ended June 30,
2010, as the average yield earned on interest earning assets decreased, and average
interest-earning assets to average interest-bearing liabilities decreased, which was only partially
offset
35
by a decrease in the average rate paid on interest-bearing liabilities. The general decline
in yields reflected the overall low interest rate environment. The increase in average interest
earning assets was due primarily to increases in average loans outstanding of $125.2 million and
other securities of $191.3 million, which were partially offset by decreases in mortgage-backed
securities, and interest-earning assets in other financial institutions. Other securities consist
primarily of investment-grade corporate bonds and government-sponsored enterprise bonds.
Provision for Loan Losses. The provision for loan losses remained unchanged at $4.7 million
for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009. The primary reason for the provision for loan
losses remaining unchanged was an increase in the general loss factors used in managements
estimate of credit losses inherent in the loan portfolio which resulted from declines in collateral
values supporting our loans and further deterioration of our local economy, which was offset by the
effect of lower levels of growth in non-performing loans and a decline in loan growth for the six
months ended June 30, 2010 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2009. Furthermore, during the
six months ended June 30, 2010, we continued our emphasis on originating multifamily real estate
loans, which resulted in less growth in commercial real estate loans as compared to the six months
ended June 30, 2009. We believe our commercial real estate loans generally have greater credit
risk than our multifamily real estate loans. Net charge-offs for the six months ended June 30,
2010, were $1.0 million, as compared to $1.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009. We
charged off $469,000 of commercial real estate loans and $443,000 of construction and land loans
during the six months ended June 30, 2010.
Non-interest Income. Non-interest income increased $1.1 million, or 44.0%, primarily as a
result of a $1.0 million increase in gain on securities transactions, net for the six months ended
June 30, 2010 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2009. We recognized $1.1 million in gains
on securities transactions during the six months ended June 30, 2010, as compared to $140,000 in
gains on securities transactions during the six months ended June 30, 2009. Securities gains
during the six months ended June 30, 2010 included gross realized gains of $1.0 million on the sale
of available-for-sale securities, coupled with securities gains of $90,000 related to our trading
portfolio. During the six months ended June 30, 2009, securities gains included gross realized
gains of $7,000 on the sale of available-for-sale securities, coupled with securities gains of
$133,000 related to our trading portfolio. We also recognized approximately $197,000 of income on
the sale of fixed assets during the six months ended June 30, 2010.
Non-interest Expense. Non-interest expense increased $735,000, or 4.4%, to $17.6 million for
the six months ended June 30, 2010, from $16.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009. The
increase in non-interest expense during the six months ended June 30, 2010 was primarily
attributable to a $910,000 increase in compensation and employee benefits expense, which resulted
primarily from increases in full time equivalent employees primarily related to our insurance
premium finance division that was formed in October 2009, higher health care costs, and to a lesser
extent, salary adjustments effective January 1, 2010. In addition, other non-interest expense
increased $589,000, or 28.2%. This increase was primarily attributable to an insurance premium
finance division license agreement. These increases in non-interest expense were partially offset
by a decrease of $592,000 in Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation insurance expense over the same
time period. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation insurance expense for the six months ended June
30, 2009 included $770,000 for the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporations special assessment.
Income Tax Expense. We recorded income tax expense of $4.2 million and $2.6 million for the
six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively. The effective tax rate for the six months
ended June 30, 2010, was 35.6%, as compared to 35.3% for the six months ended June 30, 2009. The
increase in the effective tax rate was the result of a higher percentage of pre-tax income being
subject to taxation in 2010 as compared to 2009.
36
Asset Quality
Nonperforming loans totaled $51.5 million (6.7% of total loans) at June 30, 2010, as compared
to $50.0 million (6.8% of total loans) at March 31, 2010, and $41.8 million (5.7% of total loans)
at December 31, 2009. The following table also shows, for the same dates, non-accrual loans,
troubled debt restructurings (accruing and non-accruing), loans 90 days or more past due and still
accruing, non-performing assets, accruing loans delinquent 30 to 89 days, and the ratio of
nonperforming loans to total loans.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At June 30, 2010 |
|
|
At March 31, 2010 |
|
|
At December 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Non-accruing loans |
|
$ |
34,007 |
|
|
$ |
31,248 |
|
|
$ |
30,914 |
|
Non-accruing loans subject to restructuring agreements |
|
|
17,417 |
|
|
|
13,090 |
|
|
|
10,717 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-accruing loans |
|
|
51,424 |
|
|
|
44,338 |
|
|
|
41,631 |
|
Loans 90 days or more past due and still accruing |
|
|
77 |
|
|
|
5,710 |
|
|
|
191 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-performing loans |
|
|
51,501 |
|
|
|
50,048 |
|
|
|
41,822 |
|
Other real estate owned |
|
|
1,362 |
|
|
|
1,533 |
|
|
|
1,938 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-performing assets |
|
$ |
52,863 |
|
|
$ |
51,581 |
|
|
$ |
43,760 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans subject to restructuring agreements and still accruing |
|
$ |
10,708 |
|
|
$ |
8,817 |
|
|
$ |
7,250 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accruing loans 30 to 89 days delinquent |
|
$ |
30,619 |
|
|
$ |
38,371 |
|
|
$ |
28,283 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-performing loans to total loans held for investment, net |
|
|
6.66 |
% |
|
|
6.79 |
% |
|
|
5.73 |
% |
Total non-accruing loans increased $7.1 million to $51.4 million at June 30, 2010, from
$44.3 million at March 31, 2010. This increase was attributable to the following loans being
placed on non-accrual status during the quarter ended June 30, 2010: $7.9 million of commercial
real estate loans, $550,000 of construction and land loans, $381,000 of commercial and industrial
loans, $202,000 of one- to four-family residential loans, and $119,000 of home equity loans. The
above increases in non-accruing loans during the quarter ended June 30, 2010 are net of chargeoffs
of $348,000, and have $181,000 in specific allowances at June 30, 2010. These increases were
partially offset by payoffs of a $557,000 multifamily loan and a $262,000 one- to four-family
residential mortgage loan, coupled with principal paydowns of approximately $1.2 million. At June
30, 2010, $22.4 million, or 79.7%, of loans subject to restructuring agreements (accruing and
non-accruing) were performing in accordance with their restructured terms.
Loans 90 days or more past due and still accruing interest decreased to $77,000 from $5.7
million at March 31, 2010. The majority of the decrease was due to loans being refinanced by us to
permanent real estate mortgage loans in accordance with our current underwriting standards.
Generally, loans are placed on non-accrual status when they become 90 days or more delinquent,
and remain on non-accrual status until they are brought current, have six months of performance
under the loan terms, and factors indicating reasonable doubt about the timely collection of
payments no longer exist. Therefore, loans may be current in accordance with their loan terms, or
may be less than 90 days delinquent, and still be on a non-accruing status.
37
The following tables detail the delinquency status of non-accruing loans at June 30, 2010 and
December 31, 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At June 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
Days Past Due |
|
|
|
0 to 29 |
|
|
30 to 89 |
|
|
90 or more |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Real estate loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial |
|
$ |
7,592 |
|
|
$ |
10,344 |
|
|
$ |
22,468 |
|
|
$ |
40,404 |
|
One- to four-family residential |
|
|
1,362 |
|
|
|
255 |
|
|
|
501 |
|
|
|
2,118 |
|
Construction and land |
|
|
4,579 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
873 |
|
|
|
5,632 |
|
Multifamily |
|
|
|
|
|
|
516 |
|
|
|
1,426 |
|
|
|
1,942 |
|
Home equity and lines of credit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
181 |
|
|
|
181 |
|
Commercial and industrial loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
281 |
|
|
|
789 |
|
|
|
1,070 |
|
Insurance premium loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
77 |
|
|
|
77 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-accruing loans |
|
$ |
13,713 |
|
|
$ |
11,396 |
|
|
$ |
26,315 |
|
|
$ |
51,424 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
Days Past Due |
|
|
|
0 to 29 |
|
|
30 to 89 |
|
|
90 or more |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Real estate loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial |
|
$ |
2,585 |
|
|
$ |
10,480 |
|
|
$ |
15,737 |
|
|
$ |
28,802 |
|
One- to four-family residential |
|
|
|
|
|
|
392 |
|
|
|
1,674 |
|
|
|
2,066 |
|
Construction and land |
|
|
5,864 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
979 |
|
|
|
6,843 |
|
Multifamily |
|
|
|
|
|
|
530 |
|
|
|
1,589 |
|
|
|
2,119 |
|
Home equity and lines of credit |
|
|
62 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
62 |
|
Commercial and industrial loans |
|
|
1,470 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
269 |
|
|
|
1,739 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-accruing loans |
|
$ |
9,981 |
|
|
$ |
11,402 |
|
|
$ |
20,248 |
|
|
$ |
41,631 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A discussion of the most significant nonaccrual loans at June 30, 2010 is as follows.
These loans comprise $28.2 million, or 55.0%, of total nonaccrual loans of $51.4 million at June
30, 2010.
|
|
|
An owner occupied commercial real estate relationship with a carrying value of $8.4
million at June 30, 2010. The business and collateral are located in New Jersey. The
collateral consists of a first mortgage on a commercial manufacturing facility, and a
second mortgage on the primary residence of the owner of the borrower. At June 30,
2010, the relationship is in the process of being restructured to reduce the borrowers
current debt service. |
|
|
|
|
An owner occupied commercial real estate loan with a carrying value of $5.0 million
at June 30, 2010. The business and collateral are located in New Jersey. The
collateral consists of a first mortgage on a manufacturing facility. The operating
company filed for bankruptcy protection in the first quarter of 2010. |
|
|
|
|
A commercial real estate loan with a carrying value of $3.4 million at June 30, 2010
secured by a first mortgage on an office building located in New York. At June 30,
2010, the relationship was in the process of being restructured to reduce the
borrowers current debt service. |
|
|
|
|
A commercial real estate loan with a carrying value of $3.1 million at June 30, 2010
secured by a first mortgage on a retail property in New Jersey, the primary tenant
being a recreational facility. During the quarter ended March 31, 2010, we
restructured the loan to reduce the borrowers debt service. The borrower was
performing in accordance with the restructured terms as of June 30, 2010. |
|
|
|
|
A relationship with a carrying value of $3.0 million at June 30, 2010, consisting of
three loans secured by first mortgages on three individual properties. The largest
loan has a carrying balance of $1.9 million and is secured by a mixed-use commercial
property located in New York. The borrower filed for bankruptcy protection in January
2010. The borrower has made payments and at June 30, 2010 the three loans were each 30
days past due. |
38
|
|
|
A commercial real estate loan with a carrying value of $2.9 million at June 30, 2010
secured by a first mortgage on a commercial property in New Jersey. We are currently
working with the borrower on a forbearance agreement. |
|
|
|
|
A commercial real estate loan with a carrying value of $2.4 million at June 30, 2010
secured by a first mortgage on an owner occupied office building located in New Jersey.
During the quarter ended June 30, 2010, the borrower began making sporadic payments. |
Loans 30 to 89 days delinquent and on accrual status at June 30, 2010 totaled $30.6 million, a
decrease of $7.8 million from the March 31, 2010 balance of $38.4 million. The following table
sets forth our total amounts of delinquencies for accruing loans by type and by amount at June 30,
2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Delinquent Accruing Loans |
|
|
|
30 to 89 Days |
|
|
90 Days and Over |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Real estate loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial |
|
$ |
10,931 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
10,931 |
|
One- to four-family residential |
|
|
4,715 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,715 |
|
Construction and land |
|
|
4,244 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,244 |
|
Multifamily |
|
|
8,100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,100 |
|
Home equity and lines of credit |
|
|
1,138 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,138 |
|
Commercial and industrial loans |
|
|
841 |
|
|
|
77 |
|
|
|
918 |
|
Insurance premium loans |
|
|
538 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
538 |
|
Other loans |
|
|
112 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
112 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
30,619 |
|
|
$ |
77 |
|
|
$ |
30,696 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-accruing loans subject to restructuring agreements totaled $17.4 million and $10.7
million at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively. During the six months ended June 30,
2010, we entered into seven troubled debt restructuring agreements totaling $11.9 million, of which
$3.5 million and $8.4 million were classified as accruing and non-accruing, respectively, at June
30, 2010. The following table sets forth the amounts and categories of the troubled debt
restructurings as of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At June 30, 2010 |
|
|
At December 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
Non-Accruing |
|
|
Accruing |
|
|
Non-Accruing |
|
|
Accruing |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Troubled debt restructurings: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial |
|
$ |
12,295 |
|
|
$ |
7,381 |
|
|
$ |
3,960 |
|
|
$ |
5,499 |
|
One- to four-family residential |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,750 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction and land |
|
|
4,105 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,726 |
|
|
|
1,751 |
|
Multifamily |
|
|
516 |
|
|
|
1,577 |
|
|
|
530 |
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial and industrial |
|
|
501 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
501 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
17,417 |
|
|
$ |
10,708 |
|
|
$ |
10,717 |
|
|
$ |
7,250 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This prospectus contains forward-looking statements, which can be identified by the use of
words such as estimate, project, believe, intend, anticipate, plan, seek, expect
and words of similar meaning. These forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to:
|
|
|
statements of our goals, intentions and expectations; |
|
|
|
|
statements regarding our business plans, prospects, growth and operating
strategies; |
|
|
|
|
statements regarding the quality of our loan and investment portfolios;
and |
|
|
|
|
estimates of our risks and future costs and benefits. |
These forward-looking statements are based on current beliefs and expectations of our
management and are inherently subject to significant business, economic and competitive
uncertainties and contingencies, many of which are beyond our control. In addition, these
forward-looking statements are subject to assumptions with respect to future business strategies
and decisions that are subject to change.
The following factors, among others, could cause actual results to differ materially from the
anticipated results or other expectations expressed in the forward-looking statements:
|
|
|
general economic conditions, either nationally or in our market areas,
that are worse than expected; |
|
|
|
|
competition among depository and other financial institutions; |
|
|
|
|
inflation and changes in the interest rate environment that reduce our
margins or reduce the fair value of financial instruments; |
|
|
|
|
adverse changes in the securities markets; |
|
|
|
|
changes in laws or government regulations or policies affecting financial
institutions, including changes in regulatory fees and capital requirements; |
|
|
|
|
our ability to enter new markets successfully and capitalize on growth
opportunities; |
|
|
|
|
our ability to successfully integrate acquired entities, if any; |
|
|
|
|
changes in consumer spending, borrowing and savings habits; |
|
|
|
|
changes in accounting policies and practices, as may be adopted by the
bank regulatory agencies, the Financial Accounting Standards Board, the Securities and
Exchange Commission and the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board; |
|
|
|
|
changes in our organization, compensation and benefit plans; and |
|
|
|
|
changes in the financial condition, results of operations or future
prospects of issuers of securities that we own. |
40
Because of these and other uncertainties, our actual future results may be materially
different from the results indicated by these forward-looking statements. Please see Risk
Factors beginning on page 16.
HOW WE INTEND TO USE THE PROCEEDS FROM THE OFFERING
Although we cannot determine what the actual net proceeds from the sale of the shares of
common stock in the offering will be until the offering is completed, we anticipate that the net
proceeds will be between $254.0 million and $344.3 million, or $396.2 million if the offering range
is increased by 15%.
We intend to distribute the net proceeds as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Based Upon the Sale at $10.00 Per Share of |
|
|
|
26,350,000 Shares |
|
|
31,000,000 Shares |
|
|
35,650,000 Shares |
|
|
40,997,500 Shares (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of Net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
of Net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
of Net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
of Net |
|
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Proceeds |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Proceeds |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Proceeds |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Proceeds |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Offering proceeds |
|
$ |
263,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
310,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
356,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
409,975 |
|
|
|
|
|
Less offering expenses |
|
|
9,472 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,849 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,225 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,808 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net offering proceeds |
|
$ |
254,028 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
299,151 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
344,275 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
396,167 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distribution of net proceeds: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
To Northfield Bank |
|
$ |
127,014 |
|
|
|
50.0 |
% |
|
$ |
149,576 |
|
|
|
50.0 |
% |
|
$ |
172,138 |
|
|
|
50.0 |
% |
|
$ |
198,084 |
|
|
|
50.0 |
% |
To fund loan to employee
stock ownership plan |
|
$ |
10,540 |
|
|
|
4.1 |
% |
|
$ |
12,400 |
|
|
|
4.1 |
% |
|
$ |
14,260 |
|
|
|
4.1 |
% |
|
$ |
16,399 |
|
|
|
4.1 |
% |
Retained by
Northfield-Delaware (2) |
|
$ |
116,474 |
|
|
|
45.9 |
% |
|
$ |
137,175 |
|
|
|
45.9 |
% |
|
$ |
157,877 |
|
|
|
45.9 |
% |
|
$ |
181,684 |
|
|
|
45.9 |
% |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
As adjusted to give effect to an increase in the number of shares, which could occur due to a
15% increase in the offering range to reflect demand for the shares or changes in market
conditions following the commencement of the offering. |
|
(2) |
|
In the event the stock-based benefit plan providing for stock awards and stock options is
approved by stockholders, and assuming shares are purchased for the stock awards at $10.00 per
share, an additional $10.5 million, $12.4 million, $14.3 million and $16.4 million of net
proceeds will be used by Northfield-Delaware. In this case, the net proceeds retained by
Northfield-Delaware would be $105.9 million, $124.8 million, $143.6 million and $165.3
million, respectively, at the minimum, midpoint, maximum and adjusted maximum of the offering
range. |
Payments for shares of common stock made through withdrawals from existing deposit
accounts will not result in the receipt of new funds for investment but will result in a reduction
of Northfield Banks deposits. The net proceeds may vary because total expenses relating to the
offering may be more or less than our estimates. For example, our expenses would increase if a
syndicated community offering were used to sell shares of common stock not purchased in the
subscription and community offerings. In addition, amounts shown for the distribution of the net
proceeds at the minimum of the offering range to fund the loan to the employee stock ownership plan
and to be proceeds retained by Northfield-Delaware may change if we exercise our right to have the
employee stock ownership plan purchase more than 4% of the shares of common stock offered if
necessary to complete the offering at the minimum of the offering range.
Northfield-Delaware may use the proceeds it retains from the offering:
|
|
|
to invest in securities; |
|
|
|
|
to finance the acquisition of financial institutions, although we do not
currently have any agreements or understandings regarding any specific acquisition
transaction; |
|
|
|
|
to pay cash dividends to stockholders; |
|
|
|
|
to repurchase shares of our common stock; and |
41
|
|
|
for other general corporate purposes. |
Initially, a substantial portion of the net proceeds will be invested in short-term
investments, investment-grade debt obligations and mortgage-backed securities.
See Our Dividend Policy for a discussion of our expected dividend policy following the
completion of the conversion. Under current Office of Thrift Supervision regulations, we may not
repurchase shares of our common stock during the first year following the completion of the
conversion, except when extraordinary circumstances exist and with prior regulatory approval, or
except to fund management recognition plans (which would require notification to the Office of
Thrift Supervision) or tax qualified employee stock benefit plans.
Northfield Bank may use the net proceeds it receives from the offering:
|
|
|
to fund new loans, with an emphasis on commercial real estate and
multifamily real estate loans, as well as commercial business loans, one- to
four-family residential mortgage loans, insurance premium finance loans, real estate
construction loans, home equity loans and lines of credit and consumer loans; |
|
|
|
|
to expand its retail banking franchise by establishing or acquiring new
branches or by acquiring other financial institutions or other financial services
companies as opportunities arise, although we do not currently have any understandings
or agreements to acquire a financial institution or other entity. We currently intend
to open nine new branch offices by December 31, 2013, and we have currently committed
to establishing three new branch offices in Brooklyn, New York and one branch office in
Staten Island, New York. We also intend to establish an internet banking platform
during that same time period; |
|
|
|
|
to enhance existing products and services and to support the development
of new products and services; |
|
|
|
|
to invest in mortgage-backed securities and collateralized mortgage
obligations, and debt securities issued by the U.S. Government, U.S. Government
agencies or U.S. Government sponsored enterprises; and |
|
|
|
|
for other general corporate purposes. |
Initially, a substantial portion of the net proceeds will be invested in short-term
investments, investment-grade debt obligations and mortgage-backed securities. We have not
determined specific amounts of the net proceeds that would be used for the purposes described
above. The use of the proceeds outlined above may change based on many factors, including, but not
limited to, changes in interest rates, equity markets, laws and regulations affecting the financial
services industry, our relative position in the financial services industry, the attractiveness of
potential acquisitions to expand our operations, and overall market conditions. The use of the
proceeds may also change depending on our ability to receive regulatory approval to establish new
branches or acquire other financial institutions. We estimate the costs of constructing a new
branch office to be between approximately $1.0 million and $3.0 million, depending on the size and
location of the branch office, excluding the costs to acquire land, which we generally lease.
We expect our return on equity to decrease as compared to our performance in recent years,
until we are able to reinvest effectively the additional capital raised in the offering. Until we
can increase our net interest income and non-interest income, we expect our return on equity to be
below the industry average, which may negatively affect the value of our common stock. See Risk
FactorsOur failure to effectively deploy the net proceeds may have an adverse effect on our
financial performance and the value of our common stock.
42
OUR DIVIDEND POLICY
Northfield-Federal currently pays a quarterly cash dividend of $0.05 per share, which equals
$0.20 per share on an annualized basis. After the conversion, we intend to continue to pay cash
dividends on a quarterly basis. We expect the quarterly dividends per share to be between $0.03
and $0.04 per share, depending on how many shares of common stock are sold in the offering. This
would approximately preserve the dividend amount that Northfield-Federal stockholders currently
receive, as adjusted to reflect the exchange ratio. The dividend rate and the continued payment of
dividends will depend on a number of factors, including our capital requirements, our financial
condition and results of operations, tax considerations, statutory and regulatory limitations, and
general economic conditions. We cannot assure you that we will not reduce or eliminate dividends
in the future.
Northfield-Federal began declaring dividends during the quarter ended December 31, 2008, and
dividends have been declared in each subsequent quarterly period. Northfield Bancorp, MHC owns
24,641,684 shares of Northfield-Federal common stock. Northfield-Federal has received
non-objection from the Office of Thrift Supervision to waive receipt of all prior dividend payments
on the Northfield-Federal shares owned by Northfield Bancorp, MHC. Cash dividends paid by
Northfield-Federal during the three months ended March 31, 2010 were $772,000. Dividends waived by
Northfield Bancorp, MHC during the three months ended March 31, 2010 were $986,000.
Under the rules of the Office of Thrift Supervision, after the completion of the conversion,
Northfield Bank will not be permitted to pay dividends on its capital stock to Northfield-Delaware,
its sole stockholder, if Northfield Banks stockholders equity would be reduced below the amount
of the liquidation account established in connection with the conversion. In addition, Northfield
Bank will not be permitted to make a capital distribution if, after making such distribution, it
would be undercapitalized. Northfield Bank must generally file an application with the Office of
Thrift Supervision for approval of a capital distribution if the total capital distributions for
the applicable calendar year exceed the sum of Northfield Banks net income for that year to date
plus its retained net income for the preceding two years or Northfield Bank would not be at least
adequately capitalized following the distribution. In addition, any payment of dividends by
Northfield Bank to us that would be deemed to be drawn out of Northfield Banks bad debt reserves,
if any, would require a payment of taxes at the then-current tax rate by Northfield Bank on the
amount of earnings deemed to be removed from the reserves for such distribution. Northfield Bank
does not intend to make any distribution to us that would create such a federal tax liability. See
The Conversion and OfferingLiquidation Rights. For further information concerning additional
federal and state law and regulations regarding the ability of Northfield Bank to make capital
distributions, including the payment of dividends to Northfield-Federal, see TaxationFederal
Taxation and Supervision and RegulationFederal Banking Regulation.
Unlike Northfield Bank, Northfield-Delaware is not restricted by Office of Thrift Supervision
regulations on the payment of dividends to its stockholders, except that it will not be permitted
to pay dividends on its common stock if its stockholders equity would be reduced below the amount
of the liquidation account established by Northfield-Delaware in connection with the conversion.
However, the source of dividends will depend on the net proceeds retained by Northfield-Delaware
and earnings thereon, and dividends from Northfield Bank. In addition, Northfield-Delaware will be
subject to state law limitations on the payment of dividends. Delaware law generally limits
dividends to our capital surplus or, if there is no capital surplus, our net profits for the fiscal
year in which the dividend is declared and/or the preceding fiscal year.
We will file a consolidated federal tax return with Northfield Bank. Accordingly, it is
anticipated that any cash distributions made by us to our stockholders would be treated as cash
dividends and not as a non-taxable return of capital for federal tax purposes. Additionally,
pursuant to Office of Thrift Supervision regulations, during the three-year period following the
conversion, we will not take any action to declare an extraordinary dividend to stockholders that
would be treated by recipients as a tax-free return of capital for federal income tax purposes.
43
MARKET FOR THE COMMON STOCK
Northfield-Federals common stock is currently quoted on the Nasdaq Global Select Market under
the symbol NFBK. Upon completion of the conversion, the new shares of common stock of
Northfield-Delaware will replace the existing shares. For a period of 20 trading days after the
completion of the conversion and offering, we expect our shares of common stock will trade on the
Nasdaq Global Select Market under the symbol NFBKD, and, thereafter, our trading symbol will
revert to NFBK. In order to list our stock on the Nasdaq Global Select Market, we are required
to have at least three broker-dealers who will make a market in our common stock. As of March 31,
2010, Northfield-Federal had 22 registered market makers in its common stock, including Sandler
ONeill & Partners, L.P. Sandler ONeill & Partners, L.P. has advised us that it intends to make a
market in our common stock following the offering, but it is under no obligation to do so.
The development of a public market having the desirable characteristics of depth, liquidity
and orderliness depends on the existence of willing buyers and sellers, the presence of which is
not within our control or that of any market maker. The number of active buyers and sellers of our
common stock at any particular time may be limited, which may have an adverse effect on the price
at which our common stock can be sold. There can be no assurance that persons purchasing the
common stock will be able to sell their shares at or above the $10.00 price per share in the
offering. Purchasers of our common stock should have a long-term investment intent and should
recognize that there may be a limited trading market in our common stock.
The following table sets forth the high and low trading prices for shares of
Northfield-Federal common stock for the periods indicated, and the dividends paid during those
periods. As of the close of business on July 30, 2010, there were 43,540,653 shares of common
stock outstanding, including 18,898,969 publicly held shares (shares held by stockholders other
than Northfield Bancorp, MHC), and approximately 4,683 stockholders of record.
The high and low closing prices for the quarterly periods noted below were obtained from the
Nasdaq Stock Market.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Price Per Share |
|
|
|
|
High |
|
Low |
|
Dividends Paid |
2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Third quarter (through August 6, 2010) |
|
$ |
13.81 |
|
|
$ |
12.09 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Second quarter |
|
$ |
15.30 |
|
|
$ |
12.80 |
|
|
$ |
0.05 |
|
First quarter |
|
$ |
15.00 |
|
|
$ |
12.29 |
|
|
$ |
0.04 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fourth quarter |
|
$ |
13.94 |
|
|
$ |
12.09 |
|
|
$ |
0.04 |
|
Third quarter |
|
$ |
13.10 |
|
|
$ |
11.01 |
|
|
$ |
0.04 |
|
Second quarter |
|
$ |
12.19 |
|
|
$ |
10.25 |
|
|
$ |
0.04 |
|
First quarter |
|
$ |
11.25 |
|
|
$ |
8.18 |
|
|
$ |
0.04 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fourth quarter |
|
$ |
12.50 |
|
|
$ |
9.22 |
|
|
$ |
0.04 |
|
Third quarter |
|
$ |
13.15 |
|
|
$ |
10.25 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Second quarter |
|
$ |
11.75 |
|
|
$ |
10.02 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
First quarter |
|
$ |
10.77 |
|
|
$ |
9.78 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
On June 3, 2010, the business day immediately preceding the public announcement of the
conversion, and on August 6, 2010, the closing prices of Northfield-Federal common stock as
reported on the Nasdaq Global Select Market were $14.58 per share and $12.50 per share,
respectively. On the effective date of the conversion, all publicly held shares of
Northfield-Federal common stock, including shares of common stock held by our officers and
directors, will be converted automatically into and become the right to receive a number of shares
of Northfield-Delaware common stock determined pursuant to the exchange ratio. See The Conversion
and OfferingShare
44
Exchange Ratio for Current Stockholders. Options to purchase shares of Northfield-Federal
common stock will be converted into options to purchase a number of shares of Northfield-Delaware
common stock determined pursuant to the exchange ratio, for the same aggregate exercise price. See
Beneficial Ownership of Common Stock.
HISTORICAL AND PRO FORMA REGULATORY CAPITAL COMPLIANCE
At March 31, 2010, Northfield Bank exceeded all of the applicable regulatory capital
requirements and was considered well capitalized. The table below sets forth the historical
equity capital and regulatory capital of Northfield Bank at March 31, 2010, and the pro forma
equity capital and regulatory capital of Northfield Bank, after giving effect to the sale of shares
of common stock at $10.00 per share. The table assumes the receipt by Northfield Bank of 50% of
the net offering proceeds. See How We Intend to Use the Proceeds from the Offering.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Northfield Bank |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Historical at |
|
|
Pro Forma at March 31, 2010, Based Upon the Sale in the Offering of (1) |
|
|
|
March 31, 2010 |
|
|
26,350,000 Shares |
|
|
31,000,000 Shares |
|
|
35,650,000 Shares |
|
|
40,997,500 Shares (2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of |
|
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Assets (3) |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Assets (3) |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Assets (3) |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Assets (3) |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Assets (3) |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Equity |
|
$ |
310,204 |
|
|
|
15.17 |
% |
|
$ |
416,138 |
|
|
|
19.16 |
% |
|
$ |
434,980 |
|
|
|
19.82 |
% |
|
$ |
453,822 |
|
|
|
20.47 |
% |
|
$ |
475,490 |
|
|
|
21.20 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Core capital |
|
$ |
278,658 |
|
|
|
13.91 |
% |
|
$ |
384,592 |
|
|
|
18.06 |
% |
|
$ |
403,434 |
|
|
|
18.74 |
% |
|
$ |
422,276 |
|
|
|
19.41 |
% |
|
$ |
443,944 |
|
|
|
20.17 |
% |
Core requirement (4) |
|
|
100,152 |
|
|
|
5.00 |
|
|
|
106,503 |
|
|
|
5.00 |
|
|
|
107,631 |
|
|
|
5.00 |
|
|
|
108,759 |
|
|
|
5.00 |
|
|
|
110,056 |
|
|
|
5.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Excess |
|
$ |
178,506 |
|
|
|
8.91 |
% |
|
$ |
278,089 |
|
|
|
13.06 |
% |
|
$ |
295,803 |
|
|
|
13.74 |
% |
|
$ |
313,517 |
|
|
|
14.41 |
% |
|
$ |
333,888 |
|
|
|
15.17 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tier 1 risk-based
capital (5) |
|
$ |
278,658 |
|
|
|
27.31 |
% |
|
$ |
384,592 |
|
|
|
36.77 |
% |
|
$ |
403,434 |
|
|
|
38.41 |
% |
|
$ |
422,276 |
|
|
|
40.03 |
% |
|
$ |
443,944 |
|
|
|
41.88 |
% |
Risk-based
requirement |
|
|
61,226 |
|
|
|
6.00 |
|
|
|
62,750 |
|
|
|
6.00 |
|
|
|
63,021 |
|
|
|
6.00 |
|
|
|
63,291 |
|
|
|
6.00 |
|
|
|
63,603 |
|
|
|
6.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Excess |
|
$ |
217,432 |
|
|
|
21.31 |
% |
|
$ |
321,842 |
|
|
|
30.77 |
% |
|
$ |
340,413 |
|
|
|
32.41 |
% |
|
$ |
358,985 |
|
|
|
34.03 |
% |
|
$ |
380,341 |
|
|
|
35.88 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total risk-based
capital (5) |
|
$ |
291,780 |
|
|
|
28.59 |
% |
|
$ |
397,714 |
|
|
|
38.03 |
% |
|
$ |
416,556 |
|
|
|
39.66 |
% |
|
$ |
435,398 |
|
|
|
41.28 |
% |
|
$ |
457,066 |
|
|
|
43.12 |
% |
Risk-based
requirement |
|
|
102,043 |
|
|
|
10.00 |
|
|
|
104,583 |
|
|
|
10.00 |
|
|
|
105,034 |
|
|
|
10.00 |
|
|
|
105,485 |
|
|
|
10.00 |
|
|
|
106,004 |
|
|
|
10.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Excess |
|
$ |
189,737 |
|
|
|
18.59 |
% |
|
$ |
293,131 |
|
|
|
28.03 |
% |
|
$ |
311,522 |
|
|
|
29.66 |
% |
|
$ |
329,913 |
|
|
|
31.28 |
% |
|
$ |
351,062 |
|
|
|
33.12 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reconciliation of capital infused into Northfield
Bank: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net proceeds |
|
$ |
127,014 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
149,576 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
172,138 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
198,084 |
|
|
|
|
|
Less: Common stock acquired by stock-based benefit
plan |
|
|
(10,540 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12,400 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14,260 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(16,399 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Less: Common stock acquired by employee stock
ownership plan |
|
|
(10,540 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12,400 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14,260 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(16,399 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma increase |
|
$ |
105,934 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
124,776 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
143,618 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
165,286 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Pro forma capital levels assume that the employee stock ownership plan purchases 4% of the
shares of common stock sold in the stock offering with funds we lend. Pro forma generally
accepted accounting principles (GAAP) and regulatory capital have been reduced by the amount
required to fund this plan. See Management for a discussion of the employee stock ownership
plan. |
|
(2) |
|
As adjusted to give effect to an increase in the number of shares which could occur due to a
15% increase in the offering range to reflect demand for the shares or changes in market
conditions following the commencement of the offering. |
|
(3) |
|
Tangible and core capital levels are shown as a percentage of total adjusted assets.
Risk-based capital levels are shown as a percentage of risk-weighted assets. |
|
(4) |
|
The current Office of Thrift Supervision core capital requirement for financial institutions
is 3% of total adjusted assets for financial institutions that receive the highest supervisory
rating for safety and soundness and a 4% to 5% core capital ratio requirement for all other
financial institutions. |
|
(5) |
|
Pro forma amounts and percentages assume net proceeds are invested in assets that carry a 20%
risk weighting. |
45
CAPITALIZATION
The following table presents the historical consolidated capitalization of Northfield-Federal
at March 31, 2010 and the pro forma consolidated capitalization of Northfield-Delaware after giving
effect to the conversion and offering, based upon the assumptions set forth in the Pro Forma Data
section.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Northfield- |
|
|
Pro Forma at March 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
Federal |
|
|
Based upon the Sale in the Offering at $10.00 per Share of |
|
|
|
Historical at |
|
|
26,350,000 |
|
|
31,000,000 |
|
|
35,650,000 |
|
|
40,997,500 |
|
|
|
March 31, 2010 |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Shares (1) |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Deposits (2) |
|
$ |
1,392,905 |
|
|
$ |
1,392,445 |
|
|
$ |
1,392,445 |
|
|
$ |
1,392,445 |
|
|
$ |
1,392,445 |
|
Borrowed funds |
|
|
293,060 |
|
|
|
293,060 |
|
|
|
293,060 |
|
|
|
293,060 |
|
|
|
293,060 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deposits and borrowed funds |
|
$ |
1,685,965 |
|
|
$ |
1,685,505 |
|
|
$ |
1,685,505 |
|
|
$ |
1,685,505 |
|
|
$ |
1,685,505 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value,
25,000,000 shares authorized
(post-conversion) (3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $0.01 par value,
150,000,000 shares authorized
(post-conversion); shares to be
issued as reflected (3) (4) |
|
|
456 |
|
|
|
466 |
|
|
|
548 |
|
|
|
630 |
|
|
|
724 |
|
Additional paid-in capital (3) |
|
|
203,541 |
|
|
|
457,559 |
|
|
|
502,601 |
|
|
|
547,642 |
|
|
|
599,440 |
|
MHC capital contribution |
|
|
|
|
|
|
362 |
|
|
|
362 |
|
|
|
362 |
|
|
|
362 |
|
Retained earnings (5) |
|
|
214,779 |
|
|
|
214,779 |
|
|
|
214,779 |
|
|
|
214,779 |
|
|
|
214,779 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive
income |
|
|
15,690 |
|
|
|
15,690 |
|
|
|
15,690 |
|
|
|
15,690 |
|
|
|
15,690 |
|
Less: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Treasury stock |
|
|
(22,520 |
) |
|
|
(22,520 |
) |
|
|
(22,520 |
) |
|
|
(22,520 |
) |
|
|
(22,520 |
) |
Common stock held by employee
stock ownership plan (6) |
|
|
(15,660 |
) |
|
|
(26,200 |
) |
|
|
(28,060 |
) |
|
|
(29,920 |
) |
|
|
(32,059 |
) |
Common stock to be acquired by
stock-based benefit plan (7) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10,540 |
) |
|
|
(12,400 |
) |
|
|
(14,260 |
) |
|
|
(16,399 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
$ |
396,286 |
|
|
$ |
629,596 |
|
|
$ |
670,999 |
|
|
$ |
712,403 |
|
|
$ |
760,017 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro Forma Shares Outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares offered for sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,350,000 |
|
|
|
31,000,000 |
|
|
|
35,650,000 |
|
|
|
40,997,500 |
|
Exchange shares issued |
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,209,164 |
|
|
|
23,775,487 |
|
|
|
27,341,810 |
|
|
|
31,443,082 |
|
Total shares outstanding |
|
|
43,722,522 |
|
|
|
46,559,164 |
|
|
|
54,775,487 |
|
|
|
62,991,810 |
|
|
|
72,440,582 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity as a
percentage of total assets (2) |
|
|
18.89 |
% |
|
|
27.01 |
% |
|
|
28.29 |
% |
|
|
29.52 |
% |
|
|
30.88 |
% |
Tangible equity as a percentage of
total assets |
|
|
18.11 |
% |
|
|
26.31 |
% |
|
|
27.60 |
% |
|
|
28.84 |
% |
|
|
30.22 |
% |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
As adjusted to give effect to an increase in the number of shares of common stock that
could occur due to a 15% increase in the offering range to reflect demand for shares or
changes in market conditions following the commencement of the subscription and community
offerings. |
|
(2) |
|
Does not reflect withdrawals from deposit accounts for the purchase of shares of common
stock in the conversion and offering. These withdrawals would reduce pro forma deposits
and assets by the amount of the withdrawals. |
|
(3) |
|
Northfield-Federal currently has 10,000,000 authorized shares of preferred stock and
90,000,000 authorized shares of common stock, par value $0.01 per share. On a pro forma
basis, common stock and additional paid-in capital have been revised to reflect the number
of shares of Northfield-Delaware common stock to be outstanding. |
|
(4) |
|
No effect has been given to the issuance of additional shares of Northfield-Delaware
common stock pursuant to the exercise of options under one or more stock-based benefit
plans. If the plans are implemented within the first year after the closing of the
offering, an amount up to 10% of the shares of Northfield-Delaware common stock sold in
the offering will be reserved for issuance upon the exercise of options under the plans,
subject to adjustment as may be required by Office of Thrift Supervision regulations or
policy to reflect stock options previously granted by Northfield-Federal or Northfield
Bank so that the total shares available for issuance upon the exercise of stock options
does not exceed 10% of Northfield-Delawares outstanding shares immediately after the
conversion and offering. No effect has been given to the exercise of options currently
outstanding. See Management. |
(Footnotes continue on following page)
46
(continued from previous page)
|
|
|
(5) |
|
The retained earnings of Northfield Bank will be substantially restricted after the
conversion. See The Conversion and OfferingLiquidation Rights and Supervision and
RegulationFederal Banking Regulation. |
|
(6) |
|
Assumes that 4% of the shares sold in the offering will be acquired by the employee stock
ownership plan financed by a loan from Northfield-Delaware. The loan will be repaid
principally from Northfield Banks contributions to the employee stock ownership plan.
Since Northfield-Delaware will finance the employee stock ownership plan debt, this debt
will be eliminated through consolidation and no liability will be reflected on
Northfield-Delawares consolidated financial statements. Accordingly, the amount of
shares of common stock acquired by the employee stock ownership plan is shown in this
table as a reduction of total stockholders equity. |
|
(7) |
|
Assumes a number of shares of common stock equal to 4% of the shares of common stock to
be sold in the offering will be purchased for grant by one or more stock-based benefit
plans. If the stock-based benefit plans are adopted within 12 months following the
conversion, the amount reserved for restricted stock awards would be subject to adjustment
as may be required by Office of Thrift Supervision regulations or policy to reflect
restricted stock previously granted by Northfield-Federal or Northfield Bank so that the
total shares reserved for restricted stock awards does not exceed 4% of
Northfield-Delawares outstanding shares immediately after the conversion and offering.
The funds to be used by the plan to purchase the shares will be provided by
Northfield-Delaware. The dollar amount of common stock to be purchased is based on the
$10.00 per share subscription price in the offering and represents unearned compensation.
This amount does not reflect possible increases or decreases in the value of common stock
relative to the subscription price in the offering. As Northfield-Delaware accrues
compensation expense to reflect the vesting of shares pursuant to the plan, the credit to
capital will be offset by a charge to operations. Implementation of the plan will require
stockholder approval. |
47
PRO FORMA DATA
The following table summarizes historical data of Northfield-Federal and pro forma data of
Northfield-Delaware at and for the three months ended March 31, 2010, and the year ended December
31, 2009. This information is based on assumptions set forth below and in the tables, and should
not be used as a basis for projections of market value of the shares of common stock following the
conversion and offering.
The net proceeds in the tables are based upon the following assumptions:
|
(i) |
|
50% of all shares of common stock will be sold in the subscription and
community offerings; |
|
|
(ii) |
|
our executive officers and directors, and their associates, will purchase
89,000 shares of common stock; |
|
|
(iii) |
|
our employee stock ownership plan will purchase 4% of the shares of common
stock sold in the offering, with a loan from Northfield-Delaware. The loan will be
repaid in substantially equal payments of principal and interest (at the prime rate of
interest, calculated as of the date of the origination of the loan) over a period of 30
years. Interest income that we earn on the loan will offset the interest paid by
Northfield Bank; |
|
|
(iv) |
|
Sandler ONeill & Partners, L.P. will receive a fee equal to 1.0% of the
aggregate gross proceeds received on all shares of common stock sold in the
subscription and community offerings and we will pay (a) a management fee of 1.0% of
the aggregate dollar amount of the common stock sold in the syndicated community
offering, 80% of which will be paid to Sandler ONeill & Partners, L.P. and 20% of
which will be paid to Keefe, Bruyette & Woods, Inc., and (b) a selling concession of
4.0% of the actual purchase price of each share of common stock sold in the syndicated
community offering, which will be allocated to dealers (including Sandler ONeill &
Partners, L.P. and Keefe, Bruyette & Woods, Inc.) in accordance with the actual number
of shares of common stock sold by such dealers. No fee will be paid with respect to
shares of common stock purchased by our qualified and non-qualified employee stock
benefit plans, or stock purchased by our officers, directors and employees, and their
immediate families, and no fee will be paid with respect to exchange shares; and |
|
|
(v) |
|
total expenses of the offering, other than the fees to be paid to Sandler
ONeill & Partners, L.P., Keefe, Bruyette & Woods, Inc. and other broker-dealers in the
syndicated community offering, will be $1.7 million. |
We calculated pro forma consolidated net income for the three months ended March 31, 2010, and
the year ended December 31, 2009, as if the estimated net proceeds we received had been invested at
the beginning of the period at an assumed interest rate of 2.55% (1.53% on an after-tax basis).
This represents the yield on the five-year U.S. Treasury Note as of March 31, 2010, which, in light
of current market interest rates, we consider to more accurately reflect the pro forma reinvestment
rate than the arithmetic average of the weighted average yield earned on our interest earning
assets and the weighted average rate paid on our deposits, which is the reinvestment rate generally
required by Office of Thrift Supervision regulations.
We further believe that the reinvestment rate is factually supportable because:
|
|
|
the yield on the U.S Treasury Note can be determined and/or estimated from
third-party sources; and |
|
|
|
|
we believe that U.S. Treasury securities are not subject to credit losses due to a
U.S. Government guarantee of payment of principal and interest. |
48
We calculated historical and pro forma per share amounts by dividing historical and pro forma
amounts of consolidated net income and stockholders equity by the indicated number of shares of
common stock. We adjusted these figures to give effect to the shares of common stock purchased by
the employee stock ownership plan. We computed per share amounts for each period as if the shares
of common stock were outstanding at the beginning of each period, but we did not adjust per share
historical or pro forma stockholders equity to reflect the earnings on the estimated net proceeds.
The pro forma table gives effect to the implementation of one or more stock-based benefit
plans. Subject to the receipt of stockholder approval, we have assumed that the stock-based
benefit plans will acquire for restricted stock awards a number of shares of common stock equal to
4% of the shares of common stock sold in the stock offering at the same price for which they were
sold in the stock offering. We assume that awards of common stock granted under the plans vest
over a five-year period.
We have also assumed that the stock-based benefit plans will grant options to acquire shares
of common stock equal to 10% of the shares of common stock sold in the stock offering. In
preparing the table below, we assumed that stockholder approval was obtained, that the exercise
price of the stock options and the market price of the stock at the date of grant were $10.00 per
share and that the stock options had a term of ten years and vested over five years. We applied
the Black-Scholes option pricing model to estimate a grant-date fair value of $3.73 for each
option. In addition to the terms of the options described above, the Black-Scholes option pricing
model assumed an estimated volatility rate of 38.29% for the shares of common stock, a dividend
yield of 1.4%, an expected option life of 6.5 years and a risk-free rate of return of 3.10%.
We may grant options and award shares of common stock under one or more stock-based benefit
plans in excess of 10% and 4%, respectively, of the shares of common stock sold in the stock
offering and that vest sooner than over a five-year period if the stock-based benefit plans are
adopted more than one year following the stock offering.
As discussed under How We Intend to Use the Proceeds from the Stock Offering, we intend to
contribute 50% of the net proceeds from the stock offering to Northfield Bank, and we will retain
the remainder of the net proceeds from the stock offering. We will use a portion of the proceeds
we retain for the purpose of making a loan to the employee stock ownership plan and retain the rest
of the proceeds for future use.
The pro forma table does not give effect to:
|
|
|
withdrawals from deposit accounts for the purpose of purchasing shares of
common stock in the stock offering; |
|
|
|
|
our results of operations after the stock offering; or |
|
|
|
|
changes in the market price of the shares of common stock after the stock
offering. |
The following pro forma information may not be
representative of the financial effects of the
offering at the dates on which the offering actually
occurs, and should not be taken as indicative of
future results of operations. Pro forma consolidated
stockholders equity represents the difference between
the stated amounts of our assets and liabilities. The
pro forma stockholders equity is not intended to
represent the fair market value of the shares of
common stock and may be different than the amounts
that would be available for distribution to
stockholders if we liquidated. Moreover, pro forma
stockholders equity per share does not give effect to
the liquidation accounts to be established in the
conversion or, in the unlikely event of a liquidation
of Northfield Bank, to the tax effect of the recapture
of the bad debt reserve. See The Conversion and
OfferingLiquidation Rights.
49
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At or for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
Based upon the Sale at $10.00 Per Share of |
|
|
|
26,350,000 |
|
|
31,000,000 |
|
|
35,650,000 |
|
|
40,997,500 |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Shares (1) |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts) |
|
Gross proceeds of offering |
|
$ |
263,500 |
|
|
$ |
310,000 |
|
|
$ |
356,500 |
|
|
$ |
409,975 |
|
Market value of shares issued in the exchange |
|
|
202,092 |
|
|
|
237,755 |
|
|
|
273,418 |
|
|
|
314,431 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma market capitalization |
|
$ |
465,592 |
|
|
$ |
547,755 |
|
|
$ |
629,918 |
|
|
$ |
724,406 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross proceeds of offering |
|
$ |
263,500 |
|
|
$ |
310,000 |
|
|
$ |
356,500 |
|
|
$ |
409,975 |
|
Expenses |
|
|
9,472 |
|
|
|
10,849 |
|
|
|
12,225 |
|
|
|
13,808 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated net proceeds |
|
|
254,028 |
|
|
|
299,151 |
|
|
|
344,275 |
|
|
|
396,167 |
|
Common stock purchased by employee stock ownership plan |
|
|
(10,540 |
) |
|
|
(12,400 |
) |
|
|
(14,260 |
) |
|
|
(16,399 |
) |
Common stock purchased by stock-based benefit plan |
|
|
(10,540 |
) |
|
|
(12,400 |
) |
|
|
(14,260 |
) |
|
|
(16,399 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated net proceeds, as adjusted |
|
$ |
232,948 |
|
|
$ |
274,351 |
|
|
$ |
315,755 |
|
|
$ |
363,369 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated net earnings: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Historical |
|
$ |
3,381 |
|
|
$ |
3,381 |
|
|
$ |
3,381 |
|
|
$ |
3,381 |
|
Pro forma adjustments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income on adjusted net proceeds |
|
|
891 |
|
|
|
1,049 |
|
|
|
1,208 |
|
|
|
1,390 |
|
Employee stock ownership plan (2) |
|
|
(53 |
) |
|
|
(62 |
) |
|
|
(71 |
) |
|
|
(82 |
) |
Stock awards (3) |
|
|
(316 |
) |
|
|
(372 |
) |
|
|
(428 |
) |
|
|
(492 |
) |
Stock options (4) |
|
|
(442 |
) |
|
|
(520 |
) |
|
|
(598 |
) |
|
|
(688 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma net income |
|
$ |
3,461 |
|
|
$ |
3,476 |
|
|
$ |
3,492 |
|
|
$ |
3,509 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share (5): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Historical |
|
$ |
0.08 |
|
|
$ |
0.07 |
|
|
$ |
0.06 |
|
|
$ |
0.05 |
|
Pro form adjustments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income on adjusted net proceeds |
|
|
0.02 |
|
|
|
0.02 |
|
|
|
0.02 |
|
|
|
0.02 |
|
Employee stock ownership plan (2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock awards (3) |
|
|
(0.01 |
) |
|
|
(0.01 |
) |
|
|
(0.01 |
) |
|
|
(0.01 |
) |
Stock options (4) |
|
|
(0.01 |
) |
|
|
(0.01 |
) |
|
|
(0.01 |
) |
|
|
(0.01 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma earnings per share (5) |
|
$ |
0.08 |
|
|
$ |
0.07 |
|
|
$ |
0.06 |
|
|
$ |
0.05 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Offering price to pro forma net earnings per share |
|
|
31.25 |
x |
|
|
35.71 |
x |
|
|
41.67 |
x |
|
|
50.00 |
x |
Number of shares used in earnings per share calculations |
|
|
43,341,632 |
|
|
|
50,990,156 |
|
|
|
58,638,679 |
|
|
|
67,434,481 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At March 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Historical |
|
$ |
396,286 |
|
|
$ |
396,286 |
|
|
$ |
396,286 |
|
|
$ |
396,286 |
|
Estimated net proceeds |
|
|
254,028 |
|
|
|
299,151 |
|
|
|
344,275 |
|
|
|
396,167 |
|
Equity increase from the mutual holding company |
|
|
362 |
|
|
|
362 |
|
|
|
362 |
|
|
|
362 |
|
Common stock acquired by employee stock ownership plan
(2) |
|
|
(10,540 |
) |
|
|
(12,400 |
) |
|
|
(14,260 |
) |
|
|
(16,399 |
) |
Common stock acquired by stock-based benefit plan (3) |
|
|
(10,540 |
) |
|
|
(12,400 |
) |
|
|
(14,260 |
) |
|
|
(16,399 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma stockholders equity |
|
$ |
629,596 |
|
|
$ |
670,999 |
|
|
$ |
712,403 |
|
|
$ |
760,017 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intangible assets |
|
$ |
(16,318 |
) |
|
$ |
(16,318 |
) |
|
$ |
(16,318 |
) |
|
$ |
(16,318 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma tangible stockholders equity (6) |
|
$ |
613,278 |
|
|
$ |
654,681 |
|
|
$ |
696,085 |
|
|
$ |
743,699 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity per share:(7) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Historical |
|
$ |
8.51 |
|
|
$ |
7.24 |
|
|
$ |
6.29 |
|
|
$ |
5.48 |
|
Estimated net proceeds |
|
|
5.46 |
|
|
|
5.46 |
|
|
|
5.47 |
|
|
|
5.47 |
|
Plus: Assets received from the mutual holding company |
|
|
0.01 |
|
|
|
0.01 |
|
|
|
0.01 |
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock acquired by employee stock ownership plan
(2) |
|
|
(0.23 |
) |
|
|
(0.23 |
) |
|
|
(0.23 |
) |
|
|
(0.23 |
) |
Common stock acquired by stock-based benefit plan (3) |
|
|
(0.23 |
) |
|
|
(0.23 |
) |
|
|
(0.23 |
) |
|
|
(0.23 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma stockholders equity per share (6) (7) |
|
$ |
13.52 |
|
|
$ |
12.25 |
|
|
$ |
11.31 |
|
|
$ |
10.49 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intangible assets |
|
$ |
(0.35 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.30 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.26 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.23 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma tangible stockholders equity per share (6) (7) |
|
$ |
13.17 |
|
|
$ |
11.95 |
|
|
$ |
11.05 |
|
|
$ |
10.26 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Offering price as percentage of pro forma stockholders
equity per share |
|
|
73.96 |
% |
|
|
81.63 |
% |
|
|
88.42 |
% |
|
|
95.33 |
% |
Offering price as percentage of pro forma tangible
stockholders equity per share |
|
|
75.93 |
% |
|
|
83.68 |
% |
|
|
90.50 |
% |
|
|
97.47 |
% |
Number of shares outstanding for pro forma book value
per share calculations |
|
|
46,559,164 |
|
|
|
54,775,487 |
|
|
|
62,991,810 |
|
|
|
72,440,582 |
|
(Footnotes begin on following page)
50
|
|
|
(1) |
|
As adjusted to give effect to an increase in the number of shares that could
occur due to a 15% increase in the offering range to reflect demand for the shares or
changes in market conditions following the commencement of the stock offering. |
|
(2) |
|
Assumes that 4% of the shares of common stock sold in the offering will be purchased by
the employee stock ownership plan. For purposes of this table, the funds used to acquire
these shares are assumed to have been borrowed by the employee stock ownership plan from
Northfield-Delaware. Northfield Bank intends to make annual contributions to the employee
stock ownership plan in an amount at least equal to the required principal and interest
payments on the debt. Northfield Banks total annual payments on the employee stock
ownership plan debt are based upon 30 equal annual installments of principal and interest.
Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification 718-40,
Employers Accounting for Employer Stock Ownership Plans (ASC 718-40) requires that an
employer record compensation expense in an amount equal to the fair value of the shares
committed to be released to employees. The pro forma adjustments assume that the employee
stock ownership plan shares are allocated in equal annual installments based on the number
of loan repayment installments assumed to be paid by Northfield Bank, the fair value of
the common stock remains equal to the subscription price and the employee stock ownership
plan expense reflects an effective combined federal and state tax rate of 40.0%. The
unallocated employee stock ownership plan shares are reflected as a reduction of
stockholders equity. No reinvestment is assumed on proceeds contributed to fund the
employee stock ownership plan. The pro forma net income further assumes that 8,783,
10,333, 11,883 and 13,666 shares were committed to be released during the period at the
minimum, midpoint, maximum, and adjusted maximum of the offering range, respectively, and
in accordance with ASC 718-40, only the employee stock ownership plan shares committed to
be released during the period were considered outstanding for purposes of net income per
share calculations. |
|
(3) |
|
Assumes that, if approved by Northfield-Delawares stockholders, one or more stock-based
benefit plans purchase an aggregate number of shares of common stock equal to 4% of the
shares to be sold in the offering. Such amount is subject to adjustment as may be
required by Office of Thrift Supervision regulations or policy to reflect restricted stock
previously granted by Northfield-Federal or Northfield Bank (or may be a greater number of
shares if the plan is implemented more than one year after completion of the conversion).
Stockholder approval of the plans and purchases by the plans may not occur earlier than
six months after the completion of the conversion. The shares may be acquired directly
from Northfield-Delaware or through open market purchases. Shares in the stock-based
benefit plan are assumed to vest over a period of five years. The funds to be used to
purchase the shares will be provided by Northfield-Delaware. The table assumes that (i)
the stock-based benefit plan acquires the shares through open market purchases at $10.00
per share, (ii) 5% of the amount contributed to the plan is amortized as an expense during
the three months ended March 31, 2010, and (iii) the plan expense reflects an effective
combined federal and state tax rate of 40.0%. Assuming stockholder approval of the
stock-based benefit plans and that shares of common stock (equal to 4% of the shares sold
in the offering) are awarded through the use of authorized but unissued shares of common
stock, stockholders would have their ownership and voting interests diluted by
approximately 2.21% at the maximum of the offering range. |
|
(4) |
|
Assumes that, if approved by Northfield-Delawares stockholders, one or more stock-based
benefit plans grant options to acquire an aggregate number of shares of common stock equal
to 10% of the shares to be sold in the offering. Such amount is subject to adjustment as
may be required by Office of Thrift Supervision regulations or policy to reflect stock
options previously granted by Northfield-Federal or Northfield Bank (or may be a greater
number of shares if the plan is implemented more than one year after completion of the
conversion). Stockholder approval of the plans may not occur earlier than six months after
the completion of the conversion. In calculating the pro forma effect of the stock-based
benefit plans, it is assumed that the exercise price of the stock options and the trading
price of the common stock at the date of grant were $10.00 per share, the estimated
grant-date fair value determined using the Black-Scholes option pricing model was $3.73
for each option, the aggregate grant-date fair value of the stock options was amortized to
expense on a straight-line basis over a five-year |
(Footnotes continue on following page)
51
(continued from previous page)
|
|
|
|
|
vesting period of the options, and that 25% of the amortization expense (or the
assumed portion relating to options granted to directors) resulted in a tax benefit
using an assumed tax rate of 40.0%. The actual expense will be determined by the
grant-date fair value of the options, which will depend on a number of factors,
including the valuation assumptions used in the option pricing model ultimately adopted.
Under the above assumptions, the adoption of the stock-based benefit plans will result
in no additional shares under the treasury stock method for purposes of calculating
earnings per share. There can be no assurance that the actual exercise price of the
stock options will be equal to the $10.00 price per share. If a portion of the shares
used to satisfy the exercise of options comes from authorized but unissued shares, our
net income per share and stockholders equity per share would decrease. The issuance of
authorized but unissued shares of common stock pursuant to the exercise of options under
such plan would dilute stockholders ownership and voting interests by approximately
5.36% at the maximum of the offering range. |
|
(5) |
|
Per share figures include publicly held shares of Northfield-Federal common stock that
will be exchanged for shares of Northfield-Delaware common stock in the conversion. See
The Conversion and OfferingShare Exchange Ratio for Current Stockholders. Net income
per share computations are determined by taking the number of shares assumed to be sold in
the offering and the number of new shares assumed to be issued in exchange for publicly
held shares and, in accordance with ASC 718-40, subtracting the employee stock ownership
plan shares which have not been committed for release during the period. See note 2. The
number of shares of common stock actually sold and the corresponding number of exchange
shares may be more or less than the assumed amounts. Pro forma net income per share has
been annualized for purposes of calculating the offering price to pro forma net earnings
per share. |
|
(6) |
|
The retained earnings of Northfield Bank will be substantially restricted after the
conversion. See Our Dividend Policy, The Conversion and OfferingLiquidation Rights
and Supervision and RegulationFederal Banking RegulationCapital Distributions. |
|
(7) |
|
Per share figures include publicly held shares of Northfield-Federal common stock that
will be exchanged for shares of Northfield-Delaware common stock in the conversion.
Stockholders equity per share calculations are based upon the sum of (i) the number of
subscription shares assumed to be sold in the offering and (ii) shares to be issued in
exchange for publicly held shares at the minimum, midpoint, maximum and adjusted maximum
of the offering range, respectively. The exchange shares reflect an exchange ratio of
1.0693, 1.2580, 1.4467 and 1.6637 at the minimum, midpoint, maximum and adjusted maximum
of the offering range, respectively. The number of shares actually sold and the
corresponding number of exchange shares may be more or less than the assumed amounts. |
52
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At or for the Year Ended December 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
Based upon the Sale at $10.00 Per Share of |
|
|
|
26,350,000 |
|
|
31,000,000 |
|
|
35,650,000 |
|
|
40,997,500 |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Shares (1) |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts) |
|
Gross proceeds of offering |
|
$ |
263,500 |
|
|
$ |
310,000 |
|
|
$ |
356,500 |
|
|
$ |
409,975 |
|
Market value of shares issued in the exchange |
|
|
202,092 |
|
|
|
237,755 |
|
|
|
273,418 |
|
|
|
314,431 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma market capitalization |
|
$ |
465,592 |
|
|
$ |
547,755 |
|
|
$ |
629,918 |
|
|
$ |
724,406 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross proceeds of offering |
|
$ |
263,500 |
|
|
$ |
310,000 |
|
|
$ |
356,500 |
|
|
$ |
409,975 |
|
Expenses |
|
|
9,472 |
|
|
|
10,849 |
|
|
|
12,225 |
|
|
|
13,808 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated net proceeds |
|
|
254,028 |
|
|
|
299,151 |
|
|
|
344,275 |
|
|
|
396,167 |
|
Common stock purchased by employee stock ownership plan |
|
|
(10,540 |
) |
|
|
(12,400 |
) |
|
|
(14,260 |
) |
|
|
(16,399 |
) |
Common stock purchased by stock-based benefit plan |
|
|
(10,540 |
) |
|
|
(12,400 |
) |
|
|
(14,260 |
) |
|
|
(16,399 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated net proceeds, as adjusted |
|
$ |
232,948 |
|
|
$ |
274,351 |
|
|
$ |
315,755 |
|
|
$ |
363,369 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Year Ended December 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated net earnings: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Historical |
|
$ |
12,074 |
|
|
$ |
12,074 |
|
|
$ |
12,074 |
|
|
$ |
12,074 |
|
Pro forma adjustments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income on adjusted net proceeds |
|
|
3,564 |
|
|
|
4,198 |
|
|
|
4,831 |
|
|
|
5,560 |
|
Employee stock ownership plan (2) |
|
|
(211 |
) |
|
|
(248 |
) |
|
|
(285 |
) |
|
|
(328 |
) |
Stock awards (3) |
|
|
(1,265 |
) |
|
|
(1,488 |
) |
|
|
(1,711 |
) |
|
|
(1,968 |
) |
Stock options (4) |
|
|
(1,769 |
) |
|
|
(2,081 |
) |
|
|
(2,394 |
) |
|
|
(2,753 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma net income |
|
$ |
12,393 |
|
|
$ |
12,455 |
|
|
$ |
12,515 |
|
|
$ |
12,585 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share (5): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Historical |
|
$ |
0.27 |
|
|
$ |
0.23 |
|
|
$ |
0.20 |
|
|
$ |
0.17 |
|
Pro form adjustments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income on adjusted net proceeds |
|
|
0.08 |
|
|
|
0.08 |
|
|
|
0.08 |
|
|
|
0.08 |
|
Employee stock ownership plan (2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock awards (3) |
|
|
(0.03 |
) |
|
|
(0.03 |
) |
|
|
(0.03 |
) |
|
|
(0.03 |
) |
Stock options (4) |
|
|
(0.04 |
) |
|
|
(0.04 |
) |
|
|
(0.04 |
) |
|
|
(0.04 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma earnings per share (5) |
|
$ |
0.28 |
|
|
$ |
0.24 |
|
|
$ |
0.21 |
|
|
$ |
0.18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Offering price to pro forma net earnings per share |
|
|
35.71 |
x |
|
|
41.67 |
x |
|
|
47.62 |
x |
|
|
55.56 |
x |
Number of shares used in earnings per share calculations |
|
|
44,326,741 |
|
|
|
52,149,108 |
|
|
|
59,971,474 |
|
|
|
68,967,195 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Historical |
|
$ |
391,540 |
|
|
$ |
391,540 |
|
|
$ |
391,540 |
|
|
$ |
391,540 |
|
Estimated net proceeds |
|
|
254,028 |
|
|
|
299,151 |
|
|
|
344,275 |
|
|
|
396,167 |
|
Equity increase from the mutual holding company |
|
|
362 |
|
|
|
362 |
|
|
|
362 |
|
|
|
362 |
|
Common stock acquired by employee stock ownership plan
(2) |
|
|
(10,540 |
) |
|
|
(12,400 |
) |
|
|
(14,260 |
) |
|
|
(16,399 |
) |
Common stock acquired by stock-based benefit plan (3) |
|
|
(10,540 |
) |
|
|
(12,400 |
) |
|
|
(14,260 |
) |
|
|
(16,399 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma stockholders equity |
|
$ |
624,850 |
|
|
$ |
666,253 |
|
|
$ |
707,657 |
|
|
$ |
755,271 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intangible assets |
|
$ |
(16,361 |
) |
|
$ |
(16,361 |
) |
|
$ |
(16,361 |
) |
|
$ |
(16,361 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma tangible stockholders equity (6) |
|
$ |
608,489 |
|
|
$ |
649,892 |
|
|
$ |
691,296 |
|
|
$ |
738,910 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity per share:(7) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Historical |
|
$ |
8.41 |
|
|
$ |
7.15 |
|
|
$ |
6.21 |
|
|
$ |
5.42 |
|
Estimated net proceeds |
|
|
5.46 |
|
|
|
5.46 |
|
|
|
5.47 |
|
|
|
5.47 |
|
Plus: Assets received from the mutual holding company |
|
|
0.01 |
|
|
|
0.01 |
|
|
|
0.01 |
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock acquired by employee stock ownership plan
(2) |
|
|
(0.23 |
) |
|
|
(0.23 |
) |
|
|
(0.23 |
) |
|
|
(0.23 |
) |
Common stock acquired by stock-based benefit plan (3) |
|
|
(0.23 |
) |
|
|
(0.23 |
) |
|
|
(0.23 |
) |
|
|
(0.23 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma stockholders equity per share (6) (7) |
|
$ |
13.42 |
|
|
$ |
12.16 |
|
|
$ |
11.23 |
|
|
$ |
10.43 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intangible assets |
|
$ |
(0.35 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.30 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.26 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.23 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma tangible stockholders equity per share (6) (7) |
|
$ |
13.07 |
|
|
$ |
11.86 |
|
|
$ |
10.97 |
|
|
$ |
10.20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Offering price as percentage of pro forma stockholders
equity per share |
|
|
74.52 |
% |
|
|
82.24 |
% |
|
|
89.05 |
% |
|
|
95.88 |
% |
Offering price as percentage of pro forma tangible
stockholders equity per share |
|
|
76.51 |
% |
|
|
84.32 |
% |
|
|
91.16 |
% |
|
|
98.04 |
% |
Number of shares outstanding for pro forma book value
per share calculations |
|
|
46,559,164 |
|
|
|
54,775,487 |
|
|
|
62,991,810 |
|
|
|
72,440,582 |
|
(Footnotes begin on following page)
53
|
|
|
(1) |
|
As adjusted to give effect to an increase in the number of shares that could occur
due to a 15% increase in the offering range to reflect demand for the shares or changes
in market conditions following the commencement of the stock offering. |
|
(2) |
|
Assumes that 4% of the shares of common stock sold in the offering will be purchased by
the employee stock ownership plan. For purposes of this table, the funds used to acquire
these shares are assumed to have been borrowed by the employee stock ownership plan from
Northfield-Delaware. Northfield Bank intends to make annual contributions to the employee
stock ownership plan in an amount at least equal to the required principal and interest
payments on the debt. Northfield Banks total annual payments on the employee stock
ownership plan debt are based upon 30 equal annual installments of principal and interest.
Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification 718-40,
Employers Accounting for Employer Stock Ownership Plans (ASC 718-40) requires that an
employer record compensation expense in an amount equal to the fair value of the shares
committed to be released to employees. The pro forma adjustments assume that the employee
stock ownership plan shares are allocated in equal annual installments based on the number
of loan repayment installments assumed to be paid by Northfield Bank, the fair value of
the common stock remains equal to the subscription price and the employee stock ownership
plan expense reflects an effective combined federal and state tax rate of 40.0%. The
unallocated employee stock ownership plan shares are reflected as a reduction of
stockholders equity. No reinvestment is assumed on proceeds contributed to fund the
employee stock ownership plan. The pro forma net income further assumes that 35,133,
41,333, 47,533 and 54,633 shares were committed to be released during the year at the
minimum, midpoint, maximum, and adjusted maximum of the offering range, respectively, and
in accordance with ASC 718-40, only the employee stock ownership plan shares committed to
be released during the period were considered outstanding for purposes of net income per
share calculations. |
|
(3) |
|
Assumes that, if approved by Northfield-Delawares stockholders, one or more stock-based
benefit plans purchase an aggregate number of shares of common stock equal to 4% of the
shares to be sold in the offering, subject to adjustment as may be required by Office of
Thrift Supervision regulations or policy to reflect restricted stock previously granted by
Northfield-Federal or Northfield Bank (and may be a greater number of shares if the plan
is implemented more than one year after completion of the conversion). Stockholder
approval of the plans and purchases by the plans may not occur earlier than six months
after the completion of the conversion. The shares may be acquired directly from
Northfield-Delaware or through open market purchases. Shares in the stock-based benefit
plan are assumed to vest over a period of five years. The funds to be used to purchase the
shares will be provided by Northfield-Delaware. The table assumes that (i) the
stock-based benefit plan acquires the shares through open market purchases at $10.00 per
share, (ii) 20% of the amount contributed to the plan is amortized as an expense during
the year ended December 31, 2009, and (iii) the plan expense reflects an effective
combined federal and state tax rate of 40.0%. Assuming stockholder approval of the
stock-based benefit plans and that shares of common stock (equal to 4% of the shares sold
in the offering) are awarded through the use of authorized but unissued shares of common
stock, stockholders would have their ownership and voting interests diluted by
approximately 2.21% at the maximum of the offering range. |
|
(4) |
|
Assumes that, if approved by Northfield-Delawares stockholders, one or more stock-based
benefit plans grant options to acquire an aggregate number of shares of common stock equal
to 10% of the shares to be sold in the offering, subject to adjustment as may be required
by Office of Thrift Supervision regulations or policy to reflect stock options previously
granted by Northfield-Federal or Northfield Bank (and may be a greater number of shares if
the plan is implemented more than one year after completion of the conversion).
Stockholder approval of the plans may not occur earlier than six months after the
completion of the conversion. In calculating the pro forma effect of the stock-based
benefit plans, it is assumed that the exercise price of the stock options and the trading
price of the common stock at the date of grant were $10.00 per share, the estimated
grant-date fair value determined using the Black-Scholes option pricing model was $3.73
for each option, the aggregate grant-date fair value of the stock options was amortized to
expense on a straight-line basis over a five-year |
(Footnotes continue on following page)
54
(continued from previous page)
|
|
|
|
|
vesting period of the options, and that 25% of the amortization expense (or the
assumed portion relating to options granted to directors) resulted in a tax benefit
using an assumed tax rate of 40.0%. The actual expense will be determined by the
grant-date fair value of the options, which will depend on a number of factors,
including the valuation assumptions used in the option pricing model ultimately adopted.
Under the above assumptions, the adoption of the stock-based benefit plans will result
in no additional shares under the treasury stock method for purposes of calculating
earnings per share. There can be no assurance that the actual exercise price of the
stock options will be equal to the $10.00 price per share. If a portion of the shares
used to satisfy the exercise of options comes from authorized but unissued shares, our
net income per share and stockholders equity per share would decrease. The issuance of
authorized but unissued shares of common stock pursuant to the exercise of options under
such plan would dilute stockholders ownership and voting interests by approximately
5.36% at the maximum of the offering range. |
|
(5) |
|
Per share figures include publicly held shares of Northfield-Federal common stock that
will be exchanged for shares of Northfield-Delaware common stock in the conversion. See
The Conversion and OfferingShare Exchange Ratio for Current Stockholders. Net income
per share computations are determined by taking the number of shares assumed to be sold in
the offering and the number of new shares assumed to be issued in exchange for publicly
held shares and, in accordance with ASC 718-40, subtracting the employee stock ownership
plan shares which have not been committed for release during the year. See note 2. The
number of shares of common stock actually sold and the corresponding number of exchange
shares may be more or less than the assumed amounts. Pro forma net income per share has
been annualized for purposes of calculating the offering price to pro forma net earnings
per share. |
|
(6) |
|
The retained earnings of Northfield Bank will be substantially restricted after the
conversion. See Our Dividend Policy, The Conversion and OfferingLiquidation Rights
and Supervision and RegulationFederal Banking RegulationCapital Distributions. |
|
(7) |
|
Per share figures include publicly held shares of Northfield-Federal common stock that
will be exchanged for shares of Northfield-Delaware common stock in the conversion.
Stockholders equity per share calculations are based upon the sum of (i) the number of
subscription shares assumed to be sold in the offering and (ii) shares to be issued in
exchange for publicly held shares at the minimum, midpoint, maximum and adjusted maximum
of the offering range, respectively. The exchange shares reflect an exchange ratio of
1.0693, 1.2580, 1.4467 and 1.6637 at the minimum, midpoint, maximum and adjusted maximum
of the offering range, respectively. The number of shares actually sold and the
corresponding number of exchange shares may be more or less than the assumed amounts. |
55
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
This discussion and analysis reflects our consolidated financial statements and other relevant
statistical data, and is intended to enhance your understanding of our financial condition and
results of operations. The information in this section has been derived from the audited and
unaudited consolidated financial statements, which appear beginning on page F-1 of this prospectus.
You should read the information in this section in conjunction with the business and financial
information regarding Northfield-Federal provided in this prospectus.
Overview
Our principal business consists of accepting deposits and investing such funds in mortgage
loans, secured commercial business loans and in investment securities, consisting primarily of
mortgage-backed securities. Our business is affected by prevailing economic conditions,
particularly market interest rates. Additionally, we are subject to government policies
concerning, among other things, monetary and fiscal affairs, housing and financial institutions and
regulations regarding lending and other operations, privacy and consumer disclosure. We rely on
our convenient locations, customer service, and competitive products and pricing to attract and
retain deposits. Lending activities are affected by market interest rates, loan demand and local
economic conditions. Sources of funds for lending and investing activities include deposits,
borrowings, loan and investment repayments, and income from our operations.
Our lending focus has been originating commercial real estate and multifamily loans in the
markets we serve. At March 31, 2010, total loans held for investment were $736.6 million, or
35.1% of total assets, with $519.8 million, or 70.5% of the total portfolio, consisting of
commercial real estate loans ($332.4 million, or 45.1%) and multifamily loans ($187.4 million, or
25.4%). Our loan portfolio has continued to grow in 2010 but at slower rates than we experienced
in 2008 and 2009. We do not originate for retention in our portfolio interest only residential
mortgage loans on one- to four-family residential properties, where the borrower pays interest for
an initial period and thereafter the loan converts to a fully amortizing loan. We do not offer
loans that provide for negative amortization of principal, such as Option ARM loans, where the
borrower can pay less than the interest owed on the loan, thereby resulting in an increased
principal balance during the life of the loan. We also do not offer, and have not offered,
subprime loans (loans that generally target borrowers with weakened credit histories typically
characterized by payment delinquencies, previous charge-offs, judgments, bankruptcies, or borrowers
with questionable repayment capacity as evidenced by low credit scores or high debt-burden ratios).
We do not underwrite loans with limited or no documentation.
Our investing focus has been purchasing mortgage-backed securities. At March 31, 2010,
securities available-for-sale had an estimated fair value of $1.2 billion, or 58.0% of total
assets, with $943.6 million, or 77.6%, consisting of mortgage-backed securities. At March 31,
2010, 74.9% of our securities portfolio consisted of securities issued by the U.S. government, U.S.
government agencies or U.S. government sponsored enterprises. We do not own any common or
preferred stock issued by Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac.
Our net income has decreased over the past year, and totaled $12.1 million for the year ended
December 31, 2009, compared to $15.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2008. Much of the
reduction in our net income has resulted from increased provisions for loan losses relating to
deteriorating asset quality, which also has recently affected much of the financial institution
industry, and from increases in employee compensation and benefits and Federal Deposit Insurance
Corporation insurance premiums, which were partially offset by an increase in net interest income.
Our net income was $3.4 million for the three months ended March 31, 2010, compared to $2.7 million
for the three months ended March 31, 2009. The increase was a result of an increase in net
interest income and an increase in non-interest income (primarily gains on sales of securities,
net), partially offset by an increase in non-interest expense (primarily employee compensation and
benefits).
Following the completion of the conversion, our non-interest expense is expected to increase
because of the increased compensation expenses associated with the purchase of shares of common
stock by our employee stock
56
ownership plan and the possible implementation of one or more stock-based benefit plans, if
approved by our stockholders no earlier than six months after the completion of the conversion, and
because of our anticipated growth. For further information, see Summary Benefits to Management
and Potential Dilution to Stockholders Resulting from the Conversion; Risk Factors Our
stock-based benefit plans would increase our expenses and reduce our income; ManagementBenefits
to be Considered Following Completion of the Conversion; and Risk FactorsWe may face risks with
respect to future expansion.
Our balance sheet is comprised primarily of financial instruments consisting of securities,
loans, deposits, and borrowings. Purchases of securities are recorded at cost. Subsequent to
purchase, securities designated as available for sale are carried at estimated fair value, with the
difference between the amortized cost and the estimated fair value of securities available for sale
being recorded as an adjustment to stockholders equity, net of tax. Estimated fair values of
securities available for sale above amortized cost increase total stockholders equity through
increased other comprehensive income. Estimated fair value of securities available for sale below
amortized cost will reduce total stockholders equity. If the estimated fair value of securities
available for sale are below amortized cost and are deemed to be temporary, the reduction in total
stockholders equity will be affected through a charge to other comprehensive income, net of tax.
If the estimated fair value of securities available for sale are below amortized cost and are
deemed to be other than temporary, the reduction in total stockholders equity will be effected
through a charge to current operations for that portion of the decline in estimated fair value that
is attributable to a credit loss. Declines in estimated fair values that are associated with
factors that are other than credit related, such as adjustments for liquidity and interest rates,
are recorded as a reduction to total stockholders equity through a charge to other comprehensive
income provided that it is more likely than not that we will not be required to sell the securities
before their anticipated recovery. Loans are primarily recorded at amortized cost. Estimated fair
values below amortized cost attributable to credit losses are recorded in current operations
through a charge to the provision for loan losses, with a resulting decrease to total stockholders
equity. Estimated fair values that are associated with factors that are other than credit related,
such as adjustments for liquidity and interest rates, do not affect current operations or total
stockholders equity as such loans are held for investment and the estimated fair values are
expected to return to a value that approximates amortized cost as the loans are repaid. Deposits
and borrowings are recorded at amortized cost. Changes in estimated fair values are related
primarily to changes in market interest rates and have no affect on current operations or total
stockholders equity, and are expected to return to a value that approximates amortized cost as
deposits and borrowings become due and payable.
Business Strategy
Our principal objective is to build long-term value for our stockholders by operating a
profitable community-oriented financial institution dedicated to meeting the banking needs of our
customers. Our board of directors has sought to accomplish this objective with a strategy designed
to increase profitability, while maintaining a strong capital position and high asset quality. We
cannot assure you that we will successfully implement our business strategy.
Highlights of our business strategy are as follows:
Remaining a community-oriented institution. We have been in business for over 123 years,
growing through internal expansion and acquisitions. We offer a variety of financial products and
services to meet the needs of small businesses and individuals in our market area, and we are
dedicated to providing quality personal service to our customers. We consider our competitive
products and pricing, branch network, reputation for superior customer service and financial
strength as our major strengths in attracting and retaining customers. Over the last several years,
we have significantly upgraded our technology capabilities, and currently offer mobile banking,
remote deposit capture, electronic check clearing, and online business customer cash management.
We intend to further capitalize on our technology capabilities to improve operating efficiencies
and enhance customer service.
Continuing to increase our lending. We have grown our loan portfolio to $736.6 million at
March 31, 2010 from $424.2 million at December 31, 2007. To achieve this growth, we have continued
to emphasize the origination of loans other than residential mortgage loans, primarily multifamily
and commercial real estate loans. These loans have higher yields than residential mortgage loans
and generally have periodic adjustable interest rates
57
and/or shorter terms, which assists us in managing our interest rate risk. Despite a
difficult economic environment, we have continued to lend to qualified borrowers as other lenders
have ceased or curtailed their lending, and we were able to increase our loan portfolio in 2009 and
the first quarter of 2010. In October 2009, we also began to offer loans to finance premiums on
commercial insurance policies, and such loans totaled $40.0 million at March 31, 2010.
Over the past several years, we have particularly emphasized the origination of multifamily
loans. At March 31, 2010, our multifamily portfolio totaled $187.4 million, or 25.4% of total
loans, compared to $14.2 million, or 3.3% of total loans, at December 31, 2007. At March 31, 2010,
our commercial real estate loan portfolio totaled $332.4 million, or 45.1% of total loans, compared
to $243.9 million, or 57.5% of total loans, at December 31, 2007. We intend to continue to
emphasize multifamily lending, and, as economic conditions improve, we will seek to increase the
origination of commercial real estate, commercial and home equity loans as well. However, a
continuation or worsening of economic conditions could make it more difficult to execute our
strategy, at least until economic conditions improve. Also, the additional capital raised in the
stock offering will increase our lending capacity by enabling us to originate more loans and loans
with larger balances; however, this increased lending can also expose us to increased risks, as
discussed in the Risk Factors section of this prospectus.
Improving asset quality. Maintaining loan quality historically has been, and will continue to
be, a key element of our business strategy. We employ conservative underwriting standards for new
loan originations and maintain sound credit administration practices while the loans are
outstanding. In addition, substantially all of our loans are secured, predominantly by real
estate. However, during the current economic recession, we have experienced increases in
delinquent and non-performing loans. At March 31, 2010, our non-performing loans totaled $50.0
million or 6.79% of total loans. At the same time, charge-offs have remained relatively low at
0.38% of average loans outstanding for the year ended December 31, 2008, 0.37% for the year ended
December 31, 2009, and were 0.11% for the three months ended March 31, 2010.
To mitigate our exposure to potential loss during this weak economic period, we have
de-emphasized the origination of commercial real estate loans and construction and land loans. We
have also increased our allowance for loan losses from $5.6 million, or 1.33% of loans held for
investment, net, at December 31, 2007, to $17.1 million, or 2.33% of loans held for investment,
net, at March 31, 2010. We will also work with willing and able borrowers experiencing financial
difficulties in order to maximize the recovery of the loan balance, and, when circumstances
warrant, we may grant modifications to existing loan terms and conditions that we would not
otherwise consider, commonly referred to as troubled debt restructurings (TDRs). At March 31,
2010, we had $21.9 million of loans classified as TDRs, of which $8.8 million were accruing
interest and $13.1 million were on non-accrual status. At March 31, 2010, $16.2 million, or 74.1%
of loans subject to restructuring agreements (accruing and non-accruing) were performing in
accordance with their restructured terms.
Expanding through branching and acquisitions. We intend to continue de novo branching to
expand our presence within and outside our primary market area. We currently expect to establish
nine de novo branch offices by December 31, 2013, and also expect to establish an internet platform
to gather deposits during that same time period. In conjunction with this expansion strategy, we
may dispose of underperforming or overlapping branches, if appropriate. We also believe that
acquisition opportunities exist both within and beyond our current market area. We will consider
pursuing whole-bank and branch acquisition opportunities on a selective basis in areas that will
afford us the opportunity to add complementary products to our existing business or expand our
franchise geographically. Currently, we do not have any plans or arrangements to acquire other
financial institutions or dispose of existing branch offices.
Employing securities investment strategies to increase income. We determine whether to invest
in securities or loans depending on the relative risks and returns available for each type of
investment. If opportunities exist, we may purchase additional investment securities and fund
those purchases with additional borrowings at an initial positive interest rate spread, commonly
referred to as leverage transactions, in an effort to increase our net income and return on equity.
Leveraging can expose a company to greater interest rate risk in a rising interest rate
environment, and there can be no assurance that a leveraging strategy would be successful.
58
Critical Accounting Policies
Critical accounting policies are defined as those that involve significant judgments and
uncertainties, and could potentially result in materially different results under different
assumptions and conditions. We believe that the most critical accounting policies upon which our
financial condition and results of operation depend, and which involve the most complex subjective
decisions or assessments, are the following:
Allowance for Loan Losses, Impaired Loans, Troubled Debt Restructurings and Other Real Estate
Owned. The allowance for loan losses is the estimated amount considered necessary to cover
probable and reasonably estimatable credit losses inherent in the loan portfolio at the balance
sheet date. The allowance is established through the provision for loan losses that is charged
against income. In determining the allowance for loan losses, we make significant estimates and
judgments. The determination of the allowance for loan losses is considered a critical accounting
policy by management because of the high degree of judgment involved, the subjectivity of the
assumptions used, and the potential for changes in the economic environment that could result in
changes to the amount of the recorded allowance for loan losses.
The allowance for loan losses has been determined in accordance with GAAP. We are responsible
for the timely and periodic determination of the amount of the allowance required. We believe that
our allowance for loan losses is adequate to cover identifiable losses, as well as estimated losses
inherent in our portfolio for which certain losses are probable but not specifically identifiable.
Management performs a quarterly evaluation of the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses.
The analysis of the allowance for loan losses has a component for impaired loan losses and a
component for general loan losses. Management has defined an impaired loan to be a loan for which
it is probable, based on current information, that we will not collect all amounts due in
accordance with the contractual terms of the loan agreement. We have defined the population of
impaired loans to be all non-accrual loans with an outstanding balance of $500,000 or greater, and
all loans subject to a troubled debt restructuring. Impaired loans are individually assessed to
determine that the loans carrying value is not in excess of the estimated fair value of the
collateral (less cost to sell), if the loan is collateral dependent, or the present value of the
expected future cash flows, if the loan is not collateral dependent. Management performs a
detailed evaluation of each impaired loan and generally obtains updated appraisals as part of the
evaluation. In addition, management adjusts estimated fair values down to appropriately consider
recent market conditions, our willingness to accept lower sales price to effect a quick sale, and
costs to dispose of any supporting collateral. Determining the estimated fair value of underlying
collateral (and related costs to sell) can be difficult in illiquid real estate markets and is
subject to significant assumptions and estimates. Management employs an independent third party
expert in appraisal preparation and review to ascertain the reasonableness of updated appraisals.
Projecting the expected cash flows under troubled debt restructurings is inherently subjective and
requires, among other things, an evaluation of the borrowers current and projected financial
condition. Actual results may be significantly different than our projections, and our established
allowance for loan losses on these loans, and could have a material effect on our financial
results.
The second component of the allowance for loan losses is the general loss allocation. This
assessment is performed on a portfolio basis, excluding loans analyzed for impairment and TDRs,
with loans being grouped by collateral type and delinquency status. We apply an estimated loss
rate to each loan group. The loss rates applied are based on our loss experience as adjusted for
our qualitative assessment of relevant changes related to: underwriting standards; delinquency
trends; collection, charge-off and recovery practices; the nature or volume of the loan group;
lending staff; concentration of loan type; current economic conditions; and other relevant factors
considered appropriate by management. In evaluating the estimated loss factors to be utilized for
each loan group, management also reviews our actual loss history over the prior eight quarters and
loss history as reported by the Office of Thrift Supervision and Federal Deposit Insurance
Corporation for institutions both nationally and in our market area, for periods that are believed
to have been under similar economic conditions. This evaluation is inherently subjective as it
requires material estimates that may be susceptible to significant revisions based on changes in
economic and real estate market conditions. Actual loan losses may be significantly different than
the allowance for loan losses we have established, and could have a material effect on our
financial results.
59
This quarterly process is performed by the accounting department, with the assistance of the
credit administration department and our Chief Lending Officer, and approved by the Chief Financial
Officer. All supporting documentation with regard to the evaluation process is maintained by the
accounting department. Each quarter a summary of the allowance for loan losses is presented by the
Controller to the Audit Committee of the board of directors.
We have a concentration of loans secured by real property located in New York and New Jersey.
As a substantial amount of our loan portfolio is collateralized by real estate, appraisals of the
underlying value of property securing loans are critical in determining the amount of the allowance
required for specific loans. Assumptions for appraisal valuations are instrumental in determining
the value of properties. Overly optimistic assumptions or negative changes to assumptions could
significantly affect the valuation of a property securing a loan and the related allowance
determined. The assumptions supporting such appraisals are reviewed by management to determine
that the resulting values reasonably reflect amounts realizable on the collateral. Based on the
composition of our loan portfolio, we believe the primary risks are increases in vacancy rates and
declines in rental rates for both multifamily and commercial properties, a decline in the economy
generally, increases in interest rates and a decline in real estate market values in New York or
New Jersey. Any one or a combination of these events may adversely affect our loan portfolio
resulting in delinquencies, increased loan losses, and future loan loss provisions.
Although we believe we have established and maintained the allowance for loan losses at
adequate levels, changes may be necessary if future economic or other conditions differ
substantially from our estimation of the current operating environment. Although management uses
the information available, the level of the allowance for loan losses remains an estimate that is
subject to significant judgment. In addition, the Office of Thrift Supervision, as an integral
part of their examination process, will periodically review our allowance for loan losses. Such
agency may require us to recognize adjustments to the allowance based on their judgments about
information available to them at the time of their examination.
We also maintain an allowance for estimated losses on off-balance sheet credit risks related
to loan commitments and standby letters of credit. Management utilizes a methodology similar to
its allowance for loan loss methodology to estimate losses on these items. The allowance for
estimated credit losses on these items is included in other liabilities and any changes to the
allowance are recorded as a component of other non-interest expense.
Real estate we acquire as a result of foreclosure is classified as real estate owned. When we
acquire other real estate owned, we generally obtain a current appraisal to substantiate the net
carrying value of the asset. The asset is recorded at the lower of cost or estimated fair value,
establishing a new cost basis. Holding costs and declines in estimated fair value result in
charges to expense after acquisition.
Goodwill. Business combinations accounted for under the acquisition method requires us to
record goodwill as an asset on our financial statements, which is an unidentifiable intangible
asset equal to the excess of the purchase price that we pay for another company over the estimated
fair value of the net assets acquired. Net assets acquired include identifiable intangible assets
such as core deposit intangibles and non-compete agreements. We evaluate goodwill for impairment
annually on December 31, and more often if circumstances warrant, and we will reduce its carrying
value through a charge to earnings if impairment exists. Future events or changes in the estimates
that we use to determine the carrying value of our goodwill or which otherwise adversely affect its
value could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations. As of March 31, 2010,
goodwill had a carrying value of $16.2 million.
Securities Valuation and Impairment. Our securities portfolio is comprised of mortgage-backed
securities and to a lesser extent corporate bonds, agency bonds, and mutual funds. Our
available-for-sale securities portfolio is carried at estimated fair value, with any unrealized
gains or losses, net of taxes, reported as accumulated other comprehensive income or loss in
stockholders equity. Our trading securities portfolio is reported at estimated fair value. Our
held-to-maturity securities portfolio, consisting of debt securities for which we have a positive
intent and ability to hold to maturity, is carried at amortized cost. We conduct a quarterly
review and evaluation of the available-for-sale and held-to-maturity securities portfolios to
determine if the estimated fair value of any security
60
has declined below its amortized cost, and whether such decline is other-than-temporary. If
the amortized cost of an investment exceeds its fair value, we evaluate, among other factors,
general market conditions, the duration and extent to which the fair value is less than cost, the
probability of a near-term recovery in value and our intent to sell the security and whether it is
more likely than not that we will be required to sell the security before full recovery of our
investment or maturity. If such a decline is deemed other-than-temporary for equity securities, an
impairment charge is recorded through current earnings based upon the estimated fair value of the
security at the time of impairment and a new cost basis in the investment is established. For debt
investment securities deemed to be other-than-temporarily impaired, and we believe it is more
likely than not that we will be required to sell the security before full recovery of our
investment or maturity, the investment is written down through current earnings by the impairment
related to the estimated credit loss and the noncredit-related impairment is recognized through
other comprehensive income. The estimated fair values of our securities are primarily affected by
changes in interest rates, credit quality, and market liquidity.
Management is responsible for determining the estimated fair value of our securities. In
determining estimated fair values, management utilizes the services of an independent third party
recognized as a specialist in pricing securities. The independent pricing service utilizes market
prices of same or similar securities whenever such prices are available. Prices involving
distressed sellers are not utilized in determining fair value. Where necessary, the independent
third party pricing service estimates fair value using models employing techniques such as
discounted cash flow analyses. The assumptions used in these models typically include assumptions
for interest rates, credit losses, and prepayments, utilizing observable market data, where
available. Where the market price of the same or similar securities is not available, the
valuation becomes more subjective and involves a high degree of judgment. On a quarterly basis, we
review the pricing methodologies utilized by the independent third party pricing service for each
security type. In addition, we compare securities prices to a second independent pricing service
that is utilized as part of our asset liability risk management process. At March 31, 2010, and
for each quarter end in 2009, all securities were priced by the independent third party pricing
service, and management made no adjustment to the prices received.
Determining that a securitys decline in estimated fair value is other-than-temporary is
inherently subjective, and becomes increasing difficult as it relates to mortgage-backed securities
that are not guaranteed by the U.S. Government, or a U.S. Government Sponsored Enterprise (e.g.,
Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac). In performing our evaluation of securities in an unrealized loss
position, we consider among other things, the severity, and duration of time that the security has
been in an unrealized loss position and the credit quality of the issuer. As it relates to
mortgage-backed securities not guaranteed by the U.S. Government, Fannie Mae, or Freddie Mac, we
perform a review of the key underlying loan collateral risk characteristics including, among other
things, origination dates, interest rate levels, composition of variable and fixed rates, reset
dates (including related pricing indices), current loan to original collateral values, locations of
collateral, delinquency status of loans, and current credit support. In addition, for securities
experiencing declines in estimated fair values of over 10%, as compared to its amortized cost,
management also reviews published historical and expected prepayment speeds, underlying loan
collateral default rates, and related historical and expected losses on the disposal of the
underlying collateral on defaulted loans. This evaluation is inherently subjective as it requires
estimates of future events, many of which are difficult to predict. Actual results could be
significantly different than our estimates and could have a material effect on our financial
results.
Federal Home Loan Bank Stock Impairment Assessment. Northfield Bank is a member of the
Federal Home Loan Bank System, which consists of 12 regional Federal Home Loan Banks. As a member
of the Federal Home Loan Bank of New York, Northfield Bank is required to acquire and hold shares
of capital stock in the Federal Home Loan Bank of New York in an amount determined by a
membership investment component and an activity-based investment component. As of March 31,
2010, Northfield Bank was in compliance with its ownership requirement. At March 31, 2010,
Northfield Bank held $5.0 million of Federal Home Loan Bank of New York common stock. In
performing our evaluation of our investment in Federal Home Loan Bank of New York stock, on a
quarterly basis, management reviews the most recent financial statements of the Federal Home Loan
Bank of New York and determines whether there have been any adverse changes to its capital position
as compared to the trailing period. In addition, management reviews the Federal Home Loan Bank of
New Yorks most recent Presidents Report in order to determine whether or not a dividend has been
declared for the current reporting
61
period. Furthermore, management obtains the credit rating of the Federal Home Loan Bank of
New York from an accredited credit rating company to ensure that no changes have occurred that
would negatively affect our investment in the Federal Home Loan Bank of New York. At March 31,
2010, it was determined by management that our investment in Federal Home Loan Bank stock was not
impaired.
Deferred Income Taxes. We use the asset and liability method of accounting for income taxes.
Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax
consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of
existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and
liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years
in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. If it is determined
that it is more likely than not that the deferred tax assets will not be realized, a valuation
allowance is established. We consider the determination of this valuation allowance to be a
critical accounting policy because of the need to exercise significant judgment in evaluating the
amount and timing of recognition of deferred tax liabilities and assets, including projections of
future taxable income. These judgments and estimates are reviewed quarterly as regulatory and
business factors change. A valuation allowance for deferred tax assets may be required if the
amounts of taxes recoverable through loss carrybacks decline, or if we project lower levels of
future taxable income. Such a valuation allowance would be established and any subsequent changes
to such allowance would require an adjustment to income tax expense that could adversely affect our
operating results.
Stock Based Compensation. We recognize the cost of employee services received in exchange for
awards of equity instruments based on the grant-date fair value for all awards granted.
We estimate the per share fair value of option grants on the date of grant using the
Black-Scholes option pricing model using assumptions for the expected dividend yield, expected
stock price volatility, risk-free interest rate and expected option term. These assumptions are
based on our judgments regarding future option exercise experience and market conditions. These
assumptions are subjective in nature, involve uncertainties, and, therefore, cannot be determined
with precision. The Black-Scholes option pricing model also contains certain inherent limitations
when applied to options that are not traded on public markets.
The per share fair value of options is highly sensitive to changes in assumptions. In
general, the per share fair value of options will move in the same direction as changes in the
expected stock price volatility, risk-free interest rate and expected option term, and in the
opposite direction of changes in the expected dividend yield. For example, the per share fair
value of options will generally increase as expected stock price volatility increases, risk-free
interest rate increases, expected option term increases and expected dividend yield decreases. The
use of different assumptions or different option pricing models could result in materially
different per share fair values of options.
As our common stock does not have a significant amount of historical price volatility, we
utilized the historical stock price volatility of a peer group when valuing stock options.
Comparison of Financial Condition at March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009
Total assets increased $95.5 million, or 4.8%, to $2.1 billion at March 31, 2010, from $2.0
billion at December 31, 2009. The increase in total assets reflected increases in securities of
$84.2 million, cash and cash equivalents of $8.3 million, and loans held for investment, net, of
$8.0 million.
Cash and cash equivalents increased $8.3 million, or 19.4%, to $50.8 million at March 31,
2010, from $42.5 million at December 31, 2009. We have been maintaining increased balances in
other financial institutions while we evaluate opportunities to deploy funds into higher yielding
investments such as loans and securities with acceptable risk and return characteristics.
Securities available-for-sale increased $84.4 million, or 7.5%, to $1.2 billion at March 31,
2010, from $1.1 billion at December 31, 2009. The increase was primarily attributable to purchases
of $217.2 million and an
62
increase of $5.7 million in net unrealized gains, partially offset by maturities and principal
paydowns of $123.6 million and sales of $15.2 million.
Securities held-to-maturity decreased $520,000, or 7.7%, to $6.2 million at March 31, 2010,
from $6.7 million at December 31, 2009. The decrease was attributable to maturities and principal
paydowns during the quarter ended March 31, 2010.
At March 31, 2010, $788.2 million of our securities were residential mortgage-backed
securities issued or guaranteed by Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac or Ginnie Mae. We also held residential
mortgage-backed securities not issued or guaranteed by Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, or Ginnie Mae,
which are referred to as private label securities. These private label securities had an
amortized cost of $158.5 million and an estimated fair value of $161.6 million at March 31, 2010.
The private label securities portfolio was in a net unrealized gain position of $3.1 million,
consisting of gross unrealized gains of $5.5 million and gross unrealized losses of $2.4 million.
Of the $161.6 million in private label securities, three securities with an estimated fair
value of $13.8 million (amortized cost of $15.8 million) were rated less than AAA at March 31,
2010. Of the three securities, one had an estimated fair value of $2.6 million (amortized cost of
$2.7 million) and was rated A+, another had an estimated fair value of $6.1 million (amortized cost
of $7.4 million) and was rated Baa2 (subsequently downgraded to Caa2), and the remaining security
had an estimated fair value of $5.1 million (amortized cost of $5.7 million) and was rated CCC. As
of March 31, 2010, we continued to receive principal and interest payments in accordance with the
contractual terms of each of these securities. Management has evaluated, among other things,
delinquency status, location of collateral, estimated prepayment speeds, and the estimated default
rates and loss severity in liquidating the underlying collateral for each of these three
securities. Since management does not have the intent to sell the securities, and it is more
likely than not that we will not be required to sell the securities before their anticipated
recovery (which may be at maturity), we believe that the unrealized losses of $2.0 million at March
31, 2010, are temporary, and as such, are recorded as a component of accumulated other
comprehensive income, net of tax.
Loans held for investment, net totaled $737.2 million at March 31, 2010, compared to $729.3
million at December 31, 2009. The increase was primarily in multifamily real estate loans, which
increased $9.0 million, or 5.0%, to $187.4 million, from $178.4 million at December 31, 2009,
reflecting our continued emphasis on this type of loan. Commercial real estate loans increased
$4.6 million, or 1.4%, to $332.4 million, and home equity loans increased $2.0 million, or 7.8%,
from $26.1 million at December 31, 2009. These increases were partially offset by decreases in
residential loans, land and construction loans, commercial and industrial loans, and insurance
premium loans.
Federal Home Loan Bank of New York stock, at cost, decreased $1.4 million, or 21.7%, from $6.4
million at December 31, 2009 to $5.0 million at March 31, 2010. This decrease was attributable to
a decrease in borrowings outstanding with the Federal Home Loan Bank of New York over the same time
period.
Other real estate owned decreased $405,000, or 21.0%, from $1.9 million at December 31, 2009,
to $1.5 million at March 31, 2010. This decrease was primarily attributable to downward valuation
adjustments recorded against the carrying balances of the properties which resulted from the
continued deterioration in estimated fair values, coupled with the sale of real estate owned
properties.
We invest in bank-owned life insurance to provide a funding source for benefit plan
obligations. Bank-owned life insurance also generally provides non-interest income that is
nontaxable. Federal regulations generally limit the investment in bank-owned life insurance to 25%
of the sum of a savings banks tier 1 capital and its allowance for loan losses. At March 31,
2010, this limit was $74.0 million, and our investment in bank-owned life insurance at that date
totaled $44.2 million.
Other assets decreased $2.2 million, or 14.6%, to $12.7 million at March 31, 2010, from $14.9
million at December 31, 2009. The decrease in other assets was attributable to a decrease in
deferred tax assets, which
63
resulted primarily from an increase in net unrealized gains on our securities portfolio from
December 31, 2009, to March 31, 2010.
Deposits increased $76.0 million, or 5.8%, to $1.4 billion at March 31, 2010, from $1.3
billion at December 31, 2009. The increase in deposits during the first quarter of 2010 was
primarily due to an increase of short-term certificates of deposit originated through the
CDARS® Network in the amount of $82.0 million. We utilize this funding source as a cost
effective alternative to other short-term funding sources. In addition, savings and money market
accounts, and transaction accounts increased $27.2 million and $1.9 million, respectively, from
December 31, 2009 to March 31, 2010. These increases were partially offset by a decrease of $35.1
million in certificates of deposit (originated by Northfield Bank) over the same time period.
Borrowings increased $13.6 million, or 4.8%, to $293.1 million at March 31, 2010, from $279.4
million at December 31, 2009. The increase in borrowings was primarily the result of our
increasing longer-term borrowings to lock in lower interest rates in the historically low interest
rate environment, partially offset by maturities during the quarter.
Total stockholders equity increased to $396.3 million at March 31, 2010, from $391.5 million
at December 31, 2009. The increase was primarily attributable to net income of $3.4 million for
the quarter ended March 31, 2010, and an increase in accumulated other comprehensive income of $3.5
million resulting primarily from a decrease in market interest rates that resulted in an increase
in the estimated fair value of our securities available for sale. The increase in stockholders
equity also was attributable to a $1.1 million increase in additional paid-in capital primarily
related to the recognition of compensation expense associated with equity awards. These increases
were partially offset by $2.8 million in stock repurchases, and the payment of approximately
$772,000 in dividends for the quarter ended March 31, 2010. Through March 31, 2010, we had
repurchased 1,910,089 shares of common stock at an average cost of $11.79 per share.
Comparison of Financial Condition at December 31, 2009 and 2008
Total assets increased $244.5 million, or 13.9%, to $2.0 billion at December 31, 2009, from
$1.8 billion at December 31, 2008. The increase in total assets reflected increases in securities
of $167.4 million and loans held for investment, net of $139.3 million, partially offset by a
decrease of $53.7 million in certificates of deposit in other financial institutions.
Certificates of deposit in other financial institutions decreased $53.7 million, or 100.0%,
from December 31, 2008, to $0 at December 31, 2009. The decrease was primarily a result of our
utilizing the excess cash to fund loans and purchase higher yielding investment securities during
the year.
Loans held-for-investment, net of deferred loan fees, increased $139.3 million, or 23.6%, to
$729.3 million at December 31, 2009, from $590.0 million at December 31, 2008. We continue to
focus on originating multifamily and commercial real estate loans to the extent such loan demand
exists while meeting our underwriting standards. Multifamily real estate loans increased $69.9
million, or 64.4%, to $178.4 million, from $108.5 million at December 31, 2008. Commercial real
estate loans increased $38.7 million, or 13.4%, to $327.8 million, commercial and industrial loans
increased $8.2 million, or 74.6%, to $19.3 million, and home equity loans and lines of credit
increased $1.9 million, or 8.0%, from $24.2 million at December 31, 2008. In addition, we
purchased approximately $35.4 million of insurance premium loans during the quarter ended December
31, 2009, and grew this portfolio to $40.4 million at year end. These increases were partially
offset by decreases in residential loans, and land and construction loans.
Our securities portfolio totaled $1.1 billion at December 31, 2009, as compared to $974.6
million at year end 2008, an increase of $167.4 million, or 17.2%. Securities available-for-sale
increased $174.2 million, or 18.2%, to $1.1 billion at December 31, 2009, from $957.6 million at
December 31, 2008. The increase was primarily due to the purchase of approximately $655.8 million
of securities partially offset by pay-downs and maturities of $500.5 million and sales of $3.3
million. The purchases were funded primarily by increased deposits, pay-downs, and maturities.
Securities held-to-maturity decreased $7.7 million, or 53.4%, to $6.7 million at December 31, 2009,
64
from $14.5 million at December 31, 2008. The decrease was primarily attributable to sales of
approximately $3.4 million, coupled with pay-downs and maturities of $4.6 million. We routinely
sell securities after a substantial portion (85% of the principal) has been recovered through
repayments as the cost of servicing such investments becomes too high compared to the potential
earnings.
At December 31, 2009, $773.9 million of our securities portfolio consisted of residential
mortgage-backed securities issued or guaranteed by Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, and Ginnie Mae. At
December 31, 2009, we also held residential mortgage-backed securities that were not guaranteed by
Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac or Ginnie Mae, which are referred to as private label securities.
Our available-for-sale securities portfolio at December 31, 2009, consisted of securities with
the following amortized cost: $469.5 million of pass-through mortgage-backed securities, of which
$404.1 million were issued or guaranteed by U.S. Government-sponsored enterprises (GSEs) and
$65.4 million were issued by non-GSEs; $455.9 million of real estate mortgage conduits (REMICs),
of which $344.2 million were issued or guaranteed by GSEs and $111.8 million were issued by
non-GSEs; and $185.4 million of other securities, consisting of corporate obligations, GSE bonds,
and equity securities which primarily consisted of a money market mutual fund.
Included in the above available-for-sale security amounts at December 31, 2009, were 23
residential mortgage-backed senior class securities issued by non-GSEs with an amortized cost of
$177.1 million and an estimated fair value of $176.7 million. Eight of these securities were in an
unrealized loss position with an amortized cost of $40.1 million and estimated fair value of $36.3
million.
Of the eight non-GSE securities in an unrealized loss position all but three were rated AAA at
December 31, 2009. These three securities had a total amortized cost of $20.1 million and an
estimated fair value of $16.6 million at December 31, 2009. The first of these three securities
had an estimated fair value of $5.5 million, was rated AA (downgraded to a rating of A subsequent
to December 31, 2009), and had the following underlying collateral characteristics: 84% originated
in 2004 and 16% originated in 2005. The second security had an estimated fair value of $5.9
million, was rated Baa2, and had the following underlying collateral characteristics: 83%
originated in 2004 and 17% originated in 2005. The remaining security had an estimated fair value
of $5.2 million, was rated CCC, and was supported by collateral entirely originated in 2006.
During the quarter ended September 30, 2009, we recognized an other-than-temporary impairment
charge of $1.4 million on the $5.2 million security that was rated CCC. Since management does not
have the intent to sell the security, and it is more likely than not that we will not be required
to sell the security before the anticipated recovery of the estimated fair value, the credit
component of $176,000 was recognized in earnings during the quarter ended September 30, 2009, and
the non-credit component of $1.2 million was recorded as a component of accumulated other
comprehensive income, net of tax. We continue to receive principal and interest payments in
accordance with the contractual terms of these securities. Management has evaluated, among other
things, delinquency status, estimated prepayment speeds and the estimated default rates and loss
severity in liquidating the underlying collateral for each of these three securities. As a result
of managements evaluation of these securities, we believe that unrealized losses at December 31,
2009, are temporary, and as such, are recorded as a component of accumulated other comprehensive
income, net of tax. All other losses within our investment portfolio were deemed to be temporary
at December 31, 2009.
Management evaluated the remaining five non-GSE securities that experienced unrealized losses
of less than 5% at December 31, 2009. These five securities, with an amortized cost of $20.1
million, and estimated fair value of $19.7 million, were reviewed for key underlying loan risk
characteristics including origination dates, interest rate levels, composition of variable and
fixed rates, reset dates (including related pricing indices), current loan to original collateral
values, locations of collateral, delinquency status of loans, and current credit support.
Management believes that it is not probable that we will not receive all amounts due under the
contractual terms of the securities.
Deposits increased $292.4 million, or 28.5%, to $1.3 billion at December 31, 2009, from $1.0
billion at December 31, 2008. Certificates of deposit increased $161.8 million, or 38.7%, to
$579.4 million at December 31,
65
2009, from $417.6 million at December 31, 2008. Savings and money market accounts increased $115.3
million, or 25.7%, to $564.6 million at December 31, 2009, from $449.3 million at December 31,
2008. Transaction accounts increased $15.4 million, or 9.8%, to $172.9 million at December 31,
2009, from $157.6 million at December 31, 2008. The increase in deposits was attributable
primarily to our continued focus on growing the deposit franchise by offering competitive pricing
and products, as well as an increase in consumer demand for Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
insured deposit products resulting from the financial market turmoil experienced in late 2008 and
continuing into 2009.
Total borrowings decreased $52.7 million, or 15.9%, to $279.4 million at December 31, 2009,
from $332.1 million at December 31, 2008. The decrease in borrowings was attributable primarily to
maturities during the year with such funding being replaced with deposits.
Total stockholders equity increased to $391.5 million at December 31, 2009, from $386.6
million at December 31, 2008. The increase was primarily attributable to net income of $12.1
million for the year ended December 31, 2009, and other comprehensive income of $12.2 million
resulting primarily from a decrease in market interest rates that resulted in an increase in the
estimated fair value of our securities available for sale. The increase in stockholders equity
also was attributable to a $3.0 million increase in additional paid-in capital primarily related to
the recognition of compensation expense associated with equity awards. These increases were
partially offset by $19.9 million in stock repurchases and the declaration and payment of
approximately $3.0 million in dividends for the year ended December 31, 2009. In February 2009,
our Board of Directors authorized a stock repurchase program pursuant to which we may repurchase up
to 2,240,153 of our outstanding shares. We are conducting the repurchases in accordance with a
Rule 10b5-1 trading plan, and through December 31, 2009, we had purchased 1,716,063 shares of
common stock at an average cost of $11.61 per share.
Comparison of Operating Results for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2010 and 2009
Net income. Net income increased $646,000, or 23.6%, for the quarter ended March 31, 2010,
compared to the quarter ended March 31, 2009. Net interest income increased $1.8 million, or
14.0%, and non-interest income increased $754,000, or 77.8%, which was partially offset by an
increase of $286,000, or 17.4%, in the provision for loan losses, an increase of non-interest
expense of $1.3 million, or 17.2%, and an increase in income tax expense of $271,000, or 17.3%,
over the same time periods.
Interest income. Interest income increased $525,000, or 2.6%, to $21.0 million for the three
months ended March 31, 2010, from $20.5 million for the three months ended March 31, 2009. The
increase in interest income was primarily the result of an increase in average interest-earning
assets of $261.4 million, or 15.5%. The increase in average interest-earning assets was primarily
attributable to an increase in average loans of $133.2 million, or 22.1%, and an increase in
securities (other than mortgage-backed securities) of $197.4 million, partially offset by a
decrease in average mortgage-backed securities of $34.6 million, or 3.7%. The effect of the
increase in average interest-earning assets was partially offset by a decrease in the yield on
interest-earning assets to 4.38% for the three months ended March 31, 2010, from 4.93% for the
three months ended March 31, 2009. The rates earned on all asset categories, other than Federal
Home Loan Bank of New York stock, decreased due to the general decline in market interest rates for
these asset types. The yield earned on Federal Home Loan Bank of New York stock, increased from
4.10% for the quarter ended March 31, 2009, to 6.35% for the quarter ended March 31, 2010.
Interest expense. Interest expense decreased $1.3 million, or 16.4%, to $6.5 million for the
three months ended March 31, 2010, from $7.7 million for the three months ended March 31, 2009.
The decrease was attributable to decreases in interest expense on deposits of $1.0 million, or
20.3%, and in interest expense on borrowings of $258,000, or 9.3%. The decrease in interest
expense on deposits was attributable to a decrease in the cost of deposits of 76 basis points, or
36.7%, to 1.31% for the quarter ended March 31, 2010, from 2.07% for the quarter ended March 31,
2009, reflecting lower market interest rates for short-term deposits. The decrease in the cost of
deposits was partially offset by an increase of $253.5 million, or 26.1%, in average
interest-bearing deposits outstanding between the two quarters. The decrease in interest expense
on borrowings was primarily attributable to a decrease in the average cost of borrowings of 42
basis points, to 3.26%, from 3.68% for the quarter ended March 31, 2009, reflecting lower market
interest rates for borrowed funds.
66
Net Interest Income. Net interest income increased $1.8 million, or 14.0%, due primarily to
interest earning assets increasing $261.4 million, or 15.5%, partially offset by a decrease in the
net interest margin of four basis points, or 1.3%, over the prior year comparable quarter. The net
interest margin decreased slightly for the quarter as the average yield earned on interest earning
assets decreased more than the decrease in the average cost of interest-bearing liabilities. The
general decline in interest rates was due to the overall low interest rate environment. The
increase in average interest earning assets was due primarily to an increase in average loans
outstanding of $133.2 million, and other securities of $197.4 million, which was partially offset
by decreases in mortgage-backed securities, and interest-earning assets in other financial
institutions. Other securities consist primarily of investment-grade corporate bonds, and
government-sponsored enterprise bonds.
Provision for Loan Losses. The provision for loan losses was $1.9 million for the quarter
ended March 31, 2010, an increase of $286,000, or 17.4%, from the $1.6 million provision recorded
in the quarter ended March 31, 2009. The increase in the provision for loan losses in the current
quarter was due primarily to an increase in general loss factors utilized in managements estimate
of credit losses inherent in the loan portfolio in recognition of our elevated level of delinquent
loans, as well as the current weak economic environment and real estate market. Although loan
growth in the first quarter of 2009 exceeded that of the current quarter, we experienced greater
growth in our loans past due and non-performing loans during the current quarter as compared to the
first quarter of 2009, resulting in a larger increase in general loss factors. Net charge-offs for
the quarter ended March 31, 2010, were $198,000, as compared to $595,000 for the quarter ended
March 31, 2009. The allowance for loan losses was $17.1 million, or 2.33% of loans held for
investment, net at March 31, 2010, compared to $15.4 million, or 2.11% of loans held for
investment, net at December 31, 2009.
Non-interest Income. Non-interest income increased $754,000, or 77.8%, to $1.7 million for
the quarter ended March 31, 2010, compared to $969,000 the quarter ended March 31, 2009, primarily
as a result of $615,000 in gains on securities transactions during the quarter ended March 31,
2010, as compared to $154,000 in losses on securities transactions during the quarter ended March
31, 2009. Securities gains in the first quarter of 2010 included gross realized gains of $270,000
on the sale of available-for-sale mortgage-backed securities. Securities gains in the first
quarter of 2010 included $345,000 related to our trading portfolio, while the first quarter of 2009
included securities losses of $161,000 related to our trading portfolio. We use the trading
portfolio to fund our deferred compensation plan obligation to certain employees and directors of
the plan. The participants of this plan, at their election, defer a portion of their compensation.
Gains and losses on trading securities have no effect on net income since participants benefit
from, and bear the full risk of, changes in the trading securities market values. Therefore, we
record an equal and offsetting amount in non-interest expense, reflecting the change in our
obligations under the plan.
Non-interest Expense. Total non-interest expense increased $1.3 million, or 17.2%, to $9.1
million for the quarter ended March 31, 2010, from $7.8 million for the quarter ended March 31,
2009. This increase was attributable, in part, to a $1.0 million increase in employee compensation
and benefits expense, $506,000 of which related to our deferred compensation plan, which is
described above, and had no effect on net income. The remaining increase in employee compensation
and benefits expense related to additional costs associated with equity award grants which occurred
on January 30, 2009, coupled with increases in full-time equivalent employees, primarily related to
our insurance premium finance division formed in October 2009, higher health care costs, and to a
lesser extent salary adjustments effective January 1, 2010.
Income Tax Expense. We recorded income tax expense of $1.8 million and $1.6 million for the
quarters ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. The effective tax rate for the quarter ended
March 31, 2010, was 35.2%, as compared to 36.5% for the quarter ended March 31, 2009.
Comparison of Operating Results for the Years Ended December 31, 2009 and 2008
General. Net income decreased $3.8 million or 23.7%, to $12.1 million for the year ended
December 31, 2009, from $15.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2008. Included in 2008 net
income was a $2.5 million tax-exempt gain from the death of an officer and $463,000 ($292,000, net
of tax) in costs associated with our conversion to a new core processing system that was completed
in January 2009.
67
Interest Income. Interest income increased by $10.5 million, or 14.0%, to $85.6 million for
the year ended December 31, 2009, as compared to $75.0 million for the year ended December 31,
2008. The increase was primarily the result of an increase in average interest-earning assets of
$298.9 million, or 20.0%, partially offset by a decrease in the average rate earned of 26 basis
points, or 5.2%, to 4.77% for the year ended December 31, 2009, from 5.03% for the year ended
December 31, 2008.
Interest income on loans increased $7.3 million, or 23.0%, to $38.9 million for the year ended
December 31, 2009, from $31.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2008. The average balance of
loans increased $149.9 million, or 29.7%, to $653.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2009,
from $503.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2008, reflecting our current efforts to grow
our multifamily and commercial real estate loan portfolios, and the purchase of an insurance
premium loan portfolio during the fourth quarter of 2009. The yield on our loan portfolio
decreased 32 basis points, or 5.1%, to 5.95% for the year ended December 31, 2009, from 6.27% for
the year ended December 31, 2008, primarily as a result of decreases in interest rates on new
originations and on our adjustable-rate loans, due to the lower interest rate environment in 2009,
and the effect of non-accrual loans.
Interest income on mortgage-backed securities increased $4.2 million, or 11.0%, to $42.3
million for the year ended December 31, 2009, from $38.1 million for the year ended December 31,
2008. The increase resulted from an increase in the average balance of mortgage-backed securities
of $76.4 million, or 9.0%, to $920.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2009, from $844.4
million for the year ended December 31, 2008. The increase is due primarily to the implementation
of ongoing leveraging strategies within board approved risk parameters. The yield we earned on
mortgage-backed securities increased eight basis points, or 1.8%, to 4.59% for the year ended
December 31, 2009, from 4.51% for the year ended December 31, 2008. The increase in yield was due
primarily to paydowns on lower yielding securities and the purchase of higher yielding
private-label mortgage-backed securities.
Interest income on other securities increased $1.9 million, or 139.1%, to $3.2 million for the
year ended December 31, 2009, from $1.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2008. The increase
resulted from an increase in the average balance of other securities, primarily corporate bonds, of
$91.0 million, or 252.9%, to $127.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2009, from $36.0
million for the year ended December 31, 2008, partially offset by a 121 basis point decrease in the
yield on this portfolio, to 2.54% for the year ended December 31, 2009. The increase in other
securities related primarily to the purchase of shorter-term bonds, which had relatively low
interest rates due to the current interest rate environment.
Interest income on deposits in other financial institutions decreased $2.6 million, or 76.2%,
to $801,000 for the year ended December 31, 2009, from $3.4 million for the year ended December 31,
2008. The average balance of deposits in other financial institutions decreased $14.1 million, or
14.5%, to $83.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2009, from $97.2 million for the year ended
December 31, 2008. The yield on deposits in other financial institutions decreased 250 basis
points for the year ended December 31, 2009, from 3.46% for the year ended December 31, 2008,
primarily due to the continued general decline in the interest rate environment in 2009.
Interest Expense. Interest expense increased $721,000, or 2.6%, to $29.0 million for the year
ended December 31, 2009, from $28.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2008. The increase
resulted from an increase of $283.5 million, or 26.0%, in the average balance of interest-bearing
liabilities being partially offset by a decrease in the rate paid on interest-bearing liabilities
of 48 basis points, or 18.5%, to 2.11% for the year ended December 31, 2009, from 2.59% for the
year ended December 31, 2008.
Interest expense on interest-bearing deposits decreased $308,000, or 1.7%, to $18.2 million
for the year ended December 31, 2009, as compared to $18.5 million, for the year ended December 31,
2008. This decrease was a result of a 59 basis point, or 25.9%, decline in the average rate paid
on interest-bearing deposits, to 1.69% for the year ended December 31, 2009, as compared to 2.28%
for the year ended December 31, 2008. The rate paid on certificates of deposit decreased 105 basis
points, or 30.5%, to 2.39% for the year ended December 31, 2009, as compared to 3.44%, for the year
ended December 31, 2008. The rate paid on savings, NOW, and money market accounts also decreased
25 basis points, or 18.9%, to 1.07% for the year ended December 31, 2009, as compared to 1.32%, for
the year ended December 31, 2008. The decrease in the cost of deposits was partially offset by an
68
increase of $263.3 million, or 32.4%, in the average balance of deposits outstanding, to $1.077
billion at December 31, 2009.
Interest expense on borrowings (repurchase agreements and other borrowings) increased $1.0
million, or 10.6%, to $10.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2009, from $9.7 million for the
year ended December 31, 2008. The average balance of borrowings increased $20.1 million, or 7.3%,
to $297.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2009, from $277.2 million for the year ended
December 31, 2008. The average balance of borrowings increased due to our implementing
shorter-term securities leverage strategies within board approved risk parameters in 2009. The
average rate paid on borrowings also increased 11 basis points to 3.62%, or 3.1%, for the year
ended December 31, 2009, from 3.51% for the year ended December 31, 2008.
Net Interest Income. Net interest income increased $9.8 million, or 20.9%, for the year ended
December 31, 2009, primarily due to an increase in average interest-earning assets of $298.9
million, or 20.0%, and an increase in the net interest margin of three basis points for the reasons
detailed above.
Provision for Loan Losses. We recorded a provision for loan losses of $9.0 million for the
year ended December 31, 2009, and $5.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2008. We had
charge-offs of $2.4 million and $1.9 million for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008,
respectively. The increase in charge-offs in 2009 was primarily attributable to an increase of
$346,000 in charge-offs related to commercial real estate loans and an increase of $164,000 in
charge-offs related to multifamily real estate loans. The increased provisioning and charge-offs
during the year ended December 31, 2009, compared to the year ended December 31, 2008, resulted in
an allowance for loans losses of $15.4 million, or 2.11% of total loans receivable at December 31,
2009, compared to $8.8 million, or 1.49% of total loans receivable at December 31, 2008. The
increase in the provision for loan losses in 2009 was due to a number of factors including an
increase in total loans outstanding, changes in composition of the loan portfolio, increases in
non-accrual loans and delinquencies, impairment losses on specific loans, and increases in general
loss factors utilized in managements estimate of credit losses inherent in the loan portfolio in
recognition of the current economic environment and real estate market.
Non-interest Income. Non-interest income decreased $760,000, or 12.4%, to $5.4 million for
the year ended December 31, 2009, from $6.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2008. The
decrease was due primarily to the absence of a previously recognized $2.5 million, nontaxable,
death benefit realized on bank owned life insurance during the year ended December 31, 2008. This
was partially offset by an increase of $2.2 million, or 167.6%, in gains on securities
transactions, net, from a loss of $1.3 million during the year ended December 31, 2008, to a gain
of $891,000 recognized during the year ended December 31, 2009. We recorded net securities gains
during 2009 of $299,000, which primarily resulted from the sale of smaller balance mortgage-backed
securities. We routinely sell these smaller balance securities as the cost of servicing becomes
prohibitive. Securities gains during 2009 also included $592,000 related to our trading portfolio,
which is utilized to fund our deferred compensation obligation to certain employees and directors
who contribute to the plan. We recorded securities losses of $1.3 million in 2008 in our trading
portfolio. The participants of this plan, at their election, defer a portion of their
compensation. Gains and losses on trading securities have no effect on net income since
participants benefit from, and bear the full risk of, changes in the trading securities market
values. Therefore, we record an equal and offsetting amount in non-interest expense, reflecting
the change in our obligations under the plan.
Non-interest Expense. Non-interest expense increased $9.4 million, or 37.8%, to $34.3 million
for the year ended December 31, 2009, from $24.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2008.
This includes a $2.1 million increase in Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation deposit insurance
expense for the year ended December 31, 2009, of which approximately $770,000 related to the
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporations special assessment recognized in the second quarter of
2009. Non-interest expense also increased in 2009 due to an increase of $5.2 million in
compensation and employee benefits expense, which included $2.1 million for equity awards. The
remaining increase in employee compensation and benefits costs pertained to an increase of
approximately $1.9 million related to the deferred compensation plan (explained in the prior
paragraph), coupled with increases in personnel, higher health care costs, and merit and market
salary adjustments effective January 1, 2009. Non-interest expense also increased in 2009 due to
higher levels of professional fees associated with loan restructurings and
69
collection efforts, increases in personnel, and higher premises and equipment costs associated
with additional operations center leasehold improvements, branch improvements, and lease payments
on future branch locations.
Income Tax Expense. We recorded a provision for income taxes of $6.6 million for the year
ended December 31, 2009, compared to $7.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2008. The
effective tax rate for the year ended December 31, 2009, was 35.4%, compared to 31.2% for the year
ended December 31, 2008. The increase in the effective tax rate was the result of a higher
percentage of pre-tax income being subject to taxation in 2009, compared to 2008. Income on bank
owned life insurance in 2008 included a $2.5 million, nontaxable, death benefit.
Comparison of Operating Results for the Years Ended December 31, 2008 and 2007
General. Net income increased $5.3 million or 50.7%, to $15.8 million for the year ended
December 31, 2008, from $10.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2007. Included in 2008 net
income is a $2.5 million tax-exempt life insurance gain due to the death of an officer and $463,000
($292,000, net of tax) in costs associated with our conversion to a new core processing system that
was completed in January 2009. Included in 2007 net income is a $12.0 million ($7.8 million, net
of tax) charge related to our contribution to the Northfield Bank Foundation, which was
substantially offset by net interest income of approximately $1.4 million ($795,000 net of tax)
related to short-term investment returns earned on subscription proceeds (net of interest paid
during the stock offering), the reversal of state and local tax liabilities of $4.5 million, net of
federal taxes, as a result of our concluding an audit by the State of New York with respect to our
combined state tax returns for years 2000 through 2006, and a gain of $4.3 million ($2.4 million,
net of tax) related to the sale of two branch locations and associated deposit relationships.
Interest Income. Interest income increased by $9.3 million, or 14.2%, to $75.0 million for
the year ended December 31, 2008, as compared to $65.7 million for the year ended December 31,
2007. The increase was primarily the result of an increase in average interest-earning assets of
$207.2 million, or 16.1%, partially offset by a decrease in the average rate earned of eight basis
points, or 1.6%, to 5.03% for the year ended December 31, 2008, from 5.11% for the year ended
December 31, 2007.
Interest income on loans increased $3.2 million, or 11.3%, to $31.6 million for the year ended
December 31, 2008, from $28.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2007. The average balance of
loans increased $80.0 million, or 18.9%, to $503.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2008,
from $423.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2007, reflecting our current efforts to grow
our multifamily and commercial real estate loan portfolios. The yield on our loan portfolio
decreased 43 basis points, or 6.4%, to 6.27% for the year ended December 31, 2008, from 6.70% for
the year ended December 31, 2007, primarily as a result of decreases in interest rates on our
adjustable-rate loans, and the generally lower interest rate environment in 2008. The Federal
Reserve lowered its discount rate 400 basis points during 2008.
Interest income on mortgage-backed securities increased $7.5 million, or 24.5%, to $38.1
million for the year ended December 31, 2008, from $30.6 million for the year ended December 31,
2007. The increase resulted from an increase in the average balance of mortgage-backed securities
of $126.2 million, or 17.6%, to $844.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2008, from $718.3
million for the year ended December 31, 2007. The increase is due primarily to the implementation
of ongoing leveraging strategies within board approved risk parameters. The yield earned on
mortgage-backed securities increased 25 basis points to 4.51% for the year ended December 31, 2008,
from 4.26% for the year ended December 31, 2007.
Interest income on deposits in other financial institutions decreased $749,000, or 18.2%, to
$3.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2008, from $4.1 million for the year ended December
31, 2007. The average balance of deposits in other financial institutions increased $5.0 million,
or 5.4%, to $97.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2008, from $92.2 million for the year
ended December 31, 2007. The yield on deposits in other financial institutions decreased 100 basis
points, or 22.4%, for the year ended December 31, 2008, from 4.46% for the year ended December 31,
2007, primarily due to the generally lower interest rate environment in 2008.
70
Interest Expense. Interest expense decreased $580,000, or 2.01%, to $28.2 million for the
year ended December 31, 2008, from $28.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2007. The
decrease resulted from an increase of $47.7 million, or 4.6% in the average balance of
interest-bearing liabilities being more than offset by a decrease in the rate paid on
interest-bearing liabilities of 18 basis points, or 6.5%, to 2.59% for the year ended December 31,
2008, from 2.77% for the year ended December 31, 2007.
Interest expense on interest-bearing deposits decreased $5.2 million, or 22.1%, to $18.5
million for the year ended December 31, 2008, as compared to $23.8 million, for the year ended
December 31, 2007. This decrease was due to a decrease in average interest bearing deposits of
$101.6 million, or 11.1%, to $813.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2008, from $914.8 for
the year ended December 31, 2007. The decrease in average interest-bearing deposits was the result
of our maintaining deposit pricing discipline in 2008, and choosing not to compete on interest
rates, in certain circumstances. In the latter part of 2008, pricing competition somewhat
subsided, depositor awareness of a financial institutions financial strength increased, and our
introduction of a competitively priced money market account, and statement savings account, were
the primary reasons that our year end deposit balances increasing to over $1 billion. The average
rate paid on interest-bearing deposits decreased 32 basis points, or 12.3%, to 2.28% for the year
ended December 31, 2008, as compared to 2.60% for the year ended December 31, 2007. The rate paid
on certificates of deposit decreased 91 basis points, or 20.9%, to 3.44% for the year ended
December 31, 2008, as compared to 4.35%, for the year ended December 31, 2007. The rate paid on
savings, NOW, and money market accounts increased 53 basis points, or 67.1%, to 1.32% for the year
ended December 31, 2008, as compared to 0.79%, for the year ended December 31, 2007 due to the
introduction of competitively priced money market and statement savings accounts in the latter part
of 2008.
Interest expense on borrowings (repurchase agreements and other borrowings) increased $4.6
million, or 91.9%, to $9.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2008, from $5.1 million for the
year ended December 31, 2007. The average balance of borrowings increased $149.3 million, or
116.7%, to $277.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2008, from $127.9 million for the year
ended December 31, 2007. The average balance of borrowings increased due to our implementing
securities leverage strategies within board approved risk parameters in 2008. The average rate
paid on borrowings decreased 46 basis points to 3.51%, or 11.6%, for the year ended December 31,
2008, from 3.97% for the year ended December 31, 2007.
Net Interest Income. Net interest income increased $9.9 million, or 26.9%, for the year ended
December 31, 2008, primarily as the result of an increase in average interest-earning assets of
$207.2 million, or 16.1%, coupled with an increase in the net interest margin of 26 basis points,
or 9.1%, from 2.87% to 3.13%. The change in average interest-earning assets and the net interest
margin for 2008 was due partially to our completion of our stock issuance in November 2007,
resulting in gross proceeds of $192.7 million, which included $82.4 million in transfers from
deposit accounts. We deployed the net proceeds from the stock offering into loans, short-term
investments, and securities.
Provision for Loan Losses. We recorded a provision for loan losses of $5.1 million for the
year ended December 31, 2008, and $1.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2007. We had
charge-offs of $1.9 million and $836,000 for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007,
respectively. The allowance for loans losses was $8.8 million, or 1.49% of total loans receivable
at December 31, 2008, compared to $5.6 million, or 1.33% of total loans receivable at December 31,
2007. The increase in the provision for loan losses was due primarily to loan growth, provisions
for impaired loans, and increases in certain general loss factors utilized in managements
calculation of the allowance for loan losses in response to continued deterioration in general real
estate collateral values and weakness in the overall economy.
Non-interest Income. Non-interest income decreased $3.3 million or 35.1%, to $6.2 million for
the year ended December 31, 2008, from $9.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2007. The
decrease was primarily attributable to a $4.3 million gain on the sale of two branch offices and
associated deposit relationships recognized in March 2007. Non-interest income for the year ended
December 31, 2008, also included market losses of $1.3 million on trading securities as compared to
$71,000 in market gains for the year ended December 31, 2007. These decreases were partially
offset by the recognition of a $2.5 million nontaxable death benefit realized on bank owned life
insurance for the year ended December 31, 2008.
71
Non-interest Expense. Non-interest expense decreased $11.1 million, or 30.9%, to $24.9
million for the year ended December 31, 2008, from $36.0 million for the year ended December 31,
2007. This decrease was primarily attributable to the contribution of shares of our common stock
and cash with a value of $12.0 million to the Northfield Bank Foundation during the fourth quarter
of 2007. In addition, compensation and employee benefits decreased by $962,000, to $11.7 million
for the year ended December 31, 2008, from $12.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2007. The
decrease was primarily related to $1.3 million in market losses on trading securities utilized to
fund our deferred compensation plan for certain officers and directors who chose to defer all or a
portion of their compensation received from us. The market losses recorded as a reduction to
non-interest income have the direct result of reducing amounts owed to the deferred compensation
plan participants. Excluding this adjustment, compensation and employee benefits expense increased
approximately $338,000, or 2.6%, and was primarily the result of annual cost of living, merit, and
competitive market adjustments to salaries.
Occupancy and furniture and equipment expense increased $946,000, or 24.2%, to $4.8 million
for the year ended December 31, 2008 as compared to $3.9 million for the year ended December 31,
2007. The increases were due to the occupancy of our new operations center and depreciation on
capital improvements. Professional fees increased $366,000, or 30.0%, to $1.6 million, for the year
ended December 31, 2008, as compared to $1.2 million, for the year ended December 31, 2007. The
increase in professional fees was due primarily to additional costs of being a public company,
third party consultants utilized to assist us in complying with internal control reporting
requirements under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and third-party consultation related to the
implementation of our equity incentive plan.
Income Tax Expense. We recorded a provision for income taxes of $7.2 million for the year
ended December 31, 2008, as compared to a benefit of $1.6 million for the year ended December 31,
2007. The increase in income tax expense of $8.7 million was due primarily to the reversal of $4.5
million in state and local income tax liabilities, net of federal taxes, for the year ended
December 31, 2007. In 2007, we concluded an audit by the State of New York with respect to our
combined state tax returns for years 2000 through 2006. In addition, the increase in income tax
expense for the year ended December 31, 2008, was due to an increased level of taxable income for
the year ended December 31, 2008, as compared to year ended December 31, 2007.
72
Average Balances and Yields. The following tables set forth average balance sheets, average
yields and costs, and certain other information at and for the periods indicated. No
tax-equivalent yield adjustments have been made, as we had no tax-free interest-earning assets
during the periods. All average balances are daily average balances based upon amortized costs.
Non-accrual loans are included in the computation of average balances. The yields set forth below
include the effect of deferred fees, discounts, and premiums that are amortized or accreted to
interest income or interest expense.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
At |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yield/ |
|
|
Outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yield/ |
|
|
|
Yield/ Rate |
|
|
Balance |
|
|
Interest |
|
|
Rate (1) |
|
|
Balance |
|
|
Interest |
|
|
Rate (1) |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
Interest-earning assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans |
|
|
6.17 |
% |
|
$ |
734,417 |
|
|
$ |
10,293 |
|
|
|
5.68 |
% |
|
$ |
601,245 |
|
|
$ |
8,571 |
|
|
|
5.78 |
% |
Mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
3.65 |
|
|
|
909,351 |
|
|
|
9,181 |
|
|
|
4.09 |
|
|
|
943,951 |
|
|
|
11,114 |
|
|
|
4.77 |
|
Other securities |
|
|
2.62 |
|
|
|
229,298 |
|
|
|
1,384 |
|
|
|
2.45 |
|
|
|
31,943 |
|
|
|
282 |
|
|
|
3.58 |
|
Federal Home Loan Bank of
New York stock |
|
|
4.25 |
|
|
|
6,068 |
|
|
|
95 |
|
|
|
6.35 |
|
|
|
7,917 |
|
|
|
80 |
|
|
|
4.10 |
|
Interest-earning deposits |
|
|
0.24 |
|
|
|
65,561 |
|
|
|
54 |
|
|
|
0.33 |
|
|
|
98,229 |
|
|
|
435 |
|
|
|
1.80 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-earning
assets |
|
|
4.38 |
|
|
|
1,944,695 |
|
|
|
21,007 |
|
|
|
4.38 |
|
|
|
1,683,285 |
|
|
|
20,482 |
|
|
|
4.93 |
|
Non-interest-earning assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
107,191 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
86,820 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,051,886 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,770,105 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-bearing liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Savings, NOW, and money
market accounts |
|
|
0.76 |
|
|
$ |
637,500 |
|
|
|
1,420 |
|
|
|
0.90 |
|
|
$ |
523,886 |
|
|
|
1,636 |
|
|
|
1.27 |
|
Certificates of deposit |
|
|
1.42 |
|
|
|
588,675 |
|
|
|
2,532 |
|
|
|
1.74 |
|
|
|
448,761 |
|
|
|
3,321 |
|
|
|
3.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-bearing
deposits |
|
|
1.08 |
|
|
|
1,226,175 |
|
|
|
3,952 |
|
|
|
1.31 |
|
|
|
972,647 |
|
|
|
4,957 |
|
|
|
2.07 |
|
Borrowings |
|
|
3.45 |
|
|
|
311,798 |
|
|
|
2,506 |
|
|
|
3.26 |
|
|
|
304,513 |
|
|
|
2,764 |
|
|
|
3.68 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-bearing
liabilities |
|
|
1.52 |
|
|
|
1,537,973 |
|
|
|
6,458 |
|
|
|
1.70 |
|
|
|
1,277,160 |
|
|
|
7,721 |
|
|
|
2.45 |
|
Non-interest-bearing
deposits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
109,640 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
94,185 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued expenses and other
liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,124 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,816 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,657,737 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,383,161 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
394,149 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
386,944 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and
stockholders equity |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,051,886 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,770,105 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
14,549 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
12,761 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest rate spread (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.68 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.48 |
% |
Net interest-earning
assets (2) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
406,722 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
406,125 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest margin (3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.03 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.07 |
% |
Average interest-earning
assets to interest-bearing
liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
126.45 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
131.80 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(footnotes on following page)
73
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
Outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yield/ |
|
|
Outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yield/ |
|
|
Outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yield/ |
|
|
|
Balance |
|
|
Interest |
|
|
Rate |
|
|
Balance |
|
|
Interest |
|
|
Rate |
|
|
Balance |
|
|
Interest |
|
|
Rate |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Interest-earning assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans |
|
$ |
653,748 |
|
|
$ |
38,889 |
|
|
|
5.95 |
% |
|
$ |
503,897 |
|
|
$ |
31,617 |
|
|
|
6.27 |
% |
|
$ |
423,947 |
|
|
$ |
28,398 |
|
|
|
6.70 |
% |
Mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
920,785 |
|
|
|
42,256 |
|
|
|
4.59 |
|
|
|
844,435 |
|
|
|
38,072 |
|
|
|
4.51 |
|
|
|
718,279 |
|
|
|
30,576 |
|
|
|
4.26 |
|
Other securities |
|
|
126,954 |
|
|
|
3,223 |
|
|
|
2.54 |
|
|
|
35,977 |
|
|
|
1,348 |
|
|
|
3.75 |
|
|
|
45,077 |
|
|
|
2,100 |
|
|
|
4.66 |
|
Federal Home Loan Bank of
New York stock |
|
|
7,428 |
|
|
|
399 |
|
|
|
5.37 |
|
|
|
11,653 |
|
|
|
652 |
|
|
|
5.60 |
|
|
|
6,486 |
|
|
|
519 |
|
|
|
8.00 |
|
Interest-earning deposits |
|
|
83,159 |
|
|
|
801 |
|
|
|
0.96 |
|
|
|
97,223 |
|
|
|
3,360 |
|
|
|
3.46 |
|
|
|
92,202 |
|
|
|
4,109 |
|
|
|
4.46 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-earning
assets |
|
|
1,792,074 |
|
|
|
85,568 |
|
|
|
4.77 |
|
|
|
1,493,185 |
|
|
|
75,049 |
|
|
|
5.03 |
|
|
|
1,285,991 |
|
|
|
65,702 |
|
|
|
5.11 |
|
Non-interest-earning assets |
|
|
87,014 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
80,649 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
66,614 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
1,879,088 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,573,834 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,352,605 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-bearing
liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Savings, NOW, and money
market accounts |
|
$ |
566,894 |
|
|
|
6,046 |
|
|
|
1.07 |
|
|
$ |
445,382 |
|
|
|
5,866 |
|
|
|
1.32 |
|
|
$ |
450,212 |
|
|
|
3,551 |
|
|
|
0.79 |
|
Certificates of deposit |
|
|
509,610 |
|
|
|
12,168 |
|
|
|
2.39 |
|
|
|
367,806 |
|
|
|
12,656 |
|
|
|
3.44 |
|
|
|
464,552 |
|
|
|
20,212 |
|
|
|
4.35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-bearing
deposits |
|
|
1,076,504 |
|
|
|
18,214 |
|
|
|
1.69 |
|
|
|
813,188 |
|
|
|
18,522 |
|
|
|
2.28 |
|
|
|
914,764 |
|
|
|
23,763 |
|
|
|
2.60 |
|
Borrowings |
|
|
297,365 |
|
|
|
10,763 |
|
|
|
3.62 |
|
|
|
277,227 |
|
|
|
9,734 |
|
|
|
3.51 |
|
|
|
127,926 |
|
|
|
5,073 |
|
|
|
3.97 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-bearing
liabilities |
|
|
1,373,869 |
|
|
|
28,977 |
|
|
|
2.11 |
|
|
|
1,090,415 |
|
|
|
28,256 |
|
|
|
2.59 |
|
|
|
1,042,690 |
|
|
|
28,836 |
|
|
|
2.77 |
|
Non-interest-bearing
deposits |
|
|
99,950 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
94,499 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
96,796 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued expenses and other
liabilities |
|
|
14,075 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,703 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,905 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
1,487,894 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,198,617 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,153,391 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity |
|
|
391,194 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
375,217 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
199,214 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and
stockholders equity |
|
$ |
1,879,088 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,573,834 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,352,605 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
56,591 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
46,793 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
36,866 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest rate spread (2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.66 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.44 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.34 |
|
Net interest-earning
assets (3) |
|
$ |
418,205 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
402,770 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
243,301 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest margin (4) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.16 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.13 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.87 |
% |
Average interest-earning
assets to interest-bearing
liabilities |
|
|
130.44 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
136.94 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
123.33 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Annualized. |
|
(2) |
|
Net interest rate spread represents the difference between the weighted average yield on
interest-earning assets and the weighted average cost of interest-bearing liabilities. |
|
(3) |
|
Net interest-earning assets represents total interest-earning assets less total
interest-bearing liabilities. |
|
(4) |
|
Net interest margin represents net interest income divided by average total interest-earning
assets. |
74
Rate/Volume Analysis
The following table presents the effects of changing rates and volumes on our net interest
income for the periods indicated. The rate column shows the effects attributable to changes in
rate (changes in rate multiplied by prior volume). The volume column shows the effects
attributable to changes in volume (changes in volume multiplied by prior rate). The total column
represents the sum of the prior columns. For purposes of this table, changes attributable to both
rate and volume, which cannot be segregated, have been allocated proportionately based on the
changes due to rate and the changes due to volume.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
|
Year Ended December 31, |
|
|
Year Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 vs. 2009 |
|
|
2009 vs. 2008 |
|
|
2008 vs. 2007 |
|
|
|
Increase (Decrease) |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Increase (Decrease) |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Increase (Decrease) |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
Due to |
|
|
Increase |
|
|
Due to |
|
|
Increase |
|
|
Due to |
|
|
Increase |
|
|
|
Volume |
|
|
Rate |
|
|
(Decrease) |
|
|
Volume |
|
|
Rate |
|
|
(Decrease) |
|
|
Volume |
|
|
Rate |
|
|
(Decrease) |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Interest-earning assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans |
|
$ |
1,864 |
|
|
$ |
(142 |
) |
|
$ |
1,722 |
|
|
$ |
8,811 |
|
|
$ |
(1,539 |
) |
|
$ |
7,272 |
|
|
$ |
4,845 |
|
|
$ |
(1,626 |
) |
|
$ |
3,219 |
|
Mortgage-backed
securities |
|
|
(396 |
) |
|
|
(1,537 |
) |
|
|
(1,933 |
) |
|
|
3,494 |
|
|
|
690 |
|
|
|
4,184 |
|
|
|
5,608 |
|
|
|
1,888 |
|
|
|
7,496 |
|
Other securities |
|
|
1,161 |
|
|
|
(59 |
) |
|
|
1,102 |
|
|
|
2,149 |
|
|
|
(274 |
) |
|
|
1,875 |
|
|
|
(382 |
) |
|
|
(370 |
) |
|
|
(752 |
) |
Federal Home Loan Bank
of New York stock |
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
(228 |
) |
|
|
(25 |
) |
|
|
(253 |
) |
|
|
214 |
|
|
|
(81 |
) |
|
|
133 |
|
Interest-earning
deposits |
|
|
(111 |
) |
|
|
(270 |
) |
|
|
(381 |
) |
|
|
(427 |
) |
|
|
(2,132 |
) |
|
|
(2,559 |
) |
|
|
240 |
|
|
|
(989 |
) |
|
|
(749 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
interest-earning
assets |
|
|
2,507 |
|
|
|
(1,982 |
) |
|
|
525 |
|
|
|
13,799 |
|
|
|
(3,280 |
) |
|
|
10,519 |
|
|
|
10,525 |
|
|
|
(1,178 |
) |
|
|
9,347 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-bearing
liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Savings, NOW and money
market accounts |
|
|
671 |
|
|
|
(887 |
) |
|
|
(216 |
) |
|
|
595 |
|
|
|
(415 |
) |
|
|
180 |
|
|
|
(38 |
) |
|
|
2,353 |
|
|
|
2,315 |
|
Certificates of deposit |
|
|
2,299 |
|
|
|
(3,088 |
) |
|
|
(789 |
) |
|
|
4,043 |
|
|
|
(4,531 |
) |
|
|
(488 |
) |
|
|
(3,770 |
) |
|
|
(3,786 |
) |
|
|
(7,556 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deposits |
|
|
2,970 |
|
|
|
(3,975 |
) |
|
|
(1,005 |
) |
|
|
4,638 |
|
|
|
(4,946 |
) |
|
|
(308 |
) |
|
|
(3,808 |
) |
|
|
(1,433 |
) |
|
|
(5,241 |
) |
Borrowings |
|
|
68 |
|
|
|
(326 |
) |
|
|
(258 |
) |
|
|
722 |
|
|
|
307 |
|
|
|
1,029 |
|
|
|
5,168 |
|
|
|
(507 |
) |
|
|
4,661 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
interest-bearing
liabilities |
|
|
3,038 |
|
|
|
(4,301 |
) |
|
|
(1,263 |
) |
|
|
5,360 |
|
|
|
(4,639 |
) |
|
|
721 |
|
|
|
1,360 |
|
|
|
(1,940 |
) |
|
|
(580 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in net interest
income |
|
$ |
(531 |
) |
|
$ |
2,319 |
|
|
$ |
1,788 |
|
|
$ |
8,439 |
|
|
$ |
1,359 |
|
|
$ |
9,798 |
|
|
$ |
9,165 |
|
|
$ |
762 |
|
|
$ |
9,927 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loan Quality
One of our key objectives has been and continues to be to maintain a high level of loan
quality. In addition to maintaining sound credit standards for new loan originations, we use
proactive collection and workout processes associated with delinquent or problem loans. We
actively market properties that we acquire through foreclosure or otherwise in the loan collection
process.
When a loan is over 15 days delinquent, we generally send the borrower a late charge notice.
When the loan is 30 days past due, we generally mail the borrower a letter reminding the borrower
of the delinquency and, except for loans secured by one- to four-family residential real estate, we
attempt personal, direct contact with the borrower to determine the reason for the delinquency, to
ensure that the borrower correctly understands the terms of the loan, and to emphasize the
importance of making payments on or before the due date. If necessary, additional late charges and
delinquency notices are issued and the account will be monitored periodically. After the
90th day of delinquency, we will send the borrower a final demand for payment and
generally refer the loan to legal counsel to commence foreclosure and related legal proceedings.
Our loan officers can shorten these time frames in consultation with the Chief Lending Officer.
75
Generally, loans are placed on non-accrual status when payment of principal or interest is 90
days or more delinquent unless the loan is considered well-secured and in the process of
collection. Loans also are placed on non-accrual status at any time if the ultimate collection of
principal or interest in full is in doubt. When loans are placed on non-accrual status, unpaid
accrued interest is reversed, and further income is recognized only to the extent received, and
only if the principal balance is deemed fully collectible. The loan may be returned to accrual
status if both principal and interest payments are brought current and factors indicating doubtful
collection no longer exist, including performance by the borrower under the loan terms for a
six-month period. Therefore, loans may be current in accordance with their loan terms, or may be
less than 90 days delinquent, and still be on non-accrual status. Our Chief Lending Officer
reports monitored loans, including all loans rated watch, special mention, substandard, doubtful or
loss, to the board of directors on a monthly basis.
For economic reasons and to maximize the recovery of loans, we work with borrowers
experiencing financial difficulties, and will consider modifications to a borrowers existing loan
terms and conditions that we would not otherwise consider, commonly referred to as TDRs. We record
an impairment loss associated with TDRs, if any, based on the present value of expected future cash
flows discounted at the original loans effective interest rate. We will report the loan as a TDR
through the end of the calendar year that the restructuring takes place and until such time that
the loan yields a market rate of interest (a rate equal to or greater than the rate we were willing
to accept at the time of the restructuring for a new loan with comparable risk).
76
Non-Performing and Restructured Loans. The table below sets forth the amounts and categories
of our non-performing assets at the dates indicated. At March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009,
2008, 2007, 2006, and 2005, we had troubled debt restructurings of $13.1 million, $10.7 million,
$1.0 million, $1.3 million, $1.7 million, and $885,000, respectively, which are included in the
appropriate categories which appear within non-accrual loans. Additionally, we had $8.8 million
and $7.3 million of troubled debt restructurings on accrual status at March 31, 2010 and December
31, 2009, respectively, that do not appear in the table below. We had no troubled debt
restructurings on accrual status at December 31, 2008, 2007, 2006, and 2005.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At March 31, |
|
|
At December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Non-accrual loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial |
|
$ |
32,755 |
|
|
$ |
28,802 |
|
|
$ |
4,416 |
|
|
$ |
4,792 |
|
|
$ |
5,167 |
|
|
$ |
124 |
|
One- to four-family residential |
|
|
2,195 |
|
|
|
2,066 |
|
|
|
1,093 |
|
|
|
231 |
|
|
|
234 |
|
|
|
290 |
|
Construction and land |
|
|
6,007 |
|
|
|
6,843 |
|
|
|
2,675 |
|
|
|
3,436 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Multifamily |
|
|
2,507 |
|
|
|
2,118 |
|
|
|
1,131 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Home equity and lines of credit |
|
|
63 |
|
|
|
62 |
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
104 |
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
62 |
|
Commercial and industrial loans |
|
|
690 |
|
|
|
1,740 |
|
|
|
86 |
|
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
905 |
|
|
|
885 |
|
Insurance premium loans |
|
|
121 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-accrual loans |
|
|
44,338 |
|
|
|
41,631 |
|
|
|
9,502 |
|
|
|
8,606 |
|
|
|
6,342 |
|
|
|
1,361 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans delinquent 90 days or more and
still accruing: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial |
|
|
3,976 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One- to four-family residential |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
698 |
|
Construction and land |
|
|
1,236 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
137 |
|
|
|
753 |
|
|
|
275 |
|
|
|
|
|
Multifamily |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Home equity and lines of credit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial and industrial loans |
|
|
496 |
|
|
|
191 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
475 |
|
|
|
498 |
|
|
|
|
|
Insurance premium loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other loans |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans delinquent 90 days or
more and still accruing |
|
|
5,710 |
|
|
|
191 |
|
|
|
137 |
|
|
|
1,228 |
|
|
|
773 |
|
|
|
698 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-performing loans |
|
|
50,048 |
|
|
|
41,822 |
|
|
|
9,639 |
|
|
|
9,834 |
|
|
|
7,115 |
|
|
|
2,059 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other real estate owned |
|
|
1,533 |
|
|
|
1,938 |
|
|
|
1,071 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-performing assets |
|
$ |
51,581 |
|
|
$ |
43,760 |
|
|
$ |
10,710 |
|
|
$ |
9,834 |
|
|
$ |
7,115 |
|
|
$ |
2,059 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ratios: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-performing loans to total loans
held-for-investment, net |
|
|
6.79 |
% |
|
|
5.73 |
% |
|
|
1.63 |
% |
|
|
2.32 |
% |
|
|
1.74 |
% |
|
|
0.53 |
% |
Non-performing assets to total assets |
|
|
2.46 |
% |
|
|
2.19 |
% |
|
|
0.61 |
% |
|
|
0.71 |
% |
|
|
0.55 |
% |
|
|
0.15 |
% |
Total assets |
|
$ |
2,097,803 |
|
|
$ |
2,002,274 |
|
|
$ |
1,757,761 |
|
|
$ |
1,386,918 |
|
|
$ |
1,294,747 |
|
|
$ |
1,408,562 |
|
Loans held-for-investment, net |
|
$ |
737,225 |
|
|
$ |
729,269 |
|
|
$ |
589,984 |
|
|
$ |
424,329 |
|
|
$ |
409,189 |
|
|
$ |
387,467 |
|
77
The table below sets forth the property types collateralizing non-accrual commercial real
estate loans as of March 31, 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At March 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Percent |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Manufacturing |
|
$ |
13,032 |
|
|
|
39.8 |
% |
Office building |
|
|
8,277 |
|
|
|
25.3 |
|
Restaurant |
|
|
3,580 |
|
|
|
10.9 |
|
Services |
|
|
3,130 |
|
|
|
9.6 |
|
Retail |
|
|
923 |
|
|
|
2.8 |
|
Recreational |
|
|
792 |
|
|
|
2.4 |
|
Warehouse |
|
|
638 |
|
|
|
1.9 |
|
Other |
|
|
2,383 |
|
|
|
7.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
32,755 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-accruing loans increased $2.7 million to $44.3 million at March 31, 2010, from
$41.6 million at December 31, 2009. This increase was primarily attributable to $6.3 million of
commercial real estate loans and $429,000 of multifamily real estate loans being placed on
non-accrual status, and being designated as impaired during the first quarter of 2010. These loans
did not require material increases to the allowance for loan losses at March 31, 2010, as the
estimated collateral values, including costs to sell, were considered adequate in relation to the
outstanding loan balances. These increases were partially offset by a payoff of $504,000 on one
commercial real estate loan and principal paydowns of approximately $757,000. In addition, a $2.8
million commercial real estate loan relationship was returned to accrual status. The loans under
this relationship were current as to principal and interest at March 31, 2010, and factors
indicating doubtful collection no longer existed, including the borrowers performance under the
original loans terms for greater than six months. At March 31, 2010, $16.2 million, or 74.1% of
loans subject to restructuring agreements (accruing and non-accruing) were performing in accordance
with their restructured terms.
Loans 90 days or more past due and still accruing interest increased to $5.7 million from
$191,000 at December 31, 2009. The majority of the increase was due to one loan relationship for
$3.7 million that at March 31, 2010, was current on interest payments in accordance with the
original contractual terms of the loans, but was past maturity. These loans were considered well
secured and in the process of collection. We are refinancing the loans to permanent real estate
mortgages in accordance with our current underwriting standards.
The increase in non-performing loans during 2009 was primarily attributable to an increase of
$24.4 million in non-performing commercial real estate loans. During 2009, 15 commercial real
estate loans totaling $26.3 million were placed on non-accrual status, while one loan that was
previously classified as non-accrual at December 31, 2008 was reclassified to other real estate
owned. The increase in non-performing loans also was attributable to an increase of $4.0 million
in construction and land loans over the same time period. During 2009, six construction and land
loans totaling $6.8 million were placed on non-accrual status, while one loan that was previously
classified as non-accrual at December 31, 2008, was sold.
78
The following tables detail the delinquency status of non-accrual loans at March 31, 2010 and
December 31, 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At March 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
Days Past Due of Non-Accrual Loans |
|
|
|
0 to 29 |
|
|
30 to 89 |
|
|
90 or Greater |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Real estate loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial |
|
$ |
4,105 |
|
|
$ |
4,142 |
|
|
$ |
24,508 |
|
|
$ |
32,755 |
|
One- to four-family residential |
|
|
137 |
|
|
|
546 |
|
|
|
1,512 |
|
|
|
2,195 |
|
Construction and land |
|
|
3,382 |
|
|
|
1,637 |
|
|
|
988 |
|
|
|
6,007 |
|
Multifamily |
|
|
|
|
|
|
523 |
|
|
|
1,984 |
|
|
|
2,507 |
|
Home equity and lines of credit |
|
|
63 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
63 |
|
Commercial and industrial |
|
|
|
|
|
|
501 |
|
|
|
189 |
|
|
|
690 |
|
Premium finance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
121 |
|
|
|
121 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-accrual loans |
|
$ |
7,687 |
|
|
$ |
7,349 |
|
|
$ |
29,302 |
|
|
$ |
44,338 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
Days Past Due of Non-Accrual Loans |
|
|
|
0 to 29 |
|
|
30 to 89 |
|
|
90 or Greater |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Real estate loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial |
|
$ |
2,585 |
|
|
$ |
10,480 |
|
|
$ |
15,737 |
|
|
$ |
28,802 |
|
One- to four-family residential |
|
|
|
|
|
|
392 |
|
|
|
1,674 |
|
|
|
2,066 |
|
Construction and land |
|
|
5,864 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
979 |
|
|
|
6,843 |
|
Multifamily |
|
|
|
|
|
|
530 |
|
|
|
1,589 |
|
|
|
2,119 |
|
Home equity and lines of credit |
|
|
62 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
62 |
|
Commercial and industrial |
|
|
1,470 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
269 |
|
|
|
1,739 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-accrual loans |
|
$ |
9,981 |
|
|
$ |
11,402 |
|
|
$ |
20,248 |
|
|
$ |
41,631 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A discussion of the most significant nonaccrual loans at March 31, 2010 is as follows.
These loans comprise $26.0 million, or 58.7%, of total nonaccrual loans of $44.3 million at March
31, 2010.
|
|
|
An owner occupied commercial real estate relationship with a carrying value of $8.5
million at March 31, 2010. The business and collateral are located in New Jersey. The
collateral consists of a first mortgage on a commercial manufacturing facility, and a
second mortgage on the primary residence of the owner of the borrower. At March 31,
2010, the relationship is in the process of being restructured to reduce the borrowers
current debt service. |
|
|
|
|
An owner occupied commercial real estate loan with a carrying value of $5.1 million
at March 31, 2010. The business and collateral are located in New Jersey. The
collateral consists of a first mortgage on a manufacturing facility. The operating
company filed for bankruptcy protection in the first quarter of 2010. |
|
|
|
|
A commercial real estate loan with a carrying value of $3.5 million at March 31,
2010 secured by a first mortgage on an office building located in New York. At March
31, 2010, the relationship is in the process of being restructured to reduce the
borrowers current debt service. |
|
|
|
|
A commercial real estate loan with a carrying value of $3.1 million at March 31,
2010 secured by a first mortgage on a retail property in New Jersey, the primary tenant
being a recreational facility. During the quarter ended March 31, 2010, we
restructured the loan to reduce the borrowers debt service. |
|
|
|
|
A relationship with a carrying value of $3.1 million, consisting of three loans, at
March 31, 2010 secured by first mortgages on three individual properties. The largest
loan has a carrying balance of $1.9 million and is secured by a mixed-use commercial
property located in New York. The borrower filed for bankruptcy protection in January
2010. The borrower has made payments and at March 31, 2010 the three loans were each
31 days past due. |
79
|
|
|
One relationship consisting of two construction loans with a carrying value of $2.7
million at March 31, 2010. These loans are secured by first mortgages on ten one- to
four-family residential real estate properties in various stages of construction in New
York. These loans were restructured in 2009. At March 31, 2010, the borrower has two
signed contracts for the sale of houses and expects to deliver these units in the third
quarter of 2010. At March 31, 2010, one loan in the amount of $1.7 million was 31 days
past due to interest, and the other loan was current. |
The next four largest non-accrual loans at March 31, 2010 had a total carrying value of $7.4
million, and consisted of three commercial real estate loans with a total carrying value of $5.1
million and one construction loan with a carrying balance of $2.3 million.
80
Delinquent Loans. The following table sets forth our total amounts of delinquencies for
accruing loans by type and by amount at the dates indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Delinquent Accruing Loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
90 Days and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
30 to 89 Days |
|
|
Over |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
At March 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial |
|
$ |
22,085 |
|
|
$ |
3,976 |
|
|
$ |
26,061 |
|
One- to four-family residential mortgage |
|
|
5,346 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,346 |
|
Construction and land |
|
|
997 |
|
|
|
1,236 |
|
|
|
2,233 |
|
Multifamily |
|
|
8,536 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,536 |
|
Home equity and line of credit |
|
|
213 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
213 |
|
Commercial and industrial loans |
|
|
698 |
|
|
|
496 |
|
|
|
1,194 |
|
Insurance premium loans |
|
|
282 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
282 |
|
Other loans |
|
|
214 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
216 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
38,371 |
|
|
$ |
5,710 |
|
|
$ |
44,081 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial |
|
$ |
11,573 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
11,573 |
|
One- to four-family residential mortgage |
|
|
4,716 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,716 |
|
Construction and land |
|
|
1,976 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,976 |
|
Multifamily |
|
|
7,086 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,086 |
|
Home equity and line of credit |
|
|
1,555 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,555 |
|
Commercial and industrial loans |
|
|
427 |
|
|
|
191 |
|
|
|
618 |
|
Insurance premium loans |
|
|
917 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
917 |
|
Other loans |
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
28,283 |
|
|
$ |
191 |
|
|
$ |
28,474 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial |
|
$ |
4,075 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
4,075 |
|
One- to four-family residential mortgage |
|
|
1,505 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,505 |
|
Construction and land |
|
|
|
|
|
|
137 |
|
|
|
137 |
|
Home equity and line of credit |
|
|
496 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
496 |
|
Commercial and industrial loans |
|
|
74 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
74 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
6,150 |
|
|
$ |
137 |
|
|
$ |
6,287 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial |
|
$ |
1,997 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,997 |
|
One- to four-family residential mortgage |
|
|
804 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
804 |
|
Construction and land |
|
|
490 |
|
|
|
753 |
|
|
|
1,243 |
|
Commercial and industrial loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
475 |
|
|
|
475 |
|
Other loans |
|
|
96 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
96 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
3,387 |
|
|
$ |
1,228 |
|
|
$ |
4,685 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial |
|
$ |
1,989 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,989 |
|
One- to four-family residential mortgage |
|
|
1,678 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,678 |
|
Construction and land |
|
|
3,109 |
|
|
|
275 |
|
|
|
3,384 |
|
Home equity and line of credit |
|
|
937 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
937 |
|
Commercial and industrial loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
498 |
|
|
|
498 |
|
Other loans |
|
|
68 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
68 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
7,781 |
|
|
$ |
773 |
|
|
$ |
8,554 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One- to four-family residential mortgage |
|
$ |
71 |
|
|
$ |
698 |
|
|
$ |
769 |
|
Home equity and line of credit |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
Other loans |
|
|
63 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
63 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
140 |
|
|
$ |
698 |
|
|
$ |
838 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
81
At March 31, 2010, we had $38.4 million of accruing loans that were 30 to 89 days
delinquent, compared to $28.3 million and $6.2 million of such loans at December 31, 2009 and 2008,
respectively.
Non-accruing loans subject to restructuring agreements totaled $13.1 million, $10.7 million
and $1.0 million at March 31, 2010, December 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively. During
the three months ended March 31, 2010, we entered into one troubled debt restructuring totaling
$3.1 million that was classified as non-accrual at March 31, 2010. During the year ended December
31, 2009, we entered into eight troubled debt restructurings totaling $9.8 million that were
classified as non-accrual at December 31, 2009.
In addition, during the three months ended March 31, 2010, we entered into one troubled debt
restructuring agreement totaling $1.6 million for which interest was still accruing at March 31,
2010, and, for the year ended December 31, 2009, we entered into six troubled debt restructuring
agreements totaling $7.3 million for which interest was still accruing at December 31, 2009. The
table below sets forth the amounts and categories of the troubled debt restructurings as of March
31, 2010, December 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At March 31, |
|
|
At December 31 |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
Non- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accruing |
|
|
Accruing |
|
|
Accruing |
|
|
Accruing |
|
|
Accruing |
|
|
Accruing |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Troubled Debt Restructurings: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial |
|
$ |
7,047 |
|
|
$ |
5,492 |
|
|
$ |
3,960 |
|
|
$ |
5,499 |
|
|
$ |
950 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Construction and land |
|
|
5,019 |
|
|
|
1,750 |
|
|
|
5,726 |
|
|
|
1,751 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Multifamily |
|
|
523 |
|
|
|
1,575 |
|
|
|
530 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial and industrial |
|
|
501 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
501 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
13,090 |
|
|
$ |
8,817 |
|
|
$ |
10,717 |
|
|
$ |
7,250 |
|
|
$ |
950 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The recent increases in delinquencies and non-performing loans have been directly related
to the current economic downturn. As a result of increased unemployment rates, and decreasing real
estate values, delinquencies and non-accrual loans have risen from December 31, 2008 to March 31,
2010. These factors have attributed to the growth in our allowance for loan losses as detailed
below.
Other Real Estate Owned. Real estate acquired by us as a result of foreclosure or by deed in
lieu of foreclosure is classified as real estate owned. On the date property is acquired it is
recorded at the lower of cost or estimated fair value, establishing a new cost basis. Estimated
fair value generally represents the sale price a buyer would be willing to pay on the basis of
current market conditions, including normal terms from other financial institutions, less the
estimated costs to sell the property. Holding costs and declines in estimated fair value result in
charges to expense after acquisition. At March 31, 2010, we owned 11 properties with a combined
carrying value of $1.5 million. The properties consisted of 10 single family and mixed use
properties located in Trenton, New Jersey, and one commercial real estate property located in South
Orange, New Jersey. We are currently renting certain of the properties and have contracted with
third parties to assist in disposing of all properties.
Potential Problem Loans and Classification of Assets. The current economic environment is
negatively affecting certain borrowers. Our loan officers continue to monitor their loan
portfolios, including evaluation of borrowers business operations, current financial condition,
underlying values of any collateral, and assessment of their financial prospects in the current and
deteriorating economic environment. Based on this evaluation, we determine an appropriate strategy
to assist borrowers, with the objective of maximizing the recovery of the related loan balances.
Our policies, consistent with regulatory guidelines, provide for the classification of loans
and other assets that are considered to be of lesser quality as substandard, doubtful, or loss
assets. An asset is considered substandard if it is inadequately protected by the current net
worth and paying capacity of the obligor or of the collateral pledged, if any. Substandard assets
include those assets characterized by the distinct possibility that we will sustain some loss if
the deficiencies are not corrected. Assets classified as doubtful have all of the weaknesses
inherent in those classified substandard with the added characteristic that the weaknesses present
make collection or
82
liquidation in full, on the basis of currently existing facts, conditions and values, highly
questionable and improbable. Assets (or portions of assets) classified as loss are those
considered uncollectible and of such little value that their continuance as assets is not
warranted. Assets that do not expose us to risk sufficient to warrant classification in one of the
aforementioned categories, but which possess potential weaknesses that deserve our close attention,
are designated as special mention. On the basis of our review of our assets at March 31, 2010,
classified assets consisted of substandard assets of $50.4 million ($41.1 million of which are
reported as non-performing assets or delinquent loans in the preceding tables) and no doubtful or
loss assets. At that date, we also had $24.7 million of assets designated as special mention
($24.5 million of which are reported as non-performing assets or delinquent loans in the preceding
tables).
The classification of our assets (and the amount of our loss allowances) is subject to review
by our principal federal regulator, the Office of Thrift Supervision, which can require that we
adjust our classification and related loss allowances. We regularly review our asset portfolio to
determine whether any assets require classification in accordance with applicable regulations.
Allowance for Loan Losses
We provide for loan losses based on the consistent application of our documented allowance for
loan loss methodology. Loan losses are charged to the allowance for loans losses and recoveries
are credited to it. Additions to the allowance for loan losses are provided by charges against
income based on various factors which, in our judgment, deserve current recognition in estimating
probable losses. We regularly review the loan portfolio and make adjustments for loan losses in
order to maintain the allowance for loan losses in accordance with U.S. generally accepted
accounting principles (GAAP). The allowance for loan losses consists primarily of the following
two components:
|
(1) |
|
Allowances established for impaired loans (which we generally define as
non-accrual loans with an outstanding balance of $500,000 or greater). The amount of
impairment provided for as an allowance is represented by the deficiency, if any,
between the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the original
loans effective interest rate or the underlying collateral value (less estimated costs
to sell,) if the loan is collateral dependent, and the carrying value of the loan.
Impaired loans that have no impairment losses are not considered for general valuation
allowances described below. |
|
|
(2) |
|
General allowances established for loan losses on a portfolio basis for loans
that do not meet the definition of impaired. The portfolio is grouped into similar
risk characteristics, primarily loan type, loan-to-value, if collateral dependent, and
delinquency status. We apply an estimated loss rate to each loan group. The loss
rates applied are based on our cumulative prior two-year loss experience adjusted, as
appropriate, for the environmental factors discussed below. This evaluation is
inherently subjective, as it requires material estimates that may be susceptible to
significant revisions based upon changes in economic and real estate market conditions.
Actual loan losses may be significantly more than the allowance for loan losses we
have established, which could have a material negative effect on our financial results. |
The adjustments to our loss experience are based on our evaluation of several environmental
factors, including:
|
|
|
changes in local, regional, national, and international economic and
business conditions and developments that affect the collectability of our portfolio,
including the condition of various market segments; |
|
|
|
|
changes in the nature and volume of our portfolio and in the terms of our
loans; |
|
|
|
|
changes in the experience, ability, and depth of lending management and
other relevant staff; |
83
|
|
|
changes in the volume and severity of past due loans, the volume of
nonaccrual loans, and the volume and severity of adversely classified or graded loans; |
|
|
|
|
changes in the quality of our loan review system; |
|
|
|
|
changes in the value of underlying collateral for collateral-dependent
loans; |
|
|
|
|
the existence and effect of any concentrations of credit, and changes in
the level of such concentrations; and |
|
|
|
|
the effect of other external factors such as competition and legal and
regulatory requirements on the level of estimated credit losses in our existing
portfolio. |
In evaluating the estimated loss factors to be utilized for each loan group, management also
reviews actual loss history over an extended period of time as reported by the Office of Thrift
Supervision and Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation for institutions both nationally and in our
market area for periods that are believed to have been under similar economic conditions.
We evaluate the allowance for loan losses based on the combined total of the impaired and
general components. Generally when the loan portfolio increases, absent other factors, our
allowance for loan loss methodology results in a higher dollar amount of estimated probable losses
than would be the case without the increase. Generally when the loan portfolio decreases, absent
other factors, our allowance for loan loss methodology results in a lower dollar amount of
estimated probable losses than would be the case without the decrease.
Each quarter we evaluate the allowance for loan losses and adjust the allowance as appropriate
through a provision or recovery for loan losses. While we use the best information available to
make evaluations, future adjustments to the allowance may be necessary if conditions differ
substantially from the information used in making the evaluations. In addition, as an integral
part of their examination process, the Office of Thrift Supervision will periodically review the
allowance for loan losses. The Office of Thrift Supervision may require us to adjust the allowance
based on their analysis of information available to them at the time of their examination. Our
last examination was as of June 30, 2009.
84
The following table sets forth activity in our allowance for loan losses for the periods
indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At or For the Three Months |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended March 31, |
|
|
At or For the Years Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Balance at beginning of year |
|
$ |
15,414 |
|
|
$ |
8,778 |
|
|
$ |
8,778 |
|
|
$ |
5,636 |
|
|
$ |
5,030 |
|
|
$ |
4,795 |
|
|
$ |
3,166 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Charge-offs: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,348 |
) |
|
|
(1,002 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One- to four-family residential |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(63 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction and land |
|
|
(110 |
) |
|
|
(595 |
) |
|
|
(686 |
) |
|
|
(761 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Multifamily |
|
|
(32 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(164 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Home equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial and industrial loans |
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(141 |
) |
|
|
(165 |
) |
|
|
(814 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Insurance premium loans |
|
|
(51 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
(22 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total charge-offs |
|
|
(198 |
) |
|
|
(595 |
) |
|
|
(2,402 |
) |
|
|
(1,940 |
) |
|
|
(836 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recoveries: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total recoveries |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (charge-offs) recoveries |
|
|
(198 |
) |
|
|
(595 |
) |
|
|
(2,402 |
) |
|
|
(1,940 |
) |
|
|
(836 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provisions (benefits) for loan losses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial |
|
|
2,178 |
|
|
|
222 |
|
|
|
4,575 |
|
|
|
2,722 |
|
|
|
1,035 |
|
|
|
797 |
|
|
|
(57 |
) |
One- to four-family residential |
|
|
63 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
95 |
|
|
|
71 |
|
|
|
(129 |
) |
|
|
(130 |
) |
|
|
(7 |
) |
Construction and land |
|
|
(16 |
) |
|
|
738 |
|
|
|
1,113 |
|
|
|
1,282 |
|
|
|
158 |
|
|
|
(545 |
) |
|
|
1,354 |
|
Multifamily |
|
|
491 |
|
|
|
164 |
|
|
|
1,242 |
|
|
|
689 |
|
|
|
(14 |
) |
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
(72 |
) |
Home equity |
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
64 |
|
|
|
108 |
|
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
(35 |
) |
|
|
(347 |
) |
Commercial and industrial loans |
|
|
(807 |
) |
|
|
333 |
|
|
|
1,495 |
|
|
|
204 |
|
|
|
407 |
|
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
784 |
|
Insurance premium loans |
|
|
(50 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
101 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
Unallocated |
|
|
(65 |
) |
|
|
154 |
|
|
|
351 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(42 |
) |
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
(25 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total provisions for loan
losses |
|
|
1,930 |
|
|
|
1,644 |
|
|
|
9,038 |
|
|
|
5,082 |
|
|
|
1,442 |
|
|
|
235 |
|
|
|
1,629 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of year |
|
$ |
17,146 |
|
|
$ |
9,827 |
|
|
$ |
15,414 |
|
|
$ |
8,778 |
|
|
$ |
5,636 |
|
|
$ |
5,030 |
|
|
$ |
4,795 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ratios: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net charge-offs to average loans
outstanding (1) |
|
|
0.11 |
% |
|
|
0.40 |
% |
|
|
0.37 |
% |
|
|
0.38 |
% |
|
|
0.20 |
% |
|
|
|
% |
|
|
|
% |
Allowance for loan losses to
non-performing loans at end of period |
|
|
34.26 |
|
|
|
40.78 |
|
|
|
36.86 |
|
|
|
91.07 |
|
|
|
57.31 |
|
|
|
70.70 |
|
|
|
232.88 |
|
Allowance for loan losses to loans
held-for-investment, net at end of
period |
|
|
2.33 |
|
|
|
1.57 |
|
|
|
2.11 |
|
|
|
1.49 |
|
|
|
1.33 |
|
|
|
1.23 |
|
|
|
1.24 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Annualized where applicable. |
The allowance for loan losses to non-performing loans decreased to 34.3% at March 31,
2010 from 36.9% at December 31, 2009. This decrease was primarily attributable to an increase in
non-performing loans of $8.2 million, to $50.0 million at March 31, 2010 from $41.8 million at
December 31, 2009, partially offset by an increase of $1.7 million, or 11.2%, in the allowance for
loan losses for the three months ended March 31, 2010. The increase in non-performing loans was
primarily attributable to increases in non-performing commercial real estate loans, and to a lesser
extent, multifamily real estate loans during the three months ended March 31, 2010.
The allowance for loan losses to non-performing loans decreased to 36.9% at December 31, 2009
from 91.1% at December 31, 2008. This decrease was primarily attributable to an increase in
non-performing loans of
85
$32.2 million, to $41.8 million at December 31, 2009 from $9.6 million at December 31, 2008,
partially offset by an increase of $6.6 million, or 75.6%, in the allowance for loan losses over
the same time period. The increase in non-performing loans was primarily attributable to increases
in non-performing commercial real estate loans, and to a lesser extent, construction and land loans
during the same time period.
The non-performing loans noted above were secured by real estate with either current
appraisals, or appraisals that are relatively current (within 18 months) and have been adjusted
downward when appropriate by management for perceived declines in real estate values. Generally
loans are charged down to the appraised values less costs to sell, which reduces the coverage ratio
of the allowance for loan losses to non-performing loans. We do not adjust appraised values
upwards.
The allowance for loan losses was $17.1 million, or 2.3% of loans held for investment, net at
March 31, 2010, compared to $15.4 million, or 2.1% of loans held for investment, net at December
31, 2009. The increase in the allowance for loan losses was due primarily to an increase in
general loss factors utilized in managements estimate of credit losses inherent in the loan
portfolio in recognition of our elevated level of delinquent loans, as well as the current weak
economic environment and real estate market.
The allowance for loan losses to loans held-for-investment, net, increased to 2.11% at
December 31, 2009, from 1.49% at December 31, 2008. This increase was attributable to an increase
of $6.6 million, or 75.6%, in the allowance for loan losses between December 31, 2008 and December
31, 2009, partially offset by an increase in the loan portfolio over the same time period. The
increase in our allowance for loan losses during the year was primarily attributable to specific
allowances on impaired loans, and in general loss factors related to increases in non-accrual
loans, loans 30 to 89 days delinquent, and declines in general economic conditions and real estate
values.
Impairment losses on specific loans increased $2.1 million, or 674.3%, from $310,000 for the
year ended December 31, 2008, to $2.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2009. At December
31, 2008, we had four loans classified as impaired and recorded impairment losses totaling $310,000
on two of the four impaired loans. At December 31, 2009, we had 30 loans classified as impaired
and recorded a total of $2.4 million of specific allowances on 11 of the 30 impaired loans. The
increase in specific allowances recorded on impaired loans was attributable to an increase in
impaired loans coupled with decreasing values of the underlying loan collateral.
During the year ended December 31, 2009, we recorded charge-offs of $2.4 million, an increase
of $462,000, or 23.8%, as compared to the year ended December 31, 2008. The increase in
charge-offs was primarily attributable to a $346,000 increase in charge-offs related to commercial
real estate loans. As a result of higher charge-offs, an increase in non-accrual commercial real
estate loans and commercial real estate loans past due 30 to 89 days, coupled with the general
decline in real estate values and the current economic downturn, our historical and general loss
factors have increased, thus increasing the allowance for loan losses allocated to commercial real
estate loans by $3.2 million, or 62.3%, from $5.2 million December 31, 2008, to $8.4 million at
December 31, 2009. In addition, we experienced increased charge-offs of approximately $164,000 in
multifamily real estate loans, an increase of 100% from the year ended December 31, 2008. As a
result of the charge-offs incurred, as well as increased levels of multifamily real estate loans on
non-accrual status and 30 to 89 days past due, coupled with the general decline in real estate
values and the current economic downturn, our historical and general loss factors have increased,
thus increasing the allowance for loan losses allocated to multifamily real estate loans by $1.1
million, or 136.8%, from $788,000 at December 31, 2008, to $1.9 million at December 31, 2009. The
allowance for loan losses allocated to commercial and industrial loans and construction and land
loans also increased $1.4 million and $427,000, respectively, from December 31, 2008, to December
31, 2009. These increases were attributable to increased historical and general loss factors which
resulted from additional charge-offs taken during the year ended December 31, 2009, coupled with
increased levels of non-accrual loans, and loans that are 30 to 89 days past due, and the current
economic downturn. Our allowance for loan losses could increase in future periods if charge-offs
and non-performing loans continue to increase.
86
Allocation of Allowance for Loan Losses. The following tables set forth the allowance for
loan losses allocated by loan category and the percent of loans in each category to total loans at
the dates indicated. The allowance for loan losses allocated to each category is not necessarily
indicative of future losses in any particular category and does not restrict the use of the
allowance to absorb losses in other categories. All changes to the allowance during the periods
indicated were the result of provisions or benefits for loan losses, as well as charge-offs, as set
forth in the previous table, as we had no recoveries between the dates indicated in this table.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At March 31, |
|
|
At December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans in Each |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans in Each |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans in Each |
|
|
|
Allowance for |
|
|
Category to |
|
|
Allowance for |
|
|
Category to |
|
|
Allowance for |
|
|
Category to |
|
|
|
Loan Losses |
|
|
Total Loans |
|
|
Loan Losses |
|
|
Total Loans |
|
|
Loan Losses |
|
|
Total Loans |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Real estate loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial |
|
$ |
10,581 |
|
|
|
45.13 |
% |
|
$ |
8,403 |
|
|
|
44.99 |
% |
|
$ |
5,176 |
|
|
|
49.05 |
% |
One- to four-family residential |
|
|
226 |
|
|
|
12.22 |
|
|
|
163 |
|
|
|
12.48 |
|
|
|
131 |
|
|
|
17.49 |
|
Construction and land |
|
|
2,283 |
|
|
|
5.36 |
|
|
|
2,409 |
|
|
|
6.11 |
|
|
|
1,982 |
|
|
|
8.85 |
|
Multifamily |
|
|
2,325 |
|
|
|
25.44 |
|
|
|
1,866 |
|
|
|
24.48 |
|
|
|
788 |
|
|
|
18.41 |
|
Home equity and lines of credit |
|
|
242 |
|
|
|
3.82 |
|
|
|
210 |
|
|
|
3.58 |
|
|
|
146 |
|
|
|
4.10 |
|
Commercial and industrial |
|
|
1,065 |
|
|
|
2.42 |
|
|
|
1,877 |
|
|
|
2.64 |
|
|
|
523 |
|
|
|
1.87 |
|
Insurance premium finance loans |
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
5.43 |
|
|
|
101 |
|
|
|
5.54 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
0.18 |
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
0.18 |
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
0.23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total allocated allowance |
|
|
16,860 |
|
|
|
100.00 |
% |
|
|
15,063 |
|
|
|
100.00 |
% |
|
|
8,778 |
|
|
|
100.00 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unallocated |
|
|
286 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
351 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
17,146 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
15,414 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
8,778 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans in Each |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans in Each |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans in Each |
|
|
|
Allowance for |
|
|
Category to |
|
|
Allowance for |
|
|
Category to |
|
|
Allowance for |
|
|
Category to |
|
|
|
Loan Losses |
|
|
Total Loans |
|
|
Loan Losses |
|
|
Total Loans |
|
|
Loan Losses |
|
|
Total Loans |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Real estate loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial |
|
$ |
3,456 |
|
|
|
57.50 |
% |
|
$ |
2,421 |
|
|
|
50.75 |
% |
|
$ |
1,624 |
|
|
|
42.72 |
% |
One- to four-family residential |
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
22.45 |
|
|
|
189 |
|
|
|
26.29 |
|
|
|
319 |
|
|
|
32.87 |
|
Construction and land |
|
|
1,461 |
|
|
|
10.57 |
|
|
|
1,303 |
|
|
|
12.74 |
|
|
|
1,848 |
|
|
|
13.64 |
|
Multifamily |
|
|
99 |
|
|
|
3.34 |
|
|
|
113 |
|
|
|
3.24 |
|
|
|
71 |
|
|
|
3.64 |
|
Home equity and lines of credit |
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
3.02 |
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
3.40 |
|
|
|
81 |
|
|
|
4.15 |
|
Commercial and industrial |
|
|
484 |
|
|
|
2.69 |
|
|
|
891 |
|
|
|
2.70 |
|
|
|
849 |
|
|
|
2.08 |
|
Insurance premium finance loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
0.43 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
0.88 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
0.90 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total allocated allowance |
|
|
5,636 |
|
|
|
100.00 |
% |
|
|
4,988 |
|
|
|
100.00 |
% |
|
|
4,795 |
|
|
|
100.00 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unallocated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
5,636 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
5,030 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
4,795 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Management of Market Risk
General. A majority of our assets and liabilities are monetary in nature. Consequently, our
most significant form of market risk is interest rate risk. Our assets, consisting primarily of
mortgage-related assets and loans, generally have longer maturities than our liabilities, which
consist primarily of deposits and wholesale funding. As a result, a principal part of our business
strategy involves managing interest rate risk and limiting the exposure of our net interest income
to changes in market interest rates. Accordingly, our board of directors has established a risk
committee, comprised of our Treasurer, who chairs this Committee, our Chief Executive Officer, our
Chief Financial Officer, our Chief Lending Officer, and our Executive Vice President of Operations.
This committee is responsible for, among other things, evaluating the interest rate risk inherent
in our assets and liabilities, recommending to the risk committee of our board of directors the
level of risk that is appropriate given our business strategy, operating environment, capital,
liquidity and performance objectives, and managing this risk consistent with the guidelines
approved by the board of directors.
87
We seek to manage our interest rate risk in order to minimize the exposure of our earnings and
capital to changes in interest rates. As part of our ongoing asset-liability management, we
currently use the following strategies to manage our interest rate risk:
|
|
|
originate commercial real estate loans and multifamily real estate loans that
generally have interest rates that reset every five years; |
|
|
|
|
invest in shorter maturity investment grade corporate securities and
mortgage-related securities; and |
|
|
|
|
obtain general financing through lower cost deposits and wholesale funding and
repurchase agreements. |
Net Portfolio Value Analysis. We compute the net present value of our interest-earning assets
and interest-bearing liabilities (net portfolio value or NPV) over a range of assumed market
interest rates. Our simulation model uses a discounted cash flow analysis to measure the net
portfolio value. We estimate the economic value of these assets and liabilities under the
assumption that interest rates experience an instantaneous, parallel, and sustained increase of
100, 200, or 300 basis points, or a decrease of 100 and 200 basis points, which is based on the
current interest rate environment. A basis point equals one-hundredth of one percent, and 100
basis points equals one percent. An increase in interest rates from 3% to 4% would mean, for
example, a 100 basis point increase in the Change in Interest Rates column below.
Net Interest Income Analysis. We also analyze our sensitivity to changes in interest rates
through our net interest income model. Net interest income is the difference between the interest
income we earn on our interest-earning assets, such as loans and securities, and the interest we
pay on our interest-bearing liabilities, such as deposits and borrowings. We estimate what our net
interest income would be for a twelve-month period. We then calculate what the net interest income
would be for the same period under the assumption that interest rates experience an instantaneous
and sustained increase of 100, 200, or 300 basis points or a decrease of 100 and 200 basis points,
which is based on the current interest rate environment.
88
The tables below set forth, as of March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, our calculation of the
estimated changes in our net portfolio value, net portfolio value ratio, and percent change in net
interest income that would result from the designated instantaneous and sustained changes in
interest rates. Computations of prospective effects of hypothetical interest rate changes are
based on numerous assumptions, including relative levels of market interest rates, loan prepayments
and deposit decay, and should not be relied on as indicative of actual results.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At March 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
Change in |
|
Estimated |
|
Estimated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NPV/Present |
|
Net Interest |
Interest Rates |
|
Present Value of |
|
Present Value of |
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated |
|
Value of Assets |
|
Income Percent |
(basis points) |
|
Assets |
|
Liabilities |
|
Estimated NPV |
|
Change In NPV |
|
Ratio |
|
Change |
(Dollars in thousands) |
+300 |
|
$ |
1,971,406 |
|
|
$ |
1,587,388 |
|
|
$ |
384,018 |
|
|
$ |
(66,863 |
) |
|
|
19.48 |
% |
|
|
(11.66 |
)% |
+200 |
|
|
2,018,509 |
|
|
|
1,611,132 |
|
|
|
407,377 |
|
|
|
(43,504 |
) |
|
|
20.18 |
% |
|
|
(7.26 |
)% |
+100 |
|
|
2,065,712 |
|
|
|
1,635,684 |
|
|
|
430,028 |
|
|
|
(20,853 |
) |
|
|
20.82 |
% |
|
|
(3.01 |
)% |
0 |
|
|
2,111,964 |
|
|
|
1,661,083 |
|
|
|
450,881 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21.35 |
% |
|
|
|
|
-100 |
|
|
2,148,563 |
|
|
|
1,687,185 |
|
|
|
461,378 |
|
|
|
10,497 |
|
|
|
21.47 |
% |
|
|
0.25 |
% |
-200 |
|
|
2,174,609 |
|
|
|
1,710,078 |
|
|
|
464,531 |
|
|
|
13,650 |
|
|
|
21.36 |
% |
|
|
(3.13 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
Change in |
|
Estimated |
|
Estimated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NPV/Present |
|
Net Interest |
Interest Rates |
|
Present Value of |
|
Present Value of |
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated |
|
Value of Assets |
|
Income Percent |
(basis points) |
|
Assets |
|
Liabilities |
|
Estimated NPV |
|
Change In NPV |
|
Ratio |
|
Change |
(Dollars in thousands) |
+300 |
|
$ |
1,884,900 |
|
|
$ |
1,502,093 |
|
|
$ |
382,807 |
|
|
$ |
(62,473 |
) |
|
|
20.31 |
% |
|
|
(5.24 |
)% |
+200 |
|
|
1,931,727 |
|
|
|
1,524,764 |
|
|
|
406,963 |
|
|
|
(38,317 |
) |
|
|
21.07 |
% |
|
|
(3.36 |
)% |
+100 |
|
|
1,977,999 |
|
|
|
1,548,205 |
|
|
|
429,794 |
|
|
|
(15,486 |
) |
|
|
21.73 |
% |
|
|
(1.36 |
)% |
0 |
|
|
2,017,733 |
|
|
|
1,572,453 |
|
|
|
445,280 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22.07 |
% |
|
|
|
|
-100 |
|
|
2,054,930 |
|
|
|
1,596,234 |
|
|
|
458,696 |
|
|
|
13,416 |
|
|
|
22.32 |
% |
|
|
2.48 |
% |
-200 |
|
|
2,072,124 |
|
|
|
1,618,733 |
|
|
|
453,391 |
|
|
|
8,111 |
|
|
|
21.88 |
% |
|
|
(2.39 |
)% |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Assumes an instantaneous and sustained uniform change in interest rates at all maturities. |
|
(2) |
|
NPV includes non-interest earning assets and liabilities. |
The tables above indicate that at March 31, 2010, in the event of a 200 basis point
decrease in interest rates, we would experience a 3.0% increase in estimated net portfolio value
and a 3.1% decrease in net interest income. In the event of a 300 basis point increase in interest
rates, we would experience a 14.8% decrease in net portfolio value and an 11.7% decrease in net
interest income. In addition, the tables above indicate that at December 31, 2009, in the event of
a 200 basis point decrease in interest rates, we would experience a 1.8% increase in estimated net
portfolio value and a 2.4% decrease in net interest income. In the event of a 300 basis point
increase in interest rates, we would experience a 14.0% decrease in net portfolio value and a 5.2%
decrease in net interest income. Our policies provide that, in the event of a 300 basis point
increase/decrease or less in interest rates, our net portfolio value ratio should decrease by no
more than 400 basis points and in the event of a 200 basis point increase/decrease, our projected
net interest income should decrease by no more than 20.0%. Additionally, our policy states that
our net portfolio value should be at least 8.5% of total assets before and after such shock. At
March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, we were in compliance with all board approved policies with
respect to interest rate risk management.
Certain shortcomings are inherent in the methodologies used in determining interest rate risk
through changes in net portfolio value and net interest income. Our model requires us to make
certain assumptions that may or may not reflect the manner in which actual yields and costs respond
to changes in market interest rates. In this regard, the net portfolio value and net interest
income information presented assume that the composition of our interest-sensitive assets and
liabilities existing at the beginning of a period remains constant over the period being measured
and assume that a particular change in interest rates is reflected uniformly across the yield curve
regardless of the duration or repricing of specific assets and liabilities. Accordingly, although
interest rate risk calculations provide an indication of our interest rate risk exposure at a
particular point in time, such measurements
89
are not intended to and do not provide a precise forecast of the effect of changes in market
interest rates on our net interest income and will differ from actual results.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Liquidity is the ability to fund assets and meet obligations as they come due. Our primary
sources of funds consist of deposit inflows, loan repayments, borrowings through repurchase
agreements and advances from money center banks and the Federal Home Loan Bank of New York, and
repayments, maturities and sales of securities. While maturities and scheduled amortization of
loans and securities are reasonably predictable sources of funds, deposit flows and mortgage
prepayments are greatly influenced by general interest rates, economic conditions, and competition.
Our board asset and liability management committee is responsible for establishing and monitoring
our liquidity targets and strategies in order to ensure that sufficient liquidity exists for
meeting the borrowing needs and deposit withdrawals of our customers as well as unanticipated
contingencies. We seek to maintain a ratio of liquid assets (not subject to pledge) as a
percentage of deposits and borrowings of 35% or greater. At March 31, 2010, this ratio was 72.9%.
We believe that we had sufficient sources of liquidity to satisfy our short- and long-term
liquidity needs.
We regularly adjust our investments in liquid assets based upon our assessment of:
|
|
|
expected loan demand; |
|
|
|
|
expected deposit flows; |
|
|
|
|
yields available on interest-earning deposits and securities; and |
|
|
|
|
the objectives of our asset/liability management program. |
Our most liquid assets are cash and cash equivalents, and mortgage-related securities issued
or guaranteed by the U.S. Government, Fannie Mae, or Freddie Mac, that we can either borrow against
or sell. We also have the ability to surrender bank owned life insurance contracts. The surrender
of these contracts would subject us to income taxes and penalties for increases in the cash
surrender values over the original premium payments. We also have the ability to generate brokered
deposits through our participation in the CDARS program.
The following table sets forth our primary sources of liquidity at March 31, 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At March 31, 2010 |
|
|
(In thousands) |
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
50,811 |
|
Unpledged securities (issued or guaranteed by the
U.S. Government, Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac or Federal
Home Loan Bank of New York) |
|
$ |
589,476 |
|
At March 31, 2010, we had $23.9 million in outstanding loan commitments. In addition, we
had $38.3 million in unused lines of credit to borrowers. Certificates of deposit due within one
year of March 31, 2010, totaled $525.5 million, or 37.7% of total deposits. If these deposits do
not remain with us, we will be required to seek other sources of funds, including loan sales, other
deposit products, including replacement certificates of deposit, securities sold under agreements
to repurchase (repurchase agreements), and advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank of New York and
other borrowing sources. Depending on market conditions, we may be required to pay higher rates on
such deposits or other borrowings than we currently pay on the certificates of deposit due on or
before March 31, 2010. We believe, based on past experience, that a significant portion of such
deposits will remain with us, and we have the ability to attract and retain deposits by adjusting
the interest rates offered.
Our cash flows are derived from operating activities, investing activities and financing
activities as reported in our Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows included in our Consolidated
Financial Statements.
90
Our primary investing activities are purchasing mortgage-backed securities and originating
loans. During the three months ended March 31, 2010 and the years ended December 31, 2009 and
2008, we purchased securities classified as available for sale totaling $217.2 million, $655.8
million and $421.7 million, respectively. During the three months ended March 31, 2010 and the
years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, we originated $43.8 million, $183.3 million and $202.6
million of loans, respectively. Additionally, during the fourth quarter of 2009 we purchased $35.4
million of premium finance loans.
Financing activities consist primarily of activity in deposit accounts and borrowings
(repurchase agreements and Federal Home Loan Bank of New York advances). We experienced a net
increase in total deposits of $76.0 million for the three months ended March 31, 2010, a net
increase of $292.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2009 and a net increase of $147.2
million for the year ended December 31, 2008. Deposit flows are affected by the overall level of
interest rates, the interest rates and products offered by us and our competitors, and by other
factors.
Borrowings increased by $13.6 million for the three months ended March 31, 2010, decreased by
$52.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2009 and increased by $207.7 million for the year
ended December 31, 2008. At March 31, 2010, we had the ability to borrow an additional $200.0
million from the Federal Home Loan Bank of New York.
During the three months ended March 31, 2010, we repurchased 186,281 shares of our common
stock at an average price of $13.25 per share. We repurchase shares of common stock to fund stock
benefit plans, and stock repurchases can serve as an effective capital management tool. On June 4,
2010, in connection with our announcement that we intend to convert to a fully public company, our
Board of Directors terminated its previously announced stock repurchase program. At March 31,
2010, we had repurchased 1,910,089 shares of common stock at an average cost of $11.79 per share.
All shares of treasury stock (including shares of common stock that we have repurchased) will be
cancelled at the completion of the conversion.
We have a detailed contingency funding plan that is reviewed and reported to the board risk
committee on at least a quarterly basis. This plan includes monitoring cash on a daily
basis to determine our liquidity needs. Additionally, management performs a stress test on our
retail deposits and wholesale funding sources in several scenarios on a quarterly basis. The
stress scenarios include deposit attrition of up to 50%, and selling our securities
available-for-sale portfolio at a discount of 10% to its current estimated fair value. As of March
31, 2010, we maintained significant liquidity under all stress scenarios.
Northfield Bank is subject to various regulatory capital requirements, including a risk-based
capital measure. The risk-based capital guidelines include both a definition of capital and a
framework for calculating risk-weighted assets by assigning assets and off-balance sheet items to
broad risk categories. At March 31, 2010, Northfield Bank exceeded all regulatory capital
requirements and is considered well capitalized under regulatory guidelines. See Supervision
and RegulationFederal Banking RegulationCapital Requirements and Note 12 of the Notes to the
Consolidated Financial Statements.
The net proceeds from the stock offering will significantly increase our liquidity and capital
resources. Over time, the initial level of liquidity will be reduced as net proceeds from the stock
offering are used for general corporate purposes, including the funding of loans. Our financial
condition and results of operations will be enhanced by the net proceeds from the stock offering,
resulting in increased net interest-earning assets and net interest income. However, due to the
increase in equity resulting from the net proceeds from the stock offering, our return on equity
will be adversely affected following the stock offering.
91
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements and Aggregate Contractual Obligations
Commitments. As a financial services provider, we routinely are a party to various financial
instruments with off-balance-sheet risks, such as commitments to extend credit, and unused lines of
credit. While these contractual obligations represent our potential future cash requirements, a
significant portion of commitments to extend credit may expire without being drawn upon. Such
commitments are subject to the same credit policies and approval process applicable to loans we
originate. In addition, we routinely enter into commitments to sell mortgage loans. However, such
amounts are not significant to our operations. For additional information, see Note 11 of the
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Contractual Obligations. In the ordinary course of our operations we enter into certain
contractual obligations. Such obligations include leases for premises and equipment, agreements
with respect to borrowed funds and deposit liabilities, and agreements with respect to investments.
The following table summarizes our significant fixed and determinable contractual obligations
and other funding needs by payment date at December 31, 2009. The payment amounts represent those
amounts due to the recipient and do not include any unamortized premiums or discounts or other
similar carrying amount adjustments.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments Due by Period |
|
|
|
Less than |
|
|
One to Three |
|
|
Three to Five |
|
|
More than |
|
|
|
|
Contractual Obligations |
|
One Year |
|
|
Years |
|
|
Years |
|
|
Five Years |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Long-term debt (1) |
|
$ |
61,382 |
|
|
$ |
90,000 |
|
|
$ |
118,800 |
|
|
$ |
2,500 |
|
|
$ |
272,682 |
|
Operating leases |
|
|
2,177 |
|
|
|
4,110 |
|
|
|
4,026 |
|
|
|
22,686 |
|
|
|
32,999 |
|
Capitalized leases |
|
|
365 |
|
|
|
763 |
|
|
|
810 |
|
|
|
1,075 |
|
|
|
3,013 |
|
Certificates of deposit |
|
|
517,986 |
|
|
|
33,104 |
|
|
|
28,283 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
579,373 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
581,910 |
|
|
$ |
127,977 |
|
|
$ |
151,919 |
|
|
$ |
26,261 |
|
|
$ |
888,067 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments to extend credit (2) |
|
$ |
43,472 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
43,472 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes repurchase agreements, Federal Home Loan Bank of New York advances, and accrued
interest payable at December 31, 2009. |
|
(2) |
|
Includes unused lines of credit which are assumed to be funded within the year. |
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
Effective July 1, 2009, the FASB established the Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) as
the source of authoritative U. S. generally accepted accounting principles recognized by the FASB
to be applied by nongovernmental entities. Rules and interpretative releases of the Securities and
Exchange Commission under authority of federal securities laws are also sources of authoritative
guidance for Securities and Exchange Commission registrants. The ASC did not have a material
affect on our consolidated financial statements.
ASC 810, Consolidation, replaces the quantitative-based risks and rewards calculation for
determining which enterprise, if any, has a controlling financial interest in a variable interest
entity with an approach focused on identifying which enterprise has the power to direct the
activities of a variable interest entity that most significantly affect the entitys economic
performance and (i) the obligation to absorb losses of the entity or (ii) the right to receive
benefits from the entity. The pronouncement was effective January 1, 2010, and did not have a
material effect on our consolidated financial statements.
ASC 860, Transfers and Servicing, improves the information a reporting entity provides in
its financial statements about a transfer of financial assets, including the effect of a transfer
on an entitys financial position, financial performance and cash flows and the transferors
continuing involvement in the transferred assets. ASC 860 eliminates the concept of a qualifying
special-purpose entity and changes the guidance for evaluation for consolidation. This
pronouncement was effective January 1, 2010. The adoption of ASC 860 did not have a material
effect on our consolidated financial statements.
ASC 855, Subsequent Events, establishes general standards of accounting for and disclosure
of events that occur after the balance sheet date but before financial statements are issued or
available to be issued. ASC 855
92
sets forth (i) the period after the balance sheet date during which management of a reporting
entity should evaluate events or transactions that may occur for potential recognition or
disclosure in the financial statements, (ii) the circumstances under which an entity should
recognize events or transactions occurring after the balance sheet date in its financial
statements, and (iii) the disclosures that an entity should make about events or transactions that
occurred after the balance sheet date. ASC 855 was effective for the period ended June 30, 2009.
The adoption of ASC 855 did not have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements.
Accounting Standards Update No. 2010-09 under ASC 855 removes the requirement for a Securities
and Exchange Commission filer to disclose the date through which subsequent events have been
evaluated. This change alleviates potential conflicts between subtopic 855-10 and the Securities
and Exchange Commissions requirements. The new guidance did not have a significant effect on our
consolidated financial statements.
ASC 260, Earnings Per Share, addresses whether instruments granted in share-based payment
transactions are participating securities prior to vesting and, therefore, need to be included in
the earnings allocation in computing earnings per share. This ASC was effective for financial
statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008. The adoption of ASC 260 did
not have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements.
These following three ASCs (ASC 820, ASC 825, and ASC 320) were effective for the period ended
June 30, 2009:
|
|
|
ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures, provides guidance for estimating
fair value when the volume and level of activity for the asset or liability have
decreased significantly. ASC 820 also provides guidance on identifying circumstances
that indicate a transaction is not orderly. The adoption of ASC 820 did not have a
material effect on our consolidated financial statements other than disclosures. |
|
|
|
|
ASC 825, Financial Instruments, requires disclosures about fair value of financial
instruments in interim reporting periods of publicly traded companies that previously
were only required to be disclosed in annual financial statements. The adoption of ASC
825 did not have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements other than
disclosures. |
|
|
|
|
ASC 320, Investments Debt and Equity Securities, amends previous
other-than-temporary impairment guidance in generally accepted accounting principles
(GAAP) for debt securities to make the guidance more operational and to improve the
presentation and disclosure of other-than-temporary impairments on debt and equity
securities in the financial statements. This ASC does not amend existing recognition
and measurement guidance related to other-than-temporary impairments of equity
securities. The adoption of ASC 320 resulted in $1.2 million of impairment charges
being recorded in other comprehensive income for the quarter ended September 30, 2009. |
Accounting Standards Update No. 2009-05 under ASC 820 provides clarification for circumstances
in which a quoted price in an active market for the identical liability is not available. In such
circumstances, a reporting entity is required to measure fair value using one or more of the
following techniques: (i) a valuation technique that uses: (a) the quoted price of the identical
liability when traded as an asset; or (b) quoted prices for similar liabilities or similar
liabilities when traded as assets; or (ii) another valuation technique that is consistent with the
principles of ASC 820, such as an income approach or a market approach. The update clarifies that
when estimating the fair value of a liability, a reporting entity is not required to include a
separate adjustment relating to the existence of a restriction that prevents the transfer of the
liability. The new authoritative accounting guidance also clarifies that the quoted price for an
identical liability traded as an asset in an active market would also be a Level 1 measurement,
provided that the quoted price does not need to be adjusted to reflect factors specific to the
asset that do no apply to the fair value measurement of the liability. The new guidance did not
have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements.
93
Accounting Standards Update No. 2010-06 under ASC 820 requires new disclosures and clarifies
certain existing disclosure requirements about fair value measurement. Specifically, the update
requires an entity to disclose separately the amounts of significant transfers in and out of Level
1 and Level 2 fair value measurements and describe the reasons for such transfers. A reporting
entity is required to present separately information about purchases, sales, issuances, and
settlements in the reconciliation for fair value measurements using Level 3 inputs. In addition,
the update clarifies the following requirements of the existing disclosure: (i) for the purposes of
reporting fair value measurement for each class of assets and liabilities, a reporting entity needs
to use judgment in determining the appropriate classes of assets; and (ii) a reporting entity is
required to include disclosures about the valuation techniques and inputs used to measure fair
value for both recurring and nonrecurring fair value measurements. The amendments are effective
for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2009, except for the separate
disclosures of purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements in the roll forward of activity in
Level 3 fair value measurements. Those disclosures are effective for fiscal years beginning after
December 15, 2010, and for interim periods within those fiscal years. The new guidance is not
expected to have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements.
Accounting Standards Update No. 2009-12 under ASC 820 amends Subtopic 820-10 to permit a
reporting entity to measure the fair value of certain investments on the basis of net asset value
per share of the investment (or its equivalent). This update also requires new disclosure, by
major category of investments, about the attributes of investments within the scope of this
amendment to the Codification. The new guidance under ASC 820 became effective for financial
statements issued for periods ending after December 15, 2009. Our adoption of this new
authoritative guidance did not have a material effect on our financial statements or its
disclosures at December 31, 2009.
ASC 805, Business Combinations, applies to all transactions and other events in which one
entity obtains control over one or more other businesses. The new guidance requires an acquirer,
upon initially obtaining control of another entity, to recognize the assets, liabilities and any
non-controlling interest in the acquiree at fair value as of the acquisition date. Contingent
consideration is required to be recognized and measured at fair value on the date of acquisition
rather than at a later date when the amount of that consideration may be determinable beyond a
reasonable doubt. This fair value approach replaces the cost-allocation process previously
required whereby the cost of an acquisition was allocated to the individual assets acquired and
liabilities assumed based on their estimated fair value. The new guidance requires acquirers to
expense acquisition-related costs as incurred rather than allocating such costs to the assets
acquired and liabilities assumed, as was previously the case. Specific requirements must be met in
order to accrue for a restructuring plan in purchase accounting. Pre-acquisition contingencies are
to be recognized at fair value, unless it is a non-contractual contingency that is not likely to
materialize, in which case, nothing should be recognized in purchase accounting, and, instead, that
contingency would be subject to the probable and estimable recognition criteria of contingencies.
The new guidance is effective for all business combinations closing after January 1, 2009, and will
affect our accounting for business combinations after such date.
Additional new authoritative accounting guidance under ASC 805, requires that assets acquired
and liabilities assumed in a business combination that arise from contingencies be recognized at
fair value if fair value can be reasonably estimated. If fair value of such an asset or liability
cannot be reasonably estimated, the asset or liability would generally be recognized in accordance
with ASC 450, Contingencies. This new guidance removes subsequent accounting guidance for assets
and liabilities arising from contingencies and requires entities to develop a systematic and
rational basis for subsequently measuring and accounting for assets and liabilities arising from
contingencies. The new guidance eliminates the requirement to disclose an estimate of the range of
outcomes of recognized contingencies at the acquisition date. For unrecognized contingencies,
entities are required to include only the disclosures required under ASC 450. The new guidance
also requires that contingent consideration arrangements of an acquiree assumed by the acquirer in
a business combination be treated as contingent consideration of the acquirer and should be
initially and subsequently measured at fair value. ASC 805 is effective for assets or liabilities
arising from contingencies in business combinations after January 1, 2009, and will affect our
accounting for business combinations after such date.
94
Effect of Inflation and Changing Prices
Our consolidated financial statements and related notes have been prepared in accordance with
GAAP. GAAP generally requires the measurement of financial position and operating results in terms
of historical dollars without consideration for changes in the relative purchasing power of money
over time due to inflation. The effect of inflation is reflected in the increased cost of our
operations. Unlike industrial companies, our assets and liabilities are primarily monetary in
nature. As a result, changes in market interest rates have a greater effect on our performance
than inflation.
BUSINESS OF NORTHFIELD-DELAWARE
Northfield-Delaware is a Delaware corporation, organized in June 2010. Upon completion of the
conversion, Northfield-Delaware will become the holding company of Northfield Bank and will succeed
to all of the business and operations of Northfield-Federal and each of Northfield-Federal and
Northfield Bancorp, MHC will cease to exist.
Initially following the completion of the conversion, Northfield-Delaware will have
approximately $87.4 million in cash and other assets held by Northfield-Federal and Northfield
Bancorp, MHC as of March 31, 2010, and the net proceeds it retains from the offering, part of which
will be used to make a loan to the Northfield Bank Employee Stock Ownership Plan, and will have no
significant liabilities. See How We Intend to Use the Proceeds From the Offering.
Northfield-Delaware intends to use the support staff and offices of Northfield Bank and will pay
Northfield Bank for these services. If Northfield-Delaware expands or changes its business in the
future, it may hire its own employees.
Northfield-Delaware intends to invest the net proceeds of the offering as discussed under How
We Intend to Use the Proceeds From the Offering. In the future, we may pursue other business
activities, including mergers and acquisitions, investment alternatives and diversification of
operations. There are, however, no current understandings or agreements for these activities.
BUSINESS OF NORTHFIELD BANCORP, INC.
AND NORTHFIELD BANK
Northfield-Federal
Northfield-Federal is a federally chartered corporation that owns all of the outstanding
shares of common stock of Northfield Bank. At March 31, 2010, Northfield-Federal had consolidated
assets of $2.1 billion, deposits of $1.4 billion and stockholders equity of $396.3 million.
Northfield Bank became the wholly-owned subsidiary of Northfield-Federals New York
predecessor in 1995, when Northfield Bank reorganized into the two-tier mutual holding company
structure. In November 2007, Northfield-Federal converted from a New York corporation to a
federally chartered corporation and concurrently sold 19,265,316 shares of its common stock to the
public, representing 43% of its then-outstanding shares, at $10.00 per share. An additional
24,641,684 shares, or 55% of the outstanding shares, were issued to Northfield Bancorp, MHC, and
896,061 shares, or 2% of the outstanding shares, plus $3.0 million of cash were issued to the
Northfield Bank Foundation. As part of this stock offering, we established an employee stock
ownership plan, which acquired 1,756,279 shares of common stock in the stock offering, financed by
a loan from Northfield-Federal.
Northfield-Federals home office is located at 1410 St. Georges Avenue, Avenel, New Jersey
07001 and the telephone number is (732) 499-7200. Its website address is
www.eNorthfield.com. Information on this website is not and should not be considered a
part of this prospectus.
95
Northfield Bank
Northfield Bank was organized in 1887 and is currently a federally chartered savings bank.
Northfield Bank conducts business primarily from its home office located in Staten Island, New
York, its operations center located in Woodbridge, New Jersey, its 17 additional branch offices
located in New York and New Jersey and its lending offices located in Brooklyn, New York and
Gwinnett County, Georgia. The branch offices are located in Staten Island and Brooklyn and the New
Jersey counties of Union and Middlesex.
Northfield Banks principal business consists of originating multifamily and commercial real
estate loans, purchasing investment securities, including mortgage-backed securities and corporate
bonds, and investing funds in other financial institutions. Northfield Bank also offers
construction and land loans, commercial and industrial loans, one- to four-family residential
mortgage loans, and home equity loans and lines of credit. In addition, Northfield Bank offers
loans to finance premiums on insurance policies, including commercial property and casualty, and
professional liability insurance. Northfield Bank offers a variety of deposit accounts, including
certificates of deposit, passbook, statement, and money market savings accounts, transaction
deposit accounts (negotiable orders of withdrawal (NOW) accounts and non-interest bearing demand
accounts), individual retirement accounts, and to a lesser extent when it is deemed cost effective,
brokered deposits. Deposits are Northfield Banks primary source of funds for its lending and
investing activities. Northfield Bank also uses borrowed funds as a source of funds, principally
repurchase agreements with brokers and Federal Home Loan Bank of New York advances. In addition to
traditional banking services, Northfield Bank offers insurance products through NSB Insurance
Agency, Inc. Northfield Bank owns 100% of NSB Services Corp., which, in turn, owns 100% of the
voting common stock of a real estate investment trust, NSB Realty Trust, which holds primarily
mortgage loans and other real estate related investments.
Northfield Bank is subject to comprehensive regulation and examination by the Office of Thrift
Supervision.
Northfield Banks main office is located at 1731 Victory Boulevard, Staten Island, New York
10314, and its telephone number at this address is (718) 448-1000. Its website address is
www.eNorthfield.com. Information on this website is not and should not be considered to be
a part of this prospectus.
Market Area and Competition
We have been in business for over 123 years, offering a variety of financial products and
services to meet the needs of the communities we serve. Our retail banking network consists of
multiple delivery channels including full-service banking offices, automated teller machines, and
telephone and internet banking capabilities. We consider our competitive products and pricing,
branch network, reputation for superior customer service, and financial strength, as our major
strengths in attracting and retaining customers in our market areas.
We face intense competition in our market area both in making loans and attracting deposits.
Our market areas have a high concentration of financial institutions, including large money center
and regional banks, community banks, and credit unions. We face additional competition for
deposits from money market funds, brokerage firms, mutual funds, and insurance companies. Some of
our competitors offer products and services that we do not offer, such as trust services and
private banking.
In addition, turmoil in the United States and world economies, and more specifically in the
financial services industry, has resulted in financial services companies such as investment banks,
and automobile and real estate finance companies, electing to become bank holding companies. These
financial services companies have traditionally received their funding from sources other than
insured bank deposits. Many of the alternative funding sources traditionally used by these
companies are no longer available, which has resulted in their relying more on insured bank
deposits to fund their operations, thereby increasing competition for deposits and related costs of
such deposits.
96
Our deposit sources are primarily concentrated in the communities surrounding our banking
offices in the New York Counties of Richmond (Staten Island) and Kings (Brooklyn), and Union and
Middlesex Counties in New Jersey. As of June 30, 2009 (the latest date for which information is
publicly available), we ranked fifth in deposit market share in Staten Island with an 8.85% market
share. We had a 0.09% market share in Brooklyn, New York. In Middlesex and Union Counties in New
Jersey, as of June 30, 2009, we had a combined market share of 0.69%.
The following table sets forth the unemployment rates for the communities we serve and the
national average for the last five years, as provided by the Bureau of Labor Statistics.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unemployment Rate At December 31, |
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
Union County, NJ |
|
|
9.5 |
% |
|
|
5.7 |
% |
|
|
4.5 |
% |
|
|
4.8 |
% |
|
|
4.8 |
% |
Middlesex County, NJ |
|
|
8.7 |
% |
|
|
5.0 |
% |
|
|
3.9 |
% |
|
|
4.3 |
% |
|
|
4.2 |
% |
Richmond County, NY |
|
|
8.4 |
% |
|
|
4.9 |
% |
|
|
4.4 |
% |
|
|
4.5 |
% |
|
|
5.2 |
% |
Kings County, NY |
|
|
10.1 |
% |
|
|
5.8 |
% |
|
|
5.3 |
% |
|
|
5.4 |
% |
|
|
6.2 |
% |
National Average |
|
|
10.0 |
% |
|
|
7.4 |
% |
|
|
5.0 |
% |
|
|
4.4 |
% |
|
|
4.9 |
% |
The following table sets forth median household income at December 31, 2008 for the
communities we serve, as provided by the U.S. Census Bureau.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Median Household Income |
|
|
At December 31, 2008 |
Union County, NJ |
|
$ |
67,127 |
|
Middlesex County, NJ |
|
$ |
77,015 |
|
Richmond County, NY |
|
$ |
72,557 |
|
Kings County, NY |
|
$ |
43,172 |
|
While the disruption in the financial markets has generally affected the banking industry
negatively, it has created opportunities for Northfield Bank. With many lenders reducing their
loan originations, we have continued to lend to qualified borrowers and we were able to increase
our loan portfolio in 2009 and in the first quarter of 2010. While our lending has increased in
this difficult environment, we are committed to maintaining our loan underwriting standards. We do
not originate or purchase sub-prime loans, negative amortization loans or option ARM loans. A
continuation or worsening of current economic conditions could make it more difficult in the future
to maintain the loan growth we experienced during 2009, as reflected in lower loan growth during
the first quarter of 2010.
Lending Activities
Our principal lending activity is the origination of multifamily real estate loans and
commercial real estate loans. We also originate one- to four-family residential real estate loans,
construction and land loans, commercial and industrial loans, home equity loans and lines of credit
and loans to finance premiums on insurance policies, including commercial property and casualty,
and professional liability insurance.
97
Loan Portfolio Composition. The following table sets forth the composition of our loan
portfolio, by type of loan at the dates indicated, excluding loans held for sale of $0, $0, $0,
$270,000, $125,000, and $0 at March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, 2008, 2007, 2006, and 2005,
respectively.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At March 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
At December 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Percent |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Percent |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Percent |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Percent |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Percent |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Percent |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Real estate loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial |
|
$ |
332,427 |
|
|
|
45.13 |
% |
|
$ |
327,802 |
|
|
|
44.99 |
% |
|
$ |
289,123 |
|
|
|
49.05 |
% |
|
$ |
243,902 |
|
|
|
57.50 |
% |
|
$ |
207,680 |
|
|
|
50.75 |
% |
|
$ |
165,657 |
|
|
|
42.72 |
% |
One- to four-family residential |
|
|
90,014 |
|
|
|
12.22 |
|
|
|
90,898 |
|
|
|
12.48 |
|
|
|
103,128 |
|
|
|
17.49 |
|
|
|
95,246 |
|
|
|
22.45 |
|
|
|
107,572 |
|
|
|
26.29 |
|
|
|
127,477 |
|
|
|
32.87 |
|
Construction and land |
|
|
39,523 |
|
|
|
5.36 |
|
|
|
44,548 |
|
|
|
6.11 |
|
|
|
52,158 |
|
|
|
8.85 |
|
|
|
44,850 |
|
|
|
10.57 |
|
|
|
52,124 |
|
|
|
12.74 |
|
|
|
52,890 |
|
|
|
13.64 |
|
Multifamily |
|
|
187,372 |
|
|
|
25.44 |
|
|
|
178,401 |
|
|
|
24.48 |
|
|
|
108,534 |
|
|
|
18.41 |
|
|
|
14,164 |
|
|
|
3.34 |
|
|
|
13,276 |
|
|
|
3.24 |
|
|
|
14,105 |
|
|
|
3.64 |
|
Home equity and lines of credit |
|
|
28,143 |
|
|
|
3.82 |
|
|
|
26,118 |
|
|
|
3.58 |
|
|
|
24,182 |
|
|
|
4.10 |
|
|
|
12,797 |
|
|
|
3.02 |
|
|
|
13,922 |
|
|
|
3.40 |
|
|
|
16,105 |
|
|
|
4.15 |
|
Commercial and
industrial loans |
|
|
17,833 |
|
|
|
2.42 |
|
|
|
19,252 |
|
|
|
2.64 |
|
|
|
11,025 |
|
|
|
1.87 |
|
|
|
11,397 |
|
|
|
2.69 |
|
|
|
11,022 |
|
|
|
2.70 |
|
|
|
8,068 |
|
|
|
2.08 |
|
Insurance premium loans |
|
|
39,977 |
|
|
|
5.43 |
|
|
|
40,382 |
|
|
|
5.54 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other loans |
|
|
1,328 |
|
|
|
0.18 |
|
|
|
1,299 |
|
|
|
0.18 |
|
|
|
1,339 |
|
|
|
0.23 |
|
|
|
1,842 |
|
|
|
0.43 |
|
|
|
3,597 |
|
|
|
0.88 |
|
|
|
3,510 |
|
|
|
0.90 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans |
|
|
736,617 |
|
|
|
100.00 |
% |
|
|
728,700 |
|
|
|
100.00 |
% |
|
|
589,489 |
|
|
|
100.00 |
% |
|
|
424,198 |
|
|
|
100.00 |
% |
|
|
409,193 |
|
|
|
100.00 |
% |
|
|
387,812 |
|
|
|
100.00 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other items: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred loan costs (fees), net |
|
|
608 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
569 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
495 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
131 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(345 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses |
|
|
(17,146 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15,414 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,778 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,636 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,030 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,795 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loans held-for-investment |
|
$ |
720,079 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
713,855 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
581,206 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
418,693 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
404,159 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
382,672 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
98
Loan Portfolio Maturities. The following table summarizes the scheduled repayments of
our loan portfolio at December 31, 2009. Demand loans (loans having no stated repayment schedule
or maturity) and overdraft loans are reported as being due in the year ending December 31, 2010.
Maturities are based on the final contractual payment date and do not reflect the effect of
prepayments and scheduled principal amortization.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One- to Four-Family |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial Real Estate |
|
|
Residential |
|
|
Construction and Land |
|
|
Multifamily |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Rate |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Rate |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Rate |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Rate |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Due during the
years ending
December 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
$ |
5,806 |
|
|
|
4.03 |
% |
|
$ |
24 |
|
|
|
6.61 |
% |
|
$ |
22,322 |
|
|
|
5.96 |
% |
|
$ |
5,496 |
|
|
|
6.00 |
% |
2011 |
|
|
6,219 |
|
|
|
6.52 |
|
|
|
123 |
|
|
|
6.19 |
|
|
|
12,084 |
|
|
|
6.45 |
|
|
|
304 |
|
|
|
6.93 |
|
2012 |
|
|
1,377 |
|
|
|
7.02 |
|
|
|
1,068 |
|
|
|
5.72 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013 to 2014 |
|
|
2,032 |
|
|
|
6.56 |
|
|
|
2,788 |
|
|
|
5.57 |
|
|
|
284 |
|
|
|
5.50 |
|
|
|
549 |
|
|
|
6.39 |
|
2015 to 2019 |
|
|
8,129 |
|
|
|
6.55 |
|
|
|
21,032 |
|
|
|
5.25 |
|
|
|
157 |
|
|
|
7.75 |
|
|
|
716 |
|
|
|
6.29 |
|
2020 to 2024 |
|
|
27,460 |
|
|
|
6.29 |
|
|
|
10,687 |
|
|
|
5.48 |
|
|
|
137 |
|
|
|
7.75 |
|
|
|
13,952 |
|
|
|
6.64 |
|
2025 and beyond |
|
|
276,779 |
|
|
|
6.48 |
|
|
|
55,176 |
|
|
|
5.66 |
|
|
|
9,564 |
|
|
|
5.57 |
|
|
|
157,384 |
|
|
|
5.96 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
327,802 |
|
|
|
6.43 |
% |
|
$ |
90,898 |
|
|
|
5.54 |
% |
|
$ |
44,548 |
|
|
|
6.02 |
% |
|
$ |
178,401 |
|
|
|
6.02 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Home Equity and Lines |
|
|
Commercial and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of Credit |
|
|
Industrial |
|
|
Insurance Premium |
|
|
Other |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Rate |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Rate |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Rate |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Rate |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Rate |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Due during the
years ending
December 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
$ |
616 |
|
|
|
6.67 |
% |
|
$ |
7,457 |
|
|
|
6.23 |
% |
|
$ |
40,349 |
|
|
|
6.84 |
% |
|
$ |
1,229 |
|
|
|
2.89 |
% |
|
$ |
83,299 |
|
|
|
6.24 |
% |
2011 |
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
5.48 |
|
|
|
1,033 |
|
|
|
5.63 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
7.50 |
|
|
|
70 |
|
|
|
7.00 |
|
|
|
19,862 |
|
|
|
6.44 |
|
2012 |
|
|
1,227 |
|
|
|
6.74 |
|
|
|
391 |
|
|
|
7.43 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
9.20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,083 |
|
|
|
6.65 |
|
2013 to 2014 |
|
|
1,627 |
|
|
|
5.25 |
|
|
|
1,347 |
|
|
|
5.99 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,627 |
|
|
|
5.86 |
|
2015 to 2019 |
|
|
4,376 |
|
|
|
5.70 |
|
|
|
3,207 |
|
|
|
7.41 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37,617 |
|
|
|
5.80 |
|
2020 to 2024 |
|
|
6,527 |
|
|
|
5.58 |
|
|
|
5,078 |
|
|
|
6.90 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
63,841 |
|
|
|
6.21 |
|
2025 and beyond |
|
|
11,729 |
|
|
|
4.89 |
|
|
|
739 |
|
|
|
6.25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
511,371 |
|
|
|
6.18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
26,118 |
|
|
|
5.35 |
% |
|
$ |
19,252 |
|
|
|
6.58 |
% |
|
$ |
40,382 |
|
|
|
6.84 |
% |
|
$ |
1,299 |
|
|
|
3.11 |
% |
|
$ |
728,700 |
|
|
|
6.17 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2010, we had a total of $511.4 million in loans due to mature in 2025
and beyond, of which $33.5 million, or 6.6%, were fixed-rate loans.
The following table sets forth the scheduled repayments of fixed- and adjustable-rate loans at
December 31, 2009, that are contractually due after December 31, 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Due After December 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
Fixed Rate |
|
|
Adjustable Rate |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Real estate loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial |
|
$ |
21,538 |
|
|
$ |
300,458 |
|
|
$ |
321,996 |
|
One- to four-family residential |
|
|
49,528 |
|
|
|
41,346 |
|
|
|
90,874 |
|
Construction and land |
|
|
8,403 |
|
|
|
13,823 |
|
|
|
22,226 |
|
Multifamily |
|
|
9,089 |
|
|
|
163,816 |
|
|
|
172,905 |
|
Home equity and lines of credit |
|
|
15,487 |
|
|
|
10,015 |
|
|
|
25,502 |
|
Commercial and industrial loans |
|
|
3,343 |
|
|
|
8,452 |
|
|
|
11,795 |
|
Insurance premium loans |
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33 |
|
Other loans |
|
|
70 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
70 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans |
|
$ |
107,491 |
|
|
$ |
537,910 |
|
|
$ |
645,401 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
99
Commercial Real Estate Loans. Commercial real estate loans totaled $332.4 million, or
45.13% of our loan portfolio as of March 31, 2010. Commercial real estate loans at March 31, 2010
included $29.4 million secured primarily by hotels and motels, $57.2 million secured by office
buildings, and $65.3 million secured by manufacturing buildings. Approximately $155.1 million of
our commercial real estate loans are owner-occupied businesses. At March 31, 2010, our commercial
real estate loan portfolio consisted of 333 loans with an average loan balance of approximately
$1.0 million, although there are a large number of loans with balances substantially greater than
this average. At March 31, 2010, our largest commercial real estate loan had a principal balance
of $9.7 million, and was secured by a hotel. At March 31, 2010, this loan was performing in
accordance with its original contractual terms. In recent years, we have originated limited
amounts of commercial real estate loans due to economic conditions. We expect that we would
increase our originations of commercial real estate loans if economic conditions improve.
Substantially all of our commercial real estate loans are secured by properties located in our
primary market areas.
The table below sets forth the property types collateralizing our commercial real estate loans
as of March 31, 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At March 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Percent |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Manufacturing |
|
$ |
65,189 |
|
|
|
19.6 |
% |
Office building |
|
|
57,231 |
|
|
|
17.2 |
|
Warehouse |
|
|
29,640 |
|
|
|
8.9 |
|
Accommodations |
|
|
29,361 |
|
|
|
8.8 |
|
Mixed use |
|
|
26,508 |
|
|
|
8.0 |
|
Retail |
|
|
22,139 |
|
|
|
6.7 |
|
Services |
|
|
18,358 |
|
|
|
5.5 |
|
Restaurant |
|
|
11,915 |
|
|
|
3.6 |
|
Schools/day care |
|
|
10,654 |
|
|
|
3.2 |
|
Recreational |
|
|
4,533 |
|
|
|
1.4 |
|
Other |
|
|
56,900 |
|
|
|
17.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
332,427 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our commercial real estate loans typically amortize over 20- to 25-years with interest
rates that generally adjust after an initial five-year period, and every five years thereafter.
Margins generally range from 275 basis points to 350 basis points above the average yield on United
States Treasury securities, adjusted to a constant maturity of similar term, as published by the
Federal Reserve Board. Adjustable rate loans originated during 2009 and the first quarter of 2010,
generally have been indexed to the five year London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) swaps rate as
published in the Federal Reserve Statistical Release adjusted for a negotiated margin. We also
originate, to a lesser extent, 10- to 15-year fixed-rate, fully amortizing loans. In general, our
commercial real estate loans have interest rate floors equal to the interest rate on the date the
loan is originated, and have prepayment penalties should the loan be repaid in the first three to
five years.
In the underwriting of commercial real estate loans, we generally lend up to the lesser of 75%
of the propertys appraised value or purchase price. Certain single use property types have lower
loan to appraised value ratios. We base our decision to lend primarily on the economic viability
of the property and the creditworthiness of the borrower. In evaluating a proposed commercial real
estate loan, we emphasize the ratio of the propertys projected net cash flow to the loans debt
service requirement (generally requiring a minimum ratio of 120%), computed after deduction for a
vacancy factor, where applicable, and property expenses we deem appropriate. Personal guarantees
are usually obtained from commercial real estate borrowers. We require title insurance, fire and
extended coverage casualty insurance, and, if appropriate, flood insurance, in order to protect our
security interest in
100
the underlying property. Although a significant portion of our commercial real estate loans
are referred by brokers, we underwrite all commercial real estate loans in accordance with our
underwriting standards.
Commercial real estate loans generally carry higher interest rates and have shorter terms than
one- to four-family residential real estate loans. Commercial real estate loans generally have
greater credit risks compared to one- to four-family residential real estate loans, as they
typically involve larger loan balances concentrated with single borrowers or groups of related
borrowers. In addition, the payment of loans secured by income-producing properties typically
depends on the successful operation of the property, as repayment of the loan generally is
dependent on sufficient income from the property to cover operating expenses and debt service.
Changes in economic conditions that are not within a borrowers or lenders control could affect
the value of the collateral for the loan or the future cash flow of the property. Additionally,
any decline in real estate values may be more pronounced for commercial real estate than for
residential properties.
Multifamily Real Estate Loans. In recent years, we have focused on originating multifamily
real estate loans. Loans secured by multifamily and mixed use properties totaled $187.4 million,
or 25.44% of our total loan portfolio, at March 31, 2010. We classify mixed use properties as
multifamily when they have more than four residential family units and a business or businesses.
At March 31, 2010, we had 234 multifamily real estate loans with an average loan balance of
$801,000. At March 31, 2010, our largest multifamily real estate loan had a principal balance of
$7.8 million and was performing in accordance with its original contractual terms. Substantially
all of our multifamily real estate loans are secured by properties located in our market areas.
Our multifamily real estate loans typically amortize over 20 to 30 years with interest rates
that adjust after an initial five- or 10-year period, and every five years thereafter. Margins
generally range from 275 basis points to 350 basis points above the average yield on United States
Treasury securities, adjusted to a constant maturity of similar term, as published by the Federal
Reserve Board. Variable rate loans originated during 2009 and the first quarter of 2010 generally
have been indexed to the five-year LIBOR swaps rate as published in the Federal Reserve Statistical
Release adjusted for a negotiated margin. We also originate, to a lesser extent, 10- to 15-year
fixed-rate, fully amortizing loans. In general, our multifamily real estate loans have interest
rate floors equal to the interest rate on the date the loan is originated, and have prepayment
penalties should the loan be prepaid in the first three to five years.
In underwriting multifamily real estate loans, we consider a number of factors, including the
projected net cash flow to the loans debt service requirement (generally requiring a minimum ratio
of 115%), the age and condition of the collateral, the financial resources and income level of the
borrower, and the borrowers experience in owning or managing similar properties. Multifamily real
estate loans generally are originated in amounts up to 75% of the appraised value of the property
securing the loan. Due to competitive considerations, we typically do not obtain personal
guarantees from multifamily real estate borrowers.
Loans secured by multifamily real estate properties generally have greater credit risk than
one- to four-family residential real estate loans. This increased credit risk is a result of
several factors, including the concentration of principal in a limited number of loans and
borrowers, the effects of general economic conditions on income producing properties, and the
increased difficulty of evaluating and monitoring these types of loans. Furthermore, the repayment
of loans secured by multifamily real estate properties typically depends on the successful
operation of the property. If the cash flow from the project is reduced, the borrowers ability to
repay the loan may be impaired.
In a ruling that was contrary to a 1996 advisory opinion from the New York State Division of
Housing and Community Renewal that owners of housing units who benefited from the receipt of J-51
tax incentives under the Rent Stabilization Law are eligible to decontrol apartments, the New York
State Court of Appeals ruled, on October 22, 2009, that residential housing units located in two
major housing complexes in New York City had been illegally decontrolled by the current and
previous property owners. This ruling may subject to litigation other property owners that have
previously or are currently benefiting from a J-51 tax incentive, possibly resulting in a
significant reduction to property cash flows. Based on managements assessment of its multifamily
loan portfolio, it believes that only one loan may be affected by the recent ruling regarding J-51.
The loan, which is our largest multifamily
101
residential real estate loan, noted above, has a principal balance of $7.8 million at March
31, 2010, and is performing in accordance with its original contractual terms.
Construction and Land Loans. At March 31, 2010, construction and land loans totaled $39.5
million, or 5.36% of total loans receivable. At March 31, 2010, the additional unadvanced portion
of these construction loans totaled $9.8 million. At March 31, 2010, we had 41 construction and
land loans with an average loan balance of $964,000. At March 31, 2010, our largest construction
and land loan had a principal balance of $4.8 million and was for the purpose of purchasing
commercial land. This loan is performing in accordance with its original contractual terms. In
recent years, we have originated limited amounts of construction and land loans due to economic
conditions. We expect that we would increase our originations of these types of loans if economic
conditions improve.
Our construction and land loans typically are interest only loans with interest rates that are
tied to the prime rate as published by The Wall Street Journal. Margins generally range from zero
basis points to 200 basis points above the prime rate. We also originate, to a lesser extent, 10-
to 15-year fixed-rate, fully amortizing land loans. In general, our construction and land loans
have interest rate floors equal to the interest rate on the date the loan is originated, and we do
not typically charge prepayment penalties for these types of loans.
We grant construction and land loans to experienced developers for the construction of
single-family residences, including condominiums, and commercial properties. Construction and land
loans also are made to individuals for the construction of their personal residences. Advances on
construction loans are made in accordance with a schedule reflecting the cost of construction, but
are generally limited to a loan-to-completed-appraised-value ratio of 70%. Repayment of
construction loans on residential properties normally is expected from the sale of units to
individual purchasers, or in the case of individuals building their own property, with a permanent
mortgage. In the case of income-producing property, repayment usually is expected from permanent
financing upon completion of construction. We typically offer the permanent mortgage financing on
our construction loans on income-producing properties.
Land loans also help finance the purchase of land intended for future development, including
single-family housing, multifamily housing, and commercial property. In some cases, we may make an
acquisition loan before the borrower has received approval to develop the land. In general, the
maximum loan-to-value ratio for a land acquisition loan is 50% of the appraised value of the
property, and the maximum term of these loans is two years. If the maturity of the loan exceeds
two years, the loan must be an amortizing loan.
Construction and land loans generally carry higher interest rates and have shorter terms than
one- to four- family residential real estate loans. Construction and land loans have greater
credit risk than long-term financing on improved, owner-occupied real estate. Risk of loss on a
construction loan depends largely upon the accuracy of the initial estimate of the value of the
real estate at completion of construction as compared to the estimated cost (including interest) of
construction and other assumptions. If the estimate of construction costs is inaccurate, we may
decide to advance additional funds beyond the amount originally committed in order to protect the
value of the real estate. However, if the estimated value of the completed project is inaccurate,
the borrower may hold the real estate with a value that is insufficient to assure full repayment of
the construction loan upon its sale. In the event we make a land acquisition loan on real estate
that is not yet approved for the planned development, there is a risk that approvals will not be
granted or will be delayed. Construction loans also expose us to a risk that improvements will not
be completed on time in accordance with specifications and projected costs. In addition, the
ultimate sale or rental of the real estate may not occur as anticipated and the market value of
collateral, when completed, may be less than the outstanding loans against the real estate.
Substantially all of our construction and land loans are secured by real estate located in our
primary market areas.
Commercial and Industrial Loans. At March 31, 2010, commercial and industrial loans totaled
$17.8 million, or 2.42% of the total loan portfolio. As of March 31, 2010, we had 95 commercial
and industrial loans with an average loan balance of $188,000, although we originate these types of
loans in amounts substantially greater and smaller than this average. At March 31, 2010, our
largest commercial and industrial loan had a principal balance of $3.0 million and was performing
in accordance with its original contractual terms. At March 31, 2010, $14.7
102
million, or 82.6% of our commercial and industrial loans, were secured loans, and the
remaining $3.1 million, or 17.4%, were unsecured. The security generally consists of (i) second
mortgages on commercial real estate and (ii) business assets.
Our commercial and industrial loans typically amortize over 10 years with interest rates that
are tied to the prime rate as published in The Wall Street Journal. Margins generally range from
zero basis points to 300 basis points above the prime rate. We also originate, to a lesser extent,
10 year fixed-rate, fully amortizing loans. In general, our commercial and industrial loans have
interest rate floors equal to the interest rate on the date the loan is originated and have
prepayment penalties.
We make various types of secured and unsecured commercial and industrial loans to customers in
our market area for the purpose of working capital and other general business purposes. The terms
of these loans generally range from less than one year to a maximum of 15 years. The loans are
either negotiated on a fixed-rate basis or carry adjustable interest rates indexed to a market rate
index.
Commercial credit decisions are based on our credit assessment of the applicant. We evaluate
the applicants ability to repay in accordance with the proposed terms of the loan and assess the
risks involved. Personal guarantees of the principals are typically obtained. In addition to
evaluating the loan applicants financial statements, we consider the adequacy of the primary and
secondary sources of repayment for the loan. Credit agency reports of the guarantors personal
credit history supplement our analysis of the applicants creditworthiness. We also attempt to
confirm with other banks and conduct trade investigations as part of our credit assessment of the
borrower. Collateral supporting a secured transaction also is analyzed to determine its
marketability.
Commercial and industrial loans generally carry higher interest rates than one- to four-
family residential real estate loans of like maturity because they have a higher risk of default
since their repayment generally depends on the successful operation of the borrowers business.
Commercial and industrial loans have greater credit risk than one- to four- family residential real
estate loans.
Insurance Premium Loans. At March 31, 2010, insurance premium loans totaled $40.0 million, or
5.43% of the total loan portfolio. As of March 31, 2010, we had 4,517 insurance premium loans with
an average loan balance of $9,000, although we originate these types of loans in amounts
substantially greater and smaller than this average. At March 31, 2010, our largest insurance
premium loan had a principal balance of $961,000 and was performing in accordance with its original
contractual terms.
Our insurance premium loans typically amortize over nine to 12 months at fixed rates and
typically require a down payment of 15% to 20%. These loans are structured (down payment and
repayment term) such that the unpaid loan balance is generally fully secured by the unearned
premiums refundable by insurance carriers. Insurance premium loan credit decisions generally are
based on our credit assessment of the insurance carrier, and in some instances, the credit
assessment of the borrower.
One- to Four-Family Residential Real Estate Loans. At March 31, 2010, we had 554 one- to
four-family residential real estate loans outstanding with an aggregate balance of $90.0 million,
or 12.22% of our total loan portfolio. As of March 31, 2010, the average balance of one- to
four-family residential mortgage real estate loans was $162,000, although we originate this type of
loan in amounts substantially greater and smaller than this average. At March 31, 2010, our largest
loan of this type had a principal balance of $2.4 million and was performing in accordance with its
original contractual terms. We expect the balance of these loans to decrease in the future, as we
are currently selling our originations of one- to four-family residential real estate loans.
One- to four-family residential real estate loans generally are underwritten according to
Freddie Mac guidelines using their proprietary automated underwriting software, and we refer to
loans that conform to such guidelines as conforming loans. We generally originate both fixed-
and adjustable-rate loans in amounts up to the maximum conforming loan limits as established by the
Federal Housing Finance Agency, which as of December 31, 2009, is generally $417,000 for
single-family homes. We also originate loans above the lending limit for conforming loans, which
are referred to as jumbo loans. We originate a limited number of fixed-rate jumbo loans
103
with terms generally up to 15 years and adjustable-rate jumbo loans with an initial fixed-rate
period of 10 years. We generally underwrite jumbo loans in a manner similar to conforming loans.
These loans generally are eligible for sale to various firms that specialize in purchasing
non-conforming loans. Jumbo loans are common in our market area although we have never sold jumbo
loans to any third parties.
We will originate loans with loan-to-value ratios in excess of 80%, up to and including a
loan-to-value ratio of 95%. We require private mortgage insurance for all loans with loan-to-value
ratios exceeding 80%. Generally, we will retain in our portfolio loans with loan-to-value ratios
up to and including 90%, and sell loans with loan-to-value ratios that exceed 90%. We currently
retain the servicing rights on loans sold which generates fee income, or, in the case of loans
serviced for the State of New York Mortgage Agency, income tax credits.
We do not originate for retention in our portfolio interest only mortgage loans on one- to
four-family residential properties, where the borrower pays interest for an initial period and
thereafter the loan converts to a fully amortizing loan. We also do not offer loans that provide
for negative amortization of principal, such as Option ARM loans, where the borrower can pay less
than the interest owed on the loan, thereby resulting in an increased principal balance during the
life of the loan. We do not offer, and have not offered, subprime loans (loans that generally
target borrowers with weakened credit histories typically characterized by payment delinquencies,
previous charge-offs, judgments, bankruptcies, or borrowers with questionable repayment capacity as
evidenced by low credit scores or high debt-burden ratios).
Home Equity Loans and Lines of Credit. At March 31, 2010, we had 480 home equity loans and
lines of credit with an aggregate outstanding balance of $28.1 million, or 3.82% of our total loan
portfolio. Of this total, there were outstanding home equity lines of credit of $12.8 million, or
1.74% of our total loan portfolio. At March 31, 2010, the average home equity loans and lines of
credit balance was $59,000 although we originate these types of loans in amounts substantially
greater and lower than this average. At March 31, 2010, our largest home equity line of credit was
$1.5 million and our largest home equity loan was $331,000, and both were performing in accordance
with their original contractual terms.
We offer home equity loans and home equity lines of credit that are secured by the borrowers
primary residence or second home. Home equity lines of credit are variable rate loans tied to the
prime rate as published in The Wall Street Journal, adjusted for a margin, and have a maximum term
of 20 years during which time the borrower is required to make principal payments based on a
20-year amortization schedule. Home equity lines generally have interest rate floors and ceilings.
The borrower is permitted to draw against the line during the entire term. Our home equity lines
of credit have a ceiling rate and a floor rate. Our home equity loans typically are fully
amortizing with fixed terms to 20 years. Home equity loans and lines of credit generally are
underwritten with the same criteria we use to underwrite fixed-rate, one- to four-family
residential real estate loans. Home equity loans and lines of credit may be underwritten with a
loan-to-value ratio of 80% when combined with the principal balance of the existing mortgage loan.
We appraise the property securing the loan at the time of the loan application to determine the
value of the property. At the time we close a home equity loan or line of credit, we record a
mortgage to perfect our security interest in the underlying collateral.
Loan Originations, Purchases, Sales, Participations, and Servicing. Lending activities are
conducted in all branch locations. All loans we originate for our portfolio are underwritten
pursuant to our policies and procedures. Freddie Mac underwriting standards are utilized for loans
we originate to sell in the secondary market. We may, based on proper approvals, make exceptions
to our policies and procedures. We originate both adjustable-rate and fixed-rate loans. Our
ability to originate fixed- or adjustable-rate loans is dependent on the relative customer demand
for such loans, which is affected by various factors including current market interest rates as
well as anticipated future market interest rates. Our loan origination and sales activity may be
adversely affected by a rising interest rate environment that typically results in decreased loan
demand. A significant portion of our commercial real estate loans and multifamily real estate
loans are generated by referrals from loan brokers, accountants, and other professional contacts.
Most of our one- to four-family residential real estate loans are generated through referrals from
branch personnel. Our home equity loans and lines of credit typically are generated through direct
mail advertisements, newspaper advertisements, and referrals from branch personnel.
104
We generally retain in our portfolio all adjustable-rate loans we originate, as well as
shorter-term, fixed-rate residential loans (terms of 10 years or less). Loans we sell consist
primarily of conforming, longer-term, fixed-rate residential loans. We sold no one- to four-family
residential real estate loans during the three months ended March 31, 2010 and we sold $7.4 million
of one- to four-family residential real estate loans (generally fixed-rate loans, with terms of 15
years or longer) during the year ended December 31, 2009. We had no loans held-for-sale at March
31, 2010.
We sell our loans without recourse, except for standard representations and warranties
provided in secondary market transactions. Currently, we retain the servicing rights on all one-
to four-family residential real estate loans we sell. At March 31, 2010, we were servicing loans
for others of $71.7 million of one- to four-family residential mortgage loans. Historically, the
origination of loans held for sale and related servicing activity has not been material to our
operations. Loan servicing includes collecting and remitting loan payments, accounting for
principal and interest, contacting delinquent borrowers, supervising foreclosures and property
dispositions in the event of unremedied defaults, making certain insurance and tax payments on
behalf of the borrowers and generally administering the loans. We retain a portion of the interest
paid by the borrower on the loans we service as consideration for our servicing activities, or, in
the case of loans serviced for the State of New York Mortgage Agency, we receive an income tax
credit.
During the fourth quarter of 2009, we purchased approximately $35.4 million in insurance
premium loans.
Loan Approval Procedures and Authority. Northfield Banks lending activities follow written,
non-discriminatory underwriting standards established by our board of directors. The loan approval
process is intended to assess the borrowers ability to repay the loan and the value of any
collateral that will secure the loan. To assess the borrowers ability to repay, we review the
borrowers employment and credit history, and information on the historical and projected income
and expenses of the borrower.
In underwriting a loan secured by real property, we require an appraisal of the property by an
independent licensed appraiser approved by our board of directors. The appraisal is subject to
review by an independent third party we hire. We review and inspect properties before disbursement
of funds during the term of a construction loan. Generally, management obtains updated appraisals
when a loan is deemed impaired. These appraisals may be more limited than those prepared for the
underwriting of a new loan. In addition, when we acquire other real estate owned, we generally
obtain a current appraisal to substantiate the net carrying value of the asset.
The board of directors of Northfield Bank has established a loan committee to: periodically
review and recommend for approval our policies related to lending (collectively, the loan
policies) as prepared by management; approve or reject loans meeting certain criteria; and monitor
loan quality, including concentrations, and certain other aspects of our lending functions, as
applicable. Northfield Banks lending officers have individual lending authority that is approved
by the board of directors. Aggregate lending relationships in amounts up to $1.0 million that are
secured by real estate can be approved by a senior vice president, while aggregate amounts up to
$1.5 million that are secured by real estate can be approved by a senior vice president with the
concurrence of our Chief Lending Officer, and aggregate amounts up to $2.5 million that are secured
by real estate can be approved by a senior vice president with the concurrence of our Chief Lending
Officer and our Chief Executive Officer. Approval of the loan committee is required for all
commercial real estate loans in excess of $2.5 million and for all multifamily real estate loans in
excess of $4.0 million.
Investments
We conduct investment transactions in accordance with our board approved investment policy
which is reviewed at least annually by the asset liability committee, and any changes to the policy
are subject to ratification by the full board of directors. This policy dictates that investment
decisions give consideration to the safety of the investment, liquidity requirements, potential
returns, the ability to provide collateral for pledging requirements, and consistency with our
interest rate risk management strategy. Any two of our Treasurer, Chief Executive Officer, Chief
Financial Officer and our other two executive vice presidents may approve securities portfolio
transactions, within policy requirements. NSB Services Corp.s and NSB Realty Trusts investment
officers execute security
105
portfolio transactions in accordance with investment policies that substantially mirror our
investment policy. All purchase and sale transactions are reviewed by the asset liability
committee at least quarterly.
Our current investment policy permits investments in mortgage-backed securities, including
pass-through securities and real estate mortgage investment conduits (REMICs). The investment
policy also permits, with certain limitations, investments in debt securities issued by the United
States Government, agencies of the United States Government or United States Government-sponsored
enterprises (GSEs), asset-backed securities, money market mutual funds, federal funds, investment
grade corporate bonds, reverse repurchase agreements, and certificates of deposit.
Northfield Banks investment policy does not permit investment in municipal bonds, preferred
and common stock of other entities including U.S. Government sponsored enterprises or equity
securities other than our required investment in the common stock of the Federal Home Loan Bank of
New York, or as permitted for community reinvestment purposes or for the purposes of funding our
deferred compensation plan. Northfield-Federal may invest in equity securities of other financial
institutions up to certain limitations. As of March 31, 2010, we held no asset-backed securities
other than mortgage-backed securities. Our board of directors may change these limitations in the
future.
Our current investment policy does not permit hedging through the use of such instruments as
financial futures, interest rate options, and swaps.
At the time of purchase, we must designate a security as either held-to-maturity,
available-for-sale, or trading, based upon our ability and intent to hold such securities. Trading
securities and securities available-for-sale are reported at estimated fair value, and securities
held-to-maturity are reported at amortized cost. A periodic review and evaluation of the
available-for-sale and held-to-maturity securities portfolios is conducted to determine if the
estimated fair value of any security has declined below its carrying value and whether such
impairment is other-than-temporary. If such impairment is deemed to be other-than-temporary, the
security is written down to a new cost basis and the resulting loss is charged against earnings.
The estimated fair values of our securities are obtained from an independent nationally recognized
pricing service (see Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
OperationsCritical Accounting Policies for further discussion). At March 31, 2010, our
investment portfolio consisted primarily of mortgage-backed securities guaranteed by GSEs and to a
lesser extent private label mortgage-backed securities, mutual funds, corporate securities, and
agency bonds. The market for these securities consists primarily of other financial institutions,
insurance companies, real estate investment trusts, and mutual funds.
We purchase mortgage-backed securities insured or guaranteed primarily by Fannie Mae, Freddie
Mac, or Ginnie Mae, and to a lesser extent, we acquire securities issued by private companies
(private label). We invest in mortgage-backed securities to achieve positive interest rate spreads
with minimal administrative expense, and to lower our credit risk as a result of the guarantees
provided by Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, or Ginnie Mae. In September 2008, the Federal Housing Finance
Agency placed Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae into conservatorship. The U.S. Treasury Department has
established financing agreements to ensure that Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae meet their obligations
to holders of mortgage-backed securities that they have issued or guaranteed.
Mortgage-backed securities are securities sold in the secondary market that are collateralized
by pools of mortgages. Certain types of mortgage-backed securities are commonly referred to as
pass-through certificates because the principal and interest of the underlying loans is passed
through pro rata to investors, net of certain costs, including servicing and guarantee fees, in
proportion to an investors ownership in the entire pool. The issuers of such securities pool
mortgages and resell the participation interests in the form of securities to investors. The
interest rate of the security is lower than the interest rates of the underlying loans to allow for
payment of servicing and guaranty fees. Ginnie Mae, a United States Government agency, and GSEs,
such as Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, may guarantee the payments or guarantee the timely payment of
principal and interest to investors.
Mortgage-backed securities are more liquid than individual mortgage loans since there is a
more active market for such securities. In addition, mortgage-backed securities may be used to
collateralize our specific
106
liabilities and obligations. Investments in mortgage-backed securities issued or guaranteed
by GSEs involve a risk that actual payments will be greater or less than estimated at the time of
purchase, which may require adjustments to the amortization of any premium or accretion of any
discount relating to such interests, thereby affecting the net yield on our securities. We
periodically review current prepayment speeds to determine whether prepayment estimates require
modification that could cause adjustment of amortization or accretion.
We invest in certain mortgage-backed securities (which we refer to as REMICs) that are issued
by special-purpose entities that aggregate pools of mortgages and mortgage-backed securities and
create different classes of securities with varying maturities and amortization schedules, as well
as a residual interest, with each class possessing different risk characteristics. The cash flows
from the underlying collateral are generally divided into tranches or classes that have
descending priorities with respect to the distribution of principal and interest cash flows, while
cash flows on pass-through mortgage-backed securities are distributed pro rata to all security
holders.
The timely payment of principal and interest on these REMICs is generally supported (credit
enhanced) in varying degrees by either insurance issued by a financial guarantee insurer, letters
of credit, over collateralization, or subordination techniques. Substantially all of these
securities are rated AAA by Standard & Poors or Moodys at the time of purchase. Privately issued
REMICs and pass-throughs can be subject to certain credit-related risks normally not associated
with U.S. Government agency and U.S. Government-sponsored enterprise mortgage-backed securities.
The loss protection generally provided by the various forms of credit enhancements is limited, and
losses in excess of certain levels are not protected. Furthermore, the credit enhancement itself
may be subject to the creditworthiness of the credit enhancer. Thus, in the event a credit
enhancer does not fulfill its obligations, the holder could be subject to risk of loss similar to a
purchaser of a whole loan pool. Management believes that the credit enhancements are adequate to
protect us from material losses on our privately issued mortgage-backed securities.
At March 31, 2010, our corporate bond portfolio consisted of $136.7 million of short-term
investment grade securities. Our investment policy provides that we may invest up to 15% of our
tier-one risk-based capital in corporate bonds from individual issuers which, at the time of
purchase, are within the three highest investment-grade ratings from Standard & Poors or Moodys.
The maturity of these bonds may not exceed 10 years, and there is no aggregate limit for this
security type. Corporate bonds from individual issuers with investment-grade ratings, at the time
of purchase, below the top three ratings are limited to the lesser of 1% of our total assets or 15%
of our tier-one risk-based capital and must have a maturity of less than one year. Aggregate
holdings of this security type cannot exceed 5% of our total assets. Bonds that subsequently
experience a decline in credit rating below investment grade are monitored at least monthly.
107
The following tables set forth the amortized cost and estimated fair value of our
available-for-sale and held-to-maturity securities portfolios (excluding Federal Home Loan Bank of
New York common stock) at the dates indicated. As of March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, 2008,
and 2007, we also had a trading portfolio with a market value of $3.7 million, $3.4 million, $2.5
million and $3.6 million, respectively, consisting of mutual funds quoted in actively traded
markets. These securities are utilized to fund non-qualified deferred compensation obligations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At March 31, |
|
|
At December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Securities available-for-sale: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pass-through certificates: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GSEs |
|
$ |
366,089 |
|
|
$ |
381,723 |
|
|
$ |
404,128 |
|
|
$ |
418,060 |
|
|
$ |
532,870 |
|
|
$ |
546,244 |
|
|
$ |
491,758 |
|
|
$ |
486,562 |
|
Non-GSEs |
|
|
56,696 |
|
|
|
55,969 |
|
|
|
65,363 |
|
|
|
62,466 |
|
|
|
65,040 |
|
|
|
55,778 |
|
|
|
29,200 |
|
|
|
28,867 |
|
REMICs: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GSEs |
|
|
395,438 |
|
|
|
400,238 |
|
|
|
344,150 |
|
|
|
349,088 |
|
|
|
242,557 |
|
|
|
245,492 |
|
|
|
171,709 |
|
|
|
171,207 |
|
Non-GSEs |
|
|
101,799 |
|
|
|
105,627 |
|
|
|
111,756 |
|
|
|
114,194 |
|
|
|
90,446 |
|
|
|
83,695 |
|
|
|
36,141 |
|
|
|
36,522 |
|
Equity investments (1) |
|
|
5,560 |
|
|
|
5,623 |
|
|
|
21,820 |
|
|
|
21,872 |
|
|
|
9,025 |
|
|
|
9,025 |
|
|
|
14,027 |
|
|
|
14,012 |
|
GSE bonds bonds |
|
|
129,937 |
|
|
|
130,291 |
|
|
|
28,994 |
|
|
|
28,983 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate bonds |
|
|
134,026 |
|
|
|
136,724 |
|
|
|
134,595 |
|
|
|
137,140 |
|
|
|
17,319 |
|
|
|
17,351 |
|
|
|
65,146 |
|
|
|
65,247 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total securities
available-for-sale |
|
$ |
1,189,545 |
|
|
$ |
1,216,195 |
|
|
$ |
1,110,806 |
|
|
$ |
1,131,803 |
|
|
$ |
957,257 |
|
|
$ |
957,585 |
|
|
$ |
807,981 |
|
|
$ |
802,417 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Consists of mutual funds. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At March 31, |
|
|
At December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Securities held-to-maturity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pass-through certificates: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GSEs |
|
$ |
869 |
|
|
$ |
903 |
|
|
$ |
874 |
|
|
$ |
901 |
|
|
$ |
6,132 |
|
|
$ |
6,273 |
|
|
$ |
9,206 |
|
|
$ |
9,320 |
|
REMICs: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GSEs |
|
|
5,351 |
|
|
|
5,529 |
|
|
|
5,866 |
|
|
|
6,029 |
|
|
|
8,347 |
|
|
|
8,315 |
|
|
|
10,480 |
|
|
|
10,120 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total securities
held-to-maturity |
|
$ |
6,220 |
|
|
$ |
6,432 |
|
|
$ |
6,740 |
|
|
$ |
6,930 |
|
|
$ |
14,479 |
|
|
$ |
14,588 |
|
|
$ |
19,686 |
|
|
$ |
19,440 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table sets forth the amortized cost and estimated fair value of securities
investments as of March 31, 2010 that exceeded 10% of our stockholders equity as of that date.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At March 31, 2010 |
|
|
Amortized Cost |
|
Estimated Fair Value |
|
|
(In thousands) |
Mortgage-backed securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fannie Mae |
|
$ |
290,048 |
|
|
$ |
301,421 |
|
Freddie Mac |
|
$ |
449,858 |
|
|
$ |
458,537 |
|
JP Morgan Chase |
|
$ |
60,309 |
|
|
$ |
61,882 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Direct obligations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fannie Mae |
|
$ |
59,947 |
|
|
$ |
60,137 |
|
Federal Home Loan Bank of New York |
|
$ |
41,619 |
|
|
$ |
41,449 |
|
108
Portfolio Maturities and Yields. The composition and maturities of the investment
securities portfolio at March 31, 2010, are summarized in the following table. Maturities are
based on the final contractual payment dates, and do not reflect the effect of scheduled principal
repayments, prepayments, or early redemptions that may occur. All of our securities at March 31,
2010, were taxable securities.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
More than One Year |
|
|
More than Five Years |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One Year or Less |
|
|
through Five Years |
|
|
through Ten Years |
|
|
More than Ten Years |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Yield |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Yield |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Yield |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Yield |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Yield |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Securities available-for-sale: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pass-through certificates: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GSEs |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
% |
|
$ |
126,043 |
|
|
|
4.21 |
% |
|
$ |
179,621 |
|
|
|
4.47 |
% |
|
$ |
60,425 |
|
|
|
4.92 |
% |
|
$ |
366,089 |
|
|
$ |
381,723 |
|
|
|
4.45 |
% |
Non-GSEs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% |
|
|
23,543 |
|
|
|
5.04 |
% |
|
|
33,153 |
|
|
|
5.21 |
% |
|
|
56,696 |
|
|
|
55,969 |
|
|
|
5.14 |
% |
REMICs: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GSEs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% |
|
|
200,155 |
|
|
|
1.47 |
% |
|
|
73,291 |
|
|
|
2.86 |
% |
|
|
121,992 |
|
|
|
3.81 |
% |
|
|
395,438 |
|
|
|
400,238 |
|
|
|
2.45 |
% |
Non-GSEs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% |
|
|
84,093 |
|
|
|
4.96 |
% |
|
|
17,706 |
|
|
|
2.52 |
% |
|
|
101,799 |
|
|
|
105,627 |
|
|
|
4.54 |
% |
Equity investments |
|
|
5,560 |
|
|
|
4.37 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% |
|
|
5,560 |
|
|
|
5,623 |
|
|
|
4.37 |
% |
GSE bonds |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% |
|
|
129,937 |
|
|
|
2.35 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% |
|
|
129,937 |
|
|
|
130,291 |
|
|
|
2.35 |
% |
Corporate bonds |
|
|
27,127 |
|
|
|
2.85 |
% |
|
|
106,899 |
|
|
|
2.80 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% |
|
|
134,026 |
|
|
|
136,724 |
|
|
|
2.81 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total securities
available-for-sale |
|
$ |
32,687 |
|
|
|
3.11 |
% |
|
$ |
563,034 |
|
|
|
2.02 |
% |
|
$ |
360,548 |
|
|
|
3.71 |
% |
|
$ |
233,276 |
|
|
|
2.21 |
% |
|
$ |
1,189,545 |
|
|
$ |
1,216,195 |
|
|
|
2.60 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities held-to-maturity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pass-through certificates: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GSEs |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
% |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
% |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
% |
|
$ |
869 |
|
|
|
5.36 |
% |
|
$ |
869 |
|
|
$ |
903 |
|
|
|
5.36 |
% |
REMICs: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% |
|
|
5,351 |
|
|
|
3.78 |
% |
|
|
5,351 |
|
|
|
5,529 |
|
|
|
3.78 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total securities
held-to-maturity |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
% |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
% |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
% |
|
$ |
6,220 |
|
|
|
4.00 |
% |
|
$ |
6,220 |
|
|
$ |
6,432 |
|
|
|
4.00 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
109
Sources of Funds
General. Deposits traditionally have been our primary source of funds for our investment and
lending activities. We also borrow from the Federal Home Loan Bank of New York and other financial
institutions to supplement cash flow needs, to lengthen the maturities of liabilities for interest
rate risk management purposes, and to manage our cost of funds. Our additional sources of funds
are the proceeds of loan sales, scheduled loan payments, maturing investments, loan prepayments,
and retained income on other earning assets.
Deposits. We accept deposits primarily from the areas in which our offices are located. We
rely on our convenient locations, customer service, and competitive products and pricing to attract
and retain deposits. We offer a variety of deposit accounts with a range of interest rates and
terms. Our deposit accounts consist of transaction accounts (NOW and non-interest bearing checking
accounts), savings accounts (money market, passbook, and statement savings), and certificates of
deposit, including individual retirement accounts. We accept brokered deposits (through the CDARS
program) on a limited basis. At March 31, 2010, we had brokered certificates of deposit totaling
$136.7 million.
Interest rates offered generally are established weekly, while maturity terms, service fees,
and withdrawal penalties are reviewed on a periodic basis. Deposit rates and terms are based
primarily on current operating strategies and market interest rates, liquidity requirements, and
our deposit growth goals.
At March 31, 2010, we had a total of $626.2 million in certificates of deposit, of which
$525.5 million had remaining maturities of one year or less. Based on our experience and current
pricing strategy, we believe we will retain a significant portion of these accounts at maturity.
The following tables set forth the distribution of our average total deposit accounts, by
account type, for the periods indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
Balance |
|
|
Percent |
|
|
Rate |
|
|
Balance |
|
|
Percent |
|
|
Rate |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Non-interest bearing demand |
|
$ |
109,640 |
|
|
|
8.21 |
% |
|
|
|
% |
|
$ |
94,185 |
|
|
|
8.83 |
% |
|
|
|
% |
NOW |
|
|
65,038 |
|
|
|
4.87 |
|
|
|
1.55 |
|
|
|
45,629 |
|
|
|
4.28 |
|
|
|
1.31 |
|
Money market accounts |
|
|
208,181 |
|
|
|
15.58 |
|
|
|
1.26 |
|
|
|
121,778 |
|
|
|
11.41 |
|
|
|
1.41 |
|
Savings |
|
|
364,281 |
|
|
|
27.27 |
|
|
|
0.58 |
|
|
|
356,479 |
|
|
|
33.41 |
|
|
|
1.21 |
|
Certificates of deposit |
|
|
588,675 |
|
|
|
44.07 |
|
|
|
1.74 |
|
|
|
448,761 |
|
|
|
42.07 |
|
|
|
3.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deposits |
|
$ |
1,335,815 |
|
|
|
100.00 |
% |
|
|
1.20 |
% |
|
$ |
1,066,832 |
|
|
|
100.00 |
% |
|
|
1.88 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Year Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
Balance |
|
|
Percent |
|
|
Rate |
|
|
Balance |
|
|
Percent |
|
|
Rate |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Non-interest bearing demand |
|
$ |
99,950 |
|
|
|
8.50 |
% |
|
|
|
% |
|
$ |
94,499 |
|
|
|
10.41 |
% |
|
|
|
% |
NOW |
|
|
51,336 |
|
|
|
4.36 |
|
|
|
1.48 |
|
|
|
63,512 |
|
|
|
7.00 |
|
|
|
1.97 |
|
Money market accounts |
|
|
157,620 |
|
|
|
13.40 |
|
|
|
1.56 |
|
|
|
64,444 |
|
|
|
7.10 |
|
|
|
2.95 |
|
Savings |
|
|
357,938 |
|
|
|
30.43 |
|
|
|
0.79 |
|
|
|
317,426 |
|
|
|
34.97 |
|
|
|
0.86 |
|
Certificates of deposit |
|
|
509,610 |
|
|
|
43.31 |
|
|
|
2.39 |
|
|
|
367,806 |
|
|
|
40.52 |
|
|
|
3.44 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deposits |
|
$ |
1,176,454 |
|
|
|
100.00 |
% |
|
|
1.55 |
% |
|
$ |
907,687 |
|
|
|
100.00 |
% |
|
|
2.04 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
110
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Year Ended |
|
|
|
December 31, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
Balance |
|
|
Percent |
|
|
Rate |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Non-interest bearing demand |
|
$ |
96,796 |
|
|
|
9.57 |
% |
|
|
|
% |
NOW |
|
|
46,436 |
|
|
|
4.60 |
|
|
|
1.93 |
|
Money market accounts |
|
|
2,773 |
|
|
|
0.27 |
|
|
|
2.38 |
|
Savings accounts |
|
|
401,003 |
|
|
|
39.64 |
|
|
|
0.65 |
|
Certificates of deposit |
|
|
464,552 |
|
|
|
45.92 |
|
|
|
4.35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deposits |
|
$ |
1,011,560 |
|
|
|
100.00 |
% |
|
|
2.35 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of March 31, 2010, the aggregate amount of our outstanding certificates of deposit in
amounts equal to $100,000 or more was $339.8 million. The following table sets forth the maturity
of these certificates at March 31, 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At |
|
|
|
March 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Three months or less |
|
$ |
189,950 |
|
Over three months through six months |
|
|
92,494 |
|
Over six months through one year |
|
|
27,072 |
|
Over one year to three years |
|
|
8,610 |
|
Over three years |
|
|
21,678 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
339,804 |
|
|
|
|
|
Borrowings. Our borrowings consist primarily of securities sold under agreements to
repurchase (repurchase agreements) with third party financial institutions, as well as advances
from the Federal Home Loan Bank of New York, and the Federal Reserve Bank. As of March 31, 2010,
our repurchase agreements totaled $244.7 million, or 14.38% of total liabilities, our capitalized
lease obligations totaled $2.1 million, or 0.12% of total liabilities, and our Federal Home Loan
Bank advances totaled $46.3 million, or 2.72% of total liabilities. At March 31, 2010, we had the
ability to borrow an additional $200 million under our existing credit facilities with the Federal
Home Loan Bank of New York. Repurchase agreements are primarily secured by mortgage-backed
securities. Advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank of New York are secured by our investment in
the common stock of the Federal Home Loan Bank of New York as well by pledged mortgage-backed
securities.
The following table sets forth information concerning balances and interest rates on our
borrowings at and for the periods indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At or For the Three Months |
|
|
|
|
Ended March 31, |
|
At or For the Years Ended December 31, |
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
Balance at end of period |
|
$ |
293,060 |
|
|
$ |
281,017 |
|
|
$ |
279,424 |
|
|
$ |
332,084 |
|
|
$ |
124,420 |
|
Average balance during period |
|
$ |
311,798 |
|
|
$ |
304,513 |
|
|
$ |
297,365 |
|
|
$ |
277,227 |
|
|
$ |
127,926 |
|
Maximum outstanding at any month end |
|
$ |
336,089 |
|
|
$ |
323,822 |
|
|
$ |
345,506 |
|
|
$ |
382,107 |
|
|
$ |
156,459 |
|
Weighted average interest rate at end of period |
|
|
3.45 |
% |
|
|
3.67 |
% |
|
|
3.63 |
% |
|
|
3.70 |
% |
|
|
4.12 |
% |
Average interest rate during period |
|
|
3.26 |
% |
|
|
3.68 |
% |
|
|
3.62 |
% |
|
|
3.51 |
% |
|
|
3.97 |
% |
Employees
As of March 31, 2010, we had 204 full-time employees and 33 part-time employees. Our
employees are not represented by any collective bargaining group. Management believes that we have
a good working relationship with our employees.
111
Subsidiary Activities
Northfield-Federal owns 100% of Northfield Investment, Inc., an inactive New Jersey investment
company, and 100% of Northfield Bank. Northfield Bank owns 100% of NSB Services Corp., a Delaware
corporation, which in turn owns 100% of the voting common stock of NSB Realty Trust. NSB Realty
Trust is a Maryland real estate investment trust that holds mortgage loans, mortgage-backed
securities and other investments. These entities enable us to segregate certain assets for
management purposes, and promote our ability to raise regulatory capital in the future through the
sale of preferred stock or other capital-enhancing securities or borrow against assets or stock of
these entities for liquidity purposes. At March 31, 2010, Northfield Banks investment in NSB
Services Corp. was $580.6 million, and NSB Services Corp. had assets of $580.8 million and
liabilities of $141,000 at that date. At March 31, 2010, NSB Services Corp.s investment in NSB
Realty Trust was $584.9 million, and NSB Realty Trust had $584.9 million in assets, and liabilities
of $24,000 at that date. NSB Insurance Agency, Inc. is a New York corporation that receives
nominal commissions from the sale of life insurance by employees of Northfield Bank.
Legal Proceedings
In the normal course of business, we may be party to various outstanding legal proceedings and
claims. In the opinion of management, the consolidated financial statements will not be materially
affected by the outcome of such legal proceedings and claims as of March 31, 2010.
Expense and Tax Allocation Agreements
Northfield Bank will enter into an agreement with Northfield-Delaware to provide it with
certain administrative support services, whereby Northfield Bank will be compensated at not less
than the fair market value of the services provided. In addition, Northfield Bank and
Northfield-Delaware will enter into an agreement to establish a method for allocating and for
reimbursing the payment of their consolidated tax liability.
Properties
We operate from our home office in Staten Island, New York, our operations center located at
581 Main Street, Woodbridge, New Jersey, and our additional 17 branch offices located in New York
and New Jersey. Our branch offices are located in the New York Counties of Richmond, and Kings and
the New Jersey Counties of Middlesex and Union. We also have a customer service center in
Lawrenceville, Georgia related to insurance premium financing. The net book value of our premises,
land, and equipment was $13.1 million at March 31, 2010.
112
The following table sets forth information with respect to our full-service banking offices
and our loan centers, including the expiration date of leases with respect to leased facilities.
|
|
|
|
|
Avenel
|
|
Bay Ridge
|
|
Bay Street |
1410 St. Georges Ave.
|
|
8512 Third Ave.
|
|
385 Bay St. |
Avenel, New Jersey 07001
|
|
Brooklyn, New York 11209
|
|
Staten Island, New York 10301 |
3/31/2035
|
|
10/31/2025
|
|
1/31/2027 |
|
|
|
|
|
Bulls Head
|
|
Castleton Corners
|
|
East Brunswick |
1497 Richmond Ave.
|
|
(Northfield Bank main office)
|
|
755 State Highway 18 |
Staten Island, New York 10314
|
|
1731 Victory Blvd.
|
|
East Brunswick, New Jersey 08816 |
3/31/2037
|
|
Staten Island, New York 10314
|
|
6/30/2013 |
|
|
|
|
|
Eltingville
|
|
Forest Avenue Shoppers Town
|
|
Grasmere |
4355 Amboy Rd.
|
|
1481 Forest Ave.
|
|
1158 Hylan Boulevard |
Staten Island, New York 10312
|
|
Staten Island, New York 10302
|
|
Staten Island, New York 10305 |
7/5/2018
|
|
11/1/2016
|
|
1/31/28 |
|
|
|
|
|
Greenridge
|
|
Linden
|
|
Milltown |
3227 Richmond Ave.
|
|
501 N. Wood Ave.
|
|
336 Ryders Lane |
Staten Island, New York 10312
|
|
Linden, New Jersey 07036
|
|
Milltown, New Jersey 08850 |
12/31/2015
|
|
3/1/2029
|
|
9/30/2040 |
|
|
|
|
|
Monroe Township
|
|
New Dorp Shopping Center
|
|
Pathmark Shopping Mall |
1600 Perrineville Rd.
|
|
2706 Hylan Blvd.
|
|
1351 Forest Ave. |
Monroe, New Jersey 08831
|
|
Staten Island, New York 10306
|
|
Staten Island, New York 10302 |
3/1/2024
|
|
9/30/2021
|
|
10/21/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
Pleasant Plains
|
|
Princes Bay
|
|
Rahway |
6420 Amboy Rd.
|
|
5775 Amboy Rd.
|
|
1515 Irving St. |
Staten Island, New York 10309
5/31/2032
|
|
Staten Island, New York 10309
|
|
Rahway, New Jersey 07065 |
|
|
|
|
|
West Brighton
|
|
Woodbridge
|
|
Commercial Loan Center |
519 Forest Ave.
|
|
(corporate headquarters)
|
|
8517 Fourth Ave., 2nd Floor |
Staten Island, New York 10310
|
|
581 Main St.
|
|
Brooklyn, New York 11209 |
6/30/2055
|
|
Woodbridge, New Jersey 07095
|
|
9/30/2013 |
|
|
6/30/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Premium Finance Loan Center |
|
|
|
|
3169 Holcomb Bridge Road |
|
|
|
|
Norcross, Georgia 30071 |
|
|
|
|
4/30/2012 |
|
|
|
|
SUPERVISION AND REGULATION
General
Northfield Bank is examined and supervised by the Office of Thrift Supervision and is subject
to examination by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. This regulation and supervision
establishes a comprehensive framework of activities in which an institution may engage and is
intended primarily for the protection of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporations deposit
insurance fund and depositors. Under this system of federal regulation, financial institutions are
periodically examined to ensure that they satisfy applicable standards with respect to their
capital adequacy, assets, management, earnings, liquidity and sensitivity to market interest
113
rates. Following completion of its examination, the federal agency critiques the
institutions operations and assigns its rating (known as an institutions CAMELS rating). Under
federal law, an institution may not disclose its CAMELS rating to the public. Northfield Bank also
is a member of and owns stock in the Federal Home Loan Bank of New York, which is one of the twelve
regional banks in the Federal Home Loan Bank System. Northfield Bank is also regulated to a lesser
extent by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, governing reserves to be maintained
against deposits and other matters. The Office of Thrift Supervision examines Northfield Bank and
prepares reports for the consideration of its board of directors on any operating deficiencies.
Northfield Banks relationship with its depositors and borrowers is also regulated to a great
extent by federal law and, to a much lesser extent, state law, especially in matters concerning the
ownership of deposit accounts and the form and content of Northfield Banks mortgage documents.
Any change in these laws or regulations, whether by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation,
the Office of Thrift Supervision or Congress, could have a material adverse impact on
Northfield-Delaware and Northfield Bank and their operations.
Under the recently enacted Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the
Dodd-Frank Act), the Office of Thrift Supervisions functions relating to federal savings
associations, including rulemaking authority, are transferred to the Comptroller of the Currency
within one year of the July 21, 2010 date of enactment of the new legislation, unless extended by
up to six months by the Secretary of the Treasury. The thrift charter has been preserved and a new
Deputy Comptroller of the Currency will supervise and examine federal savings associations and
savings banks.
As a savings and loan holding company following the conversion, Northfield-Delaware will be
required to comply with the rules and regulations of the Office of Thrift Supervision, and will be
required to file certain reports with and will be subject to examination by the Office of Thrift
Supervision. Northfield-Delaware will also be subject to the rules and regulations of the
Securities and Exchange Commission under the federal securities laws. Moreover, under the
Dodd-Frank Act, the functions of the Office of Thrift Supervision relating to savings and loan
holding companies and their subsidiaries, as well as rulemaking and supervision authority over
thrift holding companies, will be transferred to the Federal Reserve Board.
Set forth below is a brief description of certain regulatory requirements that are or will be
applicable to Northfield-Delaware and Northfield Bank. The description below is limited to certain
material aspects of the statutes and regulations addressed, and is not intended to be a complete
description of such statutes and regulations and their effects on Northfield-Delaware and
Northfield Bank.
New Federal Legislation
The recently enacted Dodd-Frank Act will significantly change the current bank regulatory
structure and affect the lending, investment, trading and operating activities of financial
institutions and their holding companies. The Dodd-Frank Act will eliminate our current primary
federal regulator, the Office of Thrift Supervision, and will require Northfield Bank to be
regulated by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (the primary federal regulator for
national banks). The Dodd-Frank Act also authorizes the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve
System to supervise and regulate all savings and loan holding companies like Northfield-Delaware,
in addition to bank holding companies which it currently regulates. As a result, the Federal
Reserve Boards current regulations applicable to bank holding companies, including holding company
capital requirements, will apply to savings and loan holding companies like Northfield-Delaware.
These capital requirements are substantially similar to the capital requirements currently
applicable to Northfield Bank, as described in Federal Banking RegulationCapital
Requirements. The Dodd-Frank Act also requires the Federal Reserve Board to set minimum capital
levels for bank holding companies that are as stringent as those required for the insured
depository subsidiaries, and the components of Tier 1 capital would be restricted to capital
instruments that are currently considered to be Tier 1 capital for insured depository institutions.
Bank holding companies with assets of less than $500 million are exempt from these capital
requirements. Under the Dodd-Frank Act, the proceeds of trust preferred securities are excluded
from Tier 1 capital unless such securities were issued prior to May 19, 2010 by bank or savings and
loan holding companies with less than $15 billion of assets. The legislation also establishes a
floor for capital of insured
114
depository institutions that cannot be lower than the standards in effect today, and directs the
federal banking regulators to implement new leverage and capital requirements within 18 months that
take into account off-balance sheet activities and other risks, including risks relating to
securitized products and derivatives.
The Dodd-Frank Act also creates a new Consumer Financial Protection Bureau with broad powers
to supervise and enforce consumer protection laws. The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau has
broad rule-making authority for a wide range of consumer protection laws that apply to all banks
and savings institutions such as Northfield Bank, including the authority to prohibit unfair,
deceptive or abusive acts and practices. The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau has examination
and enforcement authority over all banks and savings institutions with more than $10 billion in
assets. Banks and savings institutions with $10 billion or less in assets will be examined by
their applicable bank regulators. The new legislation also weakens the federal preemption
available for national banks and federal savings associations, and gives state attorneys general
the ability to enforce applicable federal consumer protection laws.
The legislation also broadens the base for Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation insurance
assessments. Assessments will now be based on the average consolidated total assets less tangible
equity capital of a financial institution. The Dodd-Frank Act also permanently increases the
maximum amount of deposit insurance for banks, savings institutions and credit unions to $250,000
per depositor, retroactive to January 1, 2009, and non-interest bearing transaction accounts have
unlimited deposit insurance through December 31, 2013. Lastly, the Dodd-Frank Act will increase
stockholder influence over boards of directors by requiring companies to give stockholders a
non-binding vote on executive compensation and so-called golden parachute payments, and
authorizing the Securities and Exchange Commission to promulgate rules that would allow
stockholders to nominate and solicit votes for their own candidates using a companys proxy
materials. The legislation also directs the Federal Reserve Board to promulgate rules prohibiting
excessive compensation paid to bank holding company executives, regardless of whether the company
is publicly traded or not.
Federal Banking Regulation
Business Activities. A federal savings bank derives its lending and investment powers from
the Home Owners Loan Act, as amended, and the regulations of the Office of Thrift Supervision.
Under these laws and regulations, Northfield Bank may invest in mortgage loans secured by
residential and nonresidential real estate, commercial business loans and consumer loans, certain
types of debt securities and certain other assets, subject to applicable limits. Northfield Bank
also may establish subsidiaries that may engage in activities not otherwise permissible for
Northfield Bank, including real estate investment and securities and insurance brokerage.
Capital Requirements. Office of Thrift Supervision regulations require savings banks to meet
three minimum capital standards: a 1.5% tangible capital ratio, a 4% leverage ratio (3% for savings
banks receiving the highest rating on the CAMELS rating system) and an 8% risk-based capital ratio.
The risk-based capital standard for savings banks requires the maintenance of Tier 1 (core)
and total capital (which is defined as core capital and supplementary capital) to risk-weighted
assets of at least 4% and 8%, respectively. In determining the amount of risk-weighted assets, all
assets, including certain off-balance sheet assets, are multiplied by a risk-weight factor of 0% to
100%, assigned by the Office of Thrift Supervision, based on the risks believed inherent in the
type of asset. Core capital is defined as common stockholders equity (including retained
earnings), certain noncumulative perpetual preferred stock and related surplus and minority
interests in equity accounts of consolidated subsidiaries, less intangibles other than certain
mortgage servicing rights and credit card relationships. The components of supplementary capital
currently include cumulative preferred stock, long-term perpetual preferred stock, mandatory
convertible securities, subordinated debt and intermediate preferred stock, the allowance for loan
and lease losses limited to a maximum of 1.25% of risk-weighted assets and up to 45% of net
unrealized gains on available-for-sale equity securities with readily determinable fair values.
Overall, the amount of supplementary capital included as part of total capital cannot exceed 100%
of core capital. Additionally, a savings bank that retains credit risk in connection with an asset
sale may be required to maintain additional regulatory capital because of the purchasers recourse
to the savings bank. Northfield Bank does not typically engage in asset sales.
115
At March 31, 2010, Northfield Banks capital exceeded all applicable requirements.
Loans-to-One Borrower. Generally, a federal savings bank may not make a loan or extend credit
to a single or related group of borrowers in excess of 15% of unimpaired capital and surplus. An
additional amount may be loaned, equal to 10% of unimpaired capital and surplus, if the loan is
secured by readily marketable collateral, which generally does not include real estate. As of
March 31, 2010, Northfield Bank was in compliance with the loans-to-one borrower limitations.
Qualified Thrift Lender Test. As a federal savings bank, Northfield Bank must satisfy the
qualified thrift lender, or QTL, test. Under the QTL test, Northfield Bank must maintain at
least 65% of its portfolio assets in qualified thrift investments in at least nine months of
the most recent 12 months. Portfolio assets generally means total assets of a savings
institution, less the sum of specified liquid assets up to 20% of total assets, goodwill and other
intangible assets, and the value of property used in the conduct of the savings banks business.
Qualified thrift investments include various types of loans made for residential and housing
purposes, investments related to such purposes, including certain mortgage-backed and related
securities, and loans for personal, family, household and certain other purposes up to a limit of
20% of portfolio assets. Qualified thrift investments also include 100% of an institutions
credit card loans, education loans and small business loans. Northfield Bank also may satisfy the
QTL test by qualifying as a domestic building and loan association as defined in the Internal
Revenue Code.
A savings bank that fails the qualified thrift lender test must either convert to a bank
charter or operate under specified restrictions. At March 31, 2010, Northfield Bank held 75.1% of
its portfolio assets in qualified thrift investments, and satisfied this test.
Capital Distributions. Office of Thrift Supervision regulations govern capital distributions
by a federal savings bank, which include cash dividends, stock repurchases and other transactions
charged to the capital account. A savings bank must file an application for approval of a capital
distribution if:
|
|
|
the total capital distributions for the applicable calendar year exceed the sum of
the savings banks net income for that year to date plus the savings banks retained
net income for the preceding two years; |
|
|
|
|
the savings bank would not be at least adequately capitalized following the
distribution; |
|
|
|
|
the distribution would violate any applicable statute, regulation, agreement or
Office of Thrift Supervision-imposed condition; or |
|
|
|
|
the savings bank is not eligible for expedited treatment of its filings. |
Even if an application is not otherwise required, every savings bank that is a subsidiary of a
holding company must still file a notice with the Office of Thrift Supervision at least 30 days
before the board of directors declares a dividend or approves a capital distribution.
The Office of Thrift Supervision may disapprove a notice or application if:
|
|
|
the savings bank would be undercapitalized following the distribution; |
|
|
|
|
the proposed capital distribution raises safety and soundness concerns; or |
|
|
|
|
the capital distribution would violate a prohibition contained in any statute,
regulation or agreement. |
116
In addition, the Federal Deposit Insurance Act provides that an insured depository institution
may not make any capital distribution, if after making such distribution the institution would be
undercapitalized.
Liquidity. A federal savings bank is required to maintain a sufficient amount of liquid
assets to ensure its safe and sound operation.
Community Reinvestment Act and Fair Lending Laws. All savings banks have a responsibility
under the Community Reinvestment Act and related regulations of the Office of Thrift Supervision to
help meet the credit needs of their communities, including low- and moderate-income neighborhoods.
In connection with its examination of a federal savings bank, the Office of Thrift Supervision is
required to assess the associations record of compliance with the Community Reinvestment Act. In
addition, the Equal Credit Opportunity Act and the Fair Housing Act prohibit lenders from
discriminating in their lending practices on the basis of characteristics specified in those
statutes. An associations failure to comply with the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act
could, at a minimum, result in denial of certain corporate applications such as branches or
mergers, or in restrictions on its activities. The failure to comply with the Equal Credit
Opportunity Act and the Fair Housing Act could result in enforcement actions by the Office of
Thrift Supervision, as well as other federal regulatory agencies and the Department of Justice.
Northfield Bank received a Satisfactory Community Reinvestment Act rating in its most recent
federal examination. However, the Office of Thrift Supervision is currently conducting a regularly
scheduled examination to determine our compliance with the Community Reinvestment Act. We have not
received the results of the examination, and there is a possibility that we may not receive a
rating of Satisfactory or better.
Transactions with Related Parties. A federal savings banks authority to engage in
transactions with its affiliates is limited by Office of Thrift Supervision regulations and by
Sections 23A and 23B of the Federal Reserve Act and its implementing Regulation W. An affiliate is
a company that controls, is controlled by, or is under common control with an insured depository
institution such as Northfield Bank. Northfield-Delaware will be an affiliate of Northfield Bank.
In general, loan transactions between an insured depository institution and its affiliate are
subject to certain quantitative and collateral requirements. In this regard, transactions between
an insured depository institution and its affiliate are limited to 10% of the institutions
unimpaired capital and unimpaired surplus for transactions with any one affiliate and 20% of
unimpaired capital and unimpaired surplus for transactions in the aggregate with all affiliates.
Collateral in specified amounts ranging from 100% to 130% of the amount of the transaction must
usually be provided by affiliates in order to receive loans from the association. In addition,
Office of Thrift Supervision regulations prohibit a savings bank from lending to any of its
affiliates that are engaged in activities that are not permissible for bank holding companies and
from purchasing the securities of any affiliate, other than a subsidiary. Finally, transactions
with affiliates must be consistent with safe and sound banking practices, not involve low-quality
assets and be on terms that are as favorable to the institution as comparable transactions with
non-affiliates. The Office of Thrift Supervision requires savings banks to maintain detailed
records of all transactions with affiliates.
Northfield Banks authority to extend credit to its directors, executive officers and 10%
stockholders, as well as to entities controlled by such persons, is currently governed by the
requirements of Sections 22(g) and 22(h) of the Federal Reserve Act and Regulation O of the Federal
Reserve Board. Among other things, these provisions require that extensions of credit to insiders
(i) be made on terms that are substantially the same as, and follow credit underwriting procedures
that are not less stringent than, those prevailing for comparable transactions with unaffiliated
persons and that do not involve more than the normal risk of repayment or present other unfavorable
features, and (ii) not exceed certain limitations on the amount of credit extended to such persons,
individually and in the aggregate, which limits are based, in part, on the amount of Northfield
Banks capital. In addition, extensions of credit in excess of certain limits must be approved by
Northfield Banks board of directors.
Enforcement. The Office of Thrift Supervision has primary enforcement responsibility over
federal savings institutions and has the authority to bring enforcement action against all
institution-affiliated parties, including stockholders, and attorneys, appraisers and accountants
who knowingly or recklessly participate in wrongful action likely to have an adverse effect on an
insured institution. Formal enforcement action by the Office of Thrift Supervision may range from
the issuance of a capital directive or cease and desist order, to removal of officers and/or
directors of the institution and the appointment of a receiver or conservator. Civil penalties
cover a
117
wide range of violations and actions, and range up to $25,000 per day, unless a finding of
reckless disregard is made, in which case penalties may be as high as $1 million per day. The
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation also has the authority to terminate deposit insurance or to
recommend to the Director of the Office of Thrift Supervision that enforcement action be taken with
respect to a particular savings institution. If action is not taken by the Director, the Federal
Deposit Insurance Corporation has authority to take action under specified circumstances.
Standards for Safety and Soundness. Federal law requires each federal banking agency to
prescribe certain standards for all insured depository institutions. These standards relate to,
among other things, internal controls, information systems and audit systems, loan documentation,
credit underwriting, interest rate risk exposure, asset growth, compensation, and other operational
and managerial standards as the agency deems appropriate. The federal banking agencies adopted
Interagency Guidelines Prescribing Standards for Safety and Soundness to implement the safety and
soundness standards required under federal law. The guidelines set forth the safety and soundness
standards that the federal banking agencies use to identify and address problems at insured
depository institutions before capital becomes impaired. The guidelines address internal controls
and information systems, internal audit systems, credit underwriting, loan documentation, interest
rate risk exposure, asset growth, compensation, fees and benefits. If the appropriate federal
banking agency determines that an institution fails to meet any standard prescribed by the
guidelines, the agency may require the institution to submit to the agency an acceptable plan to
achieve compliance with the standard. If an institution fails to meet these standards, the
appropriate federal banking agency may require the institution to submit a compliance plan.
Prompt Corrective Action Regulations. Under the prompt corrective action regulations, the
Office of Thrift Supervision is required and authorized to take supervisory actions against
undercapitalized savings banks. For this purpose, a savings bank is placed in one of the following
five categories based on the savings banks capital:
|
|
|
well-capitalized (at least 5% leverage capital, 6% Tier 1 risk-based capital and 10%
total risk-based capital); |
|
|
|
|
adequately capitalized (at least 4% leverage capital (3% for savings banks with a
composite examination rating of 1), 4% Tier 1 risk-based capital and 8% total
risk-based capital); |
|
|
|
|
undercapitalized (less than 4% leverage capital (3% for savings banks with a
composite examination rating of 1), 4% Tier 1 risk-based capital or 3% leverage
capital); |
|
|
|
|
significantly undercapitalized (less than 6% total risk-based capital, 3% Tier 1
risk-based capital or 3% leverage capital); or |
|
|
|
|
critically undercapitalized (less than 2% tangible capital). |
Generally, the Office of Thrift Supervision is required to appoint a receiver or conservator
for a savings bank that is critically undercapitalized within specific time frames. The
regulations also provide that a capital restoration plan must be filed with the Office of Thrift
Supervision within 45 days of the date a savings bank receives notice that it is
undercapitalized, significantly undercapitalized or critically undercapitalized. The
criteria for an acceptable capital restoration plan include, among other things, the establishment
of the methodology and assumptions for attaining adequately capitalized status on an annual basis,
procedures for ensuring compliance with restrictions imposed by applicable federal regulations, the
identification of the types and levels of activities in which the savings bank will engage while
the capital restoration plan is in effect, and assurances that the capital restoration plan will
not appreciably increase the current risk profile of the savings bank. Any holding company for the
savings bank required to submit a capital restoration plan must guarantee the lesser of: an amount
equal to 5% of a savings banks assets at the time it was notified or deemed to be undercapitalized
by the Office of Thrift Supervision, or the amount necessary to restore the savings bank to
adequately capitalized status. This guarantee remains in place until the Office of Thrift
Supervision notifies the savings bank that it has maintained adequately capitalized status for each
of four consecutive calendar quarters, and the Office of Thrift Supervision has the authority to
require payment and collect payment under the guarantee. Failure by a holding company to provide
the required guarantee will result in certain operating restrictions on the savings bank, such as
restrictions on the ability
118
to declare and pay dividends, pay executive compensation and management fees, and increase
assets or expand operations. The Office of Thrift Supervision may also take any one of a number of
discretionary supervisory actions against undercapitalized savings banks, including the issuance of
a capital directive and the replacement of senior executive officers and directors.
At March 31, 2010, Northfield Bank met the criteria for being considered well-capitalized.
Insurance of Deposit Accounts. The Dodd-Frank Act permanently increased the maximum amount of
deposit insurance for banks, savings institutions and credit unions to $250,000 per depositor,
retroactive to January 1, 2009. Non-interest bearing transaction accounts have unlimited deposit
insurance through December 31, 2013.
Pursuant to the Federal Deposit Insurance Reform Act of 2005 (the Reform Act), the Federal
Deposit Insurance Corporation is authorized to set the reserve ratio for the Deposit Insurance Fund
annually at between 1.15% and 1.5% of estimated insured deposits. The Dodd-Frank Act mandates that
the statutory minimum reserve ratio of the Deposit Insurance Fund increase from 1.15% to 1.35% of
insured deposits by September 30, 2020. Banks with assets of less than $10 billion are exempt from
any additional assessments necessary to increase the reserve fund above 1.15%.
As part of a plan to restore the reserve ratio to 1.15%, the Federal Deposit Insurance
Corporation imposed a special assessment on all insured institutions equal to five basis points of
assets less Tier 1 capital as of June 30, 2009, which was payable on September 30, 2009. In
addition, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation has increased its quarterly deposit insurance
assessment rates and amended the method by which rates are calculated. Beginning in the second
quarter of 2009, institutions are assigned an initial base assessment rate ranging from 12 to 45
basis points of deposits depending on risk category. The initial base assessment is then adjusted
based upon the level of unsecured debt, secured liabilities and brokered deposits, to establish a
total base assessment rate ranging from seven to 77.5 basis points.
On November 12, 2009, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation approved a final rule
requiring insured depository institutions to prepay on December 30, 2009, their estimated quarterly
risk-based assessments for the fourth quarter of 2009, and for all of 2010, 2011, and 2012.
Estimated assessments for the fourth quarter of 2009 and for all of 2010 are based upon the
assessment rate in effect on September 30, 2009, with three basis points added for the 2011 and
2012 assessment rates. In addition, a 5% annual growth in the assessment base is assumed. Prepaid
assessments are to be applied against the actual quarterly assessments until exhausted, and may not
be applied to any special assessments that may occur in the future. Any unused prepayments will be
returned to the institution on June 30, 2013. On December 30, 2009, we prepaid $5.7 million in
estimated assessment fees for the fourth quarter of 2009 through 2012. Because the prepaid
assessments represent the prepayment of future expense, they do not affect our regulatory capital
(the prepaid asset will have a risk-weighting of 0%) or tax obligations.
Insurance of deposits may be terminated by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation upon a
finding that an institution has engaged in unsafe or unsound practices, is in an unsafe or unsound
condition to continue operations or has violated any applicable law, regulation, rule, order or
condition imposed by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. We do not believe we are taking or
are subject to any action, condition or violation that could lead to termination of our deposit
insurance.
In addition to the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation assessments, the Financing
Corporation (FICO) is authorized to impose and collect, with the approval of the Federal Deposit
Insurance Corporation, assessments for anticipated payments, issuance costs and custodial fees on
bonds issued by the FICO in the 1980s to recapitalize the former Federal Savings and Loan Insurance
Corporation. The bonds issued by the FICO are due to mature in 2017 through 2019. For the quarter
ended March 31, 2010, the annualized FICO assessment was equal to 1.06 basis points for each $100
in domestic deposits maintained at an institution.
Prohibitions Against Tying Arrangements. Federal savings banks are prohibited, subject to
some exceptions, from extending credit to or offering any other service, or fixing or varying the
consideration for such
119
extension of credit or service, on the condition that the customer obtain some additional
service from the institution or its affiliates or not obtain services of a competitor of the
institution.
Federal Home Loan Bank System. Northfield Bank is a member of the Federal Home Loan Bank
System, which consists of 12 regional Federal Home Loan Banks. The Federal Home Loan Bank System
provides a central credit facility primarily for member institutions as well as other entities
involved in home mortgage lending. As a member of the Federal Home Loan Bank of New York,
Northfield Bank is required to acquire and hold shares of capital stock in the Federal Home Loan
Bank. As of March 31, 2010, Northfield Bank was in compliance with this requirement.
Federal Reserve System
Federal Reserve Board regulations require savings banks to maintain noninterest-earning
reserves against their transaction accounts, such as negotiable order of withdrawal and regular
checking accounts. At March 31, 2010, Northfield Bank was in compliance with these reserve
requirements.
Other Regulations
Interest and other charges collected or contracted for by Northfield Bank are subject to state
usury laws and federal laws concerning interest rates. Northfield Banks operations are also
subject to federal laws applicable to credit transactions, such as the:
|
|
|
Truth-In-Lending Act, governing disclosures of credit terms to consumer borrowers; |
|
|
|
|
Home Mortgage Disclosure Act, requiring financial institutions to provide
information to enable the public and public officials to determine whether a financial
institution is fulfilling its obligation to help meet the housing needs of the
community it serves; |
|
|
|
|
Equal Credit Opportunity Act, prohibiting discrimination on the basis of race, creed
or other prohibited factors in extending credit; |
|
|
|
|
Fair Credit Reporting Act, governing the use and provision of information to credit
reporting agencies; |
|
|
|
|
Fair Debt Collection Act, governing the manner in which consumer debts may be
collected by collection agencies; |
|
|
|
|
Truth in Savings Act; and |
|
|
|
|
Rules and regulations of the various federal agencies charged with the
responsibility of implementing such federal laws. |
The operations of Northfield Bank also are subject to the:
|
|
|
Right to Financial Privacy Act, which imposes a duty to maintain confidentiality of
consumer financial records and prescribes procedures for complying with administrative
subpoenas of financial records; |
|
|
|
|
Electronic Funds Transfer Act and Regulation E promulgated thereunder, which govern
automatic deposits to and withdrawals from deposit accounts and customers rights and
liabilities arising from the use of automated teller machines and other electronic
banking services; |
120
|
|
|
Check Clearing for the 21st Century Act (also known as Check 21), which
gives substitute checks, such as digital check images and copies made from that
image, the same legal standing as the original paper check; |
|
|
|
|
The USA PATRIOT Act, which requires savings banks to, among other things, establish
broadened anti-money laundering compliance programs, and due diligence policies and
controls to ensure the detection and reporting of money laundering. Such required
compliance programs are intended to supplement existing compliance requirements that
also apply to financial institutions under the Bank Secrecy Act and the Office of
Foreign Assets Control regulations; and |
|
|
|
|
The Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, which places limitations on the sharing of consumer
financial information by financial institutions with unaffiliated third parties.
Specifically, the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act requires all financial institutions offering
financial products or services to retail customers to provide such customers with the
financial institutions privacy policy and provide such customers the opportunity to
opt out of the sharing of certain personal financial information with unaffiliated
third parties. |
Holding Company Regulation
Upon completion of the conversion, Northfield-Delaware will be a unitary savings and loan
holding company, subject to regulation and supervision by the Office of Thrift Supervision. The
Office of Thrift Supervision will have enforcement authority over Northfield-Delaware and its
non-savings institution subsidiaries. Among other things, this authority permits the Office of
Thrift Supervision to restrict or prohibit activities that are determined to be a risk to
Northfield Bank. However, under the Dodd-Frank Act, the functions of the Office of Thrift
Supervision relating to savings and loan holding companies and their subsidiaries, as well as
rulemaking and supervision authority over thrift holding companies, will be transferred to the
Federal Reserve Board no later than one year from the effective date of the legislation, subject to
extension of up to six months if requested by the Secretary of the Treasury.
Northfield-Delawares activities are limited to those activities permissible for financial
holding companies or for multiple savings and loan holding companies. A financial holding company
may engage in activities that are financial in nature, including underwriting equity securities and
insurance, incidental to financial activities or complementary to a financial activity. A multiple
savings and loan holding company is generally limited to activities permissible for bank holding
companies under Section 4(c)(8) of the Bank Holding Company Act, subject to the prior approval of
the Office of Thrift Supervision, and certain additional activities authorized by Office of Thrift
Supervision regulations.
Federal law prohibits a savings and loan holding company, directly or indirectly, or through
one or more subsidiaries, from acquiring control of another savings institution or holding company
thereof, without prior written approval of the Office of Thrift Supervision. It also prohibits the
acquisition or retention of, with specified exceptions, more than 5% of the equity securities of a
company engaged in activities that are not closely related to banking or financial in nature or
acquiring or retaining control of an institution that is not federally insured. In evaluating
applications by holding companies to acquire savings institutions, the Office of Thrift Supervision
must consider the financial and managerial resources and future prospects of the savings
institution involved, the effect of the acquisition on the risk to the insurance fund, the
convenience and needs of the community and competitive factors.
Federal Securities Laws
Northfield-Delaware common stock will be registered with the Securities and Exchange
Commission after the conversion and stock offering. Northfield-Delaware will be subject to the
information, proxy solicitation, insider trading restrictions and other requirements under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
121
The registration under the Securities Act of 1933 of shares of common stock issued in
Northfield-Delawares public offering does not cover the resale of those shares. Shares of common
stock purchased by persons who are not affiliates of Northfield-Delaware may be resold without
registration. Shares purchased by an affiliate of Northfield-Delaware will be subject to the
resale restrictions of Rule 144 under the Securities Act of 1933. If Northfield-Delaware meets the
current public information requirements of Rule 144 under the Securities Act of 1933, each
affiliate of Northfield-Delaware that complies with the other conditions of Rule 144, including
those that require the affiliates sale to be aggregated with those of other persons, would be able
to sell in the public market, without registration, a number of shares not to exceed, in any
three-month period, the greater of 1% of the outstanding shares of Northfield-Delaware, or the
average weekly volume of trading in the shares during the preceding four calendar weeks. In the
future, Northfield-Delaware may permit affiliates to have their shares registered for sale under
the Securities Act of 1933.
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 addresses, among other issues, corporate governance, auditing
and accounting, executive compensation, and enhanced and timely disclosure of corporate
information. As directed by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer will be required to certify that our quarterly and annual reports do not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact. The rules adopted by the Securities and Exchange Commission under
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act have several requirements, including having these officers certify that:
they are responsible for establishing, maintaining and regularly evaluating the effectiveness of
our internal control over financial reporting; they have made certain disclosures to our auditors
and the audit committee of the board of directors about our internal control over financial
reporting; and they have included information in our quarterly and annual reports about their
evaluation and whether there have been changes in our internal control over financial reporting or
in other factors that could materially affect internal control over financial reporting. We have
existing policies, procedures and systems designed to comply with these regulations, and we are
further enhancing and documenting such policies, procedures and systems to ensure continued
compliance with these regulations.
TAXATION
Federal Taxation
General. Northfield Bancorp, MHC, Northfield-Federal and Northfield Bank are, and
Northfield-Delaware will be, subject to federal income taxation in the same general manner as other
corporations, with some exceptions discussed below. The following discussion of federal taxation
is intended only to summarize certain pertinent federal income tax matters and is not a
comprehensive description of the tax rules applicable to Northfield-Federal, Northfield-Delaware or
Northfield Bank.
Northfield Bancorp, MHC, Northfield-Federal and Northfield Bank are not currently under audit
with respect to their federal income tax returns and their federal income tax returns have not been
audited for the past five years.
Method of Accounting. For federal income tax purposes, Northfield-Federal currently reports
its income and expenses on the accrual method of accounting and uses a tax year ending December 31
for filing its federal and state income tax returns.
Bad Debt Reserves. Historically, Northfield Bank was subject to special provisions in the tax
law applicable to qualifying savings banks regarding allowable tax bad debt deductions and related
reserves. Tax law changes were enacted in 1996 that eliminated the ability of savings banks to use
the percentage of taxable income method for computing tax bad debt reserves for tax years after
1995, and required recapture into taxable income over a six-year period of all bad debt reserves
accumulated after a savings banks last tax year beginning before January 1, 1988. Northfield Bank
recaptured its post December 31, 1987, bad-debt reserve balance over the six-year period ended
December 31, 2004.
122
Northfield-Federal is required to use the specific charge off method to account for tax bad
debt deductions.
Taxable Distributions and Recapture. Prior to 1996, bad debt reserves created prior to 1988
were subject to recapture into taxable income if Northfield Bank failed to meet certain thrift
asset and definitional tests or made certain distributions. Tax law changes in 1996 eliminated
thrift-related recapture rules. However, under current law, pre-1988 tax bad debt reserves remain
subject to recapture if Northfield Bank makes certain non-dividend distributions, repurchases any
of its common stock, pays dividends in excess of earnings and profits, or fails to qualify as a
bank for tax purposes.
At December 31, 2009, the total federal pre-base year bad debt reserve of Northfield Bank was
approximately $5.9 million.
Alternative Minimum Tax. The Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, imposes an
alternative minimum tax at a rate of 20% on a base of regular taxable income plus certain tax
preferences, less any available exemption. The alternative minimum tax is imposed to the extent it
exceeds the regular income tax. Net operating losses can offset no more than 90% of alternative
taxable income. Certain payments of alternative minimum tax may be used as credits against regular
tax liabilities in future years. Northfield-Federals consolidated group has not been subject to
the alternative minimum tax and has no such amounts available as credits for carryover.
Net Operating Loss Carryovers. A financial institution may carry back net operating losses to
the preceding two taxable years and forward to the succeeding 20 taxable years. However, as a
result of recent legislation, subject to certain limitations, the carryback period for net
operating losses incurred in 2008 or 2009 (but not both years) has been expanded to five years. At
December 31, 2009, Northfield Bancorp Inc.s consolidated group had no net operating loss
carryforwards for federal income tax purposes.
Corporate Dividends-Received Deduction. Northfield-Federal may exclude from its federal
taxable income 100% of dividends received from Northfield Bank as a wholly-owned subsidiary by
filing consolidated tax returns. The corporate dividends-received deduction is 80% when the
corporation receiving the dividend owns at least 20% of the stock of the distributing corporation.
The dividends-received deduction is 70% when the corporation receiving the dividend owns less than
20% of the distributing corporation.
State Taxation
Northfield Bancorp, MHC and Northfield Bank report income on a calendar year basis to New York
State. New York State franchise tax on corporations is imposed in an amount equal to the greater
of (a) 7.1% (for 2007 and forward) of entire net income allocable to New York State, (b) 3% of
alternative entire net income allocable to New York State, or (c) 0.01% of the average value of
assets allocable to New York State plus nominal minimum tax of $250 per company. Entire net income
is based on federal taxable income, subject to certain modifications. Alternative entire net income
is equal to entire net income without certain modifications.
Northfield Bancorp, MHC and Northfield Bank report income on a calendar year basis to New York
City. New York City franchise tax on corporations is imposed in an amount equal to the greater of
(a) 9.0% of entire net income allocable to New York State, (b) 3% of alternative entire net
income allocable to New York City, or (c) 0.01% of the average value of assets allocable to New
York City plus nominal minimum tax of $250 per company. Entire net income is based on federal
taxable income, subject to certain modifications. Alternative entire net income is equal to entire
net income without certain modifications.
Northfield-Federal and Northfield Bank file New Jersey Corporation Business Tax returns on a
calendar year basis. Generally, the income derived from New Jersey sources is subject to New
Jersey tax. Northfield-Federal and Northfield Bank pay the greater of the corporate business tax
at 9% of taxable income or the minimum tax of $1,200 per entity.
At December 31, 2005, Northfield Bank did not meet the definition of a domestic building and
loan association for New York State and City tax purposes. As a result, we were required to
recognize a $2.2 million
123
deferred tax liability for state and city thrift-related base-year bad debt reserves
accumulated after December 31, 1987.
Our state tax returns are not currently under audit or have not been subject to an audit
during the past five years, except as follows. Our New York state tax returns for the years ended
December 31, 2000, through December 31, 2006, were subject to an audit by the State of New York
with respect to our operation of NSB Services Corp. as a Delaware corporation not subject to New
York State taxation. In 2007, we concluded the audit by the State of New York with respect to our
combined state tax returns for years 2000 through 2006.
As a Delaware business corporation, Northfield-Delaware will be required to file an annual
report with and pay franchise taxes to the state of Delaware.
MANAGEMENT
Shared Management Structure
The directors of Northfield-Delaware are the same persons who are the directors of Northfield
Bank. In addition, each executive officer of Northfield-Delaware is also an executive officer of
Northfield Bank. We expect that Northfield-Delaware and Northfield Bank will continue to have
common executive officers until there is a business reason to establish separate management
structures.
Executive Officers of Northfield-Delaware and Northfield Bank
The following table sets forth information regarding the executive officers of
Northfield-Delaware and Northfield Bank. Age information is as of December 31, 2009. The
executive officers of Northfield-Delaware and Northfield Bank are elected annually.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name |
|
Age |
|
Position |
John W. Alexander
|
|
|
60 |
|
|
Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer |
Kenneth J. Doherty
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
Executive Vice President, Chief Lending Officer |
Madeline G. Frank
|
|
|
65 |
|
|
Senior Vice President, Corporate Secretary |
Steven M. Klein
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer |
Michael J. Widmer
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
Executive Vice President, Operations |
The business experience for the past five years of each of our executive officers other than
Mr. Alexander is set forth below. Unless otherwise indicated, executive officers have held their
positions for at least the past five years.
Kenneth J. Doherty joined Northfield Bank in 1988, and currently serves as Executive Vice
President and Chief Lending Officer. Previously, Mr. Doherty worked with the Federal Home Loan
Bank Board (the predecessor to the Office of Thrift Supervision).
Madeline G. Frank joined Northfield Bank in 1983 and has served as Director of Human Resources
of Northfield Bank since that time. Ms. Frank also serves as Corporate Secretary for
Northfield-Federal and Northfield Bank.
Steven M. Klein joined Northfield-Federal and Northfield Bank in March 2005 as Executive Vice
President and Chief Financial Officer. Mr. Klein was an audit partner in the community banking
practice of KPMG LLP from September 2003 to March 2005, and was employed by KPMG LLP beginning in
1986. Mr. Klein is a licensed certified public accountant in the State of New Jersey, and a member
of the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants.
Michael J. Widmer joined Northfield Bank in 2002 and currently serves as Executive Vice
President, Operations. Mr. Widmer served as the Executive Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer, and as a Director, of
124
Liberty Bancorp, Inc. and Liberty Bank, located in Avenel, New Jersey, until they were
acquired by Northfield Bancorp, Inc. and Northfield Bank, respectively, in 2002.
Directors of Northfield-Delaware and Northfield Bank
Northfield-Delaware has nine directors. Directors serve three-year staggered terms so that
approximately one-third of the directors are elected at each annual meeting. Directors of
Northfield Bank will be elected by Northfield-Delaware as its sole stockholder.
The following details include for each of our directors: their age as of December 31, 2009;
the year in which they first became a director; the year that their term expires; and their
business experience for at least the past five years. With the exception of Ms. Catino, none of
the directors listed below currently serves as a director, or served as a director during the past
five years, of a publicly-held entity (other than Northfield-Federal). Ms. Catino serves on the
board of directors of Middlesex Water Company, which is traded on the Nasdaq Stock Market, LLC
under the symbol MSEX. The following also includes the particular experience, qualifications,
attributes, or skills, considered by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee that led the
Board to conclude that such person should serve as a director of Northfield-Federal. The mailing
address for each person listed is 581 Main Street, Suite 810, Woodbridge, New Jersey 07095. Each
of the persons listed as a director is also a trustee of Northfield Bancorp, MHC and a director of
Northfield Bank.
125
|
|
|
Name, Age, |
|
|
Director Since, |
|
|
Term Expiration |
|
Experience, Qualifications, Attributes, Skills |
John W. Alexander, 60,
director since 1997,
term expires 2011
|
|
Business Experience: Mr. Alexander joined
Northfield Bank in 1997, and has served as
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
since 1998 and Chairman of the Board of
Northfield-Federal since 2002. Mr. Alexander was
also named President of Northfield Bank and
Northfield-Federal in October 2006.
Reasons why this person should serve as a
director: Mr. Alexander is a former tax partner
with a national accounting and auditing firm,
specializing in financial institution taxation
and asset securitization. Mr. Alexander is a
registered certified public accountant, with
strong analytical and leadership skills. Mr.
Alexander resides in Staten Island, New York, and
is involved in local professional and community
organizations including the Staten Island
University Hospital, the Staten Island Economic
Development Corporation, and the Northfield Bank
Foundation. |
|
|
|
John R. Bowen, 69,
director since 2003,
term expires 2013
|
|
Business and Other Experience: Mr. Bowen has over
35 years of experience in all aspects of
community banking, and retired as the Chief
Executive Officer of Liberty Bank, in 2002.
Reasons why this person should serve as a
director: Mr. Bowen has extensive knowledge of
banking regulation and internal control, and has
strong risk assessment and leadership skills.
Mr. Bowen also has extensive experience in loan
origination and monitoring. Mr. Bowen is a
resident of New Jersey and is involved in local
professional and community organizations
including the Gateway Regional Chamber of
Commerce, and as director of the Northfield Bank
Foundation. |
|
|
|
Annette Catino, 53,
director since 2003,
term expires 2011
|
|
Business Experience: Since 1991 Ms. Catino has
served as President and Chief Executive Officer
of QualCare, Inc., Piscataway, New Jersey, a
privately held company which is a managed care
organization.
Reasons why this person should serve as a
director: Ms. Catino has over 25 years of
business experience in the healthcare industry.
Ms. Catino has strong analytical and leadership
skills and has extensive experience with
healthcare, municipal, and state governmental
entities. Ms. Catino also has the requisite
qualifications to be designated as an audit
committee financial expert under the SECs rules
and regulations. Ms. Catino is a resident of New
Jersey and is involved in local professional and
community organizations including the Boards of
Caucus Educational Corporation, the Val Skinner
Foundation, and the Meridian Healthcare
Perspective. She most recently served on
Governor Christies transition committee on
healthcare and was named by New Jersey Business
as one of the top 50 most influential people in
healthcare. In 2009, she received Monmouth
Universitys Distinguished Business Leadership
Award for her civic and business leadership. |
126
|
|
|
Name, Age, |
|
|
Director Since, |
|
|
Term Expiration |
|
Experience, Qualifications, Attributes, Skills |
Gil Chapman, 56,
director since 2005,
term expires 2013
|
|
Business Experience: Mr. Chapman has over 25
years of business experience, most recently
owning and operating an automobile dealership in
Staten Island, New York, which was sold in 2008.
Reasons why this person should serve as a
director: Mr. Chapman has strong marketing,
sales, and customer service assessment skills.
Mr. Chapman also has significant experience in
employee development and training. Mr. Chapman
is a resident of New Jersey, and is involved in
local professional and community organizations
including the National Association of Corporate
Directors and, as a former Staten Island
businessman, the Staten Island Economic
Development Corporation, and the Staten Island
Urban League. |
|
|
|
John P. Connors, Jr.,
53, director since
2002, term expires
2011
|
|
Business Experience: Mr. Connors is the managing
partner of the law firm of Connors & Connors,
P.C., located in Staten Island, New York.
Reasons why this person should serve as a
director: Mr. Connors has over 25 years of
business experience as a practicing lawyer. Mr.
Connors is admitted to practice in the state and
federal courts of the States of New York and New
Jersey and the District of Columbia. Mr. Connors
has strong risk management skills, and in-depth
knowledge of contract and professional liability
law related to key areas of our operations. Mr.
Connors also has knowledge of and relationships
with many of the residents and businesses located
in Staten Island, New York. Mr. Connors is a
resident of Staten Island, and is involved in
local professional and community organizations
including the Richmond County Bar Association,
Notre Dame Academy, The Heart Institute, and the
Northfield Bank Foundation. |
|
|
|
John J. DePierro, 69,
director since 1984,
term expires 2013
|
|
Business Experience: Mr. DePierro has over 45
years of business experience in the healthcare
industry. Mr. DePierro is currently a consultant
to the healthcare industry and is a retired Chief
Executive Officer of a major Staten Island health
care system.
Reasons why this person should serve as a
director: Mr. DePierro has strong leadership
skills, and extensive knowledge of corporate
governance, as well as knowledge of and
relationships with many of the residents and
businesses located in Staten Island, New York.
Mr. DePierro is a resident of Staten Island, New
York, and is involved in local professional and
community organizations including directorships
at the Seton Foundation for Learning, Mount
Manresa Jesuit Retreat House, and the Northfield
Bank Foundation. |
127
|
|
|
Name, Age, |
|
|
Director Since, |
|
|
Term Expiration |
|
Experience, Qualifications, Attributes, Skills |
Susan Lamberti, 67,
director since 2001,
term expires 2012
|
|
Business Experience: Ms. Lamberti was an educator
with the New York City public schools until her
retirement in 2002.
Reasons why this person should serve as a
director: Ms. Lamberti has over 30 years of
experience in the New York City Public School
system. Ms. Lamberti has strong training and
development skills, and has extensive knowledge
of and relationships with many residents and
businesses located in Staten Island, New York.
Ms. Lamberti is a resident of Staten Island, and
is involved in local professional and community
organizations including the National Association
of Corporate Directors, Sisters of Charity
Housing Development Fund Corporation, Service
Auxiliary of Staten Island University Hospital,
and the Northfield Bank Foundation. |
|
|
|
Albert J. Regen, 72,
director since 1990,
term expires 2012
|
|
Business Experience: Mr. Regen served as the
President of Northfield Bank from 1990 until his
retirement in September 2006.
Reasons why this person should serve as a
director: Mr. Regen has over 30 years of
experience in community banking. Mr. Regen has
extensive knowledge in the treasury area as well
as interest rate risk management. Mr. Regen is
currently a resident of New Jersey and is a
director of Northfield Bank Foundation. Mr.
Regen was formerly a resident of Staten Island,
New York and has extensive knowledge of and
relationships with many of the residents and
businesses located in Staten Island, New York. |
|
|
|
Patrick E. Scura, Jr.,
65, director since
2006, term expires
2012
|
|
Business Experience: Mr. Scura was an audit
partner at KPMG LLP for 27 years, until his
retirement in 2005.
Reasons why this person should serve as a
director: Mr. Scura is a former audit partner
with a national accounting and auditing firm,
specializing in community banking. Mr. Scura has
over 35 years of experience auditing public
company financial institutions in New Jersey.
Mr. Scura is a licensed certified public
accountant, and has strong risk assessment,
financial reporting, and internal control
expertise. Mr. Scura also has extensive
knowledge of and relationships with community
banks in our market area. Mr. Scura has the
requisite qualifications to be designated as an
audit committee financial expert under the SECs
rules and regulations. Mr. Scura resides in New
Jersey, and is involved in local professional and
community organizations including St. Peters
College, and the American Institute of Certified
Public Accountants. |
Board Independence
The Board of Directors affirmatively determines the independence of each director in
accordance with Nasdaq Stock Market rules, which include all elements of independence as set forth
in the listing requirements for Nasdaq securities. The Board of Directors has determined that each
of the following non-employee Directors is independent of Northfield-Federal:
|
|
|
John R. Bowen
|
|
Susan Lamberti |
Annette Catino
|
|
Albert J. Regen |
Gil Chapman
|
|
Patrick E. Scura, Jr. |
John J. DePierro |
|
|
128
Codes of Conduct and Ethics
Northfield-Federal has adopted a Code of Conduct and Ethics for Senior Financial Officers that
is applicable to our chief executive officer, chief financial officer, and controller. The Code of
Conduct and Ethics for Senior Financial Officers is available on our website at
www.eNorthfield.com. Amendments to and waivers of the Code of Conduct and Ethics for Senior
Financial Officers will be disclosed in the manner required by applicable law, rule, or listing
standard.
Northfield-Federal and Northfield Bank have also adopted a Code of Conduct and Ethics that is
applicable to all employees, officers and directors, which is available on our website at
www.eNorthfield.com. Employees, officers, and directors acknowledge annually that they will comply
with all aspects of the Code of Conduct and Ethics for Employees, Officers, and Directors.
Transactions With Certain Related Persons
Loans and Extensions of Credit. The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 generally prohibits us from
making loans to our executive officers and directors, but it contains a specific exemption from
such prohibition for loans made by Northfield Bank to our executive officers and directors in
compliance with federal banking regulations.
The aggregate amount of our outstanding loans to our executive officers and directors and
their related entities was approximately $800,000 at December 31, 2009. All of such loans were
made in the ordinary course of business, were made on substantially the same terms, including
interest rates and collateral, as those prevailing at the time for comparable loans with persons
not related to Northfield Bank, and did not involve more than the normal risk of collectibility or
present other unfavorable features. These loans were performing according to their original terms
at December 31, 2009, and were made in compliance with federal banking regulations.
Other Transactions. Stanley A. Applebaum, who retired from the Board May 27, 2009, and John
P. Connors, Jr. are practicing attorneys who perform legal work directly for or on behalf of
Northfield Bank. During the year ended December 31, 2009, Mr. Applebaum and Mr. Connors received
fees, either from Northfield Bank, or directly from our customers, in connection with transactions
with Northfield Bank, in the amounts of approximately $140,000 and $31,400, respectively. The
Board of Directors authorizes the appointment of Mr. Applebaum and Mr. Connors each year, and the
Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors reviews a summary of the services performed and
the total fees paid for services on an annual basis. All transactions with Mr. Applebaum and Mr.
Connors are in the ordinary course of business, and the terms and fees are considered to be
consistent with those prevailing at the time for comparable transactions with other persons.
Director Compensation
Every three years, director compensation is reviewed in detail by the Compensation Committee,
in consultation with the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. The Compensation Committee
considers, among other things, our size and complexity, as well as the responsibilities,
marketplace availability of necessary skill sets, and the time commitment necessary for the Board,
its committees, and its committee chairs, to adequately discharge their oversight role and
responsibilities. The Compensation Committee utilizes the assistance of a third-party compensation
consultant, Pearl Meyer & Partners (PM&P), and available peer and survey data, regarding director
compensation at other comparable financial institutions, as part of this process. For interim
years between detailed reviews, the Compensation Committee reviews current market conditions and
trends in director compensation in consultation with its third-party compensation consultant. The
Compensation Committee is scheduled to perform its detailed review of director (and executive)
compensation in 2010.
In December 2008, stockholders approved the Northfield-Federal 2008 Equity Incentive Plan.
The objective of equity awards is to further align the interests of our employees and directors
with those of other stockholders and reward sustained performance. In January 2009 the
Compensation Committee granted equity awards to each director, consisting of 27,750 shares of
restricted common stock, and 69,300 options to purchase shares of common stock at a price of $9.94
per share, representing the closing price of our common stock on the
129
grant date. The equity awards vest in equal installments over a five-year period, commencing
one year from the date of the grant.
Prior to November 2007, we were a mutual organization and did not have equity compensation
available to employees or directors. The Compensation Committees objectives in granting equity
awards in January 2009 included further aligning the interests of directors with those of our other
stockholders, consistent with comparable peers that recently completed initial public offerings,
and with organizations that were established stock companies. The Compensation Committee consulted
with PM&P during this process.
The following table sets forth the Director and committee fee structure for the Board and its
standing committees (all of which were due and payable in cash) for the year ended December 31,
2009. Directors who are also our employees receive no additional compensation for service as a
director. Attendance fees, and one-fourth of any annual retainer, are paid on a quarterly basis,
in arrears, unless a director elects to have such fees or a portion thereof, deferred under our
non-qualified deferred compensation plan, described below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Board |
|
Nominating and |
|
Compensation |
|
Audit |
|
|
of Directors |
|
Corporate Governance |
|
Committee |
|
Committee |
Annual Retainer |
|
$ |
30,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annual Retainer-Chair |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
3,000 |
|
|
$ |
4,000 |
|
|
$ |
6,000 |
|
Per Meeting
Attendance Fee |
|
$ |
1,250 |
|
|
$ |
850 |
|
|
$ |
850 |
|
|
$ |
1,250 |
|
All other committees of the Board receive, in cash, an $850 per meeting attendance fee
and an annual committee chair retainer of $3,000. In addition, the Lead Independent Director
receives an annual retainer of $3,000.
We also pay directly or reimburse Directors for normal, customary, and necessary business
expenses associated with relevant professional memberships, and participation in professional
training seminars.
130
The following table sets forth for the year ended December 31, 2009, certain information as to
the total remuneration we paid our directors. Mr. Alexander does not receive separate compensation
for his service as a director. The Non-equity incentive plan compensation, Change in pension
value and nonqualified deferred compensation earnings and All other compensation columns have
been omitted from the table because no director earned any compensation during the year ended
December 31, 2009, of a type required to be disclosed in those columns.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fees earned or |
|
Stock |
|
Stock |
|
|
|
|
paid in cash (3) |
|
Awards (4)(6) |
|
Options (5)(6) |
|
Total |
Name |
|
($) |
|
($) |
|
($) |
|
($) |
Stanley A. Applebaum (1) (2) |
|
|
21,300 |
|
|
|
275,835 |
|
|
|
223,146 |
|
|
|
520,281 |
|
John R. Bowen |
|
|
62,400 |
|
|
|
275,835 |
|
|
|
223,146 |
|
|
|
561,381 |
|
Annette Catino |
|
|
66,600 |
|
|
|
275,835 |
|
|
|
223,146 |
|
|
|
565,581 |
|
Gil Chapman |
|
|
66,400 |
|
|
|
275,835 |
|
|
|
223,146 |
|
|
|
565,381 |
|
John P. Connors, Jr. (1) |
|
|
57,700 |
|
|
|
275,835 |
|
|
|
223,146 |
|
|
|
556,681 |
|
John J. DePierro |
|
|
64,550 |
|
|
|
275,835 |
|
|
|
223,146 |
|
|
|
563,531 |
|
Susan Lamberti |
|
|
60,450 |
|
|
|
275,835 |
|
|
|
223,146 |
|
|
|
559,431 |
|
Albert J. Regen |
|
|
63,550 |
|
|
|
275,835 |
|
|
|
223,146 |
|
|
|
562,531 |
|
Patrick E. Scura, Jr. |
|
|
74,950 |
|
|
|
275,835 |
|
|
|
223,146 |
|
|
|
573,931 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
During 2009, Messrs. Applebaum and Connors provided legal services to or for the benefit
of Northfield Bank that are not included in the table above. See Transactions With
Certain Related Persons for a discussion of fees received for legal services provided in
2009. |
|
(2) |
|
Mr. Applebaum retired and was granted emeritus status on May 27, 2009. |
|
(3) |
|
Includes retainer payments, meeting fees, and committee and/or chairmanship fees earned
during the calendar year, whether the director received payment of such amounts or elected
to defer them. |
|
(4) |
|
Represents the aggregate grant date fair value of 27,750 shares of restricted stock
awarded to each director on January 30, 2009, based upon a grant date stock price of $9.94
per share, which was the final reported sales price of our common stock on the date of the
grant. The restricted stock awards vest in equal installments over a five-year period,
commencing one year from the date of the grant. |
|
(5) |
|
Represents the aggregate grant date fair value of options to purchase 69,300 shares of
our common stock awarded to each director on January 30, 2009. The options vest in equal
installments over a five-year period, commencing one year from the date of the grant and
have an exercise price of $9.94 per share, which was the final reported sales price of our
common stock on the date of the grant. The grant date fair value was $3.22 per option and
was determined using the Black-Scholes method assuming an options average life of 6.5
years; 2.17% risk free rate of return; 35.33% volatility; and 1.61% dividend yield. |
|
(6) |
|
At December 31, 2009, each Director held 27,750 unvested shares of restricted stock,
and 69,300 unvested stock options with an exercise price of $9.94 per share. |
Executive Compensation
Compensation Committee Report
The Compensation Committee has reviewed and discussed the section entitled Compensation
Discussion and Analysis included in this prospectus with management. Based on this review and
discussion, the Compensation Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that the Compensation
Discussion and Analysis be included in this prospectus. The members of the Compensation Committee
are: Annette Catino, who serves as Chairman; Gil Chapman; John J. DePierro; and Patrick E. Scura,
Jr.
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
Persons Covered. This discussion and analysis addresses compensation for 2009 for the
following executive officers: John W. Alexander, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer;
Steven M. Klein, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer; Kenneth J. Doherty,
Executive Vice President and Chief Lending Officer; Michael J. Widmer, Executive Vice President of
Operations; and Madeline G. Frank, Senior Vice President and Corporate Secretary. These five
executives are referred to in this discussion as the Named Executive Officers.
131
Executive Summary. Prior to completing our initial public offering in November 2007, we were
wholly-owned by our mutual holding company. As a mutually owned company, our compensation programs
were, by nature, limited, and consisted primarily of base salary and annual cash incentive
compensation.
The key components of our compensation program continue to evolve and are being designed,
augmented and modified, as appropriate, to ensure that we attract and retain superior financial
services executive talent, and reward sustainable performance. We strive to create a compensation
program that provides balance between shorter-term and longer-term performance, fixed and
performance-based compensation, and cash and equity compensation. A primary objective of our
current compensation program is to align the interests of our executives with those of our
stockholders. Our 2009 compensation program included competitively benchmarked base salaries, a
formal annual cash incentive compensation program directly linked to, among other things, our
strategic objectives, and beginning in January 2009, an equity incentive plan. Notwithstanding
unprecedented challenges in national and global economies and financial markets, our financial
performance in 2009 continued to exceed that of our peers. We have remained committed to our
disciplined and balanced approach to providing community banking services and utilizing the same
philosophy in designing a compensation program that is consistent with effective risk management.
Role of the Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors is
responsible for overseeing and approving, subject to ratification by the Board of Directors, the
compensation of the Named Executive Officers, including the Chief Executive Officer. As part of
these duties, the Committee administers our cash and equity incentive compensation plans and
conducts an annual performance review of the Chief Executive Officer and, in consultation with the
Chief Executive Officer, reviews the performance of the other Named Executive Officers. The Board
of Directors has ultimate authority to ratify the compensation of all Named Executive Officers,
including the Chief Executive Officer.
The Compensation Committee also reviews, oversees, and approves the management and
implementation of Northfield Banks employee benefit plans. The Committee has a formal charter
that describes the Committees scope of authority and its duties.
The Compensation Committee consists of four Directors, all of whom are independent as set
forth in the listing requirements for Nasdaq securities. The Nominating and Corporate Governance
Committee of the Board of Directors evaluates the independence of Committee members at least
annually, using the standards contained in Nasdaq listing requirements. This evaluation, and the
determination that each member of the Committee is independent, was made most recently in March
2010.
Role of Executives in Committee Activities. The executive officers who serve as a resource to
the Compensation Committee are the Chief Executive Officer, the Chief Financial Officer, and the
Director of Human Resources. Executives provide the Compensation Committee with input regarding
employee compensation philosophy, processes, and decisions for employees other than Named Executive
Officers. This communication assists in the design and alignment of compensation programs
throughout Northfield Bank. In addition to providing factual information such as company-wide
performance on relevant measures, these executives articulate managements views on current
compensation programs and processes, recommend relevant performance measures to be used for future
evaluations, and otherwise supply information to assist the Compensation Committee. The Chief
Executive Officer also provides information about individual performance assessments for the other
Named Executive Officers, and expresses to the Compensation Committee his views on the appropriate
levels of compensation for the other Named Executive Officers for the ensuing year. At the request
of the Compensation Committee, the Chief Financial Officer communicates directly with third-party
consultants, providing third-party consultants with company-specific data and information, and
assisting in the evaluation of the estimated financial effect regarding any proposed changes to the
various components of compensation.
Executives participate in Committee activities purely in an informational and advisory
capacity and have no vote in the Committees decision-making process. The Chief Executive Officer
and Chief Financial Officer do not attend those portions of Compensation Committee meetings during
which their performance is evaluated or their compensation is being determined. No executive
officer other than the Chief Executive Officer attends those
132
portions of Compensation Committee meetings during which the performance of the other Named
Executive Officers is evaluated or their compensation is being determined. In addition, the
Compensation Committee meets in executive session as appropriate.
Use of Consultants. The Compensation Committee periodically engages an independent
compensation consultant to assist it in the compensation process for Named Executive Officers. The
consultant is retained by and reports directly to the Compensation Committee. The Compensation
Committee places no restrictions on the consultant within the scope of contracted services and such
consultant is not engaged by management for any purpose. The consultant provides expertise and
information about competitive trends in the employment marketplace, including established and
emerging compensation practices at other companies. The consultant also provides proxy statement
and survey data, and assists in assembling relevant comparison groups for various purposes and
establishing benchmarks for base salary, equity awards, and cash incentives from the comparison
group proxy statement and survey data.
For 2009, the Compensation Committee engaged PM&P, an independent compensation consulting
firm, as its advisor on executive and Board compensation matters. During 2009, PM&P assisted the
Compensation Committee in making equity award recommendations for Directors, Named Executive
Officers, and other employees under our 2008 Equity Incentive Plan, as well as provided support in
the development of the 2009 cash incentive plan. In addition, PM&P performed a market update on
executive compensation data it prepared as part of the Compensation Committees comprehensive
review conducted in 2007 for Named Executive Officers. Although the Committee undertakes a
comprehensive assessment every three years, it utilizes PM&P to provide ongoing market trends and
guidance for pay structures each year.
Compensation Objectives and Philosophy. The overall objectives of our compensation program
are to retain, motivate, and reward employees and officers (including the Named Executive Officers)
for sustained performance, and to provide competitive compensation to attract talent to our
organization. The methods used to achieve these goals for Named Executive Officers are influenced
by the compensation and employment practices of our competitors within the financial services
industry, and elsewhere in the marketplace, for executive talent. Other considerations include
each Named Executive Officers individual performance in achieving both financial and non-financial
corporate goals.
Our compensation program is designed to reward the Named Executive Officers based on their
level of assigned management responsibilities, individual experience and performance levels, and
knowledge of banking and our business. The creation of long-term value is highly dependent on the
development and effective execution of our business strategy by our executive officers.
Factors that influence the design of our executive compensation program include, among other
things, the items listed below.
|
|
|
We operate in a highly regulated industry, and we value industry-specific experience
that promotes the safe and sound operation of Northfield Bank. |
|
|
|
|
We value executives with sufficient experience in our markets relating to the
behavior of our customers, products, and investments in various phases of the economic
cycle. |
|
|
|
|
We operate in interest rate and credit markets that are often volatile. We value
disciplined decision-making that respects our business plan but adapts appropriately to
change. |
|
|
|
|
We value the retention and development of performing incumbent executives.
Recruitment of executives can have substantial monetary costs, unpredictable outcomes,
and a disruptive effect on our operations. |
Our 2009 compensation program for our Named Executive Officers includes three key components.
The first component is base salary, which is designed to provide a reasonable level of predictable
income commensurate
133
with market standards of the position held. The second component is an annual cash incentive
plan, designed to reward our executives for attaining specific performance goals that support our
strategic objectives, and the third component, which was added in January 2009, is the granting of
equity incentive awards in the form of shares of common stock, and options to purchase shares of
common stock at a specified price. We also provide benefits and perquisites to the Named Executive
Officers at levels that are competitive and appropriate for their roles.
Benchmarking. Our compensation program is periodically evaluated in relation to benchmark
data derived from information reported in publicly-available proxy statements and from market
survey data. The Compensation Committee will generally review and consider updated peer proxy and
market survey compensation data every three years. In 2007, the Compensation Committee engaged
PM&P to assist it in completing a comprehensive competitive review. The Compensation Committee
selected the following companies for use in benchmarking Named Executive Officers 2007
compensation package. Although the Compensation Committee seeks to update the comprehensive
analysis every three years, PM&P reviewed and updated the data in November 2008 to reflect
appropriate market movement and provide the Compensation Committee with ongoing perspective of our
pay practices. The peer group used for the 2007 analysis is listed below and was selected based
upon similar asset size, geographic region, and business model to us.
|
|
|
|
|
Dime Community Bancshares, Inc.
|
|
State Bancorp, Inc.
|
|
Synergy Financial Group, Inc. |
TrustCo BankCorp NY
|
|
Bancorp Rhode Island, Inc.
|
|
First of Long Island Corporation |
Provident New York Bancorp
|
|
Suffolk Bancorp
|
|
Berkshire Bancorp, Inc. |
Flushing Financial Corporation
|
|
Rockville Financial, Inc.
|
|
Benjamin Franklin Bancorp, Inc. |
Oceanfirst Financial Corp.
|
|
Oritani Financial Corp.
|
|
Roma Financial Corporation |
Kearny Financial Corp.
|
|
United Financial Bancorp, Inc.
|
|
Clifton Savings Bancorp, Inc. |
Sterling Bancorp
|
|
Westfield Financial, Inc. |
|
|
Assembling the Components of Compensation. The Compensation Committee analyzes the level and
relative mix of executive compensation by component (e.g., base salary, incentives, and benefits)
and in the aggregate. The Chief Executive Officer provides recommendations to the Committee
relating to compensation to be paid to the Named Executive Officers other than himself. Based on
their analysis, the Compensation Committee approves each Named Executive Officers compensation,
subject to ratification by the Board of Directors.
When evaluating the mix of total compensation, the Compensation Committee considers among
other things, general market practices, benchmarking studies conducted by the consultant, the
alignment of cash and equity incentive awards with our strategic objectives and performance, and
the desire to reward performance through incentive compensation within Board-approved risk
parameters. The Compensation Committee seeks to create appropriate incentives without encouraging
behaviors that result in undue risk. These components are periodically evaluated in relation to
benchmark data derived from information reported in publicly-available proxy statements and from
market survey data.
Base Salary. Base salary is designed to provide a reasonable level of predictable income
commensurate with market standards of the position held adjusted for specific job responsibilities
assigned, individual experience, and demonstrated performance. Named Executive Officers are
eligible for periodic adjustments to their base salary as a result of changes in the cost of
living, individual performance, updated market analysis, or significant changes in their duties and
responsibilities. The Compensation Committee annually reviews and approves base salaries, and
changes thereto, for Named Executive Officers, including our Chief Executive Officer.
Base salary amounts for 2009 were determined based on a review of peer proxy and survey data
provided by PM&P in 2007, and updated in November 2008 by PM&P. The Compensation Committee
reviewed the 50th percentile of peer proxy and survey data, and a pay range around the median to
allow for recognition of each Named Executive Officers specific experience, responsibilities and
performance, estimated value in the marketplace, and the Committees view of each Named Executive
Officers role in our future success. For 2009, the Compensation Committee generally targeted base
salary compensation at the 65th percentile for each of the Named Executive Officers.
134
The Committee considered the responsibility, significant experience, contributions, and
performance of each Named Executive Officer, their value in the marketplace, and their critical
roles in our future successes, and determined in December 2008, that existing base salaries
properly reflected these factors and made a determination not to change base salaries for any Named
Executive Officers in 2009, with the exception of Mr. Widmer, whose annual base salary was
increased by 4.5%, to $230,000.
Cash Incentives. The Compensation Committee developed and implemented a Management Incentive
Plan (the Cash Incentive Plan, or CIP) for 2009. The Cash Incentive Plan provides
performance-based annual cash incentives to reward our Named Executive Officers for the execution
of specific financial and non-financial elements of our strategic business plan, as well as,
individual goals related to each executives function area. The Cash Incentive Plan requires that
we achieve our designated corporate goal for an individual to earn a percentage of the total cash
award available under the Cash Incentive Plan. The CIP also provides that Named Executive Officers
must achieve individual goals, as determined by the Compensation Committee, to receive the
remaining percentage of the total cash award available to him or her under the CIP.
The Compensation Committee evaluates the reasonableness and likelihood of attaining designated
incentive goals, including stretch goals, in an effort to ensure that such targets appropriately
reward performance, but do not encourage undue risk taking. Actual performance over the applicable
measurement period may exceed or fall short of the targets resulting in the Named Executive Officer
receiving an annual incentive cash award that is above or below the initial targeted level. Annual
incentive cash awards granted in prior years are not taken into account by the Compensation
Committee in the process of setting performance targets for the current year. The Committee
believes that doing so would be inconsistent with the underlying reasons for the use of incentive
compensation.
Risk Assessment and Related Considerations. During 2009, the Compensation Committee, in
consultation with PM&P, and with the assistance of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer, performed a risk assessment of our compensation program (including cash incentive
compensation) for all employee levels within our organization. The objective of the review was to
determine if the compensation programs, at all employee levels, encouraged behavior that exposed us
to unacceptable levels of risk in relation to its business model. The review evaluated the balance
of compensation elements between cash and equity, fixed versus variable compensation, and long-term
versus short-term compensation. The review considered the level of potential cash incentive
compensation as compared to base salary, the focus of individual goals, and the number, weighting,
and balance of goals, as well as internal controls in place to mitigate possible high risk
behaviors.
Based upon its risk assessment, the Compensation Committee concluded that the compensation
programs (including cash incentive compensation) for all employee levels were based on balanced
performance metrics that were reasonable in relation to base salary, and promoted disciplined
progress towards longer-term strategic goals. The Compensation Committee also concluded that the
compensation programs did not motivate improper risk taking, and are not reasonably likely to have
a material adverse effect on us.
2009 Cash Incentive Plan. For 2009, the Compensation Committee set a target total cash
incentive award of 15% of base salary for each Named Executive Officer. The actual cash incentive
award range was defined as 7.5% for threshold performance and 22.5% for stretch performance, of
base salary. These targets were intentionally set lower than current market practice as part of
our shift from its compensation philosophy as a mutually owned bank (greater focus on cash
compensation weighted towards base salary) to that of a public company (which includes equity
compensation and a greater weighting of compensation towards long-term incentive compensation
rather than short-term incentives).
The Compensation Committee established one shared corporate goal (the Corporate Goal) and
individual performance goals for each Named Executive Officer. The target Corporate Goal measured
the attainment of the Board-approved budgeted net income (before taxes) of approximately $18.1
million. The stretch goal was 120% or greater of budgeted net income (before taxes) and the
threshold was 90% of budgeted net income (before taxes). If 80% of budgeted net income (before
taxes) is not achieved, Named Executive Officers are not eligible to receive incentive payments for
achievement of their individual performance goals.
135
Individual performance goals were aligned with our strategic business plan and focused on the
following areas:
|
|
|
Name |
|
Individual Performance Goals |
John W. Alexander |
|
Effectuate a capital deployment strategy; |
|
|
Develop and execute upon a customer satisfaction enhancement program; and |
|
|
Enhance profitability and manage enterprise risk, while ensuring
liquidity and interest rate risk remain within Board approved parameters |
|
|
|
Steven M. Klein |
|
Implement formal leverage strategies to meet specified pre-tax net
income targets (threshold-$720,000, target-$800,000, stretch-$960,000)
within Board approved interest rate risk parameters; |
|
|
Maintain or reduce budgeted non-interest expense within Board approved
levels (threshold-$100,000, target-$150,000, stretch-$200,000); and |
|
|
Adapt reporting processes to monitor and support strategic plan |
|
|
|
Kenneth J. Doherty |
|
Originate loans to specified targets (threshold-$105 million,
target-$117 million, stretch-$140 million), while minimizing credit
risk; |
|
|
Implement automated credit underwriting and monitoring systems; and
Enhance credit monitoring reports to the Risk Committee of the Board |
|
|
|
Michael J. Widmer |
|
Increase outstanding deposits to specified targets (threshold-$58
million, target-$65.4 million, stretch-$77.4 million); |
|
|
Convert core bank systems to new data processor; |
|
|
Expand deposit franchise, and enhance brand; |
|
|
Finalize agreements, develop construction plans on existing sites; and |
|
|
Identify and evaluate potential branch sites |
|
|
|
Madeline G. Frank |
|
Develop automated accounting and reporting system for equity awards;
Implement a formal new hire evaluation program to identify individuals
with desired customer |
|
|
service skill sets; and |
|
|
Implement an employee satisfaction survey, evaluate results and
implement upon a management approved response |
Of our Chief Executive Officers potential cash incentive award, 85% was based on the
achievement of the Corporate Goal, and 15% was based on the attainment of his individual goals. Of
our other Named Executive Officers potential cash incentive awards, 75% was based on the
achievement of their Corporate Goal, and 25% was based on the attainment of individual goals.
In evaluating actual performance as compared to the established Corporate Goal, the
Compensation Committee may, at its discretion, exclude items that are considered non-recurring in
nature. In addition, the Cash Incentive Plan permitted the Compensation Committee to increase or
decrease a cash incentive award based upon its consideration of a Named Executive Officers
performance or achievements.
2009 Award Determinations. In February 2010, the Compensation Committee evaluated achievement
of the Corporate Goal. Our reported 2009 net income (before taxes) was $18.7 million, which
exceeded our target goal of $18.1 million. In accordance with the Cash Incentive Plan, the
Corporate Goal target award of 12.75% (15% target award times 85% weighting) for Mr. Alexander,
and 11.25% (15% target award times 75% weighting) for all other Named Executive Officers increased
(on a pro-rata basis) to approximately 13.6% (16% pro-rata award times 85% weighting) for Mr.
Alexander, and 12.0% (16% pro-rata award times 75% weighting) for all other
136
Named Executive Officers. The Compensation Committee made no upward adjustments to our 2009
reported net income (before taxes) in evaluating achievement of the Corporate Goal.
The remaining 15% of Mr. Alexanders eligible award, and 25% of each other Named Executive
Officers eligible award was determined based on each executives attainment of individual goals,
which were evaluated by the Compensation Committee in its annual evaluation of each Named Executive
Officers performance. In February 2010, the Compensation Committee concluded that Mr. Alexander
and Ms. Frank had achieved each of their individual performance goals and determined that the
target award (no stretch goals were assigned to Mr. Alexander or Ms. Frank) was earned by each
of them for all assigned goals. The Compensation Committee also concluded that Messrs. Klein,
Doherty, and Widmer had substantially met each of their assigned goals at the target level,
except for their goals related to implementing leverage strategies, loan originations, and
expanding the deposit franchise, respectively, which were achieved at the stretch payout level.
Mr. Alexanders corporate goal cash incentive payout was $92,178. Mr. Alexanders individual
goal cash incentive payout of $15,210 for 2009 reflects the Compensation Committees assessment of
his attainment of his target goal related to his leadership in developing and executing a
customer satisfaction program. The Committee also evaluated Mr. Alexanders leadership in
achieving our core strategic business goals, including effective capital deployment, and continual
improvement in customer service. The Compensation Committee attributed our results to Mr.
Alexanders vision for our organization and discipline in adhering to our conservative business
model focused on conservative credit underwriting and securities investments, franchise growth, and
operating expense discipline.
Mr. Kleins corporate goal cash incentive payout was $36,095. Mr. Kleins individual goal
cash incentive payout of $14,062 for 2009 reflects the following: achievement of his stretch goal
for executing securities leveraging opportunities in a volatile market that contributed to net
interest income at or above the stretch level of $960,000, and the attainment of his target goal
of reducing budgeted non-interest expense by $150,000. The Committee excluded the effect of the
following items from reported non-interest expense: FDIC Deposit Insurance special assessment of
approximately $1 million, $600,000 in deferred compensation plan expense associated with market
adjustments in the underlying plan assets, and approximately $600,000 in loan workout professional
fees and collateral valuation adjustments associated with other real estate owned.
Mr. Dohertys corporate goal cash incentive payout was $33,688. Mr. Dohertys individual goal
cash incentive payment of $8,750 for 2009 reflects the following: achievement of his stretch goal
for loan originations exceeding $140 million; achievement of his target goal related to
implementation of credit monitoring software; and achievement of his target award related to
enhancing credit monitoring reporting to the Board. The Compensation Committee also considered Mr.
Dohertys goal related to minimizing credit risks in the loan portfolio. The Committee noted that
credit deterioration occurred in the industry and not just at Northfield, and appropriate actions
were taken to minimize credit risk, including formation of a credit department, and a loan
operations department. However, the Committee believes that certain actions could have been
implemented more timely and a reduction of Mr. Dohertys individual incentive award in the amount
of $3,500 was made.
Mr. Widmers corporate goal cash incentive payout was $27,673. Mr. Widmers individual cash
incentive payment of $9,703 for 2009 reflects the following: achievement of his stretch goal for
deposit growth exceeding $77.4 million, achievement of his target goal related to the conversion
to a new operating system, achievement of his target goal for our opening or constructing two new
branches, and achievement of his target goal for committing to one new branch location in New
Jersey.
Ms. Franks corporate goal cash incentive payout was $20,454. Ms. Franks individual cash
incentive payment of $6,375 for 2009 reflects achievement of her target goal related to the
planning and implementation of an employee satisfaction survey, and the development and execution
of a planned response to the survey results.
137
For 2009, the Named Executive Officers total target award opportunities, and actual
incentives awarded as a percentage of target are detailed below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actual Award as a |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
percentage of |
|
|
Target Award |
|
|
|
|
|
Target Award |
|
|
Opportunity |
|
Actual Award |
|
Opportunity |
Name |
|
($) |
|
($) |
|
(%) |
John W. Alexander |
|
|
101,400 |
|
|
|
107,388 |
|
|
|
105.9 |
|
Steven M. Klein |
|
|
45,000 |
|
|
|
50,157 |
|
|
|
111.5 |
|
Kenneth J. Doherty |
|
|
42,000 |
|
|
|
42,438 |
|
|
|
101.0 |
|
Michael J. Widmer |
|
|
34,500 |
|
|
|
37,376 |
|
|
|
108.3 |
|
Madeline G. Frank |
|
|
25,500 |
|
|
|
26,829 |
|
|
|
105.2 |
|
Equity Awards. In December 2008, stockholders approved the Northfield-Federal 2008
Equity Incentive Plan. The objective of equity awards is to further align the interests of our
executives with those of stockholders and reward sustained performance. In January 2009 the
Compensation Committee granted equity awards in the form of common stock, and options to purchase
common stock at $9.94 per share, representing the closing price of our common stock on the grant
date, to each of the Named Executive Officers. The equity awards vest in equal installments over a
five-year period, commencing one year from the date of the grant. The Compensation Committee
consulted with PM&P during this process.
Prior to November 2007, we were a mutual organization and did not have equity compensation
available to employees. The Compensation Committees objective in granting equity awards in
January 2009 was to provide employees with a substantial equity interest in us, consistent with
comparable peers that recently completed initial public offerings.
Broad-based benefits. We also provide to our Named Executive Officers certain broad-based
benefits available to all of our qualifying employees, as well as fringe benefits and perquisites,
and restoration and other termination benefits, not generally available to all qualifying
employees.
The following summarizes the significant broad-based benefits in which the Named Executive
Officers were eligible to participate in 2009:
|
|
|
a defined contribution 401(k) retirement plan and discretionary profit-sharing plan; |
|
|
|
|
an employee stock ownership plan; |
|
|
|
|
medical coverage (all employees share between 20% to 30% of the cost, depending on
their elections); |
|
|
|
|
pre-tax health and dependent care spending accounts; and |
|
|
|
|
group life insurance coverage (death benefit capped at $750,000, with the value of
the death benefit over $50,000 being reported as taxable income to all employees). |
The Northfield Bank Employee Stock Ownership Plan was established effective January 1, 2007.
The employee stock ownership plan allocates a certain number of shares of our common stock on an
annual basis, which are allocated among plan participants primarily on the basis of eligible
compensation in the year of allocation, subject to Internal Revenue Code limitations. All eligible
employees, including Named Executive Officers, participate in the plan and received an allocation
of common stock for 2009.
138
Executive Benefits and Perquisites. In addition to the broad-based benefits described above,
the Named Executive Officers received the following fringe benefits and perquisites in 2009:
|
|
|
all Named Executive Officers may participate in a non-qualified deferred
compensation plan. The plan provides restoration of benefits capped under Northfield
Banks broad-based benefits due to Internal Revenue Code salary limitations or
limitations due to participation requirements under tax-qualified plans. The plan also
permits elective salary and cash incentive award deferrals; |
|
|
|
|
Messrs. Klein, Doherty, and Widmer received a monthly automobile allowance of $800; |
|
|
|
|
all Named Executive Officers pay for and are provided with reimbursement for
long-term disability insurance coverage; |
|
|
|
|
Messrs. Alexander, Klein, Doherty, and Widmer are reimbursed for appropriate spousal
expenses for attendance at business events; and |
|
|
|
|
Messrs. Alexander, Klein, Doherty, and Widmer are provided a cellular phone
allowance of $100 per month for business usage. We also reimburse individuals for the
cost of cellular phone equipment. |
We incur the expense of one country club membership and related expenses for Mr. Alexander.
Mr. Alexander reimburses Northfield Bank for personal expenses pertaining to club usage. In lieu
of a monthly automobile allowance, Mr. Alexander receives use of an automobile (including all
operating expenses) leased by Northfield Bank for business and personal use. Personal use of the
automobile is reported as taxable income to Mr. Alexander. In addition, Northfield Bank pays an
annual premium on a whole-life insurance policy for the benefit of Mr. Alexander.
The Compensation Committee reviews the other components of executive compensation (broad-based
benefits and executive perquisites) on an annual basis. Changes to the level or types of
broad-based benefits within these categories, including considerations relating to the addition or
elimination of benefits and plan design changes, are made by the Compensation Committee on an
aggregate basis with respect to the group of employees entitled to those benefits, and not
necessarily with reference to a particular Named Executive Officers compensation. Decisions about
these components of compensation are made without reference to the Named Executive Officers salary
and annual cash incentives, as they involve issues of more general application and often include
consideration of trends in the industry or in the employment marketplace.
Employment Agreements. In addition to the components of executive compensation described
above, Messrs. Alexander, Klein, Doherty, and Widmer are each parties to employment agreements with
Northfield Bank. See Employment Agreements for a description of these agreements and Potential
Payments to Named Executive Officers for information about potential payments to these individuals
upon termination of their employment with Northfield Bank.
The executive employment agreements are designed to allow us to retain the services of the
designated executives while reducing, to the extent possible, unnecessary disruptions to our
operations. In addition, the Compensation Committee believes that the employment agreements better
align the interests of the executive with those of our stockholders. The Compensation Committee
believes that these agreements allow executives to more objectively evaluate opportunities for
stockholders without causing undue personal financial conflicts.
The Compensation Committee reviewed prevailing market practices, consulted with PM&P on the
competitiveness and reasonableness of the terms of the agreements, and negotiated the agreements
with the individuals. The Compensation Committee believes such agreements are common and necessary
to retain executive talent.
139
The agreements are for a three-year period, are reviewed for renewal annually by the
Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors, and provide for salary and incentive cash
compensation payments, as well as additional post-employment benefits, primarily health benefits,
under certain conditions, as defined in the employment agreements. See Employment Agreements
for further discussion.
Exceptions to Usual Procedures. The Compensation Committee may recommend to the Board of
Directors that they approve the payment of special cash compensation to one or more Named Executive
Officers in addition to payments approved during the normal annual compensation-setting cycle. The
Committee may make such a recommendation if it believes it would be appropriate to reward one or
more Named Executive Officers in recognition of contributions to a particular project, or in
response to competitive and other factors that were not addressed during the normal annual
compensation-setting cycle. The Compensation Committee did not make any such recommendation
related to our Named Executive Officers for 2009.
The Committee will consider off-cycle compensation adjustments whenever a Named Executive
Officers status, role or responsibilities change, or an executive officer is hired. The Committee
may depart from the compensation guidelines it would normally follow for executives in the case of
outside hires.
The Compensation Committee considers, but is not bound by, the tax treatment of each component
of compensation. Under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code, annual compensation paid to a
Named Executive Officer is not deductible if it exceeds $1 million unless it qualifies as
performance-based compensation as defined in the Internal Revenue Code and related tax
regulations. Base salary is not a form of performance-based compensation. Fringe benefits and
perquisites also do not qualify as performance-based compensation. Annual incentive cash awards
may qualify as a form of performance-based compensation under the income tax regulations. In 2009,
and for prior years, we were not subject to tax deduction limitations under Section 162(m).
Committee Actions During 2009 Affecting 2010 Compensation, and Other Actions by the Committee.
Every three years, executive compensation is reviewed in detail by the Compensation Committee.
The Compensation Committee is scheduled to perform its detailed review of executive compensation
in 2010. Typically, the review commences in the middle of the year after peer proxy information
becomes readily available. In 2009, the Compensation Committee reviewed current compensation
trends and practices, in consultation with PM&P, and made a determination that Named Executive
Officers base salaries for 2010 would remain unchanged from 2009 until such review was complete.
In December of 2009, the Compensation Committee approved a 2010 cash incentive compensation
plan, with a similar structure to our 2009 cash incentive compensation plan. The plan contains
similar terms and conditions as our prior year plan. The threshold, target, and stretch
award payouts are 10%, 20%, and 30%, respectively, with a Corporate Goal that can be earned based
upon our achieving at least 90% of Board-approved budgeted net income (before income taxes), and
individual awards that are based on the achievement of goals aligned with our strategic
objectives.
Compensation Tables
Summary Compensation Table. The following table sets forth for the three years ended December
31, 2009, certain information as to the total remuneration we paid to Mr. Alexander, who serves as
Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Klein, who serves as Executive
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, and the three most highly compensated executive
officers of Northfield-Federal or Northfield Bank other than Messrs. Alexander and Klein. The
Bonus and Change in Pension Value and Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings columns have
been omitted from the Summary Compensation Table because no listed individual earned any
compensation during the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008, or 2007 of a type required to be
disclosed in those columns.
140
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Summary Compensation Table |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Option |
|
Non-equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock |
|
Awards |
|
incentive plan |
|
All other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salary |
|
Awards (2) |
|
(3) |
|
compensation |
|
compensation |
|
Total |
Name and principal position |
|
Year |
|
($) |
|
($) |
|
($) |
|
($) |
|
(1) ($) |
|
($) |
John W. Alexander, Chairman of |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
676,000 |
|
|
|
1,669,920 |
|
|
|
1,356,425 |
|
|
|
107,388 |
|
|
|
141,951 |
|
|
|
3,951,684 |
|
the Board, President and Chief |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
676,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
67,600 |
|
|
|
137,761 |
|
|
|
881,361 |
|
Executive Officer |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
750,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
75,000 |
|
|
|
165,896 |
|
|
|
990,896 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Steven M. Klein, Executive Vice |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
300,000 |
|
|
|
778,302 |
|
|
|
661,710 |
|
|
|
50,157 |
|
|
|
53,422 |
|
|
|
1,843,591 |
|
President and Chief Financial |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
300,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31,250 |
|
|
|
48,384 |
|
|
|
379,634 |
|
Officer |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
300,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,000 |
|
|
|
54,620 |
|
|
|
384,620 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kenneth J. Doherty, Executive |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
280,000 |
|
|
|
725,620 |
|
|
|
618,240 |
|
|
|
42,438 |
|
|
|
53,540 |
|
|
|
1,719,838 |
|
Vice President and Chief |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
280,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29,750 |
|
|
|
45,853 |
|
|
|
355,603 |
|
Lending Officer |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
280,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,000 |
|
|
|
52,276 |
|
|
|
360,276 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Michael J. Widmer, Executive |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
230,000 |
|
|
|
596,400 |
|
|
|
507,955 |
|
|
|
37,376 |
|
|
|
46,325 |
|
|
|
1,418,056 |
|
Vice President, Operations |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
220,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,375 |
|
|
|
40,141 |
|
|
|
283,516 |
|
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
220,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,000 |
|
|
|
43,642 |
|
|
|
285,642 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Madeline G. Frank, Senior Vice |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
170,000 |
|
|
|
132,202 |
|
|
|
85,330 |
|
|
|
26,829 |
|
|
|
28,896 |
|
|
|
443,257 |
|
President and Corporate |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
170,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,000 |
|
|
|
23,280 |
|
|
|
210,280 |
|
Secretary |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
170,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,000 |
|
|
|
27,824 |
|
|
|
214,824 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The individuals listed in this table participate in certain medical and dental coverage
plans, not disclosed in the Summary Compensation Table, that are generally available to
salaried employees and do not discriminate in scope, terms and operation. The amount shown
for each individual for the year ended December 31, 2009, includes our direct out-of-pocket
costs (reduced for Mr. Alexander, in the case of the figures shown for automobiles by the
amount that we would otherwise have paid in cash reimbursements during the year for business
use) for the following items: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mr. Alexander |
|
|
Mr. Klein |
|
|
Mr. Doherty |
|
|
Mr. Widmer |
|
|
Ms. Frank |
|
Employer contributions
to qualified and
non-qualified deferred
compensation plans
(including 401(k),
ESOP and non-qualified
deferred compensation
plans) |
|
$ |
75,485 |
|
|
$ |
38,346 |
|
|
$ |
38,101 |
|
|
$ |
32,828 |
|
|
$ |
24,596 |
|
Life insurance premiums |
|
|
38,900 |
|
|
|
2,592 |
|
|
|
3,240 |
|
|
|
1,987 |
|
|
|
2,203 |
|
Long-term disability |
|
|
2,180 |
|
|
|
968 |
|
|
|
903 |
|
|
|
710 |
|
|
|
497 |
|
Automobile |
|
|
12,768 |
|
|
|
9,600 |
|
|
|
9,600 |
|
|
|
9,600 |
|
|
|
|
|
Club dues |
|
|
10,118 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Travel expense for
spouse to accompany on
business travel |
|
|
1,300 |
|
|
|
716 |
|
|
|
496 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,600 |
|
Reimbursement for
business cell phone
and data usage |
|
|
1,200 |
|
|
|
1,200 |
|
|
|
1,200 |
|
|
|
1,200 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
141,951 |
|
|
$ |
53,422 |
|
|
$ |
53,540 |
|
|
$ |
46,325 |
|
|
$ |
28,896 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2) |
|
Represents the aggregate grant date fair value of restricted stock awarded to the employee on
January 30, 2009, based upon a grant date stock price of $9.94 per share, which was the final
reported sales price of our common stock on the date of the grant. The restricted stock
awards vest in equal installments over a five-year period, commencing one year from the date
of the grant. No forfeitures were assumed in calculating the aggregate grant date fair value. |
|
(3) |
|
Represents the aggregate grant date fair value of options to purchase shares of common stock
awarded to each employee on January 30, 2009. The options vest in equal installments over a
five-year period, commencing one year from the date of the grant and have an exercise price of
$9.94 per share, which was the final reported sales price of the common stock on the date of
the grant. The grant date fair value was $3.22 per option and was determined using the
Black-Scholes method assuming an options average life of 6.5 years; 2.17% risk free rate of
return; 35.33% volatility, and 1.61% dividend yield. No forfeitures were assumed in
calculating the aggregate grant date fair value. |
|
* |
|
Amount represents an annual discretionary stipend provided to employees whose work location
was moved from New York to New Jersey. |
141
Plan-Based Awards. As further discussed in Compensation Discussion and
AnalysisAssembling the Components of Compensation, we maintained a cash incentive award program
and equity incentive award program (both based upon Board- and stockholder-approved plans) for our
Named Executive Officers for the year ended December 31, 2009. The following table sets forth for
the year ended December 31, 2009, certain information as to grants of plan-based cash and equity
awards.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grants of Plan-based Awards Table 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All other |
|
All other |
|
|
|
|
|
Grant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
stock |
|
option |
|
Exercise |
|
date fair |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
awards: |
|
awards: |
|
or base |
|
value of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated future payouts under |
|
number of |
|
number of |
|
price of |
|
stock and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
non-equity incentive plan awards |
|
shares of |
|
securities |
|
option |
|
option |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Threshold |
|
Target |
|
Maximum |
|
stock or |
|
underlying |
|
awards |
|
awards (1) |
Name |
|
Grant date |
|
($) |
|
($) |
|
($) |
|
units |
|
options |
|
($) |
|
($) |
John W. Alexander |
|
|
01/14/09 |
|
|
|
50,700 |
|
|
|
101,400 |
|
|
|
152,100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
01/30/09 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
168,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,669,920 |
|
|
|
|
01/30/09 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
421,250 |
|
|
|
9.94 |
|
|
|
1,356,425 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Steven M. Klein |
|
|
01/14/09 |
|
|
|
22,500 |
|
|
|
45,000 |
|
|
|
67,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
01/30/09 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
78,300 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
778,302 |
|
|
|
|
01/30/09 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
205,500 |
|
|
|
9.94 |
|
|
|
661,710 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kenneth J. Doherty |
|
|
01/14/09 |
|
|
|
21,000 |
|
|
|
42,000 |
|
|
|
63,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
01/30/09 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
73,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
725,620 |
|
|
|
|
01/30/09 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
192,000 |
|
|
|
9.94 |
|
|
|
618,240 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Michael J. Widmer |
|
|
01/14/09 |
|
|
|
17,250 |
|
|
|
34,500 |
|
|
|
51,750 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
01/30/09 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
596,400 |
|
|
|
|
01/30/09 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
157,750 |
|
|
|
9.94 |
|
|
|
507,955 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Madeline G. Frank |
|
|
01/14/09 |
|
|
|
12,750 |
|
|
|
25,500 |
|
|
|
38,250 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
01/30/09 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,300 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
132,202 |
|
|
|
|
01/30/09 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,500 |
|
|
|
9.94 |
|
|
|
85,330 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
See footnotes 2 and 3 to the Summary Compensation Table for further information regarding
grant date fair value of restricted stock and option awards. |
The following table sets forth certain information regarding stock awards and stock
options outstanding at December 31, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Option Awards |
|
Stock Awards |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number |
|
Market |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of |
|
Number of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of shares |
|
value of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
securities |
|
securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
or units |
|
shares or |
|
|
|
|
|
|
underlying |
|
underlying |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of stock |
|
units of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
unexercised |
|
unexercised |
|
Option |
|
|
|
|
|
that |
|
stock that |
|
|
|
|
|
|
options |
|
options |
|
exercise |
|
Option |
|
have not |
|
have not |
|
|
Grant |
|
(exercisable) |
|
(unexercisable) |
|
price |
|
expiration |
|
vested |
|
vested (2) |
Name |
|
date |
|
(#) |
|
(#) |
|
($) |
|
date (1) |
|
(#) |
|
($) |
John W. Alexander |
|
|
01/30/09 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
421,250 |
|
|
|
9.94 |
|
|
|
01/30/19 |
|
|
|
168,000 |
|
|
|
2,271,360 |
|
Steven M. Klein |
|
|
01/30/09 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
205,500 |
|
|
|
9.94 |
|
|
|
01/30/19 |
|
|
|
78,300 |
|
|
|
1,058,616 |
|
Kenneth J. Doherty |
|
|
01/30/09 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
192,000 |
|
|
|
9.94 |
|
|
|
01/30/19 |
|
|
|
73,000 |
|
|
|
986,960 |
|
Michael J. Widmer |
|
|
01/30/09 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
157,750 |
|
|
|
9.94 |
|
|
|
01/30/19 |
|
|
|
60,000 |
|
|
|
811,200 |
|
Madeline G. Frank |
|
|
01/30/09 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,500 |
|
|
|
9.94 |
|
|
|
01/30/19 |
|
|
|
13,300 |
|
|
|
179,816 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Stock options expire if unexercised 10 years from the grant date. |
|
(2) |
|
Amount is based on a $13.52 per share closing price of our common stock on December 31, 2009. |
There were no options exercised or restricted stock vested during the year ended December
31, 2009.
Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plan. Northfield Bank maintains a non-qualified deferred
compensation plan to provide for the elective deferral of non-employee director fees by
participating members of the Board of Directors, and the elective deferral of compensation and/or
performance-based compensation payable to eligible employees of Northfield Bancorp, MHC and
Northfield Bank. A designated amount of director fees, compensation and/or performance based
compensation may be deferred until one of the specified events in the plan
142
occurs, which permits all or part of the monies so deferred, together with earnings, to be
distributed to participants or their beneficiaries. In addition, the plan provides eligible
employees of Northfield Bank with supplemental retirement income from Northfield Bank when such
amounts are not payable under the contribution formula of the Northfield Bank 401(k) Savings Plan
(the 401(k) Savings Plan), due to reductions and other limitations imposed under the Internal
Revenue Code.
Members of the Board of Trustees of Northfield Bancorp, MHC and the Boards of Directors of
Northfield-Federal and Northfield Bank, and certain employees are eligible to participate in the
plan. Eligible trustees, directors or employees become participants upon agreeing in a written
enrollment agreement to defer any portion of their trustee fees, director fees, compensation,
and/or performance-based compensation. Each participant may request that his or her deferred
compensation account be deemed to be invested in any one or more of the investment options
available to Northfield Bancorp, MHC, or Northfield Bank, in our sole discretion. A participant
may periodically request a change to his or her investment allocation deemed available under the
plan. In the event any participant fails to direct the investment of his or her deferred
compensation account, or to the extent the employer chooses not to honor the participants request,
the deferred compensation account will be deemed to bear interest at the rate prevailing for
30-year United States Treasury Bonds.
With respect to amounts of deferred trustee or director fees, deferred compensation or
performance-based compensation, distributions will be made under the plan in the event of the
participants retirement, death, termination due to disability, separation from service prior to
the participants retirement date, upon the establishment of an unforeseeable emergency, upon a
change in control, or upon the attainment of a specific date of distribution, in a single lump sum
or in up to 15 annual installment payments, as designated by the participant in his or her
enrollment agreement. In the case of an unforeseeable emergency, the amounts distributed will not
exceed the amounts necessary to satisfy the emergency plus an amount necessary to pay any taxes
owed on the distribution. In the event the participant fails to designate a payment schedule on
his enrollment agreement or if the entire balance credited to the participants account is less
than $10,000, payment will be made in a single lump sum. In the event a participant dies before
receiving the full amount of his benefit, the remaining amounts will be paid to the participants
designated beneficiary according to the participants form of election or, if there is no
designated beneficiary at the time of the participants death, to the participants estate in a
single lump sum. Distributions to certain specified employees on account of their separation
from service may be delayed for six months, if necessary, to comply with Internal Revenue Code
Section 409A.
In addition, the non-qualified deferred compensation plan provides for benefits which
supplement those paid under the 401(k) Savings Plan in the event of normal, early or postponed
retirement, death or termination of service. Such benefits will be equal to the sum of: (i) the
maximum amount of employer matching contributions provided to a participant each calendar year,
assuming a participants maximum contributions, reduced by the amount of employer matching
contributions made for the participant under the 401(k) Savings Plan for such year, adjusted by
gains and losses; (ii) commencing January 1, 2000, the amount of employer matching contributions
not credited to a participants 401(k) Savings Plan account as a result of an employer error,
adjusted by gains and losses, if any; and (iii) the maximum amount of discretionary employer
contributions that would be provided to a participant under the 401(k) Savings Plan, assuming an
allocation without taking into account the limitations imposed by the Internal Revenue Code,
reduced by the amount of discretionary employer contributions actually made to a participant under
the 401(k) Savings Plan for each such year, adjusted by gains and losses, if any. Benefits payable
under this plan that supplement matching contributions under the 401(k) Savings Plan will be
aggregated with benefits payable under the Supplemental ESOP (described below). Upon the
occurrence of a distribution event, such benefits will be payable in either a lump sum or
installments over a period of up to 15 years, at the election of the participant made in accordance
with Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code.
The non-qualified deferred compensation plan is considered an unfunded plan for tax and
Employee Retirement Income Security Act purposes. All obligations owing under the plan are payable
from the general assets of Northfield Bank and Northfield Bancorp, MHC, and are subject to the
claims of Northfield Banks or Northfield Bancorp, MHCs creditors.
143
Supplemental Employee Stock Ownership Plan. The Northfield Bank Supplemental Employee Stock
Ownership Plan (the Supplemental ESOP) is a benefit restoration plan that provides additional
cash benefits, equal to the participants account balance, at retirement or other termination of
employment (or upon a change in control) to participants who are key employees, who are approved by
the Compensation Committee and whose benefits under the tax-qualified employee stock ownership
plan, described below, are limited by tax law limitations applicable to tax-qualified plans.
Messrs. Alexander, Klein, and Doherty are the current participants in this plan. The Supplemental
ESOP credits each participant who also participates in the tax-qualified employee stock ownership
plan with an annual amount equal to the sum of the difference (expressed in dollars) between (a)
the number of shares of common stock of Northfield-Federal that would have been allocated to the
participants account in the employee stock ownership plan, but for the tax law limitations, plus
earnings thereon, and (b) the actual number of shares allocated to the participants account in the
employee stock ownership plan plus earnings thereon. In each case, the number of shares will be
multiplied by the fair market value of the shares on the allocation date to determine the annual
allocation amount. Each participant is permitted to make investment recommendations for the annual
amount credited to his or her account among a broadly diversified group of mutual funds selected
for investment by a committee appointed by Northfield Banks Board of Directors to administer the
Supplemental ESOP. Northfield Bank has established a rabbi trust to hold assets attributable to
the Supplemental ESOP to informally fund its benefit obligation. Northfield Bank, at its
discretion, may account for the Supplemental ESOP solely as bookkeeping entries. Whether or not a
rabbi trust is established, the participants account value is based on the value of the
investments in which the participant invests, or is deemed to invest, his account. Benefits
distributed to participants from the Supplemental ESOP will be aggregated with benefits payable
under the matching contributions portion of the Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plan (described
above). Upon the occurrence of a distribution event, such benefits will be payable in either a
lump sum or installments over a period of up to 15 years, at the election of the participant made
in accordance with Section 409A of Internal Revenue Code.
The following table sets forth certain information with respect to our nonqualified deferred
compensation plans at and for the year ended December 31, 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonqualified Deferred Compensation At And For The Year Ended December 31, 2009 |
|
|
Executive |
|
Registrant |
|
Aggregate |
|
Aggregate |
|
Aggregate balance |
|
|
contributions in |
|
contributions in |
|
earnings in last |
|
withdrawals/ |
|
at last fiscal year |
|
|
last fiscal year |
|
last fiscal year |
|
fiscal year |
|
distributions |
|
end |
Name |
|
($)(1) |
|
($)(1) |
|
($)(2) |
|
($) |
|
($)(3) |
John W. Alexander |
|
|
120,388 |
|
|
|
41,084 |
|
|
|
309,235 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,502,019 |
|
Steven M. Klein |
|
|
1,650 |
|
|
|
4,625 |
|
|
|
31,607 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
111,346 |
|
Kenneth J. Doherty |
|
|
2,650 |
|
|
|
2,686 |
|
|
|
37,076 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
141,835 |
|
Michael J. Widmer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,733 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
48,486 |
|
Madeline G. Frank |
|
|
4,024 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,085 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
61,377 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Contributions included in the Executive contributions in last fiscal year and the
Registrant contributions in last fiscal year columns are included as compensation for the
listed individuals in the Summary Compensation Table. |
|
(2) |
|
Amounts included in the Aggregate earnings in last fiscal year are not included as
compensation for the listed individuals in the Summary Compensation Table as such earnings are
not preferential or above market. |
|
(3) |
|
Amounts included in the Aggregate balance at last fiscal year end previously were reported
as compensation for the listed individuals except to the extent that such balances reflect
earnings, all of which were not preferential or above market. |
Short- and Long-Term Disability
Named Executive Officers and certain other members of senior management at Northfield Bank
will be paid their full salary for the duration of any period of short-term disability, up to 26
weeks. Senior management receives this benefit in lieu of the ability to bank paid time off for
future use, which is only available to employees of Northfield Bank who are not senior management.
With respect to long-term disability, senior management employees are required to purchase
long-term disability coverage and Northfield Bank provides such persons a bonus payment in
recognition of their payment of such coverage. The amount of the bonus is in the sole discretion
of Northfield Bank.
144
Life Insurance Coverage
Employees of Northfield Bank receive life insurance coverage of up to three times salary, if
hired before January 1, 2003, and up to two times salary, if hired on or after January 1, 2003.
Such life insurance coverage is generally capped at $500,000. However, in the case of senior
management, such life insurance coverage is capped at $750,000.
401(k) Savings Plan
Northfield Bank maintains the 401(k) Savings Plan, which is a tax-qualified defined
contribution plan with a salary deferral feature under Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code.
Salaried employees, who have completed at least one year of eligible service, as defined in the
plan, are eligible to participate in the plan. Employees who are paid on an hourly basis,
employees who are paid exclusively on a commission basis, leased employees or employees covered by
a collective bargaining agreement are not eligible to participate in the 401(k) Savings Plan.
Eligible employees may contribute from 2% to 15% of their base salary to the 401(k) Savings Plan
on a pre-tax basis each year, subject to the limitations of the Internal Revenue Code (for 2009,
the limit was $16,500, exclusive of any catch-up contributions). Employees who have been making
before-tax contributions for less than 36 months will receive an employer matching contribution
equal to 25% of the first 6% of before-tax base salary contributions. Employees who have
participated for 36 or more months will receive an employer matching contribution equal to 50% of
their first 6% of before-tax base salary contributions. In addition, we may make discretionary
employer contributions on behalf of eligible employees.
The 401(k) Savings Plan permits employees to invest in common stock of Northfield-Federal.
Employee Stock Ownership Plan and Trust
We maintain the employee stock ownership plan to promote employee ownership of our common
stock. At the employee stock ownership plans inception, the employee stock ownership plan trust
borrowed funds from Northfield-Federal and used those funds to purchase 1,756,279 shares of common
stock of Northfield-Federal. The collateral for the loan is the common stock purchased by the
employee stock ownership plan. The loan will be repaid principally from discretionary
contributions made by Northfield Bank to the employee stock ownership plan over a period of up to
30 years. The loan documents provide that the loan may be repaid over a shorter period, without
penalty for prepayments. The interest rate on the loan equals the prime interest rate as of
closing of the stock offering, and adjusts annually at the beginning of each calendar year. Shares
purchased by the employee stock ownership plan are held in a suspense account for allocation among
participants as the loan is repaid primarily on the basis of compensation in the year of
allocation, subject to Internal Revenue Code limitations. Benefits under the plan vest at the rate
of 20% per year of credited service beginning in the second year of credited service so that a
participant with six years of credited service will become fully vested. Credit is given for
vesting purposes to participants for years of service with Northfield Bank prior to the adoption of
the plan. Credit is also given to those employees who were employed at Liberty Bank at the time of
its acquisition by Northfield Bank for their years of service at Liberty Bank. A participants
interest in his account under the plan fully vests in the event of termination of service due to a
participants normal retirement, death, disability, or upon a change in control (as defined in the
plan). In the event of a change in control, the employee stock ownership plan will terminate, loan
amounts outstanding will be repaid, and remaining shares will fully vest.
In connection with the conversion, the trustee for our existing employee stock ownership plan
is expected to purchase, on behalf of the employee stock ownership plan, 4% of the shares of common
stock sold in the offering. We anticipate that the employee stock ownership plan will fund its
stock purchase with a loan from Northfield-Delaware equal to the aggregate purchase price of the
common stock. The loan will have a ten-year term and be repaid principally through Northfield Bank
contribution to the employee stock ownership plan and dividends payable on common stock held by the
employee stock ownership plan over the term of the loan. The interest rate for the employee stock
ownership plan loan is expected to be the prime rate of interest, determined as of the date of
origination of the loan. See Pro Forma Data.
145
The trustee will hold the shares purchased by the employee stock ownership plan in an
unallocated suspense account, and shares will be released from the suspense account on a pro-rata
basis as we repay the loan. The trustee will allocate the shares released among participants on
the basis of each participants proportional share of eligible plan compensation relative to all
participants.
We reserve the right, subject to approval from the Office of Thrift Supervision, to purchase
shares of common stock in the open market following the offering in order to fund all or a portion
of the employee stock ownership plan. We also reserve the right to have the employee stock
ownership plan purchase more than 4% of the shares of common stock sold in the offering if
necessary to complete the offering at the minimum of the offering range.
Pension Benefits
None of the individuals listed in the Summary Compensation Table had accumulated pension
benefits either at or during the year ended December 31, 2009.
Employment Agreements
Northfield Bank has entered into employment agreements with each of Messrs. Alexander, Klein,
Doherty, and Widmer. Northfield-Federal is a signatory to each of the agreements for the sole
purpose of guaranteeing payments thereunder. Each of these agreements has an initial term of three
years. Each year, on the anniversary date of these agreements, the employment agreements renew for
an additional year so that the remaining term will be three years unless notice of nonrenewal is
provided to the executive prior to such anniversary date. The Compensation Committee of the Board
of Directors conducts an annual performance evaluation of each executive for purposes of
determining whether to renew the employment agreement. The Compensation Committee also evaluates
the terms and conditions of the agreements prior to renewal, in consultation with an independent
third party compensation consultant, to determine that such terms and conditions are competitive
with the market for the designated positions.
Under the employment agreements, base salaries for Messrs. Alexander, Klein, Doherty, and
Widmer on December 31, 2009, were $676,000, $300,000, $280,000, and $230,000, respectively. In
addition to base salary, each agreement provides for, among other things, participation in cash
incentive programs and other employee retirement benefit and fringe benefit plans applicable to
executive employees. Northfield Bank also will pay or reimburse each executive for all reasonable
business expenses incurred by the executive in the performance of his obligations. In addition,
Northfield Bank will provide Mr. Alexander with a life insurance policy, pay or reimburse Mr.
Alexander for the annual dues associated with his membership in a country club, and pay directly or
reimburse Mr. Alexander for the expense of leasing an automobile and reasonable expenses associated
with the use of such automobile. Each employment agreement may be terminated for cause at any
time, in which event the executive would have no right to receive compensation or other benefits
under the employment agreement for any period after termination.
Certain events resulting in the executives termination or resignation entitle the executive
to payments of severance benefits following termination of employment. In the event the
executives employment is terminated for reasons other than just cause (as defined in the
employment agreement), disability (as defined in the employment agreements), or death, or in the
event the executive resigns during the term of the agreement following:
|
(i) |
|
the failure to elect or reelect or to appoint or reappoint the executive to his
executive position, and in the case of Mr. Alexander, the failure to nominate or
re-nominate him as a director of Northfield Bank or Northfield-Federal; |
|
|
(ii) |
|
a material change in the nature or scope of the executives authority that
would cause the executives position to become one of lesser importance; |
146
|
(iii) |
|
a relocation of the executives principal place of employment by more than 30
miles from designated areas; |
|
|
(iv) |
|
a material reduction in the benefits and perquisites of executive, other than a
reduction in pay or benefits of all Northfield Bank employees; |
|
|
(v) |
|
the liquidation or dissolution of Northfield Bank or Northfield-Federal that
would affect the status of the executive; or |
|
|
(vi) |
|
a material breach of the employment agreement by Northfield Bank, |
the executive would be entitled to a lump sum cash severance payment and the continuation of
certain welfare benefits for a period of time after termination of employment, as more fully
described under the table Potential Payments to Named Executive Officers.
In the event an executive resigns in connection with or following a change in control (as
defined in the employment agreement), the executive would also be entitled to a lump sum cash
severance payment and the continuation of certain welfare benefits, including health and life
insurance benefits for a period of time after termination of employment, as more fully described
under the table Potential Payments to Named Executive Officers. Payments will be made in a lump
sum within 30 days after the date of termination, or, if necessary to avoid penalties under Section
409A of the Internal Revenue Code, no later than the first day of the seventh month following the
date of termination. In addition, the executive and his family would be entitled, at no expense to
the executive, to the continuation of life, medical, dental and disability coverage for 36 months
following the date of termination. If such benefits cannot be provided, a lump sum cash payment
for the value of such benefits will be made to the executive.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, in the event payments to the executive would result in an
excess parachute payment as defined in Section 280G of the Internal Revenue Code, payments under
the employment agreements would be reduced in order to avoid such a result.
In the event Mr. Alexander becomes disabled, his obligation to perform services under the
employment agreement will terminate and he will receive the benefits provided under any disability
program sponsored by Northfield-Federal or Northfield Bank. To the extent disability benefits for
Mr. Alexander are less than his base salary on the effective date of his termination of employment,
and less than 66 2/3% of his base salary after the first year following termination, he will
receive a supplemental disability benefit equal to the difference between the benefits provided
under any disability program sponsored by Northfield-Federal or Northfield Bank and his base salary
for one year following the date of termination, and 66 2/3% of his base salary after the first year
following termination, until the earliest to occur of his death, recovery of disability or the date
he attains age 65. If disability payments to Mr. Alexander are not taxable to him for federal
income tax purposes, such amounts shall be tax adjusted assuming a combined federal, state and city
tax rate of 38%, for purposes of determining the reduction in payments under the agreement, to
reflect the tax-free nature of the disability payments. In addition, Mr. Alexander and his
dependents will continue to be covered, at no cost to them, under all benefit plans, including
retirement plans, life insurance plans and non-taxable medical and dental plans in which they
participated prior to the occurrence of his disability, until the earliest of his recovery from
disability or attaining age 65.
The employment agreements for Messrs. Klein, Doherty, and Widmer provide that in the event of
the executives disability, the executives obligation to perform services under the employment
agreement will terminate, and the executive will continue to receive his then current base salary
for one year. Such payment will be reduced by the amount of any short- or long-term disability
benefits payable under any disability program sponsored by Northfield-Federal or Northfield Bank.
If disability payments to Messrs. Klein, Doherty, or Widmer are not subject to federal income tax,
then amounts payable to the executives under the employment agreements shall be tax adjusted in a
manner similar to payments to Mr. Alexander. In addition, the executive and his dependents will
continue to be provided with certain medical, dental and other health benefits on the same terms as
those provided prior to the executives termination for a period of one year.
147
In the event of the executives death, the executives estate or beneficiaries will be paid
the executives base salary for one year and will receive continued medical, dental, and other
health benefits for one year on the same terms as those provided prior to the executives death.
Upon retirement at age 65 or such later date determined by the Board of Directors, the executive
will receive only those benefits to which he is entitled under any retirement plan of Northfield
Bank to which he is a party.
Upon termination of the executives employment other than in connection with a change in
control or for cause, the executive agrees not to compete with Northfield Bank for a period of two
years in any city, town or county in which the executives normal business office is located and
Northfield Bank has an office or has filed an application for regulatory approval to establish an
office.
148
Potential Payments to Named Executive Officers
The following table sets forth estimates of the amounts that would be payable to the listed
individuals, under their employment agreements and stock option and restricted stock agreements in
the event of their termination of employment on December 31, 2009, under designated circumstances.
Ms. Frank is not subject to an employment contract, but is party to stock option and restricted
stock agreements. Amounts related to the acceleration of equity awards for Ms. Frank would be
$274,686 in the event of a discharge without cause or resignation with good reason with a change
in control at December 31, 2009. See note 9 to the table below for further information. The table
does not include vested or accrued benefits under qualified and non-qualified benefit plans or
qualified or non-qualified deferred compensation plans that are disclosed elsewhere in this proxy
statement. The estimates shown are highly dependent on a variety of factors, including but not
limited to the date of termination, interest rates, federal, state, and local tax rates, and
compensation history. Actual payments due could vary substantially from the estimates shown. We
consider each termination scenario listed below to be exclusive of all other scenarios and do not
expect that any of our executive officers would be eligible to collect the benefits shown under
more than one termination scenario. If an executive officer is terminated for just cause as
defined in the employment agreement, we have no contractual payment or other obligations under the
employment agreement.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mr. |
|
|
Mr. |
|
|
Mr. |
|
|
Mr. |
|
|
|
Alexander |
|
|
Klein |
|
|
Doherty |
|
|
Widmer |
|
Disability |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salary continuation (1) |
|
$ |
1,126,799 |
|
|
$ |
140,253 |
|
|
$ |
129,930 |
|
|
$ |
104,124 |
|
Medical, dental and other health
benefits (2) |
|
|
134,039 |
|
|
|
16,526 |
|
|
|
16,526 |
|
|
|
16,526 |
|
Life insurance (3) |
|
|
188,707 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
1,449,545 |
|
|
$ |
156,779 |
|
|
$ |
146,456 |
|
|
$ |
120,650 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Death |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salary (lump-sum payment) (4) |
|
$ |
676,000 |
|
|
$ |
300,000 |
|
|
$ |
280,000 |
|
|
$ |
230,000 |
|
Medical, dental and other health
benefits (4) |
|
|
16,526 |
|
|
|
16,526 |
|
|
|
16,526 |
|
|
|
16,526 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
692,526 |
|
|
$ |
316,526 |
|
|
$ |
296,526 |
|
|
$ |
246,526 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discharge Without Cause or Resignation With
Good Reason no Change in
Control (5) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salary (lump sum) |
|
$ |
2,028,000 |
|
|
$ |
900,000 |
|
|
$ |
840,000 |
|
|
$ |
690,000 |
|
Bonus (lump sum) |
|
|
311,600 |
|
|
|
154,265 |
|
|
|
127,510 |
|
|
|
107,045 |
|
Retirement contributions (lump sum) |
|
|
227,172 |
|
|
|
81,477 |
|
|
|
115,020 |
|
|
|
98,484 |
|
Medical, dental and other health
benefits (6) |
|
|
75,313 |
|
|
|
75,313 |
|
|
|
75,313 |
|
|
|
75,313 |
|
Life insurance contributions (7) |
|
|
115,205 |
|
|
|
8,247 |
|
|
|
10,309 |
|
|
|
6,322 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
2,757,290 |
|
|
$ |
1,219,302 |
|
|
$ |
1,168,152 |
|
|
$ |
977,164 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discharge Without Cause or Resignation With
Good Reason Change in Control Related (8) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salary (lump sum) |
|
$ |
2,028,000 |
|
|
$ |
900,000 |
|
|
$ |
840,000 |
|
|
$ |
690,000 |
|
Bonus (lump sum) |
|
|
507,000 |
|
|
|
279,045 |
|
|
|
209,880 |
|
|
|
185,010 |
|
Acceleration of vesting of equity awards
(9) |
|
|
3,779,435 |
|
|
|
1,794,306 |
|
|
|
1,674,320 |
|
|
|
1,375,945 |
|
Retirement contributions (lump sum) |
|
|
227,172 |
|
|
|
81,477 |
|
|
|
115,020 |
|
|
|
98,484 |
|
Medical, dental and other health benefits |
|
|
75,313 |
|
|
|
75,313 |
|
|
|
75,313 |
|
|
|
75,313 |
|
Life insurance contributions |
|
|
115,205 |
|
|
|
8,247 |
|
|
|
10,309 |
|
|
|
6,322 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
6,732,125 |
|
|
$ |
3,138,388 |
|
|
$ |
2,924,842 |
|
|
$ |
2,431,074 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
In the case of disability, Mr. Alexanders employment agreement provides for supplemental
salary continuation until the earlier of: recovery from such disability, attaining age 65, or
death. The reported figure assumes salary continuation until Mr. Alexander attains the age of
65. Mr. Klein, Mr. Doherty, and Mr. Widmer receive salary continuation benefits for one-year
following such disability. The employment agreement provides the executive with his base
salary in the first year following disability, reduced by any assumed short-term or long-term
disability insurance benefits provided under separate insurance plans we maintain. Mr.
Alexanders employment agreement provides for second-year benefits and benefits for every year
thereafter, equal to 66 2/3% of his base salary. Such amounts due under the employment
agreements are reduced by any assumed short-term or long-term disability insurance benefits
provided under separate insurance plans on a tax- |
149
|
|
|
|
|
equivalent basis (assuming a 38% tax rate), if such short-term or long-term disability benefits
are excludable for federal income tax purposes. Supplemental salary continuation benefits have
been discounted at an annual compounding rate of 2.00% for Mr. Alexander. The figures presented
for Mr. Klein, Mr. Doherty, and Mr. Widmer are presented without discount. |
|
(2) |
|
Mr. Alexanders employment agreement provides for medical, dental, and other health benefits
to him and his family, at no cost to him, until Mr. Alexander recovers from such disability,
or Mr. Alexander attains the age of 65. Mr. Kleins, Mr. Dohertys, and Mr. Widmers
employment agreements provide for one year of medical, dental, and other health benefits on
the same terms, including cost sharing by the executive, as provided to the executive prior to
his disability. The reported figure for Mr. Alexander reflects the estimated present value of
the future premium cost of such benefits, calculated utilizing substantially the same health
care cost increase assumptions we use in measuring our liability for such benefits for
financial statement purposes. For purposes of this presentation, the estimated future costs
were discounted at a 2.00% annual compounding rate. The figures presented for Mr. Klein, Mr.
Doherty, and Mr. Widmer are presented without discount. |
|
(3) |
|
Mr. Alexanders employment agreement provides for life insurance continuation benefits. Mr.
Alexander receives an annual reimbursement for a whole-life policy premium through 2014 in the
amount of $35,660. In addition, the employment agreement provides for the continuation of
group life insurance for Mr. Alexander until the earlier of: recovering from such disability
or Mr. Alexander attaining the age of 65. The reported figure in the table assumes that group
term life insurance benefits will continue until Mr. Alexander attains the age of 65, with an
assumed annual cost increase of 4% and a present value discount rate of 2.00% annual
compounding rate. The agreement in effect for Mr. Alexander provides for salary continuation
at his base salary for the first year after such disability and 66 2/3% of his base salary
after the first year. Such payments continue until Mr. Alexanders death, recovery from such
disability, or the date he attains age 65. The figures shown assume any amounts owed to Mr.
Alexander will be reduced by applicable short-term and long-term disability payments received
from insurance carriers without discount for present value. Mr. Klein, Mr. Doherty, and Mr.
Widmer are provided a salary continuation for the first year after such disability. The
figures shown assume any amounts owed will be reduced by applicable short-term and long-term
disability payments received from insurance carriers without discount for present value. |
|
(4) |
|
Each of the employment agreements provides for a lump-sum death benefit equal to one-year of
base salary for each executive. The employment agreements also provide for the continuation
of medical, dental, and other health benefits to the executives family for a period of
one-year at the same terms and cost to the executive immediately prior to his death. |
|
(5) |
|
Each of the employment agreements provides for the lump-sum payment of: three times base
salary; three times the average annual bonus/and or incentive award for three years prior to
the year of termination; and the retirement contributions or payments that we would have made
on the executives behalf, as if the executive had continued his employment for a 36-month
period, based on contributions or payments made (on an annualized basis) at the date of
termination. |
|
(6) |
|
Each of the employment agreements provides for medical, dental, and other health benefits to
the executive and his family, at no cost to the executive for a period of 36 months from the
date of termination. The reported figures reflect the estimated present value of the future
premium cost of such benefits, calculated utilizing substantially the same health care cost
increase assumptions we used in measuring our liability for such benefits for financial
statement purposes. For purposes of this presentation, the estimated future costs were
discounted at a 2.00% annual compounding rate. |
|
(7) |
|
Each of the employment agreements provides for life insurance benefits to the executive and
his family, at no cost to the executive for a period of 36 months from the date of
termination. Mr. Alexander receives an annual reimbursement of $35,660 for a whole-life
insurance policy. Mr. Alexander, Mr. Klein, Mr. Doherty, and Mr. Widmer also participate in
our group life insurance plan. The reported figures in the table assume that the
reimbursement to Mr. Alexander for his whole-life insurance policy will continue for a period
of three years. The reported figures also include the estimated costs of group term life
insurance benefits for Mr. Alexander, Mr. Klein, Mr. Doherty, and Mr. Widmer for a three year
period with an assumed annual cost increase of 4% and a present value discount rate of 2.00%
compounded annually. |
|
(8) |
|
Under each of the employment agreements, amounts payable under a change in control are
identical to those payable for Discharge Without Cause or Resignation With Good Reason no
Change in Control except that: (i) payments pertaining to bonus and/or incentive awards are
based upon the highest annual bonus and/or incentive award earned in any of the three years
preceding the year in which the termination occurs and (ii) each of the employment agreements
limits the total payments to an executive to an amount that is one dollar less than three
times the executives base amount as defined in Section 280G of the Internal Revenue Code.
The amounts presented in the table have not been reduced to reflect any cut-back required to
avoid an excess parachute payment under Section 280G of the Internal Revenue Code. |
|
(9) |
|
Amounts represent the value of unvested equity awards at December 31, 2009 calculated as the
sum of: (a) unvested restricted stock of 168,000 shares, 78,300 shares, 73,000 shares, 60,000
shares, and 13,300 shares for Mr. Alexander, Mr. Klein, Mr. Doherty, Mr. Widmer, and Ms.
Frank, respectively, multiplied by the closing price of our common stock on December 31, 2009,
of $13.52 per share; and (b) unvested stock options of 421,250 options, 205,500 options,
192,000 options, 157,750 options, and 26,500 options for Mr. Alexander, Mr. Klein, Mr.
Doherty, Mr. Widmer, and Ms. Frank, respectively, multiplied by $3.58 per option. The $3.58
value of each option represents the closing price of our common stock on December 31, 2009 of
$13.52 per share less the option exercise price of $9.94 per share. |
150
Benefits to be Considered Following Completion of the Conversion
Following the stock offering, we intend to adopt a new stock-based benefit plan that will
provide for grants of stock options and restricted common stock awards. If adopted within 12
months following the completion of the conversion, the number of shares reserved for the exercise
of stock options or available for stock awards under the stock-based benefit plan would be limited
to 10% and 4%, respectively, of the shares sold in the stock offering, subject to adjustment as may
be required by Office of Thrift Supervision regulations or policy to reflect shares of common stock
or stock options previously granted by Northfield-Federal or Northfield Bank, so that the total
shares reserved for stock options and restricted stock awards does not exceed 10% and 4%,
respectively, of Northfield-Delawares outstanding shares immediately after the conversion and
offering.
The stock-based benefit plan will not be established sooner than six months after the stock
offering and if adopted within one year after the stock offering would require the approval of a
majority of the votes eligible to be cast by stockholders. If the stock-based benefit plan is
established after one year after the stock offering, it would require the approval of our
stockholders by a majority of votes cast. The following additional restrictions would apply to our
stock-based benefit plan only if the plan is adopted within one year after the stock offering:
|
|
|
non-employee directors in the aggregate may not receive more than 30% of
the options and restricted stock awards authorized under the plan; |
|
|
|
|
any one non-employee director may not receive more than 5% of the options
and restricted stock awards authorized under the plan; |
|
|
|
|
any officer or employee may not receive more than 25% of the options and
restricted stock awards authorized under the plan; |
|
|
|
|
any tax-qualified employee stock benefit plans and management stock
benefit plans, in the aggregate, may not hold more than 10% of the shares sold in the
offering, unless Northfield Bank has tangible capital of 10% or more, in which case any
tax-qualified employee stock benefit plans and management stock benefit plans, may hold
up to 12% of the shares sold in the offering; |
|
|
|
|
the options and restricted stock awards may not vest more rapidly than 20%
per year, beginning on the first anniversary of stockholder approval of the plan; |
|
|
|
|
accelerated vesting is not permitted except for death, disability or upon
a change in control of Northfield Bank or Northfield-Delaware; and |
|
|
|
|
our executive officers or directors must exercise or forfeit their options
in the event that Northfield Bank becomes critically undercapitalized, is subject to
enforcement action or receives a capital directive. |
We have not determined whether we will present the stock-based benefit plan for stockholder
approval prior to or more than 12 months after the completion of the conversion. In the event
either federal or state regulators change their regulations or policies regarding stock-based
benefit plans, including any regulations or policies restricting the size of awards and vesting of
benefits as described above, the restrictions described above may not be applicable.
We may obtain the shares needed for our stock-based benefit plans by issuing additional shares
of common stock from authorized but unissued shares or through stock repurchases.
The actual value of the shares awarded under the stock-based benefit plan will be based in
part on the price of Northfield-Delawares common stock at the time the shares are awarded. The
stock-based benefit plan is subject to stockholder approval, and cannot be implemented until at
least six months after the offering. The following table
151
presents the total value of all shares that would be available for award and issuance under
the stock-based benefit plan, assuming the shares are awarded when the market price of our common
stock ranges from $8.00 per share to $14.00 per share.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,639,000 Shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,054,000 Shares |
|
1,240,000 Shares |
|
1,426,000 Shares |
|
Awarded at Maximum |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Awarded at Minimum |
|
Awarded at Midpoint of |
|
Awarded at Maximum |
|
of Offering Range, As |
|
|
Share Price |
|
of Offering Range |
|
Offering Range |
|
of Offering Range |
|
Adjusted |
(In thousands, except share price information) |
|
|
$ |
8.00 |
|
|
$ |
8,432 |
|
|
$ |
9,920 |
|
|
$ |
11,408 |
|
|
$ |
13,119 |
|
|
|
|
10.00 |
|
|
|
10,540 |
|
|
|
12,400 |
|
|
|
14,260 |
|
|
|
16,399 |
|
|
|
|
12.00 |
|
|
|
12,648 |
|
|
|
14,880 |
|
|
|
17,112 |
|
|
|
19,679 |
|
|
|
|
14.00 |
|
|
|
14,756 |
|
|
|
17,360 |
|
|
|
19,964 |
|
|
|
22,959 |
|
The grant-date fair value of the options granted under the stock-based benefit plan will
be based in part on the price of shares of common stock of Northfield-Delaware at the time the
options are granted. The value also will depend on the various assumptions utilized in the option
pricing model ultimately adopted. The following table presents the total estimated value of the
options to be available for grant under the stock-based benefit plan, assuming the market price and
exercise price for the stock options are equal and the range of market prices for the shares is
$8.00 per share to $14.00 per share. The Black-Scholes option pricing model provides an estimate
only of the fair value of the options, and the actual value of the options may differ significantly
from the value set forth in this table.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,635,000 Options |
|
3,100,000 Options |
|
3,565,000 Options |
|
4,099,750 Options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grant-Date Fair |
|
at Minimum of |
|
at Midpoint of |
|
at Maximum of |
|
at Maximum of |
|
|
Exercise Price |
|
Value Per Option |
|
Range |
|
Range |
|
Range |
|
Range, As Adjusted |
|
|
(In thousands, except exercise price and fair value information) |
|
|
$ |
8.00 |
|
|
$ |
2.98 |
|
|
$ |
7,852 |
|
|
$ |
9,238 |
|
|
$ |
10,624 |
|
|
$ |
12,217 |
|
|
|
|
10.00 |
|
|
|
3.73 |
|
|
|
9,829 |
|
|
|
11,563 |
|
|
|
13,297 |
|
|
|
15,092 |
|
|
|
|
12.00 |
|
|
|
4.48 |
|
|
|
11,805 |
|
|
|
13,888 |
|
|
|
15,917 |
|
|
|
18,367 |
|
|
|
|
14.00 |
|
|
|
5.22 |
|
|
|
13,755 |
|
|
|
16,182 |
|
|
|
18,609 |
|
|
|
21,401 |
|
The tables presented above are provided for informational purposes only. There can be no
assurance that our stock price will not trade below $10.00 per share. Before you make an
investment decision, we urge you to read this prospectus carefully, including, but not limited to,
the section entitled Risk Factors beginning on page 16.
152
BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP OF COMMON STOCK
The following table provides the beneficial ownership of shares of common stock of
Northfield-Federal held by our directors and executive officers, individually and as a group, and
all individuals known to management to own more than 5% of our common stock as of July 30, 2010.
Unless otherwise indicated, each of the named individuals has sole voting power and sole investment
power with respect to the number of shares shown.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of All |
|
|
Total Shares |
|
Common |
|
|
Beneficially |
|
Stock |
Name of Beneficial Owner |
|
Owned |
|
Outstanding |
Directors: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
John W. Alexander |
|
|
374,422 |
(1) |
|
|
* |
|
John R. Bowen |
|
|
57,105 |
(2) |
|
|
* |
|
Annette Catino |
|
|
83,481 |
(3) |
|
|
* |
|
Gil Chapman |
|
|
61,610 |
(4) |
|
|
* |
|
John P. Connors, Jr. |
|
|
57,145 |
(5) |
|
|
* |
|
John J. DePierro |
|
|
50,822 |
(6) |
|
|
* |
|
Susan Lamberti |
|
|
71,610 |
(7) |
|
|
* |
|
Albert J. Regen |
|
|
92,100 |
(8) |
|
|
* |
|
Patrick E. Scura, Jr. |
|
|
67,810 |
(9) |
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Executive Officers Other Than Directors: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kenneth J. Doherty |
|
|
160,398 |
(10) |
|
|
* |
|
Madeline G. Frank |
|
|
50,098 |
(11) |
|
|
* |
|
Steven M. Klein |
|
|
160,505 |
(12) |
|
|
* |
|
Michael J. Widmer |
|
|
128,810 |
(13) |
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All directors and executive officers as
a group (13 persons) |
|
|
1,415,916 |
|
|
|
3.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Northfield Bancorp, MHC
1731 Victory Boulevard
Staten Island, New York 10314 |
|
|
24,641,684 |
|
|
|
56.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Northfield Bancorp, MHC and all
directors and executive officers as a
group |
|
|
26,057,600 |
|
|
|
59.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wellington Management Company, LLP
75 State Street
Boston, MA 02109 (14) |
|
|
2,509,532 |
|
|
|
5.8 |
% |
|
|
|
* |
|
Less than 1%. |
|
(1) |
|
Includes 9,130 shares held jointly with Mr. Alexanders spouse, 28,538 shares held in Mr.
Alexanders individual retirement account accounts, 63,445 shares held by Mr. Alexanders
spouse, and 6,059 shares allocated to Mr. Alexander under Northfield Banks employee stock
ownership plan. Also includes 134,400 shares of unvested stock awards over which Mr.
Alexander has voting control and 84,250 shares that may be acquired within 60 days by
exercising options. |
|
(2) |
|
Includes 5,667 shares held in Mr. Bowens individual retirement account, 3,673 shares held by
Mr. Bowens spouse, and 6,155 shares held in Northfield Bancorp Inc.s 401(k) Plan. Also
includes 22,200 shares of unvested stock awards over which Mr. Bowen has voting control and
13,860 shares that may be acquired within 60 days by exercising options. |
|
(3) |
|
Includes 34,771 shares held jointly with Ms. Catinos spouse, 7,000 shares held in Ms.
Catinos individual retirement account, and 100 shares held in Ms. Catinos SEP account. Also
includes 22,200 shares of unvested stock awards over which Ms. Catino has voting control and
13,860 shares that may be acquired within 60 days by exercising options. |
|
(4) |
|
Includes 20,000 shares held jointly with Mr. Chapmans spouse and 5,550 shares held by Mr.
Chapmans spouse. Also includes 22,200 shares of unvested stock awards over which Mr. Chapman
has voting control and 13,860 shares that may be acquired within 60 days by exercising
options. |
|
(5) |
|
Includes 13,197 shares held in Mr. Connors individual retirement account accounts, 1,738
shares held jointly with Mr. Connors spouse, and 600 shares held by Mr. Connors spouse.
Also includes 22,200 shares of unvested stock awards over which Mr. Connors has voting control
and 13,860 shares that may be acquired within 60 days by exercising options. |
|
(6) |
|
Includes 5,392 shares held jointly with Mr. DePierros spouse. Also includes 22,200 shares
of unvested stock awards over which Mr. DePierro has voting control and 13,860 shares that may
be acquired within 60 days by exercising options. |
(footnotes continued on following page)
153
(continued from prior page)
|
|
|
(7) |
|
All shares held jointly with Ms. Lambertis spouse. Also includes 22,200 shares of unvested
stock awards over which Ms. Lamberti has voting control and 13,860 shares that may be acquired
within 60 days by exercising options. |
|
(8) |
|
Includes 13,200 shares held jointly with Mr. Regens spouse and 14,682 shares held by Mr.
Regens spouse. Also includes 22,200 shares of unvested stock awards over which Mr. Regen has
voting control. |
|
(9) |
|
Includes 22,200 shares of unvested stock awards over which Mr. Scura has voting control and
13,860 shares that may be acquired within 60 days by exercising options. |
|
(10) |
|
Includes 18,366 shares held jointly with Mr. Dohertys spouse, 1,549 shares held as custodian
for Mr. Dohertys child, 3,368 shares held by Mr. Dohertys spouse, 24,892 shares held in
Northfield Banks 401(k) Plan, and 6,059 shares allocated to Mr. Doherty under Northfield
Banks employee stock ownership plan. Also includes 58,400 shares of unvested stock awards
over which Mr. Doherty has voting control and 38,400 shares that may be acquired within 60
days by exercising options. |
|
(11) |
|
Includes 2,050 shares held by Ms. Franks child, 14,981 shares held in Northfield Banks
401(k) Plan, and 4,467 shares allocated to Ms. Frank under Northfield Banks employee stock
ownership plan. Also includes 10,640 shares of unvested stock awards over which Ms. Frank has
voting control and 5,300 shares that may be acquired within 60 days by exercising options. |
|
(12) |
|
Includes 24,751 shares held in Northfield Banks 401(k) Plan and 6,059 shares allocated to
Mr. Klein under Northfield Banks employee stock ownership plan. Also includes 62,640 shares
of unvested stock awards over which Mr. Klein has voting control and 41,100 shares that may be
acquired within 60 days by exercising options. |
|
(13) |
|
Includes 10,000 shares held jointly with Mr. Widmers spouse, 6,700 shares held by Mr.
Widmers spouse, 4,203 shares held in Mr. Widmers individual retirement account account,
14,921 shares held in Northfield Banks 401(k) Plan, and 5,833 shares allocated to Mr. Widmer
under Northfield Banks employee stock ownership plan. Also includes 48,000 shares of
unvested stock awards over which Mr. Widmer has voting control and 31,550 shares that may be
acquired within 60 days by exercising options. |
|
(14) |
|
Based on a Schedule 13-G as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 12,
2010. |
154
SUBSCRIPTIONS BY DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
The table below sets forth, for each of Northfield-Delawares directors and executive
officers, and for all of these individuals as a group, the following information:
|
(i) |
|
the number of exchange shares to be held upon completion of the conversion,
based upon their beneficial ownership of Northfield-Federal common stock as of July 30,
2010; |
|
|
(ii) |
|
the proposed purchases of subscription shares, assuming sufficient shares of
common stock are available to satisfy their subscriptions; and |
|
|
(iii) |
|
the total shares of common stock to be held upon completion of the conversion. |
In each case, it is assumed that subscription shares are sold at the minimum of the offering
range. See The Conversion and OfferingAdditional Limitations on Common Stock Purchases.
Regulations of the Office of Thrift Supervision prohibit our directors and officers from selling
the shares they purchase in the offering for one year after the date of purchase. Subscriptions by
management through our 401(k) plan are included in the proposed purchases set forth below and will
be counted as part of the maximum number of shares such individuals may subscribe for in the stock
offering and as part of the maximum number of shares directors and officers may purchase in the
stock offering.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proposed Purchases of Stock in the |
|
|
Total Common Stock to be Held at |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Offering (1) |
|
|
Minimum of Offering Range (3) |
|
|
|
Number of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage of |
|
|
|
Exchange Shares to |
|
|
Number of |
|
|
|
|
|
Number of |
|
|
Shares |
|
Name of Beneficial Owner |
|
Be Held (2) |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Outstanding |
|
John W. Alexander, Chairman of
the Board, President and Chief
Executive Officer |
|
|
400,369 |
|
|
|
25,000 |
|
|
$ |
250,000 |
|
|
|
425,369 |
|
|
|
* |
% |
John R. Bowen, Director |
|
|
61,062 |
|
|
|
2,000 |
|
|
|
20,000 |
|
|
|
63,062 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Annette Catino, Director |
|
|
89,266 |
|
|
|
5,000 |
|
|
|
50,000 |
|
|
|
94,266 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Gil Chapman, Director |
|
|
65,879 |
|
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
|
66,879 |
|
|
|
* |
|
John P. Connors, Jr., Director |
|
|
61,105 |
|
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
|
100,000 |
|
|
|
71,105 |
|
|
|
* |
|
John J. DePierro, Director |
|
|
54,343 |
|
|
|
2,000 |
|
|
|
20,000 |
|
|
|
56,343 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Susan Lamberti, Director |
|
|
76,572 |
|
|
|
5,000 |
|
|
|
50,000 |
|
|
|
81,572 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Albert J. Regen, Director |
|
|
98,482 |
|
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
|
100,000 |
|
|
|
108,482 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Patrick E. Scura, Jr. , Director |
|
|
72,509 |
|
|
|
3,000 |
|
|
|
30,000 |
|
|
|
75,509 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Kenneth J. Doherty, Executive
Vice President, Chief Lending
Officer |
|
|
171,513 |
|
|
|
5,000 |
|
|
|
50,000 |
|
|
|
176,513 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Madeline G. Frank, Senior Vice
President, Corporate Secretary |
|
|
53,569 |
|
|
|
5,000 |
|
|
|
50,000 |
|
|
|
58,569 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Steven M. Klein, Executive Vice
President, Chief Financial
Officer |
|
|
171,627 |
|
|
|
6,000 |
|
|
|
60,000 |
|
|
|
177,627 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Michael J. Widmer, Executive
Vice President, Operations |
|
|
137,736 |
|
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
|
100,000 |
|
|
|
147,736 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total for Directors and
Executive Officers |
|
|
1,514,032 |
|
|
|
89,000 |
|
|
$ |
890,000 |
|
|
|
1,603,032 |
|
|
|
3.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Less than 1%. |
|
(1) |
|
Includes proposed subscriptions, if any, by associates. |
|
(2) |
|
Based on information presented in Beneficial Ownership of Common Stock, and assuming an
exchange ratio of 1.0693 at the minimum of the offering range. |
|
(3) |
|
At the maximum of the offering range, directors and executive officers would own 2,062,866
shares, or 3.3% of our outstanding shares of common stock. |
155
THE CONVERSION AND OFFERING
The Board of Directors of Northfield-Federal and the Board of Trustees of Northfield Bancorp,
MHC have approved the plan of conversion and reorganization. The plan of conversion and
reorganization must also be approved by the members of Northfield Bancorp, MHC (depositors of
Northfield Bank) and the stockholders of Northfield-Federal. A special meeting of members and a
special meeting of stockholders have been called for this purpose. The Office of Thrift Supervision
has conditionally approved the plan of conversion and reorganization; however, such approval does
not constitute a recommendation or endorsement of the plan of conversion and reorganization by that
agency.
General
The respective Boards of Directors of Northfield Bancorp, MHC and Northfield-Federal adopted
the plan of conversion and reorganization on June 4, 2010. Pursuant to the plan of conversion and
reorganization, our organization will convert from the mutual holding company form of organization
to the fully stock form. Northfield Bancorp, MHC, the mutual holding company parent of
Northfield-Federal, will be merged into Northfield-Federal, and Northfield Bancorp, MHC will no
longer exist. Northfield-Federal, which owns 100% of Northfield Bank, will be merged into a new
Delaware corporation named Northfield Bancorp, Inc. As part of the conversion, the 56.6% ownership
interest of Northfield Bancorp, MHC in Northfield-Federal will be offered for sale in the stock
offering. When the conversion is completed, all of the outstanding common stock of Northfield Bank
will be owned by Northfield-Delaware, and all of the outstanding common stock of
Northfield-Delaware will be owned by public stockholders. Northfield Bancorp, MHC and
Northfield-Federal will cease to exist. A diagram of our corporate structure before and after the
conversion is set forth in the Summary section of this prospectus.
Under the plan of conversion and reorganization, at the completion of the conversion and
offering, each share of Northfield-Federal common stock owned by persons other than Northfield
Bancorp, MHC will be converted automatically into the right to receive new shares of
Northfield-Delaware common stock determined pursuant to an exchange ratio. The exchange ratio will
ensure that immediately after the exchange of existing shares of Northfield-Federal for new shares,
the public stockholders will own the same aggregate percentage of shares of common stock of
Northfield-Delaware that they owned in Northfield-Federal immediately prior to the conversion,
excluding any shares they purchased in the offering and their receipt of cash paid in lieu of
fractional shares.
We intend to retain between $116.5 million and $181.7 million of the net proceeds of the
offering and to invest between $127.0 million and $198.1 million of the net proceeds in Northfield
Bank. The conversion will be consummated only upon the issuance of at least the minimum number of
shares of our common stock offered pursuant to the plan of conversion and reorganization.
The plan of conversion and reorganization provides that we will offer shares of common stock
for sale in the subscription offering to eligible account holders, our tax-qualified employee
benefit plans, including our employee stock ownership plan and 401(k) plan, supplemental eligible
account holders and other members. In addition, we will offer common stock for sale in a community
offering to members of the general public, with a preference given in the following order:
|
(i) |
|
Natural persons (including trusts of natural persons) residing in the New
Jersey Counties of Bergen, Essex, Hudson, Hunterdon, Middlesex, Monmouth, Morris,
Ocean, Passaic, Somerset, Sussex and Union, the New York Counties of Bronx, Kings,
Nassau, New York, Putnam, Queens, Richmond, Rockland, Suffolk and Westchester, and Pike
County, Pennsylvania; and |
|
|
(ii) |
|
Northfield-Federals public stockholders as of July 30, 2010. |
We have the right to accept or reject, in whole or in part, any orders to purchase shares of
the common stock received in the community offering. The community offering will begin at the same
time as the subscription offering and must be completed within 45 days after the completion of the
subscription offering unless otherwise extended by the Office of Thrift Supervision. See
Community Offering.
156
We also may offer for sale shares of common stock not purchased in the subscription or
community offerings through a syndicated community offering to be managed by Sandler ONeill &
Partners, L.P. See Syndicated Community Offering herein.
We determined the number of shares of common stock to be offered in the offering based upon an
independent valuation appraisal of the estimated pro forma market value of Northfield-Delaware.
All shares of common stock to be sold in the offering will be sold at $10.00 per share. Investors
will not be charged a commission to purchase shares of common stock. The independent valuation
will be updated and the final number of the shares of common stock to be issued in the offering
will be determined at the completion of the offering. See Stock Pricing and Number of Shares to
be Issued for more information as to the determination of the estimated pro forma market value of
the common stock.
The following is a brief summary of the conversion and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to the provisions of the plan of conversion and reorganization. A copy of the plan of
conversion and reorganization is available for inspection at each branch office of Northfield Bank
and at the Northeast Regional and the Washington, D.C. offices of the Office of Thrift Supervision.
The plan of conversion and reorganization is also filed as an exhibit to Northfield Bancorp, MHCs
application to convert from mutual to stock form of which this prospectus is a part, copies of
which may be obtained from the Office of Thrift Supervision. The plan of conversion and
reorganization is also filed as an exhibit to the registration statement we have filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission, of which this prospectus is a part, copies of which may be
obtained from the Securities and Exchange Commission or online at the Securities and Exchange
Commissions website, www.sec.gov. See Where You Can Find Additional Information.
Reasons for the Conversion
Our primary reasons for converting and undertaking the stock offering are to:
|
|
|
eliminate the uncertainties associated with the mutual holding company
structure under recently enacted financial reform legislation. As a federal mutual
holding company, we are currently regulated by the Office of Thrift Supervision. The
recently enacted Dodd-Frank Act will change our primary bank and holding company
regulator, which would likely result in changes in regulations applicable to us,
including regulations governing mutual holding companies and conversions to stock form.
Under the Dodd-Frank Act, the Federal Reserve Board will become the sole federal
regulator of all holding companies, including mutual holding companies, and the Federal
Reserve Board historically has not allowed mutual holding companies to waive the
receipt of dividends from their mid-tier holding company subsidiaries. Although
Northfield Bancorp, MHC is considered a grandfathered mutual holding company under
the Dodd-Frank Act, it is not clear how the Federal Reserve Board will evaluate
dividend waivers by grandfathered mutual holding companies and whether the Federal
Reserve Board would require any future waived dividends to be taken into account in
determining an appropriate exchange ratio, which would result in dilution to the
ownership interests of minority stockholders in the event of a second-step conversion
to stock form. The conversion will eliminate our mutual holding company structure and
any regulatory uncertainty associated with dividend waivers by our mutual holding
company, as well as the treatment of waived dividends in a conversion of our mutual
holding company to stock form. |
|
|
|
|
increase our capital. While Northfield Bank currently exceeds all
regulatory capital requirements and is not subject to any directive or recommendation
from any banking regulatory agency to raise capital, the proceeds from the sale of
common stock will increase our capital during a period of significant economic and
regulatory uncertainty, particularly for the financial services industry. |
|
|
|
|
transition us to a more familiar and flexible organizational structure.
The stock holding company structure is a more familiar form of organization, which we
believe will make our common stock more appealing to investors, and will give us
greater flexibility to structure mergers |
157
|
|
|
and acquisitions and to access the capital markets through possible future equity
and debt offerings, although we have no current plans, agreements or understandings
regarding any mergers and acquisitions or additional securities offerings. |
|
|
|
|
improve the liquidity of our shares of common stock. The larger number of
shares that will be outstanding after completion of the conversion and offering is
expected to result in a more liquid and active market than currently exists for
Northfield-Federal common stock. A more liquid and active market would make it easier
for our stockholders to buy and sell our common stock and would give us greater
flexibility in implementing capital management strategies. |
|
|
|
|
support future mergers and acquisitions. Although we do not currently
have any understandings or agreements regarding any specific acquisition transaction,
the additional capital raised in the offering may help support, and make us a more
attractive and competitive bidder for, mergers and acquisitions of other financial
institutions, as opportunities arise. |
Approvals Required
The affirmative vote of a majority of the total votes eligible to be cast by the members of
Northfield Bancorp, MHC is required to approve the plan of conversion and reorganization. By their
approval of the plan of conversion and reorganization, the members of Northfield Bancorp, MHC will
also be approving the merger of Northfield Bancorp, MHC into Northfield-Federal. The affirmative
vote of the holders of at least two-thirds of the outstanding shares of common stock of
Northfield-Federal and the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares
of common stock of Northfield-Federal held by the public stockholders of Northfield-Federal are
also required to approve the plan of conversion and reorganization. The plan of conversion and
reorganization also must be approved by the Office of Thrift Supervision, which has given its
conditional approval.
Share Exchange Ratio for Current Stockholders
Office of Thrift Supervision regulations provide that in a conversion of a mutual holding
company to fully stock form, the public stockholders will be entitled to exchange their shares for
common stock of the new holding company, provided that the mutual holding company demonstrates to
the satisfaction of the Office of Thrift Supervision that the basis for the exchange is fair and
reasonable. At the completion of the conversion, each publicly held share of Northfield-Federal
common stock will be converted automatically into the right to receive a number of shares of
Northfield-Delaware common stock. The number of shares of common stock will be determined pursuant
to the exchange ratio, which ensures that the public stockholders will own the same percentage of
common stock in Northfield-Delaware after the conversion as they held in Northfield-Federal
immediately prior to the conversion, exclusive of their purchase of additional shares of common
stock in the offering and their receipt of cash in lieu of fractional exchange shares. The exchange
ratio will not depend on the market value of Northfield-Delaware common stock. The exchange ratio
will be based on the percentage of Northfield-Federal common stock held by the public, the
independent valuation of Northfield-Delaware prepared by RP Financial, LC., and the number of
shares of common stock issued in the offering. The exchange ratio is expected to range from
approximately 1.0693 exchange shares for each publicly held share of Northfield-Federal at the
minimum of the offering range to 1.6637 exchange shares for each publicly held share of
Northfield-Federal at the adjusted maximum of the offering range.
158
The following table shows how the exchange ratio will adjust, based on the number of shares of
common stock issued in the offering. The table also shows how many shares of Northfield-Delaware a
hypothetical owner of Northfield-Federal common stock would receive in the exchange for 100 shares
of common stock owned at the completion of the conversion, depending on the number of shares issued
in the offering.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equivalent |
|
Equivalent |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Shares |
|
|
|
|
|
Value of |
|
Pro Forma |
|
Shares to |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares of Northfield-Delaware |
|
of Common |
|
|
|
|
|
Shares |
|
Tangible |
|
be |
|
|
Shares to be Sold in |
|
to be Issued for Shares of |
|
Stock to be |
|
|
|
|
|
Based |
|
Book |
|
Received |
|
|
This Offering |
|
Northfield-Federal |
|
Issued in |
|
|
|
|
|
Upon |
|
Value Per |
|
for 100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent |
|
|
|
|
|
Percent |
|
Exchange and |
|
Exchange |
|
Offering |
|
Exchanged |
|
Existing |
|
|
Amount |
|
(1) |
|
Amount |
|
(1) |
|
Offering |
|
Ratio |
|
Price (2) |
|
Share (3) |
|
Shares |
Minimum |
|
|
26,350,000 |
|
|
|
56.6 |
% |
|
|
20,209,164 |
|
|
|
43.4 |
% |
|
|
46,559,164 |
|
|
|
1.0693 |
|
|
$ |
10.69 |
|
|
$ |
14.08 |
|
|
|
106 |
|
Midpoint |
|
|
31,000,000 |
|
|
|
56.6 |
|
|
|
23,775,487 |
|
|
|
43.4 |
|
|
|
54,775,487 |
|
|
|
1.2580 |
|
|
|
12.58 |
|
|
|
15.03 |
|
|
|
125 |
|
Maximum |
|
|
35,650,000 |
|
|
|
56.6 |
|
|
|
27,341,810 |
|
|
|
43.4 |
|
|
|
62,991,810 |
|
|
|
1.4467 |
|
|
|
14.47 |
|
|
|
15.99 |
|
|
|
144 |
|
Adjusted Maximum |
|
|
40,997,500 |
|
|
|
56.6 |
|
|
|
31,443,082 |
|
|
|
43.4 |
|
|
|
72,440,582 |
|
|
|
1.6637 |
|
|
|
16.64 |
|
|
|
17.07 |
|
|
|
166 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Ownership percentages reflect shares outstanding as of July 30, 2010. |
|
(2) |
|
Represents the value of shares of Northfield-Delaware common stock to be received in the
conversion by a holder of one share of Northfield-Federal, pursuant to the exchange ratio,
based upon the $10.00 per share offering price. |
|
(3) |
|
Represents the pro forma tangible book value per share at each level of the offering range
multiplied by the respective exchange ratio. |
Options to purchase shares of Northfield-Federal common stock that are outstanding
immediately prior to the completion of the conversion will be converted into options to purchase
shares of Northfield-Delaware common stock, with the number of shares subject to the option and the
exercise price per share to be adjusted based upon the exchange ratio. The aggregate exercise
price, term and vesting period of the options will remain unchanged.
Exchange of Existing Stockholders Stock Certificates
The conversion of existing outstanding shares of Northfield-Federal common stock into the
right to receive shares of Northfield-Delaware common stock will occur automatically at the
completion of the conversion. As soon as practicable after the completion of the conversion, our
exchange agent will send a transmittal form to each public stockholder of Northfield-Federal who
holds physical stock certificates. The transmittal forms will contain instructions on how to
exchange stock certificates of Northfield-Federal common stock for stock certificates of
Northfield-Delaware common stock. We expect that stock certificates evidencing shares of
Northfield-Delaware common stock will be distributed within five business days after the exchange
agent receives properly executed transmittal forms, Northfield-Federal stock certificates and other
required documents. Shares held by public stockholders in street name (such as in a brokerage
account) will be exchanged automatically upon the completion of the conversion; no transmittal
forms will be mailed relating to these shares.
No fractional shares of Northfield-Delaware common stock will be issued to any public
stockholder of Northfield-Federal when the conversion is completed. For each fractional share that
would otherwise be issued to a stockholder who holds a stock certificate, we will pay by check an
amount equal to the product obtained by multiplying the fractional share interest to which the
holder would otherwise be entitled by the $10.00 offering purchase price per share. Payment for
fractional shares will be made as soon as practicable after the receipt by the exchange agent of
the transmittal forms and the surrendered Northfield-Federal stock certificates. If your shares of
common stock are held in street name, you will automatically receive cash in lieu of fractional
shares in your account.
You should not forward your stock certificates until you have received transmittal forms,
which will include forwarding instructions. After the conversion, stockholders will not receive
shares of Northfield-Delaware common stock and will not be paid dividends on the shares of
Northfield-Delaware common stock until existing certificates representing shares of
Northfield-Federal common stock are surrendered for exchange in compliance with the terms of the
transmittal form. When stockholders surrender their certificates, any unpaid
159
dividends will be paid without interest. For all other purposes, however, each certificate
that represents shares of Northfield-Federal common stock outstanding at the effective date of the
conversion will be considered to evidence ownership of shares of Northfield-Delaware common stock
into which those shares have been converted by virtue of the conversion.
If a certificate for Northfield-Federal common stock has been lost, stolen or destroyed, our
exchange agent will issue a new stock certificate upon receipt of appropriate evidence as to the
loss, theft or destruction of the certificate, appropriate evidence as to the ownership of the
certificate by the claimant, and appropriate and customary indemnification, which is normally
effected by the purchase of a bond from a surety company at the stockholders expense.
All shares of Northfield-Delaware common stock that we issue in exchange for existing shares
of Northfield-Federal common stock will be considered to have been issued in full satisfaction of
all rights pertaining to such shares of common stock, subject, however, to our obligation to pay
any dividends or make any other distributions with a record date prior to the effective date of the
conversion that may have been declared by us on or prior to the effective date, and which remain
unpaid at the effective date.
Effects of Conversion on Depositors, Borrowers and Members
Continuity. The conversion will not affect the normal business of Northfield Bank of accepting
deposits and making loans. Northfield Bank will continue to be a federally chartered savings bank
and will continue to be regulated by the Office of Thrift Supervision. After the conversion,
Northfield Bank will continue to offer existing services to depositors, borrowers and other
customers. The directors serving Northfield-Federal at the time of the conversion will be the
directors of Northfield-Delaware after the conversion.
Effect on Deposit Accounts. Pursuant to the plan of conversion and reorganization, each
depositor of Northfield Bank at the time of the conversion will automatically continue as a
depositor after the conversion, and the deposit balance, interest rate and other terms of such
deposit accounts will not change as a result of the conversion. Each such account will be insured
by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation to the same extent as before the conversion.
Depositors will continue to hold their existing certificates, passbooks and other evidences of
their accounts.
Effect on Loans. No loan outstanding from Northfield Bank will be affected by the conversion,
and the amount, interest rate, maturity and security for each loan will remain as it was
contractually fixed prior to the conversion.
Effect on Voting Rights of Members. At present, all depositors of Northfield Bank are members
of, and have voting rights in, Northfield Bancorp, MHC as to all matters requiring membership
action. Upon completion of the conversion, depositors will cease to be members of Northfield
Bancorp, MHC and will no longer have voting rights. Upon completion of the conversion, all voting
rights in Northfield Bank will be vested in Northfield-Delaware as the sole stockholder of
Northfield Bank. The stockholders of Northfield-Delaware will possess exclusive voting rights
with respect to Northfield-Delaware common stock.
Tax Effects. We will receive an opinion of counsel or tax advisor with regard to federal and
state income tax consequences of the conversion to the effect that the conversion will not be a
taxable transaction for federal or state income tax purposes to Northfield Bancorp, MHC,
Northfield-Federal, the public stockholders of Northfield-Federal (except for cash paid for
fractional shares), members of Northfield Bancorp, MHC, eligible account holders, supplemental
eligible account holders, or Northfield Bank. See Material Income Tax Consequences.
Effect on Liquidation Rights. Each depositor in Northfield Bank has both a deposit account in
Northfield Bank and a pro rata ownership interest in the net worth of Northfield Bancorp, MHC based
upon the deposit balance in his or her account. This ownership interest is tied to the depositors
account and has no tangible market value separate from the deposit account. This interest may only
be realized in the event of a complete liquidation of Northfield Bancorp, MHC and Northfield Bank.
Any depositor who opens a deposit account obtains a pro rata
160
ownership interest in Northfield Bancorp, MHC without any additional payment beyond the amount
of the deposit. A depositor who reduces or closes his or her account receives a portion or all of
the balance in the deposit account but nothing for his or her ownership interest in the net worth
of Northfield Bancorp, MHC, which is lost to the extent that the balance in the account is reduced
or closed.
Consequently, depositors in a stock subsidiary of a mutual holding company normally have no
way of realizing the value of their ownership interest, which has realizable value only in the
unlikely event that Northfield Bancorp, MHC and Northfield Bank are liquidated. If this occurs, the
depositors of record at that time, as owners, would share pro rata in any residual surplus and
reserves of Northfield Bancorp, MHC after other claims, including claims of depositors to the
amounts of their deposits, are paid.
Under the plan of conversion, Eligible Account Holders and Supplemental Eligible Account
Holders will receive an interest in liquidation accounts maintained by Northfield-Delaware and
Northfield Bank in an aggregate amount equal to (i) Northfield Bancorp, MHCs ownership interest in
Northfield-Federals total stockholders equity as of the date of the latest statement of financial
condition used in this prospectus plus (ii) the value of the net assets of Northfield Bancorp, MHC
as of the date of the latest statement of financial condition of Northfield Bancorp, MHC prior to
the consummation of the conversion (excluding its ownership of Northfield-Federal).
Northfield-Delaware and Northfield Bank will hold the liquidation accounts for the benefit of
Eligible Account Holders and Supplemental Eligible Account Holders who continue to maintain
deposits in Northfield Bank after the conversion. The liquidation accounts would be distributed to
Eligible Account Holders and Supplemental Eligible Account Holders who maintain their deposit
accounts in Northfield Bank only in the event of a liquidation of (a) Northfield-Delaware and
Northfield Bank or (b) Northfield Bank. The liquidation account in Northfield Bank would be used
only in the event that Northfield-Delaware does not have sufficient assets to fund its obligations
under its liquidation account. The total obligation of Northfield-Delaware and Northfield Bank
under their respective liquidation accounts will never exceed the dollar amount of
Northfield-Delawares liquidation account as adjusted from time to time pursuant to the plan of
conversion and Office of Thrift Supervision regulations. See Liquidation Rights.
Stock Pricing and Number of Shares to be Issued
The plan of conversion and reorganization and federal regulations require that the aggregate
purchase price of the common stock sold in the offering must be based on the appraised pro forma
market value of the common stock, as determined by an independent valuation. We have retained RP
Financial, LC. to prepare an independent valuation appraisal. For its services in preparing the
initial valuation, RP Financial, LC. will receive a fee of $135,000, as well as payment for
reimbursable expenses and an additional $15,000 for each valuation update, as necessary. We have
agreed to indemnify RP Financial, LC. and its employees and affiliates against specified losses,
including any losses in connection with claims under the federal securities laws, arising out of
its services as independent appraiser, except where such liability results from RP Financial, LC.s
bad faith or negligence.
The independent valuation was prepared by RP Financial, LC. in reliance upon the information
contained in this prospectus, including the consolidated financial statements of
Northfield-Federal. RP Financial, LC. also considered the following factors, among others:
|
|
|
the present results and financial condition of Northfield-Federal and the
projected results and financial condition of Northfield-Delaware; |
|
|
|
|
the economic and demographic conditions in Northfield-Federals existing
market area; |
|
|
|
|
certain historical, financial and other information relating to
Northfield-Federal; |
|
|
|
|
a comparative evaluation of the operating and financial characteristics of
Northfield-Federal with those of other similarly situated publicly traded savings
institutions located in the Eastern United States; |
161
|
|
|
the effect of the conversion and offering on Northfield-Delawares
stockholders equity and earnings potential; |
|
|
|
|
the proposed dividend policy of Northfield-Delaware; and |
|
|
|
|
the trading market for securities of comparable institutions and general
conditions in the market for such securities. |
The independent valuation appraisal considered the pro forma effect of the offering.
Consistent with the Office of Thrift Supervision appraisal guidelines, the appraisal applied three
primary methodologies: (i) the pro forma price-to-book value approach applied to both reported
book value and tangible book value; (ii) the pro forma price-to-earnings approach applied to
reported and core earnings; and (iii) the pro forma price-to-assets approach. The market value
ratios applied in the three methodologies were based on the current market valuations of the peer
group companies. RP Financial, LC. placed the greatest emphasis on the price-to-earnings and
price-to-book approaches in estimating pro forma market value. RP Financial, LC. did not consider
a pro forma price to assets approach to be meaningful in preparing the appraisal, as this approach
is more meaningful when a company has low equity or earnings. The price to assets approach is less
meaningful for a company like us, as we have equity in excess of regulatory capital requirements
and positive reported and core earnings.
In applying each of the valuation methods, RP Financial considered adjustments to the pro
forma market value based on a comparison of Northfield-Delaware with the peer group. RP Financial,
LC. made a slight upward adjustment for profitability, growth and viability of earnings, a moderate
upward adjustment for asset growth and a moderate downward adjustment for marketing of the issue.
No adjustments were made for financial condition, primary market area, dividends, liquidity of the
issue, management and effect of governmental regulations and regulatory reform. The upward
adjustment for profitability, growth and viability of earnings was based primarily on
Northfield-Federals more favorable efficiency ratio, historically more favorable interest rate
risk characteristics, the greater earnings potential derived from reinvestment of the net proceeds
from the offering and growth in the branch network, all as compared to the peer group. The
downward adjustment for marketing of the issue was initially based primarily on the potential
discounting required to complete the offering relative to the pricing of the seasoned peer group
companies and recent trends in the marketing of thrift stocks. The updated appraisal further noted
recent adverse trends in the pricing of the stocks of the peer group, the marketing of thrift
stocks and the recent stock performance of Northfield-Federal.
Included in RP Financial, LC.s independent valuation were certain assumptions as to the pro
forma earnings of Northfield-Delaware after the conversion that were utilized in determining the
appraised value. These assumptions included estimated expenses, an assumed after-tax rate of
return of 1.53% for the twelve months ended March 31, 2010 on the net offering proceeds and
purchases in the open market of 4% of the common stock issued in the offering by the stock-based
benefit plan at the $10.00 per share purchase price. See Pro Forma Data for additional
information concerning these assumptions. The use of different assumptions may yield different
results.
The independent valuation states that as of May 14, 2010, and updated as of July 16, 2010, the
estimated pro forma market value of Northfield-Delaware was $547.8 million. Based on Office of
Thrift Supervision regulations, this market value forms the midpoint of a range with a minimum of
$465.6 million and a maximum of $629.9 million. The board of directors decided to offer the shares
of common stock for a price of $10.00 per share primarily because it is the price most commonly
used in mutual-to-stock conversions of financial institutions. The aggregate offering price of the
shares will be equal to the valuation range multiplied by the percentage of Northfield-Federal
common stock owned by Northfield Bancorp, MHC. The number of shares offered will be equal to the
aggregate offering price of the shares divided by the price per share. Based on the valuation
range, the percentage of Northfield-Federal common stock owned by Northfield Bancorp, MHC and the
$10.00 price per share, the minimum of the offering range will be 26,350,000 shares, the midpoint
of the offering range will be 31,000,000 shares and the maximum of the offering range will be
35,650,000 shares.
162
The board of directors of Northfield-Delaware reviewed the independent valuation and, in
particular, considered the following:
|
|
|
Northfield-Federals financial condition and results of operations; |
|
|
|
|
a comparison of financial performance ratios of Northfield-Federal to
those of other financial institutions of similar size; |
|
|
|
|
market conditions generally and in particular for financial institutions;
and |
|
|
|
|
the historical trading price of the publicly held shares of
Northfield-Federal common stock. |
All of these factors are set forth in the independent valuation. The board of directors also
reviewed the methodology and the assumptions used by RP Financial, LC. in preparing the independent
valuation and believes that such assumptions were reasonable. The offering range may be amended
with the approval of the Office of Thrift Supervision, if required, as a result of subsequent
developments in the financial condition of Northfield-Federal or Northfield Bank or market
conditions generally. In the event the independent valuation is updated to amend the pro forma
market value of Northfield-Delaware to less than $465.6 million or more than $724.4 million, the
appraisal will be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission by a post-effective amendment
to Northfield-Delawares registration statement.
The following table presents a summary of selected pricing ratios for the peer group companies
based on earnings and other information as of and for the twelve months ended March 31, 2010, and
stock price information for the peer group companies as of July 16, 2010, as reflected in the
updated appraisal report. The summary pricing ratios for Northfield-Delaware (on a pro forma
basis) are based on earnings and other information as of and for the twelve months ended June 30,
2010 as reflected in the updated appraisal. Compared to the average pricing of the peer group, our
pro forma pricing ratios at the midpoint of the offering range indicated a discount of 18.3% on a
price-to-book value basis, a discount of 28.7% on a price-to-tangible book value basis and a
premium of 53.8% on a price-to-earnings basis. Our board of directors, in reviewing and approving
the appraisal, considered the range of price-to-earnings multiples and the range of price-to-book
value and price-to-tangible book value ratios at the different amounts of shares to be sold in the
offering. The appraisal did not consider one valuation approach to be more important than the
other. The estimated appraised value and the resulting premium/discount took into consideration
the potential financial effect of the conversion and offering as well as the trading price of
Northfield-Federals common stock. The closing price of the common stock was $14.58 per share on
June 3, 2010, the last trading day immediately preceding the announcement of the conversion, and
$12.44 per share on July 16, 2010, the effective date of the updated appraisal.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Price-to-earnings |
|
Price-to-book |
|
Price-to-tangible |
|
|
multiple (1) (2) |
|
value ratio (2) |
|
book value ratio (2) |
Northfield-Delaware
(on a pro forma
basis, assuming
completion of the
conversion) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted Maximum |
|
|
51.38x |
|
|
|
94.88 |
% |
|
|
96.99 |
% |
Maximum |
|
|
44.83x |
|
|
|
88.03 |
% |
|
|
90.01 |
% |
Midpoint |
|
|
39.10x |
|
|
|
81.23 |
% |
|
|
83.19 |
% |
Minimum |
|
|
33.34x |
|
|
|
73.53 |
% |
|
|
75.47 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Valuation of peer
group companies, all
of which are fully
converted (on an
historical basis) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Averages |
|
|
25.42x |
|
|
|
99.38 |
% |
|
|
116.16 |
% |
Medians |
|
|
24.15x |
|
|
|
98.76 |
% |
|
|
120.36 |
% |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Price-to-earnings multiples calculated by RP Financial, LC. in the independent appraisal are
based on an estimate of core, or recurring, earnings. These ratios are different than those
presented in Pro Forma Data. |
|
(2) |
|
Pro forma pricing ratios for Northfield-Delaware are based on financial information through
June 30, 2010. These ratios are different than those presented in Pro Forma Data. |
163
The independent valuation is not intended, and must not be construed, as a recommendation
of any kind as to the advisability of purchasing our shares of common stock. RP Financial, LC. did
not independently verify our consolidated financial statements and other information that we
provided to them, nor did RP Financial, LC. independently value our assets or liabilities. The
independent valuation considers Northfield Bank as a going concern and should not be considered as
an indication of the liquidation value of Northfield Bank. Moreover, because the valuation is
necessarily based upon estimates and projections of a number of matters, all of which may change
from time to time, no assurance can be given that persons purchasing our common stock in the
offering will thereafter be able to sell their shares at prices at or above the $10.00 price per
share.
Following commencement of the subscription offering, the maximum of the valuation range may be
increased by up to 15%, or up to $724.4 million, without resoliciting subscribers, which will
result in a corresponding increase of up to 15% in the maximum of the offering range to up to
40,997,500 shares, to reflect changes in the market and financial conditions or demand for the
shares. We will not decrease the minimum of the valuation range and the minimum of the offering
range without a resolicitation of subscribers. The subscription price of $10.00 per share will
remain fixed. See Additional Limitations on Common Stock Purchases as to the method of
distribution of additional shares to be issued in the event of an increase in the offering range of
up to 40,997,500 shares.
If the update to the independent valuation at the conclusion of the offering results in an
increase in the maximum of the valuation range to more than $724.4 million and a corresponding
increase in the offering range to more than 40,997,500 shares, or a decrease in the minimum of the
valuation range to less than $465.6 million and a corresponding decrease in the offering range to
fewer than 26,350,000 shares, then we will promptly return with interest at 0.25% per annum all
funds previously delivered to us to purchase shares of common stock in the subscription and
community offerings and cancel deposit account withdrawal authorizations and, after consulting with
the Office of Thrift Supervision, we may terminate the plan of conversion and reorganization.
Alternatively, we may establish a new offering range, extend the offering period and commence a
resolicitation of purchasers or take other actions as permitted by the Office of Thrift Supervision
in order to complete the offering. In the event that we extend the offering and conduct a
resolicitation, we will notify subscribers of the extension of time and of the rights of
subscribers to place a new stock order for a specified period of time. Any single offering
extension will not exceed 90 days; aggregate extensions may not conclude beyond September 27, 2012,
which is two years after the special meeting of members to vote on the conversion.
An increase in the number of shares to be issued in the offering would decrease both a
subscribers ownership interest and Northfield-Delawares pro forma earnings and stockholders
equity on a per share basis while increasing pro forma earnings and stockholders equity on an
aggregate basis. A decrease in the number of shares to be issued in the offering would increase
both a subscribers ownership interest and Northfield-Delawares pro forma earnings and
stockholders equity on a per share basis, while decreasing pro forma earnings and stockholders
equity on an aggregate basis. For a presentation of the effects of these changes, see Pro Forma
Data.
Copies of the independent valuation appraisal report of RP Financial, LC. and the detailed
memorandum setting forth the method and assumptions used in the appraisal report are available for
inspection at the main office of Northfield Bank and as specified under Where You Can Find
Additional Information.
Subscription Offering and Subscription Rights
In accordance with the plan of conversion and reorganization, rights to subscribe for shares
of common stock in the subscription offering have been granted in the following descending order of
priority. The filling of all subscriptions that we receive will depend on the availability of
common stock after satisfaction of all subscriptions of all persons having prior rights in the
subscription offering and to the maximum, minimum and overall purchase and ownership limitations
set forth in the plan of conversion and reorganization and as described below under Additional
Limitations on Common Stock Purchases.
164
Priority 1: Eligible Account Holders. Each Northfield Bank depositor with aggregate deposit
account balances of $50.00 or more (a Qualifying Deposit) at the close of business on March 31,
2009 (an Eligible Account Holder) will receive, without payment therefor, nontransferable
subscription rights to purchase up to $3.0 million (300,000 shares) of our common stock, subject to
the overall purchase limitations. See Additional Limitations on Common Stock Purchases. If
there are not sufficient shares available to satisfy all subscriptions, shares will first be
allocated so as to permit each Eligible Account Holder to purchase a number of shares sufficient to
make his or her total allocation equal to the lesser of 100 shares or the number of shares for
which he or she subscribed. Thereafter, any remaining shares will be allocated to each Eligible
Account Holder whose subscription remains unfilled in the proportion that the amount of his or her
Qualifying Deposit bears to the total amount of Qualifying Deposits of all subscribing Eligible
Account Holders whose subscriptions remain unfilled. If an amount so allocated exceeds the amount
subscribed for by any one or more Eligible Account Holders, the excess shall be reallocated among
those Eligible Account Holders whose subscriptions are not fully satisfied until all available
shares have been allocated.
To ensure proper allocation of our shares of common stock, each Eligible Account Holder must
list on his or her stock order form all deposit accounts in which he or she has an ownership
interest on March 31, 2009. In the event of an oversubscription, failure to list an account could
result in fewer shares being allocated than if all accounts had been disclosed. In the event of an
oversubscription, the subscription rights of Eligible Account Holders who are also directors or
executive officers of Northfield-Federal or their associates will be subordinated to the
subscription rights of other Eligible Account Holders to the extent attributable to their increased
deposits in the 12 months preceding March 31, 2009.
Priority 2: Tax-Qualified Plans. Our tax-qualified employee plans, including our employee
stock ownership plan and 401(k) plan, will receive, without payment therefor, nontransferable
subscription rights to purchase in the aggregate up to 10% of the shares of common stock sold in
the offering, although our employee stock ownership plan intends to purchase 4% of the shares of
common stock sold in the offering. We reserve the right to have our employee stock ownership plan
purchase more than 4% of the stock sold in the offering to the extent necessary to complete the
offering at the minimum of the offering range. If market conditions warrant, in the judgment of
its trustees, the employee stock ownership plan may instead elect to purchase shares in the open
market following the completion of the conversion, subject to the approval of the Office of Thrift
Supervision. The amount of the subscription requests by the 401(k) plan will be determined by its
participants, who will have the right to invest all or a portion of their 401(k) plan accounts in
our common stock, subject to the maximum purchase limitations. However, to comply with the
limitations applicable to our tax-qualified employee plans, our 401(k) plan may purchase no more
than 6% of the shares of common stock sold in the offering.
Priority 3: Supplemental Eligible Account Holders. To the extent that there are sufficient
shares of common stock remaining after satisfaction of subscriptions by Eligible Account Holders
and our tax-qualified employee stock benefit plans, each Northfield Bank depositor with a
Qualifying Deposit at the close of business on June 30, 2010 who is not an Eligible Account Holder
(Supplemental Eligible Account Holder) will receive, without payment therefor, nontransferable
subscription rights to purchase up to $3.0 million (300,000 shares) of common stock, subject to the
overall purchase limitations. See Additional Limitations on Common Stock Purchases. If there
are not sufficient shares available to satisfy all subscriptions, shares will be allocated so as to
permit each Supplemental Eligible Account Holder to purchase a number of shares sufficient to make
his or her total allocation equal to the lesser of 100 shares of common stock or the number of
shares for which he or she subscribed. Thereafter, unallocated shares will be allocated to each
Supplemental Eligible Account Holder whose subscription remains unfilled in the proportion that the
amount of his or her Qualifying Deposit bears to the total amount of Qualifying Deposits of all
Supplemental Eligible Account Holders whose subscriptions remain unfilled.
To ensure proper allocation of common stock, each Supplemental Eligible Account Holder must
list on the stock order form all deposit accounts in which he or she has an ownership interest at
June 30, 2010. In the event of oversubscription, failure to list an account could result in fewer
shares being allocated than if all accounts had been disclosed.
165
Priority 4: Other Members. To the extent that there are shares of common stock remaining after
satisfaction of subscriptions by Eligible Account Holders, our tax-qualified employee stock benefit
plans, and Supplemental Eligible Account Holders, each depositor of Northfield Bank as of the close
of business on July 30, 2010 who is not an Eligible Account Holder or Supplemental Eligible Account
Holder (Other Members) will receive, without payment therefor, nontransferable subscription
rights to purchase up to $3.0 million (300,000 shares) of common stock, subject to the overall
purchase limitations. See Additional Limitations on Common Stock Purchases. If there are not
sufficient shares available to satisfy all subscriptions, shares will be allocated so as to permit
each Other Member to purchase a number of shares sufficient to make his or her total allocation
equal to the lesser of 100 shares of common stock or the number of shares for which he or she
subscribed. Thereafter, available shares will be allocated in the proportion that the amount of
the subscription of each Other Member bears to the total amount of the subscriptions of all Other
Members whose subscriptions remain unsatisfied.
To ensure proper allocation of common stock, each Other Member must list on the stock order
form all deposit accounts in which he or she had an ownership interest at July 30, 2010. In the
event of oversubscription, failure to list an account could result in fewer shares being allocated
than if all accounts had been disclosed.
Expiration Date. The subscription offering will expire at 4:00 p.m., Eastern Time, on
September 13, 2010, unless extended by us for up to 45 days or such additional periods with the
approval of the Office of Thrift Supervision, if necessary. Subscription rights will expire whether
or not each eligible depositor can be located. We may decide to extend the expiration date of the
subscription offering for any reason, whether or not subscriptions have been received for shares at
the minimum, midpoint or maximum of the offering range. Subscription rights which have not been
exercised prior to the expiration date will become void.
We will not execute orders until at least the minimum number of shares of common stock have
been sold in the offering. If at least 26,350,000 shares have not been sold in the offering by
October 28, 2010 and the Office of Thrift Supervision has not consented to an extension, all funds
delivered to us to purchase shares of common stock in the offering will be returned promptly, with
interest at 0.25% per annum for funds received in the subscription and community offerings, and all
deposit account withdrawal authorizations will be canceled. If an extension beyond October 28,
2010 is granted by the Office of Thrift Supervision, we will resolicit purchasers in the offering
as described under Procedures for Purchasing SharesExpiration Date.
Community Offering
To the extent that shares of common stock remain available for purchase after satisfaction of
all subscriptions of Eligible Account Holders, our tax-qualified employee stock benefit plans,
Supplemental Eligible Account Holders and Other Members, we will offer shares pursuant to the plan
of conversion and reorganization to members of the general public in a community offering. Shares
will be offered in the community offering with the following preferences:
|
(i) |
|
Natural persons (including trusts of natural persons) residing in the New
Jersey Counties of Bergen, Essex, Hudson, Hunterdon, Middlesex, Monmouth, Morris,
Ocean, Passaic, Somerset, Sussex and Union, the New York Counties of Bronx, Kings,
Nassau, New York, Putnam, Queens, Richmond, Rockland, Suffolk and Westchester, and Pike
County, Pennsylvania; |
|
|
(ii) |
|
Northfield-Federals public stockholders as of July 30, 2010; and |
|
|
(iii) |
|
Other members of the general public. |
Subscribers in the community offering may purchase up to $3.0 million (300,000 shares) of
common stock, subject to the overall purchase limitations. See Additional Limitations on Common
Stock Purchases. The minimum purchase is 25 shares. The opportunity to purchase shares of common
stock in the community offering category is subject to our right, in our sole discretion, to accept
or reject any such orders in whole or in part either at the time of receipt of an order or as soon
as practicable following the expiration date of the offering.
166
If we do not have sufficient shares of common stock available to fill the orders of natural
persons (including trusts of natural persons) residing in the New Jersey Counties of Bergen, Essex,
Hudson, Hunterdon, Middlesex, Monmouth, Morris, Ocean, Passaic, Somerset, Sussex and Union, the New
York Counties of Bronx, Kings, Nassau, New York, Putnam, Queens, Richmond, Rockland, Suffolk and
Westchester, and Pike County, Pennsylvania, we will allocate the available shares among those
persons in a manner that permits each of them, to the extent possible, to purchase the lesser of
100 shares or the number of shares subscribed for by such person. Thereafter, unallocated shares
will be allocated among natural persons residing in those counties whose orders remain unsatisfied
on an equal number of shares basis per order. If an oversubscription occurs due to the orders of
public stockholders of Northfield-Federal or members of the general public, the allocation
procedures described above will apply to the stock orders of such persons. In connection with the
allocation process, orders received for shares of common stock in the community offering will first
be filled up to a maximum of 2% of the shares sold in the offering, and thereafter any remaining
shares will be allocated on an equal number of shares basis per order until all shares have been
allocated.
The term residing or resident as used in this prospectus means any person who occupies a
dwelling within the New Jersey Counties of Bergen, Essex, Hudson, Hunterdon, Middlesex, Monmouth,
Morris, Ocean, Passaic, Somerset, Sussex and Union, the New York Counties of Bronx, Kings, Nassau,
New York, Putnam, Queens, Richmond, Rockland, Suffolk and Westchester, or Pike County,
Pennsylvania, has a present intent to remain within this community for a period of time, and
manifests the genuineness of that intent by establishing an ongoing physical presence within the
community, together with an indication that this presence within the community is something other
than merely transitory in nature. We may utilize deposit or loan records or other evidence
provided to us to decide whether a person is a resident. In all cases, however, the determination
shall be in our sole discretion.
Expiration Date. The community offering will begin concurrently with the subscription
offering, and is currently expected to terminate at the same time as the subscription offering, and
must terminate no more than 45 days following the subscription offering, unless extended.
Northfield-Delaware may decide to extend the community offering for any reason and is not required
to give purchasers notice of any such extension unless such period extends beyond October 28, 2010,
in which event we will resolicit purchasers.
Syndicated Community Offering
If feasible, our Board of Directors may decide to offer for sale shares of common stock not
subscribed for or purchased in the subscription and community offerings in a syndicated community
offering, subject to such terms, conditions and procedures as we may determine, in a manner that
will achieve a wide distribution of our shares of common stock. In the syndicated community
offering, any person may purchase up to $3.0 million (300,000 shares) of common stock, subject to
the overall purchase and ownership limitations. We retain the right to accept or reject in whole
or in part any orders in the syndicated community offering. Unless the Office of Thrift
Supervision permits otherwise, accepted orders for Northfield-Delaware common stock in the
syndicated community offering will first be filled up to a maximum of 2% of the shares sold in the
offering, and thereafter any remaining shares will be allocated on an equal number of shares basis
per order until all shares have been allocated. Unless the syndicated community offering begins
during the community offering, the syndicated community offering will begin as soon as possible
after the completion of the subscription and community offerings.
If a syndicated community offering is held, Sandler ONeill & Partners, L.P. will serve
as sole book-running manager and Keefe, Bruyette & Woods, Inc. will serve as co-manager, and each
firm will assist us in selling our common stock on a best efforts basis. Neither Sandler ONeill &
Partners, L.P., Keefe, Bruyette & Woods, Inc. nor any registered broker-dealer will have any
obligation to take or purchase any shares of the common stock in the syndicated community offering.
In the event that shares of common stock are sold in a syndicated community offering, we will pay:
(i) a management fee of 1.0% of the actual purchase price of each security sold in the syndicated
community offering, it being understood that 80% of such management fee shall be allocated to
Sandler ONeill and 20% of such management fee shall be allocated to Keefe, Bruyette & Woods, Inc.;
and (ii) a selling concession of 4.0% of the actual purchase price of each security sold in the
syndicated community offering, which shall be allocated to dealers (including Sandler ONeill and
Keefe, Bruyette & Woods, Inc.) in accordance with the
167
actual number of shares of common stock sold by such dealers; provided, however, that sales
credit for a minimum of 20% of the securities sold in the syndicated community offering shall be
reserved for Keefe, Bruyette & Woods, Inc.
The syndicated community offering will be conducted in accordance with certain Securities and
Exchange Commission rules applicable to best efforts offerings. Under these rules, Sandler ONeill
& Partners, L.P., Keefe, Bruyette & Woods, Inc. or the other broker-dealers participating in the
syndicated community offering generally will accept payment for shares of common stock to be
purchased in the syndicated community offering on the settlement date through the services of the
Depository Trust Company on a delivery versus payment basis. Order forms may also be
used to purchase shares of common stock in the syndicated community offering. Investors in the
syndicated community offering electing to use stock order forms would follow the same procedures
applicable to purchasing shares in the subscription and community offering. See Procedures for
Purchasing Shares. If Sandler ONeill & Partners, L.P., Keefe, Bruyette & Woods, Inc. or
other participating broker-dealers collect funds from investors in the syndicated community
offering, such funds will be deposited in a segregated account at Northfield Bank. We will pay
interest at a rate of 0.25% per annum from the date funds are processed until completion of the
offering, at which time an investor will be issued a check for interest earned. Sandler ONeill &
Partners, L.P., Keefe, Bruyette & Woods, Inc. or the other broker-dealers participating in the
syndicated community offering may also, under certain circumstances, accept payment for shares of
common stock to be purchased in the syndicated community offering through a sweep arrangement,
provided we have received subscriptions to meet the minimum of the offering range, under which a
customers brokerage account at the applicable participating broker-dealer will be debited in the
amount of the purchase price for the shares of common stock that such customer wishes to purchase
in the syndicated community offering on the settlement date. Participating broker-dealers will only
sell to customers who have accounts at the participating broker-dealer and who authorize the
broker-dealer to debit their accounts. Customers who authorize participating broker-dealers to
debit their brokerage accounts are required to have the funds for the payment in their accounts on,
but not before, the settlement date. The closing of the syndicated community offering is subject
to conditions set forth in an agency agreement among Northfield-Delaware, Northfield-Federal,
Northfield Bancorp, MHC and Northfield Bank on the one hand and Sandler ONeill & Partners, L.P.,
as representative of the several agents, on the other hand. If and when all the conditions for the
closing are met, funds for common stock sold in the syndicated community offering, less fees and
commissions payable, will be delivered promptly to us. Normal customer ticketing will be used for
orders placed through Sandler ONeill & Partners, L.P., Keefe, Bruyette & Woods, Inc. or other
broker-dealers participating in the syndicated community offering.
If for any reason we cannot affect a syndicated community offering of shares of common
stock not purchased in the subscription and community offerings, or in the event that there are a
significant number of shares remaining unsold after such offerings, we will try to make other
arrangements for the sale of unsubscribed shares, if possible. The Office of Thrift Supervision
and the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority must approve any such arrangements.
Additional Limitations on Common Stock Purchases
The plan of conversion and reorganization includes the following additional limitations on the
number of shares of common stock that may be purchased in the offering:
|
(i) |
|
No person may purchase fewer than 25 shares of common stock; |
|
|
(ii) |
|
Tax qualified employee benefit plans, including our employee stock ownership
plan and 401(k) plan, may purchase in the aggregate up to 10% of the shares of common
stock issued in the offering, including shares issued in the event of an increase in
the offering range of up to 15%; |
|
|
(iii) |
|
Except for the employee stock ownership plan, as described above, no person or
entity, together with associates or persons acting in concert with such person or
entity, may purchase more than $3.0 million (300,000 shares) of common stock in all
categories of the offering combined; |
168
|
(iv) |
|
Current stockholders of Northfield-Federal are subject to an ownership
limitation. As previously described, current stockholders of Northfield-Federal will
receive shares of Northfield-Delaware common stock in exchange for their existing shares of Northfield-Federal common stock. The number of shares of common stock that a
stockholder may purchase in the offering, together with associates or persons acting in
concert with such stockholder, when combined with the shares that the stockholder and
his or her associates will receive in exchange for existing Northfield-Federal common
stock, may not exceed 5% of the shares of common stock of Northfield-Delaware to be
issued and outstanding at the completion of the conversion; and |
|
|
(v) |
|
The maximum number of shares of common stock that may be purchased in all
categories of the offering by executive officers and directors of Northfield Bank and
their associates, in the aggregate, when combined with shares of common stock issued in
exchange for existing shares, may not exceed 25% of the total shares issued in the
conversion. |
Depending upon market or financial conditions, our board of directors, with the approval of
the Office of Thrift Supervision and without further approval of members of Northfield Bancorp,
MHC, may decrease or increase the purchase and ownership limitations. If a purchase limitation is
increased, subscribers in the subscription offering who ordered the maximum amount will be given
the opportunity to increase their orders up to the then applicable limit. The effect of this type
of resolicitation will be an increase in the number of shares of common stock owned by persons who
choose to increase their orders. In the event that the maximum purchase limitation is increased to
5% of the shares sold in the offering, such limitation may be further increased to 9.99%, provided
that orders for shares of common stock exceeding 5% of the shares sold in the offering shall not
exceed in the aggregate 10% of the total shares sold in the offering.
In the event of an increase in the offering range of up to 40,997,500 shares of common stock,
shares will be allocated in the following order of priority in accordance with the plan of
conversion and reorganization:
|
(i) |
|
to fill the subscriptions of our tax-qualified employee benefit plans,
including the employee stock ownership plan and our 401(k) plan, for up to 10% of the
total number of shares of common stock issued in the offering; |
|
|
(ii) |
|
in the event that there is an oversubscription at the Eligible Account Holder,
Supplemental Eligible Account Holder or Other Member levels, to fill unfilled
subscriptions of these subscribers according to their respective priorities; and |
|
|
(iii) |
|
to fill unfilled subscriptions in the community offering, with preference
given first to natural persons (including trusts of natural persons) residing in New
Jersey Counties of Bergen, Essex, Hudson, Hunterdon, Middlesex, Monmouth, Morris,
Ocean, Passaic, Somerset, Sussex and Union, the New York Counties of Bronx, Kings,
Nassau, New York, Putnam, Queens, Richmond, Rockland, Suffolk and Westchester, and Pike
County, Pennsylvania, then to Northfield-Federals public stockholders as of July 30,
2010, and then to members of the general public. |
The term associate of a person means:
|
(i) |
|
any corporation or organization, other than Northfield-Federal, Northfield Bank
or a majority-owned subsidiary of Northfield Bank, of which the person is a senior
officer, partner or 10% beneficial stockholder; |
|
|
(ii) |
|
any trust or other estate in which the person has a substantial beneficial
interest or serves as a trustee or in a similar fiduciary capacity; provided, however,
it does not include any employee stock benefit plan in which the person has a
substantial beneficial interest or serves as trustee or in a similar fiduciary
capacity; and |
169
|
(iii) |
|
any blood or marriage relative of the person, who either has the same home as
the person or who is a director or officer of Northfield-Federal or Northfield Bank. |
The term acting in concert means:
|
(i) |
|
knowing participation in a joint activity or interdependent conscious parallel
action towards a common goal whether or not pursuant to an express agreement; or |
|
|
(ii) |
|
a combination or pooling of voting or other interests in the securities of an
issuer for a common purpose pursuant to any contract, understanding, relationship,
agreement or other arrangement, whether written or otherwise. |
A person or company that acts in concert with another person or company (other party) will
also be deemed to be acting in concert with any person or company who is also acting in concert
with that other party, except that any tax-qualified employee stock benefit plan will not be deemed
to be acting in concert with its trustee or a person who serves in a similar capacity solely for
the purpose of determining whether common stock held by the trustee and common stock held by the
employee stock benefit plan will be aggregated.
We have the sole discretion to determine whether prospective purchasers are associates or
acting in concert. Persons having the same address, and persons exercising subscription rights
through qualifying deposits registered at the same address will be deemed to be acting in concert
unless we determine otherwise.
Our directors are not treated as associates of each other solely because of their membership
on the board of directors. Common stock purchased in the offering will be freely transferable
except for shares purchased by directors and certain officers of Northfield-Delaware or Northfield
Bank and except as described below. Any purchases made by any associate of Northfield-Delaware or
Northfield Bank for the explicit purpose of meeting the minimum number of shares of common stock
required to be sold in order to complete the offering shall be made for investment purposes only
and not with a view toward redistribution. In addition, under Financial Industry Regulatory
Authority guidelines, members of the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority and their associates
are subject to certain restrictions on transfer of securities purchased in accordance with
subscription rights and to certain reporting requirements upon purchase of these securities. For a
further discussion of limitations on purchases of our shares of common stock at the time of
conversion and thereafter, see Certain Restrictions on Purchase or Transfer of Our Shares after
Conversion and Restrictions on Acquisition of Northfield-Delaware.
Plan of Distribution; Selling Agent Compensation
To assist in the marketing of our shares of common stock, we have retained Sandler ONeill &
Partners, L.P., which is a broker-dealer registered with the Financial Industry Regulatory
Authority. Sandler ONeill & Partners, L.P. will assist us on a best efforts basis in the offering
by:
|
(i) |
|
consulting as to the financial and securities market implications of the plan
of conversion; |
|
|
(ii) |
|
reviewing with our board of directors the financial effect of the offering on
us, based on the independent appraisers appraisal of the shares of common stock; |
|
|
(iii) |
|
reviewing all offering documents, including this prospectus, stock order forms
and related offering materials; |
|
|
(iv) |
|
assisting in the design and implementation of a marketing strategy for the
offering; |
|
|
(v) |
|
assisting management in scheduling and preparing for meetings with potential
investors and other broker-dealers in connection with the stock offering; and |
170
|
(vi) |
|
providing such other general advice and assistance as may be reasonably
necessary to promote the successful completion of the offering. |
For these services, Sandler ONeill & Partners, L.P. will receive a fee of 1% of the dollar
amount of all shares of common stock sold in the subscription and community offerings. No sales
fee will be payable to Sandler ONeill & Partners, L.P. with respect to shares purchased by
officers, directors, employees or their immediate families and shares purchased by our
tax-qualified and non-qualified employee benefit plans, and no sales fee will be payable with
respect to the exchange shares.
In the event that common stock is sold through a group of broker-dealers in a syndicated
community offering, we will pay (i) a management fee of 1.0% of the aggregate dollar amount of the
common stock sold in the syndicated community offering to Sandler ONeill & Partners, L.P. and
Keefe, Bruyette & Woods, Inc. and (ii) a selling concession of 4.0% of the actual purchase price of
each security sold in the syndicated community offering to these selected dealers who sell shares
in the syndicated community offering (including Sandler ONeill & Partners, L.P. and Keefe,
Bruyette & Woods, Inc.).
If the offering is completed, Sandler ONeill & Partners, L.P. will not be reimbursed
separately for expenses. However, we have agreed to reimburse Sandler ONeill & Partners, L.P. up
to $150,000 for reimbursable expenses (including legal fees and expenses and other out-of-pocket
expenses) in the event the offering is not completed.
We will indemnify Sandler ONeill & Partners, L.P. and Keefe, Bruyette & Woods, Inc. against
liabilities and expenses, including legal fees, incurred in connection with certain claims or
litigation arising out of or based upon untrue statements or omissions contained in the offering
materials for the common stock, including liabilities under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.
Some of our directors and executive officers may participate in the solicitation of offers to
purchase common stock. These persons will be reimbursed for their reasonable out-of-pocket expenses
incurred in connection with the solicitation. Other regular employees of Northfield Bank may assist
in the offering, but only in ministerial capacities, and may provide clerical work in effecting a
sales transaction. No offers or sales may be made by tellers or at the teller counters.
Investment-related questions of prospective purchasers will be directed to executive officers or
registered representatives of Sandler ONeill & Partners, L.P. Our other employees have been
instructed not to solicit offers to purchase shares of common stock or provide advice regarding the
purchase of common stock. We will rely on Rule 3a4-1 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, and sales of common stock will be conducted within the requirements of Rule 3a4-1, so as
to permit officers, directors and employees to participate in the sale of common stock. None of our
officers, directors or employees will be compensated in connection with their participation in the
offering.
We have also engaged Sandler ONeill & Partners, L.P. as records management agent in
connection with the conversion and offering. In its role as records management agent, Sandler
ONeill & Partners, L.P., will assist us in the offering in the:
|
|
|
consolidation of deposit accounts and vote calculations; |
|
|
|
|
design and preparation of proxy and stock order forms; |
|
|
|
|
organization and supervision of the Stock Information Center; |
|
|
|
|
proxy solicitation and other services for our special meeting of members; and |
|
|
|
|
preparation and processing of other documents related to the stock offering. |
Sandler ONeill & Partners, L.P. will not receive a separate fee or reimbursement for expenses
for these services.
171
Lock-up Agreements
We, and each of our directors and executive officers have agreed, subject to certain
exceptions, that during the period beginning on the date of this prospectus and ending 90 days
after the closing of the offering, without the prior written consent of Sandler ONeill & Partners,
L.P., directly or indirectly, we will not (i) offer, pledge, sell, contract to sell, sell any
option or contract to purchase, purchase any option or contract to sell, grant any option, right or
warrant for the sale of, or otherwise dispose of or transfer any shares of Northfield-Federal or
Northfield-Delaware stock or any securities convertible into or exchangeable or exercisable for
Northfield-Federal or Northfield-Delaware stock, whether owned on the date of this prospectus or
acquired after the date of this prospectus or with respect to which we or any of our directors or
executive officers has or after the date of this prospectus acquires the power of disposition, or
file any registration statement under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, with respect to any
of the foregoing, or (ii) enter into any swap or any other agreement or any transaction that
transfers, in whole or in part, directly or indirectly, the economic consequence of ownership of
Northfield-Federal or Northfield-Delaware stock, whether any such swap or transaction is to be
settled by delivery of stock or other securities, in cash or otherwise. In the event that either
(1) during the period that begins on the date that is 15 calendar days plus three business days
before the last day of the restricted period and ends on the last day of the restricted period, we
issue an earnings release or material news or a material event relating to us occurs, or (2) prior
to the expiration of the restricted period, we announce that we will release earnings results
during the 16-day period beginning on the last day of the restricted period, the restrictions set
forth above will continue to apply until the expiration of the date that is 15 calendar days plus
three business days after the date on which the earnings release is issued or the material news or
event related to us occurs.
Procedure for Purchasing Shares
Expiration Date. The subscription and community offerings will expire at 4:00 p.m., Eastern
Time, on September 13, 2010, unless we extend one or both for up to 45 days, with the approval of
the Office of Thrift Supervision, if required. This extension may be approved by us, in our sole
discretion, without notice to purchasers in the offering. Any extension of the subscription and/or
community offering beyond October 28, 2010 would require the Office of Thrift Supervisions
approval. If the offering is so extended, or if the offering range is decreased or is increased
above the adjusted maximum of the offering range, all subscribers stock orders will be cancelled,
their deposit account withdrawal authorizations will be cancelled, and funds submitted to us will
be returned promptly, with interest at 0.25% per annum for funds received in the subscription and
community offerings. We will then resolicit the subscribers, giving them an opportunity to place a
new stock order for a period of time.
We reserve the right in our sole discretion to terminate the offering at any time and for any
reason, in which case we will cancel any deposit account withdrawal authorizations and promptly
return all funds submitted, with interest at 0.25% per annum from the date of receipt as described
above.
Use of Order Forms in the Subscription and Community Offerings. In order to purchase shares of
common stock in the subscription and community offerings, you must properly complete an original
stock order form and remit full payment. We are not required to accept orders submitted on
photocopied or facsimiled order forms. All order forms must be received (not postmarked) prior to
4:00 p.m., Eastern Time, on September 13, 2010. We are not required to accept order forms that are
not received by that time, are not signed or are otherwise executed defectively or are received
without full payment or without appropriate deposit account withdrawal instructions. We are not
required to notify subscribers of incomplete or improperly executed order forms, and we have the
right to waive or permit the correction of incomplete or improperly executed order forms. We do
not represent, however, that we will do so and we have no affirmative duty to notify any
prospective subscriber of any such defects. You may submit your order form and payment by mail
using the stock order return envelope provided, or by overnight delivery to our Stock Information
Center at the address noted on the Stock Order Form. You may hand-deliver stock order forms to the
Stock Information Center, which will be located at Northfield Banks Avenel office, 1410 St.
Georges Avenue, Second floor, Avenel, New Jersey. Hand-delivered stock order forms will only be
accepted at this location. We will not accept stock order forms at our other branch offices.
Please do not mail stock order forms to Northfield Banks offices.
172
Once tendered, an order form cannot be modified or revoked without our consent. We reserve
the absolute right, in our sole discretion, to reject orders received in the community offering, in
whole or in part, at the time of receipt or at any time prior to completion of the offering. If
you are ordering shares in the subscription offering, you must represent that you are purchasing
shares for your own account and that you have no agreement or understanding with any person for the
sale or transfer of the shares. We have the right to reject any order submitted in the offering by
a person who we believe is making false representations or who we otherwise believe, either alone
or acting in concert with others, is violating, evading, circumventing, or intends to violate,
evade or circumvent the terms and conditions of the plan of conversion and reorganization. Our
interpretation of the terms and conditions of the plan of conversion and reorganization and of the
acceptability of the order forms will be final.
By signing the order form, you will be acknowledging that the common stock is not a deposit or
savings account and is not federally insured or otherwise guaranteed by Northfield Bank or the
federal government, and that you received a copy of this prospectus. However, signing the order
form will not result in you waiving your rights under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934.
Payment for Shares. Payment for all shares of common stock will be required to accompany all
completed order forms for the purchase to be valid. Payment for shares in the subscription and
community offerings may be made by:
|
(i) |
|
personal check, bank check or money order, made payable to Northfield Bancorp,
Inc.; or |
|
|
(ii) |
|
authorization of withdrawal of available funds from the types of Northfield
Bank deposit accounts described on the stock order form. |
Appropriate means for designating withdrawals from deposit accounts at Northfield Bank are
provided on the order form. The funds designated must be available in the account(s) at the time
the order form is received. A hold will be placed on these funds, making them unavailable to the
depositor. Funds authorized for withdrawal will continue to earn interest within the account at the
contract rate until the offering is completed, at which time the designated withdrawal will be
made. Interest penalties for early withdrawal applicable to certificate accounts will not apply to
withdrawals authorized for the purchase of shares of common stock; however, if a withdrawal results
in a certificate account with a balance less than the applicable minimum balance requirement, the
certificate will be canceled at the time of withdrawal without penalty and the remaining balance
will earn interest at the current passbook rate subsequent to the withdrawal. In the case of
payments made by personal check, these funds must be available in the account(s). Checks and money
orders received in the subscription and community offerings will be immediately cashed and placed
in a segregated account at Northfield Bank and will earn interest at 0.25% per annum from the date
payment is processed until the offering is completed or terminated.
You may not remit cash, wire transfers, Northfield Bank line of credit checks or any type of
third-party checks (including those payable to you and endorsed over to Northfield-Delaware). You
may not designate on your stock order form direct withdrawal from a Northfield Bank retirement
account. See Using Individual Retirement Account Funds. Additionally, you may not designate a
direct withdrawal from Northfield Bank accounts with check-writing privileges. Please provide a
check instead. If you request that we directly withdraw the funds, we reserve the right to
interpret that as your authorization to treat those funds as if we had received a check for the
designated amount, and we will immediately withdraw the amount from your checking account. If
permitted by the Office of Thrift Supervision, in the event we resolicit large purchasers, as
described above in Additional Limitations on Common Stock Purchases, such purchasers who wish to
increase their purchases will not be able to use personal checks to pay for the additional shares.
Once we receive your executed stock order form, it may not be modified, amended or rescinded
without our consent, unless the offering is not completed by October 28, 2010. In such event,
funds delivered to us to purchase shares of common stock in the offering will be returned promptly,
with interest at 0.25% per annum, for funds received in the subscription and community offerings.
Additionally, all deposit account withdrawal authorizations will be canceled. We may resolicit
purchasers for a specified period of time.
173
Regulations prohibit Northfield Bank from lending funds or extending credit to any persons to
purchase shares of common stock in the offering.
We shall have the right, in our sole discretion, to permit institutional investors to submit
irrevocable orders together with the legally binding commitment for payment and to thereafter pay
for the shares of common stock for which they subscribe in the community offering at any time prior
to 48 hours before the completion of the conversion. This payment may be made by wire transfer.
If our employee stock ownership plan purchases shares in the offering, it will not be required
to pay for such shares until completion of the offering, provided that there is a loan commitment
from an unrelated financial institution or Northfield-Delaware to lend to the employee stock
ownership plan the necessary amount to fund the purchase.
Using Individual Retirement Account Funds. If you are interested in using funds in your
individual retirement account or other retirement account to purchase shares of common stock, you
must do so through a self-directed retirement account. By regulation, Northfield Banks retirement
accounts are not self-directed, so they cannot be invested in our shares of common stock.
Therefore, if you wish to use funds that are currently in a Northfield Bank retirement account, you
may not designate on the order form that you wish funds to be withdrawn from the account for the
purchase of common stock. The funds you wish to use for the purchase of common stock will instead
have to be transferred to an independent trustee or custodian, such as a brokerage firm, offering
self-directed retirement accounts. The purchase must be made through that account. If you do not
have such an account, you will need to establish one before placing a stock order. An annual
administrative fee may be payable to the independent trustee or custodian. There will be no early
withdrawal or Internal Revenue Service interest penalties for these transfers. Individuals
interested in using funds in an individual retirement account or any other retirement account,
whether held at Northfield Bank or elsewhere, to purchase shares of common stock should contact our
Stock Information Center for guidance as soon as possible, preferably at least two weeks prior to
the September 13, 2010 offering deadline. Processing such transactions takes additional time, and
whether such funds can be used may depend on limitations imposed by the institutions where such
funds are currently held. We cannot guarantee that you will be able to use such funds.
Delivery of Stock Certificates. Certificates representing shares of common stock sold in the
subscription offering and community offering will be mailed to the certificate registration address
noted by purchasers on the stock order form. Stock certificates will be sent to purchasers by
first-class mail as soon as practicable after the completion of the conversion and stock offering.
We expect trading in the stock to begin on the business day of or on the business day following the
completion of the conversion and stock offering. It is possible that until certificates for the
common stock are delivered to purchasers, purchasers might not be able to sell the shares of common
stock that they ordered, even though the shares of common stock will have begun trading. Your
ability to sell the shares of common stock before receiving your stock certificate will depend on
arrangements you may make with a brokerage firm. If you are currently a stockholder of
Northfield-Federal, see Exchange of Existing Stockholders Stock Certificates.
Other Restrictions. Notwithstanding any other provision of the plan of conversion and
reorganization, no person is entitled to purchase any shares of common stock to the extent the
purchase would be illegal under any federal or state law or regulation, including state blue sky
regulations, or would violate regulations or policies of the Financial Industry Regulatory
Authority, particularly those regarding free riding and withholding. We may ask for an acceptable
legal opinion from any purchaser as to the legality of his or her purchase and we may refuse to
honor any purchase order if an opinion is not timely furnished. In addition, we are not required
to offer shares of common stock to any person who resides in a foreign country, or in a State of
the United States with respect to which any of the following apply:
|
(i) |
|
a small number of persons otherwise eligible to subscribe for shares under the
plan of conversion reside in such state; |
174
|
(ii) |
|
the issuance of subscription rights or the offer or sale of shares of common
stock to such persons would require us, under the securities laws of such state, to
register as a broker, dealer, salesman or agent or to register or otherwise qualify our
securities for sale in such state; or |
|
|
(iii) |
|
such registration or qualification would be impracticable for reasons of cost
or otherwise. |
Restrictions on Transfer of Subscription Rights and Shares
Office of Thrift Supervision regulations prohibit any person with subscription rights,
including the Eligible Account Holders, Supplemental Eligible Account Holders and Other Members,
from transferring or entering into any agreement or understanding to transfer the legal or
beneficial ownership of the subscription rights issued under the plan of conversion and
reorganization or the shares of common stock to be issued upon their exercise. These rights may be
exercised only by the person to whom they are granted and only for his or her account. When
registering your stock purchase on the order form, you should not add the name(s) of persons who do
not have subscription rights or who qualify only in a lower purchase priority than you do. Doing
so may jeopardize your subscription rights. Each person exercising subscription rights will be
required to certify that he or she is purchasing shares solely for his or her own account and that
he or she has no agreement or understanding regarding the sale or transfer of such shares. The
regulations also prohibit any person from offering or making an announcement of an offer or intent
to make an offer to purchase subscription rights or shares of common stock to be issued upon their
exercise prior to completion of the offering.
We will pursue any and all legal and equitable remedies in the event we become aware of the
transfer of subscription rights, and we will not honor orders that we believe involve the transfer
of subscription rights.
Stock Information Center
Our banking office personnel may not, by law, assist with investment-related questions about
the offering. If you have any questions regarding the conversion or offering, please call our
Stock Information Center. The toll-free phone number is (877) 651-9234. The Stock Information
Center is open Monday through Friday between 10:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m., Eastern Time. The Stock
Information Center will be closed on weekends and bank holidays.
Liquidation Rights
Liquidation prior to the conversion. In the unlikely event that Northfield Bancorp, MHC is
liquidated prior to the conversion, all claims of creditors of Northfield Bancorp, MHC would be
paid first. Thereafter, if there were any assets of Northfield Bancorp, MHC remaining, these assets
would first be distributed to certain depositors of Northfield Bank under such depositors
liquidation rights. The amount received by such depositors would be equal to their pro rata
interest in the remaining value of Northfield Bancorp, MHC after claims of creditors, based on the
relative size of their deposit accounts.
Liquidation following the conversion. The plan of conversion and reorganization provides for
the establishment, upon the completion of the conversion, of a liquidation account by
Northfield-Delaware for the benefit of Eligible Account Holders and Supplemental Eligible Account
Holders in an amount equal to (i) Northfield Bancorp, MHCs ownership interest in
Northfield-Federals total stockholders equity as of the date of the latest statement of financial
condition used in this prospectus plus (ii) the value of the net assets of Northfield Bancorp, MHC
as of the date of the latest statement of financial condition of Northfield Bancorp, MHC prior to
the consummation of the conversion (excluding its ownership of Northfield-Federal). The plan of
conversion also provides for the establishment of a parallel liquidation account in Northfield Bank
to support the Northfield-Delaware liquidation account in the event Northfield-Delaware does not
have sufficient assets to fund its obligations under the Northfield-Delaware liquidation account.
In the unlikely event that Northfield Bank were to liquidate after the conversion, all claims
of creditors, including those of depositors, would be paid first. However, except with respect to
the liquidation account to be
175
established in Northfield-Federal, a depositors claim would be solely for the principal
amount of his or her deposit accounts plus accrued interest. Depositors generally would not have an
interest in the value of the assets of Northfield Bank or Northfield-Delaware above that amount.
The liquidation account established by Northfield-Delaware is designed to provide qualifying
depositors a liquidation interest (exchanged for the liquidation interests such persons had in
Northfield Bancorp, MHC) after the conversion in the event of a complete liquidation of
Northfield-Delaware and Northfield Bank or a liquidation solely of Northfield Bank. Specifically,
in the unlikely event that either (i) Northfield Bank or (ii) Northfield-Delaware and Northfield
Bank were to liquidate after the conversion, all claims of creditors, including those of
depositors, would be paid first, followed by a distribution to depositors as of March 31, 2009 and
June 30, 2010 of their interests in the liquidation account maintained by Northfield-Delaware.
Also, in a complete liquidation of both entities, or of Northfield Bank only, when
Northfield-Delaware has insufficient assets (other than the stock of Northfield Bank) to fund the
liquidation account distribution due to Eligible Account Holders and Supplemental Eligible Account
Holders and Northfield Bank has positive net worth, Northfield Bank shall immediately make a
distribution to fund Northfield-Delawares remaining obligations under the liquidation account. In
no event will any Eligible Account Holder or Supplemental Eligible Account Holder be entitled to a
distribution that exceeds such holders interest in the liquidation account maintained by
Northfield-Delaware as adjusted from time to time pursuant to the plan of conversion and Office of
Thrift Supervision regulations. If Northfield-Delaware is completely liquidated or sold apart from
a sale or liquidation of Northfield Bank, then the Northfield-Delaware liquidation account will
cease to exist and Eligible Account Holders and Supplemental Eligible Account Holders will receive
an equivalent interest in the Northfield Bank liquidation account, subject to the same rights and
terms as the Northfield-Delaware liquidation account.
Pursuant to the plan of conversion and reorganization, after two years from the date of
conversion and upon the written request of the Office of Thrift Supervision, Northfield-Delaware
will eliminate or transfer the liquidation account and the depositors interests in such account to
Northfield Bank and the liquidation account shall thereupon be subsumed into the liquidation
account of Northfield Bank.
Under the rules and regulations of the Office of Thrift Supervision, a post-conversion merger,
consolidation, or similar combination or transaction with another depository institution or
depository institution holding company in which Northfield-Delaware or Northfield Bank is not the
surviving institution, would not be considered a liquidation. In such a transaction, the
liquidation account would be assumed by the surviving institution or company.
Each Eligible Account Holder and Supplemental Eligible Account Holder would have an initial
pro-rata interest in the liquidation account for each deposit account, including savings accounts,
transaction accounts such as negotiable order of withdrawal accounts, money market deposit
accounts, and certificates of deposit, with a balance of $50.00 or more held in Northfield Bank on
March 31, 2009 or June 30, 2010 equal to the proportion that the balance of each Eligible Account
Holders and Supplemental Eligible Account Holders deposit account on March 31, 2009 and June 30,
2010, respectively, bears to the balance of all deposit accounts of Eligible Account Holders and
Supplemental Eligible Account Holders in Northfield Bank on such date.
If, however, on any December 31 annual closing date commencing after the effective date of the
conversion, the amount in any such deposit account is less than the amount in the deposit account
on March 31, 2009 or June 30, 2010, or any other annual closing date, then the interest in the
liquidation account relating to such deposit account would be reduced from time to time by the
proportion of any such reduction, and such interest will cease to exist if such deposit account is
closed. In addition, no interest in the liquidation account would ever be increased despite any
subsequent increase in the related deposit account. Payment pursuant to liquidation rights of
Eligible Account Holders and Supplemental Eligible Account Holders would be separate and apart from
the payment of any insured deposit accounts to such depositor. Any assets remaining after the above
liquidation rights of Eligible Account Holders and Supplemental Eligible Account Holders are
satisfied would be available for distribution to stockholders.
176
Material Income Tax Consequences
Completion of the conversion is subject to the prior receipt of an opinion of counsel or tax
advisor with respect to federal and state income tax consequences of conversion to Northfield
Bancorp, MHC, Northfield-Federal, Northfield Bank, Eligible Account Holders, Supplemental Eligible
Account Holders and Other Members of Northfield Bancorp, MHC. Unlike private letter rulings,
opinions of counsel or tax advisors are not binding on the Internal Revenue Service or any state
taxing authority, and such authorities may disagree with such opinions. In the event of such
disagreement, there can be no assurance that Northfield-Delaware or Northfield Bank would prevail
in a judicial proceeding.
Northfield Bancorp, MHC, Northfield-Federal, Northfield Bank and Northfield-Delaware have
received an opinion of counsel, Luse Gorman Pomerenk & Schick, P.C., regarding all of the material
federal income tax consequences of the conversion, which includes the following:
|
1. |
|
The merger of Northfield Bancorp, MHC with and into Northfield-Federal will
qualify as a tax-free reorganization within the meaning of Section 368(a)(1)(A) of the
Internal Revenue Code. |
|
|
2. |
|
The constructive exchange of Eligible Account Holders and Supplemental
Eligible Account Holders liquidation interests in Northfield Bancorp, MHC for
liquidation interests in Northfield-Federal will satisfy the continuity of interest
requirement of Section 1.368-1(b) of the Federal Income Tax Regulations. |
|
|
3. |
|
None of Northfield Bancorp, MHC, Northfield-Federal, Eligible Account Holders
nor Supplemental Eligible Account Holders, will recognize any gain or loss on the
transfer of the assets of Northfield Bancorp, MHC to Northfield-Federal in constructive
exchange for liquidation interests in Northfield-Federal. |
|
|
4. |
|
The basis of the assets of Northfield Bancorp, MHC and the holding period of
such assets to be received by Northfield-Federal will be the same as the basis and
holding period of such assets in Northfield Bancorp, MHC immediately before the
exchange. |
|
|
5. |
|
The merger of Northfield-Federal with and into Northfield-Delaware will
constitute a mere change in identity, form or place of organization within the meaning
of Section 368(a)(1)(F) of the Internal Revenue Code and, therefore, will qualify as a
tax-free reorganization within the meaning of Section 368(a)(1)(F) of the Internal
Revenue Code. Neither Northfield-Federal nor Northfield-Delaware will recognize gain or
loss as a result of such merger. |
|
|
6. |
|
The basis of the assets of Northfield-Federal and the holding period of such
assets to be received by Northfield-Delaware will be the same as the basis and holding
period of such assets in Northfield-Federal immediately before the exchange. |
|
|
7. |
|
Current stockholders of Northfield-Federal will not recognize any gain or loss
upon their exchange of Northfield-Federal common stock for Northfield-Delaware common
stock. |
|
|
8. |
|
Eligible Account Holders and Supplemental Eligible Account Holders will not
recognize any gain or loss upon the constructive exchange of their liquidation
interests in Northfield-Federal for interests in the liquidation account in
Northfield-Delaware. |
|
|
9. |
|
The exchange by the Eligible Account Holders and Supplemental Eligible Account
Holders of the liquidation interests that they constructively received in
Northfield-Federal for interests in the liquidation account established in
Northfield-Delaware will satisfy the continuity of interest requirement of Section
1.368-1(b) of the Federal Income Tax Regulations. |
177
|
10. |
|
Each stockholders aggregate basis in shares of Northfield-Delaware common
stock (including fractional share interests) received in the exchange will be the same
as the aggregate basis of Northfield-Federal common stock surrendered in the exchange. |
|
|
11. |
|
Each stockholders holding period in his or her Northfield-Delaware common
stock received in the exchange will include the period during which the
Northfield-Federal common stock surrendered was held, provided that the
Northfield-Federal common stock surrendered is a capital asset in the hands of the
stockholder on the date of the exchange. |
|
|
12. |
|
Cash received by any current stockholder of Northfield-Federal in lieu of a
fractional share interest in shares of Northfield-Delaware common stock will be treated
as having been received as a distribution in full payment in exchange for a fractional
share interest of Northfield-Delaware common stock, which such stockholder would
otherwise be entitled to receive. Accordingly, a stockholder will recognize gain or
loss equal to the difference between the cash received and the basis of the fractional
share. If the common stock is held by the stockholder as a capital asset, the gain or
loss will be capital gain or loss. |
|
|
13. |
|
It is more likely than not that the fair market value of the nontransferable
subscription rights to purchase Northfield-Delaware common stock is zero. Accordingly,
no gain or loss will be recognized by Eligible Account Holders, Supplemental Eligible
Account Holders or Other Members upon distribution to them of nontransferable
subscription rights to purchase shares of Northfield-Delaware common stock. Eligible
Account Holders, Supplemental Eligible Account Holders and Other Members will not
realize any taxable income as the result of the exercise by them of the nontransferable
subscriptions rights. |
|
|
14. |
|
It is more likely than not that the fair market value of the benefit provided
by the liquidation account of Northfield Bank supporting the payment of the
Northfield-Delaware liquidation account in the event Northfield-Delaware lacks
sufficient net assets is zero. Accordingly, it is more likely than not that no gain or
loss will be recognized by Eligible Account Holders and Supplemental Eligible Account
Holders upon the constructive distribution to them of such rights in the Northfield
Bank liquidation account as of the effective date of the merger of Northfield-Federal
with and into Northfield-Delaware. |
|
|
15. |
|
It is more likely than not that the basis of the shares of Northfield-Delaware
common stock purchased in the offering by the exercise of nontransferable subscription
rights will be the purchase price. The holding period of the Northfield-Delaware common
stock purchased pursuant to the exercise of nontransferable subscription rights will
commence on the date the right to acquire such stock was exercised. |
|
|
16. |
|
No gain or loss will be recognized by Northfield-Delaware on the receipt of
money in exchange for Northfield-Delaware common stock sold in the offering. |
We believe that the tax opinions summarized above address all material federal income tax
consequences that are generally applicable to Northfield Bancorp, MHC, Northfield-Federal,
Northfield Bank, Northfield-Delaware and persons receiving subscription rights and stockholders of
Northfield-Federal. With respect to items 8 and 13 above, Luse Gorman Pomerenk & Schick, P.C.
noted that the subscription rights will be granted at no cost to the recipients, are legally
non-transferable and of short duration, and will provide the recipient with the right only to
purchase shares of common stock at the same price to be paid by members of the general public in
any community offering. The firm further noted that RP Financial, LC. has issued a letter that the
subscription rights have no ascertainable fair market value. The firm also noted that the Internal
Revenue Service has not in the past concluded that subscription rights have value. Based on the
foregoing, Luse Gorman Pomerenk & Schick, P.C. believes that it is more likely than not that the
nontransferable subscription rights to purchase shares of common stock have no value. However, the
issue of whether or not the nontransferable subscription rights have value is based on all the
facts and circumstances. If the subscription
178
rights granted to Eligible Account Holders, Supplemental Eligible Account Holders and Other
Members are deemed to have an ascertainable value, receipt of these rights could result in taxable
gain to those Eligible Account Holders, Supplemental Eligible Account Holders and Other Members who
exercise the subscription rights in an amount equal to the ascertainable value, and we could
recognize gain on a distribution. Eligible Account Holders, Supplemental Eligible Account Holders
and Other Members are encouraged to consult with their own tax advisors as to the tax consequences
in the event that subscription rights are deemed to have an ascertainable value.
The opinion as to item 14 above is based on the position that: (i) no holder of an interest
in a liquidation account has ever received any payment attributable to a liquidation account; (ii)
the interests in the liquidation accounts are not transferable; (iii) the amounts due under the
liquidation account with respect to each Eligible Account Holder and Supplemental Eligible Account
Holder will be reduced as their deposits in Northfield Bank are reduced; and (iv) the Northfield
Bank liquidation account payment obligation arises only if Northfield-Delaware lacks sufficient
assets to fund the liquidation account.
In addition, we have received a letter from RP Financial, LC. stating its belief that the
benefit provided by the Northfield Bank liquidation account supporting the payment of the
liquidation account in the event Northfield-Delaware lacks sufficient net assets does not have any
economic value at the time of the conversion. Based on the foregoing, Luse Gorman Pomerenk &
Schick, P.C. believes it is more likely than not that such rights in the Northfield Bank
liquidation account have no value. If such rights are subsequently found to have an economic
value, income may be recognized by each Eligible Account Holder or Supplemental Eligible Account
Holder in the amount of such fair market value as of the date of the conversion.
The opinion of Luse Gorman Pomerenk & Schick, P.C., unlike a letter ruling issued by the
Internal Revenue Service, is not binding on the Internal Revenue Service and the conclusions
expressed therein may be challenged at a future date. The Internal Revenue Service has issued
favorable rulings for transactions substantially similar to the proposed reorganization and stock
offering, but any such ruling may not be cited as precedent by any taxpayer other than the taxpayer
to whom the ruling is addressed. We do not plan to apply for a letter ruling concerning the
transactions described herein.
We have also received an opinion from Crowe Horwath LLP that the New Jersey and New York state
income tax consequences are consistent with the federal income tax consequences.
The federal and state tax opinions have been filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
as an exhibit to Northfield-Delawares registration statement.
Certain Restrictions on Purchase or Transfer of Our Shares after Conversion
All shares of common stock purchased in the offering by a director or certain officers of
Northfield Bank generally may not be sold for a period of one year following the closing of the
conversion, except in the event of the death of the director or executive officer. Each
certificate for restricted shares will bear a legend giving notice of this restriction on transfer,
and instructions will be issued to the effect that any transfer within this time period of any
certificate or record ownership of the shares other than as provided above is a violation of the
restriction. Any shares of common stock issued at a later date as a stock dividend, stock split,
or otherwise, with respect to the restricted stock will be similarly restricted. The directors and
executive officers of Northfield-Delaware also will be restricted by the insider trading rules
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
Purchases of shares of our common stock by any of our directors, certain officers and their
associates, during the three-year period following the closing of the conversion may be made only
through a broker or dealer registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission, except with the
prior written approval of the Office of Thrift Supervision. This restriction does not apply,
however, to negotiated transactions involving more than 1% of our outstanding common stock or to
purchases of our common stock by our stock option plan or any of our tax-qualified employee stock
benefit plans or non-tax-qualified employee stock benefit plans, including any restricted stock
plans.
179
Office of Thrift Supervision regulations prohibit Northfield-Delaware from repurchasing its
shares of common stock during the first year following conversion unless compelling business
reasons exist for such repurchases. After one year, the Office of Thrift Supervision does not
impose any repurchase restrictions.
COMPARISON OF STOCKHOLDERS RIGHTS FOR EXISTING STOCKHOLDERS OF NORTHFIELD
BANCORP, INC.
General. As a result of the conversion, existing stockholders of Northfield-Federal will
become stockholders of Northfield-Delaware There are differences in the rights of stockholders of
Northfield-Federal and stockholders of Northfield-Delaware caused by differences between federal
and Delaware law and regulations and differences in Northfield-Federals federal stock charter and
bylaws and Northfield-Delawares Delaware certificate of incorporation and bylaws.
This discussion is not intended to be a complete statement of the differences affecting the
rights of stockholders, but rather summarizes the material differences and similarities affecting
the rights of stockholders. See Where You Can Find Additional Information for procedures for
obtaining a copy of Northfield-Delawares certificate of incorporation and bylaws.
Authorized Capital Stock. The authorized capital stock of Northfield-Federal consists of
90,000,000 shares of common stock, $0.01 par value per share, and 10,000,000 shares of preferred
stock, par value $0.01 per share.
The authorized capital stock of Northfield-Delaware consists of 150,000,000 shares of common
stock, $0.01 par value per share, and 25,000,000 shares of preferred stock, $0.01 par value per
share.
Northfield-Federals charter and Northfield-Delawares certificate of incorporation both
authorize the Board of Directors to establish one or more series of preferred stock and, for any
series of preferred stock, to determine the terms and rights of the series, including voting
rights, dividend rights, conversion and redemption rights and liquidation preferences. As a result
of the ability to fix voting rights for a series of preferred stock, our Board of Directors has the
power, to the extent consistent with its fiduciary duty, to issue a series of preferred stock to
persons friendly to management in order to attempt to block a hostile tender offer, merger or other
transaction by which a third party seeks control. We currently have no plans for the issuance of
additional shares for such purposes.
Issuance of Capital Stock. Pursuant to applicable laws and regulations, Northfield Bancorp,
MHC is required to own not less than a majority of the outstanding shares of Northfield-Federal
common stock. Northfield Bancorp, MHC will no longer exist following consummation of the
conversion.
Northfield-Delawares certificate of incorporation does not contain restrictions on the
issuance of shares of capital stock to directors, officers or controlling persons, whereas
Northfield-Federals stock charter restricts such issuances to general public offerings, or to
directors for qualifying shares, unless the share issuance or the plan under which they would
generally be issued has been approved by a majority of the total votes eligible to be cast at a
legal stockholders meeting. However, stock-based compensation plans, such as stock option plans
and restricted stock plans, would have to be submitted for approval by Northfield-Delaware
stockholders due to requirements of the Nasdaq Stock Market and in order to qualify stock options
for favorable federal income tax treatment.
Voting Rights. Neither Northfield-Federals stock charter or bylaws nor Northfield-Delawares
certificate of incorporation or bylaws provide for cumulative voting for the election of directors.
For additional information regarding voting rights, see Limitations on Voting Rights of
Greater-than-10% Stockholders below.
Payment of Dividends. Northfield-Federal has no regulatory restriction on its ability to pay
dividends. Delaware law generally provides that Northfield-Delaware is limited to paying dividends
in an amount equal to its capital surplus over payments that would be owed upon dissolution to
stockholders whose preferential rights upon dissolution are superior to those receiving the
dividend, and to an amount that would not make it insolvent.
180
Board of Directors. Northfield-Federals bylaws and Northfield-Delawares certificate of
incorporation and bylaws require the Board of Directors to be divided into three classes and that
the members of each class shall be elected for a term of three years and until their successors are
elected and qualified, with one class being elected annually.
Under Northfield-Federals bylaws, any vacancies on the Board of Directors of
Northfield-Federal may be filled by the affirmative vote of two-thirds of the remaining directors.
Persons elected by the Board of Directors of Northfield-Federal to fill vacancies may only serve
until the next annual meeting of stockholders. Under Northfield-Delawares bylaws, any vacancy
occurring on the Board of Directors, including any vacancy created by reason of an increase in the
number of directors, may be filled only by a majority of the remaining directors, and any director
so chosen shall hold office for the remainder of the term to which the director has been elected
and until his or her successor is elected and qualified.
Limitations on Liability. The charter and bylaws of Northfield-Federal do not limit the
personal liability of directors.
Northfield-Delawares certificate of incorporation provides that directors will not be
personally liable for monetary damages to Northfield-Delaware for certain actions as directors,
except for (i) receipt of an improper personal benefit from their positions as directors, (ii)
actions or omissions that are determined to have involved active and deliberate dishonesty, or
(iii) to the extent allowed by Delaware law. These provisions might, in certain instances,
discourage or deter stockholders or management from bringing a lawsuit against directors for a
breach of their duties even though such an action, if successful, might benefit
Northfield-Delaware.
Indemnification of Directors, Officers, Employees and Agents. Under current Office of Thrift
Supervision regulations, Northfield-Federal shall indemnify its directors, officers and employees
for any costs incurred in connection with any litigation involving such persons activities as a
director, officer or employee if such person obtains a final judgment on the merits in his or her
favor. In addition, indemnification is permitted in the case of a settlement, a final judgment
against such person, or final judgment other than on the merits, if a majority of disinterested
directors determines that such person was acting in good faith within the scope of his or her
employment as he or she could reasonably have perceived it under the circumstances and for a
purpose he or she could reasonably have believed under the circumstances was in the best interests
of Northfield-Federal or its stockholders. Northfield-Federal also is permitted to pay ongoing
expenses incurred by a director, officer or employee if a majority of disinterested directors
concludes that such person may ultimately be entitled to indemnification. Before making any
indemnification payment, Northfield-Federal is required to notify the Office of Thrift Supervision
of its intention, and such payment cannot be made if the Office of Thrift Supervision objects to
such payment.
The certificate of incorporation of Northfield-Delaware provides that it shall indemnify its
current and former directors and officers to the fullest extent required or permitted by Delaware
law, including the advancement of expenses. Delaware law allows Northfield-Delaware to indemnify
any person for expenses, liabilities, settlements, judgments and fines in suits in which such
person has been made a party by reason of the fact that he or she is or was a director, officer or
employee of Northfield-Delaware. No such indemnification may be given if the acts or omissions of
the person are adjudged to be in bad faith and material to the matter giving rise to the
proceeding, if such person is liable to the corporation for an unlawful distribution, or if such
person personally received a benefit to which he or she was not entitled. The right to
indemnification includes the right to be paid the expenses incurred in advance of final disposition
of a proceeding.
Special Meetings of Stockholders. Northfield-Federals bylaws provide that special meetings of
stockholders may be called by the Chairman, the Chief Executive Officer, the President, two-thirds
of the members of the Board of Directors or the holders of not less than 50% of the outstanding
capital stock of Northfield-Federal entitled to vote at the meeting. Northfield-Delawares bylaws
provide that special meetings of the stockholders may be called only by a majority vote of the
total authorized directors.
181
Stockholder Nominations and Proposals. Northfield-Federals bylaws generally provide that
stockholders may submit nominations for election of directors at an annual meeting of stockholders
and may propose any new business to be taken up at such a meeting by filing the proposal in writing
with Northfield-Federal at least 30 days before the date of any such meeting.
Northfield-Delawares bylaws generally provide that any stockholder desiring to make a
nomination for the election of directors or a proposal for new business at a meeting of
stockholders must submit written notice to Northfield-Delaware at least 90 days prior to the
anniversary date of the proxy statement for the prior years annual meeting. However, if the date
of the annual meeting is advanced more than 30 days prior to or delayed by more than 30 days after
the anniversary of the preceding years annual meeting, notice by the stockholder to be timely must
be so delivered not later than the close of business on the 10th day following the day
on which public announcement of the date of such meeting is first made.
Management believes that it is in the best interests of Northfield-Delaware and its
stockholders to provide sufficient time to enable management to disclose to stockholders
information about a dissident slate of nominations for directors. This advance notice requirement
may also give management time to solicit its own proxies in an attempt to defeat any dissident
slate of nominations, should management determine that doing so is in the best interests of
stockholders generally. Similarly, adequate advance notice of stockholder proposals will give
management time to study such proposals and to determine whether to recommend to the stockholders
that such proposals be adopted. In certain instances, such provisions could make it more difficult
to oppose managements nominees or proposals, even if stockholders believe such nominees or
proposals are in their best interests.
Limitations on Voting Rights of Greater-than-10% Stockholders. Northfield-Delawares
certificate of incorporation provides that no beneficial owner, directly or indirectly, of more
than 10% of the outstanding shares of common stock will be permitted to vote any shares in excess
of such 10% limit. Northfield-Federals charter does not provide such a limit on voting common
stock.
In addition, Office of Thrift Supervision regulations provide that for a period of three years
following the date of the completion of the offering, no person, acting singly or together with
associates in a group of persons acting in concert, may directly or indirectly offer to acquire or
acquire the beneficial ownership of more than 10% of a class of Northfield-Delawares equity
securities without the prior written approval of the Office of Thrift Supervision. Where any person
acquires beneficial ownership of more than 10% of a class of Northfield-Delawares equity
securities without the prior written approval of the Office of Thrift Supervision, the securities
beneficially owned by such person in excess of 10% may not be voted by any person or counted as
voting shares in connection with any matter submitted to the stockholders for a vote, and will not
be counted as outstanding for purposes of determining the affirmative vote necessary to approve any
matter submitted to the stockholders for a vote.
Mergers, Consolidations and Sales of Assets. A federal regulation applicable to
Northfield-Federal generally requires the approval of two-thirds of the Board of Directors of
Northfield-Federal and the holders of two-thirds of the outstanding stock of Northfield-Federal
entitled to vote thereon for mergers, consolidations and sales of all or substantially all of
Northfield-Federals assets. Such regulation permits Northfield-Federal to merge with another
corporation without obtaining the approval of its stockholders if:
|
(i) |
|
it does not involve an interim savings institution; |
|
|
(ii) |
|
Northfield-Federals federal stock charter is not changed; |
|
|
(iii) |
|
each share of Northfield-Federals stock outstanding immediately prior to the
effective date of the transaction will be an identical outstanding share or a treasury
share of Northfield-Federal after such effective date; and |
|
|
(iv) |
|
either: |
182
|
(a) |
|
no shares of voting stock of Northfield-Federal and no
securities convertible into such stock are to be issued or delivered under the
plan of combination; or |
|
|
(b) |
|
the authorized but unissued shares or the treasury shares of
voting stock of Northfield-Federal to be issued or delivered under the plan of
combination, plus those initially issuable upon conversion of any securities to
be issued or delivered under such plan, do not exceed 15% of the total shares
of voting stock of Northfield-Federal outstanding immediately prior to the
effective date of the transaction. |
Under Delaware law, business combinations between Northfield-Delaware and an interested
stockholder or an affiliate of an interested stockholder are prohibited for three years after the
most recent date on which the interested stockholder becomes an interested stockholder. These
business combinations include a merger, consolidation or, in circumstances specified in the
statute, certain transfers of assets, stock issuances and other transactions involving interested
stockholders and their affiliates. Delaware law defines an interested stockholder as: (i) any
person who beneficially owns 15% or more of the voting power of Northfield-Delawares voting stock;
or (ii) an affiliate or associate of Northfield-Delaware who, within the three-year period prior to
the date in question, was the beneficial owner of 15% or more of the voting power of the
then-outstanding voting stock of Northfield-Delaware.
Before the end of the three-year period, any business combination between Northfield-Delaware
and an interested stockholder generally must be recommended by the Board of Directors of
Northfield-Delaware and approved by the affirmative vote of at least two-thirds of the votes
entitled to be cast by holders of voting stock of Northfield-Delaware other than shares held by the
interested stockholder with whom or with whose affiliate the business combination is to be effected
or held by an affiliate or associate of the interested stockholder.
Evaluation of Offers. The certificate of incorporation of Northfield-Delaware provides that
its Board of Directors, when evaluating an offer to: (i) make a tender or exchange offer for any
equity security of Northfield-Delaware; (ii) merge or consolidate Northfield-Delaware with another
corporation or entity or (iii) purchase or otherwise acquire all or substantially all of the
properties and assets of Northfield-Delaware, may, in connection with the exercise of its judgment
in determining what is in the best interest of Northfield-Delaware and its stockholders, give due
consideration to all relevant factors, including, without limitation, the social and economic
effect of acceptance of such offer on Northfield-Delawares present and future customers and
employees and those of its subsidiaries; on the communities in which Northfield-Delaware and its
subsidiaries operate or are located; on the ability of Northfield-Delaware to fulfill its corporate
objectives as Northfield Banks holding company and on the ability of Northfield Bank to fulfill
the objectives of a stock savings bank under applicable statutes and regulations.
Northfield-Federals charter and bylaws do not contain a similar provision.
Dissenters Rights of Appraisal. Office of Thrift Supervision regulations generally provide
that a stockholder of a federally chartered corporation that engages in a merger, consolidation or
sale of all or substantially all of its assets shall have the right to demand from such institution
payment of the fair or appraised value of his or her stock in the corporation, subject to specified
procedural requirements. The regulations also provide, however, that a stockholder of a federally
chartered corporation whose shares are listed on a national securities exchange or quoted on the
Nasdaq stock market are not entitled to dissenters rights in connection with a merger if the
stockholder is required to accept only qualified consideration for his or her stock, which is
defined to include cash, shares of stock of any institution or corporation that at the effective
date of the merger will be listed on a national securities exchange or quoted on the Nasdaq stock
market, or any combination of such shares of stock and cash.
Under Delaware law, stockholders of Northfield-Delaware will not have dissenters appraisal
rights in connection with a plan of merger or consolidation to which Northfield-Delaware is a party
as long as the common stock of Northfield Financial Services, Inc. trades on the Nasdaq Global
Market.
183
Amendment of Governing Instruments. No amendment of Northfield-Federals stock charter may be
made unless it is first proposed by the Board of Directors of Northfield-Federal, then
preliminarily approved by the Office of Thrift Supervision, and thereafter approved by the holders
of a majority of the total votes eligible to be cast at a legal meeting.
Northfield-Delawares certificate of incorporation may be amended, upon the submission of an
amendment by the Board of Directors to a vote of the stockholders, by the affirmative vote of at
least two-thirds of the outstanding shares of common stock, or by the affirmative vote of a
majority of the outstanding shares of common stock if at least two-thirds of the members of the
whole Board of Directors approves such amendment; provided, however, that approval by at least 85%
of the outstanding voting stock is generally required to amend the following provisions:
|
(i) |
|
The limitation on voting rights of persons who directly or indirectly
beneficially own more than 10% of the outstanding shares of common stock; |
|
|
(ii) |
|
The division of the Board of Directors into three staggered classes; |
|
|
(iii) |
|
The ability of the Board of Directors to fill vacancies on the board; |
|
|
(iv) |
|
The requirement that at least a majority of the votes eligible to be cast by
stockholders must vote to remove directors, and can only remove directors for cause; |
|
|
(v) |
|
The ability of the Board of Directors to amend and repeal the bylaws; |
|
|
(vi) |
|
The number of stockholders constituting a quorum or required for stockholder
consent; and |
|
|
(vii) |
|
The provision of the certificate of incorporation requiring approval of at
least 85% of the outstanding voting stock to amend the provisions of the certificate of
incorporation provided in (i) through (vii) of this list. |
The certificate of incorporation also provides that the bylaws may be amended by the
affirmative vote of a majority of our directors or by the stockholders by the affirmative vote of
at least 80% of the total votes eligible to be voted at a duly constituted meeting of stockholders.
Any amendment of this super-majority requirement for amendment of the bylaws would also require
the approval of 80% of the outstanding voting stock.
RESTRICTIONS ON ACQUISITION OF NORTHFIELD-DELAWARE
Although the board of directors of Northfield-Delaware is not aware of any effort that might
be made to obtain control of Northfield-Delaware after the conversion, the board of directors
believes that it is appropriate to include certain provisions as part of Northfield-Delawares
certificate of incorporation to protect the interests of Northfield-Delaware and its stockholders
from takeovers which the board of directors might conclude are not in the best interests of
Northfield Bank, Northfield-Delaware or Northfield-Delawares stockholders.
The following discussion is a general summary of the material provisions of Delaware law,
Northfield-Delawares certificate of incorporation and bylaws, Northfield Banks charter and bylaws
and certain other regulatory provisions that may be deemed to have an anti-takeover effect. The
following description of certain of these provisions is necessarily general and is not intended to
be a complete description of the document or regulatory provision in question.
Northfield-Delawares certificate of incorporation and bylaws are included as part of Northfield
Bancorp, MHCs application for conversion filed with the Office of Thrift Supervision and
Northfield-Delawares registration statement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
See Where You Can Find Additional Information.
184
Delaware Law and Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws of Northfield-Delaware
Delaware law, as well as Northfield-Delawares certificate of incorporation and bylaws,
contain a number of provisions relating to corporate governance and rights of stockholders that may
discourage future takeover attempts. As a result, stockholders who might desire to participate in
such transactions may not have an opportunity to do so. In addition, these provisions will also
render the removal of the board of directors or management of Northfield-Delaware more difficult.
Directors. The board of directors will be divided into three classes. The members of each
class will be elected for a term of three years and only one class of directors will be elected
annually. Thus, it would take at least two annual elections to replace a majority of the board of
directors. The bylaws establish qualifications for board members, including restrictions on
affiliations with competitors of Northfield Bank and restrictions based upon prior legal or
regulatory violations. Further, the bylaws impose notice and information requirements in
connection with the nomination by stockholders of candidates for election to the board of directors
or the proposal by stockholders of business to be acted upon at an annual meeting of stockholders.
Such notice and information requirements are applicable to all stockholder business proposals and
nominations, and are in addition to any requirements under the federal securities laws.
Restrictions on Call of Special Meetings. The certificate of incorporation and bylaws provide
that special meetings of stockholders can be called only by a majority of the board of directors.
Prohibition of Cumulative Voting. The certificate of incorporation prohibits cumulative
voting for the election of directors.
Limitation of Voting Rights. The certificate of incorporation provides that in no event will
any person who beneficially owns more than 10% of the then-outstanding shares of common stock be
entitled or permitted to vote any of the shares of common stock held in excess of the 10% limit.
Restrictions on Removing Directors from Office. The certificate of incorporation provides
that directors may be removed only for cause, and only by the affirmative vote of the holders of at
least a majority of the voting power of all of our then-outstanding common stock entitled to vote
(after giving effect to the limitation on voting rights discussed above in Limitation of Voting
Rights.).
Authorized but Unissued Shares. After the conversion, Northfield-Delaware will have
authorized but unissued shares of common and preferred stock. See Description of Capital Stock of
Northfield-Delaware Following the Conversion. The certificate of incorporation authorizes
25,000,000 shares of serial preferred stock. Northfield-Delaware is authorized to issue preferred
stock from time to time in one or more series subject to applicable provisions of law, and the
board of directors is authorized to fix the designations, and relative preferences, limitations,
voting rights, if any, including without limitation, offering rights of such shares (which could be
multiple or as a separate class). In the event of a proposed merger, tender offer or other attempt
to gain control of Northfield-Delaware that the board of directors does not approve, it may be
possible for the board of directors to authorize the issuance of a series of preferred stock with
rights and preferences that would impede the completion of the transaction. An effect of the
possible issuance of preferred stock therefore may be to deter a future attempt to gain control of
Northfield-Delaware. The board of directors has no present plan or understanding to issue any
preferred stock.
Amendments to Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws. Amendments to the certificate of
incorporation must be approved by the board of directors and also by at least a majority of the
outstanding shares of the voting stock; provided, however, that approval by at least 85% of the
outstanding voting stock is generally required to amend certain provisions. A list of these
provisions is provided under Comparison of Stockholders Rights For Existing Stockholders of
Northfield Bancorp, Inc.Amendment of Governing Instruments above.
The certificate of incorporation also provides that the bylaws may be amended by the
affirmative vote of a majority of Northfield-Delawares directors or by the stockholders by the
affirmative vote of at least 80% of the
185
total votes eligible to be voted at a duly constituted meeting of stockholders. Any amendment
of this super-majority requirement for amendment of the bylaws would also require the approval of
80% of the outstanding voting shares.
Business Combinations with Interested Stockholders. Delaware law restricts mergers,
consolidations, sales of assets and other business combinations between Northfield-Delaware and an
interested stockholder. See Comparison of Stockholder Rights for Existing Stockholders of
Northfield Bancorp, Inc.Mergers, Consolidations and Sales of Assets above.
Evaluation of Offers. The certificate of incorporation of Northfield-Delaware provides that
its board of directors, when evaluating a transaction that would or may involve a change in control
of Northfield-Delaware (whether by purchases of its securities, merger, consolidation, share
exchange, dissolution, liquidation, sale of all or substantially all of its assets, proxy
solicitation or otherwise), may, in connection with the exercise of its business judgment in
determining what is in the best interests of Northfield-Delaware and its stockholders and in making
any recommendation to the stockholders, give due consideration to all relevant factors, including,
but not limited to, certain enumerated factors. For a list of these enumerated factors, see
Comparison of Stockholder Rights for Existing Stockholders of Northfield Bancorp, Inc.Evaluation
of Offers above.
Purpose and Anti-Takeover Effects of Northfield-Delawares Certificate of Incorporation and
Bylaws. Our board of directors believes that the provisions described above are prudent and will
reduce our vulnerability to takeover attempts and certain other transactions that have not been
negotiated with and approved by our board of directors. These provisions also will assist us in
the orderly deployment of the offering proceeds into productive assets during the initial period
after the conversion. Our board of directors believes these provisions are in the best interests
of Northfield-Delaware and its stockholders. Our board of directors believes that it will be in the
best position to determine the true value of Northfield-Delaware and to negotiate more effectively
for what may be in the best interests of all our stockholders. Accordingly, our board of directors
believes that it is in the best interests of Northfield-Delaware and all of our stockholders to
encourage potential acquirers to negotiate directly with the board of directors and that these
provisions will encourage such negotiations and discourage hostile takeover attempts. It is also
the view of our board of directors that these provisions should not discourage persons from
proposing a merger or other transaction at a price reflective of the true value of
Northfield-Delaware and that is in the best interests of all our stockholders.
Takeover attempts that have not been negotiated with and approved by our board of directors
present the risk of a takeover on terms that may be less favorable than might otherwise be
available. A transaction that is negotiated and approved by our board of directors, on the other
hand, can be carefully planned and undertaken at an opportune time in order to obtain maximum value
of Northfield-Delaware for our stockholders, with due consideration given to matters such as the
management and business of the acquiring corporation and maximum strategic development of
Northfield-Delawares assets.
Although a tender offer or other takeover attempt may be made at a price substantially above
the current market price, such offers are sometimes made for less than all of the outstanding
shares of a target company. As a result, stockholders may be presented with the alternative of
partially liquidating their investment at a time that may be disadvantageous, or retaining their
investment in an enterprise that is under different management and whose objectives may not be
similar to those of the remaining stockholders.
Despite our belief as to the benefits to stockholders of these provisions of
Northfield-Delawares certificate of incorporation and bylaws, these provisions may also have the
effect of discouraging a future takeover attempt that would not be approved by our board of
directors, but pursuant to which stockholders may receive a substantial premium for their shares
over then current market prices. As a result, stockholders who might desire to participate in such
a transaction may not have any opportunity to do so. Such provisions will also make it more
difficult to remove our board of directors and management. Our board of directors, however, has
concluded that the potential benefits outweigh the possible disadvantages.
186
Charter of Northfield Bank
Northfield Banks charter will provide that for a period of five years from the closing of the
conversion and offering, no person other than Northfield-Delaware may offer directly or indirectly
to acquire the beneficial ownership of more than 10% of any class of equity security of Northfield
Bank. This provision does not apply to any tax-qualified employee benefit plan of Northfield Bank
or Northfield-Delaware or to an underwriter or member of an underwriting or selling group involving
the public sale or resale of securities of Northfield-Delaware or any of its subsidiaries, so long
as after the sale or resale, no underwriter or member of the selling group is a beneficial owner,
directly or indirectly, of more than 10% of any class of equity securities of Northfield Bank. In
addition, during this five-year period, all shares owned over the 10% limit may not be voted on any
matter submitted to stockholders for a vote.
Conversion Regulations
Office of Thrift Supervision regulations prohibit any person from making an offer, announcing
an intent to make an offer or participating in any other arrangement to purchase stock or acquire
stock or subscription rights in a converting institution or its holding company from another person
prior to completion of its conversion. Further, without the prior written approval of the Office
of Thrift Supervision, no person may make an offer or announcement of an offer to purchase shares
or actually acquire shares of a converted institution or its holding company for a period of three
years from the date of the completion of the conversion if, upon the completion of such offer,
announcement or acquisition, the person would become the beneficial owner of more than 10% of the
outstanding stock of the institution or its holding company. The Office of Thrift Supervision has
defined person to include any individual, group acting in concert, corporation, partnership,
association, joint stock company, trust, unincorporated organization or similar company, a
syndicate or any other group formed for the purpose of acquiring, holding or disposing of
securities of an insured institution. However, offers made exclusively to a bank or its holding
company, or to an underwriter or member of a selling group acting on the converting institutions
or its holding companys behalf for resale to the general public, are excepted. The regulation
also provides civil penalties for willful violation or assistance in any such violation of the
regulation by any person connected with the management of the converting institution or its holding
company or who controls more than 10% of the outstanding shares or voting rights of a converted
institution or its holding company.
Change in Control Regulations
Under the Change in Bank Control Act, no person may acquire control of an insured federal
savings bank or its parent holding company unless the Office of Thrift Supervision has been given
60 days prior written notice and has not issued a notice disapproving the proposed acquisition.
In addition, Office of Thrift Supervision regulations provide that no company may acquire control
of a savings bank without the prior approval of the Office of Thrift Supervision. Any company that
acquires such control becomes a savings and loan holding company subject to registration,
examination and regulation by the Office of Thrift Supervision.
Control, as defined under federal law, means ownership, control of or holding irrevocable
proxies representing more than 25% of any class of voting stock, control in any manner of the
election of a majority of the institutions directors, or a determination by the Office of Thrift
Supervision that the acquiror has the power to direct, or directly or indirectly to exercise a
controlling influence over, the management or policies of the institution. Acquisition of more
than 10% of any class of a savings banks voting stock, if the acquiror is also subject to any one
of eight control factors, constitutes a rebuttable determination of control under the
regulations. Such control factors include the acquiror being one of the two largest stockholders.
The determination of control may be rebutted by submission to the Office of Thrift Supervision,
prior to the acquisition of stock or the occurrence of any other circumstances giving rise to such
determination, of a statement setting forth facts and circumstances which would support a finding
that no control relationship will exist and containing certain undertakings. The regulations
provide that persons or companies that acquire beneficial ownership exceeding 10% or more of any
class of a savings banks stock who do not intend to participate in or seek to exercise control
over a savings banks management or policies may qualify for a safe harbor by filing with the
Office of Thrift Supervision a certification form that states, among other things, that the holder
is not in control of such institution, is not subject to a rebuttable determination of control
187
and will take no action which would result in a determination or rebuttable determination of
control without prior notice to or approval of the Office of Thrift Supervision, as applicable.
There are also rebuttable presumptions in the regulations concerning whether a group acting in
concert exists, including presumed action in concert among members of an immediate family.
The Office of Thrift Supervision may prohibit an acquisition of control if it finds, among
other things, that:
|
(i) |
|
the acquisition would result in a monopoly or substantially lessen competition; |
|
|
(ii) |
|
the financial condition of the acquiring person might jeopardize the financial
stability of the institution; or |
|
|
(iii) |
|
the competence, experience or integrity of the acquiring person indicates that
it would not be in the interest of the depositors or the public to permit the
acquisition of control by such person. |
DESCRIPTION OF CAPITAL STOCK OF NORTHFIELD-DELAWARE FOLLOWING THE
CONVERSION
General
Northfield-Delaware is authorized to issue 150,000,000 shares of common stock, par value of
$0.01 per share, and 25,000,000 shares of preferred stock, par value $0.01 per share.
Northfield-Delaware currently expects to issue in the offering and exchange up to 62,991,810 shares
of common stock, subject to adjustment up to 72,440,582 shares. Northfield-Delaware will not issue
shares of preferred stock in the conversion. Each share of common stock will have the same
relative rights as, and will be identical in all respects to, each other share of common stock.
Upon payment of the subscription price for the common stock, in accordance with the plan of
conversion and reorganization, all of the shares of common stock will be duly authorized, fully
paid and nonassessable.
The shares of common stock will represent nonwithdrawable capital, will not be an account of
an insurable type, and will not be insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation or any
other government agency.
Common Stock
Dividends. Delaware law generally limits dividends to our capital surplus or, if there is no
capital surplus, our net profits for the fiscal year in which the dividend is declared and/or the
preceding fiscal year. The payment of dividends by Northfield-Delaware is also subject to
limitations that are imposed by law and applicable regulation, including restrictions on payments
of dividends that would reduce Northfield-Delawares assets below the then-adjusted balance of its
liquidation account. The holders of common stock of Northfield-Delaware will be entitled to
receive and share equally in dividends as may be declared by our board of directors out of funds
legally available therefor. If Northfield-Delaware issues shares of preferred stock, the holders
thereof may have a priority over the holders of the common stock with respect to dividends.
Voting Rights. Upon completion of the conversion, the holders of common stock of
Northfield-Delaware will have exclusive voting rights in Northfield-Delaware. They will elect
Northfield-Delawares board of directors and act on other matters as are required to be presented
to them under Delaware law or as are otherwise presented to them by the board of directors.
Generally, each holder of common stock will be entitled to one vote per share and will not have any
right to cumulate votes in the election of directors. Any person who beneficially owns more than
10% of the then-outstanding shares of Northfield-Delawares common stock, however, will not be
entitled or permitted to vote any shares of common stock held in excess of the 10% limit. If
Northfield-Delaware issues shares of preferred stock, holders of the preferred stock may also
possess voting rights. Certain matters require the approval of 85% of our outstanding common stock.
As a federal stock savings association, corporate powers and control of Northfield Bank are
vested in its board of directors, who elect the officers of Northfield Bank and who fill any
vacancies on the board of directors.
188
Voting rights of Northfield Bank are vested exclusively in the owners of the shares of capital
stock of Northfield Bank, which will be Northfield-Delaware, and voted at the direction of
Northfield-Delawares board of directors. Consequently, the holders of the common stock of
Northfield-Delaware will not have direct control of Northfield Bank.
Liquidation. In the event of any liquidation, dissolution or winding up of Northfield Bank,
Northfield-Delaware, as the holder of 100% of Northfield Banks capital stock, would be entitled to
receive all assets of Northfield Bank available for distribution, after payment or provision for
payment of all debts and liabilities of Northfield Bank, including all deposit accounts and accrued
interest thereon, and after distribution of the balance in the liquidation account to Eligible
Account Holders and Supplemental Eligible Account Holders. In the event of liquidation, dissolution
or winding up of Northfield-Delaware, the holders of its common stock would be entitled to receive,
after payment or provision for payment of all its debts and liabilities (including payments with
respect to its liquidation account), all of the assets of Northfield-Delaware available for
distribution. If preferred stock is issued, the holders thereof may have a priority over the
holders of the common stock in the event of liquidation or dissolution.
Preemptive Rights. Holders of the common stock of Northfield-Delaware will not be entitled to
preemptive rights with respect to any shares that may be issued. The common stock is not subject
to redemption.
Preferred Stock
None of the shares of Northfield-Delawares authorized preferred stock will be issued as part
of the offering or the conversion. Preferred stock may be issued with preferences and designations
as our board of directors may from time to time determine. Our board of directors may, without
stockholder approval, issue shares of preferred stock with voting, dividend, liquidation and
conversion rights that could dilute the voting strength of the holders of the common stock and may
assist management in impeding an unfriendly takeover or attempted change in control.
TRANSFER AGENT
The transfer agent and registrar for Northfield-Delawares common stock is Registrar and
Transfer Company, Cranford, New Jersey.
EXPERTS
The consolidated financial statements of Northfield-Federal and subsidiaries as of December
31, 2009 and 2008, and for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2009, have
been included herein in reliance upon the report of KPMG LLP, independent registered public
accounting firm, which is included herein and upon the authority of said firm as experts in
accounting and auditing.
RP Financial, LC. has consented to the publication herein of the summary of its report setting
forth its opinion as to the estimated pro forma market value of the shares of common stock upon
completion of the conversion and offering and its letters with respect to subscription rights and
the liquidation accounts.
LEGAL MATTERS
Luse Gorman Pomerenk & Schick, P.C., Washington, D.C., counsel to Northfield-Delaware,
Northfield Bancorp, MHC, Northfield-Federal and Northfield Bank, will issue to Northfield-Delaware
its opinion regarding the legality of the common stock and the federal income tax consequences of
the conversion. Crowe Horwath LLP has provided opinions to us regarding the New Jersey and New
York income tax consequences of the conversion. Certain legal matters will be passed upon for
Sandler ONeill & Partners, L.P. and Keefe, Bruyette & Woods, Inc. by Kilpatrick Stockton LLP,
Washington, D.C.
189
WHERE YOU CAN FIND ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
Northfield-Delaware has filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission a registration
statement under the Securities Act of 1933 with respect to the shares of common stock offered
hereby. As permitted by the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission, this
prospectus does not contain all the information set forth in the registration statement. Such
information, including the appraisal report which is an exhibit to the registration statement, can
be examined without charge at the public reference facilities of the Securities and Exchange
Commission located at 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549, and copies of such material can
be obtained from the Securities and Exchange Commission at prescribed rates. The Securities and
Exchange Commission telephone number is 1-800-SEC-0330. In addition, the Securities and Exchange
Commission maintains a web site (http://www.sec.gov) that contains reports, proxy and information
statements and other information regarding registrants that file electronically with the Securities
and Exchange Commission, including Northfield-Delaware. The statements contained in this
prospectus as to the contents of any contract or other document filed as an exhibit to the
registration statement are, of necessity, brief descriptions of the material terms of, and should
be read in conjunction with, such contract or document.
Northfield Bancorp, MHC has filed with the Office of Thrift Supervision an Application on Form
AC with respect to the conversion. This prospectus omits certain information contained in the
application. The application may be examined at the principal office of the Office of Thrift
Supervision, 1700 G Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20552, and at the Northeast Regional Office of
the Office of Thrift Supervision, Harborside Financial Center Plaza Five, Suite 1600, Jersey City,
New Jersey 07311. Our Plan of Conversion and Reorganization is available, upon request, at each of
our branch offices.
In connection with the offering, Northfield-Delaware will register its common stock under
Section 12(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and, upon such registration,
Northfield-Delaware and the holders of its common stock will become subject to the proxy
solicitation rules, reporting requirements and restrictions on common stock purchases and sales by
directors, officers and greater than 10% stockholders, the annual and periodic reporting and
certain other requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Under the plan of conversion
and reorganization, Northfield-Delaware has undertaken that it will not terminate such registration
for a period of at least three years following the offering.
190
INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF
NORTHFIELD BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-9 |
|
***
All financial statement schedules have been omitted as the required information either is not
applicable or is included in the financial statements or related notes.
F-1
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Board of Directors and Stockholders
Northfield Bancorp, Inc. and subsidiaries:
We have
audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Northfield Bancorp, Inc. and
subsidiaries (the Company) as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, and the related consolidated
statements of income, changes in stockholders equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the
three-year period ended December 31, 2009. These consolidated financial statements are the
responsibility of the Companys management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these
consolidated financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An
audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the
financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and
significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all
material respects, the financial position of Northfield Bancorp, Inc. and subsidiaries as of
December 31, 2009 and 2008, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of
the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2009, in conformity with U.S. generally
accepted accounting principles.
As discussed in note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company changed its method of
evaluating other-than-temporary impairments of debt securities due to the adoption of new
accounting requirements issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board, as of April 1, 2009.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States), the Companys internal control over financial reporting as of December 31,
2009, based on criteria established in Internal Control Integrated Framework issued by the
Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO), and our report dated March
16, 2010 expressed an unqualified opinion on the effectiveness of the Companys internal control
over financial reporting.
/s/ KPMG LLP
Short
Hills, New Jersey
March 16, 2010
F-2
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Board of Directors and Stockholders
Northfield Bancorp, Inc. and subsidiaries:
We have audited Northfield Bancorp, Inc. and subsidiaries internal control over financial
reporting as of December 31, 2009, based on criteria established in Internal Control Integrated
Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).
Northfield Bancorp, Inc. and subsidiaries management is responsible for maintaining effective
internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal
control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Managements Report on Internal
Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on Northfield
Bancorp, Inc. and subsidiaries internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was
maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal
control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing
and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed
risk. Our audit also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the
circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
A companys internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable
assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial
statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A
companys internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1)
pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the
transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that
transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance
with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company
are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company;
and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized
acquisition, use, or disposition of the companys assets that could have a material effect on the
financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or
detect misstatements. In addition, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future
periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in
conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
In our opinion, Northfield Bancorp, Inc. and subsidiaries maintained, in all material respects,
effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2009, based on criteria
established in Internal Control Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission.
F-3
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets of Northfield Bancorp, Inc. and subsidiaries
as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, and the related consolidated statements of income, changes in
stockholders equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December
31, 2009, and our report dated March 16, 2010 expressed an unqualified opinion on those
consolidated financial statements.
/s/ KPMG LLP
Short Hills, New Jersey
March 16, 2010
F-4
NORTHFIELD BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Balance Sheets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At March 31, |
|
At December 31, |
|
(in thousands, except share data) |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ASSETS: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and due from banks |
|
$ |
9,646 |
|
|
|
10,183 |
|
|
|
9,014 |
|
Interest-bearing deposits in other financial institutions |
|
|
41,165 |
|
|
|
32,361 |
|
|
|
41,114 |
|
|
Total cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
50,811 |
|
|
|
42,544 |
|
|
|
50,128 |
|
|
Certificates of deposit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
53,653 |
|
Trading securities |
|
|
3,706 |
|
|
|
3,403 |
|
|
|
2,498 |
|
Securities available-for-sale, at estimated fair value (encumbered $261,004 (unaudited) in 2010,
$219,446 in 2009, and $183,711 in 2008) |
|
|
1,216,195 |
|
|
|
1,131,803 |
|
|
|
957,585 |
|
Securities held-to-maturity, at amortized cost (estimated fair value of $6,432 (unaudited), $6,930 and
$14,588 in 2010, 2009, and 2008, respectively) (encumbered $0 (unaudited) in 2010, $0 in 2009, and $1,241 in 2008) |
|
|
6,220 |
|
|
|
6,740 |
|
|
|
14,479 |
|
Loans held-for-investment, net |
|
|
737,225 |
|
|
|
729,269 |
|
|
|
589,984 |
|
Allowance for loan losses |
|
|
(17,146 |
) |
|
|
(15,414 |
) |
|
|
(8,778 |
) |
|
Net loans held-for-investment |
|
|
720,079 |
|
|
|
713,855 |
|
|
|
581,206 |
|
|
Accrued interest receivable |
|
|
8,042 |
|
|
|
8,054 |
|
|
|
8,319 |
|
Bank owned life insurance |
|
|
44,174 |
|
|
|
43,751 |
|
|
|
42,001 |
|
Federal Home Loan Bank of New York stock, at cost |
|
|
5,026 |
|
|
|
6,421 |
|
|
|
9,410 |
|
Premises and equipment, net |
|
|
13,114 |
|
|
|
12,676 |
|
|
|
8,899 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
16,159 |
|
|
|
16,159 |
|
|
|
16,159 |
|
Other real estate owned |
|
|
1,533 |
|
|
|
1,938 |
|
|
|
1,071 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
12,744 |
|
|
|
14,930 |
|
|
|
12,353 |
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
2,097,803 |
|
|
|
2,002,274 |
|
|
|
1,757,761 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits |
|
$ |
1,392,905 |
|
|
|
1,316,885 |
|
|
|
1,024,439 |
|
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase |
|
|
244,680 |
|
|
|
200,000 |
|
|
|
170,000 |
|
Other borrowings |
|
|
48,380 |
|
|
|
79,424 |
|
|
|
162,084 |
|
Advance payments by borrowers for taxes and insurance |
|
|
2,038 |
|
|
|
757 |
|
|
|
3,823 |
|
Accrued expenses and other liabilities |
|
|
13,514 |
|
|
|
13,668 |
|
|
|
10,837 |
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
1,701,517 |
|
|
|
1,610,734 |
|
|
|
1,371,183 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
COMMITMENTS
AND CONTINGENCIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, $.01 par value; 10,000,000 shares authorized, none issued or outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $.01 par value; 90,000,000 shares authorized, 45,632,611 (unaudited), 45,628,211, and 44,803,061 shares
issued at March 31, 2010, December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively, 43,722,522 (unaudited), 43,912,148 and
44,803,061
shares outstanding at March 31, 2010, December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively |
|
|
456 |
|
|
|
456 |
|
|
|
448 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
203,541 |
|
|
|
202,479 |
|
|
|
199,453 |
|
Unallocated common stock held by employee stock ownership plan |
|
|
(15,660 |
) |
|
|
(15,807 |
) |
|
|
(16,391 |
) |
Retained earnings |
|
|
214,779 |
|
|
|
212,196 |
|
|
|
203,085 |
|
Accumulated
other comprehensive income (loss) (net of tax of $10,444 (unaudited),
$8,336, and ($12), for 2010, 2009, and 2008, respectively) |
|
|
15,690 |
|
|
|
12,145 |
|
|
|
(17 |
) |
Treasury stock at cost; 1,910,089 (unaudited), 1,716,063, and 0 shares at March 31, 2010, December 31, 2009 and 2008,
respectively |
|
|
(22,520 |
) |
|
|
(19,929 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
396,286 |
|
|
|
391,540 |
|
|
|
386,578 |
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
2,097,803 |
|
|
|
2,002,274 |
|
|
|
1,757,761 |
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-5
NORTHFIELD BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Statements of Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
Years Ended December 31, |
|
(in thousands, except share data) |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans |
|
$ |
10,293 |
|
|
|
8,571 |
|
|
|
38,889 |
|
|
|
31,617 |
|
|
|
28,398 |
|
Mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
9,181 |
|
|
|
11,114 |
|
|
|
42,256 |
|
|
|
38,072 |
|
|
|
30,576 |
|
Other securities |
|
|
1,384 |
|
|
|
282 |
|
|
|
3,223 |
|
|
|
1,348 |
|
|
|
2,100 |
|
Federal Home Loan Bank of New York dividends |
|
|
95 |
|
|
|
80 |
|
|
|
399 |
|
|
|
652 |
|
|
|
519 |
|
Deposits in other financial institutions |
|
|
54 |
|
|
|
435 |
|
|
|
801 |
|
|
|
3,360 |
|
|
|
4,109 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest income |
|
|
21,007 |
|
|
|
20,482 |
|
|
|
85,568 |
|
|
|
75,049 |
|
|
|
65,702 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits |
|
|
3,952 |
|
|
|
4,957 |
|
|
|
18,214 |
|
|
|
18,522 |
|
|
|
23,763 |
|
Borrowings |
|
|
2,506 |
|
|
|
2,764 |
|
|
|
10,763 |
|
|
|
9,734 |
|
|
|
5,073 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest expense |
|
|
6,458 |
|
|
|
7,721 |
|
|
|
28,977 |
|
|
|
28,256 |
|
|
|
28,836 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income |
|
|
14,549 |
|
|
|
12,761 |
|
|
|
56,591 |
|
|
|
46,793 |
|
|
|
36,866 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
1,930 |
|
|
|
1,644 |
|
|
|
9,038 |
|
|
|
5,082 |
|
|
|
1,442 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income after provision for loan losses |
|
|
12,619 |
|
|
|
11,117 |
|
|
|
47,553 |
|
|
|
41,711 |
|
|
|
35,424 |
|
|
Non-interest income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fees and service charges for customer services |
|
|
660 |
|
|
|
659 |
|
|
|
2,695 |
|
|
|
3,133 |
|
|
|
3,132 |
|
Income on bank owned life insurance |
|
|
423 |
|
|
|
433 |
|
|
|
1,750 |
|
|
|
4,235 |
|
|
|
1,694 |
|
Gain (loss) on securities transactions, net |
|
|
615 |
|
|
|
(154 |
) |
|
|
891 |
|
|
|
(1,318 |
) |
|
|
71 |
|
Gain on sale of premises and equipment and deposit relationships |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,308 |
|
Other-than-temporary impairment losses on securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,365 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Portion recognized in other comprehensive income (before taxes) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,189 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net impairment losses on securities recognized in earnings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(176 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
233 |
|
|
|
103 |
|
|
|
273 |
|
|
|
Total non-interest income |
|
|
1,723 |
|
|
|
969 |
|
|
|
5,393 |
|
|
|
6,153 |
|
|
|
9,478 |
|
|
Non-interest expense: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation and employee benefits |
|
|
4,791 |
|
|
|
3,768 |
|
|
|
16,896 |
|
|
|
11,723 |
|
|
|
12,685 |
|
Director compensation |
|
|
392 |
|
|
|
308 |
|
|
|
1,338 |
|
|
|
545 |
|
|
|
598 |
|
Occupancy |
|
|
1,194 |
|
|
|
1,120 |
|
|
|
4,602 |
|
|
|
3,864 |
|
|
|
3,062 |
|
Furniture and equipment |
|
|
272 |
|
|
|
288 |
|
|
|
1,093 |
|
|
|
996 |
|
|
|
852 |
|
Data processing |
|
|
607 |
|
|
|
844 |
|
|
|
2,637 |
|
|
|
3,021 |
|
|
|
2,425 |
|
Professional fees |
|
|
379 |
|
|
|
526 |
|
|
|
1,950 |
|
|
|
1,584 |
|
|
|
1,218 |
|
Contribution to Northfield Bank Foundation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,952 |
|
FDIC insurance |
|
|
430 |
|
|
|
414 |
|
|
|
2,320 |
|
|
|
251 |
|
|
|
116 |
|
Other |
|
|
1,056 |
|
|
|
514 |
|
|
|
3,418 |
|
|
|
2,868 |
|
|
|
3,042 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-interest expense |
|
|
9,121 |
|
|
|
7,782 |
|
|
|
34,254 |
|
|
|
24,852 |
|
|
|
35,950 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
5,221 |
|
|
|
4,304 |
|
|
|
18,692 |
|
|
|
23,012 |
|
|
|
8,952 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax expense (benefit) |
|
|
1,840 |
|
|
|
1,569 |
|
|
|
6,618 |
|
|
|
7,181 |
|
|
|
(1,555 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
3,381 |
|
|
|
2,735 |
|
|
|
12,074 |
|
|
|
15,831 |
|
|
|
10,507 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per common share basic and diluted (1) |
|
$ |
0.08 |
|
|
|
0.06 |
|
|
|
0.28 |
|
|
|
0.37 |
|
|
|
(0.03 |
) |
|
Weighted average shares outstanding basic (1) |
|
|
41,509,173 |
|
|
|
43,089,331 |
|
|
|
42,405,774 |
|
|
|
43,133,856 |
|
|
|
43,076,586 |
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding diluted |
|
|
41,823,794 |
|
|
|
43,104,409 |
|
|
|
42,532,568 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Net loss per share is calculated for the period that the Companys shares of common stock
were outstanding (November 8, 2007, through December 31, 2007). The net loss for this period was
$1,501,000 and the weighted average common shares outstanding were 43,076,586. Per share data and
shares outstanding information is not applicable prior to November 8, 2007. |
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-6
NORTHFIELD BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three months ended March 31, 2010 (Unaudited) and the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unallocated |
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
common stock |
|
|
|
|
|
other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock |
|
Additional |
|
held by the |
|
|
|
|
|
comprehensive |
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Par |
|
paid-in |
|
employee stock |
|
Retained |
|
income (loss), |
|
Treasury |
|
stockholders |
(in thousands, except share data) |
|
Shares |
|
Value |
|
capital |
|
ownership plan |
|
earnings |
|
net of tax |
|
Stock |
|
equity |
|
Balance at December 31, 2006 |
|
|
100 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
510 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
177,731 |
|
|
|
(14,247 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
163,994 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,507 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,507 |
|
Net unrealized holding gains on securities arising
during the year (net of tax of $7,069) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,897 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,897 |
|
Reclassification adjustment for gains included
in net income (net of tax of $4) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
Post retirement benefits adjustment (net of tax $158) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(163 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(163 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,507 |
|
|
|
10,729 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,236 |
|
|
Contribution from Northfield Bancorp, MHC. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
500 |
|
Sale of 19,265,316 shares of common stock, issuance
of 24,641,684 shares to the mutual
holding company, and issuance of 896,061
shares to Northfield Bank Foundation |
|
|
44,802,961 |
|
|
|
448 |
|
|
|
198,350 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(246 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
198,552 |
|
Purchase of common stock by the ESOP |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(17,563 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(17,563 |
) |
ESOP shares allocated or committed to be released |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
586 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
621 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2007 |
|
|
44,803,061 |
|
|
$ |
448 |
|
|
|
199,395 |
|
|
|
(16,977 |
) |
|
|
187,992 |
|
|
|
(3,518 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
367,340 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,831 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,831 |
|
Net unrealized holding gains on securities arising
during the year (net of tax of $2,434) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,479 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,479 |
|
Reclassification adjustment for gains included
in net income (net of tax of $6) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9 |
) |
Post retirement benefits adjustment (net of tax $28) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,831 |
|
|
|
3,501 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,332 |
|
|
Cash dividends declared ($0.04 per common share) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(738 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(738 |
) |
ESOP shares allocated or committed to be released |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
58 |
|
|
|
586 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
644 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2008 |
|
|
44,803,061 |
|
|
$ |
448 |
|
|
|
199,453 |
|
|
|
(16,391 |
) |
|
|
203,085 |
|
|
|
(17 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
386,578 |
|
|
|
Comprehensive income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,074 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,074 |
|
Net unrealized holding gains on securities arising
during the year (net of tax of $8,438) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,075 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,075 |
|
Reclassification adjustment for gains included
in net income (net of tax of $35) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(54 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(54 |
) |
Post retirement benefits adjustment (net of tax $26) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35 |
|
Reclassification adjustment for OTTI impairment
included in net income (net of tax of $70) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
106 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
106 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,074 |
|
|
|
12,162 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,236 |
|
|
ESOP shares allocated or committed to be released |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
92 |
|
|
|
584 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
676 |
|
Stock compensation expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,942 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,942 |
|
Cash dividends declared ($0.16 per common share) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,963 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,963 |
) |
Issuance of restricted stock |
|
|
825,150 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Treasury stock (average cost of $11.61 per share) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(19,929 |
) |
|
|
(19,929 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2009 |
|
|
45,628,211 |
|
|
$ |
456 |
|
|
|
202,479 |
|
|
|
(15,807 |
) |
|
|
212,196 |
|
|
|
12,145 |
|
|
|
(19,929 |
) |
|
|
391,540 |
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,381 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,381 |
|
Net
unrealized holding gains on securities arising during the year (net
of tax of $2,209) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,714 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,714 |
|
Reclassification
adjustment for gains included in net income (net of tax $101) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(169) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(169) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,381 |
|
|
|
3,545 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,926 |
|
|
ESOP shares allocated or committed to be released |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
147 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
202 |
|
Stock compensation expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
776 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
776 |
|
Additional tax benefit on stock awards |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
231 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
231 |
|
Exercise of stock options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(26 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
163 |
|
|
|
137 |
|
Cash dividends declared ($0.04 per common share) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(772 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(772 |
) |
Issuance of restricted stock |
|
|
4,400 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Treasury stock (average cost of $13.25 per share) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,754 |
) |
|
|
(2,754 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at March 31, 2010 |
|
|
45,632,611 |
|
|
|
456 |
|
|
|
203,541 |
|
|
|
(15,660 |
) |
|
|
214,779 |
|
|
|
15,690 |
|
|
|
(22,520 |
) |
|
|
396,286 |
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-7
NORTHFIELD BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31, |
|
Years ended December 31, |
|
(in thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
3,381 |
|
|
|
2,735 |
|
|
|
12,074 |
|
|
|
15,831 |
|
|
|
10,507 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
1,930 |
|
|
|
1,644 |
|
|
|
9,038 |
|
|
|
5,082 |
|
|
|
1,442 |
|
Depreciation |
|
|
432 |
|
|
|
412 |
|
|
|
1,679 |
|
|
|
1,490 |
|
|
|
1,326 |
|
(Accretion) of discounts, and deferred loan fees, net of amortization of premiums |
|
|
123 |
|
|
|
(419 |
) |
|
|
(1,486 |
) |
|
|
(1,098 |
) |
|
|
(60 |
) |
Amortization of mortgage servicing rights |
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
113 |
|
|
|
135 |
|
|
|
171 |
|
Income on bank owned life insurance |
|
|
(423 |
) |
|
|
(433 |
) |
|
|
(1,750 |
) |
|
|
(4,235 |
) |
|
|
(1,694 |
) |
Contribution of common stock to Northfield Bank Foundation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,952 |
|
Net gain on sale of loans held-for-sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14 |
) |
|
|
(138 |
) |
|
|
(29 |
) |
|
|
(60 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of loans held-for-sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,222 |
|
|
|
7,509 |
|
|
|
4,092 |
|
|
|
6,265 |
|
Origination of loans held-for-sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,267 |
) |
|
|
(7,371 |
) |
|
|
(3,793 |
) |
|
|
(6,350 |
) |
(Gain) loss on securities transactions, net |
|
|
(615 |
) |
|
|
154 |
|
|
|
(891 |
) |
|
|
1,318 |
|
|
|
(71 |
) |
Net impairment losses on securities recognized in earnings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
176 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on sale of deposit relationships |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,660 |
) |
Gain on sale of premises and equipment, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(648 |
) |
Net purchases of trading securities |
|
|
(42 |
) |
|
|
185 |
|
|
|
(313 |
) |
|
|
(226 |
) |
|
|
(876 |
) |
Decrease (increase) in accrued interest receivable |
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
1,768 |
|
|
|
265 |
|
|
|
(2,719 |
) |
|
|
24 |
|
(Increase) decrease in other assets |
|
|
(287 |
) |
|
|
(1,495 |
) |
|
|
148 |
|
|
|
(5,283 |
) |
|
|
90 |
|
Decrease (increase) in prepaid FDIC assessment |
|
|
386 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,736 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ESOP and stock compensation expense |
|
|
978 |
|
|
|
706 |
|
|
|
3,618 |
|
|
|
644 |
|
|
|
621 |
|
Deferred taxes |
|
|
400 |
|
|
|
(1,171 |
) |
|
|
(4,938 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(10,396 |
) |
(Decrease) increase in accrued expenses and other liabilities |
|
|
(154 |
) |
|
|
(158 |
) |
|
|
2,831 |
|
|
|
(6,253 |
) |
|
|
5,443 |
|
Amortization of core deposit intangible |
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
95 |
|
|
|
336 |
|
|
|
378 |
|
|
|
386 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
6,189 |
|
|
|
2,991 |
|
|
|
15,164 |
|
|
|
5,333 |
|
|
|
11,412 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in loans receivable |
|
|
(8,367 |
) |
|
|
(34,927 |
) |
|
|
(108,385 |
) |
|
|
(163,643 |
) |
|
|
(16,029 |
) |
Purchases of loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(35,369 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Redemptions (purchases) of Federal Home Loan Bank of New York stock, net |
|
|
1,395 |
|
|
|
2,295 |
|
|
|
2,989 |
|
|
|
(2,708 |
) |
|
|
484 |
|
Purchases of securities available-for-sale |
|
|
(217,161 |
) |
|
|
(70,700 |
) |
|
|
(655,765 |
) |
|
|
(421,696 |
) |
|
|
(309,396 |
) |
Principal payments and maturities on securities available-for-sale |
|
|
123,590 |
|
|
|
73,431 |
|
|
|
500,518 |
|
|
|
270,091 |
|
|
|
234,457 |
|
Principal payments and maturities on securities held-to-maturity |
|
|
519 |
|
|
|
1,122 |
|
|
|
4,575 |
|
|
|
5,214 |
|
|
|
6,476 |
|
Proceeds from sale of securities available-for-sale |
|
|
15,193 |
|
|
|
1,998 |
|
|
|
3,293 |
|
|
|
3,350 |
|
|
|
3,705 |
|
Proceeds from sale of securities held-to-maturity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,371 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of certificates of deposit in other financial institutions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(63 |
) |
|
|
(118,653 |
) |
|
|
(50,500 |
) |
Proceeds from maturities of certificates of deposit in other financial institutions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
46,000 |
|
|
|
53,716 |
|
|
|
89,500 |
|
|
|
31,200 |
|
Purchase of bank owned life insurance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,000 |
) |
Cash received from bank owned life insurance contracts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,794 |
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases and improvements of premises and equipment |
|
|
(870 |
) |
|
|
(901 |
) |
|
|
(5,456 |
) |
|
|
(2,662 |
) |
|
|
(897 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of premises and equipment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,473 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities |
|
|
(85,701 |
) |
|
|
18,318 |
|
|
|
(236,576 |
) |
|
|
(337,413 |
) |
|
|
(106,027 |
) |
|
Cash flows from financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in deposits |
|
|
76,020 |
|
|
|
90,052 |
|
|
|
292,446 |
|
|
|
147,214 |
|
|
|
(3,560 |
) |
Deposit relationship sold, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(22,985 |
) |
Net proceeds from sale of common stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
107,241 |
|
Dividends paid |
|
|
(772 |
) |
|
|
(774 |
) |
|
|
(2,963 |
) |
|
|
(738 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Exercise of stock options |
|
|
137 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of common stock for ESOP |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(17,563 |
) |
Purchase of treasury stock |
|
|
(2,754 |
) |
|
|
(3,801 |
) |
|
|
(19,929 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional tax benefit on stock awards |
|
|
231 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) in advance payments by borrowers for taxes and insurance |
|
|
1,281 |
|
|
|
(1,455 |
) |
|
|
(3,066 |
) |
|
|
2,980 |
|
|
|
60 |
|
Repayments under capital lease obligations |
|
|
(44 |
) |
|
|
(67 |
) |
|
|
(160 |
) |
|
|
(136 |
) |
|
|
(114 |
) |
Proceeds from securities sold under agreements to repurchase and other borrowings |
|
|
69,680 |
|
|
|
20,000 |
|
|
|
138,600 |
|
|
|
410,800 |
|
|
|
83,000 |
|
Repayments related to securities sold under agreements to repurchase and other borrowings |
|
|
(56,000 |
) |
|
|
(71,000 |
) |
|
|
(191,100 |
) |
|
|
(203,000 |
) |
|
|
(87,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities |
|
|
87,779 |
|
|
|
32,955 |
|
|
|
213,828 |
|
|
|
357,120 |
|
|
|
59,079 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
8,267 |
|
|
|
54,264 |
|
|
|
(7,584 |
) |
|
|
25,040 |
|
|
|
(35,536 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year |
|
|
42,544 |
|
|
|
50,128 |
|
|
|
50,128 |
|
|
|
25,088 |
|
|
|
60,624 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year |
|
$ |
50,811 |
|
|
|
104,392 |
|
|
|
42,544 |
|
|
|
50,128 |
|
|
|
25,088 |
|
|
Supplemental cash flow information: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid during the year for: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest |
|
$ |
6,645 |
|
|
|
8,251 |
|
|
|
29,334 |
|
|
|
27,322 |
|
|
|
28,657 |
|
Income taxes |
|
|
1,565 |
|
|
|
183 |
|
|
|
10,351 |
|
|
|
11,316 |
|
|
|
4,298 |
|
Non-cash transactions: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits utilized to purchase common stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
82,359 |
|
Loans charged-off, net |
|
|
198 |
|
|
|
595 |
|
|
|
2,402 |
|
|
|
1,940 |
|
|
|
836 |
|
Transfer of loans to other real estate owned |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,348 |
|
|
|
1,071 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other real estate owned charged-off |
|
|
146 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-8
NORTHFIELD BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Three Months Ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 (unaudited)
Years Ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007
(1) |
|
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies |
|
|
The following significant accounting and reporting policies of Northfield Bancorp, Inc. and
subsidiaries (collectively, the Company), conform to U.S. generally accepted accounting
principles, or (GAAP), and are used in preparing and presenting these consolidated financial
statements. |
|
(a) |
|
Basis of Presentation |
|
|
|
The consolidated financial statements are comprised of the accounts of Northfield
Bancorp, Inc. and its wholly owned subsidiaries, Northfield Investment, Inc. and
Northfield Bank (the Bank) and the Banks wholly-owned significant subsidiaries, NSB
Services Corp. and NSB Realty Trust. All significant intercompany accounts and
transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. |
|
|
|
In 1995, the Bank completed a Plan of Mutual Holding Company Reorganization, utilizing a
single-tier mutual holding company structure. In a series of steps, the Bank formed a
New York-chartered mutual holding company (NSB Holding Corp.) which owned 100% of the
common stock of the Bank. In 2002, NSB Holding Corp. formed Northfield Holdings Corp.,
a New York-chartered stock corporation, and contributed 100% of the common stock of the
Bank into Northfield Holdings Corp. which owned 100% of the common stock of Northfield
Holdings Corp. In 2006, Northfield Holdings Corp.s name was changed to Northfield
Bancorp, Inc. and Northfield Savings Banks name was changed to Northfield Bank. In
2007, NSB Holdings Corp.s name was changed to Northfield Bancorp, MHC. |
|
|
|
As part of the stock issuance plan announced in April 2007, Northfield Bank converted to
a federally-charted savings bank from a New York-chartered savings bank effective
November 6, 2007. Northfield Banks primary federal regulator is the Office of Thrift
Supervision (the OTS) and was the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (the FDIC)
prior to our November 2007 conversion. Simultaneously with Northfield Banks
conversion, Northfield Bancorp, MHC and Northfield Bancorp, Inc. converted to
federal-chartered holding companies from New York-chartered holding companies. |
|
|
|
In preparing the consolidated financial statements, management is required to make
estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities as
of the date of the balance sheets and revenues and expenses during the reporting
periods. Actual results may differ significantly from those estimates and assumptions.
A material estimate that is particularly susceptible to significant change in the near
term is the allowance for loan losses. In connection with the determination of this
allowance, management generally obtains independent appraisals for significant
properties. Judgments related to goodwill, and securities valuation and impairment also
are critical because they involve a higher degree of complexity and subjectivity and
require estimates and assumptions about highly uncertain matters. Actual results may
differ from the estimates and assumptions. |
|
|
|
Certain prior year balances have been reclassified to conform to the current year
presentation. |
|
|
|
|
In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting
solely of normal and recurring adjustments) necessary for the fair
presentation of the consolidated financial condition and the
consolidated results of operations for the unaudited periods
presented have been included. The results of operations and other
data presented for the three month period ended March 31, 2010, are
not necessarily indicative of the results of operations that may be
expected for the year ending December 31, 2010. Certain prior year
amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current year
presentation. |
|
|
|
The Company, through its principal subsidiary, the Bank, provides a full range of
banking services primarily to individuals and corporate customers in Richmond and Kings
Counties in New York, and Union and Middlesex Counties in New Jersey. The Company also
finances insurance premiums for commercial customers throughout the contiguous United
States. The Company is subject to competition from other financial institutions and to
the regulations of certain federal and state agencies, and undergoes periodic
examinations by those regulatory authorities. |
|
|
|
Cash equivalents consist of cash on hand, due from banks, federal funds sold, and
interest-bearing deposits in other financial institutions with an original term of three
months or less. Certificates of |
F-9
NORTHFIELD BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Three Months Ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 (unaudited)
Years Ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007
|
|
|
deposit with original maturities of greater than three
months are excluded from cash equivalents and reported as a separate line item on the
consolidated balance sheets. |
|
|
|
Securities are classified at the time of purchase, based on managements intention, as
securities held- to-maturity, securities available-for-sale, or trading account
securities. Securities held-to-maturity are those that management
has the positive intent and ability to hold until maturity. Securities held-to-maturity
are carried at amortized cost, adjusted for amortization of premiums and accretion of
discounts using the level-yield method over the contractual term of the securities,
adjusted for actual prepayments. Trading securities are securities that are bought and
may be held for the purpose of selling them in the near term. Trading securities are
reported at estimated fair value, with unrealized holding gains and losses reported as a
component of gain (loss) on securities transactions, net in non-interest income.
Securities available-for-sale represents all securities not classified as either
held-to-maturity or trading. Securities available-for-sale are carried at estimated
fair value with unrealized holding gains and losses (net of related tax effects) on such
securities excluded from earnings, but included as a separate component of stockholders
equity, titled Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss). The cost of securities
sold is determined using the specific-identification method. Security transactions are
recorded on a trade-date basis. Our evaluation of other-than-temporary impairment
considers the duration and severity of the impairment, our intent to
sell the security and whether it is more likely than not that we will
be required to sell the security before full recovery of our
investment or maturity and our assessments of the reason for the decline in value and the
likelihood of a near-term recovery. If a determination is made that a debt security is
other-than-temporarily impaired, the Company will estimate the amount of the unrealized
loss that is attributable to credit and all other non-credit related factors. The
credit related component will be recognized as an other-than-temporary impairment charge
in non-interest income as a component of gain (loss) on securities, net. The non-credit
related component will be recorded as an adjustment to accumulated other comprehensive
income (loss), net of tax. The estimated fair value of debt securities, including
mortgage-backed securities and corporate debt obligations is furnished by an independent
third party pricing service. The third party pricing service primarily utilizes pricing
models and methodologies that incorporate observable market inputs, including among
other things, benchmark yields, reported trades, and projected prepayment and default
rates. Management reviews the data and assumptions used in pricing the securities by
its third party provider for reasonableness. |
|
|
|
Net loans held-for-investment are stated at unpaid principal balance, adjusted by
unamortized premiums and unearned discounts, deferred origination fees and certain
direct origination costs, and the allowance for loan losses. Interest income on loans
is accrued and credited to income as earned. Net loan origination fees/costs are
deferred and accreted/amortized to interest income over the loans contractual life
using the level-yield method, adjusted for actual prepayments. Loans held-for-sale are
designated at time of origination and generally consist of fixed rate residential loans
with terms of 15 years or more and are recorded at the lower of cost or estimated fair
value in the aggregate. Gains are recognized on a settlement-date basis and are
determined by the difference between the net sales proceeds and the carrying value of
the loans, including any net deferred fees or costs. |
|
|
|
The Company defines an impaired loan as a loan for which it is probable, based on
current information, that the Company will not collect all amounts due in accordance
with the contractual terms of the loan agreement. The Company has defined the
population of impaired loans to be all non-accrual loans with an outstanding balance of
$500,000 or greater. Impaired loans are individually assessed to determine that the
loans carrying value is not in excess of the expected future cash flows, discounted at
the loans original effective interest rate, or the underlying collateral (less estimated
costs to sell) if the loan is collateral dependent. Impairments are recognized through
a charge to the provision for loan losses for the amount that the loans carrying value
exceeds the discounted cash flow analysis or estimated fair value of collateral (less
estimated costs to sell) if the loan is collateral dependent. Homogeneous loans with
balances less than $500,000 are collectively evaluated for impairment. |
F-10
NORTHFIELD BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Three Months Ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 (unaudited)
Years Ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007
|
|
|
The allowance for loan losses is increased by the provision for loan losses charged
against income and is decreased by charge-offs, net of recoveries. Loan losses are
charged-off in the period the loans, or portion thereof, are deemed uncollectible.
Generally, the Company will record a loan charge-off (including a partial charge-off) to
reduce a loan to the estimated fair value of the underlying collateral, less cost to
sell, if it is determined that it is probable that recovery will come primarily from the
sale of such collateral. The provision for loan losses is based on managements
evaluation of the adequacy of the allowance which considers, among other things,
impaired loans, past loan loss experience, known and inherent risks in the portfolio,
existing adverse situations that may affect the borrowers ability to repay, and
estimated value of any underlying collateral securing loans. Additionally, management
evaluates changes, if any, in underwriting standards, collection, charge-off and
recovery practices, the nature or volume of the portfolio, lending staff, concentration
of loans, as well as current economic conditions, and other relevant factors.
Management believes the allowance for loan losses is adequate to provide for probable
and reasonably estimatable losses at the date of the consolidated balance sheets. The
Company also maintains an allowance for estimated losses on off-balance sheet credit
risks related to loan commitments and standby letters of credit. Management utilizes a
methodology similar to its allowance for loan loss adequacy methodology to estimate
losses on these commitments. The allowance for estimated credit losses on off-balance
sheet commitments is included in other liabilities and any changes to the allowance are
recorded as a component of other non-interest expense. |
|
|
|
While management uses available information to recognize probable and reasonably
estimatable losses on loans, future additions may be necessary based on changes in
conditions, including changes in economic conditions, particularly in Richmond and Kings
Counties in New York, and Union and Middlesex Counties in New Jersey.
Accordingly, as with most financial institutions in the market area, the ultimate
collectibility of a substantial portion of the Companys loan portfolio is susceptible
to changes in conditions in the Companys marketplace. In addition, future changes in
laws and regulations could make it more difficult for the Company to collect all
contractual amounts due on its loans and mortgage-backed securities. |
|
|
|
In addition, various regulatory agencies, as an integral part of their examination
process, periodically review the Companys allowance for loan losses. Such agencies may
require the Company to recognize additions to the allowance based on their judgments
about information available to them at the time of their examination. |
|
|
|
Troubled debt restructured loans are those loans whose terms have been modified because
of deterioration in the financial condition of the borrower. Modifications could
include extension of the terms of the loan, reduced interest rates, and forgiveness of
accrued interest and/or principal. Once an obligation has been restructured because of
such credit problems, it continues to be considered restructured until paid in full or,
if the obligation yields a market rate (a rate equal to or greater than the rate the
Company was willing to accept at the time of the restructuring for a new loan with
comparable risk), until the year subsequent to the year in which the restructuring takes
place, provided the borrower has performed under the modified terms for a six-month
period. The Company records an impairment charge equal to the difference between the
present value of estimated future cash flows under the restructured terms discounted at
the original loans effective interest rate, and the original loans carrying value.
Changes in present values attributable to the passage of time are recorded as a
component of the provision for loan losses. |
|
|
|
A loan is considered past due when it is not paid in accordance with its contractual
terms. The accrual of income on loans, including impaired loans, and other loans in the
process of foreclosure, is generally discontinued when a loan becomes 90 days or more
delinquent, or when certain factors indicate that the ultimate collection of principal
and interest is in doubt. Loans on which the accrual of income has been discontinued
are designated as non-accrual loans. All previously accrued interest is reversed
against interest income, and income is recognized subsequently only in the period that
cash is received, provided no principal payments are due and the remaining principal
balance outstanding is deemed collectible. A non-accrual loan is not returned to
accrual status until both principal and |
F-11
NORTHFIELD BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Three Months Ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 (unaudited)
Years Ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007
|
|
|
interest payments are brought current and
factors indicating doubtful collection no longer exist, including performance by the
borrower under the loan terms for a six-month period. |
|
(f) |
|
Federal Home Loan Bank Stock |
|
|
|
The Bank, as a member of the Federal Home Loan Bank of New York (the FHLB), is
required to hold shares of capital stock in the FHLB as a condition to both becoming a
member and engaging in certain transactions with the FHLB. The minimum investment
requirement is determined by a membership investment component and an activity-based
investment component. The membership investment component is the greater of 0.20% of
the Banks mortgage-related assets, as defined by the FHLB, or $1,000. The
activity-based investment component is equal to 4.5% of the Banks outstanding advances
with the FHLB. The activity-based investment component also considers other
transactions, including assets originated for or sold to the FHLB, and delivery
commitments issued by the FHLB. The Company currently does not enter into these other
types of transactions with the FHLB. |
|
|
|
On a quarterly basis, we perform our other-than-temporary impairment analysis of FHLB
stock, we evaluated, among other things, (i) its earnings performance, including the
significance of any decline in net assets of the FHLB as compared to the regulatory
capital amount of the FHLB, (ii) the commitment by the FHLB to continue dividend
payments, and (iii) the liquidity position of the FHLB. We do not consider this
security to be other-than-temporarily impaired at March 31, 2010 (unaudited) and
December 31, 2009. |
|
(g) |
|
Premises and Equipment, Net |
|
|
|
Premises and equipment, including leasehold improvements, are carried at cost, less
accumulated depreciation and amortization. Depreciation and amortization of premises
and equipment, including capital leases, are computed on a straight-line basis over the
estimated useful lives of the related assets. The estimated useful lives of significant
classes of assets are generally as follows: buildings forty years; furniture and
equipment five to seven years; and purchased computer software three years.
Leasehold improvements are amortized over the shorter of the term of the related lease
or the estimated useful lives of the improvements. Major improvements are capitalized,
while repairs and maintenance costs are charged to operations as incurred. Upon
retirement or sale, any gain or loss is credited or charged to operations. |
|
(h) |
|
Bank Owned Life Insurance |
|
|
|
The Company has purchased bank owned life insurance contracts to help fund
its obligations for certain employee benefit costs. The Companys investment in
such insurance contracts has been reported in the consolidated balance sheets at
their cash surrender values. Changes in cash surrender values and death benefit
proceeds received in excess of the related cash surrender values are recorded as
non-interest income. |
|
|
|
Goodwill is presumed to have an indefinite useful life and is not amortized, but rather
is tested, at least annually, for impairment at the reporting unit level. For purposes
of the Companys goodwill impairment testing, management has identified a single
reporting unit. The Company uses the quoted market price of its common stock on the
impairment testing date as the basis for estimating the fair value of the Companys
reporting unit. If the fair value of the reporting unit exceeds its carrying amount,
further evaluation is not necessary. However, if the fair value of the reporting unit
is less than its carrying amount, further evaluation is required to compare the implied
fair value of the reporting units goodwill to its carrying amount to determine if a
write-down of goodwill is required. As of March 31, 2010 (unaudited) and December 31,
2009, the carrying value of goodwill totaled $16.2 million. The Company performed its
annual goodwill impairment test, as of December 31, 2009, and determined the fair value
of the Companys one reporting unit to be in excess of its carrying value. Accordingly,
as of the annual impairment test date, there was no indication of goodwill impairment. |
F-12
NORTHFIELD BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Three Months Ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 (unaudited)
Years Ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007
|
|
|
The Company will test goodwill for impairment between annual test dates if an event
occurs or circumstances change that would indicate the fair value of the reporting unit
is below its carrying amount. No events have occurred and no circumstances have changed
since the annual impairment test date that would indicate the fair value of the
reporting unit is below its carrying amount. |
|
(j) |
|
Prepaid FDIC Assessment |
|
|
|
On November 12, 2009, the Federal Deposit Insurance
Corporation approved a final rule requiring insured depository
institutions to prepay on December 30, 2009, their estimated
quarterly risk-based assessments for the fourth quarter of 2009, and
for all of 2010, 2011, and 2012. Estimated assessments for the
fourth quarter of 2009 and for all 2010 are based upon the assessment
rate in effect on September 30, 2009, with three basis points added
for the 2011 and 2012 assessment rates. In addition, a 5% annual
growth rate in the assessment base is assumed. On December 30, 2009,
we prepaid $5.7 million in estimated assessment fees for the fourth
quarter of 2009 through 2012. The prepaid assessment is adjusted on a
quarterly basis to reflect actual results (i.e. increases in deposits
and changes in the assessment rate). The prepaid FDIC assessment is
reported as a component of other assets in the consolidated balance
sheets, and is applied against the actual quarterly assessments until
exhausted, and may not be applied to any special assessments that may
occur in the future. Any unused prepayments will be returned to the
Company on June 30, 2013. |
|
|
|
Income taxes are accounted for under the asset and liability method. Deferred tax
assets and liabilities are recognized for the estimated future tax consequences
attributable to temporary differences between the financial statement carrying amounts
of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets
and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply in the year in
which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. When
applicable, deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance for any portions
determined not likely to be realized. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities
of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the
enactment date. |
|
|
|
The Company accounts for income taxes as required by the income taxes topic of the FASB
Accounting Standards. The topic clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income
taxes recognized in an enterprises financial statements and prescribes a recognition
threshold and measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and
measurement of tax positions taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. It also
provides guidance on derecognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting
in interim periods, disclosure, and transition. Income taxes are allocated to the
individual entities within the consolidated group based on the effective tax rate of the
entity. |
|
|
|
Northfield Bancorp, Inc. and its subsidiary Northfield Bank
file a consolidated federal income tax return. Northfield Bancorp,
Inc. and its subsidiary Northfield Bank have entered into a tax
allocation agreement in order to allocate the consolidated tax
liability between the entities. For each taxable period, each entity
shall compute its separate tax liability as if it had filed a
separate tax return and shall pay such amounts to the Company. These
payments shall include estimated tax installments which shall be paid
no later than the due date required by law. This agreement shall
apply until such time that each entity shall agree to terminate the
agreement. |
|
(l) |
|
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets |
|
|
|
Long-lived assets are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in
circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the asset may not be recoverable.
Recoverability of assets to be held and used is measured by a comparison of the carrying
amount of an asset to future undiscounted (and without interest) net cash flows expected
to be generated by the asset. If such assets are considered to be impaired, the
impairment to be recognized is measured by the amount by which the carrying amount of
the assets exceeds the fair value of the assets. Assets to be disposed of are reported
at the lower of the carrying amount or fair value less costs to sell. |
|
(m) |
|
Securities Sold Under Agreements to Repurchase and Other Borrowings |
|
|
|
The Company enters into sales of securities under agreements to repurchase (Repurchase
Agreements) and collateral pledge agreements (Pledge Agreements) with selected dealers
and banks. Such agreements are accounted for as secured financing transactions since
the Company maintains effective control over the transferred or pledged securities and
the transfer meets the other accounting and recognition criteria as required by the
transfer and servicing topic of the FASB Accounting Standards. Obligations under these
agreements are reflected as a liability in the consolidated balance sheets. Securities
underlying the agreements are maintained at selected dealers and banks as collateral for
each transaction executed and may be sold or pledged by the counterparty. Collateral
underlying Repurchase Agreements which permit the counterparty to sell or pledge the
underlying collateral is disclosed on the consolidated balance sheets as encumbered.
The Company retains the right under all Repurchase Agreements and Pledge Agreements to
substitute acceptable collateral throughout the terms of the agreement. |
|
|
|
Comprehensive income includes net income and the change in unrealized holding gains and
losses on securities available-for-sale, change in actuarial gains and losses on other
post retirement benefits, and change in service cost on other postretirement benefits,
net of taxes. Comprehensive income is presented in the Consolidated Statements of
Changes in Stockholders Equity. |
F-13
NORTHFIELD BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Three Months Ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 (unaudited)
Years Ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007
|
|
|
The Company sponsors a defined postretirement benefit plan that provides for medical and
life insurance coverage to a limited number of retirees, as well as life insurance to
all qualifying employees of the Company. The estimated cost of postretirement benefits
earned is accrued during an individuals estimated service period to the Company. The
Company recognizes in its statement of financial position the over-funded or
under-funded status of a defined benefit postretirement plan measured as the difference
between the fair value of plan assets and the benefit obligation at the end of our
calendar year. The actuarial gains and losses and the prior service costs and credits
that arise during the period are recognized as a component of other comprehensive
income, net of tax. |
|
|
|
Funds borrowed by the Employee Stock Ownership Plan (ESOP) from the Company to purchase
the Companys common stock are being repaid from the Banks contributions over a period
of up to 30 years. The Companys common stock not yet allocated to participants is
recorded as a reduction of stockholders equity at cost. The Company records
compensation expense related to the ESOP at an amount equal to the shares allocated by
the ESOP multiplied by the average fair value of our common stock during the reporting
period. |
|
|
|
The Company recognizes the grant-date fair value of stock based awards issued to
employees as compensation cost in the consolidated statements of income. The fair value
of common stock awards is based on the closing price of our common stock as reported on
the NASDAQ Stock Market on the grant date. The expense related to stock options is
based on the estimated fair value of the options at the date of the grant using the
Black-Scholes pricing model. The awards are fixed in nature and compensation cost
related to stock based awards is recognized on a straight-line basis over the requisite
service periods. |
|
|
|
The Bank has a 401(k) plan covering substantially all employees. Contributions to the
plan are expensed as incurred. |
|
|
|
As a community-focused financial institution, substantially all of the Companys
operations involve the delivery of loan and deposit products to customers. Management
makes operating decisions and assesses performance based on an ongoing review of these
community banking operations, which constitute the Companys only operating segment for
financial reporting purposes. |
|
(q) |
|
Net Income (Loss) per Common Share |
|
|
|
Net income per common share-basic is computed for the three months ended March 31, 2010
and 2009 (unaudited) and the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, by dividing
the net income available to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common
shares outstanding, excluding unallocated ESOP shares and unearned common stock award
shares. The weighted average common shares outstanding includes the average number of
shares of common stock outstanding, including shares held by Northfield Bancorp, MHC and
allocated or committed to be released ESOP shares. |
|
|
|
Net loss per common share is computed for the period the common stock was outstanding in
2007 (November 8, 2007, to December 31, 2007) by dividing the net loss available to
common stockholders by the weighted average number of shares outstanding for the period
from November 8, 2007, to December 31, 2007, excluding unallocated ESOP shares. The
weighted average common shares outstanding includes the average number of shares of
common stock outstanding, including shares held by Northfield Bancorp Inc, MHC and
allocated or committed to be released ESOP shares. |
|
|
|
Net income per common share-diluted is computed using the same method as basic earnings
per share, but reflects the potential dilution that could occur if stock options and
unvested shares of restricted stock were exercised and converted into common stock.
These potentially dilutive shares are included |
F-14
NORTHFIELD BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Three Months Ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 (unaudited)
Years Ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007
|
|
|
in the weighted average number of shares
outstanding for the period using the treasury stock method. When applying the treasury
stock method, we add: (1) the assumed proceeds from option exercises; (2) the tax
benefit, if any, that would have been credited to additional paid-in capital assuming
exercise of non-qualified stock options and vesting of shares of restricted stock; and
(3) the average unamortized compensation costs related to unvested shares of restricted
stock and stock options. We then divide this sum by our average stock price for the
period to calculate assumed shares repurchased. The excess of the number of shares
issuable over the number of shares assumed to be repurchased is added to basic weighted
average common shares to calculate diluted earnings per share. At March 31, 2010 and
2009 (unaudited) there were 314,621 and 15,078 dilutive shares outstanding. At December
31, 2009, 2008, and 2007, there were 126,794, 0, and 0 dilutive shares outstanding,
respectively. |
|
(r) |
|
Other Real Estate Owned |
|
|
|
Assets acquired through, or deed-in-lieu of, loan foreclosure are held for sale and are
initially recorded at estimated fair value less estimated selling costs when acquired,
thus establishing a new cost basis. Costs after acquisition are generally expensed. If
the estimated fair value of the asset declines, a write-down is recorded through other
non-interest expense. |
|
|
|
The Company completed its initial public stock offering on November 7, 2007. The
Company sold 19,265,316 shares, or 43.0% of its outstanding common stock, to subscribers
in the offering, including 1,756,279 shares purchased by the Northfield Bank Employee
Stock Ownership Plan. Northfield Bancorp, MHC, the Companys federally chartered mutual
holding company parent originally held 24,641,684 shares, or 55.0% of the Companys
outstanding common stock. Additionally, the Company contributed $3.0 million in cash,
and issued 896,061 shares of common stock, or 2.0% of the Companys outstanding common
stock to the Northfield Bank Charitable Foundation. The Northfield Bank Charitable
Foundation purchased the common stock at par value. This action resulted in a $12.0
million pre-tax expense recorded in the quarter ended December 31, 2007. Proceeds from
the offering, including the value of shares issued to the charitable foundation, net of
expenses, were $198.6 million. The Company contributed $94.8 million of the proceeds to
Northfield Bank. |
F-15
NORTHFIELD BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Three Months Ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 (unaudited)
Years Ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007
(2) |
|
Securities Available-for-Sale |
|
|
The following is a comparative summary of mortgage-backed securities and other securities
available-for- sale at March 31, 2010 (unaudited) (in thousands): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2010 (unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
unrealized |
|
|
unrealized |
|
|
fair |
|
|
|
cost |
|
|
gains |
|
|
losses |
|
|
value |
|
Mortgage-backed securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pass-through certificates: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Government sponsored
enterprises (GSE) |
|
$ |
366,089 |
|
|
|
15,634 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
381,723 |
|
Non-GSE |
|
|
56,696 |
|
|
|
1,410 |
|
|
|
2,137 |
|
|
|
55,969 |
|
Real estate mortgage
investment conduits (REMICs): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GSE |
|
|
395,438 |
|
|
|
4,988 |
|
|
|
188 |
|
|
|
400,238 |
|
Non-GSE |
|
|
101,799 |
|
|
|
4,048 |
|
|
|
220 |
|
|
|
105,627 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
920,022 |
|
|
|
26,080 |
|
|
|
2,545 |
|
|
|
943,557 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity investments-mutual funds |
|
|
5,560 |
|
|
|
63 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,623 |
|
GSE bonds |
|
|
129,937 |
|
|
|
524 |
|
|
|
170 |
|
|
|
130,291 |
|
Corporate bonds |
|
|
134,026 |
|
|
|
2,698 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
136,724 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
269,523 |
|
|
|
3,285 |
|
|
|
170 |
|
|
|
272,638 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total securities available-for-sale |
|
$ |
1,189,545 |
|
|
|
29,365 |
|
|
|
2,715 |
|
|
|
1,216,195 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-16
NORTHFIELD BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Three Months Ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 (unaudited)
Years Ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007
|
|
The following is a comparative summary of mortgage-backed securities and other securities
available-for- sale at December 31 (in thousands): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
unrealized |
|
|
unrealized |
|
|
fair |
|
|
|
cost |
|
|
gains |
|
|
losses |
|
|
value |
|
Mortgage-backed securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pass-through certificates: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Government sponsored
enterprises (GSE) |
|
$ |
404,128 |
|
|
|
13,932 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
418,060 |
|
Non-GSE |
|
|
65,363 |
|
|
|
799 |
|
|
|
3,696 |
|
|
|
62,466 |
|
Real estate mortgage
investment conduits (REMICs): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GSE |
|
|
344,150 |
|
|
|
5,368 |
|
|
|
430 |
|
|
|
349,088 |
|
Non-GSE |
|
|
111,756 |
|
|
|
2,627 |
|
|
|
189 |
|
|
|
114,194 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
925,397 |
|
|
|
22,726 |
|
|
|
4,315 |
|
|
|
943,808 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity investments mutual funds |
|
|
21,820 |
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,872 |
|
GSE bonds |
|
|
28,994 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
28,983 |
|
Corporate bonds |
|
|
134,595 |
|
|
|
2,595 |
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
137,140 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
185,409 |
|
|
|
2,647 |
|
|
|
61 |
|
|
|
187,995 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total securities available-for-sale |
|
$ |
1,110,806 |
|
|
|
25,373 |
|
|
|
4,376 |
|
|
|
1,131,803 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
unrealized |
|
|
unrealized |
|
|
fair |
|
|
|
cost |
|
|
gains |
|
|
losses |
|
|
value |
|
Mortgage-backed securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pass-through certificates: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Government sponsored
enterprises (GSE) |
|
$ |
532,870 |
|
|
|
13,457 |
|
|
|
83 |
|
|
|
546,244 |
|
Non-GSE |
|
|
65,040 |
|
|
|
359 |
|
|
|
9,621 |
|
|
|
55,778 |
|
Real estate mortgage
investment conduits (REMICs): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GSE |
|
|
242,557 |
|
|
|
3,049 |
|
|
|
114 |
|
|
|
245,492 |
|
Non-GSE |
|
|
90,446 |
|
|
|
515 |
|
|
|
7,266 |
|
|
|
83,695 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
930,913 |
|
|
|
17,380 |
|
|
|
17,084 |
|
|
|
931,209 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity investments mutual funds |
|
|
9,025 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,025 |
|
Corporate bonds |
|
|
17,319 |
|
|
|
102 |
|
|
|
70 |
|
|
|
17,351 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,344 |
|
|
|
102 |
|
|
|
70 |
|
|
|
26,376 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total securities available-for-sale |
|
$ |
957,257 |
|
|
|
17,482 |
|
|
|
17,154 |
|
|
|
957,585 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-17
NORTHFIELD BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Three Months Ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 (unaudited)
Years Ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007
|
|
The following is a summary of the expected maturity distribution of debt securities
available-for-sale, other than mortgage-backed securities, at March 31, 2010 (unaudited) (in
thousands): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
fair |
|
Available-for-sale |
|
cost |
|
|
value |
|
Due in one year or less |
|
$ |
27,127 |
|
|
|
27,528 |
|
Due after one year through five years |
|
|
236,836 |
|
|
|
239,487 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
263,963 |
|
|
|
267,015 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following is a summary of the expected maturity distribution of debt securities
available-for-sale other than mortgage-backed securities at December 31, 2009 (in thousands): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
fair |
|
Available-for-sale |
|
cost |
|
|
value |
|
Due in one year or less |
|
$ |
12,294 |
|
|
|
12,478 |
|
Due after one year through five years |
|
|
151,295 |
|
|
|
153,645 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
163,589 |
|
|
|
166,123 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expected maturities on mortgage-backed securities will differ from contractual maturities as
borrowers may have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without penalties. |
|
|
Certain securities available-for-sale are pledged to secure borrowings under Pledge Agreements
and Repurchase Agreements and for other purposes required by law. At March 31, 2010
(unaudited), December 31, 2009, and December 31, 2008, securities available-for-sale with a
carrying value of $6,064,000, $6,537,000 and $3,772,000, respectively, were pledged to secure
deposits. See note 7 for further discussion regarding securities pledged for borrowings. |
|
|
For the three months ended March 31, 2010 (unaudited), the Company had gross proceeds of $15.2
million on sales of securities available-for-sale with gross realized gains and gross realized
losses of approximately $270,000 and $0, respectively. For the three months ended March 31,
2009 (unaudited), the Company had gross proceeds of $2.0 million on sales of securities
available-for-sale with gross realized gains and gross realized losses of approximately $7,000
and $0, respectively. All unrealized losses at March 31, 2010 (unaudited) were considered
temporary. |
|
|
For the year ended December 31, 2009, the Company had gross proceeds of $3,293,000 on sales of
securities available-for-sale with gross realized gains and gross realized losses of
approximately $89,000 and $0, respectively. For the year ended December 31, 2008, the Company
had gross proceeds of $3,350,000 on sales of securities available-for-sale with gross realized
gains and gross realized losses of approximately $15,000 and $0, respectively. For the year
ended December 31, 2007, the Company had gross proceeds of $3,705,000 on sales of securities
available-for-sale with gross realized gains and gross realized losses of approximately $9,000
and $0, respectively. |
|
|
The Company recognized
other-than-temporary impairment charges of $1.4 million during the year ended December 31,
2009 related to one private label mortgage-backed security. The Company recognized the credit
component of $176,000 in earnings and the non-credit component of $1.2 million as a part of
accumulated other comprehensive income, net of tax as a result of the Companys adoption of new authoritative guidance related to
InvestmentsDebt and Equity Securities on April 1, 2009. The Company did not record
other-than-temporary impairment charges during the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007. |
F-18
NORTHFIELD BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Three Months Ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 (unaudited)
Years Ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007
|
|
Activity related to the credit component recognized in earnings on debt securities for which a
portion of other-than-temporary impairment was recognized in accumulated other comprehensive
income for the three months ended March 31, 2010 (unaudited) and the year ended December 31,
2009, is as follows (in thousands): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
Year ended |
|
|
|
March 31, 2010 |
|
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
Credit component of all other-than-temporary impairment on
debt securities, beginning of period |
|
$ |
176 |
|
|
|
|
|
Additions to the credit component on debt securities in which other-
than-temporary impairment was not previously recognized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
176 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative pre-tax credit losses, end of period |
|
$ |
176 |
|
|
|
176 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-19
NORTHFIELD BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Three Months Ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 (unaudited)
Years Ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007
|
|
Gross unrealized losses on mortgage-backed securities, equity securities, and corporate bonds
available-for-sale, and the estimated fair value of the related securities, aggregated by
security category and length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous
unrealized loss position, at March 31, 2010 (unaudited), December 31, 2009 and 2008, were as
follows (in thousands): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2010 (unaudited) |
|
|
|
Less than 12 months |
|
|
12 months or more |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
|
losses |
|
|
fair value |
|
|
losses |
|
|
fair value |
|
|
losses |
|
|
fair value |
|
Mortgage-backed securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pass-through certificates: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-GSE |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,137 |
|
|
|
18,161 |
|
|
|
2,137 |
|
|
|
18,161 |
|
REMICs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GSE |
|
|
124 |
|
|
|
108,847 |
|
|
|
64 |
|
|
|
9,148 |
|
|
|
188 |
|
|
|
117,995 |
|
Non-GSE |
|
|
220 |
|
|
|
12,749 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
220 |
|
|
|
12,749 |
|
GSE bonds |
|
|
170 |
|
|
|
41,449 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
170 |
|
|
|
41,449 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
514 |
|
|
|
163,045 |
|
|
|
2,201 |
|
|
|
27,309 |
|
|
|
2,715 |
|
|
|
190,354 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
Less than 12 months |
|
|
12 months or more |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
|
losses |
|
|
fair value |
|
|
losses |
|
|
fair value |
|
|
losses |
|
|
fair value |
|
Mortgage-backed securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pass-through certificates: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-GSE |
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
|
1,462 |
|
|
|
3,695 |
|
|
|
27,832 |
|
|
|
3,696 |
|
|
|
29,294 |
|
REMICs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GSE |
|
|
429 |
|
|
|
116,478 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
16,507 |
|
|
|
430 |
|
|
|
132,985 |
|
Non-GSE |
|
|
189 |
|
|
|
6,970 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
189 |
|
|
|
6,970 |
|
GSE bonds |
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
4,019 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
4,019 |
|
Corporate bonds |
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
16,017 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
16,017 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
680 |
|
|
|
144,946 |
|
|
|
3,696 |
|
|
|
44,339 |
|
|
|
4,376 |
|
|
|
189,285 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
Less than 12 months |
|
|
12 months or more |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
|
losses |
|
|
fair value |
|
|
losses |
|
|
fair value |
|
|
losses |
|
|
fair value |
|
Mortgage-backed securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pass-through certificates: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GSE |
|
$ |
2 |
|
|
|
634 |
|
|
|
81 |
|
|
|
1,346 |
|
|
|
83 |
|
|
|
1,980 |
|
Non-GSE |
|
|
2,708 |
|
|
|
7,290 |
|
|
|
6,913 |
|
|
|
17,525 |
|
|
|
9,621 |
|
|
|
24,815 |
|
REMICs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GSE |
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
29,267 |
|
|
|
72 |
|
|
|
18,981 |
|
|
|
114 |
|
|
|
48,248 |
|
Non-GSE |
|
|
7,266 |
|
|
|
68,966 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,266 |
|
|
|
68,966 |
|
Corporate bonds |
|
|
70 |
|
|
|
4,298 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
70 |
|
|
|
4,298 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
10,088 |
|
|
|
110,455 |
|
|
|
7,066 |
|
|
|
37,852 |
|
|
|
17,154 |
|
|
|
148,307 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Included in the above available-for-sale security amounts at March 31, 2010 (unaudited),
were seven pass-through, non-GSE mortgage-backed securities, and two REMIC mortgage-backed
securities, in an unrealized loss position. Only three of these securities, with an estimated
fair value of $13.8 million (amortized cost of $15.8 million), are rated less than AAA at
March 31, 2010 (unaudited). Of the three securities, one had an estimated fair value of $2.6
million (amortized cost of $2.7 million), was rated A+, and had the following underlying
collateral characteristics: 84% originated in 2004, and 16% originated in 2005. The second
security had an estimated fair value of $6.1 million (amortized cost of $7.4 million), was
rated Baa2 (subsequently downgraded to Caa2), and had the following underlying collateral
characteristics: 82% originated in 2004, and 18% originated in 2005. The remaining security
had an estimated fair value of $5.1 |
F-20
NORTHFIELD BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Three Months Ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 (unaudited)
Years Ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007
|
|
million (amortized cost of $5.7 million), was rated CCC,
and was supported by collateral entirely originated in 2006. The Company continues to receive
principal and interest payments in accordance with the contractual terms of each of these
securities. Management has evaluated, among other things, delinquency status, location of
collateral, estimated prepayment speeds, and the estimated default rates and loss severity in
liquidating the underlying collateral for each of these three securities. Since management
does not have the intent to sell the securities, and it is more likely than not that the
Company will not be required to sell the securities, before their anticipated recovery (which
may be at maturity), the Company believes that the unrealized losses of $2.0 million at March
31, 2010 (unaudited), are temporary, and as such, are recorded as a component of accumulated
other comprehensive income, net of tax. |
|
|
At March 31, 2010 (unaudited), REMIC mortgage-backed securities issued or guaranteed by GSEs
(nine securities) and GSE bonds (three securities) are investment grade securities. The
declines in value are deemed to relate to the general interest rate environment and are
considered temporary. The securities cannot be prepaid in a manner that would result in the
Company not receiving substantially all of its amortized cost. The Company neither has an
intent to sell, nor is it more likely than not that the Company will be required to sell, the
securities contained in the table above before the recovery of their amortized cost basis or,
if necessary, maturity. |
|
|
Included in the above available-for-sale security amounts at December 31, 2009, were eight
non-GSE mortgage-backed securities in an unrealized loss position. Only three of these
securities with an estimated fair value of $16.6 million are rated less than AAA at December
31, 2009. The first of these three securities had an estimated fair value of $5.2 million
(unrealized loss of $911,000) and was rated CCC, the second had an estimated fair value of
$5.9 million (unrealized loss of $1.7 million) and was rated Baa2, with the third having an
estimated fair value of $5.5 million (unrealized loss of $845,000) and was rated AA
(downgraded to a rating of A subsequent to December 31, 2009). The Company continues to
receive principal and interest payments in accordance with the contractual terms on each of
the three securities. Management has evaluated, among other things, delinquency status,
estimated prepayment speeds and the estimated default rates and loss severity in liquidating
the underlying collateral for each of these three securities. As a result of managements
evaluation of these securities, the Company recognized, during the quarter ended September 30,
2009, an other-than-temporary impairment charge of $1.4 million on the security rated CCC.
The credit component of $176,000 was recognized in earnings and the non-credit component of
$1.2 million was recorded as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income, net of
tax. The Company has no intent to sell, nor is it more likely than not than the Company will
be required to sell, the securities contained in the table above before the recovery of their
amortized cost basis or, if necessary, maturity. |
|
|
In evaluating the range of likely cash flows for the impaired private label security, the
Company applied security specific, as well as market assumptions, based on the credit
characteristics of the security to a cash flow model. Under certain stress scenarios
estimated future losses may arise. For the security in which the Company recorded
other-than-temporary impairment, the average portfolio FICO score at origination was 740 and
the weighted average loan to value ratio was 70.3%. Cash flow assumptions incorporated an
expected constant default rate of 6.8% and an ultimate loss on disposition of underlying
collateral of 47.4%. The securitys cash flows were discounted at the securitys effective
interest rate (the yield expected to be earned at date of purchase). Although management
recognized other-than-temporary impairment charges on this security, the security continues to
receive principal and interest payments in accordance with its contractual terms. |
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities issued or guaranteed by GSEs (ten securities), GSE bonds (one
security) and corporate bonds (one security) are investment grade securities. The declines in
value are deemed to relate to the general interest rate environment and are considered
temporary. The securities cannot be prepaid in a manner that would result in the Company not
receiving substantially all of its amortized cost. The Company has no intent to sell, nor is
it more likely than not that the Company will be required to sell, the securities contained in
the table above before the recovery of their amortized cost basis or, if necessary, maturity. |
F-21
NORTHFIELD BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Three Months Ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 (unaudited)
Years Ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007
|
|
The fair values of our investment securities could decline in the future if the underlying
performance of the collateral for the collateralized mortgage obligations or other securities
deteriorates and our credit enhancement levels do not provide sufficient protections to our
contractual principal and interest. As a result, there is a risk that significant
other-than-temporary impairments may occur in the future given the current economic
environment. |
(3) |
|
Securities Held-to-Maturity |
|
|
The following is a comparative summary of mortgage-backed securities held-to-maturity at March
31, 2010 (unaudited) and December 31, 2009 and 2008 (in thousands): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2010 (unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
unrealized |
|
|
unrealized |
|
|
fair |
|
|
|
cost |
|
|
gains |
|
|
losses |
|
|
value |
|
Mortgage-backed securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pass-through certificates: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GSE |
|
$ |
869 |
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
903 |
|
REMICs: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GSE |
|
|
5,351 |
|
|
|
178 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,529 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total securities held-to-maturity |
|
$ |
6,220 |
|
|
|
212 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,432 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
unrealized |
|
|
unrealized |
|
|
fair |
|
|
|
cost |
|
|
gains |
|
|
losses |
|
|
value |
|
Mortgage-backed securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pass-through certificates: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GSE |
|
$ |
874 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
901 |
|
REMICs: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GSE |
|
|
5,866 |
|
|
|
163 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,029 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total securities held-to-maturity |
|
$ |
6,740 |
|
|
|
190 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,930 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
unrealized |
|
|
unrealized |
|
|
fair |
|
|
|
cost |
|
|
gains |
|
|
losses |
|
|
value |
|
Mortgage-backed securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pass-through certificates: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GSE |
|
$ |
6,132 |
|
|
|
141 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,273 |
|
REMICs: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GSE |
|
|
8,347 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
8,315 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total securities held-to-maturity |
|
$ |
14,479 |
|
|
|
154 |
|
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
14,588 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company did not sell any held-to-maturity securities during the three months ended March
31, 2010 or 2009 (unaudited). |
|
|
For the year ended December 31, 2009, the Company had gross proceeds of $3,371,000 on sales of
securities held-to-maturity with gross realized gains and gross realized losses of
approximately $210,000 and $0, |
F-22
NORTHFIELD BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Three Months Ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 (unaudited)
Years Ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007
|
|
respectively, which primarily resulted from the sale of smaller
balance (less than 15% of original purchased principal) mortgage-backed
securities. The Company sells these smaller balance securities as the cost of servicing
becomes prohibitive. The Company did not sell any held-to-maturity securities during the
years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007. |
|
|
Gross unrealized losses on mortgage-backed securities held-to-maturity and the estimated fair
value of the related securities, aggregated by investment category and length of time that
individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position, at December 31,
2008, were as follows (in thousands): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
Less than 12 months |
|
|
12 months or more |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
|
losses |
|
|
fair value |
|
|
losses |
|
|
fair value |
|
|
losses |
|
|
fair value |
|
REMICs: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GSE |
|
$ |
45 |
|
|
|
5,536 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
5,536 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
45 |
|
|
|
5,536 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
5,536 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There were no gross unrealized losses on mortgage-backed securities held to maturity at
March 31, 2010 (unaudited) and December 31, 2009. |
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities issued or guaranteed by GSEs are investment grade securities with
no apparent credit weaknesses. The declines in value are deemed to relate to the general
interest rate environment and are considered temporary. The securities cannot be prepaid in a
manner that would result in the Company not receiving substantially all of its amortized cost.
Management does not have the intent to sell the securities, and it is not more likely than
not that the Company will be required to sell the securities, before their anticipated
recovery (which may be at maturity). |
|
|
The fair values of our investment securities could decline in the future if the underlying
performance of the collateral for the collateralized mortgage obligation or other securities
deteriorates and our credit enhancement levels do not provide sufficient protections to our
contractual principal and interest. As a result, there is a risk that significant
other-than-temporary impairments may occur in the future given the current economic
environment. |
F-23
NORTHFIELD BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Three Months Ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 (unaudited)
Years Ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007
|
|
Loans held-for-investment, net, consists of the following at March 31, 2010 (unaudited),
December 31, 2009 and 2008 (in thousands): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial |
|
$ |
332,427 |
|
|
|
327,802 |
|
|
|
289,123 |
|
One -to- four family residential |
|
|
90,014 |
|
|
|
90,898 |
|
|
|
103,128 |
|
Construction and land |
|
|
39,523 |
|
|
|
44,548 |
|
|
|
52,158 |
|
Multifamily |
|
|
187,372 |
|
|
|
178,401 |
|
|
|
108,534 |
|
Home equity and lines of credit |
|
|
28,143 |
|
|
|
26,118 |
|
|
|
24,182 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total real estate loans |
|
|
677,479 |
|
|
|
667,767 |
|
|
|
577,125 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial and industrial loans |
|
|
17,833 |
|
|
|
19,252 |
|
|
|
11,025 |
|
Insurance premium finance loans |
|
|
39,977 |
|
|
|
40,382 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other loans |
|
|
1,328 |
|
|
|
1,299 |
|
|
|
1,339 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans held-for-investment |
|
|
736,617 |
|
|
|
728,700 |
|
|
|
589,489 |
|
Deferred loan costs, net |
|
|
608 |
|
|
|
569 |
|
|
|
495 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans held-for-investment, net |
|
|
737,225 |
|
|
|
729,269 |
|
|
|
589,984 |
|
Allowance for loan losses |
|
|
(17,146 |
) |
|
|
(15,414 |
) |
|
|
(8,778 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loans held-for-investment |
|
$ |
720,079 |
|
|
|
713,855 |
|
|
|
581,206 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company did not have any loans-held-for-sale at March 31, 2010 (unaudited), December 31,
2009 and 2008. |
|
|
The Company does not have any lending programs commonly referred to as subprime lending.
Subprime lending generally targets borrowers with weakened credit histories typically
characterized by payment delinquencies, previous charge-offs, judgments, bankruptcies, or
borrowers with questionable repayment capacity as evidenced by low credit scores or high
debt-burden ratios. |
|
|
The Company, through its principal subsidiary, the Bank, also services first mortgage
residential loans for others. The principal balance of residential loans serviced amounted to
$71,700,000 and $75,223,000 at March 31, 2010 and 2009 (unaudited),
respectively, and $73,800,000, $77,291,000, and $80,081,000 at
December 31, 2009, 2008 and
2007, respectively. In addition, the Company serviced $0 and $0 at
March 31, 2010 and 2009 (unaudited), respectively, and $0, $250,000,
and $250,000 in construction
loans at December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007, respectively. Servicing of
loans for others does not have a significant effect on our financial position or results of
operations. |
|
|
A summary of changes in the allowance for loan losses for the three months ended March 31,
2010 and 2009 (unaudited) and the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007 follows (in
thousands): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of year |
|
$ |
15,414 |
|
|
|
8,778 |
|
|
|
8,778 |
|
|
|
5,636 |
|
|
|
5,030 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
1,930 |
|
|
|
1,644 |
|
|
|
9,038 |
|
|
|
5,082 |
|
|
|
1,442 |
|
Charge-offs |
|
|
(198 |
) |
|
|
(595 |
) |
|
|
(2,402 |
) |
|
|
(1,940 |
) |
|
|
(836 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of year |
|
$ |
17,146 |
|
|
|
9,827 |
|
|
|
15,414 |
|
|
|
8,778 |
|
|
|
5,636 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-24
NORTHFIELD BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Three Months Ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 (unaudited)
Years Ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007
|
|
Included in loans receivable are loans for which the accrual of interest income has been
discontinued due to deterioration in the financial condition of the borrowers. The principal
amount of these nonaccrual loans (including impaired loans of $39.5 million at March 31, 2010
(unaudited), $36.8 million at December 31, 2009, and $6.6 million at December 31, 2008) was
$44.3 million, $41.6 million, and $9.5 million at March 31, 2010 (unaudited), December 31,
2009, and 2008, respectively. Loans past due ninety days or more and still accruing interest
was $5.7 million, $191,000, and $137,000 at March 31, 2010 (unaudited), December 31, 2009, and
2008, respectively. The majority of the $5.7 million relates to one loan relationship for
$3.7 million that was current on interest payments in accordance with the original contractual
terms of the loans, but past maturity. These loans are considered well secured and in the
process of collection. The loans are being refinanced by the Company to permanent real estate
mortgages in accordance with our current underwriting standards. The Company is under
commitment to lend additional funds totaling $360,000 to one borrower whose loan is on
non-accrual status at March 31, 2010 (unaudited). |
|
|
The following tables summarize impaired loans (in thousands): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2010 (unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recorded |
|
|
for Loan |
|
|
Net |
|
|
|
Investment |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Investment |
|
Non-accruing loans |
|
$ |
26,390 |
|
|
|
(190 |
) |
|
|
26,200 |
|
Non-accruing loans subject to restructuring
agreements |
|
|
13,090 |
|
|
|
(422 |
) |
|
|
12,668 |
|
Accruing loans subject to restructuring
agreements |
|
|
8,817 |
|
|
|
(465 |
) |
|
|
8,352 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total impaired loans |
|
$ |
48,297 |
|
|
|
(1,077 |
) |
|
|
47,220 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recorded |
|
|
for Loan |
|
|
Net |
|
|
|
Investment |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Investment |
|
Non-accruing loans |
|
$ |
26,113 |
|
|
|
(1,596 |
) |
|
|
24,517 |
|
Non-accruing loans subject to restructuring
agreements |
|
|
10,717 |
|
|
|
(409 |
) |
|
|
10,308 |
|
Accruing loans subject to restructuring
agreements |
|
|
7,250 |
|
|
|
(395 |
) |
|
|
6,855 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total impaired loans |
|
$ |
44,080 |
|
|
|
(2,400 |
) |
|
|
41,680 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recorded |
|
|
for Loan |
|
|
Net |
|
|
|
Investment |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Investment |
|
Non-accruing loans |
|
$ |
5,679 |
|
|
|
(185 |
) |
|
|
5,494 |
|
Non-accruing loans subject to restructuring
agreements |
|
|
950 |
|
|
|
(125 |
) |
|
|
825 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total impaired loans |
|
$ |
6,629 |
|
|
|
(310 |
) |
|
|
6,319 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-25
NORTHFIELD BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Three Months Ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 (unaudited)
Years Ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007
|
|
Included in the table above at March 31, 2010 (unaudited), are loans with carrying balances of
$22.9 million that were not written down either by charge-offs
or specific allowances in our
allowance for loan losses, as the underlying estimated collateral
values, based upon independent appraisals, exceeded the loans
carrying balance. The average balance of impaired loans was $46.2 million and $14.1
million for the three months ended March 31, 2010, and 2009 (unaudited), respectively. The
Company recorded $420,000 and $10,000 of interest income on impaired loans for the three
months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 (unaudited), respectively. |
|
|
In addition to loans written down by specific allowances recorded during December 31, 2009, $7.9
million of the $44.1 million of impaired loans at December 31, 2009 were written down during
the year to their recorded investment by charge-offs amounting to $735,000. Included in the
table above at December 31, 2009, are loans with carrying balances of $12.7 million that were
not written down by either charge-offs or specific allowances in our
allowances for loan losses, as the underlying estimated collateral
values, based upon independent appraisals, exceeded the loans
carrying balance. |
|
|
In addition to the specific allowances recorded during 2008, $2.7 million of the $6.6 million of
impaired loans at December 31, 2008 were written down during the year by charge-offs amounting
to $761,000. Included in the table above at December 31, 2008, are loans with carrying
balances of $1.1 million that were not written down by either
charge-offs or specific allowances
in our allowances for loan losses, as the underlying estimated
collateral values, based upon independent appraisals, exceeded the
loans carrying balance. |
|
|
At March 31, 2010 (unaudited) and December 31, 2009, there was a commitment to lend $360,000
in additional funds to one borrower with an outstanding non-accrual construction loan subject
to restructuring. At December 31, 2008, there were no commitments to lend additional funds to
these borrowers. The average recorded balance of impaired loans for the years ended December
31, 2009, 2008, and 2007 was approximately $27,152,000, $6,997,000, and $8,139,000,
respectively. The Company recorded $624,000 of interest income on impaired loans for the year
ended December 31, 2009. The Company did not record any interest income on impaired loans for
the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007. |
(5) |
|
Accrued Interest Receivable |
|
|
Accrued interest receivable is summarized as follows (in
thousands): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Mortgage-backed
securities |
|
$ |
2,738 |
|
|
|
2,979 |
|
|
|
3,551 |
|
Other
securities |
|
|
2,501 |
|
|
|
1,623 |
|
|
|
252 |
|
Loans |
|
|
2,803 |
|
|
|
3,452 |
|
|
|
2,785 |
|
Certificates
of deposit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,731 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
8,042 |
|
|
|
8,054 |
|
|
|
8,319 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6) |
|
Premises and Equipment, Net |
|
|
At March 31, 2010 (unaudited), December 31, 2009 and 2008, premises and equipment, less
accumulated depreciation and amortization, consists of the following (in thousands): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At cost: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land |
|
$ |
566 |
|
|
|
566 |
|
|
|
566 |
|
Buildings and improvements |
|
|
3,403 |
|
|
|
3,407 |
|
|
|
3,172 |
|
Capital leases |
|
|
2,600 |
|
|
|
2,600 |
|
|
|
2,600 |
|
Furniture, fixtures, and equipment |
|
|
12,804 |
|
|
|
12,782 |
|
|
|
11,755 |
|
Leasehold improvements |
|
|
11,360 |
|
|
|
10,570 |
|
|
|
6,376 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,733 |
|
|
|
29,925 |
|
|
|
24,469 |
|
Accumulated depreciation and amortization |
|
|
(17,619 |
) |
|
|
(17,249 |
) |
|
|
(15,570 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Premises and equipment, net |
|
$ |
13,114 |
|
|
|
12,676 |
|
|
|
8,899 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation expense for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 (unaudited), was
$432,000 and $412,000, respectively, and for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007
was $1,679,000, $1,490,000, and $1,326,000, respectively. |
|
|
During the year ended December 31, 2007, the Company recognized a gain of approximately
$648,000 as a result of the sale of premises and equipment. |
F-26
NORTHFIELD BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Three Months Ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 (unaudited)
Years Ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007
|
|
Deposits account balances at March 31, 2010 (unaudited), December 31, 2009 and 2008, are
summarized as follows (dollars in thousands): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
Amount |
|
|
average rate |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
average rate |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
average rate |
|
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transaction: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Negotiable orders
of withdrawal |
|
$ |
66,719 |
|
|
|
1.29 |
% |
|
|
62,904 |
|
|
|
1.51 |
|
|
|
64,382 |
|
|
|
1.70 |
|
Non-interest
bearing checking |
|
|
108,139 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
110,015 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
93,170 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total transaction |
|
|
174,858 |
|
|
|
0.49 |
|
|
|
172,919 |
|
|
|
0.55 |
|
|
|
157,552 |
|
|
|
0.69 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Savings: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Money market |
|
|
226,132 |
|
|
|
1.09 |
|
|
|
195,055 |
|
|
|
1.35 |
|
|
|
88,241 |
|
|
|
3.00 |
|
Savings |
|
|
365,686 |
|
|
|
0.46 |
|
|
|
369,538 |
|
|
|
0.64 |
|
|
|
361,061 |
|
|
|
1.23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total savings |
|
|
591,818 |
|
|
|
0.70 |
|
|
|
564,593 |
|
|
|
0.89 |
|
|
|
449,302 |
|
|
|
1.58 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Certificates of deposit: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Under $100,000 |
|
|
286,425 |
|
|
|
1.68 |
|
|
|
302,869 |
|
|
|
2.02 |
|
|
|
252,426 |
|
|
|
3.18 |
|
$100,000 or more |
|
|
339,804 |
|
|
|
1.20 |
|
|
|
276,504 |
|
|
|
1.76 |
|
|
|
165,159 |
|
|
|
3.41 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total certificates
of deposit |
|
|
626,229 |
|
|
|
1.42 |
|
|
|
579,373 |
|
|
|
1.90 |
|
|
|
417,585 |
|
|
|
3.27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deposits |
|
$ |
1,392,905 |
|
|
|
1.00 |
% |
|
|
1,316,885 |
|
|
|
1.29 |
|
|
|
1,024,439 |
|
|
|
2.13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company had brokered deposits (classified as certificates of deposit in the above table)
of $136.7 million, $54.8 million, and $0 at March 31, 2010 (unaudited), December 31, 2009 and
December 31, 2008, respectively. |
|
|
Deposit accounts at the Bank are insured by the FDIC up to a maximum of $250,000. In
addition, the Bank is a participant in the FDICs Temporary Liquidity Guarantee Program which
fully insures certain non-interest bearing transaction accounts regardless of the dollar
amount until June 30, 2010. |
|
|
Scheduled maturities of certificates of deposit at March 31, 2010 (unaudited) and December 31,
2009 are summarized as follows (in thousands): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
$ |
525,512 |
|
|
|
517,986 |
|
2011 |
|
|
53,411 |
|
|
|
24,741 |
|
2012 |
|
|
10,551 |
|
|
|
8,363 |
|
2013 |
|
|
2,963 |
|
|
|
2,651 |
|
2014 and after |
|
|
33,792 |
|
|
|
25,632 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
626,229 |
|
|
|
579,373 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-27
NORTHFIELD BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Three Months Ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 (unaudited)
Years Ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007
|
|
Interest expense on deposits for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 (unaudited)
and for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007 is summarized as follows (in
thousands): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Negotiable orders of withdrawal and money market |
|
$ |
897 |
|
|
|
570 |
|
|
|
3,213 |
|
|
|
3,147 |
|
|
|
951 |
|
Savings-passbook, statement, and tiered |
|
|
523 |
|
|
|
1,066 |
|
|
|
2,833 |
|
|
|
2,719 |
|
|
|
2,303 |
|
Subscription proceeds |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
297 |
|
Certificates of deposits |
|
|
2,532 |
|
|
|
3,321 |
|
|
|
12,168 |
|
|
|
12,656 |
|
|
|
20,212 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
3,952 |
|
|
|
4,957 |
|
|
|
18,214 |
|
|
|
18,522 |
|
|
|
23,763 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8) |
|
Securities Sold Under Agreements to Repurchase and Other Borrowings |
|
|
|
Borrowings consisted of Securities Sold under Agreements to Repurchase, FHLB advances, and
obligations under capital leases and are summarized as follows (in thousands): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repurchase agreements |
|
$ |
244,680 |
|
|
|
200,000 |
|
|
|
170,000 |
|
Other borrowings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FHLB advances |
|
|
46,300 |
|
|
|
71,300 |
|
|
|
159,800 |
|
Over-night borrowings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Obligations under capital leases |
|
|
2,080 |
|
|
|
2,124 |
|
|
|
2,284 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
293,060 |
|
|
|
279,424 |
|
|
|
332,084 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FHLB advances are secured by a blanket lien on unencumbered securities and the Companys
investment in FHLB capital stock. |
|
|
Repurchase agreements and FHLB advances have contractual maturities at March 31, 2010
(unaudited) and December 31, 2009, as follows (in thousands): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2010 |
|
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
Repurchase |
|
|
FHLB |
|
|
Repurchase |
|
|
FHLB |
|
|
|
Agreements |
|
|
Advances |
|
|
Agreements |
|
|
Advances |
|
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
$ |
44,680 |
|
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
|
25,000 |
|
|
|
35,000 |
|
2011 |
|
|
20,000 |
|
|
|
15,000 |
|
|
|
20,000 |
|
|
|
15,000 |
|
2012 |
|
|
50,000 |
|
|
|
5,000 |
|
|
|
50,000 |
|
|
|
5,000 |
|
2013 |
|
|
55,000 |
|
|
|
11,300 |
|
|
|
55,000 |
|
|
|
11,300 |
|
2014 and after |
|
|
75,000 |
|
|
|
5,000 |
|
|
|
50,000 |
|
|
|
5,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
244,680 |
|
|
|
46,300 |
|
|
|
200,000 |
|
|
|
71,300 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-28
NORTHFIELD BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Three Months Ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 (unaudited)
Years Ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007
|
|
At March 31, 2010 (unaudited), $19.7 million of the Banks repurchase agreements will mature
within 30 to 90 days and have a weighted average rate of 0.25%. These repurchase agreements
are secured primarily by mortgage-backed securities with an amortized cost of $20.0 million,
and a market value of $20.1 million, at March 31, 2010 (unaudited). The remaining repurchase
agreements of $225.0 million will mature after 90 days and have a weighted average rate of
3.66%. These repurchase agreements are secured primarily by mortgage-backed securities with
an amortized cost of $232.9 million, and a market value of $241.0 million, at March 31, 2010
(unaudited). |
|
|
At December 31, 2009, the Banks repurchase agreements all mature over 90 days and have a
weighted average rate of 3.76%. The repurchase agreements are secured primarily by
mortgage-backed securities with an amortized cost of $212.5 million, and a market value of
$219.4 million, at December 31, 2009. |
|
|
The Bank has an overnight line of credit with the Federal Home Loan Bank of New York for
$100,000,000. Additionally, the Bank has a term line of credit for $100,000,000 from the
Federal Home Loan Bank of New York which permits the Bank to borrow for one month. These
lines are limited to the amount of securities
available to be pledged. At March 31, 2010 (unaudited), the Company has $200.0 million
available for use. These lines expire on July 31, 2010, and may be renewed at the option of
the FHLB. Additionally, the Company has the ability to borrow at the Federal Reserve Bank
discount window to the extent the Bank has acceptable collateral to pledge. |
|
|
Interest expense on borrowings for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 (unaudited)
and for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007 are summarized as follows (in
thousands): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repurchase Agreements |
|
$ |
1,958 |
|
|
|
1,708 |
|
|
|
7,158 |
|
|
|
2,728 |
|
|
|
1,375 |
|
FHLB advances |
|
|
490 |
|
|
|
999 |
|
|
|
3,358 |
|
|
|
6,655 |
|
|
|
3,464 |
|
Over-night borrowings |
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
53 |
|
|
|
143 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
Obligations under capital leases |
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
194 |
|
|
|
208 |
|
|
|
219 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,506 |
|
|
|
2,764 |
|
|
|
10,763 |
|
|
|
9,734 |
|
|
|
5,073 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-29
NORTHFIELD BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Three Months Ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 (unaudited)
Years Ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007
(9) |
|
Income Taxes |
|
|
|
Income tax expense (benefit) for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 (unaudited)
and the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007 consists of the following (in
thousands): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three months ended |
|
|
For the years ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal tax expense (benefit): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current |
|
$ |
1,271 |
|
|
|
2,237 |
|
|
|
9,434 |
|
|
|
6,130 |
|
|
|
8,964 |
|
Deferred |
|
|
389 |
|
|
|
(891 |
) |
|
|
(3,758 |
) |
|
|
455 |
|
|
|
(2,907 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,660 |
|
|
|
1,346 |
|
|
|
5,676 |
|
|
|
6,585 |
|
|
|
6,057 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
State and local tax expense (benefit): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current |
|
|
169 |
|
|
|
503 |
|
|
|
2,122 |
|
|
|
1,052 |
|
|
|
(123 |
) |
Deferred |
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
(280 |
) |
|
|
(1,180 |
) |
|
|
(456 |
) |
|
|
(7,489 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
180 |
|
|
|
223 |
|
|
|
942 |
|
|
|
596 |
|
|
|
(7,612 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total income tax expense (benefit) |
|
$ |
1,840 |
|
|
|
1,569 |
|
|
|
6,618 |
|
|
|
7,181 |
|
|
|
(1,555 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The effective tax rate for the three months ended March 31,
2010 and 2009 was 35.24% and 36.45%, respectively. The effective tax
rate for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007 was 35.41%,
31.21%, and (17.37%), respectively. |
|
|
The Company has recognized income tax expense related to changes in unrealized gains and
losses on securities available-for-sale of $8,473,000, $2,428,000, and $7,065,000, in 2009,
2008, and 2007, respectively. Such amounts are recorded as a component of comprehensive
income in the consolidated statements of changes in stockholders equity. |
|
|
The Company has also recognized an income tax expense (benefit) related to net actuarial
losses from other postretirement benefits of $26,000, $28,000, and $(158,000) in 2009, 2008
and 2007, respectively. Such amounts are recorded as a component of accumulated comprehensive
income in the consolidated statements of changes in stockholders equity. |
F-30
NORTHFIELD BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Three Months Ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 (unaudited)
Years Ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007
|
|
A reconciliation between the amount of reported total income tax expense (benefit) and the
expected amount computed by multiplying income before income tax expense (benefit) by the
applicable statutory federal income tax rate for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and
2009 (unaudited) and for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007 is as follows
(dollars in thousands): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three months ended |
|
|
For the years ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax expense at statutory rate of 35% |
|
$ |
1,827 |
|
|
|
1,506 |
|
|
|
6,542 |
|
|
|
8,054 |
|
|
|
3,133 |
|
Increase (decrease) in taxes resulting from: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
State tax, net of federal income tax |
|
|
117 |
|
|
|
145 |
|
|
|
612 |
|
|
|
387 |
|
|
|
(4,947 |
) |
Bank owned life insurance |
|
|
(148 |
) |
|
|
(152 |
) |
|
|
(613 |
) |
|
|
(1,482 |
) |
|
|
(593 |
) |
Change in state apportionment,
net of federal tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
327 |
|
Utilization of State of New York
net operating loss carryforwards,
net of federal tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
372 |
|
Other, net |
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
70 |
|
|
|
77 |
|
|
|
222 |
|
|
|
153 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inome tax expense (benefit) |
|
$ |
1,840 |
|
|
|
1,569 |
|
|
|
6,618 |
|
|
|
7,181 |
|
|
|
(1,555 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-31
NORTHFIELD BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Three Months Ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 (unaudited)
Years Ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007
|
|
The tax effects of temporary differences that give rise to significant portions of the
deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities at March 31, 2010 (unaudited), December 31,
2009 and 2008, are as follows (in thousands): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses |
|
$ |
6,963 |
|
|
|
6,346 |
|
|
|
2,710 |
|
Deferred loan fees |
|
|
197 |
|
|
|
181 |
|
|
|
226 |
|
Capitalized leases |
|
|
869 |
|
|
|
886 |
|
|
|
985 |
|
Charitable deduction carryforward |
|
|
2,888 |
|
|
|
3,017 |
|
|
|
4,088 |
|
Deferred compensation |
|
|
2,136 |
|
|
|
2,175 |
|
|
|
1,679 |
|
Postretirement benefits |
|
|
487 |
|
|
|
483 |
|
|
|
479 |
|
Equity awards |
|
|
280 |
|
|
|
1,030 |
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized actuarial losses on post retirement benefits |
|
|
207 |
|
|
|
223 |
|
|
|
197 |
|
Straight-line leases adjustment |
|
|
610 |
|
|
|
598 |
|
|
|
524 |
|
Asset retirement obligation |
|
|
90 |
|
|
|
87 |
|
|
|
79 |
|
Reserve for accrued interest receivable |
|
|
870 |
|
|
|
1,047 |
|
|
|
602 |
|
Reserve for loan commitments |
|
|
153 |
|
|
|
111 |
|
|
|
168 |
|
Other |
|
|
235 |
|
|
|
261 |
|
|
|
168 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total gross deferred tax assets |
|
|
15,985 |
|
|
|
16,445 |
|
|
|
11,905 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Valuation
allowance |
|
|
1,035 |
|
|
|
1,038 |
|
|
|
1,046 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,950 |
|
|
|
15,407 |
|
|
|
10,859 |
|
Deferred tax liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation |
|
|
384 |
|
|
|
383 |
|
|
|
546 |
|
Unrealized gains on securities AFS |
|
|
10,666 |
|
|
|
8,558 |
|
|
|
85 |
|
Mortgage servicing rights |
|
|
89 |
|
|
|
98 |
|
|
|
134 |
|
Employee Stock Ownership Plan |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
92 |
|
Step up to fair market value of acquired loans |
|
|
116 |
|
|
|
120 |
|
|
|
157 |
|
Step up to fair market value of acquired investment |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
26 |
|
Other |
|
|
63 |
|
|
|
84 |
|
|
|
160 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total gross deferred tax liabilities |
|
|
11,327 |
|
|
|
9,260 |
|
|
|
1,200 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Valuation allowance |
|
|
1,035 |
|
|
|
1,038 |
|
|
|
1,046 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred tax asset |
|
$ |
3,623 |
|
|
|
6,147 |
|
|
|
9,659 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company has determined that a valuation allowance should be established for certain state
and local tax benefits related to the Companys contribution to the Northfield Bank
Foundation. The Company has determined that it is not required to establish a valuation
reserve for the remaining net deferred tax asset account since it is more likely than not
that the net deferred tax assets will be realized through future reversals of existing taxable
temporary differences, future taxable income and tax planning strategies. The conclusion that
it is more likely than not that the remaining net deferred tax assets will be realized is
based on the history of earnings and the prospects for continued profitability. Management
will continue to review the tax criteria related to the recognition of deferred tax assets. |
|
|
Certain amendments to the Federal, New York State, and New York City tax laws regarding bad
debt deductions were enacted in July 1996, August 1996, and March 1997, respectively. The
Federal amendments include elimination of the percentage-of-taxable-income method for tax
years beginning after December 31, 1995, and imposition of a requirement to recapture into
taxable income (over a six-year period) the bad debt reserves in excess of the base-year
amounts. The New York State and City amendments redesignated the |
F-32
NORTHFIELD BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Three Months Ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 (unaudited)
Years Ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007
|
|
Companys state and city bad
debt reserves at December 31, 1995, as the base-year amount and also provided for future
additions to the base-year reserve using the percentage-of-taxable-income method. |
|
|
The Companys Federal, state, and city base-year reserves were approximately $5,900,000,
respectively, at March 31, 2010 (unaudited), December 31, 2009 and 2008. Under the tax laws
as amended, events that would result in taxation of certain of these reserves include the
following: (a) the Companys retained earnings represented by this reserve are used for
purposes other than to absorb losses from bad debts, including excess dividends or
distributions in liquidation; (b) the Company redeems its stock; (c) the Company fails to meet
the definition of a bank for Federal purposes or a thrift for state and city purposes; or (d)
there is a change in the federal, state, or city tax laws. At December 31, 2005, the Companys
unrecognized deferred tax liabilities with respect to its base-year reserves for Federal,
state, and city taxes totaled approximately $2,800,000. Deferred tax liabilities have not
been recognized with respect to the 1987 base-year reserves, since the Company does not expect
that these amounts will become taxable in the foreseeable future. |
|
|
At December 31, 2005, the Company did not meet the definition of a thrift for New York State
and City purposes, and as a result, recorded a state and local tax expense of approximately
$2,200,000 pertaining to the recapture of the state and city base-year reserves accumulated
after December 31, 1987. |
|
|
The Company files income tax returns in the United States federal jurisdiction and in New York
State and City jurisdictions. The Companys subsidiary also files income tax returns in the
State of New Jersey. With few exceptions, the Company is no longer subject to federal and
local income tax examinations by tax authorities for years prior to 2005. The State of New
York has concluded examining the Companys tax returns filed from 2000 to 2006, resulting in
the Company reversing of state and local tax liabilities of approximately $4.5 million, net of
federal taxes during 2007. |
|
|
The following is a reconciliation of the beginning and ending amounts of gross unrecognized
tax benefits for the year ended December 31, 2008. The amounts have not been reduced by the
federal deferred tax effects of unrecognized state benefits. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
Unrecognized tax benefits at beginning of year |
|
$ |
2,700 |
|
Additions of positions of prior years |
|
|
|
|
Settlement of unrecognized tax benefits |
|
|
(2,700 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Unrecognized tax benefits at end of year |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company records interest accrued related to uncertain tax benefits as tax expense. During
the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, the Company accrued $62,000 and $350,000,
respectively, in interest on uncertain tax positions. The Company did not accrue interest on
uncertain tax positions for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 (unaudited), or for
the year ended December 31, 2009. The Company records penalties accrued as other expenses.
The Company has not incurred any tax penalties. |
|
|
The Company has a 401(k) plan for its employees, which grants eligible employees (those
salaried employees with at least one year of service) the opportunity to invest from 2% to 15%
of their base compensation in certain investment alternatives. The Company contributes an
amount equal to 25% of employee contributions on the first 6% of base compensation contributed
by eligible employees for the first three years of participation. Subsequent years of
participation in excess of three years will increase the Company matching contribution from
25% to 50% of an employees contributions, on the first 6% of base compensation contributed by
eligible employees. A member becomes fully vested in the Companys contributions upon (a)
completion of five years of service, or (b) normal retirement, early retirement, permanent
disability, or death. |
F-33
NORTHFIELD BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Three Months Ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 (unaudited)
Years Ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007
|
|
During 2007, the Company modified the employer match for the 401(k) plan. Prior to July 9,
2007, the Company contributed an amount equal to one-half of the employee contribution on the
first 6% of base compensation contributed by eligible employees for the first three years of
participation. Subsequent years of participation in excess of three years increased the
Company matching contribution from 50% to 100% of an employees contributions, on the first 6%
of base compensation contributed by eligible employees. The Companys contribution to this
plan amounted to approximately $48,000 and $43,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2010
and 2009 (unaudited), respectively, and $156,000, $166,000, and $270,000 for the years ended
December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007, respectively. |
|
|
The Company also maintains a profit-sharing plan in which the Company can contribute to the
participants 401(k) account, at its discretion, up to the legal limit of the Internal Revenue
Code. The Company did not contribute to the profit sharing plan during the three months ended
March 31, 2010 and 2009 (unaudited), or for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007. |
|
|
The Company maintains the Northfield Bank Employee Stock Ownership Plan (the ESOP). The ESOP
is a tax-qualified plan designed to invest primarily in the Companys common stock. The ESOP
provides employees with the opportunity to receive a funded retirement benefit from the Bank,
based primarily on the value of the Companys common stock. The ESOP was authorized to, and
did purchase, 1,756,279 shares of the Companys common stock in the Companys initial public
offering at a price of $10.00 per share. This purchase was funded with a loan from Northfield
Bancorp, Inc. to the ESOP. The first payment on the loan from the ESOP to the Company was due
and paid on December 31, 2007, and the outstanding balance at March 31, 2010 (unaudited),
December 31, 2009 and 2008, was $15.8 million, $15.8 million, and $16.2 million, respectively.
The shares of the Companys common stock purchased in the initial public offering are pledged
as collateral for the loan. Shares will be released for allocation to participants as loan
payments are
made. A total of 58,539, 58,643, and 58,543 shares were released and allocated to
participants for the ESOP year ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively. ESOP
compensation expense was $201,000 and $148,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and
2009 (unaudited), respectively, and $676,000, $644,000, and $621,000 for the years ended
December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively. Cash dividends on unallocated shares are
utilized to satisfy required debt payments. Dividends on allocated shares are utilized to
prepay debt which releases additional shares to participants. |
|
|
The Company maintains a Supplemental Employee Stock Ownership Plan (the SESOP) a non-qualified
plan that provides supplemental benefits to certain executives who are prevented from
receiving the full benefits contemplated by the ESOPs benefit formula under tax law limits
for tax-qualified plans. The supplemental payments for the SESOP consist of cash payments
representing the value of Company shares that cannot be allocated to participants under the
ESOP due to legal limitations imposed on tax-qualified plans. The Company made a contribution
to the SESOP plan of $41,000, $54,000, and $48,000 for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008
and 2007, respectively. |
F-34
NORTHFIELD BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Three Months Ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 (unaudited)
Years Ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007
|
|
The following tables set forth the funded status and components of postretirement benefit
costs at December 31 measurement dates (in thousands): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Accumulated postretirement benefit obligation beginning of year |
|
$ |
1,559 |
|
|
|
1,576 |
|
Service cost |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
Interest cost |
|
|
93 |
|
|
|
95 |
|
Actuarial (gain) loss |
|
|
111 |
|
|
|
(27 |
) |
Benefits paid |
|
|
(97 |
) |
|
|
(88 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated postretirement benefit obligation end of year |
|
|
1,670 |
|
|
|
1,559 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plan assets at fair value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrecognized transition obligation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrecognized prior service cost |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrecognized loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued liability (included in accrued expenses and other liabilities) |
|
$ |
1,670 |
|
|
|
1,559 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table sets forth the amounts recognized in accumulated other comprehensive
income (loss) (in thousands): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
280 |
|
|
|
186 |
|
Transition obligation |
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
117 |
|
Prior service cost |
|
|
137 |
|
|
|
152 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss recognized in accumulated other
comprehensive income (loss) |
|
$ |
517 |
|
|
|
455 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The estimated net loss, transition obligation, and prior service cost that will be amortized
from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) into net periodic cost in 2010 are $17,000,
$17,000 and $16,000, respectively. |
|
|
The following table sets forth the components of net periodic postretirement benefit costs for
the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007 (in thousands): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Service cost |
|
$ |
4 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
Interest cost |
|
|
93 |
|
|
|
95 |
|
|
|
67 |
|
Amortization of transition obligation |
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
Amortization of prior service costs |
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
Amortization of unrecognized (gain) loss |
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net postretirement benefit cost included
in compensation and employee benefits |
|
$ |
146 |
|
|
|
153 |
|
|
|
88 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-35
NORTHFIELD BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Three Months Ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 (unaudited)
Years Ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007
|
|
The assumed discount rate related to plan obligations reflects the weighted average of
published market rates for high-quality corporate bonds with terms similar to those of the
plans expected benefit payments, rounded to the nearest quarter percentage point. The
Companys discount rate and rate of compensation increase used in accounting for the plan are
as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
Assumptions used to determine benefit
obligation at period end: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discount rate |
|
|
5.50 |
% |
|
|
6.25 |
|
|
|
6.25 |
|
Rate of increase in compensation |
|
|
4.25 |
|
|
|
4.25 |
|
|
|
4.50 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assumptions used to determine net periodic
benefit cost for the year: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discount rate |
|
|
6.25 |
% |
|
|
6.25 |
|
|
|
5.75 |
|
Rate of increase in compensation |
|
|
4.25 |
|
|
|
4.50 |
|
|
|
4.50 |
|
|
|
At December 31, 2009, a medical cost trend rate of 9.0% for 2009, decreasing 0.50% per year
thereafter until an ultimate rate of 5.0% is reached, was used in the plans valuation. The
Companys healthcare cost trend rate is based, among other things, on the Companys own
experience and third party analysis of recent and projected healthcare cost trends. |
|
|
At December 31, 2008, a medical cost trend rate of 12.00% for 2008, decreasing 1.00% per year
thereafter until an ultimate rate of 5.0% is reached, was used in the plans valuation. The
Companys healthcare cost trend rate is based, among other things, on the Companys own
experience and third party analysis of recent and projected healthcare cost trends. |
|
|
A one percentage-point change in assumed heath care cost trends would have the following
effects (in thousands): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One |
|
|
One |
|
|
|
Percentage point |
|
|
Percentage point |
|
|
|
Increase |
|
|
Decrease |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Effect on benefits earned and interest cost |
|
$ |
8 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
(7 |
) |
Effect on accumulated postretirement benefit obligation |
|
|
126 |
|
|
|
120 |
|
|
|
(112 |
) |
|
|
(106 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A one percentage-point change in assumed heath care cost trends would have the following
effects (in thousands): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One |
|
|
One |
|
|
|
Percentage point |
|
|
Percentage point |
|
|
|
Increase |
|
|
Decrease |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Aggregate of service and interest
components of net periodic cost (benefit) |
|
$ |
8 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit payments of approximately $97,000, $88,000, and $83,000 were made in 2009, 2008, and
2007, respectively. The benefits expected to be paid under the postretirement health benefits
plan for the next five |
F-36
NORTHFIELD BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Three Months Ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 (unaudited)
Years Ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007
|
|
years are as follows: $130,000 in 2010; $133,000 in 2011; $136,000 in
2012; $139,000 in 2013; and $141,000 in 2014. The benefit payments expected to be paid in the
aggregate for the years 2015 through 2019 are $689,000. The expected benefits are based on the
same assumptions used to measure the Companys benefit obligation at December 31, 2009, and
include estimated future employee service. |
|
|
The Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement and Modernization Act of 2003, or Medicare Act,
introduced both a Medicare prescription-drug benefit and a federal subsidy to sponsors of
retiree health-care plans that provide a benefit at least actuarially equivalent to the
Medicare benefit. The Company has evaluated the estimated potential subsidy available under
the Medicare Act and the related costs associated with qualifying for the subsidy. Due to the
limited number of participants in the plan, the Company has concluded that it is not cost
beneficial to apply for the subsidy. Therefore, the accumulated postretirement benefit
obligation information and related net periodic postretirement benefit costs do not reflect
the effect of any potential subsidy. |
|
|
The Company maintains a nonqualified plan to provide for the elective deferral of all or a
portion of director fees by members of the participating board of directors, deferral of all
or a portion of the compensation and/or annual bonus payable to eligible employees of the
Company, and to provide to certain officers of the Company benefits in excess of those
permitted to be paid by the Companys savings plan, ESOP, and profit-sharing plan under the
applicable Internal Revenue Code. The plan obligation was approximately $3,403,000 and
$2,498,000 at December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively, and is included in accrued expenses
and other liabilities on the consolidated balance sheets. Expense (income) under this plan
was $592,000, $(1,331,000), and $62,000 for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007,
respectively. The Company invests to fund this future obligation, in various mutual funds
designated as trading securities. The securities are marked-to-market through current period
earnings as a component of non-interest income. Accrued obligations under this plan are
credited or charged with the return on the trading securities portfolio as a component of
compensation and benefits expense. |
|
|
The Company entered into a supplemental retirement agreement with its former president and
current director on July 18, 2006. The agreement provides for 120 monthly payments of
$17,450. The present value of the obligation, of approximately $1,625,000, was recorded in
compensation and benefits expense in 2006. The present value of the obligation as of December
31, 2009 and 2008, was approximately $1,190,000 and $1,334,000, respectively. |
(11) |
|
Equity Incentive Plan |
|
|
The Company maintains the Northfield Bancorp, Inc. 2008 Equity Incentive Plan to grant common
stock or options to purchase common stock at specific prices to directors and employees of the
Company. The Plan provides for the issuance or delivery of up to 3,073,488 shares of
Northfield Bancorp, Inc. common stock subject to certain Plan limitations. On January 30,
2009, certain officers and employees of the Company were granted an aggregate of 1,478,900
stock options and 582,700 shares of restricted stock, and non-employee directors received an
aggregate of 623,700 stock options and 249,750 shares of restricted stock. On January 30,
2010 (unaudited), an employee was granted 3,000 stock options and 4,400 restricted stock
awards. On May 29, 2009, an employee was granted 3,800 stock options and 4,200 restricted
stock awards. All stock options and restricted stock vest in equal installments over a five
year period beginning one year from the date of grant. The vesting of options and restricted
stock awards may accelerate in accordance with terms of the plan. Stock options were granted
at an exercise price equal to the fair value of the Companys common stock on the grant date
based on quoted market prices and all have an expiration period of ten years. The fair value
of stock options granted on January 30, 2009, was estimated utilizing the Black-Scholes option
pricing model using the following assumptions: an expected life of 6.5 years utilizing the
simplified method, risk-free rate of return of 2.17%, volatility of 35.33% and a dividend |
F-37
NORTHFIELD BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Three Months Ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 (unaudited)
Years Ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007
|
|
yield of 1.61%. The fair value of stock options granted on May 29, 2009, was estimated
utilizing the Black-Scholes option pricing model using the
following assumptions: an expected life of 6.5 years utilizing the simplified method,
risk-free rate of return of 2.88%, volatility of 38.39% and a dividend yield of 1.50%. The
fair value of stock options granted on January 30, 2010 (unaudited), was estimated utilizing
the Black-Scholes option pricing model using the following assumptions: an expected life of
6.5 years utilizing the simplified method, risk-free rate of return of 2.90%, volatility of
38.29% and a dividend yield of 1.81% The Company is expensing the grant date fair value of all
employee and director share-based compensation over the requisite service periods on a
straight-line basis. |
|
|
During the year ended December 31, 2009, the Company recorded $2.9 million of stock-based
compensation. There was no stock based compensation during the years ended December 31, 2008
and 2007. |
|
|
The following table is a summary of the Companys non-vested stock options as of March 31,
2010 (unaudited) and December 31, 2009, and changes therein during the period then ended: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
Average |
|
|
Weighted
Average |
|
|
Weighted
Average |
|
|
|
Number of |
|
|
Grant Date |
|
|
Exercise |
|
|
Contractual |
|
|
|
Stock Options |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Price |
|
|
Life (years) |
|
Outstanding- December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted |
|
|
2,106,400 |
|
|
|
3.22 |
|
|
|
9.94 |
|
|
|
10.00 |
|
Forfeited |
|
|
(23,000 |
) |
|
|
3.22 |
|
|
|
9.94 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding- December 31, 2009 |
|
|
2,083,400 |
|
|
$ |
3.22 |
|
|
$ |
9.94 |
|
|
|
9.08 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable- December 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding- December 31, 2009 |
|
|
2,083,400 |
|
|
$ |
3.22 |
|
|
$ |
9.94 |
|
|
|
9.08 |
|
Granted |
|
|
3,000 |
|
|
|
4.66 |
|
|
|
13.24 |
|
|
|
10.00 |
|
Forfeited |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Excercised |
|
|
(13,860 |
) |
|
|
3.22 |
|
|
|
9.94 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding- March 31, 2010 (unaudited) |
|
|
2,072,540 |
|
|
$ |
3.22 |
|
|
$ |
9.94 |
|
|
|
8.84 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable- March 31, 2010 (unaudited) |
|
|
402,060 |
|
|
$ |
3.22 |
|
|
$ |
9.94 |
|
|
|
8.83 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expected future stock option expense related to the non-vested options outstanding as of March
31, 21010 (unaudited), is $5.3 million over an average period of 3.8 years. |
|
|
Expected future stock option expense related to the non-vested options outstanding as of
December 31, 2009, is $5.5 million over an average period of 4.0 years. |
F-38
NORTHFIELD BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Three Months Ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 (unaudited)
Years Ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007
|
|
The following is a summary of the status of the Companys restricted shares as of March 31,
2010 (unaudited) and December 31, 2009, and changes therein during the period then ended. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
Number of |
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Grant Date |
|
|
|
Awarded |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
Non-vested at December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Granted |
|
|
836,650 |
|
|
|
9.94 |
|
Vested |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited |
|
|
(11,500 |
) |
|
|
9.94 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-vested at December 31, 2009 |
|
|
825,150 |
|
|
$ |
9.94 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-vested at December 31, 2009 |
|
|
825,150 |
|
|
|
9.94 |
|
Granted |
|
|
4,400 |
|
|
|
13.24 |
|
Vested |
|
|
(174,830 |
) |
|
|
9.94 |
|
Forfeited |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-vested at March 31, 2010 (unaudited) |
|
|
654,720 |
|
|
|
9.97 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expected future stock award expense related to the non-vested restricted awards as of March
31, 2010 (unaudited) is $6.3 million over an average period of 3.8 years. On January 30, 2010
(unaudited), 174,830 of the restricted shares vested. In connection with the vesting, the
Company repurchased 21,605 shares of common stock for employees (at their request) in
satisfaction of minimum payroll taxes. |
|
|
Expected future stock award expense related to the non-vested restricted awards as of December
31, 2009 is $6.7 million over an average period of 4.0 years. |
|
|
Upon the exercise of stock options, management expects to utilize treasury stock as the source
of issuance for these shares. |
(12) |
|
Commitments and Contingencies |
|
|
The Company, in the normal course of business, is party to commitments that involve, to
varying degrees, elements of risk in excess of the amounts recognized in the consolidated
financial statements. These commitments include unused lines of credit and commitments to
extend credit. |
F-39
NORTHFIELD BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Three Months Ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 (unaudited)
Years Ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007
|
|
At March 31, 2010 (unaudited) and December 31, 2009, the following commitment and contingent
liabilities existed that are not reflected in the accompanying consolidated financial
statements (in thousands): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At |
|
|
March 31, 2010 |
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
Commitments to extend credit |
|
$ |
23,875 |
|
|
|
4,264 |
|
Unused lines of credit |
|
|
38,340 |
|
|
|
36,027 |
|
Standby letters of credit |
|
|
3,181 |
|
|
|
3,181 |
|
|
|
At March 31, 2010, commitments to fund fixed rate loans
totaled $12.1 million, at a weighted average interest rate of 6.14%.
At December 31, 2009, commitments to fund fixed rate loans totaled
$2.6 million, at a weighted average interest rate of 6.22%. |
|
|
The Companys maximum exposure to credit losses in the event of nonperformance by the other
party to these commitments is represented by the contractual amount. The Company uses the
same credit policies in granting commitments and conditional obligations as it does for
amounts recorded in the consolidated balance sheets. These commitments and obligations do not
necessarily represent future cash flow requirements. The Company evaluates each customers
creditworthiness on a case-by-case basis. The amount of collateral obtained, if deemed
necessary, is based on managements assessment of risk. Standby letters of credit are
conditional commitments issued by the Company to guarantee the performance of a customer to a
third party. The guarantees generally extend for a term of up to one year and are fully
collateralized. For each guarantee issued, if the customer defaults on a payment to the third
party, the Company would have to perform under the guarantee. The unamortized fee on standby
letters of credit approximates their fair value; such fees were insignificant at March 31,
2010 (unaudited) and December 31, 2009. The Company maintains an allowance for estimated
losses on commitments to extend credit. At March 31, 2010 (unaudited), December 31, 2009 and
2008, the allowance was $367,000, $266,000 and $390,000, respectively, and is recorded as a
component of other non-interest expense. |
|
|
At December 31, 2009, the Company was obligated under non-cancelable operating leases and
capitalized leases on property used for banking purposes. Most leases contain escalation
clauses and renewal options which provide for increased rentals as well as for increases in
certain property costs including real estate taxes, common area maintenance, and insurance. |
|
|
The projected minimum annual rental payments and receipts under the capitalized leases and
operating leases are as follows (in thousands): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rental |
|
|
Rental |
|
|
Rental |
|
|
|
payments |
|
|
payments |
|
|
receipts |
|
|
|
capitalized |
|
|
operating |
|
|
operating |
|
|
|
leases |
|
|
leases |
|
|
leases |
|
Year ending December 31: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
$ |
365 |
|
|
|
2,177 |
|
|
|
165 |
|
2011 |
|
|
376 |
|
|
|
2,083 |
|
|
|
165 |
|
2012 |
|
|
387 |
|
|
|
2,027 |
|
|
|
165 |
|
2013 |
|
|
399 |
|
|
|
1,991 |
|
|
|
169 |
|
2014 |
|
|
411 |
|
|
|
2,035 |
|
|
|
190 |
|
Thereafter |
|
|
1,075 |
|
|
|
22,686 |
|
|
|
1,822 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total minimum lease payments |
|
$ |
3,013 |
|
|
|
32,999 |
|
|
|
2,676 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net rental expense included in occupancy expense was approximately $549,000 and $516,000, for
the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 (unaudited) and $2,128,000, $1,466,000, and
$1,140,000 for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007, respectively. |
F-40
NORTHFIELD BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Three Months Ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 (unaudited)
Years Ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007
|
|
In December of 2009, the Bank entered in an agreement to lease a building located in Brooklyn,
New York. The Bank intends to operate a bank branch at this location. The Bank anticipates
taking possession of the building during 2010 at which time the lease will commence. The
initial lease is term is 15 years with an average monthly rental expense of $22,000 per month.
The Bank has two five year renewal options. |
|
|
In December of 2009, the Bank entered in an agreement to lease a building located on in Staten
Island, New York. The Bank intends to operate a bank branch at this location. The Bank
anticipates taking possession of the building during 2010 at which time the lease will
commence. The lease is for a term of 15 years with an average monthly rental expense of
$15,000 per month. The Bank has two five year renewal options. |
|
|
In the normal course of business, the Company may be a party to various outstanding legal
proceedings and claims. In the opinion of management, the consolidated financial statements
will not be materially affected by the outcome of such legal proceedings and claims. |
|
|
The Bank is required by regulation to maintain a certain level of cash balances on hand and/or
on deposit with the Federal Reserve Bank of New York. As of March 31, 2010 (unaudited),
December 31, 2009 and 2008, the Bank was required to maintain balances of $243,000, $483,000
and $3,762,000, respectively. |
|
|
The Bank has entered into employment agreements with its Chief Executive Officer and the other
executive officers of the Bank to ensure the continuity of executive leadership, to clarify
the roles and responsibilities of executives, and to make explicit the terms and conditions of
executive employment. These agreements are for a term of three-years subject to review and
annual renewal, and provide for certain levels of base annual salary and in the event of a
change in control, as defined, or in the event of termination, as defined, certain levels of
base salary, bonus payments, and benefits for a period of up to three-years. |
|
|
On May 26, 2006, the Bank entered into a purchase and assumption agreement with a third party
which includes the purchase of certain premises, equipment, and leaseholds of two of the
Banks branches. The agreement also provides for the third party to assume the deposit
liabilities of the two branches, totaling approximately $29.0 million as of December 31, 2006,
and related lease obligations. The purchase and assumption agreement is at or above the
Banks carrying value of the related assets purchased and liabilities and obligations being
assumed. The transaction closed in the first quarter of 2007 and the Company recognized a
gain on the sale of premises and equipment and related deposit relationships of approximately
$4.3 million. |
(13) |
|
Regulatory Requirements |
|
|
Northfield Bank converted to a federally-charted savings bank from a New York-chartered
savings bank effective November 6, 2007. Northfield Banks regulator is the Office of Thrift
Supervision OTS (previously Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation FDIC). Simultaneously
with Northfield Banks conversion, Northfield Bancorp, MHC and Northfield Bancorp, Inc.
converted to federal-charters from New York-chartered holding companies. |
|
|
The OTS requires banks to maintain a minimum tangible capital ratio to tangible assets of
1.5%, a minimum core capital ratio to total adjusted assets of 4.0%, and a minimum ratio of
total risk-adjusted total assets of 8.0%. |
|
|
Under prompt corrective action regulations, the OTS is required to take certain supervisory
actions (and may take additional discretionary actions) with respect to an undercapitalized
institution. Such actions could have a direct material effect on the institutions financial
statements. The regulations establish a framework for the classification of savings
institutions into five categories: well capitalized, adequately capitalized, undercapitalized,
significantly undercapitalized, and critically undercapitalized. Generally, an institution is
considered well capitalized if it has a core capital ratio of at least 5%, a Tier 1 risk-based
capital ratio of at least 6%, and a total risk-based capital ratio of at least 10%. |
|
|
The foregoing capital ratios are based in part on specific quantitative measures of assets,
liabilities, and certain off-balance-sheet items as calculated under regulatory accounting
practices. Capital amounts and |
F-41
NORTHFIELD BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Three Months Ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 (unaudited)
Years Ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007
|
|
classifications also are subject to qualitative judgments by
the regulators about capital components, risk weighting, and other factors. |
|
|
Management believes that as of March 31, 2010 (unaudited) and December 31, 2009, the Bank met
all capital adequacy requirements to which it is subject. Further,
the most recent examination by the OTS
(as of March 31, 2009) categorized the Bank as a well-capitalized institution under the prompt
corrective action regulations. There have been no conditions or events since that
notification that management believes have changed the Banks capital classification. |
|
|
Northfield Bancorp, Inc. is regulated, supervised, and examined by the OTS as a savings and
loan holding company and, as such, is not subject to regulatory capital requirements. |
|
|
The following is a summary of Northfield Banks regulatory capital amounts and ratios compared
to the OTS requirements as of March 31, 2010 (unaudited), December 31, 2009 and 2008, for
classification as a well-capitalized institution and minimum capital (dollars in thousands). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OTS Requirements |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For well capitalized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For capital |
|
under prompt corrective |
|
|
Actual |
|
adequacy purposes |
|
action provisions |
|
|
Amount |
|
Ratio |
|
Amount |
|
Ratio |
|
Amount |
|
Ratio |
As of March 31, 2010 (unaudited): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tangible capital to
tangible assets |
|
$ |
278,658 |
|
|
|
13.91 |
% |
|
$ |
30,046 |
|
|
|
1.50 |
% |
|
$ |
NA |
|
|
|
NA |
% |
Tier 1 captial (core)
(to adjusted total assets) |
|
|
278,658 |
|
|
|
13.91 |
|
|
|
80,122 |
|
|
|
4.00 |
|
|
|
110,152 |
|
|
|
5.00 |
|
Total capital (to risk-
weighted assets) |
|
|
291,780 |
|
|
|
28.59 |
|
|
|
81,634 |
|
|
|
8.00 |
|
|
|
102,043 |
|
|
|
10.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2009: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tangible capital to
tangible assets |
|
$ |
274,236 |
|
|
|
14.35 |
% |
|
$ |
28,666 |
|
|
|
1.50 |
% |
|
$ |
NA |
|
|
|
NA |
% |
Tier 1 captial (core)
(to adjusted total assets) |
|
|
274,236 |
|
|
|
14.35 |
|
|
|
76,442 |
|
|
|
4.00 |
|
|
|
95,553 |
|
|
|
5.00 |
|
Total capital (to risk-
weighted assets) |
|
|
287,085 |
|
|
|
28.52 |
|
|
|
80,529 |
|
|
|
8.00 |
|
|
|
100,661 |
|
|
|
10.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2008: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tangible capital to
tangible assets |
|
$ |
272,480 |
|
|
|
15.98 |
% |
|
$ |
25,577 |
|
|
|
1.50 |
% |
|
$ |
NA |
|
|
|
NA |
% |
Tier 1 captial (core)
(to adjusted total assets) |
|
|
272,480 |
|
|
|
15.98 |
|
|
|
68,205 |
|
|
|
4.00 |
|
|
|
85,257 |
|
|
|
5.00 |
|
Total capital (to risk-
weighted assets) |
|
|
281,648 |
|
|
|
34.81 |
|
|
|
64,728 |
|
|
|
8.00 |
|
|
|
80,910 |
|
|
|
10.00 |
|
|
|
The following is a reconciliation of Northfield Banks total stockholders equity to
regulatory capital amounts under OTS regulations at March 31, 2010 (unaudited), December 31,
2009 and 2008 (dollars in thousands).: |
F-42
NORTHFIELD BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Three Months Ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 (unaudited)
Years Ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
$ |
310,098 |
|
|
|
302,260 |
|
|
|
289,097 |
|
Adjustments for regulatory capital purposes: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill and certain other intangibles |
|
|
(16,318 |
) |
|
|
(16,361 |
) |
|
|
(16,697 |
) |
Net unrealized gains on securities
available for sale, net |
|
|
(15,522 |
) |
|
|
(12,064 |
) |
|
|
(285 |
) |
Other |
|
|
400 |
|
|
|
401 |
|
|
|
365 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total (tier 1 capital) core |
|
|
278,658 |
|
|
|
274,236 |
|
|
|
272,480 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Qualifying allowance for loan losses |
|
|
12,755 |
|
|
|
12,583 |
|
|
|
8,778 |
|
Other |
|
|
367 |
|
|
|
266 |
|
|
|
390 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total risk-based capital |
|
$ |
291,780 |
|
|
|
287,085 |
|
|
|
281,648 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14) |
|
Fair Value of Measurement |
|
|
|
The following table presents the assets reported on the consolidated balance sheet at their
estimated fair value as of March 31, 2010 (unaudited), December 31, 2009 and 2008, by level
within the Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures Topic of the FASB Accounting Standards
Codification. Financial assets and liabilities are classified in their entirety based on the
level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The fair value hierarchy is
as follows: |
|
|
|
Level 1 Inputs Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical
assets or liabilities that the reporting entity has the ability to access at the
measurement date. |
|
|
|
|
Level 2 Inputs Inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are
observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. These
include quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets, quoted
prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not
active, inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or
liability (for example, interest rates, volatilities, prepayment speeds, loss
severities, credit risks and default
rates) or inputs that are derived principally from or corroborated by observable
market data by correlations or other means. |
|
|
|
|
Level 3 Inputs Significant unobservable inputs that reflect the Companys own
assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the assets or
liabilities. |
F-43
NORTHFIELD BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Three Months Ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 (unaudited)
Years Ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007
|
|
The following tables summarize financial assets and financial liabilities measured at fair
value on a recurring basis as of March 31, 2010 (unaudited), December 31, 2009 and 2008,
segregated by the level of the valuation inputs within the fair value hierarchy utilized to
measure fair value (in thousands): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Significant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted Prices in |
|
|
Other |
|
|
Significant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Active Markets for |
|
|
Observable |
|
|
Unobservable |
|
|
|
March 31, 2010 |
|
|
Identical Assets |
|
|
Inputs |
|
|
Inputs |
|
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
|
(Level 1) |
|
|
(Level 2) |
|
|
(Level 3) |
|
Measured on a recurring basis: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available-for-sale: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GSE |
|
$ |
781,961 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
781,961 |
|
|
|
|
|
Non-GSE |
|
|
161,596 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
161,596 |
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate bonds |
|
|
136,724 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
136,724 |
|
|
|
|
|
GSE bonds |
|
|
130,291 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
130,291 |
|
|
|
|
|
Equities |
|
|
5,623 |
|
|
|
5,623 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total available-for-sale |
|
|
1,216,195 |
|
|
|
5,623 |
|
|
|
1,210,572 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trading securities |
|
|
3,706 |
|
|
|
3,706 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
1,219,901 |
|
|
|
9,329 |
|
|
|
1,210,572 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Measured on a non-recurring basis: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impaired loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial mortgage (CRE) |
|
$ |
17,231 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,231 |
|
Construction and land |
|
|
6,219 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,219 |
|
Multifamily |
|
|
835 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
835 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total impaired loans |
|
|
24,285 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,285 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other real estate owned (CRE) |
|
|
1,533 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,533 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
25,818 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,818 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-44
NORTHFIELD BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Three Months Ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 (unaudited)
Years Ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted Prices in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Significant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Active Markets |
|
|
Significant Other |
|
|
Unobservable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for Identical |
|
|
Observable |
|
|
Inputs |
|
|
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
|
Assets (Level 1) |
|
|
Inputs (Level 2) |
|
|
(Level 3) |
|
Measured on a recurring basis: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available-for-sale: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GSE |
|
$ |
767,148 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
767,148 |
|
|
|
|
|
Non-GSE |
|
|
176,660 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
176,660 |
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate bonds |
|
|
137,140 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
137,140 |
|
|
|
|
|
GSE bonds |
|
|
28,983 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,983 |
|
|
|
|
|
Equities |
|
|
21,872 |
|
|
|
21,872 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total available-for-sale |
|
|
1,131,803 |
|
|
|
21,872 |
|
|
|
1,109,931 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trading securities |
|
|
3,403 |
|
|
|
3,403 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
1,135,206 |
|
|
|
25,275 |
|
|
|
1,109,931 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Measured on a non-recurring basis: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impaired loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial mortgage |
|
$ |
21,295 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,295 |
|
Construction and land |
|
|
6,910 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,910 |
|
Multifamily |
|
|
823 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
823 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total impaired loans |
|
|
29,028 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29,028 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other real estate owned (CRE) |
|
|
1,938 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,938 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
30,966 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,966 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
(Level 1) |
|
|
(Level 2) |
|
|
(Level 3) |
|
Measured on a recurring basis: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available-for-sale: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GSE |
|
$ |
791,736 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
791,736 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Non-GSE |
|
|
139,473 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
139,473 |
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate bonds |
|
|
17,351 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,351 |
|
|
|
|
|
Equities |
|
|
9,025 |
|
|
|
9,025 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total available-for-sale |
|
|
957,585 |
|
|
|
9,025 |
|
|
|
948,560 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trading securities |
|
|
2,498 |
|
|
|
2,498 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
960,083 |
|
|
$ |
11,523 |
|
|
$ |
948,560 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Measured on a non-recurring basis: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impaired loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial mortgage |
|
$ |
2,513 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,513 |
|
Construction and land |
|
|
2,675 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,675 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total impaired loans |
|
|
5,188 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,188 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other real estate owned (CRE) |
|
|
1,071 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,071 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
6,259 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,259 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-45
NORTHFIELD BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Three Months Ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 (unaudited)
Years Ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007
|
|
Available -for- Sale Securities: The estimated fair values for mortgage-backed securities, GSE
bonds, and corporate securities are obtained from a nationally recognized third-party pricing
service. The estimated fair values are derived primarily from cash flow models, which include
assumptions for interest rates, credit losses, and prepayment speeds. Broker/dealer quotes
are utilized as well when such quotes are available and deemed representative of the market.
The significant inputs utilized in the cash flow models are based on market data obtained from
sources independent of the Company (observable inputs,) and are therefore classified as Level
2 within the fair value hierarchy. The estimated fair value of equity securities classified
as Level 1, are derived from quoted market prices in active markets. Equity securities
consist primarily of money market mutual funds. |
|
|
Trading Securities: Fair values are derived from quoted market prices in active markets.
The assets consist of publicly traded mutual funds. |
|
|
Also, the Company may be required, from time to time, to measure the fair value of
certain other financial assets on a nonrecurring basis in accordance with U.S. generally
accepted accounting principles. The adjustments to fair value usually result from the
application of lower-of-cost-or-market accounting or write downs of individual assets. |
|
|
Impaired Loans: At March 31, 2010 (unaudited), December 31, 2009 and 2008, the Company had
impaired loans with outstanding principal balances of $25.4 million, $31.4 million and $5.5
million, which were recorded at their estimated fair value of $24.3 million, $29.0 million and
$5.2 million, respectively. The Company recorded impairment charges of $1.1 million and
charge-offs of $198,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2010 (unaudited), compared to
impairment charges of $594,000 and charge-offs of $595,000 for the same period of 2009
(unaudited), respectively, utilizing Level 3 inputs. The Company recorded impairment charges
of $2.4 million and $300,000, for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively,
utilizing Level 3 inputs. In addition, the Company recorded charge-offs on impaired loans
amounting to $940,000 and $761,000, for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008,
respectively, also utilizing Level 3 inputs. Impaired assets are valued utilizing independent
appraisals, if the loan is collateral dependent, adjusted downward by management, as
necessary, for changes in relevant valuation factors subsequent to the appraisal date, or the
present value of expected future cash flows for non-collateral dependent loans and troubled
debt restructurings. |
|
|
Other Real Estate Owned: At March 31, 2010 (unaudited), December 31, 2009 and 2008, the
Company had assets acquired through foreclosure of $1.5 million, $1.9 million, and $1.1
million, respectively, recorded at estimated fair value, less estimated selling costs when
acquired, thus establishing a new cost basis. Fair value is generally based on independent
appraisals. These appraisals include adjustments to comparable assets based on the
appraisers market knowledge and experience, and are considered Level 3 inputs. When an asset
is acquired, the excess of the loan balance over fair value, less estimated selling costs, is
charged to the allowance for loan losses. If the estimated fair value of the asset declines,
a write-down is recorded through expense. The valuation of foreclosed assets is subjective in
nature and may be adjusted in the future because of changes in economic conditions.
Subsequent valuation adjustments to other real estate owned totaled $146,000 for the three
months ended March 31, 2010 (unaudited), reflective of continued deterioration in estimated
fair values. The remaining reduction to REO was a result of sales. There were no subsequent
valuation adjustments to other real estate owned for the three months ended March 31, 2009
(unaudited). |
|
|
During the year ended December 31, 2009, the Company transferred a loan with a principal
balance of $1.9 million and an estimated fair value, less costs to sell, of $1.4 million to
other real estate owned. During the year ended December 31, 2009, the Company recorded
impairment charges of $489,000 prior to the transfer of the loan to OREO utilizing Level 3
inputs.
During the year ended December 31, 2008, the Company transferred a loan with a
principal balance of $2.1 million and an estimated fair value, less costs to sell, of $1.1
million to other real estate owned. During the year ended December 31, 2008, the Company
recorded impairment charges of $1.0 million prior to the transfer of the loan to OREO
utilizing Level 3 inputs. |
F-46
NORTHFIELD BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Three Months Ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 (unaudited)
Years Ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007
|
|
Subsequent valuation adjustments to other real estate owned totaled
$516,000 and $0 for the year ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively, reflective of
continued deterioration in estimated fair values. Operating costs after acquisition are
generally expensed. |
|
|
|
Fair Value of Financial Instruments |
|
|
|
The FASB Accounting Standards Topic for Financial Instruments requires disclosure of the fair
value of financial assets and financial liabilities, including those financial assets and
financial liabilities that are not measured and reported at fair value on a recurring or
non-recurring basis. The methodologies for estimating the fair value of financial assets and
financial liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring or non-recurring basis
are discussed above. The following methods and assumptions were used to estimate the fair
value of other financial assets and financial liabilities not already discussed above: |
|
(a) |
|
Cash, Cash Equivalents, and Certificates of Deposit |
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents are short-term in nature with original maturities of three
months or less; the carrying amount approximates fair value. Certificates of deposits
having original terms of six-months
or less; carrying value generally approximates fair value. Certificate of deposits with
an original maturity of six months or greater the fair value is derived from discounted
cash flows. |
|
|
(b) |
|
Securities (Held to Maturity) |
|
|
|
|
The fair values for substantially all of our securities are obtained from an independent
nationally recognized pricing service. The independent pricing service utilizes market
prices of same or similar securities whenever such prices are available. Prices
involving distressed sellers are not utilized in determining fair value. Where
necessary, the independent third-party pricing service estimates fair value using models
employing techniques such as discounted cash flow analyses. The assumptions used in
these models typically include assumptions for interest rates, credit losses, and
prepayments, utilizing market observable data where available. |
|
|
(c) |
|
Federal Home Loan Bank of New York Stock |
|
|
|
|
The fair value for Federal Home Loan Bank of New York stock is its carrying value, since
this is the amount for which it could be redeemed and there is no active market for this
stock. |
|
|
(d) |
|
Loans |
|
|
|
|
Fair values are estimated for portfolios of loans with similar financial
characteristics. Loans are segregated by type such as residential mortgage,
construction, land, multifamily, commercial and consumer. Each loan category is further
segmented into amortizing and non-amortizing and fixed and adjustable rate interest
terms and by performing and nonperforming categories. The fair value of loans is
estimated by discounting the future cash flows using current prepayment assumptions and
current rates at which similar loans would be made to borrowers with similar credit
ratings and for the same remaining maturities. This method of estimating fair value
does not incorporate the exit price concept of fair value prescribed by the FASB ASC
Topic for Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures. |
|
|
(e) |
|
Deposits |
|
|
|
|
The fair value of deposits with no stated maturity, such as non-interest-bearing demand
deposits, savings, NOW and money market accounts, is equal to the amount payable on
demand. The fair value of certificates of deposit is based on the discounted value of
contractual cash flows. The discount rate is estimated using the rates currently
offered for deposits of similar remaining maturities. |
|
|
(f) |
|
Commitments to Extend Credit and Standby Letters of Credit |
|
|
|
|
The fair value of commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit are
estimated using the fees currently charged to enter into similar agreements, taking into
account the remaining terms of the |
F-47
NORTHFIELD BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Three Months Ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 (unaudited)
Years Ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007
|
|
|
agreements and the present creditworthiness of the
counterparties. For fixed-rate loan commitments, fair value also considers the
difference between current levels of interest rates and the committed rates. The fair
value of off-balance-sheet commitments is insignificant and therefore not included in
the following table. |
|
|
(g) |
|
Borrowings |
|
|
|
|
The fair value of borrowings is estimated by discounting future cash flows based on
rates currently available for debt with similar terms and remaining maturity. |
|
|
(h) |
|
Advance Payments by Borrowers |
|
|
|
|
Advance payments by borrowers for taxes and insurance have no stated maturity; the fair
value is equal to the amount currently payable. |
|
|
The estimated fair values of the Companys significant financial instruments at March 31,
2010 (unaudited) December 31, 2009, and 2008, are presented in the following table (in
thousands): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
December 31, |
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
Carrying |
|
Fair |
|
Carrying |
|
Fair |
|
Carrying |
|
Fair |
|
|
value |
|
value |
|
value |
|
value |
|
value |
|
value |
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
50,811 |
|
|
|
50,811 |
|
|
|
42,544 |
|
|
|
42,544 |
|
|
|
50,128 |
|
|
|
50,128 |
|
Certificates of deposit in
other financial institutions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
53,653 |
|
|
|
53,873 |
|
Trading securities |
|
|
3,706 |
|
|
|
3,706 |
|
|
|
3,403 |
|
|
|
3,403 |
|
|
|
2,498 |
|
|
|
2,498 |
|
Securities available-for-sale |
|
|
1,216,195 |
|
|
|
1,216,195 |
|
|
|
1,131,803 |
|
|
|
1,131,803 |
|
|
|
957,585 |
|
|
|
957,585 |
|
Securities held-to-maturity |
|
|
6,220 |
|
|
|
6,432 |
|
|
|
6,740 |
|
|
|
6,930 |
|
|
|
14,479 |
|
|
|
14,588 |
|
Federal Home Loan Bank of
New York stock, at cost |
|
|
5,026 |
|
|
|
5,026 |
|
|
|
6,421 |
|
|
|
6,421 |
|
|
|
9,410 |
|
|
|
9,410 |
|
Net loans
held-for-investment |
|
|
720,079 |
|
|
|
735,885 |
|
|
|
713,855 |
|
|
|
726,475 |
|
|
|
581,206 |
|
|
|
610,713 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits |
|
$ |
1,392,905 |
|
|
|
1,394,827 |
|
|
|
1,316,885 |
|
|
|
1,319,612 |
|
|
|
1,024,439 |
|
|
|
1,027,896 |
|
Borrowings |
|
|
293,060 |
|
|
|
302,780 |
|
|
|
279,424 |
|
|
|
288,737 |
|
|
|
332,084 |
|
|
|
340,404 |
|
Advance payments by
borrowers |
|
|
2,038 |
|
|
|
2,038 |
|
|
|
757 |
|
|
|
757 |
|
|
|
3,823 |
|
|
|
3,823 |
|
|
|
Fair value estimates are made at a specific point in time, based on relevant market
information and information about the financial instrument. These estimates do not reflect
any premium or discount that could result from offering for sale at one time the Companys
entire holdings of a particular financial instrument. Because no market exists for a
significant portion of the Companys financial instruments, fair value estimates are based
on judgments regarding future expected loss experience, current economic conditions, risk
characteristics of various financial instruments, and other factors. These estimates are |
F-48
NORTHFIELD BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Three Months Ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 (unaudited)
Years Ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007
|
|
subjective in nature and involve uncertainties and matters of significant judgment and,
therefore, cannot be determined with precision. Changes in assumptions could significantly
affect the estimates. |
|
|
Fair value estimates are based on existing on- and off-balance-sheet financial
instruments without attempting to estimate the value of anticipated future business and the
value of assets and liabilities that are not considered financial instruments. In addition,
the tax ramifications related to the realization of the unrealized gains and losses can have
a significant effect on fair value estimates and have not been considered in the estimates. |
(15) |
|
Stock Repurchase Program |
|
|
On February 13, 2009, the board of directors of the Company authorized a stock repurchase
program pursuant to which the Company intends to repurchase up to 2,240,153 shares,
representing approximately 5% of its outstanding shares. The timing of the repurchases
depends on certain factors, including but not limited to, market conditions and prices, the
Companys liquidity and capital requirements, and alternative uses of capital. All
repurchased shares are expected to be held as treasury stock and available for general
corporate purposes. The Company is conducting such repurchases in accordance with a Rule
10b5-1 trading plan. As of March 31, 2010 (unaudited), a total of 1,902,344 shares were
purchased under this repurchase plan at a weighted average cost of $11.77. As of December 31,
2009, a total of 1,716,063 shares were purchased under this repurchase plan at a weighted
average cost of $11.61 per share. |
(16) |
|
Earnings (Loss) Per Share |
|
|
The following is a summary of the Companys earnings per share calculations and
reconciliation of basic to diluted earnings per share for the periods indicated (in thousands,
except share data): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
December 31, |
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income available to common stockholders |
|
$ |
3,381 |
|
|
|
2,735 |
|
|
|
12,074 |
|
|
|
15,831 |
|
|
|
10,507 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding-basic |
|
|
41,509,173 |
|
|
|
43,089,331 |
|
|
|
42,405,774 |
|
|
|
43,133,856 |
|
|
|
43,076,586 |
|
Effect of non-vested restricted stock and
stock
options outstanding |
|
|
314,621 |
|
|
|
15,078 |
|
|
|
126,794 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding-diluted |
|
|
41,823,794 |
|
|
|
43,104,409 |
|
|
|
42,532,568 |
|
|
|
43,133,856 |
|
|
|
43,076,586 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share-basic (1) |
|
$ |
0.08 |
|
|
|
0.06 |
|
|
|
0.28 |
|
|
|
0.37 |
|
|
|
(0.03 |
) |
Earnings per share-diluted (1) |
|
$ |
0.08 |
|
|
|
0.06 |
|
|
|
0.28 |
|
|
|
0.37 |
|
|
|
(0.03 |
) |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Net loss per share is calculated for the period that the Companys shares of common stock
were outstanding (November 8, 2007, through December 31, 2007). The net loss for this period
was $1,501,000 and the weighted average common shares outstanding were 43,076,586. Per share
data and shares outstanding information is not applicable prior to November 8, 2007. |
F-49
NORTHFIELD BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Three Months Ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 (unaudited)
Years Ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007
(17) |
|
Parent-only Financial Information |
|
|
The following condensed parent company only financial information reflects Northfield Bancorp,
Inc.s investment in its wholly-owned consolidated subsidiary, Northfield Bank, using the
equity method of accounting. |
Northfield Bancorp, Inc.
Condensed Balance Sheets
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash in Northfield Bank |
|
$ |
16,131 |
|
|
|
18,095 |
|
|
|
42,555 |
|
Interest-earning deposits in other financial institutions |
|
|
1,056 |
|
|
|
1,793 |
|
|
|
|
|
Certificates of deposit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,153 |
|
Investment in Northfield Bank |
|
|
310,098 |
|
|
|
302,260 |
|
|
|
289,097 |
|
Securities available-for-sale (corporate bonds) |
|
|
50,370 |
|
|
|
50,511 |
|
|
|
4,298 |
|
ESOP loan receivable |
|
|
15,798 |
|
|
|
15,798 |
|
|
|
16,179 |
|
Accrued interest receivable |
|
|
840 |
|
|
|
585 |
|
|
|
873 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
2,152 |
|
|
|
2,632 |
|
|
|
3,423 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
396,445 |
|
|
|
391,674 |
|
|
|
386,578 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and Stockholders Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
$ |
159 |
|
|
|
134 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
396,286 |
|
|
|
391,540 |
|
|
|
386,578 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
396,445 |
|
|
|
391,674 |
|
|
|
386,578 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-50
NORTHFIELD BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Three Months Ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 (unaudited)
Years Ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007
Northfield Bancorp, Inc.
Condensed Statements of Income
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
Years ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest on ESOP loan |
|
$ |
127 |
|
|
|
130 |
|
|
|
526 |
|
|
|
1,189 |
|
|
|
195 |
|
Interest income on deposit
in Northfield Bank |
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
273 |
|
|
|
965 |
|
|
|
62 |
|
Interest income on certificates
of deposit |
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
336 |
|
|
|
590 |
|
|
|
1,478 |
|
|
|
79 |
|
Interest income on corporate bonds |
|
|
335 |
|
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
603 |
|
|
|
148 |
|
|
|
|
|
Undistributed earnings of
Northfield Bank |
|
|
3,170 |
|
|
|
2,600 |
|
|
|
11,521 |
|
|
|
14,103 |
|
|
|
18,083 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total income |
|
|
3,666 |
|
|
|
3,209 |
|
|
|
13,513 |
|
|
|
17,883 |
|
|
|
18,419 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contribution to charitable foundation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,952 |
|
Other expenses |
|
|
205 |
|
|
|
381 |
|
|
|
1,177 |
|
|
|
878 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
Income tax expense (benefit) |
|
|
80 |
|
|
|
93 |
|
|
|
262 |
|
|
|
1,174 |
|
|
|
(4,051 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expense |
|
|
285 |
|
|
|
474 |
|
|
|
1,439 |
|
|
|
2,052 |
|
|
|
7,912 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
3,381 |
|
|
|
2,735 |
|
|
|
12,074 |
|
|
|
15,831 |
|
|
|
10,507 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-51
NORTHFIELD BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Three Months Ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 (unaudited)
Years Ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007
Northfield Bancorp, Inc.
Condensed Statements of Cash Flows
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
Years ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from operating activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
3,381 |
|
|
|
2,735 |
|
|
|
12,074 |
|
|
|
15,831 |
|
|
|
10,507 |
|
Contribution of stock to charitable foundation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,952 |
|
(Increase) decrease in accrued interest receivable |
|
|
(255 |
) |
|
|
822 |
|
|
|
288 |
|
|
|
(846 |
) |
|
|
(27 |
) |
Deferred taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,064 |
|
|
|
262 |
|
|
|
(3,336 |
) |
(Increase) decrease in due from Northfield Bank |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(16 |
) |
|
|
312 |
|
|
|
1,043 |
|
|
|
(1,287 |
) |
Decrease (increase) in other assets |
|
|
190 |
|
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
(1,154 |
) |
|
|
(168 |
) |
|
|
(716 |
) |
Amortization of premium on corporate bond |
|
|
286 |
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
527 |
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) in other liabilities |
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
134 |
|
|
|
(46 |
) |
|
|
46 |
|
Undistributed earnings of Northfield Bank |
|
|
(3,170 |
) |
|
|
(2,600 |
) |
|
|
(11,521 |
) |
|
|
(14,103 |
) |
|
|
(18,083 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities |
|
|
457 |
|
|
|
1,062 |
|
|
|
1,724 |
|
|
|
2,073 |
|
|
|
(3,944 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional investment in Northfield Bank |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(94,874 |
) |
Dividend from Northfield Bank |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of corporate bonds |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(50,323 |
) |
|
|
(4,468 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Maturities of corporate bonds |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,290 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loan to ESOP |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(17,563 |
) |
Principal payments on ESOP loan receivable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
381 |
|
|
|
179 |
|
|
|
1,205 |
|
Maturities (purchases) of certificate of deposits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,437 |
|
|
|
30,153 |
|
|
|
(23,653 |
) |
|
|
(6,500 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,437 |
|
|
|
(1,499 |
) |
|
|
(27,942 |
) |
|
|
(117,732 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from stock offering, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
189,600 |
|
Contribution from Northfield Bancorp, MHC |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
500 |
|
Exercise of stock options |
|
|
137 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional tax benefit on stock awards |
|
|
231 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of treasury stock |
|
|
(2,754 |
) |
|
|
(3,801 |
) |
|
|
(19,929 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends paid |
|
|
(772 |
) |
|
|
(774 |
) |
|
|
(2,963 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities |
|
|
(3,158 |
) |
|
|
(4,575 |
) |
|
|
(22,892 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
190,100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(2,701 |
) |
|
|
18,924 |
|
|
|
(22,667 |
) |
|
|
(25,869 |
) |
|
|
68,424 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
|
|
19,888 |
|
|
|
42,555 |
|
|
|
42,555 |
|
|
|
68,424 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
|
$ |
17,187 |
|
|
|
61,479 |
|
|
|
19,888 |
|
|
|
42,555 |
|
|
|
68,424 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-52
NORTHFIELD BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Three Months Ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 (unaudited)
Years Ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007
(18) |
|
Subsequent Events Plan of Conversion and Reorganization (Unaudited) |
|
|
|
The Boards of Directors of Northfield Bancorp, MHC (MHC) and the Company adopted a Plan of
Conversion and Reorganization (the Plan) on June 4, 2010. Pursuant to the Plan, the MHC will
convert from the mutual holding company form of organization to the fully public form. The MHC
will be merged into the Company, and the MHC will no longer exist. The Company will merge into
a new Delaware corporation named Northfield Bancorp, Inc. As part of the conversion, the MHCs
ownership interest of the Company will be offered for sale in a public offering. The existing
publicly held shares of the Company, which represents the remaining ownership interest in the
Company, will be exchanged for new shares of common stock of Northfield Bancorp, Inc., the new
Delaware corporation. The exchange ratio will ensure that immediately after the conversion and
public offering, the public shareholders of the Company will own the same aggregate percentage
of Northfield Bancorp., Inc. common stock that they owned immediately prior to that time
(excluding shares purchased in the stock offering and cash received in lieu of fractional
shares). When the conversion and public offering are completed, all of the capital stock of
Northfield Bank will be owned by Northfield Bancorp., Inc., the Delaware corporation. |
|
|
|
The Plan provides for the establishment, upon the completion of the conversion, of special
liquidation accounts for the benefit of certain depositors of Northfield Bank in an amount
equal to the greater of the MHCs ownership interest in the retained earnings of the Company as
of the date of the latest balance sheet contained in the prospectus or the retained earnings of
Northfield Bank at the time it reorganized into the MHC. Following the completion of the
conversion, under the rules of the Office of Thrift Supervision, Northfield Bank will not be
permitted to pay dividends on its capital stock to Northfield Bancorp., Inc., its sole
shareholder, if Northfield Banks shareholders equity would be reduced below the amount of the
liquidation accounts. The liquidation accounts will be reduced annually to the extent that
eligible account holders have reduced their qualifying deposits. Subsequent increases will not
restore an eligible account holders interest in the liquidation accounts. |
|
|
|
Direct costs of the conversion and public offering will be deferred and reduce the proceeds
from the shares sold in the public offering. If the conversion and public offering are not
completed, all costs will be charged to expense in the period in which the public offering is
terminated. No costs have been incurred related to the conversion as of March 31, 2010
(unaudited). |
F-53
Selected Quarterly Financial Data (Unaudited)
The following tables are a summary of certain quarterly financial data for the years ended December
31, 2009 and 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
Quarter Ended |
|
|
|
March 31 |
|
|
June 30 |
|
|
September 30 |
|
|
December 31 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Selected Operating Data: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income |
|
$ |
20,482 |
|
|
|
21,013 |
|
|
|
21,855 |
|
|
|
22,218 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
7,721 |
|
|
|
7,176 |
|
|
|
7,078 |
|
|
|
7,002 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income |
|
|
12,761 |
|
|
|
13,837 |
|
|
|
14,777 |
|
|
|
15,216 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
1,644 |
|
|
|
3,099 |
|
|
|
2,723 |
|
|
|
1,572 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income after provision for loan losses |
|
|
11,117 |
|
|
|
10,738 |
|
|
|
12,054 |
|
|
|
13,644 |
|
Other income |
|
|
969 |
|
|
|
1,524 |
|
|
|
1,357 |
|
|
|
1,543 |
|
Other expenses |
|
|
7,782 |
|
|
|
9,061 |
|
|
|
8,429 |
|
|
|
8,982 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income tax expense |
|
|
4,304 |
|
|
|
3,201 |
|
|
|
4,982 |
|
|
|
6,205 |
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
1,569 |
|
|
|
1,079 |
|
|
|
1,795 |
|
|
|
2,175 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
2,735 |
|
|
|
2,122 |
|
|
|
3,187 |
|
|
|
4,030 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per common share- basis and diluted |
|
$ |
0.06 |
|
|
|
0.05 |
|
|
|
0.08 |
|
|
|
0.10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
Quarter Ended |
|
|
|
March 31 |
|
|
June 30 |
|
|
September 30 |
|
|
December 31 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Interest income |
|
$ |
17,315 |
|
|
|
18,097 |
|
|
|
19,034 |
|
|
|
20,603 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
6,724 |
|
|
|
6,550 |
|
|
|
6,792 |
|
|
|
8,190 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income |
|
|
10,591 |
|
|
|
11,547 |
|
|
|
12,242 |
|
|
|
12,413 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
598 |
|
|
|
1,240 |
|
|
|
1,276 |
|
|
|
1,968 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income after provision for loan losses |
|
|
9,993 |
|
|
|
10,307 |
|
|
|
10,966 |
|
|
|
10,445 |
|
Other income |
|
|
3,399 |
|
|
|
1,207 |
|
|
|
820 |
|
|
|
727 |
|
Other expenses |
|
|
5,986 |
|
|
|
5,939 |
|
|
|
6,703 |
|
|
|
6,224 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income tax expense |
|
|
7,406 |
|
|
|
5,575 |
|
|
|
5,083 |
|
|
|
4,948 |
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
1,801 |
|
|
|
2,010 |
|
|
|
1,808 |
|
|
|
1,562 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
5,605 |
|
|
|
3,565 |
|
|
|
3,275 |
|
|
|
3,386 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per common share- basis and diluted |
|
$ |
0.13 |
|
|
|
0.08 |
|
|
|
0.08 |
|
|
|
0.08 |
|
F-54
No person has been authorized to give any information or to
make any representation other than as contained in this
prospectus and, if given or made, such other information or
representation must not be relied upon as having been authorized
by Northfield Bancorp, Inc. or Northfield Bank. This prospectus
does not constitute an offer to sell or a solicitation of an
offer to buy any of the securities offered hereby to any person
in any jurisdiction in which such offer or solicitation is not
authorized or in which the person making such offer or
solicitation is not qualified to do so, or to any person to whom
it is unlawful to make such offer or solicitation in such
jurisdiction. Neither the delivery of this prospectus nor any
sale hereunder shall under any circumstances create any
implication that there has been no change in the affairs of
Northfield Bancorp, Inc. or Northfield Bank since any of the
dates as of which information is furnished herein or since the
date hereof.
Up to
35,650,000 Shares
(Subject to Increase to up to 40,997,500 Shares)
(Proposed Holding
Company for
Northfield Bank)
COMMON STOCK
par value $0.01 per
share
PROSPECTUS
August 9,
2010
These securities are not
deposits or accounts and are not federally insured or
guaranteed.
Until September 13, 2010, all dealers that effect
transactions in these securities, whether or not participating
in this offering, may be required to deliver a prospectus. This
is in addition to the obligation of dealers to deliver a
prospectus when acting as underwriters and with respect to their
unsold allotments or subscriptions.